business of England and in case of a Prohibition to any mans little Court of Conscience in that cause he will certainly give himself a consultation The very humour of the English Nation long hath and still doth run against what they think but like Popery or makes for it and that with such a rapid current of Antipathy as is never likely to be stem'd and nothing is more out of fashion then a kind of Sir-positive or Dictatorian humour in common discourse much less then will a dogmatical Popes infallibility ever be digested here while he makes himself a St. Positive The gentile humour of the Age here that abhorrs hard words as loathsom pedantry will never be reconcil'd to one certain long hard word in Popery namely Transubstantiation nor to another namely Incineration or burning men for not understanding the former word according to the style of the Historian Imperator aegrè tulit incinerationem Johannis Husse and people will account their Protestant Bibles more agreeable to them then the English one published by the Colledge of Doway where the Translator studied for hard words in the room of plain ones as for the Passeover phase for foreskin praepuce for unleaven'd bread azyms for high places excelses and other such words we have in the English Rhemish Testament viz. exinanite parasceue didragmes neophyt spiritualness of wickedness in the Celestials In our Busy English world while men are most yary after profit and pleasure and the study of things if very few or none can be brought to learn the universal real character and which would tend to the propagating Real Knowledge among the Nations of the World accordingâ—y as the excellent propounder of it in Print with great modesty saith in his Epistle dedicatory that he had slender expectation if its coming into common use our Ingeniosi or Witts which all men pretend to be now as they did in the Late times to be Saints tho yet as few are Witts now as were Saints then will not care for troubling their brains with the studying of the Religion whose pretended universality appears but a kind of universal character and not real and tending to obscure the knowledge of things in the World. If they should see here a Religion that was full of pageantry and seem'd to be wholly theatrical they would think it was as much their birthright to censure it as 't is to be eternal talking Critics in the Pit to damn Playes and would think two Supremes in a Kingdome to be of the low nature of two Kings of Branford and rather then part with their money and stake down their Souls for seing such a Moral Representation of an absolute spiritual and absolute temporal power on the stage of the Kingdom they would be too apt with Mr. Hobs to thrust the whole Nation of Spiritual Beings out of the world I mean rather then they would be to their faces cheated and harras'd by a spiritual power and our people inspir'd with witt as well as those with the zealous spirit of Religion would cry out conclusum est contra Manichaeos I and against the Schoolmen too I mean our Romanist Manichaei who make two summa Principia in every State. In this age where the lower or Sixth rate Witts do so over-value themselves on turning every thing into ridicule the Mass would have here a Reception according to what the gloss in the Canon Law observes that when a place had layen long under an interdict the people laughed at the Priests when they came to say Mass again Nor would any Papal interdiction unless it could interdict us from the use of Fire and Water be of any moment The World would now laugh at any Prize that should be play'd between the Two Swords the very glossator on the Clementines saying occasionly that resipiscente mundo the World being grown wiser there must be no longer striving for both Swords And any one that would obtrude on us gross exploded errors in Church or State will appear as ridiculous as St. Henry the Dane who as the Martyrology mentions when worms craul'd out of a corrupted Vlcer in his Knee put them in again My Lord I will further offer it to your Lordships consideration That if it be found so hard to keep up the external polity of the Church of England thô in it self so rational and so meriting the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after the Twenty years discontinuance of it insomuch that Dr. Glanvile in the first page of his Book call'd the Zealous and impartial Protestant hath these words the first occasion of our further danger that I shall mention is the present diminution not to say extinction of Reverence to the authority of the Church of England c. and he p. 4. writes largely to that Effect what quarter can Popery expect here from an Age of sense and reason when it should break in upon both after the forementioned Hundred years discontinuance According to the foresaid Argument of the Bees for the Popes spiritual Monarchy we see it improbable for him ever to bring us to a Rendevouz in his Church again for the sad experience we have had of the Sects here that left the Hive of the Church of England not gathering together into any one new Hive but dividing into several swarms and hives and never returning to the old may shew the Hive of holy Church how little of our Company 't is to expect Having said all this about the mists of Popery being to contend with knowledge in its meridian I think I shall comply with the measures taken by our Philosophers in this Critical Age in founding their observations upon Experiments if I further add that the former Experiments England hath had of Poperies being pernicious to its external Polity and Grandeur will perpetuate and heighten the fermentation in the minds of our angry people against it All our Monkish Historians do attest the experience our Kings had in being bereav'd of great Sums of Money while they enrich'd the Pope here by giving him the Office to keep the Theological Thistle which he Rail'd in with so many censures and distinctions and non obstantes that our Kings could not pass to their Palaces but by his leave and on his terms An English King then was but the Popes Primier Ministre and yet paid great wages too for the being a Servant to the Servus Servorum King Iohn used to say That all his affairs in the World were unprosperous and went cross and untowardly after he had once subjected himself and his Kingdom to the Church of Rome His words were Postquam me mea Regna Romanae subjecâ— Ecclesiae nulla mihi prospera omnia contraria advenerunt And 't is obvious to consider on the other hand what a great figure Henry the Eighth made in the World after he had manumitted himself and his Kingdoms from the Papal Usurpation And how he held the Balance of the World in his hand and trod on
hands for discharging with Courage the Duty to his Prince that the Law of Nature and of the Land required from him have given the Name of Martyrdom to his Fate and I should ascribe the same Name to any one that should suffer the same Fate by the hands of any Ruffians that called themselves Protestants for his asserting the Religion by Law Established and discountenancing the Doctrine of Resistance and the Principles that subvert the Right of the Inheritable English Monarchy and doing what he was by the Law of Nature and the Land obliged to for the asserting the one and discountenancing the other Thus therefore do I judge that Name due to the Dire Fate that the late Arch-bishop of St. Andrews sustained from the hands of those execrable Presbyterian Bravos who defiled their Land and the light of the Sun there with the open Murder of that Prelate And supposing that the great Harry the 4 th of France who was so abandoned by Heaven to little Fears on Earth as when the Duke of Sully was perswading him not to recall the Iesuites to answer him thus Give me then security for my Life did yet receive the doom of the Fearful in this World for his continuing his Protection to his Protestant Subjects according to the Laws of Nature and of his Realm I shall not deny the right that the Nature of his Fate hath to be Crown'd with the Name of Martyrdom 'T is very possible that some wretched Protestants so call'd may to the scandal of the Name of Religion design Out-rages and Sedition and the late Publications of many Seditious Pamphlets by them and the Re-printing of some of the most Rebellious ones that faced the Light in the times of the Usurpation and for example of the Political Catechism and of the Rights of the Kingdom in which latter the Murder of the King is justified and the Right of the English Monarchy struck through the 5th Ribb by the Authors making it Elective hath given the Government a just Alarm of the designs of the Publishers of such Pamphlets and of their Abettors and they serve among Men of Caurion as a suspicious sign of some mischief intended by them as the extraordinary Commotion of the Waters is to Whale-fishers an indication of a Whale approaching and from such as well as from some of the Emissary Slaves of the Iesuites here what can any who act with the highest zeal in their several Capacities to assert the Rights of the Crown and Church expect but according to the Stile of Cicero against Cataline Nisi ut notent designent oculis ad caedem unumquemque nostrum But as to any who for the just discharge of their Natural Obligation and Duty as Magistrates or private persons shall suffer the worst of Fates I shall not deny the name of Martyrs so neither shall I think him worthy the name of an English man or a Regarder of the Divine Natural Law who doth not if a Magistrate by the due Execution of the Laws or if a private person and of Signal parts and Learning by his discourse and writing notifie the absurdities and inconveniences of any Seditious Principles chargeable on any perswasion of Religion whatsoever every Subject being under Moral Obligations duly to represent to the Pater Patriae and to his Brethren Subjects the dangers imminent over them by any destructive Principles or Practices whatever disguise of Religion the same may assume and it is most worthy of the most generous dispositions that can be in men who own the love of their Country with Monuments of Praise to honour the Memories of those Heroic Persons who were so unnaturally dealt with for asserting the Rights of the God of Nature and thus fell its Noble Victimes and who in the Race of their Lives were Agonists for it and to resemble the Justice of the Lacedemonians among whom those that died for their Country were proverbially said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and were Crown'd with Olive and other Branches and with Praises Extoll'd to the Skies and to this Custom probably the words of the Doctor of the Gentiles have a reference where he saith to Timothy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fight the good Fight of Faith and St. Paul sutably was but just to himself when writing to Timothy I am ready to be offered up c. he added I have fought a good fight c. And thus too may our Royal Martyr be said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and considering how great an Agonist and Confessor Queen Elizabeth was and how often she was designed for Martyrdom by some of her Romish Antagonists the Londoners were but just to her when adorning their Churches with the figure of her Monument they placed over her Effigies the Inscription of I have fought a good fight c. And as the old Agonistical Games were among the Graecians and Romans instituted in honour of their Gods and as critical seasons for their shewing their love to their Country by their then making Leagues and agreeing on the great Concerns of Peace and War and Men then in various Contentions of the Body and Mind shewed their utmost Abilities so doth the Divine Natural and Positive Law oblige all Christians in any Conjuncture or Season of Colluctation between true and false Religionary Principles to shew their Athletic Habits of mind in the most consummate manner and earnestly to contend for the Faith and indeed the Christian Religion in the Rule of its Practice having throughout the New Testament made Agonisme Essential to its Morals which one word of Agonisme is Comprehensive of more vigour than all the Heathen Precepts of Morality include or perhaps all the written Practices of Piety and Devotional Books let him by my consent be devested of the Name of Christian who on any just occasion shews not himself as an Athleta for his Religion and Country in all lawful ways by entring the Lists with all Principles of Hostility to either whatever the Event may be but still with a fair respect to the persons of all Contenders for even that the Agonostic Games required and particularly Ne quis in Colluctatione vel pugilatu antagonistam studio deditâque operâ conficeret alioqui ne victor Coronaretur nay so averse were the Athletick Laws to cruelty that they obliged all Contenders to endeavour Quo mollior leviorque ictus minus laederet and especially to abhor the Brutish Art of biting one another the abhorrence of which I do expect will grow more and more in fashion between Religionary Antagonists notwithstanding the many exorbitant incivilities I find practiced by some such Contenders towards the persons of each other in the present Conjuncture wherein I have observed that too many of the Protestant as well as Popish Antagonists have by cruel mockings and biting words and Shams made it their chief business but in one thing to resemble one of the old Agonistic Games namely that of the Wrestlers who after their having been first annointed
well come under the account of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as to those Opiners hath for the honour of the Church of England's Principles in his 8th Lecture and there de lege paenali well taught us in what Cases Penal Laws oblige in Conscience and shewed that they may so bind where the Legislator did intend to oblige the Subject Ad culpam etiam non solum ad paenam and in that Case saith he Certum est eos teneri ad observandum id quod lege praecipitur nec satisfacere officio si parati sint poenam lege constitutam subire and where he further saith That the mind and intention of the Legislator is chiefly seen in the Proeme of his Law in quo saith he there ut acceptior sit populo lex solet Legislator Consilii sui de eà lege ferendâ causas rationes expoâ—eâ—e quà m sit lex iusta quam fuerit tollendis incommodis abusibus necessaria quà m futura sit Reip. utilis There is a particular Principle of moment worthy of the Magistrates Survey that relates to the Gathered Churches and that is a Principle made a necessary ingredient in the Constitution of of those Churches by a Divine of the same Authority among them as Bishop Saâ—â—erson is in the Church of England and whom I occasionally beforementioned and that is Mr. Iohn Cotton B. D. who in a Pamphlet of his printed at London in the year 1642 Entâ—tuled The true Constitution of a particular visible Church proved by Scripture wherein is briefly demonstrated by Questions and Answers what Officers Worship and Government Christ hath ordained in his Church and in the Title-page whereof is this place of Scripture viz. Jer. 50. 5. They shall ask the way to Sion with their faces thitherward saying Come let us joyn our selves to the Lord in a perpetual COVENANT that shall not be forgotten in p. 1st makes his first Question what is a Church And the Answer is The Church is a mystical Body whereof Christ is the head the Members and Saints called out of the World and united together in one Congregation by an holy COVENANT to Worship the Lord and to Edifie one another in all his holy Ordinances And in another Book of his printed at London in the year 1645 called The way of the Churches of Christ in New England his third Proposition is this viz. For the joyning of faithful Christians into the Fellowship and Estate of a Church we find not in Scripture that God hath done it any other way than by entring of them all together as one man into an holy COVENANT with himself to take the Lord as the head of the Church for their God and to give up themselves to him to be his Church and People which implies their submitting of themselves to him and one to another in his fear and their walking in professed subjection to all his Ordinances their cleaving one to another as fellow Members of the same Body in Brotherly Love and Holy Watchfulness unto Mutual Edification He there partly props up the Obligation of this Church Covenant on the Iewish Oeconomy mentioned in the Book of Deuteronomy and other places of the Old Testament The reasonableness of Subjects not entring into Religionary Covenants without the Consent of the Pater patriae may be inferred from the old Testament where in Numbers c. 30 the Parent hath a power given for the controuling of the Childrens Vows not enter'd into by his consent but since these Principles of a new Church Covenant may seem to introduce a new Ecclesiastical Law without the King's privity and consent a thing that if our very Convocation should presume to do would bring them within a Praemunire and since the whole power of reforming and ordering of all matters Ecclesiastical is by the Laws in express words annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm and particularly by the 1st of Elizabeth and since that it hath been said that even without an Act of Parliament a new Oath or Covenant cannot be introduced among the King's Subjects and moreover since all the famous Religionary Confessions of the Protestant Churches abroad assert nothing of any such Church Covenant and since Covenants and Associations have lately heard so ill in the Kingdom I think the nature and terms of this Independent Covenant ought to be laid as plain before the Eye of the Government as was the Scotch Presbyterian one Those words of Mr. Cotton of the entring them all together as one man into an holy Covenant carry some thing like the same sound of one and all and tho their thus entring into it to take the Lord as the head of his Church for their God and to give up themselves to him to be his Church and People may be a plausible beginning of this new Church Covenant in nomine Domini yet the following words of submitting themselves to him and to one another in his fear and their cleaving one to another as fellow Members of the same Body in Brotherly Love and Holy Watchfulness are words that I think the Magistracy ought to watch and to see that Dissenters have a very sound form of words prescribed to them in this Case if it shall think fit to have the same continued I have found the Assertion of a Church Covenant as Essential to the Form of a true Independent Church in many other of their Books and do suppose that this Covenant being laid as Corner-stone in the building of their Churches by Divine Right it must last as long as Independency it self and of its lasting still I met with an Indication from a Loyal and Learned Official of the Court-Christian who told me that tho several of the Dissenters called Presbyterians have been easily perswaded to repair to the Divines of the Church of England that they were admonished to confer with and had upon Conference with them come to Church and took the Sacrament yet he thought that some of another Class of Dissenters were possessed with a Spirit of incurable Contumacy by reason of their Principles having tied them together to one another by a Covenant And if it shall therefore appear to the Magistrates that they are thus Conference-proof and as I may say Reason-proof by vertue of their Covenant it will then be found that no one Mâ—mber of a gathered Church can turn to ours without the whole Hyena-like turning and perhaps some of the Lords the Bishops may think it hereupon proper humbly to advise his Majesty to null by a Declaration the Obligation of this Covenant as his Royal Father did that of the Presbyterian Covenant In the mean time the Consideration of the Principles of Independecy thus seeming to have cramp'd the Consciences of its followers with a Covenant that is at least unnecessary and must naturally be a troublesom imposition to men of thought and generous Education who love to perform Moral Offices without entring into Covenant or giving Bond so to do may serve to
the exhalations of which may cast such Mists before Mens understanding Faculties as to hinder them from seeing their way in the observance of the Oaths they took and therefore as a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or premuniment as I call'd it against our being future Enemies to our selves and against poor little Mortals as it were standing for the Office of Conservators of Gods glory while they are losing their own Souls by Perjury and against some Loyal Timid People troubling themselves with falling Skies and fears of Gods not upholding his Church just as Galen tells us of a Melancholy Man who by often reading it in the Poets how Atlas supported Heaven with his Shoulders was often in a Panic fear least Atlas should faint and let Heaven fall on mens heads instead of taking pains to uphold and maintain their Oaths which they swore to God in Truth and Righteousness it may perhaps be always of importance to our English World to have right Notions of the Obligation of those Oaths left behind in it When I have read many of the late Pamphlets against the Succession the Venom of which was stolen out of Doleman's alias Parson's Book and have often considered that the Government in King Iames's time might we ll be apprehensive of the mischief that Book might do with its Poyson and perhaps with its Sting in following Ages I have then wondered why none was employed to Answer it throughly a thing that I do not find was ever done unless it may be said that an Answer to the 1st part of it was in the year 1603 published by Sir Iohn Haward and that its 2d part hath been confuted by some Loyal and Learned Persons since the late Conjuncture of our Fermentation and in which time that Book of Parsons was Reprinted I am sorry that that Book and some others of Father Parsons were in some part of King Iames's time Answered as they were by the real Characters of severity that then fell on some innocent Papists and who I believe were Abhorrers of the Sedition his Books contained and on whom Dr. Donne's Pseudo-Martyr printed in the year 1610 reflects in The Advertisement to the Reader saying That his continual Libels and incitatory Books have occasioned more afflictions and drawn more of that Blood which they call Catholick than all our Acts of Parliament have done And with a just respect to the Learning in Sir Iohn Haward's Answer to the first part of that Book and by him Dedicated to King Iames it may yet be wished that with less Pomp of Words and greater closeness of Argument referring to the Principles of internal Justice and natural Allegiance and the lex terrae he had shewn the perfect unlawfulness of defeating the Title of Proximity of Blood in the Case and instead of so much impugning the Book by References to the Civil Law and old Greek and Latin Authors making for Monarchy in general or even by the places cited out of the old Testament favouring primogeniture and indeed I do not find among all our late Writers for the Succession that so much as one of them by so much as once quoting this Book of Sir Iohn Haward tho so common hath thence brought any Aid to their Noble Cause But however the Oath of Allegiance having been enjoyned since the writing of Sir Iohn Haward's Book hath given an ordinary Writer the advantage of bringing the Cause of the unlawfulness of disturbing the Course of Succession to a quicker hearing and speedier issue in the Court of Conscience which is the point I have endeavoured to carry after the end of this Discourse leaving it to Candid Men to judge of the sincerity of my performance therein and of my fair stating of the Question and the deducing genuine Propositions from it so stated and which shall yet be reviewed by me when I come to Review this Discourse The truth is when I began it I observed the generality of Men who writ against the Exclusion-Bill with a great deal of good Law History and State-policy did shew both their Learning and their Loyalty and did very usefully set forth the dreadful Confusions it would introduce and perpetuate in the State and the Illegality and indeed Nullity of any Exclusion tho by Act of Parliament was by them likewise usefully shewn but yet I think it would have been some scandal to the present Age if it had passed away without transmitting to the next some instances of Protestants who had leisure to write writing of the unlawfulness of such a Bill with relation to our Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and I was sorry to find that when the late Loyal and Learned Bishop of Winchester had afterward appear'd as the first Dâ—vine who in Print asserted That the Exclusion of the Right Heir was contrary to the Law of God both Natural and Positive and that such Exclusion was against the Law of the Land also his judgment in his Book called the Bishop of Winchester ' s Vindication given so Learnedly in the point seemed to so many of our new pretenders to Loyalty and to Conformity to the Church of England to be a kind of a Novelty But yet I observed that that Learned Prelate thought not fit there to strengthen his Assertion of the unlawfulness of such Exclusion by the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy Nor did I observe that among all the Loyal Writers for the Succession I had met with from first to last any one had surveyed the Question of the unlawfulness of the Exclusion resulting from our Obligation by the Oaths of Allâ—giance and Supremacy tho yet some few of them hinted the thing in general and were still answered with the haeres viventis till at last another Divine namely Dr. Hicks Vicar of All hallows Barking and Dean of Worcester honoured both himself and the Question by taking notice of it in his Iovian and in the Preface to a Sermon of his printed in the year 1684 and Entituled The harmony of Divinity and Law in a Discourse about not resisting Sovereign Princes and he in the 3d p. of that Preface observes That some men did pervert the meaning of the word Heirs in the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy from its common and usual acceptation to another more special on purpose to elude the force and obligation of them which otherwise they must have had upon the Consciences of the Excluders themselves The Doctor had made himself Master of Law enough to Master the true notion of the point and did in his Preface exorcise the Fantom of haeres viventis a Noon-day Spright raised by one who was thought a great Conjurer and which had before haunted the Question and had affrighted so many from lodging their thoughts in it And tho no other of our Divines that I have heard of writ of the same nor any of the Layety otherwise than starting the Notion of it in Print yet considering the great weight of his Learning and Reason with which in
ends therein contained I fully assent unto and have been as desirous to observe but the rigid way of prosecuting it and the oppressing uniformity that have been endeavoured by it I never approved This were sufficient to vindicate me from the false Aspersions and Calumnies which have been laid upon me of Iesuitism and Popery c. And recollect whether tho that Covenant was contrary to the Oath of Allegiance any thing yet could be more contrary to that Covenant than that House of Coâ—â—ons acting single or any thing could be more contrary to the plain literal Sense of the Covenant than that refined pursuit of the Cause owned by a person of such refined and real great Abilities and within the Prospect of Eternity and whether the owning of the same then contrary to the literal Sense of the Covenant was a proper Medium for him to use then whereby to clear himself from the aspersion of Iesuitism There was another person of great Theological Learning and strong natural parts who lived about that time I mean Mr. Iohn Goodwin the Divine I before mentioned and who in two Books of his the one called Redemption Redeem'd and the other of The Divine Authority of the Scripture hath signaliz'd his great Abilities but in the very Pamphlet where he presumes to vindicate the very Sentence against the Royal Martyr and to make the same Coherent with the Scotch Covenant he in p. 51 saith Evident it is that those Words in the Covenant in the preservation and defence of the true Religion and Liberties of the Kingdom import a Condition on the Kings part without the performance whereof the Covenant obligeth no man to the preservation or defence of his Person or Authority and yet allowing the Words to speak for themselves they do not say in HIS Preservation and Defence c. but in THE Preservation and Defence c. plainly referring to the same Preservation and Defence of Religion and Liberties which is before promised and sworn to in this and the preceding Articles as evidently referring to the same Persons Preservation and Defence of them here who are to preserve and defend them in the former Clauses and who are to preserve and defend the Kings Majesty's Person and Authority in this namely the Covenanters If the Covenant had intended to ground the Preservation and Defence in this Clause upon another Person or Persons as the performers beside those to whom the same Actions are referred immediately before it would have pointed them out distinctly but when it expresseth no other the plain ordinary Grammatical construction will attribute them to the Parties before nominated and cannot put them on any other And the Premisses notwithstanding Mr. Goodwin concludes that if that his Anti-Grammatical Paraphrase were not the true meaning of those words beforementioned in the Covenant it was unintelligible by him and his Words are these If this be not the clear meaning and importance of them the Covenant is a Barbarian to me I understand not the English of it Thus naturally is it even for the learned and unstable to wrest not only the Scriptures but even their own subscribed Covenants where the words have no 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to their own destruction and the destroying of common Sense when they recede from the common Principles of Loyalty and Allegiance There was likewise another Person reputed one of first-rate Parts and great Learning in the late times who published a Book called The lawfulness of obeying the present Government and in his 11th Page there directs the World to make this Enquiry viz. Whether there be any Clause in any Oath or Covenant which in a fair and common sense forbids obedience to the Commands of the present Government and Authority and referreth particularly to the Clause of the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy in the former of which 't is said I shall bear faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors and in the latter I shall bear faith and true Allegiance to the Kings Highness his Heirs and Successors He there goeth on very Childishly to sell the World a Bargain by trying to puzzle it with Questions viz. If it be said that in the Oath of Allegiance Allegiance is sworn to the King his Heirs and Successors if his Heirs be not his Successors how doth that Oath bind Either the Word Successors saith he must be superfluous or it must bind to Successors as well as to Heirs And if it bind not to a Successor as well as to an Heir how can it bind to an Heir that is not a Successor And if you will know the common and usual sense which should be the meaning of an Oath of the word Successors you need not so much ask of Lawyers and Learned Persons as of men of ordinary knowledge and demand of them who was the Successor of William the Conqueror and see whether they will not say W. Rufus and who succeeded Richard the Third and whether they will not say Harry the 7th and yet neither of them was Heir so in ordinary acception the word Successor is taken for him that actually succeeds in the Government and not for him that is actually excluded May we not to this Questionist who was as I may say such a Mountebank of a Casuist put the Question of Tertullian Rideam vanitatem an exprobrem caecitatem And may we not properly bring in St. Austin's Casuistical Decision as to things of this Nature Haec tolerabilius vel ridentur vel flentur i. e. A man is at liberty either to laugh at or lament them I have in p. 41 of this Discourse mentioned D' Ossat's Observation of Father Parson 's often contradicting himself and that very grossly in his Book of the Succession as it happens to all Persons in passion as able as they are who are not guided by truth and reason but transported by interest and passion and I shall here further remark out of the same Letter of D' Ossat by me there cited that to those words last mentioned he there adds this viz. I will here name two of his Contradictions He opposeth to the King of Scots among other things to exclude him from the Succession of England That he was born out of England of Parents not subject to the Crown of England He likewise opposeth to Arabella among other impediments That she is a Woman and that it is not expedient for the Kingdom of England to have three Women Queens successively and that often the Children of Kings have been excluded for being Women and yet not withstanding he adjudgeth the said Kingdom to the Infanta of Spain by preference even to the King of Spain her Brother as if the said Infanta were not a Woman as well as the said Arabella I had almost forgot to observe how the Author of The lawfulness of obeying the present Government that useth such thick paint of Equivocation in his sense of the word Successors having pushed on his Question
innocency which yet perhaps may be necessary to be done for the use of those who know you not hereafter when the heat of the day and your Services in this critical juncture shall be over and would now shew as meanly as if a General in the time of Battel having some dirt or dust lighting on his face should while he was among the bullets employ his barbers washballs to cleanse it and that too when the fate of the battel seems to totter and is near decision one way or other and while there is hardly room for the Quid agendum to wedge it self in and he that saith consider is almost a foe and therefore once when a great Commander had no way to save himself and his Army but by their swimming with their horses through a River to attack their Enemy he did only to that question of quid agendum put to him by his Officers suddenly eccho back the reply of agendum and with his horse took the River and while now 't is with us as on board a Ship in the time of Fight or of a Storm when they are Fighting with the Elements and the Master or Steersman orders any thing to be done the case will bear no dilatory answer of words and the answer there is Done it is I say after all this that there is a reason which in my opinion renders any mans writing unnecessary now either to the World or himself and that is this That words and Language the which formerly having the stamp of common usage and of reason on them passed as currant coine for the Signification of mens minds and as a medium of commerce are in this juncture as useless that way and of as little value as lether coine called in and this Age wherein both the word and thing called shamme hath been brought in use and shamme calls it self an answer to that great question What is wit tho with as little reason as if a lye should call it self an answer to that old great question What is truth hath inforced those that do not love to be shamm'd upon not to measure mens actions by their words but their words by their Actions And tho a mans written books are called his works yet have I observed an occasion of Sarcasme given thereby when one speaking of a particular Divines excellent writings said he loved his works but hated his actions And written works are now indeed but actings as when a man doth agree gestum in scena on the Stage of the World and for them he finds but only a Theatrical applause Nor so much as that when like the Actor crying O heavens he looks down on the Earth As he is alwaies accounted but a smatterer in knowledge who is a pedant or petty-Chapman in words so he playes but at small games in politicks who is a pedant or trader in words or who indeed will give any thing for them He who doth verba dare has bad morals and who gives any thing else for them has bad intellectuals and according to that old Monkish verse they said Res dare pro rebus pro verbis verba solemus The only real security therefore that the World hath for its quiet is mens only giving a seeming belief to seeming professions and protestations for as Ayr out of its place makes Earth-quakes so if the articulate air of mens words gets beyond my hearing into my belief it may there raise those commotions of passion that may make me trouble both my self and the World and particularly by the passion of jealousie before-mentioned on my desire where I have a kindness that it should be mutual and when positive words brought me into the fools paradise of believing it possible a thing perhaps not possible in nature that two bodies and minds whose faculties must needs be different should have an equal intenseness of love for each other no president of friendship particularly that of Ionathan and David having shewn it and in the conjugal love the passions of the weaker Sex being observed to be the strongest and that of jealousie as well as Love jealousie particularly being most potent in minds most impotent and in persons most diffident of themselves And this may in some sort console your Lordship after all your restless endeavours to merit the love of all your Countrymen if it be not exactly mutual But this by the way The great names of Protestant and Religion began to adorn each other in the year of our Lord 1529 when some of the Electors and Princes of the Empire with a protestation opposed the Decree relating to the Mass and Eucharist made at Spiers and when some of the Capital Cities of Germany joyn'd with them to protest the same thing But every one knows that a protestation is a revocable thing and that a Protestation contrary to actions revokes it self And that the word Protestant hath not been in the World as the Poets term is of calling grass green or the like otiosum epitheton I believe the Papists will grant and 't is not one Protestation made and not revoked either by words or actions that can make that term consistent with our Religion or render a man worthy to be call'd one 'T is not a good continual claim to our Religion that yet is for land we are disseis'd of that is made only once a year whilst we live No the Protestation that the Protestant Religion requires is such a continual one as is reiterated upon every fresh act and attempt of the Papal Religion against ours 't is not a going to our Cells and saying Lord have mercy upon us but 't is our watching in our Stations and our shewing no mercy to the principles of Popery that are alwaies attacking the quiet of the World either by Storm or Siege or undermining 't is like the Protestation required when the defendant hath declined a Judge that must be made toties quoties as any new Act is done by the Judge without which the first Protestation grows insignificant 't is not one Act of protesting the Popes Bills of Exchange for good money we paid him and his giving us bank-tickets upon purgatory or giving us some fantastick Saints pretended Hair or Nailes protested with so much scorn by our Popish Ancestors in Henry the 8th's time that a piece of St. Andrews finger covered with an ounce of Silver pawn'd by a Monastery for forty pound was left unredeemed at the dissolution of it which shewed that that commodity would even then yeild nothing and was a meer drug in Scotland of which Country he is call'd the Saint Protector but 't is further like a protestation against the Sea at the next Port made toties quoties goods in a Ship are damnified by its rage which the law requires the Skipper to make or else leaves answerable for the dammage And if a poor Tarpauling who must alwaies plough the Sea for his bread during life and there still contest with the angry Elements
by Some non-Papists I know not My Author for it is Mr. Iohn Gee Master of Arts of Exeter Colledge in Oxford in his Book 4 to Call'd New Shreds of the Old Share p. 103. Printed at London in the Year 1624. In any such wretched Contention between the faex Romuli and any of the Protestants here who should become most impure by Calumny as the Protestants being much more Numerous than the Papists would be able to out-shamme them and to make the more plain detections of the Shammes contriv'd by their Adversaries it would likewise go the harder with any Sect that the Majority of Numbers would thus run down with Shammes in this Nation at this Conjuncture of time when the many swarms of those who offer at Wit and think they merit the being call'd Witts by doing the exercise in a Coffey-house Call'd Baldring that is with a serious grave face telling idle feign'd Stories farced with particular Circumstances to ensnare the belief of the Credulous which kind of ungenerous triumphing over weak Understandings by ridiculous Shammes is a false sort of wit and humour below not only the gravity of the English Nation but the levity of the French and used by none but Fools who stand for the place of being Knaves There is no doubt but the talent of these foolish Shammers as their interest and dependances or humors incline them to wish well either to Popery or Protestancy extending to abuse the belief of the unthinking Vulgar with little romantic Stories concerning those Religions helps to Convey them into the Press which gives wings to these Shams presently to fly round the Kingdome If the Papists think the Press hath not in any of the Pamphlets it dayly spits charged them with Calumny and of Such a Nature as to bring universal odium on them by alarming the Kingdom almost as much as it could be by forrain invasion and occasionally laying a Tax on men to buy what Arms for their defence the Law allowes I will ask them what they think of one of our printed Intelligences that Came out on the 26 th of February 1680 1 wherein 't is said Last Fryday came a Letter from Stafford directed to one Bacchus Tenant to the Lord Stafford from one Wilson in Cheshire but ordered to be left with one Finny of Stafford to be sent to the said Bacchus but Finny observing Letters so directed to pass through his hands and apprehending they might relate to some dangerous Correspondence took the liberty to Open this and therein to his great surprize found directions to Bacchus for burning of Stafford and several great Towns upon which making a speedy discovery to a Magistrate Bacchus was sent for who after some evasions did confess he had received Letters to that purpose And just now the said Wilson is apprehended and committed and confesseth he was by the order of a Certain Lord to fire Stafford Drayton Shrewsbury Nantwich Chester Congerton New-Castle Under-Line and two more and that he was to have 900 l. for fireing those Nine Towns. I having never heard of any Proclamation or proceedings either of the Magistracy or Lievtenancy of this Kingdom after such an alarm of public hostility and of a Rebellion hatch'd in the Kingdom nor of the last punishment inflicted on the pretended Certain Lord that was the General of those Incendiaries did look on them under the Notion of an Army in disguise But whatever ground the Protestant Religion hath got or shall get by these poor means I desire that it may go to the Next occupant for not only the ayr it exhales is Pestilential but it includes that ayr in it which may produce Earthquakes which dangers therefore the New Popish or Jesuited Religion must be exposed to by the ayr of Shams and Calumnies My Lord I shall here entertain your Lordship with somewhat very Remarkable out of the Book of Father Parsons of the Succession whereby you will see that instead of Allowing the oportet esse haereses he doth in effect tell us that while the Kingdom has two Religions in it oportet esse Calumnias that great Jesuite having with much agility danced on the high rope as to the Casuistical part of the Question of the Succession affects to do it too in the Politics but miss'd his Center of gravity in his motion both as a Divine and a States-man and did shamefully fall in either Capacity as your Lordship will find by the reading of his words He saith p. 217. being near the Conclusion of the first part of his Book And thus much now for matter of Conscience But if we Consider Reason of State also and worldly Policy it Cannot be but great folly and oversight for a man of whatsoever Religion he be to promote to a Kingdom in which himself must live one of a Contrary Religion to himself for let the bargains and agreements be what they will and fair promises and vain hopes never so great yet seeing the Prince once made and settled must needs proceed according to the Principles of his own Religion it follows also that he must Come quickly to break with the other party tho he loved him never so well which yet perhaps is very hard if not impossible for two of different Religions to love sincerely but if it were so yet many jealousies suspicions accusations Calumniations and other aversions must needs light upon the Party that is of different Religion from the State and Prince under whom he lives as not only he Cannot be Capable of such Preferments Honours Charges Government and the like which men may deserve and desire in their Commonwealth but also he shall be in Continual danger and subject to a thousand molestations and injuries which are incident to the Condition and state of him that is not Current with the same Course of his Prince and Realm in matters of Religion and so before he be aware he becomes to be accounted an Enemy or backward man which in Mind he must either dissemble deeply and against his own Conscience make shew to favour and set forward that which in his heart he doth detest which is the greatest Calamity and Misery of all other tho yet many times not sufficient to deliver him from suspicion or else to avoid this everlasting perdition he must break with all the temporal Commodities of this life which his Country and Realm might yield him and this is the ordinary end of all such men how soft and sweet soever the beginning be This Iesuite who was before mention'd to have been Call'd one of the greatest Men that his Order has produced was here it seems a States-man in his heart and no More and has very honestly foretold all Protestants that shall live under a Prince of another Religion how dishonest Roman Catholics will prove to them The Jesuite was here an Almanac-maker who predicted nothing to Protestants but Lightning and Thunder and too the Continual Raining of Snares upon them during such a Conjuncture and
then in the world had put a period to the night of ignorance in which the Beasts of Prey had domineer'd and to their Monastic denns themselves The enlighten'd part of mankind was weary of growing pale among papers and sometimes red hot with arguing about terms of art and all those barbarous too that had formerly hid the God of nature and would no longer account implicit faith the only justifying one and could not more esteem the imposing of such a blind faith commendable that was made previous to mens quest after pabulum for their Souls then that practice of the boy of Athens who did put out the eyes of birds and then expose them to fly abroad for food The Learning then introduced into the world shew'd that the hierarchical grandeur of the Roman Church was not extant formerly in the learned times when the old Roman Empire flourish'd but was contrived in the times of ignorance between the Bishops of Rome and the Leaders or Princes of the Barbarians and that it had its beginning from the Inundations of the Northern people so that with Mr. Colemans leave by the way Popery may be call'd too a pestilent Northern heresy and that to the end that those Barbarians might not find out the original of the papal power and see how narrow the stream of it was at its fountain when every Bishop was call'd Papa as every woman is now with us call'd Madam and Lady that the Pope by affronting the Emperors power effected a strangeness between the Greeks and Latines by means whereof the Barbarians being brought up in prejudice against the Graecians neglected their Language to the decay whereof in the world not only the decay of the purity of the Latine Tongue may be imputed but also of History Geography Geometry skill in antiquity and even the worlds not knowingly then conversing with the Latine Fathers It was in an age of non-sense when a Canonist venturing to be a Critic told the world concerning the Greek word Allegoria istud vocabulum fit ex duobus vocabulis ab allo quod est alienum goro sensus and when an old Schoolman Thomas de Argentina thus gave the derivation of latria istud vocabulum fit ex duobus vocabulis à La quod est laus tria quod est trinitas quia latria est laus trinitatis But the very understanding of two ordinary Greek words namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 equal priviledges in ecclesiastical matters to the Bishops of Rome and Constantinople allow'd by a General Councel that were obvious to every enquirer into history did quite blow up all pretences of the Popes supremacy and one versicle in that long unknown Greek Book 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. Luke 24. 47. which shews that the teaching of Repentance and remission of sins in the name of Christ by his own order began at Ierusalem did surprize thinking men with amazement when they heard a Pope and General Councel calling Rome the Mother and Mistress of all the Churches and anathematising all who think otherwise and saying further extra hanc fidem nemo potest esse salvus for this the Trent Councel did Thus then the abolition of the papal power here brought the world at the first step out of a blind Chaos into a Paradise of Knowledge and help'd Christians to demonstrate to themselves and to Jews and Pagans the truth of the Christian Religion for the certainty of the doctrine of which during that time of papal darkness the world had only the assertion of the present age that call'd it self the tradition of the Church but by the introduction of the Greek Tongue and other learning Christians had the sense of the Greek and Latine Fathers and those historical Records that brought down to them the certainty of the Miracles that were wrought in the founding of Christianity from the Primitive Christians who saw them 'T was the restoration of learning in general help'd them to say with Tertullian fidem colimus rationalem and with St. Paul I know whom I have believed and without the introducing of humane learning the Protestant Religion could no more have been advanced to its height in the world then men can be perfected in Astronomy without the knowledge of Arithmetic Luther came into the field arm'd with the Knowledg both of the Greek and Hebrew Tongues when he was to contest with the Errors of the Papacy and he having for his Antagonist Cardinal Cajetan who was the Legate in Germany and an eminent School Divine and who made a home thrust at Luther out of the Scripture according to the Vulgar Latine translation Luther told him in plain terms That that translation was false and dissonant to the original and hereupon the Cardinal thô he and the Papacy too had one foot in the grave Cato â—like fell eagerly on the studying of Greek that he might be able so confute Luther and his followers out of the Scriptures and was put to it to make his weapon when he was in the field And can any one think now that in this present state of England when we see so many that are Critical Masters of Experimental Philosophy and who by means of the great useful pains formerly taken by Erasmus Sir Thomas Moore and others in restoring Philological Learning have now entire leisure to devote their Studies to the substantial Knowledge of things and whose Motto is Nullius in verba and who know that if they would have every one trust them they must take nothing on trust from any one and who know that since truth doth always sail in sight of error they must all the way go sounding by experiment I say can any one think that it was less easie for the Sun to go back Ten degrees on Ahaz his Dial then 't is to make this Age run back to implicit faith and ignorance and barbarisme And is it to be thought that men who weigh Silver in Scales will not weigh Gold I mean not examine notions of Religion with care when they are so cautious in others Can we think that men who will not part with those Notions that salve the phaenomena will quit those that save their Souls and especially considering the proverbial addiction of the English genius to Religion and considering too that men by long use and Custom have been habituated to the profession of a rational Religion and that it can plead here a hundred years prescription It is certainly more easie to unteach men the use of the Sea-Compass in Navigation then the use of Reason in Religion and the inclination of the Needle to the North is not likely to be more durable then the tendency of mens affection in England to the Northern heresy so call'd and it is more easie to teach all Mankind the use of Letters then to unteach it to any one man and when the temper of an inquisitive Age is like a Trade-wind carrying men toward Knowledge and toward a rational Divinity they may
Divines of the Church of England have been how ever so much adored there and had such offerings from their adorers the substantial and learned Divines of our Church there may on occasion well say quid non speremus During that late persecution of the Divines of the Church of England in the times of the Usurped Powers who therein exercised all the cruelty they durst it might be truly said of the Doctrine of that Church and the fire of the zeal of the Laity in providing for the liberal maintenance of many of its Clergy as it is of Lime in the Emblem Mediis accendor in undis What burning and shining lights then in the midst of a perverse Generation were among others of the Church of England in London Bishop Gunning Bishop Wild Bishop Mossom Nor did their numerous Congregations in the least for want of plentiful Oblations to them starve the Cause of Religion The last forementioned person at the Funeral of Bishop Wild in a Printed Panegyric of his Life takes occasion to speak of the Oblations in those times afforded him and saith p. 7. And whereas some good Obadiahs did then hide and feed the Lord's Prophets it was his care to Communicate to others what himself received for his own support Many Ministers sequestred many Widows afflicted many Royalists imprisoned and almost famished can testifie the diffusive bounty of his hand dispensing to others in reliefs of Charity what himself received of others in offerings of Devotion And as if that Iron Age had been the Golden one of the Church of England he doth so pathetically represent the internal glories of that Church in that conjuncture that any one who would draw an Historical Painting of the State of the Primitive Church to the exactness and bigness of the life might best do it by the Church of England sitting in that posture he describes These are his words p. 6 And here I cannot but recount with joy amidst all this Funeral sorrow what were then the holy ardours of all fervent devotions in Fastings and Prayer and solemn Humiliations Ay in Festival and Sacramental Solemnities O the lift up praying and yet sometime down cast weeping Eyes of humble Penitents O the often extended and yet as often enfolded arms of suppliant Votaries Vpon days of Solemnity O how early and how eager were the peoples devotions that certainly then if ever the Kingdom of Heaven suffered violence so many with Jacob then wrestling with God in Prayer not letting him go till he gave them a blessing c. Thus was that great Magazine of Learning and Piety Dr. Hammond in the late time of the Persecution of the Church of England the Magazine then likewise of mighty Alms insomuch that Serenus Cressy saith in his Epistle Apologetical Printed in the year 1674 p. 48. Dr. Hammond in those days inviting me into England assured me I should be provided of a convenient place to dwell in and a sufficient subsistence to live comfortably and withal that not any one should molest me about my Religion and Conscience I had reason to believe that this invitation was an effect of a cordial Friendship and I was also inform'd that he was well enabled to make good his promise as having the disposal of great Charities and the most zealous promoter of Alms-giving that liv'd in England since the change of Religion Thus while as noble Confessors they forsook Houses and Land they according to the Evangelical promise received the effects of Houses and Lands and praedial Tithes an hundred fold in this Life with the Gospel Salvo as I may call it of Persecutions And as in the primitive and best times when the Christian Pastors had no Tenths but the Decumani fluctus or Ten Persecutions and many Christians were decimated for Martyrdom that Community of Goods that was never read of to be practised but in Vtopia and that Renunciation of that dear thing called Property for the defence whereof Political Government is supposed to have been chiefly invented did so much glorifie the Christian Morality to the confounding all examples of the most sublime Morals of the Heathens that the Pastors had the Christians All at their Feet and did tread on Oblations at every step they took so likewise those great Divines beforementioned and many others found that Primitive Temper revived in some of the Lay-Members of the Church of England by their generous Offerings and Contributions which adorn'd the Gospel and supported its Ministers and which Laity though cruelly decimated by the Usurpers yet were then Rich in good works ready to distribute and willing to Communicate and by their forementioned great liberality in Oblations exceeding the rate of Tenths did lay up in store a good Foundation against the time to come for the Pastors that shall be their Successors in Persecution that may secure their expectations of good Pastures in our Cities and of having a Table prepared for them in the presence of their Enemies come what can come from Popery Moreover by such an accident only can the great Cities in England be freed from some illiterate Pastors of gather'd Churches who without having their Quarters beaten up by Penal Laws will disappear there when the excellent try'd Veterans of the Church of England shall come to Garrison them Those little Sheep-stealers of others Flocks will then no longer attempt there to have Common of Pasture without Number but will by all be numbred and found too light 'T will be visible to all that the Divines of the Church of England can with ease Preach in as plain a manner as the other and that the other can not with pains Preach as Learnedly and Rationally as they We see that many ridiculous Lay-Preachers who in the late times did set up a kind of Religion-Trade in great Cities and did gather Churches and likewise gather there some maintenance have thence silently took their march on the occasion of the more Learned Presbyterian Divines ejected from their Livings retiring thither and there having constant auditories partly resembling the guise of gathered Churches And the disproportion in intellectual Talents being generally as great between them and the Divines of the Church of England as is that between them and the Lay-Preachers they must there prove Bankrupt necessarily as the others did Dr. Glanvil in his Book called The Zealous and Impartial Protestant did but right to the Episcopal Clergy of England when he ascribes to them the honour of having by their Learned Writings Confuted exposed triumph'd over the numerous Errours of Popery and there names Bishop Iewel Bishop Morton Bishop Andrews Archbishop Laud Bishop Hall Bishop Davenant Archbishop Vsher Archbishop Bramhal Bishop Taylor Bishop Cozens Dr. Hammond Mr. Chillingworth Mr. Mead Dean Stillingfleet Dean Tillotson Dean Lloyd Dr. Henry More Dr. Brevint And speaking of the Episcopal Clergy of the City of London saith How many Learned Substantial Convictive Sermons have they Preach'd against the Popish Doctrines and Practice since our late fears
in that Quarter to put an end to that which begins in Nomine Domini and that they will not be the rather willing so to do in regard that the North made the World feel the Malignity of both those Proverbs by its old well-meant charity to the Bishops of Rome And since in the days of Popery here in Harry the 8th's time it did pass in Rem Iudicatam that the Pope had no more power over us by the Scripture then any other forrain Bishop it cannot now but seem ridiculous to scruple whether he can thence claim more authority here than any other forrain Prince and he who was exploded here formerly when the Critical Spectators were not so many for having ill acted the part of a King on our stage of the World would be thought mad for personating one after the Play is over Thus too in a less people World Bartolus the famous Lawyer pronounced it to be Haeresie to deny the German Emperor to be King of the Vniverse the which any one would now account Madness to affirm And if in France hundreds of Years ago its Monarch greeted the Pope with the terms of fatuus amens for claiming a Supremacy in Temporals there 't is impossible he can be otherwise thought there now prosecuting a claim to Supremacy in things Ecclesiastic for even his pretensions to that the Clergy of France have damned in their Declaration by setting a General Council above him and which Declaration the great Monarch hath there ratify'd by a perpetual and irrevocable Edict And 't is but with a Consonancy to the nature of things that the Papal Infallibility should be concluded against in that Declaration and since as the Author of the Policy of the Clergy of France relates the Roman Catholick Church there doth so much swarm with New Phil sophers there call'd Cartesians and Gassendists whose new Philosophy has been there by Zealous Catholics observ'd to have ruin'd the mystery of the Real Presence for so the words are in that Book 't is no wonder if the growth of the Messieurs les scavants encreasing with the Populacy of that Realm makes any man's belief of his infallibility pass for a degree of madness accordingly as Mr. Hobbes Chap. 8. Of Man well observes that excessive opinion of a man 's own self for Divine Inspiration and Wisdome becomes distraction and giddiness and this probably may be the final result there of the late fermentation about the Regalia c. and the Pope be tacitly thought so as aforesaid and his Power there insensibly evaporate and without any visible distrubance given to it by the ratio ultima Regum for no prudent person would declaim reproachfully against any of a quiet Phrensy or molest and vex such a one tho living near him and would much less project the disgrace or mischief of such an one living at a great distance tho he should assume to himself bigger Titles than ever the Kings of India or Persia did and call himself Son of the Sun or Lord of the Sea and Land or like some of the Roman Emperors challenge Divinity or be styled Dominus Deus noster Papa And thus may the Pope quietly go on longer to call himself Monarch of the World without being call'd Names for it in France just as the Dukes of Savoy style themselves Kings of Cyprus without any gainsaying from the Turk who likewise did not menace the Pope for causing the Brother of the Vice-Roy of Naples to be in Rome proclaim'd King of Ierusalem nor when that Gentleman in Requital of that favour from his Holiness caused the Pope to be in Naples proclaimed Caliph of Bandas was the Mogul aggrieved thereby And thus probably too will the Enthusiast's who assert a Millennium or Universal Reign of Christ on earth with that quietness and gentleness that the ancient Fathers before the first Nicene Council did pass off the Stage of the World but it will seem ridiculous not to bind such Fifth Monarchy Men in Chains as Mad-men who have in England and Germany endeavoured to biâ—d Kings so and Nobles with Fetters of Iron and who would again make Convulsions in the State by the Diseases of their minds as once Mahomet's Epileptic Fits shook the World and who by promising us a new Heaven and a new Earth would confound the old and only give us a new Hell broke loose But the World will not now be blunder'd into Confusion by such wild Reformers In the Book of the Apocalypse of which Bodin tells us in his Methodus ad facilem Historiarum Cognitionem that Calvin's Opinion being ask'd he answer'd Se penitùs ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor it must be confessed that the Majesty of the Style is agreeable to that of the rest of the holy Text and that the predictions of the future State of the Church and of its splendor in the World are not grosso modo utter'd or attended with any irregularity but on the contrary that God appears there as the God of Order and applying all the exactness of proportion and number and its very fractions to the great things foretold After one Verse hath accounted the number of the Beast to be 666 the next mentions St. Iohn's Vision of a Lamb standing on Mount Sion and with him an hundred forty and four thousand The Bodies of the Witnesses are mentioned to be unburied three days and an half The 4 Angels were loosed which were prepared for an hour and a day and a Month and a Year for to sâ—ay the third part of Men. The Woman was to be in the Wilderness 1260 days and to be nourished there for a time and times and half a time Blood came out of the Wine-Press by the space of 1600 Furlongs There were Seal'd of all the Tribes of Israel 144000. And in the State of Babylon mentioned in Cap. 18th where the voice from Heaven is heard Come out of her my People though all the various Sects of Religion that thrust one another into Babylon will admit of no proportion in their revenge yet it is there say'd Reward her even as she rewarded you and double unto her double according to her works in the Cup which she hath filled fill to her double But near the end of that Book where the great Scene of The New Heaven and the New Earth opens and the Vision of the New Ierusalem is described a Golden Rod was given the Angel to measure the City and the Measures thereof are particularized And tho I pretend not to understand the meaning of any of these obscure passages of Scripture yet one thing seems to me there as Conspicuous as the Meridian Light namely That as the Divine Providence did found the Old World in Number Weight and Measure so it likewise will the foretold New One. The exactness of the Numbers described by St. Iohn in that Prophetick Book written in the Island of Pathmos hath assured us that his imagination was much above the Vapors that
he pleased And there in Book 7th 't is said That the Pope on further application from the Ambassadors of Princes that that Clause might be damned as contrary to the liberty of Ambassadors and Bishops in propounding what they thought profitable those for their States and these for their Churches the Pope gave them good words about it but did nothing and Book 10th The Spanish Ambassador desiring the Retractation of that Clause and that otherwise the Council could not be called free and that its freedom was to be dated only from the time of such Retractation and that the Emperor insisted on its abrogation and that by reason of that Clause no German had yet come to that Council yet nothing was effected for its revoking and still the Proponentibus legatis stood as a Rock and all their Addresses dash'd themselves in pieces producing nothing but the froath of excusatory words from the Pope about it and in fine all that could be gained was in the end of the Council after that Clause had had its full effect and done all its Execution against the freedom of the Council and particularly of the Ambassadors and Bishops there and was like a Post-horse ridd to his Stage and had brought all the Cloak-bags with the Holy Ghost from Rome to turn it to grass with a Formal Declaration or Protestation contrary to Fact that the meaning of the Synod was not by that Clause to change in any part the usual manner of handling matters in general Councils c. A crying Con licensa to the Bishops and Ambassadors after the cutting of the Throats of their Liberties And now can any Opiniatre yet further think that a Representative of English Commoners will ever think those Republican Projectors of liberty who do bare faced cut them off from the freedom of their share in Enacting any thing but what another House shall propound and that nothing shall have the Sanction of Law but what enters the Stage with a proponentibus Patriciis or by the Proposition of any other House the Style of one of Cromwels two Houses and who do set up for Inventors in Politics by reviving the exploded Constitution of the Athenians among whom Anacharsis observed Wise men did consult and Fools determine But the days are pass'd and gone that gave People of subtle and uneasie Brains the leisure of digging in Politics further than the Center which whoever doth digs not downward but upwards and that Center I account the ancient lex terrae to be and he who hath got beyond that doth digging upwards destroy the real Foundations of Churches and States while he is laying imaginary ones But since according to the saying in hieme nil movendum men of Sense who love to be tampering with Physick in other seasons will in that be averse from stirring the humours and trying Conclusions on themselves and in the churlish State of the World abroad that is in prospect all State Empirics that would any where advise a change of Fundamental Governments will find an unruly Patient of the World and all our sober Political Virtuosi will be necessarily inclined to study how to maintain and support our old Government instead of projecting any new one And in order to the support of our old one I dare say that there will be no more suspension of Royal Aids on the account of the Arminian Controversie or the freedom of our Wills while we are busied in preparing to defend the freedom of our Estates and Bodies from Forraigners and securing both Prince and Peoples not being predestinated to ruine by them The Extinguishing the maintenance of the Clergy will not pass for a new Evangelical Light but the exactest provision for the Enabling Crown'd Heads to support their Civil Government and their Clergy and with the observance of equality and proportion in the same respecting the State of their Kingdoms will be worthy the thoughts of the most illuminated Doctors for as among the Divines it is on all hands agreed that from the 40th Chap. of the Prophecy of Ezekiel to the end of that Book the thing chiefly designed in the Portraiture of the great Vision of the Prophet is to represent the figure of Church and State under the Gospel so there is great proportion kept in the same and not only the curious colouring but the exactness of draught and design required in a great Historical Painting and no wonder if the same appeared so express'd on the Table of the Prophets imagination when God himself was pleas'd there to paint it partly after the exactness and proportion of the Iewish Oeconomy and with many Additions of Curiosity and to which tho a litteral interpretation is not applicable and on which tho no expectance of the Erection of another material Temple at Ierusalem or in Iudea is to be founded or of 12000 Reeds of Land for the Temple and Priests yet may it thence be naturally inferred that the preserving of orderly proportion in the Revenue of the Prince and Priest and with respect to number Weight and Measure in the Future times of the Gospel was then the care and design of Providence The 45th Chapter that doth so nicely assign the Portion for the Prince and Priest ordains or rather predicts a Royal Patrimony for the Prince in the way of a ballance of Land as 't is said in the 8th Verse In the Land shall be his Possession in Israel and my Princes shall no more oppress my People and the rest of the Land shall they give to the House of Israel according to their Tribes The consideration of this may probably reforme the men of curious imagination who are still making the Metal of Government more fine than the Standard and thinking to leave out there the necessary Mixture of the baser allay that the frail State of humanity requires to make it currant and without which it would be too brittle for use and projecting how to make the Government of Church and State with ease to live upon nothing or on Taxes in a confused and blundering manner laid when the thought of an inspired Prophet in this Vision relating to the time of the Gospel the which is called by the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews the time of Reformation applied all the exactness of Mathematics to the supporting both the Crown and use of the Keys by an ample and certain Revenue And as the great Tax of Augustus on the Roman World or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by way of Capitation or Pole near the time of our Saviors Birth served to confirm the Christian Religion in the accomplishment of the Prediction of Christs being born in Bethlem and to cause Ioseph and Mary's going thither a resembling effect in the Confirmation of the most rational kind of the Christian Religion I mean the Protestant do I expect from our Future Legal and Equal Taxes and as I mentioned my Lord Bacon's saying of the Parliaments being yet in debt to the Church since
to believe it will ever suffer such real madness and real dangers as formerly from Suppositions and Fictions not of Law but of Injury and when some injurious Demagogues did often acquire both Popular Air and bread by their but seeming to suppose what they seduced the people really to do and to be really thereby impoverished When I think how some men by false Alarmes of suppositions would for the lengthening their Interests lengthen the fears of any persons and among Mortal men make the dangers of Plots immortal I call to mind that 't is not very long ago that a Forraigner who was Physician to King Charles the First I mean Sir Theodore Mayerne occasioned an Universal Out-cry of the Disease of the Spleen here and was observed in many Cases where the Disease proceeded from the fowlness of the Stomach or other Causes yet to attribute it to that part of the Body which tho all Animals have yet most if not all may live without I mean the Spleen but however he got his Living thereby and so plentifully that it may be said that he as it were made the Spleen and the Spleen made him And thus doth a Spleen of some Popish Sham-Plots and the continuance of the fears and danger from a true one make some persons perhaps who made the former and the continuance of the fear of the latter and such State Empyricks would be as much impoverished by the utter abolishing of the same as some of our great Merchants who Trade in Companies and with Convoys would be if there were no Argeer but as the swelling of the Spleen proves the emaciating of the other parts of the Body so hath the swoln Spleen of the Popish-Plot particularly not more enriched some Merchants that Traded therein than it hath impoverished the Kingdom in general and I do believe that a Tax of a Million of Money raised in England in the way before mentioned would not have been universally so heavy a burthen as the Popish-Plot in its Effects and Consequences hath been But what by the bravery of the English Genius to which as was said the continuance of any sort of fear is unnatural and despair which generally grows from Sloth and Cowardize appearing so dull a thing humane Nature being apt easier to descend into it than to ascend by presumption and what by Peoples being Convinced of the smallness of the Papists numbers here comparatively and of the ridiculousness of the rumour'd greatness thereof in particular places as for example of there being 60,000 Papists in St. Martins Parish where there dying ordinarily about 2000 in a Year there cannot be judged to live 60000 Souls of Men Women and Children according to the Rule of 1 in 30 dying each year and what by the late great divulsion of the double bottom of the Pope and the Iesuites appearing by his Decree of March the 2 d before mentioned which makes all thinking People as much to expect its Shipwrack as do the throngs of the Plebs resorting to the shore in Tempests expect the Ruine of Navigating Vessels and to look on Papisme as saying in effect to Iesutisme nec tecum nec sine te and what by the Notion so much in Vogue and so likely to be more that 't is as improper to call some of the Tenets of Popery by the Name of Religion as 't would be professedly to mis-call any thing obvious as for example to call Musick the Art of Rhetoric or Grammar Logic or to call Astronomy or Dyalling by Surveying or Gawging and that 't is only that that is Religion indeed that is to be honoured according to that expression in the Scripture honour Widows that are Widows indeed and what by the urging Fate of Christendom now so loudly as with the voice of Thunder repeating it to us that this Nation must either now be quiet or that the World abroad can never be so and that the hand of this Realm must be steady if ever it will keep the Ballance of Christendom so and what by the Nations having outlived all the Malignant Symptomes of the Plague of its Fears I think on the whole matter we may without any thing of the Fire of Prophecy and only from the Light of Reason presage that the excessive fear of Popery as well as its danger will here be exterminated I doubt not but the former as well as later experiences of the Papists here concerning the Inconveniences of their Artifice of making or increasing Dissensions in the Kingdom the dividing of which by them as well as other Religion-Traders hath prejudiced it more than the so much talk'd of Division of the Fleet will in the present Conjuncture of Affairs incline the sober Party of them to joyn with the Body of the People of England in being sharp Abhorrers of the Principles of the Iesuites for they can hardly go any where now in the Land without seeing a Cain's Mark set on those who cause divisions or still drive the old Trade that the Bohemian Nobleman Andreas ab Habering field in his Detection of the Popish Practices mentions that Sir Toby Mathews Maxwel and Reade those Jesuited Political Interlopers did in the Reign of the Royal Martyr namely to mis-represent the Court and the Puritans to one another and to endeavour to perswade male-contented People that that Pious Prince designed their Slavery a thing so false that he was Reverâ their Martyr as he with great Justice said of himself on the Scaffold and which great name he might challenge even on the account of Natural Justice if there had been nothing relating to reveal'd Religion in the case to entitle him to it for St. Iohn the Baptist was a Martyr and yet died for no Article of the Christian Faith. It may be justly said that our Monarch fell a Martyr for the People by not violating the lex terrae that he was by his Oath bound to maintain and by his therefore not owning the Jurisdiction of the Vile Court over him and moreover the Law of Nature obliging him indispensably to do nothing that by his exemplary abdicating any Right Inherent in the Crown would have incapacitated him and his Successors from protecting their Liege-People in their Inheritance of the Laws and it being a thing certain that the Law of Nature is as much the Law of God as is the Law positive or his written Word and indeed as Gataker saith well in his Book of Lots The Law of Nature written in Mans heart is the very same so far forth as 't is yet undefaced with the Law of God revealed in the Word it may be with reason averr'd that any Member of Mankind whether Prince or Subject who is put to death by any Court of Justice or Armed Force or by the hands of Russians or Bravos on the account of his discharging his Obligations to the Law of Nature may enter his just Claim to the Name of Martyrdom I have therefore supposing that Godfrey lost his life by vile
sententia hic pronuntiata fuit Quaenam illa Reus est mortis Hanc sententiam à spiritu sancto profectam esse non est dubium O hominem sacrilegum blasphemum Ille ne Reus mortis qui innocens innoxius vitam dedit But as inhumane as any Principles of Papists or Mahumetans or any Enthusiasts or as desperate as the very Iesuites beforementioned ones are supposeable to be and as much as any of Mankind can strive to delude others by Implicit Faith yet as it is in no mans power presently to believe what even his own and much less what his Guides appetite would have him notwithstanding any Ecclesiastical Association he may have prosessedly linked his Faith in so no man can ensure the continuance of his Belief or its holding for a Moment and therefore the more absurd and inhumane any mens Tenets are I shall expect them to be the less believed and for the less time and it is more then Holy Church can know that any one at all believes as it believes how great soever the number that pretends so to do appears Of all Papists not professing themselves bound to withdraw their Allegiance from Heretical Princes and even from such as by a particular Bull were Excommunicated by the Pope History affords many Examples and particularly of the many Loyal Papists who when the inheritable Right of the Crown of France was devolved on the King of Navarre a Protestant and as such Excommunicated with their Lives and Fortunes asserted his Title to the Crown Any of the Readers of Thuanus know that in Book 93 't is related how when many Papists would have debarred him from the Succession and that the minds of those qui in Castris erant were in that point variously affected yet Major sanior pars sic existimabat nullam publicae salutis spem superesse nisi servato legitimae successionis ordine and so were for Harry the 4 ths Right therein and whom they believed was late reconciled to the King his Predecessor for that he did per eum res administrare as the Historian's words are i. e. Harry the 4 th a Protestant Successor was Primier Ministre to Harry the 3 d a Papist And not only the Major part and the sober Party of the Popish Souldiery i. e. in Thuanus his words sanior pars was loyally addicted to the Right of the Protestant Successor but several of the Grandees of the Popish Clergy were so and particularly the Arch-Bishop whose Speech for that purpose Thuanus Book 106. sets down wherein 't is said Neque verò aut Regis personam aut subditorum robur debilitatemque heic considerandum esse quando Reges lege ad regnum vocantur Neque exemplis doceri posse quicquid contrajactetur in priscâ lege populum Israeliticum ob Religionem regibus suis defecisse c. sed totum id Deo dijudicandum reliquisse in cujus manibus regum corda sunt quae ille pro arbitrio quo vult inclinat Quid in Christianâ Ecclesiâ Nonne Christum generis humani redemptorem ejusque beatissimam matrem nomina sua apud censum Augusto imperante Gentilium sacris addicto professos esse Nonne Caesari suo Petri nomine tributum pependisse Quod verò de legibus civilibus imperialibus constitut affertur quibus Manichaei Arriani à dignitatum magistratuum ac publicorum munerum participatione excluduntur id intelligi de magistratibus inferioribus non de principalibus qui nisi cum excidio populorum Reip. eversione jure suo privari non possunt de quibus decernere ad solius Dei Omnipotentis Iurisdictionem pertinet The whole Speech is argumentative to that purpose out of the old and new Testament and Fathers c. and that Noble Loyalty of those Papists to a Protestant Successor met with a requital as to their Religion and thereby I may say in the Scripture expression that they did at once heap both a Crown and Coals of Fire upon his head Any one may be rather apt to think me less sanguine as I may say in my belief of Shame 's operating more and more among both Lay and Clerical Roman Catholicks and even among our Jesuited Protestants I mean many of our Non-Conformists that have had sanguinary and disloyal Principles transfused into them by Jesuites to the making them out of love with such Principles when he shall consider how the ingenious Maimbourg doth in the 6 th Book of his History of Calvinisme reflect on the great Calvin for his opinion and practice relating to the punishment of Heretics with death and instanceth in the Case of Servetus who was burn'd by the Magistrates of Geneva as an Heretick on Calvin's instigating them so to deal with him as Maimbourg tells us and concludes his Historical Account of the Parisian Massacre with the mention of the said opinion and practice of Calvin and doth with great Judgment and Candour thus observe viz. On á veu neanmoins de tout temps que le moyen le plus efficace quand l' heresie est deja puissamment etablie n' estoient point les supplices beaucoup moins la violence le trop de Rigueur Bien loin que le massacre qu' on fit a Paris entant d' autres villes ait aneanti ou du moins affoibli le Calvinisme qu' au Contraire il en devint plus enracinè plus puissant plus formidable qu' auparavant Les Huguenots ne voulurent plus se fier aux declarations que l' on fit pâ—ur les rasleurer c. Alsted in his Chronology of Heresy tells us that Michael Servetus Hispanus docuit nullam esse in Deo realem generationem aut distinctionem and Calvin in his Opuscula saith of Servetus vel sola modestia potuisset vitam redimere but I believe the World will grow more modest then to burn men for immodesty and 't is most certain that as the World grows the nearer to its Period and growing more and more populous that populousness will naturally tend to unite all Countries at home by preparing them to resist Invasion from abroad and make the fantastical squandring away the Members of the Common-wealth more and more ridiculous and insensibly to grow out of fashion Thus 't was with the increase of the People among the Jews and Turks that the Sicacious Zealots among the former and Dervices among the latter did gradually decrease and at last insensibly grew obsolete And thus of old did Draco's Laws evaporate Aulus Gellius tells us in his Noctes Atticae that Draco Atheniensis vir bonus multáque esse prudentia existimatus est jurisque divini humani peritus fuit Is Draco leges quibus Athenienses uterentur primus omnium tulit In illis legibus furem cujuscunque modi furti supplicio capitis puniendum esse alia pleraque nimis severe censuit sanxitque Ejus igitur leges quoniam videbantur impendio acerbiores non
they may be justly presumed to do whensoever opportunity serves and that they see it conducible to their Interest to do it Thus likewise Iudges of Ecclesiastical Courts when the consideration of the Nullity of a Marriage by reason of fear resulting from threatnings is before them do carefully regard this point concerning the Menacer an solitus est minas exequi a thing the Iesuites have not been wanting to do when Power and Opportunity have not been wanting and there is no doubt but the Iesuites by reason of their 4th Vow to the Pope over and above the Implicit Obedience they have sworn to their Superiors are to execute whatever he shall command nor is it doubtable but that when it is said by the Canonists that the Pope hath power to burn Heretical Cities he will reduce that Power into Act when he sees convenient and as Dr. Donne in his Pseudo Martyr well notes the Lawyers teach us that the word potest doth often signifie actum for which he quotes Bartolus on the Digests I believe the truth of his Computation where he saith in p. 228 of that Book That the Iesuites are in possâ—ssion of most of the Papists hearts in England but I likewise believe his other Computation in that Book where in p. 127. he saith quoting Rebadenira that in the Year 1608. the whole number of the Society of the Iesuites were 10581. and that tho their number is much encreased since there are not so many in England as were when the Book was printed viz Anno 1610. and the Dr. whose Style was as the Oxford Antiquities say of Mr. Foxes in Romanenses satis acerbus tho I think neither of their Styles was so a jot too much doth in Chap. 10th of that Book very learnedly and largely shew that many Eminent and Popish Writers have bitterly inveighed against Gratian the Compiler of the Decretum of the Canon Law. No doubt that Law was never in gross received in England in the times of our Popish Ancestors and so neither did nor doth bind English Papists in the Court of Conscience more than the Council of Trent doth in some Popish Countries where it never was received and I find Bellarmine cited by the Dr. for saying that there are many things in the Decretal Epistles which do not make a matter to be de fide but only do declare what the opinions of the Popes were in such cases I believe that no un-jesuited Papist nor perhaps some sober Party in that Order will think the worse of me for calling the Decretum of the Popes Canon Law by reason of its empowering him thus to burn Cities hâ—rrendum Decretum and it may perhaps appear ridiculous as well as horrid in the Pope in that Law to rake in the Ashes of sweet St. Cyprian for fire to burn Heretical Towns and to make him who was in a manner Excommunicated by the Pope for rebaptizing such as were baptized by Hereticks to be the Founder of that wild Tenet of converting guiltless Lime and Brick and Timber to rubbish because they had afforded dwelling places to People that differed in judgment from Rome and to make him who in the Year 258. was a Martyr for not being an Idolater to be the Author of burning Cities that would not adore the Host. But moreover it may be said that in the Decrets made by the Pope to Ape the Pandects and to consist chiefly of Canons of Councils sayings of Fathers and Constitutions of Popes as the Pandects do of the responsa prudentum c. Gratian's founding a Tenet on Cyprian or any places out of other Authors giveth it only the weight that Cyprian and they had in their proper works and the Stream of Authority from their Writings in Gratian is not to be supposed able to rise higher than the Spring and thus the Canonists agree on this as a Rule that the things quoted in Gratian Vim legis habent quatenus reperiuntur illic unde depâ—ompta sunt and they tell us that if any things that are said to be impia hiulca barbara sine ratione falsa fideique Historicae adversa are found there they are to be passed by as Gratian Dreams ut nec confirmatio Pontificum generalis ad ea sese extendere possit And on this Account his Glâ—ssographer Andreas himself doth often turn his gloss into an Animadversion on his Master for that name he bestows on Gratian and saith sometimes Magister hic non tenetur meaning Observatur and sometimes Superficialis est magistri argumentatio and elsewhere with a strain of Ruffianism fateor te plane mentitum Gratiane And if any one will read Pere Veron's Book of the Rule of Catholick Faith Dedicated to the Lords of the Assembly general of the Clergy sitting at Paris in the Year 1645. he will find he saith as for Gratian 's Decrees and the Gloss they can claim nothing of Faith the Author being a particular Doctor and Subject to many mistakes even in the Citation of Authors nor doth he pretend to any such thing much less weight hath the Gloss than the Decrees where many silly and ridiculous passages are discovered As for the Papal Decrees contained in the body of the Canon Law or published since none of them do constitute an Article of Faith c. Bellarmine makes no difficulty to acknowledge Errors in several of them as for example where the Canon out of Gratian is objected quod proposuisti extracted out of Gregory the 3d where 't is said that if a Woman should be sick and by that means unable to render her duty to her Husband the Husband if he have not the gift of continency may take another Wife he replys thus that the Pope failed through ignorance which we do not deny may happen to Popes when they do not properly define but only declare their opinions as Gregory seems here to have done And no doubt but every Papist laughs at the definition of a Whore in the Decrets i. e. Quae multorum libidini patet and at the gloss there making by multorum to be meant 23000. My Lord I discoursed frankly of all these last mentioned matters to my Roman Catholick Friend who I said would joyn Issue in the Plea about Religion if the Pope's Power of firing Heretical Cities were a Tenet chargeable on the Church of Rome and have perhaps said as much to throw off the Obligation on any Papists to obey the Pope or his Canon Law in the infliction of such dire Vengeance on whole Cities as they would wish said and do think my self indispensably obliged when I discourse with any of Mankind about any Quaesitum relating to natural truth and much more to Theological with all possible candour to say what the matter will fairly bear on both sides as accounting any mans Judgment given ex parte to be of little or no value and esteeming him a falsarius who conceals any thing of truth But this Gentleman being a close pursuer of truth
are somewhat disguised but are as well known as the Ecclesiasticks are in France and are not in the least assaulted c. There was one day in a Long-boat or Ship a Priest dressed in black Cloths who was not otherwise disguised than that his Coat was short who said his Breviary before a hundred persons with as much Liberty as he could have done in France And yet perhaps the number of those who in Holland fear them or who pretend to fear them is but the least of numbers I think too in this sharp sighted age where Art among the Inquisitive follows Nature as carefully as Equity doth Law one may safely predict that in the Dividend of our time little will come to the share of Metaphysicks or the considering how Metaphysica agit de iis quae sunt supra naturam and that the World being infinitely busie will not trouble it self with Arriagà s infinitum infinito infinitius and Christendom's being universally employed in preparing its defence against War and giving us time only for real Learning will divert us from either much opposing or defending the old point whether Vniversale be ens reale or whether Vniversalia are res extra singularia If by Metaphysicks we could find a real Answer to the Question what is truth or what is time of which it hath devoured so much or learn how to measure it by knowing what 's a Clock we might go on with its entitas which Mr. Hobs well englisheth the isseness of a thing but since it resolves not what things are as aforesaid but as Hudibrass saith only what is what I think as Filesac de authorit opiâ—c c. 1. mentions that the Council in France forbad Aristotle's Metaphysicks and punished with Excommunication the exscribing reading or having that Book our time will hold little Communion hereafter with Second Notions on those who Trade in them and that as it will seem very absurd to sacrifice much time to the enquiry if Vniversale is a real being and whether Vniversalia are res extra singularia and to sacrifice men for believing the contrary so it will likewise seem to enquire Whether there be one Catholick or Vniversal Apostolick Church existent apart from particular Churches which sense and reason tell us are and must be many tho the Catholick Church be but one and for the want of considering which so many People have been decoyed into the Church of Rome Many are the things that an ordinary Philosopher may predict concerning Rome and particularly varying from the Prophecy that it was to be destroyed by Fire may soretel Romam fore luce delendam and as Tully's words are in his Book de Naturâ Deorum Opinionem Commenta delebit dies veritatis judicia confirmabit And thus too it is easie to predict that the light of Reason and Experience will forever blot out here the Innovations that came from Geneva as well as those from Rome The Jewish Rabbins have from the words of the Sol Iustitiae arising with healing in his wings introduced a Proverb of The Sun ariseth the infirmity decreaseth meaning thereby that the Diseases that make Mortals groan and languish in the Night are somewhat abated by the rising Sun and thus the State of our Nation will be attended with greater health on the decay of Presbytery's Kingdom of Darkness The Walls of its Iericho are fallen down flat with the sound of the Trumpets of the Dissenters own Sayings so usefully published Tho I have said enough to speak my opinion of all Dissenters to the Discipline of our Church not owning such sanguinary Principles as are chargeable on some Papists yet the Dissenters Sayings have proved enough what some of their Principles were Nor can it be forgot that King Iames did very justly in the Conference at Hampton Court accuse the Notes in the Geneva Bible to be Seditious and to savour of Traiterous Conceits and that he instanced there in the Notes on Exodus 1. 19. Where they allow of disobedience to Sovereign Kings and Princes As absurd as that Tenet beforementioned in the Decrets and there founded on the 13th of Deuteronomy is I would wish no Presbyterian to insult over any Papists for it for it is visible in no meaner a Book than the Assemblies Annotations on Zechary 13. 3. where the Father and Mother of a false Prophet are commanded to say to him thou shalt not live and 't is said his Father and Mother that begat him shall thrust him through when he Prophesieth The Comment on the words Thou shalt not live affirms that the equity of the Law of Deut. 13. 6. 9. remains under the Gospel and with less danger is a Thief an Adulterer a Witch tolerated than such an Heretick and Seducer The present pleading for liberty of Conscience in Preaching and Practice is a thing extremely shameful dangerous and destructive and the Comment on the the words His Father c. is His Parents themselves shall not spare him preferring therein their Zeal and Piety towards God before the Affection and Love which naturally they bear toward their own Children See Deut. 13. 6. 9. No less Zeal is required under the Gospel than was under the Law. I pray God deliver all Mankind from the cruel rigour of the Equity as those Divines term it of that Iudicial Mosaic Law binding under the Gospel and from that kind of Zeal binding under the Gospel that did under the Law by virtue of the 6th and 9th Verses of that Chapter and from the 16th V. of which Chapter the Obligation for firing Heretical Cities was as well deduced by the Pope The Church of England illuminates us with better Doctrine and our Reverend Bishop Sanderson tells us in his 4th Lecture De obligatione conscientiae that no Law given by Moses doth directly and formally and per se â—ind the Conscience of a Christian i. e. as it was given by Moses for that every Mosaic Law as such was positive and did oblige those only it was put upon i. e. the Iews and shews that the Precepts of the Decalogue oblige not because Moses commanded them but because of their being consentaneous to nature and confirmed by the Gospel and so doth manumit the Christian World from the Yoke of the Iudicial Law that was made only for the stiff necks of Jews Calvin himself on that place of Zachary 13. 3. doth blunder as shamefully as did our Assembly men for he there makes the Penal Jewish Laws to bind under the Gospel His words there are these Sequitur ergo non modo legem illam fuisse Iudaeis positam quemadmodum nugantur fanatici homines sed extenditur etiam ad nos eadem lex and himself was in this point the Fanatick and not the contrary opinors and deniable it is not that several of the Calvinistick and Lutheran Divines beyond Sea did imbibe the error of hereticidium from the same mistaken Principle of Monk Gratians namely that the Penalâ—severe Jewish Laws were obligatory
Vsurper in his wrong Doing and Vsurpation and so become a partaker of his Sin. Obedience to one as the Supreme Magistrate is a Comprehensive thing and includes many duties toward him as a Power viz. of receiving Commission from him for Offices or Acts otherwise not competible to me maintaining and defending him in his Power by Pay Counsel and Intelligence Arms and Prayers all which I am bound to yield the Usurper to my power if I resign my Allegiance up to him and how shall I do these things and not 1. Support and have Communion with him in his wickedness 2. Combine against betray and resist the right of the injured dethroned Magistrate 3. And make my self uncapable of Obedience or being a Subject to the lawful Power hereafter The Author doth in p. 19 and many other places in this Book assert the forementioned Clauses in the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy as binding clearly plainly and in terminis to an Allegiance over-living his Majesties Person and pitched upon his HEIRS and SUCCESSORS so that the Swearer is not free from the Oaths at his Majesties decease c. and that those Oaths intend by his Majesty's HEIRS and SUCCESSORS the same Persons joyning them together with the Copulative AND and not using the Discretive OR and the former Oath twice comprising both in the following Clauses under the said Term or Pronown viz. THEM THEIRS so that according to these Oaths his HEIRS are of right his SUCCESSORS and none can be HIS SUCCESSOR but HIS HEIR while he hath an HEIR and that if any Conspiracy or ATTEMPT be made to prevent his HEIR from being and continuing his SVCCESSOR or to make any one HIS SVCCESSOR that is not HIS HEIR if he hath one the subject is sworn by this Oath to continue his Allegiance to HIS HEIR as the right SVCCESSOR and to DEFEND HIM in that HIS right to the uttermost and that the Term LAWFUL annext to SVCCESSORS in the Oath of Supremacy manifestly excludes all CAVIL of a distinction between HEIRS and SVCCESSORS the word LAWFVL whether you interpret it of LEGITIMATION of BIRTH or PROXIMITY of SVCCESSION in regard of LINE according to the Law of the Land entailing the Crown on his Majesty's Issue or rather both the latter including the former restraining SVCCESSORS from meaning any other than HIS HEIRS and that both these Oaths bind the Swearer to assist and defend to his uttermost Power against all Attempts the Course of SVCCESSION in the Race of his Majesty expressed by many-Terms to wit THEIR Crown and Dignity all Iurisdictions Privileges Preheminences and Authorities granted to the King's Highness HIS HEIRS and SVCCESSOR and united to the Imperial CROWN of this Realm How then can he yield Obedience to them that are not HIS HEIRS nor LAWFUL SVCCESSORS c. how can he not oppose and withstand them in the assistance and defence of the right of his Majesty's HEIRS and LAWFVL SVCCESSORS That judicious Author did like a substantial Confessor of the Obligatoriness of those Oaths relating to the King's HEIRS and SUCCESSORS during that Vsurpation very satisfactorily shew that the SAME Persons were meant by both and held himself obliged in Loyalty the rather so to do because in that Conjuncture the plain Sence of the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy were usurp'd upon and particularly by the Book called THE LAWFULNESS OF OBEYING THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT then published and the Fallacies in which he Learnedly Confuted and shewed how ridiculously that Book outraged the sense of the Law-givers in those Oaths whose end was to support the Crown in a just Lineal Succession and could therefore intend by Successors only such as were de jure so and that therefore that Book 's taking Successors for such who were so de facto tho very unjustly was 1. Inconsistent with the nature of an Oath which must be taken in Righteousness Jer. 4. 2. That is to oblige only to that which is just 2. With the word HEIRS which being placed first in the Oath must first be served 3. With the Oath of Supremacy which binds us to the lawful Successor 4. With the Law of the Land which appointeth Succession to the Heir 5. With a possibility of keeping the Oath for if Heirs and Successors mean divers Persons how can the Oath of Allegiance and defence of the Regal Dignity be observed Thus it seems as the Fantome of haeres viventis hath frighted many out of their Natural Senses and the Natural sense of their Oaths in the present Conjuncture the word SUCCESSORS did formerly and when they who interpreted it of actual Succeders as saith my Author that it might favour the USURPERS forgot what was the Object of that Succession viz. a CROWN and Regal Dignity wherein by virtue of that Oath those Successors are to be defended whereas those or the Republicans for whom the Book pleads have not only put by the rightful Successor but abolished the CROWN and Regal Dignity it self May this instance of Heavens uncrowning the understandings of those Republicans of common reason and sense and when in the Course of their injudicious minds they were abandoned to the most despicable sort of Counterfeit Witt called Quibbling and to the vilest sort of Quibbling and double entendre of words I mean in that which concerns the tremendous Obligation of an Oath after they had Dethroned their Prince and excluded his Heirs and Successors serve in all Future times as a Monument of the Divine Dereliction and of Heavens scattering the Proud in their reasons and imaginations of their hearts and rendring them unfortunate beyond the fate of the common saying of Eventus stultorum magister I mean by condemning them to a stated infatuation and let none hereafter value any Vsurpation on the Credit of the last as Mr. Ienkins in his famous Petition to the Vsurpers did and set Gods Seal to it on the account of the Event when the Event was what I have now mentioned Any one who will cast an Eye on the Title de verborum significatione in the Civil Law will there find the word Heir to be necessarily made Comprehensive of SUCCESSORS viz. Haeredis significatione omnes signifiâ—â—ri SUCCESSORES â—redendum est etsi verbis non sint expressi and Succession is under that Title of the Law made a part of the definition of inheritance viz. Nihil est aliud haereditas quam successio in universum jus quod defunctus habuit And the identity of the thing in the words of Heirs and Successors doth quadrare with that saying so frequent among the Civil Law Writers that Plura quando copulantur ad unum effectum loco unius habentur and with another that the word sometimes stat declarative inter duo idem importantia I should account it somewhat like Pedantry to cite any Latine Authors about Heirs and Successors signifying as here in our Case the same thing but that other Seditious Books beside that impugned by the Exercitation have endeavoured to sow
Contention between the words Heirs and Successors tho with as little sense as was in Sir W. I's fancy of Treason whereby he would have set the Assertory and the Promissory Clauses in the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy at variance nay the Promissory Clause at variance with it self There was a Book writ by a late Lawyer called Historical Discourses of the Vniformity of the Government of England first printed in the Year 1647 and reprinted by some Factious Anti-Papists since the Epoche of our Fears and Iealousies of Popery and with that former year in the Title which was an ill ominous sign of the fatal time such Persons would have driven us back upon if they could where in p. 279 of the 2d part ill reflections are made on the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy which Oaths saith the Author do make much Parly concerning Inheritance and Heirs but that they do not hold forth any such Obligation to Heirs otherwise than as supposing them to be Successors and in that Relation only His design is too plainly express'd viz. to strike at the Rights of our Hereditary Monarchy and to invite Parliaments to interlope in controuling the Succession of the Crown and he saith That the Doctrine he there insinuates doth not go down well with those that do pretend to Prerogative aided by the Act of Recognition made to King James and the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance and I shall say that I hope it never will and 't is pity but a Book that in so many places of it impeacheth the old known Rights of the Crown should in this Conjuncture of Loyalty find some Person at leisure ex professo to make Animadversions on it and the rather for that the Author doth in the Vehicle of somewhat like Witt and his affectation of which is by People of middling Capacities who generally make the greater part of Mankind judged to be Witt dispense his Poysons Yet as to the signification of HEIRS and SUCCESSORS he had before in his first part saved any one the labour of shewing their Identity for there in p. 109 and in his Chapter of the Laws of Property of Lands and Goods under the Saxons he quoted Tacitus about some of the Customs of the Germans which he judged remain'd here with them and which shewed that HEIRS and SUCCESSORS passed then as current Coyn for the same thing according to the words of Tacitus HAEREDES SVCCESSORES cuique liberi nullum est testamentum and thus Englished by that Author viz. the HEIRS and SVCCESSORS to every one are his Children and there is no Testamentary Power to DISHERIT or ALTER the COVRSE of DESCENT which by CVSTOM or Law is setled And as was shewed the Term of LAWFVL annexed to SUCCESSORS hath nailed the Canon of that Sophism and exposed the ridiculousness of any Cavilling or Calumnious Interpretation about Heirs and Successors tho yet without the interposal of the word LAWFVL the plain sense of the words Heirs and Successors in the Oaths would clearly enough have obliged us to the same Persons We say that id possumus quod jure possumus and none are to be construed Heirs or Successors but such who are so in the Eye of the Law and with reference to Proximity of Blood i. e. they who are meant for such by the Law in the Due Course of their Descent But I hope that England's happy Future State will so far influence Loyalty as to incline all Conscientious Protestants to leave of all senseless Cavilling about the sense of the plain words in those Oaths and to agree to employ their most serious and constant thoughts about the extent of the Moral Offices that relate to their bearing True Faith and Allegiance to the King his Heirs and Successors and other very important matters in the Promissory Clauses most clearly expressed in order to the discharge of their Allegiance and the duties of Loyalty viz. DEFENDING him and them to the uttermost of our Power against all Conspiracies that shall be made against his or their Persons their Crown and Dignity as the Oath of Allegiance runs and to our ASSISTING and DEFENDING to our Power all Iurisdictions Privileges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness his Heirs and Successors There are no unweigh'd and idle words in the Promissory Clauses and we are to make it our business with the judgment of discretion to consider the sense of the same and to retain it in our Memories and mens not doing which hath been the Cause of the Ebb of Loyalty in some Conjunctures According to the Degrees of mens intellectual Talents and particularly the Talent of understanding beyond other men the Laws natural and positive and the Lex terrae some are beyond others morally bound to defend the particular momentous points relating to all Iurisdictions Privileges Preheminences granted or belonging to the King and his Heirs and Successors and therefore a disloyal Divine and a disloyal Lawyer are things that do particularly hear very ill But as there is a great part of the Moral Offices expressed in these Oaths sufficiently plain and obvious to vulgar Capacities and which with their Native Light do strike common understandings so the extent of these Offices ought to employ the Meditations of all the Takers of these Oaths and how low soever their Talents lie they are to use all the means they can and particularly that of the Consilium peritorum as any occasion shall offer it self for their defence of any of the Privileges or Preheminences belonging to the Crown Our duty in this kind is very well expressed by Sanderson in his third Lecture where speaking of the Subjects Obligations by Oaths of this Nature he saith Doubtless the Subject to his Power is obliged to defend all Rights which appear either by Law or Custom Legitimate whether defined by the written Law or in force through the long use of time or Prescription that is so far as they are known or may Morally be known But he is not equally obliged to the Observation of all those which are controverted Thus therefore as to any Iurisdiction Privilege or Preheminence of the Crown that might seem doubtful the swearer is many times bound to the use of means that it may be Morally known to him as Sanderson's words are Yet what I have urged in this sixth Conclusion as Obligatory to us by virtue of the Oaths is sufficiently plain and there is no occasion for employing a great Genius and penetrating Understanding and Witt to discover that it is one of the Privileges of the Crown to be Hereditary and that the Taker of the Oaths is indissolubly bound to defend that Right There are several explicatory Notions of the word DEFEND and its extent that often occur in the Authors that treat expressly of the Ius Protectitium seu defensorium among whom I account Magerus de Advocatiâ armatâ or of the Right of Protection given by Sovereign Powers to be instar
Hereditary Monarchs He knew that a Popish Parliament in England had shewed their Abhorrence of the Pope's being somewhat like an Excluder-General of Kings and an Arbitrary one too as appeared by the Words in the Statute of 25 H. 8. viz. The Pope contrary to the inviolable Grants of Iurisdictions by God immediately to Emperors and Kings hath presumed to invest who should please him to inherit in other mens Kingdoms and Dominions which we your Loyal Subjects Spiritual and Temporal abhor and detest and the practices at Rome for King Iames's Exclusion had made deep impressions in his thoughts As he was a Prince of great Reading he could not but know particularly the many Anti-Monarchical Tenets that were published by many Popish Commentators positive Writers School-men Canonists and never censured by any Index Expurgatorius tho yet several Popish Authors who asserted the Power of Kings were so censured and particularly Bodin de Republicâ and he could not be ignorant of Popes having required several Crowned Heads to swear Fidelity to them and their Successors and that particularly the Pope sent Hubertus to require William the Conqueror â—o swear Allegiance and Fidelity to Him and his Successors and who magnanimously refused so to do and that the Papacy endeavoured to root its Power in the World by obliging men in their Oaths of Fidelity to any particular Pope to swear the same likewise to his Successors according to the common Style in those Oaths viz. Fidelis obediens ero Domino Papae c. suis successoribus and that thus too the Oath of all Popish Bishops at their Consecration runs and that the Great Austrian Family had not more carefully secured to it self the Scepters of the Empire by the Constitution of a King of the Romans than the Papacy had made Provision of that King 's being sworn that he would from that time be a Protector and Defender of the Pope and Church of Rome according to those words in the Oath as I find it set down in Magerus viz. Ego N. Rex Romanorum FVTVRVS Imperator promitto spondeo polliceor atque juro Deo leato Petro me de caetero protectorem atque desensorem fore summi Pontisicis sanctae Ecclesiae Romanae c. He had moreover considered the great Fermentation in the minds of so many Loyal People in England by Queen Elizabeth's being so reserved as She was in the business of the Succession and which as Dr. Matthew Hulton Arch-Bishop of York mentioned in a memorable Sermon he preached before her at White-Hall Gave hopes to Foreigners to attempt fresh Invasions and bred fears in many of her Subjects of a new Conquest and who thereupon very loyally said then The only way in Policy left to quell those hopes and asswage those fears were to Establish the Succession and at last intimating as far as he durst saith my Author the nearness of Blood of our present Sovereign he said plainly That the expectations and presages of all Writers went Northward naming without any Circumlocution Scotland There is an Abstract of this Loyal and Learned Sermon and which throughout pointed at the Succession in the History of some of the Bishops of England in the time of Queen Elizabeth printed in the Year 1653 and the fate of the Sermon was such that tho perhaps it tickled not the Ears of that Queen it so far touched her Conscience that the Historian saith She opened the Window of her Closet and gave the Arch-Bishop thanks for it No doubt but Parsons saying in his Book of the Succession That he thought the Affair about it could not be ended without some War did much heighten the Popular Fears of War happening thereupon and 't is most probable the long fear of War in that Fermentation did variously weaken the Kingdom Nor is it a new thought for the long fears of War to be held to bear some proportion to the mischief of War it self in obstructing Trade and Commerce insomuch that several Writers of the Regalia and fiscal matters among the Tractatus Illustrium have told us That Quando timor belli idem operatur quod ipsum bellum remissio sit conductoribus i. e. of the Revenue and hath Entituled them to defalcations We may imagine by the just effects of our late Fermentation what the state of the Body Politick was in that namely like the state of long tormenting anguish in the Body natural upon the pricking of an Artery and importing often more trouble and danger than the cutting of one And by the great triumphant Flame of joy appearing in the Act of Recognition in King Iames's time and which appears in our statute-Statute-Book as I may say lâ—ke a Pyramid of the Fire of Zealous Loyalty and greater and higher than any former Act of that nature we may judge how overjoyed all the Loyal People of England were on his coming to the Crown and as Pliny in his Panegyrick saith of Nerva's adopting Trajan It was impossible it should have pleased all when it was done except it had pleased all before it was done the same might be applied to the Case of King Iames's Succession to the Crown The very Title of the Act speaks the Triumph of the Hereditary Monarchy viz. A Recognition that the Crown of England is lawfully descended to King James his Progeny and Posterity There was an end of all the dreadful inconveniences of the uncertainty of the Succession and of the fears of the People of what was worse than being torn in pieces by wild Hâ—rses I mean the rending their Consciences by contrary Oaths about the Succession as in Harry the 8th's time There was an end of the â—ears from the growing greatness of France and fears of any Foreign Fremuerunt gentes England was restored to it self and Scotland added to it and tho Boccaline like an airy Iâ—genioso in his Politick Touchstone makes England weigh less on the throwing Scotland into the Scales any one will find that in him but grave Romancery who shall consider what with Oracular Wisdom another-guess Statos-man than Boccaline told Harry the 4th I mean D'Ossat in his long Letter to him from Rome Book 7th and Anno 1601. where he saith That the Pope desisted not to hope that his Maiesty might be perswaded by reason of State to endeavour that the Kingdoms of England and Scotland may not be joyned in the Person of one King considering the great mischiefs that the English alone have done to the French more than all other Nations put together c. And indeed that England is at this day preserved not only from the danger of being overbalanced by France but from the loss of its ancient figure of balancing the World must highly be attributed to the Hereditary Monarchy being fixt in the Line of King Iames and to Scotland being thrown into the Scales as was said and if any one shall tell me by the way that the weight of Scotland was prejudicial to Loyalty in
in King Iames's time for making the Oath of Allegiance a Praemuniment in our Consciences against Popular as well as Papal Usurpations I shall here call in Testimonium adversarii I mean the publisher of Cardinal Perron's long Oration made in the Chamber of the 3d Estate or Commonalty of France upon the Oath of Allegiance exhibited in the General Assembly of the three Estates of that Kingdom and in his long Preface to which he calls our Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance detestable but saith That the greater number of the Deputies of the 3d Chamber did frame the form of an Oath which they wished might be ministred in that Kingdom as that which bears the name of ALLEGIANCE in ours whereby the same principal Article is abjured namely That no French King can be deposed for any Cause whatsoever and that the contrary Opinion is Heretical and repugnant to the Doctrine of the Scriptures But this difference is found between the two Oaths that whereas the English one in one of the Clauses seems to exclude not only the Authority of the CHVRCH over Kings but even of the COMMON-WEALTH also yea tho it should be accompanied even with that of the Church that of France shoots only at the abnegation of the Churches Authority The Author however in that Preface and which was Permissâ— superiorum contrary to the Loyal Sentiments of the Majority of that 3d Chamber inserts very impiously and disloyally That Kingly Authority cannot come immediately from God to any man but by Miracle and that all the Kings whom we know do either rule by force of Conquest and in that Case the Authority of the Common-wealth if it be Vsurped may be resumed or by Donation Election Marriage or Succession of Blood in which Cases Kings forfeit by not performing the Conditions under which either they or their first Ancestors did enter whether they were expressed or necessarily implyed But neither that Author nor any other Roman Catholick Writer hath writ with greater Contempt of and Spight against the Power of Kings than some Nominal Protestant Authors have to the scandal of Christianity done and that I may shew how necessary it was that the Oath of Allegiance should be levelled at the outragious Principles of Disloyalty in Protestants as well as Papists I shall conclude my Answer to this Objection with a reference to a Book of some vile Nominal Protestants who having according to the Bishop of Winchester's Expression aforesaid derived Doctrines of Sedition and Rebellion from the Church of Rome 's Writers were I may add grown therein perhaps more learned than their Masters It was printed in 8 o beyond Sea in the Year 1556. and called A short Treatise of Politick Power and of the true Obedience which Subjects owe to Kings and other Civil Governors with an Exhortation to all true English men Compiled by D. I. P. B. R. W. Who the Authors of it were I know not nor the meaning of those initial Letters of Names but do judge it to be in Principles of Sedition and Treason as bad as Doleman of the Succession or Mariana and to have startled King Philip and Queen Mary as much as the Book of Killing no Murder did Cromwel I never in the Course of my viewing Books saw but one of them and the Reader will quickly see why no Library durst in the Reign of those Princes harbor it 'T is there asserted That the Body of every State may redress and correct the Vices of their Governors and ought so to do And the Book endeavours to prove the lawfulness of killing Tyrants by the Law of Nature and prophaneth the Book of God by citing for a desperate use some extraordinary Acts of private Persons there recorded and indeed a loyal man cannot read the Book without horror and especially when he shall consider what were the effects of this detestable Book It helped to provoke the fury of Philip and Mary to flie out into the Arbitrary Proclamation several Months before her death for the declaring of any one a Rebel and being without delay executed by Martial Law with whom that and other Books of that Nature printed beyond Sea should here be found And another effect of the publication of that and those other Books was to irritate the Government against those poor Innocents who were here martyr'd and who sufficiently abhorred such Treasonable Books for this Book was published beyond Sea and probably imported here about two years before her death But for the honour of our English Exiles then I judge that none of them had a hand therein I having observed many Words and Idioms and Phrases there to have been Scotish It is probable that King Iames and his Ministers had heard of this execrable Book wherein some Nominal Protestants trumpetted out their Principles of real Rebellion and no wonder then if the Oath of Allegiance was therefore framed with Clauses to secure the Government from all irreligionary Principles of Protestants as well as Papists It hath been objected in the second place against our being become bound to the Kings Heirs and Successors by Virtue of those Oaths that it is by all Casuists agreed that among the Tacit Conditions that are presumed to be in all Oaths and which are to be regarded as much as if they were express'd Rebus sic stantibus is one and that that therefore as none of the King's Heirs was then excluded from the Privilege or Right of his Lineal Succession by the Legislative Power so if things thus stood with him at the time of the Descent of the Crown that is at the time of the Kings decease the Oath obliged to the payment of absolute and irrespective Loyalty to him then and that thus when the King's Heirs and Successors were Kings and Queens of this Realm according to the Style of some old Oaths they would be Entitled to our Allegiance and not otherwise In Answer to this Objection I shall say first that if we should admit that which is not true that the Rebus sic stantibus were so to be applied in this Case yet it is most clear that the Takers of these Oaths who were any Members of the Three Estates in Parliament were thereby ipso facto and actually bound as I have said in the 7tâ— Conclusion not to do any Act there to exclude the Succession according to proximity of Blood and moreover any of the People who took these Oaths were thereby Morally bound not to choose any to represent them in Parliament from whom they might fear their endeavouring of such Exclusion Secondly Premising that there was somewhat of irreverence in supposing that the Legislative Power would ever afterward make a Solutio contiâ—ui as I called it in the Hereditary Monarchy yet it must be said that any supposed Act of that kind would be Null and Void as the Loyal and Learned late Writers of the Succession have shewed and to whose Writers of that Subject I refer and therefore our Obligations to
him our Sovâ—reign Lord the King IS lawful and rightful King c. and so the word IS must necessarily hinder any Heirs or Successors forestalling the Market if they should presume before their time to come for our actual Allegiance however sworn to them to be paid in future time Our law-Law-Book of Oaths mentions a long Promissory Oath made voluntarily to Harry the 6th by 2 Arch-Bishops 16 Bishops 3 Dukes 5 Earls 2 Viscounts 14 Abbots 2 Priors and 7 Barons and but part of which I shall here set down viz. I A. B. knowledge you most High and Mighty and most Christian Prince King Henry 6. to be my most redoubted and rightwise by Succession born to Reign upon me and all your Liege People whereupon I voluntarily without Coercion promise and oblige me by the faith and truth that I owe to God and by the faith truth and ligeance that I owe to you my most redoubted Sovereign Lord that I shall be without any variance true faithful humble and obeysant Subject and Liege man to you my most redoubted Sovereign Lord c. and swear to endeavour to do all that may be to the weal and surety of your most Royal Person c. to the weal surety and preserving of the Person and benign Princess Margaret Queen my Sovereign Lady and of her High most Noble Estate She being your Wife and also the weal surety and honour of the Person of the right High and Mighty Prince Edward my right redoubted Lord the Prince your first begotten Son and of the Right High and Noble Estate and faithfully truly and obeysantly c. First my Allegiance to you my most redoubted Sovereign Lord during your life c. and if God of his infinite Power take you from this Transitory Life me bearing life in this World that I shall then take and accept my said redoubted Lord the Prince Edward your said first born Son for my Sovereign Lord and bear my true Faith and Ligeance to him as by nature born for my Sovereign Lord and after him to his Succession of his Body lawfully begotten c. and in default of his Succession c. unto any other Succession of your Body lawfully coming But the wisdom of any Nation making Laws and especially about Oaths as short as may be I account that those of Supremacy and Allegiance have much better that Multi-loquious one as I may call it provided for the security of our Allegiance to the King Regnant and afterward to his Heirs and Successors by plain and liquid words as far as Humane Prudence could provide for the same And because what is made by Humane Art is in danger of being by Humane Art eluded and for that we see that Nature it self hath been made a Term of Art a word that St. Paul thought plain enough when he said doth not Nature teach us that c. yet of which word a late Lawyer and Kinsman of the Great Grotius hath in his Book De Principiis juris Naturalis told us of seven significations and for that it is as easie for a captious versatil Wit to turn the word Heir or most words into as many or more the Oath of Allegiance was further with deep precaution made to exterminate all cavilling senses and calumnious interpretations and such as that of the haeres viventis by that Final Clause which Crowns that Oath and that which alone as I partly hinted before amounts to an Oath viz. And I do make this Recognition and Acknowledgment heartily willingly and truly upon THE TRVE FAITH OF A CHRISTIAN and after which it follows So help me God. That the Faith of a Christian alone amounts to an Oath I shall cite the opinion of Tuldenus the Regius Professor of Law at Lovain when writing De interpretatione Iuramenti he saith Affirmatio perfidem tunc demum jusjurandum est cum additum fuit Christianam Alciat in l. 41. c. De transact I conclude therefore that what Christian soever hath taken this Oath hath by Virtue of the words of The faith of a Christian obliged himself thereby as much as if he had said That Great Privilege of Birth-right belonging to the King's Heirs a Privilege so great that the despising of it as in the Case of Esau is applied in Scripture to mens prophaneness in despising their Inheritance of Bliss by Christianity I do as sincerely promise to defend according to my Oath and without any Fraud or Mental Reservation or the least cavilling capricious or calumnious interpretation as I value the great Privilege that Christianity hath ennobled Humane Nature with in being Heirs of God and joynt Heirs with Christ as St. Pauls words are and of being Heirs according to the Promise and may all the Divine Promises be so Yea and Amen to me and interpreted with not only a plain but a full and fair interpretation and so likewise the very Oath of God mentioned in the Epistle to the Hebrews As I do plainly and fully and fairly and with the exuberant honesty and simplicity enjoyn'd by the Christian Religion and so much transcending the Bona fides of the Heathen Morality perform my Promissory Oath of Allegiance to the King and his Heirs and Successors I shall in the last place take notice of what I have not without horror observed namely that some disloyal Authors have presumed in Print to pretend the lawfulness of Exclusion of Heirs and Successors on the account of their Religion by colour of the punishment of Idolaters according to the Iudicial Law and as to which it will be sufficient here to say that that Law was given only to the Iewish Nation and that it did never bind any else or doth and that the Divine Law natural and positive bind us to the Observation of our Oaths and that Christianity doth not found Dominion in Grace and that the Patriarchs and Ioshua and the Princes of the People of Israel made Leagues with Idolaters and on both sides there was mutual Faith confirmed with solemn Oaths and that an Oath Promissory to pay Allegiance to the Heirs of the Crown at the time of its Descent is much more lawful And I might urge that the Iewish Kings tho often idolatrous yet as the Lord 's Annointed had De jure de facto Obedience payed them without respect to their Religion or Irreligion And by Virtue of the Moral Offices of honouring all men and of the Internal Communion due from all Christians to all Christians I shall without offending the Church I hold External Communion with venture to go as far in my Measures of Charity as some of its great Ornaments Dr. Hammond and Bishop Taylor and likewise Bishop Gunning have done in freeing many Roman Catholicks from the guilt of Formal Idolatry Innumerable Acts of Idolatry may be charged on many Persons of that Communion and particularly on all such as do worship the Cross or Saints and Angels Culâ—â— latriae and on such as in the Eucharist determine the
thoughts of their worship to the Consecrated Bread. But I believe there are others who do not intentionally direct their adoration to any Creature in that Sacrament and only to the Person of Christ our Lord and as when Abimelâ—â—h mistook Sara from her Husband being informed by Abraham that She was his Sister God was pleased to acknowledge That he did it in the simplicity of his heart so I shall leave such to their Master and without particular ground charge no particular Person of them with the guilt of Formal Idolatry and should much rather choose to absolve a Church from approving Idolatry than to render the Persons in it liable as Idolaters to be in a Christian State dealt with according to the rigor or as some Calvinsts call it the Equity of the Iewish Law. As we justly remember the Bigottish Cruelty of the Marian days so we must be so just to our selves as not to forget how some Nominal Protestants and such too as were magni nominis did long ago and as they do still accuâ—e the Discipline of the Church of England and its decent Ceremonies with the guilt of Idolatry and how fatal both to our Church and State so false and base and spightful an Accusation hath proved Mr. Hobs in his History of our late Civil Wars attributes somewhat of the success of the disloyal Enemies of our Church to the natural Cause of their fighting with spight We know that not only Mr. H. Iacob in his Exposition of the 2d Commandment printed in the Year 1610. hath thus charged our Church with Idolatry in express words but that Ames himself did so in effect in his Puritanismus Anglicanus that Year printed and as Learned and Pious a Man as he was his Cases of Conscience shewing him tainted with the Tenet of Monk Gratian and Calvin and our Assembly-men about the Iudicial Law for he saith there That that Law tho not appertaining to Christistians Sub ratione legis sperialiter obligantis yet is so sub ratione doctrinae quatenus vel generali suâ naturâ vel proportionis aequitâ—te exhibet sempeâ— nobis optimam juris noturalis determinationem one might easily gueâ—s from such a Principle when believed and practised what quarter the Church of England or any Church accused of Idolatry could expect The truth is that on the Division of the World by some into 30 parts and rendring 19 thereof to be down-right Idolaters and 6 Mahumetans and 5 Christians it may well seem a deplorable absurdity that the Christian Quota should be so much addicted both to call one another Idolaters and to Sacrifice one another as such beyond the superstitious rage of the Heathen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mr. Iacob in his said Exposition calls the Lutherans Idolaters for having Images in their Churches and what may well seem strange is that when Cromwel the Vsurper being inclined to tolerate the Iews and appointing a Meeting of his Ministers of State and his Divines to debate the lawfulness of it at that time Fiennes his Lord-Keeper declared it then unlawful for that the Iews were Idolaters as worshipping God out of Christ and whereby he implied in effect that Adam was an Idolater Thus apt have Enthusiasts been to play with Idolatry but a shameful thing it is to our English understandings not to have a just general apprehension of the aim of some factious Anti-Papists to set up new real Idolatry in the State while they are vexing us with their old Nominal Idolatry in the Church I here refer to all that would outrage the Hereditary Monarchy and I call any Crime of that Nature by the name of Idolatry as our judicious Sanderson hath done in his Learned Lecture De legum humanarum causâ efficiente § 15. where having shewn how Kings are called Gods Psalm 82. 6. Quod ipsius Dei in terris vices gerant idque Deo ipsis Conferente hanc potestatem non populi suffragiis EGO dixi Dii estis he thus goes on to ask very properly Poteritne populus aliquis sine turpis idololatriae crimine sibi Deos constituere cum sit uniuscujusque hominis ei qui ipsius vicem gerat potestatem vicariam suâ authoritate demandare non alieno arbitratu Audebitne quisquam mortalium id Iuris sibi arrâ—gare ut qui Dei in terris Minister Vice-Deus futurus sit omnem illam suam authoritatem potestatem ab ipso sibi collatam agnoscat Let all such then who did AVDERE thus in the Affair of our Hereditary Monarchy and to have the Vice-Deus futurus moulded by their fancies consider how great a Casuist hath loaded them with Idolatry and moreover remember how the inspired Prophet did make Rebellion as the Sin of Witchcraft and contumacy or stubborness as Idolatry I was contented with finding one thing asked by the ingenious Author of the Compendium because I supposed and that then even by Calculation I might resolve the doubt and which I have held my self obliged to do viz. Can it be said that the Monarchy of England hath gotten by the Reformation and what desperate Enemies that hath created us may be easily imagined that nothing but Popery or at least its Principles can make it again emerge or lasting but was sorry and ashamed to find that Authors had cause to cite the disloyal Pamphlet of Pereat Papa as asserting the lawfulness of proceeding against Idolaters as is there mentioned and that he likewise had so much reason to make so great a Remark on the Exclusion in the foregoing Page viz. He who believes he can disinherit a lawful Successor on the account of Religion will hardly find Arguments of force to keep the Prince in being on his Throne whenever this happens to be imputed to him Moreover I was ashamed after the effort of the Idolatry in the Exclusion and of the Mobile's worshipping a Plot-Witness with the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the Non-Conformist Author of the Book called The peaceable Design printed in the year 1675. speaking so tenderly of the Papists then in the words of The Papist in our account is but one sort of Recusants and the conscientious and peaceable among them must be held in the same predicament with those among our selves that likewise refuse to come to Common-Prayer yet reprinting his Book in the year 1680. doth thus alter the former passage and say The Papist is one whose worship to us is Idolatry and we cannot therefore allow them the liberty of publick assembling themselves as others of the Separation When the Non-Conformists had a while after the Declaration of Indulgence idolized both it and the Papists for being supposed to have had some hand in the procuring it and were as soon weary of it as Children of their Images yet it seems that presently after the noise of the Popish Plot the Non-Conformists Censure of Transubstantiation was transubstantiated and their Religion grew to be Idolatry as if the ill actings or shams of either