Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	king_n	write_v	year_n	5,160	5	4.8919	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A13839	A synopsis or compendium of the fathers, or of the most famous and ancient doctors of the Church, as also of the schoolmen Wherein is clearely shewed how much is to be attributed to them, in what severall times they lived, with what caution they are to be read, and which were their perfections, which their errors. A treatise most necessary, and profitable to young divines, and delightfull to all such whose studies in humanity take from them the leisure, though not the desire of reading the fathers; whose curiosity this briefe surveigh of antiquity will in part satisfie. Written in Latin by that reverend and renowned divine, Daniel Tossanus, chiefe Professor of Divinity in the University of Heidelberge, and faithfully Englished by A.S. Gent.; Synopsis de patribus. English	Tossanus, Daniel, 1541-1602.; Stafford, Anthony.	1635 (1635)	STC 24145; ESTC S118496	31,571	108

epist 38. Si delitioso cupitis pabulo saginari B. Augustini opuscula legite et ad comparationem siligimis illius nostrum furfur em non quaeratis If you desire saith he to be fatned with delicious fa●● read the workes of Saint Austine and having ●●sted his flowre you will not seeke after our Branne Which is to be noted against the Papists who preferre that Gregory the first before all others The workes of Saint Austine are distributed into ten Tomes some of them are Philosophicall and of no great moment as of Grammar Rhetoricke Logicke Musicke of Order of the quantity of the soule In his bookes of Confessions wherein he describes his owne life hee often useth too much simplicity and copiousnesse yet may they be read cursorily But the Students in Divinity meaning to read Saint Augustine ought to beginne at his Doctrinals and first at his foure books of Christian Doctrin in which he instructs a future Divine Next hee must read his Enchiridion to Laurentius and the booke of Faith to Peter of the spirit and the letter and of the Ecclesiasticall opinions The Epistles of Saint Augustine and the bookes of the City of God are of a mixt kind partly Doctrinall partly Historicall but full of various learning Thence let him proceed to his Polemicall or Controversiall which hee wrote against the Maniches the Arians Donatists c. His expository bookes as upon the Psalmes and Saint Iohns Gospell containe more piety than solid Interpretation partly by reason of his small insight in the Hebrew and Greeke Tongues partly because in those Interpretations hee accommodated his writing to those times as also that sometimes he makes digressions but his Commentary on Saint Iohn is excellent above the rest The Palmary or Master-peece of Saint Austin was that above all the other Fathers and almost alone being provoked by the Pelagians hee discusseth diligently the Doctrine of Originall sinne and Predestination But as in Saint Austin it is very laudable that he only of all the Ancients wrote bookes of Retractations for in his seventh Epistle hee professeth himselfe to bee of their number who write by profiting and profit by writing so there remaine some things which require a censure Yet is there no doubt but many things are inserted in his workes of which hee is not the Author For he being yet alive sixteene Articles were falsly father'd on him to which hee replyed But chiefly this was his errour that as hee wrote much so hee often varies nor is alwayes consonant to himselfe Hee hath also many Acurologia's as Danaeus a most learned Divine observes in his Annotations upon the Enchiridion of Saint Austin Then he erred in that he precisely included the salvation of Infants in the sacrament of Bap●isme But whereas in some places hee cals the Eucharist a Sacrifice hee thus interpreteth himselfe lib. 10. Civit. Dei cap. 20. that it is the Sacrament of the Sacrifice of Christ In another place hee seemes to affirme that the pious soules of the deceased are helped by the Almes and prayers of the living but without the warrant of the Word of God especially in his booke entituled The ●are for the dead where he handles this question Whether or no it profiteth to be b●ried neere the Monument of any Saint But that Booke as Calvin admonisheth lib. 3. Instit. cap. 5. Sect. 10. conteines so many doubts that the coldnesse of it is able to extinguish the heate of any foolish zeale and there is no doubt but that Booke hath beene depraved by many Monkish additions for in another place as lib. 2. question Evangeli● c●p 38. hee affirmes Nullum auxilium a justis praeberi defunctorum animabus that the soules of the deceased receive no helpe from just men Cyrillus Bishop of Alexandria flourished about the yeere 433. in the reigne of Theodosius the younger He expelled the Iewes out of his Diocesse and killed not a few of them in the Synagogues by the hands of his Souldiers Being much incensed against Nestorious he excommunicated him by his owne proper authority which was not approved of by the Fathers although he defended a good cause and that Nestorius was a little after condemned in the Ephesine Councell Cyrillus wrote in Greeke and many things which are extant in Latine They were publisht at Basill apud Hervag anno 66. with an addition In the first Tome are found Commentaries upon Leviticus in which he insists too much upon the Anagogicall sense He also wrote Commentaries upon Saint Iohn but imperfect His second Tome is Doctrinall as the booke which he calleth a Treasure There in 14. bookes he defends the Consubstantiallity of the Sonne and the holy Ghost against the Arians In the third Tome he disputes against Iulian for the Christian Religion also touching the right Faith to Theodosius and the Queene The fourth Tome conteines Epistles Homilies and an Apologie to Theodosius also an Exposition of the Nicene Creed and Synodicall Epistles together with other things against the Nestorians The fift Tome is a Commentary upon Esay not long since added to his Works and Translated by Laurence Humfre an Englishman Vigilius Bishop of Trent flourished in those times of whose Workes but a few are extant printed at Colen in Octavo as a disputation against the Arians and five books against Eutyches both pious and learned which are often objected against the Vbiquitaries The Hearers of Saint Austin who reteined his Doctrine were anno 440. Primasius who wrote upon all the Epistles of Saint Paul Prosper Aquitanic anno 454. Helychius anno 490. hee wrote upon Leviticus Fulgentius a Bishoppe in Africa about the yeere five hundred under Thrasymund King of the Vandals hee wrote three bookes of diverse questions to Monimus seven bookes to King Thrasymund and other things worthy the reading His Workes were most accurately Printed at Antwerpe by Plantin anno 74. After the time of Saint Austin and his Disciples the purity of Doctrine began with the Roman Empire very much to decline by reason of the accumulated superstitions of the Munkes wherefore the succeeding Fathers cannot be in the same esteeme with the first and more ancient yet had the following their peculiar gifts not to be cōtemned wrote many things which are read with great profit Leo the first of that name Bishop of Rome about the yeere 444. in the time of Attila Hee was the Author of gathering together a Synod against Eutyches and Dioscorus Bishop of Alexandria who would oppresse Flavianus an orthodox Bishop of Constantinople His Workes as his Sermons Epist are imprinted at Colen by Birkmannus Amongst his Epistles that to Flavianus against the Blasphemies of Eutyches is most eminent the authority of which Epistle was of great force in the Chalcedonian Councell wherein amongst the rest this speech is remarkeable Agit vtraque forma id est natura cum alterius communione quod proprium est verbo operante quod verbi est

of Patience of Mortality of the lapsed also against Demetrianus and the Iewes scarce anything of Saint Cyprian is left us although I cannot deny some other Sermons are inserted The explication of the Creed is rather made by Ruffinus than Saint Cyprian The Treatise of the Lords Supper seemes also to have another Author After the Frobenian and Lugdunensian Edition his workes were printed and revised by Turnebus at Paris and after that at Colen with an addition of some fragments Hee confuted Novatus the Hereticke whom in his Epistles hee stiles an importunate Innovat●r and a murtherer of penitence The staines of Saint Cyprian were that hee contended too obstinately that they were to be re-baptized who were baptized by Heretickes or who leaving Heresie repented Although the Affrican Councell assented to him yet Stephanus a Roman Bishop opposed him Saint Augustine lib. 2. contra Crescon Grammat saith thus Nos nullam Cypriano facimus iniuriam cum eius quaslibet literas a Canonica Divinarum Scripturarum anthoritate distinguimus Non teneor authoritate Epistolae Cypriani ad Iubaianum et cum eius pace quod cum Scripturis non convenit respuo Wee doe no wrong to Cyprian if we distinguish any of his letters from the Canonicall Authority of the Divine Scriptures I am not tyed to the authority of Cyprians letter to Iubaianus and by his leave I refuse that which agrees not with the Scriptures Saint Cyprian also in his Epistles over-carefully and superstitiously urgeth water to be mixed with wine in the Administration of the Lords Supper because water and blood flowed from the side of Christ Also Epist 8. lib. 3. hee affirmes Infantes statim esse baptizandos ne pereant quòd eis misericordia non sit deneganda That Infants must forthwith be baptized lest they perish because mercy is not to be denied them Where hee seemes to confine mercy to the Signes Anno 260. Gregorius Neocaesariensis the Disciple of Origen a learned and pious man confuted Samosatenus of whose workes there is nothing extant save a confession of his in the Councell of Antioch against Samosatenus To these times may be referred Arnobius an Affrican of whose composing eight bookes are extant against the Gentiles as also his Commentaries on the Psalmes but they are very briefe and falsified by the Monkes About the yeare after Christ 317. flourished Lactantius Firmianus in the beginning of the reigne of Constantine the great to whom hee dedicated his bookes of Divine Institutions against the Gentiles Hee lived at Nicodemia and excelled in Elegancy and lustre of Language all the Writers of the Church But hee seemed little to understand the proper Doctrine of the Gospell concerning the Benefits of Christ and of Faith For hee expresly writeth that Christ was therefore sent that by his Word and Example hee might invite us to vertue and suffered onely to be a president of Patience And when in his 5. and 6. booke hee expresly and of purpose handles the point of Christian Justice he onely disputes of the Justice of the Law and mentions very sparingly the Justification by Faith But the first part of his Institutions which taxeth the heathenish Idolatries and Philosophicall opinions of God and the Chiefe Good as also his booke of the Workemanship of God in the structure of man may be read with great profit and pleasure The Fathers in the time of the Nicene Councell which was held anno Christi 330. whose Writings are extant Athanasius although in the time of the Councell he were not a Bishop yet was he alwayes a faithfull assistant of Alexander the Bishop of Alexandria whom hee afterward succeeded and deservedly obtaines the first place amongst the Fathers of that time For although hee were exposed to innumerable Calumnies yet with an incredible constancy he frustrated all the endevours of his adversaries and is stiled the Bulwark of Faith in the Ecclesiastical History neither was there any other cause that more whetted the bitter hatred of the Arians against him as saith Theodoret lib. 1. hist than that they perceived the sharpnesse of his wit and industry in confuting of Heretickes in the Nicene Councell His Creed or his explication of the Apostolical Creed is in the Church among other Creeds received There are yet some of his most grave and excellent Treatises extant at Basill set forth heretofore by the Frobenii and Episcopii but more lately at Paris by Nivellius Petrus Nannius an eloquent man being his Interpretour as an oration against Idols of the Incarnation of the Word an Epistle against Heretickes to Epictetus Bishop of Corinth an Exposition of Faith foure Orations against the Arians a double Apology for his flight against the Calumnies of the Arians of divers questions of the Scripture to Antiochus and many others of the same Argument which our Divines usually object against the Neorians and Vbiquitarians The life of S. Anthony the Abbot is father'd on him but there are in it many things fabulous which savour not of the gravity and simplicity of S. Athanasius Most true it is that both S. Athanasius and those ancient Fathers were too fervent in commending the signe of the Crosse and the miracles wrought by that signe and by Martyrs thinking by this meanes to authorize the Evangelicall Doctrine While wee give these cautions touching the blemishes of the Fathers we are not lyable to that censure which the Papists lay upon us derived from the Authority of the same Father who in his first Oration complaines that the Arians accused the Fathers for he speakes not there of all the writings of the Fathers but of the Nicene Creed gathered out of the Scriptures by the Fathers of that Councell to confute the Arians For hee there diligently admonisheth us to try the Spirits which may be easily done by those who are conversant in the Scriptures There are some memorable speeches of Athanasius to be observed First against the Lutherans out of the second Oration against the Arians Nunquam populus Christianus ab Episcopis suis sed a Domino in quem creditum suit nomen accepit Ne ab Apostolis quidem appellationes adepti sumus sed a Christo Illi qui aliundè originem suae fidei ducunt ut haeretici meritò authorum suorum cognomenta praese ferunt The Christian people never tooke their Name from the Bishops but from the Lord in whom they beleeved Neither have wee our appellations from the Apostles but from Christ himselfe They who derive their Faith from any other Originall as heretickes deservedly beare the surnames of their Authors Then against the Vbiquitaries upon that saying Omnia mihi tradita sunt c. All things are given mee Tradita sunt illi omnia ut medico qui sanaret morsum serpentis ut vitae qui vivificaret ut luci illuminanti id est ratione officii Dedit inquit Deus ut quemadmodum per eum facta sunt omnia ita in eo omnia

Emperors and when he was Proconsul in Liguria in the time of Valentinianus he was called to the Bishopricke of Millan with the full consent of the people It is reported that he baptized Saint Austine Hee was endued with great zeale as appeares in the Ecclesiasticall story and by his demeanour in his Bishopricke The writings of Saint Ambrose extant are divided into foure Tomes and are partly morall as the three bookes of the offices of a Christian an institution and exhortation to Virgins of Widowes of Repentance of the worlds volubility of the good wee receive by death Also they are partly Doctrinall Tom. 2. of the vocation of the Gentiles of faith to Gratianus of the holy Ghost to the same of Faith against the Arians of the Sacrament of the Dominicall Incarnation But it is to bee observed that the more learned have judged Saint Ambrose not to bee the Author of the Treatise of the calling of the Gentiles 1. Because he speaks no where so purely of the Predestination of God 2. By reason there is mention made of Pelagius who lived after Saint Ambrose 3. In that Saint Augustine who cites many things out of Saint Ambrose against Boniface the Pelagian mentions not this b●●ke which inveighes most of all against the Pelagians 4. The dissimilitude of phrase But it is certaine the Author of that booke to have beene a learned man and well exercised in the Scriptures which makes Erasmus not unaptly wish that many such were mixed with the workes of Saint Ambrose Amongst many excellent sayings contained in those books these golden words are extant making directly against the Papists lib. 1. cap. 5. where hee disputes the reason why to one man grace is given to another denyed Quid Calumniamur inquit iustitiam occultam qui gratias debemus misericordiae manifestae Laudemus et veneremur quod agitur quia tutum est nescire quod tegitur Hic nec praeterita nec futura merita censeri possunt vilesceret Redemptio Christi neo misericordiae Dei humanarum operum praerogativa succumberet si iustificatio quae fit per gratiam meritis praecedentibus deberetur ut non munus largientis sed merces esset operantis Why doe we calumniate saith hee the hidden Justice who owe thankes for the manifested Mercy Let us prayse and adore what is done because it is safe not to know what is hid Here neither past nor future merits are to bee reckoned The Redemption of Christ would be abased neither would the prerogative of humane workes give place to the mercy of God if Iustification which is by grace were due to precedent merits so that it should not be the gift of the distributer but the reward of the worker The Writings of Saint Ambrose are partly also Homileticall as Tom. 3. Orations Epistles Sermons partly againe Expository as Tom. 4. lib. Hexaemeron and a Treatise of the Patriarchs which belong to Genesis He wrote also copiously on the 119. Psalme and of the Sacraments of the Church also a glosse upon Saint Luke and Commentaries upon the Epistles of Saint Paul Where againe it is to be noted against the Papists that S. Ambrose upon the fourth Chapter to the Romans useth the particle onely when he averreth Gratiam Dei solam fidem poscere ad salutem The grace of God doth require faith onely to salvation Saint Augustine quotes his Commentaries upon Esay and the 48. Psalme but they are not extant By reason of his ignorance in the Greeke and Latine Tongues he erred often in his Expositions which is common to him together with Saint Austin and some others But although he be over-vehement in the commendations of Virginity yet is that memorable against the Papists which he writes in his first booke of Virgins Non debere imperari virginitatem nec necessitatem imponendam nec castam esse quae metu cogitur Virginity saith he ought not to be commanded neither of necessity to bee imposed nor is shee chaste who is compelled by feare In his bookes of the Sacraments there are some things ambiguous othersome superstitious as of Unction in Baptisme which notwithstanding was not done altogether without cause by those of riper yeares also of water to bee mixed with the Wine in the Cup at the Lords Table Yet is it remarkeable against the Papists that in his booke of Sacraments hee onely acknowledgeth two Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord. And when lib. 6. he disputes how the bread is made the body of the Lord hee speaketh nothing at all of Transubstantiation but hee confesseth that there seemeth to be a similitude onely not true flesh and blood and that wee must beleeve the operatory word of Christ that is the efficacious that the Sacrament is taken outwardly Grace and Vertue inwardly Hee plainely distinguisheth bread from Grace Tu inquit qui accipis panem in illa alimento Divinae participas Substantiae quia idem Christus est particeps corporis et Divinitatis Thou saith hee who takest bread in that nourishment participatest of the Divine Substance because the same Christ is partaker of a body and Divinity which is as much to say wee communicate the whole Christ and communicating his flesh have communion also with God Neither did the Greeke Churches want excellent Doctors for in those times namely under Valentinian Basilius Magnus of Caesaria Cappadocia and Gregory Bishop of Nazianzena were famous of whom as yet some worthy monuments are extant Wee linke them together because they were companions in Studies and most intimate friends Yet Gregory lived longest even to the yeare 400. and wrote a Monody or Funerall Oration which containes the life of S. Basil There are extant of this S. Gregory eloquent Orations and Epistles as also Greeke Poems which are in the hands of all men There lived also in those times Gregorius Nissenus brother of Basilius who wrote eight bookes of Man There is a learned Epistle extant written to him by S. Basil of the difference betweene the Essence and Subsistence Moreover S. Basil as hee himselfe somewhere writeth was diligently instructed in the Christian Religion from a child He was indued with so much Eloquence that Erasmus doubts not to call him the Christian Demosthenes Amongst others that saying which is extant in his Sermon of Humility is eminent and is often cited by our Divines against the Papists Haec est perfecta et integra gloriatio quando non propter iustitiam suam aliquis ●ffertur sed agnoscit sibi deesse veram iustitiam fide autem sola in Christum iustificari This is saith he perfect and entire glory when a man is not puffed up with his owne Iustice but acknowledgeth himselfe to want true Iustice and that Iustification is onely by faith in Iesus Christ Also in his Epistle of the sacred Scripture to Eustathius the Physician Non consuetudinem sed sacras Scripturas nermam debere esse The sacred Scriptures and not Custome ought to

reigne of Ludovicus pius Haimo Bishop of ●abberstat wrote upon the Epistles o● Saint Paul and many other things Anno 856. lived Rabanus Maurus who being first made Abbot of Fulda was afterwards Bishop of Mens Hee is reported to have written the glosse commonly called the Ordinary There is a saying of his memorable in cap. 2. Epist Iacobi Abraham per opera quae fecit iustus non fuit sed sola fide oblatio autem ejus opus testimonium fuit fidei Abraham was not just by the works that he did but by faith onely but his oblation was a worke and testimony of his Faith But it is to be observed that the zeale and diligence of the Bishops decreasing and their wealth and dignity augmenting the priviledge of Teaching and Writing was conferred on certain Munks Priests called Schoole Doctors because they taght most in the Schools Before this time the Doctrin of Saint Austin and his manner of teaching was for the most part received but about the yeere 1200. the Schoole Divinity beganne to spring up which afterwards degenerated from its first simplicity and purity and fell upon many unprofitable and doubtfull questions full of Phylosophy call subtilties together with definitions and sentences accommodated to the corruptions of those times The chiefe of these were Lanfrancus Monachus Papiensis who opposed himselfe against Berengarius Albertus Magnus and Peter Lombard Then also did Gratianus gather the Decrees of the Popes into one Uolume and without judgement insomuch that the Glosse sweats in reconciling the contradictions Peter Lombard about the yeere 1150. wrote foure Books of Sentences collected out of all the Fathers as the foundation and compendium of all Scholasticall Divinity which with some are of great value yet hath he cited many things amisse out of the Fathers and omitted not a few necessary Many things there are in him which if rightly understood and explained make against the Papists especially where hee treats of the Supper of the Lord. He that would know the defects of Lombard let him peruse the notes of Danaeus in lib. 1. sentent But like as Lombard did not well in that he would confirme the opinions of Christian Religion rather by the Authorities of the Fathers then by the Testimonies of the Scriptures so hee is more tolerable farre then the other Schoolemen who acknowledge Aristotle for their Master and attribute more to his authority then to the Scriptures Among others of that time William Occam was famous anno 1030. who defended the right of the Emperor against the Pope very learnedly Question Whether therefore did Tertullian against Hermogin rightly call the Philosophers Patriarks of Hereticks and lib. de praescript hee tearmes the Logicke which the Hereticks learnt out of Aristotle the subverter of Truth and the turne-coat artificer of building and destroying Answer These are to be understood secundum quid of Chrisippean Sophismes and such Logicians as Eutydemus in Plato who instantly denied what hee formerly granted Next of those who make Philosophy a Mistresse and a Lady in Divine matters who ought to be the Waitingmade the imbecillity of reason in Divine things being not onely apparent but its Adunamia 1 Corinth 12. Yet are not Philosophy and Reason to be rejected but God is to be invok'd that he wil giue us the spirit of wisedome whereby the eyes of our minds may be illuminated that wee faine not false Principles and involve our selves and others in ambiguities and subtilties of words as in times past the Valentinians did and many of the Schoolemen doe which Abbot Trithemius acknowledgeth when he saith Ab hoc tempore Philosophia secularis sacram Theologiam f●cdare coepit from this time saith hee secular Philosophy began to pollute sacred Divinitie But to returne to Peter Lombard It is not to be expressed how many of his successors have I cannot say explain'd but inuolv'd his bookes of Sentences as amongst the rest Bonaventura Albertus Magnus Thomas Aquinas Occam Durandus and innumerable others the last whereof was Thomas Caietanus who lived in the time of Luther The Disciple of Albertus Magnus was Thomas Aquinas commonly called the Angelicall Doctor who lived in the yeare 1270. In him two things are laudable First that hee argued very methodically Secondly that as well in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans as in his Summa Theolog. he hath disputed more tolerably of Justification and Predestination than any of the rest But he is much to bee blamed in this that hee imployd the whole strength of his wit in defending Transubstantiation though most unhappily and with many contradictions Not long after lived Iohannes Scotus surnamed Duns a Franciscan who opposed Thomas whence sprung the two sects Thomists and Scotists of which the first were called Nominall the latter Reall because the one concluded the names onely the other the things themselves also to bee comprehended under the predicaments But it is to be noted that there was another Iohannes Scotus long before those times anno 874. a man most learned in the Greeke and Latin Tongues who govern'd the Schoole at Oxford and at length was murdered by his Schollers with Penneknives because his opinion of the Lords Supper was no way pleasing to the Monks The last Age of the Schoolemen from the Councell of Constance to the time of Luther was not more happy but more audacious infinitely ignorant although some were more enlightned with knowledge than others The chiefe of these were Iohannes Capreolus Iohannes Gerson Chancellour of Paris Gabriel Biel Tubinga Petrus de Alliaco Cardinalis Cameracensis who wrote questions upon the booke of Sentences of Peter Lombard where amongst others this saying of his concerning the Eucharist is observable Communem Sententiam esse panem Transubstantiari licet id non sequitur evidenter ex Scriptura sed ex determinatione tamen Ecclesiae Alia opinio est quod substantia panis remanet valde enim possibile est substantiam panis coexistere substantiae corporis nec est magis impossibile duas substantias coexistere quam duas qualitates Possibile inquam est Corpus Christi assumere corpus perunionem et ille modus non repugnat rationi nec authoritati Biblicae It is the common opinion saith hee that the bread is Transubstantiated although that evidently appeare not by the Scripture yet by the determination of the Church it does Another opinion is that the substance of the bread remaines for it is very possible that the substance of the bread may coexist with the substance of the body neither is it more impossible that two substances should coexist than two qualities It is possible I say the body of Christ may assume another body by union and that manner is neither repugnant to reason nor the authority of the Bible Which opinion though Lanfrancus had long before refuted as not agreeable to the words of Christ yet Luther embrac'd it as