neglect his Imployment at home and Travel up to Jerusalem at a charge double or treble to the charge of the Sacrifice which was to be Offered laying all other things aside till that be done this being not declared expresly in the Law of Moses they determined in this case that he that became lyable to any Offering might defer the paying of it till the next Solemn Festival of the three came when all must appear before the Lord at Jerusalem The Law had said thou shalt Reverence my Sanctuary but had not particularly declared in what Actions that Reverence should be expressed they therefore ordained in the pursuance of that general Precept that no Man should go into the Temple to Worship with a Purse a Staff p. 116 117 118. or his Shoes on no Man was to spit no Man to sit there during the time of Divine Service nor use any irreverent Gesture To these we may add the Gizbarin or the three common Treasurers and Overseers of the Temple stock p. 39. and all consecrated things and the Catholikin who were Head Treasurers over them The singing of the Levites Children with their Fathers as our Choristers now do p. 36. p. 53. p. 83 84. p. 96. p. 103 105. p. 108. 119. The suspensive Trespass Offering The Cross upon the Wafer made in Oyl The manner of their Lotteries for the Service of the Priests Their Publick and private Prayers and their Worshipping in time of Prayer the way of discovering the New Moon before their Feast p. 122 123. p. 138 139. p. 174 175. p. 180 181. p. 189. and giving notice of it The manner of saying the Aegyptian Hallel and the manner of conveying the Scape Goat and giving notice of it when done The Branches of Pome-Citron used at the Feast of Tabernacles and the Psalms then sung Lastly the time place and person for reading the Law at the Seventh year All these to omit many more of the like Nature were things needful or at least useful to be determined and yet the Law of Moses hath said nothing of them If therefore notwithstanding any Precepts forbidding the addition to the Law of Moses or the exactness of the Prescriptions of that Law the Rulers of the Jews found cause or at least thought themselves impowered to appoint and to determin of these things why may not Christian Magistrates and Governours use the same Power in the Church of Christ If doing this was no derogation from the fidelity of Moses in writing of the Jewish Law why should we think that doing matters of like Nature is any derogation from the fidelity of Christ in giving us that Gospel which is stiled the Law of liberty Answ 3 3ly Certain it is Christ hath done what this objection doth assert his faithfulness obliged him to do viz. He hath not in the Writings of the New Testament given us a perfect Rule which clearly and expresly mentions all Ceremonies which are needful to be used in his Service or hath determined all things indifferent in their own Nature but disjunctively necessary or after which way or manner we must Act continually in the performance of his Worship For instance He hath said nothing of the time or place where and when he would have us to Assemble for his Worship or of the Ornaments of the place or the disposal of the Seats for Priest or People or whether Men should Sit or Stand during the hearing the Word Read or Preached or of the Number which should Assemble at one place or be under the care or the inspection of one Pastor nor how long we shall continue so Assembled and when the Solemnity shall be dismist And yet he who commands us to Assemble for his Solemn Worship must command some Number to Assemble with some Minister in some place and at some time He hath enjoyned Publick Prayer but he hath not determined whether we must Pray in a set form of words or only in words premeditated Or 3ly without Antecedent Meditation what we shall say or whether we shall Pray in words composed by our selves or prescribed by others He hath not told us who shall pronounce the Prayers whether the Minister alone or whether the People may not bear a share in the performance of that duty by saying with or after him or by responses or alternate sentences as was the Custom in the Jewish Church He hath not told us how oft we shall meet publickly for the performance of this duty whether every morning and evening Wednesday and Friday or only on the Lords day He hath appointed the Scriptures to be read in our Assemblies but then he hath not told us who shall be appointed for that work whether a person shall be Ordained for that Office as in the Latin and the Eastern Churches or a Clark as it is usual in our Churches whether Scripture alone may be read there or the Epistles and writings also of Pious Men as in the Primitive Church they did He hath not told us what Chapter or what Book we are to read or in what Method or how much whether in the Old or the New Testament or what Translation shall be approved by any Church He hath commanded that his word be Preached in our Assemblies but hath not plainly told us who alone shall Preach whether ordained persons only or also gifted Brethren whether with License or without nor in what Method whether by Doctrine and use or any other way whether with Study or without whether by chusing of a Text or only chusing of a Subject to discourse upon whether with Notes or only by the help of Memory whether in a place dedicated to that service or not dedicated whether in a Church or in the open Field nor lastly hath he told us how often nor how long we are to Preach He hath Commanded us to sing Psalms but then he hath not told us whether all should sing together as is the Custom in our Parish Churches or only some as in Cathedrals Whether the Psalms we sing should be in Rythm or Meeter or not whether we should siâ—g with Vâ—â—al only or with Instrumental Musick also nor what 〈…〉 or what Translations of the Psalms shoulâ— bâ— appâ—oved or allowed to be sung in Churche◠〈…〉 we should sing before or only after Serâ—â—â—â— or whether we should do it standing or in the sitting Posture He hath said Go and Baptize all Nations but hath not clearly told us who shall Baptize and in what cases whether the Priest alone or any other Christian especially in cases of necessity whether Baptism shall be Administred to Infants is not expresly said in Scripture but is left to be collected thence by Analogy and rational deductions whether all Infants are to be Baptized or only those of Christian Parents or of true Believers whether with stipulators or without whether we should Baptize in a River Pond Spring Font or Basin whether Infants should be Baptized at Eight days old within a
do it thou shalt not add thereto or diminish from it Hence they infer that no humane Ceremonies or Circumstances of mens devising must be added to what God hath commanded in his Gospel Worship Answ 1 To this I answer That these Words do as much concern Laws made concerning civil and judicial as concerning Sacred Matters and do as much prove that our Superiours may add no Laws to the Laws made by God concerning Civil Matters as that they may make no Laws for Regulation of or ordering any Circumstances of Religious Worship that is they are as good Objections against our statute-Statute-Book as against our Lyturgy The reason is because these words are neither in the 4th nor the 12th Chapter restrained to Acts of Divine Worship but are expresly spoken of all the Statutes and Judgments which the Lord had taught them v. 1. of whatsoever thing God had commanded Deut. 12.32 Answ 2 2ly If by these Precepts the Ceremonies used in the Church of England are condemned then also must the Dissenters from the Church of England be condemned by them for they do many things and they use many Ceremonies in Religious Worship which are no where commanded they sing in stinted Meeter for which they have no Precept or Example in the Word of God they have a Directory for publick Worship containing many precepts or directions no where prescribed in that Word they when they take an Oath do not refuse to lay their hands upon and kiss the Book now all agree that Oaths are Solemn Acts of Divine Worship and know that God no where Commanded these Ceremonial additions to it Moreover when they imposed the Solemn league and Covenant they ordered that it should be taken by the whole Congregation 1st uncovered 2ly standing Ordin of the 2 of Febr. 1643. and 3ly with their right hand lift up and bare now if they notwithstanding the Texts in the objection mentioned might add three uncommanded Ceremonies unto the taking of an Oath which is a Solemn Act of Divine Worship what hinders but that Superiors may do the like in other parts of Divine Worship Answer 3 3ly The Jews themselves never conceived that by these precepts they were restrained from instituting upon occasion sacred Rites or doing many things which circumstantially belonged to Gods Worship for which they had no special Warrant from the Word of God and if we do offend against these Rules by using our Ceremonies in Gods Service even the best and wisest of the Jews did equally offend For what command had Solomon to keep a Feast of Seven days for Dedication of the Temple 1 Kings 8.65 what Command had he for hallowing the middle part of the Court that was before the House of the Lord to offer Burnt offerings Meat offerings and Peace offerings there v. 64. Dr. Ames indeed sayeth that Solomon did this by Divine Authority Fresh suit §. 17 c. p 33◠and instinct of the Holy Ghost to which vain imagination I return the Answer of Agar add thou not unto his Words lest thou be found a liar Prov. 30.6 The Holy Ghost hath in two places given us a full relation of what King Solomon did but not one tittle of any instinct of the Holy Ghost commanding him to do it how then came Dr. Ames to know what no where is revealed and what cannot be known by any Man without a Revelation Is it not wonderful that Men who will believe nothing without express Scripture proof and who so stiffly do contend for the negative Argument from Scripture should themselves thus add to Scriptures 2ly What Warrant had good Hezekiah for continuing a Feast of Unleavened Bread Seven days longer than the time appointed by the Law 2 Chron. 30.23 To this instance Dr. Ames Answers that these Seven other days were not Holy days at all of Institution properly so called but an occasional continuation of free will offerings for that time Fr. Suit p. 317. which might be offered any day of the year without new Holy days To this I Answer 1st That were this so it cannot be denyed but that their observation of other Seven days beside these which were appointed by the Law of Moses was as much adding to the Law of Moses as the imposing of our Ceremonies can be accounted adding to the Law of Christ. 2ly When in the Text we read that they kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread with greatgladness v. 21 and v. 23. that the whole Assembly took Council and kept other Seven days with gladness what reason can any person have to think that the last Seven days should not be Festival or Holy days as well as the first Seven and if they might take Council to keep those other Seven days why might they not have instituted the keeping of them when they didobserve them And 3ly What reason hath Dr. Ames to affirm that they then only offered Freewill offerings rather than such which were accustomed to be offered at the Feast of Unleavened Bread and had been offered in the first Seven days of the Solemnity The descant of other Commentators on the place is this viz. that this was done not to change the ordinance of the Passeover but partly to redeem their defect in not observing it for so many years and partly to detain the People of Israel the longer at Jerusalem that by the Preaching of the Word they might be the better informed and confirmed in the true Religion whence the inference is plainly this that upon such occasions and for such good ends it is commendable to do more than is required provided nothing be done against what is required 3ly Est 9.20 21 22. What Law had Mordecai and Esther for enjoyning the yearly observation of the Feast of Purim to stablish this among them that they should keep the fourteenth day of the month Adar and the fifteenth day of the same yearly as the days wherein the Jews rested from their Enemies and the month which was turned to them from sorrow to joy and from mourning into a good day that they should make them days of Feasting and joy and of sending portions one to another and gifts to the poor Dr. Ames saith here again that if any significant ceremony was here instituted it was by divine direction p. 317. tho neither Scripture nor Josephus mention one tittle of the matter and adds from Dr. Whitaker that forasmuch as this Feast stands approved in Scripture there is no doubt but it was done by Divine Authority tho we read nothing of it in the Scripture Which by the leave of that good Man is a plain begging of the Question 2ly He adds that if Josephus may be believed Joseph Antiq. Jud. l. XI c. 6. p. 382. the Heathen King Artaxerxes was the institutor of that Feast and if so I hope Christian Kings may do as much but this is a vile mistake for in the place cited by him it is expresly said that Mordecai appointed it
of by any but Dissenters 2ly If this be true I know not any thing more forbidden by this Commandment than this Book of Dr. Ames so full of Phantasies of his own devising that nothing can be more all which undoubtedly were intended by him for some religious use Nay this very Interpretation is forbidden here it being certainly a Phantasy of the Mind without all ground from the Commandment Nay all our pious Books our conceived Prayers our Method in composing Sermons and an hundred things of like Nature will be here prohibited The Argument whereby the Dr. Labors to confirm this fond intepretation is p. 297. that the Word likeness used in the second Commandment is General and comprehendeth under it all religious similitudes because they are Homogeneal to Images they are expresly forbidden Answ The Foundation of this Argument is a plain falshood for the Word Likeness is not General but by the Text is plainly limited to Images or Likenesses of Male or Female Deut 4.16 17 18. The Likeness of any Beast that is on the Earth The Likeness of any winged Fowl that flyeth in the Air The Likeness of any thing that creepeth on the Ground The Likeness of any Fish that is in the Waters The Likeness which may be seen is that which is forbidden v. 15. 'T is the Likeness of any thing in Heaven above or in the Earth beneath or in the Waters under the Earth Exod. 20.4 Dr. Ames goes on to Argue from the Affirmative part of the second Commandment thus p. 299. This Commandment enjoyns Obedience to all the Worship appointed by God all which was significative for it served to the Example and Shadow of Heavenly things Heb. 8.5 Heb. 10.1 The Law having a Shadow of things to come Therefore it forbiddeth any significative Ceremonies to be brought into the Worship of God devised by man Answ to omit the Illogicalness of this Argument and the many terms in the conclusion which are not vertually contained in the premisses which every fresh Man may perceive I Answ 1. That it is falsly or at least precariously affirmed that this Commandment enjoyns Obedience to all the Worship appointed by God It is the first Commandment which commands us to have God for our God that is to give him all the Internal Acts of Devotion and the External Acts of Piety which are proper to God and are in Scripture signified by loving God with all our Hearts by fearing worshipping and serving him The second Commandment doth limit the manner of exercising and expressing our Devotion to the true Object of it interdicting that mode which in the Practice of Antient times had so generally prevailed of representing the Deities they apprehended to be such in some corporeal shape thereto yielding such expressions of respect as they conceived suitable and acceptable to such Deities The Affirmative part of this Precept seems therefore to be chiefly this Thou shalt give outward Religious Worship by bowing humbling of thy Body or falling down to me so that our kneeling at the Sacrament or bowing to the Lord Jesus when we hear his Sacred Name which minds us of the great Blessings which he hath procured for us and of the Honour due unto him for them our bowing of the body to him when we go into the place of Worship is only doing what in the General is here commanded which if Dissenters well considered they would see the vanity of their Exceptions against those laudable Practices of the Church of England Farther the positive part of this Precept may imply that in our Devotions and Religious Services of God we should raise our mind above gross Sense and Phancy that we should entertain high and worthy conceptions of God that we should apprehend him incomparably Superiour to all things which we see and know in a word that we should worship him in Spirit and in Truth not as the Samaritans in the Image of a Dove who therefore are said to worship they knew not what nor as the Jews by Types and Shadows of good things to come and such like Carnal Ordinances In these two things seem fully to be comprised the special positive Duty of this Commandment Answ 2. When Dr. Ames adds that all the worship appointed by God is here commanded and that it was all significative and proveth this from Hebr. 8.5 Hebr. 10.1 Which manifestly speak only of Shadows of things to come it clearly follows from his Argument that all Worship of God is now abolished and become unlawful for all the Worship spoken of Hebr. 8.5 Hebr. 10.1 is clearly abolished and rendred unlawful to us by the appearance of the substance of which they were Types and Shadows 3ly 'T is certain that we owe Obedience to all the parts of Worship appointed by God significative or not significative but how doth it hence follow that significative Ceremonies which are declared to be no parts of Gods Worship but only accidental Circumstances may not be required by men any more than it will follow that because God hath commanded Obedience to all the Honour due to my Natural Spiritual and Civil Parents and hath commanded all the Love I owe unto my Brother that therefore I may use no expression of honour to my Parents or love unto my Christian Brother which he hath not commanded Thus have I answered all that is considerable in Dr. Ames on this Head and all that the Dissenters urge from the Old Testament against Submission to the Ceremonies appointed to be used in the Church of England § 4 From this Example of our Lord and his Apostles it doth also clearly follow Coroll 2. that those Texts of Scripture which our Dissenters urge from the New Testament and all those reasons which they plead from the fulness of Scripture the Office and the Faithfulness of Christ in the discharge of that his Office can never prove that 't is a thing unlawful to submit unto or use the Ceremonies appointed by our Church seeing our Saviour and his Disciples whose Practice certainly agreed with their Precepts and who did nothing repugnant to the fulness of the Scripture c. submitted to the use of Ceremonies of a like nature to them when by the Rulers of the Jewish Church they were imposed and they found it best conducing to the promotion of the Gospel to submit unto them Nevertheless I also shall proceed to answer all that they have produced hitherto with any shew of reason from the N. Testament Obj. 4 To this effect then it is objected That Christ himself condemned and rejected the washings of the Scribes and Pharisees altho they were but decent Ceremonies imposed by the Elders of the Jewish Church and not forbidden by the Law of Moses And he not only doth refuse to conform to them but also justifyes his own Disciples in their Nonconformity doth pronounce of all such things that being plants which his Heavenly Father had not planted Matt. 15.13 they should be
Gibbet set up to mind us of the Punishment of evil doers and every person executed on them must be Sacraments they being objects proper to Minister occasion to our minds to reflect upon the shame and punishment of such offences as bring Men to the Gibbet then all Gods judgments upon wicked Persons and all the mercies he vouchsafes unto his Servants as Testimonies of his kindness to them and the examples of all Pious Men must be accounted Sacraments they being all designed to teach our understanding or excite devotion in us and it will be as much unlawful when I wash my hands to reflect upon my obligation to purity of heart and life or when I tast the sweetness of my food or think upon my care and labour to procure it to reflect upon the sweetness of the bread of life and how much more I am concern'd to labour after it as to use the imposed Ceremonies as the occasions of devout conceptions And lastly then to smite upon my Breast to excite Godly sorrow to Pray prostrate to encrease or to express my humility or perform any other actions of like Nature must be to add unto the Sacraments of Christs appointment And whereas the objection adds that no reason can be given why the representation of some Spiritual Duty by a Mystical Rite should not as properly pertain to the Nature of a Sacrament as the shadowing or sealing some Spiritual promise I Answer the disparity is very plain for these Rites falsly stiled Mystical may of themselves be apt to express or put me in mind of my Duty but cannot of themselves be apt without Gods pleasure signified to seal his promise or to assure me of his grace I can by meditation or by reflection upon the meanest object move my self to the performance of my Duty but cannot by the like reflections move the Author of every good and perfect gift to give me what he never promised or seal unto me any Spiritual blessing § 9 Lastly If we may take an estimate of Sacraments from those recorded in the Old or the New Testament we shall find many things required to Sacraments which are all wanting in our Ceremonies supposing that they were injoyned to these very ends For 1. A Sacramental sign of Duty obliges us to the performance of the Duty signified the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to thankfulness for the blessings represented by the Elements and to walk as becomes the Members of Christ's Body whereas a Ceremony tho apt to signifie doth not oblige us to the performance of the Duty signified nor do I sin against God provided I live holily and purely tho the consideration of a Surplice do never move me so to do or be by me improved to that end 2ly All Sacraments import a Covenant established betwixt God and Man a Stipulation on each part and by partaking of them we either enter into or else renew our Covenant with God and make profession that we are in Covenant with him And by just consequence a Sacrament is Sacrae rei signum in quantum est significans a sacred sign which sanctifies and separates the receiver from others who do not receive or own such Rites thus by the Sacraments of Circumcision and the Passover the Jews were made a separate People from all other Nations and the neglect of either of these ordinances was Cutting off from Gods People because this was a breaking of Gods Covenant Numb 9.13 Gen. 17.14 likewise we Christians are by Baptism received into Covenant with God by eating at Gods Table we make profession of our adherence to that Covenant and also by participating in the Blood of the New Covenant and to exclude a Person from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is to exclude him from the Communion of the Body of Christ 3ly All Sacraments contain a promise on the part of God and Stipulation on the part of Man and upon this account they do not only mind us of our Duty but also lay upon us fresh obligations to perform it and also they oblige our God to give us grace sufficient to perform that Duty to which he doth oblige us by these Sacraments Now there is nothing of all this in our three Ceremonies we do not by them enter into Covenant with God nor are we by them Sanctified or Separated from other Christians who use them not nor doth God by them promise any Blessings to us nor do we oblige our Souls to any Duties towards him nor do we enter into any Stipulations with him or he with us they who do most do only take occasion from them to reflect upon their Duty as Men of Phancy and Devout affections may do from any other thing which doth occasionally present it self unto their minds And whereas it is more particularly excepted against the sign of the Cross that as it is imposed it hath the Nature of a Sacrament from this discourse we may return an easie Answer to the objections made against it as v. g. § 10 Here is saith Mr. Baxter the outward visible sign the Cross Diâ—p 5. of Cer. chap. 2. §. 56. Answ Just such another as is made in the Air by Preaching we may see the Minister making a Cross but who ever saw an Aerial Cross after it was made 2ly The inward and Spiritual Grace saith he is a Holy resolution to fight Manfully under the banner of Christ and to persevere therein Answ An Holy resolution in an Infant is a Spiritual grace indeed Here is saith he 1st A signification of grace to be wrought on the Soul and given us by God 2ly An engagement to perform the Duties of the Covenant our selves on Gods part we are to receive by this sign both qualitative and actual grace and relative grace Answ All this is said without all ground from any thing delivered by the Church of England it is no sign assuring us of Gods grace as all true Sacraments are 't is no engaging sign either on Gods part or on ours but only an Indicatory sign to the Congregation that the Baptized Person is listed among those who are to fight under Christ's Banner The Cross saith he is to Teach our Understandings and help our Memories and quickâ—n our dull Affections by minding us of a Crucified Christ and the benefits of his Cross so that this § 57 and such other Ceremonies are appointed to Teach the understanding by their Signification Answ The Book of Common Prayer saith not they are appointed to teach but only that the things appointed are apt to stir up the dull mind the difference of which two Phrases I have shew'd already And that this saith he § 58 is the way of working grace as Gods word and Sacraments do is undeniable Answ We are discoursing here not of Gods Word but of his Sacraments and that they only work grace Morally and as things apt to stir up the dull mind of Man and by objective Teaching is a false assertion which renders the