Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	old_a	scripture_n	write_v	3,081	5	5.9465	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A69197	The white wolfe, or, A sermon preached at Pauls Crosse, Feb. 11 being the last Sonday in Hillarie tearme, anno 1627, and printed somewhat more largely then the time would permit at that present to deliuer wherein faction is vnmasked, and iustly taxed without malice, for the safetie of weake Christians : especially, the Hetheringtonian faction growne very impudent in this citie of late yeeres, is here confuted / by Stephen Denison...	Denison, Stephen, d. 1649 or 50.	1627 (1627)	STC 6607.5; ESTC S109591	56,251	87

his Proselytes know tutissimum esse that it is the safest course as Saint e Lib. 2. de doct Christian c. 8. Augustine saith to receiue onely for Canonicall Scripture such bookes as all Catholike Churches receiue And indeede it concernes authority to take this to heart for if it were at euery priuate mans choice what bookes he would receiue to bee Canonicall what would become of the true Christian Faith or what swarmes of errors and corruption of faith would not immediately inuade the Church as wee see in Popery whilst they haue receiued pretended Apostolicall Traditions intruded into the Canon diuers Apocryphall bookes and entertained the n Bellar. lib. 3. de eccles c. 14. sentences of the Pope and the Court of Rome as inertant truth and haue o Trident concil 1. decret Sess 4. equalized traditions to the Canonicall Scripture what is become of the Orthodoxe faith amongst them It is either farre to seeke or else miserably corrupted And the Reasons to proue the bookes of Esdras not to be Canonicall Scripture against this Sectary are these following First because they were written at the first not in Hebrew as the bookes of the Old Testament were but in Latine and c In prolog Galeat ad Paulinum Saint Hierome is very confident in this that whatsoeuer Books of the old Testament were not written in Hebrew c Vide etiam praesat in lib. regum Tom. 3. they are not canonicall Secondly because the Church in former times hath not receiued them for canonicall receiuing onely the 22 books of the Old Testament as they were antiently diuided and what these 22 bookes were may bee gathered out of c Lib. 3. eccles hist cap. 10. Eusebius and g Lib. 1. contra Appion gramat Iosephus but especially out of Hierom who doth more cleerely reiect the Apocryphall bookes in the forenamed place then some other of the Fathers doe I will not insist vpon further testimonies out of n Lib. de mensur p●nd Epiphanius out of o In Synopsi Athanasius out of p Catech. 4. Cyrill Bishop of Hierusalem out of q Lib 4 Orthod fid c. 18. Damascene and others because I hasten to a conclusion I know we are not any further bound to agree to former Churches in iudgement then so farre as they agreed to the truth especially in matters of Faith but yet to depart from the ancient Churches in that wherein they are sound and Orthodoxe is horrible presumption and be wrayeth very much pride Thirdly a learned man of our Church saith of all other Apocryphall bookes the bookes of Esdras are worthy of the least credit being stuffed full of vaine fables r Dr Willet in his Synopsis fitter to feede curious eares then tending to edification Fourthly those bookes are not to bee esteemed Canonicall in the which there be errors but in the bookes of Esdras there be errors Ergo. That there be errors in the third Books of Esdras I referre the learned to the annotacions of Iunius vpon it and that there be errors in the fourth Booke I might easily proue by instance For first in the fourth Chapter the Author saith that soules are kept in the wombe of the earth In the sixth Chapter there is a tayle of two great fishes Henoch and Leuiathan which no waters could hold In the fourteenth Chapter hee reporteth that the Bookes of Scripture being lost in the Captiuity were restored by him and how hee had drunke of a cup of water as fier in colour giuen by an Angell and so spake 40 daies together and ceased not in the which space fiue Scribes wrote from his mouth 204 Bookes these and such like tales that Booke is full of as our Learned Country man speaketh whom I quoated before I doe not denie but in these bookes of Esdras there may be many truths especially the three last Chapters of the third booke which are almost a meere transcript out of the canonicall Esra and Nehemiah but yet I must say of them as Saint c Lib. 15. de ciuit c. 23. Augustine saith of them and of all the rest of the Apocrypha in his autem Apocryphis etsi inuenitur aliqua veritas tamē propter multa falsa nulla est canonica authoritas in these Apocryphall bookes although there be found some truth yet in respect of many false things found in them they haue no canonicall authority And thus I haue done with the second thing propounded namely the Consutation An exhortation to Christian people remaining sound in the Faith HAuing dispatched the two former branches concerning Discouery and Confutation come wee now to the third which concernes matter of Exhortation and to beginne with Exhortation to the Christian brethren which still by the mercy of God remaine sound in the Faith Good people you haue heard in all the foregoing discourse of false teachers and also how many such at these dayes remaine amongst vs seducing many in their priuate conuenticles giue me leaue in the next place by way of introduction to shew you the reasons wherefore the Lord suffereth such in his Church and then to propound some preseruatiues against seduction which may serue for matter of Exhortation For the first of these The Lord suffereth Seducers in his Church with long patience and doth not presently roote them out for diuers reasons First that the goodnesse of truth might the more appeare who could know the benefit of light vnlesse sometimes we were sensible of the darkenesse of the night as c Quis sciret bonam esse lucem nisi noctis tenebras sentiremus hom 9. in c. 16. 17. numer Saint Origen saith euen so who canne know the benefit of health but by the smart of sicknesse or the benefit of liberty but by restraint or imprisonment Secondly that the word might bee the more deepely sought into The mystery of the Trinity had neuer beene so exactly handled by many of the Fathers in c De Triait whole Tractates had not diuers damnable Heretickes sprung vp to oppose the same wherein the Lord shewed his singular wisedome as hee did also in the first Creation bringing light out of darknesse truth out of error good out of euill contraries out of contraries Thirdly to trie the Gouernors of the Church whether like vnto the Church of Pergamus Magistratus indicat virum they will tolerate such as hold the doctrine of Balaam Reu. 2. 12. or with the Church of Thyatyra suffer the woman Iesabel that calleth her selfe a prophetesse to teach and to seduce Gods seruants Reu. 2. 20. Fourthly he doth it for the punishment of such as haue itching eares and vnconstant mindes which are neuer satisfied with any true teachers especiall in publique but haue a lusting after the onyons and garlike of priuate errors preferring any thing done in a priuate Conuenticle though it be neuer so vnwholesome before that which is done in the publike Congregation Nolunt doctores probos

first Discouery of Iohn Hetherington which is by the oathes is honest Witnesses This man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being metamorphosed or changed from a man to a Woolfe as c Lib. 8. de repub Plato speakes of a Tyrant was discouered to the forenamed Honourable Court and testified against vpon the oathes not of Knights of the Post but of many honest conscionable men against whose persons or sayings Hetherington himselfe the party defendant did propound no manner of exceptions notwithstanding hee had sufficient time allowed him by the Court nor euer so much as offered to except against them in any Legall course by the testimonies of these vntainted Witnesses which were not a few and whereof two were Ministers of good note it appeared and was proued First that the said Hetherington hauing beene by trade a Boxe-maker cast off his trade and betooke himselfe to be an interpreter of the Scripture to many persons not of his owne Family keeping priuate Conuenticles by the Lawes of this Realme prohibited in the which Conuenticles hee tooke vpon him to bee the chiefe speaker and instructor in points of doctrine and matters of Faith giuing many interpretations contrary to the receiued Tenets taught and held in the Church of England Secondly that he hath maintained and published that the Church of England is no true Church of Christ that it teacheth false doctrine hauing vsed also many reproachfull speeches to and of the Reuerend Ministers of our Church whereby hee hath withdrawne many from the Church of England to his owne Faction Thirdly that he is a man disaffected to the gouernement and discipline of the Church of England now by law established and agreeth in opinion with the Sect of the Familists and other Sectaries holding with the Familists the perfect purity of the soule Fourthly that since the twentieth of December 1623. hee hath maintained and published that the Sabbath since the Apostles time was of no force and that euery day is a Sabbath as much as that which we call the Lords day or Sonday Fifthly that he holdeth and maintaineth that the books of Esdras are part of the Canonicall Scripture and that they ought so to be esteemed For the which his erroneous opinions and Schismaticall carriage tending to the disturbance of the peace of the Church and to the seducing of many sillie soules the Court adiudged him to be a dangerous Sectary and one that was well worthy to bee restrained and punished and amongst the rest of the punishments laid vpon him this was one that hee should publikely recant his errors at Pauls Crosse wherein the sentence of that Honourable Court is like to the censure of the Church vpon Schismatickes in the daies of Athanasius in the which time as appeares by c Epist Athanas ad Antioch one of his Epistles if any did fall or reuolt from the Church to Arianisme and afterwards repenting himselfe of his reuolt desired to be reconciled to the Church againe amongst the rest of his punishments enioyned him by the Church for his Apostacle this was one that hee should publikely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 renounce or make a Recantation of his Arian heresie For this worthy Sentence all Gods seruants in this City haue great cause to glorifie God yea I hope also his Maiesty will take speciall notice of it for the encouragement of his worthy Commissioners in wel-doing The second Discouerie of Iohn Hetherington which is by his Bookes Come we now to the second Discouerie Hetheringtons Bookes put amongst the Discoueries because they are vnworthy of confutation which is by his Bookes The said Hetherington and his Factious company haue certaine Bookes wherewith they doe vsually seduce and withdraw men and women from the Church of England and these seducing Bookes are of two sorts either such as were made by Hetherington himselfe for it is true which Horace saith scribimus indocti doctique poemata passim Hodiè quidam omnium bonarū literarum prorsus rudes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pauculis sophismatibus vt malè deguflata Aristoletis philosophia freti pedibus ac manibus illotis irruant in theolagia professionem Erasmus de vita Hieronymi ignorant idiots in our daies will bee writing Bookes as well as the Learned or such as were made by his predecessor T. L. who was as it seemes the ringleader of this factious company before Hetherington for let vs take notice of this for certainety that when any Sectmaster dies or leaueth a place either amongst Anabaptists or Familists another ordinarily succeeds him in the ministration to vphold the faction The first Booke written by Hetherington himselfe is that against one Smith an Anabaptist wherein vnder a colour of writing against Anabaptists he broacheth but very cunningly his owne familisticall errors In this Booke against Smith printed in the yeere 1610. he cunningly coucheth many dangerous errors to name but some of them for breuity sake At page 1. he acknowledgeth no other Church but that which consists of liuing stones meaning by his Church of liuing stones his owne factious Company as all Schismatickes vnderstand none but themselues whensoeuer they speake of the true Church of Christ Secondly vnto this fansied Church he appropriateth the power of the keyes page 2. 65. falsly interpreting that in Mat. 18. 17. tell the Church that is saith he at page 74. tell it to those little ones borne of God whereas it is meant that we should tell the Gouernours of the Church which are in place and authority wether they bee regenerate or vnregenerate Thirdly at page 7. 8. he arrogateth to his Church the knowledge of infallibility in iudging concerning the members of the same Fourthly at page 81. 82. hee saith that Caesar may command a place in publike so he doe forbid none in priuate wherein hee speaketh cunningly for the liberty of Conuenticles as I thinke any which know him will easily discerne Fifthly at page 86. he saith the Pope hath his power from God and that he must be obeyed wherein hee discouereth his notorious Hypocrisie as being ready if occasion were offered to submit outwardly to Antichrist himselfe Sixthly at page 88. 89. c For mine owne part I will not be peremptory in the interpreting of his meaning but let wise men reade the words and giue sentēce hee seemes cunningly to teach his Proselytes not to scruple at outward circumcision if occasion be offered nor at sitting in the Idols Temple hee would say possibly if hee durst at going to the Masse abusing that in 2 Kings 5. 19. where the Prophet bids Naaman the Syrian goe in peace as though hee had bid him goe in peace to the house of Rimmon whereby it may appeare what this man and his Proselytes would doe if Circumcision were vrged vpon them by the Turke or going to the Masse by the Pope and indeed some of his Proselytes haue beene obserued to say that if hee were at Rome hee would ioyne with them there assoone as with

vs heere many other pernitious errors are couched in this Booke against Smith by cunning intimations which none shall ordinarily vnderstand though they reade the Booke but onely his seduced Proselytes which are secretly acquainted with his mystery it is obserued by c In prompt con 2. c. 8. dux peripateticorum se ea lege sua naturalia instituta tradidisse dixit vt nemo intelligeret nisi ipso qui tradidit inter pretante Franciscus Venetus a very learned Writer concerning Aristotle that he wrote his naturall Philosophy with that art that none should vnderstand the precepts thereof saue onely they which were his Schollers and vnto whom hee himselfe would vouchsafe to interpret them Iohn Hetherington is like Aristotle in this respect not for learning but for cunning none shall fully vnderstand all his errors but such idiots as are his Proselytes The second Booke written by Hetherington as he himselfe saith is that which was set forth in the name of one Edmund Iesop called the discouery of the errors of the Anabaptists Wherein by the way Iesop deserues no small rebuke for whereas at that time he made a shew of turning from the Anabaptists to the Church of England hee turned not to vs but to Hetheringtons faction and conspired with him about the making of this erroneous Booke howbeit by his hypocriticall seeming to turne he reaped no small gaine to himselfe as it is well knowne But to let him passe and to come to the errors of the Booke In this Booke at page 3. he confoundeth Reprobation and Damnation making the foresight of mans folly and wickednesse to be the cause why God preordaines any to condemnation Secondly at page 18. hee affirmeth that the Gospell hath bin declared to the Gentiles in former times and is declared at this present in diuers parts of the world onely by the workes of creation wherein he teacheth cunningly that pernicious point c Nota est Historia expresly maintained by him and his followers in their priuate Conuenticles viz. that a man may be saued without Christ reuealed in the word by the meere contemplation of the creatures abusing that in Rom. 10. 18. which speakes of such a preaching by the creatures which leaues men without excuse not which is sufficient to saluation Thirdly at Page 48. hee cunningly coucheth a point which is maintained by him and his factious company to wit that the soule of man comes ex traduce that is that it is traduced from Adam as well as the body and that it is not immediately infused of God into this or that particular body Fourthly at Page 61 he speaketh dishonorably of Baptisme for hee saith What can men haue lesse then Baptisme which can giue to no man more then an outward name of a Christian as Circumcision did the outward name of a Iew it doth neither conferre nor confirme grace to the heart of any no more then Circumcision did And in his former Booke at pag. 13. hee speaketh contemptuously of Baptisme tearming it elementish baptisme And indeede it is apparant to them which know and are acquainted with his opinions that hee holds no other Baptisme to be of any vertue but that which he cals the Baptizing in a thousand teares in his former Booke at page 14. allegorizing the Sacrament as the rest of the familists doe And herein appeares the hypocrisie of this faction they will submit to vse our Sacraments and to come to our Churches and yet haue them in plaine contempt Fiftly whereas at page 89. he condemnes the Familists of H. N. his order as the most blasphemous and erroneous Sect this day in the world I answer all this he may doe and yet remaine a notorious Familist himselfe of another order for as it is amongst the Anabaptists so it is also amongst the Familists there be diuers orders of them and they doe mutually hate and oppose one another The Familists of the Castalion order despise them of Caps his order accounting them simple men and they of Caps his order fauour not them of Hetheringtons order and they of Hertheringtons order gnash their teeth against all but their owne faction Sixty at pag. 101. he deliuers a strange paradox viz. that Sathan himselfe with all his Angels and spirits of wickednesse by force of their torments shall be compelled with all powers people and kings whatsoeuer to confesse bow before Christ to serue and obey him to praise and magnifie him his Iustice and Mercy for euer abusing that place in Philip. 2. 10 11. which proues not that euer hell shall be made a Chappell to praise God in Thus foolish and ignorant men will take vpon them to be teachers of Diuinitie being vnseene in the very grounds thereof much like to presumptuous Quacksaluers Verum penitus absurdum est vt discipulus ad magistrum vadens antè sit artisex quam doceatur Hier. aduers Luciferian which take vpon them to be great Chirurgians and Physicians being vngrounded in the art of Surgerie and Physicke and so instead of curing men doe indeede kill them There be moreouer other Books whereby this Sect doe seduce written by T. L. Hetheringtons predecessor to wit First the Epistle to the Church of Rome Secondly the tree of regeneration Thirdly an Exposition vpon the 11 12 13. Chapters of the Reuelation Fourthly the Key of Dauid and some other Concerning the Epistle pretended to be written to the Church of Rome It is said in the Preface of it that this Booke deserueth as well to be regarded as the best newes that euer thou hast heard now the best newes that euer we haue heard as we know is the Gospell and I appeale to the consciences of this factious company whether they haue not in contempt all writings since the Apostles time in comparison of T. L. his writings yea whether they doe not equalize them to the very Scripture it selfe accounting T. L. a great Prophet In this Booke of his at page 16. the Author solemnly protesteth that hee knew not any one after the flesh that taketh part with him wherein hee sheweth himselfe a notorious factionist in thinking himselfe alone in the dayes of the libertie of the Gospell Secondly although this railing Epistle be pretended onely to be written to the Church of Rome yet it is intended also against our Church as it doth manifestly appeare by his girding at Hussites Lutherans Caluinists Euangelists Protestants and Precisians at pag. 108. and by his girding at false reformed Prophets at page 69. wherein hee cunningly inueigheth against all reformed Churches whom he tearmeth in the tree of regeneration at pag. 20. foolish and irreformed c Hetherington and his company are well knowne to despise all Churches in the world reformed and vnreformed and to acknowledge no other cōuerted Church but their owne faction reformers Thirdly in this Epistle to the Church of Rome at pag. 113. The Author saith when hee wrote this Epistle that he was in Babylon and yet he