people go up with him But stay at the bottom of the Mount as they did before the giving the X. Commandments XIX 17. below the place where the Elders were So I think Maimonides rightly understands this place in his More Nevoch P. II. c. 32. where speaking of the several degrees of Prophecy or Familiarity with God he observes that Moses was here placed in the Supreme degree he alone being allowed to come near the LORD below him was Aaron placed and below him Nadab and Abihu and below them the LXX Elders and beneath them the rest of the People Which is the meaning of that saying of their Wise men Moses is a wall by himself and Aaron a wall by himself that is they were in separate Apartments at this glorious Appearance of God Ver. 3. And Moses came From the Mount where he had received the Precepts mentioned in the three foregoing Chapters And told the People all the words of the LORD and all the Judgments Some understand here by the words of the LORD the Ten Commandments called the Ten Words XXXVIII 18. But these words the People heard spoken by God himself and not by the report of Moses Therefore I take these words to signisie rather what he had spoken in the latter part of the foregoing Chapter from the 20th Verse to the end And then by all the Judgments he means those Laws which he had received for their good Government in the XXI XXII Chapters and the former part of the XXIII And all the people answered with one voice and said In all likelyhood Moses had told the Elders what God had said to him and they went and told it to the People who gave the following Answer to them For thus it was before XIX 6 7. All the words that the LORD hath said will we do They had consented before in general to do whatsoever God required of them having him for their King and Governour XIX 6 7 8. but now they consent in particular after God had declared what he would have them do in the XX Chapter and Moses had also reported the rest of the Judgments delivered in the XXI XXII XXIII Chapters Ver. 4. And Moses wrote all the words of the LORD Both the Ten Commandments and all the rest of the Judgments delivered in the foregoing Chapters God indeed wrote the Ten Commandments himself but for the present Moses made a Record of them that the People might not only hear but read what they had to do And rose up early in the morning The next morning it is likely after he had received those Judgments and delivered them to the People and wrote them in a Book which was upon the seventh day of Sivan as I observed XX. 21. That is on the sixth of our June as Jac. Capellus reckons Therefore on the eighth of Sivan he built the Altar c. as it here follows And builded an Altar under the hill At the foot of the Hill where the People were allowed to stand This Altar was to represent God to whom Sacrifices were offered upon it And twelve Pillars according to the twelve Tribes of Israel This was to represent all the People The Gentiles abusing such Pillars to Idolatrous uses the erecting of them is afterward forbidden in the Law But before the building of the Tabernacle Moses here erects them as Jacob had piously done in former times XXXV Gen. 14. See Selden L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 6. p. 185. Ver. 5. And he sent young men of the Children of Israel These are said by the Hebrews to be the First-born as Onkelos here expresly translates it He sent the First-born and the Paraphrase ascribed to Vzielides follows him adding this reason Because the Aaronical Priests were not yet consecrated The Arabick and Persian Versions say the same as Mr. Selden hath observed L. I. de Succession ad Pontif. c. 1. and most Interpreters have been of the same mind But I have often observed before particularly XIX 22. that I can see no proof of this that they only officiated as Priests every Man anciently in his own Family having a right to offer Sacrifice till the Law of Moses restrained it to the Family of Aaron Therefore I take these young men to have been the choicest Persons among them whether First-born or others who had been appointed to Minister unto God For Joshua who is called here v. 13. Moses his Minister is in XI Numb 28. called his young man Such were fittest for all Service especially for that of Sacrificing to God For which they anciently chose the strongest and properest Persons as we see in the Greek story of Jason which our Learned Dr. Spencer observes p. 140. whose Sacrifices were led to the Altar by the young men of his Company i. e. Men of greatest strength and beauty L. I. Argonaut And this so far remained after the Priesthood was consined to the Family of Aaron that no Man was permitted to officiate at the Altar after he was Fifty years of Age that is when he was past his best as we speak the flower and strength of his Age VIII Numb 25. Fortunatus Scacchus conjectures that there were XII of these young Men one of each Tribe who offered in the Name of their Brethren Myrothec Sacr. Elaeochrism p. 2. c. 59. Which offered Burnt-offerings and sacrificed Peace-offerings of Oxen unto the LORD Though Oxen are only mentioned yet there were other Creatures Sacrificed as appears from IX Hebr. 19 20. And in following times Peace-offerings might be either of Calves or Lambs or Goats as we sind in III Lev. and so might Burnt-offerings also see I Lev. 2 10. Our Learned Primate Vsher thinks also there were Expiatory Sacrifices offered together with these Burnt-offerings and Peace-offerings and that in the first place ad A. M. 2513. mens 3. Ver. 6. And Moses took half the blood and put it in basons It may be a question whether he spake of the Blood of all the Sacrifices or only of the Expiatory if there were any or of the Burnt-offerings or Peace-offerings But which way soever that be determined this half of the Blood it is certain was reserved to be sprinkled on the People v. 8. Concerning the word Agganot which we translate Basons the Learned Reader may consult Bochartus in his Hierozoic P. I. p. 549. And half of the Blood he sprinkled on the Altar The Altar representing God as was said before v. 4. this Blood sprinkled upon it signified that he for his part engaged to be faithful in the Covenant he now made with them and they with him by performing all the Promises he had newly made them by Moses in the latter end of the foregoing Chapter especially those four great Promises of Plenty Health numerous Off-spring and Long-life v. 25 26. together with the driving out the People of Canaan from before them v. 27 c. Ver. 7. And he took the Book Some have made it a difficulty to find what Book
this was and have been pleased to fancy that some Book which Moses wrote is lost When this plainly refers to what is said v. 4. where we read that Moses wrote all the words of the LORD that is the Commandments and Judgments mentioned in the four foregoing Chapters Which though they made no great Volume yet might be called a Book in their Language for even the Bill of Divorcement which they gave their Wives and was very short is called by this Name of Sepher a Book XXIV Deut. 1. Of the Covenant That they might remember upon what terms he would bestow upon them the fore-named Blessings he engages them in a Solemn Covenant to observe the Commandments and Judgments contained in this Book Ver. 8. And Moses took the blood That half of it which was in the Basons v. 6. And sprinkled it on the people As he had sprinkled one half on the Altar in token God was a Party in the Covenant so he sprinkled the other half on the XII Pillars which represented the Children of Israel in token that they were the other Party engaged in the same Covenant Thus our fore-named Primate and several others understand it and it carries some show of probability in it Yet I cannot think it unlikely that it was sprinkled upon the LXX Elders by whom the People consented if not upon all the People who stood next to the Altar and are here expresly mentioned The Apostle to the Hebrews IX 19. saith he sprinkled the Book as well as the People which is not here mentioned but supposed For when he went to sprinkle the Blood we must conceive he laid down the Book that he might be at more liberty for this other action And perhaps he laid it on one of the Pillars where it was sprinkled as they were together with the People whom they represented And said Behold the Blood of the Covenant which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words Look upon your selves as obliged by this Blood to observe all the Commands which I have delivered to you in the words you have heard For there were two ways of making Covenants anciently both which were here used The first was after a Sacrifice had been offered to sprinkle the Blood of it upon both Parties who were to be Confederates which was done here v. 6 8. And secondly the Confederates thereupon proceeded to eat together some part of the Sacrifice which follows v. 11. where we find the Elders of Israel who represented the People did eat and drink in the Presence of God Ver. 9. Then went up Moses and Aaron Nadab and Abihu and LXX of the Elders of Israel These things being done they went up into the Mount as they were ordered v. 1. i. e. they went up to that part of the Mount where Aaron and his Sons and the Elders were appointed to come but no further Ver. 10. And they saw the God of Israel When Moses is commanded to come near unto the LORD v. 2. Maimonides acknowledges it may be understood of his local approach to the place where the Light or Glory of God then appeared More Nevoch P. I. c. 18. And therefore it is something strange that he expounds the Elders seeing God of their apprehension of him by their Understanding and not rather of their beholding some glimpse of that visible Majesty which was on the Top of the Mount For that I doubt not is the meaning as appears by what follows And so the Chaldee expounds it They saw the Glory of the God of Israel surrounded we may well suppose with an heavenly Host of Angels attending upon the SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty as it was also called And there was under his feet This hath made some conceive that this visible Glory appeared in the form of a Man with his Back towards them standing upon a shining Pavement But this is contrary to IV Deut. 15. For though that be spoken of another time and place viz. the Giving of the Law which all the People heard but saw no Similitude yet if the Elders had afterward seen a Similitude it would have spoiled Moses his Argument they being the Representatives of the People This glorious Light therefore far surpassing all other had no form nor could be described by any Art and consequently by its feet is meant only the lower part of it which rested as it were upon a most glorious Pavement And thus the Divine Majesty is said to have had a Foot-stool which was the cover of the Ark though it had no Human shape As it were a paved work of Saphire stone The glorious Majesty of God was represented as having under it a Pavement sutable to it self very bright and shineing For there is a sort of Saphire called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 spotted with little points or pricks of Gold which shine like Stars interspersed in the Body of it See Salmasius in Solinum p. 131 203. Such was this Pavement as we may gather from the following words And as it were the body of Heaven in its clearness As clear as the purest and serenest Sky when it is all spangled with Stars All which signifies as I take it that the Glory of the LORD appeared far above the Glory of the Sun in its greatest brightness upon a Pavement sparkling like the Stars in the Heaven when it is most clear The LXX instead of the words saw the God of Israel have saw 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the place of the God of Israel As if they saw a Throne upon which there was a visible Majesty beyond all description And if this be admitted then this Throne may well be said to have feet standing upon such a glorious Pavement And so they translate it in the next Verse where this is repeated Ver. 11. And upon the Nobles of the Children of Israel i. e. The Elders before-mentioned v. 1 9. called here Atzilim to signifie that they were the prime and choicest Persons among the Israelites For Atzal signisies to separate and consequently atzilim imports Men distinguished from others either by their Birth Office or some excellent qualities He laid not his hand Did not hurt them Whereas it was the common Opinion That they who saw God though it was by one of his Angels should presently die The splendour of that glorious Light was so dazling that it was a singular favour it did not put out their Eyes as the Light wherein St. Paul saw our Saviour did his We are told v. 17. The sight of the Glory of the LORD was like devouring fire Which might put them in fear perhaps they had been scorched by it when it flasht out upon them but they found not the least hurt by it Thus Jonathan saith in his Paraphrase upon the XXXII Chapter that when Moses delayed to come down from the Mount the People fancied him to be burnt up by the fire which shone from the Presence of God which there appeared This sight of God which he vouchsafed to
A COMMENTARY UPON THE Second Book of MOSES CALLED EXODUS BY The Right Reverend Father in God SYMON Lord Bishop of ELY LONDON Printed for Ri. Chiswell at the Rose and Crown in St. Paul's Church-Yard MDCXCVII A COMMENTARY UPON EXODUS ADVERTISEMENT BY reason of the Distance of the Author from the Press several Errata's have hapned which the Reader is desired to Correct before he read the Book He will find them printed at the end A COMMENTARY UPON THE Second Book of MOSES CALLED EXODUS CHAP. I. THIS Book hath its Name from the Principal Subject of it viz. the Departure of the Children of Israel out of Egypt For so the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies going out or departing from one Place to another It contains an History of about an hundred forty and five years some make it two or three years less from the Death of Joseph to the Building of the Tabernacle For it treats of several Things which went before their Departure and which followed after it but they all relate to that and depend upon it Verse 1. Now these are the Names of the Children of Israel which came into Egypt c. Being to relate the Departure of the Children of Israel out of Egypt it was very proper first to set down the Number of those who came into it and the Heads of them Whereby it might the better appear also how God had fulfilled his Promise to Abraham of multiplying his Seed Which Moses had recorded in his first Book Genesis where he shows this Promise was made at that very time when he declared after a long Affliction in Egypt he would conduct his Posterity into Canaan XV Gen. 5 13 18. Ver. 2 3 4. Reuben Simeon c. He doth not set down their Names in these three Verses according to their Birth but first the Children of Leah then one of Rachels and then those of his Handmaids and last of all in the next Verses Joseph who was in Egypt before Ver. 5. And all the Souls i. e. Persons Who came out of the Loins In the Hebrew out of the thigh which signifies that part whereby Mankind is propagated as was observed upon XLVI Gen. 26. And so the Author of the Tripartite History uses the word femur when he speaks of the Martyrdom of Benjamin as Bochart observes P. 2. Hierozoic L. 5. cap. 15. Alium rursum acutum Calamum in ejus femur unde humana origo descendit jussit immitti For Joseph was in Egypt already In the Hebrew the Particle Vau which we commonly translate and and here for sometimes also signifies with See IV Gen. 20. And so it doth in this place which should be translated seventy Souls with Joseph who was in Egypt already For Joseph is not to be added to the LXX but reckoned among them to make up that number as appears from XLVI Gen. Ver. 6. And Joseph died See Gen. 26. And all his Brethren and all that Generation All that came with Jacob into Egypt Ver. 7. And the Children of Israel were fruitful c. Here are several words for the same thing to show their extraordinary Increase beyond what was usual in that or any other Country And because there are six words in all to express this great Increase some of the Hebrews conclude they brought forth six Children at a Birth Which others of them gather from the second word here used Jischretzu which is a word whereby the Increase of Fishes is expressed in I Gen. 20. So Theodorick Hacspan observes out of Baal-hatturim and Jalkut and thinks the Tradition is not to be rejected because they bring frivolous Conceits to support it For Aristotle saith L. VII Histor Animal c. 4. the Egyptian Women were so fruitful that some of them at four Births brought Twenty Children No wonder then if some of the Israelites brought Six at a time by the extraordinary Blessing of God upon them For Caspar Schottus names the Wife of a Citizen in Florence who had Two and fifty Children and never brought less than Three at a Birth L. III. Phys Curiosae Cap. XXIX where he hath collected a vast number of Examples of such strange fruitfulness But no Body hath explained this Verse now more soberly and unexceptionably than Abarbinel who considers every one of the words here used very judiciously and shows they are not multiplyed in vain For as the first word Were fruitful Signifies he thinks that none among them were barren but brought forth every year as Trees are wont to do So the next word And increased abundantly Signifies that they commonly brought forth more than One at a time as creeping things do to which this word alludes And because when more than one are born at a Birth they are frequently very weak and not long lived Therefore he adds And multiplied Which signifies that they grew up to be Men and Women and lived to have Children of their own And those not feeble but lusty and strong as the next words he thinks imports waxed exceeding mighty of which more presently Now this vast Increase began at their first coming into Egypt XLVII Gen. 27 28. and so continued till the death of all that Generation mentioned in the foregoing Verse When it began to be taken notice of by the Egyptians who thought it might prove dangerous to them For the Israelites having multiplied exceedingly during the space of XVII years that Jacob lived in Egypt there is no doubt they increased proportionably in the space of LIV years more which Joseph lived after the death of his Father And so in LXIV years more from the Death of Joseph to the Birth of Moses must needs be grown so numerous as to fill the Country So that in LXXX years more they were increased to Six hundred thousand Men besides Children XII Exod. 37. And the next year their Number being taken they were found to be Six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty Men from Twenty years old and upward as we read I Numb 45 46. And therefore reckoning Women Children and Youths under the Age of Twenty we cannot but think they were three times as many or perhaps Two Millions Which is not incredible by a moderate Computation if we consider how many might spring from LXX Persons in the space of Two hundred and fifteen years which the fore-named Sums make as Bonfrerius and several others from him in our own Language have been at the pains to demonstrate And waxed exceeding mighty This is commonly thought to signifie that they were not only numerous but robust and strong And it may as well denote that their vast Numbers made them very Formidable to the Egyptians who began it appears by the Sequel to be jealous of their power if they should have a will to attempt any thing against them And the Land was filled with them i. e. The Land of Goshen and perhaps some other Parts of the lower Egypt Ver. 8. Now there arose up a New King
good while ago endeavoured to prove was nothing else but a corruption of this Apparition to Moses And Huetius lately in his Demonstr Evang. Propos IV. Cap. V. had made such a laborious comparison between what is said of Moses and of Zoroaster as is sufficient to make it probable the ancient Persians derived their Religion from these Books of Moses Ver. 3. And Moses said I will now turn aside It seems this glorious Appearance was not directly before him but on one side of him and some distance from him And see this great sight This wonderful Appearance or as Philo translates it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this most stupendious and astonishing Sight or Vision Why the bush is not burnt A Fire which did not burn that is consume what it laid hold on was very amazing Yet the Gentiles did not think such things incredible as appears out of Seneca in his Thyeste where he speaks of a Forest which appeared all on a flame without fire and out of Lucan and divers other Authors among the Pagans produced by the Learned Huetius in his Questiones Alnetanae L. II. Cap. XII n. 10. Ver. 4. And when the LORD saw that he turned aside c. It is plain by this that the LORD himself was here present his Angels being but Attendants as I said upon his Majesty See XXII Gen. 11.15 God called unto him out of the midst of the Bush He now calls him God whom just before he called LORD Both which are sometimes put together as comprehending all the Divine Attributes Maimonides who makes Eleven Degrees of Prophecy or Divine Communications to Men justly thinks this the very highest of all and it was peculiar to Moses to hear God himself speaking to him in a Vision when he was intirely awake And said Moses Moses He repeats his Name to excite his attention And some take it for a token of Familiarity See XLVI Gen. 2. This is called by Gregor Nyssen de Vita Mosis p. 172. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. a Voice of that Light or Splendour i. e. of the Divine Majesty which appeared to him And he said here am I. A common expression of readiness to hearken and to obey Ver. 5. And he said draw not nigh hither He commands him to keep his distance and not to approach nearer to him This and what follows plainly demonstrate what I said before that this was an Appearance of the SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty to whom he could not pay too great a Reverence Put off thy shoes from off thy feet Many frivolous Reasons have been given of this Precept as may be seen in Braunius L. I. c. 3. de Vestitu Sacerd. Hebr. But the plain Reason is immediately added in the Text because the place where he stood was holy into which it was irreverend to enter with their Shoes on because thereby it might be defiled with the dirt that adhered to them Certain it is that in the Temple afterwards the Priests officiated barefoot and all the Eastern People came into their Holy Places in the same manner which Justin Martyr thinks they learnt from this Example of Moses But Mr. Mede's Opinion seems truer That Moses did not give the first beginning to this Rite but it was derived from the Patriarchs before him and transmitted to future Times from that ancient general Tradition For we find no Command in the Law of Moses for the Priests performing the Service of the Tabernacle without Shoes but it is certain they did so from immemorial Custom and so do the Mahometans and other Nations at this day See Mr. Mede Book II. p. 442 c. and p. 516. And Huetius in his Demonstr Evang. Propos IV. Cap. XI Sect. 2. The place whereon thou standest is holy ground It was made holy by the special Presence of God which was now there who is most holy and makes every thing relating unto him to be holy also For thus the Tabernacle the Temple and the Utensils thereof with all things destined to the Divine Service were called holy Ver. 6. Moreover he said I am the God of thy Father i. e. Of Amram who it seems was a very pious Man And the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. Who were so dear to him that he made a Covenant with every one of them which is the reason he is distinctly called the God of each of them as Maimonides observes More Nev. P. III. c. 51. from XXVI Lev. 42. And this Covenant was that he would be their God after a peculiar manner For otherwise he was the God of Noah and of all the holy Patriarchs before him but he is called the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob for a peculiar reason because of the Promise made to these three of the blessed Seed which should spring from them in opposition to the Pretensions of other Neighbouring People who as the Learned Dr. Alix observes were their Rivals in that Hope These words being as much as if he had said the God of Abraham and not of Lot as the Ammonites and Moabites pretended the God of Isaac and not of Ishmael as his Posterity pretended the God of Jacob and not of Esau as the Edomites boasted And Moses hid his face In token of Humility Submission and Reverence So Elijah did in after times 1 Kings XIX 12. Nay the Angels cover their faces in the presence of God VI Isa 2. For he was afraid to look upon God The Splendour of the Divine Majesty was so great that it dazled his Eyes and he was not able to behold it For though he stirr'd not a step further after God prohibited him to come nearer yet we may suppose him to be now nearer to it than he was at the first Ver. 3. and it 's Glory also was much increased Ver. 7. And the LORD said I have surely seen the affliction c. To see signifies more than to observe and take notice including in it such Resolutions of Divine Providence as would certainly produce their Deliverance For the doubling of the Expression seeing I have seen as it is in the Hebrew denotes there was no doubt of it And have heard their cry Both this and the next Phrase know their sorrows signifie more than the simple words hear and know import viz. such a regard to their miserable Condition as moved him to order speedy Relief to be given them Ver. 8. And I am come down to deliver them I now appear unto thee for that purpose Out of the hand of the Egyptians From their tyrannical Power And to bring them up out of that Land Where they are Strangers and used as Slaves Into a good Land A fruitful Country of their own And a large Where they shall not be pent up so as they are in Goshen And if it were considered according to the Extent of the Original Promise it was large and spacious indeed even from the River of Egypt unto Euphrates XV. Gen. 18. Vnto a Land flowing
with Milk and Honey By which Phrase the Poets express the greatest Plenty as Bochart shows out of Euripides Horace Ovid c. Hierozoick P. II. L. IV. c. 12. For abundance of Milk and Honey argue a Country to be well watered fruitful full of fair Pastures and Flowers from whence the Flocks may fill their Duggs with Milk and the Bees their Cells with Honey Aelian L. III. de Hist Animal c. 35. saith the Goats of Syria which includes this Country afford such plenty of Milk as is in no other Country Vnto the place of the Canaanites c. See concerning all these People here mentioned XV Gen. 19 c. Ver. 9. Now therefore behold the Cry of the Children of Israel is come up to me c. This was said before Ver. 7. but here repeated as a reason of the Commission he intended immediately to give to Moses to go and Deliver them Ver. 10. Come now therefore and I will send thee unto Pharaoh c. Leave thy Flock for I have another more weighty Business wherein I will imploy thee For thou shalt go with my Authority to Pharaoh and command him not only to Release my People out of their Servitude but to let them go also out of Egypt He had called them by the Name of his People Ver. 7. and now mentions it again to incourage their hope that he would take care of his own What Pharaoh this was it being a common Name to all the Egyptian Kings is very much disputed The common opinion is that after Orus in whose time Moses sled into Midian Acenceres or Acherres reigned Twelve years and after him Achoris reigned Seven years more and then succeeded Cenchres the worst of them all to whom Moses was now sent But Clemens Alexandrinus tells us that Apion a great Enemy of the Jews and who wrote against them mentioning their going out of Egypt in his fourth Book of his History of Egypt saith it was in the the reign of Amosis For which he quotes Ptolomaeus Mendesius an Egyptian Priest who wrote three Books about their Affairs in which he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. I. Stromat p. 320. But Tacitus calls him Bocchoris or as some read it Occoris L. V. Hist c. 3. That thou mayest bring forth my People c. From this time we are to consider God as the King of this People Not in general only as he is Lord of the whole World but in a proper and peculiar manner For whatsoever Authority or Power of Jurisdiction the Kings of other Nations did exercise over their Subjects as Power of Life and Death of making Laws and Leagues c. the same Prerogative did the Lord of Heaven and Earth reserve to himself alone over the Children of Israel Upon which ground as Dr. Jackson well observes Moses was delegated to be his Ambassadour to the King of Egypt and constituted it appears by the whole Story his Deputy or Viceroy over Israel Ver. 11. And Moses said unto God who am I that I should go unto Pharaoh c. He modestly declines the Service considering how mean a Person he was in comparison with Pharaoh and how unable to do any thing for the Israelites He had felt some extraordinary motion in himself Forty years ago which he took to be an Indication that God would use him as an Instrument of their Deliverance See Chap. II. v. 11 12. but at that time he was a far greater Man than now and had more interest at Court the Princess who adopted him for her Son being then perhaps alive or having lest him what made him very considerable In short he was then the Son of Pharaoh's Daughter but now a poor Shepherd Ver. 12. And he said Certainly I will be with thee In answer to his Objection God bids him depend on this that he would preserve him by a special Providence from being hurt by Pharaoh So Maimonides shows this Phrase I will be with thee signifies in Scripture More Nev. P. III. c. 18. And the considence which God wrought in him of this gave him Courage and Resolution which is also denoted by this Phrase as he shows P. II. c. 38. For all the Prophets were endued with an extraordinary Fortitude and Magnanimity which was in Moses above all the rest he encountering a great King and all his Court and People barely with a Staff in his hand And this shall be a Token to thee that I have sent thee when thou hast brought forth the People out of Egypt ye shall serve God upon this Mountain This could not be a Token to him now but was afterward when God by his Power brought them to this very place to worship him according to this Promise upon this Mountain In the mean time there were many other Tokens God gave him as we find in this History which were all confirmed by this at last Ver. 13. And they shall say unto me What is his Name What shall I say unto them This doth not argue that they knew not what the Name of their God was for they and their Fathers had been long acquainted with him and they cried unto him and he heard them II. 23 24. But Moses being the first that ever spake to Men in the Name of God none of the Patriarchs either before the Flood or after it having said any such words as these God hath sent me to you the Lord commands me to bid you do so or so as Maimon observes in several places of his More Nevoch P. I. c. 63. P. II. c. 39. is was natural for the Israelites to ask him by what Name or peculiar Attribute God had made himself known unto him so as to authorize him to speak to them as never any Man before did He had spoken unto Noah and unto Abraham c. but it was only for their own Instruction He never bid them deliver any Message unto others and yet it is observable that upon particular occasions he still made himself known to them by different Names or Titles As he saith to Abraham XV Gen. 7. I am Jehovah who brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees But XVII 1. he saith I am Elshaddai And to Isaac he saith I am the God of thy Father Abraham XXVI 24. To Jacob he adds I am the LORD God of thy Father Abraham and the God of Isaac XXVIII 13. And after this I am the God of Bethel XXXI 13. No wonder then that Moses should think the People would expect upon so great an occasion when he came to them as an Ambassadour from Heaven that the God of their Fathers should speak to them in a New Stile beyond all that had been known in former days Ver. 14. And God said unto Moses I AM THAT I AM. That is saith Maimonides in the place above-named He that necessarily Exists He who so is that he must needs be Or as some translate it I will be what I will be i. e. the Eternal Immutable Being so Elmacinus
he doth that Pharaoh's eldest Son who was now slain had the Name of Osiris whose sudden Death by this stroke all Posterity lamented in one Night of the year Which was when the Moon was at full as he observes out of Apuleius which still confirms this Conjecture it being at a full Moon when this Slaughter was made and the Israelites delivered out of Egypt For there was not an House where there was not one dead If there were any Children in it Ver. 31. And he called for Moses and Aaron By some of his Servants whom he sent to them as v. 33. seems to signifie By Night He durst not stay till the next Morning for fear he should have been cut off also before that time And said Rise up One would think by this that they found them sleeping securely in their Beds when this deadly blow was given to the Egyptians And get you forth from amongst my People both you and the Children of Israel c. For he was sorely afraid if they staid any longer they would bring some greater Mischief upon him Go serve the LORD as ye have said He had several times made this Concession but was never so much in earnest as now Ver. 32. Also take your Flocks and your Herds c. Though his heart had been often hardned yet this Slaughter of all their First-born made such a deep impression upon him that he comes fully up to their Terms yielding for the present to all they had desired though he did not continue constant in this mind but soon revolted And bless me also Pray for me as the Chaldee translates it Ver. 33. And the Egyptians were urgent upon the People They that brought from Pharaoh a grant of all the Israelites desired and others also who had lost their Children pressed very hard upon them to accept it and that with all speed not out of love to the Israelites but for fear they should perish themselves if they did not leave their Country Pharaoh especially seeing his First-born the Heir of his Crown struck suddenly dead had reason to conclude the next blow would be at his own Life To send them out of the Land of Egypt This shows they were not meerly dismissed but intreated nay importuned to depart Such a change had this Slaughter and the general Outcry that followed upon it made in their hearts In haste They that were unwilling before to hearken to the Israelites Petition now make their Petitions to them and were so glad to be rid of them that they would not suffer them to delay their departure Nay made a Golden-bridge as we speak for their speedy passage out of Egypt v. 35 36. For they said we be all dead men They were desirous the Israelites should enjoy their Liberty rather than lose their own Lives Ver. 34. And the People took their Dough before it was leavened They seem to have newly mixed their Flowre and Water together and kneaded it into a Paste or Dough as we translate it but had not put any leaven into it nor had time to make it into Cakes and bake them Their kneading-troughs The Hebrew word comprehends both the Dough and the Thing wherein it was contained which in VIII 3. we translate Ovens and here Kneading-troughs in which their Dough was carried Being bound up in their Clothes The Hebrew word for Clothes signifies any thing that covers another or wherein it is wrapt as the Dough was in Linnen-clothes it is most likely for that is usual to keep it from the cold Air which was sharp in the Night and would have hindred its rising On their shoulders For we do not read of any Wagons or Horses they had for the Carriage of their Goods out of Egypt Ver. 35. And the Children of Israel did according to the word of Moses Who had commanded them from God to do as it here follows XI 1 2. which was their warrant and justified the Fact And they borrowed of the Egyptians c. So most understand it though some think it was a free gift which the Egyptians bestowed upon them when they were very desirous as we read before to have them gone out of their Country which made them not only intreat but hire them to depart So Jacobus Capellus ad A.M. 2503. They that had denied them leave to go away for a few days saith he now press them to depart with all speed quin praecibus Israelitas demulcent ac donis onerant Egyptii See III. 23. But it is commonly thought that the Egyptians imagined the Israelites only desired to appear as well adorned as they could before their God at the great Feast they were to hold in the Wilderness and so readily lent them these Jewels and sine Clothes to deck themselves withal which they hoped would be restored to them again as soon as the Sacrisice was over Ver. 36. And the LORD gave the People favour c. As he had promised III. 21. and see XI 3. So that they lent them such things as they required Though the Men borrowed as well as the Women XI 3. yet the Women are only mentioned III. 23. because they borrowed most and the Women and Maidens of Egypt might be the more willing to bestow their Jewels and Earings upon them that they might woo their Husbands Children and Relations to be gone with all speed And they spoiled the Egyptians God hath a Supream Right to all things and there was a just cause why he should transfer the Right of the Egyptians unto the Israelites See XI 2. Unto which add this Story which is told in the Gemara of the Sanhedrin that in the time of Alexander the Great the Egyptians brought an Action against the Israelites desiring they might have the Land of Canaan in satisfaction for all that they borrowed of them when they went out of Egypt To which Gibeah ben Kosam who was Advocate for the Jews replyed That before they made this Demand they must prove what they alledged that the Israelites borrowed any thing of their Ancestors Unto which the Egyptians thought it sufficient to say That they found it Recorded in their own Books mentioning this place Well then said the Advocate look into the same Book and you will find the Children of Israel lived four hundred and thirty years in Egypt pay us for all the labour and toil of so many Thousand People as you imployed all that time and we will restore what we borrowed To which they had not a word to answer Tertullian mentions such a Controversie or Plea between the two Nations L. II. advers Marcion where he relates this from an ancient Tradition See Mr. Selden L. VII de Jure Nat. Gent. c. 8. Besides this it is not impertinent to observe that the Egyptians were declared Enemies to the Jews now it is not unlawful to spoil an Enemy nor ought this upon that account to be called a Thest This reason Clemens Alexandrinus joyns to the former See L.
places And after all the pains that Franc. Gomarus hath taken in his Lyra Davidis to find of what sort of Numbers this and other Songs in Scripture consists he hath not given any satisfaction to Learned Men. Who think as Ludov. Capellus doth in his Animadversions on that Book that all the Bible may be made Verse according to his method Nay by his way of resolving Sentences all the Orations of Tully and Demosthenes may be turned into Verse of some sort or other The Author of Sepher Cosri seems to me to deal ingenuously who when the King of Cosar objects to them that the Songs in the Bible are not artificially composed according to Numbers and Quantities of Feet and Syllables makes the Jew answer That the Scripture Poetry was of a nobler sort not formed to tickle the Ear but affect the Heart by the great height and elevation of the Sense together with lofty Expressions whereby Men were moved to attend to it and to keep it in mind P. II. Sect. 69. c. And so much Abarbinel acknowledges upon this place That no such Verses consisting in the number and quantity of Syllables are to be found either in the Bible or in the Talmud either in the Mischna or the Gemara but are of later invention among the Jews in imitation of the Arabians and other Nations among whom they dwell in this long Captivity Yet in the Scripture Poetry there is a certain disposition of words which make them melodious and sit to be sung to Musical Instruments and so sententious that they might be more easily remembred than simple Narrations though now after so many Ages they cannot reduce this Poetry to Rules He tries indeed to bring this Song under certain Regulations fancying that it consists of eight Orders or Ranks as he calls them two of which are very short and two very long and four of a middle size which he prosecutes with much Subtilty but with little Satisfaction And spake saying I will sing unto the LORD c. Every one joyned in this Song of Praise which may be thus Paraphrased Ver. 1. We will joyfully praise the LORD for he hath in a most illustrious and magnificent manner shown his Power by throwing Horse and Men when they little thought of it into the Sea Ver. 2. It is he who hath given us this Victory and therefore he is to be praised and acknowledged as our Deliverer He is our most gracious and mighty God for whom we will prepare a Tabernacle wherein to Worship him Our Fathers had great Experience of his Goodness and therefore we are the more bound to make him our most thankful Acknowledgments and give him the highest Praises Ver. 3. There is none can stand before the LORD who hath perfectly subdued our Enemies and faithfully fulfilled his Promises to his Servants Ver. 4. For he hath cast Pharaoh and all his Chariots and great Commanders into the Sea as easily as one sends an Arrow out of a Bow Ver. 5. They are buried and shall rise up no more Ver. 6. Thou hast manifested thy Omnipotence O LORD most magnificently it was thy irresistible Power O LORD which dashed in pieces such mighty Enemies Ver. 7. It was a work of thy most excellent Power which will be ever magnified in the overthrow of such Adversaries With whom thou no sooner showedst thy self displeased but they vanished as stubble doth before the slame Ver. 8. Thou didst but give the Command and by a vehement Wind the Waters of the Sea were divided and heaped up so that they swelled into little Mountains and were campact like a Wall which was upheld from falling down till the People passed through the midst of the Sea Ver. 9. Our Enemies pursued us with a full considence that they should overtake and make a prey of us and after they had satisfied their Revenge upon us as certainly reduce us under their yoke as they drew their Swords against us Ver. 10. But with a turn of the Wind all their vain hopes sunk on a sudden together with themselves to the bottom of the Sea Ver. 11. There are none among all that are called Gods in Heaven or in Earth that are comparable to thee O LORD whose Perfections infinitely transcend all other and therefore art to be praised with the greatest fear and reverence for thy very works are wonderful and to be had in admiration Ver. 12. By thy mighty Power they were buried in the bottom of the Sea into which they sank Ver. 13. And in great mercy thou hast preserved thy People whom thou hast brought out of Egypt and rescued from cruel Servitude and conducted by a mighty Providence towards the holy Land which thou hast promised to them there to dwell among them Ver. 14. And why should we doubt of our coming thither The fame of this wonder shall go before us and strike a terrour into the most valiant Inhabitants of that Country Ver. 15. Nay all their Neighbours as well as they shall sind their hearts fail them and become as weak as Water Ver. 16. Such a terrour shall fall upon them that they shall be no more able to stir than a stone when they hear of this dreadful Execution but suffer thy People O LORD to pass to their Inheritance which thou hast prepared for them Ver. 17. Thither shalt thou bring them and there make them to take root in the highest Mountains of that Country where thou hast designed a place for thine own Dwelling of which thy Power also will lay the Foundation Ver. 18. And thou shalt do more Wonders since thy Dominion and Power endures to all Ages Ver. 19. For who can dethrone Thee Who in the same Sea hast made a Grave to bury the Egyptians and a Path for thy People Israel to walk in as if they had been on dry Ground And now having given the sense of the Song in this Paraphrase it may be proper to confirm it by the Explication of some Phrases in it Ver. 1. Hath he thrown into the Sea The Hebrew word ramah signifies a sudden Precipitation when they were in the heigth of their hopes to overtake and subdue the Israelites Ver. 2. He is my God Though some think the word El to be a Contraction of Elohim yet it seems to be derived from ajal and is generally thought to import might and strength But I have taken in the other Notion of goodness also See v. 11. Ver. 3. Prepare him an habitation As if they thought a Cloud too mean an Habitation for the Divine Glory they resolve to build him a Tabernacle just as David ashamed he should dwell in a Tabernacle designed to build him a Temple My Fathers God i. e. Jacob's of whom God took a singular care both before and after he came into Egypt Ver. 3. The LORD is a Man of War i. e. Gets great Victories as the Targum expresses it For when the Hebrews would express any eminent quality they put the word isch before
that their cruel usage by Pharaoh especially his Decree that all the Male Children should be slain was the occasion of this name for it made their life bitter to them as the Text saith I. 14. Thus the Author of Dibre Hajamim or of the Life of Moses and our Dr. Lightfoot and others But L'Moine guesses not unhappily that it signifies as much as Mar-jam which is in English a drop of the Sea from which the Story of Venus was framed among the Greeks who feigned her to have been born of the froth of the Sea which gave her the Name of Aphrodite The Fable of Diana also as well as Venus had no other original but from that which is here said of Miriam as Huetius hath probably conjectured in his Demonstratio Evang. Prop. IV. c. 12. sect 4. The Prophetess She was called by this Name I suppose because she had a Gift of composing Hymns in praise of the Divine Majesty which it is certain is meant sometimes by prophecying in Scripture See 1 Sam. X. 5 6. And thus among the Greeks a Prophet and a Poet were the same thing and the Latine word Vates signifies both For as Quintilian saith L. I. c. 10. Musick was had in such veneration in ancient times that iidem Musici Vates Sapientes judicarentur But there are other places of Holy Scripture which would incline one to think that she also received Revelations from God for the direction of the People Particularly VI Mich. 4. where she is mentioned as one that conducted Israel out of Egypt and her own words with Aaron's XII Numb 2. hath not the LORD spoken by us also Which the LORD heard and doth not contradict but rather allow to be true though they had not such near Communication with him as Moses had v. 6. Perhaps she instructed the Women as Moses and Aaron did the Men. The Sister of Aaron And why not of Moses The common Answer is that Aaron and she lived longest together Moses having been absent from them XL. years Or perhaps Moses was not by the same Mother which Aaron and Miriam had She was married to Hur if we may believe Josephus Took a Timbrel in her hand So the manner was in after-times when they prophesied 1 Sam. X. 5 6. 2 Kings III. 15. and when they sang Hymns XXXIII Psalm 2. LVII 7 8. and upon any occasion of great rejoycing XI Judg. 34. 1 Sam. XVIII 6. From which we may learn how ancient Musick was in the Service of God there being nothing in which it can be better imployed than in his Praises Therefore it was no part of the Gentile Idolatry that they used such Instruments as these in their Divine Worship but they honoured false Gods in that manner that Moses and the Israelites had done the true And it ought to have a remark set upon it that this way of praising God was no part of the Mosaical Institution but derived from more ancient times before the Law was given And all the Women went out after her To joyn with her in the Praises of God as the Men did with Moses and Aaron with Timbrels and Dances As they played with these Instruments in their hands so their whole Bodies made a decent motion with their feet Which afterwards tended to lasciviousness but anciently was very grave and so becoming that such Dances were as devout Expressions of Joy as their solemn Musick This appears by the Example of David dancing before the Ark when it was brought up from the House of Obed-Edom in a joyful Procession both of Men and Women with Vocal and Instrumental Musick 1 Chron. XV. 27 28 29. LXVIII Psalm 26. From which Patterns all Nations from the most ancient Times made Dancing a part of the Worship of their Gods as Huetius observes in his Demonstr Evang. Propos IV. c. 6. n. 2. who ingeniously conjectures in another place of that Work c. 12. n. 4. that from this Dancing of Miriam and her Companions on the Sea-shore Callimachus in his Hymn to Diana ascribes to her 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 threescore Dancers the Daughters of the Ocean Ver. 21. And Miriam answered them c. i. e. She and the Women answered Moses and the People Verse by Verse or after every Verse sung by Moses and the Men Miriam and the Women interposed and repeated this Verse which is the first of the Song saying Sing to the LORD for he hath triumphed gloriously c. And this was a way of singing in after Times as appears from the CXXXV Psalm and III Ezra 11. of which I have given some account in my Preface to the Paraphrase of the Book of Psalms Which justisies or rather commends our way of Reading or Chanting the Psalms interchangeably by Responses as we call them or Answering one to another which certainly it appears by this place is the most ancient way of all other And is represented in VI Isa 3. as practised by the Angels themselves in their Worship of the Divine Majesty Ver. 22. So Moses brought Israel from the Red-sea Not without some importunity they being eagerly bent upon gathering the Spoil of the Egyptians Some such thing the Hebrew word seems to import which is jassa he made them to go up Which signifies some unwillingness or backwardness arising either from that Cause or from a desire to return to Egypt as some fancy which now perhaps they thought to be so empty that they might get it for themselves And they went out From the Station where they were at the Red-sea Into the Wilderness of Shur Mentioned XVI Gen. 7. and was a part of the Wilderness of Etham which was the general Name for this Desert XXXIII Numb 8. And they went three days in the Wilderness Viz. the XXII XXIII and XXIVth of Nisan And found no Water Which was a very great Trial of them For their Cattle as well as they suffered much by it and could not afford them Milk sufficient to quench their thirst Ver. 23. And when they came to Marah This was the fourth Station of the Israelites after they came out of Egypt and in the same Wilderness which had this Name given it after they came there from the bitterness or brackishness of the Water They could not drink of the Water c. This was the more grievous because they had wanted this refreshment three days Ver. 24. And the People murmured against Moses saying What shall we drink It is the conceit of Abarbinel that Moses brought them from the Red-sea without the direction of the Cloud which conducted them thither but then left them to his Guidance Which made the People think it was Moses his Fault that they were in this destress who did not know how to lead them to the most commodious and likely places for the finding good Water And therefore from Marah they stirred not till the Cloud again led them because it is said XVII 1. they journied from Sin by the Commandment of the LORD
be the ancient grudge of the Seed of Esau to those of Israel For Amalek was descended from the eldest Son of Esau by a Concubine XXXVI Gen. 12. But it may very fairly also be supposed that there was some League between the Amalekites and the People of Canaan of mutual Defence which might move the Amalekites to oppose the passage of the Israelites and indeavour to hinder their Settlement in Canaan unto which perhaps they imagined their own pretences to be as good though the Israelites challenged the promise of it belong'd to them alone Then came These words import that the Amalekites were the Aggressors without any provocation If they fancied the Israelites would Invade them they might have prepared to defend themselves but it was no ground for Assaulting them Unto which perhaps they were moved as for other Reasons so out of greediness of Prey hearing the Israelites were loaded with the Spoils of the Egyptians And fought with Israel They came out of their own Country to sight with them in the Wilderness Or we may suppose that they attacked their Rear as they were upon their march from Rephidim to Horeb and cut off some Straglers or such as lagg'd behind through faintness and weariness as Moses relates XXV Deut. 18. The Author of Dibre Hajamim makes the Army of Amalek to have consisted of an incredible Number all exercising Divinations and Inchantments Ver. 9. And Moses said unto Joshua Who it seems was an eminent Person at their first coming out of Egypt Chuse us out men Whom he knew to be as valiant as himself And go out and sight with Amalek Meet them and give them Battle To morrow I will stand on the top of the Hill To pray to God who had lately appeared to him there v. 6. With the Rod of God in my hand This he said to encourage Joshua to hope God would not fail to deliver them though a Miracle was required to bring it to pass Ver. 10. So Joshua did as Moses had said to him c. Nothing but a strong confidence in God could have animated Men unexperienced in the Arts of War to encounter such mighty Enemies And Moses Aaron and Hur went up to the top of the Hill The Jews do but conjecture who this Hur was But we may be certain he was a Person of great Eminence for Wisdom and Piety otherwise he would not have been joyned with the Leaders of God's People Moses and Aaron We read indeed 1 Chron. II. 19. of one Hur who was the Son of Caleb and Grandfather of the famous Bezaleel who was of the Tribe of Judah But there is nothing to perswade us that he was the Person here spoken of nor that he was the Son of Moses his Sister as some of the Jews tell us See Pirke Elieser c. 45. where strange Stories are told of him But it is more probable that he was Miriam's Husband as Josephus affirms L. III. Antiq. c. 2. though we cannot tell whence he himself was descended Ver. 11. When Moses held up his hand Lifting up the hands was a posture of Prayer and imploring the Divine Aid as we find in many places particularly III Lament 40. Let us lift up our hearts with our hands to God in the Heavens And it implies great Earnestness in Prayer as doth also listing up the eyes and listing up the soul XXV Psal 1. CXXI 1 c. But though this be true and no doubt Moses and his Companions prayed to God most earnestly yet this was not the occasion of his lifting up his hand which was to advance the Rod of God which he held in his hand and lifted up as their Standard or Banner to which they should look and hope for help from the mighty Power of God who had done such Wonders by that Rod. That Israel prevailed The sight of the Rod of God inspired them with such Courage that their Enemies could not stand before them And when he let down his hand Amalek prevailed Their Spirits flagged when they did not see the Rod and they began to give ground imagining perhaps that Moses despaired of Victory who the Fight being long was not able alway to keep his hand erect Ver. 12. But Moses his hands were heavy Through weariness by long holding them out upon the stretch And they took a stone and put it under him and he sate thereon It seems he had been standing before which gave them the greater advantage of seeing the Rod but made him the more weary And Aaron and Hur stayed up his hands Were his Supporters which it is probable was in this manner Sometimes Moses held up the Rod in his right hand and sometimes in his left for v. 11. he speaks only of one hand which was lifted up or let down and Aaron stood on one side of him suppose his right hand and Hur stood on the other Who by that means helpt by turns to uphold his hands in that posture for if they had done it both together they might have been as weary as he And his hands were steady c. Were kept up stretched out without falling down till Sun-set Ver. 13. And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his People c. Routed their whole Army One would think the name of their Kings was Amalek as the Kings of Egypt were called Pharaoh because he mentions Amalek and his People Otherwise if Amalek signifies collectively the Amalekites then his People must signifie those who were confederate with them Ver. 14. And the LORD said unto Moses He appeared it 's likely to him again in this place as he had done v. 6. and gave him this order Write this for a Memorial in a Book Make a Record of it as he did both here and XXV Deut. 17. c. And no Body was so sit to do it as he who saw all that fell out in this Fight and was the undoubted Author of what we read in this Book which was written by himself And rehearse it in the ears of Joshua That he who was to be the Leader of God's People after Moses might never enter into any League with the Amalekites For his Prosperity depended upon the Observation of the Commands given by God to Moses which therefore were carefully written in a Book and delivered to him that they might not be forgotten See I Josh 7 8. where there is a plain proof that the Laws delivered by Moses were written before Joshua entred into the Land of Canaan For I will utterly put out the Name of Amalek from under Heaven Have a perpetual quarrel with them till they be quite extinct as they were partly by Saul 1 Sam. XV. and partly by David 1 Sam. XXX 17. and partly by the Children of Simeon 1 Chron. IV. 43. Balaam also prophecied of their utter Destruction XXIV Numb 20. Which may seem a hard Sentence but it was as Maimonides observes to terrifie others from the like Malice For as particular Persons are sometimes punished very severely for an
when they found any too difficult they were to refer it to be heard by Moses himself So R. Leviben Gersom explains it Every great Cause in which they know not what to judge they shall bring to thee and thou shalt show what is right or how it is to be decided There are those indeed who think there were several sorts of Causes that might not be brought before these Inferiour Courts but were to be reserved for Moses's hearing and judging These they make to be Four First All Sacred Matters or Things belonging unto God which they gather from v. 19. Secondly All Matters of Equity where the rigour of the Law was sit to be mitigated Thirdly All Capital Causes And lastly Such as the Chiliarchs i. e. Rulers of Thousands and the other Judges referred to him But this is said without ground for it is plain all sorts of Causes might be determined by the inferiour Courts if they were able to make an end of them whether Civil or Sacred Only those which were too difficult for them that is when they did not find a Law to direct them or it was obscure or they could not agree about the Punishment then they were to be brought before Moses So he himself charges not that the People should bring such Causes to him as they thought difficult but that the Judges themselves should bring them i. e. order an Appeal to him I Deut. 17. bring it unto me speaking to the Judges and I will hear it Which shows the Cause had been at the Bar of other Courts before and that it was not unlawful for them to meddle with it if they had been able to determine it And accordingly we read here below v. 26. that the Judges did so In short these words do not intimate that there were some Causes the other Judges might not try if they were able but only that such things as they found themselves not skilful enough to determine they should bring to him See Mr. Selden in the fore-named Book p. 633 c. But every small matter they shall judge Hitherto Moses but heard all Causes promiscuously great and small but Jethro well advises him to delegate the labour of judging all Causes liquidi juris as the Lawyers speak where the Right was clear and to reserve no part of the Judicature to himself but where the Law it self was either defective or obscure So shall it be casier for thy self c. Thou wilt ease thy self of a great burden by appointing others to take their share of it Ver. 23. If thou wilt do this thing and God command thee so If thou wilt follow this advice by God's approbation who was to be consulted whether he allowed it Then thou shalt be able to endure Thy days will be prolonged which otherwise will be shortned with this intolerable labour And the People go to their place in peace Go home very much satisfied with such quick dispatch and happy composure of their Differences Ver. 24. So Moses hearkened to the voice of his Father-in-law c. Followed his Counsel by God's approbation with whom no doubt he advised v. 23. Here the Samaritan Copy inserts those words of Moses I Deut. 9 c. I am not able to bear you my self alone the LORD your God hath multiplied you c. Which he spake indeed when he made this Constitution but did not set it down in this Book where he intended only a short account of these Transactions Ver. 25. And Moses chose able men c. Out of those who were presented to him by the People See v. 20. Ver. 26. And they judged the People at all Seasons Whensoever they resorted to them For some Court or other sate every day that was not appointed by God for other Business i. e. for Religion The hard Causes they brought to Moses c. It is plain by this that the Judges not the People brought the hard Causes unto Moses For the People could not know whether they might not have a Remedy nearer hand than by going to him on all occasions till they had tried Ver. 27. And Moses let his Father-in-law depart After he had staid some time with him and could not prevail with him to stay longer which he earnestly desired and go with them to see the Accomplishment of God's Promises to them as those words X Numb 29 c. are thought to signifie But perhaps that Hobab there mentioned was not Jethro himself but his Son whom Moses also perswaded not to return to his own Country for he makes no reply much less denies to stay with Moses when he pressed him the second time though he refused at first v. 32. But this I shall consider in that place And he went his way into his own Land To make his Children or the People of the Land Proselytes saith the Chaldee Paraphrase Which it's probable he indeavoured i. e. to bring them to true Religion and affected in some measure so that Piety was propagated in some Families among them to future Generations For the Rechabites came out of this Country 1 Chron. II. 55. whose vertue Jeremiah Praises in the latter end of the Jewish Church Chap. XXXV CHAP. XIX Verse 1. IN the third Month. Or in the third new Moon For the Hebrew word Chodesh signifies a new Moon as well as a Month nay that is the prime signification from whence the other is derived And so we are to understand it here that on the New Moon i. e. the first day of the third Month called Sivan after their coming out of Egypt they came into the Wilderness of Sinai Which was just XLV days after they departed out of Egypt For if we add to the XV. days of the first Month XXIX which made the second these put together with this New Moon make XLV Unto which if we add that day when Moses went up to God v. 3. and reported when he came down the Message God sent by him to the Elders of Israel and the next day after when he returned their Answer unto God v. 7 8. with the three days more which God gave them to prepare themselves for his coming down among them v. 10 11. there were just Fifty days from their Passover to the giving of the Law upon Mount Sinai which laid the Foundation of the great Feast of Pentecost The same day i. e. On the fore-mentioned New Moon of the third Month. Came they into the Wilderness of Sinai So called from that famous Mountain Sinai which gave the name to the Wilderness which lay before it This Mountain was also called Horeb IV Deut. 10. they being only different tops of one and the same Mountain but this higher than Horeb so that one may see the Red Sea from them as they that have travelled into those Parts affirm Who say it is now called by the Arabians Tur and by Christians the Mountain of St. Catherine Ver. 2. For they were departed from Rephidim c. They began to move from
but gathered into their Barns Which was the foundation of the great rejoying we read of at this time because God now gave them some rest and respiration as Maimonides speaks from their Imployments More Nevoch P. III. c. 43. where he observes that Aristotle himself in his VIIIth Book of Ethicks mentions such a Feast among the Gentiles and upon the same ground in these words as he recites them Anciently Sacrifices and publick Assemblies for the sake of Sacrifices were in the gathering of the Fruits and Products of the Earth as if the Sacrifices were offered for their respiration The Israelites dwelt in Booths at this Feast for another reason and their dwelling in Booths was now most tollerable as the same Maimonides there notes because the Weather was moderate at that time when they were not wont to be troubled either with heat or with rain Ver. 17. Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the LORD God This Verse more fully explains what was said v. 14. by showing where they should keep these Feasts viz. before the LORD i. e. in the place where his most glorious Majesty should settle which was first in the Tabernacle and afterward in the Temple And then who should appear before him there viz. all the Males Others were not bound to it though some Religious People carried their whole Families with them as appears by Elkanah 1 Sam. 1. This Command is repeated XXXIV 23. and the true reason of it seems to have been this That while they dwelt in the Wilderness they are no Meat at all at their private Tables but what had been first offered up to God at the Tabernacle XVII Lev. 4 5. Which Precept was dispensed withal when they came into the Land of Canaan and dwelt many of them so remote from the Tabernacle that they could not come up every day to Sacrifice XII Deut. 21. Instead of which therefore there were these three constant and set times appointed in the year in which every Male was bound to come up and see God at his Tabernacle and there ate and drink before him Whence the Sacrifice which was then offered was wont to be called a Sacrifice of Seeing as Dr. Cudworth hath observed in his little Treatise of the Right Notion of the Lord's Supper But as the Doctors interpret it they were not bound to bring their Males to appear before the LORD till they were able to walk in their Father's hand up from Jerusalem to the Temple Ver. 18. Thou shalt not offer the blood of my Sacrifice That is the Paschal Lamb as Jonathan in express words interprets and it appears from XXXIV 25. That the Passover was a Sacrifice I observed before XII 27. With leavened bread c. There being three great Solemn Feasts appointed in the foregoing Verses v. 14 17. in this and the following he prescribes some Rules how they were to be observed And here in this Verse ordains two things relating to the Passover that it should not be eaten with leavened bread nor any of the Fat of it remain until the morning Both which were ordained before XII 10 14 15. in its first Institution and here repeated upon its being mention'd again with the other Feasts It may be sit for me here to observe that to move the Israelites to keep this Passover with the greater care God calls it both here and in XXXIV 25. after a peculiar manner my sacrifice and my Feast as the latter part of this Verse may be translated being a Feast of a most Solemn Nature and a Sacrifice then offered of singular use For which reason he requires them as not to offer it with Leaven which was at that time forbidden for special reasons so not to reserve the Fat of the Offering till the next day For that was not for the honour of the Sacrifice Flesh being apt quickly to corrupt in those hot Countries and to offend the Palate or the Nose which had been against the dignity of the Sacrifice Which is the reason the Jews give why the Flesh of the Peace offerings was not to be kept till the third day XIX Lev. 6. It was to preserve the magnificence of the Sacrifice things kept so long being apt to stink Whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yesterdays meats in Hippocrates is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 corrupt and Galen expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to tend to corruption as Pet. Castellanus observes L. I. de Esu Carnium c. 5. p. 42. Ver. 19. The first of the first-fruits of thy land thou shalt bring unto the house of the LORD thy God This Precept hath a respect to the next Feast that of Pentecost And therefore though there were several First-fruits which were all to be offered in their time which were of seven things Barley Wheat Figs Pomegranates Olives Dates and Grapes yet here are meant only the two Loaves or Cakes made of their new Wheat which were to be offered at this Feast XXIII Lev. 17. For till this was done they might not make use of their Corn. See more concerning this matter on XXIII Lev. 10. R. Levi of Barcelona and others rightly observe that this was brought as an Acknowledgment unto God That he was the Giver of all good things Thou shalt not seethe a Kid in its mothers milk This Precept hath a particular respect to the third Feast that of the in-gathering of the Fruits of the Earth in the end of the Year mentioned v. 16. And the Jews commonly take it to be a Prohibition against eating a Kid so boil'd or tasting of the Milk taking it to be a Precept against Cruelty But here is not a word about eating either of the Kid or the Milk but only about boiling The famous Bochartus mentions three other Interpretations but confutes them all and taking the words simply as we translate them supposes there was some such Custom as this among the Gentiles which Moses would not have them imitate And so doth Maimonides in his More Nevoch P. III. c. 48. where he takes this indeed for a Command not to eat Flesh with such Milk but saith that besides it was very gross Nourishment c. it seems to him it was prohibited because it smelt of Idolatry the Gentiles doing so in their Worship upon some of their Feasts He could not find indeed as he confesses any such Rite in the Books of the Zabii but yet he was confirm'd in this Opinion by the Law constantly mentioning this only when it speaks of their Feasts for there are other places where we meet with it XXXIV 26. XVI Deut. 21. in both which he speaks as he doth here of their three great Feasts At the last of which Abarbinel expresly affirms the ancient Idolaters were wont when they gathered the Fruits of the Earth to seeth a Kid in its Mothers Milk that their Gods might be the more propitious to them But as he names no Author for
Therefore Nachmanides more reasonably conceives that these Rings were indeed in the corners of the Ark but not in the higher as R. Solomon would have them but in the lower and therefore said here to be in the feet For the Scripture calling the top of every thing the head of it the bottom is commonly there called the feet And so the Ark by placing the Rings and Staves in the bottom was carried on high upon the Priests shoulders representing God who is highly exalted And two rings shall be on the one side of it and two rings on the other side of it That is in the length of it as Josephus expresly testifies and not in the breadth Ver. 13. And thou shalt make staves of Shittim-wood Of such a length that the Ark might be at a decent distance from those that carried it And overlay them with Gold With Plates of Gold as the Ark it self was v. 14. Ver. 14. And thou shalt put the staves into the rings by the sides of the Ark. The Hebrews say these staves were ten Cubits long That the Ark may be born with them Upon the shoulders of the Levites particularly the Sons of Korah See Numb IV. 4 5 6 c. VII 9. For it was a Crime to carry it any other way either in their Hands or drawn in a Cart. Compare 1 Chron. XIII 7. with XV. 15. Ver. 15. And the staves shall be in the rings of the Ark. Continue and remain in the Rings whence they were once put therein They shall not be taken from it When they set down the Ark they were not to take out the staves and put them in again when it was to be carried but let them as was said continue in the rings that there might be no danger of letting them fall which had been a great irreverence and because they would be best preserved and take less harm there than any where else and if they had occasion to remove the Ark suddenly all would be ready and the Levites were hereby kept from touching the Ark or coming nearer to it than the ends of the staves Ver. 16. And thou shalt put into the Ark the testimony which I will give thee The two Tables of Stone containing the Ten Commandments which are called the Testimony and the Two Tables of Testimony XXXI 18. because they testified what the Will of God was which they had consented to observe and were therefore publick authentick Instruments attesting the Covenant between God and them Whence the Ark which contained these is called the Ark of the Testimony as I observed above v. 10. v. 22. and in a great many other places of the XL Chapter And in one place it is called the Testimony XXX 36. and the Ark of the Covenant of the LORD X Deut. 8. because then Ten words were the principal part of the Covenant to which they stood obliged And perhaps the Book of the Covenant which Moses made with them XXIV 7. is comprehended under the name of the Testimony For though we read in 1 Kings VIII 9. there was nothing in the Ark save the two Tables of Stone c. yet the Apostle mentions some other things that were not in yet by or before the Ark IX Hebr. 4. But I assert nothing in this matter And shall only further observe that this direction for putting the Testimony or Tables of Stone into the Ark is given before any order is taken for making a Covering to it which follows after And therefore he was to put in the Law before the Cover was set on For though v. 21. this be mentioned again and put after the Cover is named yet the meaning is that he should set on the Cover having put in the Law And it is repeated that he should be very careful of this because the Cherubims were to protect and defend it Ver. 17. And thou shalt make a Mercy-seat The Hebrew word Capporet litterally signifies a Covering of any thing And that is the proper signification of this Mercy-seat as we translate it which was the Covering of the Ark. For it had no Door but was open at the top so that they might put the Tables of the Covenant into it and then it was to be fastned above by this Cover which any one may discern by its dimensions was exactly fit for it Others will have it called Capporet not from Capar to cover but from Cipper to expiate and render propitious And so indeed the Apostle calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the propitiatory because God here showed himself to be propitious and appeased by the Blood of the Sacrifices which was sprinkled before this place But the reason of this Translation may be because when Sins are pardoned they are said in Scripture to be covered The LXX put both these together in their Translation which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of pure Gold Not of Wood crusted over with Gold but all as Abarbinel speaks of solid Gold because it was the Cover of the Ark in which were the Tables of the Covenant written with God's Finger than which nothing was more precious Two cubits and an half shall be the length thereof c. Which was the length of the Ark v. 10. as the breadth was a Cubit and a half both of that and this Which shows this was the Cover of the Ark being most exactly adapted to it Ver. 18. And thou shalt make two Cherubims of gold We read of Cherubims in the beginning of the World and have good reason to believe thereby is meant Angels See III Gen. 24. But in what shape they appeared we are not told nor is there the least signification of it here in this place but what we can gather from v. 20. So that I can only say this they were of such a shape as the Angelical Ministers appeared in which attended upon the Divine Majesty in the Mount or rather such as god showed Moses a pattern of whereby to represent these heavenly Ministers For both the Ark and all belonging to it were made according to the model God gave him not from any Egyptian pattern as some imagine Bochart seems to me to speak judiciously when he saith they were not Figures of Angels but rather Emblems whereby the Angelical Nature was in some sort expressed Hierozoic P. I. L. 2. c. 25. And were therefore ordered to be made as Maimonides conjectures that the Jews might be confirmed in the belief of the Existence of Angels which is the second Article of their Faith next to the belief of God And he commanded two to be made because if there had been but one it might have led them into a dangerous Errour that this was the Figure of God whereby they might have been inclined to worship it But there being two of them ordered with this Declaration the LORD our God is one God it led them into right thoughts that God had many of these Angelical Ministers Thus he More Nevoch P. III. c. 45. Of beaten
Solomon was 1 Kings I. 39. though we may doubt of David when he was anointed King of Judah 2 Sam. II. 4. which was I suppose by a special direction of the Prophets that the People might look upon them as sacred Persons and special Ministers of God for their good The Jews also will have it that he whom they call the anointed of War that is say the Jews the Priest mentioned XX Deut. 2. but I should rather think the General who commanded their Forces in any sudden danger was anointed also with this Oyl that he might be inspired with Courage when he fought as a sacred Person So that they interpret the first words of the foreging Verse upon mans flesh shall it not be poured in this sense None shall be anointed with it but the High Priest the anointed of War and the Kings of the House of David For the Kings of Israel were not anointed with it but with simple Balsom as they also tell us Ver. 34. And the LORD said unto Moses take unto thee sweet Spices There are the same words here in the Hebrew that we had before v. 23. save only that there he saith Take to the Besammim with the addition of Rosch principal or most excellent and here take to the Samim which we translate sweet Spices How these two differ Interpreters of all sorts extreamly vary But they both seem to be general words which contain the following Species under them and Samim to signifie Spices of less value than Besamim The latter of which denotes such Spices as were either liquid or most proper to mix with Oyl and other liquid things to give them a fragrancy as Fort. Scacchus thinks who hath discussed these two words with great diligence in his Elaeochrism Myroth P. II. c. 7. Stacte The Hebrew word signifies something that drops which some have taken for Balsom but the LXX translate it as we do and Salmasius hath shown that it is the liquid part of Myrrhe not which slows of it self which drops from it when it is pressed out by Art See Plin. Exercit. p. 520. The same Fort. Scacchus c. 8. observes out of Dioscorides who calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. the most unctuous part of fresh Myrrhe pressed out with a little Water c. 74. This was used in their Perfumes which the Heathen burnt upon their Altars as appears by that of Euripides in Troad where he mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Onycha The Hebrew word Secheleth is translated by Jonathan Ceseth which the famous Bochartus proves by many Arguments to be ladanum which was one of the principal Aromaticks among the Arabians The Stream of Interpreters indeed carry it for Onycha but are not agreed what that is For some take it for the Hoof or Claw of an Animal as Maimonides others as Jarchi for the Root of a Plant which is smooth and transparent as the Nail of a Man's Hand which the Greeks call Onyx But there are others and more numerous who take it for the shell of a Fish in the Fens of India that are full of Spikenard upon which this Fish feeding it makes the very Shell odoriferous See Hierozoic P. II. Lib. V. cap. ult He observes also P. I. L. III. c. 1. that there was such a Shell-fish in Babylonia which was nearer to the Jews than the Indian The Greeks called it Onyx from the form of it and the Hebrews Secheleth from its colour which was black And Galbanum That which is sold in our Shops is of an offensive smell but there was another in Syria in the Mount Amanus which had an excellent Scent And therefore to distinguish it from ordinary Galbanum there is a word added to it as the Vulgar Latin takes it in which it is called Galbanum boni odoris For that Translation joyns the next word which we translate sweet Spices unto Galbanum as if he had said Aromatick Galbanum With pure Frankincense It was gathered twice in the year in the Spring and in the Autumn and Pliny tells us that gathered in the Autumn was the purest and whitest with which the other that was reddish was not to be compared L. XII c. 14. Every one knows that this was very much used by the Gentiles upon their Altars Of each shall there be a like weight This is the common Interpretation of the Hebrew words and I will not trouble the Reader with any other But we have no certain knowledge what weight this was for I see no Authority for what the Hebrew Doctors say that there was LXX pound of each of these four Spices And they add which makes all they say of this matter questionable that there were also several pounds of Cinamon and Cassia and Crocus in short of XIII several Spices which Josephus L. VI. Haloseos c. 6. assirms were in this Composition Of which Moses they say made in the whole CCCLXVIII pound that is one pound for every day in the year and three for the day of Expiation And accordingly R. Levi Barzelonita saith the Priests made every year as much as would suffice for every day of it and that the ordinary Priests might make it as well as the High Priest Praecept CI. Ver. 35. And thou shalt make it a perfume Some think the last words of the foregoing Verse signifie that each sort of Spices was to be pounded one by one and then they are all ordered here to be put together A Confection after the art of the Apothecary Made with great care and according to this Divine Prescription Thus Plutarch speaking of the Aromatick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among the Egyptians which was burnt Morning and Evening on their Altars saith it was not put together 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on any fashion or as it hapned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. but the Sacred Books were read to those who compounded it when it was mixed L. de Isid Osiride Tempered together Both the Chaldee and the LXX render this mingled just as Salt is with any thing upon which it is sprinkled Pure Without any other mixture And holy To be used only in the Divine Service For this was one of the most ancient ways of worshipping God the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Sacrifice as Porphyry saith L. II. being derived 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first Men making a Fume by burning parts of Trees and Shrubs and Seeds and Fruits And the sweeter their scent was the more grateful they fancied the Fume was unto their Gods So that though at first they contented themselves with simple Herbs and Plants and Moses here prescribes only some few Spices fetcht from Foreign Countries yet in after-times they increased them to a greater number for that Aromatick Mixture I mentioned before among the Egyptians called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was a Composition of sixteen things which Plutarch reckons up in the forenamed Book And Sophocles brings in Clytemnestra in his Electr. v. 637. calling for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
17 25. and sometimes at the door of the Tabernacle XXXI Deut. 14 15. Because the Cloud abode thereon and the Glory of the LORD filled the House The Cloud and the Glory of the LORD were not two different things but one and the same as the Pillar of Cloud and of Fire were For outwardly it was a Cloud and inwardly a Fire and accordingly here the External part of it covered the Tabernacle without while the Internal part shone in full Glory within the House Thus it was upon Mount Sinai where Moses is said to draw near to the thick Darkness where God was XX. 21. That is the Glory of the LORD was in that thick Darkness And so we read before that the Glory of the LORD appeared in the Cloud XVI 10. And so those words are to be interpreted XXIV 16. The Glory of the LORD abode upon Mount Sinai and the Cloud covered it that is covered the Glory of the LORD not the Mount six days After which on the seventh day the Glory of the LORD broke through it and appeared like devouring fire in the sight of all the People v. 17. Ver. 36. And when the Cloud was taken up from over the Tabernacle the Children of Israel went onward in their journeys That is the LORD whose glorious Presence was in this Cloud led and conducted them in all their Removals And therefore they are said to have journeyed at the commandment of the LORD because when the Cloud wherein the LORD was was taken up then they journeyed IX Numb 17 18 20 23. Ver. 37. But if the Cloud were not taken up then they journeyed not till the day that it was taken up They were wholly governed by its motions and followed its directions Ver. 38. For the Cloud of the LORD So it is called also in X Numb 34. because the Glory of the LORD was in it Was upon the Tabernacle by day And so it was by Night but then had another appearance as it here follows And fire was on it by night The Fire and the Cloud as I said v. 35. were not different things but the same Pillar which was dark by day when there was no need of light shone like fire by night when the dark part of it could not be seen to lead and conduct them It appeared therefore like a Cloud by day and turned the light side to them which was bright as fire by night that they might march if there were occasion by its direction both day and night And thus it is described XIII 21 22. IX Numb 15 16 c. And so this Verse may be translated The Cloud of the LORD was upon the Tabernacle by day and the Fire was bo in it i.e. in the Cloud by night For so they are elsewhere described as one within the other V Deut. 22. The LORD spake unto all your Assembly out of the midst of the fire of the Cloud and of the thick Darkness In the sight of all the Children of Israel throughout all their journeys The whole Congregation had constantly this comfortable Token of God's Presence among them by the Cloud in the day time and Fire in the night which never left them all the time they were in the Wilderness but brought them to Canaan The End of the Book of EXODUS ERRATA PAge 3. line 1. read See Gen. L. 26. l. 27. dele now before more p. 5. l. 24. r. Aben-Ezra p. 12. l. 6. r. the Hebrews p. 27. l. 12. r. Schalschalah p. 31. l. 5. r. he called his Son p. 41. l. 31. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 51. ult r. his words p. 56. l. 1. for exciting r. exerting p. 62. l. 19. r. because he came with an unusual p. 68. l. 20. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 70. l. 10. r. all this converse l. 19. r. Temara p. 71. l. 9. r. though not very far p. 73. l. 11. r. kashah p. 75. l. 17. r. such knives p. 80. l. 22. r. should not go alone p. 81. l. 13. r. Schalshalah Hakkabalah p. 86. l. 17. r. Taskmasters p. 114. l. 14. r. Gaulmyn p. 136. l. 12. r. Quastiones Alnetanae p. 138. l. 23. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 139. l. 4. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 141. l. 23. for Aretius r. Huetius l. 25. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 143. l. 17. r. as the Jews did long p. 153. l. 20 31. r. Schechin p. 163. l. 22. r. as the Wheat and the Rye 23. r. Trees were not broken p. 193. l. 1. r. expresly p. 197. l. 4. r. Elaeochrisin p. 220. l. 22. r. without the profession p. 242. l. 14. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 249. l. penult r. so long p. 250. l. 28. r. the next verse p. 251. l. 12. r. to protect them p. 256. l. 29. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 262. l. 4. r. tells this story p. 268. l. 13. r. compact p. 278. l. 25. r. distress p. 285. l. 12. r. when we sat p. 294. l. 10. r. who therefore tells them p. 309. l. 24. r. some other Stations p. 324. l. 17. r. German Jews p. 345. l. 6. r. of our minds p. 351 l. 21. r. phrase imports p. 366. l. ult r. and not in any p. 370. l. 18. r. they are the words p. 376. l. 16. r. backward p. 377. l. antepenult r. Gem. Bab. p. 380. l. 25. r. therefore ought not p. 427. l. 15. r. opprobrious p. 443. l. 31. r. where he pleases p. 449. l. 14. r. eat and drink p. 460. l. 3. r. to be true p. 462. l. 9. r. here p. 464. l. 26. r. having owned him p. 466. l. 31. r. he speaks p. 487. l. 3. r. when they were p. 488. l. 13. r. the ten words p. 501. l. 24. r. so in the six p. 511. l. 15. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 513. l. 33. r. set it up p. 520 l. 19. r. make for it p. 545. l. 31. r. Jaspis p. 559. l. 2. r. letters deep p. 567. l. 1. r. and his sons his sons garments p. 572. l. 24. r. which went round p. 573. l. ult r. the Jews say p. 580. l. 18. r. in the first p. 585. l. 30. r. that he might p. 586. l. 11. r. at his entrance p. 608. l. 19. r. Periegetes p. 609. l. 15. r. unto thee p. 614. l. 9. r. take to the Rosamim l. 11. r. take to thee p. 617. l. 6. r. contented themselves p. 623. l. 13. r. were ordered p. 631. l. 8. r. rebuking them p. 640. l. 11. r. the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 642. l. 30. r. make thee Prince p. 666. l. 18. r. v. 20. p. 674. l. 25. r. till men p. 677. l. 16. r. thine inheritance p. 679. l. 17. r. ad praelium ferunt p. 683. l. 20. r. fear oct of their p. 714. l. 9. r. Author of Sepher l. 26. r. in the latter end it is probable p. 721. l. 7. r. as the Priess Books Written by SYMON PATRICK D. D. now Lord Bishop of ELY and Printed for Richard Chiswell THE Parable of the Pilgrim written to a Friend The 6 Edition 4to 1681. Mensa Mystica Or a Discourse concerning the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper In which the Ends of its Institution are so manifested our Addresses to it so directed our Behaviour there and afterward so composed that we may not lose the Profits which are to be received by it With Prayers and Thanksgivings inserted To which is annexed Aqua Genitalis A Discourse concerning Baptism In which is inserted a Discourse to persuade to a confirmation of the Baptismal Vow 8vo Jewish Hypocrisie A Caveat to the present Generation Wherein is shewn both the false and the true way to a Nations or Persons compleat Happiness from the sickness and recovery of the Jewish State To which is added a discourse upon Micah 6. 8. belonging to the same matter 8vo Divine Arithmatick A Sermon at the Funeral of Mr. Samuel Jacomb Minister of St. Mary-Woolnoth-Church in Lombard-street London With an Account of his Life 8vo A Sermon preached at the Funeral of Mr. Tho. Grigg Rector of St. Andrew-Vndershaft London 4to An Exposition of the Ten Commandments 8vo Heart's Ease Or a Remedy against all Troubles With a Consolatory Discourse particularly directed to those who have lost their Friends and Rekitions To which is added Two Papers printed in the time of the late Plague The sixth Edition corrected 12mo 1695. The Pillar and Ground of Truth A Treatise shewing that the Roman Church falsly claims to be That Church and the Pillar of That Truth mentioned by St. Paul in 1 Tim. 3. 15. 4to An Examination of Bellarmin's Second Note of the Church viz. A NTIQVITY 4to An Examination of the Texts which Papists cite out of the Bible to prove the Supremacy of St. Peter and of the Pope over the whole Church In Two Parts 4to A private Prayer to be used in difficult times A Thanksgiving for our late wonderful Deliverance A Prayer for Charity Peace and Unity chiefly to be used in Lent A Sermon preached upon St. Peter's Day printed with Enlargements 4to A Sermon preached in St. James's Chappel before the Prince of Orange Jan. 20. 1688. on Isaiah 11. 6. A Second Part of the Sermon before the Prince of Orange on the same Text. Preached in Covent-Garden A Sermon preached before the Queen in March 1688 9. on Colos 3. 15. A Sermon against Murmuring preached at Covent-Garden in Lent 1688 9. on 1 Cor. 10. 10. A Sermon against Censuring preached at Covent-Garden in Advent 1688. on 1 Cor. 4. 10. Fast-Sermon before the King and Queen Apr. 16. 1690. on Prov. 14. 34. A Thanksgiving-Sermon before the Lords Nov. 26. 1691. for reducing of Ireland and the King 's safe Return On Deut. 4. 9. A Fast-Sermon before the Queen Apr. 8. 1692. On Numb 10. 9. Sermon before the Lord Mayor at St. Brides Church on Easter-Munday 1696 on 2 Tim. 2. 8. A Commentary on the First Book of Moses called Geneses 4to 1695. A Commentary on the Second Book of Moses called Exodus 4to 1697. A Sermon before the Lords Nov. 5. 1696. on Dan. 4. 35.