A Plain and Easie CALCULATION Of the NAME MARK and NUMBER of the Name Of the BEAST Wherein these three Points are declared First The Name in the Apocalyptical style is no other but the Universal Headship of the Beast opposed to the Name Power and Headship of the Lamb. Secondly The Number in the same style is the Number of Years to the setting up of this Name or Headship in which respect it is called The Number of the Name Thirdly The Truth of the Exposition is cleared by agreement of all Particulars both in the Text and in the whole Prophecy and by the Event of things a sure Interpreter of Prophecy Humbly Presented To the studious Observers of Scripture-Prophecies GOD'S Works and the Times By NATHANIEL STEPHENS Minister of Penny-Drayton in Leicestershire Whereunto is prefixed A Commendatory EPISTLE written by Mr. Edm. Calamy LONDON Printed by Ia. Cottrel for Matth Keynton at the Fountain Nath Heathcoat at the gilded Acorn and Hen Fletcher at the three gilt Cups in S. Pauls Church-yard 1656. To the Reader THat which one faith of the Book of Leviticus may be also truly said of the Book of the Revelation That it contains as many Mysteries as Words and as many Sacraments as Syllables Hence it was that Calvin P. Martyr Bucer Melancthon and Luther profess That they durst not adventure upon the Interpretation of it because of the difficulty they found in it Hence it is also that so many by adventuring into this Sea have made Shipwrack not onely of their own Credit but also of the Truth and have rather revealed their own weakness then the meaning of the Revelation And yet notwithstanding I dare not but much commend and incourage those that soberly humbly diligently and devoutly endeavor to finde out the meaning of this Book especially when I consider that saying of the holy Ghost Blessed is he that readeth and they that hear the words of this Prophâ—…y and keep those things which are written therein Onely I crave leave to suggest That whosoever will undertake to unfold these heavenly Mysteries must carefully avoid three Rocks 1. He must take heed of indulging too much to Fancy For Fancy is not a sure Foundation to build Divine Interpretations upon Many men have deceived themselves and others by trusting too much unto the Luxuriancy of their Fancy There is a learned man that makes Eight Chapters from the 4th to the 12th to be Predictions of the Destruction of Jerusalem by Titus c. And he pleaseth his Fancy making the Seals and the Trumpets to agree to this Conceit of his But if those Visions were presented to Saint John in Domitians time when he was Banished into Patmos which was after the Destruction of Jerusalem then surely this Fancy of his will prove a meer Dream and Delusion Now that John was banished in Domitians time and that he then had these Apocalyptical Visions made known to him is the Opinion of Irenaeus Tertullian Eusebius Hierome and divers others Indeed Epiphanius saith twice That he was banished in the time of Claudius the Emperour But Petavius that Comments upon him saith That he was herein greatly mistaken Paraeus saith It was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphanii in putting down Claudius for Domitianus Now to build such Noâ—…el Interpretations upon a Mistake of Epiphanius must needs it self be a great Mistake 2. He must take heed that he doth not appropriate what is spoken in general concerning the Churches of Christ in the world unto that particular Church and Nation in which he liveth This hath been a common Error of many Interpreters Hence it is that a learned man makes one of the Angels that poured out the Vials to be Queen Elizabeth another The Lord Cecil Lord Treasurer of England Hence it is also that we have been so much deceived in Expounding of the meaning of the two Witnesses and of their eminent slaughter at the end of their prophesying in Sack-cloth Every Nation according to the several Persecutions which it hath been under labouring to make the eminent slaughter of the Witnesses to Syncronize with its sad condition Some say It is past Others say It is yet to come And if I may be so bold as to interpose my judgement I should conceive That the latter of these two Opinions is the truest For if what this Author not onely saith but solidly proves be true That the Roman Antichrist did not arise till 606 years after Christ And if Antichrist must reign 1260 years and if this eminent slaughter must not be till toward the end of the Prophecy of the Witnesses then it will necessarily follow That it must be many years before this eminent slaughter will happen 3. He must take heed that he be not too peremptory in determining of Times and Seasons especially of such times which are yet to be fulfilled Our Saviour Christ saith It is not for you to know the Times or the Seasons which the Father hath put in his own power And we finde by sad Experience That they that have been most confident in defining the time when the Jews shall be converted and when Antichrist shall be destroyed have been wofully deceived One learned man makes the Conversion of the Jews to be in the year 1650 But we have lived to see this bold Assertion confuted Another will have it to happen 1655 but this also we now know to be false Another upon very weak grounds concludes That it will be in the year 1656. Another in the year 1665. Such peremptory Assertions and Conclusions argue great confidence but are built upon such weak Foundations that in the issue it will appear That they have deceived both themselves and others The Reverend and Learned Author of this ensuing Tractate hath undertaken a great and difficult task that is To unriddle not onely the Name and Mark of the Beast but also the Number of his Name which he hath performed with so much Modesty Humility Industry and Exquisite Care that I am much assured That whosoever will vouchsafe to read what he hath written though it may be he will not accord with him in all that he saith yet he will much commend his pains and learning and bless God for the good he receiveth by it It cost the Author no doubt a great deal of time to compose it And it is pity that so much pains and study should not be exposed to Publick view If Renowned and Learned Mr. VINES to whom this Author was well known and who had the perusal of this Work were now alive it should have had his publick Approbation But he is now with God And therefore give me leave in his stead Christian Reader to commend it to thy diligent perusal and to accompany it with my Prayers to God That that Holy Spirit which at first made known the Revelation unto Saint John would reveal the meaning of it to thee and me Your Servant in the Work of the LORD Edm Calamy TO
hath been introduced in the latter times But now it is not so with the Universal Headship of the Bishop of Rome this hath been in hatching in all Ages almost down from the times of the Apostles till in the 666th year from the beginning of the Roman as the Fourth Metal-Kingdom it began publickly to be established under the Emperor Phocas And here was the true beginning of the Name or Universal Headship of the Beast and of the Mark of the Name Fourthly The Mark in the Forehead and in the right Hand is a convertible and reciprocal Note to distinguish the Subjects of the Beast's Kingdom from other men and such a convertible Note is the publick Profession of a Roman Catholick And therefore many of their chief Writers do lay down Three Notes to prove a true Church by Verae fidei Professione by the Profession of the true Faith Sacramentorum Communione by participating of the Sacraments Pontifici Romano tanquam legitimo Pastori subjectione by subjection to the Bishop of Rome as to their lawful Pastor Fifthly The Mark in the Forehead and the right Hand must be such a thing as is in open view and in common use for so do these figurative Expressions import It is not said That he causeth all to receive a Mark in their Arm or Breast or Foot or Leg or any other Member of the Body but in the Forehead which is in open view and in the right Hand as being that part of the Body which is of most common use Now what is there among that Society of men which is of more common use and publick view than the Profession of a Roman Catholick Experience doth plainly shew That none can buy nor sell nor hold Land and Possessions but such a one as doth acknowledge this Universal Headship Sixthly The Mark in the Forehead and in the right Hand is in express and significant terms called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mark of his Name They have no rest day nor night that worship the Beast and his Image and receive the Mark of his Name chap. 14. vers 11. Now if you apply this to the Profession of a Roman Catholick all things will agree For what is a Roman Catholick but such a one as doth make it the chief and main Article of his Faith to acknowledge the Universal Headship of the Bishop of Rome and to subject his Conscience to the Laws made by that Authority And this we have already proved in the Third Chapter of this Treatise to be no other but the Name of the Beast For if there were no such thing as the Universal Headship Sovereign Power and Supreme Dominion of the Bishop of Rome what would become of the Faith and Profession of a Roman Catholick The Name or Universal Headship is that which giveth foundation to the Mark or Profession à priori and the Mark or Profession is that which declareth the Name or Universal Headship à posteriori And therefore in significant terms it is called the Mark of the Name Seventhly The Mark in the Forehead and in the right Hand is that which the Subjects of the Beast's Kingdom do assume to themselves as a matter of the greatest Honour and Dignity It is not a brand or nick-Name put upon them by their Enemies but that which themselves do voluntarily profess as may be seen in the whole Book of the Revelation Now such a Name is the Profession of a Roman Catholick The Roman Church comprehendeth all those Nations Languages and People that agree in the same Unity of the Faith under the Pope the Head And every Member of this Church of what sort soever maketh this as the principal Badge of his Profession to adhere to the Bishop of Rome as to the visible Head of the Church Eighthly The Mark in the right Hand and in the Forehead must be so expounded That in receiving of this men must be guilty of great sin against Christ and so consequently lyable to most grievous Judgements except they repent And therefore it is expressed That such shall be tormented day and night that worship the Beast and receive his Mark. Surely then that act of receiving the Mark of the Beast must needs be a grievous sin because the Lord Christ doth threaten it with so heavie a Judgement Now if you take the Profession of the Faith of a Roman Catholick as he professeth his subjection to the Bishop of Rome this is the greatest derogation that can be to Christ to supplant him in his Universal Headship For it is his peculiar and incommunicable Priviledge to be the only Head of the Church his Mystical Body Therefore whosoever he is that doth ascribe this to himself or to any other doth sin against the Kingly Office of Christ and doth what in him lies to dethrone and put Christ from his sovereign Dignity A Wife may be guilty of many Offences against her Husband but that is one of the most capital when she doth take another in his room for that is in a sense To break the bond and to cast him off from being her Husband when she doth give her self to another man A Roman Catholick then when he doth profess his Allegiance to the Bishop of Rome as to the visible Head of the Church this publick Profession of his is Rebellion and high Treason against the Lord Christ the true Head of the Church this doth supplant him of his Kingly Power and Dignity and therefore he doth threaten this sin with such grievous Judgements Those words therefore that are added as an Epiphonema in the end of the Revelation Whosoever shall adde to the words of this Book God will adde to him the Plagues that are written in this Book And if any man shall take away from the words of the Book of this Prophecie God will take away his part out of the Book of Life and out of the Holy City and from the things which are written in this Book chap. 22. vers 18. 19. Interpreters do usually apply this place to those that bring in Traditions but I think that here is a more special sense intended sutable to the nature of the Book for the principal scope of the Book of the Revelation is to speak of the Kingly Office of Christ and therefore they that set up another Head of the Church they do adde to the words of the Prophecie of this Book and God will adde to them the Plagues that are written in the Book So they that take away from the Kingly Office of Christ they do in a more special sense take away from the words of the Prophecie of this Book And therefore God will take away their part out of the New Ierusalem and from the things that are contained in the Book If these things are so I cannot but admire at Hugo Grotius a man of great Learning in these last times who in his Tract de Antichristo doth speak very favourably of the Universal Headship of the Bishop of Rome
in the Name of the Lord the trusting upon the Lord himself This doth make good that former rule What the Name of God is that God himself is And so by way of Opposition what the Name of the Beast is that is the Beast himself If he be described as a Mighty King we have cause to take his Name for his Monarchical Power and sovereignty Secondly We often reade in the New Testament of believing in the Name of the Son of God c. we do not then look to the Name Jesus or the Name Christ as though there were any Vertue or Efficacy in the Letters and Syllables of these Names but in this case the sense of each Scripture must govern And therefore when the Apostles do Exhort us to believe on the Name of the Son of God in their sense we are exhorted to believe on the Lord Christ for pardon of sin for help in temptation and for supply in all our wants We must not look to Letters and syllables but to the main sense of each Scripture In like manner when we reade of the Name of the Beast and the Saints overcoming his Name Mark and the Number of the Name we are not here to look to the word Lateinos or any such Grammatical Name but according to the sense of the Prophecie the Name must be taken for the Potency of the Beast as he is Opposed to the Lamb. But let us come more largely to shew some particular Instances out of the Book of the Revelation where the Name of a thing person or state is to be expounded according to the Analogie of the text We read that there were with the Lamb 144000 and that they had their Fathers Name written in their Forehead chap. 14. vers 1. Now these 144000 are set in direct Opposition to the followers of the Beast and their Father's Name written in their forehead is contradistinct to the Mark of the Beast in the forehead and the right Hand Now here sâ—…th there is mention made of the Name of the Father and of his Name written in the forehead of all the followers of the Lamb shall we think therefore that it is made out of the Alphabet or that it is a literal Name Not so we must look here to the main scope of the text and accordingly we must render the meaning of the words They that have their Father's Name written in their forehead are such who in all the times of Antichrist had consecrated dedicated and given themselves up to God the Father to live in subjection to his Commandements and to take him as their sovereign Lord this was the Badge of their outward Profession By the rule of Opposition they that had the Name of the Beast were such as did resign their Obedience to him as to their sovereign Lord And the submission to this Lordship was the Badge and Livery of their outward Profession this is clear from the scope of the text Further We read chap. 2. vers 17. To him that overcometh will I give a white Stone and in the Stone a new Name written that none can read but he that hath it Now what is here meant by the Name written shall we say that it is a Name consisting of Letters and syllables If we so affirm we shall have as good foundation for such a Position as they who take Lateinos to be the Name of the Beast But this is to trifle in a serious matter Therefore we must have recourse to the forementioned Principle to wit The scope of the text When the Lord Christ promiseth to give to him that overcometh a white stone and in the stone a Name written this is nothing else but the inward testimony of the Spirit by and through which he sealeth extraordinary Consolations to his Martyrs and Witnesses in the middest of their sufferings under the tyrannical States and Governments of the world Many worthy Expositors take this for the seal of the Spirit that followeth Justification as may be seen in several late Treatises But I take it That the Promise in the text and so commonly through the whole Prophecie is immediately made to him that overcometh in the times of Persecution And therefore these things do more immediately concern the Martyrs the in-coming of Christ into their hearts and the divine Consolations which they feel in the Name written which none can read but they that have it Let us go to the meaning of that Promise Rev. 3. 12. He that overcometh will I make a Pillar in the Temple of my God and he shall go no more out and I will write upon him the Name of my God and the Name of the City of my God which is the new Ierusalem which cometh down from Heaven and I will write upon him my new Name In these words when the Lord Christ promiseth to him that overcometh That he will write upon him the Name of his God doth he intend here a writing by Letters and syllables This cannot be But according to the scope of the place this is the meaning of Christ That they that overcome shall have this peculiar testimony given into their hearts That the Lord is theirs and that they are his Further Whereas it is said I will write upon them the Name of the City of my God By this he doth mean The true Catholick Church represented Rev. chap. 21. The scope of the words is this That he will inroll them into the Number of Citizens and count them as Members of the true Church his Mystical Body And for the truth of the Interpretation we do chiefly build upon the scope of the text But now let us go to other Scriptures where usually the Name of a thing is taken according to the Analogie of the text It is said concerning the Church of Sardis Thou hast a few Names which have not defiled their Garments and they shall walk with me in white for they are worthy Rev. 3. 4. Here then when it is said Thou hast a few Names shall we understand this to be meant of Grammatical Names This cannot be The drift of the text is concerning the persons of men and women which did not defile themselves in the times of general Pollution And so at the destruction of Rome Antichristian there was a great Earthquake and there were slain of the Names of men 7000 chap. 11. vers 13. Now for the Names of men shall we understand Names consisting of Letters and syllables What a kind of slaughter would this be According to the scope of the text and the manner of the Hebrew expression we may say That such a Number of persons were slain in the Earthquake Adde moreover to this That the Beast which did carry the Whore was full of the Names of Blasphemy chap. 17. There is none so void of understanding to imagine That the Spirit speaketh of such Names that do consist of Letters and syllables We must here go to the sense of the text which speaketh of his
of the Old Empire behind and so going forward apply the rising of the Two-Horned Beast to what times we please No There is some particular instant of time when the Beast rose up out of the Earth when his Name or Universal Headship began And thiâ—… must needs be at the Decree under the Emperor Phocas when it was determined That the Bishop of Rome should be Head over all Churches So then if we lay these Three Principles together First That the Beast had a determinate Beginning of his Kingdom Secondly That this determinate Beginning was after the Fall of the Empire Thirdly That it was after the Fall of the Empire in such times when the Name or Universal Headship of the Bishop of Rome began first publickly and solemnly to be established If we put all these Three together we shall inevitably piâ—…ch upon that time when the Decree went forth That the Bishop of Rome should be the Head over all Churches For if we look to the Stories we shall find that presently after the Fall of the Empire the Bishop of Constantinople was to have equal Priviledges with the Bishop of Rome by the Decree of the Council of Calcedon Nay further The Bishop of Constantinople was in a fairer possibility for the Universal Headship than was he of Rome Only then in the time under the Emperor Phocas the Decree was Enacted That the Bishop of Rome should be the Head of all Churches And from that time downward this hath been a Priviledge perpetually annexed to that Chair And so then we have the true beginning of the rising of the Two-Horned Beast out of the Earth And it is rightly and Apocalyptically applied â—…o the times by the Position of the Three Principles aforenamed But here Bellarmine and Baronius deny That the Universal Headship began in the time of the Emperor Phocas For saith Bellarmine Phocas did not Ordain this by way of a new Institution but only by way of Declaration of a thing ever before Acknowledged in the Church In Answer to this Mornay in his History of the Papacie telleth us That all Historians down from that time as Paulus Diaconus Freculphus Rhegino Anastasius Sabelliâ—…us Blondus Pomponius Laetus and others agree in this beginning Progress 22. pag. 118. And for Baronius he saith An. 606. Therefore what did Phocas bestow upon the Roman Church Nothing truly Only he did Declare by his Sentence That the Name of the Oecumenical Bishop was unlawfully Usurped by the Bishop of Constantinople when it was due Romanae tantum Ecclesiae only to the Roman Church I cannot but admire at the boldness of this great Annalist that he should go so palpably against the Stories of the Church and against some chief Records of their own For if we look a little before in the times of Gregory the Great we shall finde that there was a sharp contest betwixt him and the Bishop of Constantinople about the Primacy For Iohn the Fourth sirnamed the Easter Bishop of Constantinople did begin to assume the Title of Universal Bishop about the year of the Lord 580 26 years before the matter was determined for the Bishop of Rome He was the more imboldened to do this because he saw the Seat of the Empire established at Constantinople and the City of Rome besieged by the Lombards And consequently the Bishop of that City brought to a low ebb Now these attempts of the Bishops of Constantinople they of Rome did most strongly oppose but none more than Gregory the Great as may appear by sundry passages in his Epistles at this very day In them we find every-where that he doth strongly Dispute against the Name and Title of Universal Bishop and doth say in effect That it is the Name of the Beast He doth again and again inculcate That the Title is new prophane contrary to the scope of the Gospel and the Use of the Church And whereas Bellarmine and Baronius have this creep-hole that he did only inveigh against the encroachments of the Bishop of Constantinople he doth again and again repeat That none of his Predecessours did ever use such a prophane Title Nullus decessorum meorum hoc tam profano vocabulo uti consuevit lib. 4. Epist. 80. But that which is most to our purpoâ—…e he doth everywhere place the formality of Antichristianism in the Universal Headship And they that affect so to be called he doth expresly term them the praecursors and fore-runners of Antichrist To let pass all others we will recite those words of his as they are in his sixth Book and thirtieth Epistle to the Emperor Mauritius Consider saith he that when Antichrist shall call himself God the matter it self is but small and frivolous yet most pernitious If you look to the quality of the word it consisteth only of two Syllables but if you regard the weight of iniquity the matter is very great For I may boldly say That whosoever calleth himself or desireth to be called by others The Universal Priest or Bishop is in his elation of minde the forerunner of Antichrist In elatione suâ Antichristum praecurrit Because in like pride he preferreth himself before others And in his Fourth Book Epist. 34. he writeth to Constantia the Empress Be it far saith he that your times should thus be defiled with the Exaltation of one man and then addeth In hâc ejus superbiâ quid aliud nisi propinqua jaâ—… Antichristi esse tempora designatur By this Arrogancy what else is portended but that the time of Antichrist is now at hand And more fully to Iohn himself he useth these words lib. 4. Epist. 38. Tu quid Christo Universalis scilicet Ecclesiae capiti in extremi judicii dicturus es examine qui cuncta ejus membra tibimet conaris Universalis appellatione supponere What wilt thou answer to Christ the Head of the Universal Church in the tryal of the Day of Iudgement seeing that by this Name Universal thou seekest to inthral the Members of his Bodie to thy self And that which maketh more to our purpose he telleth him That the times concerning the coming of Antichrist begin to be fulfilled and that there is â—…ow a performance of the Prophecies Omnia enim quae praedicta sunt fiunt Rex superbiae prope est quod dici nefas est sacerdotum est praeparatus exercitus All Prophecies begin now to be fulfilled and that which I dread to speak the King of Pride is at hand and an Army of Priests do attend him Now for these and such-like passages between Gregory and Iohn of Constantinople I cannot think otherwise of them but that they did happen by the singular Providence of God to excite the world to look after the Revelation of the man of sin For as when our Lord Christ was born at Bethlehem there was a hurly-burly in Iudaea the star appeared the wise men came to Ierusalem and the whole City was troubled What was the end of God in all this but to stir them
Graecian nor the Roman can be set forth by this Character sith the Graecian is described in the Scripture in the nature of a Tetrarchy or a Kingdom divided into Four parts and the Roman in the nature of a Decarchy or a Kingdom divided into ten inferiour Realms These are the Three False Principles on which Interpreters do usually build and therefore the interpretation cannot be good that standeth upon such a sandy foundation For the mixture of Marriages which Piscator calleth Evidentem collationem an evident collation I do acknowledge that the mixture of Marriages mentioned chap. 2. is again repeated chap. 11. In the one text it is said That they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men And in the other That there is an interchangeable Marriage one or two betwixt the Seleucidae and the Lagidae But what of all this They that are like in some things are not altogether the same If that general rule Omne simile non est idem were observed in the Exposition of Daniel and the Revelation we should have a cleerer sense of some Visions then now we have But this great Fallacy hath imposed upon Interpreters they have taken that for the same which is parallel in some things only There are some that have gone so far in these times as that they have taken the little Horn for some late Princes some for Mahomet and some for this and some for that Here I confess there may be a similitude in some particulars and the Allusion may hold in some few Circumstances But if you go to the whole Body of the notes of the little Horn and to the scope of the text here it will be very hard to make good the Assertion There is a resemblance only between the Marriages mentioned chap. 2. and chap. 11. But if we go to the main scope the whole carriage of the text doth plainly shew That the Roman is the Fourth Kingdom and so consequeâ—…ly the mixture of Marriages and the mingling 〈◊〉 the seed of men must necessarily be in the Roman Kingdom And yet further To satisfie the doubt They who do look more diligently into the sense of the Prophecie they find many things in the Graecian which are but as Types and Figures of some notable events in the Roman Kingdom Let us take for Instance the little Horn mentioned in the Eighth of Daniel Now here all do agree That Antiochus Epiphanes is the little Horn meant in this Chapter yet whosoever he is that diligently readeth the words of St. Paul in 2 Thess. 2. he shall find that the Apostle doth apply many things to the Roman Antichrist and so doth Iohn in the Revelation that are here ascribed to Antiochus Epiphanes To salve the matter Interpreters tell us That Antiochus is the Figure of the Antichrist to come We may proceed in the same Method and so we may say That the interchangeable Marriages between the Seleucâ—…dae and the Lagidae are but Figures of the future mingling with the seed of men and of all other means that shall be used to the keeping up of the Roman Kingdom in the last and Antichristian State thereof But let us proceed Piscator The same thing also may be cleerly demonstrated from the words vers 34 35. where Daniel among many other things doth speak unto the King Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands which smote the Image upon the Feet that were part of Iron and part of Clay and brake them to pieces And the stone which smote the Image became a great Mountain and filled the whole Earth This Stone Daniel doth expound vers 44. to be the Kingdom that never shall be destroyed and is the Kingdom of Christ for the Kingdom of Christ began then to fill the whole Earth by the preaching of the Gospel after the overthrow of those Four Kingdoms as it is evident from the text And truly about the beginning of the Roman Empire Christ was Born when Augustus did bear Rule c. In the 35 year from his Birth he sent the holy Spirit from Heaven into the Apostles with whose Power they being endued did Preach the Gospel first at Ierusalem to the Iews and then afterward everywhere in the whole world to the Gentiles as the Book of the Acts doth testifie Therefore sith at the Rising of the Kingdom of Christ and at his filling the whole Earth the Fourth Kingdom prefigured by this Image was already destroyed and seeing also that the Roman Empire did continue at that time it doth necessarily follow That that Fourth Kingdom cannot any way be understood of the Empire of the Romans Answer That the Stone cut out of the Mountain is the Kingdom of Christ to this we freely Assent But whereas Piscator doth alledge That all the Four Metal-Kingdoms did expire at the beginning of Christ's Kingdom this we Deny Let us consider the words of the text for they must govern in this case First It is said concerning the Kingdom represented by the Stone cut out of the Mountain That in the dayes of these Kingdoms will the God of Heaven raise up a Kingdom that never shall be destroyed If this be so it will necessarily follow That the Roman must be one of the Four Metal-Kingdoms because our Saviour was Born his Gospel was Preached the Gentiles were brought to the Faith in those times when the Romans had the Sovereign Dominion over the Earth and particularly over those parts where the Church was seated The Seleucian Kingdom was destroyed and all that tract of Land from Euphrates to the Border of Egypt was wholly brought under the power of the Romans Therefore sith the Kingdom of Christ began in the times of the Roman the Roman must necessarily be the Fourth and the last Kingdom Secondlâ—… It is said That the Stone became a great Mâ—…untain and filled the whole Earth Now when did thiâ—… come to pass The Kingdom of Christ was weak and small at his Inâ—…arnation and in the times immediately following But after that the Stone smote the Image upon the Feet and Toes after that he had broken the Roman Kingdom in the last and Antichristian state thereof then and not till then it became a Mountain and filled the whole Earth Now this was not at the Incarnatioâ—… but we look for the performance thereof at the setting up of the Majestical Kingdom of Christ as it is plainly discovered in the whole Book of the Revelation Thirdly It is said That the Stone smote the Image upon the Feet and Toes that were part of Iron and part of Clay This sheweth plainly That the Seleucidae and the Lagidae cannot be the Fourth and the last Metal-Kingdom For the Kingdom of Christ did never so much as touch these Kingdoms They were all utterly destroyed by the power of the Romans before the Coming of Christ in the Flesh. Now if you apply this to the Roman as to the last of the Four Persecuting Empires the Kingdom of Christ in these last
But saving the great worth and Learning of such an Author here is the very formality of Antichristianism for which which men shall be liable to very great Judgements unless they do repent And though they do distinguish betwixt Two kinds of Heads that Head which is Supreme and that which is Ministerial it is too too well known if we go to Practice That the Bishop of Rome hath not assumed a Ministerial Headship to himself nay indeed and in truth he hath made the Headship of Christ nothing at all Ninthly The Mark in the Forehead and in the right Hand ought to be so expounded that therein must appear the principal Cause of the sufferings of the Martyrs For after that the Beast was destroyed Iohn saw in the Vision the Souls of them that were beheaded for the Word God and for the Testimony of Jesus that had not worshipped the Beast nor received his Mark Chap. 20. 3 4. The special Cause of the sufferings of the Martyrs must be for the refusal of these things If we transfer this to Experience we shall find That great Multitudes of Men and Women have been put to death in all the times of the Beast's Kingdom because they would not yield Obedience to the Laws Ceremonies Traditions and Superstitious Observations imposed upon them by the Authority of the Bishop of Rome as Universal Head of the Church They were slain because they held the Word of God and the Testimony of Jesus Christ because they took the Lord Christ alone for the true Head of the Church and would live only in subjection to his Laws Now then to gather up all the aforementioned particulars into one sum it is clear That the Profession of a Roman Catholick in the visibility thereof is the Mark of the Beast in the Forehead and in the right Hand and all Circumstances do wonderfully agree But let us now come to give some special instance for this out of the Old Testament And here if we go to the times of Antiochus Epiphanes we shall finde a cleer instance of the Character or Mark of the Beast in the times of the Graecian Antichrist For there is mention made of one Iason when he had bought the High Priesthood for Money and did assign 150 Talents more if he might have license to set up a place for Exercise and for the training up of Youth in the Fashions of the Heathen and to write them of Hierusalem by the Name of Antiochians Which when the King had granted and he had gotten the Rule into his hand it is expressly said of this Iason 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Our English hath it He forthwith brought his own Nation to the Greekish Fashion Iunius and Montanus and the Lexicographer Scapula have it Ad Graecum Ritum But I think the words may better be translated He carried over his own Country-men to the Greek Character 2 Macc. 4. 9 10. For the more close and perfect Application of this Truth we will note these four Particulars 1. What is the Hellenick or Graecian Character 2. Who are the Persons that do receive it 3. The Time when 4. The Power and Authority which did compel them to receive it For the first A Character is nothing else but a Note of Distinction by and through which one sort of People are distinguished from another as the Ephraimites were distinguished from the Gileadites by the Word Shiboleth so one Nation is distinguished from another by their Language Attire and other Customes But in this case we have not to do with the Marks of civil distinction and therefore when it is said That Iason carried over his own Country-men to the Hellenick Character this is meant of such a way of worship as was the publick Profession among the profane Graecians in matters of Religion In respect whereof that publick Profession was determinatus modus vivendi as the School-men speak containing that manner and way of living according to the Law of the Antiochians The like may be said That the Mark of the Beast in the Revelation is that whereby they of the Romish Religion are distinguished from others for they have a peculiar manner of living according to the Laws of that Church under the Pope the Head There is then an exact Agreement betwixt the Hellenick and the Romish Character and in both Nations Men are distinguished by this as by the Badge of their Profession Secondly For the Persons who were they that Iason carried over to receive the Mark of the Beast in the Graecian Tyranny It is plainly said That he carried over 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his own Country-men of the Stock and Lineage of Abraham And these things were foretold by Daniel the Prophet many yeers before That in the dayes of Antiochus Epiphanes many of his own Country-men should forsake the Holy Covenant Dan. 11. 31 32. and as he foretold it came to pass indeed as appeareth in the Book of the Macchabees and in the Stories of Iosephus and others Now if we apyly this to the Beast in the Revelation there is a more general Defection and Apostacie of the whole Christian world He causeth all to receive a Mark in their forehead and in their right hand Thirdly For the time When was it that Iason carryed over his own Country-men to the Hellenick Character to the publike Profession of Religion used by the Grecians in the Seleâ—…cian State It was in the times of Antiochus the Grecian Antichrist If therefore we read in the Book of the Revelation That the Beast did cause all to receive a Mark in their forehead and in their right hand this was no other but that which was done before in the times of Antiochus the Grecian Antichrist who is set forth as a Type and a Figure of that great Antichrist who should come in the last times Fourthly For the power by and through which Iason should carry over his own Country-men to the Hellenick Character or to that way of Profession It was then when he had gotten the Rule into his hands Some sins do increase by Propagation as Original sin some by Ensample as many evil Customs amongst us But here is mention made of the increase and prevailing of a sin by Imperial Edict by the Countenance Power and Authority of them that have the Soveraignty in their hands The like may be said of the Beast in the Revelation all did receive the Mark in their forehead and in their right hand and if you look to the reason it was a sin of Monarchy or Imperial power The Beast as a Potentate did cause all to receive a Mark in their forehead and in their right hand By the Hellenick Character used in the times of the Grecian Tyranny we may know what is the Mark of the Beast so often mentioned in the Revelation and by the one we may finde out the meaning of the other I have stay'd the longer on this Point because it is the principal matter in the Text and the right
hath it Consideravi in libris Iunius Fui considerans ex libris All cometh to one sense That whether he did consider these times in books or by books or out of books he laid the times together to wit the times in the Prophecy of Ieremy and the times that had past in the Churches experience and accordingly did argue the approach of the deliverance that should come This act of his was by wisdome or understanding for so the word doth signifie the inward contriving or plotting of any thing in the minde as Artificers do cast the frame of a building Thus Kirkerus doth render the meaning of the word in his Concordance Iunius upon the place doth very significantly express the meaning of the word Fuit intelligens ex libris Prophetiarum Hieromiae quibus annorum numerus fuit praefinitus tum Historiis temporum quae à deportationis initio effluxerant In Danielâ—…hen â—…hen we have an example of computing the times and of his wisedome in numbring the seventy years of Ieremy before the event And this Daniel did do not by extraordinary revelation but as an ordinary believer might do by search Let us now go to another Instance When the Disciples came privately to our Saviour upon Mount Olivet they asked him concerning the time of the destruction of Ierusalem and in order to their question he made them this answer When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation stand in the holy place let him that readeth understand Mat. 24. 15. Here I demand What is meant by him that readeth Secondly what is meant by the book that he must reade By him that readeth is meant any one to whom God hath given a minde to search and to look into the meaning of the Scripture And for the Book that must needs be the Prophecy of Daniel concerning the seventy weeks Dan. 9. And whereas it is said Let him that readeth understand the words must go in this tenor Let him that readeth know and understand how many years the 70 weeks of Daniel must contain and where they must begin And from the knowledge of these two if he reckon well he shall come to that time where they shall make an end and that will be the time of the destruction of Ierusalem And so we have an answer to the Disciples question But yet further concerning the time when the period of the seventy weeks are to be studied and that is when you see the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place In that particular instant it is said Then let him that readeth understand As for the standing of the abomination of desolation in the most holy place our Saviour doth expound his meaning more plainly in another Evangelist When ye shall see Ierusalem compassed about with Armies then know that the desolation thereof is nigh Luke 21. 20. Here some man may object It is not always a necessary truth that when a City is compassed with Armies therefore it shall be taken and when it is taken it is not infallible that it shall be brought to utter desolation What doth our Saviour then mean by this speech His meaning is not that from such weak principles men should draw a Conclusion of that weight but this is the drift of his speech When ye shall see Ierusalem compassed about with Armies then let him that readeth fall upon the calculation of the times in the Prophecy of Daniel Let him consider where they begin how long they shall continue and where they make an end and then by the joynt consideration of all these together they shall finde they be not far from the destruction of Ierusalem and that the years of the patience of God are run out And yet further our Saviour would not have men calculate the times to satisfie their curiosity but meerly for use and practise and better information He saith Let him that readeth understand But to what end These words are immediately added ver 16. Then let them which are in Iudea flee to the Mountains c. Now the understanding of the Prophetical times is no common matter but there must be much study and meditation used to finde out the meaning of the Spirit The words of the Text are most emphatical 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let him that readeth ponder and consider the times by some subtilty of observation Now then to apply all this to the present Text and so we have many examples out of Scripture to warrant us That the Number 666 may be such a Number of years to the setting up of the Name or Universal Headship of the Bishop of Rome And for the computation of these years before the event this in the Scripture-language is called by the name of Wisedome Having then such a multitude of Examples out of the Old Testament where pious men have calculated the Prophetical years before the accomplishment why by the like reason may we not conceive That Iohn spake to the people in his own times to the ages immediately following but most specially to those who should live upon the borders of Antichrists rising that they should calculate 666 years to the beginning of his Kingdom The coming of Christ in the flesh and the glory that should follow was revealed to the ancient Prophets though under dark and figurative expressions Now mark what the Apostle S. Peter speaketh of the practise of those wonderful men Of which salvation the Prophets have inquired and searched diligently searching into what manner of time the Spirit did point to when he spake of the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow 1 Pet. 1. 10 11 12. The times of the ancient Church were divided into many periods Now it was shewed them though darkly in what period of time Christ should come And accordingly they who had his Spirit in them made no spare to search when that time should be In like manner the times of the New Testament are divided into many regions or parts and it was revealed to the Apostles in mystical terms how Antichrist should come in what particular period of time he should come and what should be the signs of his coming Now seeing these things are revealed in the Prophecies of the New Testament as I think none can well deny was it not the duty of men immediately after the Apostles time and so downward to calculate the Times And for the actual rising of the Kingdom of Anti-Christ there is no one place doth speak more of his pedigree and genealogie then the Text we now are upon If this be so it will quickly appear of what nature the Number 666 is seeing it is put in the close of the Chapter There is then the greatest probability as can be supposed that this must be the Number of years to the first Institution and Foundation of that Spiritual Monarchy and the person who hath wisedome is to make up the account Further if we take 666 for the Number of time and particularly for the
between this way of writing to the understanding both ways do come but to one sense if you go to the sum of the matter For if you would speak of a thing to be done in one of the years of the Lord as in thiâ—… present year for instance Is not 1654 in figures all one with One thousand 〈◊〉 hundred fifty and four in letters written at length Do not we decypher the years of the Lord in our common way of writing by figures in brief as well as by words in their full delinearion If none can deny this we may conceive the like of the meaning of the Spirit when he saith that the Number of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is as much as to say the 666th year is the Number of time when this Government shall begin to be 〈◊〉 up But â—…eeing there have been in former Ages and now there are that are doâ—…ing ripe upon the Numeral Letters I do here seriously put it to them to 〈◊〉 me their opinion concerning the two Letters of the Greek Alphabet α and ω. The question is proper to the purpose in hand for they may well observe as the Lamb standeth in direct opposition to the Beast the Name and Soveraignty of the Lamb to the Soveraignty of the Beast so the Number of the Name or Dominion of the Lamb if oppositio be in eodem must necessarily be opposed to the Number of the Name or Dominion of the Beast But for the Letters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none that ever went about to find out the Anagram of the Name of the Lamb in the Elements of the Greek Alphabet These Characters do not set forth any literal Name nor the Numeral Letters of any Grammatical word but they do denote and set forth the infinity and eternity of his Kingdom For when he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is all one with that expression 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The first and the last which is which was and which is to come the Almighty Chap. 1. v. 8 11. So in immediate opposition to those Characters of the Kingdom of the Lamb the Number of the Name or Headship of the Beast is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 666 according to the Calculation of the times in Daniels Image For as the Characters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if we take them severally in themselves they may be ascribed to any kinde of Infinity in the Lambs Kingdom he may be said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in reference to Place Power and time But in the Book of the Revelation it is necessary that these Characters should be restrained onely to the Number of time So in the like case the Number 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may many ways be applied to the Beasts Kingdom but in the natural and genuine sense of the Prophecy this doth onely denote such a Number of time to the setting up of his Kingdom Now for the further confirmation of this truth let us call to minde what is written in the Prophecy of Daniel concerning the Ancient of Days I beheld till the Thrones were cast down or more properly I beheld till the Thrones were set and the Ancient of Days did sit whose garment is as white as snow and the hair of his head like the pure wooll Ch. 7. v. 5. In these words why is God the Father called The Ancient of days why is the hair of his head compared to the pure wooll This doth note the eternity of his Kingdom in immediate opposition to the four great Periods of time set forth by the Tyranny of the four great Empires of the World So the same is â—…aid concerning the Dominion of the Son of Man that his Dominion is an everlasting Dominion that shall not pass away and his Kingdom that which shall not be destroyed ver 14 Here then if we demand Why the Kingdom of the Son of Man is called An everlasting Kingdome This is in immediate opposition to the several and respective times of the four Beasts their Kingdoms had an end and they were destroyed but the Kingdom of the Son of Man is an everlasting Kingdome that never shall be destroyed According to this Analogie do we conform the Exposition of the Number 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Number of the Kingdome of the Lamb we do oppose it to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Number of the Name of the Beast And so Iohn in the Revelation and Daniel in his Prophecy do agree in the Numbers and in the same method and way of account For when the Son is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the First and the Last in the order of time is not this all one with that passage in Daniel His Dominion is an everlasting Dominion But because many stand upon the Letters we will cite the famous Canon of Ptolomy where the Kings of Babylon of Persia of Greece and Rome are set forth by the Characters of the Greek Alphabet It is useful to illustrate many passages in this Book and therefore it followeth as hereunder written De Epochâ Nabonassareâ Ex Manuscripto libro Graeco Claudii Ptolomaei continente Hypothesâ—…s 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 26 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 38 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 43 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 45 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 48 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 54 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 55 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 59 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 67 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 80 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 100 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 122 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 143 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 186 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 188 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉