Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	old_a	part_n	testament_n	2,968	5	7.9440	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16567	A defence of that most ancient and sacred ordinance of Gods, the Sabbath day Consequently, and together with it. 2. A defence of the iiijth commandement. 3. A defence of the integrity and perfection of the Decalogue, morall law, or X. commandements. 4. A defence also of the whole and intire worship of God, in all the partes thereof, as it is prescribed, in the first table of the Decalogue. 5. A discouery of the superstition, impurity and corruption of Gods worship; yea, and idolatry, committed by multitudes, in sanctifying the Lords day, for a Sabbath day, by the iiijth commandement. Vndertaken against all anti-Sabbatharians, both of Protestants, Papists, Antinomians, and Anabaptists; and by name and especially against the X ministers, ... by Theophilus Brabourne.	Brabourne, Theophilus, b. 1590.	1632 (1632)	STC 3473; ESTC S120442	538,800	670

then is this 4th commandement a tautologie and needlesse repetition of things before commanded Or if you would suppose that that particular time in the 4th com is abolished but yet that a time or some time still remaineth in the 4th com why still it will come to the same for a time or some time is inioyned in the 2th com for where God requireth his worship there it is necessarily inferred that he there requireth a time or some time for his worship without which it cannot be Thus I haue proued it that if you hold the old Sabbath day for an abolished ceremony then you rase and deface the 4th com by making it but a tautologie and a needlesse repetition of such things as are commanded before in the 2th com it remaineth therefore that that doctrine which affirmeth the old Sabbath day to be a Iewish Ceremony is false erroniouse the contrary whereto is the very trueth ARGVM XX. My 20th argument for defence of the Lords Sabbath proueth that it must be morall or else there is no day at all commanded now by the 4th com and thus I argue If we abolish Saturday the old Sabbath day which was commanded in the 4th com then we leaue no day as commanded now by the 4th com But we must leaue a day as commanded now by the 4th commandement Therefore we must not abolish Saturday the old Sabbath day For the Minor it is confessed by all that there is a day commanded now by the 4th com therefore I passe that point as granted and so come vnto the Major the consequence whereof I proue to be sound by an Induction of particulares of which ●here is one and the same reason First for their new-moones which God commanded the Israelites Numb 28.11 wherein they were on euery first day of the moneth to rest from laboures Amos. 8.5 And to repaire vnto the Minister for instruction ij King 4.23 Now when God abolished by the text Col. 2.16.17 that very day commanded in that Law Numb 28.11 then hee left no day as commanded still by that law Numb 28.11 In the next place come we vnto all those anniuersary Sabbaths commanded in the Ceremoniall Law the Israelites had one Sabbath on the first day of the 7th moneth Leuit. 23.24 againe the Israelites had two other Sabbaths in the 7th moneth as we reade Leuit. 23.39 besides diuers other Sabbaths there mentioned in Leuit. 23. Now when by this text Col. 2.16.17 euery of those daies commanded in those lawes were abolished there were no daies left as commanded still by those commandements in Leuit. 23. Now there is the same reason of the day commanded in the 4th com if you hold it a Ceremony as there was of those other dayes which were Ceremonies Leuit. 23. for as the time in these anniuersary lawes was a Ceremony so my aduersaries hold the time in this 4th com is a Ceremony wherefore there is the same reason in all that is abolish that speciall time specified in any of these commandements and you leaue no day as commanded in these lawes commandements 2. I proue it from all those textes which are vsually brought against the Lords Sabbaths as Exod. 31.13 Col. 2.16.17 Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 In which texts our Anti-Sabbatharians or enemies to Gods Sabbaths say that the Sabbath day of the Iewes commanded in the 4th com is abolished as a signe and shaddow c. And that text of esteeming one day aboue an other Rom. 14.5 And that text also reprouing the Galatianes so obseruing of daies Gal. 4.10 are spoken against that day mentioned in the 4th com wherefore since the word day is of as larg an extent in these texts as the same word day is of in the 4th commandement it is as cleere as the sunne at noone day that if that day commanded in the 4th com be an abolished Ceremony then is there now no day commanded by the 4th com and if the obseruation of those daies commanded in the 4th com be reprouable and abolished by Gal. 4.10 c. Then are there no dayes now in vse by virtue of the 4th com the reason is because those dayes which were commanded are abolished as they say It is more then manifest then that if we abolish Saturday the old Sabbath day once commanded in the 4th com then we leaue no day as commanded now by the 4th com we must therefore cleaue vnto Saturday which God hath sanctified hallowed Genes 2.2.3 or else bid farewell vnto all daies Sabbaths as diuinly instituted ARGVM XXI My 21th argumēt for the defence of Gods Sabbath proueth that it must be morall still in force or else we mancle lame the royall Law of Gods commandements receiuing acknowledging but but some parceles peeces thereof onely doe deny that intire and whole Law of God to be whole intire to vs or to belong vnto vs in the Jntegrity perfection thereof And thus I argue If any man abolish the 7th day Saturday Sabbath commanded in the Law of Gods 10 commandements hee must also mancle and lame that royall Law of God receiuing acknowledging but some parceles and peeces thereof onely and he must deny that intire and whole Law of God which was vttered by the voice of God wrote in Tables of stone by the finger of God to be whole and intire to vs or to belong to vs in the Jntegritie and perfection thereof But no man may mancle lame that royall Law of Gods 10 commandements receiuing but some parceles and peeces thereof onely nor deny that intire whole Law of God to be whole and intire to vs or to belong to vs in the integrity and perfection thereof Therefore no man may abolish the 7th day Saturday Sabbath commanded in the Law of Gods 10 commandements For the consequence of the Major because this argument fetcheth all its force from the wholnesse Integrity of the law it is needfull therefore that I shew what the wholnesse perfection of the Law is note therefore that the Law is then said to be whole intire perfect when it hath all the partes and percelles added to it which God at the making of it put and ioyned together lacking none of them like vs we cale him an whole an perfect man who hath all his ioyntes partes which God gaue him when he made him as we cale that an whole and perfect Bible which hath in it both the old and New Testaments together with all and euery of the seuerall bookes Chapters bound together which at the first God ioyned together and as that man is said to be an whole and perfect man who lacketh no limme or ioynt of those which God ioyned together whē he made him as that is said to be an whole perfect Bible which lacketh neither Chapter nor verse of all those Chapters verses which God deliuered in writing from the Prophets and

its Integrity 2. The 4th Com. is but a Cipher 3. An holy prayer of our Church is frustrate 4. A gate is set open to Anabaptistry 5. The worship of God will languish decay 6. An old Tradition is kept in the place where the old Sabbath should stand 7. Men liue in the weekly sinne of Sabbath breaking 8. God is denied a parte of his worship Yea corruptly worshiped 9. Idolatry is committed by thowsand thowsands in the Kingdome And these are the Contentes of this booke A Defence of the Morall LAW CHAP. I. SECT I. THE scope and principall drift of this Treatise Christian Reader is the defence of the Lords Sabbathes to wit his ancient Sabbathes the Saturday seuenth dayes Sabbathes the which are expresly enioyned vs in the fourth Com. in these wordes Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it c. But the seuenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord c. Exod. 20.8.10 Against this ancient and most sacred ordinance of Gods I find two professed enemies against whom I must bend my forces the one are they who deny the Law of God the Morall Law or 10 Commandements to belong vnto Christians and so consequently they deny Gods Sabbathes also commanded in the Law and these are our Anabaptistes and our late sprung vp Antinomianes the other are they who deny the Integrity and perfection of the Law they embrace the Law of God indeed but not the whole law and these are both Protestantes and Papistes for these reiect that ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath day properly so called and expresly commanded in the morall law counting it for a ceremony and abolished by reiection whereof they reiect some thing commanded in the Law and so consequently they are partiall in the law and doe deny it in its integrity and perfection vrge an Anabaptist or Antinomian to the obseruation of the Sabbath day and he will answere you that the law is abolished at the comming of Christ as all those legall Ceremonies were vrge a Protestant or a Papist to sanctify the Sabbath day and your answere shall be that this part of the law touching the Sabbath day is a ceremonie and abolished at the coming of Christ thus Anabaptistes and Antinomians renounce the whole law Protestants and Papists renounce the wholenesse of the law the one would haue no law the other would haue no perfect law Against both these this booke is penned The partes of this booke are sixe diuided into so many Chapters also The first parte or chapter is in defense of the Morall Law and consequently of Gods Sabbathes against Anabaptistes and Antinomianes The other fiue partes or Chapters are in defense of the integrity and perfection of the Law and consequently of Gods Sabbathes against Protestantes and Papistes for this purpose the second parte or Chapter giueth the true sense and Exposition of the fourth Command and vindicateth it from the common and corrupt glosses and expositions of it The third Chapter sheweth the weaknesse and insufficiency of all those Scriptures and arguments which are vsually produced to proue the Lords day to be a Sabbath day The fourth Chapter sheweth the insufficiency and feeblenesse of all those Scriptures and arguments which are vsually alleaged against the Lords Sabbath of the seuenth day or Saturday to make it an abolished ceremony The fifth Chapter conteineth sondry forcible and vndeniable arguments and Scriptures prouing the morallity and perpetuity of the ancient Sabbath day The sixte and last Chapter conteineth a Dispensation for a season touching the present practise and obseruation of the seuenth day Sabbath together with an Exhortation to a speedy reformation Thus you see my taske what it is my aduersaries who they are and the partes of this Booke One thing more would be premised for so much as we shall often haue occasion to vse these two words Morall and Ceremoniall it is sit that I here shew in what sense I vnderstand them 1. I would vse these words but for distinction sake for whereas there are two sortes of Sabbathes the wekly Sabbath and the yeerly Sabbathes the Sabbath which God wrote and the Sabbathes which Moses wrote the Sabbath which God spake and the Sabbathes which Moses spake the Sabbath written in the Morall law Exod. 20.8 and the Sabbathes written in the Ceremoniall law Levit. 23.32 c. for the distinguishing of these two sortes of Sabbathes one from the other I doe vse these two words calling the weekly Sabbath recorded in the Morall law the Morall Sabbath and the yeerly Sabbathes recorded in the Ceremoniall law the Ceremoniall Sabbathes these Sabbathes were also distinguished in respect of time the Morall Sabbath was first deliuered Exod. 20.8 yea Gen. 2.2.3 the ceremoniall Sabbathes were afterwards deliuered Levit. 23.32 c. neither did these ceremoniall Sabbathes euer come within the pale of the Morall law or were written in the Tables of stone 2. I see not but that I may call the weekly Sabbath the Morall Sabbath properly for 1. the seuenth day or weekly Sabbath it conserneth practise and manners which is signified by the word Morall 2. Since God spake all those words Exod. 20.1 why should not euery thing he spake be called morall as well as any thing he spake and since the Sabbath day or seuenth day is a thing that is expresly commanded in the Morall law and which may I say which may be retained in the Church with great profit why should it be denied the name of morall 3. Giue me a reason why the seuenth day Sabbath should not be called a Morall as well as the doctrine of the Trinity in the first Com or as the doctrine of originall sinne or lust Rom. 7.7 in the tenth Comm 4. Since the dueties of the Sabbath to wit Rest and Holy exercises are accounted Morall why should not the time or seuenth day also be accounted morall for the time is a furtherance vnto these morall dueties now that which furthereth a morall should me thinke be also called a morall 5. Herevnto agreeth Doctour Ames in his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. and also affirmeth it to be the iudgement of the best diuines saying It is receiued by all best diuines that the Morales were differenced from the Ceremoniales by this that all and onely the Morales were wrote by God in the Tables of stones c. The Saturday and weekly Sabbath then must needs be termed a morall Sabbath In a word why should this be strange for as there is a ceremoniall law and a morall law why may there not be likewise ceremoniall Sabbathes and morall Sabbathes and since God placed the seuenth day Sabbath in the morall law among the morales why should it not be termed morall and called the morall Sabbath The morall Sabbathes together with whatsoeuer else is commanded in the morall law I doe defend the Ceremoniall Sabbathes with all other Ceremonies I doe reiect It is the Decalogue and nothing else which I defend and this I stand to maintaine in

appointed it neither will God or Christ euer reward it nay God may answer them thus who required this at your hands Isai 1.12 My third reason disswasiue is because God hath manifested his dislike of superstitiō in many passages of his Holy word see Deut. 12.32 Whatsoeuer I command you take heede you doe it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom Here you see that God will haue nothing added to his worship seruice Thou shalt put nothing thereto saith the Text but now the Patrones of this Lords day haue put some thing thereto for they haue put the Lords day vnto the 4th Com. of God a most dangerouse presumptuouse attempt such as they can neuer answer before God nay they cannot iustifie it before men by good argument how then shall they be able to stand before God think they to add an other day to Gods Com. and iustifie it before God by such their friuolouse consequences as they vainly pretend to be necessary consequences let Ministers thinke of this that seriously too let thē doe it in time also In the New Testament God hath reucaled himselfe this way also If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this booke Reuel 22.18 If Christ vvas so carefull that nothing be added to this parte of his will wrote by S. Iohn in his Reuelation no doubt he hath the same care of all partes of his will in the New Testament wherfore let our Ministers that are Patrones of our new Sabbath thinke of this Text also for when they say teach the people that Christ instituted appointed the Lords day which is false for Christ neuer instituted it as appeareth by my answer vnto all their arguments in so teaching the people they doe add vnto the New Testament they add vnto Christ his institutiones a day which Christ neuer instituted thus they haue added vnto Christ his ordinances of Baptisme the Lords Supper they hau added vnto these I say an other ordinance that is none of Christs which is the Lords day now let them heare their doome without repentance God shall add vnto them the plagues that are written in this booke of the Reuelation and one plague I sinde there written which is a plague of plagues it is hell fyer to haue a parte in the lake that burneth with fyer brimstone which is the second death Reuel 21.8 I know they sleite contemne mee think if they can so carry it with the people as they may but saue their credits with them a while they hope to quench mee for euer I being but one and such a vile one in their eyes wherefore I haue taken vnto me more helpe now I haue God on my side Christ on my side they shall defend me against these men and these men must know it now or shall will they nill they hereafter that they dispised not me but God Christ and that now they haue met t with their Master God will deale with them if they will be adding vnto God God will adde vnto them You haue an other Text also Numb 15.39 that ye may Remember all the Commandements of the Lord doe them that yee seeke not after your owne heart nor after your owne eyes after the which ye goe a whoring Where we see how God detesteth to haue mens deuices brought into his worship he calleth it a whorish tricke to hould the Lords day to be commanded by God or instituted by Christ when it cannot be proued it is to goe a whoring after their owne heart after their owne eyes An other Text you haue Mark 7.7.8 But they worship me in vaine teaching for doctrines the commandements of men for ye lay the commandement of God a parte obserue the Tradition of men a like Text you haue Isa 29.13.14.15 where a woe is denounced vpon the people whose feare towards God was taught by the precepts of men And their feare towards mee was taught by the precepts of men Whereas the former Text saith yee say the commandement of God aparte how true this is of these 10 Ministers forenamed who reiect as Iewish Ceremoniall the Lords Sabbath expresly commanded in the Morall Law let all men iudge for doe they not lay this Commandement of God a parte which inioyneth most directly the 7th day Sabbath this by the way but the words that belong vnto our purpose are these teaching for doctrines the commandements of men The Lords day Sabbath it is a doctrine taught frequently and bouldly but it is no commandement of Gods and therfore it must be onely a Commandement of men The next words for our present occation are these and obserue the Tradition of men That the Lords day is a Tradition of the Church not onely Papists auowch it but also diuerse of those Authores which I haue cited against the Lords day doe expresly affirme it that the Lords day is but a Tradition and all of them say that it is but an ordinance of men and a Commandement of man yea so much the wholl Church confessed in the dayes of K. Edward so then in kepeing it in preaching for it you keepe the Tradition of men preach for A Tradition of man And so also they that are afraide to transgresse the Lords day to worke in it this their feare toward God it is taught by the precepts of men for God hath left no precept for the Lords day the breach whereof we neede be afraide of Heare then the doome that belongeth vnto such needlesse religion all this their worship it is a vaine thing In vaine doe they worship mee c. Yea there belongeth a woe vnto such worship this is the reward of it woe vnto them c. Isa 29.15 The last Text that I will mention is Colo. 2.23 which things haue indeed a shewe of wisedome in voluntary Religion or in will-worship Iudge now good reader if I doe them any wronge to rekone the Lords day as a limme of this voluntary Religion as a branch of will-worship for if they cannot shew vs where God hath commaunded it then it is a voluntary thing and of mans owne will and therfore may be called a voluntary Religion a will-worship happely there may be in the eyes of such as haue bene nusled vp from the cradle in this superstitiouse practise a shewe of wisedome in it as the Text speaketh But if S. Paul may be iudge they are things of no value as he speaketh in the same Text. Wherefore since God hath in all these Textes of Scripture manifested his dislike of Superstition let this be enough to disswad euery man from the practise of it And that so much the rather because the vphoulding of this day is the iusling shouldering out of the Lords Sabbath day mentioned in the 4th Com. so as the words of our blessed Sauiour are true

by the 4th Com. some diuines foreseing the grossenesse of others vvho hould that the 4th Com. doth bind to the Lords day properly are ashamed of this therfore they haue found out a nevv way of binding that is not that the 4th Com. should bind to the Lords day properly but improperly Analogically by way of resemblance similitude but how euer this distinction is some what neate pretty may serue the turne in schooles yet vvhen it comes a broad into the Country it is very absurde for 1. none of our Country diuines will vse it 2. This is an absurd distinction that one and the same Command should binde both properly improperly properly for two thowsand yeeres improperly euer after Yea this is contrary to our selues for vve abhorre it in Papists that they should make 4 senses of Scripture the Litterall Allegoricall Tropologicall Anagogicall as Perkins hath them in his Arte of Prophecying pag. 651. where he affirmeth that the sense of Scripture is but one onely novv vvhy may not Papists as vvell make 4 senses as any of vs make 2 senses a proper litterall sense an improper analogicall sense 3. The 4th Com. inioyneth vs to labour 6 dayes so by consequence vpon the Lords day therfore it cannot command rest vpon the same day Neither can the reason of the 4th Com. be drawne to this 8th day c. 4. By this diuise may we reuiue all the Ceremoniall Lawes in the Old Testament saying they bind vs novv analogically which is flat contrary vnto the Apostle Ephes 2.15 Colo. 2.14.5 The fourth com cannot bind to the Lords day being a new day analogically because the Sabbath day which is the old day is not yet abolished as shall be showne and so it must bind still to the old day properly Other answers there be also in my other booke of the Sabbath vvhich here I omit for I purpose not to stand vpon this point because I thinke few or none will vrge it In the next place let vs come to them that are ashamed of nothing for they hould that the 4th com binds to the Lords day properlie these haue many deuices to deceiue themselues others as sometimes they haue this argument that the Hebrew word Sabbath signifieth a rest novv on the Lords day vve Rest therfore the 4th Com. belongeth vnto it Hereto I answer 1. that the word Sabbath vsed in the 4th Com. vvas neuer vsed for a Rest generally vpon any day but Synecdochically for a Rest particularly vpon the 7th day onely 2. By the like reason vve may hould ffast dayes Christmas day and Coronation dayes Sabbathes by the 4th Com. also for on these dayes vve Rest also Others haue this for an argument they affirme that by Sabbath day 7th day in the Com. may be meante not the Sabbath the 7th day but a Sabbath a 7th day are not these those necessary consequences whereof they talke so To vvit because these words Sabbath 7th may be vnderstood of a Sabbath and of a 7th day that Therfore they must so be taken with them then this is a necessary consequence that vvhat may be must of necessity be it may be it shall raine too morrow doth it therfore follow that for certaine it necessarily must raine too morrow but these friuolouse childish arguments my stomacke is so loathed with them as I vvill proceed no further hauing in my exposition vpon the 4th com sufficiently discouered these vanities The third argument is Mr. Chappels which he deliuered in publike thus he argueth If one day in Seauen must be a Sabbath day and not the Seauenth day then the Lords day must be the Sabbath day But one day in 7 must be a Sabbath day not the 7th day Therfore the Lords day must be the Sabbath day As for the consequence this he proued by this argument because the Lords day is the fitest of all the sixe and that because there was a weekly collection theron 1. Cor. 16.2 with other the like Textes which are vsed in defence of the Lords day ordenarily but I omit answer to this proofe of his consequence in this place because I shall haue hereafter a more fit place to answer this argument that the Lords day is the fitest c. In this place I vvill onely answer his maine argument vvhich growndeth vpon the 4th Com. for this is our taske in this Section to deale vvith the 4th com onely I come to his Minor which consisteth of two partes But one day in seauen must be a Sabbath day not the 7th day for the former parte of it in these words But one day in seauen must be a Sabbath day for proofe of this hee alleaged my Testimony and the Testimony of those of the same iudgement with me saying as for this parte of my Minor themselues confesse it for they hould that one daye in seauen must be a Sabbath but hoe there Mr. Chappell you must not carry it away so vve must discouer your fraudulent conveiances first good Sir doe not abuse vs in our tenets and thereby abuse your auditory also vve vse not to speake so promiscuously so generally and so indistinctly as you report vs for vve vse not to say one day in seauen must be a Sabbath day but thus the last day of seauen must be a Sabbath day let this be noted and this vve doe to avoide the amphibolie or double meaning of the phrase which you charge vpon vs for these vvords one day in seauen may haue a double meaning either they may be vnderstood generally for any one day in the seauen as vvell this as that as wel the first of seauen as the last of seauen or any other of the seauē or they may be vnderstood for some one certaine particular day as the 7th day last day of the seauen Now vve to auoid all doubling equiuocationes doe addict our selues vnto the simplicity of speech therfore doe choose to say the last day of seauen rather then one of seauen but Mr. Chappell quite contrary he delights to vse in publike and to put vpon vs such phrases as haue a double meaning that so he may the better double before his people and delude them novv of the two senses propounded if vve shall vse his phrase vve doe choose the latter doe vnderstand by one day of seauen that one day which is the last day of seauen but Mr. Chappell doth choose the former sense vnderstanding by one day in seauen any one day of the seauen indefinitly this or that or any other Now in this sense his Minor is most false neither shall he euer be able to proue it out of the 4th Com. that there is commanded any one day of the seauen for there is onely commanded that one day onely which is the last of the seauen furthermore he hath abused both vs but that 's not much but his

himselfe saying Remember the Sabbath day c. The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt not worke The 3d thing which I would propound shall be an Appeale vnto the consciences of all such as dare sharpen their witts against the Lords Sabbaths which he hath placed in his Morall Law my desire vnto them is that they would ransake and serch their hearts to see if they can find themselues compelled constrained by their consciences vpon the reading seriouse perpending of these and the like textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 and Colos 2.16.17 in the New Testament to abolish the 7th day Sabbath or no let them examine their consciences whither all those textes of Scripture which they bring against that Sabbath day placed by God in his Morall Law be so directly against forciblie opposite vnto Gods Sabbath day as by no honest meanes of a fit sense or a Lawfull distinction it can possibly be preserued from an vtter ruine finall ouerthrow or no now the reason why men must goe thus seriously to worke is to free themselues of a fearefull censure that they doe wilfully malitiously and vnnecessarily impugne an ordināce of Gods because we must not lightly sleitily make innouationes and alterationes in Gods worship and seruice Gods ordinances once established in his Church as this Sabbath day was must not vpon euery vaine conceit and by respect be remoued out or holden out of his Church men must deale with their consciences therfore in these pointes be suer to goe no further against them then necessity vrgeth compelleth them if in case an errour must be it is by farr the safer to erre vpon the right hand then vpon the left that is rather to giue God his Sabbaths still then to abridge him of them shall God fixe his 7th day Sabbath amongst his Morales and shall we put to our wites to roote it out thence and ranke it amongst vanished ceremonies God forbid The 4th thing to be propounded you know it is a Maxime a ruled case in diuinity that one text of Scripture it must not be so expounded and vrged as it should ouerthrow contradict an other text now if this rule hath place in any portion of Scripture it must haue place in the 10. commandements the Lords prayer in the Articles of our faith for these 3. are esteemed to containe the foundation life and Soule of all religion and that plainly wherfore no text of Scripture is to be vrged or expounded so as it should infringe contradict or ouerturne any portion of these three principles of Christian religion nay these three are made as a Rule to expound other Scriptures by therefore not to be gainsaied opposed by other scriptures well then the 7th day Sabbath it is one of those ordinances of God established of old in his Church placed amongst his Morall Lawes and in the first Table also and there expresly commanded by one of the 10. commandements wherefore since it is a parte of the 10. commandements neither these textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 Col. 2.16.17 nor any other text of Scripture must be so vrged expounded as that this commanded 7th day Sabbath be there by abolished or accounted as a vanished ceremony this stands firme by our owne Rule for the exposition of Scripture and therefore I might well iustifiablie spare to giue them any other answer to their textes brought against the Lords Sabbath then this that they abuse wrest the sense of Scripture making one text to contradict an other contrary to this aproued rule for no text may be admitted against the 4th com One absurdety more I would add whosoeuer goeth about by theise the like textes Rom. 14.5 Exod. 31.13 and Col. 2.17 to abolish Gods ancient Sabbath he maketh a godly prayer of our Church frustrate mere babling before God for when the 4th com is rehearsed in the Church the people āswer to it saying Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our heartes to keepe this Law now since the 4th com cannot be vnderstod of any day or dueties but those done on the ancient Sabbath day abolish that day thē our prayer is but babling 2. Doctour Prideaux in his booke on the Sabbath pag. 140. affirmeth that the Church following the Apostles kept the Sabbath and M. Brerewod in his book of the Sabbath pag. 77. affirmeth that the old Sabbath was religiously obserued 300. yeeres after Christ this I shall proue towards the latter end of this booke by sondry other Testimonies they therefore who by these textes Exod. 31.13 and Col. 2.16 doe attempt to ouerthrow the ancient 7th day Sabbath they doe thereby not only make frustrate an holy prayer of our Church but also they do condemne the practise of the most ancient pure and primitiue Churches which liued next vnto the Apostles Thus you see how many foule absurdeties they rune into who cale the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath Iudaisme Iewish ceremoniall attempt to roote it out of the Morall Law by these texts Exod. 31. Col. 2.17 SECT II. And now we come vnto their arguments textes of Scripture out of which they collect arguments against the Lords Sabbaths but this note in the first place that of them all they can not shew vs any expresse commandement or prohibition against the Sabbath day to countermand it therefore it followeth that what they haue against it the same is but collectiones and consequences framed by mans feeble reason and this one thing that they haue no expresse countermand against the Sabbath day doth weaken their cause exceedingly it is the worse by aboue 50. in the 100. for this wante and so I proceede There are two thinges which they labour to make ceremoniall and so abolished in the 4th com the one is the Rest the other is the time of the 7th day first let vs see what they haue against the Rest they doe not say the Rest from labour is simply abolished least so they should dashe in peeces the whole 4th com by one word therfore they haue refined it and they desire to proue the rigorouse strictnesse of the Rest onely to be a ceremony and questionlesse this conceipt of the rigorouse strictnesse of the Rest was therefore invented least they should seeme onely to deny the question namly the time of the 7th day for now thers is a little more culler put vpon the matter when they can deny ij things as ceremonies in the 10 commandements now to this purpose euery text that may seeme to sauour of any extraordenary strictnesse about the Iewish rest as they cale it those textes are not expounded as they say with a graine of Salte or any dramme of qualification but like men that had sworne to it to forsake the golden meane they are carried all wide vpon the left hand these textes are stretched vpon the Tainter hoocks vnto the vtmost tending to a

Gods lawes this no man fearing God should doe 2. Since the Lords day is no Sabbath day they that defend the 7th day Sabbath to be abolished they cast downe all Sabbaths of Gods and so draw vs to Anabaptistry and open a flood gate to all impiety prophanesse among people which no man fearing God should doe 3. Since no day can be Sabbath day by the 4th com but the old Sabbath day as hath bene proued therefore they that hold and make it abolished they make that holy prayer of our Church a meere babling with God for the 4th com being rehearsed in vaine we say Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our heartes to keepe this Law now no man fearing God should make frustrate such a deuout and ancient prayer of our Church by his absurd tenentes I might mention other absurdeties but I list not to repeate them ARGVM III. My third argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force is because so much is confessed by Diuines that are no friends but enemies vnto it thus it may be framed If such as are no friends but enemies vnto the 7th day Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force then the 7th day Sabbath is still in force But such as are no friends but enemies vnto the old Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is still in force As for the consequence it is cleere for albeit the Testimony of a man in his owne case and for his owne aduantage be of smale esteeme yet a testimony which a man giues against himselfe is euer accounted strong wherefore if I shall proue that such as mislike of the 7th day Sabbath doe for all that affirme that it is still in force then the point must needes be yeelded to me And so I come vnto the Minor here I shall proue that such as are no friends to the 7th day Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force and this I shall proue either by their expresse words or else by necessary consequence from their words for albeit they neuer intended to speake a word in defence of Gods Sabbath yet so cleere and apparent hath bene the trueth as they could not but speake for it albeit they fauoured it not my first Testimony shall be that of Doctour Prideaux in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 140. It is manifest saith he that our Sauiour did often contend with the Pharisies about the superstitiouse obseruation of the Sabbath day but where is there any thing about the abrogation of it at vbi de abrogatione ipsius suspicio and where is there any mention of setting the Lords day in the roome of it did not the Apostles keepe the Sabbath of the Iewes with the Iewes without any scruple after the ascention of Christ did not the followinge Churches doe the like for many yeeres If then there be no suspicion of the abrogation of the Sabbath day in the new Testament as Doctour Prideaux saith then it necessarily followeth that the Sabbath day is still in force My second Testimony shall be that of M. Perkines on the Creede speaking of the Creation Pag. 152. where he speaketh of the place of Gods worship then to wit the garden of Eden also of the time of Gods worship to wit the Sabbath day Touching the time of Gods worship it was the 7th day from the begining of the Creation the Sabbath day And here we must note saith he that the keeping of the Sabbath is morall some indeed saith he doe pleade that it is but a ceremony yet falslie for it was ordeined before the fale of man at which time ceremonies signifying sanctification had no place Here is no speech of the Lords day the 8th day it was not knowne at the Creation but all this is spoken of the Sabbath day the 7th day and M. Perkins doth plainly affirme that this 7th day Sabbath is morall and contesteth against those who hold it to be a ceremony saying they speake falsly c. Now if it be morall no ceremony then it must needs be still in force My third Testimony shall be that of M. Dod on the commandements who in his exposition of the 4th com pag. 122. saith that the Sabbath is morall perpetuall againe Arguments to proue the Sabbath day to be perpetuall Now that all this must be true of the old Sabbath day not of the Lords day is plaine 1. Because he nameth the Sabbath day the Seauēth day 2. Because he fetcheth reasons to proue the morality frō Gods rest at the creatiō because it was a day blessed now these things cannot agre to our Lords day 3. In pag. 129. he thus concludeth So that these reasones doe most euidently confirme to the artes of all Gods childerē that the keeping of the Sabbath day is a morall Law and bindeth vs and all men to the end of the world as much as it did the Iewes afore Christ 4. In pag. 124. he brings an other reason for the morality of the Sabbath from the time of its first institution in Adams innocency saying Now then since it was instituted in Paradise c. it may not be reputed among ceremonies Now this cannot be vnderstod of the Lords day other reasons of his I spare well if the old Sabbath day be morall as it must be by these his words and reasones then it is still in force My 4th Testimony shall be that of Doctour Bownd in his booke of the Sabbath pag. 40. The 4th com saith he cā no more be partly morall partly ceremoniall then the same liuing creature can be partly a man partly a beast yea as well may one suppose saith he the second Commandement to be partly morall partly ceremoniall also If then the 4th com be not partly ceremoniall as touching the 7th day then is the 7th day still in force My 5th Testimony shall be that which I find quoted by Doctour Bownd in his booke of the Sabbath pag. 46. out of Wolph Chron. lib. 2. cap. 1. saying But the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes because it is commanded in the Decalogue which conteineth in it nothing ceremoniall nothing Typicall nothing to be abrogated If the Decalogue conteineth nothing ceremoniall or to be abrogated then is not the 7th day ceremoniall but still inforce My 6th Testimony shall be that of M. Richard Byfield on the Sabbath against M. Brerewod pag. 88. where he thus writeth The 4th com is parte of the Law of nature so a parte of the Image of God 〈…〉 capable of a ceremony to be in it then God is If ●●n there can be no ceremony in the 4th com then is not the 7th day therein a ceremony therefore it must be still in force so absurd it semeth to me it semed vnto these Diuines to suppose a ceremony to be in

Apostles so that is said to be the whole intire perfect Law of God which hath all the partes and things commanded which at first belonged to it which lacketh none of all those precepts which at the making and diuulging of that Law God ioyned together If then we would know whither we haue the whole law of God intirly now or not we must haue recourse vnto the making first diuulging of this Law looke therefore into the twentyth Chapter of Exodus and there you shall see this whole and intire Law of God with all euery the members thereof as God made it when he first proclaimed it vnto his Church thus you see both what the wolnesse integrity of Gods Law is and where to find it whole and intire as God made it if any man shall diminish or deny any one particle commanded in this Law he must be said to mancle lame this Law the Law must be accounted but a lame mancled imperfect Law like as if a mā lacketh but a ioynte of his hand or a finger he is said to be a lame man and if a Bible wanteth but a leafe or a verse it is an imperfect Bible Now to apply this Jn the Decalogue God chargeth his people to Remember the Sabbath day and to sanctify the Sabbath day and to Rest on the 7th day now this day caled Sabbath day 7th day was our Saturday as all men know wherfore if any man will abolish this Saturday 7th day Sabbath as not commanded now to be remembred now to be sanctified and now to be rested on that man doth mancle lame the royall law of God for he withholdeth one branch of Gods Law which inioyneth the remembrance and sanctification of the Saturday 7th day Sabbath that man receiueth and obeyeth but some parceles peeces of Gods Law onely for he yeeldeth obedience but onely vnto some nyne or nyne an halfe of Gods tenn commandements for he leaueth out that peece and parte which concerneth the Saturday Sabbath and that man must deny Gods intire whole law to be intire whole vnto vs or to belong vnto vs in the integrity perfection thereof for if the Law belonged vnto vs in its integrity and perfection then the Saturday Sabbath which was once commanded in that Law so was a parte a peece of the Law it must now also be commanded in the Law and so belong vnto vs now Thus the consequence is proued good that whosoeuer abolisheth the old Sabbath day he mancleth Gods Law he yeeldeth obedience but vnto percels and peeces of it he denyeth that Gods Law belongeth vnto vs in its intigrity perfection For the Saturday Sabbath serueth to make vp Gods Law an intire an whole a perfect Law without it it is but a lame imperfect maimed defectiue Law like a lame man wanting an hand or a finger of his hand like an imperfect defectiue Bible lacking a Chapter or a verse of some Chapter I confesse that those tene Ministers Gods aduersaries and myne in this point goe aboute like botching Taylers or sowterly Coblers for I cannot more aptly and fitly resemble their action to make vp this breach againe by adding a peece of new cloth to fill vp the rent and so they suppose to auoide this blow and to make vp the Law againe an intire and perfect law now howeuer it is commendable to peece mend old garments yet it is altogether insufferable for any to play the botch er and cobler with Gods lawes the new peece wherewithall they would fill vp this rent make vp this breach it is the Lords day or first day of the weeke this day must now be thought firmely beleeued to be put into the old Law of the Decalogue then we shall haue 10 commandements againe wholly compleatly but as once it was vnlawfull to weare a garment of Linsey wolsey and to bring profane and common persones into the Temple so is it now to mingle humane institutiones with Diuine ordinances and to bring a day appointed by man into the Morall eternall and sacred Law of God for the Lords day hath no higher institution then the ordinance of the Church and will they peece and mend vp the Diuine Law of God with the peece of an humane ordinance but admit that the Lords day were of Diuine ordination yet is this peece too bigg or too little to stand in the breach of the 4th commandement as formerly I haue showne because it cannot agree to the 4th com besides to see the vnskilfulnesse of these peecers they confesse that this Lords day Sabbath is a new ordinance pertaining to the new Testament as are Baptisme the Lords Supper yet they will attempt to mende vp the breach of the old Law with a peece taken out of the new Testamēt thus the old law shall be partly old partly new partly Law partly Gospell a new kind of botching They saied indeed a Cobler should answer my booke and see now if they be not as good as their word is not this worke of theirs Coblers worke Hauing proued the Major I come vnto the Minor here I am to proue that no man may so wrest the Scriptures as thereby to mancle lame the Royall Law of God no man may receiue obey but some percels peeces of it onely that no man may deny the whole and intire Law of God to belong to vs wholly fully and in the integritie and perfection thereof me thinke none should deny this Minor if any will 1. He is guilty of doeing violence to the Law and of being partiall in Gods Lawes this was the sinne of those Priests laied to their charge by God who had polluted the Sanctuary done violence to the Law Zeph. 3.4 and againe yee haue not kept my waies but haue bene partiall in the Law Malach. 2.9 yea he must hold it Iewish Iudaisme in any that will be intire perfect in Gods Law that is that will haue an indifferent and vnpartiall respect vnto all the partes thereof for he that is intire and perfect in the Law will haue respect vnto Gods Sabbaths which they must count Iudaisme 2. I finde it in Polanus Syntag pag. 353. that Papists doe deny the second Commandement against worshiping of Jmages to be Morall and appertaine vnto Christianes to the like purpose I find in Willet on Exod. 20. pag. 342. 343. these passages The commandement say Papists of abolishing and destroying Images was ceremoniall therefore it concerneth not Christians now And againe The second praecept against the making of Images was onely temporall concerned the Iewes Thus Papists are partiall in the Law and deny its integrity now if we may deny the Integrity of the Law tell me why Papists may not doe so too 3. If any will deny this Minor by the iudgement of M. Perkins he denieth himselfe to be