of the Old and New Testament The Church of England receiveth the Canon of Scripture according to the antient Church exactly as the Church of England doth Secondly that he saith that is secundum majorum traditionem ex patrum monumentis That it is according to the tradition of the Church and out of the writings of the Fathers Whereby we see the Church of England follows antiquity in reception of the books of holy Scripture more truly than the Church of Rome doth But this obiter and the way Again Bullinger citeth the judgment of Bibliander Bibliander de opt genere interpretandi Hebraica whose words are Ecclesiasticos libros etiam Hagiographa nominant sancta scripta Quae etsi non habent idoneam authoritatem roborandi ea quae in contentionem veniunt ut Canonici Scriptores non tamen rejiciuntur ut Apocrypha qualis fuit prophetia Eldad Medad c. Ecclesiastici autem lâ—bri etiam in Scholam auditoria fidelis populi admâ—ssi sunt tam venerandi multis ut Judith etiam in ordinem canonicae Scripturae à quibusdam reponatur Which having the same sense I forbear to English Onely he saith that the Book of Judith was by some accounted Scripture I suppose he meaneth Origen which I think may as little claim that priviledge as any other Lastly Bullinger goes over every book of them and shews the benefit that the Church may reap by the reading of them And saith We may better learn the form of Houshold-government out of Tobit and Judith and the Ethicks or rules of good living out of Ecclesiasticus and the book of Wisdom than out of Plato Aristotle and Xenophon And the way of a religious Soldier out the Maccabees And of the first book of them he saith Ac tanti omnino hic liber est ut boni illo non possent citra jacturam carere That it is verily of such worth that a good man cannot without loss be without it Which is consonant unto that of King James speaking of the same book Conf. Hamp Court pag. 61. viz. Who shewed the use of the Maccabees to be very good to make up the story of the persecution of the Jews c. And of the History of Bel and the Dragon Bullinger saith Viderint autem qui eam historiam pro fabula damnant quibus nitantur Authoribus Ego video Historiam refertissimam esse multiplici fructu eruditione Let them look to it saith he what Authors they rest upon who condemn it for a fable I observe it to be a History full fraught with fruitful instructions And he names what In a word his whole discourse on these books is worth reading And it is to be noted that this was with the allowance of the rest of the Ministers of Tigur where this book was printed Necessit Reform pag. 20. Basilic Doron But the authority of King James is by some Brethren objected against the Apocrypha viz. As for the Apocrypha books I omit them because I am no Papist and indeed some of them are not like the ditement of the Spirit of God Answ Thus say they the King But it seems time and reading had further ripened the Kings judgment in that point For afterward when he upon great occasion solemnly delivered his judgment Confer Hamp Court second day confer p. 61. è Cathedrâ in reference to the satisfaction of his whole Kingdom this was the result His Majesty in the end said He would take an even order between both Affirming that he would not wish all Canonical books to be read in the Church unless there were one to interpret nor any Apocrypha at all wherein there was * He explains himself presently in allowing the book of Maccabees wherein he acknowledgeth some errors any error But for the other which were clear and correspondent to the Scripture he would have them read for else said he why were they printed and therein shewed the use of the book of Maccabees very good to make up the story of the Persecutions of the Jews but not to teach a man to sacrifice for the dead or to kill himself Thus far the King whâ—ch if the Brethren knew they did not well to cover and if they knew it not and were not vers'd in the most authentical books and writings of this nature as that Conference is a special one they were not fit to deal in such an Argument So also in the same place of the same Conference pag. 61 62. the King opened and defended a passage in Ecclesiasticus one of the Apocryphal books objected against as unsound and closes all with this salt quippe to the opposers What trow ye makes these men so angry with Ecclesiasticus by my saul I think he was a Bishop c. You see with what judgment the Brethren have quoted the King against the Apocrypha and yet as a crowing argument they insist upon it Again Object 2 Hierom. Ep. ad Laetam Tom. 1. St. Hieron is also produced as a witness against these books viz. That he should advise a Lady say they caveat omnia Apocrypha that she should take heed of all the Apocrypha Answ There are several causes of mistaking and mis-representing of an Author as 1 That men rest on Quotations Causes of misunderstanding and mis-representing of an Author and read them not themselves 2 That they understand not the language and Idiom of the writer 3 That they weigh not his scope and drift 4 That they ponder not the context 5 That they compare not one place with another 6 That they consider not the circumstances time place c. 7 That they consult not others that may illustrate him Then for misrepresenting him 1 That they make no bones of it 2 That they conceit they shall not be seen by every eye 3 And that when they be they have a brow to bear it so what they say may serve the turn at present It so fares here For if the Brethren read the place they quote in Jerom it is sure they understood not what he meant by Apocrypha Erasmus therefore on the place shall teach them Inscribuntur Petro Paulo nonnulla ipsi Christo Erasm in Hierom â—p ad Laetam num 79. veluti epistola Jesu ad Abygarum regem They are saith he ascribed to Peter to Paul and some to Christ himself as the Epistle of Jesus unto Agborus Where you see that Jerome did not mean by the Apocrypha onely the Books joyned with the Old Testament but those also yea those especially that were affixed to the New Again They did not weigh Jerom's scope for it was onely to instruct a young Girl in reading in that place not to shew what the Church might do or did Fourthly They did not compare this passage with others where he expresseth himself ex professo As where he speaks of the Books which bear Solomons name but are not his used to be read
men The Br. object Tyranny to Q. Eliz. and the Parl. which is not to be imagined To this first in general If this Reason be admitted it doth not only overthrow all constitutions that concern Religion whether made by Church or State whensoever any turbulent spirit shall fancy them not to be according to the Word And to all States and Churches But it condemns also all the Reformed Churches yea all the Churches and Christian States that are or ever have been I think in the world And particularly majorem in modum and in a special manner the Church of Geneva Ch. of Geneva requires conformity by Oath Revel 13.11 and Calvins Discipline where they are obliged thereunto by oath But to the dilemma in particular neither of the two Horns of this Lamb that speaks like a Dragon have any strength Have they forgotten or never learned that boyes are taught in the very rudiments of Logick and reasoning Kek. Log l. 3. c. 12. can 7. Quod per bonam consequentiam ex testimonio aliquo divino elicitur id EANDEM cum eo vim habet That what by good consequence is drawn from Scripture hath the same force that Scripture hath Did not our Saviour and all the Apostles prove their Doctrine so unto those that received nothing from them but what they proved Do not the Brethren think their Sermons and this their Book ought to be obeyed absolutely and in all the points they have excepted And indeed a good consequence is nothing but a natural effect Consequences And an effect is of the same nature with its cause yea as one saith nothing else but the cause in act or at least the cause is in the effect R. Hook l. 5. so is Scripture in the true consequénces of it And yet subscription to such conclusions do not argue the Authors to be infallible but only to be eyes unto the weaker-sighted to see the light by Tert. Advers Haeret. Omnia quidem dicta Domini omnibus posita sunt quae per aures judaeorum ad nos pervenerunt Gods Word is propounded unto all but it comes to us by the ears and so by the eyes of others And because men are called to subscribe and not children who should have their eyes their subscription only acknowledgeth that the Church and State have taken a true sample from the original leaving this still as the standard as prior tempore ordine naturâ dignitate Such are all the true determinations of Judges in reference to the Law as Deut. 17. They shall expound the Law to thee And the disobedient there was punished with death for contempt of the sentence of the Church and State and yet their determinations were not of equal authority but of equal force with the Law it self So here Secondly To the other horn of this Lamb or dilemma That else the statute did intend to tyrannize over the conscience which they say is not to be imagined Oportuit esse memorem Answ Did not the Brethren in the very lines immediately going before acknowledge yea urge it as an argument out of Sir Edw. Coke who saith He heard Wray Chief Justice of the K. Bench Pasch 23 Eliz. quoting Dier 23 Eliz. 377. lib. 6. fol. 69. Greens case Smiths case report that where one Smith subscribed to the 39 Articles of Religion with this addition so far forth as the same were agreeable to the Word of God that it was resolved by him and all the Judges of England that this subscription was not according to the Statute of Eliz 13. Because the Statute required an absolute subscription and this subscription made it conditional And that this Act was made for avoiding diversity of opinions c. And by this additâ—on the party might by his own private opinion take some of them to be against the Word of God and by this means diversity of opinions should not be avoided which was the scope of the Statute and the very Act it self made touching subscription hereby by of none effect Thus far their own quotation So then it is evident by the words themselves quoted just before and by the sentence of all the Judges of England that the Statute requireth absolute subscription which if it do they say it did intend to tyrannize over the consciences of men So then Q. Eliz. and that Parl. with all the Kings and Parliaments since that have confirmed that Act were Tyrants It concerns the present Parl. to vindicate their predecessors in this point also To what they add concerning mens subscribing when they are young Subscription of young men and before their judgments be mature It is answered first Those admitted to the Ministry though they may be as Timothy was but young in age yet they are not to be Novices in knowledge And Subscription is a good bond upon them Use of subscription both for the peoples good and their own to preserve them from novelties and apostacy But so that no man is engaged against the Word of God I hope then they will not urge the obligation of the Covenant upon those who have not had time or solidity throughly to ponder and weigh all the Articles thereof in the ballance of the Sanctuary and in the scale of the Law as they phrase it To the last of this head The liberty given to tender consciences Liberty to tender consciences is to be in things of lesser not of fundamentall consequence and in the Articles of the Faith for then how should the Magistrate be custos utriusque tabulae How should the Prince perform his trust of the souls as well as the bodies estates and names of his people How should there be one God one Faith one Baptisme in a particular Church and we all with one mouth glorifie God This is also against the practice of all Churches we have no such custome 1 Cor. 11. nor the Churches of God Thus much in reply to their three general first object against the Articles 1. Their doubtfulnesse 2. Their erroniousness and 3. The exacting of subscription to them I come now to the fourth viz. Their defectiveness and imperfection Defectiveness of the Artic. Where the first Exception is that Art 6. it is said that In the name of the holy Scripture we understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority there was never any doubt in the Church The Brethren oppose that some Books and passages of the New Testament have been doubted of as the Epistle of James the second Epistle of Peter The Article they say is defective in not enumerating all the Books of the New Testament as it had done those of the Old and of the Apocrypha comprehending them only under this expression All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received These words of the Article being the former contains no matter of doctrine namely those of which there was never any doubt in the
Church and the latter All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received being plain and evident all Christians now agreeing in the number of them throughout Europe The exception against them might have been omitted as tending to raise scruples in the minds of the people unless this Tract of the Brethren had been presented in writing and not published in print But that this scruple may not extend it self too far I shall name such as to my remembrance have been at any time doubted of They are the second Epistle of Peter See a very full Confutation of these doubts in Bellarm de verb. D. lib. 1 cap. 16. seqq Tertul. Cont. Marcion l. 4. Hieron proâ—em in Epist ad Titum Euseb l. 3. c 3. Calvin saith it was by the cunning of the Devil â—hat the Epist to the Hebrews should be doubted of because it speaks so ful y of Christs Priesthood the second and third of John the Epistle of Jude and by some the History of the Adulteress John 8.1 the last Chapter of that Gospel the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of James and the Revelation But first these doubters were some of them Hereticks as Marcion Tatianus c. Secondly This doubt did not spread it self in the Church but was onely of some private persons Again It was before the Church had generally consented in them The Churches motives in receiving books of Scripture Which having the same grounds of divine authority for them as for the rest both in regard of the 1 Antiquity and 2 general reception of them as also in regard of the 3 consonancy of them with the doctrine of all the other Scripture 4 and the enlargement and explanation of the same doctrine by them 5 and further the Presence of the Holy Ghost in efficacy by the matter of them thereby setting his seal unto them Upon these and the like grounds hath the Vniversal Church received them as the other I answer therfore in the words of Bullinger Professor of the Church of Tigur in this very argument De sacris libris eor dignitate Exposit premiss ante Biblia Tigurin Nec magnopere curandum existimo quod à quibusdam traditur quosdam veterum dubitasse de Epistolâ ad Hebraeos de epistolâ posteriore Petri Judae de epistolâ Jacobi Apocalypsi Quid enim ad nos quod pauci aliquot suis affectibus corrupti de rebus certis authenticis Authoribus dubitarunt Neither are we much to mind saith he what is said by some namely that certain of the Antients did doubt of the Epistle to the Hebrews of the second Epistle of Peter and of that of Jude of the Epistle of James and of the Revelation For what is it to us what some few corrupted by their depraved affections have judged concerning things certain and these undoubted Authors Thus far he Whence it appears it might truly be said there was never any doubt in the Church of these books because either the persons were not of the Church but Hereticks that doubted or else were some few perverted judgments it never came so far as to be a doubt in the Church So much for the first Exception The next is they are defective because the Articles do speak nothing of sundry points of Popery and Arminianism Predestination abused universal Redemption Object universal Grace the manner of Conversion and falling from grace which King James procured the Synod of Dort to confute and for which the late Synod at London is so much maligned To this first in general Answ It hath been always counted both the wisdom and the tenderness not onely of the English but of the antient Church to make Articles of faith whereunto all especially Ministers Conf. Hamp Court p. 39. must subscribe to be but few First It being unfit to thrust into the Book every position negative or affirmative which would make the Book swell into a volume as big as the Bible and also confound the Reader saith King James When such questions arise among Schollars pag. 40. the quietest proceeding were to determine them in the Universities and not to stuff the Book of Articles with all conclusions Theological Secondly The better course would be to punish the broachers of false doctrine as occasion should be offered For were the Articles never so many and sound who can prevent the contrary opinions of men till they be heard Thus the King Ep. 57. ad Dardanum St. Austin saith Regulam fidei pusillis magnisque communem in Ecclesia tenent The rule of faith is common to the weak and to the wise Hence my Lord Primate of Ireland infers That the rule of faith must contain such truths ONELY B. Ushers answ to the Jesuite pag. 417. as are GENERALLY agreed upon by the consent of all true Christians And accordingly we see the Creed called the Apostles the Nicene the Constantinopolitan and Athanasian how short they are now they were the Articles of Religion of those times The Articles of Ireland are larger but taken for the most part ad verbum out of our Articles Homilies and Common-prayer-book But secondly why do the Brethren urge more Articles when as they neither are willing to subscribe to these few wherein they have found but two or three faults and those inconsiderable but also refuse to subscribe to any without limits unless they mean as good-fellows upon the way to range themselves whilst they leave others bound behind them 3. Touching King James though he was opposite to the Tenets of Arminius yet you heard even now he was averse also from having the contrary doctrines inserted into the Articles farther then they are already for one of them falling from grace was there the question Conf. Hamp Court pag. 39.40 And as opposite he was to the preaching of them to the people as appears by these words That no Preacher of what title soever under the degree of a Bishop or Dean at the least do from henceforth presume to preach in any popular auditory the deep points of Predestination Election K. James Instructions to Preachers Ann. 1622. Artâ—c 3. Reprobation or of the universality efficacy resistibility or irresistibility of Gods grace but leave those themes to be handled by the learned men and that moderately and modestly by way of use and application rather than by way of positive Doctrine as being more fit for the Schools and Universities than for simple Auditories You see the King whom you quote is not of your mind 4. As to the matters themselves the Articles speak sufficiently of them so far as to clear what is most necessary in them As the eighth Article of Original sin the tenth Article of Free-will the seventeenth Article of Predestination and Election leaving what is disputable and uncomfortable to be gathered from what is expressed 5. As to the Assembly they are not condemned by all men for their conclusions in those
field as the Lord commanded me Whereas both it is in the Prophet Zachary not in Jerem. Zach. 11.12 13. and also runs thus And I said unto them If you think good give me my price and if not forbear so they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver And the Lord said unto me Cast it unto the Potter A goodly price that I was prized at of them And I took the thirty pieces of silver and cast them to the Potter in the House of the Lord. Here is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 variety of difference and yet I hope the Brethren will not deny but that the Evangelist Matthew did set down a sentence of Scripture To shake hands and part What think they of that of the Apostle It is written As I live saith the Lord every knee shall bow to me Rom. 14.11 and every tongue shall confess to God Yet in the Prophet where it is written Isa 45.23 it is thus I have sworn by my self the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousnese and shall not return that unto me every knee shall bow every tongue shall swear Which difference is such that the * In a conference with my self Quakers observe it as a ground of not-swearing because what the Prophet said of swearing the Apostle turns confessing A sentence then of Scripture it may be which is not the very words as the the title of those sentences is not these words but sentences To the second that this sentence as set down in Except 2 the Common-prayer-book is contrary to the place whence it is quoted and to other Scripture Answ The place quoted in the Service formerly is onely Ezek. 18. not naming any verse in the later Editions the 21 and 22 verses are figured but there is ground also for the sentence in the general context of that Chapter and particularly besides the former in vers 28 30 31 32. Now let us see whether there be any difference in sense much less any contrariety The Prayer-book saith At what time soever a sinner doth repent him of his sin from the bottom of his heart I will put all his wickedness out of my remembrance saith the Lord. In the Prophet verse 21 22. thus But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed and keep all my statutes and do that which is lawful and right he shall surely live he shall not dye All his transgressions that he hath committed they shall not be mentioned unto him in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live And verse 30. Repent Ezek. 18.30 31. and turn your selves from your transgressions And vers 31. ' Make you a new heart and a new spirit And then for the whensoever though implyed unavoidably in the former sentences yet 't is more than in terminis Jer. 18.7 Jer. 18.7 8. for even the Apostles cited Scriptures so as that they compacted several into one At what instant I speak concerning a Nation and concerning a Kingdom to pluck up and to pull down and to destroy it if that Nation against whom I have pronounced turn from their evill I will repent of the evill that I thought to do unto them Now compare At what time saith the Common-prayer-book in the Prophet Ezekiel it is If he will turn indefinitely excluding no time which is equivalent unto whensoever And ' At what instant saith the Prophet Jeremy that is more Repent him of his sins saith the Common-prayer-Book turn from all his sins that he hath committed saith Ezekiel vers 28. and repent and turn your selves from your transgressions vers 30. From the bottom of his heart saith the Prayer-book From all his sins saith Ezekiel vers 21. and from all his transgressions vers 30. which surely is the same with from the bottom of his heart which yet is more clearly implyed vers 31. Make you a new heart and a new spirit that ' is Repent you from your heart and spirit as before he had exhorted to repentance I will put all his wickedness out of my remembrance saith the common-prayer-Common-prayer-book All his transgressions that he hath committed they shall not be mentioned unto him saith Ezekiel vers 22. Now I shall leave it to every man that hath but two eyes Reason and Conscience to judge whether the Common-prayer-book hath a title in sense more than the Prophet pag. 26. Hebr. 4.7 chap. 3.12 Yea but it is dissonant from another To day if ye will hear his voice And Exhort one another daily while it is called to day Therefore we must not defer repentance Object but At what time soever encourages men so to do Answ To day if ye will hear As if both these sentences were not in the Old Testament as well as in the New and in both Testaments by the same Spirit 'T is evident by manifold places of Scripture that there is ever found place for true repentance without limiting of any time Why are they not offended with our Saviour for speaking of some that should be received at the eleventh hour Matth. 20. And with the Evangelist Luke for recording the repentance and acceptation of the Thief upon the Cross Luk. 23. And with the Prophet or the Lord rather in the Prophet Ezek. 23. for calling to her to return that was grown old not in ordinary sins but in Adulteries and Idolatry namely with a purpose of pardon if she would even then repent And a broken and contrite heart O Lord saith David thou wilt not despise and his repentance was late for his sin was toward the end of his life as Peter Martyr observes Pet. Mart. in 2 Sam. 11.2 One of the Martyrs hearing a Frier inveighing against the sins of the people in this manner O thou that hast spent thy youth and strength in the service of the devil dost thou think that God will now accept thee when thou canst sin no longer or to that effect said That had such doctrine been preached to him it would have cast him into despair when time was Is there any dissonancy in hastening men unto repentance and warning of them that they outstand not the day of grace and yet in the encouraging of them when they do repent To the third and last Exception that this sentence Except 3 At what time soever implies as if he could repent when he list Repent when we list c. and this occasions delay which carries many to Hell But by what Logick doth it follow that if men are told that that if they truly repent the Lord will forgive them Ergo They may repent when they list The inference is fully as good from Gods exhorting unto repentance and is urged thence by some because we are exhorted to repent therefore repentance is in the power of our own free will So whensoever you repent from the bottom of the heart c. Therefore you may when you will So that as the Brethren
and for some of our selves likewise if whilst we had such principles we had been silenc'd and asleep also To the last vâ—z That conscientious men are 3. Conscientientious men troubled for their unconformity unto these things molested and troubled I answer And well they may both for their own good and others whom by their example or perswasion they might mislead For if God may justly plague his people for neglecting his good and wholsome Law Act for the uniformity of Common-prayer in these cases provided as the Queen and Parliament imply he will It is as good service done to men by penalties to compel them to their duty in theâ—e particulars as to scourge a child to keep him from the fire St. Austin being once of the mind that Schismaticks and Hereticks should not be punished on better advice acquaintance with the Scripture and by experience Epist 48. and 50. was brought to be of another mind and wrote two large and elaborate Epistles to defend the lawfulness of the use of Laws to that purpose SECT III. Humane Inventions THe third general Exception is against the things we treat of that they are inventions humane and from man onely Answ several of them First The light of natural understanding wit and reason is from God he it is which thereby doth illuminate every man entring into the world Rich. Hook Eccles pol. lib. 3. sect 9. If there proceed from us any thing afterward corrupt and naught the mother therof is our own darkness neither doth it proceed from any such cause whereof God is the Author He is the Author of all that we think or do by vertue of that light which himself hath given And therefore the Laws which the very Heathens did gather to direct their actions by so far forth as they proceeded from the light of nature God himself doth acknowledge to have proceeded even from himself and that he was the writer of them in the table of their hearts In the second place How much more then is he the Author of those Laws which have been made by his Saints c. saith that praise worthy Author When the Disciples would have had our Saviour to put the man to silence who cast out devils in his name Mar. 9.38 and followed him not with them our Saviour rebuking of them gives us this useful Maxim in religious matters viz. That he that is not against us is on our part Things not opposing of the Scripture and intended for and tending to the furtherance of Religion they are not humane notions but the inventions of men directed by Scripture in the general touching such things viz. 1 Cor. 14. That all things be done to decency and edification and guided by the Spirit of God in such particulars Observance whereof rather then opposition thereto would represent a Christs Disciple The Feast of Dedication of the Temple was no injunction from the Lord 1 Maccab. 4.59 Joh. 10.22 But so useful an invention of man that our Lord himself observed it Remarkable also to this purpose is the profession of the Learned Zanchy touching things of this nature viz. Zanch. Observ in confess suam cap. 25. Aph. 10 11. ab initio Credo ea quae â piis patribus in nomine domini Congregatis communi omnium consensu citra ullam sacrarum literarum contradictionem definita recepta fuerunt ea etium quanquam haud ejusdem cum sacris literis authoritatis A SPIRITV SANCTO ESSE Those things saith he which have been concluded and received by the holy Fathers gathered together in the name of God Canons of the Church of what authority agreed on by common consent and without any contradiction to the Scripture although they are not of the same authority with the holy Scriptures yet I believe even those things to be from the HOLY GHOST Thus he Joh. 14. cap. 15. cap. 16. And it is not in vain that Christ hath promised his Spirit to his people to guide them into all truth SECT IV. Of the Apocrypha TO the fourth that many things in the premises are but Apocryphal and so not Scriptural nor obliging Now Touching the Apocrypha and its injunction to be read in some parts in the Church although all the Scripture be not read First which Books in case my self did think as some others do safer and better to be left publickly unread R. Hook Eccles pol. l. 5. sect 20. nevertheless as in other things of like nature even so in this my private judgment I should be loth to oppose against the force of their reverend authority who rather considering the divine excellency of some things in all and of all things in certain of those Apocrypha which we publickly read have thought it better to let them stand as a list or marginal border unto the Old Testament And though with divine yet as humane compositions to grant at the least unto certain of them publick audience in the Church of God And if in them there happen any speech that soundeth towards error should the mixture of a little dross constrain the Church to deprive her self of so much gold rather than learn how by art and judgment to make separation To this effect very fitly from the counsel that St. Jerom giveth unto Laeta of taking heed how she read the Apocrypha as also by the help of other learned mens judgment we may take direction And let me add that without such directions Confer Hamp Court pag. 61. King James said well he would not have all the Canonical Scripture read But because some there are who seem better to relish forreign judgments than those of their own Church Expositio de sacr libr. dignitate praefix ante Biblia Tigurin sive Leon Judae I shall recite first Bullingers opinion of those Books and the publick reading of them one of the Professors of the Church of Tigur his words are Ego verò arbitror salvo aliorum judicio istos libros Apocryphos rectissimè Hagiographa dici posse nimirum a sanctis viris de rebus Scriptos sacris quos quanquam non fint in Canone Hebraeo Ecclesia tamen quia sancta tradunt Canonicis non contradicunt recipit ac in sanctorum coetibus legit I do think saith he saving other mens judgments that these Apocryphal Books may very justly be called holy writings as being written by holy men touching holy things which though they are not in the Hebrew Canon yet because they treat of religious matters and do not contradict the holy Scriptures the Church doth receive them and reads them in the Assemblies of the Saints Then he produceth the judgment and relation of Cyprian Cyprian expos symb or Russinus for the work is ascribed to both in his Exposition of the Creed to the same purpose Where it is by the way to be noted out of the Text of Cyprian or Ruffinus first that he reckons the Books