Religion from the Idolatries Errors and superstitions of the Church of Rome to be assured that the way or mode for the publick Worship of God be reformed also Concerning which in the satisfying of my self I have observed that two sorts of persons have made their objections First such as have condemned the common and publick Liturgy of the Church as sinful and Idolatrous because taken out of the mass-Mass-book c. Some onely as symbolizing with the service of the Romish Church Of the former sort were the Brownists of old the later the wiser sort of the Non-conformists both formerly and at this present time who do therefore presse a necessity of a further Reformation thereof as appeareth by the Discourse of Plus ultra and by the desires of those persons that were commissioned to advise about the Liturgie c. who thought no Reformation like the laying aside the old one as to themselves and the making a new one in its stead to be left unto the Ministers liberty to chuse which they would use Sect. 2. I shall therefore for the clearing of the lawfulness of our obedience to the use of this Liturgie of the Church present and lay before you the objections against the Liturgie of the Church of England by the English Brownists by which also the Authors of the Temperate Discourse and of Plus ultra may see who they do symbolize withall and how much mistaken I suppose they are who say the cause of the Non-conformists hath been long ago stated at the troubles of Frankfort and hath continued the same Sect. 3. That which is laid to the charge of the English Liturgie is this by those called the Brownists I find in the second part of the Mr. Balls answer pag. 4. The whole form of the Church service is borrowed from the Papists for none can deny that it was culled and picked out of the Popish Dunghill the Mass-book full of all abominations from three Romish channels I say it was raked the Breviary the Ritual and the Mass-book mentioned by the Sober Discourse pag. 21. and Plus ultra pag. 17. with much earnestness affirms that the English Liturgie is Tantum non the Romish Mass Now to vindicate this mode of Gods Worship in the English Church from this charge and so consequently to give us to apprehend that we may lawfully declare conformity to the use thereof be pleased to take notice of Mr. Balls answer pag 6. Sect. 4. That which you alledge against the English Service-book in particular you intend against all set forms of prayer or stinted Liturgies whatsoever c. to pag. 8. and there saith he further It is true the Nonconformists say that it was in a great part picked and culled out of the Mass-book but it followeth not thence that either it is or was esteemed by them a devised or false Worship for many things contained in the Mass-book it self are good and holy A Pearl may be found upon a Dunghill We cannot more credit the man of sin then to say that every thing in the Mass-book is devillish and Antichristian for then it should be Antichristian to pray unto God in the mediation of Christ or read the Scriptures to professe many fundamentall divine Truths necessary to salvation pag. 9. Our Service was picked and culled out of the Mass-book you say and so it might and yet be free from all fault and tincture from all shew and appearance of evil though the Mass-book it selfe was fraught with all manner of abominations For if Antichrist sit in the Temple of God and professe himself the servant of Jesus Christ of necessity some Treasures Riches and Jewels of the Church must be gathered into his Den which being collected purged and refined might serve to adorne the chaste Spouse of Christ Neither in so doing doth the Church honour Antichrist but challenge her own right if she retain ought that belongeth to Antichrist that is her stain and blemish but the recovery of that which Christ the King of his Church hath given as her wealth and ornament must not be imputed a fault Sect. 5. Further saith he pag. 9. If it be wholly taken out of the Mass-book how cometh it to have those things which are so directly contrary to the Mass that both cannot possibly stand together In our Book of Common prayer we pray to God onely in the mediation of Jesus Christ and in a known Language we profess that Christ by one Oblation of himself once for all hath made a full perfect and sufficient satisfaction for the sins of the whole World that he hath commanded a perpetual remembrance of his Death and Passion in that Ordinance of the Supper and that the Sacrament is to be administred in both kinds the Minister and the People to communicate together Were these things taken out of the mass-Mass-book The Church of Rome joyneth the two first Commandments into one or taketh away the second thereby to cloak their Idolatry in the worshipping of Images but the Common prayer book of the Church of England divideth them into two therein following two of the Fathers at most excepted all Antiquity and setteth down the words of the second Commandment at large The Church of Rome teacheth that in the Sacrament of the Eucharist the body and blood of Christ is received and eaten carnally that as much is received in one kind as in both and that in the Mass Christ is offered up as a propitiatory unbloudy sacrifice for the sins of quick and dead but the Common prayer book of the Church of England teacheth expresly in the form of administring that Sacrament that spiritually by faith we feed on him in our hearts eating and drinking in remembrance that Christ died and shed his blood for us In the Mass the Priest receiveth alone the people standing by and gazing on him but the Minister and people are appointed with us to communicate together according to the Instition of Christ and the practice of the primitive Church We make the Communion of the Eucharist purposely a Sacrament they a Sacrament and propitiatory Sacrifice They celebrate at an Altar we at a Table according to the example of our Saviour Christ his Apostles and the Primitive Church in the purest times We pray for the living they for the living and dead And if these be not points directly contrary to the Roman Service Rome is much departed from her self Sect. 6. I have been the larger in the transcribing of this most singular vindication of the common prayer book by this judicious learned Mr. John Ball to the end that such good people who as the Author of the Treatise of Liturgies saith can by no means be reconciled to the use of it as being an Idolatrous Service may here see the vast difference between the mass-Mass-book and our common prayer and be brought to love and like thereof And that such Ministers as profess by the said Author that when their people come to them and say
to them This common prayer was taken out of the mass-Mass-book will you read it they know not what to say may be furnished with such an answer as by Gods blessing may be not onely very informing but reforming also And that such Ministers and People that doe feare that by this Act of Uniformity which requireth a Declaration from every Minister that he will conform to the use of the common prayer book and that he doth assent and consent thereto that all this conformity required is but preparatory to Popery may by a diligent comparing and considering of what Mr. Ball hath published be quieted in their mindes about their fears in this thing Mr. Ball saith expresly pag. 9. That there are such things in the common prayer such Drctrines there taught and such practises there enjoyned that are so directly contrary to the mass-Mass-book that both cannot possibly stand together Sect. 7. And that I may the further corroborate your minds in this particular I humbly desire that the further insinuatians of the displeased Ones with the common prayer as being but the English Mass and as is affirmed pag. 5. that one Dr. Carrier a dangerous seducing Papist should say That the common prayer and the catechisme in it contained hold no point of Doctrine expresly contrary to Antiquity that is as he explaineth himselfe the Romish Church onely hath not enough in it may be removed not only by what I have already transcribed out of Mr. Ball but also from what followeth in answer to the Brownists charge against the common prayer by this Carriers judgement beforesaid Saith this reverend person pag. 11. Carriers pretence in that particular is a meer jugling trick that he might insinuate a change of Religion might be made amongst us without any great alteration which is as likely as that the light should be turned into darknesse and not be espied if many points of Popery be not condemned expresly in the catechisme or Service-book c. yet so many points are there taught directly contrary to the foundation of Popery that it is not possible that Popery should stand if they take place Sect. 8. How much therefore it concerneth all zealous haters of Popery to take heed of their contempt of the Service-book and Catechisme therein contained and to take heed of such a Reformation thereof as should take this form of Common prayer Catechisme and manner of celebration of the Lords Supper out of the way may appear by what is so confidently and rationally affirmed if it be seriously considered that it is not possible that Popery should ever stand if they take place amongst us pag. 11. That I may further shew how unlike it is that the Reader of the Missale Romanum c. or the comparer of the Rituale Romanum c. with the printed common prayer Book of the 5. and 6. of Edward the 6. or this our English Liturgy as it is commonly put to sale shall find but very little but what is to be found in the mass-Mass-book in Latine Discourse of Liturgies pag. 1 21 22. I shall desire what is further alleadged by Mr. Ball may be seriously laid to heart saith he to such who speak in the language aforesaid pag. 11. It is more proper to say the Mass was added to our Common prayer book then that our Common prayer was taken out of the mass-Mass-book For most things in our Common prayer were to be found in the Liturgie of the Church long before the Mass whereof we speak on was heard of in the World and the Mass was patch'd up by degrees and added to the Liturgie of the Church now one piece and then another so that the ancient truths and holy Liturgies were at last stained with the Idol of the Mass which was sacrilegiously thrust into them Sect. 9. And that the Reverend Bishop Jewell so much magnified by Plus ultra as a greater friend to his design was a great friend to this truth laid down by Mr. Ball you may find in his defence of the Apologie of the Church of England upon the occasion of Hardings challenging the Church of England with changing their Communion book so often replies by retortion that it was their crime to be guilty of chopping and changing of the Church Liturgie and not they saith he pag. 198. If thou wilt read the often changes and alterations of the Mass read I beseech thee Platina and Polydore Virgil concerning the same and there shalt thou find how and by whom and on what occasion and in what processe of time all the parts of the Mass were pieced and set together So that it is more easie to observe how Bishop Jewell and Mr. Ball do agree in their judgements about the Mass and Common prayer book as you shall read hereafter then that Bishop Jewell and Plus ultra were both of one mind as to the matters in controversie Sect. 10. But I shall go no further in shewing than the Common prayer of the Church of England is not Tantum non the Romish Mass saith Mr. Ball pag. 11. The prayers and truths of God taught in the Common prayer pertained to the Church as her Prerogative the Masse and the abominations belonged to the man of sin and if a true man may challenge his gods which the thief hath drawn into his den the Church of God may lawfully lay claim to these holy things which Antichrist hath unjustly usurped And that the Church of God may lawfully make use of those forms of prayers recovered as it were out of their den behold the reverend Mr. Ball bringing the same quotation out of Bishop Jewell for to prove it as Plus ultra doth to prove it altogether unlawful Bishop Jewells Sermon on Joshua 6.1 2 3. The things that may be reserved viz. in the destruction of Jericho must not be dust or chaffe or hay or stubble but gold silver iron and brass I mean they may not be things meet to furnish and maintain superstition but such things as be strong and may serve either directly to serve God or else for comeliness and good order Mr. Ball in the margin of pag. 11. part 2. Sect. 11. In Plus ultra pag. 28. you will find this quotation of Bishop Jewell is brought to prove that all ceremonies are superstitious But that it is most grievously wrested and mis-applyed as are most of his quotations out of Jewell in his discourse will appear by that which Mr. Ball hath set down honestly and the other altogether omitted For though dust and chaffe hay and stubble at the destruction of Jericho might not be brought into the Lords treasury that is such things as were meet to maintain superstition yet such things as silver and gold such things as be strong and may serve directly to serve God or else comeliness and good order These things in the judgment of both Jewell and Ball which are strong and may serve directly to serve God by or elfe for comeliness and good order These holy
402. Sect. 9. and in pag. 405. having granted that God hath not tyed us to any one particular gesture but that it is left to humane prudence to order our gesture by the general rules of order decency and edification in preaching praying hearing singing and whether the Ministers habit be black or white linnen or wollen or of what shape and fashion this he saith is left to humane prudence Sect. 21. pag. 405. and in 406. he that hath commanded us joyfully to sing his praises hath not told us whether we shall use the Meeter or any melodious tune to help us or whether we shall use or not use a Musical instrument or the help of more artificial singers or choristers c. and in Sect. 23. the use of the Ring in Marriage In all these cases it is no usurpation or addition to the word or institution of God for man to determine it is but obeying of Gods commands all these are necessary in their genus and commanded us of God and the species no where by the Word of God determined of c. Sect. 15. Yet in pag. 417. he saith that of all our ceremonies there is none that I have more suspected to be simply unlawful then the Crosse in Baptism The rest as I have said I should have submitted to rather then hinder the Service or Peace of the Church saying pag. 418. yet dare I not peremptorily say it is unlawful nor will I make any disturbance in the Church about it more then my own forbearance which I fear will not be a little considering what is published against the same by these following reasons pag. 418. Sect. 53. This is not saith he the mere circumstance of a duty but a substantial humane Ordinance of Worship c. There must be some time some place some gesture some vesture some utensils but you cannot say that there must be some teaching symbols some mystical signs c. Sect. 16. To which I shall crave leave to reply That I can say so because that I have read so much affirmed by your self pag. 404. Five Disput being as much if I mistake not as the Church of England doth declare For there I find Sect. 18. Though the tongue be the chief instrument yet not the onely instrument to express the mind And though words be the ordinary yet not the onely signs as the Prophets of old were wont by other signs as well as words to prophesie to the people Sect. 19. And therefore I durst not have reproved any of the ancient Christians that used the sign of the Cross meerly as a professing signal action to shew to the Heathen and Jews about them that they believed in a crucifyed Christ and were not ashamed of his Cross Sect. 17. Now I beseech the Christian Reader to consider whether the sign of the Cross so used was not a teaching symbol or a mystical sign And therefore it seemeth strange to me that though this worthy person durst not reprove the ancient Christians for the use of the sign of the Cross yet seemeth to reprove the Church of England upon the same account and no other who do use it onely as a professing signal action who also granteth significant signs warrantable pag. 410. secondarily though not primary speaking of the Surplice Sect. 40. saying he would use that garment if he could not be dispensed with Though secondarily the whitenesse be to signifie purity and so it be made a teaching sign yet would I obey for secondarily we may lawfully and piously make teaching signs of our food and rayment and any thing that we see And if so why not of the sign of the Crosse Sect. 18. Now that the sign of the Crosse is instituted by the Church onely as a teaching sign and that according to Mr. Baxters distinction secondarily and not primary not as a humane sacrament as is said before Sect. 54. I argue first from the words quoted by Mr. Baxter in the Form of Celebration pag. 421. We receive this child into the congregation of Christs flock and do sign him with the sign of the Cross in token that he shall not hereafter be ashamed to confess the faith of Christ crucifyed c. Two things I desire may be observed from hence and then it will appear to be no covenanting sign as is said Sect. 60. pag. 420. Sect. 19. First the order of the use of this ceremony it is after the child is baptized according to Christs own institution by water in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost after that the Infant is externally admitted into the covenant by the seal thereof and thereby made a visible Church member Then it followeth We receive this child into the congregation of Christs flock and do sign him with the sign of the Cross But to what end to be an instrument to convey grace No but for the very end that Mr. Baxter durst not reprove any of the ancient Christians that used this sign viz. as a professing signal action that they should not be ashamed to confess the faith of Christ crucified c. So that the secundary end of this ceremony or sign of the Cross being onely a teaching sign to remember us of a moral duty as I have said before The Sacrament of Baptisme it self being the primary one the investing the listing and the covenanting sign The sign of the Cross as I said before being onely a teaching sign of a duty of so much moment that if we perform it not Christ will be ashamed of us before his Father Methinks this should encline all peaceable minds to encline to the use of this ceremony when commanded it being only a sign and token to mind us of a moral duty Sect. 20. But secondly that it is onely and no other then a teaching sign I argue from what I find brought to endeavour to prove the contrary pag. 419. Sect. 57. by those words prefixed before the Common prayer Book of ceremonies where they say That they be not dark and dumb ceremonies but are so set forth that every man may understand what they do mean and to what use they do serve and that they are apt to stir up the dull mind of man to the remembrance of his duty to God by some notable and special signification whereby he might be edifyed This ceremony therefore amongst the rest is declared to be but of that teaching significancy which is allowed in Five Disput. to the Surplice and therefore being onely for the remembrance of so Christian a duty being a means no where forbidden may lawfully be used The Ring in Marriage though acknowledged Five Disput. before quoted to be a symbolical sign and lawful to be used pag. 406. yet I humbly conceive that it is appointed for to remember the party that weareth it of the covenant of her God which she hath entred into with her husband at the publick celebration of Matrimony before many witnesses The engaging covenanting act in the
doth belong to the Magistrate and Church-governour to command and appoint in matters of Religion pag. 8 CHAP. IV. The term Uniformity explained and this Proposition proved That obedience to the Act for Uniformity is the way to Unity pag. 12 CHAP. V. That indifferent things may lawfully be commanded and that to obey such commands is not onely lawfull but profitable for the Peace of the Church To refuse obedience to indifferent things as sinfull is Negative superstition with several considerations about the regulating of our zeal about things indifferent in themselves pag. 22 CHAP. VI. That to declare against the binding power of the Covenant according to the Declaration appointed by the Act for Uniformity is lawfull both by the Law of God and of the Land Wherein the judgement of reverend Mr. Perkins in six cases as to the not-binding power of on Oath is applied to the case in hand pag. 33 CHAP. VII That to declare That it is not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take up arms against the King and that we do abhor that trayterous Position of taking arms by his Authority against his Person c. is very warrantable by the Law of God and of the Land pag. 48 CHAP. VIII That Uniformity in publick Worship by obedience to an Imposed Form is lawful pag. 54 CHAP. IX The Vindication of the Common prayer of the Church of England be Mr John Ball from the aspersions of the Old Prownists and the Authors of the Temperate Discourse and Plus Ultra The lawfulnesse also of Conformity to it with its Rites proved by Bishop Jewell Martin Bucer and others pag. 60 CHAP. X That to subscribe to the 39. Articles of Religion and to declare an unfeigned assent and consent c. is not contrary to any command of Christ but lawful and warrantable notwithstanding all the objections made of old by Mr. Josias Nichols against subscription which are in this Chapter laid down and modestly removed Pag. 91 CHAP. XI That to subscribe to the use of those Ceremonies which have significancy in them as the Surplice and Crosse in Baptism is lawfull and warrantable proved by the judgement of Forreign and our own Modern Divines both Conformists and Non-conformists Pag. 106 CHAP. XII The general argument against Subscription to the Book of making Bishops Priests and Deacons because the Deacon we are to approve his description is not to be found in the Book of God answered The weakness of which argument is evidenced from the example of Christ and his Apostles also the great evil of urging this argument at large that nothing is warrantable but what is expresly commanded Pag. 110 CHAP. XIII The Order of Deacon excepted against by Mr. Nichols as exercised in the Church of England justified by Mr. John Balls argument for Lecturers Together with several directions from Mr. John Randal what is to be done in this present case of Conformity as to perswading of the Conscience Pag. 124 CHAP. XIV Contains the course that a Minister is to take as to Conformity Though scandal be taken by weak Brethren in which Chapter the Doctrine of scandal is considered and what is alleadged by the Author of the Temperate Discourse is answered and the Magistrate freed from what is charged upon him under this consideration Pag. 132 CHAP. XV. That to receive Ordination from the Bishop though ordained before by Presbyters is lawful Pag. 140 CHAP. XVI That for our Ministers to receive Ordination by Bishops though ordained before by Presbyters will not conclude the Reformed Churches that have no Episcopal Ordination to have no true ministers and consequently to be no true Churches Pag. 151 Bucer Scripta Anglicana pag. 455. I give thanks to God who hath given you grace to reform these Ceremonies in such a purity And of the Common Prayer thus he there writes I have found nothing in it which is not taken out of the Word of God or at least which is contrary to it being rightly interpreted Mr. John Ball 's Answer to Mr. Can part 2. pag. 9. If the Common Prayer be wholly taken out of the mass-Mass-book how cometh it to have those things which are so directly contrary to the Mass that both cannot possibly stand together Peter Martyr's Epistle from Oxford Nov. 4. 1550. to Bishop Hooper pag. 8. How be it I will not grant that these diversities of Vestures have their beginnings of the Pope for so much as I read in the Ecclesiastical History Euseb lib. 3. cap. 31. How that John the Apostle wore at Ephesus where he dwelled a Bishops apparel terming it Petalum seu lamina pontificalis As touching S. Cyprian the holy Martyr Pontius the Deacon writeth that a little before he should be beheaded he gave unto him that was appointed to behead him his vesture called Bâ—rrus after he had put it off and to the Deacons he gave his other Vesture called Dalmatica c. Chrysostom maketh mention of the white Vesture of the Ministers of the Church in Mat. cap. 26. homil 83. ad â—oâ—ul Antioch homil 60. c. But be it so let them be the invention of the Pope as you would have it yet notwithstanding for the respect of the Papistical invention in them I cannot be perswaded so much impiety to be therein that whatsoever it toucheth it doth by and by so corrupt that it cannot be lawfull for good and godly men to use godlily pag. 7. We read how that wine was consecrated unto Bacchus bread unto Ceres water unto Neptune oyle unto Minerva song unto the Muses and unto Apollo and many other things Tertullian rehearseth in his book intituled De Corona Militis Christiani yet for all that we stick not to use all these things freely as well in holy as in prophane uses although at one time or other before they had been consecrated to Idols and to Devils Perkins on Conscience of Oaths pag. 527. If at the first it were lawful and afterward by some means become either impossible or unlawfull it binds not conscience for when it becomes impossible we may safely think that God from heaven frees a man from his oath CHAP. I. Introductory and by way of Preface pressing the necessity of searching into the nature of the things commanded before suffering for the same Section 1. INquiries after Truth in matters controverted are not more difficult in their prosecution then pleasant and delightful in the satisfaction they afford For though it be a true assertion of Democritus that Veritas in puteo latet c. and cannot be drawn out but with much labour yet no dainties are so relishing and delicious to the taste as truth obtained is to our Intellectnals Sect. 2. But more especially ought we to desire to know the truth in matters doubtful which refer to our practice and especially such as refer to the purity of Gods Worship who is a Spirit and will be worshipped in spirit and truth And though this is to be done at all times yet
things Mr. Ball saith pag. 11. Antichrist hath unjustly usurped the Church of God may lawfully lay claim unto And therefore if our Book of Common prayer saith he pag. 12. please the Papists it is but in some things wherein in reverence to Antiquity we come too nigh them in some Rites and Ceremonies But with the substance of the ministration it self they cannot be pleased unlesse they will be displeased with their own service and will renounce their own Religion Sect. 12. Surely methinks the judgment of this learned and moderate man might very much defend us against not onely the fear of Popery he having affirmed that the Papists cannot be pleased with our Book of Common prayer as to the substance of its Ministration unless they will renounce their own Religion But may cause such a day-break of light to shine upon some of our understandings as that we may be perswaded that it is lawful to declare they will conform to the use of the Common prayer of the Church of England it being no false and Idolatrous Worship as too many might apprehend from what hath been within this year or two written to exasperate mens minds against it But that I may make the lawfulness thereof to appear more evidently I shall proceed to consider of the English Liturgie and ceremonies as they are by some apprehended to symbolize too much with the Mass-book and being too like the same and that therefore upon this account conformity is unlawful it being absolutely affirmed Plus ultra pag. 30. We say it is unlawful for the Church of England to retain either in Doctrine Worship or Discipline any conformity to the Church of Rome Sect. 13. I do profess before the searcher of all hearts out of any desire to abstain from all appearance of evil When I first saw this Book I desired to take great notice how this Authority did by the authority of the Scriptures convincingly prove the same For to conform to the Doctrine of the Church of Rome is doubtless unlawful to conform to the Worship and Discipline of the Church of Rome in statu corrupto in that stace wherein it was before Reformation and is now in at this present time is sinful and unlawful But that to conform to the Common prayer book of the Church of England and those few retained ceremonies because that they symbolize with the Church of Rome That this should be sinful and unlawful notwithstanding so confidently affirmed I leave to the determination of the wise and learned upon the examination of the proofs of Plus ultra for the same Sect. 14. I do find indeed that Mr. Ball doth speak to this purpose That if any have mistaken the book of Common prayer because that it hath too much likelihood to the mass-Mass-book he saith that hath not been the judgement of the Non-conformists alone others have said and written so much that never condemned the use of the book or all things therein contained pag. 9. From whence I observe that there is a great deal of difference between the disliking of a form that doth in something as is supposed symbolize with that form that is in a corrupt Church and the condemning of it as sinful and unlawful as Plus ultra doth And yet that I may deal faithfully before I come to speak to the arguments of Plus ultra I think I should do a good work tending to our healing if I should offer but some honest inferences from Mr. Balls conclusions and concessions that may take off that dislike may be in the minds of men which may hinder an unfeigned assent and consent in declaring their confo rmity Sect. 15. For it being granted that a form of prayer is lawful and this of the Church of England so much vindicated as you have heard and may find further in pag. 3. where Mr. Ball saith that the Non-conformists can prove the Religion and the Worship of the Church of England to be of God and that by such plain Texts of Scripture against which the gates of hell shall never prevà il I humbly conceive that the offence taken at its too much likelihood to the Mass-book pag. 9. may be taken away by the very reason that Mr. Ball giveth for the same pag. 12. which he saith is in Reverence to Antiquity To avoid the imputation of novelty in a Church it is necessary to keep to those externall modes as to phrases of speech and rites for comeliness in Gods Worship which have been most ancient in the Church But if this do it not sufficiently deferring to answer what I find alledged but not proved by Mr. Ball pag. 7. as exceptions against the said book as in some points disagreeing with Gods Word pag. 7. for which they judge it unlawfull to subscribe as agreeable to the Scripture which doubtless may lawfully be done by Mr. Balls own Doctrine Sect. 16. I say forbearing to speak further to these particulars being but the same objections made by Mr. Josias Nicholls and other Non-conformists long before which I shall through divine assistance speak more particularly to in the next Chapter I shall desire that what Mr. Ball doth declare in the name of all the Non-conformists to his time that did judge the book in the form thereof so nigh the Papists pag. 15. may be considered who saith that herein they shew but what they judge most convenient not condemning the book for the substance thereof So that some of the Non-conformists of our time are gone much beyond this pious and prudent man who upon this argument doth but onely shew what was the judgment of the Authors of the Admonition and others in this case that it was not convenient to use a form so near the Papists but he saith no such thing himself being more wise then to judge in a case already determined by the Law of the Land which God had not determined against by his Law in his Word Sect. 17. But though Mr. Ball is so modest yet Mr. Plus ultra is more magisterial who as you have read out of the place before quoted affirmeth that it is unlawful for the Church of England to retain any conformity to the Church of Rome in Worship or Discipline Come we therefore to examine his grounds for it pag. 30. And because we know from whence I observe many heads were laid together to form this argument this will hardly down by any reasons we can lay before you we shall commend this argument to you under the credit of your right learned Prelate Jewell please you to peruse pag. 325 326. of his Defence The learned and godly men at whose Persons it pleaseth you so rudely to scoffe saith Jewell to Harding Mr. Doctor Harding used to scoffe at Calvin and Zuingliùs and to upbraid Jewell with them that refuse either to go in your apparel or otherwise to shew themselves note Sir like unto you have age sufficient and can answer for themselves notwithstanding thus much I 'le
and decent But the placing of holiness in them and the abusing of the people by them this was the evil in them that Bishop Jewell doth condemn but no the use of them This Reverend Prelate you may observe speaketh confidently of the Non-conformists of his time that as they did not commend Ministers garments as holy so they did not condemn them as unholy or sinful And were the Non-conformists of these times but of the same mind that they did not condemn a Cassock or a Surplice as unholy and that it were no sin to wear such vestures when commanded the case would soon be resolv'd that to wear a Cassock Surplice Gown Canonical Coat c. were lawful for distinction sake and decency in Gods Worship Sect. 23. And thus now having shewed though somewhat at large the true scope of the place brought by Plus ultra to prove his argument by in pag. 30. and that it proveth no such thing for which he doth produce it I shall onely shew how much he is mistaken in the reason that he giveth why the Church of England ought to reject conformity to the Church of Rome in matters of Worship and Discipline that have renounced communion with her in all material points of Doctrine pag. 27. Saith he the reason why we reject communion with the Church of Rome is for that the Popes Supremacy Infallibility Transubstantiation Merit of good works Invocation of Saints Purgatory Latin-Service Worshippiag of Images half communion and such like which are the Pillars of the Romiâ—h Fabrick cannot be proved and made good out of the Word of God And is not this reason of like force against the ceremonies of the Church yet in use amongst us Is there a scriptum est for one of them c. Sect. 24 To which give me leave to say the reason is not of like force for the things before named which are the Pillars of Popery Gods Word is expresly against them and the Scriptures of truth shew the Doctrine to be faelse and so ne to be the Doctrine of devils And if you could bring as clear Scriptures against using a form of prayer wearing garments for distinction and decency in Gods Worship as may be brought againâ—t Lain-Service Worshipping of Images Merit of good works c. Then there were some shew of reason in yours And as for your argument that there is not a scriptum est for one of them I shall give you a very ancient answer that was given to your very objection by the Reverend Martin Bucer to Joannes à Lasâ—o who argued against vestures and other ceremonies as holding conformity with the Charch of Rome therein and as having no scrip um est for them saith the said Bâ—â—â—er in his Epistle pag. 6. If therefore you will not admit such liberty and use of vesture to this pure and holy Church because they have no commandement of the Lord nor no example for it I do not see how you can grant to any Church that it may celebrate the Lords Supper in the morning c. for we have received for these things no commandement of the Lord nor any example yea rather the Lord gave a contrary example Sect. 25. Behold here you that have made a challenge in pag. 13. in the name of all the Non-conformists that if any learned men of our Adversaries be able to bring one sufficient sentence out of the holy Scripture or any one example of any Bishop or Minister in the time of King Edward the sixth that doe directly or ex professo plead for the wearing of Caps and Surplices c. the Zuinglian Gospellers will be then content to yeeld and subscribe Here is the authority of a great learned and pious man in the time of King Edward the sixth defending the lawfulness of these vestures you so much argue against and also condemning your very argument pag. 10. Saith he Many things which the Antichrists have made marks of their impiety may be tokens of the Kingdom of Christ as the signs of Bread and Wine the water of Baptisme the Laying on of hands Preachings Churches Holy dayes and many other things All these places of Scripture are of a great scope The earth and the fulness thereof is of the Lord not of the Devil not of Antichrist not of the wicked This colourable craft of Sathan saith he must be taken heed of by the which he bringeth to pass oftentimes that either we reckon those things which are no sins and those that be sins indeed we seem not to regard them in our selves c. Sect. 26. If the Authority of this holy man in King Edwards dayes satisfie not your conscience that these things may be continued and prevail not with you to prevail with all other Non-conformists in whose name you made the challenge and also have promised to yield and subscribe I shall in answer to your challenge produce the Authority of Bishop Jewell whom you so much quote ex professo commending the present Liturgy in the frame of it And this you will find written in pag. 162. of the Defence of the Apology occasioned by the reproachful speeches of Dr. Harding against it calling the Liturgy in Queen Elizabeth's dayes as you do now A devised Service c. but saith Bishop Jewell to him appealing to his own conscience You know that we serve God according to his holy Word and the order of his primitive Church we administer the holy Sacraments in pure and reverent sort though I suppose the signe of the Crosse was used in one and Kneeling at the other We baptise in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost we receive the Sacrament of Christs body and bloud from the holy Table we make our humble confession and prayers together we pray with one heart and one voice c. And of all these things what one is contrary to the Catholick Faith Oh Mr. Harding is it not written The man that lieth destroyeth his own soul and Christ saith the Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven in this life or in the life to come Sect. 27. If Bishop Jewell did not plead for the present Liturgy in the frame of it his zeal burning so hot that he accounteth Hardings calumnies of the Common prayer to be as a blasphemy against the Holy Ghost I leave to the consideration of all judicious Christians and consequently whether the Authors of the challenge are not bound to conform and subscribe especially considering what the said Bishop Jewell saith of the said Communion book or Common prayer book pag. 198. The holy Communion book and Order of the holy Administration standeth and by Gods mercy shall stand still without any change Observe I pray whatever you have said of the Liturgy of the Church that it is Tantum non the masse-Masse-book yet if you had searched into Jewell as you ought for truth you would have found the Jesuite frequently depravi g the book of common prayer and that for the very thing for which you plead the changing of further reformation thereof which occasioned this Reply of Jewell which cleerly evidenceth that he did so much approve of the present frame of the Liturgy that he said by Gods mercy it should not be changed no more And therefore I pray remember your promise yield and subscribe to the book of common prayer according
as the Act requireth Sect. 28. And that this may be done with an unfeigned assent and consent I doe beseech you all who are zealous haters of Popery seâ—iously to weigh what is the judgement of the most judicious Jesuited Papists of this our present Liturgy as I find it published long since by their great champion Harding saith he that which ought to be written upon the heart of every true Protestant Every good man and zealous keeper of the Catholick Faith will never allow the Service devised in King Eâ—wards time now restored again not so much for the Tongue that it is in as for the order it self and disposition of it wanting some things necessary and having some other things repugnant to the Faith and the custome of the Carholick Church Reply of Jewell to Harding pag. 162. Let me intreat all Non-conformists especially to ponder upon this passage The Liturgy and Service of the Church of England to which we are to conform though some account it Popish Idolatrous and at the best too like the Mass book in the order and disposiâ—ion of it which is the great exception of the wisest Non-conformists at this day yet this Harding with the Separatists against whom Mr. Ball hath written agree together in calling it a Devised Service an Humane Invention Now consider what is predicated of this subject that the good men and zealous keepers of the Catholick Faith viz. the hottest rankest and most violent Papists they will never allow of this devised Service I think very good news Sect. 29. But to proceed to the reason that he giveth for this not so much for the tongue in which it is being now English whereas the Service of the Romish Church is Latin to this day which some make to be the onely difference between the Mass-book and the English Liturgy grounded upon a politick Proclamation in King Edwards time to quiet an Insurrection about it But saith Harding for the order it self and the disposition of it that which is a great exception of the Non-conformists why they cannot allow it is given as the reason why the good and zelous Catholicks cannot allow it also But how doth it appear further that the good Catholicks cannot nay he saith will not allow it because that it lacketh some things necessary as prayers to Saints to Angels to Images and for the dead to bring them out of Purgatory a thing very necessary to make the Popes Pot boyle together with many of those Bables Trifles and Follies which Bishop Jewell reckons up in his Sermon at S. Mary's quoted by Plus ultra to another purpose But to make our English Liturgy completely different from the Romish Mass-book he saith that it hath many things in it repugnant to the Faith and customes of the Catholick Church For these reasons the zealous Catholicks will never allow of our book of common prayer and therefore for these reasons the Book of Common prayer devised as they say in King Edwards time restored in Queen Elizabeths time confirmed since by King James King Charls the First and the Second should be worthy of a better acceptation then yet it hath received from those that declare themselves to be the most zealous professors of the true Reformed Protestant Religion Sect. 30. And thus now having proved it to be very lawfull to declare conformity to the Book of Common prayer having by the help of an old Non-conformist uncloathed it of that Idolatrous dress in which it hath been presented to the World by the Author of the Temperate Discourse and Plus ultra who having thereby but new-vamâ—t the arguments of the old Brownists and brought them forth as new lights to mislead weak people I shall through the help of the said Mr. John Ball give you but one general answer to what the said Author of the Discourse of Liturgies and others are very copious in cha ging the Common prayer with many particular defects and errors and so conclude Which answer you shall find part 2. pag. 22. Your long Catalogue of corruptions to be found in our Liturgy is to small purpose unlesse you could prove so e of them to be sundamental heretical and really Idolatrous Suppose saith he pag. 30. the seventy errors which you reckon up were all true and justly taken against the Book and as many more to them might be named yet the quotation that he giveth out of Usher de Success Eccles Chapter 1. answers all That the main truths which concern the very life and soul of Religion be few and the failings which may stand with the substance of Religion many Sect. 31. To conclude therefore with this Memorandum to the Authors of Plus ultra who upon the Authority that I have brought in King Edwards time from the Reverend Martin Bucer in Q. Elizabeths time from the Reverend Bishop Jewell that they are under an obligation to yield to subscribe and turn conformists even all the Zuinglian-Gospellers as he calleth them pag. 13. And that it will be expected they should shew themselves to be as good as their words I shall be a further help unto them in endeavouring to remove what may be an impediment to the subscribing of the 39. Articles of Religion with what followeth in the Act for Uniformity pag. 83. hoping in the following Chapter to make it appear that the particular ceremonies and rites of the Church by Law enjoyned together with the Books of Ordination c. which are part of the 39. Articles may lawfully be subscribed and conformed to CHAP. X. That to subscribe to the 39. Articles of Religion and to declare an unfeigned assent and consent c. is not contrary to any command of Christ but lawful and warrantable notwithstanding all the objections made of old by Mr. Josias Nicholls against subscription which are in this Chapter laid down and modestly removed Section I. THat we may be the more clearly informed and more fully resolved in this case the matter of this question being the subject matter of that obedience which the Act for the Vniformity of publick prayers c. doth require That we may the better judge of the iniquity or equity of what is required I humbly conceive it would be worth our time to make a particular inspection into this Act concerning what is enacted about these things aforesaid To which end I shall offer these three particulars to your consideration First what is required Secondly of whom it is required Thirdly after what manner the things required are to be done Sect. 2. First that which is required is a Subscription or Declaration of an
approbation to the nine and thirty Articles of Religion mentioned in the Statute of the 13. of Queen Elizabeth and of the book of Common parayer c. Act. pag. 85. Secondly who are to subscribe and declare c. The persons from whom this is expected are onely schollars men of more then ordinary parts and abilities such as shall be thought fit to be Governors of others in the schools of the Prophets in both the Universities pag. 82. and all such as are thought fit to be Ministers and Teachers of others in the school of Christ the publick congregation pag. 72 85. These persons are to be light to the blind to be instructers of the ignorant Now our Saviour telleth us That if the blind lead the blind both will fall into the ditch And therefore should any such persons be ignonorant of what they are to subscribe o unwilling to it upon any fal e or erroneous principles it would prove of very dangerous consequence to the Reformed Religion and should not they be all of one mind who are Tutors and Teachers of others it must needs occasion great confusion and division amongst their Disciples and followers Sect. 3. All which being considered Subscription and Uniformity is so far from being a sin as that it is a duty which is required of these persons aforesaid An here by the wa cannot but have some ground of hope that the strict execution or this Act will keep out not onely all Papists and Romish Catholicks the professed Adversaties to the Reformed Religion of the Church of England from poysoning the fountaines of Learning and corrupting the Youth in our Vniversities but also any of their Emissaries from our publick Congregations who have formerly in the disguise of Anabaptists Quakers and others brought to many honest-hearted people into their present distempers for except they can do these things and that after the manner prescribed Assent and Consent unfeignedly and universally they are neither to have preferment or imployment in the places aforesaid And that they cannot do this what I have before quoted from Hardings own expressions doth evidence the same for he saith No good Catholick can allow of the devised Service of the Church of England Sect. 4. Now methinks this very consideration should calm our spirits to take the same into our further thoughts To this purpose I shall proceed to the next particular viz. the third and that is Thirdly the manner how this subscription or declaration is to be made In considering whereof I shall take in what the Act expresseth as the End of this Subscription after this manner p. 72. To the end that Uniformity in the publick Worship of God which is so desired may be speedily effected Therefore this declaration and subscription must be made the manner how you shall find pag. 73. with an unfeigned assent and consent pag. 84 85 to all the Articles to all the Prayers to all the Rites and Ceremonies So that from hence it is evident that this subscription and declaration as I humbly conceive must be with a n assent which is the Act of the judgment and understanding with consent and act of the will and affections and it must be unfeigned and without guile or hâ—pocrisie sincerity must attend both the assent and consent Thirdly there is the universality of this unfeigned assent and consent it must be to all and every thing rescribed in the book of Common prayer pag. 73. to all the nine and thirty Articles c. pag. 83. To evidence their agreement to that Doctrine Worship and Discipline which the Church whereof they are Members doth profess and practice Sect. 5. That we may now come to make a right judgment in this case taking for granted the manner here prescribed is no way contrary but agreeable to Christs Laws as the Scriptures evidently prove the great inquiry will be into the matter of Vniformity and Subscription c. And those are the Nine and thirty Articles of Religion the Book of Common prayer and all the Rites and Ceremonies of the same which generally contain these two particulars worthy of consideration Sect. 6. First as to matters of Faith or Doctrine Secondly as to modes and manner of Worship and Discipline Concerning the first of these the Nine and thirty Articles of Religion are to be subscribed unto and approved of Concerning the second the book of Common prayer with all its Rites and Ceremonies with the form or manner of ordaining Priests and Deacons is to be unfeignedly assented and consented to As to the former of these what I have to say is chiefly to inform those that are in my own station and capacity of the Lay sort that being rightly informed concerning these Nine and thirty Articles they may not be offended at the Subscription and Conformity of such Ministers whom they reverence and esteem Sect. 7. In the first place therefore be pleased to take notice that the Nine and thirty Articles of Religion 13 Eliz. do in the general contain a confession of the Faith of the Church of England as to matter of Doctrine Worship and Discipline That I have not given it a new name I find a person much esteemed for his piety and very modest in his Apology or Plea for the Innocent Mr. Josias Nichols an old Non-conformist I say in his Book so called printed 1602. now sixty years since giveth this term to the Articles of the Church of England The Confession of their Faith Sect. 8. Now as I said before that such as know little or nothing of these Articles and therefore may well be troubled if any of our good Ministers or Lectures should be laid aside as some have done already themselves laid aside Lecturing or preaching the Word of God upon this account as I suppose because that they cannot subscribe these Articles amongst other things I shall give you an account of some of them as I find them quoted by this worthy person whom I have often seen Mr. Josias Nicholls aforesaid saith he pag. 15. Therefore as it becometh the true people and congregation of God the Church of England humbly submitting it selfe to his Law doth meekly and constantly confesse that it is not lawfull for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to Gods written Word Artic. 20. And for this cause they describe the visible Church of Christ to be A congregation of faithfull men in the which the pure Word of God is preached c. Artic. 19. And dutifully and truly affirm that in our doings the Word of God is to be followed which we have expresly declared unto us in the Word of God Artic. 17. Sect. 9. I beseech you let us pause a little upon these Articles who know no more and let us seriously consider whether our Ministers have any just cause to lay down their Ministry because they must not lay downe subscription to these Articles which teach or professe amongst other things the Church hath no power to ordain
any thing contrary to Gods Word c. I shall omit to fill up my paper with a particular recitall of all the 39. Articles But in the stead thereof I shall give you a generall account of those Articles refetting to their Doctrinal part as to faith and substantialls of Worship as I finde them clearly expressed and acknowledged by some late writers Sect. 10. For the Doctrine saith the Authors of Plus ultra pag. 16. With the Doctrine we meddle not the bloud of the Martyrs shed in the defence of it alone by the Word of God hath washed away the Romish silth cast into it And Reverend Mr. Richard Baxter in a Post-script of his Epistle to the Reader before a Treatise of the Vain Religion of the formall Hipocrite giveth his sense not onely of the Doctrine of the Church of England but also of the Doctrine of the common prayer Book if I mistake not saith he For the Doctrine of the Common prayer Book though I had read exceptions against divers passages I remembred not any thing that might not receive a good construction if it were read with the same candour and allowance as we read the writings of other men So that it was onely the truth of the Doctrine that I spoke of against which I hate to be peevishly quarrelsome when God hath bless'd this Church so wonderfully with a moderate and cautelous yet effectuall Reformation in matter of Doctrine The more pity it is that the very modes of Worship and Discipline should be the matter of such sharp and uncharitable discords which must one day prove the grief of those that are found to be the causers of it and of the sufferings of the Church on that occasion To all which I yield my unfeigded assent and consent to be true Sect. 11. Now if I mistake not what Mr. Baxter here publisheth refers to the subject matter of the 39. Articles as to their doctrinall part concerning Faith and Worship and affords us these instructions besides viz. That the matter of our sharp contentions and uncharitable discords are the very modes of Worship and Discipline That Reformation may be effectual though but moderate and cautelous If this be a truth in matters of Doctrine it holds good in reforming the modes of worship and Discipline and these instructions if they were well twisted about our understandings might exceedingly tend to humble all of all sorts and to make us jealous that we have been out of the way of a right Reformation and incline our minds to conform and yield to what is now required at our hands Sect. 12. Especially considering that the Doctrine of the Church of England which though principally is contained in the Scripture yet in the 39. Articles is there sum'd up as a form or systeme thereof is as I have proved by these quotations from Mr. Nicholls Mr. Baxter and Plus ultra so pure and reformed Methinks it should incline all persons in the Ministry that love the Truth and Peace to resolve rather then not preach the Gospel to subscribe and approve of those Articles that teach that it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing contrary to Gods Word whose Doctrine is washed from its Romish filth by the bloud of the Martyrs and hath arrived to an effectual reformation as Mr. Baxter phraseth it Surely these considerations should make us as Mr. Baxter saith not only hate to be peevishly quarrelsome as to the Doctrine against subscription to these Articles but unfeignedly assent and consent to them and the use of the Book of Common prayer c. Sect. 13. And this now leads me to speak unto the consideration of the second particular before named comprehended in the 39. Articles and also in the Book of Common prayer viz. of subscription to and appobation of the modes and manner of Worship and Discipline By which modes I principally mean the Rites and Ceremonies of the Church with all the forms and orders in the said book rescribed For having in the preceding Discourse proved by the judgement of Mr. Ball and others the lawfulnesse of an imposed form and of the Liturgie of the Church of England I shall onely adde a testimony how far the Non-conformists in Queen Elizabeths dayes conformed to it and then proceed Sect. 14. I find it declared by Mr. Josias Nicholls in the Plea for the Innocent pag. 20. even this Mr. Nicholls named for one of those Worthies that did take conformity for a sin Saith he in the name of all the Non-conformists in his time We do willingly use the book of Common prayer and no other form unless sometime upon extraordinary occasion by publick Authority some other prayer be assigned onely we leave out some few things or peradventure explain other pag. 21. So that by the way the Common prayer was not then represented to the view of weak Christians under that Idolatrous dress you find it either in Plus ultra or the Temperate Discourse of Liturgies But those old Christians used it and no other form Sect. 15. That therefore I may be instrumental in the healing of those misapprehensions which are upon the minds of many as a hinderance of their conformity to the modes ceremonies and rites of the Church and that I may speak a word in season as to the removing of the principal part of the scruple or quaere as to subscription or conformity to all the rites and ceremonies c. I shall humbly offer this argument to the consideration of all prudent and peaceable Christians whether of the Clergy or the Layety viz. That which our Superiours either in Church or State may without sin command that every Member of the Church or State may lawfully and without sin unfeignedly assent consent and conform to Sect. 16. This proposition I have proved before in general and could do much more out of the sacred Scriptures from the examples of Christ and his Apostles the Judgement of Reverend Calvin and others all agreeing that circumstantials in the Worship and Service of God tending to Vniformity Decency Peace and Edification of the Church I say that these circumstantials rites or ceremonies may be imposed by the Church or our Superiours But when we come to the assumption or conclusion from this proposition applying it to our present case then here lyeth the great scruple about these ceremonies and rites of the Church of England these are superstitious these are insignificant these are superfluous what not and therefore no subscription no conformity to these without sin Sect. 17. That I may therefore come more close to the business I shall with much candour and faithfulness give you the objections that I find particularly made against subscription in our present sense As to the rites and ceremonies of the Church the ordaining of Priests and Deacons c. as I finde them made by Mr. Josias Nicholls Plea for the Innocent pag. 21. We subscribe willingly unto the book of Articles according to
solemnizing of Matrimony lyeth in the Promise the Ring amongst other uses is to be a token for to remember the promise that was then made Sect. 21. Now that the sign of the Cross after Baptism is appointed for the same use and is no Sacramentum in Sacramento as I have I hope fully proved before appeareth best by the Church who declare it not onely in her Preface before the ceremomies but also in several Canons of the Church to which I refer you If after all this it may be objected that though this sign of the Cross have onely this signal professing signification and so was lawful in the primitive times when the Church lived amongst Jews and Gentiles but now the reason for the continuance of the same holdethout we live not now amongst Pagans Heathens and Jews as they did Sect. 22. I answer It is true but do not many Infidels and enemies to the cross of Christ live amongst us I name them not such as do still look upon our blessed Jesus as an Impostor the Gospel as a fable and Christs crucifixion as a just demerit for his seduction of the people And therefore judge I pray you whether there be not the same if not better reason for the continuance in the Christian Church of this Ceremony of the sign of the Cross at the celebration of Baptism which ordinance of Baptism is to us as circumcision was to the Jews Whether all be true in every circumstance concerning the sig of the Cross that appeared in Constantines time with this Motto In hoc vinces By this thou shalt overcome I determine not Sect. 23. But considering this sign of it as used in the Reformed Church of England who can tell but that by an universal conformity to the use of it throughout His Majesty's dominions we may In hoc vincere by this very significant sign overcome them into Christs fold It is not irrational to think but that the Jews observing how much we all from highest to lowest glory in the representation of that opprobrious instrument of death which their Forefathers used viz. The cross so as that even at our Baptism when we are listed among the number of Christs souldiers we are by that sign and token to remember that we be never ashamed to own Christ before the Jews as well as the Gentiles Did I say they But understand it aright it might be a great means to make them ashamed of their obstinacy in which they continue to this day they being a people led so much by signes and ceremonies for although if I mistake not the manner how the Jewes shall be converted is obscurely laid down in the holy Scripture yet if there be any truth in the opinion of the learned Mead about it who from 1 Tim. 1.16 maketh the mystery of St. Pauls conversion to be a Type of the calling of the Jews shewing that as Paul was converted by an extraordinary meanes so pag. 27. The Jewes not to be converted to Christ by such means as were the rest of the Nations by the Ministry of Preachers sent unto them but by the Revelation of Christ Jesus in his glory from heaven whose coming then shall be as a Lightning out of the East shining into the West and the sign of the Son of Man shall appear in the clouds of heaven Mat. 23.39 and 24. ver 27 30. Sect. 24. I say if there be any truth in this conjecture who can tell but this simple conjecture also referring to what is said before may not be a Prodrome in this Kingdome where it is supposed so many Jewes are and prepare for it But whether this be true or no yet it is much to be feared that the divisions which are amongst Christians about the modes of Worship is a great hinderance to their conversion And therefore we should lay it to heart and as much as in us lieth to follow the things that make for peace Rom. 14. Sect. 25. Hoping therefore that what I have written in the sincerity and uprightness of my heart may be useful to this end and purpose and helpful also to take away those scruples and doubts hindering an universal subscription to the 39. Articles of Religion the Book of common prayer and all the rites and ceremonies whose sinfulness as is supposed lieth in their Sacramentality by Mr. Nicholls the Author of the Discourse of Liturgies and others CHAP. XII The general arguments against Subscription to the Book of making Bishops Priests and Deacons because the Deacon we are to approve his description is not to be found in the Book of God answered The weaknesse of which argument is evidenced from the example of Christ and his Apostles also the great evil of urging this argument at large that nothing is warrantable but what is expresly commanded Section 1. I Shall proceed to the consideration of the third great instance presented by Mr. Nicholls in the behalf of the Non-conformists of his time why they could not subscribe because that in the Book of Orders there is an Office of Ministry called the Deacon whose description is not be found in Gods book pag. 27. and that he may Preach and Baptize and not be of the Order of Priesthood as they call it We therefore think that in subscribing hereunto we should offend the holy Canon of Scripture and allow that which is contrary to the same Book by our subscription Now for the removing of this scruple which remaineth in the minds of many I fear at this day and that very much encreased since his time I shall make bold to weigh this general argument here brought against subscription viz. That the Deacon whom we are to allow of according to the Book of Orders his description is not to be found in the Book of God Therefore to subscribe is a sin Sect. 2. Now though it be a truth in general yet no general truth That to do or to allow of that which hath no description or prescription in the Word of God that is without a command from God is a sin Which is as you may observe Mr. Nicholls argument against Deacons Yet this truth taken without the distinction of Mr. Ball before quoted of matters substantial and circumstantiall not onely of Worship but of our humane converse nay in the very Function of the Ministry as you shall find from Mr. John Ball when I come to speak of the Deacon in particular is not to be approved of the argument drawn from it being of dangerous consequence Sect. 3. Now observing this argument generally propounded that I do not find this or that particular command by God in his Word was a principal pillar of Non-conformity in Bishop Hoopers time and in Mr. Nicholls time and probably began the troubles at Frankfort is also the Anabaptists great argument against baptizing Infants and the originals of the Quakers sad delusion that would therefore wear no lace or hatbands c. because not commanded in the Word and is
Sect. 7. I beseech you therefore for the Lords sake do not dispute your selves out of the Exercise of your Ministey do not bring your selves in trouble needlesly and thereby trouble the peace of the Church It is a very strange conclusion in my simple judgment That because there needeth no Law to make that which is neither commanded or fo bidden to be indifferent Five Disput. pag. 437. that therefore it is not lawful to make any thing the Subjects duty by a command that is meerly indifferent but that indifferent things must be left for us to use or not to use at cu own liberty Sect. 8. I beseech you all consider but what is said Five Disput. page 439. to this purpose If God have left us this liberty Men should not take that liberty from us without great cause and without some accidental good that is like to come by depriving us of that liberty and that good must be greater then the accidental evil To all which I do fully agree and offer to consideration whether what I have said all this time that the liberty that God hath left us in private whether we will use a form or no form in Prayer being taken away at sometimes onely in publick for I am of the mind of K. Charles the First of blessed Memory in his Meditation on the Ordinance against the Common prayer though I am for Common prayer before Preaching That yet there is use of a grave modest discreet and humble use of the Ministers gifts even in publick the better to fit and excite their own and the peoples affections I say whether this liberty is not taken away without great cause viz. for the Peace of the Church which was the cause why the liberty of eating Bloud c. was taken away from the Gentile Christians Acts 15. Sect. 9. And that the accidental good which is like to be by Uniformity is greater then the accidental evil which is the depriving us of our liberty so that as Mr. Calvin saith the Pastor in his Function may not lawfully depart from that Form and those Rites appointed which he had liberty to do before Will evidently appear not onely by what I have said of Obedience to the Act of Vniformity as the way to Unity but also by what you may find in the Five Disput. amongst those many reasons which are there given for Obedience in lawful things such as a Form of Prayer the significant gestures of standing at the profession of our Faith and the Surplice c. as you will find in the said Disputations if I have not forgot what I have there read are there granted to be lawful Sect. 10. If I mistake not amongst those reasons beginning at pag. 483. which are all very good ones and I desire may be laid to heart in this juncture of time I find pag. 487. reason 10. That by this disobedience in things lawful the Members of the Church will be involved in contentions and so engaged in bitter uncharitableness and censures and persecutions and reproaches one of another which scandalous courses will nourish Vice dishonour God rejoyce the Enemies grieve the Godly that are peaceable and judicious and wound the Consciences of the contenders We see the beginning of such fires are small but whether they will tend and what will be the end of them we see not Sect. 11. Now if the preventing of every one of these sinful evils be not a greater good then that accidental evil before spoken of That which I further offer I desire may be seriously laid to heart As there is nothing as Mr. Calvin saith to which the Wit of man is so averse as subjection so there is nothing to which humane nature is more subject then those sins before-named in Five Disput as Uncharitablenesse and Censoriousness about small matters we have found it so by woful experience both formerly and to this present day It is easie to observe how such as take their liberty as to matters of Conformity that do not wear the same Canonical habit as it is called that are no Common prayer men how are they esteemed by the generality of professors for such that see more into the evil of these things then other men And on the other side how are those which do conform such as are peaceable and judicious how are they condemned and censured by the same persons for Sursingle-men and superstitious temporizers Sect. 12. There being therefore such probable grounds of hope that by a generall obedience to the Act of Vniformity these evils may be remedied these sins suppressed which dishonour God grieve the judicious godly make the Papists to be confirmed in their ill opinion of us for our dissentions occasion others to fall off to them as we find it to be the case of Grotius mentioned Five Disput Upon all these considerations laid together I humbly conceive I have made it evident to all That obedience to the Act for Vniformity is the way to Unity Wherein I have also proved how great the mistake is in the Petition for Peace That the commanding of these unnecessary Impositions have been the cause of all the dissentions and divisions that have been from the beginning of the Reformation of Religion in King Edwards dayes Sect. 13. I shall speak a word or two in order to the inclining of such as are concerned to observe the Act of Vniformity by shewing the great mistake there is as I humbly conceive in what is urged by the Petitioners for peace pag. 15. who there say on the comrary That if these unnecessary Impositions were removed we should enjoy a blessed unity and peace For if the bare removal of these unnecessary Impositions would procure a blessed unity and peace Give me leave to desire you seriously to consider how cometh it about that in all this time of liberty from these Impositions we have been so wofully divided that were so unanimous before against the rites and ceremonies of the Church Sect. 14. Surely had I known so much before the beginning of those troubles as now I know that there was so great a difference and feud between the Non-conformists and the Separatists as now appeareth unto me by their Writings that I have seen between them in the Bishops dayes I should have foreseen by their principles which I gather most clearly in a book set forth by Mr. Simon Ash written by Mr. John Ball against John Can edit 1642. by which book it appeareth that the one sides principles did tend to Independency and the other to Presbytery I say I think verily I should have foreseen that when the Bishops were down great dissentions and divisions would arise amongst themselves Sect. 15. Mow that it did so fall out that they did fall out extremely when Episcopal Government was laid aside is so well known to all the Christian World that I need not fear I should be the first publisher thereof which animosities and divisions and oppositions of each
Now if upon a serious search into Gods blessed Book we find no command of Christ forbidding the command of our Superiours in my poor apprehension the conscience is set at liberty from doubts fears and scruples and the more evidence we have thereof the more perswasion but some you may observe from Mr. Randall is necessary And thus now having presumed to shew how in my weak judgement this fourth Direction of his may be practicable I shall proceed to the next which I reckon his fifth 5. Take such a course whereby thou mayest obey the Magistrate and the Church and yet not offend the weak herein is wisdom Sect. 8. That this may be done that weak Christians that is such who yet know not their Christian liberty concerning these circumstantials in Worship not determined by Gods Word who are apt to judge and censure those Ministers that do conform to the use of these indifferent things which are of the same nature with those matters of offence about meats drinks and dayes that were Rom. 14. that I say weak Christians may not be offended and be delivered from their fears and scruples about sinning against Christ in their own use of the same I humbly conceive that as this weakness hath been much contracted and is much continued by what they have sucked in from the general exhortations of their Teachers against Idolatry superstition and humane inventions in Gods Worship amongst which the things before spoken to have been baptised into that name because reducible to no command So the way to strengthen them is for such Ministers who have not been cleare in their expressions and whose Ministry hath a command of their consciences and affections in other substantial truths plainly to instruct them and inform them in the nature of these things to which they conform and yield obedience Sect. 9. I say did such Ministers who zealously in their preaching set forth the excellency and necessity of Christ of Holiness and Regeneration and of the sinfulness of sin with the like faithfulness present their hearers with the sinfulness of the sin of disobedience to the commands of our Superiours in matters not simply unlawful faithfully shewing them that the best way for to make these things not simply unlawful in themselves not to be so to them is to rectifie their judgements and perswade their consciences as aforesaid And also That the onely cure for our contentions about these lesser things is to mind the substantials of Christs Kingdom indeed Rom. 14. directing them to proportion their zeal more about these things then these poor circumstantial matters in difference Sect 10. I do verily believe that did such Ministers who are holy and unblameable in their lives and powerful in their preaching but make these particulars aforesaid the subject matter of their information of their hearers in the Ministry of the Word and not confound things that differ and in general terms declaime against superstitious inventions of men and additions to Gods Worship c. There would be great hopes through Gods blessing upon on this means that those who now speak evil of those things which they understand not that cannot say as the Apostle Paul in the like case Rom. 14. I know and am perswaded But they are perswaded against indifferent things as sinfull though they have no clear and distinct knowledge of the nature of these things and therefore are but weak in knowledge whatever they may think of themselves They would by this means come to be enlightned to be better informed to understand their christian liberty and so the grounds of their offence and scandall through their weakness would be taken away Sect. 11. And in order to this if I mistake not what the Law of the Land now requireth every Lecturer to do the first time he preacheth before Sermon and also upon the first Lecture-day every moneth pag. 86. may very much comport with the advice aforesaid and together may much conduce to the practice of Mr. Randalls Fifth Direction viz. to take such a course whereby we may neither offend the Magistrate or our weak Brother But what now if this cannot be done but at some Ministers first conforming according to the Act Some Christians till they be better informed will be offended what is to be done in this case This Reverend Person whose memory is precious with many old professors to this day proceedeth further to that which for methods sake I call the sixth Direction pag. 143. 6. Yet rather obey the Magistrate though with offence Sect. 12. And the reason that he gives is this which I desire may be seriously weighed For here disobedience is the greater sin and so takes away the sin of offending the weak and indeed in this case I give no offence because my hands are bound and I have no liberty to do otherwise CHAP. XIV Contains the course that a Minister is to take as to conformity Though scandal be taken by weak brethren in which Chapter the Doctrine of scandal is considered and what is alleadged by the Author of the Temperate Discourse is answered and the Magistrate freed from what is charged upon him under this consideration Section 1. NOw because that much is rapt up in a very few words I shall endeavour to let it into the understandings of weak Brethren by taking them into these proportions 1. First that though to offend the weak in things wherein we are at our liberty be a sin yet when these things come to be commanded by the Magistrate and I obey not here disobedience is the sinne to be laid to heart And the reason is because that though the matter of the command be indifferent yet obedience to that command is an express Gospel-duty 1 Pet. Rom. 13. c. And therefore as Mr. Randall saith taketh away any just cause of offending the weak 2. Secondly that where Christians are not at liberty being not sui Juris but under the command of their superiors to do those things which are not simply sinful and unlawful and in conforming to their commands I give no offence to my weak brother this may be scandalum acceptum but non datum I give no offence saith Mr. Randal And the reason is because my hands are bound where I am not at my own liberty but for the Peace of the Church the propagating and honour of Religion which is weakned by differences and divisions about modes of Worship c. I am commanded to do such things which may seem to be superstitious or superfluous to weak Christians and they may be scandalized thereat and take offence yet observe what Mr. Randall saith I give none by so doing And therefore what I find concerning the judgement of the Doctors of Aberdeene of old is very confiderable That the scandal of brethren weighs light when put into the scale with the command of Authority Sect. 2. This being the great argument used against Non-conformity in the Treatise of the Discourse of Liturgies
temporum eos abolevit aut non tulit esse restituendos He that will receive and follow the use and the opinion of the universal Church in all times and places unto this Age for a certain Interpreter will easily understand that the several degrees of Presbyters and Bishops in the Ecclesiastical government are and ever were according to Gods Word and therefore where they stand still they must not be abolished and where the iniquity of the times hath abolished or not suffered them they must be set up again Sect. 3. By which and other before quotations it appeareth that their judgment was long ago for Bishops and their Ordination by them and that the several degrees of Presbyters and Bishops in the Ecclesiastical government are according to Gods Word that they were not the same as is so strongly supposed Be perswaded therefore not onely to stand and wonder at the counsel this holy Zanchy giveth but resolve to follow it where the iniquity of the times hath abolished or not suffered that Ecclesiastical government he saith it must be set up again it must not be endeavoured to be undermined or extirpated for this is contrary to a Scripture-Reformation otherwise he would have ascribed their abolition to be from the piety and not the iniquity of the times Sect. 4. I beseech you Sirs therefore take no care for the Reformed Churches as to their Ministry and Ordination but take care of your own and take heed that you give no occasion of scandal or offence to them by suffering your selves to be deprived of the exercise of your Ministerial gifts because that you will not yield to that which may make your Ordination which hath hitherto been by the classes and so done but by halves to be more valid and complete and consonant to the practice of the primitive times Sect. 5. But if what I have said may not satisfie you as to your thoughtfulnesse and great care for the Reformed Churches lest by your being ordained by Bishops they should be unchurched as having no true Ministers because not Episcopally ordained Be pleased to take but a View of the Government and Publick Worship of God in the Reformed Churches beyond the Seas Wherein is shewed their Conformity and Agreement with the Church of England as it is established by the Act of Uniformity A Book lately set forth by Mr. John Durel And herein you will find so much said by himself and quoted from the learned Spanhemius late Professour of Divinity at Geneva and of Ludovicus Capellus late Divinity-Reader and Professour of Hebrew at Saumers with others that will not onely give a very satisfactory answer in this case but also to a serious question propounded in the Petition for peace pag. 9. What judgment all the Protestant Churches are likely to pass on your proceedings meaning the Bishops and how your cause and ours meaning the Petitioners for peace and Non-conformity will stand represented to them Sect. 6. And I hope withall will very much prevail upon you to be ordained by Bishops and to conform lest that you should be a further scandal and offence to them and give them a further occasion to be confirmed in the mean opinion that some of the most learned Pastours beyond Sea had of our work of Reformation in taking away Bishops and Liturgy and setting up the Directory in the stead thereof You will find more then what I say implyed in the great commendation that the learned Spanhemius of Geneva giveth of the beauteous face of the Church of England with her Reverence in publick Worship before these late times vide his Epistle before the third part of Dubia Evangelica quoted by Monsieur Durel pag. 66. And more then I will write in English you will find Durell pag. 15. quoted Ex Ludovic Capell Thes Salm. Th. de Liturg. part 7. Thes 6 7. who after a commendation of the Liturgy of the Church of England as free from all Popish saperstition and Idolatry and how happy we might have been c. he saith Dorec tandem nuperrimè exorti sunt in Anglia morosi scrupulosi delicatuli nimium ne superstitiosos planè dicam homines quibus Ecclesiae suae hactenus usurpata Liturgia visa est multis sed levissimis nulliusque penè momenti de causis non improbanda solum verum etiam planè abrogan la penitus unà cum toto Episcoporum Hierarchico regimine abolenda obliteranda c. Sect. 7. Now as by these two quotations you may as I said before easily see how you have stood represented to the Reformed Churches of Geneva and others so also you may apprehend what judgement the Protestant Churches are like to passe upon you for your Non-conformity and for chusing rather not to preach then to receive Ordination from the Bishop whereby that of the Presbytery may be completed and to declare an agreement with them by your subscription Oh Sirs be perswaded after all your doubts fears and scruples to observe the Act for Uniformity and take more care of giving offence to the Reformed Protestant Churches abroad by your Non-conformity then of any offence they will take at you thereat how far they are from it you will find plentifully proved in Mounsieur Durells Book aforesaid to which I refer you Sect. 8. It is confessed that in yielding to this seasonable Counsel there will be some kind of self-denyall and a departing from that sentence and opinion which many have taken up to the contrary Yet being lawful to be done and conducing so much to the Peace of Church and State and giving an opportunity to many persons whom God hath qualified for the work of the Ministry to exercise the same Be perswaded for Christs sake if ever you will shew your selves to be Christs Disciples indeed deny your selves and follow the wholsome Counsel of holy Beza before spoken that leaving all bitterness as long as the truth of the doctrine and purity of conscience was safe Bear one another with patience and obey the Queens most gracious Majesty and all her Prelates with a free heart Beza 12. Epist ue ante Sect. 9. That the Truth of the Doctrine is safe I beseech you seriously to consider what I have already quoted from Mr. Baxter and what now followeth from that Revernd and holy Mr. Robert Bolton in his Saints sure and Perpetual Guide pag. 126. Saith he Certain it is that our Church in that most exquisite and Worthy Confession of Faith contained in the Articles of Religion doth hold and professe all substantiall points of Divinity as soundly as any Church in the world none excepted either in this age nor in the primitive times of the Church Oh therefore subscribe unto these 39. Articles which the Act for Uniformity requireth and that ex animo as Beza counselled in his time the Queen and her Prelates should be obeyed Sect. 10. Especially considering that not onely the truth is safe but that whatsoever is required by this Act