Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	line_n	page_n	read_v	9,933	5	9.6901	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47599	The marrow of true justification, or, Justification without works containing the substance of two sermons lately preached on Rom. 4:5 ... : wherein the nature of justification is opened, as it hath been formerly asserted by all sound Protestants, and the present prevailing errors against the said doctrine detected / by Benjamin Keach ...	Keach, Benjamin, 1640-1704.	1692 (1692)	Wing K76; ESTC R18579	45,425	50

not justifie as an Act nor as a Habit or from any Worth there is in that it being only as a hand to apply the Remedy We say Faith is a Fruit of Christ's Purchase and that he who spared not his own Son but delivered him up for us all will much more give us all things that is Grace here and Glory hereafter He that gave us the greatest Gift will not deny to his Elect ones the lesser Gift And now know all you Pharisaical Persons this Doctrine will pull down your high Thoughts and Imaginations and abase your Pride To you that are Believers Oh! admire Free Grace lift Christ up who died for you the Just for the Vnjust who bore your Sins who was made sin for us that knew no Sin that we might be made the Righteousness of God in him He gave himself for you and has given Grace the Fruit of his Death and himself to you O labour to be a holy People live to him that died for you and rose again To conclude Is there any Sinner here Are you ungodly and in a wr●tched Condition in your own Eyes Are you weary and heavy laden Come to Christ lift up your Heads For to him that worketh not but believeth on him that justifies the Vngodly his Faith is counted for Righteousness POSTSCRIPT REader I have now given thee the Substance of the two first Sermons preached on this Text and that which follows contains an Answer to all the main Objections brought against this Doctrine particularly that of the Apostle James about Works justifying and not Faith only And if this meets with kind Reception and I have Encouragement I shall publish two Sermons more God willing and fully demonstrate That Justification is by the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness or by Grace alone and the Nature of Imputation opened together how we are to understand the change of Persons Wherein I shall produce the Testimony of the ancient Fathers and a multitude of our faithful Modern Divines and worthy late Writers that so you may see we plead for no New Doctrine but the very same that all Good Men and Orthodox Christians in every Age have maintained which will I hope be of great Advantage to the Church of God And also shew you how Faith is concerned in our Justification or is said to justifie and how not together with the Nature of that Faith As also the Difficulty and Excellency of that Faith that is accounted for Righteousness Likewise the horrid Evil and Danger of the Sin of Unbelief and Mr. Williams's Book and Doctrine further considered Reader there are some Faults that have escaped the Press which spoil the Sense Pray be pleased to correct these following with you Pen. PAge 14. Line 27. for true read new p. 15. l. 1. for no more r. no where p. 15. l. 41. for that Christ r. not that Christ p. 24. l. 22. blot out indeed FINIS ADVERTISEMENTS A Vindication of the Protestant Doctrine concerning Justification and of its Preachers and Professors from the unjust Charge of Antinomianism In a Letter from a Minister in the City to a Minister in the Countrey London Printed for Dorman Newman at the King ' s-Arms in the Poultrey in the Year 1692. MR. Rutherford's Letters the Third Edition now divided in Three Parts The First containing those which were written from 〈◊〉 where he was confined by a Sentence of the High Commission drawn forth against him partly upon the account of his declining them partly upon the accoun● of his Nonconformity The Second and Third containing some which were written from Anworth before he was by the Persecution thrust from his Ministry and others upon Occasions afterward from St. Andrews London c. Printed for Dorman Newman at the King ' s-Arms in the Poultrey

that justifies us from all things and that without any Works done by us either in respect of answering the Rules of Law or Gospel though never so sincerely performed All indeed that I can find he means is this i. e. That Christ's Merits are the Cause of the Gospel Rule and Promise and his Righteousness imputed is the Cause for which we are justified and saved when we have got new Hearts and answer the Rule of the Gospel in Holiness and sincere Obedience And thus though imperfect Obedience to the Law was Dogs meat yet imperfect Obedience to the Rule of the Gospel or Promise thereof if sincere is the Children's Bread nay that which they ought to seek Justification by and to desire to be found in If this Man's Doctrine may be received it should appear by him that Christ's Righteousness imputed and our Gospel-obedience mixt together justifies us But the chief part is our Conformity to the Rule of sincere Obedience and Christ's Righteousness cannot do by Faith alone without this of ours 2. But Soul know and be not deceived this Text hath always been urged by sound Protestant Writers as one of the Pillars of the Doctrine of Justification by the Righteousness of Christ applied by Faith alone St. Paul doth not only disclaim his Righteousness he had before Conversion or his Obedience to the Law in point of Justification but he speaks in the present Tense What things were gain to me those have I counted loss for Christ But that which he adds is more I do count all things loss He speaks as our Divines note of all both past long since and also now present whether Righteousness of his own in Obedience to the Law or Works done by him under the Gospel all he counted as dung in comparison of the Knowledge of Christ and his Righteousness or the Righteousness of God which is by Faith 3. 'T is to be noted how Mr. Williams and Bellarmine do jump together and agree in their Exposition of this Text The latter saith That by Righteousness which is of the Law are meant Works of Obedience done through the Knowledge of the Law by the only strength of natural Abilities before his Conversion To which Chemnitius and other Protestant Writers answer That Paul rejected not only his Works before his Conversion which he signifieth speaking of the time past v. 7. but also the Works of his present Condition yea doubtless and I do count all things but loss Mr. Williams saith They were the Jewish Privileges and that conceited Christless Righteousness which he once valued But saith he a Gospel-holiness is not here intended and that still by speaking in the present Tense Paul means what was past saith he Pray observe they both exclude the Righteousness of the Law done by natural or legal Abilities and they both agree to include an inherent Righteousness performed by gracious Assistance under the Gospel This Man is I hope no Papist though he strives 't is plain to maintain one of the grossest parts of Popery and that part God raised up holy Luther principally to detect Christians look about you for you are greatly concerned 4. Consider that the Apostle positively disclaims all Righteousness of Obedience done by the Creature in Justification before God and did relie on the Righteousness of God For if he sets our Righteousness or the Righteousness of the Creature in direct opposition to the Righteousness of God which is by Faith then that which is the Righteousness of God applied by Faith is not the Righteousness of the Creature though never so sincerely performed but the former is true Ergo 5. 'T is such a Righteousness Paul here intended that he desired to be found in both at Death and Judgment but durst he think you desire to be found in any Righteousness of his own at that Hour or in that great and dreadful Day As to this take what Reverend Downham and others say When a Man shall be summoned to appear before the Judgment-seat of God shall seriously consider with himself what he shall oppose to the Accusations of Satan to the Convictions of the Law to the Testimony of his own Conscience confessing himself to be a most wretched Sinner to the Judgment of God and most righteous Judge if he look back on his own Conversation as having nothing to trust to but his own Righteousness he shall find sufficient Master of Despair He may say with Anselm Terret me vita mea c. My Life doth terrifie me Alas what Man is fully able to say he is perfect or that he sincerely has done all his Duty in respect of that milder Law of Obedience which they talk of Sirs there is no way in order to Peace of Conscience for us but to do as Paul did i. e. renounce all our own inherent Righteousness and Obedience and fly to the Doctrine of Justification by the Grace of God through the compleat Righteousness of Jesus Christ received by Faith only For while a Man saith he retains this Opinion that he can be justified by his own Works or inherent Righteousness he can never be soundly persuaded that his Righteousness is sufficient for that purpose but hath just Cause not only to doubt but also to despair And this is the Cause of that Popish Opinion That no Man without special Revelation can be assured of the Remission of his Sins in this Life Downham●o● Just p. 202. Brethren some of the Papists themselves have on a Death-bed been forc'd to seek relief by renouncing all their own Works and Obedience under distress of Conscience and to fly to the Righteousness of Christ only they kept it close to themselves lest that gap being opened their Trade should fall to the ground as appears by the Answer of Stephen Gardyner to the Bishop of Chichester Foxe's Acts and Mon. Vol. 2. p. 46. Take two or three Arguments further here viz. 1. If that Righteousness which is the Righteousness of God which is by Faith in opposition to the Righteousness of the Creature doth justifie us then all Works done by the Creature are excluded in point of Justification in God's sight But the former is true Ergo all VVorks done by the Creature are excluded c. 2. If Paul nor no other Child of God durst or dare to be found in any Righteousness of their own at Death or Judgment then Works done by us or sincere Obedience justifie us not but the former is true therefore no Works of ours nor sincere Obedience doth justifie us in God's sight 3 Arg. That Doctrine that holds a Christian down under slavish Fear by grounding his Justification on his own Works of Holiness and sincere Obedience is not of God but the Doctrine of Justification by our own Work of Holiness or sincere Obedience holds a Christian down under slavish Fear by grounding his Justification on his Works of Holiness and sincere Obedience therefore that Doctrine is not of God Christians take heed what Books you read if you