Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	great_a	know_v	time_n	2,755	5	3.2913	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A84135	The deeds of Dr. Denison a little more manifested. By his ansvver to the defence of John Etherington. VVhich he published in Anno Dom. 1641. against his false accusations and the depositions of his false witnesses. Whereupon he was censured by the high commission court. And his reply to the doctors answer. Which answer he hath added to his Woolfe-sermon booke.	Etherington, John, fl. 1641-1645.	1642 (1642)	Wing E3383; Thomason E147_9; ESTC R22317	10,645	17

THE DEEDS OF Dr. Denison A little more manifested BY HIS ANSVVER TO THE DEFENCE OF John Etherington VVhich he published in Anno Dom. 1641. against his false accusations and the depositions of his false witnesses Whereupon he was censured by the High Commission Court And his reply to the Doctors Answer Which answer he hath added to his Woolfe-Sermon Booke PRO. 11.6.9 The righteousnesse of the upright shall deliver them But transgressors shall be taken in their own naughtinesse An hypocrite with his mouth destroieth his neighbour But through knowledge shall the just be preserved PRO. 12.6 The words of the wicked are to lie in wait for bloud but the mouth of the upright shall deliver them LONDON Printed by F. L. and are to be sold by Iohn Wright in the little Old-Baily 1642. THE DEEDS OF Doctor Denison a little more manifested IOHN ETHERINGTON's Reply IN the first page of your Answer Mr. D. on the 77. page as it stands in the end of your novellish booke not to reply to every word or saying of yours unmateriall I charge you with falshood in this that you say I complained first against you whereas I complained not first to go to law in the High-Commission Court which you would seem to inferre and make people beleeve but only in way of request to have things heard in peace and ended without law And this was after you had scandalized and reviled me by name in your Pulpits and that I had sought unto you often and you would by no means be spoken with according as I have declared in my defence And to the Archbishop you prevented me and got letters Missive granted to sue me in the Court all which you know very well to be true Let the Reader now judge who is here to be blamed for false speaking and evill doing you or I. And in the second page of your Answer in that you say you might have required of me costs of sute but did not you tell the Reader a manifest untruth for you did move the Court for costs of suite the same time that I was discharged and were checkt and reproved by some of the Court for the same and bid hold your peace as can be proved by sufficient witnesse if need be therefore let the Reader consider how you favoured me as you say And whereas in the same page you deny that you sought after or thirsted for my bloud besides the report of a Minister on Master Ward that told it me when I was in prison as a thing that he heard from your own mouth Your Woolfe Sermon as you preached it at the Crosse did discover your desires in that respect to many that then heard you and so judged And in your booke of that Sermon though it be much altered and refined of many hatefull and bloud-thirsty words you then uttered yet there is still enough therin that proves the same And in that you deny you said of me by name Whether he be dead or alive with God or the devill I cannot tell c. There is witnesse sufficient to prove that you did so speak in your Pulpit at Creechurch and that you were my cheife accuser except the chiefest wicked one it is well enough known to many And concerning the Depositions of your witnesses whom you stile honest men Ministers and Professours no knights of the Post c. Let the Reader but consider their depositions which neither they nor you can deny to be their own words and my defence also and he shall see if he be judicious and not partiall what honest professours they are Men may professe strictnesse in Religion as the Pharisees did and yet be no better then they that bare false witnesse against Christ and persecuted him And whereas in the third page you blame me so greatly for that in my defence Mr. Robrowgh is set down Curate if he had wrong done him therein let the Reader blame the Register or Robrowgh himselfe for so I found it in his deposition Recorded which I have yet under the Registers hand to shew and whatsoever he is now he might be so then for ought I know and to have the care of or be a curer of souls need be no disparedgement to him nay rather it would be happie for him if he were so And for your wondring that I so charge Sir Henry Martine whom you so greatly extoll in the same third page which you say I durst not have done if he had been alive Whereas it is well known I did it at least ten years before openly to the Court and in his own hearing and sight and he was living after my defence was published in print though you caring not to publish lies say the contrary But Master Doctor you have great reason to set forth the praise of Sir Henry Martin and to extoll him because he holpe you so well out of the mire wherein you had so unadvisedly befowled your selfe not only in this your evill and unchristian-like dealing against me but also in respect of your other businesse at Cree-Church concerning some of the chiefe of your Parish for which the Archbishop and Court displaced you and especially that of the women for whch that Knight got you a purgation granted by the Court that you might thereby clense your selfe therefrom without any Repentance or Remition These are some of your sure signes that Sir Henry Martin was a righteous Judge and for which hee suffered blame by some great men as the Archbishop and some other of the Bishops the same time as you know Your saying in your fourth page and your glorying in the presentation and dedication of your booke to the King I refer to the consideration of the Reader that hath or shall reademy defence and request him also to reade and consider well your Epistle Dedicatorie of your Wolfes booke to the King and see how you play the Sycophant and Colloguer especially with the High Commission Court and Bishops of Canterbury and London Abbot and Mountney And in your fifth page where you say I pretend I could never obtaine to speake with you c. and tell of Master Cleaver Robrowgh Stephens c. and then say that I know you have met me divers times in the streets of London and said unto me Iohn Hetherington I pray let me speake with you c. This tale of yours is a very untruth for untill I complained of you to the Bishop of London all the while that you scadalized and reviled me by name in your Pupits which was the time wherein I say and you know I often sought and could never obtaine to speake with you And within three dayes after we had beene before the Bishop of London you entred your suit and got Letters Missive out against me It is true after you had gotten sentence passed against me and that I had enduted three years imprisonment and being discharged and at liberty I met with you at the end of Cornhill by the

faithfulnesse in and as touching his covenant to the faithfull and their seed as circumcision in the flesh was to faithfull Abraham and his seed And that it is an outward signe shewing that we must be circumcised or cleansed in heart by the grace and Spirit of God through faith in Christ if ever we be heirs with Abraham And so I hold outward baptisme to be in force unto christians as circumcision was to the Jews contrary to your lying words that say I deny it Neither is this a familisticall trick as you so scandalously speak according to your old customes in your wolvish booke and in your former invective Sermons And although there be now no High-Commission Court as you tell me implying that you would complain against me again there if there were yet let me tell you sir there are other Courts as high and as good as that and lawes also as just and good to judge of these matters unto which you may complain if you please And whereas in your 91 page otherwise the 15 you say I have a fling at the Lords Supper a fine phrase for a Doctor And that under colour of speaking against the carnall eating and drinking the body and bloud of Christ in that Sacrament You say I condemne also the opinion of spirituall eating for say you these are my words Neither do we by the actions of eating the bread and drinking the wine of the Sacrament eat or drink the grace of God purchased by the body and bloud of Christ I confesse these are my words in my defence Now I pray sir do I in these words deny or condemne the opinion as you speak of spirituall eating and drinking the bodie and bloud of Christ or the spirituall enjoyment of the grace and love of God through faith in Christ which that Sacrament of the Supper doth shew forth unto all true christians Nay let the judicious christian Reader judge and consider what is further exprest in my defence But you Mr. Doctor your opinion and doctrine belike is that Christians by the very acts of eating the bread and drinking the wine of the Sacrament eate and drinke the grace of God Is this your orthodoxall doctrine sir is this your opinion of spirituall eating a fit man sure are you not to preach the Lecture of preparation to the Sacrament as you are admitted to do at Buttolphs without Algate and well are the people taught there the while are they not let the orthodoxall Reader judge That religious gentlewoman as I suppose she truly was which gave you that legacie to performe that work had done far better if she had given it to the poore widdow and fatherlesse or have left the same to such over-seers as should have disposed it to some one that could and would have performed the worke better and more found them so Now to make some use of your owne phrase M. Doctor who doth grosly abuse divinitie who is the proud ignorant sott who is meet to be censured to stand at Pauls-Crosse with a paper on his breast expressing his grosly abusing divinitie and venting false doctrine poisoning of others with a thousand eies looking upon him Doctor Denison or who let the judicious reader judge It is true M. Doctor that through you and your false witnesses Henry Robrostgh and Iohn Okeie and by their false depositions false I say as the Reader by my defence may plainly see One Bishop said in passing sentence according as you in your answer at the end of your wolvish booke have set it down which I had my selfe written in a coppie of my defence which you had unjustly gotten and kept among you from me otherwise I suppose you could not so readily have mentioned them but it is no matter I have suffered a great deale more then that by your false and wicked dealing and the rest of your false witnesses Rowland Thomson Thomas Rogers George Dun Peter Worcester Christopher Nicholson and the rest as I have in my defence in some part declared And now M. Doctor let me propound a matter or two unto you You may see and so may others by this and by my defence especiall how plainly and openly I have declared and published the things by you charged by your witnesses deposed and by the High-Commission Court passed in sentence against me and what in part I have suffered and do still suffer through the same And you may see how I refer all to the judicious christian Reader to consider of and judge You know sir that after this cause of yours against me there was as I have a little remembred you of before a Cause or two commenced against your selfe in the same High Comission Court concerning some of the chiefe of your Porish of Creechurch and some severall women whom you were charged to have abused They of your Parish publiquely in your Pulpit and the women secretly in your chamber I will not here name the particular abuses they were plainly enough spoken and read in the Court the foulenesse whereof being such as caused all or the most part of the people there present hearing the same to hang down their heads greatly ashamed thereat when you stood holding up your head boldly in the face of the Court not seeming to be ashamed at all which many did wonder at to behold and one Bishop observing you and having heard the foule matters that were deposed against you by so many witnesss as you know not knight of the post sir any more then as you tell me they were not that deposed your Cause against me but such as if the Reader please he may inquire of as you speak This Bishop as you may remember reproved you very sharply and said do you see how boldly he stands here before us facing us he hath a forehead of brasse Now sir if your Cause be so good and your selfe so honest and innocent as you would have all men think which yet they do not wright done all what your accusers have charged you with and what hath been deposed against you and by what manner of persons every thing in their own plain words and what the sentence of the Court was and publish the same openly in print with your defence unto every particular charge and deposition as you see I have done that of yours against me Do this I say if your cause be good and cleane and your selfe honest and upright it will be no greater chage I suppose then the new re-printing of your wolfe-sermon that so all men may see plainly and judge of the cause and you accordingly But otherwise if it be naught and foule and your self justly charged as you in your owne conscience know best then let it alone except in the way of humble confession of your sins unto God in true repentance if it be possible Another thing that I propound unto you is concerning my selfe and you and your witnesses seeing my defence will not silent you nor all that I have unjustly suffered by your meanes satisfie you that you and they will be willing with me to have all matters between us heard and considered of anew in a faire way either before the Bishop of London and some other Ministers chosen on both sides or else by some Committee of the Parliament if it may be obiained that so the blame may be laid rightlie where it ought And as touching your Pauls-Crosse wolvish-sermon that master-peece of yours which you in the conclusion of your answer to my defence say you have for this Cause caused to be new printed that so the Reader may see whether I have answered what concerns me in it or no telling in print of purpose a manifest lie it being not in any part new printed but only the rem under of an old impression printed in Anno 1627. foureteen years agoe to which you have put a new title page dated 1641. and added your answer to the end numbering the pages thereof according to your old booke as if indeed all were printed anew together according to your saying so to delude the Reader as your usuall custome and manner in all your matters is and hath been to do with cunning equivocations falshood and lies whereof that wolvish-sermon book of yours is full agreeable to your Articles against me in the Court and to your witnesses depositions for like master like schollers and servants like accuser like witnesses And for your booke I say no more of it at this time but this let it remaine among the rest of your deeds as it hitherto hath beene a monument to the world of your wickednesse and folly And so I leave you and your witnesses together a while to consider of all what you have done and of my propositions though I have not any beliefe that you will regard my motion or have a thought in your heart to do either the one or the other IOHN 3. For every one that doth evill hateth the light neither cometh to the light least his deeds should be reproved But he that doth truth cometh to the light that his deeds may be made manifest FINIS