than that it might be alledged that any of their Children did cast them out for their Children did believe they did cast out Devils by the Power of God and Christ had far greater cause to say the same to wit that he did cast out Devils by the Power of God Nor doth the manner of Expression If Sathan cast out Sathan argue or imply in the least that Sathan is not divided against himself or that his Kingdom is not divided for the Particle if is not always to be understood to imply a negative but frequently an affirmative as in v. 28. said Christ But If I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God c. the sense is not Negative And hereby it doth plainly appear that Cotton Mather is a Falsifier and Wrester of Christs words who would bring Christs Authority to prove That Sathan is is not divided against Sathan which is utterly false for Sathan is divided manifestly oft times against Sathan and his Kingdom is divided also and therefore it cannot stand but must needs fall and great will be the Fall thereof for there is no true nor real Unity betwixt the Devils nor can there be because they are not in unity with God nor Truth which is the alone foundation ground of all true Unity and tho' Devils may seem to agree and the parts of his Kingdom to be in Union yet that is no real unity and therefore they oft fall at variance as their wicked Actions and Work in wicked men plainly demonstrate that are most commonly divided and discordant And as for thy Book of Witchcraft though I believe there is such a thing that is too frequent as real Witchcraft and too many that are real Witches yet I find little or indeed nothing in all thy book thâ—t doth effectually prove thâ—t any of these Children were really bewitched the most it proveth is that some Whimsies and Fancies together with some sits of Madness or Melancholy Distractions did seize upon them or suppose a Diabolical Possession all this doth not prove they were bewitched nor do I find any effectual proof that it was a Bodily Possession of the Devil But whether it was so or not I am little concerned to enquire further than to take notice that C. Mather will needs have it to be so not only to bespatter and abuse the People called Quakers because a whimsical Boy became well when his going to the Quakers Meeting was but mentioned which might be used rather for than against them but really is of no force either for or against but to make simple and too credulous People believe That some of his Brethrens or his own Prayers did conjure the Devil and cast him out And all this to prove the great worth and excellency of the Presbyterian or Independent Religion But I have both read heard as great or rather greater instances of evil Spirits and Devils being cast out of some by Popish Priests which doth no more prove either the truth or worth of Pope or Papacy than this pretended or supposed Ejection and casting out or perhaps the going out of the Devil without any force but on his crafty design to make Cotton Mather imagin it to be so and others of the like silly credulity doth prove the truth or worth of your Religion for C. Mather should remember his own words in that thing call'd his Sermon on Witchcraft p. 36. Sometimes saith he the Devil will use a digression he will seem to give over his intent in one thing but make sure of his intent in another such a Stratagem he â—seth as what Joshua took Ai withal he retires and so he conâ—uors I say then what doth Cotton Mather know or how can he prove to the contrary but that the Devil used this Stratagem in retiring or going out without being conjured by the force of his and his Brethrens Prayers And though the great worth and power of true Prayer I most willingly acknowledge which is only performed by the Inspiration and Revelation of the holy Spirit yet seeing Cotton Mather and his Brethren generally mock at any at this day laying claim to divine Inspiration and Revelation I cannot own their Prayers to be true they are liker to Charms and Spells of superstitious Persons all such Prayers that are performed without divine Inspiration and true internal divine Revelation Nor doth it content or satisfie Cotton Mather to accuse and speak evil of the honest People called Quakers and to belye CHRIST himself and the Scripture as I have above sufficiently proved but he also falleth foul upon his own Native Country and the People in it saying expresly of the Country of New-England A COUNTRY FULL OF LYES pag. 28. in his discourse of Witchcraft How may the People of New-England relish this a People generally all over few excepted your Church Members and yet by Cotton Mathers Authority full of Lyes Also he doth plainly accuse not a few of them for using and practising manifold Sorceries and Charms Had the People called Quakers so accused them of New-England it would have been judged great impiety But what saith the People of New-England now to Cotton Mather who doth so accuse them let them see to it and if they be not guilty of his Charge whether is he not severely to be reprehended And what say his Brethren the men called Ministers in Boston who have so highly praised his Book have they no Garment to cast over their Naked Brother Here follow a few words of a Letter to Iohn Cotton called a Minister at Plymouth in New-England John Cotton HAving seeen a few Lines from thy hand attested by thee and other two Witnesses wherein thou and they declare That in the Town of Plymouth in New-England last Summer save one ye heard me affirm That the Scriptures are the Word of God My Answer to thee and them is That ye have not dealt fairly nor as becoming true Witnesses in this case for every Witness should declare all the Truth and conceal nothing of the Truth which they heard Now this ye have not done but diminished from my words as your Consciences may bear witness if your Memory be not bad for I very well remember my words at that time which were these That I did acknowledge the true Sense of the Scripture to be the Word of God and that in the same I was not singular in my Perswasion from the People called Quakers for Samuell Fisher in his Book called Rusticus ad Academicos that hath been in print upwards of twenty five Years hath affirmed the same to wit That the true Sense of the Scripture is the Word of God And at that time I further said That not every one who had the Letter of the Scripture had the Word of God to speak properly because they had not the true sense of Scripture which none have but such to whom it is given by the Spirit of God I also did further affirm That the Letter or words of Scripture may be called the Word in a figurative sense as the Map or Card of England is called England and that the Greek word is used in Scripture in divers acceptations All this and more to the same purpose I spoke to thee at that time G. K. The substance of this I have more largely asserted in my late Book printed called The Presbyterian and Independent visible Churches c. cap. 1. THE END
A REFUTATION OF Three Opposers of Truth By plain Evidence of the holy Scripture VIZ. I. Of Pardon Tillinghast who pleadeth for Water-Baptism its being a Gospel-Precept and opposeth Christ within as a false Christ. To which is added something concerning the Supper c. II. Of B. Keech in his Book called A Tutor for Children where he disputeth against the Sufficiency of the Light within in order to Salvation and calleth Christ in the heart A false Christ in the secret Chamber III. Of Cotton Mather who in his Appendix to his Book called Memorable Providences relating to Witchcrafts c. doth so weakly defend his Father Increase Mather from being justly chargeable with abusing the honest People called Quakers that he doth the more lay open his Fathers Nakedness and beside the Abuses and Injuries that his Father had cast upon that People C. Mather the Son addeth new Abuses of his own And a few Words of a Letter to Iohn Cotton called a Minister at Plymouth in New-England By GEORGE KEITH Zephaniah 3.4 Her Prophets are Light and Treacherous Persons her Priests have polluted the Sanctuary they have done Violence to the Law Philadelphia Printed and Sold by William Bradford Anno 1690. Water-Baptism No Gospel-Precept c. Pardon Tillinghast AFter I had read thy small Treatise in print wherein thou undertakest to prove Water-Baptism to be a Gospel Precept by plain Scripture I was sorry on thy account to find thee with such confidence to publish thy Ignorance and Folly as well as thy great bitterness of Spirit and Prejudice against the Truth and the Witnesses of it so openly in the face of the World But when I call to mind how that God in his infinite Wisdom permits men to rise up to oppose the Truth that the Truth it self may be the more clearly discovered by the breakings forth of Gods Light still more and more the more that the Truth is opposed I am truly comforted and encouraged And for thy Reviling and Reproachful words against me I regard them not further than to pity thee and heartily to desire that God may open thy Eyes and give thee true Repentance Forgiveness for I have that Charity that what thou dost in this thy work of opposition it is through thy ignorance and therefore upon thy Repentance is pardonable But as for me and my Brethren it is a small thing for us to be reproached and falsly accused by thee seeing thou art so ignorantly bold and fool-hardy to reproach the Lord Iesus Christ in his inward appearance and Light in the hearts of men calling him a false Christ as if these who preach Christ in the hearts of Gods Saints were those of whom Christ foretold that should come in the latter days and preach a false Christ saying he is in the secret Chamber which thou understandest as if Christ had meant the secret Chamber of the heart following herein thy Brother in Iniquity Darkness Benjamin Keech who in his Book called The Childs Instructor hath these express words in that Section concerning the Light within Therefore believe not him that saith behold he is here in the secret Chamber viz. the heart The which expression thou seemest to have borrowed from the said Book But if thou hadst any true knowledg in the Mystery of Christ thou wouldst sooner have chosen that thy right hand that pen'd these words had been cut off than to have used them But by this and other the like expressions in thy Treatise thou plainly discovers thy self to be a man altogether ignorant of the true knowledge of Christ yea thou seemest ignorant of the very Letter of the Scripture which in plain and express words doth mention Christ dwelling in the heart and Christ within the hope of Glory the Mystery hid from Ages and Generations And said Paul to the Corinthians Know ye not that Iesus Christ is in you unless ye be Reprobates And said Christ in his Prayer unto his Father Thou in me and I in them And when he told the Pharisees who looked that the Kingdom of God should come with Observations as to say lo here or lo there he said for behold the Kingdom of God is within you Luke 17.21 and surely where the Kingdom of God is there are God and Christâ— So that the plain letter of the Scripture is against thy most absurd and Anti-christian Doctrine That the Christ in the hearts of men yea even of the Saints as thou wouldst have it for thou makest no distinction is a false Christ for the plain tendency of this thy Work of Darkness is to make People believe that Christ is not a Light within the Saints because as thou alledgest the Light within was not crucified for us but Iesus Christ of Nazareth And in this absurd distinction and dividing of Christ thou acts the part of Socinus and his followers who are called Socinians that affirm most absurdly That Christ is only a meer man and that he had no being nor existance before Mary But if thou say thou believest that Christ is both God and Man and that he was from the beginning to wit that Word by whom all things were made then why dost thou deny that Christ as he is that Word is in the Saints for though Christ only suffered in the flesh and as Man upon the Tree of the Cross yet he who suffered was not meer Man but God and Man and yet still one Christ. And thus also Christ within spiritually and inwardly revealed in the Saints is not another Christ from him that came in the flesh and was crucified for us even Jesus of Nazareth And hadst thou taken a little pains to read my book and consider it impartially and fairly thou shouldst have seen what a plain and single account I give of mine and my Friends Faith concerning the Man Christ Iesus as he came in the flesh and dyed for our sins and rose again and ascended c. even Jesus of Nazareth and that true faith in Christ Jesus is not only a believing in him as he is the Word c. but as the same Word did take flesh and was God manifest in the flesh c. to wit Christ crucified and risen again made of a Woman made under the Law c. and that the true faith of a Christian doth not divide Christ c. as false Christians do who say they believe in Christ without them but do not believe and receive Christ within them as God the Father doth inwardly reveal him or as Ranters and other high Notionists who pretend to believe in Christ as the Word and Light in them but slight and blaspheme against Christ that was crucified without them as is plainly to be seen in my late book pag. 131 132 133 and pag. 103 104 108. and p. 229. and hereby it doth plainly appear how safely I guard against both extreams of false Teachers some preaching Christ without but denying him within as thou Pardon Tillinghast and most of thy
being arrived to a state above or beyond the Apostles after they had receiv'd the holy Ghost for thou say'st Here we may note the pride that this Boaster is filled with counting even the Master Builders of God's House but Children in comparison of them c. And again thou sayst The Generation of Quakers it seems are got into an higher degree of stature and fullness thinking they are in an higher Dispensation than they had attained c. All this is a most injurious and gross Perversion of my words and of our Principle I never said writ or thought any such thing But take notice on what false foundation he grounds this his Perversion because I said in my last book If they who are so zealous for Water Baptism were cordially zealous for the inward and spiritual Baptism they might be the more born with as Men bear with Children c. and Charity might be allowed them in that case to be as Children or Babes in Christ. I intreat the Readers to take notice that I say nothing here of the Apostles or any living in that Age but of these now living in our Age who are generally too zealous for the Water Baptism but have little or no zeal most of them for the inward and spiritual plainly denying inward Divine Revelation as the priviledge given to the Saints in our Age and calling Christ in the hearts of the Saints a false Christ as this Pardon Tillinghast hath done and as many others do And though the Apostles after they received the holy Ghost used Water Baptism yet it was not for themselves who saw beyond it and were attained to that One Baptism Not the putting away the filth of the Flesh but the answer of a good Conscience as Peter declared but in the Apostles days there were Babes in Christ and many scarce arrived at the true state of spiritual babes whom the Apostles saw meet to baptize into Water but yet that Water baptism was not the Milk where with they were fed but rather as stilts or Crutches that these babes or lame Persons used for some time And whereas thou further sayst That we called Quakers are born Monsters not Babes to be fed with Milk as the Saints heretofore Here thy scornful Spirit full of bitterness and prejudice doth plainly appear How many thousand babes in Christ have been before ever baptism with Water was in being and since it received its burial and whoever seek to raise it again or restore it in their own self-will and meer imaginations from what they falsly infer or draw from the Letter of the Scripture they but raise a dead thing that is not the sincere Milk for the Milk of Babes is the sincere Milk of the Word and that is not Water-baptism And whereas thou alledgest That to pretend to the Power and deny the Form of Godliness is as Hypocritical as the other is Formal This we agree unto but it remaineth as yet to be proved that Water baptism is any part of the Form of Godliness since the form and practice of it hath generally ceased since the Apostles for many Ages past and but again is raised up by the meer will of Man without any divine Call or Authority so far as ever I could yet learn for I never yet heard that any in this Age or since the Apostacy began did pretend to an inward divine Call for Water Baptism But whether when the Gospel shall have it free course to be yet preached to all Nations any shall be raised up to baptize with Water by a divine Authority belongs not to the present debate And thus I hope it will appear to the impartial Readers that I have sufficiently answered to thy Objections and pretended Reasons from plain Scripture which thou hast but grosly wrested and perverted In the close of thy book thou sayst I strike as well at the Lords Supper as at Water Baptism alledging further that I say our common eating that we use is the Lords Supper whether two or three more or less but both these are thy false alledgings and none of my words nor justly can be gathered from my words And first as to the Lords Supper I say where Christ is not inwardly and spiritually seen tasted and fed upon by his inward Revelation in mens hearts there is not the Lords Supper altho' they gather together with ever so great a Solemnity as outwardly to eat outward Bread and drink outward Wine in remembrance as they pretend of Christ. Secondly There is neither Number of Persons nor any set Times appointed by Christ in relation to the outward eating and drinking which ye call the Supper and therefore as the Church of England use it once Quarterly and some Baptists Monethly or perhaps some Weekly why may not others with as good reason use it daily and seeing the Number of Persons is no essential part as ye must confess then why may not two or three as well as some hundreds use it with equal Solemnity and religious Devotion viz. eating and drinking together both with a holy fear and chearfulness remembring the Lords Death even until his last coming as well as until his more abundant inward spiritual Coming into their hearts And whereas I queried in my last book Wherein we are behind you or wherein we fall short of you or what excellency worth or value hath your Supper above and beyond ours To this thou hast not answered one syllable nor hast thou shewed any one particular instance wherein your eating and drinking excelleth ours and therefore I return it again unto thee to be answered And I thus further query Is the difference about the bear Name that ye call it The Supper of the Lord and we have no freedom to call the bare outward eating and drinking unless Christ be inwardly enjoyed the Supper of the Lord but where Christ is inwardly enjoyed and fed upon together with the outward eating and drinking as most frequently is witnessed to God's praise that we can freely call the Lords Supper Or 2 dly Is the difference because ye have some Priest or Pastor or gifted Brother to consecrate the Bread and make it more holy than our Bread that we eat even when we use Prayer and Thanks-giving before eating either vocal or only mental and frequently both Or 3 dly Is it because we do not use that formality of repeating the words Take eat this is my Body which we find no where commanded to be used in the Saints eating Or 4 thly Is it because the eating and drinking that was among the Saints called by thee and others the Supper was never in ended for satisfying hunger as thou hintest And what if I should say the same thou gainest nothing for it is not the simple eating and drinking that I call a holy Remembrance of Christs Death but the holy and religious way and manner of performing it and yet thou canst not prove that the Saints when they did eat that commonly called the
are not gathered from any express words of the People called Quakers but are only the false and absurd Consequences he gathers from our Principle altogether grounded upon his Ignorance and Mistakes and especially his Prejudice against the Truth A Brief ANSWER to Cotton Mather his Appendix to a little Book of his called Memorable Providences relating to Witchcrafts c. THe main design of Cotton Mather in this his Appendix is to vindicate and defend his Father Increase Mather as no wise guilty of these Charges which I laid against him towards the end of my late Book call'd The Presbyterian and Independent Churches in New-England and else-where brought to the Test. Now if Cotton Mather had made any true and just Vindication of his said Father it had been a commendable work in him but he is so far from that that his so weak and impertinent pretended Vindication doth not in the least excuse him and he is so far from any just Vindication of his Father that he doth rather more lay open his Fathers Nakedness in the sight of the world and addeth to his Fathers grosly abusing the honest People called Quakers new Abuses and lying abusive Speeches of his own besides that in the judgment of any impartial understanding Reader he discovers himself to be a very shallow man airy and full of froth but showing nothing of Solidity in his whole discourse As for his scornful and disdainful words and reflections on me calling me One Keith a Quaker not deigning to design me by my full Name and Our little Author This new Apostle This waspishman c. I value them not so as to be any discouragement unto me to bear my Testimony for the blessed Truth of God against his and his Brethrens false Doctrine and Hypocrisy and the words of our Lord Jesus Christ left upon record in Scripture in a measure of the sence of that holy Spirit that gave them forth have been are made comfortable unto me Mat. 5.11 Blessed are ye when men shall revile you c. I desire to bless the Lord who hath truly made me little in my own eyes and hath let me see not only my littleness but nothingness as of my self and given me also to know that I am one of his little Ones which to me is greater satisfaction than to have the greatest worldly advantages and that he seems to reflect upon the littleness of my stature as is apparent showeth in him little wit or discretion many excellent men were of little bodily stature far exceeding Cotton Mather or me either and Goliah was a man of great bodily stature who defied the host of God and yet fell before little David and tho' I do readily acknowledge my self little every way yet by the Grace of God I doubt not but to be made able to defend the Truth against all that thou and all thy Brethren can do to withstand it for the Truth is the greatest and strongest of all and when he who is the Truth pleaseth to use an Instrument let it be ever so little or mean it is well enabled to do the work it is raised up for And tho' in the close of his Appendix that containeth little else but silly drolling he saith G. K. has given sufficient cause why his own Sect should be ashamed of him if shame were compatible to such a perfect People Which last part is a meer Scoff yet he hath not made it appear and I hope in the Lord he never shall be able to make it appear that my Friends have any cause to be ashamed of me Before he cometh to his Fathers Vindication he thought fit to tell the world of the strange liberty which the Devils gave to some possessed Children to come to the Meetings of the Quakers and to read their writings And if all this be true what saith it against the Quakers in the least to discredit them or their Religion We know many wicked People whose Souls the Devils possess and that is worse than a meer Bodily Possession may read both our Books and the Scriptures also yet as this is no discredit to the Scriptures so no more to our books yea the Devil could and did cite Scripture to Christ and could use the outward names of God and Iesus And thou grantest that that Girle possessed as thou alledgest Bodily with the Devil did read the 59 Psalm And what may be concluded from this according to Cotton Mathers pretended Logick that tho' the Devil would not suffer the Girle to read some Presbyterian Books but gave her liberty to read some of the Common Prayer or other Episcopal Books and Quakers Books and also the 59 Psalm that all these are of the like quality Thou further sayst The Girle so possessed as thou alledgest could hear the Scripture read and called to one to read of Mary Magdalen and I see not what difference the Devil doth make in good earnest betwixt reading and hearing the Scripture read Again That the Devil suffered some of them to come to the Quakers Meetings Supposing it were so is this any more in prejudice of the Quakers Meetings than that Cotton Mather saith The same Girle so possessed came to a study or Closet in his House and entred therein and there read on the Bible and good Books And if he say It was because the Devil had left her how soon she came there Why may not the same be alledged on behalf of the Quakers Meetings Who seeth not how shallow this man is that from so ridiculous an instance would represent the Quakers Meetings and Books such as the Devil had a good liking to But it seems the holiness of his Study drove the Devils away and made the Girle so quiet in his Study as is implied in his words where he saith She added a Reason for it which the Owner of the Study thought more kind than true It seemeth then that Cotton Mather thinketh himself in that respect obliged to the Devils kindness more than to the truth of the Reason That they left the Girle how soon she entred into his Closet But why could not the Devil carry the Girle into his Closet as well as the Devil took Christ into the holy City and set him on a Pinacle of the Temple Mat. 4.5 and as it is in Iob When the Sons of God came together Sathan also came among them and if Sathan can come where the Sons of God are met together why may he not quietly suffer some possessed by him to come either to C. M's Closet or the Quakers Meeting without any just reflection on either of the places But if C. M. think the Devil more kind than true to him he had need beware of his Kindness left it turn to his damage in the end for a kind Devil is the most dangerous Devil In the beginning of the Vindication of his Father he saith One would think that if an Historian did but secure his Veracity from being impeached most of
his Father made a distinction betwixt the late singing and dancing Quakers yet the Son Cotton thinking himself more wise than his Father maketh no distinction at all and will have Cases Crew and all other Quakers which he as falsly as foolishly calleth Keith's Crew to be substantially of the same drove both Mad tho' with some variety of application in their Phrensies This is barely alledged but not in the least proved and therefore needeth no further Answer The honest People called Quakers through the Love and Grace of God whereof they are made partakers without boasting or vain-glorying may in general be compared to the best of your Church Members in Sobriety and good Christian Behaviour It hath been the lot of good men before us to be called Mad and worse But thou hast given us no evidence or proof that we are so and therefore it returns upon thee as a Calumny and Slander And whereas thou sayst One Keith a Quaker had been compassing Sea and Land to make Proselites visits New-England in his Progress where meeting with small Applause and less Success instead of Converts picks up what Quarrels our Country could afford him and among the rest this Book of Providences Answ. That I have travelled in many places both by Sea and Land to turn People unto the Lord and from Darkness to Light I am not ashamed to acknowledge for so did many of the Servants of God in former Generations and not like Cotton Mather and his Brethren generally who creep into one certain place or House and there continue to preach for hire and rarely remove but when the motive of a greater Sallary doth invite them And as for mens applause I regard it not whether great or small I seek not honour of men but the honour that cometh of God that doth satisfie me and the good and Christian esteem that I have in the hearts of many Brethren as well as my honest Report among men that truly know me which hath not been wanting to me in New-England as well as in other places where I have travell'd and as for Success in my Ministry and being made instrumental to convert some and build up others in the most holy Faith through the Grace of God I need not bear witness to my self but if need were many can bear witness to it even in New-England so that my labour in New-England hath not been in vain and I hope yet to see more the fruit and effect of it through the blessing of God Next whereas thou sayst At my return to Pennsilvania I bless the World with a little Volumn of Heresies and Blasphemies against the Protestant Religion Here thy scoffing airy Spirit appeareth as oft else-where how can the world be blessed with a Volumn of Heresies and Blasphemies But that my book containeth either Heresie or Blasphemy thou hast not yet showed far less proved Thou callest my Book Some further improvements of Non-sence than the Abilities of the Quakers had heretofore helped them to and after a few lines thou sayst I have been craftily assaying to spoil your Vines This seemeth not well to consist if my Book be nothing but Non-sence how can it or I by it craftily assay to spoil your Vines Craft and Non-sence seldom go all along together And that thou sayst thou supposest I will not be long without the Castigations of a full though short Answer c. I fear not this menacing if any such pretended Castigation come forth tho' thou callest me a Fly I doubt not but if I live God will enable me to detect the vanity and impertinency thereof or if removed by Death that he will raise up some of his Servants to do it But that thou sayst The twelfth Article I charge on you is directly contrary to what ye assert and maintain and preach every day and then add'st scoffingly after thy wonted manner This was his Inspiration then I Answer Then why dost thou not produce this twefth Article and demonstrate it so to be as thou affirmest But I say thy Affirmation is false in that very thing the 12th Article being this in express words That the Scriptures ought to be believed only for their own outward Evidence and Testimony and not for the inward Evidence and Testimony of the holy Spirit in mens hearts That this is justly charged on you I need not much enlarge to prove it at present only in short I prove it thus Seeing ye deny true divine Inspiration and inward Revelation of the holy Spirit in the hearts of the Saints ye must needs deny the inward Evidence and Testimony of the holy Spirit for they are one and that ye deny the former is plain from the express words of your Confession that saith There is no new Revelation and the former wayes of Gods revealing his Mind are ceased 2 dly Iohn Owen whom ye used to call your Reverend Brother hath writ a large Book to prove the self-evidencing Power and Authority of the Scriptures and denyeth that it deriveth its evidence from the inward Revelation or Inspiration of the holy Spirit in mens hearts yea thou thy self scoffest at Inspiration in this very place and else-where and tho' in words ye seem to own the inward Testimony of the Spirit yet in Deed ye disown it while ye deny true divine Revelation and Inspiration properly so call'd 3 dly If ye did indeed believe the Scriptures for the inward Evidence and Testimony of the holy Spirit then ye would acknowledge it to be the principal Rule of Faith but this ye do not for ye say in your Confession The Word of God contained in the Scriptures is the only Rule c. Whereas I said in my Book That when some of T. Cases Crew were whipt at Plymouth some of the honest People call'd Quakers openly declared before the People that the Quakers did not at all own them to be of their Society To this thou makest no direct Reply but sayst I am to ask him who of this honest People then it was that then declared them to be the dear Children of God I Answer readily No not one and I challenge thee to instance any one owned by the Society of that honest People that so declared But this question of thine is a meer deceitful Evasion containing in it some Insinuation as if some did so declare which is utterly false Next as to the story in old England taken from H. More concerning one Robert Churchman that was no Quaker but only had some inclination to be a Quaker as H. More doth alledge and he imagined that the Spirit of God spake in him and at last it appeared it was not so but that the man was under some mistake or suppose a real Possession of the Devil To this I answered What can all this say to discredit the Quakers Religion and Principle Have there not been mad People and whimsical both of the Presbyterian and Independent Churches To this thou answerest not denying but that a Possession
Brethren called Baptists most Anti-christianly have done and yet continue to do Oh Pardon Pardon God Almighty give thee pardon through unfeigned Repentance for this thy great sin others not these sober People called in scorn Quakers but Ranters and high Notionists who pretend to own Christ within them but deny him without as come in the Flesh c. And though thou call'st thy self in thy title page A Servant of Iesus Christ yet thou hast plainly discovered that thou yet art ignorant of him and in this thy Work thou hast rather proved thy self a servant of Anti-christ for what greater opposition can Anti-christ make against Christ than to oppose the presence and in-being of Christ in his People who is their Life And if he who is their Life be not in them they cannot live yea if Christ live not in thee thou art dead in thy treâ—passes and sins and the old man is alive in thee and his servant thou art and Christ is not like to live in thee as he did in Paul and as he doth in all true Christians so long as thou judgest That the Christ in the heart is a false Christ. Oh Pardon Tillinghast thou hast made too great haste in this thy undertaking as in many other thy works wherein possibly thou mayst imagine thou art tilling and plowing in Gods field but remember that the Scripture saith The plowing of the Wicked is sin and when thou makest haste to till without the true knowledge of God and Christ thou hadst better let alone and imploy thy self in some other lawful occupation Hast thou no other way to defend thy Idol of Water-baptism but to smite against the Lord Jesus Christ in his inward appearance in his Saints But know O vain and foolish man that as that idol Dagon did fall before Gods Ark so thy idol of Water-baptism shall fall before the Lord Jesus Christ inwardly appearing in thousands and ten thousands of his Saints and let none be offended that I call thy Water-baptism an â—dol for whatever man sets up in opposition to the inward appearance of Christ in his People they make it unto themselves an Idol and it will fall and they together with it But as for Iohn's Baptism with Water or that baptism with water that others of the Disciples of Christ used I call it not an Idol far be it from me it had its blessing and service in its day and pointed as a figure to Christs inward and spiritual Baptism and if there be an inward baptism of Christ then is not Christ the inward baptiser and minister of this inward baptism yea certainly and yet thou denyest Christ within calling him A false Christ in the secret Chamber of the heart And as for thy undertaking to prove thy Water Baptism to be a Gospel Precept by plain Scripture I question not but through Gods assistance I shall prove that thou hast grosly perverted mis-applied the scriptures not understanding the scriptures nor the power of God like unto the Sadduces of old Thou comparest thy self to David with his sling his few stones smiting at Goliah But alas poor man that sling and these stones and that River or brook out of which he did take these stones according to the deep Mystery signified under that figure or allegory thou understandst not it is a dark Riddle and Parable unto thee and thou thy self art more a kin to Goliah than to David In the beginning of thy work thou dost not fairly state the Question first that thou takest no notice of my plain and express words in my book pag. 184. where I say expresly as followeth If any were raised up by the Lord as John was and could prove and instruct their being sent to baptize with Water as he was these to whom they should be sent ought gladly to receive it but to do it by bare imitation or a meer pretended Call which they cannot prove to be either mediate or immediate is great Presumption yea Superstition This one short section is enough to overthrow thy whole Work and yet thou hast made no Reply to it nor given the least notice of it in thy book and all that thou hast said for Water-baptism doth not in the least give any ground for thy Water-Baptism thou and thy brethren set up in your vain Imaginations without any call either immediate or mediate from God so that your work in your Water-baptism is a Will-worship Secondly Thou dost not fairly cite my words in thy stating the Question saying That I affirmed that the Apostles practiced it viz. Water-baptism Only by permission c. The word Only is thy addition and is not in my book but my words are these following The Apostles generally thought fit both to use and tolerate the use of Water-baptism that belonged to John and divers other things of the Law which was by permission for a time and not by any Gospel standing Commission c. Now the word Only being added doth derogate from my words as if I did understand that the Apostles only baptized by a bare dry or naked permission whereas I did understand and so I do still that it was not a meer or bare permission but they they thought fit both to use it and tolerate the use of it and that which made them think and judge it fit to use it for sometime was really the Spirit of God in them that gave them not only a spiritual and chearful freedom to use it for some time but let them see a great service and conveniency in it for somtime until men began to contend about it and lay more weight on it and other things of the like nature than they ought to have done for as in the change of an outward form of Government or a new administration of worldly and civil Laws the former Laws and the execution of them cannot in an instant be removed but gradually otherwise great inconveniences would follow as when a house is to be supported with new Pillars the oâ—d Pillars must not be first removed else the House would be in danger of falling but the new Pillars must first in great part be well placed and fixed and then the old are by degrees safely and wisely removed Even so Iohn's Baptism and other things of like nature were not presently and suddainly to be removed because many both Iews and proselited Gentiles laid great stress and weight on them And therefore I say the Apostles not by a meer bare and naked permission but in the wisdom and counsel of God used Water-baptism for a time and yet all this will not prove that it is a Gospel Precept or a standing Gospel Ordinance that was to continue in the Church to the end of the World Nor art thou more successful in managing this Controversy about Water Baptism than in stating it for almost throughout thou fight'st against thy own shadow and takest much pains and usest many Arguments to prove many things no wise denyed by
legal and evangelical but the Evangelical doth but obscurely and hiddenly appear and therefore the first may be called more Legal and in that respect is called by Paul and others The Law by a synecdoche the denomination being taken from the larger part and this Dispensation continued until Iohn according to Christs own Words The Law and the Prophets were unto John The Second Dispensation of the same Gospel may vvell enough be understood to begin at Iohn according to Acts 1.22 beginning from the Baptism of Iohn unto that same day that he vvas taken up from us see also Acts 10.37 38. and to continue until the plentiful pouring forth of the holy Ghost both at and after the day of Pentecost and this second Dispensation comprehendeth all the time of Christ his being on Earth in the flesh vvhich though a more clear and glorious Dispensation of the Gospel yet vvas in some degree vailed vvith the figures of the Lavv for not only Iohn's Baptism but the vvhole Lavv of Moses vvas in force until Christ suffered on the Cross and became a Sacrifice of a svveet smell unto God and a Propitiation for the sins of the vvhole World and thereby put an end to all these Sacrifices of Rams Lambs and Bullocks c. for Christ himself being made of a Woman vvas made under the Lavv and fulfilled it both in his being circumcised and baptised and he preached the Law and Gospel and sent one vvhom he had cured of his Leprosie to the Priest according to the Lavv and told the Iews That their paying Tythes which wholly belonged to the Law was a thing to be done but that withal the greater things of the Law as Mercy and Iudgment were not to be neglected And Christ told that it is written in the Law They shall be all taught of God which is a Gospel Promise So that the Gospel and Law were united and joyned together in both these former Dispensations and the Gospel was in the Law as some precious Treasure hid within some vail The Third and last Dispensation began from the giving of the holy Ghost at Pentecost most apparently and was to encrease until it should come to its Meridian or Noon-tide Glory as so it may be said it did really so come in the days of the Apostles before their decease And this third Dispensation of the Gospel is that which ought to be called The pure and perfect Gospel Dispensation purely and perfectly unvailed and uncovered declaring and revealing that great Mystery of Christ and of eternal Salvation by faith in him both as he came and suffered outwardly in the flesh and dyed for us and rose again and ascended and is now in Heaven at the right hand of Majesty making intercession for us and also as he doth come inwardly to live dwell and rule in our hearts for both his outward and inward coming are a most choice and excellent Doctrine of the Gospel of our Salvation but the one without the other is lame and defective for as it is most glad Tidings which the word Gospel or Evangel signifieth that Christ hath dyed for us purchased to us the forgiveness of all our sins through Faith in his Name so likewise that the Father hath given him to us in our hearts to kill and destroy the very life of sin in us and perfectly to sanctifie and renew us into the Image of God and no Vails nor Figures nor Types of things to come belong to this third Dispensation of the Gospel but the Truth of the Gospel is held forth purely and perfectly in its own native lustre beauty and glory without any figure or shadow of the Law such as Circumcision and Iohn's Baptism was These Positions thus being laid down and well understood the substance of which are sufficiently laid down in my late book tho' not so largely or in so many express words may serve sufficiently to answer to every one of thy Objections against us without a particular application to every particular of thy Treatise And thus it plainly doth appear how it may be granted that Iohn's Ministry and Baptism was the beginning of that second Dispensation of the Gospel that as yet had its Vails and Figures in some degree remaining vailing that more abundant glory that was to follow But it doth not follow that Iohn's Baptism or Water baptism of any that did baptize did really belong to the third Dispensation of the Gospel as any part thereof and this third Dispensation is being the Gospel perfected and consummated as it cometh to its Meridian or Noon-tide Glory and Brightness that which is most commonly and frequently called the Gospel in the New Testament being cleared and discharged from all these Vails and Figures of the Law even as when Christ arose he laid aside his grave Clothes and did not after his Resurrection re-assume his Garments which he did use as a cloathing before he suffered but left them to remain with the Souldiers that put him to death A figure of this very Mystery And thou art at great pains to prove That John was sent to baptize with Water and Christ's Disciples baptized with Water and so did the Apostles after the giving of the holy Ghost and a great many other things thou bringest no wise contradicted by us the People called Quakers and therefore thou might'st have spared thy needless pains But the great thing for thee to prove was That John 's Baptism or Water Baptism is any part or precept of the Gospel Dispensation and Administration as it began to take place after the Death and Resurrection of Christ and the giving of the holy Ghost This thou hast not done in the least and therefore thou hast done nothing to purpose And whereas thou pleadest That Christ sent John to baptize and preach I answer And so I say as truly he sent Moses to give the Law and Circumcision for the Spirit of Christ was in Moses and in Aaron and in the holy Priests under the Law that circumcised and sacrificed and Christ gave both the Law and Gospel and was the Mediator under both and the Minister of both for without Christ the Word that was in the beginning by whom all things were made neither Law nor the Prophets could have been But the thing thou shouldst have proved That Christ as the Mediator of the New-Covenant in the pure and perfect Dispensation of the Gospel in the last administration of it ever commanded Water Baptism or that Christ after he rose from the dead commanded Water Baptism which thou dost not do in the least Thou seemest to lay great stress on these words Acts 10.48 That Peter commanded them to be baptized who had received the holy Ghost to wit Cornelius and his company But this I have answered already and I say further this doth not prove that Water Baptism is a Gospel Precept but only that that second Dispensation being not yet vvholly abolished Peter savv a service in it in the Wisdom
of God revealed in him and therefore he might vvell command it for that time tho' no Gospel Precept But vvhereas thou sayst That Peter and the Apostles did command in Christ Iesus the Lords Name Water Baptism is a thing utterly false the Scripture saith no such thing but That Peter commanded them to be baptized in the Name of the Lord so that the Name of the Lord is relative to their being baptized not to the command and their being baptized in the Name of the Lord doth plainly signifie that their being baptized vvith Water vvas som outward sign that they became the Lords and were true believers in him Next vvhereas thou sayst I affirm that Water Baptism was at that time an abolished Ceremony is false I said no such thing It was beginning to be abolishing and decaying and was decreasing as John said in respect of his Baptism I must decrease but Christ must encrease But that it vvas then totally abolished I say not for it could not be safely abolished all at once but by degrees and after some time as I have above demonstrated And novv that I call this third and last Dispensation that began to take place after the Death and Resurrection of Christ the pure and perfect Dispensation of the Gospel I understand it not as if the first and second Dispensations before and under Moses or before and under Christ as he vvas present in the flesh had any mixture or impurity of sin or evil nay far be it from me but I call it pure and perfect as having none of these Figures and Types of the Lavv mixed vvith it as formerly And though the Apostles after the giving of the holy Ghost did grovv up into the attainment of this most pure and perfect Gospel state and Dispensation yet many Christians vvho had a measure of sincere Faith in Christ vvere short of it and for the cause of such vvho vvere vveak and but as Babes in Christ they savv it meet in the Wisdom of God to use it for some time But after the days of the Apostles and their Successors about three or four hundred years there-after the true Gospel Spirit was generally lost a Remnant excepted of hidden ones who in some measure retained it and the inward Power of Godliness departed from and then Water Baptism and many other things belonging to the outward form became as a dead thing and was more fit to be buried than to be used And none ought to presume to raise it up again unless it could be said That the Power of God had raised it or renewed it in the users or practisers of it and that they could sincerely say and prove that God had sent them or given them Authority to use Water Baptism and other the like things but this I do not find that any called Baptists so much as pretend unto and if they did pretend to it their bare pretence without some real and effectual prooff were not to be believed And that Peter caused Water-baptism to be administred to Cornelius and other Gentiles doth not prove it to be a Gospel Precept for under the Law the Gentiles who became Proselites of the Covenant so called were generally baptized into Water as well as Circumcised long before Iohn's time as the Iews Books plainly declare and as may be gathered from Scripture and as divers Christian Writers relate from the Iews and particularly Thomas Godwin in his Book called Moses and Aaron lib. 1. cap. 3. And seeing it was so commonly practised by the Iews as well before Iohn's time as then and thereafter as both Iewish and Christian Writers affirm and as the Epistle to the Hebrews doth plainly declare Heb. 9.10 how that the Law had its divers Baptisms so the Greek translated into English Washings and carnal Ordinances until the time of Reformation it doth more plainly evince that Water Baptism was a legal thing tho' both it Circumcision with all the other Types and Figures of the Law pointed at Gospel Mysteries and in so far may be said to relate or belong to the Gospel in its more obscure Administration but that whole Dispensation both of Moses and the Prophets is in Scripture stile call'd The Law altho' Moses himself and all the Prophets saw beyond the Figures of the Law and were truly endowed in great part with a Gospel spirit That thou say'st if Water Baptism had not been comprehended in Paul 's Commission then he had done evil in baptizing so many I Answ. It doth not follow any more than that he did evil in circumcising Timothy for things may be done upon occasions without a Command from God and that not only by a bare or simple permission but in a sweet heavenly freedom of Gods holy Spirit inwardly revealed which is the only chief and principal Rule of every true Christians freedom as well as of their Obedience How many good Christians joyn in Marriage having no command so to do but knowing and enjoying an inward Liberty by the Spirit of the Lord so to do and therein receiving the blessing of the Lord and many other the like cases might be mention'd Thou givest a very strange and exceeding strained Gloss upon Paul's words That he was not sent to baptize but to preach the Gospel to wit that Water Baptism was not so bound to Paul or any other sent to preach the Gospel that they with their own hands must needs perform that Work of Baptizing and Paul and the other Apostles had such and such for their Ministers as John Timothy and others But what then what Paul commanded other Disciples to do is all one as if he had done it himself as thou arguest in another case but not to thy purpose and therefore it cannot be reasonably judged that if Paul had been sent to baptize either by himself or making use of others to assist him in that work he would have said He was not sent to baptize for that would imply a plain Contradiction to be sent and not to be sent But this thy strein'd gloss on Pauls words is grounded upon a meer supposition of thine That Paul was sent to baptize with Water which thou hast not in the least proved nor art ever like to do Matth. 28. saith nothing of Water Thy similitude betwixt Solomons Temple and the Gospel-Church as thou dost apply it is exceeding vain foolish and proceedeth from great Ignorance as if the Stones that were the Foundation of Solomon's Temple cut out of the Mountains and the Timber-work did signifie that the Foundation of God's Spiritual House should be Water-Baptism But this is plain contrary to Scripture that saith The Church is built on the Foundation of the Prophets Apostles Iesus Christ himself being the chief Corner Stone And thou that sets up Water-Baptism as the Foundation of the Gospel Church preachest another Foundation than Christ Jesus and another Gospel If Solomon's Temple had been built on the Waters thou mightst have had some slender
pretext or colour to use such a Comparison but what Resemblance Stone and Timber hath to Water Baptism I do not understand And if Water-Baptism be the Foundation of the Church then the Church hath had no Foundation for many Ages past for Infant Baptism by sprinkling ye Baptists do not acknowledge to be any true Baptism at all but a meer fiction or invention and yet for many Ages there hath been no other Water-Baptism used but that of sprinkling Infants for that party or society of People called Baptists or Anabaptists did but appear about Luther's time or since and therefore if Water Baptism be the Foundation of Gods Church the Church hath had no Foundation for many Ages and therefore hath quite ceased to be for she cannot be or subsist without a Foundation And as concerning the Allegorical and Spiritual signifycation of Solomon's Temple it is very well understood without your Water Baptism for Solomon's Temple as it was a figure of Christs Body which was crucified and rose again and ascended into Glory so also it was a figure of the Gospel Church under the pure Gospel Dispensation the Foundation whereof is Christ Jesus as he came in the likeness of sinful flesh and took upon himself the form of a Servant and humbled himself unto Death even the Death of the Cross made of a Woman made under the Law the Seed of Abraham and David I say Christ thus come in the flesh and crucified for our sins as the Mystery of him is inwardly revealed by the holy Spirit in the hearts of all true believers in respect of his thus humbling himself and taking hold of the seed of Abraham may well be compared to the Stone Wood of Solomons Temple which were but mean and not very costly Materials but the fullness of the Godhead that dwelt in Christ Bodily and his being anointed with the holy Spirit without measure being the only begotton Son of God full of Grace and Truth of whose fullness all true believers do plentifully receive and Grace for Grace and the many most rich and excellent divine Virtues wherewith both Christ and his Church are most richly endued and adorned are well signified by that great plenty of Gold and Silver and other precious Furniture wherewith the Temple of Solomon was beautified But it is much thou didst not make the Sea in Solomon's Temple to signifie Water-Baptism possibly some of thy Brethren may judge this a great omission or neglect in thee but hadst thou brought it it could have made nothing for thy Water Baptism for that Sea in Solomon's Temple was not a figure of outward Water which it self was but a figure but of these spiritual Waters of the Sanctuary mentioned by the Prophet Ezekiel chap. 47.1 7 8 9. and by Iohn c. 4. v. 6. and Rev. 22.1 But this most idle and ignorant gloss and comparison of thine is like to that other passage in thy book where thou sayst Repenting Believers baptized with Water being a sign and token from God to them of the remission of sins are the only true Heirs of the Promise of the holy ghost c. Which assertion thou dost falsly ground on Peter's words to the Iews Repent and be baptized every one of you mind it sayst thou every one that expects Salvation in the Name of Iesus Christ for the Remission of sins and you shall receive the gift of the holy ghost But whether Water Baptism is to be here understood or not thy arguing that it must be Water Baptism is most weak and idle as if to render it only Spirit is to charge the Spirit of God in Peter with gross Impertinencies and Tautologies as if he should say Repent and be baptized with the holy Spirit and you shall receive the holy Spirit To this I Answer This is no Impertinency nor Tautology in the least but very proper as it is very proper to say White Cloth being dip't into the Dyers Fat that hath a red dye receiveth the said red dye even so the Soul being dipt into that spiritual Water of Gods holy Spirit receiveth it as the Cloth receiveth the dye But this to thee is a Mystery and Parable and therefore it is not strange thou talkest such gross impertinencies And it is plain by these words of thine thou makest Water Baptism equally necessary to Salvation with Faith and Repentance and therefore all are eternally and finally Lost who have not been baptized or plunged into Water O Monster of uncharitableness This most Uncharitable Doctrine damneth all to the Pit of Hell for many Ages that never received Water Baptism this is like one of thy Brethren who printed a book with this Title Dip or Damn It is no wonder to find you Baptists generally so bitter and peevish for this your Uncharitable Doctrine of Condemning all to Hell who are not baptized into Water begetteth this evil nature in you even as the narrow Doctrine of the Presbyterians as touching the Grace of God maketh them of the like evil nature for evil Principles and Perswasions have a great influence upon mens Hearts and Lives And now I find thee in this thy work against us joyn'd with the Priests of New-England and particularly these of Boston tho' formerly some of thy Brethren suffered great persecution by the Priests of New-England where it seems thou hast got thy book printed and so like Herod and Pontius Pilate joyning together against Christ as he came in the flesh so ye joyn together against him as he is come and coming more abundantly in Spirit but this Stone which ye builders of Babylon have refused will God exalt and is exalting to be the head of the Corner Thou art as idle and impertinent to alledge That by Water and Blood mentioned 1 Iohn 5.6 This is he that came by Water and Blood is to be meant Water Baptism and that call'd the Supper in giving and receiving Bread Wine But this being thy bare alledgance without any shadow of proof it is altogether denyed and the Virtue of both the Water and Blood together with the Spirit are inwardly and spiritually felt which three agree in one and are inseperable but so are not your Water Baptism and Bread and Wine which ye your selves confess are oft seperated from the Spirit as the many vain persons among you and the many dry and barren Souls of your society too palpably demonstrate for who more gawdy and vain in their Attire and Cloathing both men and women than many call'd Baptists as I have seen and observed in part to my great grief Who greater Enemies to the Spirits inward Revelation and to Christ's inward presence and Appearance in Believers than thou and the Baptists generally perhaps some few excepted And therefore the Spirit and your Water Baptism and breaking of Bread agree not in one and are not in unity And whereas thou chargest it on me and my Friends the People called in scorn Quakers as if we did presume or boast of our
which is preparatory thereunto and infallibly will bring them to partake of it as they are diligent rightly to improve that first degree of divine Grace and Illumination already given unto them Now let us hear his Arguments against the Sufficiency of the Light within so much as to begin the least good Work of God in the Gentiles 1 st he saith It cannot discover unto thee that there is a Redeemer who suffered Death without the Gates of Jerusalem 2dly Tho' it convince of many sins yet it cannot cleanse thee from them 3dly It cannot make Satisfaction for the sins that are past 4thly It cannot lead thee into Evangelical or Gospel Truths 5thly It cannot teach thee the Righteousness of God without the Law being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets even the Righteousness of God by Faith of Iesus Christ unto all upon all that do believe 6thly It leaveth thee under the sentence of Death and Misery without affording any directions or help for thy Recovery Note these words whereby it plainly appeareth he taketh away from it all sufficiency so much as to begin any good work in men as having the least tendency to begin the work of Salvation or prepare thereunto 7thly It cannot give thee he saith eternal Peace and Salvation as these Miserable men meaning the People called Quakers do affirm Thus he argueth In Answer to these his Arguments I say it is really a degree of Blasphemy to say that there is no Light or Principle or Being in men that can do these things for God and Christ can do all things and both God and Christ are in all men not only as to that general presence in all the Creatures but in a special way of Revelation as being the Off-spring of God as Paul declared to the Athenians But it is one thing what God and Christ can do and far another thing what they commonly and universally do Now it is readily granted that God and Christ do not commonly reveal unto men the knowledge and faith of Christ crucified c. without the Scriptures Testimony or some outward Teaching but this doth not prove that the Light in men hath no preparatory service use or tendency in order to receive the knowledge faith of Christ crucified as we see it hath according to Scripture as is clear in the â—ase of Cornelius and in the Parable of the good ground that signified the good and honest heart even before the Seed of the pure and perfect evangelical Dispensation was sown in it And at this race he might as well argue against the Light in the beâ—t Saints or Christians in these Ages of the World as being insufficient to give eternal Life and Salvation for the ordinary and usual way of God to beget in all true Believers the true knowledge and faith of Christ crucified is by some outward means of Preaching Reading or Hearing the Scriptures read and not without them the inward Light and Grace of God mightily co-operating and working together with the outward means of the Scriptures preached read or heard And whereas he directeth his Book generally to these called Christians many of whom are of his own Profession if his Doctrine be to be received none of his own Brethren nor any Christians whatsoever have any saving Light or Grace in them for he maketh no distinction betwixt Christians and Heathens but saith generally to all That they have no saving Light in them But for the better understanding of the whole matter let it be considered that the Light in men hath a two fold sence and signification 1 st It may and doth signifie God who is Light and Christ who also is Light as the holy Scripture declareth 2 dly It may and doth signifie some divine inward Illumination and Revelation of God and Christ in men which hath also a quickening and cleansing operation in it Now admitting that the divine Illumination and Revelation of God and Christ doth not at first reveal or discover these peculiar Mysteries of the pure Gospel Dispensation as Christ crucified and Faith in him yet it doth suffice that I have proved that it can begin and doth really begin a good Work of God in them that are diligent to obey it and where this good Work of God is begun in any they cannot perish altho' they dye in that state for as no Unrighteous Soul can while such go into Heaven so none that are in any the least degree Righteous by the Work of God in their hearts while such can go to Hell or finally perish But to determine at what precise time and how this work of God begun in honest Gentiles is perfected in them and at what precise time the knowledge and faith of Christ is wrought in them is not a difficulty that is singular to us the People call'd in scorn Quakers but doth equally urge and pinch our Adversaries yea I suppose generally the Baptists themselves for first They acknowledge That many Infants dying in infancy belong to Gods Election and are saved 2dly That not only Infants but others come to Age may belong to God's Election who are born Deaf and Dumb and many will acknowledge also That God hath his Elect among the Gentiles who have not heard Christ outwardly preached and shall be saved God working by his Spirit when where and how he pleaseth as the Presbyterian Confession of Faith owned by Baptists doth expresly declare Now it is plain the Difficulty is equal to them with us and is a great secret known perhaps to few of the Sons of men the precise time way manner and means of Gods saving them with eternal Salvation who have not had Christ outwardly preached unto them neither by men nor Scripture and let it suffice to clear us that we say the knowledge and faith of Christ crucified even Jesus of Nazareth is universally necessary to the full and final perfecting the work of mens eternal Salvation and Happiness and is ordinarily and commonly wrought in men by outward preaching reading or hearing the Scriptures Testimony But again let it be considered when we say That the inward Light and Grace of God is sufficient to Salvation it is to be understood that its sufficiency reacheth to the present time work and purpose for which it is given even as B. K. hath confessed for not only the Gentiles have not received at once all that divine Illumination and Grace and Assistance of God that sufficeth unto all time to come but even none of the Saints have received at once so much as is sufficient for all time to come otherwise they might say We are Lords and will come no more to God nor pray any more to him whereas all true Believers feel their continual need and want of a new and fresh supply of Gods Grace and gracious Assistance both to think to will and to do any thing good and acceptable unto God And as true Believers in Christ crucified c. have that which is sufficient
his other fauls were pardonable c. But to this I Answer That Increase Mather hath not secur'd his veracity from being impeached for it belongeth to Veracity and to him who hath it not only to tell some true matters of fact but to tell them with a true intention and for a true and upright end and to assign the true and right Names to the Persons that have done the things alledged as when a man is murdered tho' the matter of Fact be true yet if he who relates it doth charge it upon a person or persons no wise guilty his Veracity may justly be impeached and so the case is here as to I. Mather suppose the matter of fact be true yet it is as gross and false a charge and imputation to cast these things acted and done by Tho. Case and his Crew upon the Quakers as to cast them upon any other People whatsoever yea as upon them whom he may judge to be true Christians or suppose Presbyterians and Independents for what tho' they call themselves or that others ignorantly call them Quakers doth it therefore follow that they are owned by that People or are of their Society no wise no more than it doth follow that they are Christians because they call themselves also by that name And suppose these of T. Case's crew should call themselves Presbyterians Independents or Members of the Congregational Churches of New-England doth it therefore follow that ye of New-England should be charged with these things And whereas I said in my last book That I. M. relates these stories on purpose to abuse the honest sober People call'd Quakers without making any distinction thou Cotton Mather leavest out altogether the following words that were most material for the clearing of the Quakers and proving I. M. guilty of slandering and falsly accusing an innocent People my following words being these nor giving the least information to the world how that the Body of the People call'd Quakers doth not in the least own these ungodly and wicked People c. But what doth his Son C. M. answer to this that may satisfie the impartial Reader surely nothing but answers with a Scoff like to himself it seems he hath largely accustomed himself to sit in the Seat of the Scorner saying But what Mettal is this mans fore-head made of and then he proceeds to alledge That his Father very carefully made a distinction because once or twice he calleth them the late singing and dancing Quakers And again that he saith The Quakers are some of them possessed with evil Spirits But I Answer Thou C. Mather rather bearest in thy forehead the print of him that hath a face of Brass than of an ingenuous man in thy undertaking so to palliate and excuse thy Fathers gross abuse and slander Doth not every one that knoweth what a distinction is know that it consisteth at least of two Members or parts and not of one only member or part Now I challenge Cotton Mather to produce one word or syllable in all Increase Mathers discourse where the other Member or part of the distinction is named or exprest in the least whereas if he had indeed made any distinction he would at least have informed the world That there is another sâ—rt of People called Quakers that doth no wise own Thomas Case or any of his Crew nor their Spirit nor Doctrine nor Practices but abhor them and their way as much as any People can do and do as widely differ from them as white from black or as one contrary from another yea it is easie to show that Tho. Case and his Crew are more near to many called Presbyterians and Independents than to the honest Quakers both in Doctrine and some Practices for the honest People called Quakers own no carnal Singing and do not own dancing on any account and yet to my certain knowledge many called Presbyterians do both own and practise carnal Singings and Dancings and Pipings and Fiddlings also at Feasts and Weddings all which practices are more like to the mad Crew of Tho Case than to the sober and honest Quakers who own no singing but what is truly spiritual and holy and it doth not appear that when I. M. nameth the late singing dancing Quakers that he intended any distinction but that he gave such Names only as certain Epithets to the Quakers or to some of them as when Cott. Mather calleth us absurd and angry People it doth not appear that he intendeth a distinction as if some of us were not absurd nor angry or as when his Brethren used to call us The Cursed Quakers that they intended any distinction as if some of us were blessed or if he had called us The late upstart Heretical Quakers as some have called us as if some or us were not late nor heretical but Antient Orthodox nor is it any real or true distinction to say Some of the Quakers as implying not all for all and some are no specifical distinction but only numerical whereas I said in my book without any distinction it is most clear from my following words in that book purposely as it seemeth omitted by C. M. that I meant a specifical distinction for what I. M. alledgeth on some of the Quakers as such belongeth to all of the same society even as what belongeth to some men as men belongeth to all men and if these wild and mad and abominable Practices do not belong to T. Case's Crew as Quakers then why doth he so charge them as â—uakers or why doth he not inform the People of New-England That T. Case's Crew are no Quakers any more than real Christians altho' they falsly are so called and are no wise owned by the Body or Society of that People this he hath not done in the least and no man that hath not some better Information what the Quakers are than what I. M. hath given of them can know any other but that the Quakers generally are all singing and dancing Quakers or at least own these mad Practices for as I said before I say again he maketh no distinction betwixt them he calleth Mad Quakers and others that are sober and there are many hundreds in New-England that reading I. M's Book will be ready enough to believe the Quakers generally are such as these of T. Cases Crew seeing he mentioneth no other sort and they have no other intelligence what the Quakers are having never seen any of them nor heard them nor read their Books But C. M. perceiving this pinch or strait how he could not make it appear that his Father made any real distinction takes another course and plainly telleth us His Father needed not make any distinction at all and rather than C. Mather will allow the least Charity to the Quakers he will fall at variance with his Father and show himself of a contrary mind as one would think to his supposed reverend Father that whereas he thinketh or would have it believed