the Parliament time by all the Members of the House of Commons and is required by the Law to be taken in all Parliaments otherwise they have no power nor colour to meddle with the publick Affaires This Oath being taken in Parliament that the King is the only and Supream Governour in al causes then it followes in Parliament causes over all persons then over the two Houses Let them keep this Oath and we shall bee sure of Peace in the Land and good Lawyers ought to desire peace both for the publicke good and their private and not dishonour that Noble profession as many doe in this miserable time The Gent. sayes Wee do not swear that the King is above all Law nor above the safety of his people neither do we so swear but his Majesty and we will sweare to the contrary and have sworne and have made good and will by Gods grace make good our Oath to the world that the KING is not above the Lawe nor above the safety of his people the Law and the safety of his people are his safety his Honour and his Strength AD 8. The Gent. concludes That Acts of Parliament are not formaly binding nor compleat without the Kings assent yet the Houses have a virtual power with out the Kings particular assent to doe things in order to publique justice and Safety viz. In setting up the Excise in raising and maintaining of Armes in Taxing the people at pleasure with Fifth and Twentieth part Fifty Subsidies Sequestrations Loans Compositions imprisoning the King abolishing the Common prayer Book felling the Churchs Lands c. all these are in order to the publick Justice and Safety Mr. H. P. you are of my profession I beseech you for the good of your Country for the Honour of our Science perswade your selfe and others as much as in you lies to beleeve and follow the monition and councell of that memorable reverend and profoundly Learned in the Lawes and Customes of the Land the Lord COOKI 3 par Inst pag 36. who writes as becomes a great and a learned Iudge of the Law a person much magnified by the two Houses in these words Peruse over all Books Records and Histories and you shall finde a Principle in Law a Rule in Reason and a Triall in Experience that Treason doth ever produce farall and finall destruction to the offender and never attains to the desired end two incidents inseparably thereunâ—o therefore let al men abandon it as the poysonouâ— bait of the divil follow the Precept in Holy Scripture SERVE GOD HONOUR THE KING AND HAVE NO COMPANY WITH THE SEDITIOVS Conclusion I say againe that without an Act of Oblivion a gratious Generall pardon from his Majesty the arrears of the Souldiers paid a favourable regard had to tender Consciences theâ—e will he neither Truth nor Peace in this Land nor any mansâ—cure of any thing he hath By me David Jenkins Prisoner in the Tower A DISCOURSE TOVCHING The Inconveniencies of a Long-continued PARLIAMENT A Perpetuall Parliament is repugnant to the Act made this Parliament for a Triennial Parliament for how can every three yeares a Parliament beginne if this bee perpetuall which may bee so if the two Houses please 2. An adjournment of the Parliâ—ment makes no Session 4 pars institut fol. 27. Howbeit before the adjournment the KING gives His Royall assent to some Bills Cookeibid 3. There is no Session till a Prorogation or dissolution of the Parliament 4. This Parliament as appeâ—res by the Act for not dissolving thereof set downe in the printed Statutes of this Parliament Plowd com 33.8 Bro. relation 35. Bro Parl. 86. Dâ—â— 1. Mariae 8 fol. 138. cannot be prorogâ—ed or dissolved but by Act of par liamènt There hath been as yet no Act of Parliament in that behalfe And therefore all the Acts of this Parliament are Acts of one Session 5. All Acts of one Session relate to the first day of the Parliament and all the Acts of such a Parliament are acts of one day so the Act for the Trienniall and the Act for this Perpetuall are two Acts of one day by the Law 6. 4 Ed. 3. cap. 36. Ed. 3. cap. 10. A Parliament is to be holâ—en once every yeare and more often if need shall bee those Acts are confirmed by the Act for the Trienniall Parliament How doth a perpetuall Parliament agree with a Parliament once every yeare or with the intention of those Lawes How doth a Parliament every three-years agree with a Parliament for ever which may be if the two Houses please 7. The result is this atâ—ent day in Law this Parliament two acts have passed for howbeit the one was in 16 Carol. and the other in 17 Carol. yet both in Law are Acts of one day the one saith there shall be a Trienniall Parliament after the end of the sitting of this Parliament The other this Parliament shall sit for ever if they please The one will have a Parliament with an end the other a Parliament without an end When an Act of Parliament is against common Right or Reason 1 Pars. Doct. Bon. hams case â—o 11 8. 8. E. 3 3.30.33 E. cassaâ—it 32. 27. H. G. Anuity 41. 1. Eliz. Dâ—er 113. or repugnant or impossible to be performed the Common Law shall controle it and adjudg this Act to be void they are the words of the Law An Act of Parliament that a Man shall be judg in his own Cause is a void Act. Hobbart Fol. 120. Begin with Common Right It is against Common Right that indebted men should not pay their debts That if any Member of the House of Commons doe any Subject wrong by disseising him of his land or dispossessing him of his goods or blasting of his fame or doing violence to his person that such persons during their lives should not be questioned by a Priviledg of Parliament and that extended also to many other beside themselves common right doth abhor these Enormities which a perpetuall Parliament doth beget besides the utter destruction of al mens actions real personall or mixt 21. Iac c. 16. who have to doe with Parliament-men by the statute of Limitation which confines Suites to certaine yeares For Common Reason Parliaments were ordained for remedies to redresse publique greivances it is against reason they should make publique and insufferable Grievances The Law of the Land allowes no protection for any men imployed in the service of the Kingdome but for a yeare to be free from Suites and in many Suites none at all howbeit he be in such service 39. H. 6.39 but a Parliament perpetuall may prove a protection not for a yeare but for ever which is against all manner of reason For impossibility The death of his Majesty whose life God prolong dissolves 〈◊〉 necessarily for the Writ of Summons iâ— Carolus Rex in hoc individuo and Carolus Rex is in this particular habiturus colloquium tractatum cum prelat is
Soveraigne Lord at all seasons when need shall be Here the supreame power in the time of Parliament by both Houses is declared to belong to the King At the beginning of every Parliament all Armes are 7. Ed. 2.4 pars instit 14. or ought to be forbidden to be borne in London Westminster or the Subburbs This condemnes the multitudes comming to Westminster and the Guards of armed men All who held by Knights service 1 Edw. 2. de Militibus and had twenty pounds per annum were distraynable ad Arma militaria suscipienda This agrees with the Records of ancient time continued constantly in all Kings times but at this Parliament 3. November 1640. The King out of his grace discharged this duty which proves that the power of warre and preparation thereto belongs not to the two Houses but only to the King The two Spencers in Edw. 2. Edw. 3. Caâ—vins Case Cookâ—e 7. fol. 11. time hatched to cover their Treason this damnable and damned opinion viz That Ligeance was more by reason of the Kings politick capacity then of his person upon which they inferred these execrable and detestable consequences First if the King demeaned not himselfe by reason in the right of his Crowne his Lieges are bound by Oath to remove him Secondly seeing the King could not be removed by suit of Law it was to be done by force Thirdly that his Lieges be bound to governe in default of him All which tenets were condemned by two Parliaments the one called exilium Hugonis in Ed. 2. time the other by 1. Edw. 3. cap. 2. All which Articles against the Spencers are confirmed by this last Statute the Artiles are extant in the booke called vetera Statuta The separation of the Kings person from his power is the principall Article condemned and yet all these three damnable detestable and execrable consequents are the grounds whereupon this present time relies and the principles whereupon the two houses found their cause The Villeine of a Lord in the presence of the King cannot be seized â—â—â—nden com 322. â—y ass pl. 49 for the presence of the King is a protection for that time to him This shewes what reverence the Law gives to the person of a King Regis 33 Ed. 3. â—yde de roy 203 Fitz 30 H. 7.16 sacro oleo uncti sunt capaâ—es spiritualis jurisdictionis But the two Houses were never held capable of that power Rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote haâ—et Ecclesiasticam spiritualem jurisdictionem This shewes the Kings power in Ecclesiasticall Causes The Lands of the King is called in Law Patromoniâ—n sacrum Com. Sur. Littl Sect. 4. The Houses should not have meddled with that sacred Patromony 3 Ed. 3.19 The King hath no Peere in his Land and cannot be judged Ergo the two Houses are not above him The Parliament 15. Ed. 3. was repealed for that is was against the Kings Lawes and prerogative 4 part institâ— fol. 25. This shewes cleerely the Propositions sent to Newcastle ought not to have beene presented to his Majesty For that they are contrary to the Lawes and his Prerogative The Lords and Commons cannot assent in Parliament to any thing that tends to the dis-inherifion of the King and his Crowne 4 Part Cooke inâ—â—it fol. 14. 42. E. 3. to which they are sworne This condemnes the said Propositions likewise To depose the King Parliamenâ— Rol. num 7. Rex 〈◊〉 suetudâ— Parâ—amenti to imprison him untill he assent to certaine dedemands a warre to alter the Religion established by Law or any other Law or to remove Councellors to hold a Castle or Fort against the King are offences against that Law declared to be treason by the resolution herein after mentioned by that Law men are bound to ayd the King when warre is levied against him in his Realme 25 Ed. 3. cap. 2. King in his Statute must be intended in his naturall body and person that only can dye for to compasse his death and declare it by overt Act is declared thereby treason to incounter in fight such as come to ayd the King in his warres is treason Compassing of the Qâ—â—ens death of the Kings Eldest Sonne to coyne his money to counterfeit his Great-Seale to levy Warre against him to adhere to such as shall so doe are declared by that Act to be high treason This Statute cannot referre to the King in his politique capacity but to his naturall which is inseperable from the politick for a body politick can have neither Wife 〈◊〉 13. nor Childe nor levy Warre nor doe any Act but by the operation of the naturall body A Corporation or body politick hath no soule or life but is a fiction of the Law and the Statute meant not â—â—ctitious persons but the body naturall conjoned with the politique which are inseperable The clause in that Act that no man should sue for grace or pardon for any offence condemned or forfeiture given by that Act 21 Ed. 4.14 â— 2.11 an was repealed by a subsequent Act in 21. R. â— holden unreasonable without example and against the Law and custome of the Parliament This condemnes the Proposition for disabling the King to Pardon 4 pars instit fol. 42. 4. Pars instit fol. 42. The Act of 11. R. 2. so much urged by the other side was an Act to which the King consented and so a perfect Act yet Note the Army then about the Towne Note that that Law is a-against private persons and by the 3. cap. thereof the treasons there declared are declared to be new treasons made by that Act and not to be drawne to example it was abrogated 21. R. 2. and revived by an usurper 1 H. 4. to please the people and by the tenth chap. thereof enacts that nothing shall be treason but what is declared by 25. Ed. 3. 16. Ed. cap. 5.16 R. 2. cap. 5. H. 4. The Regality of the Crowne of England is immediately subject to God and to none other Plaine words shewing where the supreame power is The Commission of Array is in force and no other Commission Rot. Parlm 5. H. 4. numb 24. an Act not printed this Act was repealed by 4. and 5. P. M cap. 2. this repealed by the Act of 1 Iacobi and so it is of force at this day for the repealing Statute is repealed 4. pars instituâ— fol. 51. 125 published fithence this Parliament by the desire of the house of Commons their Order is printed in the last leafe of the commentaries upon Magna Charta Sir Edward Cooke A booke alowed by Sir Na Brent called the reason of the War fol. 65. by their party is holden for the Oracle of the Law who wrote the said fourth part in a calme and quiet time and I may say when there was no need to defend the authority of the Commission of Array For that objection that that Commission leaves power to the
Roys ' avisera or nâ— veulâ— it was against Magna Charta Articuli Cleri and many other Acts of Parliament And might have farther given these reasons if it had so pleased him for the same First that this Bill destroyes the Writ whereby they are made two Houses of Parliament 14 Hen. 7. fol. 22. Evesque est signior de grand honneâ—r the King in the Writ being â—um praelaris colloquium habtre Secondly they have been in all Parliaments since we had any and voted but in such wherein they themselves were concerned And there have been Bishops here sithence we were Christians and the Fundamentall Law of the Kingdome approves of them If any of them were conceived offensive they were left to Justice and his Majesty would put in inoffensive men in their places but sithence his Majesty hath passed the Bill for taking away their Vores in Parliament it is a Law that bindes us so farre Upon the whole matter the Law hath notably determined that Billa agreed by both Houses pretended to be for the publick good are to be judged by the King for in all Kings Reignes Bils have been preferred by both Houses which alwaies are pretended to be for the publique good and many times are not and were rejected with Roy's auisera or Roy ne veult This Parliament began the 3 of Novemb. 1640. before that time in all the kings reign no armed power did force any of the people to doe any thing against the Law what was done was by his Judges Officers Refers and Ministers from that time untill the 10. os Ia. 1641. when the King went from London to avoyd the danger of frequent tumults being a year and 3 months Privie Counsellors and all his Justices Ministers were lest to the Justice of the Law there wanted not time to punish punishable men The Sphere of the House of Commons is to represent the grievances of the Countrey to grant aydes for the King upon all fit occasions extraordinary to assent to the making or abrogating of Lawes The Orb of the House of Lords to reforme erroneous judgements given in the Kings Bench to redresse the delayes of Courts of Justice to receive all Petitions to advise his Majesty with their Councell to have their Votes in making or abrogating of Lawes and to propose for the common good what they conceive meet Lex non cogit ad impossibilia Subjects are not to expect from Kings impossible things so many Judges Councellours Sheriffes Justices of the Peace Commissioners Ministers of State that the King should over-looke them all cannot be it is impossible The King is vertually in his ordinary Courts of Justice so long as they continue his Courts their charge is to administer the Lawes in being and not to delay deferre oâ— sell Justice for any Commandment of the King We have Lawes enough Instrumenta boni saeculi sunt bonâ— viri good Ministers as Judges and Officers are many times wanting the houses propose new Lawes or abrogation of the old both induce novelty the Law for the reasons aforesaid makes the King the onely Judge who is assisted therein by a great number of grave learned and prudent men as aforesaid For the considerations aforesaid the Kings Party adheared to him the â—aw of the Lnnd is their Birth-â—ight their Guide no offence is committed where that is not violated they found the Commission of Aâ—â—ray warrauted by the Law they found the King in this Parliament to have quitted the Shâ—-money Knighthood-money seven Courts of Justice consented to a Triennall Parliament setled the Forrest hounds tooke away the Cearke of the Market of the houshold trusted the House with the Navy passed an Act not to dâ—â—olve this Parliament without the Houses assent no people in the world so free if they could have been content with Lawes Oathes and reaâ—â—â— and nothing more could or can be devised to secure us neither hath been in any time Notwithstanding all this we found the King driven from London by frequent tumults that two thirds an dt more of the Lords had disserted tha House for the same cause and the greater part of the House of Commons left that House also for the same reason new men chosen in their places against Law by the pretended Warrant of a connterfet Seale and in the Kings name against his consent leavying Warre against him and seizing his Ports Forts Magazines and Revenue and converting them to his destruction and the subversion of the Law and Land laying Taxes on the people never heard of before in this Land devised new Oathes to oppose Forces raised by the King nor to adhere to him but to them in this Warre which they call the 〈◊〉 the Oath and the V. W. and Covenant By severall wayes never used in this kingdome they have raised Monies to foment this Warre and especially to inrich some among them namely first Exâ—is secondly Contributions thirdly Sequestrations fourthly Fift-parts fiftly Twentieth-parts sixtly 〈◊〉 money seventhly Sale of Plundered gpods eightly Loanes ninthly Benedolentes tenthly 〈◊〉 upon their fast-dayes eleventhly new Impoâ—tions upon Merchandâ—res twelfely Gâ—ards maintained upon the charge of private men thirteenthly Fifty Subâ—â—dies at â—â—e time fourteenthly Compossâ—â—ons with such as they call Delinquents fifteentlaly Sale of Bishppâ— Lands c. From the Kings Party meanes of subsistance are taken 〈◊〉 R 3. cap. 3 Bract. li. 3. c. 8. Stanford 192. Sir Ger. Flâ—â—twoods Case S. pars Cook 7. H. 〈◊〉 â—ast leafe before any Indictment their Lands seized their goods taken the Law allowes a Traytor or Fellon attained Necessaria sibi familiae suae invictu vestitu where iâ— the Covenant Where is the Petition of Right Where is the liberty of the Subject First we have ayded the King in this Warre contrary to the Negative Oath and other Votes Our Warrant is the twenty fifth of Edward the third the second Chapter and the said resolutions of all the Judges Secondly 〈◊〉 Insâ—it a 25. a Instit 696 The Law so at the Edition of that booke Hutton and Crook we have maintained the Commission of Array by the Kings Command contrary to their Votes We are warranted by the Statute of the fifth of Henry the fourth and the judgement of Sir Edward Cooke the â—â—cle of the Law as they call him Thirdly we maintained Archâ— Bishoâ—â— and Bishops whom they would suppresse Our warrant is Magna-Charta and many Statutes more Fourthly we have maintained the Booke of Common mayâ—r they suppresse it Our warrant is five acts of Parliament in Edward the fixt and Queene Elizabeths time 5 Pelchae 35 Elizabeth inter placita Coronae in Banâ—â— Regis New booke of Entries fol. 252. Penry for publishing two scandalous Libels against the Church Government was indicted arraigned attainted and executed at Tyburne Fiftly we maintained the Militiâ—â— of the Kingdome to belong to the King they the contrary Our warrant is the Statute of the seventh of Edward the first and many Statutes â—â—thence
constantly in this Parliament that the King to the onely supreme Governour in all causes ever all persons at this present time For what of verball or personall commands of the King which is objected we affirme few things to be subject thereto by the Law But his Majesties Command under his Great Seale which in this warre hath been used by the Kings Command for his Commission to â—savie and array men that is no personall command which the Law in some cases disallowes but that is such a command so made as all men hold their Lands by who hold by Patents all Corporations have their Charters which hold by Charters and all Judgesa and Officers their places and callings It is Objected 〈…〉 the King cannot suppresse his Courts of Justice and that this warre tended to their suppression The answer is Sol. 7 pars The â—a le of Westmerlands Ca e. 1 Eliz. Dier 165. 7 pâ—rs Cooke the King cannot nor ought to suppresse Justice or his Courts of Justice nor ever did but Courts of Justice by abuser or non user cease to be Courts of Justice when Judges are made and proceedings in those Courts holden by others then Judges made by the King and against his command under the great Seale The case of discontinuance of Processe and his Majesty is not obeyed but the Votes of the Houses and his Judges breaking that condition in Law of trust and loyalty implyed in their Patents are no longer his Judges they obey and exercise their places by vertue of Writs and Processes under a counterfet Seale The King onely can make Judges the twenty seventh of Henry the eighth Chapter the twenty fourth Justices of the Peace c. The Kings Patent makes Judges 28 H. 8. Dâ—â—r 11. The chiefe Justice of the Kings Bench is made by the Kings Writ onely of all the Judges The Great Seale is the key of the Kingdome Artiâ—uli super chartas cap. 5. 2 pars instit 552. and meet it is that the King should have the key of his Kingdome about him which confutes their saying that the King got the Seale away surreptitiously The King Brittâ—n sol 23. and he only may remove his Courts from Westminster into some other place at Yorke the Tearmes were kept for seven yeares in Edward the first 's time but for the Court of Common Pleas the placâ— must be certaine for the Kings Bench and Chancery the King by the Law may command them to attend his person alwaies if it seeme so meet unto him but the removing of the Common Pleas must be to a place certaine and so notified to the people All the Bookes of Law in all times agree that the King may grant conusance of all Pleas at his pleasure within any County or Precinct to be holden there onely and remove the Courts from Westminster to some other place for the Common Pleas 6 H. 7.9 6 Eliz Dier 226. the place must be certaine and so notified to the people and adjourne the Tearmes as he sees cause All which the two houses have violated Some seeming objections of Master Prinn's scattered in divers books answered and the truth thereby more fully cleered THE first of Henry the fourth 1 Ob. revived the Statute of the eleventh of Richard the second and repeales the one and twentieth of Richard the second whereby certaine persons were declared Traytors to the King and kingdome being of the Kings Party by 11 Rich. 2. True but note the eleventh of Richard the second Sol. a Parliament beset with 40000. men and the King assents to it so an Act and besides the first of Henry the fourth declares that the Treasons mentioned in the Act of the eleventh of Richard the second being but against a few private men shall not be drawne into example and that no Treason should be but such as the twenty fifth of Edward the third declares 9 Ed. 4. fol. â—0 All these are Acts passed by the King and the three Estates nor to be drawne into example in a tumultuous time by a besieged Parliament with an Army and Henry the fourth being an Usurper makes that Act of the first of Henry the fourth to secure himselfe Also what is this to the Votes of the two Houses onely at this time The Court of Parliament is above the King 2. Ob. for it may avoyd his Charters Commissions c. granted against the Law And the Law is above the King By the same reason you may say that the Courts of Chancery Sol. or any of the Courts of Law at Westminster are above the King for they make of no effect the Kings Charters which are passed against the Law and the King is subject to Law and sworne to maintaine it Againe it is no Parliament without the King and the King is the head thereof he is principium capus finis of a Parliament as Modus tenendi Parliament hath it and two houses onely want principiwn caput finis of a Parliament and it is a sorry Parliament that wants all these And therefore to say that Parliaments are above the King is to say the King is above himselfe The Parliament can enlarge the Kings Prerogative 3. Ob. therefore it is above him If the King assent Sol. otherwise not and then it is an Act of Parliament and otherwise no Act. Bracton saith God the Law 4 Ob. and the Kings Court viz. his Earles and Barons are above the King viz. in Parliament as Mr. Prynne expounds it Where is then the House of Commons Indeed take God the Law Sol. and Earles and Barons together it is true but to affirme that the Earles and Barons in Parliament are above the King the King being the head of the Parliament and they one of the members how an inferiour member is above the head is hard to conceive besides that position destroyes all Mr. Prynnes discourse who attributes much to the House of Commons The King is but one of the three Estates of Parliament 5 Ob. and two are greater then one therefore above The Legs Armes Sol. and Trunke of the body are greater then the Head and yet not above nor with life without it the argument holds for quantity but not for quality and in truth the King is none of the three Estates but above them all the three Estates are the Lords Spirituall the Lords Temporall and the Commons Cake their Oracle in his Chap. of Parl. f. 1 In Corporations the greater number of voyces make all the Acts of the Corporation valid 6 Ob. therefore so in Parliament By this reason the Kings assent is needlesse Sol. and to no end and all the Acts of Parliament formerly mentioned and Law-bookes have quite mistaken the matter which with unanimous voyce requires the Kings assent as necessary besides the Corporations are so constituted by the Kings Charters and the greater number of votes shall make their Acts valid The King
7 Ob. as King is present in his Parliament as well as in all other his Courts of Justice howbeit he is not there In his other Courts of Justice he hath no voyce Sol. he is none of the Judges in the Parliament he hath if his presence be not necessary his voyce is not nor his assent The originall prime legislative power of making Lawes 8 Ob. Soveraigne power of Parliaments 4â— 44 Sol. to binde the Subjects and their posterity rests not in the King but in the Kingdome and Parliament which represents it Master Prinne in the same lease affirmes and truly that the Kings assent is generally requisite to passe Lawes and ratifie them the King is the Head of the Kingdome and Parliament how then can a Body act without a Head A major part of a Corporation bindes 9 Ob. therefore the major part in Parliament and so of by Lawes The Corporation is so bound Sol. either by the Kings Charters or by prescription which sometimes had the Kings concession but prescription and Law and practise alwaies left the King a negative voyce The King cannot alter the Bills presented to him by both Houses 10 Ob. go. True Sol. but the King may refuse them Acts of Parliament and Lawes ministred in the Reignes of Usurpers 11 Ob. binde rightfull Kings g o What is this to prove the two Houses power only which is the question Sol. A King de facto must be obeyed by them who submitted to him and they are his Subjects by their submission and not Subjects de facto to the true King 9 Ed. 4. and such being Traytours and Rebells to the Regent King having renounced the true King when the lawfull King is restored may be punished by him for their Treason against the Usurper But here is a King still in both cases and the proceedings at Law holds the Judges having their Patents from the being Kings in the Reignes of Kings de facto or de jure for all Kings are bound and sworne to observe the Lawes A King dyes without Heire 12 Ob. is an Infant non compos mentis c. the two Houses may establish Lawes g o There is no Inter-regnum in England Sol. as appeares by all our Bookes of Law and therefore the dying without Heire is a vaine supposition and by their principle he is considerable in his politick capacity which cannot dye at all The Protectour assisted by the Councell of the King at Law his twelve Judges the Councell of State his Attorney Solicitor and two Sergeants at Law his twelve Masters of the Chancery hath in the Kings behalfe and ever had a Negative Voyce but what is this to the present question We have a King of full age of grear wisdome and judgement the power of the two Houses in such a case to be over the King cannot be showne The King cannot disâ—assent to publique and necessary Bills for the common good 13 Ob. g o Nor ever did good King Sol. but who shall be judge whether they be publique and necessary The major part in either of the Houses for passing of Bills so pretended may be but one or two voyces or very few and perhaps of no judicious men is it not then fitter or more agreeable to reason that his Majesty and Councell of State his twelve Judges his Sergeants Attorney and Solicitor twelve Masters of the Chancery should judge of the conveniency and benefit of such Bills for the publick good rather then a minor of which sort there may be in the Houses or a weake man or a few who oftentimes carry it by making the major part which involves the consent of all Let reason determine The Kings of England have been elective 14 Ob. and the King by his Coronation Oath is bound to maintaine justas leges consuetudines quas vulgas elegerit g o Popery hath been in the Kingdome Sol. and therefore to continue it still will not be taken for a good argument when things are setled for many ages to looke back to times of confusion is to destroy all repose The Act of Parliament of the first of K. James Chapter the first and all our extant Lawes say that the Kings Office is an heritage inherent in the bloud of our Kings and their Birth-right And Usurpers that come in by the consent of the people â— Ed. 4. c. 1 are Kings de facto but not de jure as appeares by the Acts of Parliament declaring them so and by all our Law-bookes and the fundamentall constitution of the Land Regall power is hereditary and not elective For the words vulgus elegerit if vulgus be applyed to the House of Commons 1 Hen 7. they of themselves can make no Lawes The Peeres were never yet termed vulgus but allowing they be so called the Lawes to be made be just and who is fit to judge thereof is before made evident Customes cannot referre to future time 15 Ob. and both are coupled Lawes and Customes Princes have been deposed and may be by the two Houses g o The deposers were Traytours Sol. as appeares by the resolution of all the Judges of England Coke Chap. Treason in the second part of the Institutes And never was King deposed but in tumultuous and mad times and by the power of Armies and they who were to be the succeeding Kings in the head of them as Edward the third and Henry the fourth The appeale to the Parliament for errours in Judgements in all Courts is frepuent 16 Ob. g o This is onely to the House of Lords Sol. and that is not the Parliament the House of Commons have nothing to doe therewith and in the House of Peeres if a Writ of Errour be brought to reverse any judgement there is first a Petition to the King for the allowance thereof and the reason of the Law in this case is for that the Judges of the Land all of them the Kings Councell and twelve Masters of the Chancery assist there by whose advice erronious judgements are redressed The Parliaments have determined of the rights of Kings 17 Ob. as in Henry the sixts time and others and Parliaments have bound the succession of Kings as appeares by the Statute of the thirteenth of Queene Elizabeth Chapter the first And the discent of the Crowne is guided rather by a Parliamentary Title then by common Law g o If this objection be true Sol. that the Title to the Crowne is by Parliament then we had no Usurpers for they all had Parliaments to backe them yea Richard the third that Monster All our Bookes of Law say they have the Crowne by discent and the Statutes of the Land declare that they have the same by inherent birth-right And the Statute of the thirteenth of Elizabeth the first Chapter was made to secure Queene Elizabeth against the Queene of Scots then in the Kingdome clayming the Crowne of
will not come to them and yet the King desires to come but they wil not suffer him but keepe him prisoner at Holmby so well doe their Actions and Oathes agree 5. They sweare now King Charies is their only and supreame Governor but with a resolution at the time of the Oath taking and before and after that he shall not be only or supreame Governour or only and supreame but not any Governour at all For there is no point of Government but for some yeares past they have taken to themselves and used his name only to abuse and deceive the people 6. That this virtuall power is a meere fiction their Propositions sent to Oxford to Neweastle to be signed by the King doe prove it so What needs this adoe if they have the virtuall Power with them at Wistminster 7. To affirme that the Kings power which is the vertue they talke of is separable from his person is High Treason by the Law of the Land which is so declared by that learned man of the Law Sir Edward Cocke so much magnified by this present Parliament who in the 7 part of his Reports in Calving case fol. 11 saith thus In the reigne of Edward the second the Supencers the Father and Sonne to cover the Treason hat hed in their hearts invented this damnable and damned opinion that homage and Oath of Legeance was more by reason of the I Kings Crowne that is of his potitick capacity theu by reason of ohe person of the King upon which â—â—inion they inferred three execraâ—le and detestable consequences h. If the King to not demeaue himselfe by reason in the right of his Crowne his Lieges are bound â—y Oath to remove the King 2 seeing that the King â—ould not be retormed by â—nte of Law that ought so be dene per aspertes that is by orce 3. That his Lieges be beund to governe in â—yde of him and in default of him all which wâ—re condemned by two Parliaments one in the raigue of Edw. 2. called exilium Hugonis le Spencer and the other in anno 1. Edw 3 cap. 2. And that the naturall body and politick maks one indivisible body that these two bodies incorporate in one person make one body and not divers is resolved as the Law of Eng. 4 Ed 3 Ploydon Com. fol. 213 by Sir Co bet Catlin L. Chiefe Justice of Eng. Sir Iâ—mes Dâ—er L. Chief Justice of the Common pleas the L. Sanders L. Chief Baron of the Excheâ—ner by the rest of the Judges viz. Justice Restall Justice Browne Justice Corbet Justice weston Baron Frevylâ— Carus and Powâ—rel Sergeant to the Queene Gerrard Auturny Generall Carell Atturney of the Dutchy Pâ—owdon the learnedest man of that age in the knowledge of the Law and Customes of the Realme 8. The Law in all ages without any controversie is and hath been that no Act of Parliament bindes the Subjects of the Land without the assent of the King â— Hâ—â— 3 Mogn Charta So in every Age till this dâ—y and in every Kings time as appeares by the Acts in Print 1 part of the Iustit Sect. 234. 〈◊〉 fine where many of the Law-Bookes are â—iied 7 Hen. 7.14.12 of Hen. 7.20 either for Person Lauds Goods or Fame No man can shew any sillable letter or line to the contrary in the bookes of the Law or printed Acts of Parliament in any age in this Land If the virtuall power be in the Houses there needs no assent of the Kings The stiles of the Acts printed from 9 Hen. 3. to 1 Hen. 7. were either The King ordaines at his Parliament c. or the King ordaineth by the advâ—ee of his Prelates and Barâ—â—rs and at the humble Petition of the Commons c. In Hen. 7. his time the Stile altered and hath fithence continued thus It is oâ—dained by the Kings Majesty and the Lords spirituall and temporall and Commons in this present Parliament assembled So that alwayes the Assent of the King giveth the life to all as the soule to the body and therefore our Law bookes call the King the Fountaine of Justice and the life of the Law 9. 2 Han. 4 Cap 22 4 pars instit 42. Mr. â—â—in in his Treatise of the great Seal fol. 17.27 Hen. 8 Chap. 24. Mercy as well as Justice belongs by the Law of the Land onely to the King This is confessed by Mr. Pryn and it is so without any question The King can onely pardon and never more cause to have sufficient pardons then in such troublesome times as these and God send us pardons and peace None can give any pardon but the King by the Law of the Land The whole and sole power of pardoning Treasons and Felonies belongs to the King are the words of the Law and it is a delusion to take it from any other and utterly invalid 27. Hen. 8. c. 24. 10. Queene Elizabeth summoned her first Parliament to bee held the 23. of Jan. in the first yeare of her Majesties Raigne The Lords and commons assembled by force of the same Writ the 21 day the Queen fell sick and could not appeare in her person in Parliament that day and therefore prorogued it untill the 25 of the same Month of January Resolved by all the Judges of England that the Parliament began not the day of the returne of the Writ 3 of Eliz. Dier 2â—3 viz. the 23. of January when the Lords and Commons appeared but the 25 of the said Moneth when the Queene came in person which sheweth evidently that this virtuall presence is a meere deluding fiction that hath no ground in Law reason or sence They have the King now a prisoner at Holmby with guards upon him and yet they governe by the virtuall power of their prisoner These are some few of the causes and reasons which moved me to deliver that paper to Mr. Corbet which I am ready to justifie with my life and should hold it a great honour to dye for the honourable and holy Lawes of the Land that which will save this Land from destruction is an Act of Oblivion and his Majesties gracious generall pardon the Souldiers their Arrears and euery man his own and truth and Peace established in the Land and a favourable regard had to the satisfaction of tender Consciences April 29. 1547. David Ienkins THE ARMIES INDEMNITY WITH ADDITION Together with a DECLARATION SHEWING How every Subject of ENGLAND ought to be tried for Treasons Felonies and all other Capital Crimes as is set down in the Lawes of the LAND By DAVID IENKINS now Prisoner in the Tower of London Printed in the Yeare 1648. The Armies Imdemnity c. UPon the publishing of the Ordinance of the 22 of May last for the Indemnity of the Army certaine Gentlemen well affected to the peace of the Kingdome and safety of the Army desired mee to set down in writing whether by the Law of the Land the said Ordinance did secure them from danger as to
the matters therein mentioned For whose satisfaction in a businesse wherein the lives and fortunes of so many men were concerned and the peace of the Kingdom involved I conceived I was bound in duty and conscience faithfully and truly to set down what the Law of the Land therein is which accordingly I have with all sincerity expressed in this following discourse The danger of the Armie by the Law of the Land is apparent to all men 25 â—d 3. c. 21. 2 R. 2. c. 3. â— H. 4. c. 10. 1 2. Th. Mary c. 10. It is high Treason by the Law of the Land to leavy warre against the King to compasse or imagine his death or the death of his Queene or of his eldest Sonne to counterfeit his Money or his great Seale They are the very words of the Law Other Treasons then are specified in that Act are declared to be no Treasons untill the King and his Parliament shall declare otherwise 3 Pars inst p. 22. 2 pars instit pag. 47 48. 4 pars instiâ— p. 23.48.29 3 pars instit cap. Treason p. 9 10 12. they are the very words of the Law King and Commons King and Lords Commons and Lords cannot declare any other thing to be Treason than there is declared as appeares by the Lord Cook in the places cited in the Margin A Law book published by order of the House of ComoÌ„ns this Parliament as appears in the last leafe of the 2. part of the Institutes published likewise by their Order The Resolutions of all the Iudges of England upon the said Statute of the 25 Edward 3. 〈◊〉 5. Iohn the Sollicitor in his speech upon the Araignment of the Flarle of Strafford Printed by order of the House of Commons .7 13. as appeares in the said third part of the Institutes Chap. High-Treason have been that to imprison the King untill hee agree to certaine demands is High-Treason to seize his Ports Forts Magazine for Warre are High Treason to alter the Lawes is High Treason The word King in the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. c. p. 2. must be understood of the Kings naturall person for that person can only die have a Wife have a Son or be imprisoned The Priviledge of Parliament protects no man from treason or felony 4 pars insti c. Parl. p. 25â— howbeit he be a Member much lesse can they protect others Those who cannot protect themselves have no colour to make Ordinances to protect others who are no Members The Statute of 11 Hen. 7. c. 1. doth by expresse words free all persons who adhere to the King 11 H. 7. c. 1. The Army by an Act of Indemnity free themselyes from all those dangers Stamfo d. l. 2. fol. 99. 18 Ed. 3. Statutes at larg 144. 20 Ed. 3. c. 1. 11 Râ—â— 2. c. 10. 4 pars instit pag. 23.48.29 which an Ordinance can no more do than repealé all the Lawes of the Land the whole and sole power by Law to pardon all Treasons Felonies c. being solely and wholly in the King as is cleared by the Statute of 27 H. 8. c. 24. and the Law of the Land in all times Having shewed the danger of the Army by the Law of the Land next consider thâ— Ordinance of the Lords and Commons published the 22 of May last for their Indemnity by the ensuing discourse it doth appeare they have no Indemnity at all thereby The Indemnity proposed by the Ordinance is for an Act done by the authority of the Parl or for the service or benefit thereof and that the Judges and all other Ministers of Justice shall allow thereof This Ordinance cannot secure the Army for these reasons 1. Their Judges are sworne to doe justice according to the Law of the Land 3 Pars inst p. 21. 2 pars inst 47.48 1 pars inst 19â— Princes case 8 reports and therefore the Judges must be forsworne men if they obey it because an Ordinance of both Houses is no Law of the Land and no man can believe they will perjure themselves so palpably and visibly in the eye of the World 2. All tryals for treasons felonies robberies Magna Charta cap. 19. 25 Ed. 3. c. 4. 28 H. 3. c. 3. 37 Ed. 3. c. 42 Ed. 3. c. 3. and such like capitall offences are by the Law of the Land to be by indictment of a Jury appointed out of the Neighbourhood where the offence was done there is no common Jury-man but understands what the Law is in these cases as well as the best Lawyers and the Law makes the Jury Judges of the fact Doclaration of the Army presented at Walden and printed by the appointment of the Officers subscribed whereby the souldier is left to their mercy whom he hath offended as some of them have lately had wofull experience and thereupon doe rightly apprehend their danger Now no man can think that the Jurors will perjure themselves to acquit the souldiers for robbing and plundring of the Countryes and thereby utterly destroy their own Rights and Properties 3. If the Judges conceive as they may that the taking of other mens horses or goods is not by the Authority of Parliament or for the service and benefit thereof the souldier dies for it they may say to steale or rob any man of his goods is not for the Parliaments service but against it which was alwayes the sense of the people and doubtlesse the Jurors will not think otherwise 4. This Ordinance is restrained to the authority 4 Pars inst p. 1. 3 pars inst p. 22. 1 pars inst p. 1. 28 H. 8. f. iâ— Dier 38 H. 8. fol. 60. 12 H. 7. 20. 1 pars instit 159. Princes case 8 Reports service or benefit of the Parliament the Lords and Commons make no more a Parliament by the Law of the Land than a body without a head makes a man for a Parliament is a body composed of a King their head the Lords and Commons the Members All three together make one body and that is the Parl. and no other and the Iudges may ought and I believe wil according to their oathes proceed as not bound at all by this Ordinance For it is restrained to the authority of Parliam service or benefit thereof whereas the two Houses are not the Paâ—l but onely parts thereof and by the abuse and misunderstanding of this word Parliament they have miserably deceived the people 5. This Ordinance is against their Ordiinance which expressly prohibits plundring 28 Aug. 1642. Col. of Ord. first part 565.592.605 severall Ordinances and so there is one Ordinance against another whereby their Judges have an out let to proceed on the one or the other and thereby the Army hath no manner of security 6. The word Parliament is a French word howbeit such Assemblies were before the Norman Conquest heere and signifies in that language to consult and treat 1 Pars inst 109. 1 pars
Subject is bound to govern in ayd of him we only say that his power is distinguishable from his person and when he himselfe makes a distinction betwixt them commanding one thing by his legall Writs Courts and Officers and commanding another thing extrajudicially by word of mouth Letters or Ministers we are to obey his power rather than his person 5. We take not from the King all power of pardoning Delinquents we onely say it is not proper to him quarto modo For if the King pardon him which hath murthered my son his pardon shall not cut me off from my appeal and 't is more unreasonable that the Kings pardon should make a whole State which hath suffered remedilesse than any private man So if the King should deny indemnity to those which in the furie of war have done things unjustifiable by the Lawes of peace and thereby keep the wounds of the state from being bound up 't is equitable that an Act of Indemnity should be made forcible another way And if his will not hold yet this is no good consequence the King is absolute in point of pardons therefore he is absolute in all things else and the parliament hath no power to discharge Delinquencies therefore it hath no power in other matters 6. The Parliament hath declared the King to be in no condition to governs but thir must not be interpreted rigidly and without distinction for if the King with his Sword drawn in his hand and pursuing the Parliament and their Adherents as Rebels be not fit for all Acts of Government yet it is not hereby insinuated that he is divested of the habit or right of Governing if he be unqualified now he is not unqualified for the future if he may not do things destructive to the parliament he is not barred from returning to the parliament or doing justice to the parliament This is a frivolous cavil and subâ—erfuge 7. We swear that the King is our supreme Governour over all persons and in all causes but we do not swear he is above all Law nor above the safetie of his people which is the end of the Law and indeed Paramount to the Law it selfe If he be above Law or liable to no restraint of our Law then we are no freer than the French or the Turks and if he be above the prime end of Law common safety then wee are not free as the French or Turks For if the totall subversion of the French or Turk were attempted they might by Gods Law imprinted in the book of Nature justifie a self-defence but we must remedilesly perish when the King pleases to command our throats Besides how atchieved the King of England such a Supremacy above all Law and the community it selfe for whose behoofe Law was made If Gods donation be pleaded which is not speciall to him or different from what other Kings may pretend to then to what purpose serve our Lawes nay to what purpose serve the Lawes of other Countryes for by this generall donation all Nations are condemned to all servitude as well as we If the Law of this Land bee appealed to what Bookes hath Mr. Ienkins read where hath he found out that Lex Regia whereby the people of England have given away from themselves all right in themselves Some of our Bookes tell us that we are more free than the French that the King canot oppresse us in our Personâ— oâ— Estates by imprisonment denying justice or laying Taxes without our consents Other Books tell us that the safety of the people is the supreme Law and that the King hath both God and the Law for his Superiour But all this is nothing to learned M. Jenkins 8. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are compleat or formally binding without the Kings assent yet this is still to be denied that therefore without this assent particularly exprest the two Houses can do nothing nor have any virtual power at all no not to examine M. Ienkins nor to do any other thing of like nature though in order to publike justice and safetie I have done and wish M. Ienkins would call in and lick up again his black infamous execrable reproaches so filthily vomited out against the Parliament To the first I Was examined by a Committee appointed by the House of Commons I say and said that the House of Commons have no power to examine me for that it is no Court every Court hath power to examine upon Oath this power the House of Commons never claimed The Court of Pye-powders court-Baron Hundred court County court and every other Court of Record 5. H. 4. c. 3. 3 H. 6.46 19 H. 6.43 â—5 H. 6.5 or not of Record hath power to examine upon Oath and an examination without Oath is a communication onely examination in Law is upon Oath There is no court without a power of tryall Sir Anthony Maynes â—ase Cook 1. par Reports Lit. 2. lib. Sect. 194. 6. H. 4.1 the House of Commons have no power to try any offence nor ever practised it by Bill Indictment Information Plaint or Originall Writ to reduce it to tryall nor to try it by Verdict Demurrer or Examination of Witnesses upon oath without which there can be no condemnation or judgement and that which can attaine to no reasonable end the Law rejects as a thing inutile and uselesse Sapiens incipiâ—a â—ine The Writ whereby they are called gives them power Ad faciendum consentiendum â— paâ—s instit fol. â— 9. To what To such things Quae ibidem de communi consilio ordiâ—â—â— contingerint viz. in the Parliament This makes nothing at all for a Court for the House of Commons that consilium which that Writ intends is cleared partly by the Writ for chusing Knights c. For the King by that Writ is said to resolve to consult and treate with the Prelates and Peeres of the Kingdome for and touching the great concernments of the Common-wealth for the King never sits in the House of Commons and this also is made evident by the Writs to the Prelates Peeres Judges and to his Counsell at Law The words in the Writ are To appeare and attend the Parliament Consilium impensuri the one doth conâ—ulere the other sacere conseâ—tire The House of Lords where the King sits in person assisted by His Lords Judges Serjeants Atturney 7 H. 6.28 1 H. 7. â—0* 13 Ed. 3. c. 5. 4 pars inst p. 21. Sollicitor Masters of the Chancery is a court of Record to many purposes set down in the Bookes of Law and the Statutes of the Land and that court is onely in the House of Lords where the King sits A court must either bee by the Kings Patent Statute Law or by the common Law Plowd Com. 319. which is common and constant usage the House of commons hath no Patent to bee a court nor Statute Law to bee a court nor common usage they have no Journall Booke but since Edward
affirmes That the sending propositions to the King and desiring his concurrence is scarce worth an answer for Subjects may humbly petition for that which is their strict right property c. The propositions sent to Newcastle are in print wherein the two Houses are so farre from humbly petitioning that they stile not themselves his Majesties Subjects as appeares by the propositions That they have a strict right or property to any one of these propositions is a strange assertion every one of them being against the Lawes now in force Have the two Houses a strict right property to lay upon the people what Taxes they shall judge meet To pardon all Treasons c. that is one of their Propositions Have they a strict right and property to pardon themselves and so for all the rest of their Propositions These propositions have been Voted by both Houses the Kings assent they being drawn into Bills makes them Acts of Parliament Hath the King no â—ight to assent or dis-assent 12 H. 7 20. 1 Iac. c. 1.1 Car. c. 7. Waâ— the sending but a Complement All our law-Law-books and Statutes speak otherwise This Gent. and others must give an account one time oâ— other for such delusions put upon the people AD. 4. The Gent. saith They affirme not that the Kings power is separated from his person so as the two Spencer affirmed c. His Majesties person iâ— now at Holâ—by under their Guards have they not severed his power from him when by no power they have left him he can have two of his Chaplains who have not taken their Covenant to attend him for the exercise of his conscience For the three conclusions of the Spencers 15. Ed 2. Exilium Hugonis Calvins case 1 E. c. 2.7 pars â—â—ports 11. do not the two Houses act every of them They say his Majesty hath broken his Trust touching the Government of his people They have raised armies to take him they haue taken him and imprisoned him they governe themselves they make Laws impose Taxes make Judges Sheriffes and take upon them omnia insignia summae potestatis Is not this to remove the King for misdemeanours to reforme per asperte to govern in aid of him the three conclusions of the Spencers Doe they think the good people of England are become stupid and will not at length see these things The Gentleman saith Plowd 4. Eliz. 213. the Kings Power and his person are indivisible They doe not separate his power from his Person but distinguish it c. His power is in his legall Writs Courts and Officers when they counterfeit the Great Seal and seale Writs with the same make Judges themselves Courts and Officers by their owne Ordinances against his consent declared under his true Great Seale of England not by word of mouth letters or ministers onely their Seale is obeyed their own Writs their own Judges their owne Courts their own Officers and not the Kings The time will come when such strange actions discourses will be lamented AD. 5. The Gentleman goes on We take not from the King all power of pardening Delinguents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo c. What doe you meane by quarte modo I am sure Omnis Rex Angliae solus Rex semper Rex can doe it and none else read the bookes of the Law to this purpose collected by that reverend and learned Judge Stanford Stanford pleas 99. 27 H. 8. c. 24. Dier 163. from all Antiquity to his time who died in the last yeare of King Philip and Queene Maries Reigne you shall finde this a truth undeniable and this power was never questioned in any Age in any Book by any untill this time that every thing is put to the question You Gentlemen who proâ—esse the Law and maintaine the party against the King returne at length and bring not so much scandall upon the Law which preserves all by publishing such incredible things We hold only what the law holds Bract. lib 3 cap 14. fol. 132. 1. pars Instit pag. 344. Plow 3. Eliz 236. 237. the Kings Prerogative and the subjects Liberty are determined and bounded and admeasured by a written Law what they are we doe not hold the King to have any more power neither doth his majesty claime any other but what â—he Law gives him the two Houses by the Law of this Land have no colour of power either to make Delinquents or pardon Delinquents the King contradicting and the Army under Sir Thomas Fairfax howbeit but Souldiers doe now understand that to be Law and doe now evidently see and assuredly know that it is not an Ordinance of the two Houses but an art of Parliament made by the King Lords and Commons that will secure them and let this Army remember their exccuted fellow-Souldier and the Law was alwaies so taken by all men untill these troubles that have begoâ— Monsters of opinions AD. 6. This Gentleman sayes The Parliament hath declared the King to be 〈◊〉 condition to governe c. There is no end of your distinctions I and you professe the Law shew me Law for your distinctions or lâ—tter syllable or line in any Age in the books of the Law that the King may in one time be in no condition to govern and yet have the habit of governing and another time he may viz when the two Houses will suffer him the Law saith thus Vbi lex non distinguit non est distinguendum He saies The King is not barred from returning to His Parliament as he calls the two Houses he knowes the contrary the whole City knows the contrary Nos juris consulti sumus sacerdotes as Justinian the Emperour hath it in the first book of his Institutions and therefore knowledge and truth should come from our lips Worthy and ingenious men will remember and reflect upon that passage of that good and wise man Seneca Non qua itur sed qua eundum follow not the wayes of the Lawyers of the House of Commons God forgive them I am sure the King will if they be wise and seek it in time AD. 7. The Gent sayes â—e swear that the King is our supreme Goverour ouer all persons in all causes 5 Eliz. ch 1. Cawdreys case 5 pars fol. 1. c. Why hath he left out the word onely for the Oath the Members now take is that King Charles is now the only and supreame Governour in all causes over all persons and yet they keep their only Supreme Governour now in prison and act now in Parliament by vertue of their prisoners Writ and by a concurrent power in this Parliament and by their own strict right and property as the Gentleman affirms in his Answer These things agree well with their Oath This Oath is allowed by the common-Law Law of the Land that the King is the onely Supreame Governour in all causes over all persons This Oath is taken now in
besides that it incites men to selfe ends will be a constant charge to the Kingdome by reason of the wages of parliament men p. 141. Mischiefs by the length of parliaments p. 121. Certaine Erroneus Positions and Proceedings of both Houses of Parliament discovered and confuted THe two Houses without the King are not the Parliament but onely parts thereof and by the abuse and misunderstanding of this word Parliament they have miserably deceived the people p. 80.156 The King is not vertually in the two Houses p. 12.13.20.21 The two Houses are not above the King but the King is Superiour to them p. 11.19.23 24.133 The tenents of the Spencers are the ground of their proceedings p. 10.22 And upon their pretences they take upon them the Government at this time They have destroyed above a 100. Acts of parliament even all concerning the King the Church and Church men and in effect Magna Charta and Charta de Forresta which are the Common Lawes of the Land p. 154. They have fifteene severall illegall wayes raised Money upon the Subject this present parliament p. 35. There is no Crime from Treason to Trespasse but they are guilty of p. 142. They are not to bee Judges in their owne cause p. 15. Of their League and Covenant with the Scots p. 158.160 The two Houses by the Law of this Land have no colour of power to make Delinquents or pardon Delinquents the King contradicting p. 119.131 Certaine Erroneous Positions and Proceedings of the House of Commons discovered and confuted THey cannot bee Members of the House of Commons who were not recident in the Counties or Burroughs for which they were elected at the time of the Teste of the Writ of Summons of parliament p. 149. If any undue Returne bee made the person Returned is to continue a Member and the tryall of the Falcity of the Returne is to bee before the Justice of Assize in the proper County this condemnes the Committee for undue Elections p. 148. The House of Commons cannot Elect and Returne Members of that House p. 144. The ejecting of a Member that hath sitten is against Law also their new elections are against Law And by this it may be judged what a House of Commons we have p. 148. Breaches of priviledges of parliament may bee punished in other Courts p. 149. And what need then of the Committee for priviledges The house of Commons by their Writ have no separate power giuen them over the Kings people p. 144. The house of Commons cannot imprison any who are not their Members or Disturbers of their Members in the service of the parliament p. 143 144 145. The House of Commons no Court p. 115 116.144 145 146 c. The Propositions sent by the Parliaments of both Kingdomes to His Majestie at New-Castle pag. 6. GEnerall Reasons against those propositions p. 11.15.128 Reasons in particular against those propositions For disabling the King to pardon p. 13. For altering Religion in point of Government 37.61.63 For sale of the Bishops Lands p. 36. For taking away the Booke of Common-prayer p. 37. For taking from his Majesty all the power by Land and Sea p. 37. For laying upon the people what Taxes they shall think meet p. 128. Besides in their propositions they doe not style themselves His Majesties Subjects p. 128. The Kings Party pag. 36 37 38. THe Subjects are commanded by Law to Assist the King in War 36. Those who adhere to the King are freed by the Statute of the 11th Hen. 7. p. 39.78.97 Master Prins objections against the King and his party answered p. 47. c. The Parliaments Party are Delinquents A Delinquent is hee who adheres to the kings enemies this shewes who are Delinquents p. 7. The Army serving the Parliament THe summe of the Ordinance for the Indempnity of the Army p. 79. It can no more free the Souldiers than repeale all the Lawes of the Land p. 78. The Judges are sworn to doe Justice according to the Lawes of the Land p. 79. An Act of Oblivion and a Generall Pardon the only means to Indempnifie the Army and the whole kingdome p. 84. And the conclusion of all the other bookes The Army Rescuing the King TO deliver the King out of Traiterous hands is our bounden duty by the Law of God and the Land p. 155. By the Law of the Land when Treason or Felony is committed it is lawfull for every subject who suspects the Offender to apprehend him so that Justice may be done upon him according to Law p. 157. As the Army hath power so adhering to the King all the Lawes of God Nature and man are for them p. 166. None by the Law of the Land can in this kingdome have an Army but the King p. 153. The Liberty of the Subject Our Liberties were allowed in the 17th of King John and confirm'd in the 9th of Hen. 3. and are called Mâgna Charta and Charta de Forresta p. 6.117.130 Magna Charta is irrepealable p. 62. Severall Bils for our Liberties passed at the beginning of this Parliament p. 34. And how secured The Liberty of the Subject violated by the two Houses of Parliament 140 Miscellanea THe Lord Cookes Institutes published by the Order of the House of Commons p. 77. Of the Bill passed this parliament for taking away the Bishops Votes in Parliament p. 31. Against that saying that the King got away the Great Seal surreptitiously from the Parliament p. 45. Of Jack Cade p. 160. Treasons Murthers Felonies and Capitall Crimes to bee tryed by Iuries and not otherwise but by Act of parliament p. 102. The Chancellors or Keepers Oath 174. The present Commissioners have no Court Seal nor commission 175. The King the Laws and kingdome cannot bee severed The only quarrell was for the Militia which the Laws have ever setled upon the King 177. No peace can possibly bee had without the King ibid. No man can devise lands till he be 21 years of age 1. 84. An Infant of 17 years may dispose of goods by will by the opinion of some but by others not till 18. 181. The Court of Wards had no jurisdiction over the personall estate 185. Peace and plenty abounded during his Majesties Government 187. Since the two Houses have usurped the power the kingdom hath been in a sad condition 19. Nothing delivered in this book for Law but what the house of commons have avowed for Law this Session 194. The 24 positions of Law set out in divers books by the House of commons order p. 196. It is honourable to dye for the Laws 202. Good counsell for them if it be taken in time 203. That which will save this Land from destruction is an Act of Oblivion and his Majesties Gracious Generall pardon the Souldiers their Arrears and every man his own and truth and peace established in this Land and favourable regard had to the satisfaction of tender Consciences God save the King To the Honourable Societies of Grayes
England and having many adherents And that Statute to that end affirmes no such power in the two Houses which is the question but in Queene Elizabeth and the two Houses which makes against the pretence of this time Master Prynne fol. 104 of his booke intituled the Parliaments supreme power c. Objecting the Statute of the first of Queens Elizabeth and his owne Oath that the King is the onely supreame Goverhour of this Realme Answers The Parliament is the supreme power and the King supreme Governour And yet there he allowes him a Negaâ—ive Voyce and fol. 107. confesseth that Acts of Parliament translated the Crowne from the right Heires at Common-Law to others who had no good Title then the Parlimentary Title makes not the King so powerfull in truth that it escapes from a man unawares To make a distinction betweene supreame Governour and supreame power is very strange for who can governe without power The King assembles the Parliament by his Writ adjournes Vide Speep 645.4 par Instit 27. 2. prorogues and dissolves the Parliament by the Law at his pleasure as is evident by constant practise the House of Commons never sate after an adjournement of the Parliament by the Kings Command Where is the supreame power The King by his Oath is bound to deny no man right 18 Ob. much lesse the Parliament to agree to all just and necessary Lawes proposed by them to the King This is the substance of the discourse against the Kings Negative Voyce The King is so hound as is set downe in the Objection Sol. but who shall judge whether the Bill proposed be just and necessary For all that they do propose are so pretended and carried in either House sometimes by one or two Voyces or some sew as aforesaid and certainly it hath been shewen the King his Counsell of State his Judges Sergeants Attorney Sollicitor and twelve Masters of the Chancery can better judge of them then two or three or few more Mr. Prynne fol. 45. In his Booke of the Parliaments interest to nominate Prnvy Councellors calleth the opinion of the Spencers to divide the Person of the King from his Crowne Calvins case 7 pars fol. â—1 a stringe opinion and cites Calvins Case but leaves out the conclusions therein mentioned fol. 11. Master Prynne saith there But let this opinion be what it will without the Kings Grace and Pardon it will goe very farre and two Acts of Parliament there mentioned are beyond an opinion And in his Book of the opening of the Great Seale fol. 17. The Parliament hath no jurisdiction to use the Grear Seale for Pardons Generall or Particular Where is the supreme power then Mr. 19. Ob. Prynnes opening of the Seale pag. 19. saith the Noblemen and State the day after the Funerall of King Henry the third King Edward the first his Sonne being in the Holy Land made a new Great Seale and Keepers of the same And in Henry the sixts time in the first yeare of his Reigne the like was done in Parliament A facto all jus Sol. is no good Argument for than in Edward the firsts time it was no Parliament for King Henry the third was dead which dissolyed the Parliament if called in his time and it could be no Parliament of Edward the firsts time for no Writ issued to summon a Parliament in his Name nor could issue but under that New Seale it was so suddainely done afterâ— Henry the thirds death King Edward the first being then in the Holy Land it was the first yeare of his Reigne and no Parliament was held that yeare nor the second yeare of his Reigne The first Parliament that was in his Reigne was in the third yeare of his Reigne as appeares by the printed Acts Also the making of that Seale was by some Lords then present What hand had the Commons in it Concerning the Seale made in Henry the sixths time the Protector was vice-Roy according to the course of Law and so the making of that Seale was by the Protector in the Kings name and that Protector Humphrey Duke of Gloucester as Protectour in the Kings Name summoned that Parliament and was Protector made by the Lords and not in Parliament as appeareth plainely for that Parliament was in the first of Henry the sixth and the first holden in his time and power given by Commission to the said Duke then Protector to summon that Parliament Prynne ibid. fol. 19. But the new counterfeit Seale was made when the King was at Oxford in his owne Kingdome and not in the holy Land Mr. 20 Ob. Prynne in his Booke of the two Houses power to impose Taxes restraines Malignants against any Habeaâ— Corpus c. saith that the Parliament is above Magna Charta and fol. 15. ibid. The Parliament hath power over Magna Charta to repeale the same when there is cause This Argument supposeth that they have the Kings power Sol. which hath appeared formerly they have not But suppose they had Magna Charta containes many Morall Lawes which by the Law of the Land a Parliament cannot alter 21 H. 7.2 D. and Student 2 Dialogue For example it saith cap. 11. Justice shall not be sold delayed nor denyed to any man but by this Argument the Parliament may make Law to delay deny and to sell Justice which surely is a very ill position to maintaine What they would have doth now by the Propositions sent to Newcastie to his Majesty appeare whereby they would have him divest himselfe and settle in them all his Kingly power by Sea and Land and of themselves to have power without him to lay upon the people of this Land what taxes they thinke meet to abolish the Common prayer-booke to abolish Episcopacie and to introduce a Church Government not yet agreed but such as they shall agree on His Majesty finding a prevailing party in both Houses to steere this course and being chased away with Tumults from London leaves the Houses for these Reasons viz. First because to alter the Government for Religion is against the Kings Oath Secondly against their Oaths For every of them hath sworne in this Parliament That His Majesty is the onely supreme Governour in all Causes Ecclesiasticall and over all persons Thirdly this course is against Magna Charta the 1. Chap. and the last Salve sint Episcopis omnes liber tales sue Confirmed by thirty two Acts of Parliament and in the two and fortieth of Edward the third the first Chapter enacts if any Statute be made to the contrary it shall be holden for none and so it is for judgements at Law in the 25 of Edward the 1. chap. 1.2 The great Charter is declared to be the Common Law of the Land Fourthly they endeavout to take away by their Propositions the Government of Bishops which is as ancient as Christianity in this Land and the Books of Common prayet settled by five Acts of Parliament and compiled by
and in laying Burdens upon the people and in breaking all the Oathes Vowes and promises they ever made As the Army hath power 2 3 E 6. c. 2. 11 H 7 c. 1. Calvins case 7. pars Cook fol. 11 so now adhering to the King all the Lawes of God Nature and Man are for them their Armies are just and blessed and the King is bound in justice to reward his Deliverers with honour profit and meere Liberty of conscience To the VI. Quaere All the sixth Quaere containes calumnies cast upon the Army the new Elections are against all the Lawes mentioned in the Margin and are against the Ejection of the old Members and by this it may be judged 11 M 4 c. 1 1-h 5 0 1.8 h 6 c. 7 23 h. 6 c. 15. what a House of Commons we have By the said Lawes it appeares that if any undue returne be made the person returned is to continue a Member the Sheriffes punishment is two hundred pounds one to the King and the other to the party that is duly elected Imprisonment for a yeare without Bail or mainprize and that person who is unduly returned shall serve at his own charge and have no benefit at the end of the Parliament by the Writ De solutione Militum Civium Burgensium Parliament And the trial of the falsity of the returne is to be before the Justices of Assizes in the proper county or by action of Debt in any Court of Record This condemnes the Committee for undue Elections 3. Ed. 4.20.5 Ed. 4.42 which hath been practised but of late times for besides these Lawes it is a-Maxime of the Common Law art Averment is not receivable against the returne of the Sheriffe for his Returne is upon Oath which Oath is to be credited in that Suit wherein the Returne is made The said Statutes condemne Elections of such men who were not resâ—ant and dwelt in the County or Boroughs for which they were returned and any abusive practise of late times to the contrary is against the Law and ought not to be allowed To the VII Quaere The Quaerist saith that the Votes of the Independents in the Houses were arbitrary exorbitant and irregular and that they disposed and singred more of the common Treasure than others That whole Quare I believe is false and slandeâ—ous and the Author ought to make it good or else to undergo the Law of Talnio 37. Ed. 5. c. 17. which is to suffer such punishment failing of his poof as the accused should in case of proofe made To the VIII Quaere This Quaere is all minatory and threatning and the contrary of every part is true by the deliverance of the King and Kingdom from the bondage of that party in the 2 Houses by the Army their renown will be eversasting they secure themselves they content and please the Kingdome City and Countrey as appeares by their confluence to see his Majesty and the Army and their acclamations for his Majesties safety and restitution all which doth evidence to every one of the army how acceptable the intentions of the Army are to the people of this Land who have been so long inthralled Sir Thomas Fairfaâ— let your Worthinesse remember your extraction and your Ladies by the grace and favour of the Prince to be in the ranke of Nobility Remember what honour and glory the present Age and all posterity will justly give to the Restorer of the King to his Throne of the Lawes to their strength and of the afflicted people of this Land to peace Let the Colonels and Commanders under You and likewise your Souldiery rest assured that they shall not only share in the renowne of this Action but also shall have such remuneration as their haughty Courage and so high a virtue doth deserve This his Majesty can and will do the Houses neither will nor can and God blesse you all and prosper you I Conclude all as I have alwayes done without an Act of Oblivion a generall pardon the arrears of the Souldiery paid and a regard to Liberty of conscience this Kingdom will certainly be ruined Iudge Ienkins PLEA delivered into the Earl of Manchester and the Speaker of the House of COMMONS Sitting in the CHANCERY at WESTMINSTER Which was read by their Command in open Court the 14th of Febr. 1647. And there avowed By DAVID IENKINS Prisoner in NEVVGATE LONDON Printed In the Yeare 1648. Judge Jenkin's PLEA Delivered in to the Earle of Manchester and the Speaker of the House of COMMONS sitting in the CHANCERY at WESTMINSTER I Have been required to appear in the Chancery the Twelfth of this instant February before Commissioners appointed by the two Houses for the keeping of their Great Seal and managing the Affaires of the Chancery I cannot nor ought nor will submit to this power I am a Judge sworne to the Lawes The Law is First that this Court is Câ—ram Râ—gâ— in Cancellaria 4 pars instfol 79 â— E 4 fol 5 â— E 4 f 15 Secondly the Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seale is by delivery of the Great Seale to him by the KING and by taking of an Oath The Oath followeth in these words 1. 42 pars inâ—â— 10 R 2 rot Parlanum â— Well and truly to serve our Sovcraigne Lord the King and his people in that Office 2. To do right to all manner of people poor and rich after the Laws and usages of this Realm 3. Truly to Counsell the King and his Coun cell to conceate and keep 4. Not to suffer the hurt or disheriting of the King or that the rights of the Crown be decreased by any means â—â—farre as he may let it 5. If he may not let it be shall maâ— it clearly and expresly to be knowne tâ— the King with his advice and counâ— sell 6. And that be shall do and purchase the Kings profit in all that he reasonably may as God him help and the contents of Gods book The said Commissioners among others have Imprisoned their King Declar. 17 Ian. 1647 have declared to the Kingdome that they will make no Addresses or Applications to him nor receive any from him Have counterfeited a new great Seal Articulisup chartrs c. 5 and after destroyed the true old great Seale which belonged by the Law to the Kings custody These Commissioners have had no Seale delivered to them by his Majesty have taken no such Oath or full ill kept it and for these evident reasons grounded upon the sundamental Lawes of this Land these Commissioner have neither Court Scale or Commission and therefore I ought not against â—he Lawes against my knowledg and against my conscience submit to their power To affirâ—e that they maintaine the Kings power and authority in relation to His Lawes as they often do and restraine only his person is strange They must be remembred that the House of commons this Parliament gave in charge to Mr. Solicitor upon the prosecution of the