four Disciples to wit Valentinus Gentilis Alciat of Milan Gibradus and Blandrata First Valentinus spread his Errors secretly in Geneva for which being taxed renunced them under his own hand under pain of perjurie notwithstanding began to spread them the second time for which he was imprisoned and to be liberat from Prison wrot a second Recantation of his Blasphemies and at the command of the Magistrat burnt them publickly with his own hands Thereafter spread his Errors in France and Italy Arius was but once perjured but he twice then he went to Pole where he did meet with Blandrata and Alciat his old Companions which two had also fled out of Geneva and these three spread their Errors in Pole two years untill the King of Pole banished them out of his Dominions then Gentilis wandered through Austria Moravia and Savoy at last was apprehended within the confines of the Republick of Bern and for his doubled perjury and obstinancy in his Blasphemies against the blessed Trinity was judicially condemned at Bern by the Magistrat and burnt in the Year of Christ 1556. a Bucan loco 1. quest Sect. 5. Beza epist. 81. The History whereof is written at length by Aritius Professor at Bern. Third Blandrata a Physician disput often against Calvin at Geneva thereafter in Germany Helvetia and Pole vented his Errors at last turned Arian Anno Dom. 1569. and wrot against the Trinity Faustus Sosinus in his Book of Epistles pag 687. calls Blandrata his great Patron to be ever in honour with him but at last Blandrata was brother son and died b Beza epist 81. miserably The Fourth Alciot turned Mahumitan and fled to Turkie c Beza epist 16 Gilbraldus died of the Pestilence Beza writes of other two whereof the one â—rowned himself in a well The other Ochinus how miserable he died all Pole knew as writs Beza and Cardinal Hosius Staucarus in Pole wrot against the Sacred Trinity which the Orthodox Synod in Pole condemned and the Divines of Hidelberg and Tigurie refuted and Calvin also An. Dom. 1563. and Beza 1568. d Beza epist. ad Polonos 28. An. 1567 a Book written at Alba Julia by the Hereticks in Sarmatia and Transilvania is refuted at large by Zanchius de tribus Elohim Georgius Paulus Superintendent of the Hereticall Churches in the Dioces of Croco of whom writs Beza Epist 81. Statorius against whom Beza writs Epist 15 and 16. Andrew Dudithius sometime a Bishop in Hungarie and a conspicuous member of the Trent Council he left the Roman Church to him Beza writs his first Epist Anno Dom. 1570. both large and loving yet at last he fell in the snare of the Transilvanian Hereticks Sylvanus Pastor in Hydelberg turns Arian and Traitor against his Prince Palatine For these two crymes he was beheaded Anno Dom. 1522. His Colleague Menzerus escaping out of Prison went first to Pole then to Transilvania at last to Constantinople and there turned a circumcised Turke he dyed crying and roaring most terribly that the Turks said they never saw such a fearfull death and that he was a Child of Satan and the Reader may think no wonder of his desperat death seing he had renounced his Saviour and Baptisme Saedelius in Pole denyed Christs Divine Nature and the New Testament Laelius Sosinus an Italian foresaking the Errors of the Roman-church Calvine wrot an Epistle to him Anno Dom. 1555. of him Beza writs Epist 81. Faustus Socinus his Nephew leaving Italy came to Tyguri with his Uncles Papers where he spent three years in privat Studies he was of a quick wit but too proud and bold he confesseth in his writs that he had little Logick Greek or Hebrew he went to Transilvania and there spread his Errors he was in such repute with these Hereticks that even at this day they are designed Socinians Franciscus Davidis about the Year 1580. Superintendent in Transilvania to that Sect of Hereticks denyed that Christ was God or the Messias or should be worshipped For which the Prince of Transilvania cast him in Prison where he turning mad dyed in dispair affirming he saw the Devils came to take him away with them Poleologus a Dominican at Rome fled to Poland turned Arian but was brought back to Rome and burnt Smalcius Socinian Preacher at Racovia wrot a large Socinian Catechism Printed Anno Dom. 1608. As Socinus had written another and still the Socinians are busie scribling their Blasphemies and Printing them at Goslavius Anno Dom. 1613. And Nicolaides Anno. Dom. 1614. An Advocat at Paris Anno Dom. 1616. caused Print Abailardus his Blasphemies which had been condemned and accursed by a Church Council above 500. years before Anno Dom. 1620 Servetus Books were turned in Dutch and Printed in Belgia in which he blasphemes the most blessed Trinity a Triceps cerberus diabolicum phantasma illusio Doctor Forbes Anno Dom. 1631. refutes a dissertation of a certain Socinian then newly written b Instructionum historico Theologicarum lib. 1. cap. 7. Anno Dom. 1642. Crellius Socinian Preacher at Racovia hath Printed a Book against the Trinity and after him Stychmanus The Socinians not only increased in Pole and Transilvania but also are come to Belgia where they consort with the Arminian For Anno Dom 1611. The Orthodox Synod in Pole writs to Paraeus regrating that the Socinians in Pole made much of Arminius and now the later Arminians are poysoned with Socinianism as is clear from the writtings of Episcopius their Chiftain c Socinanismi confutati tom 1. pag. 92. It was granted indeed that the Socinians are banished Belgia by publick Proclamation of the States of the Natherlands yet notwithstanding many Socinians lurk there under the notion of Remonstrants and Anabaptists both which Sects are tolerat there and who all three joyn and agree in many of their Opinions as writs Hoorn Beek Divinity Professor at Utright Anno Dom. 1650. a Voetius de tolerantia Antitrinitatiorum ministri remonstrantes non pauci in Socinianis erroribus deprehensi inter quos celebres Hendricus Slatius Adolphus Venator Gesterani duo complures in Zuid Hollandia Ann-Dom 1618. 1619. Idem Voetius in thesebus de necessitate utilitate dogmatis de trinitate scribit quod Remonstrantes inter suos tolerent foverent promoveant eos omnes quos Socinianis aut Anabaptisticis Erroribus aut pejoribus opinionibus delibutos probe noverint E. G. Velsingium Tonbergium Anno Dom. 1638. Sartorius a Socinian at Amsterdam wrot a Letter to Adam Frank Socinian Preacher at Claudiopolis which the Prince of Transilvania intercepted and caused Print where is written that in Holland there is a great harvest of Socinians a The Socinians do not only lurk and multiply in Belgia but which is lamentable are creept over to England Mr. Edwards Ganerene parte prima Printed at London Anno Dom. 1646. Writs That here the Doctrine of the Trinity by too too many is called a Popish Tradition and part third
pag. 58. Thus he writs all men may see that many in England are Arians and Antitrinitarians he writs also pag. 136. a Letter from Holland to London dated 1646. Here we burn the Books of the Socinian Errors and they dare not be sold in these parts but at London is taught Blasphemy against God and his Christ and a Minister in Holland wrot a Letter dated October 18. 1646. to some Ministers in London that diverse English Merchants were seeking to buy Socinus Works and Crellius c. from a Stationer in Holland and when the Stationer answered that these Books were prohibit by the States General the Merchant replyed nevertheless you may transport them from other Nations and we shall give you for them what you will and the Generall Assembly in Scotland Anno Dom. 1648. Sess 43. Writs thus Socinianisme is now spread in England As for our sentiment upon the Socinian there was in the ancient Church two Heresies that were most dangerous and prevalent First the Arian then the Pelagian both which the Orthodox Church zealously opposed and justly condemned but the late Socinian hath drunk in all the poyson both of the Arian and Pelagian and much more Secondly That as the Ancient Church did condemne Arius and Pelagius in their Councils and being obstinat Excommunicat them So the Ancient Fathers b Athanasius oratione prima contra Arianos multis probat Arianos non debere dici christianos Idem scribit Theodoretus lib. 2. cap. 16. Fulgentius Hilarius ad Imperatorem Constantium denyed the Arian to deserve the name of Christian yea the moderns both Papists and Lutherians that wrot against the Socinians deny them also to be Christians the same doth Gomarus and Doctor Forbes in his Theological Instructions lib. 10. cap. 13 Sect. 14. denyes the Socinian Baptism to be valid The Professors of Leyden Anno Dom. 1598. gave their judgment of Osterodius the Socinian his Writs that they led Men very near to Turcism and Grotius writing of the Piety of the States of Holland saith Seing Heresie is the Venom of the Church and that suddenly working yet there are degrees in Heresies whereof some are more hurtful then others but a worse Heresie then Socinianism is not to be found at the very mentioning of which all the godly should shrink Against this Heresie not only the Civil Magistrate and Church but also the God of Heaven by His immediate Hand of Providence hath given Testimony the Magistrate hath put them to death not only in the reformed Church but also the Roman Church Thus the Parliament of Pole being informed Anno Dom. 1638. that the Socinians in Racovia had begun to print a Book of Blasphemies against the Sacred Trinity a Libri titulus Tormentum Throno Tritnitatem deturbans they did take from them their Bibliotheck Printinhouse and Press and being many banished them the Town As for the immediate Hand of God upon the Socinian it is remarkable both in Temporal and Spiritual Judgments that some of them were their own Murderers and others of them died in Despair others renunced Christ and turned Mahumetan Thus having spoken of the Socinian remains a word of the Anabaptist and Quaker who also are Blasphemers of the Trinity That the Anabaptists are such the Professors of Leyden are sufficient Witnesses b Profess Leidens disp 23. in antithesi Sabellius Praxias hodie libertini Anabaptistae quidam trinominem Deum statuentes personarum realem distinctionem tollentes modumque tantum patesactionis varium inducentes Patrem incarnatum passumque revera statuunt As for the Quakers who not only are in England and Jreland but even some of them scattered in Scotland It 's well known by many of their own printed Pamphlets and by the Books of others their mad Pranks and Blasphemies and Disputes against the Sacred Trinity for instance The Phanatick History printed at London Anno Dom. 1660. pag. 54. In a publick Dispute at Cambridge they denied the Sacred Trinity with Blasphemies that I abhor to write And Anno Dom. 1657. a Book printed at London by John Stalham called the Reviler rebuked wherein he refutes Quaker Richard Fairnworth who printed and spread a Pamphlet about that time wherein he denied the Holy Ghost to be a Person in the Trinity Therefore as the Universal Church of old did piously and wisely appoint and practise the singing of the Doxology to confirm the Flock of Christ against the dangerous Blasphemies of Arius and other Antitrinitarian Hereticks so to this day the Universal Church do still continue that practice to guard their Flocks against the Blasphemies of Anabaptists and Quakers but especially Socinians who in horrid and hellish Blasphemies out do the old Arian CHAP. VI. The lawfulness of Singing the Doxology proven by these Arguments 1. Because all Christians are baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost 2. They believe or profess their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost 3. They believe Father Son and Holy Ghost to be their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier 4. Their Faith and Hope of Eternal Glory is from Father Son and Holy Ghost 5. God Father Son and Holy Ghost made all things and especially for His Glory 6. This Lord of Glory often calls Man's Tongue His Glory 7. From the practice of the Saints and Angels 8. From God's Command 9. The Appointment and Practice of the Universal Church 10. The indivisibility of the Worship we give to God one in Essence and three Persont illustrate by Fathers and Councils IN the former Chapters I having described the occasion upon which the Universal Church did appoint the singing of the Doxology to wit The abounding of Blasphemers against the Trinity proven in the first three Chapters Secondly The unanimous Agreement of the Church for singing the Doxology in the fourth Chapter and the reason of its continuance in the Church to this day even because the Church ever since hath never altogether wanted some blasphemous Hereticks within the Church besides the Turk and Jew both deniers of the Trinity without the Church Follows the second part of this Treatise which is subdivided thus First I prove by many Arguments the lawfulness of the singing of the Doxology in the sixth seventh eighth ninth and tenth Chapters Secondly I answer some Objections in the eleventh and twelfth Chapters Thirdly I show the many Evils from the refusing to sing the Doxology Lastly I close with an Exhortation to receive with all tenderness all that shall return from their Errors In this and some following Chapters I have accumulate Arguments because I supponed I did write to some Christians weak in Knowledge I say weak in Knowledge because I am loath to judge that any Christian strong in Knowledge will deny its lawfulness unless their Judgement be strangely overclouded by prevalent Prejudice and if any such there be we have also brought Arguments for their perusing We begin with Arguments for the Weak All who are baptized in
were now Christians of understanding as they were Baptized presently in the name of Father Son and Holy Ghost and gave a Confession of their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost that they also in their publick worship did sing Glory to that Father Son and Holy Ghost in whose name they were newly Baptized Some asks the question upon what Text of Scripture the Doxology is chiefly founded for answer It hath two parts to wit The three Persons of the Trinity which are the object of that worship Secondly the Glory given to them which is the Act of worship in the Doxology accordingly the giving of Glory to God is founded on many Scriptures but there is one full and express Rom. 11. the last verse Of him and through him and to him are all things to whom be glory for ever Amen But seing the object of the worship in three distinct Persons of the Trinity is most clear in the Words of the Baptismal institution Matth. last Baptizing them in the Name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost therefore with Athanasius Bazil and the rest of the Greek Fathers we think that the Doxology is chiefly grounded upon that Text in Matthew It is true some of the Learned would build it on that Text Rom. 11. And that because they alleadge the three Persons of the Trinity insinuate here which though it Lombardus lib. 1. senten distinct 36. capitulo 3. putat cum Augustino in lib. 1. de trinitate cap. 6 in loco praedicto 11. capitis ad Romanos indigitari distinctionem trium personarum astibi certum est to loco non satis perspicuum datur fundamentum fidei trium personarum trinitatis pro argumento invincibili quod Eunomius Arianus istam textam citat ut patet Basilei lib. 1. contra Eunominium dum dat confessionem suae fidei pag. 7. Credimus inquit in unum Deum ex quo sunt omnia in unum unigenitum dei filium eundem verbum dominum nostrum Jesum Christum per quam sunt omnia in unum Spiritum Sanctum paracletum Haec Arij confessio fidei in trinitatem subolet hunc locum ad Romanos ipse Arianus prius rumperet quam consiteretur se credere in Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum aut ita proferret Doxologiam ut scribit Basilius were granted that the three Persons are there insinuat yet the other Text being full and express and the strongest Bulwark against the Arian therefore that Text in Matthew is the chief ground for the Doxology for to glorify God according to that Text in the Romans is so general that the Arian could easily subscribe to such a Doxology CHAP. VII The lawfulness of singing the Doxology proven by the Induction of all it's Parts 12. from the three Holies Isa 6. 3. IN this Chapter we prove by Induction that all the Parts of the Doxology are in the Holy Scriptures from whence we deduce this Reason that Divine Glory which in the Holy Scripture is given to Father Son and Holy Ghost that same Divine Glory is lawfull to sing to Father Son and Holy Ghost we prove the assumption that Glory is given to Father Son and Holy Ghost Rom. 11. v. last To God be glory for ever 1 Tim. 1. 17. To God be honour and glory forfor ever and ever Amen 2 Tim. 4. 18. To God be glory for ever and ever 1 Tim. 6. v. 16. To God be honour and power everlasting for ever Jude v. last To God be glory now and for ever Amen Galat. 14. 5. To God and our Father be glory for ever and ever Amen and the same Words Philip. 4. 20. Secondly Glory to God through Christ these words you shall find Rom. 16. v. last Eph. 3. 21. Heb. 13. 20 21. Thirdly To Christ be glory now and for ever Amen 2 Peter 3. v. last Revel 16. Revel 5. 12. He is the Lord of glory 1 Corinth 2. 8. James 2. 1. He is crowned with glory Heb. 2. 9. The Lords glorious branch Isaiah 11. 10. The Holy Ghost Pet. 14. 14. The Spirit of glory is glorified Thus we have proven from Scripture these parts of the Doxology Glory to the Father to the Son and Holy Ghost for now and ever There remains one word to be cleared in the Doxology to wit As it was in the beginning for clearing of which we wrot in the end of the fourth Chapter that these words were added to the Doxology because of Arian Hereticks and that in the fourth Century when Arius denyed that the Son was with the Father from all eternity but affirmed that there was a time when the Son was not and these Ancient Doctors of the Church knowing that the first Words in St. Johns Gospel in these three Verses were indited by the Holy Ghost and written by the Apostle John his Pen-man to assert the Co-eternity of the Son with the Father and that against Ancient Hereticks who lived in the Apostle St. John's time and were Blasphemers of Christ the Church therefore hath made choise of that same Text as fittest against the Arians a Alexander Alexandriae Episcopus Concilij Niceni Membrum Arij Blasphemijs infensissimus in sua Epistola ad omnes ubique gentium fratres scribit Arium asserere tempus aliquando fuisse cum filius Dei non esset quod sic refutat in initio Evangilij Joannis In principio erat verbum itaque non erat tempus cum non esset Socrates lib. 1. cap. 3. Syrmiense concilium in symbolo damnat eos qui dicunt erat tempus aut seculum quando 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non erat ibidem anathemate 25. Si quis dicat Christum ex quo ex Maria natus est initium accepisse ut Deus esset anathema sit ut Samosatenus Ebion Cerinthus Thus have we cleared that all the Words in the Doxology are express Scripture and according thereunto and if any object that it follows not to be lawfully sung in the Church except it were in Scripture all contiguous together as one of the Psalms of David to these in this place I only give this Answer That the reformed Church of France in their publick worship sing the Apostolick Creed turned in Meeter and is therefore printed and bound in with their Psalm Books and yet that Creed is far lesse continued Scripture then the Doxology And the Learned know that the Church of France is famous not only of old time for many glorious Martyres before the Council of Nice but also in the beginning of Reformation from Popery b Origines in hunc locum Is 66. 3. ait hic trinitatem insinuari Athanasius tom 1. operim pag. 154. 255. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proferunt glorificationem dicentes sanctus sanctus sanctus tres personas perfectas ostendunt sub una voce Dominus unam substantiam declarant idque 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in confuse indivise subinnuens nec Angelos
evadere se ommnino abnuere sed instexibiliter desiderare qualis fortitudo in pluribus martyribus fuit conspicua Joy given them from above to the Admiration and Confusion of their their tormenting Enemies 2dly Miracles manifested without them in their Death as the Learned may read in the Church History often the wild beasts refusing to devour them and sometimes the fire to burn them b Hujus instantia in Polycarpi martyrò commemorantur haec miracula in itinere ad ignem voce è Coelo confortatur 2. dum stat in igne ingens flamma ad distantiam corpus circumvallat quasi sanctum dei attingere renuens ita ut miles illud observans flamma crudelior Policarpi corpus hastâ confoderit 3 sancti combusti corpus suavissimum fragrantissimum emisit odorem Euseb hist Eccles lib. 4. cap. 14. Yea 3dly the Lord wrought many Glorious Miracles at the Graves of Martyres after their Death of which there are many Examples in the Church History The Fourth Mean whereas Solomon saith in the multitude of counsellers there is safety Therefore the Doctors of the Primitive Church did meet in Councils as they saw need in this or that Kingdom but sometimes also they did meet more solemnly in greater numbers sometimes 3 or 4. sometimes 600 Bishops together besides moe then the double number of Presbyters and these of the most Learned and Pious Divines that were in the Christian World out of Asia Affrica and Europe by long and perilous journies crossing Sea and Land beginning with a Patres Synodi Nicerni jejunium indixerunt ut Deus utilitati Ecclesiarum consultum vellet Teo doret in ancorato fasting and praying To which Councils respective the then reigning Hereticks were Summoned to appear and appearing were examined anent their Errors their Errors refuted and sometime yet seldome themselves converted but if obstinat their mouths stopped their Errors and Blasphemies condemned and accursed themselves Excommunicat and sometimes also Banished by the supream civil Magistrate and for the furder confirmation of the Faith of following Generations and establishment of the Posterity in the Truth The Church did put in register the proceedings of these famous Councills whether Nationall or Generall against these severall Hereticks As also their severall Acts for Order and Decency which Books are extant to this day in great Volumes As for these Hereticks albeit the Lord did permit them for a season to try His People if they would cleave to His Truth or not Deut. 13. 3. And that the approved might be made manifest 1 Cor. 11 13 Yet the Lord blessed the pains of His faithfull Servants against them So that these Storms were turned to a Calme and these Hereticks wholly made known and He who sets bounds to the proud waves of the Sea set also bounds to Satans Malice and put a hook in the nose of these Blasphemers The Fifth Mean The Lord from Heaven did manifest His Wrath and Indignation signally against some of the speciall Ring-leading Hereticks or else by the hand of the civil Magistrat b Eus lib. 2. cap. 1. 13 14. Egesippus lib. 3. cap. 2. Epiphanius lib. 2. her 22. Simon Magus at Rome by the help of Devils did flee in the Air but fell down and was bruised to death at the prayers of the Apostle Peter Secondly Elimas the Sorcerer was by God miraculously smitten with blindness for his Anti christian perversness Acts 13. 11. c Eus lib. 5. cap. 15 18. Thirdly Montanus and his Prophetess Maximilla hanged themselves d Eus lib. 5. cap. 14. Fourthly Theodotus by force took his flight towards Heaven but fell down and died miserably Fifthly Buddas or Terebinthus Nicen through Sorcery did flie up in the Air but fell down and brake his neck e Socrat. lib. 1. cap. 17. Sixthly Manues a Persian Heretick the King of Persia caused take off his skin flayed alive filled it with Chaffe and hanged it up at the Gate of the City f Socratas lib. 1. cap. 21. Seventhly Arius being observed by the Bishop of Alexandria that he was a dangerous Heretick and mighty proud while he is under Process intends to come to the Church of Alexandria to morrow in a presumptuous manner wherefore the Bishop all that night stayed in the Church with Fasting and Prayers and Tears wrestling against Arius who to morrow going to that Church a sudden Terror of Conscience and vehement louseness of Belly did assault him that he was forced to go aside to the next publick Jacks where all his bowells gushed out a fit Death-bed for so vile an excrement of Satan whose breath had bred the most deadly pestilency that ever was in the World whose manner of Death was a mercy to the World and a Beaken of his Shipwrack fixed by the Almighty upon the dangerous Rock of his Blasphemous Heresie g Prosper in chronico Eightly Priscbillianus Anno Dom 400. being condemned by a Church Council at Burdeaux for his Blasphemies against the Trinity with others of his Stamp was beheaded by the Emperour Maximus All the foresaid Blasphemers of the Trinity the Lord stigmatized with a miserable death to the terror of others CHAP. III. Containeth the rise of the Arian Heresie in the Fourth Century their Persecution and Activity their Falshood Injustice and Cruelty and the prevalent Testimony both of God and His Church against them AS in the first 300. Years after our Lord's Ascension His Church was sore vexed by Ten bloody Persecutions raised by Pagan Emperours and molested by Antitrinitarian Hereticks of which we have given you a short view in the former Chapter So in this fourth Century Satan the Father of Lies Anno Dom. 324. filled the Heart of Arius a proud Presbyter in Alexandria with Blasphemies against the second Person of the Blessed Trinity wherefore the famous Council of Nice consisting of 318. Bishops conveened partly for examining and confounding of Arius Error in the Year 325. where after long dispute granted to the Adversary his blasphemous Error was condemned and he Excommunicate Notwithstanding thereafter his Errors spread like a Gangren and that chiefly by occasion of two Emperours Constantius and Valence whom the Arians seduced to their Heresie and so the Arian obtaining the Arm and Countenance of the Civil Power to their wicked Faction they left no mean unesseyed to encrease and strengthen their Party and spread their Poison which we intend to treat of in this Chapter in these particulars First Their indefatigable pains in conveening Church Councils Secondly The Falshood and Injustice in their Proceedings Thirdly Their hellish Policies Fourthly Their monstruous Cruelty against the Orthodox Fifthly The Lord 's witnessing against them both by His Church and His own immediate Hand of Justice upon them To return to the first of these in imitation of the Orthodox and true Church like Satan they transformed themselves into Angels of Light did conveen Councils sometime in one City and Kingdom and sometime in another
malice in stirring up Hereticks against the Sacred Trinity and Mans Naturall weakness and pronness to listen to Error and believe Lies especially against the blessed Trinity most prudently and Piously aggreed and unanimously to sing the Doxology to the blessed Trinity in the publick Worship of God to be a Witness against the Arian and other Blasphemers of the Trinity and for Confirmation of the Orthodox and sound Believers in the True Faith for Singing Glory to God Father Son and Holy Ghost being in it self a Lawfull and Holy unquestionable Duty of Christians albeit there were neither Heretick to oppose and Blaspheme the Trinity nor Devil to tempt them to that wicked Deed then finding both wicked Men and Devils by Experience enemies to that found and saving Truth makes the singing of the Doxology besides it's Lawfulness and Expediency to be most usefull and edifying for the People of God and a strong preservative against Antitriâ—itarian Heresies Here we are not to think that the Doxology or praising of the Holy Trinity was not used by the Doctors of the Church these burning and shining Lights before and beside the publick singing in the Church for the Sacred Trinity being the great Fundamental of the Christian Faith and object of Divine Worship these Doctors ordinarily closed their Prayers or Sermons or other Writtings with the Doxology Anno Dom. 165. Policarpus Bishop of Smirna who had been the Disciple of the beloved Disciple St John dying a glorious Martyre in presence of many thousand Jews Pagans and Christians ready to step into the Fyre closed his heavenly Prayer thus I glorifie thee through the everlasting high Priest Jesus Christ thy welbeloved Son to whom with the and the Holy Ghost be all Glory World without end Amen Here this blessed Martyr not only sealled the Doctrine of the blessed Trinity with his Death but also the Blessed Glorious Trinity Father Son and Holy Ghost Sealled that same Faith of this Faithfull Martyr with many miracles at his Death of which we wrot in the second Chapter b Eus lib. 4. hist cap. 19. About the Year of Christ 190. Clemens Alexandrinus writeth thus Let us praise Father Son and Holy Ghost who one is all and in whom are all altogether Good Beautifull Wise and Just to whom be Glory now and for ever a lib. 3. paedagog In the Year of Christ 325. The famous Councill of Nice having condemned Arius and his Blaspheming Associats for denying the Co-eternity of the Son and Holy Ghost with the Father they writ a Synodical Letter to the Churches of Alexandria Aegypt Lybia and Pentapolis which they close with a Doxology to the Sacred Trinity Thus By the help of God the Father Almighty and our Lord Jesus Christ with the grace of the Holy Ghost to whom be glory for ever Amen b Socrat. lib. 1. cap. 6. Theodoret lib. 1. cap. 9. The Synodical Epistle of the Council of Illyricum closeth thus these things are inacted to the glory of the Father Son and Holy Ghost for ever 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sozemen lib. 3. cap. 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sozomen closeth the Preface to his Church History to Christ with God the Father and Holy Ghost be Glory for ever Amen c Macarius a Church-man in Aegypt who lived in the reign of Constantine and Constantius closeth his 12th 16th and 17th Homolies with the Doxology About the Year of Christ 360. in the Church of Antioch being a Patriarchall See at Publick Worship were conveened most part Orthodox but some Arians mixed with them when they came to that part of the Worshhip which a Chronologer d Nicephorus Hist Ecclesiast lib. 9. cap 24. Ait eos cecinisse Doxologiam ad sinem Psalmodij writes was immediatly after their singing the Psalm then the Orthodox did sing the Doxology Glory to the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost according to the Doctrine of the Nicen Council But the Arians who were with them in the Church differing from the Orthodox sang Glory to the Father by the Son thereby purposing that the Father was greater then the Son which difference in the singing being perceived by Leontius e Leontius tametsi sordibus Arianae blasphemiae fuit inquinatus tamen eas callide admodum occultare studuit Etenim cum clerum Laicam etiam multitudinem in duas partes divisam cerneret Orthodoxos adhibentes conjunctionem Filio Spiritui Sancto Arianus vero ante Filium Per ante Spiritum Sanctum In. praeponere Ipse totam glorisicationem tacitus secum recitavit adeo ut qui ei proximi erant solum hanc particulam in secula seculorum audirent haec Theodoretus lib. 2. cap. 24. Ex Athanasio Regnante Anastasio diuterius Arianorum Constantinop Episcopus cum quendam Barbam nomine baptizare intenderet spreta dominica institutione diceret baptizatur Barbas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc dicto aqua in columbethra evanuit Barbas vero arreptâ fugâ exivit miraculum hoc cunctis significavit Haec scribit Theodorus lector in collectaveris lib. 2. Nicephorus calisti lib. 16. hist Eceles cap. 35. then Bishop of Antioch and inclining to Arianisme putting his hand to his Gray Hairs said when this snow is melted there will be much Mire by Age and Experience and Humane Prudence he did foresee the Storm of the Arian persecution of which I have spoken somewhat in the 3d. chap. of this Treatise for the Orthodox did sing the Doxology according to the Words of our Saviour in the Gospel in the Words of His Divine Institution of Baptisme Matth. 28. 19. All three in one manner to the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost but the Arian did sing Glory to the Father by the Son in the Holy Ghost where observe that the Arian as yet did not altogether refuse to sing the Doxology upon any pretended reason or scruple of Conscience as some men do now but it is like the singing of the Doxology was then performed by the Orthodox with such Zeall and unanimity that the Arian was as yet afraid or ashamed altogether to refuse the singing of it as some now do Basil the great who lived in the Year of Christ 369. in his Book concerning the Holy Ghost cap. 27. He writs that the most ancient Fathers did sing Gods praise to Father Son and Holy Ghost according to the Word in Baptism and these two great Doctors Basil and Chrysostom who were contemporary Bishops in the Greek Church each of them wrot a Greek Leturgy being their Mother tongue which both are used at this day in all the Christian Churches of the World that are within the Greek Communion a In Lyturgia St. Basil prope finem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The one Lyturgy on the Sabbath Dayes b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The other Lyturgy on all other Solemn Dayes and in both these Lyturgyes the Doxology was and still is used these 1300 Years without
parte 2. Bishops some he burnt to Ashes and some of them their Tongues were pulled out who flying to Constantinople spoke miraculously as if they had had Tongues g Evagrius lib. 4. cap. 14 15. Anno 448. The Eutichians in Alexandria slew the Orthodox Bishop Proterius in the Church harled his body throgh the Streets and gnashed his Bowels with their Teeth a Evagrius lib. 2. cap. 8. Anno 496. Many Manicheans who also were Blasphemers of the blessed Trinity were detected at Rome and their Books burnt Honoricus King of the Vandalls in Africk being Arian banished at once 5000. Orthodox Christians b Centuria Magdeburgesis Anastasius the Emperour Anno Dom. 520. Commanded not a Trinity but a Quaternity to be worshipped he was smitten with a thunder bolt and so dyed in his wicked Reign 300. Orthodox were killed and some Orthodox Bishops banished c Petrus Diaconus Platina d Centuria Magdeburgensis Centuria 6. cap. 8. Theodoricus Arian King of the Gothes in Italy persecuted the Orthodox there and the King of the Arian Gothes in Spain slew his own natural Son for turning Orthodox e Magdeburgensis Centuriâ—s centuria 6. cap. 9. The Gothes in Spain who had long persecut the Orthodox Christian they were at last converted to the true Faith Anno 585. In the seventh Century the Monotholites which were a Branch of the Eutichian Heresie troubled the true Church for the Emperour Constance was a Monotholite and also Heraclius Arjovaldus King of Lambards was an Arian Anno Dom. 640. Rotharius another of their Kings was Arian also in the seventh Century beside the trouble that the Church endured from the Eutichian and Monotholite Hereticks which were chiefly in the Eastern Church at Constantinople and Alexandria so be the Arians in Italy In this Century arose Mahamet and composed his Alcaran Anno Dom. 622. In which Blasphemously they deny the blessed Trinity These not only spread and prevailed mightily in Asia and Africk but also crossed the Hellespont and molested Greece both with the Sword and Blasphemies yea also they crossed the Mediterranian over against Spain and Italy at last Anno Dom. 829. came over with a Navy from the Coast of Barbary and spoiled Rome and returned to Africk with the Prey and again Anno Dom. 845. f Palmerius in chronico came over and spoiled Rome the 2d time and Anno Dom. 933. came over the third time and spoiled Genoa In the 7th Century the Orthodox Church gave Testimony against Hereticks in a Council held at Rome Anno Dom. 650. of a 100 Bishops and upward where the Monotholites and the Antitrinitarians were condemned and another there of 125. Bishops and a third at Constantinople Anno Dom. 681. of 150. Bishops And as the true Church gave Testimony against the Antitrinitarian Hereticks so the Lord from Heaven by His signal Judgements For First Honoricus King of Vandalls in Africk an Arian and cruel persecuter of the Orthodox was long tormented with Venemous Boils at last was consumed with Worms and so ended his wretched Life Secondly in this same Century Theodoricus King of the Gothes in Italy a vile Arian having murdered an Orthodox Noble Man Senatour named Symachus thereafter shortly sitting at Table the head of a great Fish dressed in a Dish set before him which he imagined to be the head of Symachus and was so stupified that he dyed with fear Abaliardus a professor in Paris about the year 1143. wrot Blasphemously against the blessed Trinity whom Bernard refuted and then there conveened a Council of Church-men in France where he was confuted convinced converted a Caranza folio 258. In the Year 1215. in the Council of Lateran Joachim Abbas his Erronious Book against the Trinity was condemned to which he submitted b Caranza folio 260. If it be objected that seing in the Church History and Councils from the seventh Century to the fifteenth there is only mention of two Antitrinitarian Hereticks and consequently these Blasphemous Heresies being now banished and buried and seing it is granted that the Doxology was first appointed to be sung in the Church by occasion of Antitrinitarian Hereticks for confirming in the Faith the Lords People against their Blasphemies why then was it any longer continued after the cause was removed I answer because the Church then perceived by comfortable experience that the constant singing of the Doxology in the Publick Worship of God had proved an excellent mean to confirm Christians in the Doctrine and Faith of the Trinity and to guard them against the temptations of Satan and his supposts and their own corruption who were all yet lying in wait to blow at the Ashes of the little spunks of the said old Blasphemies that seemed to be buried many hundred years before This is Calvins Metaphore and accordingly it came to passe for in the year of Christ 1531. Satan did fill the heart and furnished the pen of a Spaniard Servetus with the Blasphemies and black Venome of that Old Serpent and now we intend to begin the 2d Part of this Chapter and to manifest to every Christian Reader that if the universal Church had good cause to appoint the singing of the Doxology because of the Blasphemies of the Arians against the Sacred Trinity So now in this old and doting Age of the World the Church have much cause to continue that ancient practice for the new and late opposers of this blessed Trinity in this Age are more blasphemous then ever the old Arian was of which the rise and growth in Europe we intend to give you a summar account First That Spaniard Servetus being a Physician by profession travelled 30. Years in Pole Hungary and Transalvania practising Medicine but infecting Souls with his Blasphemies a worse disease then all his Bodily Cures For which he was first apprehended and imprisoned at Lions in France but escaped Prison there afterward having written some Books against the Sacred Trinity he was apprehended at Geneva for his Blasphemies and obstinancy in them was condemned by the Magistrat and burnt quick Anno Dom. 1553. a Beza Epist 81. Genevas just punishing of him is approven by the Cantons of Tygurie b Calvin Epist 157. Scaffusium c Calvin Epist 158 Melancton and d Calvin Epist Aecolampadius rcfuts him and Calvin also in his Institutiones Opuscula and Melanthon in his Fourth Volumne who in the Year 1556. writs to the Vesalians vulgo the Veisle that if any maintained Servetus Errors he should be expelled out of their Town and Cardinal Hosius one of the three that presided in the Council of Trent in his Works follo 352. Writs that Servetus justly deserved so to die for his Blasphemies and Beza gives a just but black Testimony of him e Beza Epist 81. In unico Serveto revocati sunt ab inferis Somasatenus Arius Eutiches Marcion Apollinaris quod ibidem erudite probat inductione comparativa Servetus having strongly fermented
of Faith to be allowed and accepted of God and to be comfortable to your Soul for I suppone it well grounded on the Word of God His Promise and Command whosoever believes in Christ shall be saved John 3. 16. and John 6. 40. But I John such a one believe in Jesus Christ therefore I John such a one shall be saved the General Promise is express in the Word but not your two following Acts of Faith builded thereon and yet you will assume they are Acts of true Faith and for the first of the two it 's truth is best known to your selves who are alone privy to that heart secret of yours 1 Cor. Chap. 2. 11. For all within the visible Church say I believe in Christ â—ccording to the Apostles Creed received by the universal Church for an Act of true Faith and yet a great part speak not truly This is a sad but sure Truth but as truely as thou believes in Christ it is assuredly as true thou shall be saved then if I grant that your Act whereby you believe to be saved is True Faith and rightly believed by you albeit it is not express in in your Bible then why shall not this be an Act of Faith when a Christian believes it is lawfull to sing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost albeit these words be not express in the Bible altogether but deduced from the Scripture by infallible consequence I could proceed further in this point but because the Babes are not able to bear it and the Learned are fully clear in this Truth I shall not insist and these who will not assent to the Truth the defect is in themselves and not in the Truth for Children so long as they are such will think speak and understand as Children for which the strong Christian should not despise the Babes but consider they were once Babes themselves and on the other hand the Children should not presume nor overwean themselves nor judge uncharitably of the strong but that they sing the Doxology in Faith grounded on a strong Scriptural Consequence as when the weak Christian takes his Sacrament and I request the weak Christian to think soberly of himself when David a Man according to Gods own heart said in sincerity Psalm 131. 2. I have quieted my self as a child that is weaned of his mother and if ye will ask wherein he so behaved he tells you himself he did not aspired things too high for him If every Christian would do so there would be more peace in the Church CHAP. XI The Reasons why the General Assembly was not in power to lay aside the Doxology proving their great reluctancy to their own deed with several other circumstances alleviating the same IN this Chapter we are to answer the Grand Objection to wit That the singing of the Doxology in the publick worship of God was laid aside by the Generall Assembly of this Church Anno Dom. 1649. To this my first answer is that Assembly hath fourty two Sessions mentioned in the Index of the imprinted Acts thereof but the laying aside of the Doxology is not mentioned in the Printed Acts of that Assembly nor yet in the index of the imprinted Acts therefore seing there is no mention in the Register of the Church to prove to Posterity that the Doxology was laid aside it may put some to demurr in that affair seing there is no legal proof of it extant 2 dly I answer though the laying aside of the Doxology was res gesta yet seing there is not a word of it in the Register of the Church the laying of it aside will come under the Notion of an unwritten Tradition to Posterity 3 dly I answer That it is to be considered whether or not the Generall Assembly was in potestate and had lawfull power to lay aside the Doxology for in their National Covenant they grant their Religion as reformed at the first expelling of Idolatry and was Ratified in Parliament in Anno Dom. 1560. And it 's Confession of Faith to be Christs true and perfect Religion that they shal adhere to it all their dayes to which they bind themselves with Solemn and fearfull Curses but so it is That at the said Reformation in the Lyturgy then appointed and Printed at the beginning of the Psalm Book Glory to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost as it was in the beginning is now and aye shall last is extant in Print yea in that Psalm Book of the Church of Scotland of the old Edition there is great variety of the Meeter Poesies and lest any of them having their diverse Tune should want the Doxology sung at the close of it each of these diverse Poesies have a diverse Doxology one in substance with the ordinar Doxology but differing in some words being framed to be sung according to the particular musical Tunes all which Doxologies were in use in the Church of Scotland after the Reformation which Book is yet extant Printed at Aberdeen cum privilegio in Anno Dom. 1638. So that the National Covenant compared with our first Reformation engadgeth us in all Scotland not to quite the Doxology under the pain of perjury as for that foresaid Lyturgy of Scotland which was Printed and bound in with the Psalm Book it was drawn up by the General Assembly Anno Dom. 1560. and 1555 and 1567. The Fourth Answer The General Assembly 1639. August 30. Which day that Assembly hath enacted thus The General Assembly considering that the intended Reformation being recovered may be established Ordains that no Innovation which may disturbe the peace of the Church and make division be suddenly proponed or enacted but so as the motion be first communicat to the severall Synods Presbytries and Churches that the matter may be approven by all at home and Commissioners may come well prepared unanimously to conclude with settled deliberation upon these points in the general Assembly Which Act of Assembly as it was prudently made so accordingly practised thereafter for in the General Assembly Anno Dom. 1642. August 6. There are four Overtures Printed with the Acts of that Assembly to be advised by Presbyters against the next Assembly So that his laudable Act was carefully obeyed in other things but not so in laying aside the Doxology For it was done abruptly without the knowledge or advertisement of particular Churches Presbytries or Synods who should have been acquainted before and canvassed the matter before any thing had been determined in the General Assembly anent the Doxology and the laying of it aside which was an innovation suddenly proponed and instantly passed to the discomforming division of themselves from all transmarin Protestants yea and from the universal Church Fifthly In the Solemn League and Covenant of Scotland and England approven by the General Assembly of Scotland Anno. Dom. 1643. August 17. In the said League and Covenant with hands lifted up to the most high God they swear sincerely and constantly to
endeavour the preservation of the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in Worship but then the Church of Scotland in their Worship did sing the Doxology to endeavour the Reformation of Religion in England and Ireland in Worship c. according to the Example of the best Reformed Churches but then and to this day the best Reformed Churches did use and still use the Doxology in the Worship of God as is to be seen in the particular Psalm Books in Helvetia Geneva France and Holland c. Here in the Solemn League and Covenant are two tyes on the Covenanters in both Nations to use the Doxology Sixthly The same General Assembly Anno Dom. 1643 After their approbation of the League and Covenant in their Answer to the Syned of Divines in England August 19 Writ thus That you may be more closely united to the best Reformed Churches in Worship c. But so it was that Scotland and the best Reformed Churches did then and to this day use the Doxology and in another Letter of the said Assembly to the Parliament of England they writ thus That the Purpose and End of the League and Covenant is for setling and holding fast of Unity and Uniformity betwixt the Churches of this Island and the best Reformed Churches beyond Sea but all these Churches beyond Seas did then and still does to this day sing the Doxology then surely the Church of Scotland even after their taking the League and Covenant as it did tye them to keep the Doxology so they sincerely purposed to keep it and their practice was conform Seventhly The General Assembly Anno Dom. 1645. Feb. 3. post merid Sâ—ss â—o By their Act they establish the putting in execution the Directory notwithstanding in the close of that Act they dissent from England expresly in two particulars anent the manner of giving the Lords Supper As also Sess 16. Of that Assembly they freely dissent from the Westminster Synod in other two particulars as also they provide that this shall be to prejudice to the Order and Practice of this Church in such particulars as re appointed by the Books of Discipline and Acts of General Assemblies and are not otherwise ordered and appointed in the Directory And this Act is not only to be found Printed in the General Assembly Anno 1645 But also the said Directory was Printed at Edinburgh in the said Year by Order both of Church and State and the foresaid Act of the General Assembly of Scotland Printed and prefixed to it Now among thâ—se particulars in which the Church of Scotland preserveth her Right and protests timously norwithstanding the Derectory and wherein the Directory hath not appointed other wayes the singing of the Doxology and the ordinar manner of Blessing the Lords People at the close of the Publick Worship are two for neither of which are particularly ordered in the Directory contrarily as for the Doxology no mention to sing it or not to sing it 2 dly For the blessing of the Congregation these are their Words Let the Minister dismiss the Congregation with a solemn blessing but no particular word of a Directory mentioning either the blessing in the Old Testament Numb 6. 24 25. Or in the New Testament 2 Corinth 13 14. As they are both mentioned in their express words in our Scots Lyturgy at our Reformation pag. 29 As also the said Scots Lyturgy hath the Doxology Printed in the Psalm Book so that both from the National Covenant and Solemn League and Covenant from many Acts of General Assemblies and Letters of the said Assembly it is without doubt and notour that the Church of Scotland when they laid aside the Doxology were no wayes in power to do it but on the contrare by both Covenants and many other previous Oaths of their own oblidged still to retain it and not by quitting of it so far as to have made a Schism from the Reformed Churches with which they had Solemnly sworn to keep Union in Worship but beside all these Tyes of their own Vowes and Promises willingly taken by themselves which does denude them of all Liberty and Power to lay aside the Doxology I bring this Reason to wit As the General Assembly of this Church did bind up their own hands from laying aside the Doxology by both Covenants and many Acts of General Assemblies beside so there are Reasons brought from the substance of their deed to invalid at the same as First there is a Rule in the Word of God Whether ye eat or ye drink do all to the glory of God Then every Church Act should be done to the Glory of God then the tenor of this Church Act must come to this for the Glory of God we lay aside singing Glory to God Father Son and Holy Ghost this is a hard saying and like a Paradox For he that offereth praise glorifieth me Psalm 50 13. 2dly Consider that the Almighty can and does make Lawes to His Creature and His Will and infinit Goodnesse is a sufficient Reason to Him stat pro ratione voluntas but Men both in Church and State they and their Laws both are subject to Censure and control of the Supream Law-giver and therefore Mens Laws ordinarly have a Rational Narrative on which they are founded for all good Laws are founded upon good Reasons and Reasonable Men should be led by reasonable Laws especially when they are invalidating one former Law or Decree not out of use or forgotten but used for many Years with approbation yea even to that very hour Then this Law required a very grave and weighty Narrative but the Act for laying aside the Doxology had no such Rational Narrative and in so far it is invalidat from having the essentiall of an Act for it is like they could not have a rational Narrative for it therefore it was the prudency of the General Assembly to buâ—y in silence both the Act and it 's Narrative This shews their unwillingness to the thing and therefore I hope there may the rather an Act of Oblivion or rescissory passe upon their imprinted Act. Thirdly We challenge the Roman Church that they lean too much to unwritten Traditions but I fear they may retort the Argument upon us that some of the Reformed Church adhere too much to unwritten Tradition for the layinâ— aside of the singing of the Doxology is not in the Word of God nor in any Act of the Church and therefore if there be any unwritten Tradition owned by the Reformed Church this must be it For why some people make as much dinn and reluctancy to sing the Doxology as some of the Roman Church does for keeping of their unwritten Traditions 4. No particular Church in this or that Kingdom hath power to change any thing in the Publick Worship of God without the consent of the Supream Civil Magistrate â—â—umble not at this for it is the Doctrine of the Church of Geneva a Theses Genev. Bâ—zae Anno Dom. 1586. cap.
the Lord is His Word to obey the Magistrat in things lawful and also according to your refusal it is good Conscience to disobey the Magistrat therefore be pleased to consider that there is a twofold superstition First positive which is most ordinar to which the old Pharisees were much addicted There is also a negative superstition of which we have example Colos 2. 19. Touch not taste not handle not there is an other example of the same Rom. 14. 3. Where ye will find a superstidious eat not upon consideration of which two Texts see that your refusing to sing the Doxology come not in in that category sing not in which place ye may find a controversy betwixt two sorts of Christians the strong in knowledge and the weak the strong Christian believes that he may can any thing and not ask question or scruple for Conscience sake and him the Apostle approveth and alloweth for him the Apostle defends against the weak Christian in the end of the 3. verse God hath received him to wit the strong Christian and albeit the weak Christian who is stiff through his ignorance to eat not yet the Apostle condemns him because he proudly and ignorantly thought these things unclean whereas the Apostle sayes they were not unclean and therefore the strong made no scruple but eat and is approven of God So in the 14. verse of this 14. Chapter the weak thought that unclean which was not unclean and therefore refused to eat it then apply this to your own Consciences who sayes sing not because your Conscience thinks it unlawfull to sing when we have proven already that it is both lawfull and expedient See then that ye are not as wrong with your sing not as these weak Christian Romans were with their eat not The strong Christian thinks it clean to sing and dutifull and is approven of God ye think it unclean and unlawfull and are not approven of God because ye obey not the Magistrat in that which is lawfull and I pray you consider in the 14. verse of that Chapter the Apostles vehement and emphatick expression I know and am perswaded by the Lord Jesus Christ that there is nothing unclean of it self So I know and am perswaded with the universall Church that the Doxology is not unclean nor the singing of it an unclean Action and though ye judge him that singeth God hath saved him In these two ranks of Christians strong in knowledge and weak I perceive a fault in each of them mutually toward the other vers 3. The weak judged or condemned the strong for the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies both as if they had been sinning in their eating and as people that made no conscience of their doings So beware it be not your sin proudly and ignorantly to condemn them that sings as it were a sin There was a sin also on the other hand in the strong that despised the weak for their refusing to eat because of their scrupulous and ignorant conscience therefore it is my humble request to all that sing the Doxologie that none of them despise or set at nought him that singeth not upon meer ignorance his conscience being sincere for despising is a sin against Christian love therefore even these who in great weakness sing not yet bestow Christian love on them and still the more if ye see any sign of Christ in them and be willing to instruct them in the spirit of meekness for which cause I have written these lines for your information and am to exhort you to tenderness with them in the last Chapter And if any object that there is some diversity and difference betwixt particular Churches which viosits not Christian union as in some Churches they kneel at the receiving of the Lords Supper in another Church they sit in the third they stand I answer albeit diverse Churches in diverse Kingdoms have diverse wayes yet no Church in one and the same Kingdom allows such a latitude as this receive the Communion standing or not standing as you please but every Church have their settled way and uniformity otherwayes it would violat the Apostles rule let all things be done in order and decency 1 Cor. 14. vers last and make confusion of which God is not the Author as it is vers 33. of that same Chapter and according a Justinianum lib 4. cap. 10. § 27. Si Ecclesiae incolumitati bene prospectum volumus diligenter omnino curandum est ut decenter omnia secundum ordinem fiant at cum in hominum moribus tanta in sit diversitas tanta in animas varietas tanta in ingeniis judiciisque pugna neque politia ulla firma est nisi certis legibus constituta nec nisi stata quadam forma servari ritus quispiam potest Calvin writes judiciously that there cannot be order and decency unless there be one certain state form so that this difference in some Churches one from another will not allow in the same Church some to sing the Doxologie some not For as Calvin did sing it to the day of his death so neither at that time nor never before it was the singing of the Doxologie called in question 2 Answer Albeit the universal Church hath judged some things of less moment then that the universal Church should be tyed to an uniformity in them because Church Communion might be kept firm amongst diverse Churches notwithstanding that they differed in some smaller particulars of which Socrates in his Church History lib. 5. cap. 21. writes at length which the Learned know yet there are some things belonging to the Church of so weighty and important concernment that the universal Church judged it no wayes expedient that particular Churches should be left to their own choise but that the universal Church should agree upon one certain way wherein all particular Churches might keep uniformity according to the rule of Gods Word for order and decency and peace and therefore the learned know what contentions fell out in the second Century betwixt the Church in the West and the Churches in lesser Asia for these in lesser Asia kept their Feast of Easter the same day that the Jews kept their Passover but the Christians in the West kept their Feast of Easter upon the first Sabbath day thereafter And albeit in this mean time the foresaid West and East Churches their judgement and practice was diverse upon that matter yet on both sides they who were strong in knowledge still kept Church Communion one with the other as Socrates proves learnedly in the foresaid Book and Chapter so that Polycarpus Bishop of Smyrna afterwards a glorious Martyr of Jesus Christ albeit he did celebrat Easter in that same day with the Jews Passover as ordinarily did all his Neighbour Bishops in lesser Asia yet coming to Rome he Communicat with their Bishop upon their Christian Sabbath day which differed from his day of giving the Communion at home but because there