Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	old_a	prophet_n	testament_n	5,085	5	8.1969	4	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16065	Of the auctorite of the word of god agaynst the bisshop of london wherein are conteyned certen disputacyons had in the parlament howse betwene the bisshops a bowt the nomber of the sacramen[n]ts and other things, very necessary to be known, made by Alexa[n]der Alane Scot and sent to the duke of Saxon.	Alesius, Alexander, 1500-1565.; Allen, Edmond, 1519?-1559.	1544 (1544)	STC 292; ESTC S108900	30,774	92

neuer cease til thei had goteÌ„ him out of the way and thei had before brought to death diuerse whom the king did highly fauor before the king him self whom thei moued by all meanes to put them to execucyon quickly could perceyue spye out their craft and suttilty But he bad me gyue hym the paper wherin I had writton my disputacyon that he might shewe it to the bisshop of londoÌ„ to the other bisshops in the councel the coÌ„tentes wherof was this Right honorable and noble lord and ye right reuerend fathers yesterday whan I disputed of the sacramentes with the bisshop of london we came thus farre that those only ought to be called sacramentes which haue the word of god for them and this point only remained to be further declared that nothing ought to be taken for the word of god but only the holy bokes of the old and newe testameÌ„t For the bisshop of london affirmed that the tradicions and ceremonys wherof the old ecclesiastical writers do make mencyon were receiued of the apostles and geuen us of the fathers from hand to hand and therfor thei may be laufully called the word of god vnwrittoÌ„ and our faith must be proued by them as well as by the holy scripture which is writton in the bible Now I haue determined to coÌ„fute this saing and opinyoÌ„ and to shewe by the manifest testimonys of christ of the Apostles of the prophetes and also of the old doctors that the Christen faith ought to leane only vpon the holy scripture and that the bokes of the old newe testament only ought to be had and taken for the word of god And because there hangeth a nother disputacyoÌ„ vpon this that is to say of the auctorite of the doctors and of councels I wil also speake of them For cochleus and other blasphemos lyers which for the bellys sake haue salable tuÌ„ges and in whom the saing which Paul alledgeth against them that mainteyne wicked doctrine for their bellys sake doth very wel agre saing The cretyaÌ„s are alweys false lyers wicked beastes and slowe bellys These hipocrites I say do plainly hold that the church that is to say the bisshops as thei vnderstond hath pour to iudge ouer the scripture and to examyne it and also that it hath auctoryte to allowe or to refuse the gospel and to dispense with the .x. commandments and to alter the forme of baptyme and to make newe articles of our faith beside those which be conteined in the scripture Some there be that speake yet more reuerently saing that thei contend not of the scripture or of the word of god but of the exposicyon theroff which thei wil haue to be taken and sought of the church and of the doctors which be alowed of the church vnto whose iudgemeÌ„t thei say we ought to stand in all coÌ„trouersys of our faith what so euer thei deere whether thei haue any scripture for them or no. This sophistical suttelty although it hath more coning than the first grosse blasphemy yet it is to the same effect and thei both haue one end and defend both one opinion But yet before the bisshop of londoÌ„ there was neuer none so farre past shame as to say that the rytes and ceremonys in the church which can not be proued by the scripture ought to be called the word of god vnwritten â–ª and that we ought to byld our faith vp on them as vp on the holy scripture written in the bible This threfold maze or rather one traâ—â—formed .iij. ways couered painted with diuers wordes hath those reasons onli to coÌ„firme it which the bisshop did before alledge for the vnwritton word and certeÌ„ other which I wil reherse and confute in the end of this writing But first I wil beate downe this grosse blasphemy and I wil shewe and declare that our whole fayth and all the articles of the christeÌ„ religioÌ„ be coÌ„teined in the scripture of the prophetes and apostles so that a christen man is bownd to byleue no other thing than such things as may be proued out of that scripture This horrible blindnes of men and the boldnes malycyos obstinacy which foloweth therup on wherthorow thei blaspheme god and his holy word is rather to be lamented than to be conuict with many reasons the thing being so manifest But the nerer that the brightnes of the sonne of reightwisnes doth coÌ„e and the more clerely that the light of the gospel doth shyne so moch more blinder and more obstynate are the vnfaithful made in so moch veryly that thei are more blynder now in the gret light than thei were before and thei stomble in very dede vp on the stomblyng stone and vp on the rock of sclander For the false teachers euen whan thei were in the most blind darknes were neuer so bold nor impudent as to breake out in to such a blasphemy as to say the church might make newe articles of the faith not coÌ„teyned in the scripture or that it hath auctorite to dispeÌ„se with the .x. coÌ„mandmeÌ„ts and to alter the forme of baptyme Gerson duns dorbel Decam Tomas BonaueÌ„ture do plainly condemne this heresy and thei affirme that the truth reueled of god and conteined in the body of the bible or in the holy scripture is the foundacion of our faith that is to say the thiÌ„g where vp oÌ„ our fayth ought to be bylded thei wold neuer haue byleued that there shuld euer be so gret blindnes in the church that any man shuld be so bold as to affirme that the articles of the christen faith ought to be sought not in the scripture but in the gloses of men and in bisshops lawes or that mans tradicions rites and ceremonys receyued in the church and not conteyned in the scripture ought to be called the word of god vnwritton But I wil cease my coÌ„playning seing I know that now is the latter tyme wherof the prophetes christ and the apostles did prophecy that there shuld come false prophetes which shuld face out the gospel and imagyne a newe gospel euen stynking hethenyssh old wiuyssh and capcyos fables inuented by the suttyl wit of man as peter and paul calle them and of these false prophetes that is to say Antichrist did daniel christ and paul admonissh us that he shuld extolle him self a boue god and shuld robbe god of his name pour wisdom and mercy and shuld accuse him of right wisnes cruelnes and weakenes vnabylyte which thing we do manifestly see in maner in all their doctrynes as in their pardons in the popes your in purgatory in pryuate masses in the prayng vnto saintes in worshipyng of Images in the vowes of monkes and pristes and in all mans tradicyons And I pray yow is not this to accuse god of ignorance of malice and of sluggisshnes neclygence to say that god hath not writton in his holy bokes of scripture all things necessary vnto our saluacyon as though either he did not remember althings

we cal baptyme and the supper of the lord sacramentes of the gospell what we meane therby I knowe right wel that s. Ambrose and other autors calle the wasshiÌ„g of the disciples fete and other things sacrameÌ„tes which I am sure yow your selues wold not suffer to be nombred among the other sacramentes This exhortacyon did the archbisshop make most soberly discretely as he is a man of a singular grauyte with such swetenes that it did my hart good to hear him And bicause I did signifye bi some token of my countnance that this admonicyoÌ„ of the archbisshop did please delight me excelleÌ„tly wel the lord cromwel bad me speake what I thought of this disputacyoÌ„ but he told the bisshops before that I was the kings scolar and therfor he desiered them to be coÌ„tent to heare me indifferently Than I after the rude maner of the scholes rather than after any courtly solemnyte bowing my knee for a token of curtesy and reuerence as It became me with out any preface at all begaÌ„ to speake after this maner Ryght honorable noble lord and yow most reuerend fathers and prelates of the church although I come vnprepared vnto this disputacyon yet trusting in the ayde of christ which promiseth to geue both mouth and wisdom vnto vs whan we be required of our fayth I wil vtter my seÌ„tence and iudgement of this disputacyon And I think that my lord archbisshop hath geuen you a profitable exhortacion that ye shuld first agree of the significacyon of a sacrameÌ„t whether ye wil call a sacrameÌ„t a ceremony institute of christ in the gospel to signifie a special or a singular vertu of the gospel and of godlines as paul namith remissyon of sinnes to be or whether ye mene that euery ceremony generally which may be a token or a significacyon of an holy thing to be a sacrameÌ„t For after this latter significacyon I wil not stike to grant yow that there be .vij. sacramentes and more to If ye wil. But yet Paul semeth to describe a sacrament after the first significacion wheras he sayth that circuÌ„cisioÌ„ is a token and a seale of the rightwisnes of fayth This diffinycion of one particular sacrament must be vnderstoÌ„d to perteine vnto all sacramentes generally for the Iewes had but one sacrament only as all the scholastical writers do grant And he describeth baptyme after the same maner in the .v. to the Ephesians wheras he sayth that Christ doth sanctifye the church that is to say all that be baptised thorow the bath of water in the word of life For here also he addeth the word and promes of god vnto the ceremony and Christ also requireth fayth where as he saith who so euer bileueth and is baptised shal be saued And s. Austen describeth a sacrameÌ„t thus The word of god coming vnto the element maketh the sacrament and in a nother place he saith a sacrament is a thing wherin the pour of god vnder the forme of visible thinges doth work secretly saluacyon And the master of the sentences doth describe a sacrament no nother wise A sacrameÌ„t saith he is an inuysible grace and hath a visible forme and bi this inuysible grace I meane saith he remissyon of sinnes Finally s. Thomas denieth that any maÌ„ hath auctorite to institute a sacrament Now if ye agree vnto this diffinicyon of a sacrameÌ„t it is an easy thing to iudge of the nomber of those sacramentes which haue the manifest word of god and be institute bi christ to signifye vnto us the remissyon of our sinnes s. Austen saith that there be but .ij. such sacramentes in the .cxviij. pistle vnto Ianuarius His wordes be these First I wold haue the to vnderstoÌ„d the somme and effect of this disputacyoÌ„ which is this that our lord Iesus Christ as he him self saith in the gospel hath ladeÌ„ us but with a light and easy yock or burden Wherfore he hath glewed the felowship of his newe peple with sacramentes very fewe in nomber very easy to be kept and very excellent in signifycacyon which be baptyme and the supper of the lord and such other if there be any moo commanded in the holy scripture those except which were burdeÌ„s for the seruytute of the peple in the old lawe for the hardnes of their hartes et ce And agayne in the .iij. boke of the lerning of a Christen man he saith the scripture hath taught us but fewe signes as be the sacrameÌ„t of baptyme and the solemne celebracyon and rememberance of the body and blode of the lord et ce The bisshop of london could scarsly suffer me to speake thus moch but he brake forth and said thus vnto me where as ye affirme all right and true sacramentes to be institute of Christ or to haue the manifest scripture to proue them or that all sacramentes must haue a significacyoÌ„ of remissyon of sinnes It is all false Than I answered that I wold proue all that I had sayd to be true not only by the scripture but by the old doctors and by the schole writers also But the bisshop of herforth whom the kings grace fauored highly both for his singular wisdom and lerning which was thaÌ„ newe comne out of germany where he had bene Imbassytor being moued with the frowardnes of this bisshop of londoÌ„ sayd vnto me brother Alexander contend not moch with him about the myndes and sayngs of the doctors and schole writers for ye knowe that thei in many places doo differ among them selfes and that thei are contrary to them selues also almost in euery article And there is no hope of any concord to be made if we must leane to their iudgementes in these maters of controuersy and we be commaÌ„ded by the kings grace to dispute by the holy scripture et c. And he turned him to the bisshops and made a short and pythy oracyon Think ye not sayd he that we can by any sophistical suttiltes steale out of the world agayn the light which euery man doth see Christ hath so lightned the world at this tyme that the light of the gospel hath put to flight all misty darknes and it wil shortly haue the higher haÌ„d of all cloudes though we resist in vaine neuer so moch The lay peple do now knowe the holy scripture better than many of us And the germanes haue made the text of the Bible so playne and easy by the hebrewe and the greke toÌ„g that now many things may be better vnderstand without any gloses at all than by all the commentarys of the doctors And more ouer thei haue so openned these controuersys by their writings that womeÌ„ and childern may wonder at the blindnes falshode that hath bene hetherto Wherfor ye must consider ernestly what ye wil determyne of these controuersys that ye make not your selues to be mocked and laughed to storne of all the world and that ye bring them not to haue this opinion of yow to think euer more here after that ye haue

against the doctrynes tradicyons of men saing All flessh is euen grasse all the glory of it that is to say euen his most excellent wisdom pour is euen lyke the floure of an herbe the grasse widdereth away and the floure of the herbe falleth a way for the spyryte breath of the lord hath blowne vpon it And the peple be very grasse the grasse I say widdereth the floure falleth but the word of the lord endureth for euer c. He threatneth also euerlasting night of infidelyte or vnbylefe if we beleue eyther any newe reuelacyons withowt the word of god or els any apparicyoÌ„s of dead spretes The wordes after the true hebrue text be these Shal the peple seke councel of their god or shal thei are councel of the deade for the liuyng shal thei not rather loke serch in the lawe of the lord and tak the testimony of god vnto councel Iff thei tel you not saith he according vnto this word thei shal haue no morniÌ„g lyght Sureli this is a sore threatning vnto them which vnderstond what this voyce is what this derknes signifyeth and who is the auctor causer of it Iohn calleth christ the light that shyneth in darknes that lightneth all meÌ„ which come in to this world he saith that the true life is in the word of god that life is the light of men again that god is the light in whom is no darknes at all that who so euer walketh in darknes hath no felowship with god And christ calleth hiÌ„ self the life of the world he saith vnto us Walk in the light whyle ye haue it that no darknes compasse now c. Now the deuel is the prince of all darknes he did first steale this light from mankind thorow infidelite he did first robbe us of the true knowlege of god and brought us in to all darknes of infydelite and in to all kindes of errors But the sonne of rigtuosnes hath restored this light vnto the world agayne and his coming was vnto us the bright morniÌ„g wherof Esay speaketh in this place And it is no meruel that we haue walked in a continual darknes thus long for we haue forsaken the word of god and sought the light in the deuils doctrine in our own wisdom in mans tradicyons we haue had so gret confydence in fantasyes that we haue byleued deade spyrites made newe artycles of our fayth euen owt of the appearing of them as namely that there is a purgatory after this life out of the which soules may be redemed thorow the sacrifice of the masse which the pope and the deuyl haue ordeyned to be a sacrifice for the quick and the deade contrary to the institutyon and ordinaÌ„ce of christ But now let us heare what witnesse christ him selfe the euerlasting word of god geueth of his scripture For the same question was disputed of eueÌ„ in christes tyme among the high doctors which thought that the scripture without the tradicyons of the elders was not sufficient vnto their saluacyon and one of those doctors came to christ and saide master what may I doo to enioye euerlasting life But christ seÌ„t this curios infidele vnto the scripture sayng what is writton in the lawe How dost thow reade thereiÌ„ as though he shuld say Doist thou thinck that god is a wauerer or a changeling that wil alter his mynd euery howr as men change their lawes and imagine dayli newe opinions of god I tell the the word of god continueth for euer and do thou nothing but euen the selfe thing only that thow seyst writton in the law and so thou shalt liue he saith not now how thinkest thou or how dost thow heare the pharises the scribes preach teach but he sendeth hym to the scripture and sayth what readest thou there Do that thou shalt lyue And although the scribes pharises and doctors did euer patch their lawes and tradicyons vnto tâ—e word of god yea and preferred theÌ„ also before it as christ sheweth in the .xv. .xxiij. of Mathew yet all other among wâ—om the true church did raygne had on iudgement bylefe namely that the wil of god must be known by the scripture only that aâ—l articles must be iudged and examyned by it as christ declareth where as he saith vnto the iewes Serch the scriptures for ye beleue surely that ye shal haue euerlasting life in theÌ„ by the which wordes christ testifieth playnly that this was the opynion and iudgement of the oâ—d church that all men shuld knowe the wil of god by the scripture only and that thei shuld iudge all articles of the faith necessari vnto saluacyon by that only And where as he biddeth theÌ„ examâ—ne his preaching by the scripture he sheweth euidently euin the whole gospel to becoÌ„teyned in the old scripture And who so euer denieth the coÌ„mandment of Moyses before rehersed to perteyne vnto us because the Apostles had not yet writtoÌ„ their bokes thei be very asseheades withowt any knoulege or vnderstoÌ„ding For this rule did the Apostels folowe whan thei testified vn to the church of the gospel that no boke shuld be receyued except it consentyd with the old scripture and by this rule the church refused the bokes which confirmed their storys by the prophetes And by this rule do the Euangelistes proue their writings Paul also procureth auctorite vn to his pistle to the Roma .j. by this same rule where as he saith that his gospel was before promised by the prophetes in the holy scriptures To this purpose also serue these saings of christ If ye beleued Moyses ye wold bileue me also for he wrote of me c. and agayne this Serche the scriptures c. for euen thei beare witnesse of me Now this controuersy of the vnwritton word of mans gloses and tradicyons if we wil folow the councel of our fore fathers and stande to the iudgement of the church in christes tyme I wil lay this senteÌ„ce of the old church confirmed of christ for me against all that my aduersarys can make or say writton in the xij of Iohn The word which I haue spoken shal iudge them in the last day And if this word were not writtoÌ„ or if it were not all writton who could besure certen of his saluacyon or of the wil and pleasure of god And if our faith and the saluacyon of mankynd did depend only of mennes doctryne so that the soÌ„me rule of our religion were not writton in the scripture who durst trust bileue that one hole perfight and vnblemisshed sentence of christ were left vnto us For seing the deuel wresteth the scripture vnto eueri wicked opinyon and durst refuse the scripture thorow the Manicheis as he doth now adays cause it be burnt by the bisshops who dowteth but that he wold rather haue destroyed the whole scripture at ones more than .xv. hundreth yere agone and to haue

Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Text snippets containing the quad