the liberty granted to the people in having in their hands the bookes of the old and new Testament had beene much abused by many false glosses and interpretations which were made upon them tending to the seducing of the people especially of the younger sort and the raysing of sedition within the Realme And thereupon it was enacted by the authority of the Parliament on whom he was content to cast the envy of an Act so contrary to his former gracious Proclamations that all manner of bookes of the old and new Testament of the crafty false and untrue Translation of Tyndall be forthwith abolished and forbidden to be used and kept As also that all other Bibles not being of Tyndalls translation in which were found any Preambles or Annotations other than the quotations or Summaries of the Chapters should be purged of the said Preambles and Annotations eyther by cutting them out or blotting them in such wise that they might not be perceived or read And finally that the Bible be not read openly in any Church but by the leave of the King or of the Ordinary of the place nor privately by any Women Artificers Prentices Iourneymen Husbandmen Labourers or by any of the servants of Yeomen or under with severall paines to those who should doe the contrary This is the substance of the Statute of the 34. 35. H. 8. cap. 1. which though it shewes that there was somewhat done in Parliament in a matter which concern'd Religion which howsoever if you marke it was rather the adding of the penalties than giving any resolution or decision of the points in Question yet I presume the Papists will not use this for an Argument that we have eyther a Parliament-Religion or a Parliament-Gospell or that we stand indebted to the Parliament for the use of the Scriptures in the English Tongue which is so principall a part of the Reformation Nor did the Parliament speede so prosperously in the undertakiug which the wise King permitted them to have an hand in for the foresaid ends or found so generall an obedience in it from the common people as would have beene expected in these times on the like occasion but that the King was faine to quicken and give life to the Acts thereof by his Proclamatiom An. 1546. which you shall find in Fox his booke fol. 1427. To drive this nayle a little farther The terror of this Statute dying with H. 8. or being repealed by that of K. E. 6. 1 E. 6. c. 12. the Bible was againe made publique and not only suffered to be read by particular persons either privately or in the Church but ordered to be read over yearely in the Congregation as a part of the Liturgy or divine Service which how farre it relates to the Court of Parliament we shall see anon But for the publishing thereof in print for the use of the people for the comfort and edification of private persons that was done only by the King at least in his name and by his authority And so it also stood in Q. Elizabeths time the Translation of the Bible being againe reviewed by some of the most learned Bishops appointed thereunto by the Queenes Commission from whence it had the name of the Bishops-Bible and upon that Review reprinted by her sole Commandement and by her sole authority left free and open to the use of her well affected and Religious Subjects Nor did the Parliament doe any thing in all her Reigne with reference to the Scriptures in the English tongue otherwise than as the reading of them in that tongue in the Congregation is to be reckoned for a part of the English Liturgy whereof more hereafter In the translation of them into Welch or British somewhat indeed was done which doth looke this way It being ordered in the Parliament 5. Eliz. c. 28. That the B. B. of Hereford St. Davids Bangor Landaffe and St. Asaph Should take care amongst them for translating the whole Bible with the booke of Common Prayer into the Welch or British tongue on paine of forfeiting 40 a peece in default hereof And to encourage them thereunto it was enacted that one booke of either sort being so translated and imprinted should be provided and bought for every Cathedrall Church as also for all parish Churches and Chappells of ease where the said tongue is commonly used the Ministers to pay the one halfe of the price and the parishioners the other But then you must observe withall that it had beene before determined in the Convocation of the selfe same yeare An. 1562. That the Common-prayer of the Church ought to be celebrated in a tongue which was understood by the people as you may see in the booke of Articles of Religion Art 24. which came out that yeare and consequently as well in the Welch or British as in any other And for the new Translation of K. Iames his time to shew that the Translation of Scripture is no worke of Parliament as it was principally occasioned by some passages in the Conference at Hampton Court without recourse unto the Parliament so was it done only by such men as the King appointed and by his authority alone imprinted published and imposed care being taken by the Canon of the yeare 1603. That one of them should be provided for each severall Church at the charge of the Parish No flying in this case to an Act of Parliament either to authorize the doing of it or to impose it being done 3. Of the Reformation of Religion in points of Doctrine NExt let us look upon the method used in former times in the reforming of the Church whether in points of Doctrine or in formes of Worship and we shall find it still the same The Clergy did the worke as to them seemed best never advising with the Parliament but upon the post fact and in most cases not at all And first for Doctrinals there was but little done in king Henries time but that which was acted by the Clergie only in their Convocations and so commended to the people by the Kings sole authority the matter never being brought within the cognizance of the two Houses of Parliament For in the yeare 1536 being the yeare in which the Popes authoritie was for ever banished there were some Articles agreed on in the Convocation and represented to the King under the hands of all the Bishops Abbats Priors and inferiour Clergy usually called unto those meetings the Originall whereof being in Sir Robert Cottons Library I have often seene which being approved of by the King were forthwith published under the Title of Articles devised by the Kings Highnesse to stable Christian quietnesse and unity amongst the people In which it is to be observed first that those Articles make mention of 3 Sacraments only that is to say of Baptisme Penance and the Sacrament of the Altar And secondly that in the declaration of the Doctrine of Iustification Images honouring of the Saints departed as also concerning many
with the curiositie of the Ministers and mistakes of the People rather then for any other weighty cause As the Statute 5. 6. Ed. 6. cap. 1. it was thought expedient by the King with the Assent of the Lords and Commons in Parliament assembled that the said Order of Common-Service should be faithfully and godly perused explained and made fully perfect Perused and Explained by whom Why questionlesse by those who made it or else by those if they were not the same men who were appointed by the King to draw up and compose a Form of Ordination for the use of the Church And this Assent of theirs for it was no more was the only part that was ever acted by the Parliament in matter of this present nature save that a Statute passed in the former Parliament 3. 4. Ed. 6. c. 12. unto this effect that such Form and manner of making and consecrating Archbishops Bishops Priests Deacons and other Ministers of the Church which before I spake of as by six Prelates and six other men of this Realm learned in Gods Lawes by the King to be appointed and assigned shall be devised for that purpose and set forth under the Great Seale shall be lawfully used and exercised and none other Where note that the King only was to nominate and appoint the men the Bishops and other learned men were to make the book that the Parliament in a blinde obedience or at the least upon a charitable confidence in the integrity of the men so nominated did confirm that book before any of their Members had ever seene it though afterwards indeed in the following Parliament this book together with the book of Common-prayer so printed and explained retained a more formall confirmation as to the use thereof throughout the kingdome but in no other respect for which see the Statute 5. 6. Ed. 6. c. 1. As for the time of Q. Elizabeth when the Common prayer book now in use being the same almost with the last of King Edward was to be brought again into the Church from whence it was cast out in Q. Maries Reigne it was committed to the care of some learned men that is to say to Master Whitehead once Chaplain to Q. Anne Bullen Doctor Parker after Archbishop of Canterbury D. Grindall after Bishop of London D. Coxe after Bishop of Ely D. Pilkinton after Bishop of Durham D. May Deane of S. Paules D. Bill Provost of Eaton after Deane of Westminster and Sr. Tho. Smith By whom being alter'd in some few passages which the Statute points to 1 Eliz. cap. 21. It was presented to the Parliament and by the Parliament received and established without more adoe or troubling any Committee of both or either Houses to consider of it for ought appeares in their Records All that the Parliament did in it being to put it into the condition in which it stood before in King Ed. Reigne partly by repealing the Repeale of King Ed. Statutes made in the 1 of Q. Mary cap. 2. and partly by the adding of some farther penalties on such as did deprave the book or neglect to use it or wilfully did absent themselves from their parish-Churches And for the Alterations made therein in King Iames his time being small and in the Rubrick only and for the additions of the Thanksgivings at the end of the Letany the Prayer for the Queen and the royall Issue and the doctrine of the Sacraments at the end of the Catechisme which were not in the book before they were never referred unto the Parliament but were done only by authority of the Kings Commission and stand in force by virtue only of his Proclamation which you may find before the book the charge of buying the said book so explained and altered being layd upon the severall and respective parishes by no other authority than that of of the eightieth Canon made in Convocation An. 1603. The like may also be affirmed of the Formes of Prayer for the Inauguration day of our Kings and Queenes the Prayer-books for the fifth of November and the fifth of August and those which have beene used in all publique Fasts All which without the help of Parliaments have been composed by the Bishops and imposed by the King Now unto this discourse of the Formes of Worship I shall subjoyn a word or two of the times of Worship that is to say the holy daies observed in the Church of England and so observed that they doe owe that observation cheifely to the Churches power For whereas it was found in the former times that the number of the holy daies was grown so great that they became a burden to the common people and a great hindrance to the thrift and manufactures of the kingdome there was a Canon made in the Convocation An. 1536 for cutting off of many superstitious and superfluous holy daies and the reducing them unto the number in which now they stand save that St. Georges day and Mary Magdalens day and all the Festivals of the blessed Virgin had their place amongst them according to which Canon there went out a Monitory from the Archibishop of Canterbury to all the Suffragans of his Province respectively to see the same observed in their severall Diocesses which is still extant on Record But being the authority of the Church was then in the wane it was thought necessary to confirm their Acts and see execution done upon it by the Kings Injunction which did accordingly come forth with this Form or preamble That the abolishing of the said holy daies was Decreed ordained and established by the kings Highnesse Authority as supreme Head in Earth of the Church of England with the common consent and assent of the Prelates and Clergy of this his Realm in Convocation lawfully assembled and Congregate Of which see Fox his Acts and Monuments fol. 1246.1247 Afterwards in the yeare 1541. The King perceiving with what difficulty the People were induced to leave off those holy daies to which they had been so long accustomed published his Proclamation of the twenty third of Iuly for the abolishing of such holy daies amongst other things as were prohibited before by his Injunctions both built upon the same foundation namely the resolution of the Clergy in their Convocation And so it stood untill the Reigne of King E. 6. at what time the Reformation of the publique Liturgy drew after it by consequence an alteration in the present businesse no daies being to be kept or accounted holy but those for which the Church had set apart a peculiar office and not all those neither For whereas there are severall and peculiar offices for the day of the Conversion of Saint Paul and the day of St. Barnabas the Apostles neither of these are kept as holy daies nor reckoned or esteemed as such in the Act of Parliament wherein the names and number of the holy daies is precisely specified which makes some think the Act of Parliament to have had an over-ruling
Power in Spirituall matters from no other hands than those of Christ and his Apostles their Temporall honors and possessions from the bounty and affection only of our Kings and Princes their Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction in Causes Matrimoniall Testamentary and the like for which no Action lieth at the Common-Lawe from continuall usage and prescription and owe no more unto the Parliament than all sort of Subjects doe besides whose fortunes and Estates have been occasionally and collaterally confirmed in Parliament And as for the particular Statutes which are touched upon that of the 24 H. 8. doth only constitute and ordain a way by which they might be chose and consecrated without recourse to Rome for a confirmation which formerly had put the Prelates to great charge and trouble but for the Form and manner of their Consecration the Statute leaves it to those Rites and Ceremonies wherewith before it was performed And therefore Sanders doth not stick to affirm that all the Bishops which were made in King Henries dayes were Lawfully and Canonically ordained and Consecrated the Bishops of that time not only being taken and acknowledged in Queen Maries dayes for lawfull and Canonicall Bishops but called on to assist at the Consecration of such other Bishops Cardinall Poole himselfe for one as were promoted in her Reigne whereof see Mason's book de Minist. Ang. l. 3. c.. Next for the Statute 1 Ed. 6. cap. 2. besides that it is satisfied in part by the former Answer as it relates to their Canonicall Consecrations it was repealed in Terminis in the first of Q. Maries Reigne and never stood in force nor practice to this day That of the authorizing of the book of Ordination in two severall Parliaments of that King the one a parte antè and the other a parte pòst as before I told you might indeed seem somewhat to the purpose if any thing were wanting in it which had been used in the formula's of the Primitive times or if the book had been composed in Parliament or by Parliament men or otherwise received more Authority from them then that it might be lawfully used and exercised throughout the Kingdom But it is plain that none of these things were objected in Queen Maries dayes when the Papists stood most upon their points the Ordinall not being called in because it had too much of the Parliament but because it had too little of the Pope and relished too strongly of the Primitive Piety And for the Statute of the 8 of Q. Elizabeth which is cheifly stood on all that was done therein was no more than this and on this occasion A question had been made by captious and unquiet men and amongst the rest by Dr. Bonner sometimes Bishop of London whether the Bishops of those times were lawfully ordained or not the reason of the doubt being this which I mervaile Mason did not see because the Book of Ordination which was annulled and abrogated in the first of Q. Mary had not been yet restored and revived by any legall Act of Q. Elizabeths time which Cause being brought before the Parliament in the 8. yeare of her Reigne the Parliament took notice first that their not restoring of that book to the former Power in Termes significant and expresse was but Casus omissus and then declare that by the Statute 5 6 Ed. 6. It had been added to the Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments as a member of it at least as an Appendant to it and therefore by the Statute 1 Eliz. c. 2. was restored againe together with the said book of Common Prayer intentionally at the least if not in Terminis But being the words in the said Statute were not cleare enough to remove all doubts they therefore did revive it now and did accordingly enact that whatsoever had been done by virtue of that Ordination should be good in Lawe This is the Totall of the Statute and this shewes rather in my judgement that the Bishops of the Queenes first times had too little of the Parliament in them then that they were conceived to have had too much And so I come to your last objection which concernes the Parliament whose entertayning all occasions to manifest their power in Ecclesiasticall matters doth seem to you to make that groundles slander of the Papists the more faire and plausible 'T is true indeed that many Members of both Houses in these latter times have been very ready to imbrace all businesses which are offered to them cut of a probable hope of drawing the managery of all Affaires as well Ecclesiasticall as Civill into their own hands and some there are who being they cannot hope to have their fancies authorised in a Regular way doe put them upon such designes as neither can consist with the nature of Parliaments nor the esteem and reputation of the Church of Christ And this hath been a practice even as old as Wicklef who in the time of K. Rich. 2. addressed his Petition to the Parliament as we reade in Walsingham for the Reformation of the Clergy the rooting out of many false and erroneous Tenents and for establishing of his own Doctrines who though he had some Wheat had more Tares by ods in the Church of England lest he might be thought to have gone a way as dangerous and unjustifiable as it was strange and new he laid it down for a Position that the Parliament or Temporall Lords where by the way this ascribes no authority or power at all to the House of Commons might lawfully examine and Reform the Disorders and Corruptions of the Church and on discovery of the errors and corruptions of it devest her of all Titles and Temporall endowments till she were reformed But for all this and more than this for all he was so strongly backed by the Duke of Lancaster neither his Petition nor his Position found any welcome in the Parliament further than that it made them cast many a longing eye on the Churches Patrimony or produced any other effect towards the worke of Reformation which he chiefly aymed at then that it hath since served for a Precedent to Penry Pryn and such like turbulent Innovators to disturbe the Church and set on foot those dreames and dotages which otherwise they durst not publish And to say truth as long as the Clergy were in power and had authority in Convocation to doe what they would in matters which concern'd Religion those of the Parliament conceived it neither safe nor fitting to intermeddle in such businesse as concern'd the Clergy for feare of being questioned for it at the Churches barre But when that power was lessen'd if it were not lost by the Submission of the Clergy to K. H. 8. and the Act of the Supremacy which ensued upon it then did the Parliaments begin to intrench upon the Church's Rights to offer at and enterteine such businesses as formerly were held peculiar to the Clergy only next to dispute their Charters and reverse
thing at all with the booke of Articles Where by the way if you behold the lawfullnesse of Priests Marriages as a matter Doctrinall or thinke we owe that Point of Doctrine and the indulgence granted to the Clergy in it to the care and goodnesse of the Parliament you may please to know that the point had beene before determined in the Convocation and stands determined by and for the Clergy in the 31. of those Articles and that the Parliament looked not on it as a point of Doctrine but as it was a matter practicall conducing to the benefit and improvement of the Common-wealth Or if it did yet was the Statute built on no other ground-worke than the resolution of the Clergy the Marriage of Priests being before determined to be most lawfull I use the very words of the Act it selfe and according to the word of God by the learned Clergy of this Realm in their Convocations as well by the common assent as by subscription of their hands 5.6 Ed 6. c. 12. And for the time of Q. Elizabeth it is most manifest that they had no other body of Doctrine in the first part of her Reigne then only the said Articles of K. Edward's booke and that which was delivered in the booke of Homilies of the said kings time in which the Parliament had as little to doe as you have seene they had in the booke of Articles But in the Convocation of the yeare 1562. being the fifth of the Queenes Reigne the Bishops and Clergy taking into consideration the said booke of Articles and altering what they thought most fitting to make it more conducible to the use of the Church and the edification of the people presented it unto the Queene who caused it to be published with this name and Title viz. Articles whereupon it was agreed by the Archbishops and Bishops of both Provinces and the whole Clergy in the Convocation holden at London An. 1562. for the avoiding of diversitie of opinions and for establishing of consent touching true Religion put forth by the Queenes authority Of any thing done or pretended to be done by the power of Parliament either in the way of approbation or of confirmation not one word occurres either in any of the printed bookes or their publique Registers At last indeed in the thirteenth of the said Queenes Reigne which was eight yeares full after the passing of those Articles comes out a Statute for the redressing of disorders in the Ministers of holy Church In which it was enacted That all such as were ordeined Priests or Ministers of God's Word and Sacraments after any other forme than that appointed to be used in the Church of England all such as were to be ordeined or permitted to preach or to be instituted into any Benefice with cure of Soules should publiquely subscribe to the said Articles and testifie their assent unto them which shewes if you observe it well that though the Parliament did well allow of and approve the said booke of Articles yet the said booke owes neither confirmation nor authority to the Act of Parliament So that the wonder is the greater that that most insolent scoffe which is put upon us by the Church of Rome in calling our Religion by the name Parliamentaria Religio should passe so long without controle unlesse perhaps it was in reference to our Formes of worship of which I am to speake in the next place But first we must make answere unto some objections which are made against us both from Law and practise For Practise first it is alleaged by some out of Bishop Iewell in his answere to the cavill of Dr. Harding to be no strange matter to see Ecclesiasticall causes debated in Parliament and that it is apparent by the Lawes of K. Inas K. Alfred K. Edward c. That our godly forefathers the Princes and Peeres of this Realme never vouchsafed to treate of matters touching the common State before all controversies of Religion and Causes Ecclesiasticall had beene concluded Def. of the Apol. pt. 6. c. 2. 1. But the answere unto this is easy For first if our Religion may be called Parliamentarian because it hath received confirmation and debate in Parliament then the Religion of our Forefathers even Papistry it selfe concerning which so many Acts of Parliament were made in K. Henry 8. and Q. Maries time must be called Parliamentarian also And Secondly it is most certaine that in the Parliaments or Common Councels call them which you will both of King Inas time and the rest of the Saxon Kings which Bishop Iewell speakes of not only Bishops Abbats and the higher part of the Clergy but the whole body of the Clergy generally had their votes and suffrages eyther in person or by Proxy Concerning which take this for the leading Case That in the Parliament or Common Councell in K. Ethelbert's time who first of all the Saxon Kings received the Gospell the Clergy were convened in as full a manner as the Lay subjects of that Prince Convocato coÌ„muni Concilio tam Cleri quà m Populi saith Sr. H. Spelman in his Collection of the Councels An. 605. p. 118. And for the Parliament of King Ina which leades the way in Bishop Iewell it was saith the same Sr. H. Spelman p. 630. Commune Concilium Episcoporum Procerum Comitum necnon omnium Sapientum Seniorum populorumque totius Regni where doubtlesse Sapientes and Seniores and you know what Seniores signifieth in the Ecclesiasticall notion must be some body else then those which after are expressed by the name of Populi which shewes the falshood and absurdity of the collection made by Master Prynne that in the epistle to his booke against Doctor Cousins viz. That the Parliament as it is now constituted hath an ancient genuine just and lawfull Prerogative to establish true Religion in our Church and to abolish and suppresse all false new and counterfeit doctrines whatsoever unlesse he meanes upon the post-fact after the Church hath done her part in determining whâ—t was true what false what new what ancient and finally what Doctrines might be counted counterfeit and what sincere And as for Law 't is true indeed that by the Statute 1 Eliz. cap. 1. The Court of Parliament hath pawer to determine and judge of Heresie which at first sight seemes somewhat strange but on the second view you will easily finde that this relates only to new and emergent Heresies not formerly declared for such in any of the first foure Generall Councells nor in any other Generall Councell adjudging by expresse words of holy Scripture as also that in such new Heresies the following words restraine this power to the Assent of the Clergy in their Convocation as being best able to instruct the Parliament what they are to doe and where they are to make use of the secular sword for cutting off a desperat Heretick from the Church of CHRIST or rather from the body of all Christian people 4. Of the Formes
of Worship THIS rub removed we now proceed unto a view of such formes of Worship as have beene setled in this Church since the first dawning of the day of Reformation in which our Parliaments have indeed done somewhat though it be not much The first point which was altered in the publique Liturgies was that the Creed the Pater-noster and the ten Commandements were ordered to be said in the English tongue to the intent the people might be perfect in them and learn them without book as our phrase is The next the setting forth and using of the English Letanie on such daies and times in which it was accustomably to be read as a part of the Service But neither of these two was done by Parliament nay to say truth the Parliament did nothing in them All which was done in eyther of them was only by the Kings authority by virtue of the Head ship or Supremacy which was vested in him eyther cooperating and concurring with his Convocation or else directed and assisted by such learned Prelates with whom he did advise in matters which concern'd the Church and did relate to Reformation By virtue of which Head-ship or Supremacy he ordained the first and to that end caused certain Articles or Injunctions to be published by the Lord Cromwell then his Vicar-Generall An. 1536. And by the same did he give order for the second I meane for the saying of the Letany in the English tongue by his own royall Proclamation An. 1545. for which consult the Acts Mon. fol. 1248. 1312. But these were only preparations to a greater worke which was reserved unto the times of King Ed. 6. In the beginning of whose Reigne there passed a Statute for the administring the Sacrament in both kindes to any person that should devoutly and humbly desire the same 1 Ed. 6. cap. 1. In which it is to be observed that though the Statute doe declare that the ministring of the same in both kinds to the people was more agreeable to the first Institution of the said Sacrament and to the common usage of the primitive times Yet Mr. Fox assures us and we may take his word that they did build that Declaration and consequently the Act which was raised upon it upon the Iudgement and opinion of the best learned men whose resolution and advise they followed in it fol. 1489. And for the Forme by which the said most Blessed Sacrament was to be so delivered to the Common people it was commended to the care of the most grave and learned Bishops and others assembled by the King at his Castle of Windsor who upon long wise learned and deliberate advice did finally agree saith Fox upon one Godly and uniform Order for receiving the same according to the right rule of Scriptures and the first use of the primitive Church fol. 1491. which Order as it was set forth in print An. 1548. with a Proclamation in the name of the King to give authority thereunto amongst the people so was it recommended by especiall Letters writ unto every Bishop severally from the Lords of the Counsell to see the same put in execution A copy of which Letters you may find in Fox fol. 1491. as afore is said Hitherto nothing done by Parliament in the Formes of Worship but in the following yeare there was For the Protector and the rest of the Kings Counsell being fully bent for a Reformation thought it expedient that one uniform quiet and godly Order should be had throughout the Realm for Officiating God's Divine Service And to that end I use the very words of the Act it selfe appointed the Archbishop of Canterbury and certain of the most learned and discreet Bishops and other learned men of the Realm to meet together requiring them that having as well eye and respect to the most pure and sincere christian Religion taught in Scriptures as to the usages in the primitive Church they should draw and make one convenient and meet Order Rite and Fashion of Common Prayer and Administration of Sacraments to be had and used in this his Majesties Realm of England Well what did they being thus assembled that the Statute tells us where it is said that by the ayd of the holy Ghost I pray you marke this well and with one uniform agreement they did conclude upon and set forth an Order which they delivered to the Kings Highnesse in a book entituled The Booke of Common-Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church after the use of the Church of England All this was done before the Parliament did any thing But what was done by them at last Why first considering the most godly travaile of the Kings Highnesse and the Lord Protector and others of his Highnesse Counsell in gathering together the said Bishops and learned men Secondly the godly prayers Orders Rites and Ceremonies in the said book mentioned Thirdly the motives and inducements which inclined the aforesaid learned men to alter those things which were altered and to reteine those which were reteined and finally taking into consideration the honour of God and the great quietnesse which by the grace of God would ensue upon it they gave his Majesty most hearty and lowely thanks for the same and most humbly prayed him that it might be ordeined by his Majesty with the assent of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament and by authority of the same that the said Form of Common-prayer and none other after the Feast of Pentecost next following should be used in all this Majesties Dominions with severall penalties to such as either should deprave or neglect the same 2. 3. Ed. 6. cap. 1. So far the very words of the Act it selfe By which it evidently appeareth that the two Houses of Parliament did nothing in the present businesse but impose that Form upon the people which by the learned and religious Clergie men whom the King appointed thereunto was agreed upon and made it penall unto such as eyther should deprave the same or neglect to use it And thus doth Poulton no meane Lawyer understand the Statute who therfore gives no other Title to it in his Abridgement published in the yeare 1612 than this The Penalty for not using uniformity of Service and Ministration of the Sacraments So then the making of one uniform Order of celebrating Divine Service was the worke of the Clergy the making of the Penalties was the worke of the Parliament And so much for the first Liturgy of King Edwards Reigne in which you see how little was done by the authority or power of Parliament so little that if it had beene lesse it had been just nothing But some exceptions being taken against the Liturgy by some of the preciser sort at home and by Calvin abroad the book was brought under a review and though it had been framed at first if the Parliament which said so erred not by the ayd of the holy Ghost himself yet to comply