Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	new_a	testament_n	write_v	6,542	5	5.9777	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A02919	The faith of the church militant moste effectualie described in this exposition of the 84. Psalme, by that reuerend pastor, and publike professor of Gods word, in the famous vniuersitie of Hassine in Denmarke, Nicholas Hemmingius. A treatise written as to the instruction of the ignorant in the groundes of religion, so to the confutation of the Iewes, the Turkes, atheists, Papists, heretiks, and al other aduersaries of the trueth whatsoeuer. Translated out of Latine into English, &c. by Thomas Rogers.	Hemmingsen, Niels, 1513-1600.; Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616.	1581 (1581)	STC 13059; ESTC S118432	286,633	582

Christ. But in à consideration they differ Because the one which is the Gospel hath à name from bringing ioiful and good newes touching the attainment of euerlasting life through Christe and by the other that is the Testament is signified that God not content with à simple promise doth binde himselfe to vs by couenant an oath comming betweene that we maie vnderstand both the immoueable decree of God touching the attaining of saluation by Christ and howe we also for our partes are bound to God by faith For faith is one part of the couenant to wit of mans part For in al couenants as aboue also hath bene shewed mutual conditions and lawes be required The same is to be saide of the olde Testament and of Moses lawe Furthermore when the Scripture is diuided into the lawe and the Gospel it is to be vnderstoode that the difference is taken from the things subiect and when it is diuided into the old and newe Testament the differences are taken from certaine circumstances of the things subiect But when the holie Scripture which we cal the old and newe Testament is so caled it is rather of custome than of any difference of things subiect except you speake by the figure Synecdoche And therefore Augustine doth saie Where I saide the authoritie was included within the 44. bookes of the olde Testament following the vsual maner of speaking which the Church hath at this daie I called it the old Testament But the Apostle seemeth not to cal anie thing the old Testament but that which was giuen in mount Sinai And therefore y e same Augustine writing vnto Bonifacius doth saie howe they might more truly be called instruments than testaments that that might be called the old and this the new I wil add also herevnto à question out of Augustine whose words be these Howe is it named old which after 430. yeares was made by Moses and howe is it called newe which before so manie yeares was made vnto Abraham The reuelations are to be cōsidered in these names and not the institutions The reuealing of the olde Testament was made by Moses but the reuealing of the new was done by Christ when he manifested himselfe in the flesh in whom the iustice of God appeared Againe because the old testament pertaineth vnto the old man from which mā of necessitie is to begin the new vnto the new man of which man must passeouer frō oldnes therfore in that earthly promises are conteined but in this heauēly Furthermore seeing the Apostle saith the old testament is abrogated by the newe and the olde was giuen in mount Sinai where the Ten-commandements were published-out it maie in this place be asked touching the Ten-commandements whether they also be taken-awaie as part of y e old testament Vnto which question I do thus answere The Ten-cōmandements as they be a part of Moses law do no whit bind vs but as they containe the eternal pleasure of God they do must continue euē as manie other things in Moses which are natural But a double vse according vnto y e consideration of double man is to be respected in the decaloge For if you respect y e time of man before the reuelation of Christe in man that is before the iustification of man through y e faith of Christ as man himselfe is called old who is bound either perfectlie to obeie the law or to be punished according to our Sauiours words vnto the proude Lawer If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commaundements So the Ten-commandements by a certaine analogie maie bee comprised vnder the olde testament For it is a certaine Schoolemaster to bring vnto Christe as the olde testament accusing and condemning man for that he hath not the righteousnesse which the lawe requireth whereby man is driuen to seeke Christe who is the end of the lawe for righteousnesse vnto euerie one that beleeueth In this sense Paul opposeth the moral lawe against the newe Testament But if you haue an eie vnto the time of man after the reuelation of Christe in man as man himselfe is become newe So the Ten-commandements is a rule how a newe man should leade his conuersation and shal neuer be abolished Whose newe obedience doth please because y e person pleaseth for Christ his sake whose perfect obedience to the lawe is imputed to the beleeuing man Now of that which hath bene saide let vs make manifest the differences betweene the old and the newe Testament The which although they differ not in respect of the last end seeing they both do respect the reconciliation attonement of man with God as the final end yet if we doe consider the endes comming betweene and circumstances the olde Testament doth goe before the manifestation of the new if the mediators the old by the seruant Moses y e newe was administred by Iesus Christe the Sonne if the maner of the dispensation the Old was but in à shadowe the Newe hath the verie image of things The shadowe and the figure was the deliuerance of Israel from the bondage of Aegypt Pharao being oppressed The truth is the deliuerance of the faithful from the bondage of sinne Satan being ouercome The bringing of Israel into the land of Canaan and the possessing of the same was the shadowe y e bringing of the spiritual Israel into heauen and the hereditarie possession thereof is the truth The giuing out of the lawe vpon mount Sinai by Moses was the shadow The truth is the word which came frō Sion by Christ. The lawe written in the tables of stone was the shadow but the lawe of God written by the finger of God in the harts of men is the truth The ministerie of death was y e shadowe but the ministerie of the spirit and of life is the truth To speake in a word al y e Mosaical things as his gouernment priesthood purgations sacrifices and the rest were but shadowes but Iesus Christ the eternal Priest with his benefites is the truth Or to speake both with Augustine In the olde Testament there is a hiding of the newe in the newe a manifestation of the olde Againe The olde is the beginning the new is the end with Ambrose It is called a testament because it is dedicated with bloud the olde in a figure to wit by the bloud of à brutish beast The newe in the trueth namelie by the bloud of Iesus Christ. Thus much concerning the couenant annexed to the priesthoode of Christe and of comparison betweene the olde and the newe Testament whereof we haue spoken the more at large because both olde and late writers doe varie in this point but we hope we haue made it manifest according to the trueth of Gods worde CHAP. 39. 1. Howe man is to applie to himselfe the sacrifice of Christ 2. Of Gods worde the happinesse of the imbracers and the punishment of the contemners of the same 3. Of Faith and of

For both y e Apostles and y e holie fathers also tooke it far otherwise than do the papistes by the comparing of scriptures we wil make it euident Paul in his first Epistle vnto the Corinthians writeth after this wise First of al I deliuered vnto you that which I receiued howe that Christ died for our sinnes according to the Scriptures And 1. Corinthians 11. For I haue receaued of the Lorde that which I also haue deliuered vnto you to wit That the Lorde Iesus in the night that he was betraied tooke breade c. Matth. 15. Whie do thy disciples transgresse the tradition of the Elders Of these places I do gather how ther be three sortes of traditions the first of doctrine the seconde of diuine ceremonies the last of humane rites Tradition of doctrine is y t which is deliuered touching the lawe and the gospel and such thinges are conioined with them which forsomuch as they are commaunded of God maie not be altered Tradition of diuine ceremonies is of baptisme and of the Lordes supper in the newe Testament which likewise dependeth vppon the auctoritie of Christ and therefore is immutable Tradition of humane rites containeth manifolde canons both touching ceremonies and also concerning discipline of the clergie laitie this maie be altered for the profite of the Church at the discretion of gouernors Irenaeus in his third booke vseth the word Tradition oftentimes for the doctrine which the Apostles from God deliuered to their auditors and the same auctor calleth the Apostolical Creede y e the tradition of the Apostles Now then seeing the Church according to the doctrine of Paul hath auctoritie to ordeine such rites as make for edification for so he saith Power is giuen vs for edification Againe Let al thinges be done comelie and in order godlie magistrates maie appoint rites for comelines and order sake The ende of comelines is twofolde first by these helpes to stir vs vp vnto godlines secondlie that modestie and grauitie maie bee seene in the handling of Gods matters Order hath three endes one is that rulers and preachers of the worde maie haue à certaine rule to worke by another that auditors maie bee trained vp vnto obedience and discipline and the third that peace and concord maie be prouided for the Church being set in à good staie And herein the people doeth owe obedience to y e magistrats of the Church yet with certaine conditions For in the traditions of man manie thinges are to be taken heede-of First that they be not contrarie to the rule of faith neither that they bring vs from Christ. As doe manie of the popish rites of inuocation of sainctes of prophanation of the masse of buieng selling pardōs of bearing-about worshiping bread of holie water of rosaries of sundrie consecrations of y e toies of purgatorie such like infinite vanities and deceipts of the diuel In these the godlie are excused by the cōmandement of an hier auctoritie whereby we are bidden to bewar of idolatrie Secondly that they be not preferred before Gods heauenlie worde and ceremonies as they were sometime by the Pharisies as maie appeare in y e Gospel after Mark ye rethe commaundement of God that yee maie obserue your owne traditions and are at this daie by the Papistes as maie appeare by the punishments whereby the transgressors of Gods commaundement and of the Popes traditions are corrected It would therefore be knowen that as the traditions of God through the cōmandement of God doe binde vs vnto perpetual obedience so the traditions of men must giue place to Christian libertie and that without case of offence Thirdlie that they be not deemed necessarie vnto saluation nor counted for the seruice of God of themselues and ex opere operato as they vse to saie Last of al that vnder the pretence of indifferencie they destroie not religion For as the Papistes are subtil such thinges as appeare to the eies goodlie they doe amplifie and vnder à sweet baite the hide deadlie poison Some Papistes do exclame how their Masse is neither commaunded nor prohibited by the word of God and therfore is a thing indifferent and was in the feare of God ordained by the godlie fathers for the memorie of y e sacrifice of Christ. But vnder this goodlie shewe of wordes as vnder a faire garment as it were they conceale in abominable idole whereof in due place we purpose to speak And therfore it is wiselie to be regarded when true consideration is had of comelines and of order Interpretation of the Scripture which is another thing theie put-vnder the authoritie of the Church being a free gift of God which the Lord bestoweth vpon whom he list cannot be tied by mans authoritie vnto anie certaine caling of men For as in olde time God bestowed not the spirite of prophecie neither vpon the ordinarie Bishops onelie naie fewe of them were adorned with that excelent gift nor to the tribe of Leuie onlie but at his pleasure made manie of other tribes to be famous therebie So the Sonne of God wil not haue this gift to be tied to ordinarie succession but bestoweth it vpon whom he wil. In the tentes of the Hebrues it is giuen-out how Eldad and Medad did prophecie in y e hoste which thing when Ioshua the seruant of Moses could not brooke he requested his Lord to forbid them But what doth Moses What saith he Enuiest thou for my sake Yea wold God that al the Lords people were Prophetes and that the Lorde would put his spirite vpon them So then the spirite of prophecie and exposition of Gods worde is the peculiar gift of God Which he bestoweth by meanes somtime and sometime without meanes When it is giuen without meanes it is counted for à miracle but when by means it is Gods ordinarie gifte which he both imparteth vpon such as earnestlie cal vpon him labor therfore and encreaseth in those who doe vse it rightlie vnto his glorie But three things in this place are to be obserued The first although God indue manie with this gift yet that none presume to teach in the Church being not lawfulie caled therevnto For theie are neuer blessed in their doinges which rush-into the office of teaching without lawful caling and doe runne before theie are caled Which thing if some factious fellowes would thinke-vpon such troubles would not be in the Church at this daie as there be The seconde that both the whole Church and euerie member of the same haue power as aboue also I touched to proue the spirites For so saith the Apostle Trie the spirites whether theie are of God The third is how al the wordes of interpreters be not of equal weight For some are probable some certainlie true and some are meerelie erroneous Things probable for y e authoritie sake of the vtterers are so long to be imbraced as theie be not

vnto Christ that as they should finde the lawe fulfilled in him so they should be made partakers of the promised mercie And therefore this promise of mercie hath one conditiō fro the law without Christ to wit touching y e fulfilling of y e law another in Christ name lie of faith wherbie the end of the law which is righteousnes is obteined So that as manie as beleue haue righteousnes which is as much as y e law requireth Wherof the promise of mercie is ratified and confirmed to them and this is that couenant whereof the 25. Psalme doth speake Al the pathes of the Lorde are mercie and truth vnto such as kepe his couenant and his testimonies that is as another Psalme doth expound it Mercie shal compasse him that trusteth in the Lord. The mercie then of GOD is moderated according vnto the rule of iustice when it is exhibited to such as repent For this iustice of God is à perpetual rule that as he wil condemne such as be rebellious without al pitie and mercie so he wil of his infinite mercie saue as manie as turne vnto the Lord. This rule of God his iustice is to be thought vpon when we reade in the Psalmes that Dauid praied God that he would heare him for his righteousnes ● For three thinges together came into his minde namelie the promise of mercie the free pardon of his sinnes and the price wherebie the iustice of God is satisfied namelie by the sacrifice of his Sonne for he is vniust that hauing receiued à raunsome wil not set free the captiue and by the merite of Christ wherebie we are iustified before God being conuerted vnto him through faith Whence it is that if he should not heare them which repent and forgiue their offences he should be vniust as one that dealeth against the rule of his own iustice that denieth his promise that would accept no ransome nor regarde the righteousnes of his sonne wherebie he did merite fauour for vs. So that Dauid after his adulterie murder and betraieng the hoste of God did craue mercie and remission of his sinnes through faith and among other reasons brought this in for one That thou maiest be iust when thou speakest that is that men maie confesse thee iust for keeping thy wordes whereby thou promisedst pardon to as many as repent CHAP. 33. 1. Of Christe his wonderful obedience to his Father for our saluation 2. The fruite thereof NExt vnto the mercie of God we are to consider the wonderfull obedience of Christ which would vouchsafe to take our cause vpon himselfe and feele the wrath of God to deliuer vs from eternall death Of this obedience Paule vnto the Philippians on this wise Who being in the forme of God thought it no roberie to be equal with God but he made himselfe of no reputation and tooke on him-selfe the form of à seruant was made like vnto men was found in shape as à man He humbled him selfe became obedient vnto the death euen the death of the crosse Here Paul entreateth of the vnspeakeable obedience of the sonne of God and because equals cannot properly be said to obey one another but inferiors their betters Paule sheweth howe the sonne beeing of one essence and power with the Father did humble him selfe taking to himselfe the nature of man wherein he became obedient to the Father euen vnto the death of the crosse And in the 10. Chapter of the Epistle vnto the Hebrues out of the 40. Psalme Because it is vnpossible that the bloud of Buls and Goates should take away sinnes Wherefore when he commeth into the world he saith Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not but à bodie thou hast ordeined me In burnt offeringes and sinne offeringes thou hast had no pleasure Then I saide Loe I come In the beginning of the Booke it is written of me that I should do thy will O God Isaiah 53. He was offered euen because he would But with this obedience how agreeth that prayer thrice repeated in the garden O my Father if it be possible let this cup passe fro me neuerthelesse not as I wil but as thou wilt This praier seemeth to import that the wil of the sonne differed yea and was contrarie also to the Fathers wil. For the Fathers wil was that he should drinke of the cup which he had prepared And the sonne desireth that the same cup if it were possible might passeawaie This obiection is aunswered by the wordes of our Lord afterward in the same Chapter vttered The spirit in deed is willing but the flesh is weake So that what he would not through y e weaknesse of the flesh the which naturalie without offence dreadeth death the same he wold through the willingnesse of the spirite wherbie he was obedient to the Father And thus doth Cyril also distinguish the same when he saith That the passion of the Crosse was not voluntarie to Christ and againe was voluntarie for the fathers wil and for our saluation you maie easilie perceiue by this praier O my Father if it be possible let this cup passe from me For as the word of God is God and naturalie the verie life no man wil saie that anie waie he feared death but beeing made flesh he permitteth fleshe to suffer that which belongeth to flesh and therefore as verie man he dreadeth death standing at the dores Here an other question doth arise what obtained Christ by his praieng The Epistle vnto the Hebrewes maketh answere He was hearde in that which he feared for the paines of death being remoued awaie he ouercame those conflictes The fruite of this wonderful obedience of the sonne of God is our iustificatton and saluation As by one mans disobedience saith Paul manie were made sinners so by the obedience of one shal manie be made righteous The Apostle highlie extolling this obedience doth saie Christ when we were yet of no strength at his time died for the vngodlie Doubtlesse one wil scarse die for a righteous man but yet for a good man it maie be that one dare die But no tongue can vtter nor minde conceaue howe greate the obedience of the sonne of God was who deriued the wrath of God vpon himselfe and put himselfe into our place to suffer the paines due vnto vs for our saluation Christ hath redeemed vs from the cursse of the lawe when he was made a cursse for vs. Againe He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of God in him CHAP. 34. 1. The greeuousnes of the paines which Christ endured for our sakes 2. What theie signified WIth this obedience would be considered both the greeuousnes of the pain which the sonne of God endured for our sakes both in minde and in bodie and also the reproche against his person The griefe of minde Christe doth testifie when he