Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	holy_a	word_n	write_v	5,008	5	5.6967	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A03881	A treatise of the vvritten VVord of God. Composed in Latin, by the Reuerend Father Iames Gordon Huntley of Scotland, Doctour of Diuinity, of the Society of Iesus. And translated into English, by I. L. of the same Society. The first part of the first controuersy; Controversiarum epitomes. English. Selections	Gordon, James, 1541-1620.; Wright, William, 1563-1639.	1614 (1614)	STC 13996; ESTC S115737	32,568	73

bookes to wit that which is receaued and appre●ued by the iudgment of the Catholike Church which cannot erre our Aduersaries reiecting this Canon make all the bookes doubtfull conteined therin for no certayne testimony can be had of these bookes but eyther by this Canon only or by the aunciēt tradition of the Church but they neyther admit this Canon nor wil stand to this vnwritten Traditiō or acknowledge it for the true Word of God 2. Now as for the Canons lately set out by themselues no man can safely belieue them seeing they neyther agree one with another nor with the auncient Canons of the Church nor are any where found in the writtē Word of God which as they teach is only to be belieued neyther can they bring any thing eyther concerning the Canon of the Hebrewes or any other auncient Canon which they haue not taken from the writings of the auncient Fathers whose authority without the expresse written Word of God they will haue to be in no wise sufficient to ingender fayth so as euen by the iudgment of our Aduersaries none of all these can establish fayth concerning this matter 3. Iohn Caluin indeed sayth that it is as easy for a faithfull man to discerne Canonicall Scripture from that which is not Canonicall as to one that seeth it is easy to discerne light from darknes and white from Black But in so saying he contradicteth both reason and experience for it is euident that in old tyme there was no small controuersy amongst the raythfull yea and amongst learned and godly men concerning many bookes of the old and new Testament yea and also euen now amōgst such as our Aduersaries esteeme faithfull men which Caluin himselfe in many places confesseth 4. Moreouer Caluins owne followers well perceauing this fly vnto their owne peculiar spirit by which they say they are chiefly perswaded and moued and not by the only consent of the Church But these speake nothing to the purpose for in faith two thinges concurre one is the cause or origen of fayth to wit God himselfe and the holy Ghost whereof there is no controuersy betweene vs and them for we all acknowledge the holy Ghost to be the principall cause of the assent we giue by fayth that is to say that it is the holy Ghost who chiefly perswadeth vs to belieue The other is the obiect of fayth or that which is to be belieued whereof we now dispute for the holy Ghost doth not induce vs to belieue the false vncertaine deuises of men but the pure and sincere Word of God only we aske therfore of our Aduersaries by what expresse Word of God he reuealeth vnto them that there are so many Canonicall bookes and neyther fewer nor more for we read not this any where in the Scripture and they admit only the written Word of God how can the holy Ghost then perswade thē●o belieue that which is not the Word of God for we are not now to expect new ●●uelations from God as do the ●nabaptists and Libertines whom for this cause our Aduersaries condemne It is necessary therefore that if they will haue vs belieue that they are perswaded by the holy Ghost to belieue such books only to be authenticall as they doe say are such that they first shew this to be a truth expressely contayned in holy Scripture which they will neuer be able to do wherfore there is no certainty with them eyther of the sense of the holy Scripture or of the Letter nor euer wil be vntill they returne vnto the Church agayne But we Catholikes are certaine of both for we haue a most faythfull Canon receaued in the Church more thē a thousand and two hundred yeares agoe confirmed by a generall and Oecumenicall Councell 5. And this to haue beene the faith and doctrine of the auncient Church for the discerning of true and authenticall Scriptures that short but pithy sentence of S. Augustins whome Caluin acknowledgeth to haue byn the best and most faithfull witnes of antiquity sufficiently testifyeth saying I for my part would not belieue the Ghospell vnlesse I were moued by the authority of the Church of which place I will say more herafter in the Controuersy of the Church And else-where he saith VVe receaue the old and new Testamēt in that nūber of bookes which the authority of the holy Catholike Church deliuereth So S. Augustine 6. I know our Aduersaries obiect many thinges against many bookes contayned in our Ecclesiasticall Canon but their chiefe arguments do not only derogate authority from those bookes but also from many others which they receaue as Canonicall For they obiect that some Fathers did sometymes doubt of those bookes which they will not admit but they are not ignorant that some Fathers of old haue doubted of the Epistles of S. Iames and S. Iude of the second Epistle of S. Peter of the 2. and 3. of S. Iohn of the Epistle to the Hebrewes and of the Apocalyps of which bookes they dare not now doubt especially Caluins followers as is manifest by their confession of faith 7. They say further that in those bookes which they reiect there are many thinges obscure difficult and full of contradiction but what booke of Scripture in a manner is there in the which there do not occurre sometymes thinges obscure and hard to be vnderstood did not S. Peter acknowledge as much But as for true contradictions there are none at al howsoeuer there may be some things which at the first fight may seeme to imply contradiction yet indeed all thinges agree very well togeather such a contradiction is oftentymes found in those bookes which euen our Aduersaries receaue yea euen in the Ghospells themselues which for all that are not to be reiected but humbly soberly and piously to be ●nterpreted as S. Augustine many tymes admonisheth 8. To conclude all the arguments that our Aduersaries make against these bookes are fully answered by Catholike writers which haue set out Commentaries vpon those bookes to wit Cornelius Iansenius vpon Ecclesiasticus Ionnnes Laurinus vpon the booke of VVisedome Ioannes Maldonatus and Christopher à Castro vpon Baruch and Nicolas Serarius vpon the rest of the bookes of the old Testament which our Aduersaries call Apocriphall to omit the most Reuerend and famous Cardinall Bellarmine and his Champion Iacobus Gretserus as also Iames Gordon Lesmoreus For it is sufficient only to haue cited them seeing that I write only an abridgment of Controuersies not any long commentaries vpon the Scripture And therfore contēt my selfe to haue shewed in this place that our Aduersaries must either receaue the Canon of Scriptures approued by the Councell of Trent or be vtterly destitute of any certayne and assured Canon CHAP. VI. Of the Hebrew Text. OVR Aduersaries when they are vrged with Catholike argumēts taken from the Scriptures are wont to fly to the Hebrew text of the old Testament and

Bezas errors in translating or rather peruerting the holy Scriptures whole books are extant as also of the corruptions of the Geneua Bylles which are euery yeare increased but this shall much more commodiously be declared heerafter in the particuler Cōtrouersies We will only heere set downe one example of a corruption to be found in Caluins Bezas and all the Geneua Bybles And this corruption is forged a purpose by them to confirme a new and notable blasphemy against Christ and himselfe by some apparent testimony of Scripture for they reach in many places that Christ when he praied in the Garden was seized with an extreme feare least God being angry with him for our sinnes for which he had taken vpon him to satisfy should inflict vpon him eternall damnation neyther did Christ feare without cause for they say he suffered vpon the Crosse the paynes of a damned person the torments of hell for these are the impions words of Caluin Christ suffered in his soule the torments of a forlorne and damned man and Beza sayth at what tyme Christ hang vpon the Crosse he was in the middest euen of the torments of hell which is as much as to say that God himselfe was not only afraid of the torments of hell but that he suffered and endured them for it is euident that Christ was true God But against these absurd paradoxes we are to dispute heerafter It shall suffice heere to shew that they haue depraued the holy Scripture to 〈◊〉 this their impious assertion for wheras it is written in the fifth to the Hebrewes and 7. v. that Christ was heard of God for his reuerence Caluin first and after Beza and all the Geneua Bybles make the text to say Christ was heard by reason of his feare or because he was afraid but that in the last Edition Beza hath added more words to the text making it sound thus His prayers being heard he was deliuered frō this feare Moreouer Caluin in his commentaris and Beza in his annotations seeke to proue out of this text that Christ feared eternall damnation that he was deliuered out of this feare by his prayers which he offered with teares true it is that in the French Bybles lately printed at Geneua the yeare 1●05 they haue put in the margent vel pro sua reuerentia where inforced by truth they manifestly contradict Caluin and Beza who plainly deny that this place is so to be trāslated yet least their inconstancy should be noted they leaue the former words in the text ayant esté exaucé 〈◊〉 qu'il craignoit that is in latin exauditus est eo vel in eo quod timuit 6. But all others as well Catholikes as their Aduersaries who haue written before Caluin translate prosua reuerentia vel propietate sua as Erasmus Bucer the Tiguriues in their bibles of the yeare 1542. Nay Sebastian Castalio for this cause sharply reprehendeth Beza who glorieth that Caluin was the first that found out this new explication in a note of his vpon this 7. v. se his editions of the yeare 1560. 1565. 7. The third shift is their false exposition of the text though neuer so truly translated for by diuers commentaries and little notes in the margent they goe about to perswade the Readers the cleane contrary to that which is expressely in the text see examples hereof in this Chapter in the latin edition CHAP. XV. The fourth fift and sixt shift that our Aduersaries vse in deprauing the Word of God THE fourth shift of our Aduersaries is to fly to figuratiue and metaphoricall speaches for it is most true that was wit●●ly obserued by S. Augustine If sayth he the mind be preoccupated with any erroneous opinion whatsoeuer the Scripture saith to the contrary men take to be a figuratiue speach And surely there is no kind of figuratiue speaking to which our Aduersaries at one tyme or another haue not recouse but there are three figures of which our Aduersaries doe o●tenest serue themselues in deprauing the holy Scriptures which are these Me●onymia Hyperbole and Ironia Metonymia is a figure very familiar with Caluin for by it he peruerteth many places of Scripture yea euen those playne words of Christ this is my body for hauing disputed long about the sense of those words at last he concludeth thus I omit sayth he Allegories and Parables least any man should thinke that I seeke euasions a●d to go from the matter in hand I say it is a Metonymicall speach So Caluin 2. By the figure Hyperbole our Aduersaries shift of all those so euident testimonies by which wee proue that remisof sinnes is obtayned of God by good works as are these Almes deliuereth from all sinne and death and suffereth not the soule to go into darknes And againe Almes deliuereth frō death it is that that purgeth sinne maketh vs find mercy life euerlasting Moreouer water putteth out a burning fier and Almes resisteth sinne for the Lutherans say that all these are Hyperbolicall speaches Beza also seeketh to extenuat by the figure Hyperbole that which the Apostle writeth in the praise of the Roman Church when he sayth your haith is preached all ouer tse world Caluin in like manner by the same figure not only depraueth many places of the auncient Fathers but will needes force Christ himselfe without any need at all to speake Hyperbolically And finally Philip Melancthon goeth about by the figure Ironia to delude those manifest wordes of Christ that which remayneth giue Almes and behold all thinges are cleane vnto you For Philip contendeth that Christ spake not those words in earnest but in iest which he tooke from Erasmus as he did many other things but Caluin and Beza confesse that this is a foolish Ironia Albeit they also peruert the same wordes another way for they restrayne the word omnia only to meate 3. The fift shift is when Catholiks alledge plaine places of Scripture which admit no figure to say that the Scripture yea euen Christ himselfe did speake exactly but after a grosse and popular manner the meaning is that he speaketh only probably and not solidly For example sake when wee proue that the Sacrament of the Eucharist excelleth the Manna of the Iewes by these wordes of Christ your Fathers indeed haue eaten Manna and are dead this is the bread descending from heauen that if any man eate of it he dye not Caluins answere is that Christ accommodated his speach to the grosse conceipt or opinion of the Iewes When we proue the Exorzismes of the Church by which she casteth out diuells to be holy because Christ sayth one Diuell will not cast out another Caluin answereth we must remember sayth he that when Christ vseth such prouerbes as are in vse among the people he vseth them only as probable coniectures and not as solid proofes So he No meruaile therfore if