Repentance and return 1 Pet. 3. I am obliged to render VVithall for the honour of those that went before us and have setled the things that here I plead for it is not amisse to shew 1 Cor. 7. that they had also the Spirit of God Besides it is requisite to Evidence that those that have not hearts to love this Church and Kingdom yet to hate them they have no Cause Add hereunto 'T is not perhaps impossible that some Eye by Gods direction may fall on these Lines who may thereby not only with a more steddy foot walk himself in the good and the old Paths Jer. 6.16 which I point at but may be of Influence also to cause others to do it likewise and not to suffer them to stumble in their ways from the ancient ones Jer. 17.15 to walk in paths in a way not cast up Lastly there is nothing new under the Sun Eccles 1.9 that which hath been may be again to the prevention whereof I have endevoured to contribute somewhat in this Treatise After some Recovery purging is most requisite Nam quae in Morbis relinquuntur post crisin Hipp. l. 2 Aph. 13. recidivas facere consueverunt Dreggs of Diseases if not digested or expelled do cause Relapses Especially in such distempers as are malignant Of which sort if any are Schisme and Sedition Fare thou well Septemb. 27. Anno Dom. 1661. The Contents of this Treatise The Chapters Sections and Pages are referred to as they are here Printed which sometimes but not often are amiss LIB I. Of the Civil Controversie CHAP. I. 1. OF the Right of Retractations allowable unto all men 2. Evidenced from the General Causes of Error 3. and of some great Examples of them Ancient and Modern CHAP. II. How far only the Author declined how he behaved himself therein and what awakened him unto Recovery pag. 15. CHAP. III. What the Author doth Retract both in General and in Particular 1. The War 2. Independency p. 24. CHAP. IV. Causes of the Authors falling and first the Negative p. 28. CHAP. V. The Causes positive And first in General p. 39. to 58. CHAP. VI. Causes particular to each Controversie And first of the VVar. SECT I. Cause general and privative Not obeying the Spirit of God p. 56. SECT II. Particular Motives to the VVar with their Refutation p. 58. to 83. CHAP. VII Reply to certain general Grounds for the VVar being the chief heads of a Book Entituled Scripture and Reason pleaded for Defensive Arms. p. 90. to 106. The Contents of the Second Book Of the Church Controversie CHAP. I. Of Independency SECT I. THe Occasion of the Authors lapse into it p. 109. SECT II. Causes 1. Privative viz. not obeying the particular Word of God p. 112. SECT III. Causes Positive p. 113. SECT IV. The Contents of Independency p. 114. CHAP. II. Of the Grounds of Separation And first in generall p. 119. CHAP. III. Particular Exceptions against the matter of the Premisses 1. Against the Articles or Doctrine p. 174. CHAP. IV. Of Worship and the Directory thereof the common-prayer-Common-Prayer-Book SECT I. Of Worship 1. In it self p. 195. 2. In the Ceremonies p. 196. SECT II. Objections particular against the matter of our Worship p. 204. SECT III. Exceptions against the Body of the Common-Prayer-Book SECT IV. A Vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy in this particular p. 231. SECT VI. Exceptions against the Ceremonies pag. 270. CHAP. VI. Of the Assemblies their matter and mixture SECT I. The means in the Church of England of preserving them from Corruption p. 266. this number and some following are to be looked for in the 6. Chap. of the Second Book p. 269. SECT II. Causes Constitutive of the Church of England p. 270. SECT III. Apostolical Churches vitiated but no separation p. 273. SECT IV. The Primitive Churches also p. 275. SECT V. The Reformed Churches p. 280. CHAP. VII Of Discipline CHAP. VIII Of Government 1. By the Ministery in general and 2. by Episcopacy in particular Sect. 1. The Conditions requisite to the constitution of a Ministery p. 301. Sect. 2. Of Episcopacy It s Right and Title p. 304. Sect. 3. Exceptions against the former Government and Discipline 1. Episcopacy established by Law in Engl. p. 325. Subsect 2. Whether Episcopacy be a different order from Presbytery ibid. Subsect 3. The Question not of order but of Power p. 332. Subsect 4. Whether Ordination in the N. Testament without a Bishop p. 334. Sect. 4. Of the Book of Ordination Subsect 1. Bishops Imposition of hands upon Deacons p. 338. Subsect 2. Apostles choose Deacons ibid. Subsect 3. That phrase Receive the Holy Ghost defended p. 339. Subsect 4. Consecration of Bishops and Archbishops p. 346. Subs 5. Episcopal Jurisdiction p. 349. Sect. 6. The Close of the Church Controversie CHAP. IX The Proof and Trial of these Retractations CHAP. X. The Conclusion 1 A Petition p. 367. The Elder Son ibid. 2. An Admonition of Zanchy p. 368. 3. The Prediction of his late Majesty p. 370. CHAP. XI Additionals The Scope and Protestation of the AUTHOR Containing also an Explication of the FRONTISPIECE MY ayme is to perform by way of Retractation some small service Principi Patriae to the King and to my Country My allegeance to the one and engagement to the other and my lapsing in both so much obliging me Now a] Psal 20. the Kings honour is great in Gods Salvation And b] Psal 144. blessed are the people who have the Lord for their God But c] Amos 3. how can two walk together unless they be aggreed We d] 1 Joh. 3.5 must be like him if we would see him as he is Now God is a righteous God Psal 11. his countenance will behold onely the thing that is JUST This was the end of our Redemption viz. e] Tit. 2. to deliver us from the practise of all iniquity that we might live a godly righteous and sober life Now the the onely rule of this righteousness and justice is the f] Tit. 1. will of God Which will is revealed either generally in the Scripture and in the Law of Nature or particularly in the constitutions of every Nation which contradict not the former Hence g] Dâ— Sibbis Souls conflict cap. 17. what is agreeable to Law is agreeable to Conscience said once the Lawyers Casuist Hence also h] Ro. 13.1 he that resists the Laws of particular Nations resists the Ordinance of God and he be he head or tail branch or rush as the i] Isa 3. Prophet phraseth it shall receive to himself damnation k] Eccles 10. He that brakes this hedge a serpent shall bite him he that removeth these foundation stones they shall fall upon him Laws therefore being the sacred impress of the will of God and the observance of them the obligement and security both of Majestrate and Subjects of Prince and People my onely scope is the
person of Christ and from the continual commemoration of his benefits and from the fervent calling upon his name whereby our faith is nourished there can not be separated an endeavour of perpetual repentance Three chief effects of faith Now these meditation prayers to him and repentance are the three chief effects of faith c. Let the Brethren then cease to quarrel Te Deum as Popish for this doctrine hath been preserved pure in the Popish Church as we saw above out of Zanchy or else confess their own Antichristianism In the answer to the fifth general Exception that is their Arianism and Socinianism Touching their exception in particular against Benedicite or O all ye works of the Lord Benedicite or O all ye works c. bless ye the Lord. It is first to be noted as appears in the Books of King Edw. 6. that this was appointed for Lent onely in the place of Answ 1 Te Deum We praise thee O God but since left indifferent Answ 2 Secondly for the matter of it it contains no other doctrine nor for the order any other method than what is in the 104 and 148 Psalms with something Answ 3 out of the 118 Psalm being a convenient compages of them What the Title is in the Apocrypha needs not to be mention'd here speaking of the Common-prayer-book Answ 4 in which it hath no title As for the reproaches here cast upon it and the holy Martyrs the compilers of the Liturgy who put it in of bungling and Mass-book and belying the Canonical Text because it is said to be the song of the three childr in the furnace Dan. 3. mentioned by Daniel which yet may be well understood to be so as Austin we heard above understood the Book of Wisd and Ecclesiasticus to be called Solomons ob quandam similitudineÌ„ because of a kind of likeness so Ans It is no way probable but that those 3. children did praiâ—e â—od in the midst of the fire which they saw he restrained from hurting of them and might justly take occasion to magnifie God for his Works in the Creatures in giving them such vertues and yet restraining them at his pleasure and so if it were not indeed yet ob quandam similitudinem for some likeness sake it may not be unsitly called so But howsoever who shall compare it will find that it doth in all things follow the pattern of the Psalms above mentioned and so of the Scripture and though Apocryphal yet is a fit form of thanksgiving But as I said the Bunglings and Mass-book and lying we leave them to the father of lies and to those his children that by imitating that Parent in calumny and falshood do merit to be his heirs But yet God in his mercy give them repentance and pardon and according to their Baptism the form whereof they do little less thâ—n blaspheme ' make them the members of Christ the children of God and inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven SECT IV. The Responds of the People THe fourth exception is against the Responds and Answers of the People to the Minister appointed in the Prayer-Book excepting Amen The Brethren say Fourth Excâ—ption The Respondâ— P. 27 28 n 4. They have no warrant from the Word and are will-Will-worship nor can be done in Faith That they interrupt the reading contrary to the Preface are taken out of the mass-Mass-Book onely that there are above one hundred of them To which are added the Peoples answering the Confession of sins Creed and every other Verse of the Psalms But they omit the Principal the matter and the use of which anon First for the number Though they may be so many in the whole Number yet are they not all in one service but so divided that they are neither burdensome nor confused To the interrupting of the reading and the Mass-book hath been answered If all were reading where were the Liturgy Nowhere else That they are said to be no where else If they speak of the substance of them argues their want of reading in Antiquity which they would seem to have seriously consulted and of the practice of some in later times Are there not in the ancient Liturgies mentioned by themselves many Responds and Answers of the People Whether those Liturgies be theirs whose names they bear is not the question but ancient they are and the question is whether they had any such answerings of the People which every one by inspection may see they had We will cite but two Witnesses the one Ancient the other Modern The first shall be the Liturgy of Chrysostome How often is repeated besides the Amen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord have mercy upon us and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To thee O Lord we commend them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord vouchsafe pardon And sometimes longer Responds than any of ours are and the very same in sense as at the Communion The Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let us give thanks unto the Lord Liturg. Chrysost Tom. 6. Then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is meet and right to worship the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost the Trinity of the same and undivided substance And a little after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The People for so Chorus is taken also both in the Poets and as we shall see straightway in Neoterick Liturgies Holy holy holy Lord of Sabbath Heaven and Earth are full of thy Glory Hosanna in the highest Blessed be he that cometh in the Name of the Lord Hosanna in the highest And afterward the Priest and the Deacon having uttered their sentences 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The People We praise thee we bless thee we give thanks unto thee O Lord and we supplicate unto thee O our God Which are the words much of them of one of the Peoples Responds at the Communion in our Liturgy Lib. Hermaâ—i Archiep. Colon. Reformation The next for I omit other things shall be that notable Liturgy called the Book of the Reformation of Colon compiled by * Vid. Sleidan com lib. 15. Ad Ann. 1543. Against it the Popish party wrote the Antididagma Bucer one of our own Reformers and Melancthon and Pistorius all thorough-Protestants and men of eminency as all know in the Church The Book is so remarkable that it hath ben translated into English the Latine Copy I follow and it is a most usefull piece for all those Ministers that would seriò and in good earnest feed the Flock of God over which the holy Ghost hath made them Overseers In this Common Prayer Book besides the Symphony in Doctrine in some things carped at by the Brethren in our Liturgy of which anon there are several Responds and Answers of the People Not here to insist upon the Answers of the Sureties in Baptism in the name of the child As creditis credimus Answers of the witnesses in Baptism
he maketh little of to the Romans the times and persons differed The Colossians and Galatians had been long in the saith and now put a righteousness and a necessity in those observations The Romans were but weak in the faith and observed those things as religious exercises which yet they might have more conscience of than was requisite but out of weakness onely not out of conceitedness or carnal wisdom So here Effectual course was to be taken to draw off the minds of the people from the opinion they then had of the Bishop of Rome which now being effected we must take heed we go not to the other extreme by continuing of that prayer to alienate more and more those amongst us affected to him from our publick service which the Act against Recusancy not then made doth oblige them to frequent Hence both the precept of King James Act against Recusancy prohibiting bitter invectives and undiscreet railing speeches against the persons of either Papists or Puritans Directions for Preachers anno 1622. Art 5. Dr. Ushâ—r And the practice of those in Ireland related in my hearing by the late Lord Primate not to inveigh against Popery it self but as the Kings words are modestly and gravely when they are occasioned by the Text of Scripture free both the Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of England from the aspersion of either Except 6 To that Exception they have against three Prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Family Additions of Prayers c. onely because not confirmed by Parliament and therefore not to be used without danger of Law In the Reply to the sixth general Exception hath been answered above To the seventh Exception That whereas the Preface of the Common-prayer-book saith That things uncertain vain and superstitious be cut off and nothing ordained to be read Preface Common-prayer but the very pure Word of God the holy Scripture or that which is evidently grounded on the Except 7 same And that the Collects for Christmas day and Whitsunday say That Christs was born on this day and that the Holy Ghost descended as on the other viz. Whitsunday and these to be read seven days after They say first Pag. 29. n. 7. On what Scripture is it evidently grounded that Christ was born on this very day As also that the Holy Ghost descended on that day seeing it is a moveable Feast and that therefore it is gross lying to Answ 1 God and horrible abusing of God in Prayer First we must distinguish betwixt things and the circumstance of them which are especially Time and Place No thing that is no matter of Doctrine or point of Worship requisite to edification in faith and holiness is appointed to be read but out of the very pure Word of God or that which is evidently grounded on the same But as for circumstances of times or names of places they are not either Doctrine of Faith or Matter of the Worship but Appendixes which vary not the substance of the Book 2. In particular Collect for Christmas day On Christmas day they appoint these words ' O God who hast given thy Son this day to be born c. First they do not say as the Brethren unfaithfully relate it this very day then indeed it might have been doubtfull but this day which admits a latitude and doth not binde the understanding to that very day it is sufficient if it be so commonly conceived and taken Aug. Ep. 23. ad Bonif. Saepe ita loquimur ut pascha propinquante dicamus crastinam vel perendinam Domini passionem cum ille ante tam multos annos passus sit Nempe ipso die dominico dicimus hod è Dominus resurrexit cum ex quo resurrexit tot anni transierunt Cur nemo tam ineptus est ut nos ita loquentes arguat esse mentitos nisi quia istos dies secundum illorum quibus haec gesta sunt similitudinem nuncupamus ut dicatur ipse dies qui non est ipse sed revolutione temporis similis ejus Thus we often speak saith the Father that when Easter is coming we say to morrow or two days off is the passion Good Friday so on the Lords day we say the Lord rose to day whereas so many years are passed since wherefore is no man so foolish as to say we lye the Brethrens words because we call those days so by way of similitude and likeness to those wherein such things were done No lye then if we say this day or as this day in Austins judgement but onely in the opinion of those whose like for folly had not then been Again Aug. Januar. Epist 119. c. 1. they might remember that even Antiquity did not celebrate it as an Article of Faith Noveris diem natalis Domini non in Sacramento celebrari sed tantum in memoriam revocari quòd natus sit Thou shalt know saith S. Austin that the day of Christs birth is not celebrated as a Sacrament but onely as a memorial that he was born And therefore needed not such exactness in the very day Thirdly the Church of England in saying this day followed the steps of Antiquity which did so account Nam ille Joh. Baptista natus est sicut tradit Ecclesia octavo calendas julias cùm jam incipiunt dies minui Dominus autem natus octavo calendas Januarias Aug. in Ps 132. prope fin Vid. ut de Temp. Serm. 12. quando jam dies incipiunt crescere For he John Baptist saith the Father was born according as the Church hath delivered it on the eighth of the Calends of July that is the twenty fourth of June when the days now begin to shorten but our Lord on the eighth of the Calends of January that is Decemb. 25. for the Calends must be reckoned backward beginning at the first day of the following moneth when the days now begin to lengthen Collect for Whitsunday Fourthly Touching that of Whitsunday they do not say this day as on the Nativity but as on this day noting as S. Austin said above not a Sacrament but a commemoration onely As on this day which is as much as if the Church had said The memory of this benefit we celebrate on this day as if it had been done therein Which is evident to be the Churches meaning because it needed not the Brethrens tuition to make them understand that Whitsunday is a moveable Feast falling sometimes sooner sometimes later Repeating the Collect seven days To the last of repeating the Collect for these days seven days after as if this were a gross lying to God and horrible abusing of God in prayer I might answer onely that which was said above to the like exception In answer to their exception against the matter of the Artic. n. 6. of not changing the Qu. name into the Kings it foams out their
APPROBATIO REtractationes venerabilis viri JOHANNIS ELLIS libentissimè perlegi easque proelo tradendas censui ut iis qui Ecclesiam Anglicanam deseruerunt in exemplum qui revertuntur in solatium qui firmi permanserunt in stabilimentum ipsi denique Retractanti in sincerae conversionis ingenuaeque pietatis gloriam vivant Quintilis 1. 1661. MA. FRANCK S. T. P. R. in X to P. GUL. Epo. Lond. à Sacris Domesticis Christi Caroli Luke 15 St. Austin Imitated or Retractations Repentings in Reference to the Late Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall Changes in this Nation by John Ellis 2. Sam 19 1. Peter 3. Leges Angliae Verbum daej Aliud fundamentum nemo Iaciat 1. Cor. 3. S. AVSTIN Imitated OR RETRACTATIONS AND REPENTINGS In reference unto the late CIVIL and ECCLESIASTICAL CHANGES in this NATION Wherein I. The GROUNDS Of Obedience to the CROWN Adherence to this CHVRCH In Doctrine Worship and Government II. An Answer to that Tractate Entituled Reasons shewing the Necessity of Reformation III. The Non-Obligation of the COVENANT Are Represented and Demonstrated In II. Books By JOHN ELLIS If we would judge our selves we should not be judged of the LORD 1 Cor. 11. Videbunt omnes homines quà m non sim acceptor personae meae Aug. Ep. 7. Marc. LONDON Printed by W. Godbid and are to be sold by Timothy Garthwait at the Little North-dore of S. Paul's M.DC.LXII DEDICATIO EGO Utrique Academiae Cantabrigiensi Matri Oxoniensi alteri EARUMQUE Honoratissimis D. D. Cancellariis Reverendis D. D Procancellariis Honorandis Collegiorum Praefectis Sociis Dilectiss bonae frugi Scholarib universis Hasce Paginas In Poenitudinis Symbolum Juventutis monitum Grati Animi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. M. D. D. Non ita pridem Academiae Superius memoratae Alumnus Aulae S. Catharinae Socius Civibus Cantabrigiensib Lector sive Concionator publicus JOHANNES ELLIS To the Well-affected Reader YOU may please to take notice that being unexpectedly drawn forth into a Disputation in Writing touching Infant Baptism by the Clerk of the Place unto which I have reference acted 't is like by some other heads and ingaged to the publishing of my * May Anno 1659. when neither the Sun nor any Star of Charl's wain if I may so speak as then appeared Reply having formerly marred as the fruit in great part of my Ministery so also Two * The first a Sermon before the House of Commons Feb. 22. 42. Intituled THE SOLE PATH to a SOUND PEACE Containing some model of a Reformation The other an Answer to Mr. Sam. Hudson Intituled Vindiciae Catholicae Or the Rights of particular Churches asserted Containing a Defence of the Doctrine of the Church of England as I take it and other reformed touching the Non-visibility of the Catholick Church as Organical In which Tractates more pains was taken and excepting what I here retract whereof perhaps more use might be made then it may be is convenient for me to signifie Treatises by the mixture of Apologies for the War and for Independency I took it as my part being to appear again in Publick to Retract and recall as I had bewayled my Mistakes in those Affairs And accordingly before that Treatise of Baptisme Intituled THE PASTOR and the CLERK because the Debate was betwixt two such persons in relation to the same place I did then prefix in severall particulars the summe of my Cogitations in that matter In the last Paragraph whereof I promised if it should seem convenient and God were pleased a larger explication of that brief Palinodye Which soon after drawn up in Part hath ever since layen by Till the last Summer some Sheets of it began to be printed without my Knowledge by the care and cost then of a * Mr. Tim. Thirscr Reverend Friend and others whom he excited into whose hand I had committed them for perusal But finding the Eruption was somewhat precipitate I caus'd it to withdraw its hand again for more Maturity and Growth In the Travelling toward the Birth whereof though upon another occasion also I was seis'd by a dangerous Feaver which with other Occurrences hath impeded it till now though often incited a fresh unto the communicating of it For non mihi Tulliana illa Blanditur sententia qua dictum est nullum unquam verbum quod revocare vellet Aug. Epist 7. Marcellino emisit sed plane me angit Horatiana sententia Nescit vox missa reverti Hinc est quod periculosissimarum quaestionum libros de Genes scil de Trinitate diutius teneo quam vultis fertis ut si non poterint nisi habere aliqua quae merito reprehendantur saltem pauciora sint quà m esse possent si praecipiti festinatione inconsultius ederentur I am not flattered saith mine Author with that Sentence of Tully Never did he utter any word which he would recall But rather that saying of Horace sorely troubleth me viz. A Word once out although amisse it fall And fain you would yet can you not recall Hence it is that those Books of most difficult and perillous Questions de Gen. Trinit I keep from coming abroad longer then either ye would or will bear That if it cannot be but that there will be some things in them which may deservedly be blamed they may at ast be fewer then they could have been if by a rash precipitancy they had been unadvisedly published But I have now given way VVhereunto I am the more inclined because it is a kind of Confession of my Faith Zanch. Now jucundum optabile est pio cuique viro publicum sempiternum suae in Christum Fidei pietatis testimonium in Ecclesia relinquere ex iis quae divinâ providentiâ mihi contigerunt videbor quasi videre me ad hanc pugnam divinitus vocari Because it is a comfortable and desireable thing to every Good man to leave a publick and lasting testimony of his Faith in Christ and of his Piety in the Church And by the providences that have fallen out I seem to my self to be called out by God unto this Service Epist Dedic ad Archiep. Ebor. Grindal ante operis sui de 3. Eloh partem 1. as Zanchy hath expressed it for me before hand Now I did intend a much briefer Tractate and only to content my self with a moderate account of the reasons of my return to my obedience to the Church and State Excuse unto the Reader But considering that it is required in one of my profession that he should not only utter sound speech that cannot be reproved Tit. 2. chap 1. but also be able to convince the Gainsayer I have been forc'd to be a little copious Yea Object Quis leget haec nemo hercule nemo But who a book so large will read Of things that are now gone and dead The War is past and the Church is in reforming VVell but yet a reason of my Faith
and he could be without them Reading surely as it doth enlarge our abilities An tu existimas aut suppetere nobis posse Cic. pro. Archia Poet. quod quotidie dicamus in tanta varietate rerum nisi animos nostros doctrinâ excolamus Canst thou think saith Tully that we can have material supply to speak daily in such variety of matters if we did not encrease our parts by study So also it sharpneth our reasoning to see both into words and things even in Religion it self Ut de sermone rectiùs judicemus Melanchton praefat in Hesiodum ut dogmata religionis enarrare explicare quoties hoc poscit publicus usus possimus variè subigendum est ingenium omnibus disciplinis excolendum That we may the better judge of the meaning of words and be able also to open and explain the doctrine of Religion so often as the Publick calls for it The mind is to be tilled several ways and furnished with all kind of learning Psal 119.98 99 100. saith Melanchton Lastly It fixeth our judgment Hence David did not count it vanity to boast Thou through thy commandements hast made me wiser than mine enemies for they are ever with me I have more understanding than all my teachers for thy testimonies are my meditation I understand more than the antients because I keep thy precepts Namely I keep first to the reading considering of them Hence the Apostle charges Timothy not to live upon his own fancy 1 Tim. 4. but to give attendance to reading to exhortation and doctrine and to meditate on what he read Yea and himself also as appears had read all sorts of Authors for he quotes the Greek Poets So even when old and as himself saith near his end yet he gives order unto Timothy to bring him his Books and Parchments 2 Tim. 4. in which perhaps his gatherings in his readings were Aug. prolog in lib. de doct Christ I conclude this point with that of the Father finding such temptations in some of his time Quod per hominem discendum est sine superbia discat per quem docetur alius sine superbia sine invidia tradat quod accepit Neque tentemus eum cui credimus ne talibus inimici versutiis perversitate decepti ad ipsum quoque evangelium audiendum atque discendum nolimus ire in ecclesias expectemus rapi caveamus tales tentationes superbissimas periculosissimas magisque cogitemus ipsum Apostolum Paulum licet divinâ coelesti voce prostratum instructum ad hominem tamen missum Quomodo enim verum esset Templum Dei sanctum est quod vos estis si Deus de humano Templo responsa non redderet That which may be learned from man saith he let the Christian receive without pride and let him by whom another is taught deliver without pride and without envy what he hath received Neither let us tempt him in whom we believe lest being deluded with such fine and nice conceits of the enemy we at length come to refuse to go to Church to hear the very Gospel it self but wait till we are inspired Let us take heed of such proud and perilous temptations Note Quakers in Austins time and rather consider that even the Apostle Paul himself although dejected and instructed by Christs own voice from heaven was yet for all that sent unto man namely Ananias for further information For how else should it be verified which is promised viz. That the Temple of God is holy 1 Cor. 3.16 which Temple are ye if so be that God did not give forth Oracles out of this humane Sanctuary Thus far he And that for the second point neglect of other Authors besides the Scripture Come we to the third defect in reading 3. Controversies of the times neglected viz. Not studying what might be said on both sides And the controversies of the times neglected I remember that Dr. Sibs a man * Prov. 31. Dr. Sibbs St. Austin's seventh Tome useful in these times whose works do praise him in the gate the then Master of our Colledge on occasion of certain opinions started by some at that time amongst us commended unto me the reading of Austins seventh Tome God preserved me from that infection although I lived for some time in a Holland-like aire from whence that wind blew and near that w ter which was conceived to exhale some such vapours without that Antidote But had I read then all that Tome it had with his blessing secured me against Independency the one half of whose evil consists in Donaâ—â—sm and Sep râ—tion Against which St. Austin in one half of that work strenuously disputes Of one Tract whereof Bucer saith thus Particularly Contr. Epist Parmen lib. 3. Is locus hac maximè tempestate nobis singulari diligentiâ legendus perpendendus est That is That Treatise viz. St. Austins third Book against Parmenian is in these times especially to be read and pondered on Bucer in Matth. 18.7 with special industry Thus of the third cause neglect of Reading Now as the Beast 4. Cause Zeal unguided Job 39.22 28. whose neck is cloath'd with thunder as Job speaks cannot stand still when he smells the Battel and if he want his eyes must needs do mischief so that zeal which I had of God wanting the due conduct of knowledge did indeed precipitate as well as provoke me unto these actings What the dire effects of these two in conjunction would prove our Saviour before hand shews us when he saith that those who are acted by them even then when they persecute the Saints to death Joh. 16.2 shall think they do God service The Apostle himself was an example of it who before conversion was exceedingly mad against the Saints Act. 26.11 and persecuted them even unto strange cities And after him his Schollar Austin * St. Austin studied Paul especially for St. Paul's writings at first he chiefly studied acknowledgeth his unguided zeal * Itaque avidissimè arripui venerabilem stylum Spiritus tui prae caeteris Apost Paulum Aug. confess lib. 7. cap. 21. and the pernicious effects of it Omnia illa figmenta quaesivi curiosè attente audivi temerè credidi instanter quibus potui persuasi adversus alios pertinaciter animoseque defendi S. Aug. contr Epist quam vocant Fundamenti cap. 3. All those fancies saith he I sought after curiously and heard them diligently and believed them rashly and perswaded them to whom I could earnestly against others I defended them with pertinacy and passion Thus he of himself whilst an heretical and schismatical Manichee 5. Cause Idolizing some persons 5. St. Paul a man as full of charity as of faith yet did with great prudence labour to take off from the Churches the too great opinion they had conceived of some persons Nay he spares
of the Old and New Testament The Church of England receiveth the Canon of Scripture according to the antient Church exactly as the Church of England doth Secondly that he saith that is secundum majorum traditionem ex patrum monumentis That it is according to the tradition of the Church and out of the writings of the Fathers Whereby we see the Church of England follows antiquity in reception of the books of holy Scripture more truly than the Church of Rome doth But this obiter and the way Again Bullinger citeth the judgment of Bibliander Bibliander de opt genere interpretandi Hebraica whose words are Ecclesiasticos libros etiam Hagiographa nominant sancta scripta Quae etsi non habent idoneam authoritatem roborandi ea quae in contentionem veniunt ut Canonici Scriptores non tamen rejiciuntur ut Apocrypha qualis fuit prophetia Eldad Medad c. Ecclesiastici autem lâ—bri etiam in Scholam auditoria fidelis populi admâ—ssi sunt tam venerandi multis ut Judith etiam in ordinem canonicae Scripturae à quibusdam reponatur Which having the same sense I forbear to English Onely he saith that the Book of Judith was by some accounted Scripture I suppose he meaneth Origen which I think may as little claim that priviledge as any other Lastly Bullinger goes over every book of them and shews the benefit that the Church may reap by the reading of them And saith We may better learn the form of Houshold-government out of Tobit and Judith and the Ethicks or rules of good living out of Ecclesiasticus and the book of Wisdom than out of Plato Aristotle and Xenophon And the way of a religious Soldier out the Maccabees And of the first book of them he saith Ac tanti omnino hic liber est ut boni illo non possent citra jacturam carere That it is verily of such worth that a good man cannot without loss be without it Which is consonant unto that of King James speaking of the same book Conf. Hamp Court pag. 61. viz. Who shewed the use of the Maccabees to be very good to make up the story of the persecution of the Jews c. And of the History of Bel and the Dragon Bullinger saith Viderint autem qui eam historiam pro fabula damnant quibus nitantur Authoribus Ego video Historiam refertissimam esse multiplici fructu eruditione Let them look to it saith he what Authors they rest upon who condemn it for a fable I observe it to be a History full fraught with fruitful instructions And he names what In a word his whole discourse on these books is worth reading And it is to be noted that this was with the allowance of the rest of the Ministers of Tigur where this book was printed Necessit Reform pag. 20. Basilic Doron But the authority of King James is by some Brethren objected against the Apocrypha viz. As for the Apocrypha books I omit them because I am no Papist and indeed some of them are not like the ditement of the Spirit of God Answ Thus say they the King But it seems time and reading had further ripened the Kings judgment in that point For afterward when he upon great occasion solemnly delivered his judgment Confer Hamp Court second day confer p. 61. è Cathedrâ in reference to the satisfaction of his whole Kingdom this was the result His Majesty in the end said He would take an even order between both Affirming that he would not wish all Canonical books to be read in the Church unless there were one to interpret nor any Apocrypha at all wherein there was * He explains himself presently in allowing the book of Maccabees wherein he acknowledgeth some errors any error But for the other which were clear and correspondent to the Scripture he would have them read for else said he why were they printed and therein shewed the use of the book of Maccabees very good to make up the story of the Persecutions of the Jews but not to teach a man to sacrifice for the dead or to kill himself Thus far the King whâ—ch if the Brethren knew they did not well to cover and if they knew it not and were not vers'd in the most authentical books and writings of this nature as that Conference is a special one they were not fit to deal in such an Argument So also in the same place of the same Conference pag. 61 62. the King opened and defended a passage in Ecclesiasticus one of the Apocryphal books objected against as unsound and closes all with this salt quippe to the opposers What trow ye makes these men so angry with Ecclesiasticus by my saul I think he was a Bishop c. You see with what judgment the Brethren have quoted the King against the Apocrypha and yet as a crowing argument they insist upon it Again Object 2 Hierom. Ep. ad Laetam Tom. 1. St. Hieron is also produced as a witness against these books viz. That he should advise a Lady say they caveat omnia Apocrypha that she should take heed of all the Apocrypha Answ There are several causes of mistaking and mis-representing of an Author as 1 That men rest on Quotations Causes of misunderstanding and mis-representing of an Author and read them not themselves 2 That they understand not the language and Idiom of the writer 3 That they weigh not his scope and drift 4 That they ponder not the context 5 That they compare not one place with another 6 That they consider not the circumstances time place c. 7 That they consult not others that may illustrate him Then for misrepresenting him 1 That they make no bones of it 2 That they conceit they shall not be seen by every eye 3 And that when they be they have a brow to bear it so what they say may serve the turn at present It so fares here For if the Brethren read the place they quote in Jerom it is sure they understood not what he meant by Apocrypha Erasmus therefore on the place shall teach them Inscribuntur Petro Paulo nonnulla ipsi Christo Erasm in Hierom â—p ad Laetam num 79. veluti epistola Jesu ad Abygarum regem They are saith he ascribed to Peter to Paul and some to Christ himself as the Epistle of Jesus unto Agborus Where you see that Jerome did not mean by the Apocrypha onely the Books joyned with the Old Testament but those also yea those especially that were affixed to the New Again They did not weigh Jerom's scope for it was onely to instruct a young Girl in reading in that place not to shew what the Church might do or did Fourthly They did not compare this passage with others where he expresseth himself ex professo As where he speaks of the Books which bear Solomons name but are not his used to be read
to the judgment of these Brethren that the Q. and these Parl. then were in matter of the greatest moment the establishing of the Doctrine and Worship Articles and Liturgy of Almighty God and means of the salvation of men either so ignorant that they understood not what was requisite to the full establishment of their own Acts or so negligent that they minded it not as they should And seeing all the Kings and Parliaments since have swallowed their error As also all the Judges of the Land who do not only sit in Parliam to give advice but also have judged in their several Circuits the violations of those Books And because the present and future Parliaments may be subject to the like miscarriages may it be prevented in a better way then by the Parliam restoring to the Clergy the liberty of being elected Burgesses lost as I take it but in Henry the 8 th his time and so the Brethren may obtain places in the House of Commons and the Parliament enjoy the benefit of their guidance 2. To their instances particular in their printed sheet of alterations in the first printed book of Queen Elizabeth from that of Edward 6. viz. certain Saints days in the Kalender 1 Saints days but in black letters instead of others that were named in that of Edw. 6. Secondly certain Lessons of the Apocrypha appointed to be read instead of some out of the Canonical Scripture which were before appointed in the book of Edw. 6. For answer to both these first in general we have heard above to which I refer the reader Next in particular to that of the Saints days it doth not seem to hazzard the bringing in of new Holy-days both because as the brethren acknowledge they are set down in black letters those to be kept Holy-days in red but especially because the number of Holy-days is stinted they are set down by name in the Liturgy and a prohibition of any other to be kept so that as long as the book remains as now it is there can be no peril of that It may be the change of names was because the days now put in might be days of payment of mony or days of Law or perhaps unworthy persons names put out and better put in their room as Mr. Fox did in that Kalender of his Martyrology But this whatsoever it be makes no alteration in the Service or in the reading Yea but the alteration of the Chapters does 2. Apocryphal chapters To that therefore I say that this alteration was done either casu and by chance or consilio and of purpose And then either by privat hands or by publick authority by the Queen or Commissioners from her according to the clause in this Act authorising her for explanations In all which respects I refer unto the general answer afore-going But more particularly They might be altered upon some such suggestions as was made afterward by the Brethrens Ancestors modestly at the Conference of Hampton-Court of which afterwards To the Second 2. Book of Common-prayer aâ— it now stands established The book of Common-prayer as it now stands as established which the Brethren oppose as differing from that of Queen Elizabeth in alterations detractions and additions For answer first in general We must reflect on what hath been said above viz. That such alterations as have been made by Royal authority by commission under the great Seal being made but for explanations fake and containing nothing contrary to any thing in the book contained doth not derogate from the authority and establishment of the book but such alterations are confirmed such power being yielded to the Kings of this Nation by the Laws K. James Proclamation for uniformity of Com. prayer And for that purpose gave forth Our Commission undes Our Great Seal of England to the Arch-bishop of Canterbury and others according to the form which the LAWS of this Realm in like case prescribed to be used to make the said EXPLANATION c. saith the King upon occasion of the alterations made at the Instance of the Brethrens predecessors at the Conference at Hampton-Court But to come unto particulars first to the Alterations 1. Alterations in the Liturgy That of Holy-days hath beâ—n replyed unto as also that of Apocryphal Chapters To which I add R. Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 20. That it cannot be reasonably thought that we do thereby offer disgrace unto the word of God For in such choice we do not think but that fitness of speech may be more respected than worthiness of matter But this alteration whatsoever it were was made as by the authority of the King By whose means the Apocryphal chapters were altered so it seems by the occasion of Dr. Reynolds anotations For the King said That Dr. Reynolds should note those chapters in the Apocrypha books where those offensive places were and bring them But why do the Brethren appear now so zealous for the reading of the Scripture Conf. Hamp Court p. 63. Matth. 15. which they had almost laid aside in the publick worship for their own traditions i. e. for what they thought better to deliver unto the people 3. As for the alterations made for explanations sake K. James explanation of the present Liturgy by the King at the suit of the Non-conformists at that Conference now made violations of the Statute and essential alterations of the book they were not in any part of the substance of the book it self not in any prayer Not any alteration in the matter of the Liturgy or Exhortation and so in no one point either of Doctrine or Worship let the Reader note against the calumnies insinuated by these Brethren but onely in some two or three words in the old Translation of the Gospels And in a few Rubricks Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 19. which are directions for the service The words altered in the Gospels wherein the steps of the latine-service-Latine-service-book have been somewhat too nearly followed they are these 1. ' And Jesus said to them Conf. Hamp Court p. 86. to be put twice into the Dominical Gospels instead of Jesus said to his Disciples Though at the Conference it was answered That for ought that could appear by the places Ibid. pag. 63. he might speak as well to his Disciples as to the Pharisees The alterations in the Rubricks are Ibid. pag. 86. 1. Before the general Absolution is put or Remission of sins which before was onely Absolution 2. In private Baptism the lawful Minister present before it was then they minister it 3. In the same Rubrick they procure not their children to be baptised before it was they baptize not children 4. In that before Confirmation Examination with Confirmation of children it was appointed but I do not find it was done So that as the alterations of the words of the old Translation were but two so these in the Rubricks are but three And none of
them in the very Text of the Liturgy it self 2. Detractions from the Liturgy The second variation of the present book from that of Queen Elizabeth are detractions or takings away But God wot they are scarce a number but two and the present Book innocent of them being both made in that of Queen Elizabeth The one is a Rubrick mark nothing of the substance and Text but a Rubrick onely after the Communion containing an explication in what sense kneeling is enjoyned at the Communion Kneeling at the Communion explain'd And the Brethren say 't is an excellent and solid one and so it is but will they then now kneel First negatively it saith That the kneeling is not to the Bread and Wine Reas for Reform Ed. 2. pag. 3. of the inserted sheet for they remain Bread and Wine still Secondly Nor to any real and essential Presence there being of Christs natural flesh and blood for they are in heaven and not here But secondly and positively this gesture of kneeling is for signification of the thankful acknowledgment of the benefits of Christ given unto the worthy Receiver and to avoid prophaneness Now I suppose this Rubrick might be omitted in the Liturgy as being rather a Canon than a Rubrick These serving chiefly for direction how the worship is to be performed Not so properly for explication though some of the Rubricks also do explain But none of them the chief Ceremonies as the Surpliss or the Cross in Baptism and therefore the exposition of these being omitted the other might be thought fit also to be left out which would else have occasioned the addition of the explication of them also and of others to the occasioning of disputes rather than devotion it being not so needful to explain there the Orthodox doctrine in this point being laid down in the Articles and in the Homilies Artic. 28. Homil. of the receiving the Sacrament Can. 30. Can. 18. The explanation of Rites being thought fit for the Canons as in ours the explication of the Cross in Baptism and of bowing at the Name of Jesus But secondly this appears that this Rubrick doth seem not to be appointed by Parliament For if you observe the first Edition of the Common-prayer-book of 5 6 Edw. 6. which is done in very good paper and print the next being in worse as is usual in second Editions of books you shall see room enough vacant in the left page to have received that Rubrick but that is left bare and the Rubrick is printed in a leaf by it self and pasted on Observed as we were viewing by my worthy friend M. Tho. Smith keeper of the publick Library at Cambr. which is further cleared by the Errata in the first edition the second having none In that first edition the Rubrick is printed after all the Rubricks in the other it is in order at n. 3. in another between n and o. which shews that it came after the book was printed off and so not in that passed by the Act. Now then not being established by the Act as it seems the Parliament of 1 Eliz. knew they might omit it and yet not be guilty of detractions from the Book A prayer omitted The next omission is a prayer to be used in times of dearth and famine But seeng it contâ—ins no other matter for doctrine but what is in the prayer yet standing for that occasion 2 King 7. The former draws an argument to prevail with God from the miracle wrought by Elisha in the famine of Samaria And the latter yet standing from the general course of Gods providence and from his goodness which surely are more immediate grounds of faith It is not at all material especially seeing the omission might be from the Press and not from the Prelates Now these two are the onely detractions of the book from that of King Edward but neither of them chargeable upon the present but on the Book of Queen Elizabeth which this follows It appears from the premises that we have all the Liturgy that was established Text Substance and Circumstance as in Queen Elizabeth's time and that Book of hers all that the other had except these immaterial omissions of one Rubrick not establish'd and of one Prayer another more pertinent still remaining two for the same thing in this case and place being not thought so necessary Though all now in the Liturgy be not by that act established which leads me to the last head of Exceptions against the present Book viz. the additions 3. Additions to the Liturgy The Additions For answer in the general I refer unto what was said above Secondly in particular These additions are not annexed as part of the Book that the Act established But either as explanations of it which as we heard above the King hath power to do As are the Questions and Answers added to the Catechism Conf. Hamp Court p. 43. at the suit of the Non-conformists at the Conference at Hampton-Court Or they are certain necessary Prayers for the Kings relations which must be variable according to times and the state of the Royal Family and so not to be established necessarily by Parliament but put into this Common-prayer-book because of daily use with it yet not made parts of it and therefore not altering what was established by the Act. No more then the printing of the Kings Proclamation for uniformity before it is part of the Book or then divers godly prayers at the end devised by some good men But to come to the particulars 1. Prayers The Prayers and the Questions in the Catechism both which the Brethren acknowledge to be useful though with some particular exceptions against a question or two The Prayers added to the Book of King Edward are one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny which the Brethren acknowledge to be useful and necessary They acknowledge also pag. 28. pag. 30. that in the Catechism somewhat of that kind to be useful and necessary though not that model To collect then and conclude It appears that we have the Book now as established in Queen Elizabeths time without alteration 1 Except some odd days set down under other names 2 Also perhaps some few Chapters altered in the Kalender 3 Two words chang'd in the old Translation 4 And three or four Rubricks or directions explained And all these except the first names of days at the request of the Non-conformists the Brethrens Predecessors in these exceptions And no detraction of any Rubrick or Prayer or Exhortation or line or word in the text of the Book or otherwise but of a Rubrick about kneeling that seems not to be established by Parliament and of one Prayer against famine not of any consequence with the addition of some useful prayers and some Questions and Answers necessary for the enlarging and explication of the Catechism but not as part of the Book
Scripture This refers especially to the seventh Article touching Predestination c. whose words in the latter part they are Lastly Ministers are not prohibited absolutely from searching but from that which is curious Answ 5 and beyond sobriety This for the doubtfulness of the Articles The second exception is their erroneousness 2. Error for on this the Brethren insist though under the other covered head of doubtfulness First because it is said Not every deadly sin committed willingly after Baptism Artic. 16. is a sin against the holy Ghost they infer that the Church holds the distinction of venial and deadly sin which is Popish What if the Article speak in the then received language and according to such distinction not owning of it therefore in the sense held by the adversary but using it for the purpose they had in hand viz. that though all sins be deadly of themselves yet seeing some are greater than other grant the worst which they call deadly sin as we usually express a great evil by that word that it is a deadly one as a deadly grief a deadly mischief yet is not every such a sin against the holy Ghost especially when the Church hath in other places so plainly declared her self to the people as in the Homilies Catechism and common-prayer-Common-prayer-book in the last whereof it prescribeth confession of sins to be made twice every day by all the Congregation Now it is not to be thought that every one is guilty of deadly sin every day in the sense expressed so that the people are in no great danger by that expression And the Articles declaring Artic. 11. Artic. 22. that we are accounted righteous before God onely for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ And that there is none other satisfaction for sin but that offering of Christ alone and damning of all Purgatory Pardons worshipping of Images and Reliques and invocation of Saints do declare they count no sin in it self venial but by the blood of Christ Again Artic. 20. where because 't is said The Church hath power to decree Rites and Ceremonies and authority in controversies of faith Because the Kings declaration and the Act before that say That the Articles must be taken in the literal and grammatical sense they infer ' That if a Convocation declare any thing in the premises they must assent and subscribe in the literal sense or be deprived But I it is not forbidden either by that Act or the Kings Declaration to enquire the literal sense and so to examine them nor 2 are they required by that declaration to subscribe to what a Synod shall conclude in the literal and grammatical sense of such conclusions or Canons but onely to the literal and grammatical sense of the Articles This therefore is a captious inference upon the Declaration and the Act. And so much more are their exceptions against the 34 Article That whosoever through his own private judgment willingly and purposely doth openly break the Traditions and Ceremonies of the Church which be not repugnant unto the Word of God and be ordained by common authority c. But are there not three or four Cautions in it that should defend it from all calumny 1. That these Traditions and Rites must not be repugnant to the Word of God 2. That they be established by common Authority 3. That a man do transgress of his own private judgment And 4. willingly purposely Yea and 5. openly This exception taketh away the obedience to all Church-Laws yea to all Civill Laws they may as well except against subscribing if any such Act were to the sense of this Article applyed to the Laws of the Kingdom As suppose they should be enjoyned to subscribe That whosoever shall through his private judgment willingly and purposely openly break the Laws of the Land which be not repugnant to the Word of God and be ordained by common Authority and to take these words of the Act in the literal and grammatical sense without putting their own private or new sense upon it c. Would not such persons be thought unworthy to have any place in any Common-wealth that should refuse And why then in the Church surely they must be both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 men without yoke and without use and that per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is pernitious unto all Societies and men of Belial 3. Artic. 35. Their third exception is against Artic. 35. wherein is required the subscribing to the Book of Homilies as a godly and wholesome doctrine and necessary for these times Against this they object that there are false doctrines or assertions in them First in general subscription to the Homilies is intended by the Church The Homilies how to be understood in Subscription not in so punctual and verbal a degree as is required unto the Articles as appears because the Articles are to be distinctly and severally read and the expressions in them every one assented to the Homilies not so but onely as they agree with the Articles which are the superior rule unto them Not therefore to every expression or sentence no nor doctrine nor assertion if any were contrary to the definitive doctrine of the Articles All men know that there is a greater latitude of expression allowed to popular Sermons as the Homilies are than to Articles And the Brethren would have their Sermons to contain necessary and wholesome doctrine yet perhaps will not be so hardy as to affirm that they may not have uttered some sentences not so true or congruous if exactly scanned or that nullnm unquam verbum emisit eorum quisque quod revocare vellet as he said above And lest there should any inconvenience arise to the people though now the danger is little the Homilies being so much if not too much laid aside the Common-prayer and reading of the Scripture publickly together with preaching according to the Articles are provided as a remedy Yea which is more if one Homily speak less warily in any material point it is corrected in another as in the Homily of Alms-deeds seeming in one passage or so to ascribe some kind of merit unto them though it doth not taking the word properly yet it explaineth it before-hand in another namely in the Homily of Salvation or Justification wherein that doctrine is excellently set forth as also in the Homily of Faith So when in the Homily of Alms Tobith is cited as Scripture not onely the Article doth regulate that expression but every ones Bible also Instructions to Preachers Artic. 1. Ann. 1622. Besides every exhortatory expression must not be called a doctrine or an assertion but that which as a point is purposely insisted on to be maintained of which sort I believe verily the Brethren will never be able to instance in any one out of the Homilies And indeed had they observed the instructions of King James above mentioned viz. That no preacher
their usual mistakes For first they are in the Roman and Paris Edition of the Greek and in many antient Eastern Psalters as is noted in those Bibles As also are they in that Edition so magnifi'd by Austin which he followed in his Exposition of the Psalms Aug. in Ps 13. But howsoever they are Scripture and are found altogether in Rom. 3. as themselves acknowledge I might add that they are also in that follow'd by Jerom Hieron in Ps 13. if that Commentary upon the Psalmes be his which Bellarmine saith is obscura quaestio a difficult Problem When they add Insert sheet pag. 6. Object Answ that the Translation of the Epistles and Gospels is as antient as 25 Hen. 8. and taken out of the Mass-book This is added to make this Translation odious but sure they will grant that the Epistles and Gospels in the Mass-book were first taken out of the Scripture it self But of the Mass-book in general we have spoken above and shewen that every thing in it ought not to be rejected Hook eccles pol. 5. § 19. Conf. Hamp Court pag. 45 46. Lastly for the particular places they name some of them have been objected and answered long since And the difference not overthrowing either faith or manners there being also a correct translation for constant use appointed and these but onely in the Epistles and Gospels which are to be used not so frequently these faults moreover not being many nor of any great consequence are venial That of Hezekiah his destroying the brazen Serpent might have here been omitted having been so fully replyed unto and the disproportion shewn by a learned Pen so long ago And afterward briefly by a learned King Hook eccles pol. l. 5. § 65. Conf. Hamp Court pag. 73. Of which Books and Answers the Brethren take not the least notice whether out of ignorance or want of ingenuity may be left in medio without danger of the Law I hope Necess Reform pag. 18. 1. The Kalender Next after the man that bore the Armour comes the Champion himself after the inserted sheet the solemn treatise where the first title is of the Kalender And the main quarrel against it for appointing so much of the Apocrypha to be read In the Answer to the fourth general Exception of which above To the particulars if any thing sound toward error or be indeed dross should that deprive the Church of the gold contained in the rest Do we not read of the Midwifes lying of Abrahams twice of Rachels stealing her fathers Idols and many other in Scripture which ought not therefore to be rejected Again if it were requisite to spend time in the particulars there might not want perhaps a probable defence Tob. 3. of what either the daughter of Raguel or Raphael the Angel or Asmodeus the evil Spirit or Judith are there said to have done or spoken Jacob said He obtained the portion of Sichem with his sword and with his bowe much after that sense that Judith there speaks according unto Calvins Exposition Jus victoriae ad se transfert quasi divinitus sibi concessum quia in ejus gratiam homicidis Deut peperceret Calv. in Genes 48.22 Simeon and Levi might have a laudable zeal as Judith speaks and God might use it in his secret counsel and did so to purchase a place for Jacob And Jacob own the Land as his conquest though he detest the action The like may be said touching Judith's prayer as no doubt Jahel had hers before she cut of Sisera's head Judg. 4. whom also she slew by the deceit of her lips as well as Judith did Holofernes Genes 30. Did not Rachel and Leah with great Religion bless God for the children that they had made their husband Jacob beget upon their Handmaids Times and persons must be noted And every thing in Scripture is not to be imitated Else we might say as the Brethren Are not these gallant chapters to be read in the Churches The examples then in Scripture must be interpreted by rule and may not also the Apocrypha The next Regiment assaulted by the Brethren are the Redcoats the Rubricks so called 2. The Rubricks because antiently written in red Letters and are directions how to officiate and read the Common-prayer-book the first whereof is cloathed not with a coat of Male but of a Priest at which they fire They say Priest is the old style and title in the Mass-book This Mass-book is the Gorgons head wherewith they terrifie all assailants But was the Mass book ever in English True indeed Fox Act. Mon. in Edw. 6. King Edward the sixth for the appeasing of a rebellion told the Rebels so but that was not as it was the Mass-book but as it was a Prayer-book as little as might be at that time different Besides that prayer-book is not the same with ours now for it hath been reformed more than once since The Mass then never having been in English the word Priest could not be taken thence Yea but it answers to Sacerdos in the mass-Mass-book which signifies Priest Priest That 's the Brethrens translation to avoid Presbyter out of the Mass-book whose evident derivative Priest is with very little alteration If this please not may one more antient and more cheerful be admitted viz. Walter Mapes Arch-deac of Oxf. in King Johns time M. Sâ—r. Sacerdos enim est cùm sacra dederit Tunc verò Presbyter cùm ter praebiberit i. e. When sacred things he gives he is a Priest A Presbyter when thrice before the rest He takes his Cup and so begins the Feast Thirdly Is it equipollent the word Priest to a sacrifice surely not in the etymology for it signifies onely an administration of holy things nor in the use unless we shall say that in the Primitive Church they owned a proper and real sacrifice These Bâ—ethren with the finger point us to take notice That they have seriously consulted Antiquity pag. 47. did they never in all their reading meet amongst a multitude of the like with such a passage as this Cùm haec tanta ac talia multa alia exempla praecedant Cypr. lib. 1. ep 3. quibus Sacerdotalis authoritas potestas divina dignatione formatur quales putas esse eos qui Sacerdotum hostes contra ecclesiam catholicam rebelles nec praemonentis domini comminatione nec futuri judicii ultione terrentur c. Whereas these such so great and so many examples have gone before us of the admonitions and executions of the judgments of God against the despisers of the Priesthood whereby the authority and power of Priesthood is by Gods special providence established what kind of men wouldst thou take them to be who being enemies to Priests and rebels against the Catholick Church are neither terrified with the Lords forewarning nor with the punishment of the judgment to come And what more usual than that title
The Br. iniquity in citing of the Rubricks The Rubrick will apologize for it self if you give it leave to speak out for the Brethren stopt its mouth with the padlock of c. before it had done because they would confute what it never meant to say its words at length are And shall receive the Sacraments and other rites according to the order of this Book appointed injoyning thereby none other either Sacraments or rites Sacraments and Rites but that they that are should be received according to the order of this Book and as they are appointed to be administred therein and none other or otherwise as also the words of the Act for uniformity of Common-prayer runs The sixth Exception is against the last Rubrick before the Catechism in order to Confirmation which is Except 6. That no man shall think that any detriment shall come to children by deferring of their Confirmation he shall know for truth that it is certain by Gods Word that children being baptized have all things necessary for their salvation and be undoubtedly saved The Objection is that after Baptisme they may commit many sins before they come to be confirmed which requires some growth in understanding whereof they cannot be pardoned without true repentance notwithstanding their being baptized c. Answ As the fumes of choler from the stomach ascending into the head do sometimes make dim the eyes and as the God of this world sometimes by covetousness sometimes by ambition Luk. 16.14 Joh. 12. Matth. 27. sometimes by envy and sometimes by other things darkens the mind So it seems to fare with these Brethr. whose eyes charity and duty would have enlightened to have seen that this Rubrick went upon no such supposition that the children should come to years before they were confirmed or else they could not answer the Catechisme but upon this that whereas under Popery soon after which this Book was compiled in part and imposed Confirmation was accounted a Sacrament namely one of the seven the being deprived whereof was counted a damning thing and therefore in case of extremity was no less in their opinion necessary then Bapt. to which end they did oftentimes confirm children in their infancy this practice being by the Church removed it was held necessary to remove the doctrine whereupon it was built viz. the necessity of confirmation unto salvation But this doth no more fix salvation upon the children that sin after Bapt. being come to years if they repent not then the Apostle doth fix it upon men who have received that ordinance 1 Pet. 3.21 when he saith that Baptisme doth now save us Doth this assure all men baptized of salvation if they commit sin afterward without repentance No more doth the other But because the Brethren do seem to teach with their finger Prov. 6.13 as the wise man saith some do as if their fingers itched at that part of the Rubrick that children baptized have all things necessary to salvation and are undoubtedly saved And ask â—he question where that word is that saith so which may indeed have reference unto the former clause or to this either I shall endeavour to shew them where First not to dispute the point here at large * In a Treatise Intituled The Pastor and the Clerk which I have done elsewhere I take it for granted that Bapt. is the seal of the Covenant of Grace by its succession unto and proportion with Circumcision which was so and by the effects of both Col. 2. Rom. 4.11 12 Act. 2.38 Col. 2.11 all which the Scriptures cited in the Margin will evince Secondly That all believers being the children of Abraham unto whom the promise whilest in uncircumcision was made viz. that God would be a Father unto him and his seed after him unto all Generations do inherit the promise of the Covenant of Grace Gal. 3.7 17. Genes 17.7 as fully as he did that is for themselves and their posterity in the faith Thirdly That the profession outward of the Faith and Bapt. constituteth a man in the esse and state of a Believer As it did Simon Ananias and Sapphira till their hypocrisie being discovered they were cut off from the Church Fourthly That a child born in the bosome of the Ch. and under the profession of the Gospel although the immediate parents should be either very wicked or excommunicate Ubicunque non prorsus intercidit vel extincta fuit Christianismi professio fraudantur jure suo infantes si à communi symbolo arcentur Calv. Epist Knoxio Novemb. 1559. is yet the child of the Church and capable of Baptisme upon orderly care for its due education in the faith Fifthly That the children are as capable Subjects of the reception of the Covenant of Grace which is free and of the H. Ghost and the seed of Grace as they are of the seed of reason which all men grant they have as appears in those infants that were sanctified in the womb And by those words of our Saviour where he affirmeth that even of those for he took them up in his arms Matth. 18. put his hands upon them and blessed them doth the Kingdome of God consist Now to these touching the Subject Add but those touching the efficacy of Baptism and according to my Logick the conclusion of the Church of England is most consequent for Baptisme doth save us 1 Pet. 3.2 If we be not born of water and of the H. Ghost we cannot enter into the Kingdome of God In the exposition of which testimony current of Scriptures speaking of the efficacy of Bapt. withholds my assent from the exposition of Calv. Act. 2.38 Rom. 6.3 Gal. 3. 1 Cor. 12. Be baptized saith Peter for the remission of sins We are baptized into his death and by it put on Christ and so are all baptized into one spirit And arise saith Ananias to Paul and be baptized and wash away thy sins Now surely he who makes his Kingdome to consist * Quum longe plures in puerili atate hinc rapiantur significare juxta hic dominum voluisse credo nullam omnio hominum aetatem regno coelorum plures cives dare Bucer in Matth. 19.13 much of these kind of Citizens and that declared so much of his good will unto them having made them capable of that ordinance that furnisheth those that receive it and put no obstacle themselves to the force of it with all things necessary to salvation what fault in the Churches argument viz. This Baptisme affordeth all things necessary to salvation but children are baptized and that of right they are therefore if so dying undoubtedly saved Except 7. Married to receive the Sacrament The seventh Exception is against that Rubrick after matrimony which saith that the married persons must receive the Communion the Brethren ask what necessity A question somewhat too loose for those who pretend to so much piety Why for several reasons it were enough
field as the Lord commanded me Whereas both it is in the Prophet Zachary not in Jerem. Zach. 11.12 13. and also runs thus And I said unto them If you think good give me my price and if not forbear so they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver And the Lord said unto me Cast it unto the Potter A goodly price that I was prized at of them And I took the thirty pieces of silver and cast them to the Potter in the House of the Lord. Here is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 variety of difference and yet I hope the Brethren will not deny but that the Evangelist Matthew did set down a sentence of Scripture To shake hands and part What think they of that of the Apostle It is written As I live saith the Lord every knee shall bow to me Rom. 14.11 and every tongue shall confess to God Yet in the Prophet where it is written Isa 45.23 it is thus I have sworn by my self the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousnese and shall not return that unto me every knee shall bow every tongue shall swear Which difference is such that the * In a conference with my self Quakers observe it as a ground of not-swearing because what the Prophet said of swearing the Apostle turns confessing A sentence then of Scripture it may be which is not the very words as the the title of those sentences is not these words but sentences To the second that this sentence as set down in Except 2 the common-prayer-Common-prayer-book is contrary to the place whence it is quoted and to other Scripture Answ The place quoted in the Service formerly is onely Ezek. 18. not naming any verse in the later Editions the 21 and 22 verses are figured but there is ground also for the sentence in the general context of that Chapter and particularly besides the former in vers 28 30 31 32. Now let us see whether there be any difference in sense much less any contrariety The Prayer-book saith At what time soever a sinner doth repent him of his sin from the bottom of his heart I will put all his wickedness out of my remembrance saith the Lord. In the Prophet verse 21 22. thus But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed and keep all my statutes and do that which is lawful and right he shall surely live he shall not dye All his transgressions that he hath committed they shall not be mentioned unto him in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live And verse 30. Repent Ezek. 18.30 31. and turn your selves from your transgressions And vers 31. ' Make you a new heart and a new spirit And then for the whensoever though implyed unavoidably in the former sentences yet 't is more than in terminis Jer. 18.7 Jer. 18.7 8. for even the Apostles cited Scriptures so as that they compacted several into one At what instant I speak concerning a Nation and concerning a Kingdom to pluck up and to pull down and to destroy it if that Nation against whom I have pronounced turn from their evill I will repent of the evill that I thought to do unto them Now compare At what time saith the Common-prayer-book in the Prophet Ezekiel it is If he will turn indefinitely excluding no time which is equivalent unto whensoever And ' At what instant saith the Prophet Jeremy that is more Repent him of his sins saith the Common-prayer-Book turn from all his sins that he hath committed saith Ezekiel vers 28. and repent and turn your selves from your transgressions vers 30. From the bottom of his heart saith the Prayer-book From all his sins saith Ezekiel vers 21. and from all his transgressions vers 30. which surely is the same with from the bottom of his heart which yet is more clearly implyed vers 31. Make you a new heart and a new spirit that ' is Repent you from your heart and spirit as before he had exhorted to repentance I will put all his wickedness out of my remembrance saith the Common-prayer-book All his transgressions that he hath committed they shall not be mentioned unto him saith Ezekiel vers 22. Now I shall leave it to every man that hath but two eyes Reason and Conscience to judge whether the Common-prayer-book hath a title in sense more than the Prophet pag. 26. Hebr. 4.7 chap. 3.12 Yea but it is dissonant from another To day if ye will hear his voice And Exhort one another daily while it is called to day Therefore we must not defer repentance Object but At what time soever encourages men so to do Answ To day if ye will hear As if both these sentences were not in the Old Testament as well as in the New and in both Testaments by the same Spirit 'T is evident by manifold places of Scripture that there is ever found place for true repentance without limiting of any time Why are they not offended with our Saviour for speaking of some that should be received at the eleventh hour Matth. 20. And with the Evangelist Luke for recording the repentance and acceptation of the Thief upon the Cross Luk. 23. And with the Prophet or the Lord rather in the Prophet Ezek. 23. for calling to her to return that was grown old not in ordinary sins but in Adulteries and Idolatry namely with a purpose of pardon if she would even then repent And a broken and contrite heart O Lord saith David thou wilt not despise and his repentance was late for his sin was toward the end of his life as Peter Martyr observes Pet. Mart. in 2 Sam. 11.2 One of the Martyrs hearing a Frier inveighing against the sins of the people in this manner O thou that hast spent thy youth and strength in the service of the devil dost thou think that God will now accept thee when thou canst sin no longer or to that effect said That had such doctrine been preached to him it would have cast him into despair when time was Is there any dissonancy in hastening men unto repentance and warning of them that they outstand not the day of grace and yet in the encouraging of them when they do repent To the third and last Exception that this sentence Except 3 At what time soever implies as if he could repent when he list Repent when we list c. and this occasions delay which carries many to Hell But by what Logick doth it follow that if men are told that that if they truly repent the Lord will forgive them Ergo They may repent when they list The inference is fully as good from Gods exhorting unto repentance and is urged thence by some because we are exhorted to repent therefore repentance is in the power of our own free will So whensoever you repent from the bottom of the heart c. Therefore you may when you will So that as the Brethren
fell in with Novatus in the former by seeming to deny forgiveness whensoever a man repents from the bottom of his heart so in the latter with Pelagius in concluding Austin Tom. 7. part 2. from a suposition if we do that therefore we may do it Though indeed he went rather upon the command than supposition Object Secondly where they say it occasions men to delay their repentance Have they not read Answ Rom. 2. That the goodness of God and especially that held out in the promise of forgiveness does lead unto repentance Artic. Relig. 17. Is not despair of mercy truly concluded to be a most dangerous downfall whereby the devill doth thrust men either into desperation or into wrethchlesness of most unclean living no lesse perilous than desperation But God may in mercy let these Brethren one day feel in their own consciences the pretious use of this sentence What time soever c. And indeed there is age enough in some of them before and sin enough I fear to make them need it In Psal 31. In te Domine speravi Savanarola to be sure that learned and constant Martyr having acknowledged in the person of sadness and despair objecting to him when he was very near his end Te scientiâ scripturarum ornavit sermonem praedicationis in ore tuo posuit quasi unum de magnis viris in medio populi te constituit That God had endued him with the knowledge of the Scriptures and put the word of preaching also into his mouth and made him as one of the great men of his time as * En Monachus solers rerum scrutator acutus Martyrio ornatus Savanarola pius Chr. Pflug ad Icon. Savanar Ante compend s Philosoph excellentiss he was indeed yet was glad to make use of this sentence even in the words of the Common-prayer though not out of it to refresh his conscience in the sore conflict under the sense of sin wherein he was Annon audivisti Dominum dicentem in quacunque die ingemuerit peccator omnium iniquitatum ejus non recordabor ampliùs Hast thou not heard the Lord saying In what day soever a sinner repenteth I will remember none of his sins any more But these perhaps are but the prefaces may not so much latent evil be within as that their true quarrel with this Scripture should be the same that theirs was in the Gospel with the good-man of the house Matth. 20. for making those that came in at the eleventh hour and had wrought but one equal to them that had undergone the burden and heat of the day And take it ill that a poor sinner at the last repenting from the bottom of his heart should be as the Thief crucified was with Christ in Paradise as well as they who conceive they have done God so so much good service This for the first General the reply to the Brethren SECT IV. A Vindication of the compilers of the Liturgy A Word now of vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy and first in general Script Angl. Censur Liturg. cap. 1. and it shall be in the words of Bucer censuring the whole order of the Service till the Communion In descriptione communionis quotidianarum praecum nihil video in libro esse descriptum quod non sit ex divinis literis desumptum si non ad verbum ut Psalmi Lectiones tamen sensu ut sunt collectae Modus quoque harum lectionum ac precum tempora sunt admodum congruenter cum verbo Dei observatione priscarum Ecclesiarum constituta Religione igitur summa retinenda erit vindicanda haec ceremonia In the description saith he of the Communion he meaneth here communion in prayer for of the Lords Supper he speaketh next and in the description of the daily prayers in the Common-prayer-book I see nothing set down but what is taken out of the holy Scriptures if not verbatim as the Psalms and Lessons yet in sense and meaning as are the Collects And the manner or measure and order of these Lessons and Prayers and the times are very convenient and appointed according to the Word of God and the practise of the most antient Churches Therefore this Service is to be retained and defended in a most religious manner Note How weak were Bucers eyes that could not see that beam which our Brethren stumble upon at the very threshold nay he could see nothing in all that part of the Service amiss even as it was then But in particular touching this sentence The wisdom and piety of the Composers did appear therein forasmuch as they prudently considered that there is nothing more necessary than the publishing of the Gospel The wisdom of the Composers of the Liturgy as being the power of God to salvation And that this is nothing else but the offer of mercy to the penitent through faith in Jesus Christ They considered that there is nothing draws to repentance more effectually than the goodness of God and hope of pardon Therefore being to propound the form of Confession and of Repentance they propose this and other sentences to excite them thereunto And because they would have the people to retain in their minds these special places of Scripture for that purpose and the words of Ezekiel being somewhat long they contracted the substance of them into this sentence Except 2 The second Exception in the body of the Book is against that clause in the general Confession No health in us There is no health in us May we not reply There is no Except 3 soundness in them Let the one help the other A third is TE DEUM Benedicite i. e. We praise thee O God All thy works praise thee Answ the TE DEUM and BENEDICITE which are said to be Apocryphals and interrupt the reading of the Scripture So do also the Prayers and Exhortations in the Liturgy If there must be no interruption of reading of the Scripture it must be all reading and no Liturgy That falshood that they would fix upon the Preface of the Book which they say would bear us in hand Scripture that it is provided against that the continual reading of Scripture shall not be interrupted lies in the falseness of their conception for the Preface takes the word Scripture in the sense that sometimes the Fathers do in a larger one namely and as was in use in the time when the Liturgy was compiled as comprehending those antient Religious writings which when properly distinguished from those that are Canonical as they are by the Articles which are the rule to measure particular expressions by that are found in the Offices of the Church then when they are so distinguished they are called Apocryphals but largely often Scripture and holy Scripture As Austin saith the books of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are called Solomons de quadam similitudine Retract l. 2. c. 4. for some
likeness-sake So are these also called Scripture and holy Scripture yea and sometimes Canonical some of them De doctr Christ lib. 2. cap. 8. by St. Austin But so that aliter Hieronymus accipit vocabulum hoc Canonicus aliter eam vocem Augustinus Innocentius Patres Carthaginuenses interpretanter Otherwise doth Jerom take the word Canonical and otherwise Austin Innocent and the Fathers at the Councel of Carthage saith our Whitaker Contr. 1. Q. 1. c. 4. And so I say otherwise do the Articles of our Church take the word Canonical and otherwise sometimes the prayer-Prayer-book and the Homilies But of this more largely above In the answer to the fourth general Exception Secondly These are brought in here not as an interrupting of the reading any more than the singing of a Psalm which though not express Scripture might be sung betwixt the Lessons or reading an Exhortation or Prayer for they are brought in by way of Hymn onely and are sung also in some Churches But in particular they except first against Te Deum Te Deum We praise thee O God c. that it is a piece taken out of the Mass-book and in Popish Churches usually sung Thence brought in by Bishops into Protestant Churches but no where enjoyned or warranted by any Law in force That it shews the Bishops are not able to give thanks themselves for extraordinary mercies That it is a superstitious formal dress c. Answ To the antiquity of Te Deum beyond the Mass-book its reference unto St. Ambrose might be testimony But it s being used there or taken thence doth no more derogate from the matter of it than it doth from the Psalmes Epistles and Gospels or then it doth from the Doctrine of Free-mercy against Merits which is yet there and in the very office of the Mass as we saw above In answer to the fifth general exception It is recorded as a reputation to the old Romans that they disdained not nec ab hoste doceri To learn even of an enemy for we In what is good all friends and fellows be That the Bishops brought it in does not argue want of ability to give thanks themselves but their want of self-conceit and singularity They prudently and modestly choosing to receive and close with what is good and of general reception That they might declare their communion with all Christians in what they might and fulfilling the Apostles prayer Rom. 15. With one mind and one mouth glorifie God with the rest of his Church That it is no where enjoyned and warranted by any Law in force Not established is more than they have charged the Book hitherto with Answ having not nor indeed being not able to do it alledged any one thing added to the body of the Liturgy established by Law pag. 28. n. 6. but an Appendix as themselves reckon of three prayers one for the Queen or King another for the Bishops a third for Queen Anne and the Royal Progeny 2. Act uniform com pr. Besides it is also untrue for themselves acknowledge as it is in the Act for the Uniformity of Common-prayer that the Books of 5 6 Edw. 6. shall be established without alteration except one sentence in the Letany and the addition of two in the Lords Supper c. Now it is evident that TE DEUM is in King Edwards Books and in the Book of Queen Elizabeth established by Parliament as we now receive it with all the Kings Parliaments and Judges since and comprehended by Bucer in that Elogy of his before named viz. That all generally till the Communion was agreeable to Gods Word and the use of the primitive Church Which form of Communion then hath been since reformed in part as he directed So that Te Deum is as well established by Law as any other part of the Book This gross reeling of the Brethren doth not it argue now they were etcaetera To the last which touches the matter of it viz. That it is a superstitious formal dress Seeing this is a high charge not on it but on the Common-prayer-book also yea and on the Church of England it should have in particular been shewed by the Brethren wherein it is so for dolosus versatur in universalibus This is the fruit perhaps of their Law-studies they have learned the course of Chancery to charge heavy crimes and prove nothing But shall I open this mystery of iniquity to be suspected in the breasts of these Brethren they seem to be Socinians and enemies to the Godhead of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the Doctrine of the Trinity both which are there splendidly acknowledged and professed in the Hymn of Te Deum Mr. Cartwright as it seems before Dr Reynolds and the rest at Hampton-Court were ashamed to except against it though they spared not where they thought exception might with any modesty be taken But as I said here is not onely a profession of the doctrine of the Trinity and a kind of repetition of the common Creed by way of Hymn The special use of the hymn TE DEUM but a particular application of prayer unto our Lord Jesus Christ which is done in no other part of the Book so expresly except the Letany Communion This is the superstition it may be feared that the Brethren aim at for other there is none We may now understand them when they call it and other parts of the Book Popish superstitious and Antichristian namely in his sense who writing against the doctrine of the Trinity and the Godhead of the Lord Jesus entituled his book Antithesis doctrinae Christi Antichristi de uno vero Deo An opposition of the doctrine of Christ and of Antichrist concerning the one true God To which the learned Zanchy making answer shews that for strengthning our faith in the doctrine of the Godhead of Christ Zanch. epistol dedic ad Sturm ante Resp suam ad Arrianum Tom. 8. p. 6. Ad hanc fidem in cordibus nostris servandam fovendam augendam quà m necessaria est crebra ad Christum in coelo residentem pro nobis interpellantem mentis elevatio EJUSQUE ac patris invocatio à verâ porrò seriâ contemplatione personae Christi ab assiâ—ua beneficiorum ejus commemoratione denique ab ardenti nominis ejus invocatione quibus fovetur fidos nostra separari non potest studium perpetuum resipiscentiae c. sunt autem haec meditatio invocatio resipiscentia tria praecipua verae fidei effecta c. For the nourishing this our faith saith he in the Godhead of Christ namely in our hearts and for the encreasing and preserving of it Prayer to Christ necessary for the strengthning of faith in him how necessary is the often lifting up our minds to Christ sitting in heaven and interceding for us and as necessary is prayer to him and to the Father Now from the true and serious consideration of the
their general exception The next is against the Ceremonies of this Church and of the Common-prayer Book in particular Of the Ceremonies in partic Against which they except these things First that they are not established by Law Secondly that they are superstitious Thirdly that they are scandalous Fourthly that they have been occasions of persecution Fifthly they are burdensom for their number And lastly even by the consequence of the Article 34. of the 2. Homilie of the time and place of Prayer by the very Preface of the Common-prayer Book it self and also the practice of the Bishops they ought to be removed Touching the first that they are not established they endeavour to prove first generally in that the Common-prayer Book is not established secondly particularly because of the Book of 2. and 5 6 Ed. 6. and the Act of Uniformity of Common-prayer Touching the first that they are not established In the Answ to the sixth gen Except because the Common-prayer Book is not established hath been answered above Touching the particular proof here the Brethren do prevaricate not unpalpably and very undutifully traduce Qu. Eliz. and the Parliament that established the Book of Common Prayer P. 34. For first they say that However the Rubrick before the Book of Common-prayer printed in 1 Eliz. directeth to use such Ornaments as were in use in 2 Edw. 6. Ornaments of service yet that is no part of the Book of Common-prayer which the Parliament of 1 Eliz. established because the Book of 5. 6 Edw. 6. hath no such Rubrick or direction and that Act of 1 Eliz. for Uniformity of Common-prayer injoyns all things to be done according to the Book of 5 6 Edw. 6. and none other nor otherwise therefore nothing according to the Book of 2 Edw. 6. which yet * P. 39. afterward they say is good Law So that they make that Parliament very weak and inconsiderate men Answ and indeed meer C. Combs if that word might be used in reference to so awfull an Assembly that what they appointed in the very entrance of the Book by Rubr. they would establish they did by the Act immediately overthrow They appoint such Ornaments in the Book unto the Minister in Divine Service as was in use by Act of Parliament in the second year of Ed. 6. And in the Act they conform the Prayer-book unto that of 5 6. Ed. 6. and none other or otherwise As if the former were not an Exception and a Provâ—so also in the Act it self Act for Uniformity prope sinem Provided alwayes sayes the Act and be it enacted that such Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers thereof shall be received and be in use as were in the Church of England by the Authority of Parliament in the second year of the Reign of King Edw. 6. untill other order shall be therein taken note by the Authority of the Queens Majesty Note with the advice of her Commissioners appointed and authorised under the Great Seal of England for Causes Ecclesiastical or of the Metropolitane of this Realm Which latter clause of the Act yields a farther Answer to the Breth viz. that if those Ornaments were not otherwise established either by the Act or by the Liturgie yet by this Act Other Ceremonies if they be established by the Queen and her Commissioners and so by the following Princes Q. hath power to ordain Ceremon Rites and Orders Ecclesiastical it is sufficient The like may be said for Ceremonies Rites and Orders appointed by the Book That Act immediately after the former words subjoyning And also that if there shall happen any contempt or irreverence to be used in the Ceremonies or Rites of the Church by the misusing of the Orders appointed in this Book the Queens Majesty may by the like advice of the said Commissioners or Metropolitane ordain and publish such further Ceremonies or Rites as may be most for the advancement of Gods glory the edifying of his Church and the due reverence of Christs holy Mysteries and Sacraments So that here is establishment enough Next they would prove that the Ceremonies in the Common-prayer Book for of those they are speaking are not established by Law Pag. 38. because the Common-prayer Book of 2 Edw. 6. is in some things referred to And particularly as to Ornaments and Rites both by the Rubrick before Common-prayer in the present Liturgy and by the Statute of 1 Eliz. 2. So that as to this point vâ—z of Ornaments and Rites which they named and as to Ceremonies for of those they are speaking and instance in them presently so much of that Book is still in force by Law But that Book hath expresly given a liberty in some of the things here desired to be no further imposed where in the last page thereof called Certain Notes for the more plain Explication and decent Ministration of things contained therein it saith As touching kneeling crossing holding up of hands knocking upon the breast and other gestures they may be used or left as every mans devotion serveth without blame This say the Brethren is still good Law c. wherein they do as well falsifie as prevaricate for neither the Rubrick before the Common-prayer nor the Act for Uniformity do name Ornaments and Rites as the Brethren recite the words but Ornaments only Now the word Rites comprehends the Ceremonies also which are not referred to in this Act but bounded in the Book it self and further liberty given to the Queen about them as we saw above out of the Act. Again they prevaricate for they know it was far from the meaning of that Rubrick they quote in 2 Ed. 6. when it names kneeling crossing and other gestures as things indifferent to be done or left according to every mans devotion Far it was from them to intend the Crosse in Baptism or the kneeling at the Communion or other gesturâ—s establisht in that very Book and by Act of Parliament and the latter whereof they explain by Rubrick in the Book of 5 6. Edw. 6. But the Brethren know they meant these words of such other Crossings and Kneelings and gestures which were many in those times not appointed by the Book So much for the â—stablishment The next is they are superstitious Superstitious Thirdly scandalous Both which have been replyed to above to which I referre for brevities sake only because this Tract is growen farre beyond what I intended The fourth is they have been occasions of persecution to manâ— able and godly peaceable Miniâ—teâ—s and sober Christians With reference to what hath been said above I add Pâ—â—â—â—â—ble Ministâ—â—s first Touching the Ministers that peacâ—â—ble they are not if like the Brethren Who first endâ—avour to enflame the people as well as Parliament and then to cast questions of difference between the King and Parliament â—ag â—â—â— â—â—â—r â— about Prerogative â— as they not obscurely do by quarrellâ—ng the validity of the
repetition of this Testimony Non Crambe bis cocta haec bis repetita placebunt In Musick streins often repeatâ—d are In mental harmony why is' t a jarr nemo post divinum judicium post populi suffragium post Coepiscoporum consensum judicem se non jam Episcopi sed Dei faceret Nemo dissidio unitatis Christi Ecclesiam scinderet c. For from no other root saith hee either Heresies spring or Schisms do arise than from this That Obedience is not given to the Priest or Minister of God so hee calls the Bishop by way of eminency as the words following declare And that it is not considered that there is for the time but One Priest and but ONE JUDGE in Christs stead To whom if the WHOLE Church according as the Scripture hath appointed were obedient no man would move any thing against the Colledge of Ministers no man after Gods sentence the peoples suffrage election or approbation after the consent of the other Bishops would make himself Judge not now of the Bishop but of God himself In which Testimony onely by the way noting that populi suffragium must be according to Calvins observation not properly an Election though in a large sense it may be called so according to that of the former Author elsewhere Quum ipsa plebs maxime habeat potestatem L. 1. Ep. 4. vel eligendi dignos Sacerdotes vel indignos recusandi That the people have chief right either to chuse good Ministers or of refusing those that are bad But either a signification of their desire whom they would have or else an approbation of the Election made by the Bishops and confirmed by the Magistrate So Calvin Instit lib. 4. cap. 4. s 12. Cap. 13. Laodic Concil Est quidem illud fateor optimâ ratione sancitum in Laodicensi concilio ne turbis electio permitteretur primum soli Clerici eligebant offerebant Magistratui tum ad multitudinem res deferebatur Aut si à multitudine incipiebatur tantum id fiebat ut sciretur quem potissimum expeteret It is saith hee I confess excellently decreed in the Councel of Laodicea that the election of Ministers should not be permitted to the people But first the Clergy did chuse then they presented him to the Magistrate and lastly hee was propounded to the people c. But this occasionally onely to prevent mistaking As to the former Testimony of Cyprian out of it wee learne First That the eminency of one Minister above the rest in Government is of Divine Institution Post Judicum divinum Secondly That hee being chosen hath a sole superiour power of judgement in the Church to whom all must be obedient I say not hee hath a sole power absolutely but a sole superiour power over all within his Diocess and Jurisdiction by this Testimony whatsoever is to be said of the thing it self according to the Word of God And indeed the liberty or advantage that Civil Laws give of exercising Episcopal Authority doth not imply they have no other The Church hath taught us they may concur Will you such as be unquiet disobedient and criminous within your Diocess Book of Consecrat Q. At the consecrat of a Bishop correct and punish according to such Authority as yee have by Gods Word and as to you shall be committed by the Ordinance of this Realm 〈…〉 Ecclesiastical whether in order or degree which at present wee dispute not be according to Scripture as before hath been shewn Government and Jurisdiction cannot bee separated from it although the Laws should not confer any yea forbid it seeing the Church cannot subsist without Government which cannot be exercised regularly without Bishops Cypr. lib. 8. Ep. 3 The same Cyprian and in the same Epistle now cited shewing it to be the design of Satan in setting men to oppose godly Bishops that so hee may destroy Discipline and by that the Church it self saith Apparet quis impugnet non scilicet Christus qui Sacerdotes aut constituit aut protegit sed ille qui Christi adversarius Ecclesiae ejus inimicus Ob hoc Ecclesiae praepositum sua infestatione persequitur ut Gubernatore sublato atrocius atque violentius circa Ecclesiae naufragia grassetur Who it is and upon what design that opposeth Episcopacy It appears saith hee who opposeth the Bishop to be sure not Christ who either appointeth or protecteth Bishops But hee who is Christs adversary and his Churches enemy for this end persecutes and infests the Church Ruler that the Pylot being taken off hee might with greater cruelty and violence make spoil and shipwrack of the Church Thus far Cyprian And this here for the Right of this office in humane and divine SUBSECT II. THe next is whether it bee a distinct Order from or a superiour Degree above the Presbytery or ordinary Ministry Whether Episcopacy be a different order Necess Ref. p. 42. Touching the judgement of the Church of England in which point there need not be any great controversie if men that have little else to defend themselves were not too captious of words Of which sort of controversies the Apostle giveth warning viz. 2 Tim. 2.14 That wee should not strive about words without profit Answ 1 The Preface to the Book of Ordination of Ministers saith Preface to the Book of Ordination It is evident to all men diligently reading holy Scripture and Ancient Authors that from the Apostles time there have been THESE ORDERS of Ministers in Christs Church Bishops Priests and Deacons which offices were evermore had in such reverent estimation that no man by his own private authority might presume to execute any of them Where it is plain that saying these Orders and then naming three it is as much as if it had said These three Orders which is the Exception the Brethren have against it And because it calleth them presently Offices But that altereth not what it said before for every order is an office and every office is in some order Again they evidently prevaricate for whereas they say that the passage Almighty God which hast appointed divers orders of Ministers in the Church or in thy Church is in one prayer at the consecration namely of a Bishop It must be noted that it is three times in the book viz. At the ordering of a Deacen of a Priest and consecrating of a Bishop Now applying this word in prayer divers orders of Ministers to every one of those offices Can any man in his conscience doubt but that they took them for several orders who compiled the book and which being confirmed by Parliament and Convocation 8. Eliz. cap. 1. is the judgement of the Church of England in this point although it doth not every time it mentions the Bishop name order but sometime Office and Ministry That the book calls the inauguration of a Bishop Consecration of Bishops not an ordering but a Consecration doth not overthrow what
they said in the Preface and in the Prayer in both which the book speaks of them as of several orders as wee saw but now for that word of Consecration is used for honours sake onely as being the separation of a person to a more eminent order If the Brethren could make advantage of it they might by the same Logomachy prove that Bishops Priests and Deacons are consecrated also for the Title of the Book saies The form and manner of consecrating Bishops Priests and Deacons Ergo Priests and Deacons are consecrated as well it may bee said as that Bishops are consecrated therefore not ordered This for the judgement of the Church of England and of the Articles whereof the book of Ordination is a branch unto which the Brethren as it seems have also subscribed Artic. 36. For revolting from which Can. 38. they have merited the censures of the Church but that they say those Canons have now no powder but there may bee some in making If Linwood and Anshelme say Linwood constitut Anshelm in Phâ—l 1. that Episcopacy is not an order distinct from Presbyters wee are to note that these and many streams like have but one head which when it issued out this was a little troubled it is St. Hierom whom in this they follow and whose words they use Who being provoaked by John Bishop of Hierusalem Ad Evagr. Tom 2. in Ep. ad Tit. 1. took occasion warmly to make that a general note which hee had but from a few particular instances and the latitude of the word Bishop in Scripture That because there was not at that time any one so constituted at Ephesus Act. 22. when Paul left that Church therefore there was not one afterward when John wrote his Revelation and Christ sent the message to the Angel especially of that Church To say that Angel was the company of the Ministers Apoc 2. is to beg the question not to answer the proof Also because there was none one while more specially designed by Paul at Philippi or at least spoken to therefore there was none at Colosse when as the Apostle directs his speech to bee delivered to Archippus To say there was no other Minister there is to avoid what can not by such evasion be escaped Ephesus had a Bishop or call him what you will a superiour Governour to all the Ministers 1 Tim. 1. when Timothy was there and so had the Isle of Crete when Titus governed it Tit. 1. When the Apostle admonisheth the Hebrews to obey them that have the Rule over them Heb. 13. Act. 15. Gal. 2. 1 Cor. 3 5. 2 Cor. 3.6 Eph. 6.21 Rom. 13.4 cap. 15.8 doth it exclude the government of James or of Peter to whom Paul applyed himself as the pillars and rectors of that Church A speech uttered to many doth not shut out the precedency of some one among them The word Deacon is sometime applyed to the Apostles themselves and to the Evangelists And to the Magistrate Luk. 19.44 1 Pet. 2.12 and to â—hr st himself So the word Episcopacy sometimes signiâ—ies viâ—itation in general in the Scripture sometimes the offiâ—e of A ostleship Act. 1.20 And his Bishoprick let ano her take â—nâ— sometimes the office of a Bishop or Pastor or Presbyter 1 Tim. 3. Hee that desireth the office of a Bishop But this latitude of the Word in Scripture impedeth not but that the thing now understood thereby may be in Scripâ—ure distinct from that of Presbyter and is in all those plaâ—es and persons where and who had jurisdiction over other Ministers as the Apostles the Evangelists and others such as Timothy and Titus were But that Hieron even when hee disputes upon the Word was not so clear against the thing Ep. ad Evagr. in ipso fine appeâ—rs in that hee saith Presbyter Episcopus aliud aetatis aliud dignitatis est nomen Unde ad â—imotheum de ordinatione Episcopi Diaconi dicitur de Presbyteris omnino reticetur quia in Episcopo Presbyter continetur Et ut sciamus traditiones Apâ—stolicas sumptas de Veteri Testamento Qâ—od Aaron silii ejus atque Levitae in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Episcopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicent in Ecclesia The name saith hee of Presbyter and Bishops the one is a title of years the other of dignity Whence it is that in the Epistle to Timothy there is mention made of the ordination of a Bishop and a Deacon by the way note Consecration an Ordination that Antiquity doth name the consecration of a Bishop ordination which the Brethren deny but there is no mention there of the ordination of a Presbyter because that in a Bishop a Presbyter is also contained And that wee may understand the postolical traditions taken out of the Old Testament Hieron judgement of Epâ—scopacy whilst he dâ—sputes against it look what Aaron and his Sons and the Levites were in the Temple Let the Bishops and he Presbyters and the Deacons challenge unto themselves in the Church where first we have as much distinction yeelded as was betwixt Aaron and his Sons and the Levites between the Bishops and Presbyters and Deacons Secondly That this distinction is Apostolical and grounded on the equity of the orders of the Ministery in the Old Testament so that it is agreeable unto Scripture both in the Old and New Testament Thirdly That the word Bishop is used for Presbyter sometimes because it comprehends it But hee doth not say it is comprehended also of it SUBSECT II. Answ 2 BUt wee may quit this controversie about the distinction of the orders of Episcopacy and Presbytery for the question is of the power which of men in the same degree is not alwaies the same When the same Father saith in the same Epistle Quid enim facit exceptâ ordinatione Ep. ad Evagr. Episcopus quod non facit Presbyter What doth a Bishop excepting Ordination which a Presbyter doth not and where elsewhere hee saith That imposition of hands or confirmation of the Baptized was proper to the Bishops though hee qualifie it by saying that it was done ad honorem potius Sacerdotis quam ad legis necessitatem ' for the honour of the Priesthood for so by way of excellency hee often as also other of that time call Episcopacy as we saw above out of Cyprian rather than by necessity of the institution ' And when in the former Epistle and elsewhere hee saith Ad Evagr. in Tâ—t cap. 1. In toto orbe decretum est ut unus de Presbyteris electus superponeretur caeteris ad quem omnis Ecclesiae cura pertineret Schismatum semina tollâ—rentur That it was decreed through the whole world that one should be elected out of the Presbyters and set over the rest unto whom the whole care of the Church should belong and the seeds of Schism taken away Also Ecclesiae
follows that no Minister can be made but hee must have the Authority of the Holy Ghost Secondly It is necessary also that hee receive the Holy Ghost it self in the gifts and abilities of it for the discharge of this calling For no man can say that is effectually teach that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 12. And every spirit that confesseth that is soundly preacheth that Jesus is the Christ is of God 1 John 4.1 2. John 16. For it is the Holy Ghost onely that leadeth into all Truth concerning Christ Thirdly The conveyance of the Holy Ghost in all publick Ordinances is by some Ministerial hand as in Baptism and the Lords Supper wherein at least unto the faithful the Holy Ghost is conveyed So as in respect of the thing it self the Holy Ghost is necessary to bee conveyed to every Minister that is to bee ordained Sense of the words 2. Next for the meaning of the phrase First wee must observe That the word Holy Ghost here may be either taken for his person and gifts or for his Authority or both by a Metonymy It is taken for his gifts where it is said John 7. that the Holy Ghost was not yet because Christ was not yet glorified It is taken for his Authority when the Apostle saith that the Holy Ghost had made the Ministers of Ephesus the overseers of the flock Act. 20. Secondly wee may expound the words by way of declaration and solemn pronouncing as well as imparative or communicative bidding And the other words may bee so expounded also according as in absolution it is in one place in the Common prayer-Prayer-Book pronounced authoritatively yet it is expounded to bee onely a declaring and pronouncing Now to apply the former The word Holy Ghost here seems to bee taken for the Authority especially of the Holy Ghost to the exercise of the Ministerial function As if it were said Take thou the Authority of the Holy Ghost which hee hath appointed his Church to communicate and dispense to persons worthy for the Ministry of the Word in binding and loosing and of the Sacraments 3. To their exceptions First To the exception general it self that this form hath no warrant No warrant It is answered Answ That in other things they urge the Letter of the Scripture And surely where there is no incongruity in the thing nor impediment from some other cause from using the very words of Institution there cannot bee desired a better warrant Now that there is no such incongruity nor impediment shall bee shewn in answering unto the Reasons of the former exception whereof the first is that Proof none but God himself hath power to give the Holy Ghost But it hindreth not but that what none but a superiour Authority can have power to give originally may yet bee given ministerially Answ and by delegation from that superiour power Neither Moses had power to consecrate Aaron nor Samuel to confer the Kingdome unto David nor the Apostles themselves to give the Holy Ghost but by delegation and commission Which power if as to that right of the conferring the power and authority of the Holy Ghost to the ordaining of a Minister the Church ministerially hath not for without that power it cannot bee done then must every Minister receive his authority and outward call immediately from Heaven Neither is repugnant hereunto Lib. 1. dist 14. cap. 1. Hic quaeritur Aug. de Trin. l. 15. c. 26. either that of the Master of the sentences nor of Austin himself whence hee hath it viz. Neque enim aliquis discipulorum ejus dedit spiritum sanctum Orabant quippe ut veniret in eos quibus manum imponebant non eum ipsi dabant Quem morem in suis propositis etiam nunc servat Ecclesia Object For neither saith hee any of the Disc ples gave the Holy Ghost but they prayed that hee might come on those upon whom they laid their hands but gave him not themselves which custome the Church even now retaineth in her Bishops For our Church doth pray in laying on of hands and with and under the words Answ 1 of Institution asketh also before and after What form of words the Apostles used in laying on of hands and conferring the Holy Ghost is not expressed but unlikely it is that they used none Now those they used whether they were those used by our Saviour or others in form of praying cannot be determined nor therefore their example urged in that which our Church pretendeth not unto But the former will bee more evident in other ministrations also In Absolution the form is in the Liturgy in the visitation of the sick Imperative and authoritative as I may so speak and in a good sense so it is by his authority committed unto mee I absolve thee from all thy sin c. yet in the general absolution after the general confession at morning-prayer by which the former must bee expounded it is expressed to bee but declaratory by way of solemn and authoritative pronouncing and with the concurrence of prayer for efficacy of such declaration Almighty God who hast given power and commandment to declare and pronounce to his people being penitent the absolution and remission of their sins c. In Baptism the Holy Ghost and remission of sins is given and that by the ministration and the words spoken by the Minister So also in the Lords Supper the body and blood of Christ sacramentally is conferred by the words and action of the Minister none of which is in the power of any to bestow but God onely Shall wee therefore except against the fruits of those Ordinances or against the Minister for pronouncing such words and doing such actions Again as in the Absolution there goeth with the Pronounciation prayer also and so likewise in Baptism and the Lords Supper what hindereth but that the words may be taken under a precatory sense also and as including prayer which more expresly goeth both before and after The words therefore take thou the Holy Ghost do not argue an original or an inherent power but Ministerial onely and so as not excluding a precatory vertue also This to the first Reason The second is because they were the words of Christ himself to his Apostles what Proof 2 then were all Christs words to his Apostles peculiar to them Answ It was to his Apostles that hee gave the command of baptizing and teaching and of giving his last Supper Have none therefore power since to administer these Ordinances Again if no Minister can be made but by the Holy Ghost and his Authority and this Authority were proper onely to the Apostles because the words were spoken to them then is the Church deprived of the Holy Ghost ever since the Apostles nor hath power to ordain a Ministry The third reason is taken from the parallel of other administrations Proof wherein the words of institution in
King James's Proclamation for Uniformity of Common-prayer prefixed to some Editions of the Liturgy which by Law was established in the daies of the late Queen of famous memory blessed with a peace and prosperity both EXTRAORDINARY and of many years continuance A STRONG evidence that God was therewith well pleased The importunity of the complainers was great their affirmations vehement and the zeal wherewith the same did seem to bee accompanied very specious And they began such proceedings as did rather raise a scandal in the Church than take offence away and did other things carrying a very apparent shew of Sedition Upon this double experience when such motions of change were made to him hee * In his Proclamation for unity of Common-Prayer and confer H. Court crushed the chicken here in the shell lest it being hatched by indulgence might pick out his eyes as it did afterward some others and did well King Charls His Majesties Father yeelded in these things to Scotland but doth not obscurely bewail it If any saith hee speaking of Episcopacy shall impute my yeelding to them my failing and sin Icon. Basilic medit 17. p. m. 156. I can easily acknowledge it On the issue whereof no man can without horrour reflect Now Faelix quem faciunt aliena pericula cautum O happy hee whom others failings make Wise to become and by them warning take But it may be times are different and am I made of the Kings Counsel I conclude all 2 Chron. 25.16 Erasm in Epist Hieron ad Heliodor Tom. 1. Ep. 1. in Antidot advers calumniam first with that of Erasmus Ad haec video esse non-nullos hujuscemodiingenio ut cùm apicula ad omnem flosculum ad omnem advolans fruticem tantum id excerpat quod ad mellificium sit conducibile ipsi solum hoc venentur si quid sit quod aliquo pacto Calumniari possint His mos est è toto libro quatuor aut quinque verba decerpere atque in eis calumniandis ostendere quantum ingenio polleant Non animadvertunt quibus temporibus cui Causes of calumniating of an Author qua occasione quo animo scripserit ille Neque conferunt quid praecesserit quid sequatur quid alio loco eadem de rescripserit Tantum urgent ac premunt quatuor illa verba ad ea machinas omnes admovent Syllogismorum detorquent depravant aliquoties non intellecta calumniantur That is I perceive saith Erasmus that some men are of that disposition that whereas the little Bee flyes to every flower and to every green thing onely that it may gather that whereof it would make honey these men only hunt after that which they may rail at The custome of such men is out of a whole book to cull out four or five words and in reviling of them to shew what abilities they have They consider not in what times the Author wrote nor to what persons nor upon what occasion nor with what intention Nor do they compare what went before with what follows after what hee said of the same matter in another place Onely they urge those four words they wrest they deprave and sometimes reproach what they understand not Thus far hee Next with that elegant and prudent observation absit invidia verbo of our late Soveraign upon this same Argument Icon. Basilic Medit. 27. To His Majesty that now is Not but that saith hee the draught being excellent as to the main both for Doctrine and Government in the Church of England some liues as in very good figures may happily need some sweetening or polishing Which might have easily been done by a safe and gentle hand if some mens praecipitancy had not violently demanded such rude alterations as would have quite destroyed all the beauty and proportion of the whole Thus the King The close of all Dr. Usher L. Primate of Armagh Serm. before the H. of Com. Febr. 18. 1620. pag. 6 7. Rom. 16.17 I seal up all with the grave admonition of a Primate Bishop and the Authentique Decision of this case by a Prince of Kings Let not every wanton wit saith the former to one of the Houses of Parliament bee permitted to bring what fancies hee list into the pulpit and to disturb things that have been well ordered I beseech you Brethen saith the Apostle mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the Doctrine which yee have learned and avoid them Howsoever wee may see cause why wee should dissent from others in matter of opinion yet let us remember that that is no cause why wee should break the Kings Peace and make a rent in the Church of God A thing deeply to bee thought of by the Ismaels Ismaels of our time whose hand is against every man Gen. 16.12 and every mans hand against them who bite and devour one another until they bee consumed one of another Gal. 5.15 who forsake the fellowship of the Saints and by sacrilegious separation break this bond of peace Little do these men consider how precious the Peace of the Church ought to be in our eyes to bee redeemed with a thousand of our lives and of what dangerous consequence the matter of Schism is unto their own souls For howsoever the Schismatick secundum affectum as the Schoolmen speak in his intention and wicked purpose taketh away unity from the Church even as hee that hateth God taketh away goodness from him as much as in him lyeth yet secundum effectum in truth and in very deed hee taketh away the unity of the Church onely from himself that is hee cutteth himself off from being united with the rest of the body and being dissevered from the body how is it possible that hee should retain communion with the head Thus that most learned Primate Note for whom the Brethren seem to have a special reverence in recommending of his Model of Episcopacy Necessit Reform p. 53. Wherein yet hee did propound but not prescribe his â—udgement according to that Seneca Illi qui in his rebus nobis praecesserunt non Domini sed Duces nostri sunt or as the Apostle as a helper 2 Cor. 1.24 not as a Lord over the Faith of the Church in this particular but especially as respecting the time when more could not well bee hoped for The last word as 't is meet shall bee the Kings and 't was his deciding one in these controversies after hearing of all debates about them at the conference at Hampt Court Proclamat for authorizing the book of Com. prayer at the close And last of all saith hee wee do admonish all men that herereafter they shall not expect nor attempt any further alteration in the common and publick form of Gods service from this which is now ESTABLISHED For that neither will wee give way to any to presume that our own judgement having determined in a matter of this weight shall bee sweighed to
1 Cor. 4.5 until the Lord come who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts and then shall every man have praise of God who shall defer his judgement till then for that his modesty and charity Neither let others be difficult in forgiving Concilium Alexandr apud Ruffin Hist lib. 1. cap. 28. remembring that ille Evangellicus junior filius paternae depopulatur substantiae sed in semetipsum reversus non solum suscipi meruit sed dignus paternis complexibus deputatur annulum fidei recipit stola circumdatur per quam quid aliud quam Sacerdotii declarantur insignia Nec probabilis extitit apud patrem senior filius quod invidit recepto nec tantum meriti habuit non delinquendo quantum noxae contraxit non indulgendo Germano I. E. Luke 15. That younger Son mentioned in the Gospel the waster of his Fathers substance but returning unto himself did not onely obtain to be received but was also counted worthy of his Fathers embracements and received the Ring of Faith and was cloathed with a Robe by which what other thing is signified than the Ornaments of Priesthood Neither was the elder Son approved of his Father in that hee envyed the reception of his Brother Neither deserved hee so well by not offending as hee contracted guilt by not indulging Let no man therefore bee high minded but fear Rom. 11. Gal. 6. and let him that standeth take heed least hee fall And let him whom God hath recalled Psal 8. Prov. 14.14 1 King 2. see that hee return not again to folly For the backslider in heart shall bee satisfied with his own way as wee see in Shimei who was not hearty to his submission And I remember that Watson the Priest having well * Watsons Quodlibets defended allegeance was afterward executed for * At Winchester treason I crave therefore the benefit and exercise of that Article of our Faith which every one of us professeth the communion of Saints And particularly in the conjunction of their prayers with mine that God who hath begun this good work in mee Phil. 1.6 would strengthen stablish confirm and perfect it until the day of Christ Amen SECT II. The heads of this Treatise ANd now having rendred the grounds of these Retractations and given a reason of mine and the Church of Englands Faith in these particulars And represented the consent thereof with the holy Scripture with primitive Antiquity and with the judgement of the best of the late writers of the Reformed Churches and made reply also to such Objections as did seem material let mee adjure all men and conclude in the Church affair with the prayer obtestation and admonition of the learned Zanchy Zanch. in clausulâ observationum in confess suam Tom. 8. Precor omnes Christianos per Dominum Jesum ut positis vanis privatorum hominum somniis positis etiam propriae carnis affectibus odiis inimicitiis amplexi vero certam ac salutarem veteris Ecclesiae doctrinam Christianamque dilectionem coeamus omnes in unam fidem sanctamque amicitiam sicut nobis quoque omnibus unus est Deus unus Mediator unum Baptisma una spes vocationis nostrae Ad gloriam nominis Dei Ecclesiae aedificationem salutemque animorum nostrorum Citius enim quam putamus sistemur ante tribunal Christi ut referat unusquisque prout se gesserat in corpore in hac vita Quando post hanc vitam nulla spes veniae nullus resipiscentiae locus I beseech all Christians saith hee by the Lord Jesus that laying aside the dreams and vanities of private men and laying aside also the corrupt affections of their own flesh as hatred and enmities and embracing the sure and soveraign Doctrine of the Antient Church with Christian love wee may all grow into one Faith and Christian friendship As there is to us also all but one God one Mediator one Baptism one hope of our Calling This do wee to the glory of the Name of God the edification of the Church and the salvation of our own souls For sooner than wee are aware of Note wee shall bee set before the judgement seat of Christ that every one may receive according as hee hath carried himself in the body and in this life when after this life there will bee no hope of pardon no place for repentance Thus far hee And in the matter of the Civil State I cannot end better than with that most true and charitable both judgement and prediction of the Kingly Prophet our late slaughtered Soveraign Icon. Basilic Medit. 27. speaking to His Majesty that now is and whom God long preserve Be confident saith hee as I am that the most of all sides who have done amiss have done so not out of malice but mis-information or mis-apprehension of things And none will bee more loyal and faithful to mee and you than those subjects who sensible of their errours and our injuries will feel in their own souls most vehement motives to repentance and earnest desires to make some reparations for their former defects Psalm 32.3 5. Whilst I kept silence thy hand was heavy on mee I said I will confess and thou forgavest mee O ter beatum cui bonus arbiter Non imputavit lubrica devia Errata vitae nec reperit dolum Caeco in recessu pectoris Erasm in vita Hieron de ipso Hieron verba faciens Fit nescio quo pacto ut efficacius nos eorum exempla permoveant quibus ex vitiosa vita contigit ad pietatem resipiscere * Reg. juris in Tit. digest Reg. 108. Fere in omnibus paenalibus judiciis aetati imprudentiae succurritur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 CHAP. XI Fuga Vacui or Some Additionals Phys lib. 4. cap. 8. Seqq. NOn dari Vacuum that there is no emptiness in Nature and the works of God was the assertion of the Philosopher And ne detur Vacuum that there may be none in Morals and in our works must be the contention of every Writer For which purpose partly to fill the Vacant pages and specially the Readers mind with satisfaction I shall subjoyn first certain notes in reference unto the chief Arguments in this Treatise Next some other Examples of Retractations and lastly an undoubted evidence of the sincerity of my own Concerning the Notes 1. Touching the Common-Prayer-Book the notable * Suggested to my search by my Reverend friend Mr. Tim. Thriscrosse Testimony of John Careless Confessor and Martyr who died in the Marshalsey 1556. The words * Fox Act. Mon. Edit the first for none since have it in his Examination are Dr. Martin But I pray thee how sayest thou now thy second Book the Liturgy reformed in 5 6. Edw. 6. is also condemned in divers points of Heresie at Frankford among the Brethren which Book will you allow Careless I am
sure that it is not there in any point condemned of Heresie unless it be of the ANABAPTISTS as it is here And I do not think but there be some as well there as in England and it is like enough that SUCH do finde fault with it Who are offended with the Liturgy Dr. Martin Nay even of Mr. Cox himself and other that were Preachers in King Edwards time they have disproved your * This Book established 5 6. Edw. 6. was re-established 1. Eliz. with two or three alterations and is that we now use as was proved above The Alterations are in the Act prefixed before the Service-Book second Book in divers points and have now made a third Book how say you which of these three Books will you allow now Careless Forsooth I say still as I have written that the second Book is good and godly and IN ALL POINTS agreeing to the Word of God and I am sure that neither Master Cox nor any other of our godly Preachers that be fled unto Frankford have condemned that Book IN ANY POINT as repugnant to the Word of God though perchance they have altered something therein according to the usage of that Country where now they are And I have not denied in my Articles but the Church of Christ hath power and authority to enlarge or diminish any thing in the same GOOD BOOK so far forth as it is agreeable to the Scriptures D. Martin But what authority have you or how durst you bee so bold to make an Article of the Faith concerning that Book to be beleeved of all men under pain of damnation Carelesse Ah Master Doctor have I bound any man to beleeve that Article under pain of damnation as you do charge mee I am sure there is no such word in all my Articles I have there written what I hold and beleeve my self as I am bound to do in conscience And now I will add thus much more That the same Book which is so consonant and agreeable to the Word of God ☞ Nore in the fear of God and consider being set forth by Common Authority both of the Kings Majesty that is dead and the whole Parliament House ought not to be despised by mee or any other private man under pain of Gods high displeasure and DAMNATION except they repent 2. Concerning Monarchy and that of this Nation * The Testimony of Mr. Sam. Ward sometime the famous Preacher of Ipswitch the Author of several elegant and useful pieces Hoc enim mihi ratum indubitatum semper fuit hoc semper cum Politicis Theologis gravissimis sensi palum apud omnes professus sum Monarchiam haereditariam sub qua mihi vitales auras feliciter haurine bonis omnimodis frui piè tranquillè degere contigit esse omnium quotquot extant aut excogitari possunt regiminum formae longè multumque praestantissimam utilissimam laudatissimam Cui me ex animo favere ille novit qui perscrutatur renes meos c. i. e. This hath alwaies been with mee a certain and undoubted maxime In his Preface to King Charls the first prefixed before his Treatise in Latine of the Load-stone dedicated unto him intituled Magnetis Reductorium this alwaies with the best States-men and Divines I have ever concluded and openly among all men professed viz. That a Monarchical Government hereditary under which providence hath so ordered that I have drawn my vital breath enjoyed many comforts have had the opportunity to live godly and quietly is of all Governments which are or can be divised by many degrees the best the most beneficial and most commendable to which that I am from my heart a well-wisher hee knows that searches my reins and my heart said that Author Dr. Sanderson the now Right Reverend Bishop of Lincoln in his late treatise intituled Episcopacy not prejudicial to Regal Power as established by Law in the Postscript Lastly Concerning the Divine Right of Episcopacy Though from one in that function yet because it derives it higher and founds it somewhat deeper more solidly and also briefer than is usually done deserves more special notice His words are My opinion is that Episcopal Government is not to bee derived meerly from Apostolical practice or Institution But that it is originally founded in the person and office of the Messias our Blessed Lord JESUS CHRIST who being sent by his heavenly Father to bee the great Apostle Heb. 3.1 Bishop and Pastor 1 Pet. 2.25 of his Church and annointed to that office immediately after his Baptism by JOHN with power and the Holy Ghost Act. 10.37 8. descending then upon him in a bodily shape Luke 3.22 did afterward before his ascension into Heaven send and impower his holy Apostles giving them the Holy Ghost likewise as his Father had given him John 20.21 to execute the same Apostolical Episcopal and Pastoral office for the ordering and governing of his Church until his coming again and so the same office to continue in them and their Successors unto the end of the world Mat. 28.18 20. This I take to be so clear from these and other like Texts of Scripture that if they shall bee diligently compared together both between themselves and with the following practice of all the Churches of Christ as well in the Apostles times as in the purest and Primitive times nearest thereunto there will bee left little cause why any man should doubt thereof Thus that Reverend Author II. Certain other Examples of Retractations In the next place other Instances of Retractations and repentings Beda prefat in Retract suas in Actor Apostol Tom. 6. Cujus Augustini industriam nobis quoque pro modulo nostro placuit imitari Nunc in idem volumen Actor Apostolic brevem Retractationis libellum condamus studio maximè vel addendi quae minus dicta vel emendandi quae socus quam placuit dicta videbantur The ingenuity and industry of St. Austin in his Retractations it is my purpose in my small measure to imitate also Now therefore let us compile a brief Treatise of Retractations with this intent especially either of adding those things which were not sufficiently expressed or of amending those that were expressed otherwise than did seem convenient saith venerable Bede Again For my part saith another though a late Author yet one of good note Good Reader Mr. Whately in his Bride-Bush in his advertisement to the Reader I account it no shame to confess and revoke an errour and will therefore do it plainly and without circumstance Then hee closes with this honest and Austin-like expression viz. From him that had rather confess his own error than make thee erre for company The like whereunto wee heard above out of that Father And Dr. Bishop Brownriggs sentence concerning Retractations Related by Dr. Gauden the now very Rev. Bishop of Excester his successon Brownrigge the late most worthy Bishop of Excester would say that Hee
men The Br. object Tyranny to Q. Eliz. and the Parl. which is not to be imagined To this first in general If this Reason be admitted it doth not only overthrow all constitutions that concern Religion whether made by Church or State whensoever any turbulent spirit shall fancy them not to be according to the Word And to all States and Churches But it condemns also all the Reformed Churches yea all the Churches and Christian States that are or ever have been I think in the world And particularly majorem in modum and in a special manner the Church of Geneva Ch. of Geneva requires conformity by Oath Revel 13.11 and Calvins Discipline where they are obliged thereunto by oath But to the dilemma in particular neither of the two Horns of this Lamb that speaks like a Dragon have any strength Have they forgotten or never learned that boyes are taught in the very rudiments of Logick and reasoning Kek. Log l. 3. c. 12. can 7. Quod per bonam consequentiam ex testimonio aliquo divino elicitur id EANDEM cum eo vim habet That what by good consequence is drawn from Scripture hath the same force that Scripture hath Did not our Saviour and all the Apostles prove their Doctrine so unto those that received nothing from them but what they proved Do not the Brethren think their Sermons and this their Book ought to be obeyed absolutely and in all the points they have excepted And indeed a good consequence is nothing but a natural effect Consequences And an effect is of the same nature with its cause yea as one saith nothing else but the cause in act or at least the cause is in the effect R. Hook l. 5. so is Scripture in the true consequénces of it And yet subscription to such conclusions do not argue the Authors to be infallible but only to be eyes unto the weaker-sighted to see the light by Tert. Advers Haeret. Omnia quidem dicta Domini omnibus posita sunt quae per aures judaeorum ad nos pervenerunt Gods Word is propounded unto all but it comes to us by the ears and so by the eyes of others And because men are called to subscribe and not children who should have their eyes their subscription only acknowledgeth that the Church and State have taken a true sample from the original leaving this still as the standard as prior tempore ordine naturâ dignitate Such are all the true determinations of Judges in reference to the Law as Deut. 17. They shall expound the Law to thee And the disobedient there was punished with death for contempt of the sentence of the Church and State and yet their determinations were not of equal authority but of equal force with the Law it self So here Secondly To the other horn of this Lamb or dilemma That else the statute did intend to tyrannize over the conscience which they say is not to be imagined Oportuit esse memorem Answ Did not the Brethren in the very lines immediately going before acknowledge yea urge it as an argument out of Sir Edw. Coke who saith He heard Wray Chief Justice of the K. Bench Pasch 23 Eliz. quoting Dier 23 Eliz. 377. lib. 6. fol. 69. Greens case Smiths case report that where one Smith subscribed to the 39 Articles of Religion with this addition so far forth as the same were agreeable to the Word of God that it was resolved by him and all the Judges of England that this subscription was not according to the Statute of Eliz 13. Because the Statute required an absolute subscription and this subscription made it conditional And that this Act was made for avoiding diversity of opinions c. And by this additâ—on the party might by his own private opinion take some of them to be against the Word of God and by this means diversity of opinions should not be avoided which was the scope of the Statute and the very Act it self made touching subscription hereby by of none effect Thus far their own quotation So then it is evident by the words themselves quoted just before and by the sentence of all the Judges of England that the Statute requireth absolute subscription which if it do they say it did intend to tyrannize over the consciences of men So then Q. Eliz. and that Parl. with all the Kings and Parliaments since that have confirmed that Act were Tyrants It concerns the present Parl. to vindicate their predecessors in this point also To what they add concerning mens subscribing when they are young Subscription of young men and before their judgments be mature It is answered first Those admitted to the Ministry though they may be as Timothy was but young in age yet they are not to be Novices in knowledge And Subscription is a good bond upon them Use of subscription both for the peoples good and their own to preserve them from novelties and apostacy But so that no man is engaged against the Word of God I hope then they will not urge the obligation of the Covenant upon those who have not had time or solidity throughly to ponder and weigh all the Articles thereof in the ballance of the Sanctuary and in the scale of the Law as they phrase it To the last of this head The liberty given to tender consciences Liberty to tender consciences is to be in things of lesser not of fundamentall consequence and in the Articles of the Faith for then how should the Magistrate be custos utriusque tabulae How should the Prince perform his trust of the souls as well as the bodies estates and names of his people How should there be one God one Faith one Baptisme in a particular Church and we all with one mouth glorifie God This is also against the practice of all Churches we have no such custome 1 Cor. 11. nor the Churches of God Thus much in reply to their three general first object against the Articles 1. Their doubtfulnesse 2. Their erroniousness and 3. The exacting of subscription to them I come now to the fourth viz. Their defectiveness and imperfection Defectiveness of the Artic. Where the first Exception is that Art 6. it is said that In the name of the holy Scripture we understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority there was never any doubt in the Church The Brethren oppose that some Books and passages of the New Testament have been doubted of as the Epistle of James the second Epistle of Peter The Article they say is defective in not enumerating all the Books of the New Testament as it had done those of the Old and of the Apocrypha comprehending them only under this expression All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received These words of the Article being the former contains no matter of doctrine namely those of which there was never any doubt in the
Church and the latter All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received being plain and evident all Christians now agreeing in the number of them throughout Europe The exception against them might have been omitted as tending to raise scruples in the minds of the people unless this Tract of the Brethren had been presented in writing and not published in print But that this scruple may not extend it self too far I shall name such as to my remembrance have been at any time doubted of They are the second Epistle of Peter See a very full Confutation of these doubts in Bellarm de verb. D. lib. 1 cap. 16. seqq Tertul. Cont. Marcion l. 4. Hieron proâ—em in Epist ad Titum Euseb l. 3. c 3. Calvin saith it was by the cunning of the Devil â—hat the Epist to the Hebrews should be doubted of because it speaks so ful y of Christs Priesthood the second and third of John the Epistle of Jude and by some the History of the Adulteress John 8.1 the last Chapter of that Gospel the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of James and the Revelation But first these doubters were some of them Hereticks as Marcion Tatianus c. Secondly This doubt did not spread it self in the Church but was onely of some private persons Again It was before the Church had generally consented in them The Churches motives in receiving books of Scripture Which having the same grounds of divine authority for them as for the rest both in regard of the 1 Antiquity and 2 general reception of them as also in regard of the 3 consonancy of them with the doctrine of all the other Scripture 4 and the enlargement and explanation of the same doctrine by them 5 and further the Presence of the Holy Ghost in efficacy by the matter of them thereby setting his seal unto them Upon these and the like grounds hath the Vniversal Church received them as the other I answer therfore in the words of Bullinger Professor of the Church of Tigur in this very argument De sacris libris eor dignitate Exposit premiss ante Biblia Tigurin Nec magnopere curandum existimo quod à quibusdam traditur quosdam veterum dubitasse de Epistolâ ad Hebraeos de epistolâ posteriore Petri Judae de epistolâ Jacobi Apocalypsi Quid enim ad nos quod pauci aliquot suis affectibus corrupti de rebus certis authenticis Authoribus dubitarunt Neither are we much to mind saith he what is said by some namely that certain of the Antients did doubt of the Epistle to the Hebrews of the second Epistle of Peter and of that of Jude of the Epistle of James and of the Revelation For what is it to us what some few corrupted by their depraved affections have judged concerning things certain and these undoubted Authors Thus far he Whence it appears it might truly be said there was never any doubt in the Church of these books because either the persons were not of the Church but Hereticks that doubted or else were some few perverted judgments it never came so far as to be a doubt in the Church So much for the first Exception The next is they are defective because the Articles do speak nothing of sundry points of Popery and Arminianism Predestination abused universal Redemption Object universal Grace the manner of Conversion and falling from grace which King James procured the Synod of Dort to confute and for which the late Synod at London is so much maligned To this first in general Answ It hath been always counted both the wisdom and the tenderness not onely of the English but of the antient Church to make Articles of faith whereunto all especially Ministers Conf. Hamp Court p. 39. must subscribe to be but few First It being unfit to thrust into the Book every position negative or affirmative which would make the Book swell into a volume as big as the Bible and also confound the Reader saith King James When such questions arise among Schollars pag. 40. the quietest proceeding were to determine them in the Universities and not to stuff the Book of Articles with all conclusions Theological Secondly The better course would be to punish the broachers of false doctrine as occasion should be offered For were the Articles never so many and sound who can prevent the contrary opinions of men till they be heard Thus the King Ep. 57. ad Dardanum St. Austin saith Regulam fidei pusillis magnisque communem in Ecclesia tenent The rule of faith is common to the weak and to the wise Hence my Lord Primate of Ireland infers That the rule of faith must contain such truths ONELY B. Ushers answ to the Jesuite pag. 417. as are GENERALLY agreed upon by the consent of all true Christians And accordingly we see the Creed called the Apostles the Nicene the Constantinopolitan and Athanasian how short they are now they were the Articles of Religion of those times The Articles of Ireland are larger but taken for the most part ad verbum out of our Articles Homilies and Common-prayer-book But secondly why do the Brethren urge more Articles when as they neither are willing to subscribe to these few wherein they have found but two or three faults and those inconsiderable but also refuse to subscribe to any without limits unless they mean as good-fellows upon the way to range themselves whilst they leave others bound behind them 3. Touching King James though he was opposite to the Tenets of Arminius yet you heard even now he was averse also from having the contrary doctrines inserted into the Articles farther then they are already for one of them falling from grace was there the question Conf. Hamp Court pag. 39.40 And as opposite he was to the preaching of them to the people as appears by these words That no Preacher of what title soever under the degree of a Bishop or Dean at the least do from henceforth presume to preach in any popular auditory the deep points of Predestination Election K. James Instructions to Preachers Ann. 1622. Artâ—c 3. Reprobation or of the universality efficacy resistibility or irresistibility of Gods grace but leave those themes to be handled by the learned men and that moderately and modestly by way of use and application rather than by way of positive Doctrine as being more fit for the Schools and Universities than for simple Auditories You see the King whom you quote is not of your mind 4. As to the matters themselves the Articles speak sufficiently of them so far as to clear what is most necessary in them As the eighth Article of Original sin the tenth Article of Free-will the seventeenth Article of Predestination and Election leaving what is disputable and uncomfortable to be gathered from what is expressed 5. As to the Assembly they are not condemned by all men for their conclusions in those