Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	day_n	lord_n	sabbath_n	2,881	5	9.6080	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A63266	An apology for the non-conformists shewing their reasons, both for their not conforming, and for their preaching publickly, though forbidden by law : with an answer to Dr. Stillingfleet's sermon, and his defence of it, so much as concerneth the non-conformists preaching / by John Troughton ...	Troughton, John, 1637?-1681.	1681 (1681)	Wing T2312; ESTC R1706	102,506	125

of the Parishes any more then the Non-Residents may plead that they cannot reside with their own people or perform Ministerial duties to them because they must hold Communion with them amongst whom they dwell Thus the Dr in all his book hath said nothing directly to the question in hand but the Terms of Communion he saith are the same now as at the first Reformation but as to the Ministers this is apparently otherwise such Subscriptions and Declarations being required of them as no History can match except those imposed on the Jansenists in France of which ours seem to be an immitation The contrivers of our impositions being then in France when the Jansenists were removed from all Ecclesiastical Places by a like artifice as we afterwards were If he mean the Terms of Communion that concern the people as he elsewhere expresseth himself and restrains them to the Terms imposed by Law this is nothing to the purpose for the Ministers though they should submit to those terms when they act as private men may nevertheless be bound not to for sake the exercise of their Ministry Besides there is a Fallacy in restraining the Terms to those enjoyned by Law what if neither Ministers nor people can enjoy the benefit of the Law but new terms are imposed on them without Law as were the subscription to the Service Book Can. 36. whereby so many worthy Ministers were turned out in K. Jame's time the Reading of the book for Soorts on the Lords Day and the Reading of the Prayer against the Scots and the order for Preaching but once a Sabbath and then not to exceed an hour for disobeying which more were rejected in the late King's time and many such are still continued viz the constant Reading of the Communion Service though there be no Sacrament which makes the Prayers more tedious and fuller of Repitions then they need to be and also straitneth the Preacher if it do not hinder the Sermon the placeing the Communion Table and Railing it like an Altar and compelling the Communicants to come up by parcels to kneel before it contrary to Q. Eliz. injunctions must the people submit still because these things are imposed by Law do not innovations and corruptions come into the Church by degrees and by connivance at first and afterwards when their Authors are strong enough they are then established by Laws and Canons And yet the Argument holdeth not the things imposed might be submitted to at the first Reformation ergo they must be so still The Jewish Ceremonies were tolerated and practised by the Apostle Paul in the beginning of the Gospel and yet when false teachers and other peevish or timorous men contended for the observation of them still when the reason of it viz not offending the Jews was ceased and they were an hindrance to the Gospel then the same Apostle would not give place to them no not for an hour though Peter and Barnabas joyned with them Gal. 2.3.4.5 and ver 11. to the 18. Nor doth our practise reflect on our first Reformers unless they had been extraordinarily inspired to that work then indeed to vary from them or endeavour to correct them would be to reproach the Spirit by whom they acted But if they made that Reformation only as good and wise men acting according to Principles of Piety and Prudence as farr as they could in their circumstances it is no disparagement to them if others vary from them according to the times and circumstanees they live in My L. Bacon observes that in civil matters our Parliament does dayly alter our Laws Bacon 's Essays and suit them to the present times and case of the people yet this is thought no disparagement to the Wisdom or Justice of their Ancestours in former Parliaments but the Church ●●eth almost buried in the Rubbish of time and this must not be removed out of Veneration forsooth to Antiquity The best men not inspired can but do what is best for their own time we should therefore inquire not only whether the terms of Communion be the same now that they were at the first Reformation but also whether those terms be as necessary as Tolerable and as fit to be submitted to now as they wre then Nor did our Reformers expect that their endeavours should be made an unalterable Standard to all posterity The exprest in their Preface to the Common-Prayer Book their mind this purpose viz. That they had done what they could in reforming the Church and the Liturgy according to their light and as their times would bear and that they hoped those that came after would be able to do more and go further This I have heard from divers Ancient and Credible Persons who remembred they had read this passage in the said Preface though it be now left out And it is the more unreasonable to urge the platform of the first Reformation as a Rule not to be altered though in disputable and mutable things because some of these Reformers both Ministers and People of that time disliked some things that were imposed and because they were yoked with some Papists who dissembled their Religion that they might both keep their places and more effectually hinder the Reformation as Bishop Cranmer is said to have complained How ever the thing was an unquestionable Truth Nor is it altogether true which he saith that the dislike of our Liturgy or Ceremonies was wholly brought from abroad by Hooper Rogers c. such as had travelled in Germany and Helvetia where Cranmer himself had also been a considerable time But it sprang up at home also together with the first seeds of the Reformation Almongst Wicklif's Opinion recited by Mr. Fox and charged on him by his Adversaries there by many pieces of the present Non-Con-formity relating to Discipline and Ceremonies * Church Hist Cont. and Dr. Fuller reports that in the latter end of K. Henry 8th many Articles were complained of in the Convocation as being now common among the People as against Lent most of the Ceremonies and such like It is natural for Christians not only to desire to hear true Doctrine and to have true Worship but to have that Doctrine and worship maintained by such Discipline and expressed by such Ceremonies or Circumstances as are allowed by it and agreeable to it and not by exotick things of mans device and humour It is true then Conformity and Non-conformity were Twins conceived and Born together in the Womb of our Church and it is as true that Non-Conformity put forth its hand first though Conformity had the hap first to break and to be Midwifed into into the world by Law But indeed is it a Reflection on our first Reformers to desire to mend what they were not peremptory in and some of them disliked And is it no dishonour to them to change the Doctrine then establisht in chief Articles of Faith viz. the Pelagian and Arminian points which have so long reigned amongst us And

of men appointed by David by Divine inspiration for this work and so the manner and method also was appointed by God and Art and rules of Musick were then acceptable and part of the Ceremonial worship But there being such Offices nor such service appointed in the Christian Church this is no warrant for our Responses Neither do the Scriptures give any warrant or example for observing dayes as sacred in the honour of Saints Or of instituting new Offices in the Church or new Ceremonies of worship but on the contrary our Saviour declares that men worship in vain that teach for Doctriens the Commandements of men Matth. 15.9 It seems then That Decency and Order which men purposely devise to add significancy or comliness to gods worship is abominable in his sight he hath no need of mans service and therefore will accept of nothing but what is appointed and carried on by his own Spirit Neither do the Scriptures appoint or warrant any superiority of Bishops above ordinary Ministers at least not such as that they should have sole power of governing the Church The high Priests of old had no such power of the Priests as this Learned Doctor hath proved in his Irenicum They had some peculiar things appropriated to their office but were themselves subject to the Sanhedrim The Apostles were all of one Order and had no authority over each other and governed the Church only by consent Gal. 2.9 Nor is there any distinction made betwixt ordinary Ministers except what they see needful to make amongst themselves for the good of the Church This all our old Bishops acknowledged and therefore pleaded for Episcopacy only as an humane constitution And those who of late wrote for its Divine-right do yet the most learned of them acknowledge that it cannot be proved from Scripture unless perhaps from the angels of the Church of Asia which this Dr. hath solidly confuted It was alwaies objected to the Non-conformists that the Scriptures do not forbid those things though they do not command them But they replyed that the Non-command of any thing in Gods worship and Church is a prohibition except of those things only that occasionally become necessary or that are naturally necessary circumstances of such actions as are commanded for it would argue great imperfection in the Law if it should omit things that are constantly or generally necessary for the good of the Church And as Moses closed his Law with this command that none should adde or diminish it so Christ having given his Law to his Church and appointed Officers with power to make govern and cast members out of it as there was need without giving them liberty to adde or alter He also did virtually prohibit such additions or alterations till he shall come again and their Commission being only to teach baptize and to teach all that Christ commands to the end of the world Mat. 28.18.19 This doth sufficiently restrain them from making or teaching cammands of their own all their authority being grounded on that Commission 2. From Antiquity the Non-Conformists alledge that the primitive Churches for many hundred years had no stated Liturgies prescribing the words as well as method of worship Justin Martyr in his second Apoligy designedly gives an account of the Christian worship viz the order and method of praying preaching admitting of Members administring both Sacraments but hath no word of a prescribed form but he saith the Minister prayed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he was able Tertullian giving the same account in his Apol. Cap. 39. saith likewise sine monitore quia de pectore oramus they prayed by heart and therefore had no prompter much less a book We read that Constantine the great Euseb de vit constant l. 4. cap 19.20 having abolished idolatry composed a form of Prayer for his Heathen Souldiers wherein t hey should pray to one God the Creatour of all things but we read of no form imposed on Christians There are indeed Lyturgies that goe under the names of the Apostle James Basil Chrysostome and Ambrose but they convince themselves to be forged by later men and so are an argument that there were no such things in the primitive times but when the Church was over-run with errours and superstitions it was appointed in Africa that the Ministers should either receive a form of Prayer from their Bishops Cansil Milevet 2 dum Can. 12. or shew their own Prayer to them for their approbation but this was above 400 years after Christ the usurpation of Bishops Lazines and ambition of Ministers ignorance and superstition in the people bred Liturgies and they grew up together Nor is their any mention of Responses in the Antient Church a superstitions story of a vision of Angels singing an Hymn in that manner by turns is pretended to be seen by Ignatius dead long before nor had the antient Church days holy to Saints for 300 years and upward we find only mention amongst them of easter-Easter-day and yet that caused such division and contentions that it might have been a warning to after ages for contending about things that God hath not commanded The Apocryphal Books were indeed read in the Christian Church very antiently though they never were amongst the Jews but it was more excusable in them then in us because it was long e're the books of the Scripture especially the books of the New Testament were gathered into one Volumn or it was agreed among the Churches which were Canonical and which Apocryphal for some of the Apocryphal were read in some Churches as Canonical and some of the Canonical were by some Churches rejected The Cross in Baptism was so long unknown to the Church that it is hard to say when it came in though the sign of the Cross was commonly used amongst them upon their Cloaths in their Hats to distinguish them from Heathens and as a token that they were Christians the Montanists began to make a superstititious use of the Cross and so did many others soon after Constantine himself can scarce be excused if Eusebius be credited but that it was annexed to Baptism and made a symbole of mens embracing Christianity there is no record Kneeling at the Lords Supper was not enjoyned till transubstantion was established above 1200 years after Christ nor is any general example for it pretneded in former ages The Surplice was much Elder then the Cross in Baptism or kneeling at the Supper yet for 200 years and upwards there is no mention of it nor is it known when or how it came in many Rites Customs and Ceremonies were used in the Primitive Churches some being derived from the Jews some from the Heathens by the converts of both sorts yet not imposed upon others the Apostles Rule being yet observed that no man should judge another in meats or drinks Col. 2.16 Rom. 14. or in respect of an holy day i. e. the Jewish Festivals which were once of divine institution Nor did the

2. But instead of amending any thing amiss or disliked in the Liturgy some things were added to make it more offensive viz Sundays are more expresly reckoned as Church-Feasts than in the former book the new book saith thus a Table of all the Feasts that are to be observed in the Church of England through the year all Sundays in the year The former book thus these holy days to be observed and no other all Sundays in the year The word Holy-day which was somewhat suspicious is now changed to feast-Feast-day and Sundays put in the number of feast-Feast-days without any distinction which makes it more evident that they are accounted but Church Festivals The 29 of September in the old book is appointed a Festival to Michael the Arch-Angel the new book adds and to all Angels so that this is a Festival in the honour of all the Angels as the First of Novemb. is in honour of all the Saints also two new Holy-days are added never before enjoyned by the former book viz St Pauls Conversion and St Barnabas Moreover in the book of Consecration several passages are added declaring Bishops to be a distinct order from the Presbyters and the 36th Artic. is appointed to be understood of this book herein they contradict the Law and the Judgment of all our first Reformers in K. Edw. and Q. Eliz. days and the very book of Consecration it self 3. Nevertheless all Ministers are to approve this book and that by a publick declaration in the Congregation when they first enter upon their Ministry in these words and no other I vid. Act. of unif Ann. 14 Can. 2. A B do here declare my unfeigned assent and consent to all and every thing contained and prescribed in and by the book entituled the book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church according to the use of the Church of England together with the Psalter of Psalms of David pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches and the form or manner of making ordaining and consecrating of Bishops Priest and Deacons It is said in excuse of this imposition that it is only a consent to the use not an approbation of the truth and goodness of all contained in the book because the words immediate foregoing are that Ministers should declare their unfeigned assent and consent to the use of all things in that book contained and prescribed Be it so and that the words Assent and Consent signifie the same things after the manner of Lawyers though some doubt it and those words to the use c. are not expressed in the form of a Declaration which they ought to have been yet we must observe First That this was a further alteration of the Case of Conformity to make it more intollerable Q. Eliz. Act of Uniformity only required that Ministers should be bound to read the book of Common Prayer and no other Liturgies or forms of prayer in publick The Canons went further and did require they should subscribe at their Ordination before the Bishop that the book of Common Prayer and of Ordination hath nothing in it contrary to the word of God that it may be lawfully used and that he himself will use that and no other but this new Declaration is to be made publickly before the Congregation on forfeiture of their Ministry and place that so there may be no favour shewed to any Also it requireth unfeigned Assent and Consent which cannot mean less then an hearty approbation of the use of what is enjoyned which is much more then barely to judge that nothing is contrary to Gods word and that they may be Lawfully used This Assent and Consent is to be made to all and every thing contained in and prescribed by the book of Common Prayer c. and then the particulars are specified viz the Prayers the Administration of Sacraments and of other Rites and Ceremonies and the book of ordering Bishops Priests and Deacons and the Psalter or Psalms of David as they use to be said in the Church of England Here is nothing omitted of all those things the Non-Conformists used to object against some as unlawfull and others as inconvenient and not for edification yet now they must from their hearts allow the use of them each one in particular not omitting the corrupt translation of the Pslams contradicted by our own allowed Bibles which how they could do who long contended that many of these things ought to be reformed let all that have Conscience judg The Non-Conformists think no form of words could have been contrived more spitefully either to keep them from conforming or to make them lay wast their Consciences if they did conform besides that they know from the mouths of the compilers that they did design it for these ends that they might either root out every branch of Conformity out of mens judgments or every Non-Conformist out of the Church 4. The Act requires this Assent and Consent not only of all that should hereafter enter the Ministry but of all those likewise that were already Ministers and were either Pastours or Lecturers in any Congregation and this Declaration to be made together with the subscription hereafter to be mentioned by a certain day viz before the 24th of August Anno 1662 whereas it is generally known that the book of Common Prayer came not out of the press abroad till within two or three days of that said 24th of August so that it was impossible that it should be seen much more that it should be considered by half the Ministers in England before that day and those that were resolved to keep their Places did a great part of them subscribe before they had read the book which practise doth manifest a further design to root out all that made any Conscience of what they said or subscribed seeing they must doe it without consideration or loose their places however to devise and impose new Terms of Communion upon men that are in the quiet possession and practice of their ministry is very unjust and contrary to all peace and by this practise men shall never be at quiet for though they have conform'd to all things enjoyned they know not how soon a prevailing faction will enjoyn them more nor what that will be especially the things enjoyned in the Declaration and Subscription being such as was known before hand many of the Ministers in place could not subscribe to with safe Consciences It is apparent that their design was not the peace of the Church but to remove them out of the Church 5. It is further required that all should have Episcopal Ordination who should in any sort exercise the Ministry had this concerned only those that should thereafter come to be ordained it had been more tolerable though it would have been contrary to Q. Eliz. moderation and reflecting upon all other reformed Churches An. Eliz. 13. who have not Episcopal Ordination