Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n think_v time_n write_v 3,105 5 5.0991 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A19567 The copy of certain lettres sent to the Quene, and also to doctour Martin and doctour Storye, by the most reuerende father in God, Thomas Cranmer Archebishop of Cantorburye from prison in Oxeforde: who (after long and most greuous strayt emprisoning and cruell handlyng) most constauntly and willingly suffred martirdome ther, for the true testimonie of Christ, in Marche. 1556 Cranmer, Thomas, 1489-1556.; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558.; Martin, Thomas, d. 1584.; Story, John, 1510?-1571. 1556 (1556) STC 5999; ESTC S116426 13,460 34

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Now whether I or they speake more to the purpose herein I referre me to the iudgemet of al indifferēt hearers Yea the olde churche of Rome aboue a thousaunt yeares together neither beleued nor vsed the Sacrament as y e church of Rome hathe done of late yeares For in the beginning y e churche of Rome taught a pure and a sounde doctrine of the sacrament But after that the churche of Rome fell in to a newe doctrine of transubstanciacion w t the doctrine they chaunged the vse of the sacrament contrary to that Christ commaunded and the olde churche of Rome vsed aboue a thousaunt yeares And yet to deface the olde they saye that the newe is the olde wherin for my parte I am content to the tryall of stande But their doctrine is so fonde and vncomfortable that I maruail that any man wold allowe it if he knewe what it is But what so euer they beare the people in hande that which they wryte in their bokes hathe nother truthe nor cōfort For by their doctrine of one body of Christ is made two bodies one natural hauing distaunce of membres w t forme and proporcion of a mans perfite body and this body is in heauen But the body of Christ in the sacramēt by their owne doctrine must nedes be a monstrous body hauing neither distaūce of membres nor forme facion or proporcion of a mannes naturall body And suche a body is in the sacrament teache they and goth in to the mouthe with the forme of bread and entreth no farther thā the forme of bread gothe nor tarieth no longer than the forme of bread is by natural heat in digesting So that whan the forme of bread is digested that body of Christ is gone And forasmuche as euil men be as long in digesting as good men the body of Christ by their doctrine entreth as farre and tarieth as long in wicked men as in godly men And what cōfort can be herein to any christian men to receaue Christes vnshapen body it to entre no farther than the stomacke and to departe by by as sone as the bread is consumed It semeth to me a more sounde cōfortable doctrine that Christ hath but one body that hathe forme faciō of a mannes true body which body spiritually entreth into the hole mā bodye soule And though the sacrament be consumed yet hole Christ remayneth fedeth the receauer vnto eternal life if he cōtinue in godlynesse neuer departeth vntill y e receauer forsake him And as for the wicked they haue not Christ within them at al who can not be where Belial is And this is my fayth and as me semeth a sounde doctrine according to goddes worde sufficient for a christian to beleue in that mater And if it can be shewed vnto me that the Popes autoritie is not preiudicial to the thinges before mētioned or that my doctrine in y e sacrament is erroneous which I thinke can not be shewed than I was neuer nor wilbe so peruerse to stande wilfully in myne owne opinion but I shall with all humilitie submitte my selfe vnto the Pope not only to kisse his fete but an other parte also An other cause why I refused to take the b. of Gloucestre for my iudge was the respecte of his owne person being more than ones periured Furst for that he being diuerse tymes sworne neuer to consent that the B. of Rome should haue any iurisdiciō within this realme but to take the king his successours for supreme heades of this realme as by goddes lawes they be Contrary to that lawfull othe the said B. sate than in iudgemēt by autoritie from Rome wherin he was periured and not worthy to syt as a iudge The seconde periurie was that he toke his bishoprike bothe of y e Quenes Maiestie of y e Pope making to eche of them a solemne othe Which othes be so contrarie that the one must nedes be periured And furthermore in swearing to the pope to maintene his lawes decrees cōstitutiōs ordinaūces reseruaciōs prouisions he declareth him selfe an enemy to the Imperial crowne to the lawes state of this realme wherby he declared him selfe not worthy to syt as a iudge win this realme And for these cōsideraciōs I refused to take him for my iudge This was written in an other lettre to the Quene I Learned by D. Martin that at the daye of your Maiesties coronacion you toke an othe of obedience to the pope of Rome And y t same tyme you toke an other othe to this realme to mayntene y e lawes liberties and customes of y e same And if your Maiestie did make an othe to y e pope I thinke it was accordīg to y e other othes which he vseth to ministre to princes which is to be obedient to him to defende his person to mayntene his autoritie honour lawes landes priuileges And if it be so which I knowe not but by reporte thā I beseche your maiestie to loke vpon your othe made to the crowne realme to expende and weighe the two othes together to see how they do agre as your graces cōscience shal geue you For I am surely persuaded that willingly your Maiestie will not offēde nor doo against your conscience for nothing But I feare me that ther be contradictiones in your othes and that those which should haue informed your grace throughly did not their dueties therin And if your Maiestie pondre y e two othes diligently I thīke you shal perceaue you were deceaued than your hignesse maye vse y e mater as God shall put in your hearte Furthermore I am kept here frō cōpanie of learned men from bokes frō coūsail from penne inke sauing at this time to writ vnto your Maiestie which all were necessary for a man being in my case Wherfore I beseche your maiestie y t I maye haue suche of these as maye stande w t your Maiesties pleasure And as for myne appearaunce at Rome if your Maiestie wil geue me leaue I will appeare ther. And I trust that God shall put in my mouthe to defende his truthe ther as well as here But I referre it holly to your maiesties pleasure To Doctour Martin and Doctour Storye I Haue me commended vnto you And as I promysed I haue sent my lettres vnto the Quenes Maiestie vnsigned Praieng you to signe thē deliuer them w t al spede I might haue sent them by the ●aryer soner but not surer But hearing M. Balif saye that he wolde goo to y t court on Frydaye I thought him a meter messagier to sende my lettres by For better is later and surer thā soner neuer to be deliuered yet one thing I haue written to the Quenes Ma. inclosed sealed which I require you may be so deliuered w t out delay not be opened vntill it be deliuerd vnto her graces owne hādes I haue writtē al y t I remēbre I sayd except y t which I spake against y e B. of Glou. owne person which I thought not mete to wryte And in some places I haue writtē more thā I said which I wolde haue answered to y e B. if you wold haue suffred me You promised I should see mine answer to y e .xvi. articles y t I might correcte amēde and chaunge them wher I thought good which your ꝓmyse you kept not And myne answer was not made vpon myne othe nor repeted nor made in Iudicio but extra iudiciū as I ꝓtested nor to y e B. of Glou. as iudge but to you y e kynges Quenes proctours I trust you deale syncerely with me without fraude or crafte vse me as you wold wishe to be vsed in like case your selues Remember y t Qua mensura mensi fueritis eadam remetietur vobis That is what measure you meate y e same shalbe measured to you agayne Thus fare you well And God sende you his spirite to induce you in to all truthe The furst cause why tharchebish wolde not make answer to the popes comissary is to auoide periury The .2 cause is that the popes Lawes are contrary to the crowne lawes of Englande The crowne temporal power is takē immediatly frō God The othe of the king and iustices and the duety of Subiectes Other the popes lawes be vnlauful or els all England is accursed Note wherin the popes lawes and the lawes of Englande do varye Marke this wel The duety of the cleargye neclected in the parliament Note The .3 cause why he could not allowe the Pope The popes religion is against Christes religion why latin seruice ought not to be restored in Englande The papistes can saye yea and naye to one thīg with one breathe The pope commaundeth bothe against God and natural reason The Sacrament ought to be receaued in bothe kyndes of all christianes Marke wel The deuil and the pope are like The pope is Antichrist that is Christes enemye wherfore the pope is ●ichrist Note this conclusion The causes why the Archebishop spake wrote thus The sacrament The papistes make Christ two bodies Marke The sounde true doctrine of the Sacrament That can they neuer doo The bishop of Gloucestres periury The B. of Gloucestre a traitor and an enemye to the realme worthy othes wherby periury must nedes be cōmitted No ye shalbe despeched nerer home Martyn and Story promise breakers