putteth one Iohn Goose a VVicklefist burnt vnder him And Ibid. noteth that since the time of King Richard 2. there is no reigne of any King to be assigned hitherto wherin some good man or other hath not suffered the paines of fier for the religion of Iesus Wicklef Besides Stow pag. 690. saith that King Edward vvent crowned in VVestmenster in the honor of God and S. Peter and the next day in paules in the honor of God and S. Paule And his daughter Brigit became a Nonue polidor lib. 24. King Edward 5. XLVIIII THe 49. Christian Prince was Edward 5. soune to Edward 4. a child of a 11. yeares old who liued not many dayes after his Father As for the religion which this child had it may easely appeare by what hath bene said of the Father King Richard 3. L. IN rhe yeare 1483 the 50. Christian Prince was Richard 3. brother to Edward 4 who tooke the Crown held it two yeares The qualities of this K. are notorious in all Chronicles K. Richards religion And his religioÌ„ is known both by what hath bene said of his brother And as Polidor l. 25. he began a Colledg in Yorke of an hundreth Priests King Henrie 7. LI. IN the yeare 1485. succeeded King henry 7. of the house of Lankaster and reigned 23. yeares VVorthines of K. Henrie 7. He was faith Stow a Prince of meruailous wisdomme police iustice temperance and grauity Fox Acts. pag. 729. saith the same His Rom. Religion His Roman Catholicke religion is euident For Fox setteth downe diuers Wicklefists burnt or otherwise punished vnder him as pag. 731. four wherof one the K. caused to be brought before him but when he would not be perswaded was burnt And pag. 774. he reckneth diuers others others abiured and burnt in the cheeke Wherupon Considerat 10. he saith Protestants rather died than liued vnder King Henry 7. And p. 776. saith thus of K. Henrie 7. othervvise a prudent and temperat Prince permitted the rage of the Popes Clergie so much to haue their wills ouer the poore flock of Christ as they had Ibid. The persequution began novv in the Church to be â—oat and he attributteth the death of the K. to the persequution forsooth of the Gospellers Moreouer pag. 799. He roporteth out of G. Lilly how Henry 7. Anno 1506. send three solemne Orators to Pope Iulius 2. to yeald his obedience Ex more saith Lilly to the See of Rome And Stow p. 811. writeth that Pope Iulius 2. sent a cap of maintenance and a sword to King Henrie 7. as to a Defender of the Church And Fox pag. 799. saith that Pope Alexander 6. and Pius 3. had before done the same King Henrie 7. builded also three Monasteries of Franciscans Pollidor in vit In this kings time liued Iohn Alcok Bishop of Elie Holie 7 men A man saith Godwin in his life of admirable temperance for his life and behauior vnspotted and from a child so earnestly giuen to the studie not onely of learning but of all vertue and godlinesse as in those dayes neuer any man bore a greater opinion and reputation of holines He liued all his time most soberly and chastly subduiing the temptations of the flesh by fasting studie and praier and other such good meanes King Henrie 8. LII KIng Henrie 8. sonne to king Henrie 7. began his Reign An. 1509. From the which time to An. 1530. he continewed an earnest Roman Catholick For as Fox saith pag. 789. From Anno. 1509. to 1527. diuers VVicklefists were preseÌ„ted troubled imprisoned And pag. 836. He setteth downe a letter of king Henrie Anno 13. To all Maiors Sherifes Bailifs and Constables and other officers to assist the Bishop of Lincoln for punishing Hereticks according to the lawes of holy Church And Bale Cent. 8. cap. 62. saith that two were burnt An. 1515. for the matter of the Sacrament And cap. 75. that Barnnes was made to recant Anno 1525. And likwise Bilney Garret and others An. 1527. Stow also and others write how king Henrie Anno 1511. wrote to the French king to desist from molesting Pope Iulius 2. and in the next yeare sent an army of ten thousand men into France in the Popes defence And An. 1513. K. Henrie 8. zeal in defence of the Pope VVent himself in person with a royall army conquered Torwin and Turney And not content thus manfully to haue aduentured his person to defend the Pope with his sword did in the yeare 1521. write also an excellent booke in his defence against Luther The originall wherof I haue seene in the Popes Librarie with the Kings subscription therto in these bad verses if I wel remember Hunc librum Henricus Leoni decimo mittit In signum fidei pignus amicitiae This booke to Leo tenth King Henrie the eighth doth send In testimonie of his faith and token of a freind For which booke Pope Leo gaue to him his successors for euer the glorious title of Defender of the faith And again in the yeare 1527. When Pope Clement 7. was taken prisoner he gaue monthly 60. thousand angels for the maintenance of an army for the Popes deliuerie And after this made long time suit to the same Pope that he would by his authoritie pronounce his mariage with Queene Catherin to be none and diuorce them which he not granting King Henrie as yow shall heare in the next Booke renounced the Popes authoritie and made him self head of the Church and yet remained in all other points a Roman Catholick Whervpon Bale Cent. 8. cap. 80. saith K Henrie 8. nevver a ProtestaÌ„t that King Henrie did admitt the Doctrine of Antichrist euen in the matters of greatest moment and did retain the contagious dreggs Sleidan Englil 13. fol. 174. By such phrases this wrech vseth to vnderstand Papistrie And Fox pag. 1291. granteth that Obits and Masses appeare in his will Most seuer of all Engl. Kings against Heretiks And as he saith pag. 1135. made it high treason to deny the reall presence and fellonie to defend mariage of Priests breaking of vowes or to condemne Communion in one kinde priuat Masse or auriculer CoÌ„fession without all benefit of abiuration or Clergie VVhich Lawes were seuerely executed by him And at his death would gladly haue bene reconciled to the Roman Church as Bishop Gardiner with whome he delt about that matter protested openly in a sermon at Pauls Crosse And so Catholick was the people of England in his time euen after his reuolt from the See Apostolick as when the Vicar of Croidon a most famous preacher of that time tolde them in a sermon at Pauls that as they had denyed the supremacie of the Pope so in time they would fall to deny other points of the Catholick faith Zeal of our grand fathers touching the real presence euen the reall presence of Christ in the blessed Sacrament The people at that word cryed out Neuer Neuer Neuer which yet
other to Ministers Iudg then good Reader what kind of orders they haue if they haue any by their owne verdit Ministers vtterly shame their religion to wit impious prophane horrible and sacrilegious Iudg also what is to be thought of them and their religion who hitherto haue and yet doe permit Popish Priests that is as they accouÌ„t slaues and shauelings of Antichrist and enemies to Christ prophane and mere laie men yea impious sacrilegious no way degraded or new ordered of them but but by vertue only as they speak of their greasing of the Romish Antichrist the mortal enemy of Protestancy by power of their prophane impious sacrilegious orders to be sufficieÌ„t Ministers of their word and sacram O impious Antich word which can be sufficieÌ„tly ministred by vertue of impious AntichristiaÌ„ orders Note ministers Can Antich order Christs lawful Ministers Shal his orders become Christs orders shall Antichrists shaueling slaues be sufficient Pastors for Christ Shall Christ be serued by no other officers theÌ„ such as ether mediatly or immediatly were made by Antichrist See Doue of Recusancie Luth. cont Anabapt Is Christ comen to beg orders at Antichrists haÌ„ds to receaue pastors of his making Can Antichrist giue spiritual supernatural authoritie And haue Christs pastors no other then what came from Antichrist o shameful Christian religion if this be christian religion which hath no bible or word of God but what came from Antichrist no sacrament but from Antichrist no preacher but from Antichrist no orders but from Antichrist no spiritual authoritie or iurisdiction but from Antichrist Sâ—e Suruey cap. 8 3. 1â— Dangor Posit lib. 2. cap. 13. what then maie we conclude but the religion is Antichristian And why shold ProtestaÌ„ts maruail to heare their owne brethren call their Bishops and Ministers Bishops and Ministers of the diuel enemies of God pettie Antichrists and such like sith all the orders they pretend they must deriue from the pope whom they all account the true Antichrist No true religion vvithout true calling and right orders God open the eyes of my deere Countrymen that as they partly see that their Ministers haue nether right calling nor lawfull orders so they maie also see that they haue no true religion which without pastors both rightly called lawfully ordered can not stand And thus hauing shewed how vnfit Luther was to be Preacher both for his life learning calling and orders now let vs come to his doctrine to see whether that be any whit better CHAP. XII That Luthers doctrine was contrarie to the vniuersall faith of Christendom in his time 1. THat Luthers doctrine was contrarie to the vniuersall faith of Christendom at that time I proue by many waies First by the condemnation therof by the cheefe heades spirituall teÌ„porall of the ChristiaÌ„ people of that time For Luthers doctrin condemned by P. Leo. 10. as Protestants confesse Leo 10. than Pope spirituall head of Christian people condemned it An. 1520. whose Bull therof is extant in Fox p. 1166. And not longe after Hieremie Patriarch of Constantinople head as he accounteth him self of the Greeke or East Church condemned their doctrin in a booke which is called Censura Orientalis By Heremie Patriarch of Constantinople wherin he saith ther doctrine was altogeather new and directly both against the Gospell of Christ By charles 5 Emper. Sleid. also lib. 1 fol. 3. setteth doune Emper Maxmil letters against Luther Sleid. lib. 3. fol. 30. 33. 50. 51. By K. Henrie 8 Sleid. lib 3. fol. 34. and right reason and calleth them Hereticks And in the yeare 1521. Charles 5. then Eemperor of Germany King of Spain Naples Sicilie and Sardinia and Lord of all the low Countryes first writ a letter to the States of Germany which is set downe in Fox pag. 778. in which he professed to pursue Luther and all his adherents by all meanes that can be deuised for to extinguish his doctrine And sone after directed a solemne writ of outlawrie against Luther and all them that tooke his parte commanding the said Luther to be apprehended and his bookes burnt Likewise the same yeare 1521. King Henrie 8. of England wrote a booke against Luther in which saith Fox pag. 780. By the French King Sleidan lib. 6. fol. 68. lib. 8. fol. 120. First he reproueth Luthers opinion about pardons 2. He defendeth the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome 3. Laboreth to refel Luthers doctrine of the sacraments And againe in the yeare 1523. writ saith Cooper in Chron. to the Princes of Germany against Luther And in the yeare 1525. as the same Cooper writeth he entred league with the French King to suppresse the sect of the Lutherans vvhich they thought to be no lesse dangerous than the Turkes power And Anno 1535. he writeth that six were burnt in Paris for Lutherans before the French King his sight And Anno t543 that the French King made strait proclamation against the Lutherans By Iames 5 King of ScotlaÌ„d And as for Iames 5. King of Scotland and Grand-father to his Maiesty Hamilton Confut. Caluin a Scottish writer testifieth that when King Henry 8. hauing fallen into one point of Lutheranisme promised to make K. Iames his heire if he would do the like he rather refused so great a profer than consent to his desire And behold the different reward from God of the two Kings King Henrie 8. issue is quite extinguished Note and Iames his royall progenie wee behould not only florishing but possessing King Henries crowme and Kingdome So hath God euen in thie life recompensed By the States of Suizerland Sleidan ib. 3 fol. 54 55. By the learned men of all partes of Christendome the religious zeale of that most Catholick King And as for Swizerland Fox p. 792. writeh that Anno 1524. the States of that countrie in their assembly Decreed that no opinion of Luthers should be tought priuatly nor openly and wrote to the men of Zurich and do much lament saith Fox and complaine of this new broached doctrine which hath set all men togeather by the eares through the occasion of certaine rash and nevv fangled heades and vvill bring destruction both to body and soule And as for the learned men of that age in all Christian Countries their detestation of Luthers doctrin is euident By vniuersities For first the Vniuersities of Louain and Colen condemned Luthers bookes as hereticall in the year 1520. And in the next yeare the Vniuersitie of Paris did the like Sleid. Engl. lib. 1. fol. 14. lib. 3 fol. 32. And in all Christian Contries almost the cheefest learned men wrote against him as Eckius Cocleus Gropperus in Germanie Silueuester Caietan Catherin in Italy Petrus a Soto Alfonsus a Castro Canus Turrianus in Spaine Clictoneus and others in France By a general Councel Bishop Fisheâ—and Syr Thomas More in England Driedo Tapper Erasmus in Flanders Hosius in Polonie
same hath Stow pag. 244. and pag. 324. A magnifical and faithful man who as long as he liued kept King Iohn from mischeefe and miserie He was saith Godwin an excellent and memorable man a bridle vnto the King and an obstacle of tyrany the peace and comfort of the people And lastly a notable refuge both of high and lowe against all manner of iniurie and oppression faithful and loyal to his Prince louing and very careful of his Contrie in which he caused many excellent lawes to be established King Richard ceur de Lion had experience of his great wisdom and other manifould vertues Nether was ther euer Clergie man ether befor or after him of so great power neuer any man vsed his authoritie more moderatly His Rom. Religion And as for the religion of this worthie Prelat it is manifest For as Godwin testifieth he founded a monasterie for his owne soules health and for the soules of his Father and mother as him self speaketh in the foundation and an other of Cistercian Monkes After his election professed him selfe a Monke had a Pal from the Pope and was his Legat. Pope Celestin the third in Houeden pag. 763. praiseth him exceedingly and maketh him his Legat at the request as he saith of King Richard and all his Suffragans and testifieth that of Huberts deserts vertue wisdome and learning the vniuersal Church reioyceth And pag. 755. Houeden writeth that this Archbishop held a Councel wherin he apointed diuers things concerning Masse and Priests espetially that they should not keepe women in their houses Priests forbidden to keep vvomen Stephen Langton Archbishop XLIII 12. THe 43. Archbishop was Stephen Langton an 1207. and died an 1228. He was saith Westmon an 1207. A man of deepe iudgment Singuler learning and vvorthines of Archb. Stephen of comely personage fine behauior fit and sufficient as much at lyeth in a man to gouern the whole Church Paris in his Hist pag. 297. addeth that there was none greater nor equal to him for maners and learning in the Court of Rome Godwin saith he was a maÌ„ in regard of many excellent gifts both of mind and bodie very fit for the place brought vp in the Vniuersitie of Paris and greatly esteemed by the King and all the nobilitie of France for his singuler and rare learning made Chancellor of Paris was admirablie learned and writ many notable bookes He deuided the Bible into Chapters in such sort as we now account them VVho built the Archb. palace in Canterb. and built in a maner all the Archbishops Palace at Canterburie The like commendations of learning yeldeth Bale vnto him Cent. 3. cap. 87. As for His Roman religion there can be no doubt His Rom. religion For he was both Cardinal of Rome and made Archbishop by the Popes absolute authoritie as the said Authors and all Chronicles testifie He built also a sumptuous shrine for the bones of S. Thomas of Câ—nterburie and as Bale speaketk after his maner He largely poured out dreggs out of the goulden cup of the harlot Incomparable learning and uertue of Archb. Richard Richard Magnus Archbishop XLIIII 13. THe 44. Archbishop was Richard Magnus elected An. 1223. and continued about two yeares He was saith Paris who then liued Hist pag. 494 Incomparable for learning and vertue Fox Acts. pag. 274 saith that he was of a comely personage and eloquent tongue Godwin addeth that he was a man very vvel learned vvise graue vvel spoken and of good report stoute in defending the rights and liberties of the Church and of a personage all streight and well fauored and that the Pope delighted much with the eloquence grauitie and excellent behauiour of this Archbishop His Rom. Religion The Roman Religion of this notable Prelat is euident For as Godwin saith he was elected by the Pope him self and so great in fauor with the Pope as both he and Fox l. cit write that he obtained of the Pope what so euer he asked S. Edmund Archbishop XLV Famous learning and vertue of Saint Edmund 14. THe 45. Archbishop was S. Edmund elected an 1234. and deceased an 1244. A man saith Westmon an 1234. mirae sanctitatis mansuetudinis of admirable sanctitie and meeknes desiring the peace and honor both of the King and Realme Paris who then liued Hist pag. 730. 743. writeth much of his miracles which Westmon an 1244. saith were so many His Miracles Vt viderentur c. that the Apostles times seemed to be returned again And Bale Cent. 3. cap. 96. confesseth that cum aqua lustrali c. VVith holy water he wrought many miracles That omni tum literarum c. He exercised him self in all maner of learning and vertue Fox Acts. pag. 339. calleth him a Saint Godwin saith he was a man very wel knowne and indeede famous for his vertue and great learning His Rom. Religion The Roman religion of this holy Archbishop is certain For as Godwin writeth he was chosen by the procurement of the Pope and had his Pal from him as both he and Fox pag. 279. do testifie and opposed him selfe against the marriage of a noble womaÌ„ Mariage after vovv of chastitie forbidden who vpon the death of her first husband had wowed chastitie and was after his death canonized for a Saint by Pope Innocent 4. Bale saith he was chosen Tanquam ad Rom. Pont. c. As one more redy at the Popes beck And that vt Virginitatis assequeretur donum Strange deed of S. Edmund to keep his virginitie To attain the gift of Virginitie he betrathed him selfe with a ring to a woodden Image of the blessed Virgin wore hearcloth preached the word of the Crosse for the Pope Boniface Archbishop XLVI 15. IN the yeare 1244. was chosen of the monks at the instance of king Henrie 3. Boniface sonne to the Earle of Sauoie who deceassed An. 1270. He was saith Godwin of a comely person and performed three notable things whorthie memorie Notable deeds of Archb Boniface He payed the debt of two and twentie thousand Marks that he found his See indebted in He built a goodly Hospitall at Maidston And lastly fineshed the stately Hall at Canterburie with the buildings adioyning Of his Roman Religion there can be no doubt His Rom. Religion For as Godw. writeth he was coÌ„secrated with the Popes owne handes and obtained of the Pope the Bishoprick of Valentia and diuers other spiritual promotions Robert Kilwarby Archbishop XLVII Famous learning and sanctitie of Archb. Robert 16. THe 47. Archb. was Robert Kilwarby elected An. 1272 and continued about six yeares He was saith Paris Author of that tyme Hist pag. 1348. Non solum vitae religiosae sanctitatis c accounted most famous not onely for the holines of a religious life but also for knowledg and learning Godwin writeth that he was a great Clerk and left many monuments of the same in writing behind him In both
now we finde too true Queene Marie LIII AFter K. Henrie the eight succeeded in the yeare 1546. King Edward the sixt his sonne a child of nine yeares olde which childe wanting the vse of perfect reason and vnfit to gouern him self was the first Protestant Prince that euer was in England and turned the Roman religion which his Father had left though maimed in one principall point to open Protestancie Not for the miracles or rare vertues of the Preachers therof or their conuincing their aduersaries in disputation as King Ethelbert changed his Paganisme into the Roman religion as is before shewed but because the Lord Protector and his complices thought it most sutable to their humors and most fit for their aspiring pretences But how vnfortunat this exchange was not onely to the soules of this King and principall Actors therin but also to their liues and bodies yow may reade in Stow The ill end of the kringets in of Probestancie where yow shall see that the very same yeare 1548. that Proclamation was made for receauing in both Kindes the Lord Admirall a cheefe agent in the change of religion though brother to the Protector and Vnkle to the King was beheaded for a Traitor And the next yeare 1549. VVhen Proclamation was made against Masse sone after also was Proclamation made against the Protector him selfe the principall author of the change and he cast into the Tower And in the yeare 1552. when the newe seruice booke of Common prayer begun in Pauls the said Protector was beheaded And the next yeare the King died and the Duke of Northumberland an other principall actor in the change of religion though against his own conscience as he openly declared at his death was beheaded for treason and Cranmer and Ridley and other fauorers of that change were depriued of their Dignities and sone after burnt This was the rufull end of the first setters vp of Protestancie For maintenance wherof albeit a new Queene was proclaimed Nobles sworne and the strength of England gathered yet in short time almightie God ouerthrew it again without any bloodshed by one vertuous woman Q. Marie Protestancie ouerthrone by a vvoman vvithout any bloodshed Vertue of Q. Marie Author of danger positions l 2 cap. 14. Her Rom. Religion In the arraignment of F Garnat D Doue lib. of Recusancie vvil haue Bellarm. to be a Protest or at lest no perfect Papist who all the time of her life liued so chastly and religiously that all her enemies could not to this day fasten the least suspicion of vice vpon her And whome euen Protestants write to haue Bene of nature and disposition verie milde and pittifull VVhich argueth that they wel deserued the seueritie which shee shewed towards them And so earnest a Roman Catholick shee was as the Protestants write of her that there was Not these thousand yeares a more obedient daughter to the Church of Rome than she was VVherby yow may iugde of the impudencie of Doctor Reinolds who in his Confer pag. 583. denieth not onely all the former Princes but euen Queene Marie euer to haue alowed the Popes absolute spirituall supremacie or as he speaketh the Popes Monarchie but onely to haue granted him such a preheminence as the Duke of Venice hath in that state But with her in the yeare 1558. ended all the glorie of Catholick Princes of England Who except King Henrie 8. for a few yeares and King Edward 6. had continewed from the yeare 598. till the forsaid yeare 1558. the space almost of a thousand yeares And after rose a new kind of Protestancie differing from that of King Edward the childs time Not as I said before through any miracles or strange vertue of the Preachers therof or their ouercomming their aduersaries in Disputation but against the will of all the Bishops and a great parte of the Nobilitie by the counsel of meere Lay men and the authoritie of a woman who was induced to make this change not for zeale of religion which shee little regarded but to assure her state the more because shee feared if she acknowledged the authoritie of the Church of Rome her birth might be called in question But of the cause maner and meanes of erecting Protestancie we shall speake more in the second booke Epilogue HItherto gentle Reader thou hast heard 53. Princes of England successiuly beleeuing and professing the Rom. Catholick faith besides 70. and more others who reigned ouer certain partes of England whiles it was deuided into diuers Kingdoms whose names onely I will here set downe Kings of Kent 13. Ethelbert Edbald Ercombert Egbert Lotharius Edricus VVithâ—ed Edbert Edilbert Alriâ—us Edilbert-pren Cuthred and Baldred Kings of the East Saxons 9. Sebert Sigebert Sigher S. Sebba Sighard Senfred Offa Sclred Swithed Kings of Eastengland 13. to wit Redwald Carpwald S. Sigebert Egris Anna Ethelere Ethelwald Adulph Elwald Beorna Ethelred Saint Ethelbright S Edmund kings of middle England 17. Namely Peda Vulpher Ethelred Coenred Ceolred Ethelbald Bernred Offa Egfert Kenulph Saint Kenelm Ceolwulph Bernulph Ludecan VVithlof Bertulph Burdred Kings of the Northpart of England 18. Edwin Saint Oswald Oswin Oswi Egfrid Alfrid Ostred Kenred Ostrie Ceolwulph Egbert Ostwuld Mollo Alred Ethelbert Alswald Ostred Athelred and some kings also of the South Saxons Consider I pray thee now the number of these kings which is aboue 120 far aboue the smallest number of two Protestant Princes Consider their sex and age who almost all were men and of mature yeares VVheras of the Protestant Princes one was a childe the other a woman Consider their wisdome and valour in which they were inferior to no Princes in Christendome Consider their vertue which was so great as there are more Kings of Ingland Saints than of all Christendome besides Consider the end for which they first embraced the faith which was nether to enioy their lust nor to get any Church goods nor to assure their temporall state but to gaine heauen Consider the Counsellors whose aduise they followed herein were not ignorant and laye men but vertuous and learned Diuines Consider the motiues which drew them to the Catholick religion to witt rare vertue great learning admirable miracles of their first preachers Finally consider how long they continewed in their faith to wit almost a thousand yeares and how almost in euery Kings time here liued some notable men who with rare vertue and miracles haue confirmed their faith Consider I say all this and then iudge whither the Catholick religion of so many and so worthie Kings or the Protestant faith of one Child and one woman be more likely to be good and to come from God Can we thinke that so many Princes of mature yeares and iudgment should be blinde rather then one child a woman that these could see that in so few yeares which all they could not perceaue in a thousand That these two should hit vpoÌ„ Gods truth for temporall endes rather thaÌ„ they for spirituall That that should be
THE PRVDENTIALL BALLANCE OF RELIGION Wherin the Catholike and Protestant religion are weighed together with the weights of Prudence and right Reason THE FIRST PART In which the foresaide Religions are weighed together with the weights of Prudence and right Reason accordinge to their first founders in our Englishe Nation S. Austin and Mar. Luther And the Catholike religion euidently deduced through all our Kings and Archbishopps of Canterburie from S. Austin to our time and the valour and vertue of our Kings and the great learninge and Sanctitie of our Archbishopps together with diuers Saints and miracles which in their times proued the Catholike faith so sett downe as it may seeme also an abridgment of our Ecclesiasticall Histories With a Table of the Bookes and Chapters conteyned in this Volume PSALM 118. The wicked haue told me fables but not as thy Law Printed vvith Licence 1609. EPISTLE TO THE MOST Noble and renovvned ENGLISH NATION my most deere Countrimen 1. RIGHT Honorable right worshipfull and dearelie beloued Countrymen giue me leaue to ioyne you all in one Epistle whom I contayne in one brest of loue and include in one lincke of entire affection Because the end for which I write vnto you concerneth you all alike and equallie to witt the true Religion and worshipp of God and saluation of your owne soules A matter vs of the greatest weight and worthiest of Search fo in these our miserable dayes of most controuersie and perplexed difficultie Wherin to helpe you the better to discerne true gold from shyninge brasse true religion from false and counterfeit I haue framed for you a Prudentiall Balance of Religion by which euery one of you may by the weightes and rules of right reason and true prudence weighe the Roman Catholique and the Protestant religion together and distincklie perceaue whither of them is more likelie to come from God and to lead you to him VVhy this course of comparinge religions is taken 2. And this course of comparinge these two religions together I haue taken before any other because as the Philosopher teacheth and experience confirmeth Contraria iuxta se posita magis elucescunt Contraries put together do more apppeare As beautie in presence of deformitie seemeth more gratious and deformitie more vglie Truth before lies appeareth more loue lye and lies more odious vertue before vice more amiable and vice more detestable Euery thinge as it were striuinge to shew it selfe more when it is set as it were to wrastle with the contrarie And I haue made choyse of comparinge these religions accordinge to the rules of ttue prudence and right reason VVhy the comparinge of religions accordinge to rules of vvisdome is chosen before others rather then otherwise as the most generall most easie most euident and most effectuall for all sortes of people for albeit Catholiques Protestants agree that to be the true religion of God which is most agreable to his word yet sith they neyther agree which is his word Protestants reiectinge much of that which Catholiques reuerence for Gods heauenly word nor which is they sense therof Thus Tertullian lib. de praescript proued by reason the Cath. religion to be preferred befor anie heresie they can not be brought to agree about one balance of Gods word wherby they may weigh their religions together Besides that not onely Catholicks teach but also Protestants confesse that the weaker sorte of Christians can not iudge which is the true exposition of Scriptures And therfor to weighe religions to them by the balance of Scripture D. Reinolds Confer pag. 149. were to weigh one vnknowne thing by an other But the weights of Prudence and right reason are both commun and euident to all therfor the weighinge of religions by them must needs be most generall most easie and most effectual with all sortes of people And if anie refuse to haue their religion tried by these kinds of weights VVhat religion is against vvisdom and reason is follie they confesse therby that they fear their religion to be contrarie to wisdome and reason which is as much as to be fabulous and foolish For what can be opposit to wisdome and reason but follie and fables 3. Nether let anie think that that religion which is most agreable to Prudence and the light of reason is not also most agreable to Scripture Because reason and Scripture are both God his word and Gods truth the one naturall written by his owne hand in our soules by creation the other supernatural written in paper with the hands of his holie Scribes by reuelation The agreablenes of Religion and reason And therfor though these two words be of different degree they can not be contrarie but rather as twinnes of one and the self same parent haue great sympathie and connexion together For as God doth not by his grace destroie the naturall inclination of our will to good but perfecteth it So by his word and faith he extinguisheth not but increaseth the naturall insight which our vnderstanding hath of truthe yea such is the force of our vnderstanding to pearce into Gods truth as that by it the Philosophers as the Apostle witnesseth Rom. 1. came to know the inuisible proprieties of God and his euerlasting power diuinitie S. Paul And sith we see that men by the light of reason know so much of other moral vertues as without all other teaching they perceaue in manie things what is honest what dishonest what iust what vniust what is vertue what vice why should we doubt that God hath giuen to vs equal knowledge of matters of religion and worship of him self Which vertue as it is the cheefest of all morall vertues so the knowledge therof is most necessaire of them all vnto vs. Yea S. Austin accounted so much of Reason as lib. de vtil credendi cap. 12. he said that Recta ratio est ipsa virtus S. Austin because it is the naturall square and rule which God euen in creation giueth to euery one to know what he ought to do Calvvin And Caluin saith that Semen religionis est in mente humana And Iewel art 6. diuis 12. that naturall reason holden within her bondes is not the enemye Iuel but the daughter of Gods truth And therfor he must be very vnreasonable that will without cause be angrye with reason Doct Reinolds And Doctor Reinolds in his conference pag. 207. saith Reason is a notable helpe of mans weaknes This rule therfor of naturall reason and prudence giuen vnto vs by God common and euident to all authorized by verdit of the Apostle confirmed by reason and approued by consent both of Catholiques and Protestantes is that wherwith I intend to direct you in the choyce of Religion and the Balance wherwith I purpose to to weigh before your eyes the two more famous religions which are in our Lande 4. Not because I thinke that onelie naturall light of reason is able without
vpon it And therfor if it be reiected all our auncient Chronicles may be contemned as fables or vncertayne tales C CAPGRAVI lyued vnder King Henry the fixt He was saith Bale Centuria 8. cap. 1. Doctor of Diuinitie of Oxford and Prouinciall of the Austin fryers the cheife diuine and Philisopher of his tyme of a cleare witt and vtterance he loued the Scriptures singularly and commented the greatest part of the Bible and was Confessour to Humfrey Duke of Glocester E EALRID liued vnder King Henry the second He was saith Bale Cent. 2. cap. 99. famous for birth for learning and for innocent life He in short time excelled all his fellowes in all ornaments of life left no kind of learning vntouched refused a Bispoprike the better to excercise vertue and to preach the Gospell He was an other Bernard mild in disposition pious in action and most modest in Counsell and was a godlie man And in all kind of vvriting most like to Bernard Thus Bale ETHELWERDVS seemeth saith Cambden in descrip Brit. 100. to haue bene great grand child to King Adulph and liued about the yeare 950. His booke was published by Protestants with Malmes buriensis and others Sauill who published him saith he is to be commended for his nobilitie and antiquitie F. FLORENTIVS liued vnder King Henry the first He vvas saith Bale Cent. 2. c. 66. very learned both in diuine and humane literature and gott great fame by his vvriting He had saith Bale a vvit apt for any thinge and an excellent memorie let no day passe vvherin he did not some vvhat for the honour of his Countrie and calleth his Chronicle an excellent comment which also is printed by Protestantes G S. GREGORY the great was the cheefe Author next after God of the conuersion of our English Nation vnto Christianitie and lyued eight yeares after he had sent S. Austin hither and had heard of great fruit of his labours He is one of the famous Doctors of the Church and greatlie reuerenced of Protestantes as you may see infra lib. 1. cap. 5. GILDAS syrnamed the vvise a Britan florished about the yeare 580. which was eighteen yeares before S. Austins comming hither He vvas saith Bale Cent. 1. cap. 66. out of Polidor a most graue Author hauinge vvell learnt liberall sciences gaue himselfe vvholie to studie the Scriptures and ledd a most innocent life This mans writinges also haue bene published by Protestantes and I produce his testimonie cheiflie to shew what was the Religion of the auncient Britons GEFFOREY of Monmonth lyued vnder King Stephen He vvas saith Bale Cent. 2. cap. 86 a Briton and learned both in verse and proofe and he highlie commendeth his diligence and saith he excellentlie deserueth of his Countrie Thus he and other Protestantes account of this Geffrey which maketh me to alleadge his authoritie against them though Catholickes for the most part account him but a fabulous Authour and his bookes be forbidden by the Councell of Trent and Cambden Britan. pag. 8. calleth his historie Ineptias fooleries H HOVEDEN lyued vnder kinge Iohn He vvas saith Bale Cent. 3. cap. 55 of a noble race and a famous Chronographer His historie was published by Savill and dedicated to Queene Elizabeth wher togither with Huntington he is called a very good and diligent Authour and most true guide of the times past HVNTINGTON liued vnder King Stephen He vvas saith Bale cent 2. cap. 82. out of Polidor and Leland an excellent Historiographer and approued Authour and vvrit saith he finely and learnedly He is acounted of Cambden in Britan. pag. 306. an Authour priscae fidei Of Doctor Caius lib. de antiquit Cantabr pag. 64. Summus Historicus And his history was publâ—shed by Savill with the foresaid commendations Fluyd in descript Monae calleth him egâ—egium Historicum I. INGVLPHVS lyued in the time of the Conquest is much desired saith Sauil who published him of very many vvho desire to knovv our Antiquities M MALMESBVRIENSIS lyued vnder Kinge Stephen He vvas saith Sauil who published him in his epistle to Queene Elizabeth amongst the faithfull recorders of thinges done the cheefe both for truth of Historie and for Maturitie of iudgment very learned and hath comprised the historie of Seauen hundred yeares vvith such fidelitie and diligence that he may seeme of all ours to haue bene the onelie Historiographer Camb. in Brit pag. 514. calleth him Optimum Historicum an excellent Historiographer Bale Cent. 2. cap. 73. saith playnelie he was the most learned of his age in all kinde of good learning and of singular vvitt diligence and industrie in searchinge all Antiquites and compiled a fine and most excellent Historie And this man so highlie commended by Protestants is the Authour vpon whom next after S. Bede I relie and the edition which I cite of his historie and of Huntington Houeden and Ingulph is of Franckford Anno. 1601. infol MARIANVS liued at the time of the Conquest He vvas saith Bale Cent. 14. cap. 45. learned both in diuinitie and Humanitie and lyued all most thirtie yeares solitarie vvith admiration of all men and continuallie studied He is accounted an excellent Historiographer a singular Calculator and a graue diuine vvhich titles saith he to this dâ—y all vvriters de giue him Thus Bale Cambd. in Brit. pag. 321. calleth him an Historiographer Antiquae fidei N. NEVBRIGENSIS lyued vnder Kinge Iohn He vvas saith Bale Cent. 3. cap. 53. Doctor of diuinity scarce let any hovver pâ—sse vvithout reading of learned bookes and vvrote a Historie vvith a cleare stile O. OSBERNE liued vnder Kinge William Conqueror He vvas saith Bale Cent. 2. cap. 54 most familiar and invvard vvith Archbishop Lanfrancke vvas the excellentest Musycion of his time and had a florishing and eloquent stile OTTERBVRNE He vvrote saith Bale Cent. 7. cap. 75. out of Leland a historie sincerely though his cheefe studies vvere in Phiâ—osophy and Diuinitie P. PARIS lyued vnder King Henry the third He vvas saith Bale Cent. 4. cap. 26. from his infancie brought vp in learning and continuallie at studie And vvrote a Historie from the conquest vnto the thirtie fift yeare of the said King Henrie vvith most great diligence and fidelitie And for his singular giftes both of bodie and minde vvas deere to that King at vvhose commande he vvrot his Actes This authour is much esteemed by Protestants because some times he inueigheth bitterly against some acts of the Pope of his time and therfor was published by them and greatly commended in the preface by the pretended Archbishop Parker as it is thought W. VVALSINGHAM lyued vnder King Henry the Sixt. He vvas saith Bale Cent. 7. cap. 88. out of Leland studious diligent in Histories He is much commended by the Protestantes who published him in a Preface before his historie who is thought to haue bene pret Archbishop Parker VVESTMONASTERIENSIS lyued vnder King Edward the first He did saith Bale Cent. 6. cap. 31. labour singularlie in vvriting and vvas in all kind of learninge of
of Protestants are the Protestant writers vpon whose confession or testimonie I cheefly relie in what I write of S. Austin and Luther Against whose verdict no Protestant can iustlie take exception either of ignorance because they are of the cheefest writers they haue or for partialitie for they were all most earnest Protestantes And therfor no Protestant can iustlie reiect their testimonie as insufficient THE BOOKES AND Chapters conteyned in this first parte of the prudentiall Ballance of Religion First Booke or Scale in which the qualities of S. Austin and of his doctrine are set downe 1. VVHat Religion was in this land before the comming of S. Austin Chap. 1. 2. That Saint Austin was the first preacher of the christian saith to our English Nation Chap. 2. 3. That Saint Austin preaching tooke great effect in our Nation Chap. 3. 4. That Saint Austin was a great Clarke and excellent Diuine Chap. 4. 5. That Saint Austin was A great Saint Chap. 5. 6. Certayne slanders against S. Austin disproued Chap 6. 7. That S. Austin was moued by holie motiues to come to preach to our Nation Chap. 7. 8. That S. Austin was lawfully sent to preach to our Nation proued by diuers authorities Chap 8. 9. That S. Austin was lawfully sent hither to preach proued by reason grounded in Scripture Chap. 9. 10. That S. Austin was rightlie ordered to administer the word and sacramentes Chap. 10. 11. That the faith which S. Austin preached was the vniuersall faith of Christendome in his time Chap 11. 12. That faith which S. Austin preached is confessed by the aduersaries to haue bene sufficient to saluation Chap. 12. 13. That the faith which S. Austin preached was confirmed of him by true miracles Chap. 13. 14. That the faith whi h S. Austin preached was the present Romayne Catholique faith proued by his Mayster and sender S Gregory Chap. 14. 15. The same proued by S. Austins and his fellowes deedes and Doctrine Chap. 15. 16. The same proued by the confession of learned Protestantes Chap. 16. 17. The same proued by the faith of the English Church which he founded Chap. 17. 18. That the faith of all the Archbishopes of Canterburie from S. Austin to our time was Romane Catholike proued by general Reasons Chap. 18. 19. That the faith of euery Archbishop of Canterburie from S. Austin to the time of the Conquest was romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 19. 20. That the faith of euery Archbishop of Canterburie from the Conquest to our time was Romaine Catholike proued in particular Ch. 20. 21. That the faith of all our Christian English Kinges from S. Austins time to King Henrie the eight was Romane Catholique proued by generall reasons Chap. 21. 22. Certayne obiectiōs against the Catholique faith of our Auncient Kings aunswered Chap. 22. 23. That the faith of all our Christian Kinges to the time of the Monarchie of England was Romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 23. 24. That the faith of all our Christian Kings from the Monarchie to the Conquest of England was Romane Catholike proued in particular Chap. 24. 25. That the faith of all our Kings from the Conquest to King Edward the third was Romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 25. 26. That the faith of all our Kings from King Edward the third to Kinge Henrie the eight was Romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 26. Epilogue or Conclusion The second Booke or Scale wherin the qualities of Luther and his doctrine are set downe 1. That Luther was the first Authour of the Protestants Religion Chap. 1. 2. That VVicklef and his followers were no Protestantes Chap. 2. 3. That the old auncient Britons were no Protestants Chap. 3. 4. VVhen wher wherfor and how Luther began Protestancie Chap. 4. 5. How Protestancie spred so farr Chap. 5. 6. VVhen hy whom wherfor and how Protestancie began in England Chap. 6. 7. That Luther was but meanlie learned Ch. 7. 8. That Luther was a vicious and naughtie man Chap. 8. 9. That Luther was moved to preach Protestantisme with humane noughtie motiues Ch. 9. 10. That Luther was neuer sent or called to preach Protestantisme Chap. 10. 11. That Luther was neuer ordered to preach the Protestants word or administer their Sacramentes Chap. 11. 12. That Luthers doctrine was contrarie to the vniuersall faith of Christendome at that time Chap. 12. 13. That Luthers doctrine was neuer confessed by Catholiques to be sufficient to saluation Ch. 13. 14. That Luther neuer confirmed his Doctrine by Miracles Chap. 14. 15. That Luther hath had no succession or continuance of his Doctrine heere in England Chap. 15. The third Booke in vvhich S. Austin and Luther and their Doctrines are weighed together according to the foresaid qualities of them 1. SAint Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their learninge Chap. 1. 2. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their vertue or vice Chap. 2. 3. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their motiues of preachinge Chap. 3 4. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to their Mission or sendinge to preach Chap. 4. 5. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their orders of preachinge and administring the sacraments Chap. 5. 6. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to the vniuersalitie or singularity of their Doctrine Chap. 6. 7. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their aduersaries allowance of their Doctrines Chap. 7. 8. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to their Miracles Chap. 8. 9. S. Austin and Luther weighed acccordinge to the succession and continuance of their Doctrines Chap. 9. THE FIRST BOOKE OR SCALE IN VVHICH The qualities of S. Austin and of his Doctrine are set dovvne THE FIRST CHAPTER VVhat Religion was in this Land before the comminge of S. Austin THE ancient Inhabitans of this Iland were the Britons whome wee now call Welch-men Amongst whome the faith of Christ was first planted by the glorious Apostles S. a Metaph. in Sur. Iun. Cambd. descript Brit. pa 52. Baron an 58. p. 597. 401. Peter S. b Theod. l. 9 de Graec. Sophron. Natal Apost Fortunat Bale cent 1. c. 26 Cambd. in Britan. p. 52. Paul S. c Nicep l. 2. c. 40 Doroth in Synop Symon and the Apostolick men S. d D. Caius de antiq Cātabr Capgrau in Ios Bale cent 1. c. 22. vbi citat Fleming Scrop Polid Geo. maiorem Cambd. l. cit Ioseph of Arimathia who buried our Sauiour and S. e Doroth. in Synop. Aristobulus of whome S. Paul maketh mention in his Epistle to the Romans All these Protestants grant to haue preached Christs faith in this Iland except Saint Peter to whome some of them will not haue this Land so much behoulden Which question because it is besides my purpose I wil not stand to discusse Onely I assure the indifferent Reader that S. Peters preaching to the ancient Britons on the one side is affirmed both by Latin and Grecke by ancient and newe by foraine domesticall by
necessary to the sustenance of their life and liuing in all points according to the doctrine which they set forth Itē King Ethelbert was persuaded by the good example of S. Austin his company and by miracles shewed to be baptized Hereto I might add what diuers Protestants haue written of the great holines of some of S. Austins company who succeeded him in the Archbishoprik of Canterbury But for that we shall haue more conuenient place hereafter Now let vs see what the malice and hatred of some Ministers against Saint Austins doctrine hath caused them to obiect against his person CHAP. VI. Certain slanders imposed vpon Saint Austin disprooued CIcero in his Oration for Roscius saith that as fier falling into water is straight put out so a slander put vpon an innocent man is quickly extinguished Which I doubt not will prooue true in the calumniations obiected against S. Austin The first wherof is cruelty say they in exhorting Ethelfrid a Heathen King of the North against the British Monkes of whome he slew at once aboue 1200. But this is an impudent slander deuised first for any thing that I can finde by Bale who centur 1. capit 70. Bale slandereth S. Austin vpon reports fearfully broached it and therfor referreth it to reports saying Vt ferunt as some reporte But afterward Cent. 13. cap. 1. he confidently auoucheth it After him tooke vp that slander Iuell Defens Apolog. part 5. Abbots in his Answer to Do. Bishop p. 198. Sutclif Subuers c. 3. 7. and others That S. Austin vvas no cause of the death of the British Mōks This false slander is many wayes refuted First because it is auouched without all testimonies of antiquity Bale as I say hauing no one to name before referreth him selfe to vncertain reports if he be not both Author and reporter too Abbots citeth Iuell Sutclif alleageth Thomas Grey a nameles Chronicle which he calleth ould as if they should haue said ask my fellow if I be a theefe Secondly because the Britons albeit enemyes to Saint Austin blamed not him but others for this slaughter as is euident in Galfrid lib. 4. cap. 4. Thirdly because the slanderers of Saint Austin disagree in their tale more than the accusers of Susanna and therfor if Daniel might be iudge these would be condemned as well as they were For some say S. Austin excited King Ethelfrid to this murder others say not Saint Austin but K. Ethelbert his scoller Some say that Ethelfrid made this slaughter others that K. Ethelbert as Grey cited by Sutclif So they agree nether in the Author nor Actor of this matter Fourthly because as Beda testifieth lib. 2. c. 2. Saint Austin was long before that slaughter taken out of this life to the Kingdom of heauen and no way caused it but rather forwarned the Britons therof by prophecie But it came to passe saith Beda by the secret working of Gods iudgement vpon that vnfaithfull and naughty people And the same testifie our best Historiographers both Catholicks and Protestants Namely Malmesbury lib. 3. Reg. pag. 325 Hunting lib. 3. Florent an 603. Westmon an 603. Sigebert an 602. 615. Stow Chron. pag. 66. Godwin in the life of Saint Austin Fox Acts pagina 119. where he writeth that Saint Austin forspoke the destruction and by report of others was dead before it hapned 2. To this Sutclif cap. 7. cit answereth Sutclif feigneth corruption in S. Beda that those words of Saint Beda touching Saint Austins death before the slaughter are added by some forger First because after this war Saint Austin ordained Iustus and Mellitus Bishops as Beda saith he reporteth Secondly because they are not in the Saxon Translation of Beda made by King Alfred Thirdly because the Chronicle of Peterbrough and Flores Histor testifye that Saint Austin dyed three yeares after this execution Confuted But this surmise of forgerie in Saint Beda his Latin History is altogeather incredible both because all Latin copies in which language Saint Beda wrote haue the sayd words and impossible it is that ether one forger should corrupt all the copies in Christendome or that in all Christēdome men would agoe to corrupt Beda in that place and in no other And also because till Sutclif no man suspected any such forgerie Finally because as it shall appeare anon by true Chronologie of tyme Saint Austin was indeed dead befor the slaughter And no little presumption therof it is that the Britons who layd the blame therof on King Ethelbert Saint Austins scoller would soner haue layd the blame therof on Saint Austin himselfe who threatfully saith Saint Beda prophecied it if he had bene aliue as King Ethelbert was when it chauced But little will he maruell to hear Sutclife to suspect Saint Beda as corrupted who considereth how many and how vndoubted bookes of Fathers in his Challeng he had reiected as ether forged or corrupted Vsuall vvith Sutclif to say Authors are forged as Saint Athanas de vita Antonij Saint Hierom de vita Pauli Hilarionis S. Gregories Dialogues Saint Ambrose de Viduis many others Which kinde of shift at it is most vsuall with Sutclif so in the eye of any wise man it is most desperat As for his proofes the first is a manifest vntruth Sutc. belieth S. Beda For Saint Beda reporteth not that S. Austin ordained Bishops after the said slaughter of the British Monkes but onely talketh of the slaughter before he speaketh of the ordination The cause wherof was because hauing tould of Saint Austins prophecie of the Britons destruction which prophecie was before he ordained Bishops to shew that it was a true prophecie addeth that after it hapened as S. Austin had fortould and how long after he soone after declareth to wit long after S. Austins death Sutclifs second proofe I greatly suspect to be a forgerie of his owne But how so euer that be ther is nether reasō that he should vrge nor that we should beleeue one translation before all originalls Originals to be beleeued before trāslations many before one For who would not think that that trāslation were defectiue in that place rather than that all Originalls had more than they should As for the Chronicle of Peterbrough and Flores Histor wee might take iust exception against them as hauing past through the corrupt fingering of diuers Protestants but who are they to oppose against so many cited before to the contrary especially seeing that Flores Histor cleareth Saint Austin from this slaughter and attribueth it to Prophecie And besides his Chronologie as Godwin in the Bishops of York pag. 442. a Protestant confesseth is very vncertain VVhē the British Monks vvere slaine in this point is very false For as Sigebert in Chron. and Bale him self Cent. 1. cap. 74. reporteth out of Masseus the slaughter was done an 615. At what tyme as all writers agree S. Laurence was Archbishop and Saint Austin dead VVhen S. Austin died
ether an 614. as Malmesbury saith in Hist and in Fastis or an 605. as Sigebert saith in Chron. or 608. as Bale hath cent 13. cap. 1. or an 604. as Baron gathereth out of Beda and Florent in Chron. and Stow pag. 62. affirmeth How then could Saint Austin cause this slaughter which was so long after his death and much les goe in the army to the slaughter as Sutclif citeth out of an ould Chronicle if he do not lye himselfe 3. For this Bilson in his Booke of Obedience pag. 114. saith that the King Ethelbert King of Kent whome Saint Austin conuerted mooued King Ethelfrid to commit this massacre and citeth therto Galfrid of Munmouth lib. 8. cap. 4. and so indirectly deriueth the faulte to Saint Austin his teacher That K. Ethelbert caused not the British Mōkes to be slaine But first if this slaughter were done as we haue seene out of Bale in the yeare 615. certain it is that Saint Austin liued not till that tyme but dyed before as is alredy shewed and therfore he could not be the author of this fact Secondly in defence of King Ethelbert I oppose against Bilson what Fox saith p. 119. Fox defēdeth King Ethelbert that it seemeth rather suspicious than true that Ethelbert being a Christian King ether could so much preuaile with a Pagan Idolater or els would attempt so far as to commit such a cruell deede And in truth who so considereth the disposition of that Pagan King in Beda lib. 1. cap. 33. where he is compared to a rauening wolfe will easely see that he needed no stirrer vp to make war against the Britōs And therfor Fox loco cit rightly ascribeth it to the fierse furie of Ethelfrid which was so great as he is sirnamed Ferus Besides that K. Ethelbert was more potent than King Ethelfrid for he had all the South part of England at command as testifyeth Saint Beda lib. 1. cap. 25. and Ethelfrid onely the North. And therfor if he would haue reuenged Saint Austin by war and bloodshed he would rather haue done it him selfe than stirred an other Heathen King against them But this good King was so far from causing the Britons to be murdered because they would not receaue S. Austins doctrine as that as writeth Saint Beda lib. 1. c. 26. he would not force his owne subiects to receaue it As for Galfrid ther is no such thing in the place cited by Bilson which argueth that he cited it out of Iuell without seeing the booke But indeed lib. 11. c. 13. Galfrid saith that Ethelbert excited Ethelfrid to goe to Bangor and destroy Abbot Dimoth other Monkes who had resisted S. Austin But Galfrid is a very fabulous Author the first broacher of Merlins Prophecies Cambd. in Brit. p. 8. calleth his history inepties fooleries and his book is forbidē by the Councell of Trent and of other incredible fables and liued many hundred yeares after Saint Beda who testifyeth lib. 2. cap. 2. that King Ethelfrid came not of purpose to kill the Monkes but to get Chester as he loco cit and Malmesbury lib. 1. Reg. c. 3. do insinuat and being to ioyne battell with the Britons espying the Monkes at prayer and vnderstanding that they came to pray against him set first vpon them and slew them 4. The second fault which Ministers impute to S. Austin That S. Austins not rising to the Britons proceded not of pride is pryde because he sat stil in his chaire when the British Bishops and Deuins came to confer with him True it is that S. Austin did so but that it proceeded not of pryde appeareth because nether S. Beda nor any English or foraine writer vnto our times besides the Britons who were hereticks then consequētly most proude themselues imputed it to pryde Secondly because Saint Austin and his fellowes as them selues write in Beda lib. 2. cap. 4. Honored the Britōs with great reuerēce while they thought they were Catholicks Therfor Saint Austins not rising to them proceeded not of pride but of some other iust cause Thirdly because the British Priests were such then as they deserued no honor yea much dishonor and therfore it could be no pride in S. Austin to giue them none VVhat kind of men they vvere to vvhome S. Austin did not also For besides that they were hereticks S. Beda lib. 2. cap. 2. calleth them vnfaithfull naughty and detestable people And Gildas their owne Contry man saith that they were wolues enemies of truth and friends to lyes enemyes of God and not Priests merchants of mischeef and not Bishops Impugners of Christ and not his Ministers more worthy to be drawn to prison or to the cage than to Priesthood And much more of the like sorte And Fox addeth out of an ould Chronicle Acts lib. 2. pag. 114. that all things whether they pleased or displeased God they regarded alike and not onely seculer men did this but their Bishops teachers without distinction Which being so I appeale to the iudgement of any indifferent man whether these men deserued any honor at S. Austins hands especially he being lawfully apointed their Archbishop and Superior by Saint Gregory Great humilitie in S. Austin to confer vvith those to vvhome he did not rise And whether it were not great humility in him to seeke conference with this kind of people now the second tyme after he had once before confuted them both by disputation and euident miracle which made them to confesse that he taught the truth The cause therefor why he arose not to them vvhy S. Austin arose not to the Britons was ether because he followed the aduise of his Maister Saint Gregory who albeit he were one of the humblest men that euer was yet lib. 4. Epist 36. giueth this counsell to Bishops Let vs kepe humility in minde and yet maintain the dignity of our order in honor Or els perceauing the Britons to be obstinat which well appeared when for so small occasion they would forsake the doctrine which them selues had seene confirmed by miracle and confessed to be truth he followed the aduise of Saint Iohn Epist 2. Protest cōdemne that in S. Austin vvhich they commend in Cranmer If any come to yow and bring not this doctrine receaue him not into your house nor say to him God speede But whether S. Austin would not arise to the Britons for these or other iust causes to him known Protestants can no way cōdemn his fact who commend a far les excusable fact of Cranmer Fox Acts edit 1596. p. 1599. 1699. Latimer and Ridley For Cooper Chron. an 1555. sayth that because the Bishops of Lincoln Gloster Bristow declared themselues to be in the Popes Commission nether Ridley nor Latimer would shew any reuerence to them nor put of their capps The same he writeth of Cranmer pag. 373. And if this behauiour be commēded in protestant Prelats towards their superiors and Iudges why should the like
much filth of superstition D. Fulk Fulk 1. Cor. 4. Austin did not beget the Nation of the English men to Christ by the pure Gospel but vvith the mixture of Traditions And that Christian Religion vvhich he found in the Britons he labored to corrupt vvith Romish inuentions 1. Cor. 15. Austin did not in all points teach the true faith to the Saxons 2. Cor. 12. Aust brought in corruption Syr Francis Hastings in his Wast word once or twise saith that Austin brought in the Romish Religion Osandes Osiander Epit. Hist cent 6. Aust thrust Roman rites and customs vpon the English To vvit Altars Vestements Masses Chalices Crosses Candlesticks Censars Banners holy Vessels holy vvater and bookes of Roman customs B. Bale See Magdeburgenses cent 6. Bale cent 1. pag. 19. After Austins Apostleship saith he vnder the English Saxons there followed an other kind of Monkes which corrupted all with most filthy superstitions Idolatries And cent 1. cap. 70. Austin entred not with the Gospel of Luther of Christian peace but with the banner of his Apostleship with a siluer Crosse Letanies Procession Images painted Pictures Reliques and ritual bookes And cap. 72. Aust made Elbald drinck of the cup of the whore cap. 73. King Ethelbert first of all English men receaued of Greg. 1. Bishop of Rome by Austin the opinions of the Roman ReligioÌ„ with all saith he the imposture or deceit and dyed the one and twentith yeare of his receaued Papisme And pag. 73. he calleth our primitiue church a carnal Synagogue And yet further cent 8. cap. 85. Austin saith he brought in Popish Monkerie besides the Popes traditions o filthie and blasphemous mouth brought no thing but mans dung Cent. 13. c. 1. Austin the Roman brought hither Romish rites without sound doctrine The King receaued Romanisme with the anexed Idolatries He brought in Monkes Altars Vestements Images Masses Chalices Crosses Candlesticks Banners holy as they call them Vessels holy water and bookes of Roman customs Their cheeffest studies were about the oblations of Masses And finally Cent. 14. cap 31. he saith Austin disposed all things in England to the forme of the Sinagogue of Rome and made English men honorers of the Pope Thus plainly is S. Austins Roman Religion confessed by Bale who was both as earnest a Protestant and as skilful in antiquities as euer â—nglish Protestant was Holinshead Holinshead also Descript Brit. cap. 27. saith The Inhabitants of Britanie receaued the Doctrine of Rome brought in by Austin and his Monks Ib. Austin indeed conuerted the Saxons from Paganisme but imbued them with no lesse hurtful superstition than they did know before For besides the name ef Christ and external contempt of their pristinat Idolatrie he taught them nothing at all but rather made an exchange from grosse to subtil trecherie from open to secret Idolatrie and from the name of Pagans to the bare Title of Christians So far were these men from thincking S. Austin to haue bene a Protestant or to haue agreed with them as Fulk would 2. Cor. 12. in the cheefe and most essential points of faith CHAP. XVII That S. Austin was a Roman Catholick proued by the Doctrine and faith of the Engilsh Church which he founded 1. IN this Chapter I will first set downe what Catholicks haue written of the faith of our Primitiue Church and after what Protestants First therfor our Primitiue English Christians sayd Masse Masse in honor of Saints and that in honor of Saints Beda lib. 4. cap. 14. Let them say Masses and giue thanks that their prayer is heard and also for the memorie of King Oswald Likwise they sayd Masse for the dead and consequently beleued it to be propitiatorie for sinnes Masse for the dead Ibid. cap. 22. Tuna a Priest and Abbot did often times cause Masse to be saide for his brothers soule Item lib. 5. cap. 13. and lib. 3. cap. cit They erected Monasteries that dayly praier might be made for the dead Offered to god the pretious bodie and blood of Christ Secondly they did beleeue that they offered to God the pretious body and blood of Christ as we beleeue we do at Masse Beda lib. 5. cap. 22. All Christian Churches throughout the world should prepare bread and wine for the mystery of the flesh and precious blood of the immaculat lambe and when all lessons prayers rites and ceremonies vsed in the solemn feast of Easter were done should offer the same to God the Father in hope of their redemption to come lib. 4. cap. 28. S. Cutbert offered the host of the holsome Sacrifice to God Thirdly CoÌ„fession of sinnes and pennance for them they confessed their sinnes to Priestes and they enioined pennance lib. 4. cap. 25. Adaman in his youth had committed a certain greiuous sinne resorting therfor to a Priest confessed his sinne to him The Priest when he had heard his sinne said a great wound requireth a great cure and medecin therfor giue thy self to fasting and prayer as much as thou art able And lib. 4. cap. 27. He telleth how Saint Cutbert heard mens confessions and enioined them pennance Miracle for confession And lib. 5. cap. 14. He telleth a dreadful punishment inflicted by God on one because in time of sicknes he would not confesse his sinnes Fourthly Priests could not marry their Clergy after holy orders takeÌ„ could not marry S. Greg. in Beda lib. 1. cap. 27. If ther by any in the Clergy out of holy orders that can not liue chast they shall take wiues The same hath S. Beda l. 5. c. 22. Fiftly Dirige Masse for the dead they song dirige ouer night and in the morning sayd Masse for the dead Beda lib. 3. cap. 2. The religious men of Hagstalden haue of long time bene accustomed to come euery yeare the eue and the day that S. Oswald was slayne to keepe Dirges there for his soule and in the morning solemnly to offer for him the sacrifice of the holy Oblation Sixtly they vsed holy water and consecrating Churches Holie vvater candels Crosses holie oile Beda lib. 5. cap. 4. The Bishop S. Iohn sent the sick Lady some of the holy water which he had halowed in the Dedication of the Church and also candles lighted Crosses and holy oyle as we do now as is euident by Malmsb lib. 2. Pont. pag. 235. and Ealred in vit Edwardi Seuenthly they blessed them selues with the signe of the Crosse Blessing vvith the signe of the Crosse Beda lib. 4. cap. 14. Cednam blessing him selfe with the signe of the holy Crosse layd down his head on the Boulster and so falling a little in a slumber ended his life in quiet And lib. 5. cap. 22. Euery congregation of faithful men accustometh to beare the signe of the Crosse on their forheads that by the Diuin power of the same they may be defended from all assaults of the Diuel Eightly their Priests and Monks vsed round shauen
1366. He was saith Godwin Doctor of Law a verie frugal man and built the Colledg of Canterb. in Oxford which is now a part of Christchurch His Roman religion is vndoubted His Rom. Religion For as Godwin writeth the Pope bestowed the Archbishoprick vpon him And in his Epitaph S. Peter is professed Princeps Apostolorum The prince of the Apostles Simon Langhorn Archbishop LVI 25. THe 56. Archbishop was Simon Langhorn elect an 1366. and continewed but two yeares He was saith Godwin first a Monke then Prior lastly Abbot of Westminster Thence elected Bishop of London then of Ely and lastly of Canterburie Rom. religion of Archb. Langhorn How Roman a Catholick he was appeareth by Godwin who writeth that the Pope remoued him from Ely to Canterburie sent his Pal and lastly made him Cardinal and Legat into England as appeareth by his Epitaph In this Archbishops time Wicklef began to be angry saith Godwin with the Pope VVhy vviclef reuolted from the Cathol faith Archbishops and Monks because this Archbishop displaced him out of Canterb. Colledg And the better to wreak his anger vpon them went out of the Church and began his heresies VVilliam VVitlesley Archbishop LVII 26. THe 57. Archbishop was William Wittlesley Great learning of Archb. vvitlesley elected an 1368. and died an 1374. He was saith Godwin Doctor of Law and preached in Latin verie learnedly He was a Roman Catholick as the same Godwin declareth saying that he was aduanced by the Popes onely authoritie His Rom. Religion Simon Sulburie Archbishop LVIII Notable learning and qualities of Archb. Sudburie 27. THe 58. was Simon Suldburie elected an 1375. and died an 1381. He was saith Godwin a noble Prelat verie wise learned eloquent liberal merciful and preached in Latin very learnedlie Stow Chron. pag. 458. saith he was eloquent man and wise beyond all wise men of the Realme and fulfilled most worthie martirdom being slaine of the rebellious commons His Rom. Religion His Roman religion is notorious For as the said Godw. writeth he was houshould Chaplin to Pope Innocent and one of the Iudges of his Rota who bestowed vpon him the Archbishoprick and sent him his Bulls VVilliam Courtney Archb. LIX Noblenes and great learning of Archb. Courtney 28. IN the yeare 1381. succeded William Courtney and deceased an 1396. He was writeth Godwin sonne to hugh Courtney Earle of Deuonshire and was a great Lawyer His Rom. Religion As for his Roman religion ther can be no doubt For as Godwin saith the Pope bestowed the Archbishoprick vpon him sent him his Pal and as Walsingham writeth made him Cardinal And Eox Acts pag. 505 saith He set King Richard 2. Vpon the poore Christians of VVicklefs side condemned some made diuers abiure and do pennance Thomas Arundel Archbishop LX. 29. IN the year 1396. succeded Thomas Arundel Noblenes and vvorthines of Archb. Arundel and died 1413. He was saith Godwin sonne to Robert Earle of Arundel and VVarren was vndoubtedly saith he a worthy Prelat wise and very stout And Walsinghan who them liued Hist pag. 432. saith he was eminentissima turris Ecclesiae c. A most eminent Tower and inuincible Champion of the Church of England His Rom. Religion As for his Roman religion there can be no doubt therof For Godwin writeth that by the Popes prouision he was made Archb of Canterb and receaued his Pal. Fox Acts pag. 524. citeth his Constitution wherin he professeth S. Peters supremacie and pag. 507. saith He was a great enemy of English Wicklefian bookes and the Authors of them Bale Cent. 7. cap. 50. saith he imprisoned the Wiclefists and made them abiure their haeresie Henrie Chichley Archbishop LXI The learning and vvorthines of Archb. Chichley 30. THe 61. Archb was Henrie Chichley in the yeare 1414. and departed this wordl An. 1443. He was as Godwin writeth Doctor of lawe much employed in Embassages of the King wherin he euer behaued him self wisely and to the kings good liking He alwaies enioyed his Princes fauor was wise in gouerning his See laudably bountiful in bestowing his goods to the good of the common vvelth and lasly stout and seuere in administration of iustice In Hiham Feris he built a goodly Colledg and also an hospital and in Oxford two Colledges and called one Bernards Colledg an other Al soules His Rom. religion As for his Roman religion there can be no question of it For as the said Godwin writeth the Pope bestowed the Archb. vpon him sent him his Pal and made him Cardinal and his Legat in England And Bale Cent. 7. cap. 50. accounteth him a persecuter of Wicklefists And as is said in the Epitaph of his Tombe was made Bishop by the Popes owne hands Iohn Stafford Archbishop LXII 19. IN the yeare 1443. succeded Iohn Stafford and died Nobilitie and great learning of Archb. Stafford His Rom. Keligion 1452. He vvas saith Godwin in the Bishops of Bathe a man very noble and no les learned sonne vnto the Earle of Stafford and Doctor of Lavve As for his Roman religion that is manifest because as Godwin writeth he was made Archb. by the Popes absolute authoritie and before obtained of Pope Martin the Bishoprick of Bathe Iohn Kemp Archbishop LXIII 15. IN the yeare 1452. succeded Iohn Kemp and deceased An. 1453. He was saith Godwin Doctor of Lavve And his Roman religion is certain for as Godwin writeth The learning and religion of Archb. Kemp. The Pope bestowed the Archb. vpon him sent him his Pal and after made him Cardinal which also testifieth Bale Cent. 11. cap. 55. Thomas Bourchier Archbishop LXIIII. Nobilitie and learning of Archb. Bourchier 33. THe 64. Archb was Thomas Bourchier elect An. 1454 and deceased An. 1486. He was sonne to Henrie Bourchier Earle of Essex brought vp in Oxford of which Vniuersitie he was Chancelor Bale Cent. 11. cap. 75. saith he was a man honorable for his learning vertue and the blood of the Earles of Essex His Rom. religion His Romane Religion is manifest by Godwin Iohn Morton Archbishop LXV 34. THe 65. Archb was Iohn morton An 1487. and dyed An. 1500. He vvas saith Stow Chron. Eccellent learning and vertue of Archb. Morton pag. 789 of excellent vvit learning and vertue Godwin saith he was Doctor of lavv had manifould good partes great learning in the lavv vvisdom discretion and other vertues notable loyaltie and faithfulnes to his Prince Bale Cent. 11. cap. 85. Vir moribus c. A famous man in that age for vertue and learning seuere and a louer of iustice A man that in his time surpassed all the Prelats of England in vvisdome and grauitie As for his Roman religion that is manifest His Rom. religion For he was elected by the Monks confirmed redily by the Pope and made also Cardinal and procured Saint Anselm to be canonized Henrie Dean Archbishop LXVI 35. THe 66. Archb. was Henrie Dean An. 1501. and died
accused in the Conclaue of fauering protestants and of other matters He cleared himself saith Godwin of all these suspitions absolutely so that the next day they were more resolute to make him Pope than before And infra he saith Queene Marie loued him for his learning and nobilitie but aboue all for his religion and finally that he reconciled England to the Pope and receiued from him his Pal. Bale Cent 8. cap. 100. saith he was a Cardinal soldier of Antichrist not to be commended for any vertue by the seruant of God and saith that in an Oration to the Emperor he called the German Protestants newe Turks Sleidan lib. 10. in fin and their Gospel Turcicum pestiferum adulterinum semen Turkish pestiferous and adulterous seede An. 1607. which Crashew was not a shamed in his sermon at Paules Crosse to affirme that Poole said o the written word of God Farther more Bale termeth this worthie Prelat and great ornament of our Nation horrible beast a rooter out of the truth of the Gospel a most wicked Traitor to his Contrie and prayeth God to confound him So vndoubted it was while Cardinal Poole liued that he was no Protestant but a most earnest Roman Catholick See Andreas Dioditius in vit Poli. Which who readeth his booke and considereth his deedes may yet see more fully But by him may the iudicious reader see with what truth or face our Ministers challeng S. Austin and other holy and antient Archbishops of Canterburie to be of their religion Epilog First and last Cath. Archb of Canterb. said Masse and haue palls from Rome The number of our Archb. Their continuance learning vertue and vvisdom 39. THus yow see the first and the last of the Catholick Archbishops of Canterburie namely S. Austin and Cardinal Pole to haue said Masse and had their Palls from Rome and all of them except one euer since the first Christianitie of our Nation vnto our daies for number thre score and nine for continewance of nine hundred fisty and eight yeares for learning many of them most famous for wisdom most excellent and for vertue diuers of them most admirable as you haue heard by the very confession of Protestants them selues VVho vvil not advventure his soule rather vvith these than vvith Cranmer Thus manie I say thus excellently qualified Primats and Pastors of al England thus long to haue taught the Catholick faith to haue followed it them selues to haue defended it with their great learning maintained it by their miracles authorized it by their notable vertues and finally to haue liued in it most religiously and died most happely What shall wee thinck of them That so many and great Clerks were so many hundred yeares ignorant of the truth That so many and so great Saints so long tyme missed of the way to heauen That all our Ancestors who so many yeares followed them were christened in vaine beleeued in vaine and worshiped and serued God in vaine and finally died in their sinnes and are damned and gon to hel No vvaie to heauen but by Christ and his true faith As we must needs thinck vnles we graunt the Roman Catholick faith to be the faith of Christ and right way to saluation Shall I say such an vnchristian vnnatural and vnreasonable thought enter into our harts And not rather follow the aduise of S. Paul saying Mementote Praepositorum vestrorum qui vobis locuti sunt verbum Dei quorum intuentes exitum conuersationis imitamini fidem Beholding the end of the coÌ„uersation of your Prelats follovv their faith Let vs behould the holy conuersation and happie vertuous ende of those holy and worthy Prelat and primats of England assuring our selues that vertue can not follow the Diuel nor Gods Saints be condemned to Hel. Let vs embrace their faith which was the roote of their vertue and their cheefe guide in their way to heauen whither they are happily ariued and we shall assuredly follow if we keepe their faith and imitat their vertue And thus hauing shewed that all our Archbishops of Canterburie and consequently all our Clergie Bishops Archdeacons Deacons Canons Pastors Vicars Monkes All Besides VViclef and his small number and Friers were Roman Catholicks euen from the first Christianity of our Nation to our age Let vs procâ—ed an shew the same of our Christian Kings and Laitie CHAP. XXI That all our Christian English kings to king Henrie 8. time were Roman Catholicks proued by general reasons 1 No record that anie of our old christian Kings vvas Protestant 1. FIrst because as I said of the Archbishops ther is no script no scrole no record no monument to testifie that our former Christian kings were of any other religion than king Henrie 8. was before he began the change Therfor they that affirme the contrarie either know it by reuelation or speake without booke Besides it is impossible that ther should be an alteration in religion which is the most markablest thing in a Common welth and that there should be no mention therof and altogether incredible in England where we see the first alteration from Paganisme to Christianitie and now lately from Papistrie to Protestancie recorded in all Histories yea priuat mutations made by kings in some Churches from Priests to monks or contrary wise And can we thinck that a mutation from Protestancie to Papistrie if any such had bene would haue bene omitted and forgotten 2. All the Archbishops of Canterburie were Roman Catholicks as is before shewed 2 All their Archb. vvere Catholicks and yet none of them trobled by the kings of former times for his religion yea most of them greatly honored by them and diuers made Archbishops by their kings procurment 3 They suffered Archb. to be consecrat of the Pope c. 3. They suffered the said Archbishops to go to Rome where diuers of them were consecrated of the Pope to receaue their Pal to be his legat and take their forsaid oath of fidelitie to the Pope which if they had bene Protest and not perfect Roman Catholick they would neuer haue permitted yea some of the kings procured Pals for their Archb Kings procure palls from the P. for their Archb. as King Edwin for S. Paulin in Beda lib. 2. cap. 17 King Alfwald for Archbishop Eanbald Florent An. 779. Huntington lib. 3. king Rufus for S. Anselm Fox Acts. pag. 185. 4. Nine of the ancient kings left their Kingdomes and became monks 4 Manie ancient Kings became Monks as Fox confesseth Acts. pag. 133. whose names are these king Kinegilfus K. Cedwalla king Ina king Ethelred king Sigebert king Coenred king Offa king Edbert Monks vovved chastie pouertie and obedience to whome pag. 131. he addeth king Kenred Now moÌ„kes in that time vowed chastitie as is euident in S. Beda lib. 5. cap. 22. lib. 4. cap. 25. lib. 3. cap. 25. And Pouertie lib. 1. cap. 25. And obedience lib. 4. cap. 5. And how
Fulke They Protestants were often driuen into mountaines and desert places of the Alpes Apenin Hercinia silua and other corners of the world or els dispersed kept close in all regions of Europe Surueler The surueier of the pretended discipline c. 8. in this latter age saith he when after a long darknes it pleased God to restore vnto vs the light of the Gospel c. 4. All priests and people drovvned in Poperie from top to toe Priests of all sortes likewise the people all of theÌ„ together from the top to the toe were drowned in the pudles of Poperie And I pray you who was then a Protestant 3. But how long was this ignorance this darknes this drowning of Priests people in Poperie Fox in his Acts edit 1596. which edition I cite in this booke p. 767. Fox saith From 400. yeares heretofore and more the religion of Christ was wholie burned into Idolatrie And p. 390. About the yeare 1370. all the world saith he was in desperat estate and ignoraÌ„â—e of Gods truth ouershadowed the whole world there seemed in a maÌ„ner to be no one litle spark of pure doctrine left Again in his ProtestatioÌ„ befor his Acts. About the yeare 1215. 1080 Christian faith was exstinguished then the true visible Church began to shrink and keep in for fear And further pag. 138 In the time of King Edgar which was An. 954. and of the ould Monkes superstition began to creep into the Church for ignorance of free iustification by faith And yet further speaking of our Christian Kings from our first Christianitie vnto the yeare 800. he writeth thus pag. 120. How much are we Protestants bound to God for the sinceritie of his truth hidden so long to our Ancestors and opened now to vs. Protestantisme hidden to our Anceitors Ibid. They lacked our faith Thus Fox confesseth that the Protestants truth was hidden and vnknowne here for one thousand yeares almost Nay p. 138. he feareth no to write that Shortly after the time of Christ and his Apostles the Doctrine of Christian Iustification which pag. 770. he accounteth the onely principall origin of our saluation and pag. 767. the foundation of all Christianitie began to be forgotten Bale In like manner Bale an other great Antiquarie Centur. 6. cap. 69. calleth the time of King Richard 2. a darkish age And Centur. 5. cap 85. The age saith he of K. Edward 3. was couered with darknes of extreme ignorance And in King Henrie 3. time as he writeth Centur. 4. cap. 6. Holesome truth perished from earth And vnder K. Henrie 2. as he writeth Cent. 3. c. 14. Mannes life was corrupted vpon earth with Antichristian traditions So that all this time ther was no roome for Protestants on earth And yet further Cent. 1. pag. 69. From the yeare 607. saith he puritie of heauenly doctrin vanished in the Church And p. 65. After Greg. the first puritie of doctrine perished And Cent. 1. c. 74. Protestancie for a thousand yeares onely in Ideots and in holes From Phocas who liued An 602. till the renevving saith he of the Gospel by Luther the doctrine of Christ was for that space amongst Idiots and in lurking holes Doest thou hear Reader in whom and wher this new Gospel was for almost 1000. yeares together Napier Napier also in his Treatise vpon the Reuelat. pag. 145. Euen 1260. years saith he the Pope and his Clergie hathe possessed the outward and visible Church of Christians reigning without any debatable coÌ„tradiction Gods truth saith he p 191. 161. 156 most certainly note the word abiding so long latent invisible Behold this ProtestaÌ„t coÌ„fessing that their truth was inuisible for more than twelue hundred yeares Fulke yea Fulk in his Answer to a Counterfeit Cathol pag. 35. will haue the Church to haue decaied immediatly from the Apostles time And to conclude with Luthers testimonie as I began with it He Galath 1. fol. 27. Luther hath these words VVhen the light of the Gospel after so great darknes begaÌ„ first to appear And Galath 3. fol. 154. Of this difference taught by me betwene the lavv and the Gospel ther is nothing to be fouÌ„d in the books of the MoÌ„kes Canonists Scholemen Luthers doctrin not knovvne to the antient Fathers no nor in the books of the ancient Fathers And Galat. 5. fol. 271. This vvas coÌ„mon in these our daies befor the light truth of the Gospel was reueled 4. Thus you see it euideÌ„t by the coÌ„fession of Luther diuers other ProtestaÌ„ts both domesticall and foraine that their Church their faith religioÌ„ was inuisible and vnknowne to the world before Luther And this inuisibilitie of their Church before Luthers time do all ProtestaÌ„ts mantaine who affirme the calling or sending of Luther Caluin such like to preach to haue bene extraordinarie or onely from God because ether there was no protest church or ministrie of which they could be sent ordinarily or at least none such knowne to them And hervpoÌ„ may any maÌ„ of iudgmeÌ„t gather that indeed their Church religioÌ„ was not at all befor Luther For if it were not visible how came they to knowledg of it Or if as Fox saith in his Protest it was not reported in Histories how know they that it was Can they tell what was in times past without relatioÌ„ of those who theÌ„ liued vnles they pretend some such reuelatioÌ„ as Moyses had to know the CreatioÌ„ of the world Is it not a meere fictioÌ„ or imaginatioÌ„ such as euery new start vp Heretick can auouch Is it not a witles witfull assertioÌ„ to affirme that there hath bene euer such kind of people yet not to be able to name one maÌ„ of theÌ„ one place wher they were one witnes of their being Doth Gods word force vs to such poore miserable yea incredible shifts Or rather is it not wrongly vnderstood when we are compelled to inuent such shamefull shifts or els to confesse that Gods truth and religion was no wher in the world before Luther Iuel Surely to vse euen Iuels words in the like matter Articulo 2. diuision 8. It must needs be a straÌ„ge Church that had nether beginning nor ending no defender no reprouer no mouth to vtter or ear to hear it nor pen to write nor place to rest in Tertullian And we may say to such as Tertullian said to ould Heretiks VVho are you whence are you wheÌ„ came you VVher lurked you so long The meetings of witches though they be brought together by the diuel yet be often times seene Protestants for one thousand yeares more inuisible them Fairies The meetings of Fairies though they be spirits some times are discried And were there ProtestaÌ„ts these thousand yeares yet more inuisible than ether witches or Fairies were ther CoÌ„gregations of them yet nether seene heard or imagined of by the world Surely this kind of Church hath her being as Protest
them both of as much iustice in this life and glorie in the next as anie Saint in heauen had or hathe Luthers doctrin taketh avvaie the fear of God in this life For as for the fear of God in this life he taketh that away by assuring those that haue his iustifying faith that all their sinnes are forgiuen and all punishment due vnto them remitted Which securitie Caluin some what increased by adding that who once hath iustifying faith can neuer leese it which two points who soeuer firmely beleeueth I see not how or why he can fear God in this life For how can he fear God in this life who is sure that nether he can leese Gods fauor nor be punished of him for any sin which he commiteth And in the next life too And as for fear of God in the next world first Luther tooke quite away Purgatorie and though he left Hell yet not for his followers whome he assured that beleuing as he tought them they could not be damned whatsoueer they did So rich saith he lib. de Captiu cap. de Euchar. is a Christian as he can not leese his saluation with what sinnes soeuer vnles he will not beleeue for no sinnes can damne him Taketh also avvaie fear of mâ—n And as touching fear of man also he tooke that away as much as he could For a Christian saith he 2. Galat. fol. 66. is free from all lawes and subiect to no creature And lib. de Captiu A Christian is bound to no law but to Gods No law can be imposed vpon Christians by any right ether of men or Angels but as much as they will themselues Which doctrine D. Whitaker cont Dur. pag. 726. expoundeth thus The conscience is bound to no law but Gods And pag. 731. The particuler lawes of Magistrats haue no command ouer the conscieÌ„ce Which who beleeueth need not fear to break any maÌ„s law if he can keep it secret Luthers doctrin taketh avvay exercise of all vnpleasing things In like sorte Luther remoued from his followers all difficult and hard things For he tought them that Gods commandements were impossible to be kept Confession Satisfaction AbstineÌ„ce Fasting austerity of life he ether condemned or accounted no more acceptable to God than feasting and pampering our bodies 6. And on the other side touching pleasures delites of this world he licensed Bishops Priests Monks Friers Giueth licence to enioy all pleasures Nonnes to break their vowes of chastitie pouerty and obedience and to marie to to get riches Luthers general indulgence to sin and to liue at their owne commaÌ„d gaue leaue to the people to read and vnderstand Scriptures according to their priuat spirits to make choise of their Pastors and to take all or a good part of Church liuings He freed Princes from all Ecclesiasticall subiection and graunted to all sortes of people a licence to eate at what time and what meat they list yea he gaue a generall and direct indulgence for to syn For 2. Galat. fol. 66. A Christian saith he hath nothing to do with the lavv and sin 3. Galat. fol. 114. sin in vs is no sin And fo 140. If sin vex the think that it is at it is indeed but an imagination ibidem True diuinity teacheth that there is no sin in the world any more fol. 138. Christ saith he is the only sinner And his whole drift in that booke is to extinguish in his followers all feeling of sin or remorse of conscience therof Luthers quiet of conscience in extinguishing remorse of sin Luther Serm. de nativv B. Mariae and this he termeth quiet of Conscience And withall this as I said he assureth euery one of his followers that they are as iust as our blessed ladie and if they beliue as he teacheth them as sure of heaune as she is And do we maruel to see common people to embrace so secure and pleasing a religion Surely we need maruell no more than to see water run the lower way or stones rolle downe the hill But alas poore soules who like silly fishes are caught with this pleasing bat to their euerlasting death For this learning cometh not from aboue but as S. Iames speaketh is earthly sensuall and diuelish what religion of God can that be which abandoneth al fear of God what piety can that be which remoueth the exercise of hard things as for the most parte the acts of vertue are What Christianity can that be which ioyneth league with the flesh and the world which Christians renounce in their baptisme And these motiues I haue noted in the spreading of Luthers doctrine But let vs hear the foresayd Surueyer 7. First saith he cap. 8. Luther and his parteners saught to persuade the Pope and Bishops to to their reformation Luthers means of spreading his doctrin out of the Surueyer This is euident by Luthers to P Leo to the Archb. of Mentz and others But finding small encouragement of them they vvere driuen saith he to flie to the ciuil Magistrats the rather to moue them to their reformation they laboured by all means they could to make the Popish Clergie most odious vnto them They inueighed against their pride against their superfluities against their corruptions They perswaded the Princes that Bishops and Abbots had too much and told free citties that notwitstaÌ„ding their freedome in respect of the Emperor yet they were subiect to their Bishops and were not saith he discontented that so good an occasion was offered them to procure their greater libertie Moreouer Luther and his were content to yeeld to much against their mind with many vnequall conditions So at last the ciuil Magistrats began a reformation The Pope the Bishops and the cheefest of the Clergie impugned it VVherupon their liuings which they had in any of those territories were seased into the hands of the ciuil Magistrates Thus you see euen by the confessioÌ„ of Protestants that Luther could not persuade his religion to the chiefest of the Clergie but spred it by temporizing with Princes and States with yeelding too much eueÌ„ against his mind with exciting cities to rebell against their Bishops and take their liuings from them VVhich whither it be an Apostolike kind of proceeding or no I durst make the Surueier himselfe iudge Sure I am that he greatly condemneth the like proceding of Caluin cap. 2. and feareth that Puritans will in time vse the like course to reforme him and his Company CHAP. VI. VVhen by whome wherfore and how Protestancie began first in England 1. IN the first booke yow haue heard how all our Christian Kings to K. Henry 8. were Roman Catholickes Now it commeth to shew when wherfore how he altered the Religion of all his Forfathers and Predecessors About the yeare 1527. The Protest diuines in German vvold not auovv K. Henries deuorce Sleidan Engl. lib. 10. fol. 139. Causes of K. Henrie 8. reuolt from the Pope out of Cooper and Stovv
time And as for the effects therof in King Edward 6. time the Protestant who published Cranners booke against traditions telleth vs what they were thus VVe were talkers only and not walkers lip Gospellers from mouth outward and no further vve vvere euen such as the Prophet speaketh of saying That people honoreth me vvith their lipps but are far from me with their hart we could speak of Gods word and talk gloriously therof but in our harts vve vvere ful of pride malice enuie couâ—teousnes backbiting Men no vvhit bettered vnder protestaÌ„tisme rioting harlot hounting no whit bettered at all than vve vvere before vnder the Popes Kingdome Nothing was amended in vs but only our tonges no nor they nether if I shall speak rightly and as the truth was in deed For vve vsed detraction of our neighbour filthy talke with many proud braggs of holines For vvhat end Protestants read scriptures VVhat Protest preachers vvere we read not the scriptures nor heard them for any amendment of our ovvne vvicked liues but only to mak a shew and brag therof to check and to taunt others yea and to espie small motes in other mens eyes but nothing desirous to see the greate beames in our owne This I say to talk and not to vvalk to say and not to doe was not only among the vnlearned sorte of men but also amoÌ„g the graue Cleerks and preachers of Gods word And much more their of there like stuffe Fruits of Protestancie vnder Q. Elizab. 9. And touching the effects of Protestancy in Queen Elizabeths time Fox him self Consid 3. telleth vs theÌ„ in these words God graunt saith he vve may do better for vvorse I think vve cannot do if vve English men in these reformed daies walk with monstrous pride pranking vp our selues more like plaiers on a stage than Gods chrildren in his Church Protest can not do vvorse if they vvould And Considerat 4. who saith he followeth that he knoweth To rip vp all our deformities in particuler I meane not here nether need I the same being so euident to all mens eyes that who can not se our excessiue outrage in pompeous apparell our carnal desires and vnchast demeaners without fear of God Protestants careles securitie our careles security vvithout conscience as though their were no iudgmeÌ„t to come our studie vpon this vvorld as if there were no other heauen And much more of the like tune And in his latin Ep. he complaineth that euery blast of tentation carieth Protestants headleng into pride auarice pleasure filthines reueng and what wickednes not VVhat present Protestants are And as for the present Protestants Collins in his sermoÌ„ at Paules crosse 1607. saith his eyes gush out vvith vvater to see there is no religion amongst men for the most parte but that which is tainted with a spice of faction Protestants churches void of all true religion The declarat of discipline pag. 148. saith their very temples chappels and alters vvax prophan and void of all true religion the Surueyer cap. 21. saith that men are kept from confession to no conference vvith their pastor from long praier to two or three words and farewell from superstition to very great security and prophanation And cap. vlt. he citeth the words of a principall Ministers in Scotland touching the encrease of vice there Increase of Protestant knovvledg is the disase of conscience wherof he giueth the cause in these wordes The more knowledge of the new Gospell increaseth conscience decaieth If any be desirous to see in particuler what kind of men our Ministers be he may read the danger Positions lib. 2. cap. 11. seq and lib. 4. cap. 4. the Surueyer cap. 3. 8. 18. I. B. his taile cap. 11. and others For my owne parte I loath to moue this dunghil any further Quo modo obsâ—uâ—atum est auâ—umâ— mutatus est Color optimus Thâ—â—n 4. But O what difference is there betwene S. Augustin and his follows and our ministers and betweene our foresaid vertuous Ancestors and the present Protestants And thus hauing shewed how vnfit Luther was both for learning and life to be a Preacher and especially a first Preacher immediatly sent of God to Preach his heauenly truth let vs see what motiues he had to preach and afterward what Commission CHAP. IX That Luther was moued by humane and naughtie motiues to preach Protestantisme VVHat can be said of this matter is clear by what hath bene declared in the former Chapter notwithstanding because we will obserue the like of Chapters in discoursing of Luther which we vsed of S. Austin let vs heere see what motiues Lut er had of beginning and continuing his Protestants doctrine The first motiue of beginning his doctrine was as is shewed before enuie and emulation against the Dominicans for hauing the publishing of the indulgences which was wont to be giueÌ„ to the Austin Friers lib. 2. cap. 4. And his motiue of continewing and proceding in his new Doctrine was his pride which wold not permit him to recant what himselfe thought so ill of as he offered to suppresse and burie in perpetuall silence Besid these principall motiues others he had which set him forward in his new doctrine For being before a Frier vnder obedience and bound to pouerty chastity by his new doctrine he shaked of subiection got licence to gather riches to mary to enioie the conteÌ„tments of the world To these motiues were added vain glorie the nurse of all Archeretiks to haue followers termed after him Lutherans the applause of vulgar and licentious people and such like CHAP. X. That Luther was neuer sent or called to preach Protestantisme 1. FOr the better vnderstanding of that which shal be said in this Chapter we must note first that it is not denied that Luther was once lawfully sent to preach to wit to preach Papistrie For Being made Doctor and Preacher of Diuinity by Catholicks he was by them sent to preach their faith and doctrine But it is denied that euer he was sent to preach Protestancie Secondly we must note that there are two kinds of sending to preach the one extraordinary by God alone as the Prophets and Apostles were sent Discension among Protestants about Luthers sending Naz. veruÌ„ est quod vnum est mendacium multiplex est Luthe-not sent to preach by his Magistrat The other ordinarie by man also but yet such as God hath giuen authority vnto to send others So were Timothy Titus all Pastors in Gods Church since the Apostles How Luther was sent Protestants can not agree For some will haue him to haue bene sent extraordinarily by man also and of these some will haue him to haue bene sent by this man others by that which variance alone if Daniel might be iudge wold descrie the vntruth of their tale But God willing I will shew that Luther was sent no way to teach Protestancie 2. Amongst those who affirme that
teacheth me maners Againe The diuel oftener and nearer sleepeth vvith me than my Kate. I haue tvvo maruelous diuels Se◠Feuard in 4. Iren cap. 32 Vlenberg Cansa 21. Apol of Protestants trac 2. cap. 2 parag 2. Testimonie of other Prottestants for the same Erasmus Fox in Calendar D. Reinol Confer pag 155. Ministers of zurich vvho among the diuels are great Doctors in diuinitie And in his letters to the Elector of Saxonie The diuel some times so passeth through my braines as I can nether vvrite nor read And in Colloq latin fol. 32. I had rather saith he be killed by the diuel than by the Emperor And of the forsaid conference betwene Luther the diuel Erasmus cont epist non Sobr Lutheri writeth thus He bringeth in a disputation of the diuel vvith a man in his book of Masse in corners ascribeth such strong argumēts to him diuel as he saith he could not ansvver them And againe The diuel did impugne his mynd about Masse vvith strong vveapons Thus Erasmus a Confessor and plaine meaning man amongst Protestāts And the Ministers of Zurich in their Confession fol 25. 26. 127. call Luther the Minister of Sathan and say that he wrote his books impulsu spiritus Satanae cum quo disputationem instituit quique vt videtur Lutherum disputando superauit by the motion of that spirit Satan vvith vvhome he disputed and vvho as it seemeth ouercame him in disputation This same also testifie Gesnerus Gesner and others Tossanus Neostadius Beza Caluin and others cited by Feuardent in lib. 4. Iren. cap. 32. Nether was it peculier to Luther to be thus taught of the Diuel For to Carolstadius appeared a diuel whiles he was preaching as Alberus a Protestant witnesseth to which the Ministers of Basil add that he was killed of a diuel Zuinglius in his book de Subsid Euchar. professeth that he learnt his doctrine about the Eucharist of a spirit which I know not saith he albus an alter fuerit whether it were black or vvhite that is good or bad God or the Diuel Caluin epist ad Bucer confesseth he had Genium a familiar to whome he attributeth his vaine of cursing And of Knox his conference with the diuel you may see Hamilton Confut. Caluin pag. 254. And thus much touching Luthers deeds Luthers vvicked doctrin 6. As for his wicked doctrine some thing hath bene said already and here we will add a litle more referring the cheef to the third part of this Treatise In behalf of sin he teacheth l. de Captiu thus No sinnes cā damne a Christian but onely incredulitie And against goods works he hath these two Articles in Fox p. 1167. In euerie good work the iust man sinneth Euerie good vvorke of ours vvhen it is best done is a veniall sin In fauor of carnall lust he writeth serm de Matrim If the vvife can not or wil not let the maide come againe As it is not in my povver that I shold be a man so it is not in my povver that I shold be vvithout a vvomā Item It is not in our povver that it shold be ether staied or omitted but it is as necessarie as that I shold be a mā more necessarie thā to eate drink or steepe And l. de Captiu l. de Matrim If a womans husbād be impotent than saith he I vvold aduise that vvith consent of her husband she shold by vvith an other Epist ad Albert d Mogunt Horribile est si vir in morte inueniatur sine vxore or vvith her husbands brother yet vvith secret mariage If her husband vvold not consent I vvold aduise that mariyng to an other she shold fly into some remote vnknowne place Ib. I had rather suffer pluralitie of wiues than diuorce 7. And as for the effects of Luthers new doctrin Erasmus Epist ad Vultur saith thus Bring me one whome this Gospel of Luther hath of a glutton made sober of feirce mild Luthers vvicked faith of couetous liberall of an ill speaker wel spoken of vnchaste shamefast I can shew them many who are made worse than they were Sleidan lib. 6 fol. 83 To this Feild lib. 3. of the Church cap. 8. findeth no better answer than to say thus Erasmus was variable and inconstant Caluin But by his leaue otherwise iudged Fox of Erasmus whē he placed him in his Calendar for a Cōfessor otherwise D. Reinolds whē in his Confer p. 152. Luther he termeth Erasmus a man of excellent iudgment p. 155. Men seuē times vvorse vvhen they are Protestants than before a plaine wel meaning man And for his iudgment of the Lutherās maners Feild cā not shew that Erasmus was various But what wil he say to Caluin who admonit vlt. ad VVestphal writeth that Lutherans haue not one iot of honest shamefastnes are brutish men make no account of the iudgment of men or angels What wil he say to Luther him self who 5. Galat. fol. 252. writeth that his followers are seuen times worse vnder the name of Christian libertie than they were vnder the Pope And fol. 285. This saith he is the lot of the new Gospel that when it is preached men begin to spoile to rob By Protestancie men grovv out of kind to steal and to beguile To be brief men seene sodenly to grow out of kind and to be transformed into cruel beasts And much more he hath of the like sorte fol. 27. 286. 39. 252. And who will see more of the wicked effects of Luthers Gospel may read Schusselb lib. 2. Caluin theolog Iezler de bello Eucharist Feuardent in 2. Iren. cap. 9. And also Luther postil supra dom 1. aduentus Smidelin Cant. 4. in 21. Luc. wigand de malis German Bulling conc Brent Caluin de scand and serm 10. and 11. in epist ad Ephes. Muscul L. de Prophet cant 4 de planetis Here I will add a litle of the increase of ill life in England since Protestantisme entred 8. King Henrie after he had admitted one point of Protestancie to wit the denial of the Popes supremacie and permitted the Bible to be read in English in his oration to the Parlament in Fox pag. 1124. telleth the effects therof in these words I am very sorie to hear and know how vnreuerently that iewel the word of God is rymed Effects of Protestancie in K. Henrie 8. daies sung and iangled in euerie alehousse and tauerne contrarie to the true meaning and doctrin of the same And yet I am as much sorie that the Readers of the same follow it in doing so faintly and coldly For of this I am sure that charitie was neuer so faint amongst you and vertuous and godly liuing was neuer les vsed God neuer les reuerenced than after Protestantisme entred Fruits of Protestancie in K. Edvvard time nor God him selfe amongst Christians was neuer les reuerenced honored and serued Thus King Henry of the effects of Protestancy in his