by so many different and far distanâ— Nations without some good Grounds is not conceâ—vable because it can neither be imagined that thâ— Christians of the present Age dispersed in all Countriâ— should combine together to say that they receiv'â— these Books from their Fathers as the genuine Wrâ—tings of the Apostles if they had not so receiv'd them nor that their Forefathers in any of the Ages paâ—â— should have all agreed together to put a Cheat upoâ— their Posterity by delivering down to them theâ—â— Books as written by the Apostles when they themselves had no good Reason to believe them so or whâ—â— they knew the contrary It is a further Satisfaction to us to observe and consider that the Authority of these Books is as well proved as it can be not only by oral but also by the best written Tradition The Christian Writers of all Ages citing them as they had Occasion as the genuine Writings of the Apostles And that as well before the Canon of the New Testament was defined and declared by Councils as since And lastly It gives us very good Satisfaction that these Books are the genuine Writings of the Persons to whom they are ascribed that we do not find they were ever excepted against as spurious and counterfeit in those times when it would have been most proper to have made the Exception and by those Persons whose Cause and Interest it would have served very much to have proved them Spurious if it could have been done For the proper time to have made this Exception to these Writings was when or soon after they were first published when it would have been easie to have proved them Spurious if they had been so and no less easie to have brought positive Evidence of their being Genuine if indeed they were Genuine either by the living Testimony of the Authors themselves or of others that knew their Writing or by producing the original Copies under their own Hands And therefore their being then received as the Writings of the Apostles by those who were best able to know whose Writings they were and their being not for ought appears excepted against upon this Account at that time â—s a very good Argument that there was no just Ground for any such Exception And the most likely Persons they whose Cause and Interest it would have served most to deny that these Books were written by the reputed Authors thereof were the Enemies of our Religion The Jews or the Heathens who neither of them wanted either Malice or Wit to alledge any Fact that they could have justified the Truth of in Disproof of the Christian Religion It is therefore no small Satisfaction to us to observe that they never argued against the Christian Religion from this Topic that they never denied that the Books which the Christians received as written by the Apostles were genuine Nay that Julian himself one of the subt'lest as well as of the bitterest Adversaries of the Christian Faith did yet expresly own that the Books read by the Christians as the Books of Peter Paul Matthew Mark and Luke were indeed theirs After all indeed it must be owned that we have not such Demonstration that the Books of the New Testament were written by the Apostles as is self-evident and cannot possibly be contradicted for the Matter it self is not capable of such Demonstration But we have such Demonstration of it as cannot be contradicted with any Reason We have as good Assurance of it as we have or can have of any Matter of that kind We have as good Evidence of the Truth of it as supposing it to be true we could have of it and more than this cannot be desired We are as morally certain that these Books were written by the Authors to whom they are ascribed as we are that any other ancient Book was written by the Person who is said to be the Author of it There being no Argument by which it is or can be proved that any ancient Book was written by the Person who is said to be the Author of it which does not prove the Authority of these Books rather more strongly than it does the Authority of any other Book And there being no Argument that is or can be urged against the Authority of these Books which may not with as good Reason be urged to disprove the Authority of any other Book of the like Antiquity nay indeed of all the Books in the World ancient or modern the Authors of which are not now living or of whose Writing the Books ascribed to them no living Evidence can be produced For what is there that can be said to disprove or to render suspected the Authority of these Books but only that there is a Possibility that Things may not be as we believe them to be It may be the Atheist or Infidel will say that these Books were not written by the Persons under whose Names we receive them but by some others It may be he 'll say for Instance that there never was such a Man as Matthew the Publican afterwards an Apostle of Christ Or if there was yet it may be that the Gospel that goes under his Name was not of his Writing but is a Book of a much later Date It may be that it was written by some crafty Priest no longer ago than the last Age And that he and some others in Confederacy with him at the same Time that they forged this Gospel in the Greek Tongue did likewise make and contrive all those Translations of it into several Languages that are now extant some of which pretend to very great Antiquity and which are all made with such an Appearance of Truth and with such Congruity to the several Times in which they are said to be made that none of the Learned Men of the present Age have been able to discover the Fraud And It may be also that when they forged the Gospel it self they forged likewise all the other Books that are pretended to be written by several Historians and Divines in divers Languages and in several Ages of the World for Sixteen Hundred Years past in which this Gospel is either testified to be written by St. Matthew or is cited or commented upon as his And it may be likewise that at the same Time that they trumped up all these Books in one Countrey they had their Confederates and Correspondents that did the same in all the other Countries where they are now found not only exposing them to publick Sale as Books of ancient Date and venerable Antiquity but likewise slily conveying an infinite Number of written and printed Copies of the same into all Libraries both publick and private unknown to the Keepers and Owners thereof And it may be that all these things were done so secretly that none of the Confederacy did ever confess nor any besides ever discover the Cheat And it may be that all the rest of the World was so much asleep at that time as to have
them it was because there had been then lately such Evidence and Attestation given of their being written by the Apostles or other Inspired Men as they had not heard of before such as they could not then with any Reason contradict or gainsay For ordinarily a less Reason will persuade a Man to take up an Opinion at first than will persuade him to go back from an Opinion how weakly soever grounded which he has before embraced and defended So that this Objection is so far from lessening that it rather strengthens the Proof we have of the Authority even of these once controverted Books And it is besides a very good corroborating Evidence of the Authority of all the other Books of the New Testament For the Backwardness of some Churches to receive these controverted Books at first when they had nothing to object to the Matter of them makes it evident that the Christians of the first Ages were not so very easie and credulous as some have represented them that they did not so very greedily swallow any Book for divine Revelation that contained a great many Miracles mixed with a few good Morals without making due Enquiry concerning the Author and Authority thereof But on the contrary their being so hard to be persuaded to receive these controverted Books for some time while they wanted as they thought sufficient Attestation altho' the Doctrine of them was in all Points agreeable to the Doctrine of the other Books which they had before received their being so hard I say to receive these Books of the Authority of which there nevertheless really was such Evidence as they themselves after having well weighed and considered it declared themselves satisfied with gives very good Ground to believe that they had from the Beginning such Evidence as was without Exception of the Authority of all those other Books that is of much the greatest Part of the New Testament which were never controverted which were from the first and with universal Consent receiv'd by all Christian Churches For if there had not been very undeniable Evidence of their being the genuine Writings of the Apostles or other inspired Men there would certainly have been the same Doubt and Controversie concerning them that there once was concerning these But 4. It hath been further objected that in the early Times of Christianity there were several counterfeit Gospels and Epistles which passed among some for the Writings of the Apostles and that 't is possible some of them may have slipped into the Canon unawares to the first Christians who by all the Accounts of those Times were more remarkable for their Honesty and Simplicity and Zeal than for their extraordinary Parts and Learning But this Objection granting the Matter of Fact alledg'd in it to be true is so far from lessening that it rather adds to that reasonable Assurance that we have that all the Books of the Canon are true and genuine For there is nothing so apt to put Men upon using Caution as a great Probability of being cheated if they be not cautious Thus when the Coin is generally good and there is very little base or counterfeit Money stirring Men commonly take it by Tale without examining the Weight and Purity of every Piece and so may more easily have a single Piece of lighter Weight or baser Metal put upon them without discerning it But if the Coin be much corrupted they look more narrowly upon every single Piece of Money that they take and if there be the least Cause to suspect it make Trial of it by the Scale or Touchstone before they accept it as good If therefore there were in the early Times of Christianity many counterfeit Pieces given out and perhaps receiv'd by some as written by the Apostles and which were some of them discovered to be spurious and there is not greater Evidence from Antiquity that there were any such spurious Writings than there is that the Spuriousness of some of them was soon discern'd this could not but put the Christians of those Times upon examining more strictly what Evidence and Attestation there was that those other Books were true and genuine which had been generally receiv'd as such So that the more there were of these spurious and counterfeit Books so much the more assured and confident we may reasonably be that none but such as were undoubtedly true and authentick and very well attested were admitted into the Canon And of the two it is much more probable that they did for Want of clear Attestation refuse to admit some that had been written by the Apostles than that they did without sufficient Attestation admit any that were not And that the Christians of those early Times who had the best Means and Opportunities of satisfying themselves whether any Book given out as written by an Apostle was so or not wanted not Skill to discern between a true and a spurious Writing as is maliciously suggested by some Men is abundantly evident from those Monuments of the excellent Parts and Learning of some of the first Converts to Christianity which are still extant in their Books and from the Testimony that is therein given to the like good Ability of several others who were famous in their Generation for their Preaching and Writings and for their stoutly maintaining the Truths of Christianity both against Infidels and Hereticks but whose Books are now unhappily lost But 5. and lastly It was further said That tho' it be granted that all the Books of the New Testament that are now receiv'd were originally written by the Apostles or other inspired Men yet those which we now have are but Copies in which by so many Transcriptions thereof as must have been in about 1400 Years many Alterations may have happened thro' the Ignorance or Oversight or evil Design of the Transcribers And that several Changes have been made iâ— undeniably plain by the various Readings that have been observed in comparing the best Manuscript Copies that are now or have been extant since Printing began So that we cannot be sure whether any particular Passages once found in those Books are the very Words of an Apostle or of some ignorant or careless Scribe But to this it hath been answered 1. That so far as this Objection is of any Force it â—nvalidates the Credit of all History and of all other Books of ancient Date as well as of the New Testament Nay indeed of all other Books much more than of â—his for the faithfully Transcribing whereof it may â—easonably be presumed there was formerly greater Care taken as there is now for the correctly Printing 〈◊〉 than there ordinarily was of other Books that â—ere of less Consequence 2. That tho' it be certain that some Hereticks â—ave attempted to corrupt the Text of the New Testaâ—ent in some Places and have made Changes in some â—â—w Copies thereof it is almost as certain that their â—ttempts of this kind neither have nor ever could â—â—ount to a Corruption of all
gratifie Men in this unreasonable Desire working every Day new Miracles before their Eyes or sending their deceased Friends to them from the dead to assure them of a future State and to warn them to prepare for it 't is highly probable that very few or none of those who do not believe and are not brought to Repentance by the Preaching and standing Revelation of the Gospel would be perswaded by this Means If they hear not Moses and the Prophets nor Christ and his Apostles neither will they be perswaded though one rose from the dead I. I shall endeavour to shew that the present standing Revelation of God's Will contained in the Books of the Old and New Testament is abundantly sufficient to perswade Men to Repentance if they are not unreasonably blind and obstinate They have Moses and the Prophets Christ and his Apostles let them hear them And I think that if the standing Revelation which God hath made of his Will in the Holy Scriptures can upon any account be thought insufficient to effect this Design it must be upon one of these two Accounts viz. Either 1. Because no standing Revelation can be sufficient for this Purpose Or 2. Because there are some particular Defects in that standing Revelation which we have in the Holy Scripture which render it not so sufficient for this Purpose as 't is possible a standing Revelation might be 1. It may be pretended that no standing Revelation can be sufficient for this Purpose I am now therefore to enquire with what Reason this can be pretended And in speaking to this Point it does not lie upon me to prove that God could not reveal his Mind afresh to every Man in every Age of the World if he so pleased for there is no question but that the same God who in divers manners spake in times past to our Fathers by the Prophets could if he pleased speak to every one of us their Children in such Manner as he then spake to the Prophets themselves so that we might be all immediately taught of God as they were But every thing that may be done is not expedient to be done And whether this Method would be expedient or not will be hereafter enquired Neither does it now lie upon me to prove that this Way which God hath thought fit to take to instruct the greatest Part of the World viz. by a standing Revelation is the best Way and the most like to be effectual of any that could be used Of this I shall likewise have Occasion to speak somewhat hereafter But what lies upon me at present to make good is only this That a standing Revelation of God's Will may be so well contrived and so well attested as to be sufficient to perswade Men. And if there be any Ground for the contrary Pretence I think it must be either 1. Because all Matters necessary to be known and done by Men at all Times cannot at once be committed to Writing Or 2. Because there cannot be sufficient Evidence given to satisfie a Rational Man that any Writing that is said to be of divine Inspiration and Authority is indeed so 1. It may be said That all Matters necessary to be known and done by Men at all Times cannot be at once committed to Writing Because every Age of the World produces new Opinions which whether they be erroneous or not cannot be judged by a Criterion that was given many Ages before these Opinions were broached And as the World grows older in Years it likewise improves in Wickedness which cannot be restrained and suppressed by an old Law which was made before several Instances of those Wickednesses that are now practised were either known or thought of And if it were not so what need would there be of such a number of Books as are written in every Age to direct Men how to distinguish between Truth and Error and what Opinions to fix upon in that great Variety of Opinions that are offered to them Or what need would there be of so many new Laws as are daily made in every Commonwealth to restrain the growing Extravagances of Mankind and to keep them within due Bounds So that if there be any Necessity at all of divine Revelation to teach Men the Belief of Truth and the Practice of Righteousness it is necessary that there should be a new and fresh Revelation made at least as often as any new Error is broached or any new Piece of Villainy is practised in the World But to this Objection against the Sufficiency of a Standing Revelation I suppose a full Answer will be given in these two particulars 1. That there is no Arguing from the Wisdom and Power of Men to the Wisdom and Power of God It may be granted to be impossible for a Man to write such a Book as shall be sufficient to confute all the Errors that can possibly at any time afterwards spring up Or to compile such a Body of Laws as shall be sufficient to prevent or punish all future Crimes But what is impossible with Men may be possible with God who has a perfect Foresight of all the Errors that will ever be broached and of all the Wickedness that will ever be practised by Men to the End of the World To a Being of infinite Wisdom and Knowledge it may be not only possible but very easie so to contrive a Revelation designed by him for the Direction of future Ages that no Addition shall ever after need to be made to it Nay indeed 2. The Thing it self that is That a standing Revelation should be thus perfect that it should be so contrived at once and at first as to be sufficient to answer all the Ends of a divine Revelation as long as the World shall last is not very hard to be conceived For tho' Error be infinite Truth at least all Truth necessary to be believed is finite and limited And after a divine Revelation is once given no more is necessary to be believed in after Ages than was at first nor will there ever be more things necessary to be believed to the End of the World unless God shall please to add some new Revelation to the former And this Revelation of all necessary Truth once made being given to Men that are endued with Reason nothing more is or ever will be needful for the Discovery and Confutation of all Errors that can possibly spring up in after Ages but only a right Understanding of the Truths already delivered and a right Use of Reason in making Inferences and drawing Consequences therefrom And this is all that is pretended to by the Books of Controversie that are written in every Age The Design of them is not to declare new Truths or to establish new Articles of Faith but only to shew that those Opinions which they represent as false and erroneous are either in themselves or in their true Consequences contrary to some Maxims that are already receiv'd as true And it is no
less easie to conceive that a standing Revelation may be at once so contrived as to be for ever sufficient to direct Men in all Points of Practice Because altho' t is possible that every Age may afford new Instances of Wickedness yet the Law that they are all Transgressions of may be but one And the Rule once given is a perpetual Direction not only what to do but likewise what to avoid and this as well in those Instances of Wickedness which may be invented afterwards as in those which were in Practice before the Rule was made For he that giving Direction to a Traveller in his Way bids him keep strait forward shall not need if he speaks to a Man of Reason to tell him over and above that he must be careful to avoid all Turnings to the right hand or to the left and much less shall he need to give him a particular Account of every Turning that he is to avoid And tho' in Time to come there would be many more By-ways and Turnings out of the Road than there are at present yet the same one Direction to keep strait forward will be as full and as sufficient a Direction then as it is now And the Necessity that Humane Law-givers find themselves under to be every Day repealing former Laws and adding new Ones is not caused by an absolute Impossibility of making at once such a Body of Laws as might be sufficient for all after Times but arises as I suppose Partly from the Nature of Humane Laws which are for the most part Negative and Prohibitive only and by such a Law nothing is rendred unlawful but what is named and to name at once every thing that is then or may be in all after Ages needful to be prohibited would indeed be a Work of very great Difficulty Partly from the Nature of that Obedience that is due to a meer Humane Law which is only an external Obedience and to the Letter of the Law and that indeed must needs be a Law or a Body of Laws of a prodigious Bulk and very difficult to be contrived at once which in the Letter thereof shall comprehend and give Direction concerning every Action and every Mode of Action that are necessary to be done or forbore in order to the preserving Justice and Peace among Men Partly from the little Regard that Men generally have to the good of Posterity which makes them only careful to contrive such Orders and Constitutions as they hope will suffice to preserve Peace in their own time leaving it to those that come after to take the like Care for themselves in their Times Partly from the Weakness and Ignorance of the wisest of Men who not understanding exactly the Tempers of all their Subjects cannot know certainly what Effect their Laws will have till after they have been for some time experienced And partly from the unexpected Difficulty that is sometimes met with in the Execution of a Law which may make it necessary afterwards to enforce it with a greater Penalty or to take some further Care than at first was thought needful to see it executed But none of these Reasons of the Necessity of new Laws among Men are of any force to shew that it is also necessary that God should be every Day making new Declarations of his Will and that no Standing Revelation can be sufficient for all Times For the Laws of God are positive and commanding enjoining the truest and heartiest Love both to God and Men and every natural and proper Expression thereof and by consequence prohibiting every Affection of Mind and every outward Act that is contrary thereto whether it be expressly named or not And the Obedience that we owe to a divine Law is the Obedience of the Heart and of the whole inner Man such as looks beyond the Letter to the Design and Intention of the Law and avoids as carefully whatsoever is contrary to the Reason of the Law as if it had been forbidden in the most express Words And God being King for ever and ever has the same Relation to all Men in all Ages and cannot but be supposed to design the good Government of his Subjects in after as well as in former Times And he also understanding fully the Tempers of all his Subjects knows beforehand what Effect the Laws he gives them will have and can never be disappointed in his Expectation and so can never be obliged to repeal or alter any of his Laws by an unforeseen Experience that they are not so convenient or so effectual as he thought they would be And lastly He having all Power in his Hands and a soveraign and uncontroulable Dominion over all can appoint what Penalty he pleases to the Transgression of his Laws can at any time convict Transgressors by his own unerring Knowledge only and the Testimony of their guilty Consciences without other Witnesses and has it in his own single Power without any Help of others to execute when-ever he will whatever Penalty he threatens Thus I think it appears that a standing Revelation may be so well contrived as to be sufficient for all Times that all Matters necessary to be known and done by Men at all Times may be at once committed to Writing 2. But Secondly Tho' this be granted it may be still further objected against the Sufficiency of a Standing Revelation that it can hardly be sufficiently attested that there cannot be sufficient Evidence given to satisfie a Rational Man that any such Writing which is said to be of divine Inspiration and Authority is indeed so And that 1. Because there is no Way but Eye-witness to be sufficiently assured that any Book was written by the Person who is said to be the Author of it 2. Because there is no Way to be sufficiently assured that the Author of such a Book did not design to impose upon his Readers And 3. Because no Man can be sure that he himself was not deceived in his Opinion of his own Inspiration or of a Revelation made to him or in the Truth of any other Matter which he has related as of his own Knowledge 1. It may be said that there is no Way but Eye-witness to be sufficiently assured that any Book was written by the Person that is said to be the Author of it But that is very strange that there should be no other Way to be sufficiently assured of the Author of any Book and yet that there are a great many Books in the World ancient as well as modern the Authors whereof were never in the least doubted of who yet I suppose did not use to call together a Company of Men to stand by and see them write those Books which they intended to Publish It seems then that either there may be besides Eye-witness sufficient Reason to believe that a Book was written by the Person under whose Name it goes or else that all the World has been extremely credulous in receiving an infinite Number
no Suspicion of what was done nor any Sense of that great Alteration that had been made in the World by these Books nor any Remembrance afterwards when they awoke and found themselves Christians that they had been of some other Religion before when they were first taken with that Lethargick Fit But if these things may be what is there of this kind that may not be If the World be so much mistaken in this Matter it may be as much mistaken in any other Matter of the like Nature And then It may be that there never was such a Man as Homer or Virgil or Coesar or Cicero or Plutarch or any other of those Persons as whose Writings we now receive the Books that go under their Names but that all the Books pretended to be written by those Authors and likewise all the Books of later Date whereby the Authority of those former Books is attested were in like Manner contrived and made and dispersed by such another Gang of crafty and designing Knaves who took a Pleasure in abusing the rest of the World or hoped to make a Gain to themselves â—hereby Nay then for why should we stop here It may be that not only the Laws of our Religion but the Laws of our Civil State too are all forged and counterfeit It may be that once upon a time The Keeper of the Publick Records having by much and long Observation attained to good Skill â—n the ancient Ways of Writing for many Ages backward and being a compleat Master of his Pen and having also gotten an Art to make a fresh Writing seem just as old as he had a Mind it should be thought to be did compose and deposite in â—heir proper Places those Original Acts of Parliament which are now taken to be the Laws of some of our former Kings and that to confirm and establish his Fraud he procured some other Persons at the same Time to Write or Print and to convey into all Shops and Libraries several Books of Reports and Pleadings wherein these counterfeit Acts were cited and referred to and it may be that while as this was doing none else had their Eyes open to see it nor had ever after the least Suspicion of what was done Or if they had yet that they were so well pleased with the Cheat which they thought would be a good Means of preserving Peace and Justice in the Nation as to be willing it should pass to Posterity undiscovered These May be 's are I am sure every whit as possible and as likely as the other Either therefore let those Men who upon this Account doubt of the Authority of the Books of the New Testament Or who would make others doubt of it only by suggesting that it is a thing possible in Nature that they may be all forged and counterfeit let them I say either entertain and suggest the same Doubt concerning all other ancient Books of the Antiquity and Authority of which there is not greater Evidence than there is of these And then they will render themselves so justly ridiculous to the World that there will be no Need to expose their Folly for then they must call in Question the Authority of all Books and the Truth of all History Or else let them fairly own that the true Reason of their making a Doubt concerning these Books rather than concerning others is because they do not relish the Matter of them because they find it easier to resist that strong Evidence that is given of the Authority of these Books than they do to govern their Lives according to those strict Rules of Holiness and Purity that are therein prescribed and to bring their Wills to the Obedience of Faith And if they will but own this which I believe is the Truth their Prejudice and Partiality will be so evident to all that it may be reasonably hoped their impious Suggestions will do but little Harm in the World and that few Men of any Sense or Reason will be so fool-hardy as to venture their Souls and run the Hazard of a miserable Eternity upon so many and such very improbable I had almost said such impossible may be 's as must be supposed to have been if indeed these Books are forged and counterfeit if indeed they were not written by those Persons whom they are commonly ascribed to But yielding this Point may the Atheist or Infidel farther say viz. that the Gospel called St. Matthew's was written by St. Matthew and that of St. Mark by St. Mark and the Rest of the Books which are ascribed to any other certain Authors by those Persons to whom they are severally ascribed yet the Authority of the whole New Testament will not by this Concession be sufficiently established For of some Books of the New Testament the Authors are not known of others they are doubted Some Parts of this Book that are now received have been rejected in ancient Times and â—thers not universally receiv'd And besides 't is cerâ—ain that in the early Times of Christianity there were several Counterfeit Gospels and Epistles some of which may possibly have slipped into the Canon unawares And lastly If it be granted that all the Books of the New Testament were originally written â—y the Apostles or other Inspired Men yet however the Books that we now have are but Copies in which many Alterations may have been made by designing Men or careless Transcribers These Objections or Cavils rather for such I am sure they would be accounted in any other Case against the Authority of these Sacred Books have been urged by some Men both anciently and lately But they have been also so well and fully answered by those learned Persons that have written in Defence of the Canon that I once thought to have taken no Notice of them and I believe had not done it but that I considered on the other Hand that when an old Objection that has been answered an Hundred times is urged afresh a great many may take it for a new one and if it be not quickly answered may be apt to think it unanswerable so that in this Case it may be better to repeat the same Answer if it be a good one that has been often formerly made to it than to say nothing And besides in this degenerate Age in which any wild or Atheistical Discourse passes for Wit it may be the Hap of some Persons who have not much Mind or Leisure or Opportunity to read Books to hear these things in Conversation and not knowing readily what Answers to make to them to be somewhat staggered in their Belief thereby Especially if they be such whose loose and licentious Way of Living makes them easie to receive without Examination any Notions that may give them Ease or Encouragement in Sin For these Reasons therefore I thought it would not be amiss especially because it is a Matter properly belonging to the Subject I am now upon and because I have some time left for it to
mention as briefly as may be the Answers that have been usually given to these Objections And 1. Whereas 't is said that of some of the Books of the New Testament the Authors Names are not certainly known as namely of the Epistle to the Hebrews and that of others the Authors have been doubted particularly of the second and third Epiâ—tles of St. John To this it hath been answered 1. That the Credit and Authority of a Book depends many times much more upon the good Assurance that we have of the time when it was written and of the Character of the Person that wrote it than upon the certain Knowledge of his Name It is therefore a Matter of no great Conseâ—uence whether the Epistle to the Hebrews was writâ—en by St. Paul himself as is commonly and upon â—ery probable Grounds believed Or as some have â—onjectured by St. Luke his constant Companion Or as others by St. Clemens his Fellow-labourer â—hose Name was in the Book of Life Phil. 4.3 Or as others â—y St. Barnabas his Assistant in Preaching the Goâ—pel Acts 14.14 and who is dignified by St. Luke with the Tiâ—e of an Apostle And so neither is it very maâ—erial whether the Epistles called the second and third Epistles of St. John and commonly believed to be written by the same Person that wrote the first were indeed written by St. John the Apostle and Evangelist or as some have thought by another â—ohn who was made Bishop of the Jewish Christians â—t Ephesus by him For it is sufficient that the Writers of these Books which soever they were of the Persons before-mentioned were of good Ability and Integrity and well instructed in that Doctrine and Religion which they wrote about And of this besides the Testimony of the Ancients there is good Evidence enough in the Writings themselves 2. In Answer to this and to all other Objections of this sort against these or any other Books or Chapters or Paragraphs of the New Testament it hath been farther truly said that there is nothing singular in these Books that there is no Doctrine of Christianity taught in any Part of the New Testament of the Author or Authority of which there hath ever been any Doubt in the Church which is not taught in some other undoubted and uncontroverted Part of the same Book So that if it were granted that those Parts of the New Testament of which there has been formerly any Doubt were still of uncertain Authority our Christianity would suffer no real Loss thereby Only giving up these controverted Places we should sometimes want a good Help to enable us to understand readily those other uncontroverted Places of the New Testament wherein the same Doctrines are but perhaps more briefly or obscurely delivered 2. Whereas 't is said that some Parts of the New Testament have been rejected in ancient Times This is granted But then it hath been shewn that considering by whom they have been rejected and under what Notion and for what Reasons they were rejected this Objection is of no force to invalidate the Authority even of those Parts of the New Testament which have been so rejected and much less of the rest of the Book which has been allowed by all Thus some Portions of the New Testament have been rejected by Hereticks because they contradicted their private and singular Notions Some by Judaizing Christians as the Two first Chapters of St. Matthew because they were not found in that Hebrew Copy of that Gospel which they used and all the Epistles of St. Paul were likewise rejected by the same Persons but not as not written by St. Paul but only because they were written by him whom they looked upon as an Enemy to their Nation because he levelled them with other Nations and as too averse to that Religion which had been introduced by Moses which they continued so wedded to even after their embracing Christianity that they could not but suspect him to be a false Apostle who had so plainly taught the Abrogation thereof And for the like Reasons some other Parts of the New Testament have been likewise rejected by some few Men that is not because they wanted the same Attestation which the other Parts of it had or because it appeared by credible History that they were Spurious but only because they contradicted too plainly some Notions which their former Prejudices or Education had made them fond of So that this Argument against the Authority of the New Testament taken from the Rejection of some Parts of it by some particular Men or Sects is manifestly of no Strength unless there was some good Reason for their Rejecting them And that there was good Reason for it has not yet been shewn but the contrary has been shewn very plainly by the ancient Writers of the Church in several Books written by them in Confutation of those Sects and Heresies which are still extant And 3. Whereas it is further said that some Books which are now receiv'd as Parts of the New Testament were not universally receiv'd in the most early Times when their Authority if they were authentick might have been asserted upon more certain Grounds than it can be now viz. the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of St. James the 2d of St. Peter the 2d and 3d. of St. John the Epistle of St. Jude and the Book of the Revelation This is likewise granted But in Answer to it it is said 1. That there is good Evidence from Antiquity that these controverted Books were receiv'd in the most early Times by those who had the best Opportunity of satisfying themselves of the Authors and Authority thereof viz. by those to whom they were sent and in general by the whole Greek Church 2. That it is no Wonder that these Books being written either to Christians dispersed and consequently only published by giving out Copies thereof to some to be communicated as there was Opportunity to others or else to private Persons living perhaps at great Distance from the Places from which they were sent were not so easie to be attested and upon that Account were not at first so generally receiv'd as the others were which were either written to particular Churches to which the Authors Hands and the Messengers that brought them were well known or which were first published and receiv'd in the same Places where they were written And 3. That even those Churches which did for some time doubt of the Authority of these Books were persuaded at last to receive them as the Authentick Writings of the Apostles or other Inspired Men. If therefore it be supposed that while they doubted of these Books they had Reason for their Doubt that is that they did it because they were not as yet fully satisfied that they were Apostolical Writings which the Objectors I believe will readily enough grant it may be very reasonably presumed that they had afterwards greater Reason to lay aside their Doubt and that when they did receive
the Copies thereof that â—ere generally in Mens Hands In which there is â—en to this Day an admirable Agreement in all Matâ—â—rs of Moment And from that general Agreement â—â—at always was in all the Copies of this Book exâ—â—pt those few that were sometimes corrupted by Heâ—â—ticks to serve a Turn their Attempts of this kind â—â—ve been always rendred successless and those false â—octrines that were justified only by their own false â—opies of this Book solidly confuted 3. It is further answered that not only there is no â—â—idence that there has been but that 't is morally â—â—possible that there should be a general Depravation 〈◊〉 the Copies of this Book either designedly or by â—ance in any Place of great Consequence either Point of History or Doctrine For when was it possible that this Corruption should be Was it in the Copies that were given out in the Days of the Apostles and while they were living This can't well be supposed Or if it had been done then it can't be thought but that the Authors of these Books being living would have taken Care to have had such false Copies of their Books suppressed or well corrected or at least have given publick Notice in order to their Correction of those Faults that had been committed in the transcribing which did either obscure or spoil their sense Was it then in the Times immediately after the Apostles were dead But neither could this be for by this time an infinite Number of true Copies had been made and dispersed in all Parts of the Christian Church And besides the Autographs of the Books themselves were then probably all in being For Tertullian who lived in the Third Century witnesses that some of them were extant and to be seen even in his Time So that by comparing of the new false Copies with the ancient true ones or with the Originals themselves then extant the Fraud would have been quickly discovered or the Mistake easily rectified Was it then in the Times after this when the Originals were lost or worn out This was still less possible For by this Time not only a greater Number of true Copies thereof in the Original Greek were dispersed and in the Hands of all Christians but several Translations thereof had been likewise made into other Languages several Commentaries had been written thereupon and the most material Passages thereof had been occasionally cited by the Christian Writers of those or the foregoing Times And the further we go on downwards 't was still for such Reasons as have been given already more impossible that the Copies of this Book should be generally corrupted in any Place or Matter of Moment as well as more likely that there should be every Day an Increase of such small and literal Mistakes as could hardly be avoided by the greatest Care and Faithfulness And these are the Various Readings before spoken of Concerning which and in Answer to the before-mentioned Objection so far as it is grounded upon them it is farther said 4. In the fourth Place That they are no other than such as are to be met with in Comparing the Manuscripts of all other Books That these various Readings if they be compared together with Judgment are more like to lead us to understand the true Meaning of the Writers than to endanger our mistaking their Sense it being very probable that when there are several Readings one of them is the right and easier by their Help to rectifie the Mistakes that may have been made in some Copies than it would have been if all Copies had agreed in the same Mistake And lastly that it is hardly in any Place of which there are such various Readings very material which is the true Reading there being no Point that is of the Substance either of the History or Doctrine of Christianity that is grounded upon any Text of which there are in different Copies various Readings but which may be proved by some other Texts in the Reading whereof all Copies do agree 5. And Lastly In Answer to this Objection that the Text of the New Testament is depraved and corrupted and consequently of uncertain Authority it is further said That supposing these Books to be written by the Apostles and by divine Direction and Inspiration which must be supposed or at least for Argument sake be allow'd by those that make this Objection Or else the Objection is trifling it is by no Means credible that the same Goodness of God which took Care for the Writing has not likewise taken Care for the preserving of these Books so free at least from Corruption that they may be sufficient to answer the Ends for which they were written that is fully to instruct Men in all Points of Christian Faith and Practice to make them wise unto Salvation and throughly to furnish them unto all good Works And now from all that hath been said I hope it appears that we have sufficient Reason to believe that the Books of the New Testament were written by those Persons whose Names they bear or to whom they are ascribed viz. by the Apostles of Christ or other inspired Men Which was the first thing I was to make good Whether there be sufficient Reason to give them Credit in the Matters of Fact which they have related and whether the Doctrine of the Gospel be well proved by the History of it shall God willing be hereafter enquired In the mean Time supposing their Testimony to be credible what has been said upon this first Head may serve to shew in some Measure the Unreasonableness of those Men who are not satisfied with the Scripture Revelation For I believe there are few that have heard anything of the Manner of the first Preaching of the Gospel but who think that they that lived in those Times and heard the Apostles themselves had sufficient Reason to receive their Testimony And this perhaps they 'll say is what they could with for themselves viz. That they might have heard the Apostles themselves or that they might now have as good and sure Grounds of Faith as those had who were converted to Christianity by the Preaching of the Apostles which if they had they make no Doubt but they should be not only almost but altogether such as the Primitive Christians were both in Belief and Practice But if they are not such now 't is much to be doubted whether they would have been such if they had lived then For by what has been now said it appears that the Books of the New Testament being as we have very good Reason to believe they were written by the Apostles themselves are their Words their Sermons that therein the Apostles themselves being dead do yet truly speak to us the very same things tho' not just in the same Manner that they spake before while they were living and that their Testimony written if indeed it be theirs which I have shewn there is no Cause to doubt of is as credible as their living Testimony
disproved but that there has been no such History cannot with certainty be affirmed This therefore say they is our Unhappiness that tho' we have a good Cause we are destitute of Means to support it and are in the Condition that the Israelites are said to have been in in the Days of Saul 1 Sam. 13.22 when they had War with the Philistins It came to pass in the Day of Battel there was neither Sword nor Spear found in the hand of any of the People But what was the Reason of this Why the Philistins had disarmed them Ver. 19. they had taken away the Weapons they had before and would not permit more to be made And this say the Infidels is exactly our Case In the War we have now with the Christians we are forc'd to fight without Sword or Spear And tho' for other good Reasons we are confident the Gospel History is false and are resolved never to believe it and make no doubt but that in former times it has been opposed and contradicted yet in this the Christians have been too hard and too cunning for us that while they have kept their own Weapons they have slily taken away ours for they have been careful to preserve the ancient Books that were written by those of their own Party in Defence of their Superstition but the Books of their Adversaries they have been as careful to suppress and destroy And they have had such good success in it that of all the Books or Discourses of the ancient Champions of Judaism Paganism or Deism Trypho Celsus Porphyry Julian and other great Names not much is now remaining besides Fragments and those perhaps imperfectly or falsly cited to be picked up out of the Books of those who have written Answers to them who we may well presume took notice only of those Passages therein which they thought were easiest to be answer'd But this is no unusual thing for the powerful and prevailing Party to stifle that Evidence which they know not how to disprove and to supâ—ress those Books which they cannot answer And â—his say they we take for a good Argument that â—here was something very considerable in these Books â—nd not easily to be answer'd because otherwise the Christians of former times would have been more willing that they should be preserv'd and transmitted â—o after times that so Posterity upon a fair Hearing â—f all that had been said on both sides might be â—ble to pass a right Judgment upon the Case and eiâ—her to chuse or to reject the Profession of Christiaâ—ity with Prudence and Discretion This is what has been sometimes suggested by â—he Enemies of our Religion and indeed I know not â—hat else can well be said to invalidate that Proof of â—he Gospel History which I am now upon But what â—ender ground there is for this Suggestion and how â—ery little the Christian Cause is affected by it a few Words will suffice to show For 1. Whereas 't is said that tho' indeed there â—â—e no Histories now in being whereby the Gospel â—istory can be disproved 't is possible however there â—ay have formerly been several Narratives extant that were perfectly contradictory to it and those too perhaps better attested and confirmed than the Gospel History was To this I answer That t is never allow'd to be a good Proof that a thing is to say that 't is possible it might be And besides if this surmize or suggestion of a thing barely possible be a good Objection against the Gospel History it is as much an Objection against all other ancient Histories If for this Reason the Gospel History be not credible no other History is so for there is no ancient History in the World now extant which we can be sure was never contradicted by some other as ancient History that is not extant But 2. As there is no Evidence that the Gospel History was contradicted when it was first publish'd that is when if it had been false it might most easily have been disprov'd so there is on the other Side as good Evidence as such a Matter is capable of that it never was thus contradicted or disproved Because if the Facts recorded in the Evangelical History had been then denied or disproved by any competenâ— and credible Witnesses 't is impossible that the Christian Doctrine which was grounded upon and chiefly established by these Facts should ever have spread so fast as by the Confession of all Parties it did from the time that it began to be preached by the Apostles Nothing but the strong Evidence that there was of the Truth of the Gospel History and strong it cannot be accounted if there was stronger and better Evidence on the other side could have supported the Profession of Christianity when it had nothing tâ— recommend it self by but its Purity and Truth against that violent Opposition which it met with every where in the World And 3. Whereas 't is further suggested that the Loss of those ancient Books which are supposed to have been written to disprove the Gospel History is owing to the Power and Subtlety of the Christians of those early times who thought it best to stifle that Evidence which they could not gainsay or refute this Suggestion is manifestly as groundless as 't is malicious For many Books of all sorts and of all sides have perish'd by Accident or been worn out by Time without any formal Design of any Party or Persons to suppress and destroy them And I see no Reason why these Books written in contradiction to the Gospel History if indeed any such were ever written may not have perished one of these ways as well as many other Books have done Or if a Reason must needs be given why some Books and why these in particular have been lost while others of the same or greater Antiquity have been preserv'd I think the little Value that Men generally had for those Books that are lost is the best Reason that can be given why they were suffered to perish and that the most probable Cause of Mens having so little value for them was because the Matter of them was so evidently false or the Reasoning of them so manifestly weak and fallacious that no Man thought it worth his while to be at the Pains or Charge of getting them transcribed Or if the Men we are now arguing with will not allow this to be a good Account of the Loss of such very valuable Books as they think these Anti-Gospel Histories were let them find out a better But I 'm sure that that before suggested by them viz. that it was by Design the first Christians purposely abolishing and destroying all Testimonies and Records that made against them is a much worse Account of it and infinitely more improbable than that which I have given For it must be supposed either that these Anti-Gospel Histories were written very early as soon almost as the Gospel History was published by the Preaching or Writing
of the Apostles or else in after Times And if they were destroyed by the Christians this must have been done either soon after they were written or else after they had been for some time receiv'd and allow'd as true Histories by the Adversaries of the Christian Faith Now if it be suppos'd that these Books were not written till a good while after the Apostles had preach'd and the Evangelists written the Gospel they were written too late to be of sufficient Authority to weaken the Credit of the Gospel-History For how could those that were not born when the things recorded in the Gospel were said to be done pretend to contradict the Testimony of those who were living at that time and who testified either that they saw them with their own Eyes or that they receiv'd that Account of them which they publish'd from very credible Persons who said they had been Eye witnesses thereof But if it be supposed that these Books were written sooner even as soon almost as the Evangelists wrote or the Apostles began to publish by their Preaching the Gospel History then I say 't is impossible they should be suppress'd and destroy'd by the Christians either then or afterwards Not then for tho' we grant that Christianity from the very first Preaching of it made a very swift Progress in the World and from a Beginning no bigger than a Grain of Mustard-seed grew up quickly to be a goodly Tree shadowing many Nations under the Branches of it yet it did not spring up like a Mushroom in a Night it did not grow to this Bigness all at once And what were the Christians in the weak and infant state of the Church but an Handful of Men in Comparison with their numberless Opposers and those too without Wealth without Power of no Interest or Esteem in the World that they should undertake to corrupt or stifle the Evidence that was given against them which was supported by the Secular Power and gladly receiv'd and embrac'd by all other Men but themselves What were they that they should be able to call in all the Books that had been written against them and to suppress and destroy them at their pleasure and that too so fully and effectually as that with the Books themselves which they destroy'd all Memory of them should likewise perish A powerful and prevailing Party with the Government on its side may indeed do much in this kind and yet hardly so much as this But they that believe the Christians to have been such a powerful and prevailing Party early enough to hinder the spreading and dispersing of any Books that were written against them believe without any Ground or Warrant from History a more unaccountable and incredible thing than any that is recorded in the Gospel But if this could not be done then it might perhaps be done afterwards For in progress of Time 't is certain it may be said that the Christians did come to be of very great Power and Interest and able to bear down all their Opposers and 't is likely enough that then they might set themselves to destroy all those Monuments of Antiquity whereby their fabulous Gospels had been contradicted and disprov'd And 't is not incredible that they should so far succeed in their Attempt as to leave no means to Posterity to discern how weak and sandy a Foundation their Religion was built upon But this Supposition taking it altogether involves a greater Difficulty and supposes a greater Miracle than the former did For whatever the Christians might attempt to do or whatever they might be able to do after they had attained to such great Power and were become the most numerous and prevailing Party 't is utterly incredible that they ever could have attained to such great Power that they ever could have become the most numerous and prevailing Party if indeed the Gospel History had almost from the very Beginning been opposed and contradicted by other Histories that were more credible than the Gospel History was For it must be and is granted by all that at the first Preaching of Christianity all worldly Power and Interest were on the other side and engaged most strongly to hinder the Growth and spreading of it Now when Truth is on one side and Power and Interest on the other 't is not impossible that Truth may at last prevail against Interest and bring the Power also to be of its side But if Truth I mean that which hath most Appearance of Truth I say if Truth and Power and Interest are all on the same side from the Beginning as it must be allowed they were by those who say that the Gospel History was quickly prov'd false by other Histories written and publish'd about the same time than I say it is utterly impossible that an Imposture quickly discover'd to be an Imposture and which serv'd no worldly Interest should ever have so gained ground as Christianity did against that apparent Truth and mighty Power and Interest that were on the other side So that whatever Progress Christianity might have made for a short time at first by reason of the Boldness and Confidence of its first Preachers it must needs be that immediately from and after the Time that the Anti-Gospel Histories of better Credit and Authority than the Gospel History was were publish'd it must have declined much faster than it had before increased and in a very few Years have so dwindled to nothing that 't is like in the Age in which we live there would hardly have been so much as any Remembrance of it left And now if nothing more could be said upon this Subject for I have not time at present to take into Consideration the other Proofs before hinted at of the Truth of the Gospel-History I think what has been said already is enough to shew that there is sufficient Reason to give full Credit to the Evangelical Writers in their Relations of those Matters of Fact which they have recorded This I 'm sure of that upon much less Evidence and Assurance of Truth than we have in this we generally give Credit to other Histories For we believe other Historians in their Relation of such Matters as they could not have so certain Knowledge or so good Assurance of as the Evangelical Writers might have of those plain Matters of Fact and Sense which they have related in their History And again we believe other Historians giving an Account of things which they do not pretend to have had a personal Knowledge of which were done in Countries far Distant from them and in Times long before them which their Readers had no Means to enquire into the Truth of which were done in secret or when but few were by and which if they were falsly related none were engaged by any Worldly Interest to be at much Pains to disprove And lastly If two Historians of the same Antiquity give different or contradictory Accounts of the same Matter we do not for that Reason
is enough in all Reason and as much as could be expected in this Case supposing there Facts to be true that they are not by any Historians that were of another Religion contradicted or attempted to be disprov'd more than this would have been too much And should we now in some ancient Manuscript History new brought 〈◊〉 Light and bearing the Name of some Jewish or Heathen Author find a large and formal Account of any of those Facts relating to the Christian Religion that are recorded in the Gospel this would give very just ground to suspect that the whole History whatever other Appearance it had of Truth was forged and counterfeit or at least that those Passages speaking honourably of the Christian Religion or the Author of it were knavishly foisted into the Book by some Christian Transcriber For this is indeed the best Argument that is brought to discredit some Passages of this kind that are now to be found in some Heathen or Jewish Historians and particularly in Josephus viz. that they say more than was proper or likely to be said by Heathens or Jews that if those Passages are genuine and the Authors had believed what they themselves wrote they must have been Christians Now this I 'm sure is not fair Dealing that the Paucity and slenderness of those corroborating Testimonies to the Truth of the Christian History that are to be met with in other Historians and that the Multitude and Fulness of such Testimonies should both be urged as Arguments against Christianity And therefore when they are both urged as they are and have been by our Adversaries we may reasonably conclude that the Truth is in the Mean and that there are indeed no more nor no fewer Testimonies of this kind to be met with in other Writers and that they are not either more or less to the Purpose than supposing the Christian History to be true might fairly be expected It only remains then that we enquire whether there be in the Gospel History any intrinsick Evidences of Falshood And 't is pretended by the Adversaries of our Religion that there are many such For there are they say some things related in the Gospel History that are altogether incredible and there is they say oftentimes great Difference in the several Relations of the same Story by the several Evangelists And not only so but there are they say besides in their several Histories compared together some flat Contradictions and Repugnancies I intended therefore at the End of this Discourse if I had had time for it to have spoken largely upon this Subject But because I have not must referr you to those Books that have been written on purpose to give an Account of the difficult Texts of Scripture and to reconcile those that are seemingly repugnant Or for want of such Books to any good Commentary on the Bible in which you will hardly fail to meet with Satisfaction in any Difficulty of this kind if you read it with a Mind disposed to receive satisfaction And I shall conclude this Discourse with only observing in General 1. That the pretended Impossibilities that are said to be related in the Sacred History are only Difficulties They are indeed Events above and beyond the known Power and common Course of Nature but they are such as are easily Credible when they are ascribed as they must be to the Almighty power of God 2. That the Difference that may sometimes be observ'd in the several Relations of the same Story by the several Evangelists is very inconsiderable consisting only in this That one perhaps relates the Story in a different Order of things than another does Or that One tells it briefly another more at large Or One with a few another with more Circumstances Or that some Circumstances are mentioned by each of them which the other had omitted So that this Observation is so far from being a just Objection against the Truth of the History that it is rather a Proof and Confirmation of it For 't is an Argument that the Evangelists did not conferr together in the Writing of their Histories and that they did not Copy or Transcribe from one another but that every one of them reported the Story he wrote in such manner as he himself remembred it to have been and with such Circumstances as he himself took most notice of And 3. As to the Repugnancies and Inconsistences that are said to be in the Evangelical History These we absolutely deny I have not time now to consider or attempt to reconcile all the Places that are pretended to be contradictory to each other but those Passages which seem most liable to this Exception are I think the Relation of Judas's Death and the Account of our Saviour's Genealogy But as to the first There is plainly no Impossibility no Contradiction in it if we should say that after he had hanged himself as St. Matthew Mat. 27.5 Acts 1.18 says he did fall down and his Bowels gush'd out as St. Luke affirms Or it may be that he did not hang himself but only was * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 choaked or suffocated by the violence of his Grief and that the same Passion by which he was strangled made him also fall down headlong and burst assunder in the midst so that all his Bowels gushed out And as to the other when 't is remembred that by the Jewish Law the next of Kin was to raise up Seed to his near Relation that died without Issue Deut. 25.5 by Marrying his Widow and that the First-born of the Woman after such second Marriage was reputed in Law the Son as well as he was the Heir of the Deceased so that consequently the same Person might be the Legal Son of one Man and the Natural Son of another Man tho' it may be difficult perhaps impossible for us at this Distance of Time to say with certainty which of the two different Lines by which our Saviour's Pedigree is deduced from David is the Legal and which the Natural Line it is very easie nevertheless to believe that one is the Legal and that the other is the Natural Line and if so there is plainly no Contradiction between the two Evangelists altho' St. Matthew Mat. 1.16 makes our Saviour to be descended from Solomon and St. Luke from Nathan altho' St. Matthew says that Joseph the Husband of the Blessed Virgin was the Son of Jacob and St. Luke Luâ—e 3.23 that he was the Son of Heli. And now the Truth of the Gospel History being as I hope by what hath bâ—en said sufficiently established I should proceed to shew That if the Matters of Fact related in the New Testament are true they are sufficient Proofs of the Truth and Divine Authority of all the Doctrines that are therein Taught But I am sensible that I have trespassed too much upon your Patience already and so shall reserve this for the Subject of my next Discourse FINIS ERRATA IN
1700. BEING The Seventh for the Year 1700 of the LECTURE Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq By OFSPRING BLACKALL D. D. Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His MAJESTY LONDON Printed by J. Leake for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1700. St. LUKE XVI 29 30 31. Abraham saith unto him They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them And he said Nay father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead VVHEN I first began to Discourse on these Words I proposed to speak to these three Points I. To shew that the present Standing Revelation of God's Will contain'd in the Books of the Old and New Testament is abundantly sufficient to persuade Men to Repentance if they are not unreasonably blind and obstinate They have Moses and the Prophets I add they have also Christ and his Apostles let them hear them II. To shew that having already such good Grounds of Faith such full Directions for Practice and such strong Motives to Repentance it is an unreasonable Request to desire more Nay Father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And III. Lastly To shew that in case God should condescend to gratifie Men in this unreasonable Desire working every Day new Miracles before their Eyes or sending their deceased Friends to them from the dead to assure them of a future State and to warn them to prepare for it 't is highly probable that very few or none of those who do not believe and are not brought to Repentance by the Preaching and Standing Revelation of the Gospel would be persuaded by this means If they hear not Moses and the Prophets nor Christ and his Apostles neither will they be persuaded tho' one rose from the dead The first of these has been the subject of several former Discourses the second I design to speak to at this time viz. II. To shew that having already such good Grounds of Faith such full Directions for Practice and such strong Motives to Repentance as I have shewn we have in that Standing Revelation of God's Will which is contained in the Holy Scripture it is an unreasonable Request to desire more Nay Father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And the Unreasonableness of the Request which the Rich Man here makes in the behalf of his Brethren viz. That God would be pleased to send one from the dead to preach to them or in general how unreasonable it is for men now a-days to desire or look for more means of Conversion or Motives to Repentance than God has been pleased to afford us in the Standing Revelation of the Gospel will appear if we consider these following things 1. That the Principles of Faith and the Motives to Repentance which we have already being well grounded upon Matters of Fact which have been once already sufficiently prov'd and attested 't is altogether needless that any fresh or further Proof should be given of them and 't is what we never think reasonable to desire in other the like Cases That when God requires us to believe or do any thing and sends a special Messenger to acquaint us with his Will he should grant to this Messenger such Testimonials as are sufficient to satisfie reasonable Men that he is no Impostor but a Teacher sent from God is indeed a thing that may fairly be expected And if God should not do thus we should be excusable in not hearkning to such a Messenger because we could not know whether he was a true or a false Prophet and God does not require neither indeed is it reasonable that we should believe every Pretender to Revelation And the clearest Proof of any Man 's being sent from God to teach us any thing being a Power of doing such Miracles and Mighty Works as are manifestly above the skill and strength of a Man to do it was therefore highly requisite and what might reasonably be look'd for that God should grant such a Power as this to all those whom he has ever inspired with new Light and Commission'd to make any new Revelation of his Will to Mankind And this he has always done He gave this Power to Moses in a large measure because the Matters that Men were to trust him for were many and very considerable He gave it also to some of the succeeding Prophets but in a less measure because their Business for the most part was only to Interpret or to press the Observation of the Law of Moses which had been sufficiently prov'd before And he gave it in the largest measure of all to our Saviour and his Apostles because the Revelation made by them was of Truths very mysterious some of them above the Reach and Comprehension of Humane Reason It was also a Revelation in a manner wholly new even to the Jews themselves and much more to the Gentiles And besides it was a Revelation in many Points to appearance contrary to a former Divine Revelation inasmuch as it ordered the Abolition of many things which had been before enjoyned by divine Authority viz. all the Ritual and Ceremonial Law of Moses And therefore to gain Credit to their Testimony that they were inspired and sent by God to teach such things it was very requisite that they should produce more and more plain and undeniable Testimonials of their divine Mission than Moses himself had done And such Testimonials they had such they did produce working more Miracles and those as I may say more wonderful and Miraculous than Moses and all the Prophets together had wrought before But when these Testimonials had been once fairly produced and examined and by all reasonable Men allowed to be true and sufficient and when Christ and his Apostles had made and published all that Revelation which they were Commissioned to make And when to prevent all misunderstandings of it or mistakes concerning it they had committed it all to Writing and the Men that lived in those times and were capable of enquiring into the Truth of it were well assured that the Books said to be written by the Apostles and Evangelists were indeed theirs and contain'd in substance all the same things and no other which they had before declared by word of Mouth and confirmed by Miracles After this I say when the Divinity of the Revelation was thus once at the first Publishing of it so fully confirmed there was no need that it should be proved any more and all other Proof thereof would have been superfluous because the whole Matter both Doctrine and Proof being once faithfully recorded and those Records well attested there could afterwards be no reasonable Cause to call it again in Question So that the Reason of working Miracles being then ceased it was reasonable that the
THE SUFFICIENCY Of a Standing REVELATION in General AND Of the Scripture REVELATION in Particular BOTH As to the Matter of it and As to the Proof of it AND That NEW REVELATIONS Cannot Reasonably be Desired and Would Probably be Unsuccessful In Eight SERMONS Preach'd in the CATHEDRAL-CHURCH of St. Paul London At the LECTURE Founded by the Honourable ROBERT BOYLE Esq in the Year MDCC By OFSPRING BLACKALL D. D. Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His MAJESTY LONDON Printed by J. Leake for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1700. THE SUFFICIENCY OF A Standing Revelation A SERMON Preach'd at the CATHEDRAL-CHURCH of St. Paul January the 1 st 1699 700. BEING The First for the Year 1700 of the LECTURE Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq By OFSPRING BLACKALL Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His MAJESTY LONDON Printed by J. Leake for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1700. To the most Reverend Father in GOD THOMAS Lord Arch-Bshop of Canterbury Sir HENRY ASHURST Baronet Sir JOHN ROTHERAM Serjeant at Law JOHN EVELYN Senior Esquire Trustees appointed by the Will of the Honourable ROBERT BOYLE Esquire Most Reverend and Honoured I Beg leave humbly to present you with these First-fruits of my Labours in that Station which you have been pleased to assign me for this Year Taking this Occasion both to acknowledge publickly and with all Thankfulness the Honour you have done me in appointing me to this Work and likewise to give you Assurance that the After-fruits shall also in due Time be offered to you if God shall be pleased to give them a Season to ripen And I heartily wish they may be better and more worth your Acceptance than I am sensible these are However I hope the same Goodness and kind Opinion of me which moved you to nominate me to the Employment will incline you to forgive all my Failings in the Management of it And if my Labours shall be well accepted by you And especially If by the Blessing of God who only giveth the Increase they shall any Ways contribute toward the Promoting the pious Design of the Honourable Founder of these Lectures of blessed Memory I shall be very easie under the too just Charge of Insufficiency for such an Vndertaking which I make no Doubt will be cast upon me by those who will be inwardly glad that I have performed my Task no better and will earnestly wish that the Christan Cause may never have an abler Advocate But that by your wise Choice of Persons to succeed in this Employment they may see themselves every Year disappointed in this their Wish is the hearty Desire of Most Reverend and Honoured Your most obliged and obedient Servant OFSP BLACKALL Feb. 26. 1699 700. St. LUKE XVI 29 30 31. Abraham saith unto him They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them And he said Nay father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be perswaded though one rose from the dead THESE words contain some of the Discourse that passed between Abraham in Heaven and a certain rich Man in Hell occasioned by a Request which he had made in the foregoing Verses in the behalf of his five Brethren whom he had left alive upon Earth that Abraham would be so kind as to send Lazarus to them to testifie to them lest they also should come into that Place of Torment And the general Design of them and indeed of the whole Parable of which they are a Part is to assert the Sufficiency of those Means which God hath thought fit to use to bring Men to Repentance particularly by granting them a standing Revelation of his Will and the probable Unsuccessfulness of any other Method that we could propose and perhaps might think more proper for this Purpose And when these Words were first spoken it was with a special Reference to the State of the Jews and and to that Light and those Means of Salvation which were afforded to them at the Time when our Saviour began his Preaching when all the standing Revelation of God's Will was contained in the Books of Moses and in the Writings of the Prophets But since then our Lord Jesus Christ the eternal Son of God a more credible Messenger than Lazarus from the dead has come himself in Person to assure us that there is a Heaven and a Hell and to shew us the Means of attaining that and avoiding this and God having raised him up from the dead after he had been crucified by the Jews has given sufficient Assurance to the World of his divine Mission And that Jesus did and said such things and that he died and rose again we have the Testimony of his Apostles and others who were Eye and Ear-witnesses thereof and who in Confirmation of their Testimony were empowered by God to do as great Miracles as Jesus himself had done And lastly of what was done and taught by our Saviour and his Apostles we have very credible Records still remaining viz. the Books of the New Testament the Authority of which is at least as well proved to us as ever the Authority of the Old Testament was to the Jews So that we now have plainly more and stronger Motives to Repentance than the Jews before our Saviour's Time had we consequently do stand in less need of new Miracles and new Revelations than they did And therefore the Argument in the Text as it may be applied to us who live now is much stronger than as it was here urged by Abraham with Reference to the Jews while they had only Moses and the Prophets And thus in my Discourse upon the Words I shall now consider it viz. as if the Request made by the rich Man in the Behalf of his Brethren in the two foregoing Verses were made now in the Behalf of those to whom the Revelation of the Gospel has been given but without Success and as if the Answer here returned to it by Abraham had been suited to the present State of things And from the words thus largely understood I shall take occasion to speak to these Three Points I. I shall endeavour to shew that the present standing Revelation of God's Will contained in the Books of the Old and New Testament is abundantly sufficient to perswade Men to Repentance if they are not unreasonably blind and obstinate They have Moses and the Prophets I add they have also Christ and his Apostles let them hear them II. I shall shew that having already such good Grounds of Faith such full Directions for Practice and such strong Motives to Repentance it is an unreasonable Request to desire more Nay Father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And III. Lastly I shall endeavour to shew That in case God should condescend to
of Books as written by such and such Authors without sufficient Assurance thereof But I believe the Truth is There are some Men who for Reasons best known to themselves but which may some of them be easily enough guessed at will not allow that to be sufficient Evidence that a Book was written by a Prophet or an Apostle which they must and do allow to be sufficient Evidence in any other Case of the like Nature For in other Cases we make no Doubt to receive a Book as written by such an Author if he owns himself to be the Author of it or if it be shewn written with his own Hand or if they that are the Publishers of it declare that they had it from him as his own or that they transcribed or printed it from a Copy which they knew to be of his Hand-writing or if it passes current in common Fame and Report to be his and his most intimate friends believe it so and he himself does not disown it and there be none else that pretend any Claim or Title to it Where these or most of these Circumstances do concurr we never doubt but that the Person said to be the Author of such a Book is so indeed unless there be some very clear Reason grounded upon the known Incapacity of the Person to write in such a Language in such a Stile concerning such a Subject or the like whereby it may be demonstrated that whoever was he could not be the Author of it The truth is Now adays and I suppose the Case was much the same formerly whoever is the true Author of any Book finds very little Difficulty to make Men believe that the Book is his the greatest Difficulty is for a Man to conceal himself in case he be not willing to be known to be the Author of it And when once a Book is generally receiv'd as written by such a Person when I say 't is thus receiv'd in that Age in which it was first publish'd and by those that were in the best Capacity to inquire and to judge who was the true Author of it they that live in after times never think it reasonable to question the Authority thereof unless there be evidently something either in the Language Dialect or Stile or else in the Matter of the Book as in the Relation of some Piece of History the References to some ancient Customs the Citations out of other Authors or the like by which it may be clearly made out that the Book cannot be of such Antiquity as it pretends to or could not be the Writing of that Person who is reported and has been commonly taken to be the Author of it Upon such Reasons as these a great many Books are every Day received as written by such and such Authors and tho' we cannot be so sure of a thing that we believe upon these Inducements as we are of what we see with our own Eyes yet such Reasons as these are by the general Consent of Mankind judged to be sufficient in a Matter of this Nature which is hardly capable of better Proof And for a Man to disallow in one Case that same Evidence of the Truth of a Matter of Fact which in other Cases of the like kind he allows to be sufficient for a Man to receive a Book as written by another Person and not to receive a Book as written by a Prophet or an Apostle when he has as much Reason to receive one as the other and no more Reason to reject one than the other is not Judgment or Discretion or reasonable Caution but manifest Prejudice and Partiality But 2. It was further said That tho' we might be well enough assured that a Book was written by the Person who is said to be the Author of it there is no Way to be sufficiently assured that who he was the Author of it did not design to impose upon his Readers It seems then there is no Way to be sufficiently satisfied that any Man is an honest Man and fit to be credited that he does not lye in every thing he says and intend a Cheat in every thing he does For if a Man may be believed in what he says he may as well be believed in what he writes And if he may be trusted in one Concern he may be as safely trusted in another unless good Reason can be shewed to the contrary But in judging of humane Nature in general Men commonly judge of others by themselves What they are inclined to they think is the Inclination of Mankind what they allow themselves in they think others whatever they may pretend make as little scruple of as they do what they freely practice they make no Doubt other Men would practise as freely on the same Occasions and upon the same Inducements So that when any Man is so very suspectful of the Honesty and Veracity of other Men it gives but too just Ground to think that the Reason of his Aptness to distrust all others is his Consciousness of his own evil Designs and of the little Regard that he himself has to Truth in his own Assertions And if those he has to deal with should refuse to give any Credit to any thing that he affirms because according to his own declared Opinion very little Credit can reasonably be given to the Report and Affirmation of others I do not see with what Reason he can blame them for so doing Not but that after all 't is possible that a Man may 't is doubtless what has been done by some give out a Report or write Book on purpose to deceive Mankind But nevertheless I say that it ought not without very good Reason to be suspected that this is any Man's Design and that we may have Assurance enough that a thing is not which yet we must grant was possible to have been Particularly as to the Matter we are now speaking of First In case the Author of any Book or of any Report relates a Matter of Fact of which there are not nor well could be any other Witnesses but himself as if he says that he has received from God such a Revelation with order to publish it to the World or that he himself was an Eye or Ear-witness that such a thing was privately done or spoken by another the Credibility of such a Report whether written or spoken depends Partly upon the Nature of the Report its self Partly upon the Credit of its Author And partly upon the Proofs that he gives of his Honesty and Veracity in that particular And where there is a full Concurrence of all these that is When the Matter of the Report is credible in its self when its Author is a Person of Credit and when he gives the best Proofs that can be of his Veracity in that particular there is no Reason to reject his Testimony there is sufficient Reason to give Credit to it 1. If the Matter of his Report be credible in its
other Matter that he has related as of his own Knowledge that 't is possible there might be Mistake in the Sign and Proof of the divine Revelation as well as in the Revelation its self that 't is possible that the Author of the Report whether it was the Prophet himself or any other Man who has reported the Miracles done by the Prophet as Matters of his own Knowledge did imagine he saw things which he did not see and that he heard things which he did not hear But if this be supposed possible that any Man and much more that several Men agreeing in the same Report the Organs of whose Senses were rightly disposed and who by all their other Actions and Discourses appeared to be sober and considerate and judicious should yet in the Day time and in a clear Light and when they were sure they were broad awake be mistaken in the plainest Matters of Sense then there is no such thing as Certainty in the World Then they that make the Objection can be no more sure of what they themselves see and hear than other Men can be And 't is to no Purpose to hold an Argument with such as dare not believe their own Eyes and Ears The only sense whereby I think such Men can be convinced must be Feeling And it will be well for them if they can carry the same Scepticism with them into the other World and when they are compassed about with the Flames of Hell can be able to doubt whether it be a real or a painted fire whether they are tormented in that Flame or not Leaving these therefore to be convinced in the other World as being I think not capable of Conviction here I shall content my self with having said what I suppose is enough to satisfie others That the Witness of a plain Matter of Fact may be sure of the Truth of what he witnesses and that 't is possible for God to speak so plainly to Men that they may be certain they have had a divine Revelation and that such Evidence may be given of the Veracity of an Author and of the Authority of a Book as is sufficient to satisfie a reasonable Man And by this and what was said before I hope I have made it appear that a Standing Revelation of God's Will may be so well contrived and so well attested as to be sufficient to effect its Design viz. to bring Men to Repentance Whether the Standing Revelation which we have in the Holy Scripture be sufficient for this Purpose will be Matter of Enquiry in the next Discourses In the mean time what has been already said may serve to dispose us to hear without Prejudice the Arguments that may be offered to prove the sufficiency of the Holy Scripture For 1. If it be possible that there may be such a Standing Revelation it is very probable that there is one for from that natural Notion that we have of the Goodness of God it may be fairly argued that he is not wanting to Men in the necessary Means of Salvation and therefore it being evident that there are not new Revelations made every Day it may be reasonably concluded that the Reason is because there is already some Standing Revelation of God's Will extant that is sufficient to direct us in the Way to Happiness And 2. If there be already any such Standing Revelation extant it may be strongly presumed that it is that which we have in the Holy Scripture because there is no other Book that we know of which has such good Evidences of divine Authority and Inspiration as that has Let us then be prepared to inquire into the Grounds and Reasons of the Christian Faith and Religion with unprejudiced Minds with a sincere Love and Desire of Truth and with a Resolution to hear Reason and to be convinced by it And above all which indeed is the best Preparation for Truth and the best Security against Error let us in the Sincerity of our Hearts apply our selves to God for his Help and Direction And that our Prayer may be effectual let us be careful to approve our selves to him by a conscientious Discharge of all those Duties of Piety Justice Temperance and Charity which are clearly taught even by natural Reason and be readily disposed to practise whatever else we shall learn to be our Duty by any farther Illumination Joh. 7.17 for if any Man will do his Will he shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God FINIS ERRATA IN Epist Ded. l. 3. r. Arch-Bishop p. 8. l. 31. r. forborn p. 13. l. 19. r. he who p. 14. l. 16. r. a Book THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE Scripture-Revelation As to the Matter of it A SERMON Preach'd at the CATHEDRAL-CHURCH of St. Paul February the 5 th 1699 700. BEING The Second for the Year 1700 of the LECTURE Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq By OFSPRING BLACKALL Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His MAJESTY LONDON Printed by J. Leake for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1700. St. LUKE XVI 29 30 31. Abraham saith unto him They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them And he said Nay father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead THE first thing which I propounded to do in Discoursing on these Words was to endeavour to shew that the present Standing Revelation of God's Will contained in the Books of the Old and New Testament is abundantly sufficient to persuade Men to Repentance if they are not unreasonably blind and obstinate They have Moses and the Prophets they have also Christ and his Apostles let them hear them And if that Standing Revelation which God hath made to us of his Will in the Holy Scriptures can upon any Account be thought insufficient to effect this Design it must be I think either 1. Because no Standing Revelation can be sufficient for this Purpose Or 2. Because there are some particular Defects in that Revelation which we have in the Holy Scriptures which render it not so sufficient for this Purpose as 't is possible a Standing Revelation might be I have therefore in a former Discourse upon these Words endeavoured to shew in general that a Standing Revelation of God's Will may be so well contrived and so well attested as to be sufficient for this Purpose I proceed now in the second place 2. To Consider whether that Standing Revelation which we have in the Holy Scriptures be such a Revelation whether it be sufficient to persuade Men to Repentance and fully to direct them in the Way to Happiness Or whether there be not some particular Defects in this Revelation which render it not so sufficient for this Purpose as 't is possible a Standing Revelation might be And if there be any such Defect
Christ every one that had heard him Preach and had been a Witness of his Life and Miracles and Resurrection and had received the Miraculous Gifts of the Holy Ghost did write a distinct Gospel giving an Account of some of the most remarkable Passages of our Saviour's Life which he had been a Witness of and did likewise as he had Occasion write Epistles or other Tracts for the Use and Instruction of the Christian Church every one of all which Books if they were now extant and as well attested as the Books of the New Testament are would be of equal Authority with them because dictated by the same Spirit by which all the Apostles were led into all Truth and had all things that Jesus had spoken brought to their Remembrance yet I say it would by no Means follow from hence either that those Books which are now lost if indeed there are any lost that were written by the Apostles were needless when they were written or that those which do now remain are not sufficient And a very little Consideration of the State of things as it was then and as it is now will make this which I have said very plain For the Case then was thus The Gospel of Christ was to be preached to the whole World by a few Persons who had been Eye-witnesses of his Miracles and were enabled by the Power of the Holy Ghost to confirm their Testimony of him by doing the like Miracles themselves And that this great Work might be accomplished within the Term of their Life it was necessary that they should quickly disperse themselves into all Parts of the World one going this Way and another that according as they had agreed among themselves or were directed by the Spirit And in this Division of Countries every one had a large Province assigned to him so that having much Work to do in a little Time he could not well stay long in one Place And upon this account it might be very proper for him after he had preached the Gospel in one City and made a good number of Converts and ordained Elders and established a Christian Church there when he went thence to leave behind him in Writing the Sum of what he had before preached among them for the Help of their Memories for the Direction of their Pastors and to prevent any Mis-representation that might afterwards be made of his Doctrine by ignorant or designing Men And after he was gone from thence he might have frequent Occasion to send them Letters either to confirm them in their Faith or to caution them against some Errors which he had heard were springing up among them or to correct some Fault in their Discipline or Manners By this Means I say it might well enough be tho' there be no Evidence that it was so that in the first Age of Christianity there might be besides occasional Letters as many distinct Gospels as there were Apostles every One writing a Gospel for the proper Use of those Churches which he himself had planted and in the Language that was best known to them And this if it was done might be no more than might be then necessary when it was not so easy as it is now since the Increase of Commerce and Navigation and the Invention of Printing to communicate and disperse the Books that are Published in one Country to other Countries that are far distant Besides if this could have been done then it can't well be supposed that a Gospel written by any other of the Apostles who had never been in that Province or Division and of whom they had never heard perhaps more than only his Name should be at first of so great Authority to them as a Gospel written by that very Apostle by whose Ministry they had been converted and of whose Miracles they themselves had been Witnesses Thus it might be and if it was so it might be agreeable to the divine Wisdom and Goodness so to order it that before those Books of the New Testament which we now have could be well dispersed and upon good Attestation receiv'd in all Christian Countries some particular Churches and especially those most remote from Judea should have for their present Use other Books written by some other of the Apostles containing the same Form of sound Words and relating the same things concerning the Life and Doctrine of our Saviour that these do And that some of those many Books which might be written by the Apostles or other inspired Men upon this Subject should be lost is no Marvel at all 't is rather a Wonder considering the Poverty of the first Christians and the constant Persecutions they were then under and the many Revolutions of Government that have been in Christendom since that time that so many as we have now left could be preserved for so many Ages before Printing was found out And those were of all the most like to be lost which were published in rude and barbarous Countries and which were written in some Language that was peculiar to one Nation only And those the most easie and consequently the most probable to be preserved which were published in the learned Part of the World and written in the most learned Language then in Use But altho' a greater Number of inspired Books than are now extant might be necessary in the first Age of Christianity before the Christian Churches then newly planted in all Countries of the then known World could have Communication with one another it cannot be argued from hence that those Books which we have now remaining are not sufficient for the present Time and for all the Time that has passed since the other Books were lost But rather it may very reasonably be presumed that there was nothing more for Substance in those Books which are supposed to be lost than there is in these which are now remaining so that the Loss of them may be no real Loss or Detriment to Religion and those which remain and are now receiv'd in all Christian Churches may be abundantly sufficient to instruct us in all Points of Christian Faith and Practice And there is indeed no Reason to think they are not seeing some of those single Books which we have now were written for this very Purpose were designed as Compendiums of the whole Christian Institution For St. Luke wrote his Gospel that Theophilus might know the Certainty of those things wherein he had been instructed And if this was the Evangelist's Design Luke 1.4 it can't be supposed but that he thought he had put into his Gospel whatever was necessary or very material And St. John in the same Place where he acknowledges that he had omitted the Relation of many things which Jesus did Joh. 20.30 31. says that he had written the things contained in his Gospel that Men might believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God and that believing they might have Life through his Name By which it appears that
of Holy Scripture were written by those Persons who are said to be the Authors thereof 2. That there is sufficient Reason to give full Credit to them in their Relation of those Matters of Fact which they have recorded And 3. That if the Matters of Fact recorded in the Scripture are true they are sufficient Proofs of the Truth and divine Authority of all the Doctrines that are therein taught These things therefore I shall now endeavour to make good But in speaking to this Point I shall for Brevity's sake confine my Discourse only to the Books of the New Testament Partly because these are the Books wherein our Christian Religion is chiefly taught And especially because I think there are none who receive the New Testament as of divine Authority that do or â—ndeed can with any Reason reject the Old 1. Then I am to shew that we have sufficient Reason to believe that the Books of Holy Scripture of the New Testament in particular were written by those Persons that are said to be the Authors thereof This indeed is a Point that it does not properly lie upon us to make any Proof of For as a Man's Possession of an Estate is alone a good and a sufficient Title to it till a better is shewn by the Person that endeavours to eject him so it is here These Books are generally receiv'd as written by such and such Persons These Authors have the Name these have as it were â—he Possession of them and that 's Title enough if no other could be produced so long as no Evidence is ofâ—ered to shew that any other Persons have a better Title â—o them It lies on them therefore who deny that the Books are theirs to give a Reason of what they say â—ither by alledging some special Matter out of the Books â—hemselves whereby it may be proved that they could â—ot be of their Writing or by producing some creâ—ible and authentick History testifying that they were written by some other Persons and not by them And â—ill they can and shall do this which I am persuaded â—an never be done we may very well refuse to proâ—uce any positive Evidence to affirm or prove their Title their Possession being a good Title enough till a better appears And a Tenant might with as good Reason refuse to pay Rent to the Person of whom he â—ook the Estate and to whom he hath ever hitherto â—aid Rent and whose Right to it is not at all controverted until he shall suffer his Writings to be perused and examined and by them make it plainly appear that he is the lawful Landlord as any Man can now refuse to give that Credit to these Books as written by the Apostles which has been given hitherto and is still given by all Christians unless he may have now as good positive Evidence of their being written by the Apostles as might have been given thereof at first and as it may be presumed was given before their Title to them was so universally acknowledged But nevertheless what a Man is not under any Obligation to do for the asserting of his Right he may do wisely enough for his own Satisfaction And it must needs be a Satisfaction and Pleasure to a Man altho' his Title to his Estate be not at present controverted if in looking over the Writings and Evidences of it he sees plainly how it descended to him by a lineal Succession from Father to Son for many Generations past and how it came at first to his Ancestors by a clear and fair Purchase from the former Possessors or by Donation from the Prince in the Division of a wast or conquered Country and if he also finds ancient Terriers agreeing in the same Measure and Boundings and exactly describing the same Estate which he now possesses and if moreover looking far back he sees that upon some Disputes or Law-suits that have formerly been concerning it Judgment has been always given on his Side It cannot but please him I say that upon such a Search into Antiquity he finds that he is so very well provided to make out his Title if there should ever be any Occasion for it altho' by Reason of the long and quiet Possession that he and his Ancestors before him time out of Mind have had of it he has no just Cause to fear he shall ever meet â—ith any Disturbance And so it is here These Writings the Books of â—he New Testament are generally acknowledged to be â—ritten by the Apostles of Christ and their Authoâ—â—ty is at present uncontested It may therefore reaâ—â—nably be presumed especially by those who have â—ot Parts or Learning or Leisure to examine into the â—easons of such things that they would not have â—â—en so universally acknowledged and reverenced as â—â—ey are upon this Account but upon very good â—rounds tho' what the Grounds thereof are they â—â—ve not yet inquired Their being in Possession is â—one Reason enough to acknowledge and assert their â—â—tle It lies upon them that deny these Books to 〈◊〉 theirs to produce satisfactory Evidence of their â—ing forged or counterfeit and till they shall proâ—â—ce some Evidence thereof that has a Shew and Apâ—â—arance of Truth we have no Reason to be stagâ—â—red in our Belief by their bare however bold and â—â—nfident Denial of their Authority And much â—s shall we need to give our Reasons for our reâ—â—ving them as written by the Apostles till our Adâ—â—â—saries shall offer some Reasons why we ought not 〈◊〉 receive them as such But nevertheless because we see there are some in â—s incredulous Age that shew a good Will to deny 〈◊〉 Authority of these Sacred Books and whose Inâ—est it would be to prove them Spurious and beâ—se we cannot tell what unwarrantable Practices â—ir Inclination and Interest may put them upon 〈◊〉 what Writings or Evidences plausibly forged 〈◊〉 counterfeited they may hereafter produce it cannot be amiss for us to inquire and see and it cannot but be a Pleasure and Satisfaction to us who hold our Hope of eternal Life chiefly by these Writings to find and consider how well provided we are to detect and disprove any such Forgeries if they should be offered by being able to produce in Opposition thereto as good positive Proof that these Books are genuine as such a Matter is capable of much better than I believe can be produced for the Authority of any other Books of the like Antiquity And it gives us some Satisfaction in the Belief wâ— have been bred up in that these are the genuiâ—â— Books of the Authors to whom they are ascribed tâ— find that they are receiv'd as such not by a smaâ—â— Party of Men not by that Church and Nation onlâ— to which we belong but by all Christians disperseâ— in all Parts of the World and likewise that they aâ— agree with us in the same Testimony viz. that theâ— received then as such from their Fathers For thâ—â— these Books should be thus generally receiv'd anâ— acknowledged
was For in Matters of common Testimony we make little Difference between Speech and Writing If a Man whom we dare trust sends us a Letter and therein relates such and such things as heard or seen by himself or as well attested to him by unexceptionable Witnesses we give as full Credit to his Letter as we should do to his Words So that in Truth our Case who live now is not very different from theirs who lived in the Apostles Days and heard them saying those same Things which we now read in their Books and if we think those inexcuseable who did not receive their Testimony when given by Word of Mouth we can't in good Reason hold our selves excused if we receive not the same Testimony of the same Persons given under their Hands In one Respect indeed it must be granted that they had the Advantage of us viz. because they might be surer that they heard an Apostle speak than the Nature of the Thing will admit we should be that we read the Words of an Apostle written But we are sure enough of this We have as good moral Certainty of it as we can have of any thing that is not capable of any other than a moral Certainty And if the Words that we read in the New Testament are the Words of the Apostles of Christ we have in some Respects the Advantage of those who lived in those early Times for we have the concurrent Testimony of several of the Apostles written whereas hardly any in those times when a few Persons were to bear Witness to all the World could have more than the Testimony of one single Apostle only by Word of Mouth and many Witnesses are more credible than one And besides there being several Witnesses their Testimony if it be false may be more easily proved so by their Disagreement with one another than the Testimony of one single Witness could be And lastly a Writing which we may review and read over as often as we will and which we may take what time we please to consider of may be more throughly understood and better digested than a Sermon or Discourse only once spoken can well be But if it be granted that the Faith of the first Converts to Christianity which came by Hearing of the Apostles might be built upon more certain and infallible Grounds than ours that comes only by Reading is And some Reasons may perhaps be given hereafter why 't was fit it should be so it is enough however to render our Infidelity inexcusable if the Grounds of Faith that we now have are very rational if they are a sufficient Support for such a Faith as will enable us to please God and to overcome the World And this may be farther said for our Comfort and to make us easie and satisfied with those Grounds and Reasons of Faith which are afforded to us by the written Testimony of the Apostles in the Books of the New Testament that as there is more Certainty in that Belief if it may be called Belief which is grounded upon Demonstration or infallible Evidence so there is more Praise and Vertue in that good Disposition of Mind which makes us rest satisfied with such Grounds of Faith as tho' not absolutely and infallibly certain yet cannot with any good Reason be denied or excepted against According to that Saying of our Saviour to St. Thomas in a like Case with which I shall conclude Joh. 20.29 Thomas because thou hast seen me thou hast believed blessed are they that is they are more blessed their Faith is more excellent and praise-worthy and so will intitle them to a greater Reward who have not seen and yet have believed Which Blessedness that we may all attain God of his great Mercy and Goodness grant for the sake of our Lord Jesus Christ c. FINIS ERRATA Pag. 8. l. 19. for then r. them Books Printed for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's-Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard A Sermon Preach'd before the Honourable the House of Commons at St. Margaret's Westminster January the 30th 1698 9. The Sufficiency of a Standing Revelation A Sermon Preached at the Cathedral Church of St. Paul's Jan. 1st 1699 700. being the first for the Year 1700. of the Lecture Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq The Sufficiency of the Scripture Revelation as to the Matter of it Being the Second for the Year 1700. of the Lecture Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq These Three by Ofspring Blackall Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His Majesty A Perswasive to Prayer A Sermon Preach'd before the King at St. James's A Sermon Preach'd before the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament Assembled in the Abby Church at Westminster Jan. 30th Fifteen Sermons Preached on several Occasions the Last of which was never before Printed These Three by the most Reverend Father in God John Lord Arch-Bishop of York Primate of England and Metropolitan The Faith and Practice of a Church of England Man A False Faith not Justified by Care for the Poor Prov'd in a Sermon Preach'd at St. Paul's Church Mysteries in Religion Vindicated or the Filiation Deity and Satisfaction of our Saviour asserted against Socinians and others with Occasional Reflections on several late Pamphlets These Two by Luke Milbourn a Presbyter of the Church of England Two Sermons of Mr. Young's about Nature and Grace Preach'd at Whitehall THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE Scripture-Revelation As to the Proof of it PART II. TWO SERMONS Preach'd at the CATHEDRAL-CHURCH of St. Paul April 1 st and May 6 th 1700. BEING The Fourth and Fifth for the Year 1700 of the LECTURE Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq By OFSPRING BLACKALL Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His MAJESTY LONDON Printed by J. Leake for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1700. St. LUKE XVI 29 30 31. Abraham saith unto him They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them And he said Nay father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead THE Point I entred upon the Proof of the last time was this 3. That we have sufficient Reason given us to convince us of the Truth and Authority of the Holy Scripture and consequently of all the Doctrines that are taught by it And for the Proof of this having for Brevity sake confined my Discourse upon it to the Books of the New Testament only the rather because the Authority of that being granted the Authority of the Old Testament cannot reasonably be questioned I propounded to shew 1. That we have sufficient Reason to believe that the Books of the New Testament were written by those Persons who are said to be the Authors thereof 2. That there is sufficient Reason to give full Credit to them in their Relations of those
Matters of Fact which they have recorded And 3. That if the Matters of Fact related in the New Testament are true they are sufficient Proofs of the Truth and Divine Authority of all the Doctrines that are therein taught And I hope enough was said the last time to shew that we have sufficient Reason to believe that the Books of the New Testament were written by those Persons who are said to be the Authors thereof What I am next to do is 2. To shew that there is sufficient Reason to give full Credit to these Authors in their Relations of those Matters of Fact which they have recorded And I hope none of you that hear me whom I presume to be all Christians will take Offence at it if now while I am arguing this Point I sometimes speak of the Holy Evangelists with the same Freedom that might be used in speaking concerning any other Authors and if I sometimes Plead for no more Credit to be given to them in their Relations than is fit and reasonable to be given to any other Historian that was naturally as well furnished and qualified to write a true History as they were and whose Fidelity and Veracity is as well attested and confirmed other Ways as theirs was For you will consider I hope that my Business is now with Infidels with whom we can argue only upon the Principles of common Reason And tho' we who are Christians already do believe as one of the first Principles of our Religion that these Sacred Writers were divinely and supernaturally assisted in their Work and that upon that Account they deserve much greater Credit in what they have written than other Historians do yet this is what those who are yet Infidels will not allow And in Disputation nothing is to be presumed on one side but what will be readily allowed by the other Party So that the divine Inspiration of the Evangelical Writers and the supernatural Assistance which we believe they had in their Writing cannot as yet be regularly insisted upon as an Argument to gain them Credit But it is what will easily be granted afterwards when the Truth of their History shall be well established upon other Grounds as I hope it will be in the following Discourse and 't is what may then serve to procure a religious Respect and Reverence to these Sacred Writings 1 Thess 2.13 and to ingage us to receive them not as the Word of Men but as they are in Truth as the Word of God But this one thing nevertheless I suppose I may presume viz. that if the Books of the New Testament the Historical Parts of it in particular were written by those Authors to whom they are ascribed which has been already proved the Matters of Fact recorded by the Evangelists in Writing are the same which they and the other Apostles testified by Word of Mouth in their Preaching For it cannot I think with any Reason be suspected that their Preaching and Writings were disagreeable to each other because such Disagreement would most certainly have utterly destroyed the Credit of them both And this being supposed I hope it will clearly appear that there is abundantly sufficient Reason to give full Credit to these Writings if these following things be considered 1. If we consider the Nature Conditions and Circumstances of the Matters that are recorded in the Historical Books of the New Testament and of the History its self 2. If we consider the good Capacity that the Authors thereof were in to know the Truth of the things they have related 3. If we consider the strong Obligations they were under to write nothing but the Truth according to the best of their Knowledge or Information 4. If we consider the good Evidences that we have of their Honesty and Faithfulness And 5. Lastly If we consider the Confirmation that was given to the Truth of their History by God himself 1. I say the Evangelical History will appear to be highly credible if without any Regard as yet had to the Ability and Integrity of its Authors we only consider the Nature Conditions and Circumstances of the Matters therein recorded and of the History its self Concerning which there are two things especially that may be observed 1. That the Matters recorded by the Evangelical Writers are such as might be certainly known And 2. That they are such and in such manner related by the Evangelists that if their History of them had been false it could never have gained Credit in the World 1. First I say the Matters recorded by the Evangelical Writers are such as might be certainly known I mean either by the Historians themselves or by those from whom they had their Information For 1. They are for the most part plain Matters of Sense which those who were present at them could have no doubt of without Distrusting their own Faculties of Hearing or Seeing and which those who testified them might be as certain of the Truth of as we can be of any thing that we hear with our own Ears or see with our own Eyes For thus whether our Saviour gave out himself to be the Messias foretold by the Prophets whether he said that he was the Son of God and whether he uttered those other Speeches which the Evangelists have recorded as spoken by him could not but be certainly known by the People who often heard him and especially by his Apostles who constantly attended him And so likewise whether he did those many wonderful Works which the Evangelists have recorded of him could not but be known by those that were present with him They might be certain either that he did them or that he did not do them Thus for instance it might be certainly known to those that first affirmed that he gave Sight to the Blind whether those Persons had been once blind and whether afterwards they â—aw and to those that witnessed that he gave Strength â—o the Cripples whether the Men whom they said he wrought this Cure upon had been Lame or disabled â—n their Feet Hands or Body before and whether â—fterwards they walked and had Strength like other Men and to those that testified that he raised the Dead whether the Persons said to have been raised by â—im had been truly dead and whether afterwards â—hey lived But above all his own Resurrection which the preâ—ent Season as well as the Wonderfulness and Imporâ—ance of the thing obliges us to have a special â—egard to was a thing that might be most certainly â—nown to those that pretended to be Witnesses of it This Sermon was Preached on the Monday in Easter Week â—hey might be certain whether he had been once dead â—nd whether he shewed himself alive after his Passion â—y many infallible Proofs and was seen of them forty Days Of this they might be rather more certain than â—f any other of his Miracles because it was a thing â—ot to be judged of by one sense only as some of the â—est were
Power of working Miracles should cease too at least till such time as God should think fit to make some Alteration in or Addition to his former Revelations which we have good Reason to think he will never do or 'till he should please to undertake the Conversion of those Nations to the Christian Faith to whom the Knowledge of the former Miracles that had been wrought for its Confirmation could not be so well communicated by credible History as it is to us For as was hinted before Credible History is all the Proof and Evidence that we ever think reasonable to require in other Cases of the like Nature As for instance When a new Law is made concerning any Matter it is requisite according to the Custom of our Country that it should pass both Houses of Parliament and that the King should ratifie and confirm it and that afterwards it should be some way so published and promulged that all the Subjects that are then alive should have sufficient Assurance given them that such a Law is made But after this Law has been once so passed and ratified and promulged it is passed and ratified and promulged for ever and no Man is so unreasonable as to expect that every Parliament that is called afterwards should read and pass over again all the Laws that have been made before their Time or that every King that succeeds to the Throne should afresh ratifie and publish all the Laws that were made by all his Predecessors But all the Proof that we ever require of the Authority of any ancient Law is a true Copy of it and a good History or Record of its being made at such a time by such a King confirmed by the Tradition of all the intermediate Ages to our Time which have allowed of its Authority by citing it as a Law of the Land by Pleading from it and by giving Judgment according to it And he who will not allow of the same Proof and Evidence of the Authority of the Christian Institution so many hundred years ago established but would needs have new Miracles and new Revelations to confirm the former is every whit as unreasonable as that Criminal would be who being Indicted upon some Ancient Statute should refuse to plead to his Indictment upon Pretence that he knew not whether there was any such Law or not it being made if ever it was made long before his Time and there being none now alive that were present at the making of it Shew him the Law in the Statute Book why how does he know he 'd say but that the Printers had a mind to put a Cheat upon the Nation by Printing a Law of their own making as a Law made by some of our ancient Kings nay shew him the Original Record still he 'd say There have been abundance of Forgeries in the World and how does he know but that this is one The Record he 'd own perhaps looks like an Ancient Deed and has all the Marks of such Antiquity as it pretends to but after all 't is possible it may be and therefore he cannot be sure it is not a Forgery and 'till he is assured of this he will not plead to an Indictment that is grounded upon it But if the King and Parliament that now are will be pleased to declare that this is a good Law and if he himself may be allowed to be by when they shall declare it or if at least two or three Witnesses that he can trust shall testifie upon Oath that they were present when it was passed into a Law then he will allow it to be a good Law and after that will be content to suffer the Punishment of it if he shall ever again be a Transgressor Now what Man is there that would think this a reasonable Demand Or what Judge or Court would ever allow of such a Plea And yet as unreasonable as it is it is just the same with theirs who pretending to be more wise and cautious than their Neighbours will not allow of the same sort of Proof tho' indeed much better in its kind of the Truth of the Christian Religion but tho' we have as Authentick Histories as any are in the World such Histories as the greatest Adversaries of Christianity have not been able to say any thing to invalidate the Truth of which declare that Christ and his Apostles taught such and such Doctrines and wrought such and such Miracles to confirm the Truth of their Doctrine yet will not believe that the Doctrine of Christianity is true and Divine unless they may have special Messengers sent to them to declare a-fresh all the same things which the Apostles once did and those endued with a Power of working in their sight and presence the same Miracles over again that are said to have been formerly done by Christ and his Apostles to confirm the Testimony that they gave 2. The Unreasonableness of that Request which the Rich Man here makes in the Behalf of his Brethren viz. That God would make a new Revelation for their particular Conversion or in general The Unreasonableness of our now desiring fresh Revelations new Miracles or Apparitions of Men from the dead to confirm the Truth of those things which are already sufficiently proved to us by the Standing Revelation of the Gospel will further appear if we consider That to us who live now in Christian Countries other Grounds of Faith or stronger Motives to Repentance than we have already in the standing Revelation of the Gospel might be inconsistent with the Excellency of Faith might destroy the Virtue of Believing and might be too great a Force and Constraint upon us such as would in a manner take away our Liberty of Choice For there is no Virtue at all in Believing what we see there is no Praise or Thanks at all due for doing what we are driven or forced to do and for us who have already abundantly sufficient Grounds to believe and embrace Christianity to have fresh Miracles wrought every day before our own eyes such Miracles as we could not possibly doubt the Truth of to confirm those Doctrines which are already sufficiently confirmed would not be to persuade us but to force us to be Chistians so that then the State we are now in would not be as God designed it should be a State of Trial for the Trial of Wisdom is when there are some Reasons on both sides and he is the Wise Man who in that Case gives Judgment on that side on which the Reasons are strongest But against what I have now said perhaps it may be objected That the Evidence which we desire of the Truth of Religion is no more than we are told has been already given to some Men particularly to those who lived in our Saviour's and his Apostle's times and we can't see why it would be more inconsistent with the Nature of Faith and Religion now than it was then or how it would more destroy our Freedom