that you did desire Judgement should be given against him and not so much you as the blood that had been shed that cryed for Judgement truly whether that was a Judgement that you intended for acquital that must be left to the Jury You asked because I will repeat it in order as my memory will give me leave whether there was any other words in the charge than was in the Proclamation Mr. Cook Whether there was any other words or no that differed in the Proclamation as it was a great sin and foul fact in the Proclamation so it was as foul in the Charge Master Masterson swears the same too he heard you say the second day you had delivered a charge the day before against the King and that he had delayed his answer you desired he might plead guilty or not guilty the last day that you did in the names of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the people of England demand Judgement against the King and then another swears those words Judgement against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King Burden swears you examined him as a Witness against the King in what place he was with the King It seems he was in the King's Army he swears you gave him an Oath it is testimony fit to be believed but however if you did not give the Oath by what you say your self you may be by and asked him the question Master Starkey he tells you that during the Tryal and before the Sentence that you being an old acquaintance of his in Grayes-Inn speaking with him he spake like a friend to you I hear you are up to the ears in this business and whereas you talk of the people there is a thousand for one against it that you should tell him again You will see strange things but you must wait upon God these words of waiting upon God are words of that nature people do use them now adaies when they would do some horrid impiety which hath been the sin of too many it is but a canting language that is the best term I can give it you told him then He must die this was before the Sentence that is to be observed Gentlemen of the Jury you say you did not know of the Sentence you said He must die and Monarchy with him you must here know that some of those persons that sate upon him said the King was a gracious and wise King and as Mr. Cook did say and they were the best words they spoke and I think he thinks so in his conscience but in conclusion He must die and Monarchy must die with him others said they did not hate King Charles but they hated Monarchy and Government but Monarchy was the thing that they would behead I think I have done with the Evidence that was given against you the Indictment it self was read the Overt acts was the meeting propounding consulting about it It appears he was in the Chamber about the Charge that he did propound it he delivered the Charge it appears withal that he demanded Judgement he desired the King might answer or that it might be taken pro confesso these are overt acts to declare the imagination of his heart The answer of Mr. Cook I will repeat it as clearly as I can because nothing shall go to the extenuating of the fact but it shall be spoken Mr. Cook in your answer your defence that you make you set forth the heads of this Indictment and you set them forth very truly the heads are the aggravations of the Indictment the Indictment was the compassing and imagining the death of the King you said it was upon these grounds that you did propound abet and consult the death of the King that you with others did assume power and authority to kill the King that thereupon a person unknown in a Frock did accordingly kill the King You say to the first part if it did not appear that you did advise the death of the King that you were not guilty for that Sir as I told you before taking them either complexly or singly if any of the particulars reached to one of these acts it was enough but it reaches to all you required Judgement against the King as a Traytor and that with a reason and certainly death must follow you say you were appointed to give your advice you had a Proclamation first for Tryal of the King you had the Order of Jan. 10. whereby you were appointed to give your advice if it were so it will be no excuse at all the Proclama gives you no warrant at all he that obeys so wicked a Proclamation it will not save him it appears you were privy to this before the Proclamation if you were not at all when such a thing as this is such a Proclamation and Act and such a manner of Tryal as I believe though you have read very much you never heard of such a thing in our Law or foreign Nations That you thereupon should take upon you to be of Council against the King it aggravates the fact other men may be impudent ignorant but you that were a learned Lawyer your being of Council doth aggravate the thing You say Secondly by Law words will not amount to Treason for that I would not have that go for Law by no means though it be not your Case for you are not indicted for words but words are Treason and Indictments are often for it but the difference is this The Indictment is not for words but compassing and Imagining the death of the King words are evidences of the compassing imagining the Kings death It is the greatest evidence of the imagination of the heart Words do not make a Treason that is if it be by inference or consequence but reductively but if it be immediately I shall say to a man go kill the King by theat which is an absolute immediate necessary consequence to say this is not Treason I would not have that go for Law your Case is not for words but for delivering a Charge the ground that you speak of words may make a Heretick but not a Traytor it was a witty saying but you have no sufficient authority for it these are words put in writing we all know if a man put his words in writing if a man speak Treasonable words and put them in writing they have been several times adjudged Treason and so in my Lord Cook 's 3. Institutes the Case of Williams of the Temple there was a Book of Treason in his own Study of his making and he was indicted for it words put in writing is an express evidence of the imagination of the heart you say it was dictated to you but when words are written in a Charge and your name to it which I had almost forgotten that 's more than words the Witnesses swear the likeness of your hand they do but swear the likeness of your hand no man can swear
Imprimatur J. BERKENHEAD 1660. AN EXACT and most IMPARTIAL ACCOMPT OF The Indictment Arraignment Trial and Judgment according to Law of Twenty Nine REGICIDES THE Murtherers Of His Late SACRED MAJESTY Of Most Glorious Memory Begun at Hicks-Hall on Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. And Continued at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayley until Friday the nineteenth of the same Moneth Together with a SUMMARY of the Dark and Horrid Decrees of those Caballists Preparatory to that Hellish Fact Exposed to view for the Reader 's Satisfaction 〈◊〉 Information of Posterity London Printed for R. Scot T. Basset R. Chisâ—ell and J. Wright 1679. A SUMMARY by way of Premise of the dark Proceedings of the Cabal at WESTMINSTER Preparatory to the Murther of His late Sacred Majesty Taken out of their own Journal-Book THe Commons Resolved That no further Addresses be made to the King by themselves nor by any other without leave of both Houses And those that do to incur the Penalty of High-Treason And Declare They will receive no more Messages from Him And Enjoyn That no Person whatsoever receive or bring any Message from Him to Both or either Houses or to any other Person 15. Jan. 1647. The Lords concurred to these Votes 17. August 1648. The Commons concur with the Lords That these Votes for Non-Addresses be Revoked 20. November 1648 The Army present their Remonstrance to the Parliament for bringing Delinquents to Justice 24. November 1648. The Treaty at the Isle of Wight Voted to continue till the twenty seventh of November 1. December 1648. Master Hollis presents an Account of the Treaty with the King And the same day information was brought them of the King 's being removed from Carisbrook to Hurst Castle 5. December 1648. The King's Answer to the Propositions Voted a Ground for the House to proceed upon for Settlement of the Peace of the Kingdom 6. December 1648. The Members were secured by Colonel Pride 7. December 1648. The House of Commons appointed a day of Humiliation Peters Caryl and Marshal to perform the Duty The several Votes For Revoking the Votes for Non Addresses to the King For a Treaty to be had with Him That His Answers to the Propositions were a Ground for Peace Voted Dishonourable and Destructive 23. December 1648. A Committee was appointed to consider how to proceed in a way of Justice against the King and other Capital Offenders 28. December 1648. An Ordinance for Trial of the King was read 1. January 1648. Declared and adjudged by the Commons That by the Fundamental Laws It is Treason in the King of England for the time being to levy War against the Parliament and Kingdom 2. Jan. 1648. The Lords disagreed to this Vote and cast it out and the Ordinance for Tryal of the King Nemine contradicente 3. Jan. 1648. The same Vote was again put to the question in the House of Commons and carried in the Affirmative 4. Jan. 1648. Master Garland presents a new Ordinance for erecting an High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King which was read the first second and third time assented to and passed the same day And Ordered no Copy to be delivered Same day Resolved That the People are under God the Original of all just Powers That themselves being Chosen by and Representing the People have the Supreme Power in the Nation That whatsoever is Enacted or Declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament hath the force of a Law and the People concluded thereby though Consent of King and Peers be not had thereunto 6 Jan. 1648. The Commissioners for Tryal of the King are Ordered to meet on Monday then next at two of the Clock in the Painted-Chamber Their days of sitting were 8 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 of January 1648. Painted-Chamber Monday 8 January They chose Ask Dorislaus Steel and Cook to be their Councel and other Officers And sent out their Precept under their Hands and Seals for Proclaiming their Court in Westminster-hall to be held in the Painted-Chamber on the tenth Which Precept is all of Ireton's Hand-writing Journal of the Court fol. 6. And Tuesday the 19th The Commissioners Ordered That the Proclamation be made in Cheap-side and at the Old-Exchange And appointed a Committee to consider of the matter of Government of making a new Great Seal and not using the name of a Single Person Wednesday the tenth They chose Bradshaw who was absent for their President and Say pro tempore who gave Garland thanks for his Pains about the business of the Court Fol. 72. And appointed their Councel to prepare and prosecute their Charge And a Committee to consider for carrying on the Tryal Whereof Millington Garland and Martin were three Friday the twelve Waller and Harrison are desired to attend the General to appoint Guards to attend the Court. And Titchbourn and Roe with others to prepare for the Solemnity of the Tryal and to appoint Workmen c. Fol. 16. The Charge to be brought in on Monday And Waller Scot Titchbourn Harrison and others to consider of the place for Tryal and Report the next day Saturday the thirteenth Upon Garland's Report Ordered The Tryal be where the Courts of King's Bench and Chancery sate in Westminster-Hall fol. 20. Monday the Fifteenth The Councel brought in a Draught of the Charge And a Committee appointed to advise therein and compare the Evidence therewith fol. 21. And they and others to consider the manner of bringing the King to his Tryal And that day Titchbourn delivered a Petition to the Commons in the name of the Commons in London in Common-Council differing from the Lord Major and Aldermen The Substance was for bringing the King to Justice Which was Ordered to be Registred in the Books of Common-Councel Wednesday the 17th The Charge recommitted to the Committee Fol. 24. Thursday the 18th Tichbourn excused the absence of Mr. Steel and nothing then else done Fol. 29. Friday the 19th Upon Millington's Report of the Charge and Form of words for exhibiting it Ordered That the Attorney or in his absence the Solicitor exhibit it Fol. 30. And Waller Harrison and others to appoint thirty to wait upon the King and twenty upon the President Saturday the 20th Forenoon Ordered That Mildmay deliver the Sword of State to Humphreys to bear before the President The Solicitor presents the Charge engrossed which being read and signed by him was returned to him to be exhibited And then Adjourned to Westminster-Hall Westminster-Hall Saturday the 20th Afternoon The King was brought in by Thomlinson attended by Hacke and two and thirty Partisans And Cook then exhibited the Charge And the King not owning their Authority was remanded And they Adjourned till Monday Painted-Chamber Monday the 22d Forenoon They approved of what their President had done on Saturday and Resolved That the King should not be suffered to question their Jurisdiction Fol. 50. Westminster-Hall Same day Afternoon Cook prayed That the King
so unnatural and Devilish to destroy his Father But we do find amongst the Romanes such a Fact was committed and then they were at a loss to punish it The way was this that they found out the Offendour they sewed into a Mail of Leather so close that no Water could get in when they had done they threw him into the Sea by this denoting the Offendour was not worthy to Tread upon the Ground nor to Breath in the Air nor to have the benefit of any of the four Elements nor the use of any of God's Creatures and so he starved Gentlemen Parricide and Regicide differ not in Nature but in Degree Parricide is the killing of the Father of one or a few Persons Regicide the Killing the Father of a Countrey What Punishment then is suitable to this Offence Gentlemen The Prisoner at the Bar is accused of this Offence and now to be Tried by you but before we enter upon the Evidence I must with the leave of the Court inform you That though the Indictment contains many Circumstances and Gradations in the Treason yet the Imagining and Compassing the Death of our late Sovereign is the Treason to which we shall apply our Evidence this being both by the Common-Law and by the Statute of the 25th of Edward the 3d. the Principal Treason to be enquired of And the other Circumstances in the Indictment are but so many matters to prove the Overt-Act The Consultations the Assuming Power to Try and Condemn the King The Assault upon him and the Fatal Blow that was given him are but so many Demonstrations and open Acts proving the first Treasonable Design of the Heart It will be enough for you and so my Lords will tell you if we prove the Treason it self which is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King though we fail in some of the Circumstances laid in the Indictment I do not speak this as if we should fail in any but it is not necessary to prove them all if we prove any you are to find the Prisoner Guilty I am not willing to hold your Lordships too long in the Porch but desire to descend into the Body of the Business and so we shall call our Witnesses and doubt not but to prove that this Man at the Bar was the first and not the least of these Offendours Mr. George Masterson was called Mr. Harrison When I was before your Lordships yesterday I offered something very material in reference to the Jurisdiction of the Court but you told me according to the Rule I must Plead Guilty or Not Guilty and what I had to offer should be heard in its proper place I now desire to know whether it be proper now to deliver my self before you proceed to the calling of Witnesses for I would go the best way and would not willingly displease you Lord Chief Baron What was promised you yesterday God forbid but you should have it But I think it will be best for you to hear the Evidence and then what you have to say you shall be fully heard Mr. Harrison I am content Whereupon George Masterson Stephen Kirk Francis Hearn William Clark Robert Coitmore and James Nutley were called and sworn Councel Mr. Masterson Whether did the Prisoner at the Bar sit in that which they called the High Court of Justice to sentence the King or no Pray tell my Lords and the Jury thereof and what else you know of the matter Mr. Masterson Upon the Oath I have taken my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the Prisoner Th. Harrison sit in that which they called The High Court of Justice upon the 27th day of January in the year 1648. to sentence the King Councel Was it the day the Sentence was passed against the King Mr. Masterson It was the day of the Sentence the 27th of Jan. 1648. Councel Can you say any thing else Mr. Masterson I do Sir further remember that when the Clerk of the Court as he was called read the Sentence against the King and said It was the sentence of the whole Court I saw the Prisoner at the Bar together with others stand up to my apprehension as Assenting to it Councel Was there not direction that all should stand up as Assenting Mr. Masterson I do not know that but when the Sentence was read several of them did stand up and he among the rest as Assenting to the Sentence as the Spectatours understood Councel Mr. Clark What do you say to the same Question Mr. Clark My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I remember I saw the Prisoner at the Bar sit several times in the Court of Justice as they called it particularly on the 23d and 27th of January 1648. as I took notice of it in a Book Councel Was that the day of the Sentence Mr. Clark Yes my Lord. Coun. What say you to that of the rising of those persons in the Court Mr. Clark I remember they all rose but I did not take particular notice then of the Prisoner Councel Mr. Kirk You hear the Question Did you see the Prisoner at the Bar in Westminster-Hall sitting upon the Bench in that which they called the High Court of Justice when the King stood Prisoner at the Bar there Mr. Kirk My Lord I did see the Prisoner at the Bar sit several days in that which they called the High Court of Justice I was there every day of their sitting Councel Do you remember he was there on the 27th of Jan. 1648 Mr. Kirk I do Sir Councel Tell the Jury what was the Work there Mr. Kirk It was Sentence I did take the Names of all those Gentlemen that did appear in the Court on that day the 27th of Jan. 1648. and amongst the rest I took a Note of that Gentleman's Name as being present Councel Whereas these Gentlemen Mr. Masterson and Mr. Clark have declared that as Assenting to the Sentence they all stood up Did you see them stand And whether by Direction or no Mr. Kirk As for the Direction I know nothing of it but the Members then present in the Court after Sentence was read as far as my Eyes could perceive stood up unanimously I suppose as Assenting to the Sentence Court Mr. Nutley Did you know the Prisoner at the Bar Have you seen him sit in Westminster-Hall at any time upon the Bench when the King was brought as a Prisoner to the Bar Mr. Nutley My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the Prisoner at the Bar several days sit there amongst the rest of the Judges as a Judge I suppose To the best of my remembrance he sate there four days together Court Was he there upon the day of the Sentence Mr. Nutley I did take Notes My Lord that day in the Court and I find he did sit that day Court Do you know any thing more of the Prisoner at the Bar Mr. Nutley Thus much I know concerning the Prisoner at the Bar my Lord. The first
day that they sate in publick was as I remember the 20th of Jan. 1648. Some few days afore that there was a Committee that sate in the Exchequer-Chamber and of that Committee the Prisoner at the Bar was one of the Members I do remember well it was in the Evening they were lighting of Candles they were somewhat private This Gentleman was there I saw him for through the kindness of Mr. Phelps who was then Clerk to that Committee I was admitted pretending first to speak with the said Mr. Phelps and that I had some Business with him and so as I said before I was admitted into the Committee-Chamber Being there I did observe some Passages fall from the Prisoner at the Bar the words were to this purpose He was making a Narrative of some Discourses that passed between his late Majesty and himself in coming between Windsor and London or Hurst-Castle I know not well whether My Lord that Passage that I observed to fall from him in that Discourse was this He said That the King as He sate in the Coach with him was importunate to know what they intended to do with Him Mr. Harrison In the Coach was it Mr. Nutley Yea Sir it was in the Coach He told the rest of the company as I said before that the King asked What do they intend to do with me Whether to murther me or no And I said to Him There was no such intention as to kill Him we have no such thoughts But saith He the Lord hath reserved you for a publick Example of Justice There is one word more My Lords and that is this which I heard from this Prisoner at the Bar That the reason and end of their Meeting together at that Committee was concerning the Charge So much I observed It was concerning the Contracting of the Impeachment I observed that some found fault with the length of that as it was drawn They were offering some reasons to Contract it and I heard this Prisoner at the Bar vent this expression Gentlemen It will be good for us to blacken Him what we can Pray let us blacken Him or words to that Purpose I am sure Blacken was his word Mr. Wyndham Mr. Nutley you speak of an Impeachment Against whom was that Impeachment Mr. Nutley It was against His late Majesty the King Councel And it was to draw up that Impeachment so as to Blacken Him Was it so Mr. Nutley Yes Sir Mr. Coytmore sworn Mr. Wyndham Did you see the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High-Court of Justice on the Day when the King was Sentenced or at any other time Pray tell my Lords and the Jury Mr. Coytmore My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was in that which they called the High-Court of Justice three or four times I saw this Gentleman either once or twice sitting there Councel Do you know any thing more Coytmore No really I came onely to hear and see what they were doing and I did there see him I think several Days I am sure once Councel Did you see him on the seven and twentieth of January 1648. sitting there which was the Day of the Sentence Coytmore I cannot call that to Memory Councel Do you know of any Expressions that the King should be an Example of Judgment Coytmore No my Lords Mr. Windham My Lord in the next place We shall shew that Instrument that was made under the Hand and Seal of the Prisoner at the Bar as well as others for Execution of the King that Bloody Warrant But first we will ask this Witness another Question Councel Did you see the Prisoner at the Bar sit on the Bench as an ordinary Spectatour or as one of the Judges Coytmore He was in the Court sitting amongst the rest of the Judges as one of them Mr. Solicitour My Lords we will prove that this Prisoner at the Bar was one of them that took upon him the Conducting of the King and that the King was in his Custody and to the High-Court of Justice also The Lord Newburgh sworn Councel Pray my Lord give your self the Trouble to raise your Voice and to tell my Lords and the Jury what you know of the Prisoner at the Bar the part that he acted in bringing up the King Lord Newburgh I was then living at his Majestie 's Lodg at Bagshot when the Prisoner at the Bar brought the King from Hurst-Castle to London He was the Person that commanded the whole Party and when the King by the way went to Dinner by his Order there were Centries set at every Door where He was When the King had Dined he carryed him to Windsor and appointed several of his Officers to ride close to the King as He was riding lest He should make His escape from them Councel That was an Imprisonment it self and so a Treason Mr. Windham My Lords we shall now produce to you two Instruments which were made the one for Convening and Summoning the Assembling of that which they called the High-Court of Justice and shew this Prisoner's Hand and Seal to that And then shew you likewise that which was the Consummating of all that Bloody Warrant for Execution of His late Majesty of blessed Memory with the Hand and Seal of the Prisoner at the Bar unto it amongst others Mr. Sollicitour My Lords it will be fit before this to give you an account how we came by these Instruments Mr. Jâ—ssop sworn Councel Shew to Mr. Jessop the Warrant for summoning that Court. Mr. Sollicitour Mr. Jessop pray tell my Lords and the Jury how you came by that Instrument you have in your Hand Mr. Jessop May it please your Lordships I having the Honour to attend the House of Commons the House was pleased to make an Order that Mr. Scobel should deliver into my hands all such Books and Records Papers and other things as did belong to the House of Commons and in pursuance of that Order I did receive amongst other things this Instrument as a thing that had been formerly in his hands as Clerk of the House of Commons Mr. Sollicitour We desire it may be read my Lords Court Pray first prove his Hand Mr. Harrison I desire to know what is offered to be Read Court It is a Warrant that you Sealed amongst other pretended Judges of your Hight Court of Justice as you called it for Trial of the King for Summoning that Court. Councel Mr. Kirk Have you seen the Hand-writing of the Prisoner at any time Mr. Kirk I have very often seen it and am well acquainted with it and so far as it 's possible a man can Testifie touching the Hand of another Person I do verily believe this to be his Hand Councel How came you to be acquainted with his Hand Mr. Kirk As he was a Member of the House of Commons and my Imployment having relation thereto I have seen him set his Hand several times Mr. Farrington Sworn Councel Do you believe that this is
compass of it according to his Royal Word and Honour in it you will have the benefit of it but it is not a Plea in Law but it must be a Pardon under Seal whatsoever concerns that Proclamation will be considered It is nothing to the matter whereupon the Jury are to go Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen of the Jury you see the Prisoner Tho. Scot stands Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the death of our Dread Soveraign King Charles the First of most glorious and blessed memory He is Indicted for Compassing and Imagining his death there is the Treason and what is set afterwards in this Indictment is only to manifest this Compassing and Imagining because that being in the heart alone without some overt Act no body can prove it There are several overt Acts laid in the Indictment one is A Trayterous consulting and meeting together how to put the King to death Then a sitting upon the King as a Prisoner being before them about his life and death The third is Sentencing to death that which followed is That he was Murthered If any of these acts should be proved the Indictment is proved for the proof there are several Witnesses have fully proved that he did sit there several times particularly upon Jan. 27. which was the day of the Sentence That he did sit there all of them agree to that It is true as to the Circumstance where he sate one Gentleman saith he sate in the second Row on the left hand of Bradshaw you well remember it is 12. years ago how any man upon the view and after so long a distance of time should he able to remember in what posture one man was from the rest I think neither you nor I can remember Here is one proved to you that he did sign that Warrant for Executing the King he saith How can another know his Hand You see what the Witnesses say they knew it a man can prove nothing more of another mans Hand than that unless they see it written there is nothing to put upon you but his words You see what words are aggravated against Mr. Scot Whereas he saith It is a breach of the Priviledges of Parliament if it were so it is nothing to this Fact though another man should break the priviledges of Parliament it is nothing to you but besides it is not a breach of the priviledge of Parliament You have heard the Witnesses what they have said against him Mr. Lenthall swears that he did speak at large fully in owning that business of the Kings death The rest swear positively to the same effect and that at several times What was that He gloried in it defended it and said He could wish it were Engraven on his Tomb stone he hath denyed this that the Witnesses have proved That which is lest to you is whether upon all this matter that you have heard Whether the Prisoner at the Bar is Guilty of Compassing and Imagining the Kings death and so go together After a little Consultation together they setled in their places again Clerk Tho. Scot hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner at the Bar How say you is he Guilty of the Treason whereof he stands Indicted or not Guilty Jury Guilty Cl. Look to him Keeper Cl. You say the Prisoner is Guilty c. and so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Set Mr. Scot aside Clerk Set John Jones and Gregory Clement to the Bar. Which was done accordingly Thereupon the said Gregory Clement preferred his Petition to the Court. Indictment read against them both Lo. Ch. Bar. If you do confess your Offence your Petition will be read Clem. I do my Lord. Lord Ch. B. Mr. Clement if you do confess that you may understand it you must when you are called and when the Jury are to be charged You must say if you will have it go by way of Confession That you Wave your former Plea and confess the Fact Clerk Gregory Clement you have been Indicted of High Treason for Compassing and Imagining the death of his late Majesty and you have pleaded not Guilty Are you contented to wave that Plea and confess it Clem. I do confess my self to be Guilty my Lord. Clerk Set him aside Clkek John Jones hold up thy hand These men that were last called c. if you will Challenge all or any of them you must Challenge them when they come to the Book and before they are sworn Jones I confess I sate amongst them some days but not maliciously contrived the death of the King Coun. He is troubled at the Form he confesseth the Matter That he was there sitting in the High Court of Justice If he will not confess it he knows we can prove his Hand and Seal to that bloody Warrant He is troubled that he is said to have Trayterously and Maliciously Contrived the Kings death He that doth these Acts towards it is by Law responsible as to the Malice Jury Sworn Sir Tho. Allen Sir Henry Wroth Sir Jer. Whitchott James Hawley Henry Mildmay Christ Abdy Nich. Raynton Richard Cheney Tho. Bide Charles Pitfield Abraham Scudamore Charles Pickerne in all 12. Cl. Cryer make Proclamation Cryer If any man can inform c. Cl. John Jones hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner c. Mr. Soll. Gen. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I must open to you as to other Juries that the short Point of this long Indictment is but this That the Prisoner at the Bar did Imagine and Compass the death of the King which is your Issue to Try We shall prove it by those overt acts which the Law doth require To prove the Sitting Sentencing and Signing the Warrant for Execution by the Prisoner at the Bar. Coun. Call Mr. Clark and Mr. Carr and Holl. Symson who were sworn Mr. Symson did you see the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice Sym. I did see Mr. Jones sit divers times both there and in the Painted Chamber Jones I do confess I sate divers times Coun. Did he sit the day of Sentence Sym. I cannot say it Coun. Mr. Clark you hear the question Pray answer my Lord. Clark My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was there the 27. of Jan. 1648 I saw Coll. Jones there several days before but I did not see him that day his name was called but I do not know whether he was present Coun. Mr. Carr did you see him sit on the 27th day which was the day of Sentence Carr. My Lords he answered to his name some days I am not able to tell what day Mr. Nutley Sworn Coun. Can you tell whether the Prisoner at the Bar was present in that which they called the High Court of Justice Nutley The Prisoner at the Bar was several times in the Court which was called the High Court of Justice truly I cannot say whether he was there the 27th day the day of the Sentence The Warrant for Summoning that
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
Executioner and such other Acts prove these are in your Commission and you say something I am sure you cannot be ignorant that That very Authority that you do now urge to give life and power to your Actions that you destroyed it laid it in the dust acted contrary to it several ways when the Parliament protested against fetching the King from Holmby as they did when they went on proceeding in the way of peace then came you up to the Bar I think you your self and charged some of the Members first 11 as rotten Members and these Men were forced away this you know your General had no Commission to do and this you know was a Violation of that Power that gave our General the Commission After that when the Treaty was brought on in the Isle of Wight when there was great hopes of peace then you knew the King was hurried thence by Force which the Parliament protested against After that when both the House of Commons and Lords came to consider of one particular that passed they resolved that it was sufficient ground to proceed on for the settlement of peace then did you fall upon these Houses and tear them in pieces and throwing out above 200 suffering only about 40 to remain and they were glad to send for one Member out of Prison to make up a House That which you say of the Supreme Authority and that by Vertue of which you did Act it shews that you did not at all go by any Authority but you followed your own Lusts and therefore do not few these Fig-leaves together which will stand you in no stead if you would apply your self to answer that which you were charged with it were something Axt. I do desire to have no more interruptions then is me◠〈◊〉 making my own Defence My Lord here are many things by way of motive urged to the Jury which is not within the Charge I desire I may have that fair play that nothing may be urg'd but what is in the charge L. Ch. Bar. You give the occasion Mr. Axtell keep to the matter and you shall not be interrupted Lord Hollis I shall be very sorry to urge any thing against you which doth not necessarily follow for what you say touching your Authority I shall shew you have no Authority Axtell My Lord I have the same Commission as the General what I did was not of mine own head I had a Command As for all that hath been charged against me I shall say this I was none of the Court I did not fetch the King from the Isle of Wight nor advised compassed or imagined his Death or sentenced him to Death or signed the Warrant for his Execution or Executed Him I am none of them My Lords and therefore whoever did make any breach upon the House of Commons they were Grandees persons of a greater Quality I was an inferior Officer I was never at the House Bar but upon presenting one Petition to the Parliament from the Army I shall now come to speak to the Evidence which hath been given particularly against me and the first my Lord is Mr. Simpson he saith I had the Commands of the Guards at Westminster-Hall My Lords I have told you already shewn you by what Authority I came thither and that I ought not to refuse if I had according to the laws of War I must have suffer'd death and that is all as to Mr. Sympson only that a Lady he knows not who spake something there L. Ch. Bar. He saith he heard you bid the Souldiers give fire against the Lady Axt. My Lord I must say if there was any Lady that did speak who she was I know no more than the least child here but my Lord to silence a Lady I suppose is no Treason If a Lady will talk impertinently it is no Treason to bid her hold her tongue L. Ch. Bar. A Lady was speaking pertinently enough when she heard Bradshaw say to the King such a Charge is exhibited a charge of High Treason against Him in the Name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good People of England she said That was a lye not half nor a quarter of the people of England That Oliver Cromwel was a Traytor Then you took upon you to command Souldiers to fire at her and accordingly they levelled the muzles of their Musquets towards her Axtell My Lord as to that particular concerning Oliver Cromwell or any other words concerning the Court I understand them not but if any interruption was made to preserve the peace to desire a Woman to hold her tongue is no Treason To the next particular wherein Col. Huncks saith at a door at a certain lodging where Ireton and Harrison were in Bed together he saith that upon his refusal to sign the Warrant for executing the King I said to him Col. Huncks I am ashamed of you the Ship is now coming into Harbour and will you strike Sayle before we come to Anchor truly my Lord I think all that amounts to nothing if it were so which I deny it for to bring the Ship into Harbor what is that there is no person named Fact named nor Design named and I appeal to my conscience I remember not the time place person or words and I can call for Col. Phayre and Col. Hacker who were there for I desire things may appear right I desire they two persons may be called for their Evidence in that point L. ch Bar. They both are in the same condition Col. Hacker in the prison behind you Col. Phayre in the Tower Mr. Axtell you know the strength of one Affirmative witness I saw such a man and heard such a man say c. is more then if twenty should witness they stood by but did not see him or hear him speak Axt. My Lord he saith only this I saw you at the door going unto Ireton's chamber and said will you strike Sayl c. Truly my Lord he doth not say what or how or any thing I meant there must be according to Sir Edward Cook 's 7th Book of his Institutes that Oracle of the Law he saith That Evidence ought to he as clear as the Sun at noon day All that you can say is this it must be a wide Inference a large Inference I conceive there is nothing in these two witnesses and if the two Prisoners were here they would clear me in this L. ch Bar. If by Law you could have had them you should but I fear if they could be admitted they would not be to your advantage Axtell Then my Lord in the next place Col. Temple is pleased to say that the Lady Fairfax saying something against the Court which in truth as I said before I know not who it was or what the words were he saith I bid Fire against them I did nothing but what I was commanded upon pain of Death to preserve peace and in pursuance of that command from the superior
Officers of the Army silence was required and that was all that was done I suppose where a man is commanded to keep silence as the Sheriff is required to keep all at peace in a Court if he restrain a person that will not be quiet it is not Treason in him nor in me in this particular My Lord in the next place Mr. Temple is pleased to say that I stood upon the pavement laughing while others sighed Truly my Lord I know not whether I saw the Gentleman or no certainly smiling is no Treason if I did so though I believe I had as great a sense that day as many other persons there this is the sum of that he saith only he further adds that I bid the Souldiers cry for Justice truly my Lord L. ch Bar. Because it may be your Notes are short I will acquaint you there was a little more in it he said you bid the Souldiers cry out Justice Justice and they coming not very readily to it you struck some of them till they with your self cryed out Justice Justice till they with your self did it Axt. My Lord To that I answer that in the Hall there was some kind of people did set up a crying some kind of words and may be some of the Souldiers might cry so too I might command them to hold their Tongues and to say I 'le teach you to cry Justice and so the Gentleman standing by might believe I was the person that bid them do it Truly my Lord is this all that the Gentleman says which I humbly conceive is nothing because he does not say against any person and therefore my Lord I do hold to that Maxim in the Law as Sir Edward Cooke holds that man of great parts of learning and knowledg That in matters of Treason wherein a man is the most highliest concern'd in his life and posterity there ought not to be construed against him Inferences or presumptions or strains of wit there is no more in this and this is all that I say in this particular In the next place Mr. Temple is pleased to say that after the Court had sentenced his Majesty he was hurried away in a Cedan Truly whether he was or not I know not There was a Guard of Halbertiers whereof Col. Huncks was one and several others as I have heard they were Select Guards of his Majesty Guarding him from St. Jame's to other places how he came to be hurried I know not it was not by me and whereas he say's during the whole Tryal I was there truly I think I was there by command of my General by Authority of the Lords and Commons L. ch Bar. You speak this that the Jury may understand you did it by command of your General Do you mean by express command Axt. I did not move a day but by special command L. ch Bar. By whom Axtell The Lotd Fairfax gave his Orders every morning to his Adjutant General or Major General and they issued them out to such and such persons as he appoints L. ch Bar. Who gave these Orders out Axt. The Lord Fairfax we did all under him L. ch Bar. You had not the order immediately from him Axtell The Major General had L. ch Bar. What Major General gave you that Order Axtell There was Cromwell and Ireton L. ch Bar. The Lord Fairfax gave you no immediate Commission Axtell He have my Superior Officers L. ch Bar. How do you know that Axtell My Lord because they told me so it was by his command L. ch B. The question is now understood Axt. The next person that speaks is Mr. Bodurdoe and he says that I commanded the Souldiers at the King's Tryal and that a Lady that was speaking was commanded silence to this purpose Truly my Lord this is but the same as before L. ch Bar. You said Shoot too Axt. No my Lord I said not any such word or any thing like it I heard there was an Officer went up and intreated her to be silent I say it is the same with the former it is no Treason to desire one to be silent My Lord the next Witness that speaks in Evidence against me is Mr. Young he says this I bid the Souldiers cry for justice it is very like that person as well as Mr. Temple might see me in the croud speaking to make the Souldiers quiet I might repeat the words that the people said repeat the word justice or some such word as the peoples words L. Ch. Bar. Remember how he repeats them he saw you active in setting on the Souldiers to cry justice Axt. If I have taken them right one says he heard me say such words as justice and that he saw me strike two or three Souldiers if in the Tumult such a word should be started I hearing of them I might strike those Souldiers that said justice justice and might repeat the words I 'le give you justice and so strike them that is a good Evidence that it might be a repetition of their words and not any of mine own They both speak as to the word justice but here was not justice mentioned to any person I might repeat their own words and chastise them for those words besides this though I do not say the word was spoken by me if the word justice had been spoken my Lord I hope it is no Treason to say desire justice it is Gods great Attribute it is God's Ordinance and that can be no Treason I have read in Law Books though but lately and I cannot find that the word Justice should be made Treason then there is no person to whom that adjunct doth belong The next Evidence my Lord is Capt. Jeonar he saith I commanded a Guard truly several Regiments took their turns as they were commanded by the General and I as an inferior Officer was there but that is no more than what was said before it was done by the Authority of the General if I had not done it I had died by the Law of War He saith there was a cry for Justice I can say nothing more than I have formerly said it may be in the Tumult the Souldiers might say so and I chastising of them and repeating that in my chastisement they might think they were mine own words L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would help your memory he swears the last day you encouraged the Souldiers to cry Execution Execution Axt. For that particular I am coming to it I thank your Lordship for helping me My Lord for that of Execution truly I cannot say whether I was there that day or no one day I was commanded to be there with some Companies in Westminster-Hall but whether I was there any more than that one time is the question Admit I was there that day I was never there but when I was commanded when the Colonel that commanded the Regiment was there I as an inferior Officer ought to be there I was there by a special Order and not by
what degree or quality whatsoever who within Four days after the publishing hereof shall lay hold upon this our grace and favour excepting only such persons as shall hereafter be excepted by Parliament that is a Parliament called by his own Writ You know this Parliament L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would not interrupt you to that but this very Objection was made by one of the Prisoners before this answer was given First the King's Declaration is not a Pardon in point of Law it must be under the Broad-Seal but God forbid but it should bind in honour You instanced in the word Parliament what was meant by the word Parliament you must know this the exigency of the Times were such that there were many Noble Persons that took the advantage to Assemble themselves together to reinstate the King they did that which was just and lawful according to the exigency of the Times This Declaration he sent to the two Houses he called them His Two Houses so that it appears clearly and manifestly they were then sitting they being accepted by the King and owned by Him and they did sit in way of Convention according as a Parliament and his Majesty sent his Letter to them and these are the persons that have thought fit to except you out of that Act. Axtell My Lord may I speak to that any further L. Ch. Car. If you do it will be over-ruled Axt. I submit with submission to the providence of God I did apply to Sir Harbottle Grimston for the Mercy and Favour of his Majesty according to his Declaration and here is Sir Harbottle's own hand for a Certificate L. Ch. Bar. That is allowed you that you did claim that benefit within the time but you may remember that it was referred to those two Houses of Parliament they were to consider who was fit for the Pardon and you are by them Excepted out by Name Your question now is no more but whether guilty or not guilty and these are but extravagant Discourses that you say otherwise and rather do you harm then good Axtell I hope you will pardon me my Lord I hope I have spoken to clear the Point The Fact charged by your Lordships and before the Jury and I hope the Lord will give the Jury a Memory of it and a right Understanding in what I have said for my own Defence My Lord the next thing I have to offer is this to Expound that Act of Parliament that it was the intention of his Majesty and Parliament that all should be excepted but those guilty of Councelling Signing or Sentencing Truly my Lord I humbly conceive I being none of those am not guilty of Treason I shall only speak one word to my Jury That they will remember what I have said that there is but two things two Witnesses as to Justice and Execution that it relates to no person but in General and then I do not own the things but possibly they might hear such words I taking of them up upon a rebound reproved the Souldiers for the other that I should send one for the Executioner he heard so and that I should name who was the Executioner I would not have that person or any other to suffer for that L. Ch. Bar. That is not at all pressed upon you not as to any Charge Axtell I thank your Lordship I am very ignorant L. Ch. Bar. Have you done Sir Axtell I leave the matter to the Jury in whose hands I and my little Ones and Family are left I only say this to you Remember your Ancestors Remember your Posterity I never heard it before that words were Treason In Queen Maries time Throckmorton was acquitted for words by the Jury Gentlemen of the Jury I leave my Case my Life my All in your Hands L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury There hath been several things offered by the Prisoner at the Bar as near as my Memory will give me leave in so long a Discourse I shall repeat all things which he saith for himself and which are said against him There are some things that he seems to utter as tending to matter of Law and something meerly of Fact proper only for you of the Jury For matter of Law he hath urged several things for himself not by way of justification of the Fact I must do him that right but in excuse of himself and I hope his conscience hath so wrought upon him that he is of opinion the Fact was a horrid Fact which was so indeed For that which he hath said for himself First he doth alledge to have his Commission from the Lord Fairfax My Lord Fairfax had his Commission from the two Houses of Parliament and this Gentlemans was in March the beginning of the year 1648. he saith what he did was in obedience to his superiors as a Soldier that he never consulted or advised about any thing of the Tryal or execution of his Majesty For this point it hath already been spoken to Gentlemen for that which hath been spoken to at large heretofore I must repeat it here that he may know it That no Person whatsoever no Community not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive Power over the King neither the Lord Fairfax his General not he nor any other person could be excused for this horrid Fact of bringing the King to Trial No person as I said before nor Community have any such power The law-Law-books which he hath lately seen and truly he hath imployed his time well in that the Law-books tell us that whereas the two Spenceers had broached a damnable and detestable principle that the homage was only due to the King in respect to his Crown that if he did not demean himself according to such and such rules his Subjects might rule him per aspertee by asperity and sharpness but this was condemned by two Acts of Parliament they both appear in my L. Cooke in Calvins case I do not go to repeat all the evidence that might clear this truth I say had there been any such thing but it hath been told him there was no such thing in Fact My Lord Fairfax's Commission was for the preservation of the King as well as for the liberties of the People The 11. of Rich. 2. Robert de Vere and others for levying a War was punished but this Gent. was not charged for levying of War If either of the Houses of Parliament should command such a thing as tends to the death of the King it would be void in it self Something he let fall of the Parliament not being dissolved My Masters for that you have heard some of my Lords declare how and in what manner this was an Authority of Parliament but it was clearly nothing at all this Gentlemen goes by Vertue of a Power from the Lord Fairfax The next thing he urges in point of Law was this he comes by way of Dilemma saith he either I must obey my General or dye