Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	lord_n	name_n	write_v	5,698	5	5.8489	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A83437	The casting down of the last and strongest hold of Satan. Or, A treatise against toleration and pretended liberty of conscience: wherein by Scripture, sound reason, fathers, schoolmen, casuists, Protestant divines of all nations, confessions of faith of the Reformed Churches, ecclesiastical histories, and constant practice of the most pious and wisest emperours, princes, states, the best writers of politicks, the experience of all ages; yea, by divers principles, testimonies and proceedings of sectaries themselves, as Donatists, Anabaptists, Brownists, Independents, the unlawfulnesse and mischeif [sic] in Christian commonwealths and kingdoms both of a vniversal toleration of all religions and consciences, and of a limited and bounded of some sects only, are clearly proved and demonstrated, with all the materiall grounds and reasons brought for such tolerations fully answered. / By Thomas Edvvards, Minister of the Gospel. The first part.; Casting down of the last and strongest hold of Satan. Part 1	Edwards, Thomas, 1599-1647.	1647 (1647)	Wing E225; Thomason E394_6; ESTC R201621	211,214	231

seven Precepts Juris Noachidarum seu Naturalis as they are called among which Idolatry and Blasphemy De Cultu extraneo De maledictione Nominis sanctissimi seu Numinis were the first Nay further he proveth that every Gentile which had not received those seven Precepts was to be punished with death if he stayed in the Jewes Territories and particularly in divers places of that Book showes that Idolatry and Blasphemy were punished by death upon all that lived in the Iewish Common-wealth though they were not Proselyti Justiciae and on those words Levit 24. And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord he shall surely be put to death writes thus Id est sive fuerit Proselytus sen peregrinus sive indigena aut civis ex eo quod blasphemaverit nomen Domini morte plectendus est yea he saith that the Gentiles or Proselytes Domicilii were punished more severely then the Iewes in this case of Blasphemy not only for blaspheming the proper name of God but the Cognomen All which showes clearly these punishments were not inflicted upon the Iewes qua Iewes and qua a typicall people in a typicall Land c. but upon them as the nature of such crimes calling for such punishments and that 't is the Magistrates duty to restraine in Iews or Gentiles in all under their jurisdiction Idolatry blasphemie c. Thirdly the reasons and grounds of these Lawes and commands with the use and end of them upon which they are inforced are of common reason and equity that concern us under the New Testament as well as the Iewes I doe not finde one Ceremoniall or properly Iudiciall reason given of any one but all of them are laid downe either absolutely and simply without any reasons at all or else upon such reasons as are morall and perpetuall and I judge that in all commands which are not typicall and ceremoniall and so some other thing apppointed to come in upon the abolishment to make good their perpetuall end and use assigned that rule of Divines holds universally true Ratio immutabilis facit praeceptum immutabile which by the way may serve to answer the Evasions of Minus Gelsus Senensis and of Hagiomastix bringing instances in Circumcision and such like which the Scriptures declare expressely to be abolished having substituted Baptisme and other ordinances in their roome but have not said one word in the like kind of the commands in question besides that Christ the substance of those shadows is come and so they are of no further use at all And indeed Acontius though a great Libertine doth confesse that Law in the 13th of Deuterenomy of the stoning of the false Prophet and Seducer is not confined only to the time before Christ having no place at all under the Gospel and to the ground and conjecture as Acontius calls it of that opinion he saith that the reason set downe in the same is against it viz. All Israel shall beare and feare and shall do no more any such wickednesse as this is among you which reason certainly abides alwayes so that although this Law had exspired yet notwithstanding by vertue of it the Magistrate hath a right and power of making another like it as he hath of making Lawes against Murtherers Adulterers and other flagitious persons Fourthly Before these Lawes in Deut. 13. and Deut 17. for punishing Idolaters were given by Moses yea before Moses time or any Common-wealth among the Iewes was erected in other Countries remote from the Land of Canaan Idolatry in worshipping creatures deserved punishing by the Magistrate as I have showed already fully in page 13 14. of this Book yea the particular kind of Idolatry instanced in Deut. 17. 3. of worshipping the Sunne or Moone which among the Israelites was to be punished by death if it had been found in Job in the Land of Vz he had beene worthy of punishment from the Iudges for it Job 31. 26 27. 28. And other Princes not Iewes as Artaxerxes Nebuchadonezar c. made Lawes and Edicts for punishing those that blasphemed the God of heaven and transgressed his Lawes as the Scriptures testifie Now the Lawes properly judiciall that were the Iewes civill Lawes simply belonging to them as such a people in such a Countrey were in use only among themselves and not practised by other Nations and Countries but such Lawes and Customes used among them that were observed universally among all Nations or by divers Nations though not of all strictly speaking were not Iudiciall Lawes but the Lawes of Nature and Nations though according to the Discipline of the Iewes that is what was received in the Church and Common-wealth of the Iewes and accordingly accounted by them as the Law of the world of all men and ages or the Law of many Nations common to them with those Nations of all which the Reader may be further satisfied in that learned Peece of Mr. SELDEN'S De jure Naturali Gentium juxta disciplinam Ebraeorum and particularly in the Preface of that Book where he sheweth the reason of that Title and gives the summe of his work and undertaking and in his first Book And among the Iawes of Naturall right as distinguished from the civil lawes of the Jews or simply Israeliticall those commands of punishing for strange worship and Blasphemie are reckoned by the Jewes themselves as the Reader may find in the first book de Jure Naturali Gentium cap. 10. 2 book cap. 1. 12. 3 book cap. 1. Fifthly The Spirit of God under the New Testament Hebr. 10. 28 29. speaking according to the common equity and justice of the matter and not according to a Politicall law peculiar to one Nation saith of the despisers of Moses law that died without mercy under two or three witnesses that they were worthy of it as appears by the comparative Of how much sorer punishment suppose ye shall he be thought warthy Every comparative implying a positive The sorer punishment that he is worthy of who hath trodden under foot the Son of God supposes the other worthy of the sore punishment inflicted upon them by Moses law for despising it Now by Moses law in this place the breach whereof deserved capitall punishment must needs be meant sins against the first Table rather then against the second and that because the scope of the Apostle is to warne the Hebrews against Apostasie and falling off from the Christian religion for which end he brings these words among others and therefore would speak ad idem Beza upon 〈◊〉 place saith that the Apostle speaks not of the transgression of any one command but of the apostasie and totall defection from the true Religion of which Moses in Deut. 17. 2. had spoken So Calvin upon this text The law under Moses did not punish with death all sins or transgressions committed but Apostasie The Apostle had an eye to that of Deut. 17. 2. of stoning him that served strange gods And Pareus

found to make for the defence and preservation of the obedience of the Decalogue 3. If appear as usefull and necessary now for the glory of God the salvation of mens soules the peace safety of the Church and State as then Now all these do most clearly appear in punishments of sins immediately against God as Apostasie Idolatry Blasphemy c. For first these commands are of the light of nature tha● he who is in place and power should forbid and punish the speaking evill of God This sentence as Melancton writes is preacht to all men yea to all reasonable creatures every one in his place ought to forbid and hinder the manifest reproaches and dishonours of God And therefore Magistrates ought to forbid and punish Epicurean speeches worships of Idols profession of wicked doctrines Many Common-wealths among the Heathens have made Lawes against Epicures and Atheist● who have openly held there was no God or that there was no providence of God Peter Martyr in his Common Place● that Heathen Princes used to care for Religion and have punished men even to death for the matters of Religion Thus Socrates was condemned at Athens for no other cause but for teaching of new gods I and for with drawing the youth from their old worship of the gods Zanchius on the fourth Commandement writes that by the Law of nature all Princes among the Heathen judged that the care of Religion belonged to them The Athenians judged so the Romans also and thereupon made Lawes and punished for violation of religion Beza gives three instances of punishments inflicted by heathen Magistrates upon three cheif Philosophers for matters of Religion Socrates Theodorus Protagoras the last of which was by the Athenians banished out of their Territories and his books burnt for writing contemptuously of the gods in these words De diis neque ut sint neque ut non sint habeo dicere Musculus in his Common Places speaking of Magistrates having the care of Religion saith the wise men among the Heathen acknowledged it and that the truth of this opinion was so manifest as that it could not lie hid from the Heathen it was jus gentium dictated by the light of nature and therefore ought to be much more acknowledged and embraced by us who in the knowledge of God go farre beyond not only the Gentiles but the Iewes Master Selden in divers places of that learned Book De Jure Naturali Gentium proves that those commands De Cultu Extraneo and De Maledictione Nominis sanctissimi seu Numinis were Jus Naturalis common to all men were indeed the cheif and first Heads of the Law of Nature and that in those precepts viz. for the negative part all the Gentiles who lived or but passed through the Land of Judea were punished by the Magistrate for Idolatry and blasphemy as well as the Iewes and that from Lawes common to the Iewes with the Gentiles though the kinds of the punishments viz. this or that as whether stoning c. were not of the same nature but more proper to the Iewes yea he showes it was an opinion held by some learned men that it was not lawfull for any Gentile to speak evill of and blaspheme his God which hee worshipped as the God of his Countrey and saith it was founded upon those words Levit. 24. 15. Whosoever curseth his god shall heare his sinne the blaspheming the name of the Lord being spoken of after in the 16. verse as if it were distinct from that in the 15. verse In which forme of speech divers learned men both Rabbins Fathers and others would have forbidden to all the sonnes of men not only speaking evill evill of the most holy and only God but also the speaking of those gods which they had chosen to themselves So as none of the Gentiles might blaspheme their false God which yet they had not renounced without the violation of that Law Whosoever curseth his god shall beare his sinne Master Burroughs in his Irenicum though he be for a Toleration in a great measure as in things controversall and doubtfull amongst godly and peaceable men and that with a liberty of declaration of difference of judgement and some different practise page 55. yea brings such Arguments for that Toleration that if they prove any thing they prove a generall Toleration yet confesses page 23. of that Book T is the dictate of nature that Magistrates should have some power in matters of Religion The generality of all people have ever thought it equall It hath ever been challenged of all Nations and Common-wealths The Heathens would never suffer their gods to be blasphemed but punished such as were guilty thereof by the power of the Magistrate Socrates was put to death for blaspheming their multiplicity of gods And Master Burroughs in page 19. of the same book affirmes that Principle That Magistrates have nothing to doe with matters of Religion is abhorring to nature Is it not an abhorring thing to any mans heart in the world that men suffer that God to be blasphemed whom they honour and that nothing should be done for the restraining any but to aske them why they doe so and perswade them to doe otherwise There hath ever been as great a contestation amongst people about Religion as about any thing Exod. 8. 25 26. Pharaoh hade Moses sacrifice in the Land But Moses said it is not meete so to doe for we shall sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians Lo shall we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes and will they not stone us Though they had leave of the King yet the people would not endure it By which place of Scripture 't is evident that the Egyptians who were heathens by the light of nature would not endure the dishonour of their gods to see those creatures they worshipped for gods to be killed as Oxen and Sheep the principall sacrifices of the Hebrewes but they would kill the Israelites for so doing And lastly Master Prynne in that late Book of his The sword of Christian Magistrates supported doth largely and excellently show that by the light of nature in all ages Heathen Magistrates have made Lawes against and punished such whom they esteemed Atheists Hereticks Blasphemers of their Gods or oppugners of their established Religion and that with no lesse then Capitall punishments unto which Book from page 14. to 19. I referre the Reader where he shall finde many examples of Heathen Kings and Nations recited and shall conclude this with that saying of Seneca De Benefic lib. 3. cap. 6. Violatarum Religionum aliubi atque aliubi diversa p●na est Sed vbique Aliqua as well as of homicide paricide poysoning Secondly the Magistrates sword in matters of Religion in punishing Blasphemies Idolatries Heresies hath been found by good experience in all ages to make greatly for the defence and preservation of the first Table to stirre men

Ecclesiasticall Sanhedrin distinct from the Civill and among other grounds from this of Deut. 17. 8 9 10 11 12. But none of these learned men not any but Papists that ever I met with give the least hint of any judgement by Vrim to bee meant in this place neither do I find in all the Authors that I have read concerning the way of passing sentence in the highest Synedrion at Jerusalem and determining the difficulties about the Law brought to them whether the Ecclesiasticall of which the high Priest was president or the Civill that ever for the satisfaction of the parties and giving the true sense of the Law thus controverted and so putting an end to all controversies they were wont in that Court to enquire by Vrim nay there are severall things written in the Scriptures and by learned men who write of the customes of the Iewes and proceedings in that Court which show the contrary as those words imply as much Deut. 17. the Priest and the Iudge that shall be in those dayes from whence the Hebrews gather that if the high Synedrion had judged and determined of a matter as seemed right in their eyes and after them another Synedrion rose up which upon reasons seeming good unto them disannulled the former sentence then it was disanulled and judgement passed according as it seemed good unto these latter thou art not bound to walke save after the Synedrion that are in thy generation Now if it were a sentence by Vrim immediate and infallible from God no following Synedrion might have disannull'd it So those words according to the sentence which they shall teach thee showes the sentence was to be according to the Law the word written and not by a voice from heaven as also that instance of Ierem. being condemned to die by the supreme Court at Ierusal the Court of the Priests doing their part judging him a false Prophet and worthy to die the Court of the Princes acquitting him as a true Prophe● of which see more in Aarons Rod blossom p. 18. 19. both of them going upon Scripture Grounds as I have shown p. 99. but in this great Controversie never appealing to the judgement of Vrim and so in their way of trying false Prophets they went not by the Priests putting on the Ephod to enquire of the Lord but therein all say the Iewes was this If he had threatned a judgement to come although it came not yet hee was not a false Prophet for that God say they is gracious as hee was to the Ninivites and to Hezekiah But if hee promised a good thing and it came not to passe then hee was a lyar For every good thing which God promiseth he performeth so Ieremiah tried Ananias to be a false Prophet because hee promised a good thing to Zedekiah and it came not to passe Fifthly the current of the Scripture both in the Law and Prophets still speaks of going to the Law and according to that making that the last resolution of Practise and Controversies in all morall things both of duties and sins and that for private and publick persons Esaiah 8. 20. To the Law and to the Testimony if they speake not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Deut. 30. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. the Iewes must hearken to the commandement written in the Book of the Law t is not hidden neither is it farre of t is not darke that it cannot be attained to It is not in heaven that it should be said who shall goe up for us to heaven and bring it unto us that wee may heare it and doe it But the worde is very nigh c Deut. 17. 18. v. the Law of God is to bee for the direction of the King and of the Priests and Levites The Book of the Law of the Lord given by Moses 2 Cron. 34. 15 19 30 31. compared with 2 Kings chapter 22. 8 11. v. chapter 23. 2 3. was that by which Josiah made his Reformation both in the removing of persons and things not once enquiring by Vrim whether he should slay Idolatrous Priests put downe others keep such a solemne passeover c and t is observable that the King commanded Hilkiah the high Priest and Shaphan the Scribe c to goe and enquire of the Lord for him and for the People concerning the words of this Book what judgement hanged over their heads and when it was like to fall and whether there were any means or whether it was not too late to appease his wrath and accordingly they went unto Huldah the Prophetesse yet he commanded not Hilkiah to enquire by Vrim neither did Hilkiah the high Priest put on the Ephod but went to the Prophetesse which is to me a great argument that the judgement of Vrim was only in some particular set cases as going in and out to war and such like but not for inquiry in cases of the Law what Reformation to be made or what transgressions of the Law to bee punished by death As for those other two places Deut. 19. 17 18. 21 and 5. I shall not spend many lines in clearing them as being not brought to prove the glorious Ordinance of the Oracle least I should be charged by Hagiomastix to show my valour in fighting with men of clouts of my owne setting up For the first t is understood of a single witnesse accusing one for seducing to Apostasie and revolt so Junius reads it ad testificandum in ●um Apostasiam and Ainsworth to testifie revolt against him not civill wrong as the English translation seems to carry it and the meaning is this although in all other causes two witnesses atleast are required by the Law yet in the businesse of religion one witnesse is sufficient to make a questiō of the partie by which God shows be would have the preservation of Doctrine commended to the Magistrate for this is an appendix of that Law which is spoken of Deut. 17. 2. So Iunius Diodate also on the place writes thus in case of a secret Seducement from Gods true service he that had been sollicited though hee were alone ought to detect the Seducer Deut. 13. 6. 8. and the Judges ought to proceed therein as upon an advice and denunciation not as upon a formall accusation which had required two witnesses And if the calumny was made to appeare unto them they were to observe this Law if it were truth that of Deut. 13. 9. So then this place holds forth no more then what Deut. 17. 8 9. does which hath nothing to doe with the judgement of V●im as I have already showen at large and yet if this place had any thing in it more for enquiring by Vrim then the former it could doe Hagiomastix no good nor is to the point at all brought by him because this enquiring by Vrim is not to know from the Lord what kind of Idolatrie and Idolater this is whether that for which

gr●sse then the Papists I referre the Reader to the Theses of learned Voetius De necessitate utilitate Dogmatis de sa●st● Trinitate who fully and excellently proves all these particulars In the ancient Constitutions of Gratian Valentinian Theodosius Martian Iustinian Antitrinitarians are said Iewishly and Apostatically to contradict the Trinitie and the name of Christians is denied them Are not Anti-trinitatians as Paul Best that hath belched out so many reproachfull speeches against Christ and the Holy-Ghost Blasphemers in a high measure Are not they who doe not only speak evill of the Trinitie but teach others so to doe greater Blasphemers then those spoken of in Levit. 24. 16 Are not divers Anabaptists who have broached false Doctrines and foretold divers things to come as the day of judgement to be on such a day such a City or Country to be destroyed on such a day such a Citie or Kingdome to be given them of God and that by affirming they spake by Revelation and immediate inspiration of God false Prophets as well as those in Deut. 13. 2. Deut. 18. 20 22 In a word I shall conclude this with a passage out of * Beza De Haereticis a Magistratu puniendis brought by way of Answer to a like objection against Deut. 13. c Those Lawes are not now in force because there is no man now a false Prophet according to Moses definition that is who foretels any thing to come and teaches to worship other gods I answer that the mind of the Law-giver is to be understood from the cause of making the Law Because he hath spoken to turne away from the Lord your God Now there are divers publick Declarations of this defection of which although the Principall only and those which most commonly fall out be named in the Laws yet the very reason of the Law is expressed in a universall forme and therefore in the general oúght to be in force against those who doe fall from the true religion and sollicite others to defection whom in a generall word we call now Hereticks not false Prophets or dreamers of dreams or Sacrificers to other gods because that those out ward ceremonies and those gifts of Prophecie are ceased But though they be ceased notwithstanding neither defection nor the punishment of it is ceased Moreover I say those who interpret the holy Scripture wrongfully withdraw men from the true worship of God and so perswade them to the worship of other gods For t is necessary that all Doctrine which speaks of the worship of God if it be not of God it proceeds from the Devil Therefore he that receives it intertains the Devil and he that perswades the receiving it drawes away from God For Paul cals the Doctrines of forbidding meats and marriage the Doctrines of Devils Fourthly In the commands given by God either against such and such sins or for punishing in such and such sins without any stretching of the commands at all or interpretations at large many things not named must necessarily be contained as under generals the particulars as under one kind other kinds of a higher nature or of the like nature as under the male the female also and other such or else many common received Rules given by Divines for interpretation of the Decalogue and Scripture are to be rejected Yea many things that are evill and abominable are not forbidden in the Law of God There are many things may be instan●ed in out of the new Testament of which God showes his dislike which yet in the letter and particularly by name are not forbidden in any of the commands of the old Testament as Rom. 1. 26. with divers others that might be named and there are many abominations that have been are and may be committed even of things against the light of nature that are neither in the old Testament nor new forbidden particularly and yet certainly these things are forbidden directly and properly in the commandements and the commandements are not stretcht nor wyre-drawn by those who alledge such commands against such Practises If the Scriptures must set down particularly by name all the kinds and degrees of evils with the particular manner and way of doing them which the corrupt nature of man is capable of committing and al particulars of all kinds and manner of duties with all particular cases about punishments and all kinds and degrees of punishment belonging to all kind of offences that may fall out and that both in Civil and Ecclesiastical censures with the particular way and manner of proceeding in them all I suppose some hundreds of great volumes would not containe them all but that it might be said in this case as t is Iohn 21. the last verse of the things which Iesus did that if they should be written every one the world it selfe could not containe the Books that should be written And if there must not be an extension and interpretation of commands so as to hold such commands and places of Scripture forbid or enjoyne some things not particularly named how will Hagiom prove many things practised by Papists and Prelaticall men to be against the second command or against any command as the making Crosses for Religion Holy-Water Saints Reliques bowing at the name of Jesus Holy-Dayes Surplices Altar-Clothes with a hundred other Ceremouies and Inventions of men in the worship of God are these literally and by name forbidden in the second command or any other and may not the Papists and Prelates in all the texts of Scripture brought against their Wil-worship and Inventions of men say the very same to Hagiomastix and his fellowes that Crosses Holy-Dayes bowing at the name of Iesus c are not mentioned nor touched in any one word of those Laws under the old Testament given against Idolatrie But if any one will goe about to draw these words unto their Crosses c that cannot bee done by the proper force of the words but as Law●ers speake per extensionem latamque interpretationem And it would be first well considered of whether every Law does admit of such extensions and if not every one which of them then does admit and wherefore and whether in the second commandement there are those things for which an extension is to be made Again I desire Hagiomastix and his compeers to resolve me these questions seeing there must be no extension of that command in Deut. 13. 1 5. nothing else commanded but what is in the letter of the Law Whether a false Prophetesse that should arise and endeavour to perswade to the worship of a false God and that by affirming she spake by the inspiration of some deitie and that her saying's were to be esteemed Oracles were not to be put to death by virtue of this command as well as the false Prophet and yet a Prophe●esse is not in the text Whether that command Exod. 21. 33 34. of the owner of the pit into which his neighbours Oxe or Asse fell making good the

to punish for Murther Adulterery Theft more then for Idolatrie Blasphemie Here●ie 2. Hagiomastix brings in the Church again as well as the State surely he is for a Toleration of all Heresies Blasphemies c in the Church as well as the State to have no man punished for his religion with any censure of Admonition Excommunication or Non-Communion In his M. S. he was for spiritual censures but in these 3. yeers last past the man is well improved belike to reason against any Church censure as well as State Punishment And by the way I desire the Reader to observe whatever reason in the wisedome of God there might be that nothing is set down in the Gospels of Christs charging the State with sin for not proceeding against the Sadduces c that cannot be the reason to show the unlawfulnes of Magistrates punishing Hereticks because Hagiom confesses the same of the Church that Christ charged not the Church nor the Officers with sin for not proceeding against the Sadduces and yet I suppose Hagiomastix will not openly professe t is a good Argument that no Church censures may be used against any Heretick however I am sure many of his Compeers in handling the question distinguish of a Toleration and censures granting Ecclesiastical censures though denying Civil And I am sure if Christs never charging the church nor those that bore office in her with sin for not proceeding against the Sadduces be no good argument to take away all Church censures neither is it to lay wast all Magistrates punishing in such cases 3. Christ did to the Scribes Pharisees Sadduces speak and reason against their errors yea reproved and threatned them for those errors which also is granted by Hagiomastix in doing of which he did equivalently and really presse upon them the suppressing and punishing of Heresies in persons under their power whilst he spake to men in Authoritie and denounced the judgements of God because of them He that preaches to a Prince against Idolatrie and showes the evils that will come upon a King and his Kingdome for it preaches to him to restraine Idolatrie though he doe not particularly in expresse words call upon him not to suffer any man to practice Idolatrie and therefore Christ speaking to the Scribes and Pharisees the Rulers and Elders that knew the Laws of God how Magistrates in Israel were to punish false Teachers in speaking so against false Prophets Hereticks and Sectaries as Sadduces c that was a charging them such a thing being spoken to such men to doe their duties against them which by the Law was more then if private persons and being spoken to qua such as Scribes c was a commanding them according to their places to proceed against them For t is a rule among Divines that in many things recorded in Scriptures which are delivered only in common and in general they are to be taken by every one according to their relations and places by the Magistrates according to their relation the Ministers according to theirs and the People according to their Sphere of which many instances may be given in the new Testament 4. Supposing it could be proved Christ never reproved the Jewish Church and State for suffering the Sadduces c yet it followes not Magistrates therefore should tolerate Hereticks and Sectaries and that both because Gods declaration of his mind in other parts of Scripture though not in the Gospel is a sufficient as also because there might be some particular reasons proper to the Iewish State as that Christ saw the Iewish State and Magistracie it selfe that then was to be leavened and corrupted with those errors and opinions to be either Sadduces Pharisees Scribes Herodians and such like so that to have spoken against Toleration and for punishing Sadduces c had been to have spoken to the State not to have suffered it selfe as if one should preach to the Parliament now not to tolerate but to punish themselves So was it for Christ to have urged those commands in Deut. 13. c and those examples of Iosiah Nehemiah c upon the Iewish State then 2. That in the times of Christs preaching the Civil Power of the Common-Wealth of the Jewes was much weakned if not wholly taken away from them by the Romans of which I have spoken something before page 30. and doe now adde that the Iewes had no power at all of capitall punishments then and therefore to what end should Christ charge them with those Lawes of putting false Prophets c to death for full proo●e of which I refer the Reader to Master Gillespies Aarons rod blossoming Book 1. chapt 3. page 29. 30 31 32 33 34 35. who learnedly proves that point both from Scripture and the Testimonies of many learned writers who have written of the Iewish Antiquities and Customes and Answers the contrary objections 3. Christ knew that Church and Common-wealth were to be certainly shortly dissolved the Christian Church to be set up and though he warned the People of those errors and wayes and denounced the judgements of God against them yet because he knew the purpose of God was to destroy the Iewish Common-wealth he might not speake for that and the other Reasons forenamed to the Magistrates as otherwise he would of which the Reader may read more in pag. 30. of this present Book And now for putting a Period to this 17. Thesis and to all the Answers given by me to those evasions brought against ●hose old Testament Lawes of Deut. 13. Deut. 17. and the rest I shall briefly adde 3 things First To cleare a little further some passages of Deut. 13. Secondly show the slightnesse and weaknesse of Hagiomast exceptions against those old Testament Laws Thirdly Show the excessive pride and folly of the man in boasting and glorying in such poor weak things as he brings against the Vindicator of the Ordinance for preventing the groth and spreading of Heresies in Sect. 34. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41. First As I shall adde two places more out of Moses Law before omitted in the beginning of the 17. Thesis to prove the Magistrates power of punishing in matters of the first Table viz Deut. 19. 16 17 18 19. and Numb 15. 30 31. the former in case of Aposta●ie the latter in case of blaspheming God so to all I have said of Deut. 13. I desire the Reader to observe that God having in the former chapter commanded the worshipping of the ture God and forbidden that of Idols which unquestionably is morall this 13. chap. is fitly added to it as an appendix in which God gives direction for removing the impediments opposite to his worship commanded particularly he commands the Authors of Apostasie not to be hearkned unto nor tolerated but to be punished with death and for that end that such who are obstina●e and will not be amended nor regard their own salvation may be hindred at least from being an impediment to the salvation of

God and Christ his Sonne standeth in as full strength under the Gospel as ever it did under the Law For Princes in the new Testament be Gods Ministers to revenge Malefactors as they were in the old and the greater the wickednesse the rather to be punished ergo the greatest as Heresies Idolatries Blasphemies are soonest of all other vices to be repressed by Christian Magistrates whose zeale for Christs glory must not decrease Christs care for their Scepters being increased and those monuments of former Kings left written for their instruction were not this sufficient as in truth t is to refute your evasion yet King David foreseeing in Spirit that Heathen Kings would ●and themselves and assemble together against the Lord and his Christ extendeth the same charge to the Gentiles which the Kings of Jurie received before and warned them all at once Be wise ye Kings understand ye● Judges of the world Serve the Lord. And so in another place of this Book the Jesuits saying these were Kings of the old Testament and they had the Law of God to guide them he answers Then since Christian Princes have the same Scriptures which they had and also the Gospel of Christ and Apostolick writings to guide them which they had not why should they not in their Kingdomes retaine the same power which yee see the Kings of Iudah ●ad and used to their immortall praise and joy Againe Christ came not to abolish or diminish the power of Kings and States but to save their souls they are no way loosers but gainers by Christs comming Christs Kingdome is not of this world it alters not the Power and Preeminence God once gave to them as Kings and Magistrates Lastly If Magistrates under the new Testament should have this power taken from them the Church of God should be in a farre worse condition and more uncomfortable then it was under the old Law the Church should lose a great helpe it sometimes enjoyned neither can that helpe the matter to say that we have now Excommunication and other spirituall weapons to supply that losse For the Church of the Jewes had excommunication and the word of God yea extraordinary Prophets many miracles answers by Vrim and Thummim in all difficult cases about religion as Hagiomastix faith which we have not and yet they had need of Magistrates coercive power in matters of religion for all that To conclude there can be no reason in the world showen or given why Magistrates under the new Testament should not have power to restraine and punish Aposta●ies Blasphemies c as well as under the old but many might be given why their power rather should be continued and enlarged under the new and in this wee have Master Burroughs himselfe a witnesse what a sad condition the Church of Christ would be in if we had no externall power to restraine from any kind of Blasphemie and Seducements which passage having quoted before and having spoken something on that occasion page 63. of this Treatise of Toleration I referre the Reader thither and to Master Burroughs Irenicum page 23. 24. Fourthly God is unchangeable the Covenant of life under the old and new Testament is one and the same for the essence and substance as our Divines show against the Socinians Antinomians Anabaptists and the rule of righteousnesse and holinesse is the same under the new that it was under the old and therefore God hating corruptions of Religion so as to command his Vice-gerents to punish them then and to prevent their spreading he being unchangeable and the punishing of violations of Religion and impieties being acts of holinesse and righteousnesse must needs stand firm● and bind Magistrates under the new Testament And if the Magistrates restraining and suppressing the dishonors of God ruine of souls by his sword be altered and changed by God in the times of the Gospel then that power of punishment was either truely Ceremonial or else judicial belonging properly to the Poli●ie and Paedagogie of the Jewes but it was neither First Not Ceremoniall it was no type of any thing which was to come as I have showen before page 168. 169. of this Treatise Secondly Not properly judiciall in the sense laid downe page 53. 54. of this Treatise but morall of common right used by other Nations and that both before the judicial Law was given and after of which having spoken so much in divers pages and places of this Booke I shall onely adde this viz. that Zepp●rus in his fourth Booke de Legibus mosaicis excellently showes these Lawes to be Appendixes of the Decalogue and in stead of a just Commentarie upon them particularly of the first commandement whereupon he handles that question of punishing false Prophets and Hereticks and showes how many Errors and Opinions be Blasphemies as Servetus Opinion against the Holy Trinitie and Opinions against the Attributes of God c which abominations whosoever denies ought to be punished capitally he overthrowes all pietie and showes himselfe to be a stranger to all Religion and faith where among other reasons brought by him why false Teachers and Hereticks should be punished by the Civil Magistrates as the expresse Lawes of God given by Moses and not antiquated he gives this No substantial sufficient reason can be brought why the Majesty of God and the Authoritie of the Church ought to be of lesse moment and waight among Christians then in times past it hath been amongst the Jewes Yea by how much God hath more clearely manifested himselfe by his Sonne then in times past by his Prophets by so much the lesse can that coldnesse and luke-warmenesse be excused if wee be carried with a lesse study of our Religion and do lesse defend it then they Fifthly It cannot upon any reasonable ground be presumed that Idolatries Heresies Blasphemies c commanded by God to be punished by the Civil Magistrate under the old Testament should by Christs comming be set at libertie and absolutely freed from punishment For 1. Besides that the old Testament prophecying of Christs comming speaks of those dayes as times of greater holinesse and strictnesse and that in reference to the commands of the first Table as these Scriptures show Isaiah 35. 8 9. there shall be a way and it shall be called the way of holinesse the uncleane shall not passe over it no Lion shall be there nor any ravenous beast shall go up thereon that is no enemie of God hurtfull to the Church among which false Teachers are chief cald by Christ and Paul ravening Wolves and greivous Wolfes not sparing the flock Matth. 7. 15. Acts 20. 29. Zach. 13. 2 3. prophecies that in the day in which the Messiah shall come into the world he shall overthrow Idolatrie false Doctrine and whatsoever is contrary to the word of God and true Religion The Prophet comprehends all under three Heads 1. I will out off the names of the Idols out of the Land and they shall no more

Gratian Theodosius and others who by publick Edicts did prohibit false Doctrines and did command all throughout the whole Empire to embrace the true Faith t is confessed by Master Burroughs himselfe The protection of their Civil peace is not sufficient to give them such a denomination of nursing Fathers and Mothers Upon which place B●lson writes thus with this endeavour of Christian Princes God comforteth his Church by the mouth of Esay Kings shall be thy nursing Fathers c what Esay saith Princes shal do that I conclude Princes must doe because God would not promise they should usurpe another mans office but discharge their owne If you take the milke of Princes for temporall honours Lands and goods the ●ery Children will laugh you to scorne The Church of Christ is no wanton Church She lusteth for no worldly wealth which is rather harmful poison then wholesome food Gods provision for her is spiritual not carnall her delights are not outward in flesh but inward in grace The Prophet good man had no leasure to thinke on yo● farms demeans and Revenues no remedy you must needs yeeld us that Christian Princes in respect of their office not of their riches have received an expresse commandement from God to show themselves Nurses to his Church Now Nurses by nature must provide for their infants and defend them from danger ergo Kings and Queens in the new Testament are bound to tender the Church of Christ and by their princely power and publick Laws to defend the same from infection of Heresies invasions of Scismes and all other apparent corruptions of faith and good manners Zach. 13. 2 3. is a prophecie of the times and dayes of the Gospel as the context is cleare and is confessed by some Patrons of Toleration though put off and evaded that t is allegorical and figurative and meant of some one particular time only under the Gospel with other such like as the Posteript to Hagiomastix writes page 21. 22. all which evasions I had thought at this time to have fully taken of and to have cleared this text by many passages and Phrases in the context besides severall reasons that it must needs be understood literally and of all times under the Gospel but the troubles of the times call me of from my intended thoughts and preparations in this kind and shall reserve them if God will for a second part only I shall adde that divers learned Interpreters ancient and moderne as Theodoret Calvin and others hold the Prophet here alludes to Deut. 13. where God required such strictnesse in maintaining pure Doctrine that the Father should rise up against the Sonne whom he begat God would have all the godly to burne with such a zeal of defending the true worship of God and Pietie that no affinitie nor consanguinitie nor any other carnall respect should prevail to hinder the requiring of punishment upon their neerest friends in cases of violating the worship of God and corrupting sound Doctrine This was the Prescript of the Law But whereas for a time Religion had beene neglected yea troden under foot Zacharie saith that when the faithfull should repent they should bee endowed with such a desire of true Pietie as neither Father nor Mother should suffer wicked errors in their Sons And here t is to be observed that this zeale is approved of under the Kingdome of Christ for Zacharie does not here restraine this Doctrine to the time of the Law but showes what shall be when Christ is come namely that then again that zeale shall burne in the hearts of all the godly which was almost extinct It followes therefore this Law was not given only to the Jewes as many fanatical men imagine who would have a leave of disturbing the world but that this Law extends to us also Musculus speaking of things appertaining to the Classis of morall commands shows that many things in the Prophets writings belong thereunto and he gives this reason That in most things they were Interpreters of the Mosaicall Law And therefore Zacharie does here inter ●●t that Law in Deut. 13. concerning false Prophets and Seducers to be in force under the Gospel The Prophets in their writings doe interpret and explaine Moses writings as the Books of Moses doe the Decalogue written by God in two Tables of stone and delivered unto Moses Deut. 5. 22. That in Deut. 13. is to be compared with this Zach. 13. 3. where we find the same things almost the same words used in a Prophecie of the times of the Gospel the meaning of which is not that his Father or Mother should presently run a Knife into him but that though they begat him yet they should be the means to bring him unto condigne punishment even the taking away of his life and so Master Cartwright speaking of this prophecie writes thus No power is given to one private man to kill another nor for the Private man to kill his children but this manner of speech is grounded on Deut 17. 7. where t is proved the Witnesse who accused should throw the first stone against the convicted persons ergo they ascribe the killing of the guilty person as belonging to the duty of the Accuser THESIS 20. In the Scriptures of the new Test there are clear grounds full proofes that Hereticks and false Teachers corrupters of Religion deserve to be punished corporally as well as spiritualy by excommunication and that Magistrates ought to punish in cases of Idolatry Heresie and such like as well as for transgressions against the second Table Now among many I shall lay down these following 1. That Christ and his Apostles being accused before Magistrates about matters of Religion as blasphemy being against the Law of Moses and such like they never pleaded for themselves that it was not lawfull to punish any man for matters of Religion but they defended their causes that they had not taught any thing against the word of God and the Law of Moses were not guilty of Blasphemy or Heresie so that they granted the major proposition namely that is was lawful for the Magistrate to punish Hereticks who taught against the Word of God but they denied the minor that they were Hereticks For out of the word of God they showed they were not Hereticks in that they taught nothing against the Word of God yea nothing but what had a proof in the Word of God But of this the Reader may see more in Zanchits Miscellanies De Magistratu page 173. 2. Christ in John 2. 14 15 16. made a scourge and drove out of the Temple those that made his Fathers house a house of merchandise which now false Teachers are said to doe 2 Pet. 2. 3. and t is the more observable that Christ who let the woman taken in adultery go away and did not punish her that would not divide an inheritance because his Kingdome was not of this world yet in the matter of his Fathers house did exercise