the Old Testament from the apostles at their first conversion but suddenly they could not be translated into every language and till they were translated they could not be read in the congregation unto edifying The books of the New Testament could not be delivered untill they were written but they were not written all at once and when they were all written being sent to severall churches it must be some time before they could be gathered together and translated And if nothing be allowable in the church but what was found in the primitive churches planted by the apostles by record of scripture I fear the reading of the scriptures in a known tongue must be cast out of the congregations I go not about to equalize stinted Liturgies with set translations of the holy scriptures but I would intreat such as oppose a stinted Liturgie by these reasons to consider whether they do not put weapons into the adversaries hands to fight against the scriptures Again set forms of catechismes publick or private composed by the minister or devised by others used with liberty to adde or alter as occasion requireth are no more commanded of God then set forms of prayer nor no more in use in the apostolick churches Christ our Saviour the Prophets or Apostles have no more appointed the one then the other if all parts of holy and spirituall worship may be performed without a stinted Liturgie they may be performed also without a stinted or set catechisme and if a set form of prayer must be disallowed a set form of catechisme publick or private composed by the minister or devised by others must be condemned also But the antiquity excellency and necessity of catechizing is known to them who are exercised in the building and governing of the house of God the use and profit of a set form therein is both manifest by reason and confirmed by experience at home and abroad in publick and private to them who have laboured to lay the foundation of Christian religion and train up the people committed to their charge in sound wisdome and understanding And in these things we swerve not from our pattern because we teach and professe the same doctrine and worship God with the same worship and substantiall means of worship that the primitive churches and Christians did There is the same reason of reading the Apocrypha books of Maccabees and those that follow them in the congregation and of reading a stinted form of Liturgie and the same reasons that silence the Apocrypha will silence stinted prayers as well and as much When we prove the lawfulnesse of a stinted form of prayer by the stinted forms of psalmes and blessing mentioned in scripture it is thought answer sufficient to say There is great difference betwixt blessings or psalmes and prayer and yet here it is enough to match things unlike together and to say of them without all proof There is the same reason of both But if it have any sinews it will silence the singing of psalmes sermons professions of faith and conceived prayer no lesse then stinted especially the use of notes to help memory and forms of catechisme by whomsoever and howsoever used For there is the same reason of reading and uttering by heart in the congregation And if nothing but the canonicall scriptures must be read in the congregation nothing must be uttered by heart or strength of memory but the scriptures alone But sermons professions of faith conceived prayer are not canonicall scripture The reason is one and whatsoever can be answered truly in the one will put the other to flight If it be said That it is the prerogative of the scripture to be the rule of faith and manners and therefore nothing is to be read in the congregation as the ground undoubted and immediate of faith and manners but the scripture alone this openeth way for stinted prayer as well as for sermons or conceived prayer The substantiall means of worship both publick and private are determined of God It is unlawfull to set up an image for worship either publick or private The scripture must be acknowledged the sole rule of faith and manners both in publick and private It is unlawfull to devise sacramentall signes in private as well as in the congregation And if it be unlawfull to reade any other book in the congregation because the reading of the scripture is the onely approved medium cultûs by the same reason all forms of catechismes and singing of psalmes and reading or use of stinted praiers in the family are unlawfull And if the one be an image in the congregation the others are so in the family When the Lord had devised and appointed a perfume saith the authour of the Letter all men are forbidden to make a composition like that perfume Exod. 30. 35 37. So if it could be proved that Christ had made a form for the churches and believers alwayes when they pray then the offering up of any other prayers made by others or of our own devising would seem to be as unlawfull as the offering of strange incense Exod. 30. 9. Where it is implyed that seeing God hath determined no certain form therefore forms devised by men are not necessary but lawfull In the same manner they may be answered from their own grounds That seeing God hath sanctified and set apart the canonicall scriptures given by immediate Divine inspiration to be the sole and perfect rule of faith and manners therefore the scripture alone must be read and acknowledged as the sole ground of heavenly instruction But seeing he hath determined no certain form of prayer or sermons professions of faith or thanksgiving therefore either none at all must be made or forms devised by men are lawfull to be heard in the congregation yet not as immediate and undoubted grounds of faith for that is proper to the scripture but as instructions and exhortations builded upon or petitions framed according to the scripture as present occasion doth require In sermons who doth not put a difference betwixt the text whereupon the discourse instructions exhortations rebukes comforts be grounded deduced the exhortations rebukes comforts which are propounded in method phrase of speech devised by men The first is ought to be canonicall scripture the other not so But it would argue great ignorance if not perversenesse if a man should cavill in this manner against the preaching of the word That the scriptures alone are to be read in the congregation therefore the minister of the Gospel must simply reade the scripture but never give the meaning nor make application In the Primitive church sundry councels have forbidden the reading of any books as parts of Divine worship but canonicall scripture onely of the Old and New Testament but no councel ever condemned the use of a stinted Liturgie Those churches which forbad the reading of any books which be without the canon did
which assembled every day the word was preached every day And in the congregations which assembled every Lords day after the reading of the lessons psalmes and evangelists the word was preached constantly before they were dismissed The time specially appointed or taken for the sermon was the morning after the reading of the prophets and psalmes and evangelists In the afternoon as assemblies so sermons were frequent and two or more sermons were made in one and the same congregation sometimes by one sometimes by divers ministers After the sermon ended followed the prayers of the congregation as the testimonies before alledged plentifully confirm Clemen Constit lib. 2. cap. 57. After the exhortation of the Presbyter and the Bishop all pray unto God Justin Apol. 2. ad Anton. Then we rise all and pray together sc after the exhortation ended Origen Hom. 3. in Isa Idcirco surgentes oremus Deum Hom. 36. in Luc. Surgamus precemúrque Deum Chrysost Hom. 50. ad cap. 14. Matth. But now it is time to conclude our speech with prayer orate igitur universi nobiscum In all which we see the wisdome of the church so moderated the length of the Liturgie that each ordinance of God had its proper season that reading and prayer did not thrust out preaching nor preaching eat up prayer that the weak were not tired and burdened nor the sluggish fostered in their securitie And if a Liturgie be onely burdensome for length it is not altogether to be cast off For the thing it self is thereby justified as good and allowable that which burdeneth being taken away And it is much better to wrestle against bodily tirednesse with spirituall fervour then deprive themselves of the comfort and profit which is to be had in the ordinances of God The worship of God by that stinted form whereof our question is is the devise of Antichrist it being never prescribed or used in the primitive churches planted by the apostles and recorded in scripture But as the mystery wrought to a greater height in declining times of the church it was received by little and little till at last it came to be completely framed strictly enjoyned and every where used in the papacy as serving to maintein superstition and a dumbe idole-reading ministery and to nourish people in ignorance of the nature and right use of prayer The Masse-book is in Latine this Liturgie-book is in English the masse-Masse-book hath all the prayers this Liturgie hath and some more other differences I know not between them Therefore king Edward the sixth in his letter to the Devonshire-men to convince them that their Liturgie was our service telleth them that it was no other but the old and the self-same words in English which were in Latine save a few things taken out which were so fond that it was a shame to heare them in English And king James in a speech of his in Scotland said that their English Liturgie was an ill-said Masse Pope Pius the fourth sending Vincentio Parpatia Abbat of S. Saviour to Qu. Elisabeth offered to confirm the English Liturgie by his authoritie if she would yield to him in some other things Indeed this Liturgie pleased them so well that for the first eleven years of Qu. Elizabeth Papists came to the English churches and service as the Lord Cook sheweth And when the Popes intelligencers had seen service solemnly sung and said in Canterbury and London with all their pomp and procession they wondred that their master would be so unadvised as to interdict a Prince or State whose service and ceremonies so symbolized with his own The whole form then of the church-service a few grosse things taken out is borrowed from the Papists culled and picked out of that popish dung-hill the Portuis and vile Masse-book But that form of prayer by which God is worshipped after the manner that idolaters worship their Gods swerveth from a rule of prayer prescribed in scripture Deut. 12. 3 4. 30. 31 32. And this is made the first of the exceptions against the common-prayer-book which were briefly added to in the Abbridgement That it appointed a Liturgie which in the whole matter and form thereof is too like unto the Masse-book The main challenge in this objection which I have set down more at large because it is much insisted upon against our communion-book is That it was taken out of the masse-book But in the manner of propounding there be divers great mistakes to say no more It is a great fault that they put no difference betwixt the substance of worship and the externall form or order of celebration The substance of worship in that stinted form of prayer is That we call upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ according to his will Is this the devise of Antichrist because the form of words was taken out of the masse-book Suppose a minister of the Gospel should borrow some expressions or phrases of speech from heathen authours is his sermon forthwith the invention or devise of an heathen It is as far wide that they say Not onely the form of it taken from the church of Antichrist but surely the matter also For the matter of our Liturgie is the reading of the scriptures in a known tongue the calling upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ and not upon angels or saints departed for the living and not for the dead the right administration of the sacraments for substance and singing of psalmes are these the devises of Antichrist Is the administration of the Lords supper in both kinds in remembrance of Christs death and passion who by one oblation of himself once offered hath made a full perfect and sufficient oblation and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world is this taken from the church of Antichrist These imputations are not so grosse as their reasons weak upon which they are built If our stinted Liturgy be the devise of Antichrist because it is not prescribed by the apostles or recorded in scripture then every stinted Liturgie must fall under the same censure for none other is prescribed in scripture or recorded by the apostles And so either every stinted Liturgie is part of that mystery of iniquitie which began to work in the apostles dayes or our Liturgy is not Antichristian because it was not prescribed or used in the primitive churches planted by the apostles If it was received by little and little till at last it came to be completely framed then the first beginning of it was no more from Antichrist then was the beginning of other Liturgies Antichrist sitteth in the Temple of God and antichristianisme is a filthy and lothsome leprosie which by degrees did infect the pure worship of God If therefore our Liturgie was sowred in after-times with that old leaven it might be pure and free in its first originall Is it for matter taken from the church of Antichrist
and through Jesus Christ To God onely as the chief best and most perfect good through Christ as our Mediatour in whom we have accesse to the throne of grace Prayer is not a work of nature but of grace The principall authour thereof is the holy Ghost Man indeed doth poure out his soul unto the Lord but he is first taught moved and enabled thereunto by the Spirit of grace so that prayer is Gods gift and mans act The matter of our prayer is diverse according to the sundry occasions which happen in this life but ever it must be agreeable to the word and will of God Understanding faith humilitie reverence fervencie holinesse and love are required to that prayer which is acceptable unto God and doth procure audience In prayer with others especially in publick prayer where the minister is the mouth of the people the use of the voice is necessarie for the edification of the hearers for they cannot joyn in supplication and yield their consent unlesse they heare and understand what is prayed for In solitary prayer the voice and words are very usefull but not necessary usefull to stirre up affection and prevent rovings not necessary because it is the soul only that doth animate prayer A man may pray fervently and speak never a word but words be of no worth if the heart be absent Prayer endited by the Spirit and poured out by a sanctified soul is ever sweet and pleasant melodie in the eares of God though the tongue keep silence and the phrase of speech be rough and unpolished But let the outward frame of words be never so smooth and well set together the prayer is not pleasing unto God if therein we crave things unlawfull and impertinent if it be read or uttered without intention of heart understanding faith c. Neverthelesse in prayer with others specially in the publick assemblie words and decent phrase must not be neglected because all things must be done gravely and to edification To place devotion in words is superstition to hunt after quaint terms is foolish vanity but to neglect a decent and comely manner of speech is barbarousnesse Seeing then the use of the voice is not of the essence of prayer no man of understanding will deny that to be an holy and acceptable prayer which proceedeth from a sincere and upright heart feeling its own or others wants and craving supply thereof according to Gods will whether the petitions be put up in the self-same or in other words And yet because the ordinances of God must be kept from contempt in the publick assembly it is good neither to be over-neat nor over-homely but to use such a mean as doth most tend to the glory of God and good of Gods people Here a question is moved Whether a stinted Liturgie or set form of prayer publick or private be lawfull in the deviser or user A penned or stinted prayer I call Prayer in respect of the matter and externall form because the matter is delivered in form of a prayer or supplication tendred to God though properly it is not a prayer as it is penned or printed but as it is rehearsed as our prayer with understanding feeling of our wants humilitie confidence c. The controversie is not of this or that prescript form in particular much lesse of one faulty or erroneous but of a prescript form in generall Whether it be lawfull especially in the publick assembly to appoint any prescript or set form of prayer though for matter never so sound and allowable For if the exception be against this or that form in respect of the matter or maner of imposing then the question should be Whether this prayer for matter or manner of imposing be erroneous not Whether a stinted form of prayer or Liturgie be lawfull It is not questioned whether a man may ask things unlawfull or impertinent in prayer for the matter of our prayer must be agreeable to the word of God and our present occasions A prayer for matter and externall form holy and fit may by accident be sinfull in the user viz. when it is repeated without understanding or intention of the heart Of this there is no doubt It is granted also that no one prescript and stinted form of prayer or Liturgie is simply necessary either in publick or private for then our Saviour Christ who would not be wanting to his church in things necessarie would by his Apostles expressely have set down one to be an exact and unchangeable rule to all Christians and churches to the worlds end both for matter and form words and method whereunto they should have been tied and that alwayes But seeing our Saviour hath commanded no such unchangeable form it is not the Necessity but the Lawfulnesse of a stinted Liturgie or set form of prayer that is pleaded for and that as a matter of order not of religion or substantiall means of worship For in this sense there is no means of worship expedient which is not necessary by commandment It was never held that a man should so tie himself or be tied alwayes to a set form without variation that he should never offer up any prayer unto God as occasion is offered and necessitie requireth but what he findeth in his book Such use of a set and stinted form of prayer we do not acknowledge nor seek to perswade But to reade prayer as a prayer upon a book or to make known unto God the desires of our heart in a set form of words devised by others or our selves when the things we beg are allowable fit and necessary and when it is done with right affection is contrary to no precept or commandment directly or by lawfull consequence Amongst them that oppose a set form of prayer we may observe differences in opinion The ancient brethren of the Separation as M r Smith calleth them for distinction condemn all stinted forms of prayer to be used as a prayer Thus they dispute against set or stinted forms of prayer that it is a devise of man an Idole-prayer a stinting of the Spirit the substituting of a book in the room and stead of the holy Ghost a drawing nigh to God with the lips when the heart is removed farre from him That if set forms be lawfull then one may make anothers prayer buy his prayers at a book-binders shop carry them about in his pocket with many the like Which arguments whatsoever their weight be strike at all set forms and not at this or that onely prescribed in this or that manner M r Robinson hideth the matter as much as well he may by such like additions as these of matter and manner The thing saith he you should have endeavoured to prove is That your Divine service-book framed by man and by man imposed to be used without addition or alteration as the solemn worship of your church is that true and spirituall manner of
worshipping God which he hath appointed Again That these stinted and devised forms do quench the spirit of prayer which God would have them use stinting the minister yea all the ministers of the kingdome to the same measure of the spirit not onely one with another but all of them with him that is dead and rotten and so stinting the spirit which the Lord giveth to his ministers for his church and that so strictly as till the stint be out it may not suggest one thought or word otherwise or when it is out one more then is prescribed Neverthelesse his drift is plainly to disprove all stinted forms as it is evident by that he writeth in answer to some objections For Grant saith he that these words of Christ PRAY AFTER THIS MANNER AND VVHEN YE PRAY SAY are to be interprâ—ted as these men would have it yet do I except against their service-service-book in a double respect The first is That the reading of prayers upon a book hath no justification from them If it be said that to commit a certain form of words to memory and from it to utter them and to reade them upon a book be all one I deny the consequence and though I approve not the former yet is the latter farre worse And in another place You speak not properly no nor truly in saying you Pray stinted prayers for you Read them and who will say Reading is Praying or if you so say or do is it agreeable either to his ordinance or common reason And in the page cited last before He that readeth hath another speaking to him as it were even him whose writing he readeth and himself speaketh not to God but to the people Thus also he speaketh concerning the Lords prayer We may use a petition two or more or all in or of it even word for word if so the holy Ghost by whose immediate teachings and suggestions all our requests must be put up do direct us and that we apply the same words to our needs And in the same section So neither is the reading of this prescript or repeating it by memory praying Now let the indifferent consider and give sentence whether this be not to condemn all set forms of prayer to be used as prayer And if more then down-weight be required his fourth reason against the stinted form of service in use in our church will put this beyond all exception For thus he disputeth As it were a ridiculous thing for a child when he would ask of his father bread fish or any other thing he wanted to reade it to him out of a paper so it is for the children of God especially for the ministers of the Gospell in their publick ministrations to reade unto God their requests for their own and the churches wants out of a service-service-book wherein they are also stinted to words and syllables So that all other respects and considerations laid aside for what advantage soever alleadged the simple use of a stinted Liturgie or form of prayer to be used as a prayer is disallowed of them And if this be once accorded the other respects will easily be wiped away at least in regard of the users and them that joyn in prayer and participation of the sacraments In the copie of a letter lately published against stinted Liturgies the Authour willeth us to consider That the Liturgie he excepteth against was devised by men viz. other men whom God hath not called to such a work as to invent forms of prayers which should be used by all the churches in the land for their prayers and That it is imposed upon the minister and the people of necessity That it is stinted both in matter and words to be used without variation and That the service is read out of a book many wayes faulty and corrupt But look to most of the reasons brought to shew the justnesse of this exception and they make against all sorts of stinted forms used as prayers and not against a form corrupt and faulty imposed in such or such a manner as namely these God did never command to use nor promise to accept such a worship in which respect it is the manifest breach of the second commandment God hath appointed other helps for prayer which are sufficient without this Publick prayers offered up by the minister in church-assemblies must be framed according to the present and severall occasions of the church and people of God as also mens private prayers ought to be ordered which cannot be done when men are stinted to forms If you draw any conclusion from these premises it must be That all stinted forms are unlawfull not That a form corrupt and faulty is to be disallowed But if the foresaid cautions be added by way of distinction or limitation as if all stinted Liturgies were not disliked but such onely as be imposed as necessary to be used without variation and for matter or form corrupt and faulty then the reasons fight directly with the conclusion and hang no otherwise together then if a man should thus dispute All stinted forms of prayer are not to be disliked but corrupt onely imposed as necessary because God did never command nor promise to accept any stinted service or devised worship For what purpose therefore these cautions were added let others judge whether by way of aggravation onely or to set the greater lustre upon the position or for some other advantage Some others professe That they oppose not all nor any set form simply as such but are perswaded in many cases there is a lawfull use to be made of them but such a set form as is prescribed amongst us for matter and manner they affirm to be against the second commandment and a sin in the maker and deviser of it to such an use and a sin in the user of it according to that devise or making But the lawfull use of such forms publick or private they allow onely in some case of necessity which cannot fall out in a minister of the Gospel or any man else who deserveth the name of a strong Christian For they suppose abilities in all ministers and in every man else who hath his wits exercised to discern good and evil and deserveth to be esteemed a strong man in Jesus Christ Their words be these Set forms have their proper place and lawfull use onely where abilities are not as a naturall means and help to further some branch or other of that we call Prayer or conceived prayer as to supply defect of invention memory utterance or the like So the lawfulnesse of it lieth onely in a case of some necessity The difference then betwixt them so farre as I can gather standeth in this one thing That these latter allow some lawfull use of a stinted private form of prayer in some cases of necessity which the others altogether condemned But whether they dissent in any other particulars or no it is needlesse to enquire
they be applyed without speciall commandment to be the matter of form of a stinted prayer or thanksgiving at this time they are the devise of man that is they are so applyed by man without the extraordinary guidance direction of the holy Ghost Let us suppose a stinted form of Liturgie or prayer to be framed of the very words and sentences of scripture wherein nothing is to be read by way of prayer praise exhortation or declaration of the end and use of the sacraments but the very text of scripture if it be demanded whether this stinted Liturgie be the devise of man or no I conceive our brethren will answer That the matter and form both is of God as they are parcells of holy writ but as they are prescribed and used as a stinted form it is the devise of man This may be concluded from their grounds for all stinted forms of prayer and administration to be used in the publick congregation not commanded of God be the devises of men as they hold But this foresaid stinted form is not commanded of God as they affirm Therefore it is the devise of men There is now no form commanded of God as they professe and therefore to prescribe any text of scripture to be read in the administration of the sacraments or the Lords prayer to be used as a prayer is the devise of man What is more constantly affirmed by them then this That a stinted form of Liturgie is no necessry means of Gods worship because in time of the Law God prescribed none to his people when they were in their minority In times of the Gospel our Saviour Christ who would not be wanting to his church in the necessary means of worship hath given no form to be used of all churches throughout the world nor tyed any one member of the church precisely to this or that form of words in prayer and none others That we are not necessarily bound to the very words of the Lords prayer because the Evangelists do not tie themselves to the same words or number of words in recording that form of prayer the Apostles did not bind themselves to those words but used others according to their severall occasions nor do we reade in scripture that they laid any bond upon the churches to repeat over those very words Though therefore the prayer it self was taught by Christ the matter be of God and the form as it is canonicall scripture and though it be left as a perfect and genuine rule of prayer yet the application and use of it in such and such manner at such or such times in prayer in respect of the words themselves that is of men and not of God by particular institution Thus the reason may be contracted briefly the ordinary use of the Lords prayer without variation or addition is either commanded of God and so necessary or devised by men and so free and arbitrarie either it is a naturall help as some speak to supply some defect or taken up upon free choice But it is not commanded of God it is not necessary necessitate praecepti or medii nor an help naturall to supply some defect Therefore it is free and arbitrarie as that which may be done onely but it is not necessary to be done This being observed it will easily appear how little that distinction of using forms inspired by the holy Ghost but not of forms devised by men will avail because there is no form at all prescribed by God as they maintein Secondly if that distinction be granted it is here impertinently alleadged because it cannot be applyed to any part of the reason For forms of prayer inspired by the holy Ghost and recorded as parts of the sacred Canon be not of necessary use for us because they are recorded have not the true matter and form of prayer as they are there registred but as they are put up in faith to God being suitable to our occasions and a devised form of prayer fit for the matter tendred unto God in holy affiance by the work of the holy Ghost hath the true matter and form of prayer God never gave commandment that all our petitions should be presented unto his Majesty in a form of words inspired by the holy Ghost immediately God never disallowed the prayers of the faithfull because the externall form or phrase of speech was devised by man If the devised form of prayer before and after sermon be worship acceptable to God because it is devised of him who is called of God to devise and endite it then all men living are called and commanded to devise the worship of God and not for themselves alone but others in some cases Then the forms of prayer publick or private morning and evening the forms of thanksgiving before and after meals is devised worship but acceptable for the foresaid reason But that God hath called and authorized every man living or all in the church to devise a worship acceptable to his Majesty is most strange And so this first reason stands firm That all things essentiall to prayer or necessarily required in prayer by the word of God may be observed in a stinted from devised by men CHAP. III. A stinted Liturgie or publick form of prayer is no breach of the second commandment THat which is the breach of no commandment which is no where disallowed in the word of God either in expresse words or by necessary consequence that is no sin For sin is a transgression of the law and where there is no law there can be no sin But a prescript form of prayer of Liturgie is the breach of no commandment is no where disallowed in the word of God The exposition of the commandments is to be found in the Prophets and Apostles but the Lord by his Prophets and Apostles doth in no place restrain us to the use of conceived prayer so to call it Prayer is Gods ordinance but whether our prayers be uttered in our own or others words whether by pronouncing or reading that is not appointed God requireth that we lift up our hearts unto him and ask of him in the name of Christ whatsoever we stand in need of and is agreeable to his will But when spake he one word of praying within book or without in this or that precise form of words More particularly a stinted form of prayer for matter and externall form lawfull and pure fit in respect of our occasions and the necessities of the church read or uttered with knowledge affiance and intention of heart is not a breach of the second commandment either in the deviser or user For if all stinted forms of publick prayer be a transgression of the second commandment then in their common nature such stinted forms agree with images devised for worship But stinted forms or prayer agree not in their common nature with images devised for worship False worship forbidden in the second commandment is
opposite to the true worship which must in speciall be instituted by God But a stinted form of prayer is not opposite to that worshop which must in speciall be instituted by God False worship forbidden in the second commandment is in common nature use and end one with that positive worship which is there commanded But a stinted form of prayer is a matter of order and not for common nature use and end one with the true and pure worship of God there commanded The pure worship of God in spirit and truth is set against the worship of images But the pure worship of God in spirit and truth is not opposite to the worship of God in a stinted form of words Against a generall negative commandment no speciall act affirmative is lawfull unlesse the same be specially warranted by the Law-giver But some stinted forms of prayer are lawfull which are not in speciall warranted by the Law-giver viz. such as we have liberty to use but are not tyed to use by any necessity of precept If a publick stinted form of prayer be a breach of the second commandment then all publick stinted forms whereof there is the same formall reason and consideration both for persons and things are breaches of the second commandment at all times and in all men for it cannot be that a perpetuall commandment should be interpreted to forbid an act to one man when if the formall reason and consideration be the same in all it doth not forbid the same to every man But every publick stinted form of prayer whereof there is the same formall reason and consideration is not a breach of the second commandment in all men and at all times For there is the same formall reason and consideration of a publick stinted form of prayers to Christians now that there was formerly to the Jews The same formall reason and consideration I say not of this or that particular rite or ordinance which did peculiarly agree to them in respect of the speciall manner of dispensation proper to those times but of a stinted form in generall which was proper to them in no consideration but common to us with them As for example If the priests might blesse in a stinted form of words the ministers of the Gospel may do so likewise If the Levites might praise God in a stinted form of thanksgiving the ministers of the Gospel may use the Lords prayer as a prayer without addition or variation But all use of a stinted form of prayer and thanksgiving was not a breach of the second commandment in the priests and Levites If a stinted arbitrary prayer be the breach of the second commandment then is conceived prayer when uttered a sin likewise For they both agree in the matter as of God in externall phrase of speech and words boâ—h are of men in that which maketh stinted prayer a breach of the second commandment if it be a breach there is no difference Therefore we conclude That a stinted form of prayer is not a breach of the second commandment Means of Divine worship not ordained of God be unlawfull But a stinted form of prayer is a means of Divine worship not ordained of God Means of worship not to contend about words are of two sorts Some substantiall which are so means of worship as they be worship it self as the word is used when we speak of worship taught in the 2. commandment So the sacraments are means of worship branches of positive worship taught in that precept And in this sense all means of worship allowable are necessary by Divine precept and we are bound in conscience to apply our selves to them as Gods ordinance and not we onely but all the churches throughout the world For such ordinances of God pertein to the substance of worship whereof nothing can be changed or taken away but the worship is changed and another made Others are mere accidents to the substantiall means and deserve not to be called means of worship and if so called it is very improperly concerning which God hath given no particular commandment in his word whereunto the conscience is not bound either to apply it self unto them or to witnesse against them and of this sort are the circumstances of time place order method phrase and stinted form of words in the administration of the holy things of God which are no parts of the worship but honest circumstances of the celebration consonant to the generall rules given in scripture for the right administration of Divine ordinances but not commanded or disallowed in particular For generall rules are not commandments of this or that in particular but approbations of any particular this or another agreeable to those rules The apostle in commanding that all things be done in order doth not command this or that particular order nor forbid this or that in particular because it is not ordained of God For if all such means or worship shall be properly worship then not onely preaching but the church pulpit bells bell-man the phrase and method of sermons then each particular form of prayer the hower and order shall be worship because they are furtherances thereof If all such means of worship must be ordained of God or they shall be unlawfull God must have no worship at all from us in the means which he himself hath ordained because it is impossible to use the means he hath ordained and not to do many things which he hath not instituted Book-prayer is a manifest breach of the second commandment The reason I conceive is because words are signes of our conceits and notes of the things themselves writing is a signe or picture of the thing signified and so words devised by men and books of stinted prayers are images or pictures of our own devising And in this sense onely can a stinted prayer be called a devised worship For the matter of the prayer is of God it is the frame of words and method onely that can be challenged to be of man and if devised words be not images condemned I cannot comprehend how the externall form should be an apparent breach of the second commandment But if this reason be ought worth it is a manifest breach of the second commandment to preach pray administer the sacraments or reade the scriptures in a prescribed translation nay in a vulgar tongue For in preaching and prayer the matter is of God holy and good but the words and phrases of men In translations the matter is immediately inspired of God but the words are devised of men The sacrameÌ„ts are Gods ordinances by speciall and expresse institution but what shall we say of the outward form of words used in the administration If words devised by men be images condemned by the commandments do we not make one commandment of God crosse to another when we say that God requireth these things at our hands and yet condemneth all devised words without which they
if it be uttered with the lips without the intention of the heart it is a bare similitude and if the other be read or uttered after an holy manner with that affection which God requireth in prayer it is true and acceptable prayer Words without the heart are but empty sounds whether read or pronounced out of the memory or ex tempore and if the voice be joyned with the heart it is pleasant melody though our petitions be read out of a book But the book then saith he supplieth the room of the word and spirit Nothing lesse For the word of God directeth us what to ask even when we reade our prayers upon a book so long as we crave with understanding things agreeable to the will of God And the spirit doth enable and stirre us up to desire that which is according to Gods will and our necessity We may utter requests with our lips in conceived prayer without the aid and assistance of the holy Ghost and so we may in a penned prayer but offer up the sighs and grones of the heart we cannot without his grace It is no more lawfull to use any strange manner of prayer then it was to use strange fire or strange incense in time of the law Psal 141. 2. Apoc. 8. 3 4. But a stinted form of prayer is a strange manner of prayer The proposition we grant if rightly understood otherwise symbolicall and analogicall arguments if the proposition be not rightly taken are very dangerous But a stinted form of prayer is no strange manner of worship because in it all things required to the nature of true prayer may be observed In the word of God we have direction given to whom for what with what heart and affection to what end a man ought to pray but in what method or frame of speech he is to be a petitioner we find nothing prescribed in particular neither do we judge any thing necessary more then this That order decency and edification be observed That which hath the common nature definition use and end of worship but wanteth Divine authority and institution to make it approved and true worship that is strange in the worship of God But the method and phrase of speech hath not the common nature definition use or end of worship or prayer belonging unto it As conceived prayer so a set form of prayer is for substance and nature agreeable to the rules of direction delivered in the word of truth though for method and words both the humane Let our brethren set down out of the word of God what is necessarily and essentially required to the nature and being of true prayer shew if they be able that some one or other condition or requisite cannot be observed in a prescript or stinted form If this cannot be done as I think it never hath nor can be how dare they esteem or style it a strange worship They tell us God hath not ordained that manner of worship But this phrase the manner of worship is used two wayes first as it noteth the substantiall means of worship ordained of God by speciall institution secondly as it is put for the outward order or form how this worship or means of worship is performed A third signification might be added as when we say the third commandment teacheth in what manner the name and ordinances of God are to be used Now if it be taken in the first or third signification the outward frame of words order and method is neither means nor manner of worship either in preaching prayer or administration of the sacraments If in the second the word of God doth not prescribe any particular form stinted or not stinted as necessary but doth warrant both as allowable For where nothing is in particular commanded touching the externall form of words and order in which our petitions should be presented to the Lord there we are left at liberty And to put religion in reading or uttering words in a stinted or conceived form where God hath laid no bond upon the conscience what is it lesse then superstition If the phrase of speech be modus or medium cultûs as it is referred to the second commandment then it is instituted commanded and determined of God in particular then that and none other is lawfull and necessary for so it is in all parts of his positive worship Those sacramentall signes which God hath designed in the covenant are necessary and those onely lawfull and if method and phrase of speech be medium cultûs in the same sense the like must be said of that also In substance a prayer read and conceived is all one and the one is no more a strange manner of worship then the other And here let it be observed that all these objections are made against all use of stinted or read prayers publick or private voluntary or imposed sound and pertinent as well as corrupt and cannot be restrained to a form imposed upon the minister of the congregation to be used continually and that corrupt and faulty The matter if supposed to be alike from God as being truth and according to sound doctrine the manner in that we call conceived prayer is the same which nature teacheth and scripture approveth and is the onely way in which the prayers of all holy men recorded in scripture since Christ have been carried as the Papists themselves grant But for the manner or way of book-prayer we have not so much as example in scripture for it The strength of this reason let us view in the like M r Smith would prove the originals not to be given as helps before the eye in worship Because upon the day of Pentecost and many yeares after the churches of the new Testament did use no books in time of spirituall worship but prayed prophesied and sung psalmes merely out of their hearts Acts 2. 4 42. 10. 44 48. 19. 6. 1. Cor. 14. 15 17 26 37. Because no example can be shewed of any man ordinary or extraordinary that at or after the day of Pentecost used a book in praying prophesying and singing of Psalmes if yea let it be done and we yield And against the use of translations for the hearers thus he argueth The Prophets and Apostles wrote books but did never divide their books into chapters and verses Seeing therefore that chapters and verses were of mans invention hence it followeth before chapter and verse came in the hearers could not turn to search their books in time of hearing The Apostles in quoting testimonies of the prophets do not quote chapter and verse but onely say It is written The scripture saith The holy Ghost saith thereby teaching us that there is no use of chapter and verse for searching in time of hearing Never was there mention made of any hearer that ever had his book to search in time of hearing The reasons be the same and yet I perswade my self they
whom hath the Lord committed that charge and given ordinary authoritie to prescribe forms of singing in the churches in the new Testament If thee be such difference as is pretended betwixt the devised forms of praying and singing it is necessary that he that denieth the one to be lawfull and challengeth liberty in the other should shew his commission Christ fitteth his servants with gifts for the whole work of the ministery to pray as well as to preach by their own gifts for prayer is an ordinance of the new Testament as well as preaching and they are made able thereunto not by shewing the sufficiency of other men whose prayer they reade but their sufficiency is of God enabling them Thus our brethren reason against read or prescribed prayer and doth not the same hold as truly against the use of a prescribed psalme To sing psalmes is an ordinance of the new Testament and the minister of God is enabled to sing as well as to pray by his own gifts otherwise he is not enabled for the whole work of his ministery and if he reade or sing a psalme whose gifts doth he exercise therein This necessitie being presupposed I would know whether that particular form of singing devised by man and prescribed by others be an humane invention or no If it be the devise of man then it is forbidden in the second commandment as they say If it be not of man then it must be of God by speciall institution and immediate inspiration then the self-same form of words issuing from the same cause or authour should be humane if delivered in form of prayer and Divine in form of a psalme Whereas this necessitie is onely an adjunct to the thing and doth not so change the nature of it as to make that which is of man by common gifts to be from God by speciall institution as it must in this case according to their tenent I would know further whether this devised or prescribed form of singing be an acceptable worship and service of God or no If it be then some worship devised by men is acceptable to God in case of necessitie which cannot be admitted If it be not worship then a devised form of prayer cannot be condemned as a devised worship And therefore if there be any such necessity as is pretended it should rather exempt from the practice of singing then give liberty to a devised form which God hath not warranted nor approved For it is a rule in Divinity That against a generall negative precept no particular affirmative can be lawfull unlesse that particular be warranted in scripture For the scripture should not be perfect to furnish the man of God completely to every good work if a particular affirmative not warranted in speciall might be lawfull against a generall negative seeing in that case a man can have no sure ground to rest on But against this supposed generall negative precept forbidding all humane inventions in Gods worship all devised helps and furtherances all strange worship there is no particular warrant allowing it in singing psalmes When all devised worship is condeÌ„ned how shall the conscience be assured that this particular devised worship shall be accepted No necessity excuseth in the doing of a thing otherwise unlawful but that which exempteth from the coÌ„mandment in that case Now whether that pretended necessity of a set form should exempt from the generall negative precept forbidding all devised forms as will-worship as they expound it or froÌ„ the affirmative precept of singing of psalmes let them judge who put the exception Necessitie which hath no law in some particular case presupposeth some free time wherein that pressing necessitie hath no place then what necessity hath found out for remedy that must cease the necessity ceasing But that any necessity which lieth continually upon all churches as doth the singing in a prescript form if they sing at all should warrant them to do that which is coÌ„trary to a general negative precept is a tradition in Divinity never heard of before The reason therefore standeth still in force If it be lawfull to praise God in a form of words devised by man it is lawfull also to pray to God in a stinted form and an arbitrary form is altogether as lawfull as a devised form And if Christians shall not withdraw themselves from the stinted prayers of the congregation before a materiall difference be shewed in these particulars and that destinction of Arbitrary and Necessary devised forms be proved by scripture or solid reason the world shall end I am confident before they separate And thus some other objections made against a stinted Liturgie are answered It is Gods ordinance that the churches should be edified by their gifts who minister unto them and that in prayer as well as in preaching and Christ â—itteth all his servants with gifts for the whole work of the ministery But in reading a stinted Liturgie a minister doth not edifie the church with his own gifts This reason concludeth not against a publick stinted Liturgie as a breach of the second commandment or a devised worship nor as unlawfull in it self but by accident onely as it hindreth the edification of the church by the ministers own gifts But I desire to know whether it be not lawfull for the minister at all in the publick execution of his office or any part thereof to make use of other mens gifts or that he must not make use of other mens onely and not of his own at all If the former it is not proved by any text of scripture If the later it maketh nothing against the use of stinted prayer In every part of his publick function preaching prayer blessing singing administration of the sacraments reading of the scriptures a minister may and ought to make use of the gifts of others In exposition of scripture he may make use of the divers readings marginall notes interlineary glosses marginall references he may make use of the gifts of linguists translatours paraphrasts and commentatours to explain hard phrases find out the coherence and meaning of the text c. In matters of controversie of the labours and gifts of them that have travelled most painfully therein In application of doctrine he may make use of such as have handled that matter more soundly fully pithily then he is able and in the act of preaching of all these joyntly or severally as he doth utter what he hath gathered out of his notes or memory Calvine a man of great learning admirable dexteritie of wit singular skill in the Hebrew tongue was yet pleased in his commentaries upon the psalmes to make great use of Vatablus annotations Mercer in his exquisite Commentary upon Job was not a little holpen by the sermons of Calvine upon the same book Mollerus is pleased for the most part to gather his observations upon the psalmes word for word professedly out of Calvine How many sermons and tractates be extant
proved already Why may they not as lawfully command to preach by reading of Homilies as to pray by reading of the Liturgie both which are contrary to the institution of Christ and the holy scriptures The two feet upon which the dumb ministery standeth like Nebuchadnezzars image upon the feet of iron and clay are the book of Common prayer and of Homilies the reading of the former which is the right foot serving them for Prayer and the other for Preaching Which feet if they were smitten as were the other with the stone cut without hands the whole Idole-priesthood would fall and be broken a-pieces as that other image was This objection presupposeth that there is some great affinity betwixt a stinted Liturgie and an idle ministry which is a bare conjecture For in the Primitive church the abettours mainteiners and in part devisers of stinted Liturgies have and for ever shall be renowned in the church of God for their constant continuall and unwearied pains and industry in preaching the Gospel It is a thing notoriously known and confessed that Cyprian Ambrose Chrysostome and Augustine did all of them allow and approve and some of them devise stinted forms of Liturgies and yet who almost for diligence and labour in teaching the people in the wayes of salvation to be compared unto them Of their learning and zeal it is needlesse to say any thing For three of them there is plentifull testimony that they preached every day in the week and yeare at least once or twice without fail Ye heard yesterday Ye shall heare to morrow is common in their tractates and homilies Augustine even to the extremity of his sicknesse preached the word of God in his church cheerfully and boldly with a sound mind and judgement without any intermission at all The like diligence is noted in others who lived before and about those times in all which a stinted Liturgie was in use And generally the Fathers in the primitive church presse the knowledge of the scriptures residence upon his charge diligence in reading meditation prayer and instruction of the people as duties requisite and necessary and by no means to be neglected or omitted of the minister They also exhort the people not onely to heare the word of God but to learn it by heart to instruct and warn one another to sing psalmes conferre religiously begin and end their feasts with solemn prayer reade the scriptures in their houses and discourse thereof one with another for their mutuall profit and edification and to call their families children wives servants friends and neighbours together and to repeat the sermons they heare at church-together after the sermon ended Such exhortations are common and ordinary in them who approved stinted Liturgies Let one of you take in hand the holy book and by the heavenly words having called his neighbours about him let him water and refresh both their minte and his own Being at home we may both before and after meat take the holy books in hand and thereof receive great profit and minister spirituall food unto our souls Gregorie disalloweth that such should attend to singing and modulation of the voice who should apply themselves to the office of preaching Hierome cut short the lessons when whole books were read in order before that so there might he time for preaching Durantus himself misliketh the men that extra modum ordinem orationes multiplicant unde auditores sibi ingratos efficiunt populum Dei potiùs fastidio avertunt quà m alliciunt And Petrus de Aliaco counselleth quòd in Divino officio non tam â—nerosa prolixitas quà m devota integra brevitas servaretur A stinted Liturgie then in it self doth not abbridge nor hinder the liberty of preaching or prayer according to the speciall present occasions nor ought it so to do For when the minister of the Gospel is bound to be instant in season and out of season to teach exhort reprove with all long suffering and patience these necessary and wholesome functions of the holy ministery must not be trust out or hindred And it is not hard to shew the wisedome and moderation of the churches in their prescribed catechismes stinted prayers and exhortations in the administration of the sacraments c. to be such that they have allowed time convenient both for preaching and prayer according as God hath enabled his messengers In these times of this reformation the pains of such whom God stirred up first to preach the Gospel and instruct the people in the wayes of salvation was almost miraculous and yet generally they approved and devised a publick stinted form of Liturgie As for Homilies they were first allowed in the church not to uphold or maintein an ignorant ministery or to supply his defect that should take pains but would not much lesse to shut out preaching but to supply the casuall defect of preaching through the weaknesse and infirmitie of the minister CHAP. V. A stinted form of prayer doth not quench the Spirit THe Spirit of Grace enableth us to pray and maketh requests for us but worketh by means It instructeth us what to ask not in what phrase of speech It stirreth up in us holy desires but giveth not abilitie suddenly and without help to expresse and lay open our hearts in fit method and words significant As the Spirit doth perswade and assure the heart that the scripture is the word of God not witnessing of the letters syllables and words but of the matter and saving truth therein conteined So the Spirit instructeth us to pray by opening our eyes to see our misery and inflaming our hearts with a longing desire of mercy and relief in the mediation of Jesus Christ but it giveth not abilitie evermore to utter and expresse these our desires in fit and decent phrase of speech Abilitie of speech is a common gift of the Spirit which the Lord bestoweth upon good and bad Yea many times gracelesse persons are herein preferred before the most sincere and upright and many an honest heart can cry aloud for mercy who is scarce able to utter one distinct and perfect sentence in fit words and order Let no man except that ministers have better abilities For when the Apostle saith the Spirit is given to help our infirmities who know not how to pray as we ought he speaketh of all beleevers as well others as ministers private prayers as well as publick And whosoever is enabled or provoked to lift up any one sigh or grone unto God or to make apologie for himself in the mediation of Christ in any manner it is by the holy Ghost These things considered I suppose all men will grant 1. That it is lawfull for a man before-hand to meditate on his own particular wants and the necessities of others and that he may more fully understand and more sensibly be affected with them to reade good books which unfold the
particular sinnes against the law of God the state of man by nature and the condition of the Saints and of the church as also to think upon the works of Gods providence and how he is pleased to deal with his people in all places 2. The better to stirre up confidence and affection and to furnish himself with words and matter it is not unlawfull nor unprofitable to reade the prayers of the godly registred in holy scripture or published in other godly books to observe the matter of their prayer their ferventnesse in praying and the arguments wherewith they pressed their suits and contended for audience 3. After a man hath collected matter for prayer by meditation and reading he may studie to digest it into due order and method and to expresse his requests in fit and decent speech and the same so conceived he may utter as a prayer according as occasion shall offer it self The reason may be thus contracted If the Spirit of God doth work by means and stir up good desires but giveth not abilitie to expresse our desires in fitting significant words 〈◊〉 it is lawfull for us to use all godly means to stirr up the graces of God in us and premediate how we may utter our requests in such form and manner as may best serve for our quickning and the edification of others And if the use of a premeditated form of words in prayer do not stint the Spirit in a sinfull manner a set form of prayer cannot be condemned as injurious to the Spirit The Spirit of God is the onely sufficient help which God giveth us to help our infirmities in the time of prayer Rom. 8. 26. Gal. 4. 6. Zech. 12. 10. We confesse most willingly that prayer is not a work of nature wit or learning but of the Spirit of grace True desire or abilitie to pray is not bred in us by nature nor procured and gotten by our study and industry but proceedeth onely from the holy Ghost as the authour and efficient and this is proved by the places quoted But ability to pray standeth in the lifting up of the soul unto God not in the ample expression of our desires according to the various occasions in fit words and pressing them with forcible arguments Prayer is the immediate work of the Spirit But no text of scripture doth in such sense make the holy Ghost the authour of prayer or helper of our infirmities as that it should be unlawfull to make use of outward means to furnish the soul with matter stirre up the graces of God in the heart and blow the coals of the spirit For then we must not reade the scriptures nor other godly books we may not meditate or conferre the better to fit us for prayer Peradventure it will be said the Spirit of God is our onely helper in the time of prayer so that at other times we may use helps to stirre up the graces of the Spirit but not in the time of prayer And if this distinction be found in scripture or by sound reason may be deduced out of scripture we must hearken unto it but if it be of our selves whiles we pleade against the devises of men we maintein devises The Spirit of grace is at all times the sole mover and enabler of us to pray and the use of lawfull helps and such as suite with the nature of prayer are at no time unlawfull As it is fit to meditate and reade before we pray so in prayer it is lawfull to kneel lift up the eyes and hands use the help of the voyce and the benefit of a Christian friend to stirre up affection Therefore for the lawfulnesse of book-prayer we may dispute thus If it be lawfull to use externall helps in time of prayer the better to stirre up affection then book-prayer is not to be condemned for this that the Spirit of God is the onely or sufficient help that God giveth to help our infirmities in the time of prayer But it is lawfull to use externall helps in time of prayer The Spirit alone either immediately or by means sanctified and ordained by himself maketh requests for us yea it is by the immediate teachings and suggestions of the Spirit that all our requests must be put up no other helps are mentioned or can be collected in the present action of prayer I will not stand to enquire how these things can agree together what is meant by the immediate teachings of the Spirit or how the Spirit maketh requests either immediately or by means The Spirit alone and that immediately is the authour of prayer but by means he ministreth varietie of matter order and words But what are we to understand by means sanctified and ordained by himself If means ordained by speciall institution it is too strait and hard to conceive what they be If means allowed by God as those whereby we may furnish our selves with words and matter for prayer as reading godly books conference meditation on the works of God c. a stinted form of prayer is a means sanctified And here I desire it may be noted in what sense a form of prayer is called a means or furtherance not as a means or form of worship properly so called but as in fit words and phrases it presenteth to our minds or memories what we ought to beg agreeable to the word of God as the frame of words and matter kept in memory may be called and is reputed a stinted form A stinted form of prayer quencheth the Spirit It is a quenching of the Spirit to reade another mans prayer upon a book That quencheth the Spirit which is as water to cool or allay or exstinguish the heat of that holy fire which cannot be imputed to a set form of prayer either by authoritie of scripture or sound reason Reading godly books is an exercise profitable to stirre up the graces of Gods Spirit in us were it not a wonder if reading a godly prayer should produce the contrary effect As in the ministery of the word the corruption of mans heart and the hainousnesse of sinne may more lively and fully be discovered for his humiliation then he is able of himself to set it forth so in prayer penned by a goldy andwell experienced Christian the case of a distressed soul may more pithily and amply be deciphred and anatomized then he of himself is able to lay it open And in such case to deny this lawfull help is to take away a crutch from the lame and bread from the hungry In the very act of prayer it is lawfull to use outward helps whereby we may be enabled to pray better and shall it not be lawfull for a burdened soul perplexed with doubtings overwhelmed with bitter anguish to use the help of a book that he might the better unfold and lay open his misery into the bosome of his loving Father The ample and particular laying open of our necessities doth ease the
first receive a stinted form of prayer and the councels themselves take order touching the reading of the scripture and the singing of psalmes and other things which pertein to a stinted Liturgie So that those Fathers churches had not learned that the same reasons which silence the Apocrypha in the congregation will silence all stinted forms of Liturgie as well and as much As it were a ridiculous thing for a child when he would ask of his father bread c. to reade it to him out of a paper so it is for the children of God especially for the ministers of the Gospel in their publick ministrations to reade unto God their requests for their own and the churches wants out of a service-service-book wherein they are stinted to words and syllables It is a common saying Similitudes agree not in all things and a rule as generall That to argue from a bare similitude is the loosest kind of reasoning which may be applyed to cover or countenance any errour or abuse whatsoever Therefore this objection might well have been passed over as it is omitted by the most that have written of this subject that I have seen but that colours and shadows do often take more with some then that which is substantiall If a man would set himself to plead for superstitious abuses and idolatrous practices errours and unwritten traditions is it not an easie matter by some similitude to cast a fair glosse upon them And it is a strange thing that such as with so much earnestnesse set themselves against all humane inventions and devises in Gods worship should by their form of reasoning open the floud-gates wide for all superstitious idolatrous antichristian devises and impieties as this reason doth I need not instance every man that knoweth what is principally alledged in defense of any popish vain unprofitable superstitious or idolatrous practice or custome or will take pains to look must needs see this to be so But to look upon the objection it self If a child being to ask many particulars of his father for himself and others should write them in a paper for the help of memory or some other reason and having committed them to memory as they are registred in his paper should in that form of words digested and written down present his requests before his father without addition or alteration what morall evil or incivility should be committed in this case why should this be esteemed a thing ridiculous And if similitudes do please so well may we not say with more reason and upon better ground That as a learned oratour being to make an oration in an honourable presence about divers matters of weight and importance will not onely study and digest but penne his speech and deliver it word for word as it is contrived and penned so the minister of the Lord of hosts in his publick ministration is not onely to consider what requests he is to make to God in his own and the peoples behalf but to digest them into fit method and to penne or write them down and to utter them in the congregation as he hath contrived them Let the indifferent judge whether of these two be the most reasonable Book-prayer is generally laid aside in the families of best Christians And in all reformed churches generally the use of a book by every able and godly minister is left off and at home it is accounted and complained of as a burden by the better sort of them that use it Many things are disused and that by the best Christians which are not unlawfull Where there be many wayes to the wood ordinarily men may make choice of one or two not disallowing the other It is lawfull for Christians when they pray in their families dayly to reade the ten commandments the profession of faith c. which is generally laid aside without sinne Many things also may be decent in the congregation which are not so expedient and requisite in the family And in one congregation a thing may be lawfull and of use which is disused in another without sin where yet it would not be unprofitable The deacons in Chrysostomes and Basils time used to call upon the people with these words Oremus Attendamus Let us pray Let us give eare The deacon at the holy mysteries stood up and thus spake unto the people Oremus pariter omnes The manner was that before every lesson or chapter the minister should say unto the people Let us attend If this custome be disused either in the congregation or Christian families at this day it doth not argue the thing it self to be indecent or unprofitable And if by Book-prayers all stinted forms whether read or repeated by help of memory be understood they are not so generally rejected in the families of the best Christians nor in the ministery of the most able and godly ministers as the objection importeth Let us heare the testimony of a godly learned and well experienced minister now at rest with the Lord When as saith he the question is made by many of the lawfulnesse or at least of the expediency of praying by the help of a book or of using a prescript and set form of prayer it is to be considered that there be divers degrees and measures of gifts both naturall as wit memory utterance as also of grace as knowledge faith zeal given to divers men besides that some have been more trained and exercised in this holy duty then others Now they that are better gifted either by nature or else by grace and custome may use the more liberty Which difference I have observed not onely in divers private Christians but also in some most reverend faithfull and worthy ministers some using both in their publick ministery and in their private families a stinted prayer and set form of words with little alteration at all except some extraordinary occasion have happend and yet both sorts so furnished with pietie and learning as I could hardly preferre one before the other And a little after For the publick congregation for the most part it is expedient to keep a constant form both of matter and also of words and yet without servile tying of our selves to words and syllables If the judgement of reformed churches abroad or of the godly faithfull learned and reverend at home be of any weight they are so farre from complaining of a stinted form as burdensome that in many cases they judge it expedient A set form of prayer and administration of the sacraments not onely devised by the minister himself but agreed upon by the churches is approved by generall consent Is there any reformed church established which hath not their book of common prayer The ministers at home to whom the use of common prayer hath been thought most burdensome have from time to time professed their liking and approbation of a stinted Liturgy That they like well enough of
formula deflectere non liceat Object 3. Johnson p. 14. Greenw pag. 14 15. Copy of a Letter pag. 8 9 17. Robinson Against Bern. pag. 473. Answ Object 4. Answ Object 5. Answ 6. Argum. See Paul Burgens in Psal 112. Joseph Scalig. De emendat tempor l. 6. Beze Annot. maâ—or in Matth. 26. â—0 Drus Praeterit lib. 1. in Matth. 26. 30. Answ Annot in Exod. 12. v. 8. Muscul in Psal 95. Apparet hunc psalmum ecclesiasticae congregationi praesertim frequentiori destinatum qualis erat apud Judaeos die Sabbaâ— Moller in Psalm 95. 1. Apparet autem ex verbo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 psalmum hunc non in privatum usum scriptum sed sacris couventibus destinatum fuisse quando populus frequens ad templum conveniebat Fulc in 1. Cor. 14. §. 12. It is not certain whether they had any set form of Liturgieâ— and if they had any the same ought to have been in one tongue ordinarily Fulc 1. Cor. 11. §. 10. Petrus Diaconus and the rest that were sent from the East to Rome in their book to Fulgentius and other Bishops of Africk cap 8. do rehearse a prayer of Basils Liturgie which they say almost the whole â—ast frequented These words LIFT UP YOUR HEARTS and WE LIFT THEM UP UNTO THE LORD were anciently in use if not from the age of the apostles Clem. lib. 8. Constitut apost cap. 16. Object 1. Copy of a Letter p. 5 12. Answ Deut. 31. 9 10 11. Act. 15. 21. Psal 74. 8. Synagogas id est domoâ— conventuum sacrorum ubi legebatur lex Pisc scholas synagogas quae passim in uâ—bibus erant constitutae Moll Herisbach Object 2. Answ Object 3. Answ Object 4. Copie of a Letter pag. 21. Shall I in your heat be pressed with the multitude of churches Greenwood pag. 17. then heare what the Lord saith Thou shalt not follow a multitude c. Answ Acts 15. 22 28. 1. Cor. 11. 16. 14. 33. Object 5. Copy of a Letter ibid. Robinson Against Bern. pag. 474. Answ At the first preaching and publishing of the Gospel certain barbarous nations received the faith of Christ had neither books nor letters Iren. lib. 3. Advers â—aer cap. 4 Jewel Against Hard. art 15. div 4. Arias Montan in Isa 28. 20. Quae oratio ut clariùs exponatur observationem postulat consuetudinis Judaeorum qui breves artes sive catechismos conscribere consuevere quibus tota Legis summa in sexcenta sex praecepta breviter divisa continebatur Quorum libellorum exempla adhuc exstant Erat ut videre etiam atque expetiri licebit in libellis istis verbum frequens Tsau quod non ratò apud Mosen invenitur Hoc voluit Esa populum illum in nudis brevibus atque jejunis elementis rudimentis haerentem c. The Prophets and the Apostles are not found to prescribe set words for the minister to teach or the people to answer being examined Ainsworth pag. 238. See Calvin Opusc Praefat. Catechism Object 6. See Robinson pag. 476. Answ Copy of a Letter pag. 18. Mr Greenwood perceiving the weaknesse of this objection frameth it thus No Apocrypha must be brought into the publick assemblies for there onely Gods word lively voice of his own graces must be heard Greenwood pag. 10. But this limitation is groundlesse propounded without warrant of â—â—ripture and may be rejected as 〈…〉 devise For the phrase of speech in 〈◊〉 prayer professions of faith 〈◊〉 of psalmes is of man as well as in stinted prayers devised by others and 〈…〉 may not be heard in the congregation neither may the other be uttered or 〈…〉 most certain it is that neither the one nor the other is to be received as the undoubted rule of faith or manners Concil Laodic can 59. Concil Carthag 3. can 47. Concil Hippon can 38. See Jewel Def. Apol part 5. cap. 3. div 10. Coâ—cil Laodicen can 15 16 59. Concil Carthag 3. can 23. Jewel art 3. dit 2. Object 7. Robinson Against Bern. pag. 475. Answ Object 8. Rovins ibid. Answ Chrysost hom 3. in 2. ad Thess Quandâ— enim qui lectutus est surgens dicit Haec DICIT DOMINUS diaconus 〈◊〉 omnes indicto silentio compescit Chrys hom 3. in Epist ad Ephel Jewel Def. art 3. divis 16. Chrys in Act. hom 19. Stat minister communis minister altâ voce clamar Post illam vocem incipit lector prophetiam Esaiae Isidor Hispalens l. 1. De eccles offic c. 10. l. 2. c â— St. Egèrton Practic of Christ Certain advertisements touching prayer c. Synops turior Theolog. disp 3â— thes 33. Quaeri hîc soler utrùm conceptis precationum formulis publicè aut privatim uti liceat Nos si modò cum debita animi attentione pronuncientur non tantùm licitas sed valde utiles esse contendm us quia novas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 concipere cuivis Christiano datum non est attentio auditorum in magnis conventibus per usitatas formulas non parùm juvatur c. Imò Christus ipse in cruce pendens deprecationis formâ a Davide tanquam typo antea observatâ usus est Matth. 27. 46. Raine in 2. Tim. c. 1. vers 13. It is good to have a set form of doctrine God gave this summe to Adam The seed of the woman c. The ten commandments the propheticall sermons abbridged Heb. 6. 1. They had the principles of the doctrine of Christ And when religion was restored new forms institutions catechismes were appointed in the church Concil Laodit can 59. Concil Carthagin 3. can 23. Concil Milâ—vitan can 12. African can 70. See Regers 7. Treatis 3. treat chap. 4. See Zepper De polit eccles lib. 2. cap. 4. Calvin Opusc Precum ecclesiâ—st formula Beza in Cantic Hom. 1. Copy of a Letter pag. 4. Argum. Object 1. Johnson ubi supra pag. 35. Answ Object 2. Johnson ubi suprà Robinson Against Bern. pag. 425 473. Greenwood Answ to Gifford pag. 2. Answ 2 Argum. See Paulus Fagiâ—â— in Chald. Paraphr Lev. 16. Idemin Chald. Paraphr Deut. 8. Fr. Jun. Annot. in Act. 13. 15. Luke 4. 16 31. 13. 10. Mark 1. 21 23. Object 1. Answ See Gerhard Harm in Matth. 26. cap. 1. Object 2. Answ The word in scripture signifieth I. in a large 〈◊〉 to separate or set apart to some use lawfull but naturall or civill 1. Tim. 4. 5. 1. Cor. 7. 14. Isa 13. 3. II. To prepare appoint proclaim Exod. 19. 10. Sept. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Targ. praepara Jer. 12. 〈…〉 51. 27. 2. Reg. 10. 20. Sept. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joel 1. 14. Jer. 6. 4. Sept. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 John 10. 36. III. To set apart to an holy use as God is said to sanctifie persons things and times by his institution and appointment Jer. 1. 5. Gal. 1. 15. Gen. 1. 3. and that either to sanctifie but not to
because it was culled and picked out of the popish dunghill the popish and vile masse-masse-book full of all abominations Who knoweth not that many pretious truths may be culled and picked out of the masse-book Good gold may have some drosse and amongst an heap of drosse it is possible to find some good gold A true mans goods may be found in a thieves den or cave and the goods of the church in the possession of Antichrist Antichrist hath either by violence broken in upon or by secret insinuation before his cunning was spied gotten the rich treasures of the church into his hand which the right heirs may lawfully require and take back again not as borrowed from him but as due to them I scarce know how a man should more honour Antichrist or wrong the true church of God then to grant that all the good things that Antichrist doth usurp do of right belong unto him and are borrowed from him For they are the rich legacies which Christ hath bequeathed unto his church to whom properly they pertein The matter then of our stinted form may be from God and proper to the church though picked and culled out of the Masse-book If therefore our stinted Liturgie be Antichristian it is so either in respect of the matter or of the form Not of the matter for that which properly belonged to Antichrist the soul and grosse errours are purged out Not of the form for order and phrase of speech is not properly Antichristian of which more hereafter The Papists cannot sincerely approve our publick service but they must condemn and detest their own their prayers in an unknown tongue their praying to saints departed much more to feigned saints their receiving in one kind their unbloudy sacrifice their reall presence their satisfaction for veniall sinnes and temporall punishment of mortall sinnes their blotting out of the second commandment or at least confounding it with the first with others the like And if for the first eleven yeares of Qu. Elisabeth the Papists came to our churches and service what can we think but that the hand of the Lord was with us at that time for good when without division we sought him and he was pleased so to honour us that our adversaries should at least feignedly submit themselves The Lord grant all estates and conditions wisely to consider the true cause why they are fallen from our assemblies since that time and hardned in their perversenesse every day more and more But to come to the thing it self objected to wit That our book of common prayer is wholly taken out of the Masse-book we are here to note that the Masse in former times did signifie the worship of God which consisted in publick prayers thanksgivings confession of faith singing of psalmes reading and interpretation of the holy scriptures and receiving the sacrament of the Lords supper and so the ancient Masse and Liturgie were the same But now the Romane Masse is put for the unbloudy sacrifice of the body of Christ which the priest doth offer up for the quick and dead And in this sense the word is to be taken when they say our service-book is taken out of the Masse-book But it should rather be said that the Masse was in time added to our communion-book and by the purging out of the Masse it is restored to its former puritie Popery is as a scab or leprosie that cleaveth to the church and the Masse an abomination annexed to the Liturgie Before ever the Masse was heard of in the world or began to be hatched there were stinted Liturgies in the church for substance much-what the same with ours and these at first more pure after stained with more corruption as the times grew worse and worse The Eastern churches as it should seem had their stinted Liturgies first and the Western borrowed many things from them but as the times declined they brought in more and more drosse into the church untill the canon of the Masse was completely framed The ancient Liturgies attributed to James Basil Chrysostom c. are counterfeit as our Divines have largely proved and the Papists cannot deny But divers things conteined in those Liturgies were in use in the primitive church without question In the primitive times they had their appointed lessons out of the Law and the Prophets and the Psalmes and the Evangelists their stinted prayers and forms of celebration with some variety but in substance all one in a manner This is evident if we compare the genuine writings of the Fathers with those counterfeit Liturgies before mentioned whereof some particular instances are given in the chapter following The stinted forms at first were more brief afterwards they were enlarged and as often it falleth out by enlargement corrupted and defiled Corruption by this means as a disease cleaving to the Liturgie it is necessary it should be corrected and thereby recovered to its first integrity or foundnesse Thus Cardinal Quignonius by the commandment of Clement the seventh so changed the Romane Breviarie that for a great part it was more like the English book of prayers than the Romane Breviarie And the English Liturgie gathered according to the module of the Ancients the purest of them is not a collection out of the Masse-book but a refining of that Liturgie which heretofore had been stained with the Masse And if those things were unjustly added to the Liturgie they might be and were justly cast out If it was wholly taken out of the Masse-book I should desire further to know how the Masse-book came to have those things in which are found in the book of Common prayers sound and holy for matter and directly contrary to Antichristianisme If these things were in the book before then all things therein were not of Antichrist but he had usurped them and it is lawfull for the true man to lay claim to his goods whereever he find them If they were not in the Masse-book then all things are not taken out of it but somethings restored out of purer Antiquity which the man of sinne had wickedly expunged The ministers of Lincoln never judged the use of the Book unlawfull never thought it lawfull to separate from the prayers of the congregation never refused to use the book though in some things they desired to be excused The churches of God have been evermore taught to prize and esteem these main and fundamentall truths and ordinances of worship at an higher rate then that some petty dislike of this or that in the externall form when the matter is sound and good should cause Separation The conclusion in brief is That our Service-book is not a translation of the Masse but a restitution of the ancient Liturgie wherein sundry prayers are inserted used by the Fathers agreeable to the scriptures Causelesse separation from the externall communion with any true church of Christ is the sinne of schisme But to separate from the prayers of the