Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	new_a	old_a	testament_n	18,420	5	8.4579	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47133	The deism of William Penn and his brethren destructive to the Christian religion, exposed and plainly laid open in the examination and refutation of his late reprinted book called, A discourse of the general rule of faith and practise and judge of controversie, wherein he contendeth that the Holy Scriptures are not the rule of faith and life, but that the light in the conscience of every man is that rule / by George Keith.	Keith, George, 1639?-1716.	1699 (1699)	Wing K156; ESTC R6589	71,572	164

allow What if any now should say that the Light within them forbids them to eat Flesh How could W.P. convince them of their Error If he bring Paul's words or any other Scripture words to his Conviction may he not answer that the Scripture is not the Rule of his Faith and W.P. hath confirmed him by his late Book that saith the same and if the Light within in the Esseni might contradict the Scripture of the Old Testament why may not the Light within in a Quaker contradict the Scripture of the New Testament both being given from the same Spirit and the Scripture of the Old Testament as binding to the Jews before Christ's Incarnation as the Scripture of the New Testament is to the Christians since And how can W.P. prove that Poligamy is against the Light within It is granted that the New Testament forbids it But what then by W. P's Doctrine the greatest things in the New Testament are not necessary absolutely to be believed but upon Conviction of the Spirit i. e. upon a new Revelation as that Christ was born of a Virgin dyed for our Sins c. And he plainly tells us Any such new Revelation is not necessary If this be not to turn People loose and to run them into great Confusion Light against Light and Spirit against Spirit while the Holy Scripture is denied to be the Rule of Faith and Life yea a Rule I leave to the Sober and Intelligent to judge Section 18. A Correction of a Saying of W.P. Scandalous and Offensive to Christian Ears That Men are not like to be informed of the Knowledge and Experience of the New Birth from our Saviour's words to Nicomedus John 3. Nor can that Scripture be my Rule saith he in that heavenly travel c. Neither can any other Writing whatever Page 29. HERE I find one passage more in this book of W. P's that I am sure greatly derogates from the Scriptures and is justly offensive to Christian Ears Having quoted our Saviour's words to Nicodemus that he saith may be credited Historically that unless a Man be born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God John 3. But what is that saith he to the Knowledge and Experience of the new Birth that they are never like to be informed of there Nor can that Scripture be my Rule in that heavenly Travel respecting the many and wonderful Trials and Exercises that are to be met with in the way to it Neither can any other Writing whatever This Only is the Office of that Spirit and Word Immortal by which we are begotten again I answer Here he excludes not only that place above mentioned but the whole Scripture from being instrumental to our Information and plainly denies that any can be informed of it there this is indeed to make it not only not the Rule but not a Rule in this great case But his assertion is extreamly false the place quoted John 3.3 5. informs us of the necessity of Regeneration and the following words informs us of the way and manner how it is wrought to wit by the Spirit as the principal Efficient and by Faith in the Son of Man as the Instrumental cause v. 14 15 16. and this Faith is wrought instrumentally by the Words and Doctrine of the Gospel called by Paul Rom. 6.17 The Form or Pattern of Doctrine whereunto the believing Romans were delivered as the Mettal that is melted into the Mould that frames it into a Vessel And will W.P. say that his and his Brethrens Preaching and Words inform People nothing of Regeneration nor of the manner of it and the several steps in the progress of it If not their Preaching so much of the New Birth and the manner of it at least as they think is very unprofitable but if they think their Preaching profitable to inform concerning Regeneration and manner of it then their Preaching must be better than the whole Scripture Had he said the Scripture without the Spirit cannot guide or direct us in the way of Regeneration nor be instrumental towards it without the same he had not been to blame all true Christians say the same but to exclude the Scriptures that is the Word and Doctrine contained in the Scriptures from being so much as an Organ or Instrument in the hand of the Spirit as the Spirit giveth Efficacy to it is extreamly false and erronious and contradicts the Scriptures Testimony and the Experience of Thousands who can set to their Seal that the Spirit of God has made the Scriptures to wit the Word and Doctrine delivered in them Instrumental both to their Conviction and Conversion Surely James was of another mind than W.P. who said That the Faithful were begotten of the Will of God by the Word of Truth and Peter said They were made Partakers of the Divine Nature by the exceeding great and precious Promises which are to be found in the Holy Scriptures through the Operation of the Divine Power And as false it is what he saith That Experience to wit of the New Birth must go before all Doctrinal Scripture Meaning the Doctrine delivered in the Scripture which was the same before it was written This is to set the Cart before the Horse as the Proverb is or the Fruit before the Seed Are Men regenerated in Blindness and Ignorance or rather are they not renewed in Knowledge And this Knowledge doth it not presuppose some doctrinal Principles of which Men must be first convinced Has the Doctrine of the great Love of God in sending his Son into the World outwardly to dye for us and inwardly to enlighten us no Influence on our Regeneration Was Adam regenerated before God gave him the Promise of the Womans Seed after his Fall by his Assertion it must be so which is wonderful Ignorance Is he so little acquainted with the Holy Scriptures as not to have seen the Lineaments Steps and Progress of the New Birth fairly delineated and the whole manner of it as clearly as any Country can be delineated in the fairest Map with all the several Roads but as the Map can be of no use to a blind Man though to a seeing it is of great use so to a Man whom the Spirit of God has in some measure enlightned the Scriptures are as serviceable as a Map to a Traveller yea and much more they are really the Instrument of the Spirit both for convincing and converting Men and the Rule according to which the Spirit leads them in the various steps of it It is granted That the Experience of Regeneration in whom it is wrought is much more than any verbal account of it by the best of words and gives a Man in some respect a more satisfactory Knowledge of it than any Man can have by Scripture words or any words whatsoever who is not himself regenerated as the sight of a Country is more and gives a Man a more satisfactory account of it than all verbal Descriptions or Maps can do to

THE DEISM OF WILLIAM PENN And his Brethren Destructive to the Christian Religion Exposed and plainly laid open IN The Examination and Refutation of his late reprinted Book called A Discourse of the General Rule of Faith and Practise and Judge of Controversie Wherein he contendeth That the Holy Scriptures are not the Rule of Faith and Life but that the Light in the Conscience of every Man is that Rule By GEORGE KEITH LONDON Printed for Brab Aylmer at the Three Pigeons against the Royal Exchange in Cornhill 1699. The PREFACE to the Christian Protestant Reader Christian Reader I Have been concerned more earnestly and amply to treat on this Subject in the following Treatise to refute that grand Error of William Penn and his Brethren who make it their great Fundamental that the Light within with respect only to its ordinary and common Discoveries given to all Mankind to Christians Jews Mahometans and Heathens of all sorts Protestants and Papists is the general Rule of Faith and Life to them all So that all under these several Denominations are true and good Christians and ought to own and acknowledge one another as Christian Brethren and Members of one Catholick or Vniversal Church if they obey and walk according to the common and ordinary Dictates thereof without all superadded Revelation External or Internal of Christ without as God and Man in one Person But their constant Practise doth evidently contradict their Principle for though they have acknowledged that such the Heathens who were or now are obedient to the common Discoveries of the Light within them without all Faith in Christ without them are their Christian Brethren and for the same reason they may conclude Jews and Mahometans who are obedient to their Light within to be such yet generally they disown all Christian Protestants among whom they live be they ever so Just and Sober and obedient to their Light within them if they come not under their Profession and Circumstances to be Christians And thus as some have well observed they Christianise the Heathens and Heathenise the Christians calling them all the Worlds People but themselves they call the Children of Light the Elect People of God and say of themselves they are in the Truth and none but they and their Deist and Heathen Brethren and perhaps the Quietists and Followers of Molinus whose Book they so much esteem among the Papists This being their Fundamental and Capital Error and the great Original and Spring of all their other Errors that as so many Streams issue and proceed from it the which being plainly detected as by Divine assistance I hope I have done in the following Treatise it is greatly to be hoped to which I joyn my earnest and sincere Prayers to God Almighty in the Name of Christ Jesus that it may be a means to undeceive and recover from Error many of that People if they will or dare give themselves the liberty to read it The Book called A Discourse of the General Rule of Faith and Life by W. Penn to which this is an Answer was first Printed in the Year 1673 as an Appendix to his part of the Christian Quaker and is now again reprinted in this present Year 1699 which sufficiently sheweth that W.P. and his Brethren are not changed nor reformed from what they were so long ago though his and their late Pretences That they own the common Principles of Christianity and differ not much in Doctrine from the Church of England have occasioned some to think them somewhat Reformed of late but it is their great Mistake which the Fallacies of W.P. and others of his Brethren by their late Fallacious Creeds have led them into Indeed I did not know but that it was a new Book so litte had I read or considered the Contents of it which by occasion of their reprinting it this very Year I have been awakened and as it were alarumed to take special notice of and strictly to examine detect and refute the which whither effectually done or not is left to the free and impartial Judgment of the Intelligent Christian Protestant Reader Their printing it at this juncture doth not a little argue their great Imprudence in laying themselves so open to be rank Deists while they at the same time pretend to hold the Christian Doctrine that is point blank incosistent therewith and great boldness that they are not ashamed in the face of the World to say and unsay and to be profess'd Deists and Christians at once which is as great a Chimera or Impossibility as for one and the same thing to be Horse and Man at once I mean not one part Horse and another part Man for such a Monster perhaps is possible but to be in all the parts both Man and Horse without all Redundancy or Deficiency of either which as impossible as it is to be in Nature it is as impossible that W.P. and his Brethren can be both Deists and true Christians at once that they are Deists the Book to which this is an Answer doth sufficiently prove And therefore notwithstanding all their late Pretences till they retract that and their other former Books true Christians they cannot be ERRATA PAge 35. Line 13. read imperfect p. 43. l. 10. for regulus read regulans p. 76. l. 2. for Iad r. and. p. 99. l. 12. for 13 r. 3. The DEISM of William Penn and his Brethren Destructive to the Christian Religion Exposed and plainly laid open The Introduction Shewing the great Importance of our knowing what the True Rule of Faith and Life is And containing a Retractation of some Vnsound and Erronious Passages in some of my former Books about the Rule of Faith yet no-wise so Erronious as the Doctrine of W.P. nor being of that Tendency as his is to introduce Deism Page 3. HE saith Since there are so many Faiths in the World and perplex'd Controversies about them that is greatly behoves every Man if he contend for then first to know the True Faith that overcometh the World Concerning the General Rule of Faith and Life he is press'd to say something from that weighty Consideration That Men Perish for want of it and can no more arrive at Truth without it than the distressed Mariner can gain his Port who Sails without either Star or Compass This his weighty Consideration is a plain Confession That the not having a right and true understanding of the Rule of Faith what it is is of very dangerous Consequence even no less than Perishing and Destruction to all such who want the true Knowledge of it and set up another thing in the room of it It may therefore be very necessary for W.P. to consider the Matter a little more weightily that in case he himself have not the true Knowledge of the Rule of Faith and Life in what danger he is of Perishing And how in this his Work of labouring to bring all People under a Christian Profession that give up to believe him to

observed in his Book giving his Reasons and Arguments That the Scripture is not the Rule of Faith and Life but the Light in every Conscience and having shewn the Weakness yea the Falsity of them I thought it not necessary to take notice of his Enlargements and Amplifications on his several Arguments but answer to the Argument it self wherein its strength seemed to lye I shall be brief in my Examination and answer to his second part to wit concerning the Judge of Controversie for because it hath such a necessary Connexion with the former the former being clearly discussed the latter will easily be determined Page 39. He gives us his explanation what he means by these Terms Judge and Controversie A Judge saith he is one that has not only power to determine but discerning to do it rightly Controversie is a debate between two parties about the Truth or Falshood to be determined by that Judge But as he wrongly stated the Question in the first part about the Rule so here he is very short in stating the Controversie about the Judge It is without all Question among all that own that there is one great God Almighty that he is the Great and Supreme Judge of what is Truth and what is not universally and that most perfectly and infallibly and all that believe in Christ and in the Holy Spirit do own that Christ and the Holy Spirit together with the Father are that Supreme Judge as they are one and the same Supreme God and not only so but all true Christians own that Christ as the Son of Man has all Judgment committed to him and is both Head and Judge in his Church Now that wherein W.P. is short in stating the Question here is that he doth not assign the true Rule whereby the Judge to wit God Christ and the Spirit doth give forth a definitive Judgment to be understood and received by the Members of the Church of Christ Neither God nor Christ nor the Holy Spirit need the Scripture to give a Judgment as to themselves their knowledge of what is Truth and what is not so is wholly independent from the Scripture but the Question is to be thus stated What Rule Standard or Measure God Christ and the Spirit has given to the faithful in particular and to the whole Church in general since the Doctrine of the true Faith was committed to writing whereby they may understand and know the true Judgment and determination of God and Christ and the Holy Spirit the Supreme Judge of Controversie True it is that the Law-giver is the best interpreter of any point that may concern his own Law and therefore as God is the Law-maker so he is the Supreme Judge and Interpreter of his Law But as an Earthly Law-giver suppose an Earthly King with the consent of the great Counsel of the Nation gives forth his Laws to his Subjects if any Controversie arise about the true sense of those Laws the King and his Counsel that made those Laws is to determine the Controversie by the Laws themselves one part of the Law serving as a Key to open what is hard to be understood in another part of it Thus it is in this Nation and commonly in all Nations for the Law is supposed to be such a perfect Law Intire and Compleat that the Sense of it needs not be given by giving forth any new Law to give the sense of the former nor ought any Subject to presume to give his private Interpretation of the Law by any private Gloss or Sense which he cannot demonstrate from the Law it self and as it 's thus as to the Laws of Men how much more is it so as to the Laws of God The Laws of Men indeed receive frequently new Additions and Alterations and yet this cannot be done but by Publick Authority But the Law and Rule of Faith and Life that God has given to the Faithful and to his Church now under the New Testament is so full perfect and comprehensive that is fully Sufficient without any Addition and if it can be supposed that it may please God to give forth any new Laws to his Church it must be allowed that there must be the same Evidence and ground of receiving them to be such as was given for the Old Testament by Moses and for the New Testament by Christ Now had W.P. fairly stated the question he should have stated it thus Whither the Spirit of Christ whose Judgment and Determination is all one with that of Christ and the Father doth give his Judgment to the Church and the Members of it by any other Law or Rule Measure or Standard than what is already to be-found in the Holy Scriptures whether relating to Articles of Faith or positive Precepts of revealed and instituted Religion by Christ and his Apostles in the New Testament Or whither the Spirit gives this Judgment not by the Doctrines and Precepts contained in the Scriptures but by the common discoveries and Dictates of the Light within every Man's Conscience which are commonly the same and of the same extent in all Mankind be they Jews and Mahometans and Painims abroad or Deists at home here in England or elsewhere Or lastly whither by any new particular Discoveries Revelations or Dictates and new Precepts of the Spirit not formerly given either to Mankind in general or to the Church in particular To the first all sound Christians agree The Second is the sence of W.P. and those of his Brethren of the Second Days Meeting that have approved his Book The third is the sence of some of the chief Teachers and Leaders that first arose among the Quakers that did affirm they had new Commands given from the Spirit by immediat Revelation from Heaven some of which are neither the common Dictates of the Light in every Conscience of Mankind nor to be found in the Scriptures either expresly or by any necessary consequence from them And indeed the first Teachers and Leaders amongst that People did not think it worth while to prove their Doctrine or warrant their Interpretations by consequences from Scripture but the general proof was This is the Word of the Lord unto you for G.F. see his Journal plainly told that when he first came forth he was commanded of God to say thee and thou to every Man to whom he spoke and not to put off his Hat to any Also the setting up of Womens Government in their Meetings distinct from the Men by the more devout sort who did think and still think that G.F. was a Prophet as immediately sent as Moses or any other is Judged to have been by a Divine Authority and Power in G.F. without any dependance on Scripture Rule or seeking to fish it by consequence from Scripture And pray what need is there to bring Scripture proof for any thing that Men either believe or practise either by consequence or express words seeing that is not the Rule of either Faith or practise but