Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n word_n worship_n zeal_n 39 3 7.7133 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A56632 A commentary upon the fourth Book of Moses, called Numbers by ... Symon, Lord Bishop of Ely. Patrick, Simon, 1626-1707. 1699 (1699) Wing P774; ESTC R2078 399,193 690

There are 24 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Proselyte that sojourned for a time or were settled among them And will offer an offering made by fire of a sweet savour unto the LORD Any of the fore-mentioned Offerings which could be offered as is here directed by none but one that was subject to their Law For though another Proselyte who worshipped the true God but was not Circumcised might bring a Burnt-offering yet they say it was without a Meat-offering and Drink-offering and no Peace-offerings were accepted from him As ye do so he shall do Offer according to the Rules above given which is farther explained in the following Verses Verse 15 Ver. 15. One Ordinance Viz. About Sacrifices Shall be both for you of the Congregation i. e. For you Israelites And also for the Stranger that sojourneth with you Here the LXX translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Proselytes that are added or joyned to you or are juris vestri participes as Mr. Selden expounds it L. II. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 2. p. 147. An Ordinance for ever c. Never to be repealed as long as your Religion lasts As ye are so shall the Stranger be before the LORD in Matters of Religion and Divine Worship though not in all Civil Things For no Proselyte they think could be chosen a Member of the Sanhedrim or great Council at Jerusalem The Jews extend these words to the way and manner of being made Proselytes by Circumcision Baptism and Sprinkling of Blood as the Jews were originally they say initiated into their Religion Selden Lib. I. de Synedriis cap. 3. p. 34. Ver. 16. One Law and one manner shall be for you Verse 16 and for the Stranger that sojourneth with you This general Rule was made to invite and incourage Strangers to become Proselytes to the Jewish Religion and to engage the Jews to be kind to them they being admitted to an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Philo calls it an equal Priviledge with those who were born Jews Yet this the Jews say is to be received with some distinctions For the Laws of Moses either concerning the Duties they owed to God and one to another or concerning Magistracy and Marriages they say those of the first sort belonged to Proselytes as much as to original Jews yet with some temperament as Mr. Selden observes Lib. II. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 4. But in those of the second sort they had not an equal priviledge for they were not to have any sort of Command either Civil or Military and though they might marry with the Jews yet not with the Priests and some Marriages were permitted to them which were forbidden to the Israelites See there p. 167. Ver. 17. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying Verse 17 These Commands were given in all likelyhood at the same time with the foregoing Ver. 18. Speak unto the Children of Israel and say Verse 28 unto them See v. 2. When ye come into the Land whither I bring you See there also only add this That the Jews acknowledge such kind of Offerings as here follow and First-fruits were due by the Law only from the Corn c. that grew in the Land of Canaan but by the Decree of their wise Men they were to bring them out of Syria and out of the Land of Og and Sihon as Maimonides saith in his Treatise called Biccurim cap. 2. Verse 19 Ver. 19. When ye eat i. e. When it is ready to be eaten for they offered it before they ate of it Of the Bread of the Land So Corn is called CIV Psalm 14. and the meaning seems to be that when they made Bread of the new Corn of the Land they should out of the Dough first make a Cake and offer it to the LORD before they baked Bread for their own use Ye shall offer up an Heave-offering unto the LORD This is explained in the next verse of offering a Cake out of the first Dough whether it were of Wheat or Barley or Rye or Oats or that which they call Cusemim which they describe to be a kind of Wheat or Barley different from that which is commonly known by those names For of these five kinds of Grain the Talmudists say this Cake was to be offered and that out of the Gleanings and the Sheaf left in the Field and out of the Corners of the Field Verse 20 Ver. 20. Ye shall offer up a Cake of the first of your Dough for an Heave-offering Not upon the Altar but it was given to the Priests on whom God bestowed all their Heave-offerings XVIII 8. yet they are said to be offered unto the LORD because they were heaved or lifted up to him as the Creator of Heaven and of Earth and then given to his Ministers who had it in his right As ye do the Heave-offering of the Threshing-floor so shall ye heave it That is as the First-fruits of the Harvest were given to the Priests and not offered upon the Altar so should this be given them XXIII Lev. 16 17. And so was the First-fruits of their Oyl and their Wine c. XVIII Numb 12 13. All which the Jews call the great Terumah or Heave-offering Ver. 21. Of the first of your Dough shall ye give unto Verse 21 the LORD an Heave-offering in your Generations This being a new Law not given before he repeats it that they might be the more observant of it As we may see they were by this that it was one of the things which rendred a Woman infamous though not so as to give her the bitter Water if she did not separate this Cake from the first Dough of the new Corn to be presented to God but either made her Husband believe she had done it when she had not or ate it her self as Mr. Selden observes L. III. Vxor Hebr. cap. 17. And therefore at this very day the Jews are so nice in this point that they take enough to make a Cake as soon as the Meal is mingled with Water The proportion is not mentioned in the Law but their wise Men say it was to be the forty fourth part of the whole Dough. See Buxtorf Synagog Jud. cap. 34. The Cabbalists observing that this verse begins with the Letter Mem and ends with Mem conclude after their way that therefore they were to give the fortieth part because Mem is the numeral Letter for forty Ver. 22. And if ye have erred and not observed all Verse 22 these Commandments which the LORD hath spoken unto Moses Which have been now given concerning Sacrifices for to such Commandments these words seem to have respect Maimonides in his Treatise of the Worship of the Planets and the Jews generally saith this concerns Idolatry Ver. 23. Even all that the LORD hath commanded you by the hand of Moses That is all the Commandments in the Book of Leviticus about such Matters Verse 23 of God's Worship and Service From the day that the LORD commanded Moses The word Moses is not in the Hebrew and the
only carry it in the manner there described Verse 21 Ver. 21. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying He was principally concerned in this but Aaron was also joined with him to see the Execution of what is here required v. 1.19 34. Verse 22 Ver. 22. Take also the Sum of the Sons of Gershon c. The eldest Son of Levi III. 17. who though they were employed in lower Services were to account it an Honour to serve about the Tabernacle Verse 23 Ver. 23. All that enter in to perform the Service I do not understand why this should not be translated as v. 2. into the Host For it is the very same Phrase in the Hebrew both here and there only here more emphatical by doubling the word for Host And therefore may very properly be translated in this place that enter in to war the Warfare For the Service of the Gershonites was more burthensome than the former though they were fewer in number ver 36 40. Ver. 24. This is the Service of the Families of the Gershonites Verse 24 Which were only two III 18. 21. To serve and for Burdens To serve when the Tabernacle rested and to carry Burdens when it removed See v. 47. Ver. 25. And they shall bear the Curtains of the Tabernacle Verse 25 The ten fine Curtains which were the inward Hangings of the Tabernacle XXVI Exod. 1 2 c. Which I suppose were taken down as well as carried by the Gershonites because nothing is said here of Aaron or his Sons being employed to make them ready for carriage And the Tabernacle of the Congregation his Covering Not the Boards of the Tabernacle which were the Charge of the Children of Merari v. 31. but the eleven Curtains of Goats-hair which covered the Boards XXVI Exod. 7 8 c. And the Covering of Badgers Skins which is upon it The outward Covering of all which was of Rams Skins dyed Red and Badgers Skins as we translate it XXVI Exod. 14. And the Hanging for the Door of the Tabernacle Which is described in the Conclusion of the same Chapter XXVI Exod. 36. Ver. 26. And the Hangings for the Court XXVII Exod. 9 c. And the Hanging for the Gate of the Door of the Court. See XXVII Exod. 16. Which is by the Tabernacle and the Altar round about The Sense would have been more plain if the Particle al which we translate by had been translated upon or over for the Court encompassed both the Tabernacle and the Altar XL Exod. 6 7 8. And their Cords Which were employed in fastning these Hangings And all the Instruments for their service The brazen Pins I suppose mentioned XXVII Exod. 19. And all that is made for them And whatsoever else belonged to them See III. 26. So shall they serve Or in that shall they serve Verse 27 Ver. 27. At the appointment of Aaron and his Sons shall be all the Service of the Sons of the Gershonites c. In the Hebrew it is at the Mouth of Aaron c. i. e. according to their Order every one of the Gershonites were to apply themselves to such Services as they directed For God had given the Levites to them to be their Ministers and keep their Charge III. 6 7. And ye shall appoint unto them in charge all their Burdens The word here for appoint seems to import that the Priests gave them a Particular as we speak of what they were to do that they might neither forget nor mistake For it is the same word that is used in the beginning of this Book I. 3. for numbring the People and so it is used here v. 34 47 48. Therefore the Vulgar translates these words Et sciant singuli cui debeant operi mancipari and every Man may know what is his proper business Which is the Sense of the LXX also And affords an excellent Instruction to all Men to follow diligently the business of their own Callings not to meddle with other Mens nor to think themselves fit to undertake every thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Aristotle speaks in his Politicks L. III. One work is best performed by one Person Ver. 28. And their charge shall be under the hand of Ithamar the Son of Aaron the Priest That is under Verse 28 the Direction and Conduct of Ithamar For though the Gershonites had a Chief of their own III. 24. yet Ithamar was to inspect both him and them and see they did not neglect their Duty Thus Eleazar was set over the Kohathites v. 16. Ver. 29. As for the Sons of Merari thou shalt number Verse 29 them after their Families c. Which were but two III. 33. as those of Gershon were Ver. 30. Every one that entreth into the Service Verse 30 The words in the Hebrew are the very same with those v. 3. which we translate enter into the Host See there Ver. 31. This is the charge of their Burden c. Verse 31 The most cumbersome things fell to their charge which here follow The Boards of the Tabernacle See XXVI Exod. 15 c. And the Bars thereof See there v. 26 c. And the Pillars thereof See in the same place v. 32. and XXXVI 36. And Sockets thereof These belonged both to the Boards of the Tabernacle XXVI Exod. 19 21 25. and to the Pillars XXVI Exod. 32. XXXVIII 27. Ver. 32. And the Pillars of the Court round about Verse 32 XXVII Exod. 10 11 12. And their Sockets See there And their Pins V. 19. and XXXVIII 20. And their Cords XXXV Exod. 18. XXXIX 40. By name ye shall reckon the Instruments of the charge of their Burden The Priests particularly Ithamar were to give them an Inventory of these things Expressing by name every Pin for instance and to what use and in what place it served Because otherwise such small things might have been lost if they had not taken a special care of them and they might not have been able to set up the Tabernacle again when they rested for want of them Verse 33 Ver. 33. This is the Service of the Families of the Sons of Merari according to all their Service in the Tabernacle of the Congregation In taking down and carrying the Tabernacle Vnder the hand of Ithamar c. Who had the over-sight both of the Gershonites and the Merarites As Eleazar had of the Kohathites v. 16 28. Verse 34 Ver. 34. And Moses and Aaron and the Chief of the Congregation They took to their assistance the very same Men I suppose who were employed in the numbring all the Children of Israel Chap. I. 4. 16 17. Numbred the Sons of the Kohathites c. Having assigned to them their particular Charge they now proceed to number them as God commanded v. 2 3. Verse 35 Ver. 35. Every one that entreth into the Service Or as we translate it v. 3. entreth into the Host Verse 36 Ver. 36. And those that were numbred of them by their Families were Two thousand seven hundred and fifty Of
to keep the Jews from following their Customs but they rather imitated what was practised among the Jews Particularly Bochartus observes out of Philostratus there were Waters in Cappadocia sacred to Jupiter which were very sweet and pleasant to those who were innocent and swore truly but quite contrary to those who were perjured Whose Eyes Hands and Feet were presently seiz'd and infected with Blotches and filthy Ulcers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the very Disease here mentioned if we believe Josephus who saith the Woman's Belly swelled by the Dropsie till at last it burst And Philostratus adds that the whole Body of such People grew Consumptive nor could they stir from those Waters but there they lay deploring their Misery See Bochart L. I. Canaan cap. 28. p. 589 590. Which agrees so perfectly with what the Jews say of this bitter Water that it is most likely this Story of the Cappadocian Water was derived from thence For they say not only the Belly of the Woman swelled and her Thigh rotted but every Member of her Body felt the Effects of this deadly Poyson which spread to the very Hairs of her Head as they tell us in Ratboth quoted by Wagenseil upon the Mischna which saith the same cap. 1. Sotae sect 7. And therefore Huetius justly thinks the Fable of the Stygian Lake and several other Rites of finding out the truth of secret Crimes were invented by the Greeks from this Example Demonst Evang. Propos IV. cap. 11. n. 2. Many Authors have collected several sorts of Trials of this kind and lately Guil. Saldenus in his Otia Theologica Exercit. V. n. 24 25. But above all see Huetius his Quaestiones Alnetunae L. II. cap. 12. n. 22. where he gives a large account how far this Rite of trying Womens Chastity by drinking this Water was spread among the most barbarous Nations And the Woman shall say Amen Amen The word Amen is doubled to express her full consent and her earnest desire that God would deal with her according to her deserving The Mischna will have the first Amen refer to those words The LORD make thee a Curse and the second to the next words and an Oath among thy People So that she prayed God both might come upon her if she were guilty We may as well say that one of these Amens relates to the first part of the Adjuration v. 19. and the other to the second part v. 21. Or as Abarbinel doth that there being a double Curse one that her Belly should swell and another that her Thigh should rot she said a double Amen praying both might befal her if she were guilty And as the Talmudists understand it they were an Imprecation upon her self For so they say in Schevnot Whosoever saith Amen to an Oath or Curse seems to pronounce the Oath or Curse with his own Mouth See Wagenseil upon Mischna Sotae cap. 2. sect 5. Annot. 3. Where he produces a great deal more out of the Scripture it self in confutation of the Opinion of our Learned Fuller who in his Miscellanies affirms That Amen is only an Asseveration but never a Form of Swearing Ver. 23. And the Priest shall write these Curses Verse 23 Several Opinions are related in the Mischna concerning the words that were to be written Which some would have to begin at v. 19. If no Man have lien with thee c. and to continue to this Verse But others think they began at those words v. 21. The LORD make thee a Curse and an Oath c. and that the last words were omitted The Woman shall say Amen Amen Which of these Opinions is the true neither the Gemara nor Maimonides have determined In a Book Every Scroll of Parchment wherein any thing was written the Jews call Sepher a Book In which it hath been commonly said the Name of the Woman was written together with the Curse but there is nothing either in the Scripture or in Antiquity to countenance this And he shall blot them out with the bitter Water Or rather Into the bitter Water That is he was to scrape out the words he had written into the Water and so make the Woman drink it Or as the Jews explain it wash the words he had written with the bitter Water till they were quite blotted out See Wagenseil in Mischna Sotae cap. 3. sect 3. Who observes a great many Curiosities which the Jews have about the Parchment and the Ink upon and with which these Curses were written and that they were not valid if they were written by a Lay-man or by a Priest that was not of Age or if they were written before she was adjured or if he blotted out one word before the rest were written c. See there cap. 2. sect 4. Hottinger forgot himself when he said The Scroll it self was thrown into the Water Thesaur Philolog L. II. cap. 2. for no such thing appears Verse 24 Ver. 24. And he shall cause the Woman to drink c. viz. After he had offered the Jealousie-Offering upon the Altar v. 26. And if she refused to drink the Water into which the Curses were scraped they forced her to it with this preceding Admonition My Daughter if thou art confident of thine Innocence do not fear to drink this Water which will do thee no more hurt than dry Poison laid upon the Flesh of a living Creature c. If hereupon she confessed that she had been poluted the Water was straightway poured out because there was no holiness in it as Maimonides saith For it is called holy v. 17. not because it was sanctified to this use but only because it was taken out of the Laver which was an holy Vessel See Selden L. III. Vxor Hebr. cap. 15. who observes also in the foregoing Chapter that if after a Man had brought his Wife to this Trial he chanced to die before this Adjuration she was freed from taking the Potion but lost her Dowry And the Water that causeth the Curse Or that is loaded with Curses which have been scraped into it Shall enter into her and become bitter Produce those direful Effects before-mentioned if she be guilty Ver. 25. Then the Priest shall take the Jealousie-Offering Verse 25 out of the Woman's hand Into which he had put it before he adjured her v. 18. And shall wave the Offering before the LORD How this Waving was performed hath been shown before upon Leviticus Rasi here expresses it in four words he moved the Oblation to and fro up and down Something like to which Pythagoras seems to intimate in that Symbol of his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Worship turning round Which Plutarch ascribes to Numa in whose Life he says a great many observable things concerning turning round in their Sacred Offices Which was a Rite in use among the Gentiles who when they saluted their Gods standing with their Heads uncovered turned about their Bodies to the Right-hand As Christoph Arnoldus observes out of Suetonius and others in his
but that word as Dr. Lightfoot observes signifies a blast which put the quavering Sound before and after and the plain Note in the midst which is contrary to the Jewish description of it See Temple Service chap. 7. sect 2. Hottinger makes no other distinction between the foregoing Sound v. 3. called Tekiah and this called Teruah but that the former was equal and this was quick and concise Analect Dissert III. p. 152. Then the Camps that lye on the East parts shall go forward viz. If this Alarm was blown only once as appears from Verse 6. then the Hosts that were under the Standard of Judah began to march See Chapt. II. 3. Verse 6 Ver. 6. When ye blow an Alarm the second time c. Having ceased for a while if the Alarm was blown again then those Tribes which were under the Standard of Reuben Chapt. II. v. 10 11 c. began to move who lay on the South-side They shall blow an Alarm for their Journeys That is they shall blow a third and fourth Alarm for the moving of the other two Standards So the LXX rightly explain it in so many words at length Ye shall blow an Alarm the third time and the Camps that lye towards the Sea i. e. on the West-side shall take their Journey and ye shall blow the fourth Alarm and they shall lye towards the North c. In what order the Camp of the Levites moved is related afterwards v. 17 21. Verse 7 Ver. 7. And when the Congregation is to be gathered together you shall blow but you shall not sound an Alarm Here is a manifest distinction between plain blowing and sounding an Alarm which were for different purposes and accordingly to be used v. 3 5. Verse 8 Ver. 8. And the Sons of Aaron the Priests shall blow with the Trumpets None else was permitted to use them either for calling the Assembly together or for their March or at their Feasts because God would have the greater regard paid to the Sound which was made by his Ministers as if he himself called upon them to attend his Summons And they shall be to you for an Ordinance for ever throughout your Generations These Trumpets shall be used by you not only while you stay in the Wilderness but in future Ages as long as you are a Nation Ver. 9. And if you go to war in your Land against Verse 9 the Enemy that oppresseth you c. This is thought to be a third use of the Trumpets when they were going to give Battel to their Enemies Which may be confirmed from XXXI 6. and from 2 Chron. XIII 12. But this doth not exclude another meaning which is that they called the People together to Fast and pray to God before they went out to Battel For it is certain that a Fast was proclaimed by blowing of the Trumpet II Joel 15 c. Which justifies what Maimonides saith in Taanioth cap. 1. that they blow with the Trumpet not only when they were in danger from their Enemies but in all other Distresses by Famine or Pestilence c. For he makes this blowing with the Trumpets in this place to be the same with that Precept L Psal 14. Call upon me in the day of Trouble More Nevoch P. III. cap. 36. The only Objection that I can find against this Exposition which is very ancient is that Moses speaks here of blowing an Alarm with the Trumpets which was not used v. 7. for calling the Assembly together but for the motion of the Camps v. 5. yet one cannot conceive how they should be gathered together to make an Army to sight with their Enemies but by some sort of Sound with the Trumpet See III Judg. 27. VI. 34. and being met it is highly probable they called upon God by Prayer and Fasting for good Success as the latter part of this Verse intimates Besides these silver Trumpets seem to have been used only at the Sanctuary and other Trumpets were used when they went to War For at the Siege of Jericho the Priests blew with Horns not with these silver Trumpets Therefore they may well be thought here to have called them to the Sanctuary to pray to God before they went to War and that by blowing an Alarm whereby they understood the meaning of the Summons And if we may believe the Jews they used when the Temple was built to blow an Alarm every Morning at the opening of the Gates of it particularly at the opening of the East Gate called the Gate of Nicanor as Dr. Lightfoot observes in the place above-named For which though there was no express Command yet it was grounded on this Reason That the Levites who were God's Host as they are often called in this Book IV. 3 c. VIII 24. might be awakened to come and attend their Service in the House of God And ye shall be remembred before the LORD your God He will be merciful to you and grant your Request as the next words explain it And ye shall be saved from your Enemies Which is to be understood with this Condition That they turned to him with unfeigned Repentance which was the proper intention of their Prayer and Fasting Verse 10 Ver. 10. Also in the days of your gladness Here is a fourth use of these Trumpets which were blown when they rejoyced for the good Success suppose of their Arms or any other great Deliverance like that mentioned IX Esther 19. when they feasted upon the Peace-offerings which were then offered And thus it was when Solomon built the Temple 2 Chron. V. 12. VII 6. and at the laying the Foundation of the second Temple after the Captivity III Ezra 10. and at the Dedication of the Walls of Jerusalem XII Nehem 27 35. And in your solemn Days Mentioned in XXIII Levit. which were proclaimed by Sound of Trumpet See there v. 2. and there were great Feasts upon many of them at which the Levites the Poor and the Widows were entertained XVI Deut. 11. VIII Nehem. 10 12. But they were not all Feasts which are there mentioned for one of those Solemn Days was a Fast viz. the great Day of Atonement And therefore the Hebrew word MOED should rather be translated Days of Assemblies as our Mr. Thorndike observes who in his Book concerning the Service of God at Religious Assemblies notes that Moses here distinguishes three sorts of Solemnities First The Days of your Gladness which signifie Solemnities to be celebrated with cheerfulness of heart i. e. Feasts Then The Solemn Days of Assemblies as he translates it containing besides those Assemblies for Humiliation as the Day of Atonement And lastly The beginnings of your Months to which there was a peculiar Service appointed XXVIII 11. And in the beginning of your Months On the New Moons which the Jews observed not like those other Festivities and Days of Assemblies upon which they abstained from all Servile Work but with special Sacrifices which God appointed to be offered to him upon them XXVIII
derived its Original from hence was Seventy two and makes it appear they were only Seventy and with Moses their Head Seventy one sect 8. And it is not unworthy our notice that about the same time as he observes sect 12. that this number of Seventy Judges was here constituted in the Wilderness the great Judicature in Areopagus was constituted among the Greeks viz. in the Reign of Cecrops the first King of Athens after the Ogygian Flood when according to Eusebius the People of Israel were brought out of Egypt The Marmora Arundeliana indeed say this Court was erected in the time of Cranaus but that makes no great difference for he was the Successor of Cecrops We do not find of what number it consisted but it is certain it was the highest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of all the Courts among the Greeks And it is no less observable that as that Court began about the same time with the Constitution of this among the Hebrews so they both ended in the Reign of the Emperor Vespasian as the said Mr. Selden shows in that Book cap. 16. sect 10. And bring them unto the Tabernacle of the Congregation That there they might be as it were consecrated unto God and that the People might know they received their Authority from him That they may stand there with thee As those Men who were to be sharers with him in his Authority and were like to him in Wisdom Piety and Descent So Maimonides glosses upon these words in Hilk Sanhedr cap. 2. where he saith none were made Members of the Sanhedrim but Priests and Levites and such of the Israelites as were descended from the noblest Families and quotes these words to prove it Verse 17 Ver. 17. And I will come down In a visible manner verse 25. And talk with thee there To declare perhaps in their Audience that he appointed them to the Office of being the Assistants of Moses in the Government And I will take of the Spirit which is upon thee and put it upon them He did not take away from Moses any of the Gifts which he had bestowed upon him nor did he diminish them but conferred upon these Men some of the Gifts which are here meant by Spirit viz. of Wisdom and Judgment and Courage with all others that were needful in a Governor This R. Solomon Jarchi illustrates by the comparison of a great Lamp set up in a room at which many others are lighted without the least diminution of its Light See further verse 25. And they shall bear the burden of the People with thee By this it appears it was the Spirit of Government which God intended to give them that they might ease Moses by assisting him with the same Authority that he had to hinder or to appease such Mutinies as now the People were faln into That thou bear it not thy self alone That all the Murmurings of the People might not be only against him but some of their Complaints might be diverted unto others Who might also help him in the judging of such Causes as had hitherto been reserved to him alone For it is plain that these Seventy Persons made an higher Court than any of those constituted by the advice of Jethro Cornelius Bertram indeed fansies that these Rulers of Thousands Hundreds Fifties and Tens not being sufficient for the business committed to them though he likewise conceives they had some of their several Families joyned with them God appointed these Seventy for their assistance to whom they were to bring all Causes which they could not determine before they troubled Moses with them Lib. de Repub. Jud. cap. 6. But our learned Mr. Thorndike in his Rights of the Church chap. 2. hath well observed that those Captains were to be in place only during the Pilgrimage of the Wilderness For when they came to the Land of Promise the Law provided that Judges and Ministers should be ordained in every City XVI Deut. 18. who if there fell any difference about the Law were to repair to the place where God dwelt to the Successors of Moses and these Seventy for Resolution in it XVII Deut. 11 12. For as he judiciously notes in his Review p. 69. sutable to what is here delivered they were assumed to assist Moses in his great Office of judging the hardest Causes and by that Law XVII Deut. 8 c. were afterwards made a standing Court resident at the Place of the Tabernacle to judge the last Result of all Causes concerning the Law and to determine all Matter of Right not determined by the Letter of the same Ver. 18. And say thou unto the People All that he said hitherto concerned Moses himself in answer to his Request Now he tells him what he should Verse 18 say to the People in answer to their Complaint Sanctifie your selves Here the word Sanctifie seems to signifie no more but to prepare and make themselves ready to receive what they desired So the Chaldee expounds it and so the word is translated by us several times in the Book of Jeremiah VI. 4. XII 3. LI. 28. Against to morrow He seems at the same time to gratifie Moses and satisfie them for his setting the Seventy Elders before the LORD and their eating Flesh succeed one another Or else he immediately gathered the Elders and the next day the Quails came for their Food And ye shall eat Flesh for ye have wept in the Ears of the LORD c. You shall have what you long for with such vehemence that it hath made you utter Complaints against the LORD Verse 19 Ver. 19. Ye shall eat not one day As they did about a Year ago XVI Exod. 12 13. Nor two days nor five days c. Not for a short time only Verse 20 Ver. 20. But even a whole Month. So long the Hebrews gather from hence they staid in this part of the Wilderness of Paran Or rather a little longer For they came hither on the twenty third Day of the second Month in the Even on which if we suppose the Fire to have burnt among them v. 1. and that the next Morning which is scarce credible they lusted after Flesh and in a tumultuous manner demanded it of Moses who promised they should have it we must allow a little time for the constituting of the Seventy Elders And suppose it was done on the twenty fifth Day and that the next Day the Quails came as we translate it they were two Days in gathering them From whence if we begin this Month it will appear they stayed here longer than that space Vntil it come out at your Nostrils Till you be glutted with it and vomit it up so violently that it come not only out at your Mouth but at your Nostrils And it be loathsom to you Which was both the Cause and the Effect of Vomiting Because that ye have despised the LORD Forgetting all that he had done for them as if it had been nothing and slighting his Servant
the word may be understood with God's whole Family that is with all the Children of Israel and faithfully discharged the Trust reposed in him by acquainting them with all God's Will and executing all his Commands and doing nothing of himself as now he was fasly accused but only what God required This is a high Testimony to him and the Jews when they are in the humour of exalting Moses say he was more faithful than the Angels of the Ministry They are the words of R. Jose in Siphri and if he had said As faithful as the Angels of the Ministry it might have passed for a good Explication Ver. 8. With him will I speak mouth to mouth Verse 8 In a most familiar manner as one Friend discourses with another So it is explained XXXIII Exod. 11. From whence Abarbinel in his Rosch Amana gathers That Moses his Prophecy differed from others in these four things First That God spake to others by a Mediator that is as he explains it by some Angel but to him by himself without the intervention of any other Secondly That they never prophesied but their Senses were all bound up either in Visions or in Dreams whereas he was as perfectly awake as we are when we discourse one with another Thirdly That after the Vision was over they were often left so weak and feeble that they could scarce stand upon their feet as appears from X Dan. 8 11. but Moses spake with the Divine Majesty without any consternation or alteration his conversation with him being like that of one Friend with another And lastly No Prophet but he could understand the Mind of God when they pleased for he communicated himself to them only when he thought good whereas Moses might at any time resort to God to enquire of him and receive an answer See IX 8. To the same purpose also Maimonides writes in his Book de Fundamentis Legis cap. 7. Even apparently Plainly clearly and distinctly so that there was no difficulty to apprehend his meaning nor need of an Explication Thus he proclaimed his Name to Moses XXXIV Exod. 6 7. And not in dark Speeches Or in Parables and Enigmatical Representations Such as the Ladder which Jacob saw in a Dream the Boiling-pot which was shown to Jeremiah the Wall the Plumb-line and the Basket of Summer-fruits which Amos saw the Beasts which were represented to Daniel the Lamps Mountain Horses and Chariots to Zachariah the Roll of the Book which Ezekiel was to eat By all which the Prophet as Maimonides observes whose Illustrations these are of these words was given to understand some other thing which was intended to be made known to him by these Figures More Nevoch P. II. c. 43. who in his Book concerning the Foundations of the Law further observes that some of these Prophets had both the Parable as he calls it and its Interpretation represented to them others the Parable only without any Exposition and to some was only delivered the Explication And the Similitude of the LORD shall he behold I am apt to think the word not should be here again repeated as it must be in some places to make out the Sense as XXV Prov. 27. which will make the meaning plainly this he shall not behold the LORD in Similitudes and Resemblances as other Prophets did For the Hebrew word Temunah signifies the Shape of a thing represented either to the outward Senses or to the Imagination not the thing it self Therefore it would be to equal Moses with the rest of the Prophets to say he should see the Similitude of the LORD for so did they Amos for instance saith he saw the LORD standing upon the Altar IX 1. that is some Angelical Appearance in a glorious shape And Eliphaz saith That a Spirit passed before him the form or aspect whereof he could not discern only the Temunah we render it an Image was before his Eyes IV Job 15 16. But God did not thus reveal himself to Moses by Images and Similitudes of Things but spake to him himself as it goes before mouth to mouth Which led Maimonides into the opinion which he often repeats that when God is said to speak to any other Man it was by an Angel and that he never spake to any one himself but only to Moses Nor did any Man before him say that God spake to him or that he sent him on a Message unto others but Moses was the first that had this honour More Nevoch P. I. c. 63. and P. II. cap. 39. But if we follow our Translation which should run thus But the Similitude of the LORD shall he behold it relates to that wonderful Apparition of God to him in the Bush III Exod. 6. as Maimonides thinks More Nevochim P. I. cap. 5. where he saith God poured upon him as much as he could contain but especially to that Revelation which God made of himself to him when he told him that he could not see his Face but should behold his back Parts XXXIII Exod. 20 23. Which was a Priviledge granted to none but him And thus the Similitude of the LORD or his Likeness signifies the LORD himself XVII Psal ult When thy Likeness shall awake that is thou thy self appear for me I shall be satisfied Wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my Servant Moses Who is my prime Minister employed by me in the highest Services Ver. 9. And the Anger of the LORD was kindled against them As appeared by what follows And he departed He withdrew his Presence from Verse 9 the Door of the Tabernacle immediately before they could make any answer Which was a token of exceeding great Displeasure as it is in us when we will not so much as hear what Men say for themselves when they have highly and notoriously offended us and we reprove them for it but turn away from them Verse 10 Ver. 10. And the Cloud departed from the Tabernacle It was not merely taken up from it as it was wont to be when they were to remove their Camp but quite disappeared for a time or stood at a great distance from them till Miriam was removed from the Tabernacle and carried out of the Camp For that was one reason of its departure the Divine Majesty not designing to stay where so impure a Creature was And this was also a manifest token of God's high Displeasure against them which moved him to forsake them And behold Miriam became leprous Or was become leprous A proper Punishment for pride and evil speaking Which was not inflicted upon Aaron because he was to judge of Leprosie and was not the first in the Transgression And besides it is likely God would not have one that was but newly made his High-Priest become vile and contemptible White as Snow Which was a mark of an incurable Leprosie when all the Body was over-spread with it IV Exod. 6. 2 Kings V. 27. And Aaron looked upon Miriam As the Priest was bound to do whose Office
or both of them because they were near Jordan which ran into them And by the Coast of Jordan Where the Canaanites were also seated as is evident from XI Deut. 30. For there were both Western and Eastern Canaanites as appears from XI Josh 3. and they are frequently joyned with the Perizzites particularly I Judg. 4. who were a fierce sort of rough People that dwelt in the woody part of the Mountains So that the Intentions of the Men who made this Report was to represent to the People that whether they invaded the Land by the Southern Parts or the Eastern they would find both strongly guarded by a mighty People much superiour to them in force Which account the following verse shows put the People into a Tumult Ver. 30. And Caleb stilled the People It is plain by this that the People understood by their way of speaking Countenances and Gestures that the meaning of these Men who made this Report which was not false in it self was that though the Country indeed was very rich and desirable yet it was impossible for them to drive the Inhabitants out of it Which put them into a mutinous Disposition as Caleb perceived by their Looks and their Muttering and therefore stept forth before it brake out to quiet their Spirits with his Account of the Country and Inhabitants in which Joshua no question joyned with him It is not indeed here mentioned because Caleb perhaps stood next to those who began to make a Commotion and therefore spake first but he was seconded by Joshua we may be sure because we find him mentioned in the next Chapter and in the first place together with Caleb as indeavouring to appease the Tumult And he is not only exempted from the Punishment inflicted upon the People for their Rebellion XIV 30 38. but is expresly said to have followed the LORD fully as well as Caleb XXXII 12. Before Moses The Hebrew Phrase El Moscheh may signifie that he stilled them as they were coming towards Moses in a Seditious manner or quieted them so far as to make them hearken to Moses or as we render it in his Presence when they were ready to fly in his Face One of the Doctors in the Gemara before-mentioned cap. 9. saith That Joshua being about to speak they bitterly reproached him and would not suffer him to proceed And therefore Caleb thought good to give them a great many blandishing words and to call Moses this Son of Amram which lookt like Contempt of him whereby he stilled them and disposed them to listen to him And then he said Is not he the Person that brought us out of Egypt that divided the Red Sea for us to pass through it that gave us Manna from Heaven What if he should bid us make Ladders and climb up into the Skies should we not obey him And said Let us go up at once Or go up immediately without a stop And possess it He speaks as if it were already their own as indeed it was by God's gift and they need only enter and take possession of it For we are able to overcome it There will be no such difficulty as these Men represent in the Conquest of it Ver. 31. But the Men that went up with him The Verse 31 rest of the Company that went to search the Land who if they had not persisted in their Unbelief the People perhaps might have been perfectly appeased by Caleb and Joshua Said We be not able Now they open their Minds more plainly in their Reply to Caleb Whom they oppose directly and declare their Opinion downright that they were not an equal Match for their Enemies To go up against the People To beat them out of the Mountains which they inhabited For they are stronger than we These Men had no confidence in the Promise and Power of God on which Caleb and Joshua relyed but measured all things by Human strength Ver. 32. And they brought up an evil report of the Verse 32 Land which they had searched unto the Children of Israel In the heat of their Opposition they now disparage the Country which they had before praised v. 27. and also stretch their Report of the Inhabitants beyond the Truth Saying The Land through which we have gone to search is a Land that eateth up the Inhabitants thereof Unless we suppose that there was a great Plague at this time in the Country as the Hebrews do who love to excuse their Fore-fathers sins this was a gross lie But take it as they suppose yet this was a very malignant Report For if they saw the People of the Country every where as they passed along carrying their Neighbours to their Graves as the Jews tell the Tale this which they should have ascribed to the Providence of God who sent this Mortality that they might have fewer Enemies to oppose them and that these Spies might pass more freely and less observed they most wickedly ascribe to the badness of the Air which being very unhealthful to the Natives might well be thought would be much more so to Strangers Thus bad Minds as the aforesaid Gemara glosses well enough upon this Story turn that which God intends for their Benefit into their Hurt And if we had any better Authority for this Story the word achal which we translate eat up would well enough agree with it For as Maimonides observes in the first part of his More Nevoch cap. 30. it is used in the Holy Scriptures concerning any kind of Consumption Destruction or Desolation As here in this Book XI 1. XXVI Lev. 38. 2 Sam. II. 26 c. And all the People that we saw in it were Men of great Stature The Hebrew Phrase is Men of Measures 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the LXX translate it Men of larger size than the rest of Mankind Which we have no reason to think was true But having seen the Sons of Anak in one part of the Country they imagined all the rest of the People to be near unto their Stature For this is the Description of that Giant of Gath mentioned 1 Chron. XX. 6. where he is called a Man of Measure and 2 Sam. XXI 20. where he is called in the Plural Number as they are here a Man of Measures 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Man above the common bigness And thus very great Houses are called Houses of Measure XXII Jerem. 24. Ver. 33. And there we saw the Giants Men of Verse 33 greater Bulk and Strength than the biggest of those very great Men see VI Gen. 4. which they spake of in the foregoing words The Sons of Anak They had mentioned this once before v. 28. and now repeat it again because they were struck with such a Terror at the sight of them that they were always at their Tongues end Just as Homer mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Bochartus makes the Comparison Lib. I. Canaan cap. 1. Which came of the Giants Who were descended from a Gigantick Race of Men
killed all this People As one Man On a sudden with one stroke as if they had all but one Life Then the Nations which have heard the fame of thee will speak saying Of which the Nations that have heard the fore-named Report of thy Majesty will make this Construction Verse 16 Ver. 16. Because the LORD was not able to bring this People into the Land Because he whom they called Omnipotent was indeed defective in his Power which at last failed him so that he could not compleat what he had undertaken Which he sware unto them XV Gen. 17 18. XXIV 7. Therefore he hath slain them in the Wilderness Killed them all before they came to the Land he had solemnly promised to them for that was an easier work than to make good his word The sum of this Argument is That it would be a great disparagement to the Divine Majesty if he now destroyed this Nation because his Enemies would conclude he had deluded them with false Promises which he wanted Power to effect Ver. 17. And now I beseech thee let the Power of Verse 17 my LORD be great That is let it appear to be unlimited by bringing them into the Land which he sware to give them v. 16. or by pardoning their Sin which had provoked his high displeasure against them v. 11. For by Power may be meant either that which is properly called by that Name viz. his Omnipotence which can conquer all Opposition Or his Mercy and Clemency in overcoming his Anger and bearing with an ungrateful People Which agrees very well with what follows but both tend to the same meaning that he would not destroy them but bestow the Land of Canaan upon them according to his Intentions According as thou hast spoken saying Which will be suitable to thy blessed Nature which thou didst proclaim to me when thy Glory passed by me XXXI Exod. 22. XXXIV 5 6. Ver. 18. The LORD is long-suffering and of great Verse 18 mercy forgiving iniquity c. In these very words though something more largely God proclaim'd his Name to Moses when he showed him his Glory XXXIV Exod. 6 7. where they are explained And by no means clearing the guilty Even these words according to the Interpretation I have there given of them are a plain Argument to move the Divine Goodness to pardon their Sin But the next words visiting the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children c. seem to be directly contrary to the intention of his Petition till it be considered that they had not now committed Idolatry against which Sin God in these words particularly declares his Severity and that Moses did not now plead for an absolute Pardon without any Punishment at all but only that he would not destroy the whole Nation as one Man and utterly disinherit them as he seemed resolved to do v. 12 15. This Threatning he hoped his gracious Nature would incline him to revoke notwithstanding which he might visit the Sin of the Fathers upon the Children unto the third and fourth Generation That is punish them and their Posterity a long time And so this latter part of the verse is to be interpreted according to what I observed XXXIV Exod. 7. in making desolate he will not make quite desolate though he visit the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children c. Verse 19 Ver. 19. Pardon I beseech thee the Iniquity of this People So far as not to destroy them utterly According to the greatness of thy Mercy Which God himself had proclaimed v. 18. As thou hast forgiven this People from Egypt even until now This looks like an Argument against them for they having provoked him so often as they had done since they came out of Egypt in the space of one Year and a little more See v. 22. and been as often forgiven it might seem more reasonable that he should now punish them and not forgive them any more But he appeals to that long-suffering Goodness which he mentions as the prime Character of the Divine Nature v. 18. which though it had been exercised by them many ways yet he hoped would still bear longer with them Ver. 20. And the LORD said I have pardoned according to thy word Granted thy desire not to destroy them utterly and altogether v. 12 15. Ver. 21. But as truly as I live all the Earth shall be Verse 20 filled with the Glory of the LORD In the Hebrew Verse 21 the words run plainly thus As true as I live and that all the Earth shall be or hath been filled with the Glory of the LORD For so the Egyptians themselves confessed v. 14. that the fame of it was come to them and afterwards he did many more wonderful things when he brought them into Canaan Unto which if these words be taken in the Future Tense he hath respect when he saith As true as that he would in a most glorious manner subdue the Canaanites not one of these murmuring Israelites should come into that good Land Ver. 22. Because all these Men c. The sence Verse 22 would have been clear if we had left out the word because as we might have done the Hebrew Particle ki being sometimes only an expletive or if we had translated it that as it signifies in XXII Gen. 17. and many other places For the meaning plainly is though the words be something intricate That all the Men of whom he is speaking should perish and not one of them come into Canaan Which have seen my Glory Which appeared to them in the Cloud upon Mount Sinai and resided in the Tabernacle And my Miracles which I did in Egypt Mentioned in the IV VII VIIIth and following Chapters of the Book of Exodus And in the Wilderness Where he divided the Red Sea for them to pass through on dry Land and gave them Manna constantly from Heaven with Water out of a Rock which followed them whithersoever they went c. And have tempted me now these ten times That is very oft as this Phrase ten times signifies XXXI Gen. 7 41. IV Nehem. 12. XIX Job 3. But some of the Hebrews will not be satisfied with this Explication but indeavour to find out precisely just ten Provocations of which they were guilty Though to do this they are forced to begin with one which fell out before they came to the Red Sea XIV Exod. 11 12. and all the other Nine they find in the Wilderness See Pirke Avoth cap. 5. and Paulus Fagius his Scholia upon it with Genebrard upon the LXXVIII Psal v. 46. Mr. Mede hath observed that to tempt God in Scripture Language is to provoke him by some presumptuous Fact to anger as it were to try whether he will punish or not or in fewer words to dare God Book I. Discourse 26. p. 153. And the following words in the next verse justifie this Notion in this place And have not hearkned to my Voice This seems particularly to refer to their Disobedience when he
would have been to have given them more than a tenth part but they were to give the Priests as good as they left for themselves For that was the Rule XXVII Lev. 32 33. And it was but reason the Priests should have this honourable provision made for them above the Levites their Vocations being more honourable and their Service more noble in the very Sanctuary it self For which cause this tenth of the Tythe of the Land was assigned them which they being but few in comparison with the Levites made the allowance to every one of them much greater than to any of the Levites And yet as an augmentation to it they had the First-fruits and their Fees as I said before out of the Sacrifices and other things wholly to their own use Even the hallowed part thereof out of it The sacred part was the tenth part which they might not use it being taken by God for his part XXVII Lev. 30. By which all the rest was sanctified to the use of the owner when this part was taken out of it which may possibly be here also intended Ver. 30. Therefore thou shalt say unto them Tell them the reason why this tenth part must be separated from the rest When ye have heaved the best thereof from it Taken Verse 30 out the tenth part as an Offering to the LORD Then it shall be counted to the Levites as the increase of the Threshing-floor and as the increase of the Wine-press Then the remainder may be as freely used by them as the Corn or the Wine of any Man's Land in Israel when he had paid his Tythe But till then it was unlawful for him to enjoy it because God was first to be served This is made more plain in the next verse Ver. 31. And ye shall eat it After the hallowed Verse 31 part was taken out v. 29. all the rest was theirs to be enjoyed as Men do that which is their own In every place This seems to be said to distinguish these from the holy things given by God to the Priests Which being offered at the Altar were to be eaten only in the Holy Place but the Tythes though they were a kind of Offering to the LORD yet not being presented at the Altar might be eaten any where after the tenth part was given to the Priests And your housholds All their Family Servants as well as others might eat of them whether they were clean or no. And more than this they might sell them to Strangers to buy other Necessaries with the Money they yielded or exchange them for other Commodities For it is your reward for your Service in the Tabernacle of the Congregation See v. 21. Ver. 32. And ye shall bear no sin Suffer no punishment By reason of it For eating it with your Housholds When ye have heaved from it the best of it When they had taken out the tenth part as sacred to God's uses v. 28. they might safely use the rest themselves as they pleased For God had given it to them for their support and therefore would not punish them for eating it as he did those that did eat holy Things which did not belong to them Neither shall ye pollute the holy things of the Children of Israel Nor would there be any danger of polluting the holy Things which God had reserved to himself by turning them to a common use as there would have been if they had eaten the Tythes or other Gifts before the tenth part which was God's was taken out of them Lest ye die In the Hebrew it is Nor shall ye die as those did who meddled with the holy Things which God reserved for his Ministers alone CHAP. XIX Chapter XIX Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND the LORD spake unto Moses and unto Aaron saying They were both concerned in what follows Moses to deliver the Command and Aaron to see it executed Verse 2 Ver. 2. This is the Ordinance Or the Constitution Of the Law which the LORD hath commanded Which is now passed into a Law by God's command who had ordered this Water of Purification to be made some time before as appears from VIII 7. But now sets down a Rule for all Posterity to observe in the making of it It is the rather mentioned now after the foregoing History to free the People from that great fear they were in of perishing in their Uncleanness XVII 12 13. by showing them a way how to be purified from the greatest Pollution before they approached to the Tabernacle Speak unto the Children of Israel that they bring thee At the common Charge of the People because it was for their common benefit A red Heifer The Hebrew word Parah which we translate Heifer signifies a young Cow as Par signifies a young Bullock not above two or three years old at most as Kimchi and others observe Without spot This the Jews refer to the word red which goes before and take it to signifie perfectly red without the mixture of any other colour for as to any other Imperfections they are provided against in the next words without blemish Insomuch that Maimonides in his Treatise on this Subject saith That if this Cow had two Hairs black or white it was unfit for this use From whence other Nations particularly the Egyptians derived the custom of sacrificing red Oxen as Plutarch tells us in his Book de Iside Osiride 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. And he saith they searcht them so very narrowly that if they found one hair black or white they counted it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unfit to be sacrificed See Bochartus P. I. Hierozoic Lib. II. cap. 39. where he shows this was the most common colour among that sort of Creatures in some Countries Wherein is no blemish See XXII Lev. 20 21 22. And upon which never came yoke Had never been imployed in ploughing the Ground or any other Work for according to the common sense of all Mankind those Creatures which had been made to serve other uses became unfit to be offered to God Whence Diomedes promises Pallas a Cow of a year old 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which no Man hitherto had brought under the yoke Iliad K. And so doth Nestor Odyss T. and the like Bochartus observes out of Virgil Ovid and others in his Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. II. cap. 33. All this is very plain but why a young Cow rather then a Bullock which is commonly appointed in Sacrifices and why one perfectly red is not so easie to understand If we had any reason to believe that those Superstitions were among the Egyptians in the days of Moses which were when Plutarch or Herodotus lived we might very probably say as some Men of Learning have that this Precept was given to preserve the Israelites from their Religion For they abhorred to offer a Cow whom they honoured as sacred to Isis So Herodotus they sacrificed Males both old and young 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but it is not lawful for them to
XXXIIId Chapter of this Book See v. 41 42. And pitched in Oboth Where it is probable they found Water of the want of which they complained See XX. 2. Ver. 11. And they journeyed from Oboth and pitched Verse 11 in Jie-Abarim Not that Mount Abarim where Moses died XXVII 12. but another place in the Confines of Moab as it here follows See what I have observed XX. 2. In the Wilderness which is before Moab Called the Wilderness of Moab II Deut. 8. Towards the Sun-rising On the East part of it as Jephthah observes a great many Years after this That they came by the East side of the Land of Moab XI Judges 18. Ver. 12. And from thence they removed As they Verse 12 were about to remove from this last place they received a Command from God not to meddle with the Country of Moab II Deut. 9. Which is the reason as Abarbinel observes that Moses here sets down briefly whence and whether they went and where they pitched that it might appear they did not transgress that Command And pitched in the Valley of Zared Or as some translate it in Nachal-Zared which is called Dibon-Gad XXXIII 45. For this place had two Names as the same Author observes and it was just eight and thirty Years since the Spies went up to Survey the Country from Kadesh-barnea till their passing this Brook as we translate it II Deut. 14. But I take Dibon-Gad rather to have been a place which lay upon the Brook Zered Ver. 13. And from thence they removed and pitched Verse 13 on the other side of Arnon The Hebrew word meheber may be translated on this side or on the other side And some think they were now on this side of the River and not yet gone over it Nor did they immediately come hither from their former Station but first to Almon-Diblathaim XXXIII 46. which is also called Beth-Diblathaim in the Wilderness of Moab XLVIII Jerem. 22. and Diblah VI Ezek. 13. And then passing by Ar in the Confines of Moab and approaching to the Country of the Children of Ammon God commanded them not to invade the Ammonites being Descendants from Lot as well as the Moabites II Deut. 18 19 37. but to pass over the River Arnon II Deut. 24. to that side of it which belonged to the Amorites For this River at that time divided the Moabites from the Amorites as it here follows Which is in the Wilderness that cometh out of the Coasts of the Amorites Runs by the Wilderness of Kedemoth unto which the Amorites extended their Dominion II Deut. 26. For Arnon is the Border of Moab between Moab and the Amorites This River flowed from the Mountains of Arabia where it had its rise and fell into the Dead Sea as Josephus saith Lib. IV. Antiq. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bounding the Country of the Moabites and of the Amorites the Country of Moab lying on one side of it and that of the Amorites on the other For though the Moabites formerly possessed the Country on both sides of Arnon as far as Heshbon yet the Amorites had driven them out of that part of it which lay next to them and made the River the Boundary of their two Kingdoms v. 26 27. This Moses recites the more exactly that it might appear the Israelites invaded none of the Moabites Possessions but what was now possessed by the Amorites By which Jephthah defended the Right of the Children of Israel in future times against the Ammonites who pretended this Country belonged to them XI Judges 13 14 15 c. Ver. 14. Wherefore it is said in the Book of the Wars Verse 14 of the LORD A proof of this Moses thought good to alledge out of an Authentick Record in those Countries containing the History of all the Wars that had been in those Parts which are here called the Wars of the LORD because he is the great Governour of the World as Abarbinel interprets it from whom and by whom are all things who putteth down one and setteth up another as the Psalmist speaks at his good pleasure This Book he thinks was written by some of the Wise men of those Naons and so thinks Nachmanides who looking upon this Conquest made by Sihon as a very memorable thing put it down in their Annals which after the way of those Countries were written he thinks in a Poetical manner There are those who are of opinion that this Book was written by Moses himself who left in it directions to Joshua how to proceed in the Wars of the LORD when he conquered Canaan So Dr. Lightfoot conjectures and Bonfrerius doth not much differ from him But I take the former account to be the more probable that Moses justifies what he writes concerning this Conquest out of their own Books which he quotes just as St. Paul in the New Testament doth one of the Greek Poets What he did in the Red Sea These are the words of the Book out of which he quotes a small Fragment And the Marginal Translation of them is most proper Vaheb in Supheh only the word eth is omitted which makes the Sence to be this against Vaheb in Supheh That is he came some such word must be understood against Vaheb a King of the Moabites and overthrew him in Suphah a place in the Frontiers of Moab See I Deut. 1. Others understand by Vaheb the place where Sihon gave the Moabites this blow which he did by falling upon them on a sudden with a terrible Fury So Nachmanides understands these words besuphah he stormed the City and made a furious Assault when they thought not of it For Suphah signifies a Whirlwind or stormy Tempest V Isai 28. And in the Brooks of Arnon The same Nachmanides takes the word veeth which we translate and in to signifie rather and with and these being still the words of the Book before-mentioned the sence is this In the same manner he smote the Brooks or Torrents of Arnon upon which he fell like a Tempest and carried all before him Verse 15 Ver. 15. And at the Streams of the Brook None I think hath given a better account of these words than the same Nachman who by Esched hannechalim which we translate the Streams of the Brooks understands either a Cliff from whence the Torrents flowed as Aschdod and Happisgah III Deut. 17. are the Hills from whence the Springs gushed or the Valley through which the Torrents ran where they made a great broad Water which is here called an Effusion of Torrents as R. Levi ben Gershom interprets the Hebrew words Esched hannechabim That goeth down to the dwelling of Ar. Which extends it self as far as Ar a City of Moab v. 28. R. Levi ben Gersom takes the word Schebet which we translate dwelling to signifie a Place as well as Ar towards which these Torrents bent their Course And lyeth upon the Borders of Moab Which leaneth or belongeth unto Moab being in the Border of that Country Thus far are
the words of the Book of the Wars of the Lord And the meaning of them is That the King of the Amorites took all these Places by a sudden furious Invasion which Moses therefore punctually recites to show that the Country of the Moabites now reached no further than Arnon All the Brooks or Torrents and all the Effusions of Water as far as Arnon i. e. all the Country about them being taken from them by the Amorites in whose possession it now was and perhaps had been a long time And therefore the Israelites took nothing from the Moabites when they conquered this Country as was said before nor from the Ammonites neither part of whose Country the Amorites also had got from them III Deut. 11. and the Israelites took from the Amorites when they conquered Sihon and Og and it fell to the share of the Gadites XIII Josh 25. Ver. 16. And from thence they went to Beer A Verse 16 Place which took its Name from the Pit or Well which was here digged by God's order as the next words tell us That is the Well whereof the LORD spake unto Moses That is saith Abarbinel that Place was remarkable for the Well that God gave us of his own accord without our Petition which he prevented by bidding Moses dig it for us Gather the People together and I will give them Water Which they now again wanted being removed from the River Arnon but did not murmur about it as they had done formerly and therefore God most graciously when he saw their Distress provided it for them Verse 17 Ver. 17. Then Israel sang this Song This extraordinary Kindness of God which prevented their Prayers and gave them Water out of his own good Pleasure alone as Abarbinel speaks transported them with such Joy that it made them express their Thankfulness in this Song Spring up O Well As soon as they saw Moses and the Princes thrust their Staves into the Earth and the Water began to bubble up they said with a loud voice Come up O Well that is let Waters flow abundantly to satisfie us all Sing ye unto it Or as it is in the Margin Answer unto it The manner of the Hebrews was anciently to sing their Songs of Praise alternately as appears from XV Exod. 20. And so one Company having said Spring up O Well which it's likely they repeated often they called to the rest to answer to them which they did I suppose in the following words Verse 18 Ver. 18. The Princes i. e. The LXX Elders and Heads of the Tribes Digged the Well Very easily only turning up the Earth with their Staves The Nobles of the People digged it The other side of the Quire perhaps took up the Song again repeating the Sence of what the former Company had said By the direction of the Law-giver Or Together with the Law-givers who began the Work and whose Example they followed With their Staves With no more labour but only thrusting their Staves into the Ground and turning up the Earth For as R. Levi ben Gersom takes it the Ground here being Sandy and very soft was easily penetrated though they were not likely to find Water in it But they believing Moses and following his direction God sent it copiously unto them and with no more pains than a Scribe takes when he writes with his Pen. For so he translates the Hebrew word Mechokek which we render Law-giver a Scribe or Doctor of the Law And from the Wilderness Mentioned v. 13. They went to Mattanah This and the place following are otherwise named in the XXXIIIth Chapter as the forenamed ben Gersom understands it But others think these were not Stations which alone Moses gives an account of in the XXXIIIth Chapter where the Israelites pitched their Tents but Places through which they passed till they came to the Station from whence they sent to Sihon for leave to pass through his Country Ver. 19. And from Mattanah to Nahahel c. This Verse 19 as well as the place next mentioned in this verse seems to have been on the Borders of Moab Ver. 20. And from Bamoth in the Valley Rather From Bamoth which signifies a very high place to the Valley Or it may be translated from Bamoth a Valley that is there is a Valley in the Field of Moab c. unto which they came next for some such thing must be understood That is in the Country of Moab Or near to it To the top of Pisgah Or To the beginning as the Hebrew word Rosch may be interpreted of the high Mount Pisgah That is they pitched at the foot of it where the Mountain began which Mountain was a part of the Mountains of Abarim as appears from XXXII Deut. 49. XXXIV 1. Which looks towards Jeshimon Or Towards the Wilderness For so R. Levi ben Gersom interprets it to a Land that was shemumah untilled and desolate viz. to the Wilderness of Kedemoth where they pitched and settled their Camp and from thence sent Messengers to Sihon Verse 21 Ver. 21. And Israel sent Messengers to Sihon King of the Amorites These Messengers were sent from the Wilderness of Kedemoth which was in the Skirts of his Country II Deut. 26. or lay just upon it For there was a City of this Name in that Country which was given to Reuben in the Division of the Land XIII Josh 18. Verse 22 Ver. 22. Let me pass through thy Land They do not seem to desire a Passage through the midst of his Country but only the extream Parts of it which would have much shortned their Journey to the Fords of Jordan We will not turn into the Fields or into the Vineyards we will not drink of the Waters of the Well c. This is the very same civil Message which they sent to Edom XX. 17. By whose Example they pressed Sihon to grant them at least as much as the Edomites and Moabites had done See II Deut. 28 29. Verse 23 Ver. 23. And Sihon would not suffer Israel to pass through his Border This shows that they askt only to pass through the Skirts of his Country See II Deut. 30. But Sihon gathered all his People together He not only refused to grant their Request but came in an Hostile manner with all the Forces he could raise to oppose their passage over Arnon And went out against Israel into the Wilderness From whence they sent their friendly Message to him v. 21. which Moses in II Deut. 26. calls Words of Peace And he came to Jahaz A City it is probable belonging to the Moabites whether the Israelites perhaps retreated when Sihon denied them a Passage through his Country For Isaiah plainly mentions Jahaz as a place either in the Country of Moab or near it XV. 4. and Jeremiah also calling it Jahazah XLVIII 21. And fought against Israel Who had orders from God not to decline the Battle as they did with the Edomites and the Moabites and assured them of Victory II Deut. 31.
Rabbah-Ammon i. e. the great City of the Ammonites For so we find in Stephanus de Vrbibus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Bochartus hath truly corrected it in his Preface to his Phaleg which he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For Ar as I said was the old Name of it II Deut. 29. XVI Isa 1. from whence came the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which it retained in later Ages And the Lords of the High-places of Arnon The Masters or Owners as the word Baale may be translated of the High-places c. i. e. those that dwell in the strongest Forts of the Country Or as some fancy the Priests of the Places are here meant or rather their Temple where Baal was worshipped For we find a place in this Country called Bamoth-Baal XIII Josh 17. The High-places of Baal And it is evident this Poet triumphs in this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over their Gods and their Religion as well as over them Verse 29 Ver. 29. Wo unto thee Moab He goes on to foretell the Calamity of the whole Country Thou art undone O People of Chemosh So he calls the Moabites who served as the Chaldee translates it or worshipped Chemosh as their God For so we read he was XLVIII Jerem. 7 13. 1 Kings XI 7. XI Judges 24. which St. Hierom thinks differs from Baal-Peor only in Name See Vossius de Orig. Progr Idolol Lib. II. cap. 8. Some take Chemosh to be Saturn particularly Scharastanius the manner of whose Worship see in Dr. Pocock's excellent Annotations in Specim Hist. Arab. p. 316. I shall only add That as the Moabites are called the People of Chemosh because they worshipped him as their God so the Israelites are called the People of the LORD and the People of God because they worshipped the LORD alone V Judges 11. 2 Sam XIV 13. For in the Days of Paganism as Mr. Mede observes every Country nay every City had their proper and peculiar Gods which were deemed as their Guardians and Protectors From whence the Nations themselves are expressed by the Name of their Gods That is evident from this place but it is not so plain that when God threatens to deliver up Israel to serve other Gods he means giving them up into the Hands of the People of strange Countries which he takes to be intended in IV Deut. 28. XXVIII 64. XVI Jerem. 16 c. See Book IV. p. 977. And so he thinks the words of David may be expounded 1 Sam. XXVI 19. They have driven me out this day from abiding in the Inheritance of the LORD saying Go serve other Gods i. e. banished me into the Country of Idolaters See Book III. p. 823. where this is more largely explained He hath given his Sons that escaped and his Daughters into Captivity unto Sihon King of the Amorites This is a manifest triumph over their god Chemosh who was not able to save his Worshippers whom he calls his Sons and his Daughters i. e. his Children who were under his Protection No he could not so much as preserve those that escaped the fury of the Sword but they were afterward taken Captive to make up part of the Triumph of Sihon King of the Amorites Ver. 30. We have shot at them Heshbon is perished Verse 30 even unto Dibon The Hebrew words vanniram abad Heshbon at h Dibon may as well if not better be translated their Light is perished or taken away from Heshbon unto Dibon So Forsterus in his Lexicon and the Tigurin Version and others That is their Glory is gone from one end of the Country to the other For Heshbon and Dibon were two famous places in this Territory XIII Josh 17. And some think this is the place called Dibon-Gad XXXIII 45. Which was the more noted because there Nebo one of their Gods was worshipped For in XV Isai 2. Dibon is mentioned as one of their High-places and there Nebo is lamented i. e. their God which was there worshipped When Hesychius saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which no doubt is this Dibon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Place where the Moabites had a Temple See Selden de diis Syris Syntagm 2. cap. 12. We have laid them waste even unto Nophah Another place in that Country as appears by the words following Which reacheth unto Medeba That is the Territories of Nophah extended as far as Medeba which was certainly a place in the Country of Moab XV Isai 2. But the word reacheth is not in the Hebrew and the words without it may be thus truly translated and as far as Medeba For so the Hebrew Particle ascher is sometimes used to signifie simply and as VI Eccles 12. ascher mi and who can tell c. So here ascher ad and unto c. And here I think fit to note That it is likely these Verses were some part of the History of those Countries For a Poetical way of writing was in use before Prose as Strabo tells us Lib. I. Geograph p. 18. where he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. All set or artificial Speech whether Historical or Rhetorical was but an imitation of Poetical Compositions the Ancients knowing no other Cadmus and Pherecydes and Hecataeus being the first who brought in this form of writing now in use See Salmasius in Solinum p. 841. and Cuperus in his Apotheosis Homeri p. 55. However this is certain that they who would instruct the People put their Lessons into Verse as Strabo there shows where he says p. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Ancients call Poetry the first Philosophy forming our Lives from tender years teaching good manners governing the passions and actions with pleasure For which cause the Greeks instituted their Children in their Cities by Poety 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not merely for the sake of bare delectation but to form them to sobriety Ver. 31. Thus Israel dwelt in the Land of the Amorites Verse 31 This he mentions again to make it the more observed that this was the Country of the Amorites into which the Children of Israel entred not of the Moabites who had been expelled out of it as was notoriously known there being a Song in every Bodies mouth which continued the memory of it Ver. 32. And Moses sent to spy out Jaazer Another Verse 32 City formerly belonging to Moab but now in the possession of the Amorites Which the Israelites did not take at the first but after they had conquered all the Country before-mentioned they sent some Men to bring them Intelligence which way it was best to attack that City also and the Country about it It was not far from Mount Gilead 2 Sam. XXIV 5 6. 1 Chron. XXVI 31. and both of them were famous for good Pasture and therefore given to the Tribe of Reuben and Gad who had much Cattle XXXII of this Book 1 3 4 35 36. After the ten Tribes were carried Captive from their own Land
to Palestine Though it is very probable the People of both these Countries were descended from Abraham by one of the Sons he had by Keturah XXV Gen. 2. Now shall this Company The Army of Israel encamped in the Plains of Moab v. 1. Lick up all round about us i. e. Devour us and all our Neighbours or our whole Country unless we joyn together to oppose them As the Ox licketh up the Grass of the Field They use this Metaphor to signifie how easily the Israelites would conquer them without a timely resolute and unanimous Opposition and likewise what an Universal Desolation they would make For the words are in the Hebrew the green of the Field i. e. not only the Grass but the Leaves of Trees which Oxen eat as Bochartus observes out of the Scripture as well as other Authors XXVII Isai 20. And to lick up is not lightly to touch with the Tongue but to eat and consume See Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. II. cap. 31. And Balak the Son of Zippor was King of the Moabites at that time He was mentioned before v. 2. but here recorded to have been King of the Country who endeavoured to secure himself by the assistance of his Neighbours and Allies Unto whom he sent this Embassy to advise with them what Course it was best for them to take for their common Safety Ver. 5. He sent Messengers therefore The Result of the Treaty with Midian was That with joynt Consent they should send Ambassadors of each Nation and of the same Quality on the following Message Verse 5 v. 7. And this Counsel it is likely was given by the Midianites for Balak saith nothing of it by his Messengers but it was resolved on when they came there as the most effectual Means for their Security This I think the word therefore imports Vnto Balaam A famous South-sayer or Diviner as he is called in XIII Josh 22. That is one who pretended to foretel Future Things and discover Secrets c. though not by good and allowable Arts but such as were absolutely prohibited to God's People XVIII Deut. 10. He had been formerly a good Man and a true Prophet till loving the wages of Vnrighteousness he apostatised from God and became a Rosem which we translate a Diviner That is saith Aben-Ezra an Astrologer who observing when Men were under a bad Aspect of the Stars pronounced a Curse upon them which sometimes coming to pass gained him a great Reputation But this is not the import of that word as I shall show in its proper place Let it suffice now to observe that the Jews are so much of this Opinion that he had been a better Man than he was now that they take him as St. Hierom observes to be the same Person who in the Book of Job is called Elihu But Origen and some others think he was no Prophet but only one of the Devils Sorcerers of whom he went to Enquire but God was pleased to put the Devil by and give what Answer he thought fit which Balaam himself plainly discerned and therefore calls himself He who heard the words of God c. On which side the Truth lies we shall be able to judge when we come to consider what passed between God and him in the following History The Son of Beor Who was also called Bosor as some gather from 2 Pet. II. 15. though that place may have another Interpretation To Pethor A City in Aram or Mesopotamia XXIII 7. XXIII Deut. 4. This was the ancient Name of the place which in after times the Syrians called Bosor by an easie change of two Letters which is very usual So Grotius understands those words 2 Pet. II. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Balaam not the Son but of the City of Bosor Which is by the River of the Land of the Children of his People i. e. Near to Euphrates which is commonly in these Books called by the Name of the River XV Gen. 18. and many other places This determines Aram which was the Name of several Countries thereabouts to signifie that which is called in Scripture Aram Naharaim that is the Aram which lay between the two famous Rivers of Euphrates and Tygris The former of which was called by way of Eminence the River though the other also was eminent because it was nearest and best known to the Israelites And Ptolemy mentions a City called Pachoria in his time upon this River which some take to be Pethor And it is very probable that Abraham before he came into Canaan lived here about XXIV Gen. 4 10. XXIV Josh 2. And here Jacob also served for his Wife and begat all the Patriarchs except Benjamin whence the Israelites acknowledged their Father to have been a poor Aramite or Syrian as we translate it XXVI Deut. 5. By which means some Relicks of true Religion still remained in this Country though mixed with a great deal of Superstition To call him To invite him to come to them Saying There is a People come out of Egypt Which all the Power of Pharaoh could not hinder They cover the face of the Earth Are exceeding numerous And they abide over against me Lye incamped not far from me and are ready to invade my Country Ver. 6. Come now therefore I pray thee They Verse 6 were to speak in the Name of the King of Moab whose words these are said to be v. 7. there being no King perhaps at this time in Midian but several little Princes who are called Kings XXXI 8. And Curse me this People It seems they had an Opinion in those days which prevailed much in after times That some Men had a power by the help of their Gods to blast not only particular Persons but whole Armies so that they should not be able to effect their Designs This they are said to have done sometimes only by bare words of Imprecation of which there was a Set-form among some People which Aeschines calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the determinate Curse Sometimes they also offered Sacrifices and used certain Rites and Ceremonies with Solemn Charms a famous instance of which we find in the Life of Crassus Where Plutarch tells us That Attejus Tribune of the People made a Fire at the Gate out of which Crassus was to march unto the War against the Parthians into which he threw certain Things to make a Fume and offered Sacrifices to the most angry Gods with horrid Imprecations upon him which he saith according to ancient Tradition had such a power that no Man who was loaded with them could avoid being undone For they are too mighty for me I am not able to deal with them without thy help Peradventure But I hope c. For the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not a Particle of Doubting but of Hoping Non est particula dubitantis sed benè ominantis sperantis as Forsterus observes XXXVII Isai 4. II Zephan 3. I shall prevail that I may smite them and that I may drive
is to whom these Sacrifices were offered I suppose each of them had their several Intentions Balak supplicating Baal by them and Balaam making his Prayer to the LORD though with such Superstitious Ceremonies it is likely as were used by the Worshippers of Baal in one of whose High-places these Sacrifices were offered But it may also be supposed that Balaam telling Balak he could not effect any thing without the LORD the God of Israel perswaded him to joyn with him at present in his Worship that they might prevail with him to withdraw his presence from the Israelites For there is no reason to think that Balaam would go to enquire of the LORD when he had Sacrificed to other Gods And it appears evidently from v. 4. that he pretended to Sacrifice unto God and would not have presumed surely to tell him so if he meant otherwise Verse 3 Ver. 3. And Balaam said unto Balak When he had laid the pieces upon the Altars Stand by the Burnt-offering Attend thy Sacrifice and pray to God to accept it By this it appears that these Sacrifices were of a different Nature from those mentioned in XXII 40. being Burnt-offerings which were wholly consumed And one of them seems to have been offered particularly for Balak which he calls his Burnt-offering as the rest were for the Princes of Moab who it is likely stood by them representing all the People And here it is to be observed that in old time before the Law of Moses was given Burnt-offerings served for all purposes in Divine Worship whether they gave thanks for Blessings or deprecated evil things or prayed for good Thus Noah when he returned Thanks to God for his preservation in the Ark offered Burnt-offerings VIII Gen. 20. And when Job beseeched God to pardon his Sons I. 5. and his Friends XLII 8. he offered Sacrifices of this sort and so did Balak and Balaam here use them to procure Blessings upon Moab and a Curse upon Israel And I will go By my self into some private place to consult with God and to exercise his Inchantments as may be gathered from XXIV 1. whereby he thought he might prevail for such a power as he desired of Cursing the People of Israel Peradventure the LORD will come to meet me He durst not be confident because he had lately opposed his proceeding XXII 31. in a frightful manner And whatsoever he sheweth me Whatsoever he reveals to me either by word or otherwise I will tell thee Deal faithfully with thee and conceal nothing from thee And he went to an High-place Or rather into a Valley for he was now in an High-place when he Sacrificed and did not go into another High-place but down into the Plain as the Hebrew word properly signifies where he might in some solitary Retirement address himself to God and expect his Presence with him So we translate it in the Margin he went solitary Therefore if we retain the other translation it must be understood of some part of the High-place where he might be solitary viz. into the Grove which High-places seldom wanted In these High-places they built their Temples and had their Oracles as we learn from Justin Lib. XXIV cap. 6. where he saith the Temple of Apollo positum est in monte Parnasso c. was seated upon the Mountain Parnassus and from Pausanias who speaking of the Cave of Trophonius in Boeotia saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Oracle is in a Grove upon a Mountain The like might be observed of other Oracles which may countenance this Conjecture that some such pretended Oracle might be in this High-place where Balaam went for direction from God Ver. 4. And God met Balaam Appeared unto Verse 4 him as he had been wont to do in other places XXII 9 20. where the word Elohim is constantly used as it is here and every where else till we come to verse 16. Which strengthens the opinion that the LORD hitherto spake to him only by an Angel And he said unto him i. e. Balaam said unto God when he saw him appear I have prepared seven Altars and have offered upon every Altar a Bullock and a Ram. This shows he sacrificed unto God and not unto Baal and he represents it to God that he might be moved thereby to condescend to his desire For Sacrificing was a form of Supplication as we find in other places particularly 1 Sam. XIII 12. and that which he begged of God was in all likelyhood that he would give him power to Curse Israel Ver. 5. And he put a word into Balaam's mouth Told him what he should say And therefore saith Maimonides he spake by the Spirit of God which he makes account was the second degree of Prophecy Whence that Description Balaam gives of himself he hath said who heard the words of God P. II. More Nevochim c. 45. And said Return unto Balak and thus shalt thou speak He commanded him to speak unto Balak at his return to him as he was instructed and no otherwise The words he bad him speak are those that we read below v. 7 8 c. Verse 6 Ver. 6. And he returned unto him and lo he stood by his Burnt-sacrifice He found him in the very same posture wherein he left him v. 3. Which shows Balaam did not go far nor stay long before he returned and that Balak was earnest in his Supplications He and all the Princes of Moab Who were concerned in the good Success of this Negotiation Verse 7 Ver. 7. And he took up An Hebrew phrase for speaking aloud His Parable Or Prophetical Speech which was sometimes delivered in Parables properly so called that is not in plain Words but in apt Figures and Resemblances concerning which see Maimonides P. II. cap. 43. But here the word Parable signifies as it doth in the Book of Job a weighty Speech expressed in sublime and majestick words XXVII Job 1. XXIX 1. And said Balak the King of Moab hath brought me from Aram. See XXII 5. From the Mountains of the East The Country of Mesopotamia lay Eastward of Moab and in that part of it towards Arabia was stony and mountainous See Bochartus in his Phaleg Lib. II. cap. 6. Saying Come curse me Jacob and come defie Israel Two different Expressions for the same thing only the latter word which we translate defie imports something of fury because he would have had him curse them in such a Prophetick Rage as should have the most direful Effects upon them Ver. 8. How shall I curse him whom God hath not Verse 8 cursed c. As much as if he had said Balak desires of me that which is impossible In the Hierusalem Targum this verse is thus paraphrased How shall I curse the House of Jacob when the WORD of the LORD hath blessed them or how shall I diminish the Family of Israel when the Word of the LORD hath multiplied them Ver. 9. For from the top of the Rocks Upon which Verse 9 he then stood when
to deliver what follows Verse 14 Ver. 14. And now behold I go to my People And now I will obey thee as well as God and be gone to my own Country Come therefore and I will advertise thee c. But before I go permit me to give thee some Advice So the Hebrew word Jaatz constantly signifies to give Counsel And so the Vulgar here translates it but took it for the wicked Advice which we read in the next Chapter was executed after Balaam's departure and of which he was certainly the Author XXXI 16. and therefore thus translates the next words What thy People shall do unto this People But the Hebrew Text and the LXX are directly contrary unto this being as we translate the words What this People shall do to thy People Therefore Onkelos to take in the foregoing sence without altering the latter part of the verse puts in one word and makes the whole run thus I will give thee counsel what to do and will show thee what this People shall do to thy People in the latter days And the Hierusalem Targum more largely and plainly I wll advise thee what thou shalt do to this People make them to sin Otherwise thou shalt not have dominion over them but this People shall domineer over thy People in the latter end of days In the latter days In future Ages This shows the foregoing words do not speak of what Moab should do to Israel by his Advice for that was done as soon as he was gone Ver. 15. And he took up his Parable and said Balaam Verse 15 the Son of Beor hath said c. This was the Preface to his foregoing Prophecy See v. 3. Ver. 16. He hath said who heard the words of God Verse 16 c. This verse also is the same with the fourth only a few words added And knew the knowledge of the most High Which he adds to show his intimate acquaintance with the Supreme LORD of the World For he speaks of God in the very same stile which Moses doth calling him both El and Schaddai and Eljon and Jehovah Which demonstrates that he was not a Stranger to the true God though corrupted with bad Affections and addicted also to foul Superstitions Verse 17 Ver. 17. I shall see him Or I do see him for the Future Tense is often used for the Present that is he saw the Person of whom he was going to speak represented to him in a Vision But not now He saw him not as in being now at present but to come in future times I shall behold him but not nigh The same thing in other words but more plainly telling them they must not expect this Person in their time nor in the next Generation but in remoter Ages There shall come a Star out of Jacob. A Star denotes a great Person and being understood to be spoken of Christ it denotes his Caelestial Original And both Onkelos and Jonathan and the Hierusalem Targum take the Messiah to be here meant and so doth R. Moses Haddarsan and Bereschith Rabbath and a great many Christian Interpreters as Huetius observes in his Demonstr Evang. Propos VII sect 9. particularly Eusebius and Cyril of Alexandria Who in his VIIIth Book against Julian confutes his Exposition of these words which is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That this belongs to David and to his Successors is sufficiently manifest To which St. Cyril replies That if Balaam had spoken of David and the Kings of Israel he would have said There shall arise Stars out of Jacob c. whereas he speaks of one alone 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as very illustrious among the Stars which it is evident can be none but Christ Unto which I shall add the words of a later Writer of the Jewish Nation R. Isaac in his Illumin Fidei set forth not long ago by the learned Wagenseil Where he argues this cannot be understood of David or any other King of Israel because none of them ever reigned over all the Earth i. e. over all the Children of Seth whom none of them destroyed but it is meant he concludes of the MESSIAH who is compared to a Star because of the perennity of his Kingdom and the splendor of his Dominion and his great Acts throughout the World p. 72 and 80. Where he makes this a Prophecy of one Kingdom alone to be in the World viz. that of the Israelites who are called the People of the Saints of the most High VII Dan. 27. Which is true enough if he had understood the right meaning of Israelites who are those not after the Flesh but after the Spirit It is not fit to conclude this without one Observation more that so long ago as the time of the Emperour Adrian this was understood by the generality of the Jews to be a Prophecy of the Messiah For they followed one whose Name was Chocab i. e. a Star to whom the famous R. Akiba a Doctor who they say had Four and twenty thousand Scholars applied these words of Balaam and calling him Barchoceb i. e. the Son of a Star anointed him their King and carried a Sword before him crying Behold the very King Messiah This is reported by the Jews themselves in Tzenach David and several other Books All which I think doth not hinder but that King David may be hereby signified in the first sence though as a Type of the MESSIAH the great Son of David in whom it was compleated And a Scepter shall rise out of Israel This some think may first have a respect to David and then to the MESSIAH the King of Israel But the Chaldee paraphrast refers the whole to Christ whose words are these A King shall arise out of the House of Jacob and the Messiah shall be anointed of the House of Israel Nor is it any wonder that Balaam should prophesie of him so many years before he was born and so plainly that Moses himself doth not speak in plainer terms but it is to be lookt upon as the effect of God's infinite Goodness who would not have those that were not of the Seed of Abraham to be wholly ignorant of what he intended to do for all Mankind And this was necessary to be plainly told them because otherwise they would not have understood it And shall smite the Corners of Moab The latter part of this Prophecy Huetius thinks belongs to David as the former part to Christ. Which was the opinion of Maimonides who divided the Prophecy between them And this was indeed literally fulfilled in David who subdued the Moabites intirely as we read 2 Sam. VIII 8. LX Psal 8. CVIII 9. Some translate these words He shall smite through the Princes of Moab So the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which doth not alter the sence And it is no unusual thing with the Prophets when they intend to speak of something nearer to them to be transported by the Spirit of God to speak of things a great deal more
order the Judges to assemble and call before them such as were suspected and having examined the Fact accordingly proceed against them and punish such as had offended Thus the Samaritan Copy reads it expresly and so Onkelos and the Paraphrast called Vzielides and the Hierusalem Targum and the Arabick Translation of Saadia Gaon and both the Talmudists and Karaites agree in this sence as Mr. Selden shows at large Lib. II. de Synedriis cap. 1. n. 10. And Joh. Coch upon the Gemara of the Sanhedrim cap. 4. sect 4. where he observes that Aben-Ezra and Solomon Jarchi thus interpret it and takes the meaning to be certain that the Heads of the People should divide themselves into several Courts of Judgment and examine who had committed Idolatry and after Conviction cause them to be hang'd For there is great reason to think the Constitution of Judges by Jethro's advice continued all the time they were in the Wilderness who might easily find out the Guilty in their several Divisions Before the LORD i. e. Before the Sanctuary as Men who had forsaken the Worship of their God and by his Sentence were adjudged to die Against the Sun Openly that all the People might see and fear to Sin So both R. Solomon and Aben-Ezra expound it For this was a peculiar mark of the Divine Displeasure against Idolaters and Blasphemers that they should be hanged up and publickly exposed after they had suffered death For none were hang'd alive among the Hebrews but first stoned which was the common Punishment of the fore-named Offenders and then hanged up in the eyes of all as R. Solomon expounds this Phrase against the Sun That the fierce anger of the LORD may be turned from Israel By their Zeal to vindicate the Divine Honour Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses said unto the Judges of Israel Some take these for the LXX Elders mentioned XI 25. Slay ye By hanging them up as some understand it But the Hebrew word imports killing with the Sword which they commanded their Officers to do with the assistance of such as abhorred the wickedness of their Neighbours Every one his Man The LXX Elders being appointed to be coadjutors to Moses in the Government made a division of the People it is most likely into so many districts and each of them having the charge of one all the People therein are called his Men of whom he was to give an account That were joyned unto Baal-Peor Who were so well known that there was no danger of slaying the innocent Verse 6 Ver. 6. And behold This which follows is the more wonderful if the Judges had already begun to execute the foregoing command and argues Zimri to have been very impudently wicked who thought himself so great a Man that no Judge durst meddle with him One of the Children of Israel came and brought unto his Brethren In the Camp of Israel or into the Tent where his own Family dwelt A Midianitish Woman By which it appears that both Nations Moab and Midian were in this Plot against Israel In the sight of Moses A high contempt of his Authority and of God's also whose Servant Moses was And in the sight of all the Congregation of the Children of Israel This seems to be a further aggravation of his Sin that he was not content to go to the Women who invited them v. 2. but brought one of them along with him into the Camp of Israel and this he did before the face of all the People as well as of Moses and that when they were mourning for this Sin as it here follows Who were weeping before the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation This shows that though there were great numbers ingaged in this Defection yet the generality of the People clave unto the LORD and bewailed the Wickedness of their Brethren most earnestly imploring God's Mercy towards them Ver. 7. And when Phineas the Son of Eleazar the Son Verse 7 of Aaron the Priest c. A Man of great Authority being next to the High-Priest whom he succeeded in his Office as he did Joshua if we may believe some Writers in the Government of all Israel He rose up His Spirit as St. Luke speaks of St. Paul was stirred in him and being inspired with an holy Zeal was moved to do what follows From among the Congregation Who were weeping at the Door of the Tabernacle or rather from among the Judges with whom he was assembled being one of them So Jonathan he rose up from the midst of the Sanhedrin For as Bonav Cornel. Bertramus thinks Eleazar after the death of Aaron appointed his Son Phineas to be Prince of the Levites Which he thinks appears not only from his rising up here from the midst of the Judges of Israel but from the Embassy wherein he was employed by Joshua unto the Reubenites c. beyond Jordan XXII Josh 14. and from 1 Chron. IX 20. where he is said to be Ruler over the Korahites Which signifies he thinks such a preheminence as Eleazar himself had over the Levites while his Father Aaron lived De Repub. Jud. c. 15. And indeed the Psalmist saith that Phineas stood up and executed Judgment CVI. 39. Which seems to import that he acted as a Judge but by an extraordinary motion which made him kill the Offenders with his own Hands without a Judicial Process against them And took a Javelin in his hand Or a Sword as Josephus calls it which he snatcht out of the hand of Moses as the tradition is in Pirke Elieser cap. 47. Verse 8 Ver. 8. And he went after the Man of Israel into the Tent. It is an unusual word in the Hebrew which we translate Tent importing a private secret place like a Cave as Kubba or Kobba is thought to signifie which the Arabians call Alcobba From whence comes the word Alcove which signifies as Bochart observes conclave camerati operis quo lectus circumdatur A Room of arched Work which incloses a Bed in it See his Hierozoicon Pars I. p. ult And thrust both of them through the Man of Israel and the Woman This he did saith Philo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the command of Moses But should rather have said by a Divine Instigation which he followed when the rest of the Judges were afraid as some conceive to meddle with so great a Man as Zimri was And upon this Fact the Jews ground that which they call the Judgment of Zeal which authorized them who were full of Zeal to punish such as blasphemed God or prophaned the Temple c. in the presence of ten Men of Israel without a formal Process against them Thus Matthias killed a Jew who sacrificed after the manner of the Greeks 1 Maccab. II. 24. and three hundred others were killed by their Country-men as is related in the Book commonly called the Third Book of Maccabees And upon the pretence of such Zeal St. Stephen was stoned and St. Paul intended to be killed c. as Grotius
so constant was God to his Promise that he preserved his Line in a continued Succession of twelve Persons from Phineas to Azariah who executed the Priest's Office in the Temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem as we read 1 Chron. VI. v. 4. to the 10th From which time to the Captivity of Babylon there were nine more as we read there in the following verses And after the end of the Captivity unto the time of Antiochus Eupator the Jews reckon fifteen more the last of which Onias was killed by Lysias And after him there were eight of the Family of the Asmonaei the last of which Aristobulus was killed by Herod who after that made whom he pleased Because he was jealous for his God God who searches the hearts saw that this motion proceeded not from any private Passion but out of pure Love and fervent Affection to him and from Indignation to see his Divine Majesty so affronted For Zeal is a mixed Affection of Love and Anger And made an Atonement for the Children of Israel Procured a Pardon for all his Brethren 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Philo expresses it by his uncommanded and spontaneous diligence to vindicate God's Honour flowing from his sincere Devotion to God's Service Verse 14 Ver. 14. Now the name of the Israelite that was slain even that was slain with the Midianitish Woman God would have his Name stand upon record partly to make it infamous and partly to do honour to Phineas who durst venture to set upon a Man who had so great an interest in his Tribe as is mentioned in the next words Zimri the Son of Salu a Prince Not the chief of the whole Tribe but of a great Family in that Tribe Of a House among the Simeonites In the Hebrew the words are of a House of a Father For the Tribes were divided into Families and these into Houses every one of which had a Head or Chief See the first Chapter of this Book v. 2. and Zimri was one of those principal Persons though not Prince of all the Simeonites Verse 15 Ver. 15. And the name of the Midianitish Woman that was slain was Cozbi the daughter of Zur This is set down also to show how little Phineas feared the great Men either in Israel or elsewhere For Zur is reckoned afterwards as one of the Kings of Midian XXXI 8. or Princes XIII Josh 21. He was Head over a People and of a chief House in Midian The Hebrew word Vmmoth which we translate People signifies Nations So that if we translate these words exactly they sound thus He was Head of Nations of a House of a Father in Midian that is Chief of divers Families who all sprung from the same Father or Original in that Country Ver. 16. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying Verse 16 Some time after this though not long as appears from XXXI 1 2. but a little before Moses his death Ver. 17. Vex the Midianites Among whom this Verse 17 pernitious Contrivance was hatched For Balak being so incensed against Balaam that he bid him be gone in all haste out of his Country XXIV 11. Balaam would not stay to propound unto him this mischievous Advice which was in his Head but went to the Midianites and there discovered it Which was the same thing he knew as if he had acquainted Balak with it there being a great Friendship between the two Nations XXII 4. It is likely also that the Midianites were the first that advised Balaam should be sent for which made their Guilt the greater but the Moabites did not escape though for Lot's sake perhaps II Deut. 9. their Punishment was deferred till future times as Balaam prophesied XXIV 17. And they were also excluded by a Law made immediately after this from the Society of the Israelites for this very Fact XXIII Deut. 3 4. And smite them With the Sword as we find they did Chapt. XXXI Ver. 18. For they vex you with their wiles Have Verse 18 sorely distressed you by their subtil Devices Wherewith they have beguiled you in the matter of Peor Drawn you in to commit foul Idolatry Here Peor which was a Mountain in Moab where Baal had a Temple as I observed XXIII 28. is used for the Idol it self which was there worshipped being a contraction of Baal-Peor And so it is XXXI 18. XXII Josh 17. And in the matter of Cozbi And into lewd filthiness with Idolatrous Women The Daughter of a Prince of Midian By whose consent no doubt she went upon this wicked design that by her noble Garb and Attendance she might the more powerfully intice the great Men of Israel to Idolatry Their Sister Whom the whole Family were content to prostitute that they might compass the destruction of the Israelites But by Sister may be meant one of the same Country or Nation the same kind of Language being used among them that was among the Jews who called one another Brethren and Sisters being descended from the same stock as Christians did all those that were of their Religion Which was slain in the day of the Plague When so many Thousands fell by the Pestilence For Peor's sake For worshipping Baal-Peor into which they were inveigled by the Women who invited them to a Feast and there by their Charms excited another fleshly Appetite in them which they would not let them satisfie unless they would both eat of their Sacrifices and worship their Idol And perhaps they told them it was not lawful for them to consent to their desire unless they would be of their Religion CHAP. XXVI Chapter XXVI Ver. 1. AND it came to pass after the Plague Mentioned Verse 1 in the foregoing Chapter v. 9 17. Though some fancy it refers unto all the Plagues that had swept away all the former Generation except two Persons It is likely this may be done in the eighth Month of the fortieth Year after they came out of Egypt The LORD spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the Son of Aaron the Priest saying As God had formerly joyned Aaron with Moses I Numb 1 17. II. 1. IV. 1 c. So now Aaron being dead he joyns his Son Eleazar with him to show that he succeeded not only in his Place and Office but also in his Authority Ver. 2. Take the Sum of all the Congregation of the Verse 2 Children of Israel They had been twice numbred before this Once before the building of the Tabernanacle in the first year after they came out of Egypt when they paid every Man half a Shekel towards it XXX Exod. 11 13. XXXVIII 25. And again when they were to be encamped in the second month of the second year I Numb 1 2 c. And now all those Men who had been then numbred thirty eight years ago being dead as appears from v. 64. of this Chapter God commands them to be numbred a third time Partly that he might demonstrate his faithfulness to his word in multiplying them vastly notwithstanding all their
rather to insinuate that he was not guilty of such a Crime as might make Men justly forfeit what they had for their Children as well as for themselves For all the Family of Dathan and Abiram perished and it is taken notice of as a singular Mercy that the Children of Korah did not XXVI 10 11. But died in his own Sin i. e. For his own Sin which God had declared should not affect the Children XIV 31. For to that General Sin in which all the People were engaged these words seem to refer And so it was his own sin not with respect to the rest of the People for they were all alike guilty but with respect to his Children it being a personal Guilt in which they were not concerned The Jews commonly say that Zelophehad was the Man that was stoned for gathering Sticks on the Sabbath-day For which they have no authority but a fancy of R. Aquiba who is sharply reproved for it by another considerable Rabbi who saith it is a rash Judgment for if it were true since the Scripture conceals it he ought not to have revealed it but hath reproached a just Man for any thing that appears See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 1. sect 9. And had no Son As was found when the People were numbred XXVI 33. Ver. 4. Why should the name of our Father be done Verse 4 away from among his Family One Family of the Tribe of Manasseh viz. the Hepherites being in danger to be wholly extinguished R. Judah will have the word Name in this place to signifie as much as hereditary possession and so he thinks it signifies XXV Deut. 6. as Mr. Selden observes out of Pesikta Lib. de Successionibus cap. 14. Because he hath no Son Merely for want of Issue-Male when he hath left many Daughters Give unto us therefore a possession among the Brethren of our Father Let us come in for a share among those that are descended from Manasseh Which if they did the Name of their Father could not be thereby preserved but by the Son of one of these Daughters taking upon him not the Name of his Father that begat him but of his Mother's Grand-father viz. Hepher which was ordered afterwards by a general Law XXV Deut. 6. Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses brought their Cause before the LORD This was too difficult a Cause though there seemed to be a great deal of Reason on their side to be judged by the great Court before-mentioned and therefore it was referred to Moses alone as other weighty Causes used to be See XV. 32. XXV 4. for neither Eleazar nor any other Person before whom it was brought v. 2. are here mentioned as the Judges of this matter And he durst not judge it though the equity appeared very plain without bringing it before the LORD for his direction which he could have upon all important occasions XXV Exod. 22. VII Numb 89. Verse 6 Ver. 6. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying This shows that the Cause was devolved upon Moses alone for the LORD tells him and no other Person how it should be determined Verse 7 Ver. 7. The Daughters of Zelophehad c. The LORD approves of their Claim and gives a Sentence in their favour Thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their Father's Brethren Because the word for them in the Hebrew is of the Masculine Gender some think it signifies they were to be considered as if they had been Sons And thou shalt cause the Inheritance of their Father to pass unto them So that they were to enjoy what would have faln to his share had he been alive ob indutam defuncti patris personam as the Lawyers speak because they stood in the place of their dead Father and represented his Person And accordingly they put in their Claim at the Division of the Land and had their Portion therein according to this Decision XVII Josh 2 3 c. How the Portion was divided among them according to the Hebrew Doctors Mr. Selden shows at large in his Book de Successionibus in bona defunctii cap. 23. Ver. 8. And thou shall speak unto the Children of Israel Verse 8 saying Upon this occasion he passes this special Case into a General Law to be hereafter observed If a Man die and have no Son then ye shall cause his Inheritance to pass unto his Daughter It being a reason as Maimonides observes More Nevochim P. III. cap. 42. that what a Man leaves should come to his Family and to those who are next of Kin to him for the nearer any Person is to us we are inclined by natural affection to have the greater regard to him But all this is to be understood of Land as for Money and moveable Goods which were of his own getting the Father might dispose of them by his Will to whom he pleased Ver. 9. And if he have no Daughter then ye shall give his Inheritance unto his Brethren Unless his Father was alive who undoubtedly the Jews say was Verse 9 the next Heir but not mentioned because it was not necessary Or as some say because it was too sad a thing to speak of a Fathers burying all his Children without Issue See Selden de Success in bona defuncti cap. 12. Where he observes that according to the Rule v. 11. it must come to the Father because he is nearest of kin to it And therefore the Jews interpret this as if Moses had said If he have Daughter he shall give his inheritance to the next of his Kindred to his Father for instance and afterwards ye shall give it to his Brethren i. e. the Children of his Father And the same is to be said of the Grandchildren unto whom the Brethren of a Father dying without issue are heirs For the Grandfather stands in the same relation to a Father that a Father doth to his Son Verse 11 Ver. 11. And if his Father have no Brethren then ye shall give it to his Kinsman that is next of Kin to him of his Family and he shall possess it To his Brothers Children or to those who are descended from them or from his Fathers ' Brethren But no consideration was to be had of his Mother's Kindred as the Jewish Lawyers say who could never be capable of the Inheritance Which they gather not only from these words which determine the Inheritance to his Family i. e. the Family of the Father before-mentioned not to the Family of the Mother but from the frequent mention of the Father of Mischpachoth which we translate Families or rather Kindreds of the Fathers in the Books of Moses Chronicles Ezra and others From whence this solemn Maxim of the Talmudists The Family or Kindred of the Mother is never called by the name of Kindred That is it hath not the effect of a Kindred in Successions to Inheritances Which is the same with that in the ancient Book Siphri Families follow the Fathers as Mr. Selden
observes in the place before-mentioned Who in the next Chapter cap. XIII gives an example drawn up by Maimonides of such a Succession out of the holy Scriptures Amram had two Sons Aaron and Moses as we read VI Exod. 20. If they had both died without Issue Miriam their Sister had inherited And if she had died in like manner the Inheritance of the Family would have reverted to Kohath the Father of Amram Or he being dead to his three Sons the Brethren of Amram viz. Izhar Hebron and Vzziel as the Heirs of Kohath And there would have been no consideration of Primogeniture both because none of them was the First-born and because the Inheritance was not in the Possession of their Father at the time of his Death c. And it shall be unto the Children of Israel a Statute of judgment c. A Law whereby to determine such Matters in future times and to be observed inviolably So that no Father should have power to make any other Settlement but if either by Word or Writing he declared his will to be that his Son should not inherit his Act was null and void As the Jewish Lawyers resolve from these very words a Statute or Decree of Judgment i. e. as I said a Rule whereby to Judge of Succession into Inheritances If therefore a Man made a Will wherein he declared his Daughter or Brethren c. should not inherit in case he had no Son it was void because contrary to this Law See Selden de Successionibus cap. 24. Ver. 12. And the LORD said unto Moses get thee up into this Mountain Abarim Either these words were spoken after all that follows here and in the Verse 12 Book of Deuteronomy or they were repeated again when he had repeated his Laws and inforced them by many excellent Discourses and taught them that famous Song XXXII Deut. where in the conclusion of it v. 49. it is said that very day he bad him go up this Mount Abarim And there we learn also that Abarim was a long Tract of Mountains one of which was called Nebo and the very top of it called Pisgah See XXXIV Deut. 1. And see the Land which I have given to the Children of Israel Take a full view of it as he did from that high neighbouring Mountain III Deut. 17. XXXIV 1 2 3 4. Verse 13 Ver. 13. And when thou hast seen it thou also shalt be gathered unto thy People as Aaron thy Brother was gathered Upon Mount Hor as we read in this Book XX. 23 24. Verse 14 Ver. 14. For ye rebelled against my Commandment in the Desert of Zin c. See Chap. XX. 1 12 24. where all this verse is explained Verse 15 Ver. 15. And Moses spake unto the LORD saying He did not speak those words which follow immediately after God bad him go up Mount Abarim and die but first desired he might be permitted to go over Jordan c. III Deut. 24 25 26. Unless we can think that he made the Prayer there mentioned as soon as the Sentence was passed upon him at the Waters of Meribah which doth not seem so likely Verse 16 Ver. 16. Let the LORD the God of the Spirits of all Flesh c. As soon as he found that God was resolved he should not conduct the People into Canaan he was concerned for nothing but for a fitting Person to take that Charge upon him For he had a most generous publick Spirit wholly intent upon the good of this People The God of the Spirits of all Flesh Who hast not only made the Souls of all Men but knowest their Dispositions See XVI 22. and understandest who are fit for this weighty Employment Set a Man over the Congregation To be chief Ruler and Governour of the People in my place Ver. 17. Which may go out before them and which Verse 17 may come in Before them and which may lead them out and which may bring them in If the latter part of these words be not a mere repetition of the former as is usual then the one relates to their Conduct in War and the other to the management of all their Civil Affairs And both of them seem to be a Metaphor from Shepherds watching over their Flocks That the Congregation of the LORD be not as Sheep which have no Shepherd Having none to govern and take care of them This is a description of the most miserable condition a People can be in and became a Proverb among the Hebrews 1 Kings 22.17 X Zachariah 2. XIII 7. IX Matth. 36. Ver. 18. And the LORD said unto Moses take thee Verse 18 Joshua the Son of Nun. Who had been a long time Servant unto Moses and attended upon his Person XXIV Exod. 13. well known to Moses and perfectly acquainted with his administration A Man in whom is the Spirit Of Courage and Prudence and the fear of God with all other Gifts necessary in an excellent Governour Among which Onkelos reckons the Spirit of Prophecy which is not unlikely And lay thine hand upon him Which was a Ceremony usual in Blessing XLVIII Gen. 14 c. and in setting Men apart and Consecrating them to an Office VIII 10. Upon which followed a more abundant measure of the Spirit as appears from XXXIV Deut. 9. Verse 19 Ver. 19. And set him before Eleazar the Priest and before all the Congregation Being all assembled for this purpose that all might acknowledge him for the designed Successor of Moses and be Witnesses of all that Moses commanded him And give him a charge in their sight He told him before them all what God expected from him and bad him not be afraid to execute it See XXXI Deut. 7 8. Where he sets down the words of this Charge unto which God presently after added one of his own v. 14 15 23. Verse 20 Ver. 20. And thou shalt put some of thy honour upon him Communicate some of thy Authority to him at present and not let him be any longer as thy Minister but as an associate in the Government The word we translate honour being glory in the Hebrew it made Onkelos and other Hebrew Doctors imagine these words have respect to that Splendor which shone in Moses his Face after he came down from the Mount Some of which they suppose was imparted unto Joshua to make him appear more venerable in the Eyes of the People And R. Menachem observes that it is not said impart thy glory but of thy glory to him From whence came that ancient saying the Face of Moses shone like the Sun but Joshua's only like the Moon This might have passed for Truth or at least that hereby was meant some great increase of illustrious Gifts of Mind which procured him such reverence as Moses had if it had been said that God put some of Moses his glory upon him whereas Moses is commanded to do it which makes the first sence most reasonable That all the Congregation of Israel may be obedient
That the People may begin to submit to his Authority and learn to obey his Commands as well as thine Ver. 21. And he shall stand before Eleazar the Priest Verse 21 c. For the incouragement of Joshua to undertake this Charge he assures him he shall never want direction from God what to do when he was in any doubt but in the manner here prescribed most certainly receive it And what is here said concerning him belongs to all their succeeding Governours And it is observed by Maimonides and other Jewish Doctors that the High-Priest stood before the Kings of Israel out of great respect to them but no King is said to stand before the High-Priest but only in this case when he was to consult the holy Oracle That it might appear the Honour was given not to the Priest but unto the Divine Majesty whom he consulted by the Priest Who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Vrim Because the word Thummim is here wanting some understand these words as if he had said the High-Priest shall ask counsel for him by the illumination of the Spirit of God So Conradus Pellicanus But the word Thummim in all likelyhood is here to be understood though not expressed being always joyned with Vrim except in this and one other place where Vrim only is named after a short manner of speaking in XXVIII Exod. XXXIII Deut. II Ezra VII Nehem. For they were inseparable from the Breast-plate of Judgment as it is called XXVIII Exod. 30. See there with which the High-Priest appeared before God when he consulted him in great Affairs concerning the Publick Safety more especially in times of War of which we have many Instances in I Judg. 1. XX. 18. 1 Sam. XIV 18. XXVIII 6. David indeed is said to consult God by the Ephod but it must be observed that the Breast-plate was annexed to it which Abiathar brought along with him when he fled from Saul who commanded the Priests to be slain 1 Sam. XXII 2 9. XXX 8. 2 Sam. V. 19. And it is further to be noted that though David thus frequently consulted God this way being engaged in Wars yet we never read that Solomon asked counsel by it being a peaceable King Grotius also observes that Joshua now and the Kings of Judah afterwards therefore stood before the Priest that they might be near to the Vrim and Thummim which he had upon his Breast without which he could not receive any answer De Imperii Sum. Potest c. cap. 6. Before the LORD The High-Priest never inquired by Vrim and Thummim but standing before the LORD that is before the Ark where the SCHECHINAH was At his word shall they go out and at his word shall they come in That is saith Grotius in the place fore-named at the Word of the LORD by the Judgment of Vrim which goes just before Others at the word of the Priest which comes to the same And this the Hebrew Doctors understand concerning the People of Israel making War which is wont to be meant in Scripture by the words going out and coming in And they distinguish between the War that was made by the Divine Commandment against the VII Nations of Canaan and against Amalek and that which was voluntary against any of their Neighbours or others as there should be reason In the former case they think there was no need to ask whether they should make War or no because it was commanded and Joshua and the Kings afterward did it when they pleased But in the other they were not to make War without this Divine Order See Selden Lib. III. de Synedr cap. 12. n. 4. But it is plain from I Judg. 1. that they consulted the LORD also in the first sort of War with the People of Canaan how to manage it to the best Advantage Both he and all the Children of Israel with him even all the Congregation By the first word he the Jews understand Joshua and all the succeeding Princes of Israel who were bound to advise with God by Vrim and Thummim before they made War And by the next words all the Children of Israel with him they understand the Priest that was particularly anointed to go with the People to War XX Deut. 2. And by the last words the whole Congregation they understand the LXX Elders or the great Sanhedrim So Maimonides Abarbinel and a great many others expound these words as Mr. Selden shows in the same place from which they have framed this general Maxim That no private Man might consult this Oracle but the King and the Head of the great Sanhedrim and he that was appointed by all the People in their name And that Col haedah all the Congregation signifies frequently the great Assembly of the Elders and Judges See also Bertram de Repub. Jud. p. 72. Here the Jews start a difficulty as they account it why we never read in the whole Book of Joshua that he consulted the LORD after this manner but as soon as ever he was dead they did I Judg. 1. From whence Abarbinel concludes that Joshua was bound to do this only at the first entrance upon his Office that all Israel might know he was Moses his Successor and that God was with him but that afterward the Spirit of Prophecy rested upon him and conducted him without this Oracle But if nothing was done that is not recorded in the Scripture he might as well have said that Joshua never consulted the Oracle at all for we do not read he did though he be here so ordered R. Levi ben Gersom therefore seems to me to speak more reasonably when he says that those words in the beginning of the Book of Judges do not import that they did not consult God by Vrim in the Life of Joshua but only that after his Death the Children of Israel would not adventure to proceed in the War of Canaan without the same direction And there is something else which they might have observed from this verse with great reason which is how much inferiour Joshua was to Moses though he succeeded him in the Conduct of the People For Moses never made use of the Vrim and Thummim to consult God by the High-Priest but went directly and immediately to God himself whereas Joshua was not admitted to such Familiarity nor had he such frequent Revelations from God as Moses had Yet sometimes God vouchsafed him the honour to speak to him as we find in the beginning of Joshua III. 7. IV. 1 15 c. And there was a most illustrious appearance of God to him before Jericho V. 13 c. Ver. 22. And Moses did as the LORD commandded him and he took Joshua and set him before Eleazar and before all the Congregation According as he was ordered v. 18 19. In this we see the great Verse 22 Integrity the sincere Humility and Self-denial of Moses that he readily submitted to have the Government of Israel translated from his own Family and Tribe
as long as they lived yet they found this temperament that if one who had been High-Priest but removed from his Office was alive when the slaughter was committed after his death both he that killed the High-Priest or any other unawares and the High-Priest himself who had done the same were set free from the City of Refuge See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 9. sect 6. and Lib. III. cap. 8. sect 3. There may seem to be some inequality in this Law because as some High-Priests lived long and others but a short time so some Man-slayers fled to the City at the beginning of their Priesthood and others just before their death But it must be considered that this could not be better ordered than to make the Man-slayer's Liberty depend upon the death of the High-Priest whensoever it fell out that an higher value might be set upon him and that it might represent our Deliverance only by the Death of the Son of God of which many great Men look upon this as a Type or Shadow though it must be confessed there is not the least signification of this in the N. Testament And since the great Expiation which the High-Priest made every year on the Day of Atonement did not procure such Men their Liberty I cannot look upon it as the effect of the High-Priest's Death but only as that which followed upon it by vertue of this Law For the High-Priest having a great power every where and particularly in these Cities of the Priests and Levites over whom he was the chief it is possible the Man-slayer might be confined here by some peculiar Act of his Authority which expiring together with himself he was released Ver. 26. But if the slayer shall at any time During Verse 26 the Life of the High-Priest Come without the border of the City of Refuge whither he was fled If he went beyond the Bounds of the Fields in which he had liberty to walk and might not be touched For if a Tree was planted as the Misna resolves in Maccoth within the Borders of the Fields of the City though the Boughs stretched themselves beyond the Borders yet the Man-slayer was safe under the Tree In like manner when Churches became places of Refuge the Civil Law allowed the priviledge to extend to the Church-gate and the Council of Toledo to thirty Paces from the Church which Pope Nicholas enlarged to forty Thus among the Heathen the Bounds of the Refuge at the Temple of Diana at Ephesus was sometimes more and sometimes less as Ritterhusius observes in his Book before-named where he shows how far it was extended by Alexander and afterwards farther by others And Tacitus Lib. III. Annalium mentions a Temple of hers to which was granted by several Emperours duobus millibus passuum eandem sanctitatem the same Sanctity for two Miles round about it Verse 27 Ver. 27. And the avenger of blood find him without the borders of the City of his Refuge and the avenger of blood kill the slayer he shall not be guilty of death The Court of Judgment were not to put him to death though perhaps he was obnoxious to the Judgment of God because he had killed an innocent Person But he was free from the Punishment of the Law that Men-slayers might be the more careful to keep within their Bounds which was a profitable restraint upon them for the Publick Good All Men seeing how much God hated Murder by the confinement of him who had slain a Man unawares to a kind of Imprisonment But it may be said on the other side that he who killed a Man-slayer in this case was perfectly guiltless because he did not herein act as a Private Person but executed a Sentence against him who was condemned by Publick Authority Which gave no protection to the Man-slayer but within the Borders of his City of Refuge leaving him to the Avenger of Blood if he came out of those Bounds till the death of the High-Priest After which if the Avenger of Blood killed him no doubt he was to be punished as a Murderer Verse 28 Ver. 28. Because he should have remained in the City of his Refuge until the death of the High-Priest These words give the reason why the Avenger of Blood was not to be punished in this case because the Man-slayer was guilty of breaking another Law and so in some sort accessory to his own death for he might have been safe if he had pleased But after the death of the High-Priest the slayer shall return to the Land of his possession Where he was not only to remain safe but to be restored to all his Honours if he had any before he fled to the City of Refuge Ver. 29. So these things shall be for a Statute of Judgment Verse 29 unto you A Rule whereby to judge between Man-slayers and Murderers Throughout all Generations The like Clauses are usual in the ancient Civil Law Hoc perpetua lege sancimus Hoc generali in perpetuum valitura lege decernimus c. In all your dwellings This the Jews interpret as an obligation upon them to have Courts of Judgment wheresoever they dwell Thus R. Solomon upon these very words They teach us saith he the use of Courts of Judgment which ought to be even out of the Land all the time that they were used in the Land So the ancient Book Siphri and many others mentioned by our most Learned Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 5. n. 1. Ver. 30. Whoso killeth any person the murderer shall Verse 30 be put to death by the mouth of Witnesses This direction for their proceedings in this Case was to be the Rule in all others of like nature by examining Witnesses who were to be competent Upon which account ten sorts of Persons were uncapable to be Witnesses according to the Hebrew Doctors viz. Women Servants Minors Fools the Deaf and Dumb the Blind Impious and audacious People near Relations and those that had been convicted of bearing false witness and they endeavour after their manner to find Reasons against all these in the Law it self See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 13. n. 11. But one witness shall not testifie against any person to Verse 12 cause him to die This was such an established Rule in the Civil Law that it saith ubi numerus testium non adjicitur sufficiunt duo where the number of Witnesses is not mentioned two suffices Pluralis enim locutio duorum numero contenta est For where Witnesses in the Plural Number are spoken of two are enough to answer the intention of the Law Which number therefore are frequently mentioned expresly in Scripture as necessary in all Cases XVII Deut. 6. particularly in this of Murder XIX 15. Yet where there was but one Witness or not two who both together saw the Man killed so that he who was accused of the Murder could not be put to death he was thrown into a very strait Prison and there
two preceding verses I shall not here examine It is sufficient to note that Onkelos hath expressed the Hebrew Text word for word and the LXX do not depart from the sence of it Verse 10 Ver. 10. Even as the LORD commanded Moses so did the Daughters of Zelophehad Accordingly they followed this direction when they came into the Land of Canaan and had received their Portion there Now there being no such words added here as there are in other Cases this shall be unto the Children of Israel a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. much less a Statute of Judgment throughout your Generations XXXV 29. it led I conjecture the Talmudick Doctors into the fore-mentioned Opinion that this Law concerned only the present Generation Ver. 11. For Mahlah Tizzah and Hoglah and Verse 11 Milkah and Noah the Daughters of Zelophehad Thus they are called both in XXVI 33. XXVII 1. though they are not there mentioned in the same order for Tirzah is there named last who here is named in the second place Perhaps they are set down here in the order wherein they were disposed in Marriage and Tirzah who was the younger was married in the second place Were married unto their Fathers Brothers Sons For Hepher no doubt had other Sons besides Zelophehad who had Issue-male though Zelophehad had not What their Names were or how many of them we do not know but some suppose them to have been six one of which died in the Wilderness without Issue See Selden de Successionibus cap. 23. where he discourses at large of the Portion which fell to them in the Land of Canaan Ver. 12. And they were married into the Families Verse 12 c. In the Margin more exactly out of the Hebrew to some that were of the Families i. e. to one of the Families of Manasseh from whom several Families descended XXVI 29 c. And their Inheritance remained in the Tribe of the Family of their Father The word for Tribe signifies sometimes merely a Family in a Tribe And so the LXX as Grotius observes in the place before-named in this very business uses sometimes the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former of which signifies a part of a whole Tribe And thus Josephus also uses the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie a Family Mr. Selden hath the same Observation in his Book de Successionibus cap. 18. that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and then it signifies not a Tribe but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 familiam cognationem seu genus sanguine proximum a Family a Kindred or those that are next in Blood But there is no need of these Observations if the words be translated as they may rightly and their Inheritance remained in the Tribe and the Family of their Father See v. 6. Verse 13 Ver. 13. These are the Commandments and the Judgments which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses to the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho He began to deliver the Precepts here intended at the XXVIth Chapter See v. 3. and continues them to this place By Commandments seem to be meant the Precepts about the Worship of God Chapt. XXVIII XXIX XXX and by Judgments the Civil Laws about dividing their Inheritances and regulating their Descent to their Posterity and establishing Cities of Refuge for Man-slayers which are expresly called a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. XXXV 29. Some other things are interspersed as God's Commandment to number the People which was in order to the assigning them their Inheritances proportionable to their Families to execute Judgment on the Midianites and to set down in Writing their Travels in the Wilderness of which I have given an account in their proper places FINIS By reason of the Distance of the Author these ERRATA have hapned which the Reader is desired to Correct Page 5. Line 7. read are reckoned Page 73. Line 29. r. See Levit. II. 15. Page 74. Line 22. r. were signs Page 82. Line 12. r. Rabboth Page 96. Line 4. r. aquatiles Line ult r. so that they might not Page 107. Line 13. r. other shoulder Page 110. Line 2. r. Chaskuni Page 123. Line 31. r. XL. Exod. Page 140. Line 30. r. may teach Page 152. Line 5. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 158. Line 31. r. Acropolis Page 163. Line 10. r. Choten Page 166. Line 31. r. the following story Page 167. Line 3. r. Rise up Page 171. Line 22. r. it is likely Page 190. Line 12. r. Setting forth the Praises Line 20. r. such credit Page 191. Line penult r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 195. Line 21. r. whose Presence Page 198. Line 1. r. kadim Page 201. Line 11. r. but besides that there is Line 12. r. and it is Page 210. Line 28. r. as were never bred Page 216. Line 18. r. not deigning to stay Page 221. Line 21. after July begin a new line Page 227. Line 2. r. Torquatus Page 228. Line 3 4. r. a stony place Page 241. Line 1. dele and that Page 251. Line 7. r. Bitter Line 31. r. Spirit with him Page 282. Line 1. r. The Man shall be Page 284. Line 31. r. And the Garment the Jews say in the Selvedge c. Page 284. Line 33. r. Talith Page 316. Line 19. r. it being broke out Page 332. Line 3. r. where as Page 333. Line 21. r. within the veil Page 335. Line 11. r. Zeback Page 358. Line 7. r. more fit to treat Page 367. Line 7. r. as we may call it Page 387. Line 26. r. Successors of Esau Page 402. Line 19. r. by way of apposition Page 404. Line 24. r. the words are Page 406. Line 30. r. Bootius Page 420. Line 6. r. from Arnon Page 426. Line 1. r. whence Hesychius Line 22. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 433. Line 18. r. Kosem Page 446. Line 9. r. proffer'd him Page 468. Line 9. r. per juga Page 469. Line 7. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 470. Line 15. r. Sepher Cosri Page 482. Line 2. r. Dei nutu Page 501. Line 4. r. Baal-Peor Line 26. r. were called Baalim Page 519. Line 30. r. are reckoned Page 523. Line 14. r. Zelophehad Page 532. Line penult r. who was born Page 539. Line 21. r. being but reason Page 555. Line ult r. pouring out upon Page 556. Line 4. r. Heliogabalus Page 564. Line 18. r. and so doth Page 598. Line 19. r. and what I have Page 618. Line 22. r. Jogbehah Page 634. Line 22. r. to have been places Page 635. Line 9. r. anciently called Abel-shittim Page 673. Line 14. r. XXXI XXXII 2. Books written by Symon Patrick D. D. now Lord Bishop of Ely and Printed for Richard Chiswell THe Parable of the Pilgrim written to a Friend The Sixth Edit 4 to 1681. Mensa Mystica Or a Discourse concerning the Sacrament of the Lords Supper In which
over the Ark of the Testimony IX 15. not in the Door of the Tabernacle for there Korah and his Company stood See XVI Exod. 10. And the end of the LORD 's appearing was to to give Sentence in this case and to declare by a visible Token whom he accepted as his Priests Thus the Glory of the LORD appeared the first time that Aaron and his Sons offered Sacrifice IX Lev. 6 23. Ver. 20. And the LORD spake unto Moses and Verse 20 Aaron saying A little before they put Fire in their Censers Ver. 21. Separate your selves from this Congregation Verse 21 Viz. From Korah and his Company and the People they brought along with them who seemed to favour them v. 19. That I may consume them in a moment As he did Korah and his Companions Ver. 22. And they fell on their faces To pray to Verse 22 God as they had done before v. 4. O God The most mighty The God of the Spirits of all Flesh Who hast created the Souls of all Mankind so Flesh often signifies all Men VI Gen. 13. and therefore searchest into their most secret Thoughts and Inclinations So these words signifie XXVII 16. Shall one Man sin Korah who was the chief Incendiary and Contriver of this Sedition And wilt thou be wroth with all the Congregation Many of which he thought might through weakness be seduced into this Faction having no Malice at all in their hearts Which God knew perfectly and therefore he begs of him that he would make a distinction between such as these and the Men that misled them Verse 23 Ver. 23. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying He bad him rise up having granted his Petition Verse 24 Ver. 24. Speak unto the Congregation Whom Korah had gathered together and brought along with him to the Door of the Tabernacle v. 19. Get ye up from about the Tabernacle of Korah Dathan and Abiram Which it seems was not far off or wheresoever it was there a great number of People was gathered together to see what would be the Conclusion of this Contest The word Tabernacle is in the Singular Number but includes all the Tents belonging to these Men as appears from v. 26. Or perhaps they had set up one great Tabernacle for the word here is Mischean which may be thought to signifie more than Ohel a Tent v. 26. unto which abundance of People resorted as the place that Korah and the rest had appointed for the general Rendevouz as we now speak of all their Party For here Dathan and Abiram it is evident v. 27. were with him but there is no mention at all of On which makes it probable he had forsaken them as Moses wisht all the People to do on which Condition God promised to pardon them Ver. 25. And Moses rose up and went unto Dathan and Verse 25 Abiram To try I suppose if he could reduce them to their Obedience and prevent their ruine He seems to have had no hopes of Korah but lookt upon him as incorrigible And the Elders of Israel followed him Either the LXX Elders who were lately chosen out of the rest XI 16. or the whole Body of those who were called by that Name and were Men of Authority attended upon him to make this Action more solemn and to let Dathan and Abiram see how much Moses was reverenced by better Men than themselves who refused to come to him v. 12 14. Ver. 20. And spake unto the Congregation saying Verse 26 It seems Dathan and Abiram refused to hear him as they did to come to him for here is no mention of any thing he spake to them but only to the Congregation who were gathered about their Tents Depart I pray you from the Tents of these wicked Men. I suppose now they were gone to their own Tents where their Families were from which he beseeches the People to remove with all speed And he doth not mean merely that they should remove their Persons from them but their Tents and their Goods and Cattle And touch nothing of theirs Because all belonging unto them was under an Anathema which God had passed upon them That is was devoted to destruction and therefore not to be touched XIII Deut. 17. Lest ye be consumed in all their sins Destroyed with them who had sinned so grievously as to fall under the Curse before-mentioned Verse 27 Ver. 27. So they gat up from the Tabernacle of Korah Dathan and Abiram Where the greatest number of People were gathered together as I observed v. 24. For here is the same word Mischean again in the Singular Number denoting some spacious Habitation where perhaps they held their Consultations and unto which there was the greatest resort On every side From which we may conclude that the People had come from all quarters of the Camp to these Rebels either to joyn with them or out of Curiosity to see how things would go And Dathan and Abiram With Korah also it may be thought because he is mentioned in the beginning of the Verse Yet this Conclusion cannot be drawn from thence for it is not said he was now there but that it was the Tabernacle of Korah Dathan and Abiram where they used I suppose to meet Came out From the Tabernacle before-mentioned And stood in the door of their Tents Of their own Tents where they commonly dwelt And their Wives and their Sons and their Children With their whole Families This was the highest degree of audacious and hardned Infidelity whereby they declared that they feared not what Moses who had given the greatest proof he was a Man of God could do unto them Ver. 28. And Moses said Unto all the People of Israel or to the Elders and as many as could Verse 28 hear him Hereby you shall know I will now give you an evident Demonstration That the LORD hath sent me to do all these works That I have been commissioned by God to do all the things with which those Men find fault particularly to take upon me the Government of them and to put Aaron and his Family into the Priesthood and make the Levites only their Ministers c. See v. 2 3 13 14. For I have not done them of my own mind In the Hebrew the words are And that not out of my heart It was none of my own device or contrivance I did it not out of an ambitious desire to be great myself or out of private affection to my Brother Ver. 29. If these Men die the common death of all Verse 29 Men. In the Hebrew it is As die all Mankind that is a Natural Death as we now speak Or they be visited after the visitation of all Men. i. e. Such Judgments of God come upon them as are usual and common in the World viz. a Pestilence the Sword or Famine The LORD hath not sent me Then look upon me as an Impostor Ver. 30. But if the LORD make a new thing Verse 30 In the Hebrew the words are If
the LORD create a Creature i. e. do something that was never seen nor heard of in the World before The Jews in several of their Books particularly in Pirke Avoth say there are ten things which God created after the World was perfected and they mention the mouth of the Earth for one of them that is the gaping of the Ground to swallow up these wicked People Which is said to be created as Aben-Ezra well observes because by this Miracle God altered the Course of Nature and did a thing extraordinary And the Earth open her mouth and swallow them up with all that appertain unto them i. e. On a sudden when there is no Earthquake but all is calm and still and it swallow up none but them alone And they go down quick into the Pit Be buried alive when they are in perfect health By this place it is apparent that the Hebrew word Sheol doth often signifie the Grave which Bellermine and others most earnestly contend never signifies so but Hell which from hence he asserts to be in the Center of the Earth Lib. IV. de Christo cap. 10. not observing that if it signifie Hell in this verse and v. 33. then the Houses of these Men and their Houshold-stuff and all that appertained to them went down thither which is very absurd It is hard also to think that all their little Children went down into Hell for their Father's sin though they did into the Grave Then ye shall understand that these Men have provoked the LORD You shall be sufficiently convinced that they have unjustly accused me and brought this destruction upon themselves Verse 31 Ver. 31. And it came to pass that as he had made an end of speaking all the words that the Ground clave asunder that was under them He had no sooner done speaking but immediately what he said was verified which made it the more remarkable Ver. 32. And the Earth opened her mouth and swallowed them up Viz. Dathan and Abiram before-mentioned Verse 32 v. 27. who stood in the Door of their Tents outfacing Moses And their Houses i. e. All their Family or as Moses himself hath explained it XI Deut. 6. Their Housholds and their Tents and all the Substance that was in their possession And all the Men that appertained unto Korah We are not told what became of Korah himself for it is not said he was swallowed up but all that appertained to him i. e. all that were at that time in his Tent His whole Family except his Sons who escaped XXVI 11. taking warning I suppose from what Moses said v. 26. Which hath made some think that Korah was at the Head of his Two hundred and fifty Men who were the great Abetters of his Faction who if he had forsaken them at this Trial that was made who were in the right we may well think would have withdrawn themselves also and not have stood to it without their Chieftain as we find they did v. 35. Yet he is not mentioned there as perishing with them by Fire from the LORD and Moses seems to say XXVI 10. that Dathan and Abiram were swallowed up together with Korah who had as much reason or more perhaps to think it necessary to be with that other Company which he had gathered against Moses v. 19. and to incourage them to persist in their Resolution than to be with the Two hundred and fifty Men who were Men of such Authority v. 2. that they may be thought to have needed none to support them It may be added also that the word appertaineth is not here in the Hebrew which makes these words sound as if the meaning were only those that were of Korah's Family but simply all the Men that were to Korah i. e. were gathered to him and were at that time with him Which seems to be an Indication that they and he were swallowed up together How many there were that staid with him there is not certain but the generality left him v. 27. where it is expresly said they gat up from the Tabernacle of Korah Dathan and Abiram as Moses had commanded v. 24. Which may be taken for a further Indication that he was swallowed up in the Tabernacle where he was or in his own Tent after he came out of that Tabernacle But those places I observed before may be otherwise understood that place also which is the main foundation of this Opinion XXVI 10. may likewise receive another Interpretation as I shall show when I come thither And they that are of the other Opinion think his Tabernacle and his Family and all his Houshold-stuff might be swallowed up though he himself was not with them but was burnt by Fire with the Two hundred and fifty Men that offered Incense for Moses bad him take his Censer as well as they v. 17. Which since they did and put Fire and Incense therein why should it be thought he did not do the same It seems to me highly probable that he did otherwise he would have seemed to distrust his Cause but it must be confessed that it is obscure which way he perished and therefore it is not fit to contend about it And all their Goods All their Houshold-stuff and Cattle and whatsoever was in or about their Tents Ver. 33. They and all that appertained to them See XI Deut. 6. Went down alive into the Pit As Moses had foretold v. 30. Verse 33 And the Earth closed upon them This made it the more wonderful that the Earth having swallowed them all up had no Cleft remaining in it but closed up again and was as firm as before And they perished from among the Congregation Were never more seen Ver. 34. And all Israel that were round about them Verse 34 fled at the cry of them Though they were at a distance from their Tents whence they had removed on all sides v. 27. yet they heard them shriek so loudly as they sunk down into the Ground that it put them into a great fright and made them fly still further off For they said lest the Earth swallow us up also Some of them were conscious to themselves that they had favoured this wicked Faction and all of them knew how highly they had lately offended God by their unbelief and murmuring Chapt. XIV which might make them justly fear the same Fate with their Brethren Ver. 35. And there came out a Fire from the LORD Verse 35 From the Glory of the LORD which appeared unto all the Congregation v. 19. as ready to decide the Controversie This fell out either at the same time the Earth swallowed up Dathan and Abiram or immediately after it And consumed the two hundred and fifty Men that offered Incense Which was a plain declaration that they usurped the Office of Priests and therefore were thus punished by God himself for their presumption It is not certain whether they were devoured by the Fire or only struck dead as Men are sometimes on a sudden by