Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	house_n	king_n	lord_n	2,914	5	3.9837	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A78598	The charge against the King discharged: or, The king cleared by the people of England, from the severall accusations in the charge, delivered in against him at Westminster-Hall Saturday last, Jan. 20. by that high court of justice erected by the Army-Parliament; which is here fully answered in every particular thereof. Viz. The Parliaments propositions to the King. The Kings to the Parliament. The Kings condescentions to the Parliaments propositions. The overture of a treaty at Windsor. The massacre in London by vertue of the Kings commission. The coronation oath. The private articles, match with Spaine, and the match of France., King James death, Rochel. The German horse, loanes, and conduct money, privy seales, monopolies. Torturing our bodies, and slitting noses. The long intermission of Parliaments. The new liturgie sent to Scotland, calling and dissolving the short Parliament. The summoning this present Parliament. The Queens pious design, commissions to popish agents. The bringing up the northern Army. The Kings offer to the Scots of the plunder of the city. The Kings journey into Scotland. The businesse of Ireland solely cleered. The cloathes seized by his Majesties souldiers. The Kings letter to the Pope. The Kings charging the Members with his coming to the House. The list of armes and ammunition taken in his papers. ... The calling the Parliament at Oxford. The cessation in Ireland. The peace made there. The Kings protestation against popery. The letters to Marquesse Ormond.		1649 (1649)	Wing C2046; Thomason E542_10; ESTC R204182	27,986	35

remember that by your Order the Judges of Assize gave us notice thereof At Summer Assizes 1641. and highly extolled his Majesties goodnesse in passing so many gracious Acts for us And must these grievances now after seven years redresse be objected to us against him And must the King who by your owne Law can do no wrong in these cases be prosecuted and those vile Monopolists Sir Hen. Mildmay Sir John Wollaston and M. Lawrence Whitaker and also White the Sope-boiler at Lambeth be protected and cherished by you 7. Concerning the Spanish Fleet That it was bound to Flanders with new levied Souldiers to recruit their Army there which souldiers were without Arms and without Officers as we remember the Fleet was without Powder and therefore they intended no invasion being not provided for it Concerning the torturing of our bodies by whippings slitting of noses cutting off eares c. and the Lording over our soules by Oaths Excommunications c. We find that these judgements and proceedings upon our bodies passed in due forme of Law in Courts of Justice and that the Oaths Excommunications Ceremonies and Canons were no other and no otherwise exercised then was agreeable to the Lawes and Government established But we cannot but be sensible that our sufferings in every kind have been much more during your reigne then they were in his Majesties reigne for how have you devoured our estates by Taxes Free-quarter and that Compendium of all slavery the Excize how have you destroyed our bodies by strict imprisonment and cruell starving and how have you indeavoured to damne our soules and to send us to hell by whole-sale by your illegall anti-legall disloyall Vowes Covenants and Ingagements Concerning the long intermission of Parliaments and the two Principles of Tyranny We find that the Parliament begun 3. Caroli was dissolved upon your Remonstrances See the Petition of Right 3. Carol. and we believe that thereupon followed the long intermission of Parliaments for twelve years after And that it was in the Parliament aforesaid the King avowed those Maximes or Principles that he oweth an accompt of his actions to none but God alone See the Petition of Right 3. Carol. And that the Houses of Parliament joynt or seperate have no power either to make or declare any Law which induceth us to believe that even then there was some assault made by the two Houses upon the Royall Authority which made the King to avow those principles The anti-monarchicall spirit beginning to work in that Parliament and so making the King averse from Parliaments Nor do we see how these principles are introductive of Tyranny but sure we are the contrary are destructive of Monarchy And touching the first we learn from Rom. 13.4 That the King is the Minister of God and who art thou that judgest another mans servant to his own Master he standeth or falleth Ro. 14.4 The Law also averreth that the Crown of England is in no earthly subjection but immediately Subject to God in all things touching the regality of the same Crown and to no other 16. R. 2. c. 5. And touching the second Principle the Law also tells us That it is of the Kings Regality to grant or deny such of their Petitions for that was then the usuall forme of presenting their desires as pleaseth himselfe 2. H. 5. And that 1. Jacob. 1. the two Houses craving the Royall assent to that Act confesse without it the Act cannot be compleat or perfect c. Sir Edward Cooke also in the fourth Part of his Institutes a Book printed this Parliament by your Order pa. 25. saies That there is no Act of Parliament but must have the consent of the Lords and Commons and the Royall assent of the King The same also is true concerning the declaring of Law as appeares by the 25. Edward 3. The words whereof are And because many other like cases of Treason which are not expressed in that Statute may happen in time to come it is accorded That if any other case supposed Treason which is not above specified doth happen before any Justices the Justices shall tarry without any going to Judgement of the Treason till the cause be shewed and declared before the King and his Parliament whether it be judged Treason or other Felonie Which Declaration ought to be by the whole Parliament and not by the King and Lords or King and Commons or Lords and Commons Cook Instit 3. part fol. 22. Now Innovations and Novelties in Parliamentary proceedings are most dangerous and to be refused Cook 4. part Instit p. 11. Concerning Scotland the new Liturgy and Canons and the cancelling and burning the articles of Pacification We find that the Liturgie and Canons were framed and sent thither with the advice or approbation of the Lords of the Councell of that Kingdome and if they were pursued with more vehemency then ought it must be imputed to the Ministers of that Kingdome that were trusted with it And that the Articles of Pacification were cancelled and burnt by the unanimous advice of the Privy Councell here after they had been first broken by the Scots And we cannot but wonder how you should take cognizance of transactions between his Majesty and his Subjects of Scotland especially after an Act of Oblivion Concerning the calling and dissolving the short Parliament We find that this was part of the Charge against the Earl of Strafford and the Archbishop of Canterbury though declined in the prosecution of them both and the reason hereof we conceive to be that Sir Hen. Vane Senior might not be questioned by whose false information and instigation that Parliament was unhappily dissolved that the Parliament being dissolved his Majesty tooke from his Subjects by power what he could not otherwise obtaine is one of the uncertainties in your Declaration that we except against Concerning the summoning this present Parliament and his Majesties expectation of supply against the Scots and his protecting of wicked Councellors We find that the King had little reason to hope for any assistance against the Scots knowing as he did who called them in and that from the Scots themselves whilst he was at Yorke a Secretary of the Scots Lords at Newcastle telling some English taken prisoners at Newburne That their coming in had not been but by the invitation of the English And that the King excepted no man of what quality or neernesse soever unto him from a legall triall leaving unto you the Earl of Strafford the Archbishop of Canterbury all the Judges and whomsoever you would accuse in so much that you examined and committed the Queenes Confessor and examined the Ladies of her Bedchamber and your Serjeant at Armes presumed so far as to come into the Kings withdrawing Roome next unto his Bed-chamber to cite and summon persons of greatest quality and neernesse unto himselfe Concerning the Queens pious Designe c. We find that the Queenes Designe if any were was most industriously examined by you and