Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	great_a	life_n	write_v	5,211	5	5.2860	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B09695	Railings and slanders detected: or The folly and heresies of the Quakers further exposed. Being an answer to an invective libel written by G. Whitehead, impertinently called, Antichrist in flesh unmasked, &c. which some of the Quakers call an answer to a book truly stiled Antichrist in Spirit unmasked: or, Quakerism a great delusion. In this brief discourse you have the slanderous out-cries of G. Whitehead, against Edward Paye, Henry Loader, and William Alcot, examined, detected, and confuted.	Paye, Edw. (Edward)	1692 (1692)	Wing P884; ESTC R181559	21,006	57

and should they go about to do it with their Equivocal Stuff they know they shall appear in an evil Case Well but it may be some Advocate for the Quakers may be ready to say That although the Quakers first Original and Ancient Authors of that Antiquity as 1648. and since for I think they do not pretend to any greater Antiquity See John Whitehead's small Treatise p. 4. He saith That in the year 1648. God who had Compassion on his People did cause a Branch to spring forth of the Root of David which was filled with Virtue for the Covenant of Life and Peace was with him c. and much more matter of this Blasphemous nature you have in the Book and Page aforesaid But who the degenerate Plant of this strange Vine was I know not except James Naylor And saith John Whitehead In the year 1655. I being a Branch of this Tree viz. the Branch aforesaid the Life of this Root caused me to Blossom and bring forth Fruit for the Spirit of the Lord came upon me Ibid. But to return suppose that these Antient Authors did at first and since till very lately run into gross and abominable Errors about the Holy Scriptures denying them to be the Word of God and Rule of Faith and Practices and did deny Christ's being at God's right hand in the Glorious Heavens beyond the Stars and did deny the Humanity of Christ and Justification by his Works Righteousness and Merits c. yet they may now have seen their former Errors and it may be by some means they have been convinced thereof so that now they are become good Orthodox Christians and therefore they have published a Christian-like Profession of Faith c. Answer But then ought they not to have renounced their former Writings that directly contradict it and then we should have been heartily glad to hear of so great and so happy a Reformation in and amongst them But now I think upon it to put them upon renouncing any of their former Writings or Authors Works will be a greater affront than the other and I shall incurr G. Whitehead's displeasure worse than before for how can they do that since all their Authors Books be they ever so full of Railings Falsities and Blasphemies yet they intitle them to the Divine Majesty and his Eternal Life and Light given forth from his Mouth and Sealed by his Spirit c. So that I see not how they can renounce what they have written but must look upon all as infallibly true on their account as the Pope and his Conclave looks upon their Councils Edicts and Decrees so that as the Laws of the Medes and Persians they are never to be altered or renounced Then lastly which way could the Quakers expect to escape being defamed or discredited why it is like they did suppose that the Honourable Assembly in Parliament had matters of greater moment in hand than to compare their former Writings with their new Faith So that if we had not concerned our selves to peep into their Writings and compare them with their newly professed Faith and publish'd this to the World namely That the Quakers former Writings and their late Profession of Faith are as really alike as an Apple is to an Oyster and agree as directly as Light and Darkness it had not been known But G. Whitehead saith in p. 6. That this Confession of Faith was sincerely own'd and consented to as one condition of their present Liberty Well then we hope you in plainness speak your Faith therein for if you did dissemble your Principles to obtain your Liberty it was but a bad way to get at it But we hope better things Now would the Quakers but clear themselves in these their First and Primitive Errors and corrupt principles in point of Faith we should be heartily glad to hear thereof First That they would never more deny the Scriptures to be the Word of God and Rule ●f Faith and Life which they have done ●●●●●…ly That they would never more am●●… the Scriptures to be of no use in order to the true Knowledge of God This they have formerly done Thirdly That they would no longer hold it to be a sin Ay the sin of Idolatry and Breach of the Second Commandment to take the Practices of the Saints Recorded Commanded or Approved c. in the Scriptures for our Examples and Rules This you have done Fourthly That they would never more affirm That whatever is commanded in Scripture is no Duty to us except we receive the Command by immediate Inspiration as the Prophets and Apostles did Fifthly That they would never more deny the Resurrection of the Bodies of Men from the Graves of the Earth as they have done Sixthly That they would never more deny the Body of Christ of Flesh and Bones to be raised from the Grave and to be now in the Glorious Heavens above beyond the Stars This they have also done Seventhly That they would never more deny Gospel Ordinances as Baptism in Water and the Lord's Supper Administred in Bread and Wine which the Quakers do both despise and contemn Eighthly That they would forever renounce this pernicious Tenet of believing that no Blessedness is to be enjoyed by the Saints after Death the Body never being to be raised to any further Blessedness no more than 〈◊〉 enjoyed a thousand years before they 〈◊〉 and that the Soul is part of God came 〈◊〉 ●rom God and shall return into God again being part of his Essence Ninthly That they would never more deny Justification by Christ's Works Righteousness and Merits and for time to come never call it a Doctrine of Devils as they have formerly done Tenthly that they would never say and affirm that the Light within is Christ and God as they have too commonly done And finally that they would leave off their Billings-gate Complements and learn to treat their Antagonists more moderately and mildly for evil Communications will corrupt all their good Manners if they have any And waiting for this Reformation in them I shall now proceed to examine G. W's long Story and loud Out-cries about the Westmorland Petitioners which is my next Work About the Story of the Westmorland Petitioners G. W. spends several pages in cavelling with what I say Antichrist in Spirit c. pag. 78. namely That Quake●●●● is not derived from a Person but from ● Gesture used much amongst the Quakers formerly in ' their Meetings as was manifest by what was alledged against them by the Westmorland Petitioners who alledged that their practice did exceedingly savour of Sorcery because of the Swellings Quakings Roarings and Foamings that were amongst them in their Meetings I also cite the Quakers Answer to this Petition p. 35. where they deny not Swelling Foaming and Quaking But they deny Sorcery and Blasphemy they justifie their Quaking and Trembling as being used by the Saints of old c. James Naylor p. 16 and 17. of his Book The Power and Glory of

Railings and Slanders detected Or the Folly and Heresies of the QUAKERS Further Exposed Being an Answer to an Invective Libel Written by G. Whitehead impertinently called Antichrist in Flesh unmasked c. Which some of the QUAKERS call An Answer to a Book truly Stiled Antichrist in Spirit unmasked OR Quakerism a great Delusion In this Brief Discourse you have the Slanderous Out-cries of G. Whitehead against Edward Paye Henry Loader and William Alcot Examined Detected and Confuted He Seedeth of Ash●s 〈◊〉 deceived heart hath turned him aside that he cannot deliver his Soul nor say Is there not a Lye in my right hand Esai 44. 20. Wh●●st that Hereticks speak like the Faithful they not only mean otherwise than they say but clean contrary and by their Tenets full of Blasphemies they destroy the Souls of those who with their fair words suck in the Poyson of their foul Opinions Irenaeus in his Third Book against Heresies London Printed in the Year 1692. Railings and Slanders Detected or the Folly and Heresies of the Quakers further Exposed c. IT is well known to all that are but a little acquainted with the Faculties and Writings of the Quakers that their usual methods are to cry out against all that oppose or detect their corrupt notions as such that abuse and defame an Innocent and Religious People But amongst the many causeless out-cries they have proclaimed in the World I have not seen one for its magnitude that hath out-done a small parcel of slanderous confused Railleries that lately was Midwiv'd into the World and Fathered by George Whitehead which if there be a Wise Man amongst them it appears strange that it had not been stifled in the Birth rather than such an ill shapen Cub should have gone forth into the World to declare it self Legitimate and publish it self the true Off-spring of a Quaker But we must take it as it is and in the Title Page G. W. saith our Book is a desaming confused Book Answer I suppose a great part of it must needs be confused being taken out of your own confused Writings the reconciling of which to themselves is as easie as bringing together the South and North Poles 2. He calls it a defaming Book Answer It defames no Mans Person nor indeed your Principles any further than your Tongues and Pens did it first of all for it Treats of your professed notions which if false are deservedly exposed nothing being a more destructive evil in our day than for falshood to be carried on in the World with Fame and Applause But to come to your Book it self Could you suppose that any thing was contained in it to the purpose I cannot imagine what you could think of it If you had said any thing towards reconciling your former Writings with your late professed Faith you had done something to the purpose do you think that any whose Eyes are in their Heads will not easily see that your defects in Truth aud Reason are supplied with Slanders and Railings You tell us p. 5 6 7 8. We have shewed our envy and bitterness yea we appear Envious against your present Liberty as Men of Envious Turbulent Persecuting Spirits c. Why what 's the matter why our Book defames the Quakers as a People of a Religious Society c. who have solemly and sincerely declared to the Government That they own and believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament and desire to live in the Faith Knowledge and Practice of them and that they believe in the Three Divine Witnesses bearing Record in Heaven the Father Word and Holy Spirit and the Divinity and Humanity of Christ and Justification by Christ's Works Righteousness and Merits and not by their own This and much more in their professed Faith whereunto I referr the Reader Now we have gone and published to the World wherein the Writings of their chief Guides do directly oppose and contradict this Confession of Faith from which G. Whitehead concludes That by this we would make void one Condition of their present Liberty p. 6. As People not fit to be tolerated now have their Liberty of Conscience p. 7. And saith G. W. No doubt had these angry Anabaptists power we should not enjoy our Liberties the very Nature and Tendency of these their bitter lying Invectives being to bring Persecution upon us as a People not to be given any credit unto in our Solemn Profession before Authority To all which I Answer First We did not know till our Book was Published that you had professed this as your Faith before the Parliament And secondly we must the more admire your Presumptuous confidence herein that you should so affront the Government except you had at the same time renounced your former Writings that so evidently contradict it And whereas you falsly charge us with persecuting Spirits and Envy it is well known that our principles are and ever were that none ought to be persecuted for their Religious Principles or Notions no not the Papists themselves so long as they live peaceably in subjection to Authority and the Civil Government yet had they come and set up a Mass-House at Deptford and that they might the more effectually prevail upon the Ignorant and easilier proselyte them to their Idolatry and Superstitions should have published a Profession of Faith directly contrary to their known Principles and the Writings of their Chief Guides We should in like manner have looked upon our selves obliged both in Honour to God and Love to our Neighbours to have detected their Deceits And we freely allow any to examine our published Faith and if they can find such plain contradictions as aforesaid we will be content to bear the discredit and not retaliate them with Railings and Slanders nor account them envious Persecutors for it And now I would appeal to the Light in G. Whitehead whether he believes that we envy their Liberty and would Persecute them had we Power if he so believes he is miserably deluded in that matter and if he doth not so believe how willfully doth he sin against the Light in casting these Slanderous Aspersions upon us What are we envious Persecutors Hypocrites and possessed with an unclean Spirit and lying Devil p. 5 8 17. Fie George are these Thunderbolts fit to be shot at your Antagonists on all occasions I own that you have some cause to be displeased at our putting you upon a work you cannot possibly do namely to reconcile your late Faith with your former Writings But then you might have called us unreasonable Men or compared us to Pharaoh's Task-masters for its a work we put you upon that is harder than to make Brick without Straw And indeed G. Whitehead appears to have no mind to touch it with one of his fingers it is so knotty and difficult a piece of work No it passeth the skill of the ablest Orator with all his Rhetorick or George Whitehead with all his pretended skill in Logick to do it

present in Spirit they are obliged to Prayer and Fasting and all other Gospel Ordinances till his second personal and glorious coming But what the Quakers have to do with Ordinances Prayer or Fasting I see not 2. Neither is there Reason to believe you dare in your Assemblies in Christ's Name rebuke any unclean Spirits lest you meet with the same Answer and Repulse as the seven Sons of Sceva did Acts 19. 14 15 16. And the evil Spirit answered and said Jesus I know and Paul I know but who are you And the Man in whom the evil Spirit was leaped on them and overcame them c. And to conclude my Answer to his long Story I ask George Whitehead why he had not denied this Gesture of Quaking and Foaming to Mr. John Faldo who gives him Provocation enough to do it See his Book Quakerism no Christianity pag. 12. Saith he How generally were their Meetings viz. the Quakers either silent or taken up with sudden and violent Eruptions of dismal Howlings and horrid Ravings Persons suddenly taken as with the Falling Sickness shaking and foaming at the Mouth and some lying flat on the ground as if stark dead And saith Mr. Faldo some such things as these I have seen and heard and that there are undeniable Testimonies of it that are so numerous and notorious that though now they have almost if not altogether left the latter sort of them they dare not deny that it was so And if they dare to challenge this with an Untruth I may requite them to keep alive their Remembrance with a good part of a volume of them Thus far Mr. Faldo whose Book is signed and approved by 21 Ministers of the Independent and Presbyterian Way I needed not to have taken this Pains since these Gestures are fresh in the Memories of many in this Nation And George Whitehead hath said nothing that denies the Matter of Fact charged in my Books p. 6 7. upon the Quakers he denies not Quaking and Trembling which was all the Instance was brought for and then I think for any Service G. W. hath done the Cause he had better have said nothing 3. George Whitehead saith in p. 16. that I have falsely cited and grosly perverted the Quakers Words and Authors and taken many false things on Credit not only the Story from the Westmorland Petitioners but also out of his Brother Tho. Hicks his abominable Forgeries and Lyes in his factious Dialogues And in p. 8. He prays his Reader to observe that much of our Book against them is taken out of other Books and Pamphlets of their Adversaries long since answered and refuted and their Authority is utterly denied by us as the Westmorland Petitioners who were envious Persecutors Tho. Hicks his abusive Dialogues who was proved a notorious Forger of Lyes And a malicious Libel stiled Tyranny and Hypocrisie detected Answer I am inclinable to think G. W. hath said some Truth in what hath been repeated nay I do in Charity believe it then I will shew you what I believe he saith Truth in 4. Namely That the Authority of the Quakers Adversaries Books is utterly denied by them I am strongly persuaded G. W. saith Truth in this for they that can deny the Authority of the Scriptures being the only Rule of Faith and Practice when alledged against them may well deny the Authority of all Books wrote against them whatsoever tho' the Matter be ever so true 2. As to the rest asserted by G. W. I will not tell him he lyes But I am well satisfied he is departed very far from the Truth And as to that Book Tyranny and Hypocrisie detected It treats chiefly of the Usurping and Lording Authority that some of the Quakers assumed over others and of others opposing and contradicting them as might be made manifest And as to what instances I bring from that Book as Josias Coal's Letter from Berbaldus to George Fox giving him those blasphemous Titles mention'd Antichrist in Spirit unmask'd p. 43. or any other passage from thence cited by me let G. W. deny them as to Matter of Fact if he dare 3. As for Mr. Hicks his Dialogues that George Whitehead calls Lyes and Forgeries and the Author a notorious Lyer and Forger c. It had been much more to purpose had G. W. shewed us what some of those Lyes and Forgeries were I have it 's true examined the Quakers Appeal by way of Charge against Tho. Hicks wherein they charge him with Lyes and Slanders and Forgeries and what not and I have perused Mr. Hicks's Answer to their Appeal where Mr. Hicks clears himself both of Lyes and Forgery I find his Answer to their Appeal subscribed and approved by no less than 22 Persons of Credit who testifie that they have compared Tho. Hicks his Citations with the Quakers Books out of which they were taken and find them truly cited then let the Reader judge who is the Lyer Tho. Hicks or G. W. Again G. W. seems to be angry with my Citation out of Mr. Hicks's Dialogue p. 24 25. In Antichrist in Spirit p. 14 15. As for us had the Scriptures never been we could have known what is therein contained I have also heard this from a Quaker my self But G. W. was not so fair as to mention this though it was the ground of my Demand And let the Reader observe what an apparent Perversion George Whitehead makes of my Words and the occasion of them p. 18 19. of his Pamphlet after he hath charged us with Forgery Now pray observe saith he what strange Test or Proof your Agent Edw. Paye puts upon us to evince an immediate Inspiration G. W. knows this Question was demanded to prove what is before mentioned Namely that had the Scriptures never been they could have known what was therein contained Now if this be so then let the Quakers resolve me what those things were that Jesus did that are not written Joh. 21. 25. or what were the Contents of that writing on the ground Joh. 8. 68. Or else let their proud boasting of immediate Inspirations be condemned to perpetual silence c. Saith G. W. Hereupon you have passed unjust Judgment and falsely charged us with proud boasting and argued absurdly against immediate Inspiration as if none have the Spirit of Christ unless they know and can declare all things that it knows I answer It is a strange thing to me that G. Whitehead doth not see that he condemns himself whilst he is judging another and it is a lamentable thing that the Quakers will admit of no distinctions But it verifies that true Proverb that the want of distinctions are the cause of mistakes Here G. W. will not admit of a distinction betwixt immediate Inspirations and the mediate or more common Gifts of the Spirit Now all Christians that I know of will admit of this distinction That it is one thing to be immediately and extraordinarily endowed and inspired with the Holy Ghost as the Prophets and Apostles

Dip. Pl. p. 13. Burrough's Works p. 150. It is not our wonted course to say that Christ hath no Body but his Church But we say the Church is his Body Observe they do not usually say so but it appears they believe so See ibid p. 151. 152. To say Christ hath two Bodies one out of the sight of the Saints There is so much Wickedness and Ignorance in the Broachers of such a Particular that it needs no Answer c. See G. Whitehead's Verdict and I shall leave this to the Reader 's Judgment his Apology p. 33. Them that accuse us for saying Christ hath but one Body should produce Scripture that saith he hath two And where doth the Scripture say that Christ's glorified Body in Heaven is of humane Nature Now the Quakers own Christ's Church to be his Body then that is the one Body G. W. intends And it is monstrous to say he hath two So that then I do not wrong the Quakers in saying that they own Christ to have no Body but his Church Now all Christians own Christ's Church to be his Mystical Body and they also believe him to have a personal glorious Body distinct from his Church saith he Ep. c. p. 59. refers to Pernel's Sheild of Truth p. 12. Where I. P. calls Water-Baptism a formal Imitation and Invention of Men c. G. Whitehead saith James Pernel speaks not this of Water-Baptism without distinction Answer However he saith so and then the Charge is owned to be true To this agrees Smith's Primer p. 39. Thy Baptism Bread and Wine rose from the Pope's Invention And James Nailor's Salutation to the Seed of God p. 33 34. calls Water-Baptism a carnal thing Now let the judicious Reader judge how far I have been concerned in wronging the Quakers c. To conclude we will give an Answer to G. Whitehead's impertinent Questions though I think they are not worth taking notice of His Questions are 4 but his Reasons for asking them vanish in answering the first viz. Was E. P. deputed and approved by your Congregation or any select Assembly of Elders or Ministers of the Baptized People or Churches to write or publish his said Book against the People called Quakers Or did he do it on his own Authority or Head with your Approbation only Answer Your pretended Faith being published and dispersed plentifully here it did more directly affect this People of the baptized Way and therefore E. P. did write and publish the said Book by the approbation of the Majority of this Congregation And so he did not do it on his own Head Neither did we see it needful to desire the approbation of others herein though several have approved of it since And it is most ridiculously impertinent for you so often to speak of defaming you as a People except you could shew a Dispensation to be universal Dictators and a License to disperse your confused and pernicious Stuff without Controul Moreover Edw. Paye hath this to say that although he doth not pretend to Perfection as some of the Quakers have done that is a living without Sin Yet when G. W. becomes Master of an Inquisition Edw. Paye will give sufficient Testimonies both of his Life and Doctrine to the confutation of his Defamers And the mean time he challenges any to charge and prove against him any thing unbecoming a Man and a Christian respecting either Life or Principles humane Frailties excepted And although G. W. infinuates most arrogantly that he had need to be a Man of singular Piety and eminent Parts that is sit to discourse with a Quaker in this Controversie yet E. P. believes that a Man of as mean Qualifications as himself can do it And let this serve for an Answer to your impertinent Questions And now G. W. I conclude with a Word to thee and do hereby declare that I never had the least prejudice against or Controversie with any Quaker about civil things though I have been intimate with several of them both at Bristol when I lived there and elsewhere but from your Principles Liberanos Domine I hope shall ever be my Litany And I hope all that are or would be Christians will join with me and say Amen And now I have done except I am foolishly provoked which if I am you may it is like have a Quarterly Packet to keep your Fame in remembrance This is all from thy Friend Edward Paye FINIS ERRATA PAge 3. line 20. for ●●w read ●●r p. 24. 1. 7. dele And. 1. 26. for Mat● read Mat● p. 29. 1. 28. for 〈◊〉 read George