Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	find_v	scripture_n	word_n	3,449	5	4.1562	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47118	An account of the great divisions, amongst the Quakers, in Pensilvania, &c. as appears by their own book, here following, printed 1692, and lately came from thence, intituled, viz. The plea of the innocent, against the false judgment of the guilty : being a vindication of George Keith, and his friends, who are joined with him in this present testimony, from the false judgment, calumnies, false informations and defamations of Samuel Jenings, John Simcock, Thomas Lloyd, an others, joyned with them, being in number twenty eight : directed, by way of epistle, to faithful friends of truth, in Pensilvania, East and West-Jersey, and else-where, as occasion requireth.	Keith, George, 1639?-1716.; Budd, Thomas, 1648-1699.	1692 (1692)	Wing K136; ESTC R14385	22,843	26

imprisoned or imbondaged with other words to that effect so cannot die Another called Rob. Young a great Preacher among them openly said as many can bear witness in one of these Meetings That he did not find Christ without in all the Scripture further positively affirming That Christ when he ascended into the Cloud was separated from his Body and tho' one or two checkt him a little for his assertion yet no further notice was taken of it to bring him to any Condemnation for his Blasphemy Also Arth. Cook in one of these Meetings accused G. K. for saying at the Meeting at R. Ewer's House That Christs Body that was crucified and buried is gone into Heaven was is in Heaven oven the very same Body which G. K. most freely acknowledged he had so affirmed and that Christs body was not changed in Being or Substance of Body but in Manner Condition And whereas at one of these Meetings G. K. had complained against J. Simcock that he had questioned G. K. at the Meeting at R. Ewer's saying Did Christs Bones rise which G. K. affirmed and proved from Scripture but the said J. S. boldly deny'd that he asked any such Question until J. Delavall and W. Bradford affirmed they heard him question it And not only J. Simcock Arth. Cook and others did openly blame G. K. both at the Meeting at R. Ewers and at others Meetings at the Yearly Meeting for imposing a Novelty upon his Antient Brethren but more especially and principally T. Lloyd who was the great Attorney for W. Stockdale and the great Mouth of all these that opposed G. K. in his Testimony to these sound Fundamental Principles and Doctrines of the Christian Faith did oft object against G. K's Imposing an Unscriptural Faith on his Brethren all which is so openly known to many that we judge they scarce have the Confidence themselves to deny it but what was this Unscriptural Faith that they did blame G. K. for imposing on his Antient Brethren even no other but this That we ought to believe in Christ without us in Heaven as well as in Christ within for Salvation and That Christ is in Heaven having the true Nature of Man both of Soul and Body the same he had on Earth for Being but wonderfully and most gloriously changed in Condition and Manner and is not only God in Heaven but both God and Man and yet one Lord Jesus Christ and many are Witnesses how at the School-house Meeting as well as at these other Meetings aforesaid T. Lloyd argued That Faith in Christ without us as he died for our sins and rose again was not necessary to our Salvation which his Son-in-law I. Delavall openly contradicted bringing for his Proof Rom. 10. 9 10. And at one of these Yearly Meetings T. Lloyd said Christ within did all which J. Wilsford contradicted saying That he did not believe for Christ without did somewhat when he died for us And at another of these Meetings Samuel Jenings having rudely uncivilly stopt G. K. in his Testimony when he was recommending to them seriously to consider whether it was not their Duty to preach Christ outwardly more than they did said If thou preached Christ without less others might preach him more whereof divers present took great notice and was very offensive to them as well as to G. K. and did signifie that S. Jenings was too much a Preacher at his own will as well as prejudiced against G. K. that because he would not seem to follow G. K. he and others would not preach what G. K. preached tho' true And this is but a hint of many more things that could be mentioned as Instances of their gross Ignorance Unbelief and Blasphemy that some of them showed themselves openly guilty of at these Meetings and others their being guilty of gross Partiality and Hypocrisie labouring to cover these men in their Impious Blasphemies against Christ Jesus the Son of Man Was it therefore any matter of Wonder or Crime that G. K. being zealous and servent for the true Faith and Doctrine of Christ so much openly contradicted by some of them and questioned by others at these Meetings aforesaid was stirred in spirit to use sharp words against them which yet were all true and therefore no Railing nor yet blame-worthy even as it is said of Paul That his Spirit was stirred in him when he saw the City viz. of Athens wholly given to Idolatry And suppose that G. K. did exceed at times the due bounds by great provocations on their side Is it not great Hypocrisie and Partiality of these men so severely to judge him and wholly to conceal nor only their own Ignorance Error and Blasphemy but the extream Passion the rude uncivil and unmannerly Speeches they uttered against him both in these Meetings and often since calling him Reviler of his Brethren Accuser of the Brethren Brat of Babylon One that always endeavoured to keep down he power of Truth drawing from the Gift of God calling him also Pope Primate of Pensilvania Father Confessor accusing him of Railing Envy extream Passion and a Turbulent and Uusubdued Spirit and not only so but most uncivily and unchristianly yea inhumanely otherwise treating him in these Meetings often six or ten all at once speaking to him and some pulling him by one sleeve and others by the skirts of his Coat more like Mad men than Sobet and some bidding him go out and when he essayed to go out prayed them to let him go others pulling him back and detaining him so that greater Confusion was scarce ever seen in any Meetings pretending to Christianity and why do they conceal all this their rude and base and inhumane Carriage as well as uncivil words towards G. K but to demonstrate their Partiality and Hypocrisie at least to give us a fair occasion to demonstrate it and what Partial and Hypocritical men they are whom GOD hath in great measure already discovered and we doubt not will further discover in due time And many of these men have discovered no less Ignorance and Error in the late Difference that hath happened betwixt G. K. J Fuzwater who hath openly in the face of a Monthly Meeting accused G. K. for denying the sufficiency of the Light and the rhing at last is come to this Issue that by the Act of a Monthly Meeting held ad Philadelphia the 26. 3. mon. G. K. is condemned for saying The Light is not sufficient without something else and at the next Monthly Meeting following T. Lloyd did acknowledge in the open hearing of all present whereof many are ready to bear Witness which we judge they will not deny That by that something else they knew that G. K. did hold as he hath oft declared both in publick Testimonies other occasional Discourses The Man Christ Jesus without us and what he did and suffered for us on Earth and what he now doth for us in Heaven Whereupon G. K. said

If this be a Guiltiness That the Light within doth not save us or is not sufficient without the Man Christ Jesus and his Death Resurrection Ascension Mediation for us in Heaven I own my self guilty but by their thus condemning G. K. for his sound Doctrine and clearing T. F. they have declared openly their being no Christians and therefore it is no Railing nor Ungodly Speech to call them Ignorant Heathens for it is their proper Name due to them seeing they will not own any thing else not the Man Christ Jesus but only the Light in them to be sufficient and necessary to their Salvation but for a more full account of their thus publickly renouncing the Man Christ Jesus we refsr to two Papers of Minuts writ by G. K. of what passed at the last Quarterly and Monthly Meetings about this matter But whereas some of them say They have not cleared T. F. let all impartial men who read their act recorded in their Monthly meeting Book a copy of which with great difficulty we have at last obtained judge whether their words in the said Act doth not clear him when they say The Meeting saw no Reason to give Judgment against him in this particular above-mentioned as much as when the Grand-Jury bringeth in their Verdict of an Ignoramus into the Court doth not clear the Person accused for that time and whether this their clearing of him is not further confirmed by their allowing and countenancing him to preach and pray in their Meetings and the last clause of their Paper concluding that T. F's Charge in it self wes true 2dly Whereas in their Epistle they use a great many words in Commendation of what formerly G. K. was and how once he walked in the Counsel of God and was little in his own Eyes and his Brethren honourable in his esteem and that he was lovely in that day when the Beauty of the Lord was upon him and his Comliness covered him and other high words of Commendation scarce given to many far more worthy than he It is very apparent that all this is but on purpose first to raise him up as it were on high that they may seem the more to throw him down into their deep Pit of Infamy false Judgment they have given against him together with their deceitful hypocritical Lamentation over his Fall from the kigh places of Israel as a man slain in his high places this is not unlike to their Predecessors the Persecuting Clergy of the Church of Rome who before they burnt that worthy Servant of Christ John Huss they caused be put on him his Priestly Robes then afterwards stript him of them on purpose the more to defame him and render him vile before the People the which as they were doing that worthy Servant of Christ called to remembrance that White Vesture which Herod put upon Christ to mock him withal as Fox doth relate it in his Book of Martyrs pag. 739. Tom. 1. But we would have these men to know that G. K needs none of their hypocritical and mock Lamentations but rather let them in good earnest weep for themselves and for their great Ignorance Error and Unbelief that some if not all of them have sufficiently discovered themselves guilty of and most of them of their great Prejudice and Hypocrisie and all of them of their Folly and rash and false Judgment which will be their own burden and for which we wish them true Repentance And seeing their Accusations against G. K. lie much in bare generals we see no cause further to take notice of them as they contain bare generals as his being guilty of Anger Envy Cruelty Treachery and other false and reproachful Speeches they give out against him but to show that for want of particular matter against him they thus labour to defame him so much in bare Generals a way common to all Sophisters and false Accusers And for the hard words they alledg he used to call some of them as Fools ignorant Heathens Infidels silly Souls Lyars Hereticks Rotten Ranters Muggletonians c. G. K. saith and that in the uprightness of Heart that he never gave such Names to any of them but to such as he can prove did deserve them and for which he can appeal to all impartial men that profess Christianity whether they to whom he gave such Names did not deserve them as when one of them said to him in his own house in the hearing of some present That seeing to preach Faith in Christ without did give Offence to his Brethren and was like to make a Division among Friends it was best to let it alone as Paul said concerning eating of Flesh if it did offend his weak Brother this W. Gabitas said to him whereupon G. K. said as he solemnly declareth and as some do witness Thou silly Soul or little Soul dost thou compare the preaching of Christ Crucified to eating of flesh And to call Men Fools and Sots yea blind and dark Sots that deserve it hath been the practice of some very eminent Friends for no greater cause than some have given who have openly renounced the Faith of Christ without them as necessary to their Salvation as we can sufficiently prove some of them have done who deservedly may be called Ignorant Heathens Infidels and Hereticks and if G. K. did call some of them Lyars he can prove they were such and that is no Railing to call a Lyar by his true Name so did Christ call such as deserved it and so did Paul and divers of them that have signed that Epistle have called G. K. openly in a Meeting Lyar and other unworthy and base Names without all just ground and therefore it is base Partiality in these men to condemn G. K. for that which they are guilty of themselves some of them having not only called him Lyar but Apostate and worse than Prophane as particularly S. Jenings in the hearing of divers credible Witnesses and Arthur Cook who is of their side tho' his hand is not at their Paper being absent at the School-house-Meeting did openly call him Muggletonian for affirming That Christ had the true Body of Man in Heaven the which Body was not every where of this many can bear witness and at the same time the said A. C. would not acknowledge that Christs appearance to Paul mentioned 1 Cor. 15. 8. was without him alledging it was Only within and put G. K. to prove Where we read in Scripture of Faith in Christ within and Christ without as also to prove that Cornelius was faithful to the Light within or had the Light within And T. Lloyd hath used very uncivil Expressions to G. K. in some of those Meetings one time saying No Man could differ with G. K. but he was in danger of the Life of his Soul by him which G. K. was greatly offended with and judged the most uncharitable saying that ever any of his greatest Enemies gave him this T. L. knoweth

An Account of the Great Divisions Amongst the QUAKERS IN Pensilvania c. As appears by their own Book here following Printed 1692. and lately came from thence Intituled viz. The Plea of the Innocent against the False Judgment of the Guilty Being a Vindication of George Keith and his Friends who are joined with him in this present Testimony from the False Judgment Calumnies false Informations and Defamations of Samuel Jenings John Simcock Thomas Lloyd and others joyned with them being in Number Twenty Eight Directed by way of Epistle to faithful Friends of Truth in Pensilvania East and West-Jersey and else-where as occasion requireth John 7. 50 51. Nicodemus said Doth our Law judge any Man before it hear him Acts 25. 16 17. It is not the manner of the Romans said Festus to deliver any man to die before that he which is accused have the Accusers face to face and to have License to answer for himself concerning the Crime laid against him Psal 58. 1 2. Do ye indeed speak Righteousness O Congregation Do ye judge Uprightly O ye Sons of Men Yea in Heart you work Wickedness you weigh the Violence of your Hands in the Earth London Printed for and are to be Sold by John Gwillim in Bishopsgate street and Rich. Baldwin in Warwick-lane 1692. The Plea of the Innocent c. Directed by way of Epistle to faithful Friends of Truth in Pensilvania East and West-Jarsey c. Dear Friends and Brethren every where to whom this may come WE dearly Salute you in the Love of God The occasion of this present Writing is in Vindication of the Truth and Us the defamed Witnesses of it and particularly of George Keith from the false Judgment Calumnies false Informations and Defamations of S. Jennings John Simcock and Thomas Lloyd Pretended Preachers and others joined with them being in Number Twenty Eight in their late Epistle sent to the Monthly and Quarterly Meetings in Pensilvania East and West-Jarsey First of all whereas they pretend to give an Account to these Meetings of the Tedious Exercise and Vexatious Perplexity they have met with in their late Friend George Keith for several Months past In this they have dealt most unfairly and unjustly with him in that they have given no account of the Occasion of that called by them the Tedious Exercise and Vexatious Perplexity c. which because they have not given we see fit to do the Truth and all Friends of it to whose hands this may come that Justice as to give you a true Information of the Cause and Occasion of the late Difference that hath happened betwixt divers of them that hath signed their Epistle and these the chiefest among them and G. K. which was this viz. About fifteen Months ago Wiiliam Stockdale an Antient Preacher having accused G. K. of preaching Two Christs because he preached Faith in Christ within and Faith in Christ without the which G. K. hearing after he had privately dealt with him laid his Complaint first before about twelve of the Friends of the Ministry met at the House of Robert Ewer who having done nothing in the said Meeting to bring W. Stockdale to due Coviction or Condemnation for his said Error but rather for the most part did excuse and defend him as can well be proved by divers Credible Witnesses then present only two of the said Friends of the Ministry then present viz. John Hart and John Delavall dissented from the rest then G. K. did again lay his Complaint before Friends of the Ministry at the last Yearly Meeting at Philadelphia in the first week of 7 mon. 1691. and soberly desired to have their sence and judgment Whether he was guilty of preaching Two Christs or whether W. S. was not guilty of Blasphemy for saying Christ within and Christ without are Two Christs and no less than six several Meetings were had about this Matter in that time of the Yearly Meeting and the first Meeting continued about ten hours viz. from about nine in the fore-noon to the time that Candles were lighted in the Evening And it must need be granted That it was a time of tedious Exercise vexatious Perplexity in all the six Meetings but who was to be blamed for it deserveth your serious Examination Is it not matter of Astonishment that such an easie Question being proposed to so many men called Ministers of Christ all highly pretending to the Spirits immediate teachings and leadings and to be in a degree of Christianity above all other Professions in Christendom there being assembled of these called Ministers cut of these three Provinces about forty or fifty if not more six Meetings could not determine it viz. Whether to preach Faith in Christ within us and Faith in Christ without us was to preach Two Christs or One Whereas G. K. had many Witnesses to clear him that he always said when he treated on that Subject that Christ within us and Christ without us was but one Christ the Measure of the Gift of Christ within us and the Fullness without us in the Man Christ Jesus being one Lord Jesus Christ a sincere Christian though in the lowest degree and but a Babe in Christ could have easily determined and resolved this Question and given judgment against W. S. being guilty of Blasphemy against the Son of Man though not against the Holy Ghost for his blasphemous Assertion That to preach faith in Christ within and Faith in Christ without was to preach Two Christs for according to him Christ without is a false Christ he being a great Owner in Pretence and words of Christ within and yet which will be matter of Admiration to all Impartial Persons that hear it who have the least true Knowledge in the Mystery of Christ this great and solemn Assembly of so many high Pretenders to be Ministers of Christ were at a great stand and demur to determine and in the conclusion of the sixth Meeting gave but a very slender and partial determination and judgment concerning it which yet such as it was was not intimated by any Order of the Meeting as themselves have acknowledged And indeed such was the Partiality as well as the Ignorance and gross Unbelief that openly and manifestly appeared in these Meetings whereof sufficient Proof can be given and that of divers owned and esteemed great Preachers among us that is scarcely credible a hint whereof we think necessary to give for your true Information In one of these six Meetings T. Fitzwater in Prayer said O God that dyed in us and laid down thy Life in us and took it up again c. After he had ended his Prayer G. Keith G. Hutcheson and J. Hampton but few or none others greatly blamed T. F. for his Prayer for it appeared to them as Blasphemy and surely it is not only contrary to Scrripture but to the express Testimony of Friends That God is Immortal and cannot die yea G. W. in his Book called Judgment fixt expresly saith God cannot be