Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n day_n lord_n sabbath_n 2,881 5 9.6080 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A85121 A plain-dealing, and plain-meaning sermon, preach't in the parish church of St. Nicholas, Bristol, April. 6. 1660. Being the day appointed by the Parliament for publique fasting and humiliation for the sins of the nation, &c. Together with a prefatory epistle, and subsequent vindication both of the sermon, and author. Wherein (besides an apology for home and plain-preaching) you have something offered to allay the heat of thier stomacks, and to temper the tongues of those, who (being ignorant in scripture) reproach and revile Presbytery and Presbyters. With some hints at Satans subtlety, and the mischief of those people, who brand zeal for God and truth (in free, home, and faithfull preaching) with the reproachful names of anger, passion, and railing. Farmer, Ralph. 1660 (1660) Wing F443; Thomason E1025_5; ESTC R208684 39,155 50

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

eternally But that King Jesus will assuredly save them if he rule over them I hope you will not say this is a crime if you do the Lord make you wiser And this I think is all you have to charge me with in this matter and how wisely justly charitably Christianly let all wise men judge Confident I am what I delivered might have been spoken even in the Kings presence and he would not have been offended What would these captious hearers have said had I used such plain language as was spoken unto him at his Coronation in the Coronation Sermon Coronation Sermō preacht at Scoon Ian. 1651. by Mr. Rob. Douglas Printed at Aberdeen 1660. That his Father set himself in a hostile way to overthrow Religion Parliaments Laws and Liberties and in page 27. of the same Sermon they charge his Grandfather King James with foul defection and that he peresecuted faithful Ministers and that he laid the foundation whereupon his Son our late King says he did build much mischief to Religion all the days of his life And he tells him that the guiltiness of the transgression lies upon the Throne and Family and that is one of the sins for which he had professed humiliation very lately and advises him to take warning And in his Exhortation to the King page 32. he tells him There is too much iniquity upon the Throne by his Predecessors who framed mischief by a Law such Laws as have been destructive to Religion grievous to Gods people and page 36. he may say it freely That chief cause of the judgement upon the Kings House hath been his Grandfathers breach of Covenant with God and his Fathers following his steps in opposing the work of God and his Kirk within these Kingdoms He says They have broken the Covenant with God and men have broken Covenant with them Most cruelly and perfidiously says he they have invaded the Royal Family and trodden upon all Princely Dignity And therefore charges him in Christs name not to break Covenant if he do he assures him The Controversie is not ended between God and his Family but it will be carried on to further weakning if not to the utter overthrow of it Here 's plain dealing now what would our men have said to this matter Surely never a villain in England would have preached such a Sermon and yet such foolish sots have we in England to say so of a Sermon that hath none of all this nor any thing like in it But now Sirs to convince you of your perverseness and to let you see how like you are to those noxious creatures the Flies that flie-blow wholsome meat so are you It is usuall with them if there be any bruised place they are sure to light upon that first and there to sucke and feed themselves But if there be none they flie-blow so long till they have made it fit for their purpose So do you flie-blow discourses For whereas you charge me to be against the King and his coming in did I not say It was a judgement that we were removed from our ancient foundations And what could I mean or did I mean But the changing our government And did I not quote that place Isay 3. to the end of vers 8. as a dreadfull judgement most sadly fallen upon us And did I not afterwards say That as we had been under that curse and judgement so we might see that blessed morning promised to Gods people in the same Prophet Chap. 1. ver 25 26 27. Do but read the places and let any man say what could be thence intended And did I not pray for the hastning of that happy morning And when I quoted that place in 1 Sam. 12.19 to the end did I not in express words say That that place in all things did not run parallel with our condition But that in something it was pertinent to my purpose which was in the later part onely in that the peoples wickedness would destroy themselves the King and Kingdome And did I not in plain words say That that portion of Scripture held not parallell in that very particular in that it was said they sin'd in desiring a King with more to that purpose as you may see in the Sermon And did I not say That if it were the late Kings own sins which I did not nor dare I determine that brought that judgment upon him it was not just in them who did it And when I advised you to be more careful to bring King Jesus into your hearts then King Charles into the Throne did I not expresly and in these significant words say That the one was not opposite contradictory or destructive to the other But onely that King Jesus was to be prefer'd before him And that if he King Charles be minded to rule for him and under him did I not say If God and the great Council see it fit let him come and welcome Well the Lord forgive you and make you wiser and more discreet and bonest And I cannot passe by but must reprove you for one most abominable lie of some of you That I should pray in my Prayer That as the Lord had delivered us from one Devill so he would deliver us from another and that hereby I did mean the King Good Lord what a lying malicious Devill hath possest these people No these and such like prophane and ungodly wretches in an humane shape are the Devils I prayed against I prayd That as the Lord had graciously in a good measure delivered us from the devil of Hersie and blasphemie so that he would also keep us and deliver us from the Devil of prophanenesse And the God to whom I prayed knows that these ungodly wretches are all the Devils I prayed against and no other not having any thought apprehension or imagination of the King in this particular And so much to my first charge 2 Now for my second in which I shall be brief My Sermon say some drove all at this The bringing in of the King would bring in all prophanesse But did I any where say so Truly I needed not Prophanesse is in already in the Nation nor did I thinke the King would bring it in and I hope he never will But this I think all the ungodly and prophane people in the Nation have a very great and strong desire of the Kings coming in as hoping to have as much liberty to be prophane and to exercise it as they had before Oh! how hath the Parliament Acts and Ordinances hampered and chained and fettered these beasts They cannot swear or be drunk but they must pay for 't Taverns Innes and Ale-house must be shut on the Lords day all day long that they cannot tipple be drunk They must not walke in the streets nor in the fields on that day under a penalty and many of them have been sued and indicted for it and the like And oh How like wilde Buls in a net have they fretted and vext and raved at it Oh! that blessed book think they that most excellent book for sports on the Sabboth That
was a good a blessed a merry time with us These people are like those Jer. 44.16,17,18 As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the Lord we will not hearken unto thee But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth to burn incense unto the Queen of heaven and to pour out drink-offerings unto her as we have done we and our fathers our Kings and our princes in the Cities of Iudah and streets of Ierusalem For then had we plenty of victuals and were well and saw no evill But since we left off to burn incense to the queen of heaven c. we have wanted all things and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine Well sirs think as you will For my part I thinke that accursed book was none of the least provocations that drew down the judgements of God upon the Nation And yet how glad would many be of this licentious liberty re-introduced And oh for some good Court Bishops to help us in this particular against the Round-heads and these puritanical Presbyterians Beloved Reader I charge this upon the Court Bishops onely For confident I am there were many good and godly Bishops in the Nation who abhorred that execrable thing and yet this is the thing these miserable wretches look for And here let me not be mistaken or mis-reported as if I thought that none but prophane and godlesse persons look and long for the Kings coming No far be it from my soul For I am assured there are many godly and honest hearts sober and discreet persons who earnestly desire it and would be glad to see it But as for prophane and ungodly persons drunkards swearers whoremongers Sabboth-breakers despisers of Religion and godlinesse in the power of it upon what good account can they desire him I leave it to any reasonable man to judge Do they desire it either for the Kings good or their own good certainly no But they are sure if one party whom they how hate should prevail they shall still walke in their chains and fetters but from another they hope at least for freedome And should they be hampered and restrained by that other they would hate both alike For 't is not this person or that person this party or that which is the quarrel or offence But the old enmity of opposition and hatred between the two seeds of godly and ungodly And if the King be as by some he is reported which God grant godly and shall shew it by his curbing their wickednesse they will not like him long but would be weary of him And clearly the observation and information of their prophanesse the last Fast day is to me yea and to any considering person a sufficient argument of their ungodlinesse and these onely are the men I spoke of and desired to consider the vanity of their expectations That if it had been the will of God I might have been instrumental to undeceive but some one of them and see how they requite me for my labour But I shall not lose it And truly although these be the persons I chiefly aym at as most worthy of reprehension Yet since I am now discharging my conscience in this way of writing which I think not to do again I would beg leave to advise some of our more civill and moderate opponents in one particular 'T is too easie and familiar with many of you upon the least provocation sometimes without it to return upon us with the word Presbyterian by way of reproach as a Nick-name and to inveigh against Presbytery But Sirs do you understand what you do It 's true the Bishops have a long time kept the name and thing in a kind of silence under hatches But will you without passion and partiality and as in the presence of God for so I desire to deale with you be informed in the truth Then I must tell you this one thing the Scripture speaks more of and for Presbyters then Bishops Not that I bring this as an argument to prove Presbytery to be more sacred then Episcopacy For I thinke them both so alike and I intend not to handle that controversie My designe is to let you know if the Scripture may rule you you may as well speak scornfully of Bishops as Presbyters and of Episcopacy as of Presbytery For I tell you again the Scripture makes oftner mention of Presbyters then Bishops Now for your information and to clear this to you you must know that the word presbyter though we by use make it English is a Greek word which we in our English Bibles have always translated by the word Elder It comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Senex one that 's old And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Senior one that 's Elder And this word is used in Scripture sometimes in a naturall sense to signifie one elder in age and sometimes in an ecclesiastical sense for an Officer in the Church of Christ Now it was my purpose to have examined all the places in the Greek Testament where the word Presbyter is used and to have observed how many times it was used in an ecclesiastical sence signifying a Church-Officer But the day before the writing hereof there came very happily to my hand a Book lately published by one whose other workes praise him in the gate and this not a little scil Mr. George Lawson Politica Sacra which saves me some labour which I am willing to embrace at this time for hast-sake especially from such an Author And he tells me page 139. of that Book that he finds the word Presbyter in an ecclesiastical sence and notion about sixteen times in the New Testament And now as for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is sometimes translated an Overseer as Acts 20.28 and sometimes a Bishop I could quickly number them for 't is but five times used and one of them is spoken not of an ordinary Church-officer but of our Lord Christ Jesus 1 Pet. 2.25 So that I say the Scripture makes more use and more often mention of the word Presbyter then Bishop and therefore not so to be slighted and reproached or to be used as a terme of disgrace to any man unlesse you have a mind to disgrace the Scripture which thus honours Presbyters and Presbyterians above Bishoips Yea but Bishops are above them How know you that They were so and so have a long time that 's true But did the Scripture put them there Good sirs let no man be angry with me if I express my mind freely I mean not to make a quarrel of it nor contend with any man about it for I have better work to do then nodum in scirpo quaerere But where doth the Scripture put a Bishop above a Presbyter Let any man in the world shew me the place Shall I ask
Gods blessing setled and established upon sure foundations That now was the onely time I will not say but surely in all good reason it was a very seasonable time When people are high and full earnest and that generally and it being almost the onely talk of bringing in the King was it not seasonable upon a solemn Fasting day to minde people of being more carefull of bringing King Jesus into their hearts then any mortal King unto the Throne And inasmuch as sin the sins of the people for that way I carried it had destroyd our former King that therefore they should beware lest by their sinnes they destroy the latter Had I said any thing by way of opposition or had I not very frequently upon all occasions and that not in corners onely but openly declar'd my judgement for the coming in of the King it had been something But surely these men have some prejudice against my person But whether they have or no thus much I tell them in the fore quoted words of the reverend Dr. in the Preface and where this exception is in part answered I will no more learn of them how to preach then they will learn of me to buy and sell And so I leave them And now upon the whole matter I will draw towards a close with this request to those who may be Auditors hereafter that they would not by ignorant or wilfull mistakes or if reports make the reproach of Ministers a means to repair their decayd and broken fortunes in taking up or carrying on and telling lies to those whom they have a mind to ingratiate themselves withal and may as they hope lift them up out of their low condition I must tell you sirs in few words for I have gone beyond what I intended already in thus doing belying and reproaching the Ministers of the Gospel you do but the Devils business Satans greatest design is to hinder the progress of the Gospel And he well knows contempt of the Minister brings neglict of his Doctrine It is a truth so clear in your own experiences that I need not say more to it And consider you are hereby injurious not onely unto us weakning our hands that we cannot reap the desired fruit of our labours But you injure both your selves and others of our people who by your evill practice and example in this kind are drawn into the prejudice sin and mischief with you I shut up all with this If it be an honour which brings a great reward with it to be instrumentall in the work of mens salvation what can they expect who in any kind hinder it Consider it betimes and be wise for the future TO fill up the void place of my paper I thought good to add a testimony or two conducent to my purpose in the preceding Vindication and that from a witnesse not to be suspected of partiality in this matter And that is Dr. Laud Archbishop of Canterbury taken out of his own Diary or Day book of every days observations under his own hand and found with him by Mr. Pryn when he searched him and his Lodgings in the Tower And this I have in a Book published by Mr. Pryn intituled A breviate of the Life of William Laud c. where page 21. you have this passage recorded June 14. This day John Bastwick Dr of Physicke Henry Burton Batchellor of Divinity and Will Pryn Barrester at Law were censured for Libels against the Hierarchy of the Church June 26. The speech I then spake in the Star-Chamber was commanded by the King to be Printed and it came out June 25. I suppose the first June 26. should have been June 16. And this now manifestly evidences their sufferings were not for any offence against the Civill State And what power that Bishop then had to tyrannize and how they did rage for things of their proper concernment And what was the cause of the tumults in Scotland which we all know led in the tumults in England the same Bishop who best knew it will tell you In the same page thus April 29 1638. The tumults in Scotland about the Service-Book offered to be brought in began July 23. 1637. And continued increasing by fits and hath now brought that Kingdom in danger No question there is a great concurrence between them and the Puritan party in England a great aym there to destroy me in the Kings opinion c. Mark here These 3. men suffered in June 37. and the Tumults began the next moneth following and so went onwards And did they prosper And he here acknowledges these tumults began about the Service-Book Which what a one it was and how differing from ours you may read in another Book of Mr. Pryns entituled Hidden works of darkness brought to light discovering the practices used to usher Popery into our Realms I 'le add one testimony more out of the former Book page 22. Thursday Decemb. 5. The KING declared his resolution for a Parliament in case of the Scottish Rebellion The first movers to it were my Lord Deputy of Ireland my Lord Marquess Hamilton and my selfe And a Resolution voted at the Board to assist the King in extraordinary wayes if the Parliament should prove peevish and refuse c. By the Board he means the Councel-Table Observe here now who and why and whence came all our Troubles And how per fas aut nefas it must be carried on as it was to his the Kings and the Kingdoms undoing And see if the Parliament answer not their ends in this good Bishops language they are peevish THE END