Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	law_n	lord_n	read_v	2,876	5	6.3934	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A81829	The povver of the Christian magistrate in sacred things Delivered in some positions, sent to a friend, upon which, a returne of his opinion was desired. With some considerations, upon the answer; and a digression concerning allegiance, and submission to the supreame magistrate. By Lewis du Moulin, History-reader of the University of Oxford.	Du Moulin, Lewis, 1606-1680.	1650 (1650)	Wing D2551; Thomason E1366_4; ESTC R209267	40,736	161

and over all persons no prophet in his time prophesied but the 70 Elders who yet prophesied by the spirit of Moses communicated to them In Joshuah's time the Regall or Civill Supreame Power was joyned with the Sacerdotall and seated in Eleazar as we may read Numb 27. vers 18 19. c. And St. Peter in his 1 Epistle chap. 2. vers 9. he coupleth them together or rather maketh but one of them calling the Common-wealth of Israel a Royall Priesthood That these Powers were no lesse divided in Samuel appeareth by the word of God to him 1 Sam. 8. ver 7. They have not rejected thee but me as if he should have said this people is weary to be under thy government they must needs have a King of their owne but in so doing they have not so much cast thee off as me who had set thee over them After Saul the High Priests attempted nothing except it were by a speciall command of God without the Kings consent Thus when the Booke of the Law had been a long time lost and then found the Priests enquired of the Lord concerning that Book by the command and direction of Josias so that the supreame visible authority to judge whether the Booke found was to be received for the Law of Moses and the word of God did only belong to the King as we see in the 2 Book of King chap 22. 23. where we read that the King called together all sorts of men viz. Elders Priests Prophets and all the people and read the Book of the Law before them all and withall was the author of the Covenant to which all the people stood under the word people all ranks of men being comprised After the return from the captivity it is knowne that the Sacerdotall Kingdome was againe set up as it was in Joshuah's time and under the Judges Letter IN the 10th Article he saith it is not understood that the Soveraigne Magistrate ought to give orders which concession will serve to keep a part of the authority belonging to the Ministers for if the ordination doe belong to none but the Pastors only it followeth that to them only belongeth the degrading and exauctorating of Ministers which are either vicious or hereticks or yet uncapable They may take away what they have given but still the punishing of them for crimes is in the power of the Soveraign Magistrate Consideration THere might be yet a question made whether when the Supreame and Regall Power is set in it hath not much of the Ministeriall and Sacerdotall Office annexed to the Regall calling and paternall Right for 1500 yeares together the Soveraigne Power was joyned with the Sacerdotall and among the chiefe Cities of Greece the Kings were Priests omnino apud veteres saith Cicero qui rerum potiebantur iidem auguria tenebant ut enim sapere sic divinare regali ducebant The division that was made to Aaron was not of the Soveraign Power but of the exercise of the Office Besides Aaron was an expresse figure of Christ our great High Priest which office near the time of Christ even soone after the Captivitie was againe confounded with the Regall but not to make use of this plea I say it is of ordination as of taking of the degree of Doctor of Physick or Law in an Academy This co-optation though made without the speciall privacie of the Supream Power yet in generall 't is not done without his consent permission he hath stil an inspection over the man quatenus Physitian or Lawyer and so long as he exerciseth the profession In like manner though the Soveraigne Power doth not ordaine this particular man yet is ordination of his appointment and one of his Lawes though it comes first from God for so doth the morall Law which notwithstanding after it hath been published under certaine penalties becomes the Law of the Supream Legislator of the State we have amongst the Constitutions of Justinian some bearing that title De ordinatione Episcoporum Clericorum Letter NOw if the Orthodox Magistrate under whose shadow the Church subsisteth and the true Religion maintained should transgresse the limites vindicating to himselfe more power over the Church then God hath given him in his Word I shall alwayes give counsell to the Pastors of the Church and to the people to beare that yoake with patience without murmuring giving thankes to God for bestowing Magistrates who are conservators of the purity of the Gospel under whose shelter and protection the souls are directed to the way that leads to salvation Consideration I Conceive that if the Soveraigne Magistrate takes upon him the care of ordering Church matters that the Pastor and Church have a yoak so much the lighter and therefore have need of lesse patience to beare it then if they carried it themselves neither doe I conceive that the transgression here mentioned in the Letter can be any trespasse in the Magistrate and though it were one that it is not much materiall nor of any dangerous consequence he having as the Letter saith the maine qualification required in a Magistrate which is to be conservator of the purity of the Gospel and besides the main end being obtained which can ever be desired and aymed at in any government which is to be directed to the way that leads to salvation But suppose that the Magistrate abuseth his own power over the Christian people in ordering the things which concern the Kingdome of God I doe likewise conceive that here the Magistrate does trespasse as a tyrant and not as an usurper and is like him that is drunke with his owne wine and not with anothers in which there is yet a double trespasse the one against his owne body the other against the good creature of God which he spils to no purpose But as they say by way of proverb right is right still and wrong wrong in what ever disguise they appeare So mischiefe is a mischief still and as great a mischief in the Soveraigne Magistrate whether his power exceedeth in things they call Civill or things which pertaine to the Kingdome of heaven though the inconvenience be farre greater in mis-ordering the latter God having equally entrusted him over all persons and causes in a Christian Common-wealth In the discharge of which trust it were to be wished that all Christian Magistrates would governe without that distinction of Powers Ecclesiasticall and Civill FINIS February 25. 1649. Imprimatur Nathaniel Brent

which of them the Temple and Priesthood did belong Letter GRegory of Tours who wrote about the yeare of our Lord 585. the historie of France in the 18 chap. of the 5 book speaks thus to the King Chilperick If any of us O King go besides the path of righteousnesse thou mayest redresse him but if thou dost transgresse who shall be able to correct thee we speak to thee and thou hearest us but if thou wilt not who shall have the power to condemne thee but he that is Iustice it selfe At that time the Bishop of Rouen named Praetextat was in great reputation yet was this Bishop being accused to have adhered to Meroue who rebelled against Chilperick clapt into prison by the Kings command and sore beaten and banished to Garnsey Consideration ALL this is sufficient to prove that the Soveraigne power of the State hath alwayes challenged power over Ecclesiasticall persons by that which follows it will be as clear that they challenge likewise the cognizance and ordering of Ecclesiasticall causes and actions Letter THE Greek Emperours have called all the oeconomick Councells not expecting the consent of the Bishop of Rome and often against his consent as the first Councell of Constantinople and of Chalcedone Yea in matters of Religion and Ecclesiasticall policy one cannot deny but that the Soveraign power of the State hath made orders David made twenty foure ranks of Priests Salomon had the chief oversight of the building of the Temple and bringing in all the vessels We see in the Code of Iustinian great number of Lawes concerning not only the policy of the Church but also the purity of the doctrine as be the titles de summa Trinitate fide Catholica de Episcopis Clericis ne sanctum Baptisma iteretur By which Lawes it appeareth that the Emperours had power to punish the Bishops namely by the 123 Authentick chap. 1. the Emperour speaketh thus Si quis autem extra memoratam observationem Episcopus ordinetur jubemus hunc Episcopatu depelli Yea he there addeth pecuniary Fines Consideration AS by these Lawes in the code of Justinian it appeareth that the Emperours had power to punish the Bishops as the Letter saith so doe they much more clearely assert the right and power which the Supreame Magistrate hath not only over all causes they call Ecclesiasticall but to make Lawes and Constitutions of the same nature as the causes be Letter A Great part of the Capitularies of Charles the great and of Lewis le Debonnaire are Laws Ecclesiasticall like those we read in the Councels of those dayes The Councell of Meyns held in the yeare 813. begins thus Carolo Augusto verae religionis Rectori Defensori Sanctae Ecclesiae And the second Councell of Meyns speaks thus to Lewis le Debonnaire at the opening of it Domino Serenissimo Christianissimo Regi Ludovico verae religionis strenuissimo Rectori Defensori Sanctae Ecclesiae I doubt not but these Emperours made those Lawes by the counsell of the Bishops and Prelats within their Dominions But they were willing to have them currant under the name of their Imperiall Lawes and the stamp of their Authority for the Soveraign Magistrate is the servant of God appointed by God to see the Law of God observed amongst men and the pure worship of his name set up Consideration THe Soveraigne Power is constituted by God to the end that men might live godly justly soberly and peaceably A Heathen could say that in a Common-wealth the first care must be Religion the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist And there is good reason that the Soveraign Magistrate should seeke after that which he is in the first place to ask for which is the Kingdome of Heaven being the basis of humane society so saith Cicero Religio est humanae societatis fundamentum But that the duty of the Supream Power is equally to order the religion and the civill government St. Austin doth plainely set it downe in the third Book against Cresconius Grammaticus In hoc Reges sicut eis divinitus praecipitur Deo serviunt in quantum Reges sunt si in regno suo bona jubeant mala prohibeant non solum quae pertinent ad humanam societatem verum etiam quae ad divinam religionem In that Kings as they are injoyned by God doe serve God as they are Kings if within their Kingdom they command good things and forbid evill things not onely in things belonging to humane society but also to divine religion Letter ANd I doe not believe that in England there is any Minister of the Word of God found who doth not acknowledge a subjection to the Sovereign Magistrate but is rather exceeding joyfull that the holy Ordinances are setled by publick authority and therefore there is no feare that any of them should goe about to perswade that there must be an Ecclesiasticall Common-wealth differing from the civill and one Common-wealth within another 'T is all the fault we finde with the Pope and his Clergy that they have made Imperium in Imperio and that the Clergy by his Lawes cannot be convented before the Royall Judges for they have Courts of Judicature and Prisons severed from the civill they have their appeales to the Roman Court and are freed from taxes and impositions Consideration THat power which the Ministers doe challenge in censuring and punishing of offenders suspending from the communion or excommunicating as inherent and intrinsecall to the Ministers of the word and not being a branch depending of the jurisdiction of the Soveraign Christian Magistrate that power I say thus challenged is as much as to constitute one Common-wealth within another Letter FOr I doe not thinke that Bishops or Ministers ought to render themselves Judges in any cause civill or capitall to punish the offenders by imprisonment taxes or bodily penalties Jesus Christ never authorized them so to doe for he would not so much as accept of being an arbiter in sharing of an Inheritance For these reasons I doe not believe that those in whose hands God hath now entrusted the Soveraign Power in England shall have any ground of fearing that the Ministers so long as they discharge their calling making use of that authority that Jesus Christ hath given them have any intention to intrench upon the Power and Authority of the Soveraign Magistrate But because the third Article attributing to the Supream Magistrate a right to order all humane actions tending to the Soveraign end which is the glory of God and the salvation of souls might seem to draw this consequence that the soveraign Magistrate is judg of all actions about Ministry and the Preaching of the Word therefore the article addeth a prudent cautition viz. That we must obey the Soveraign Magistrate so long as his commands are not repugnant to Gods commands for if he should command the abjuring of the Christian Religion or bowing before an Idol or should introduce another propitiatory sacrifice for sinnes

Pastors or society of Christians get an increase of power of Jurisdiction and Legslation if they be a Law unto themselves and practise the duties of piety and exhort one another so to do Plinius the younger in the 97 Epistle to Trajan and the tenth book where he speaks of Christians saith that one of their crimes was that they joyned themselves in a covenant to live unblameably not to steal not to commit fornication not to defraud his neighbour and the like I believe that none will from that practise of the Christians argue that they took upon them more power for so doing then they durst under a Christian Magistrate except he were of the mind of some of late in Authority in England who disliked and endeavoured to suppresse all godly private meetings under pretence of Factions Sure if I mistake it not it will be found that the Pastors power of the Keyes had no life to compell the disobedient to Gods ordinances till they received it from the Soveraigne Magistrate when he gave his name to Christ who both more honoured and exalted Gods ordinances raising them from the dust and added weight to the heavenly messages by the mouth of the Ministers by being a terrour to the evil and punishing the ungodly To the power of persuasion and declaration he addeth that of coaction in which the Pastors have nothing to do The Bishop saith Saint Paul must not be a striker 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And hereupon Chrysostome saith well If a man is drawn from the faith the Priest must undertake with patience to exhort him for he cannot redresse him by force onely he must strive to perswade him to bring him to the right Faith Pastors saith the same Father are appointed to preach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not to rule or command with authority Letter HEre I dare say that the Reformers of the Doctrine of the Pope have not retained the Keys that were under Popery In reforming the Doctrine they have also reformed the abuses cleaving to the Keyes which are abominable for in the Romish Church they extend the power of the Keyes so farre as pardoning sinnes in a judiciall way saying to the sinner I absolve thee from thy sinnes The Priest renders himself Judge in a cause wherein God is the party offended By vertue of these Keyes the Pope drawes souls out of Purgatory he looseth those he never bound and which are none of his flock he doth loose under earth because Jesus Christ hath said what ever you shall bind on earth he doth loose and dispence with oaths and vows and freeth Subjects from the obedience due to their Soveraigne Prince he separates marriages exempting also children from the obedience they owe to their Father and Mother These holy men of God who have reformed the Doctrine have left off those Keyes and kept those which Jesus Christ hath given to his Disciples and their successors I will give thee the Keyes of the Kingdome of heaven it was also impossible to reform the Doctrine without reforming the Keyes since those Keyes are a part of the Doctrine they have retained to themselves the power to bind and loose which Jesus Christ gave to his Disciples Math. 16. Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth c which power goeth no further then Ecclesiasticall censures as the Lord Jesus Christ teacheth in the same place giving to understand that by this binding the rebellious sinner is put among the Publicanes and sinners who were excluded from the Communion of the Church Thus we must understand the power of remitting or reteining sinnes given by Jesus Christ to his Disciples The faithfull Pastors do remit sinnes when they release men of Ecclesiacall penalties and receive to the Communion of the Church the repenting sinner who was excluded Consideration THe Reformers have done as Richard the third in usurping a power which yet he exercised with moderation and making of good Lawes so did Augustus Caesar and some more Thus the Reformers have reteyned the Keyes to which they had no more right then the Pastors of the Romish Church but have taken away those adjuncts of abuses and abominations adhering to the power of the Keyes In that sence as Richard the third may be said to have usurped the Crowne as well as he who to usurpation hath added a tyrannicall Government and making of wicked and unjust Lawes so may it be said that the Reformers in reforming the Doctrine have reteined the power of the Keyes the Article thus speaking having no further meaning then to say that the Reformers in reforming the Doctrine have still challenged to themselves an Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction not belonging to the Civil Magistrate even as the Pastours of the Romish Church have donc though not the same for qualifications As for the meaning of the words dic Ecclesiae tell it unto the Church it cannot have much strength what ever interpretation one may give to the words whether by the word Church we understand a Synagogue or judicatory as was that of the Iewes amongst which there was no difference between Church and State or Common-wealth or a society of faithfull men and though by the Church Pastours should be understood I do not see here any Iudiciall sentence binding him that trespasseth against his neighbour but still he may if he will hearken without fear of any coercive power seated in the Ministers and the words Let him be to thee a heathen or a publican have no further meaning then have him for such a one in thy thoughts and estimation a Publicans office was lawfull neither yet could he be excluded from the communion nor from the congregation the very heathen not being excluded from the latter for how else could they have been converted Letter THE Reformers then in reforming the abuses in the Doctrine and Keyes have retained the Keyes and power to bind and unbind committed to them by Jesus Christ The Author of the Articles acknowledgeth that the Pastors of the Church have well done to retain that power under the heathen Emperors that is almost for the space of 350 yeares from Christ to Constantine the first Christian Emperour since which Emperour the said Author thinks that the Bishops and Pastors were to part with that Power and that the Soveraigne Power of the Keyes did no longer belong to them but that they were to desert it in obedience to God which yet they have not done for all the ancient Councels although convened by the will of the Emperours are full of penitentiall canons prescribing the forme time and degrees for publique pennances in the execution of which canons the consent of the Emperours nor of their Lieutenants was never expected Consideration WE have seen before that the power of the Ministers is neither increased nor diminished whether the Magistrate be Orthodox or no and that the power of the keyes given them by God hath more lively actings under the Orthodox Magistrate To that part of the Letter which saith that in

Letter that Jesus Christ did not except against the power that Pilate tooke to judge him but rather said that that power was given him from God Thus in the fourth of the Acts Peter and John doe not except against the validity of the Court over them but freely acknowledge their Judges We are examined say they of the good deed done in the impotent man The state of the controversie was whether it was lawfull to heal any one in the name of Jesus Peter in the name of the Apostles proved it was lawfull because Jesus was an Head over the Church and was author of Salvation which they further strengthened by proofes from his Resurrection and antecedent Oracles and when they were forbidden to preach any more in the name of Jesus they replied Judge yee whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more then unto God Intimating that even the power of judging whether Jesus was the Messias did belong unto them Letter Of the Power of Kings over the lives and calling of the High Priest we have a cleare example in the 1 Book of the Kings Chap. 2. Vers 26. where Salomon saith to Abiathar Thou art worthy of death but I will not at this time put thee to death only was contented to thrust him out from being Priest unto the Lord and confined him to his house at Anatoth and oft-times the Roman Emperors and the Christian Kings have punished Bishops and Pastors with banishments stripes yea with death The Emperour Constantius did remove Liberius Bishop of Rome from the function of his Episcopacy and banished him to Berea Consideration THis example and many more he addeth are sufficient to evince that the Magistrate hath power to exauctorate or degrade and thereupon to put another in the place He that hath power to expell a Bishop from his Dominion hath also power to thrust him out of his Sea which is within the Dominion and if the Election was not an Act of the Soveraign Power either by his concession or delegation to others the Minister or Bishop could not be put out but by the power that invested him Any Act which may contribute towards the securitie peace and weal of the state is of the cognizance of the supream power of that State and the Jus sacrum was comprised under Jus publicum for the definition of Jus is the knowledge of Divine and humane things Letter IN the dayes of Valentinian Damasus and Ursicinus being competitors of the sea of Rome the sedition being grown to that height as that there was found 137 dead bodies in a Basilisk but the commotion was appeased by the authority of the Emperour who expelled Ursicinus and setled Damasus In the yeare of our Lord 420. there arose a great strife between Bonifacius and Eulalius competitors for the sea of Rome by the clashing of the Suffrages of the people of Rome to whom at that time belonged the power and right of election But the authority of Honorius intervening he thrust out Eulalius and preferred Bonifacius and withall made this Law that if it falls out that against right and by the rashnesse of the contending parties two are made Bishops we will not suffer that either of them be Bishops this Law is found in the Decree of Gratian Distinct 79. Canon si duo forte Consideration THough the election of Pastors should naturally belong to other Pastors or Christian people as naturally every one chuseth a Tutour to his sonne a Patient what Physician he liketh best a Merchant his Factor yet no doubt but the Soveraign power may exercise such actions that have no definitive bounds and rules prescribed by the dictates of nature thus in many places the Soveraigne power will provide Tutors for Pupills publick Schoolmasters for youth Physicians for Townes and Cities Besides the Factions Schismes and Heresies may so rend the State that if the supream power hath not a chief regulating hand in the election of Pastors calling or convocation of Synods it will never be able to settle the peace and security of the State upon a right Basis The Canons about elections have no life nor validity but what they receive from the supream power much lesse the elections which are regulated according to the canons and decrees Letter IN the yeare of our Lord 451. The Emperour Theodosius the II. whose piety and goodnesse is generally commended expelled Nestorius Patriarch of Constantinople and banished him In the yeare 498. a great strife happened about the election of a Bishop of Rome betwixt Symmachus and Laurentius the King Theodorick taking notice of the strife and hearing that Symmachus had been first named preferred him before Laurentius but soon after Symmachus being accused of many crimes he appointed Peter Bishop of Altin to iudge of the accusations and look to the disorders of Rome In the year 525. King Theodorick sent Iohn Bishop of Rome Ambassadour to Iustine the Emperour but this Iohn behaving himselfe contrary to his instructions Theodorick put him to death in prison Gregory the I. Bishop of Rome who wrote about the yeare of our Lord 595. writing to Maurice the Emperour calls himself unworthy servant and subject to his commands yea dust and ashes in his presence and a worme In the yeare 654. Constant the Emperour put Martin the Bishop of Rome in chaines and banished him to Chersonesus where he died Under Pepin Charles the Great and Lewis le Debonaire the power of the Romane Pontife grew by the liberality of those Kings yea since them have they been often ill intreated punished degraded and deposed by the Emperours of Germany and the Kings of Italy and the Histories of Germany France and England are full of examples of Emperours and Kings who have dealt roughly with the Bishops putting them out of their sea c. There is no doubt made when the King Clouis was a heathen but that he had an absolute power over all French both Lay and Ecclesiasticall and that retained still the a Christian he being afterwards same power else he had been a loser by his change and suffered a diminution of authority in his Empire Under the first line of our Kings Councells were assembled by their command and the Bishop of Rome never intermedled and had neither Nuncioes nor Legats in France Consideration THat the Supream power even of contrary Religion challenged power as well over Eclesiasticall persons as causes and were acknowledged competent Iudges we may see by the appeal of Saint Paul who appealed to Cesar I stand saith he at the Judiciall seat of Cesar there I must be indged and when Saint Peter not declining the Iudgement of the Councell said Act. 4. Whether we ought rather to obey God or man Judge yee And the great controversie about the Temples of Jerusalem and Garizin between the Iewes and the Samaritanes was decided by Ptolomeus King of Egypt and which was most materiall by the Law of Moses and his judgement was right pronouncing to

administer justice impartially though any or all of them may faile in the discharge of their duty The King being a persecutor of the christian people instead of being their nursing Father the Father leaving his children to the wide world and the Judge taking bribes and being prepossessed with prejudices If mens sins should exempt exempt them from their duty a wicked mans duty should be never to be converted None will say 't is not the duty of a Governor of a strong hold to defend it although he lets in the enemy without resistance That 't is not the office of a Magistrate to look to the safety of the high wayes because he either neglects that care or conniveth at such as doe commit robbery For the second ground Suppose that the Soveraigne Power doth not impose any Law or rather suppose his Lawes are unjust shall a man under such a power live lawlesse or shall not rather such a man being a Christian be tied to be a Law unto himselfe or rather to make the word of God a Law to his conscience Sure such a man must not expect the commands of the Soveraign Power to abstain from stealing or fornication which may be are authorised by Law but must avoid these not for wrath that is not for fear of punishment but for conscience sake as the Apostle speaketh thus when Christ commandeth the Ministers to preach baptise c. and the people not to forsake their mutuall Assembly no doubt but that both the Christian Pastor and people are bound to all Church duties though they have the Soveraign power opposite and threatning all kind of punishment to those that exercise them If those in authority be wanting to their duty I have no reason or ground to be deficient in mine As for the third ground concerning meetings assemblies c. I say that they may be such as though it should be granted on all sides that the Church and States Jurisdiction were but one that the very Soveraign power needs not to pretend to have an eye over them It being a kind of right of nature for Merchants trading in the same commodity to meet for acquaintance to appoint a Randezvous A man being a feciable creature it is no marvell if men are naturally desirous to converse together without expecting any order for so doing Were not the Heteries and Meetings of the ancient Christians of the same nature And upon that account I see not but the Meetings of congregations of those called Independents are very commendable and not to be enquired after by the Soveraigne Magistrate nor by Synods which cannot be proved to be of Divine institution but have taken their originall from those kinds of naturall and innocent meetings which when they were about things which were neither plots nor conspiracy to disturb the peace of the State needed not to be looked after by the Magistrate except when being converted to the Christian Religion he became himself a principall member of those meettings for then specially when the meetings are not onely in houses but in publick places and are tending to have the holy Ordinances set up and published as the main rule of life and ground-work of humane society his chief duty was to govern the Empire as Christian contributing his whole endevour towards the defence maintenance and encrease of the Christian Religion Thus Leo Bishop of Rome Ep. 75. to Leo the Emperour Debes incunctanter advertere Regiam potestatem tibi non solum ad mundi regimen sed maxime ad Ecclesiae praesidium esse collocatam Thou oughtest soberly to consider that the Royall power is not onely committed to thee for the Government of the world but chiefly for the defence of the Church Letter ALL the difficulty then is concerning the Orthodox Magistrate and one that is endowed with the true knowledge of God such as by the mercies of God the Magistrate of England is upon that the fifth Article saith that the Reformers have indeed purged the Popish Doctrine but have reserved to themselves the Soveraigne cognizance of the actions they call Ecclesiasticall challenging the power of the Keyes which when all is said is reduced to this sentence that God must be rather obeyed then men The Authour of the Articles thinks that the Reforming Pastors in retaining the power of the Keyes have not obeyed God he doth indeed acknowledge that under a Prince of contrary Religion the Christian people have done well to establish a government which they call purely Ecclesiasticall and create Elders who are deputies of the people but he is of that opinion that where the Magistrate is of the same Religion with the body of the people there ought not to be any further distinction of Jurisdiction the Church and State concurring into one Christian common-wealth To be short all his discourse is tending to that viz. that in a State where the Magistrate is Orthodox the Keyes and power which the Pastors had under Magistrates of contrary Religion doth no longer belong to them but doth onely belong to the Soveraigne Magistrate whose power is over all persons and things and that in all Assemblies Synods and Classes the conclusions have no force if they be not ratified by the will of the Supreme Magistrate by whom they usually are assembled Consideration VVHat he saith from the Author of the articles that where the Supream Magistrate becomes Orthodox the power of the Keyes doth no longer belong to the Ministers ought to be understood with some explication for the power of the Keyes is still and ought to be the same whether the Magistrate be orthodox or no there is not in the Ministers any addition of that power under the heathen Magistrate nor any substraction of it under a Christian suppose that the Christian Magistrate and Orthodox should turn Apostate I do not conceive that it follows thereupon that the power which the Christian Magistrate hath over the Church is through his Apostacy devolved unto the Ministers for that Legislation or Iurisdiction practised in Christian Congregations Synods or Assemblies under the heathen Magistrate is no more then a harmony of minds affections and actions to holy ordinances and orders by which Christians may worship God more purely and walk more closely with him which ordinances are either Gods word or such as encrease the power of piety and as they are published by common consent as the best rule to walk by so are they in the practise of them willingly and unanimously consented unto and every member of a Christian society submitteth himself to the rules exhortations and censures of that society or Church not being awed or compelled by any coercive power which they cannot avoid if they listed but led by voluntary submission to which by promise and pact they are in a manner already engaged Besides suppose that the Magistrate doth not impose any Lawes to restrain ungodlinesse or the currant sins in the world yea suppose that vices are authorised by Law doth either