Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	old_a	prophet_n	testament_n	5,085	5	8.1969	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B09229	The apocalyps unveyl'd, or, A paraphrase on the Revelation of the holy apostle and evangelist John the Devine in which the syncronisms of Mr. Joseph Mede, and the expositions of other interpreters are called in question, and a new exposition given of the prophecies of the Revelation, never before extant in any author, from the 6th chapter to the 18th, with variety of reasons for the exposition / by An Orthodox Divine.	Hayter, Richard, 1611?-1684.; Mede, Joseph, 1586-1638. Clavis apocalyptica.	1676 (1676)	Wing H1224; ESTC R202384	176,063	254

Thunders had uttered their voices I was about to write what the seven Thunders had spoken for they spake things remarkable but I heard a voice from Heaven saying unto me Conceal the things which the seven Thunders have spoken and write them not for they are too terrible to be revealed 5. And the Angel whom I saw standing with his right foot upon the Sea and with his left foot upon the dry Land lifted up his hand to Heaven as a token that he meant to swear 6. And he sware by the true and ever-living God who made the Heaven with the things which are therein and the earth with the things which are therein and the Sea with the things which are therein that the mystery of God should be delayed no longer 7. But in the days of the voice of the seventh Angel when he shall sound his Trumpet Rom. 11.25 Esa 11.11 12. Esa 14.1 2 3. Esa 27.12 13. Jer. 23.7 8. Jer. 31.27 28. Jer. 32.37 38. Jer. 46.27 28. Eze. 37.16 17. Hos 3.4 5. Joel 3.1 Amos 9.11.14 15. Zach. 8.20 21 22. which after these things now in hand will shortly be the calling conversion and restoring of the Iewish Nation shall be put in execution and not be laid aside until it be brought to full perfection As soon as that Angel shall begin to sound their calling and conversion shall be brought to pass and before that Angel ends the restauration of their Kingdom shall be finished and this joyful news is no new invention but God hath told it his Servants the Prophets in the old Testament long ago 8. And the voice which I heard from Heaven before bidding me seal up the things which the seven Thunders had spoken and write them not spake to me again the second time and said unto me Go take the little Book or Schedule which is wide open in the hand of the Angel which standeth with his right foot upon the Sea and with his left upon the dry Land 9. So I went unto the Angel as the voice commanded me and I said unto him Give me the little Book or Schedule which is wide open in thy right hand and he said unto me Take and eat it and when thou hast so done it shall make thy belly bitter but in thy mouth it shall be sweet as Hony 10. So I took the little Book or Schedule out of the Angels hand and eat it up before him and it was as the Angel said in my mouth as sweet as Hony but when I had eaten it my belly was bitter 11. And he told me the meaning of it and he said unto me Thou must Prophecy again before the sixth Trumpet endeth and thou must tell what shall befal the People of the Iews and what shall befal the Gentiles and their Kings before the seventh Trumpet soundeth and the mystery of God which I told thee of take effect And the first things that thou must Prophecy of will be very sweet and pleasant as Hony to thy mouth but the second will be very bitter as Gall unto thy stomach Disputation VI. 1 Quest Whether the little Book had any Prophecy written in it Answ 1. It is not said in the Text that it had any Prophecy written in it and therefore they which say it had do it upon no ground at all 2. It was wide open and not shut nor sealed therefore there was not any secret thing therein 3. It was but one Schedule or piece of Parchment and that a little one too and therefore too little to contain all the Prophecies from the eighth verse of the tenth Chapter to the end of the Revelation 4. It was far less than the other Book which had seven rolls and seven seals to them But if all the Prophecies from the eighth verse of the tenth Chapter to the end of the Revelation should be comprised in it it would be far bigger than the other Book which had seven rolls and seals to them 5. The other Book which had the seals is commended for its Prophecies Rev. 5.2 3 4 5. But this Book is no where commended for any Prophecy it had 6. The Prophecies in the following Chapters be of higher note and far more excellent and of more concernment than the Prophecies in the former Chapters be and therefore they belong not to this little Book which is no where commended for its Prophecies but to the other Book with seven seals which hath so high a commendation as not any Book the like Rev. 5.3 4 5. 7. There should be by this reckoning two Prophetical Books of the Revelation and the seventh verse of the tenth Chapter should be the last verse of the first Book and the eighth verse of the tenth Chapter should be the first verse of the seeond Book but St. John makes but one Book of all the Revelation and he writes it all in one Volume without division and calls it a Revelation in the singular number and not two Revelations in the plural number Rev. 1.1 8. By this reckoning the Prophecies of the other Book with seven seals should be mingled with the Prophecies of the little Book without seals for they say that all the Prophecies in the Revelation from the eighth verse of the tenth Chapter to the end of the Revelation belong unto the little Book Now if you look into the eleventh Chapter you shall there find the ending of the sixth Trumpet v. 14. and after that the seventh Trumpet or some part thereof from the fifteenth verse to the end of the Chapter both which belong unto the other Book with seven seals and namely to the seventh seal thereof Rev. 8.2 and after this come in the Prophecies as they say of the little Book again What a mingle mangle have we here of those two Books one in another Surely as St. John eat up the little Book so they make the little Book swallow the Prophecies of the other Book into his Belly 9. The sixth Trumpet doth not end with the seventh verse of the tenth Chapter but goes onward to the fourteenth verse of the eleventh Chapter and there ends and not before so that all that Prophecy in the eleventh Chapter to the fourteenth verse doth belong unto the other look with seven seals and the seventh Trumpet doth not end with the eleventh Chapter for if it did a close would have been put unto it at the end of that Chapter to distinguish it from the Prophecies that follow but there being no period put unto it there as there is to the former Trumpets where they end it is an Argument sufficient that it doth not end there but is to be extended farther even to the twelfth Chapter and to all the Chapters following inclusively until a Period be put unto it which is no where to be found so that the seventh Trumpet hath no end at all nor any close put unto it as the fifth and sixth Trumpets have Rev. 9.12 Rev. 11.14 and seeing the seventh Trumpet

was the First year of Nero's Reign See Bishop Vshers Annal. pag. 668. 670. 671. from whom we may learn that Ephesus was not converted until the Reign of Nero. 10. Suppose it were true that these Churches were converted in the dayes of Claudius yet they could not be converted any long time before his Death and that because he Reigned but thirteeen years and nine moneths in all and either all or the greatest part of that time was spent in converting other Churches as you may read Act. 15 16 17 and 18. Chapters so that they could not be converted any long time before his death yea in his time it was that Paul and Timothy were forbidden to Preach in Asia Act. 16.6 But now the Gospel had been Preached unto them a long time before this Book was written and they were not new converts but old ones and of long standing in the Christian Faith when this Book was written to them as these Texts of Scripture sufficiently declare Rev. 2.2 3 4 5.9.13.19.21 11. If this Book had been written in the ninth year of Claudius Paul would not have gone to Ephesus to Preach the Gospel there at the latter end of his Reign for Paul did not Preach the Gospel where it had been Preached before by others as he himself confesseth Rom. 15.20 21. 2 Cor. 10.13 14 15 16. Now we find that Paul went to Preach the Gospel at Ephesus before it was converted Act. 18.19 and this was at the latter end of Claudius's Reign for his going thither was as Dr. Hammond in his Preface before the Epistle to the Ephesians saith about the one and fiftieth year of Christ and that was at the latter end of Claudius's Reign and therefore this Book was not written then but at some time or other afterward 12. Why was this Book revealed unto John and not rather unto Paul for Paul was the Apostle of the Gentiles and John of the circumcision Gal. 2.9 and Paul had the honour to convert the Gentiles to the Christian Faith not John as you may read in the Acts of the Apostles c. 18.19 and 20. and therefore it is likely that if this Prophecy had been revealed in the days of Paul that it should have been revealed unto him and that Paul should have been the pen-man of it and not John which we know is otherwise and therefore the true cause why this Prophecy was revealed unto John and not to Paul was because Paul was dead and the other Apostles were dead when this Prophecy was revealed and onely John was then alive whom it could be revealed unto 13. This Book was one of the last Books of Scripture that was written if not the last of all as the words Rev. 22.18 do imply but if this Book were written in the ninth year of Claudius the Epistle to the Ephesians and all other of Pauls Epistles had been written after this yea the Gospel of St. Luke the Acts of the Apostles and all other Books of the new Testament except the Gospel by St. Mathew had been written after this and this Book should not have been one of the last much less the last of all but one of the first Books of the new Testament that was written Ob. What Irenaeus affirms concerning John's Vision at the end of Domitian is not of all but particularly of that Vision of the number of the Beast c. 13.18 Thus will Eusebius's words be understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. If the name of Antichrist ought to be Proclaimed openly now it would have been declared by him that saw the Revelation for it was not seen any long time ago Where 't is clear that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was seen may belong to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the name of the Beast as before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 declared did And that it not only may but must be so understood appears by the Latine of Irenaeus which only is extant which reads it thus Antichristi nomen per ipsum utique editum fuisset qui Apocalypsin viderat neque enim ante multum temporis visum est sed pene sub nostro seculo ad finem Domitiani imperii The name of Antichrist would have been published by him who saw the Apocalypse for it was not seen any long time since but almost under our age at the end of Domitians Empire Where the word visum in the Neuter seen not visa in the Feminine belongs apparently to the name not to the Apocalypse Ans 1. John saw the Prophecies of the Revelation all together at one time and not at several distant times as shall be proved in the next question and therefore for any man to think that he had the vision of the name of the Beast by it self alone at the end of Domitians Reign and of the rest of the Apocalypse at some other time before is but a meer fancy at the best 2. Irenaeus counted the name of the Beast not worthy to be divulged at large by the Holy Ghost and therefore it is far from his meaning that it was seen by itself alone from the rest of the Apocalypse 3. Irenaeus doth not say nomen viderat that John saw the name of the Beast but Apocalypsin viderat that be saw the Apocalypse and this was seen not any long time ago but almost in our time at the end of Domitians Reign 4. Eusebius brings the Testimony of Irenaeus to prove that John was banished into Patmos at the end of Domittans Reign and therefore he understands Irenaeus as we do and his opinion is that the Apocalypse was seen by John in the Reign of Domitian and not the name of the Beast by itself alone 5. It is a very unlikely thing that John should be banished into Patmos in the Reign of Claudius and see some part of the Revelation there in his time and the name of the Beast elsewhere by itself alone at the end of Domitians Reign which was above fourty years afterwards without the least intimation of any such thing 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not the Nominative case to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was seen as the objection would have it but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the Nominative case unto it which I prove thus That which John saw is the Nominative case to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was seen but Eursebius saith that John saw 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Revelation therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Revelation is the Nominative case to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was seen 7. Though it be true that in the Latine Copy of Irenaeus the word is visum in the Neuter Gender yet in the Latine Copy of Eusebius the word is visa in the Feminine Gender and in the Margent of one of them I find these words Anno Domini 96. Joannes in Patmon relegatus scripsit Apocalypsin in the year of the Lord 96. John was banished into Patmos and then wrote the Revelation 8. Let the word