Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n place_n time_n write_v 2,965 5 5.2112 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A25697 An Apology for the English Presbyterians with a defence of the heads of agreement assented to by the united ministers in the year 91. 1699 (1699) Wing A3548; ESTC R17890 29,933 88

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

People could be entirely for it nor could the Shadow of it find acceptance amongst us the Sober Party who Dissented from the Diocesans being for the most part English Presbyterians and Congregationalists SECT IV. The ENGLISH PRESBYTERY after the Restauration of Charles II. prevail'd again and so continued till the late Vnion commenced These things shewn out of the Writings of Dr. Collings and Mr. Baxter §. 1 WHen Charles II. was Restored soon after the Presbyterians were cast out and the Episcopal put into their Places whereupon the Nonconformists who were not of the Independent way did soon by their Practice and the several Books written in Defence of their Nonconformity convince their closest Observers that they were for those Principles which the English Presbyterians had from time to time Asserted And that thus much may with the greatest Clearness and to the most satisfaction be evinced I will refer to what Dr. Collings and Mr. Baxter have offered on this Occasion §. 2 1. Dr. Collings who laboured much and wrote well in the Controversie about Church-Government gives an Account of the main Opinions of those Ministers and People in England who go under the Name of Presbyterians and calls his Book ENGLISH PRESBYTERY §. 3 2. In the Account he gives of their Opinions he tells us That they were for a Catholick Church Visible which the Old English Presbyterians would never own but the it must be observ'd that he doth not represent them as Asserters of a Catholick Church Visible form'd into one Govern'd Society or an Organick Body For he carefully appropriates the Governing Power to fixed single Congregations in which the Ruling Officers may have the Knowledge of every Member under his Care His Words are They Believe that Christ hath Appropriated Ministers of the Gospel to this Visible Church who may Preach the Gospel and Baptize in any Parts of it but CAN ONLY Exercise an ordinary Jurisdiction in those particular Parts of it over which God hath given them a particular Oversight as Pastors and Teachers The Exercise of Acts of Jurisdiction REQUIRING A PARTICULAR KNOWLEDGE of PERSONS OPINIONS KNOWLEDGE and CONVERSATION which no single Person can have as to all the Members of the Visible Church P. 6. § 4. and in the same Page § 6. 't is added They Believe Persons thus set apart as in a foregogoing Paragraph to the Ministry are fully Authorized to Preach the Gospel and to Baptize in any Place where they are called to it AND TO ADMINISTER THE LORD'S SUPPER when they shall be FIXED IN ANY CONGREGATION that they may Administer it knowingly to Persons that are able to discern the Lord's Body and to EXERCISE ACTS OF JURISDICTION in THEIR FIXED CONGREGATION And P. 10. § 2. An Admonition which is a Church Censure is the Act of the whole Congregation or the officers of it as well in the Name of Christ as IN THEIR NAMES shewing a Person Offending his Errour from the Word of God and Exhorting and Warning him to Reform This they say may be often Repeated 4. Excommuniation being the Highest Censure they Believe ought not to be Denounced by any Persons but those whom God's Word hath appointed thereunto The Persons Decreating it must be the Church by its Officr or Officers they agreeing thereunto §. 4 3. The Doctor in these Paragraphs as he truly Represents the English Presbyterians to be of Opinion that Christ's Ministers may Preach and Baptize whenever in the Visible Church they are called so He adds That they say the Exercise of Jurisdiction belongs to the Minister as he is fixed to a Congregation that he is to Admonish Ecclesiastically in Christ's and the Churches Names that the Persons decreeing to Excommunicate must be the Church by the Officer or Officers allowwing unto the Christian Magistrate more Power in these Matters than Classical Presbyterians as in P. 8 9 and so far from making the Catholick Church Visible a Governed Society or Organnick Body that you see they Appropriate the Power of Jurisdiction unto a fixed a Congregation without mentioning a Subordination of Classical or Provincial Assemblies of the Ruling Officers unto a National or other Greater Synods But §. 5 1. The Learned Mr. Baxter who about the Nature and Constitution of Particular Churches hath been more Elaborate and Convincing than most in Desending their Non-conformity unto the Church of England doth most exactly describe the English Presbyterians fetching his Arguments from the Inconsistency there is between the Diocesan Government and the Specific Nature of Christ's Instituted Churches Ministry and Discipline And §. 6 2. That he may the more clearly shew where the Strength of his Arguments doth lie he distinguisheth between particular Instituted Churches and the Catholick Church Visible affirming that they are Specifically Distinct from each other upon the account of the different sorts of Communion that are had in a Particular and in the Catholick Church For saith he §. 7 3. Communion which is the Essentiating End of these Societies is twofold The One sort is in the same Species or kind of Worship only and the other in the same Individual Acts of Worship Adding that the Communion which is in the same kind of Worship only may be between them who are at the greatest distance from each other and consequently with every Member of the Catholick Church Visible which therefore he calleth Catholick Communion and seeing it can be only in kind it cannot be more visible as such than the Species of things are But Communion in the same Individual Acts of Worship is by joyning in the same Ordinances of the Word Prayer and Lord's Supper and they who have Communion with each other in this way must meet in the same Place at one and the same time and 't is therefore called Personal-Presential or Local Communion which is therefore Proper and Adaequate to a particular Congregational-Church This is a thing that must be Inculcated viz. Communion in the same Individual Acts can be had only in a single Congregation because there alone they can actually joyn in the same Worship whence it necessarily follows §. 8 4. That that Communion which is stretched beyond the Bounds of one single Congregation being only in the same kind of Worship is of the same sort with Catholick Communion And seeing the Members of a Diocesan or Classical Church can have no other Communion with each other than what is Catholick they want that Communion which is Essential unto those particular Churches which are of Divine Institution and specifically distinguished from the Catholick Church And on the other Hand the Asserting Diocesan or Classical to be particular Churches of the Lowest Rank and Order is quantum in se a destroying Parish or Congregational Churches and as stretching particular Churches to a larger Extent is to make the Ends of their Constitution impossible to be attained As Mr. Alsop in his Misch of Impos It is very Lawful to build a Ship or a Man of War as big as two or
English Presbyterians being firm Adherers unto the first Reformers did in their Opposition to the Papal Tyranny hold first That there was no proper Visible Church but what was Particular secondly That Particular Churches were of the same Extent with Single Congregations and the Power of those in Office was confined to the Limits of a single Congregation §. 16 The Learned Mr. Cartwright a Person of that esteem amongst the Nonconformists in the Reign of the Queen as to be chosen by them to defend their Principles against Dr. Whtgift expressing their sense with much Freedom and Clearness I need insist on no other to prove what I affirm of them and who-ever is conversant with the Books then written will see that their Authors so generally and frequently refer'd themselves to his Writings and so constantly undertook his Defence as to be satisfied that the mentioning what was pressed by others is altogether unnecessary §. 17 This Learned Cartwright writing in Defence of the Admonition tot he Parliament Published in the Year 1572. Answered by Dr. Whitgift doth not only make a Reply to that Answer which was in the Year 1574. defended by Whitgift But in his Reply to this Defence of the Answer Anno 1575. expresseth himself fully to this effect I both mention Cartwright's Reply to Whitgift's Defence of the Answer and do inculcate it because Fuller Heylin and Walton have told the World that the Defence of the Answer kept the Field with all the Marks of an absolute Victory whereas it 's most manifest that Cartwright made a Reply thereunto in two Parts the First Anno 1575. and Anno 1577. he Published the rest And what is Remarkable Fuller in the same or very next Page where he so confidently avers that Cartwright never Replyed to the Second Answer doth himself refer to the first part of the Reply that was made unto it See his Church Hist Cent. 16. l. 9. p. 102. Now in the first Part of this second Reply Cartwright fully Confirms the Truth of my Assertion That every Particular Church should have her Bishop is manifest by Paul to Timothy For seeing the Discription of a Bishop which he gives doth Agree unto the Minister of every Congregation and nothing there requir'd in the one which is not in the other it follows that the Minister of every Congregation is the Bishop thereof For the Description agreeing with every of them the things described must likewise Secondly unless he do by this description of the Bishop set forth the nature of every Minister of the Word in his Congregation in describing the Offices of the Church he has left out the Principalest Members and was more careful in describing the Deacons Ministry not occupied in the Word than the teaching Ministries But that is absurd it must follow that he understood them by the name of Bishop Furthermore St. Paul's Bishop was appointed to the same Place whereunto his Deacons But his Deacons were assigned to a Particular Congregation St. Paul also there assigning the Charge and Care of the Bishop over the Church of God must either give him Charge over the Whole Body of the Catholick Church or over One Particular Congregation or of the Faithfull Company of one House But he extendeth not the Charge over all the Catholick Church for that were to make a Pope not a Bishop nor restraineth him to the Faithful of one Household considering that he opposeth the Government of his House to the Government of the Church It followeth therefore that he appointeth him to one Particular Church That by this Word Church must be understood one of these three Significations it standeth upon this Ground that in none of St. Paul's other Epistles or St. Luke's Writings that word Church is ever used otherwise and never signifieth the Church either of a Province or Diocese Rep. 2. Part. 1. p. 360. and in page 687. saith he I have shewed that Scripture useth not to call a Province or Diocese a Church but either the whole Vniversal or else a Particular Congregation Thus you see how Mr. Cartwright doth not only hold a Presbyter and a Bishop to be the same office but that the office of a Presbyter is Appropriated to a single Congregatio and that the Holy Scripture never speakes of a Diocesane or Provincial Church but only of the Vniversal which is Invisible and a Particular Church and therefore not of a Classical Church But §. 18 What I shall offer from the multitude of Nonconformists whose Sorrows encreased on James the First 's coming to the English Throne will evidence what I affirm to Persons of the meanest Capacities For Dr. Ames who gathered up the sence of these Old Nonconformists whom he styles in his Preface to his English Puritanism Rigid Presbyterians declared positively that they Hold and Maintain That every Company Congregation and Assembly of true Believers joining together according to the Order of the Gospel in the true Worship of God is a true Visible Church of Christ and that the same Title viz. of True Visible Church is Improperly given to other Societies Combinations or Assemblies whatsoever That Christ Jesus hath not Subjected any Church or Congregation of his to any other Superiour Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction than unto that which is within it self So that if a whole Church or Congregation shall err in any Matter of Faith and Religion no other Churches or Spiritual Church-Officers have by any Warrant from the Word of God Power to Censure Punish or Controul the same But are only to Counsel or Advise the same and leave their Souls to the immediate Judgment of Christ and their Bodies to the Sword and Power of the CIVIL MAGISTRATE who alone upon Earth hath Power to Punish a whole Church or Congregation They hold that every Established Church ought as a special Prerogative wherewith she is endowed by Jesus ChrisT to have Power and Liberty to choose their own Spiritual and Ecclesaistical Officers They hold and believe the EQuality in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority of Churches and Church-Ministers is no more Derogatory and Repugnant to the State and Glory of a Monarch than the Parity and Equality of School-Masters or Masters of Families Chap. 2. § 1. 5. 11. There was also about this time a Protestation of the Kings Supremacy made in the Name of the Afflicted Ministers in which they declare That they confine and bound all Ecclesiastical Power within the Limits only of one Particular Congregation holding that the greatest Ecclesiastical Power ought not to stretch beyond the same And that it is an ARROGATING PRINCELY Supremacy for any Ecclesaistical Person or Persons whosoever to take upon themselves Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction over many Churches That it is utterly unlawful for any one Minister to take upon himself or accept of a sole Eclesiastical Jurisdiction over so much as one Congregation And therefore some of the most Honest and Godly in the Congregation ought to be adjoined to the Minister in the Spiritual Regiment of