Aharonicall garments but onely in obedience to the King his Maiestie and those with whom God hath left authoritie to determine of externall Rites of the Church yet according to Gods word and further that they doe it to auoid the scandall of troubling the publike order and agreement and last of all testifying to godly men that euery creature of God is good and therefore all Christians may vse such things godly howsoeuer others haue impiously abused them Idem ibid. in Epistol ad Cranmer fol. 682. Againe I can by no meanes affirme these garments by Antichrists abuse to bee so defiled that they are not to bee permitted to any Church notwithstanding that that Church knoweth and worshippeth Christ and withall knoweth and practiseth the Christian libertie of all things Neither doe I see any Scripture whereby I may defend this condemnation of the good creature of God Ibid. in Respons ad liter as Hooperi de re vestiariaÌ„ fol. 707. To make it impium perse an euill thing in nature for a man to vse these garments in Gods seruice in any respect I see no Scripture to permit or affirme so much ibid. fol. 709. § Againe I verely as I haue confessed vnto you and declared to our Countreymen had rather that no kind of vesture which the Papists vsed were reteined amongst vs for the more full detestation of the Antichristian Priesthood for plainer aduouching of Christian libertie for the auoyding of dangerous contention among the Brethren Yet I cannot be brought by any Scriptures as farre as to see hitherto to denie that the true Ministers of Christ his Church may vse without superstition and to a certaine edification of faith in Christ any of those vestures which the Antichristians abused Idem in Epist Io. Alasco at the ende of the examination a booke so named and written in answere of a booke called the vnfolding of the Popes attire Againe I know very many Ministers of Christ most godly men who haue vsed godly these vestures and at this day doe vse them So that I dare not for this cause ascribe vnto them any fault at all much lesse so hainous a fault as communicating with Antichrist For the which fault wee may vtterly refuse to communicate with them in Christ Ibid. Peter Martyr Seeing these garments are things in different and in themselues good they neither make any man godly nor wicked yet as you also thinke I iudge it rather expedient that these garments and other things of that kind be remooued when conueniently they may that matters of the Church may much more simply bee perfourmed Loc. com ad finem inter Epist. Amico fol. 1085. Againe the reasons by you Bishop Hooper alleadged perswade me not to holde the vse of these garments to bee pernitious or in their nature contrary to the word of God which I suppose to be altogether indifferent being not ignorant of this that things indifferent may sometimes be vsed and sometimes should bee remooued Ibid. Hoopero fol. 1086. Againe albeit I doe but slenderly approue these of garments yet I perceiue somtimes that some indifferent things albeit troublesome and burde some yet must needs bee borne with thus farre foorth as wee cannot doe otherwise lest if it be contended more bitterly then it ought to be it prooue to be an hinderance vnto the Gospel and by our vehement contention we teach those things to be impious which in their nature are indifferent Ibidem Againe surely to mee it should bee farre more pleasing as I haue often testified that wee might onely doe those things which Christ himselfe practised and deliuered to his Apostles Howbeit if some indifferent things be added such as the Surplesse I would not haue men too eagerly to contend about this matter especially when we see those by whom the light of the Gospel is much furthered in England and may yet more bee furthered to oppose themselueâ— to vs heerein Ibid. fol. 1085. Againe First I exhort that you withdraw not your selfe from your calling to the Bishopricke which is offered you in regard of the wonderfull penury of able Ministers Whence this mischieâ—e will come that if you that are the pillars of the Church pull backe and refuse to execute the Ecclesiasticall affaires both the Churches will bee distitute of faithfull Pastours and you shall giue toome to Wolues and Antichrists after Concerning the square Cappe and externall Apparrell of Bishops I suppose that it ought not much to bee disputed of seeing it is free from superstition and may haue a ciuill reason especially in this Kingdome of England Touching the holy Garments as they call them I wonder that they bee so strictly retained For I wish that all things in Gods worship may be perfourmed with greatest simplicitie Howbeit when I thinke with my selfe that if reconcilement in points of doctrine might be made betweene the Saxon Churches and ours there would be no separation for such garments as these For albeit wee like them not a whit yet wee would beare with their vse among them and gratulate our selues that wee haue abolishâ—d them Wherefore you may lawfully vse these garments either in preaching or in administring the Lords Supper yet so as you proceed to speake and teach against the inconuenience in the vse of them Idem ibid. fol. 1127. amico in Angliam Caluin of Bishop Hooper As I commend his constancy in refusing vnction and annealing so I had rather that hee had not so exceedingly contended de pileo veste linea about the square Cap and Surplesse Epist 120. fol. 217. Againe to Melancth To that you say the Magdeburg Ministers doe moue brawles about a linnen garment onely I see not whereto such brawles of theirs did appertaine or tend a little before It may be some will vrge some things as in contentions it came to passe will odiously ventilate some ceremonies wherein there is not so much euill as they pretend Epist. 17. fol. 213. Also although at first Caluin being demanded his iudgement de rebus adiaphoris of things indifferent in the Saxon Churches such as Surplesse c. did freely manifest his iudgement and admonish Melancthon whom some accused as to soft and too remisse for hee perswaded to conformitie rather then to suffer depriuation vt superius yet saith Beza they accused him immerito quidem very vndeseruedly as afterwards Caluin knew more thorowly For then it was not known with what intention that euill spirit and whole troope of Flaccians which perswaded rather to be depriued then conforme which after occasioned so many tumults and now saith Beza at this time doth hinder the worke of God against the Papists with that impudency and fury as if he had beene hired with large summes vnto it by the Pope of Rome Beza in vit Caluin anno 1540. Beza But if any man demand whether nothing at all of those things which are indifferent in themselues may bee retained at least for the sake of the weake and whether I thinke the ministry rather
Leiser They permit allow and defend the Baptisme of Women Colloqu Mompelgart fol. 499. Conrad Schlusselb lib. 1. cap. 18 fol. 60. They vse the old hallowed Fonts to baptize in Berne and Lansanna Beza in vita Caluini anno 1538. and euerie where They haue such as vndertake for childrens education in Baptisme commonly called Godfathers Caluin Ep. 302. fol. 491. So in the Lowe Countries as appeareth in Actis inferioris Germaniae M. Can. 41. anno 1581. apud Sculting Anachr Hierarch lib. 9. Touching the Lords Supper THey vse kneeling at the Communion in all the Lutheran Churches Harmon confess Bohem. § 14. fol. 120 and that is the more dangerous because of their doctrine of consubstantiation They vse the Wafer cake as the Papists doe in the Church of Geneua Bez. in vita Caluin They giue it in priuate and vnto the sicke Schluselb lib. 1. cap. 30. fol. 161 162. Harm confess § 16. Witenberg fol. 197. Yea they gaue it vnto onely two ibid. § 14. fol. 146. They retaine the name of Missa the Masse Harm confess § 14. fol. 107. Augustan They keepe none backe from the Communion be they neuer so scandalous of life in the Churches of Heluetia in libello de ritibus Eccles Tigur fol. 16. The ministers doe put in the Bread and Wine into the mouthes of the Communicants ibid. fol. 15. Touching the holy Scripture THey make the Epistle to the Hebrewes and that of Solom Gesner compend de Script fol. 11. Iames and the second and third of Iohn and Iude with the Apocalyps to be either Apocryphals or at least of more doubtful authority then other parts of Scripture in the Lutheran Churches Chemnit Enchir. fol. 63. propositiones Marpurg tom 1. Hunnij fol. 3. tom 2. Winkelman fol. 5. Laelius de verbo Dei proposit 22. fol. 113. propos 22. 130. They reade the Scriptures after the forme of Epistles and Gospels in the Churches of the Lutherans Heluetians Nassouians Countie Palatines as appeareth by the Epistle of Luther Melancthon Heming Gualt Oleuian Textor So Harm confess § 1. fol. 9. Bohem. lib. de ritibus Eccles Tigur fol. 4. They reade publikely the Apocryphal Books of Scripture in the Church Touching prayer and Leturgie THey retaine the forme of their Leturgie like vnto the Masse booke Harm confess § 14. fol. 127. Augustan fol. 131. ibid. Looke the Booke de ritibus Eccl. Tigur fol. 12 13 15 16. they haue the Angelicall Hymne Gospels gloria Patri gloria tibi Domine after the Gospel c. They haue sundry prayers and Hymnes in the Latine tongue Harm confess § 14. fol. 127. Aug. They haue the vse of Waxe candles in the Lutheran and Danish Churches Heming syntag 4. lex Decal § 33. fol. 365. Simlerus de vita Bulling fol. 34. They vse the Surplesse Heming ibid. Simler ibid. They vse no singing of Psalmes in some Churches of Heluetia in lib de ritibus Eccle. Tigur fol. 9. b. They suffer and doe vse priuate prayers at burials ibid. fol. 27. a. b. Touching Churches THeir old Churches idolatrously abused standing East and West with the Chancell and in forme of a Crosse retained euery where They retaine Images in their Churches and maintaine a lawfull vse of them Colloq Mompelg fol. 390 403 404. Schlusheb Theolog. Calu. li. 1. cap. 10. fol. 35. 36. Eckhard Fasc quaest cap. 8. quaest 3. Heming syntag 4. lex Decal § 33. fol. 365. Siml b. sup They retaine Altars in stead of the Communion Table so placed in the Church as are the idolatrous altars of the Papists Colloqu Mompelgart fol. 424. 425. In the Lutheran Churches and also in the Church of Berne Ibid. Heming syntag 4. lex decal § 33. fol. 365. They retaine the vse of Organs in the Church and other musicall instruments Colloq Mompelg fol. 391. 409. Touching discipline THey haue Diocesan Bishops and Archbishops in Simler in vit Bulling fol. 35 36. Heming enchirid class 3. cap. 10. ord Eccle. fol. 348. Idem Syntag. tit gubernat Eccl. §. 15 16 17. fol. 228. Denmarke and superintendants and euen Abbots in Germany among the Lutherans Melancht consil part 1. fol. 95 96 225 276 610. Harm confes § 17. fol. Augustan Some Bishops of France conuerted from Popery retained their place and office still by common consent of the French Church Caluin Epist 373. fol. 646 647 648. So Martyr Loc. com ad finem inter Ep. fol. 1143. Bezae They haue no vse at all of excommunication in the Churches of Countie Palatine Heluetia of Witenberg Mompelgart Erast de excommunica fol. 356 382. Vrsin catech part 2. qu. 83 84. fol. 620. Caluin Epist 166 170 366. neither ruling Elders T. C. his admonit fol. 83 84. They haue holy dayes of Christ his Natiuitie Passion Resurrection Pentecost c. in the Heluetian Churches lib. de ritib. Eccl. Tigur fol. 4. In the Churches of the Low-countries Brownist 2. Letters to Iunius in the Churches of Denmarke Heming Syntagm 4 lex Decal 22. 24. 25. fol. 363. 364. Also in the Church of Berne Aretius Problem loc 99. fal 289. They haue holidaies consecrated to the memoriall of the Virgin Mary the twelue Apostles S. Paul S. Iohn Baptist S. Stephen Innocents Saint Michael Al Saints as appeareth in the Epistles which are before alleadged also Heming vbi sup Harm confess § 19. fol. 176. Bohem. Their Ministers are called by them Sacerdotes Priests as are the Popish Mass-priests Harm confess Bohem. § 11. fol. 47. fol. 4. 62. Aug. Item § 13. fol. 93. Bohem. Heming syntag 4. lex Decal § 11. fol. 43. albeit otherwise the Tigurines disclaime this name being taken in the worser sence Harm confess § 11. fol. 38. They haue Deacons not Collectors for the poore but a degree to the Ministry and an assistant to him yea supplying the place of a Minister in his absence Harm confess 11. fol. 47. lib. 2. de ritibus Eccle. Tigur fol. 7. 16. Their Ministers in the Heluetian Churches doe play the Deacons and gather contributions for the poore lib. de ritibus Eccles Tigur fol. 22. They practise and maintaine auricular confession and priuate absolution Harm confess § 8 fol. 142. 143. Bohem § ibid fol. 147. 150. August ‖ ibid fol. 154. Saxon. ‖ ibid. fol 160. Wittenberg schlusselb Theol. Caluinist lib. 1. cap. 19. fol. 6. 9. Simlerus in vita Bullingeri fol. 34. calleth it priuatam quandam confessionem parum a Papistica differentem yet looke Zepper de Sacram cap. 35. fol. 787. 798. They allow and practise a kind of preaching and absolution of repentant sinners by women in the absence of the minister among the Lutherans Colloqu Mompelg fol. 499. And thus wee see in part the estate of reformed Churches in respect of ceremonies Not that hereby I doe goe about to iustifie these Ceremonies which they doe practise but thinking and professing many of them rather most fit to be abolished in many respects and the Churches of Christ to be reduced so
opposit therto if it be fauourably taken or construed on the better part For I confesse there want not some few matters which if they be not * candidè fairely taken may seeme not altogether to agree vnto the word of God Script Angl. fol. 456. Praefac ad censur Caluin In the English Leturgie or booke of Common prayer which you describe I perceiue sundry * tolerabiles ineptias Looke the discourse of the troubles at Frankford fol. 28. wherin is shewed that Knox Whitingham and others described the English Leturgie to which description this was the answer of Caluin as appeareth there fol. 34 35 tolerable vnfitnesses In which two words I expresse thus much that there was not that purity therein contained which were to be wished which blemishes at the first day of reformation could not be corrected Wherein seeing there is conteined no manifest impiety these things therfore ought to be borne with for a season Ep. 200. fol. 336. and a little after to the English exiles at Frankeford which desired reformation of the English Leturgie hee giueth this aduise Vos vltra modum rigidos esse nolim Epist. 200. fol. 336. Of the which aduice of his he thus speaketh in Epist. 228. fol. 374. in Anglorum controuersia moderationem tenui cuius me non poenitet in Epist 206. fol. 342. hee perswadeth one part to incline themselues to all possible moderation and is displeased with the other part that nothing by them was yeelded or mitigated Martyr loc com inter Epist fol. 1127. amico in Angliam For mine owne part I wish that all things may bee done simplicissimè most free from humane mixtures in the worship of God Yet when I thinke with my selfe that if peace betweene the Saxon Churches and ours might be obtained there would follow no separation for such matters as these Ceremonies Alexander Alesius a worthy Scot of great account and note in Proaem before his Translation of the Common prayer Booke in Script Anglican Buceri fol. 373. commendeth the performance of it by our Countrey-men exceedingly with their great diligence and care therein and calleth it Preclarissimum diuinum factum in constituting and ordering the Church of Christ according to that Booke further declareth that the vertue and pietie of English men in this matter would reioyce many mindes and bee an help to the endeuors of others in the like and that it was euident that the enemies of the trueth were very sorry of the good successe and progresse herein Also hee complaineth with Gregory of some Vt cōmotis studijs contentio semper irritet aliquorum indignationem vtque nimio ardore interdum admodum peccetur dum nemo minus videri altero ac potius solus sapere vult fit vt non necessarijs quaestionibus disputationibus necessariarum rerum cognitio negligatur further he sheweth this contention of brethren about this booke to come of the diuell who failing one way seeketh another to mischiefe the Church hee complaineth of some Aliquam diuisionis occasionem arripientibus non iam nulli vocabula penissyllabas expendendo verbis tantùm litigant reipsa si placidè exquiratur futuri concordes Of the common prayer booke it selfe he saith Hic liber per se vtilis futura lectio ipsius quà m plurimis hoc tempore diuinitus oblatus esse videatur ibid. fol. 375. Cranmer Martyr In his purgation of slanders against him If the Queenes highnesse will graunt thereunto I with Maister Peter Martyr and other foure or fiue which I shall chuse will by Gods grace take vpon vs to defend not onely the common prayers of the Church the ministration of the Sacraments and other rites and Ceremonies but also all the doctrine and religion set out by our said Soueraigne Lord King Edward the sixt to be more pure and according to Gods word then any other that hath beene in England these 1000. yeeres so that Gods word may bee iudge Acts mon. fol. 1465. Bishop Ridley When Bishop Grindall from beyound Sea wrote to him in prison being condemned to bee burned concerning Knox his peremptory and violent exceptions against our booke of Common prayer which was euen misliked by Caluin himselfe Epist fol. answered by writing thus Alas that brother Knox could not beare with our booke of Common prayer in matter against which although I grant a man as hee is of wit and learning may finde apparant reasons yet I suppose hee cannot soundly by the word of God to disproue any thing in it Act. mon. Doctor Taylor Martyr There was after that set forth by the most innocent King Edward for whom God be praised euerlastingly the whole Church seruice with great deliberation and by the aduise of the best learned men of the Realme and authorised by the whole Parliament and receaued and published gladly by the whole Realme which booke was neuer reformed but once and yet by that reformation it was so fully perfected according to the rules of our Christian religion in euery behalfe that no Christian conscience could bee offended with any thing therein contained I meane of that booke reformed Act. mon. fol. 1521. Exiles at Franckeford Among them was great diuision and dissention about the vsing of the Common prayer booke of England one part refusing it as Iohn Knox William Whittingham Christopher Goodman Dauid Whitehead Miles Couerdale Iohn Fox Anthonie Gilby c. The other part standing for it which also were reuerend persons as Thomas Leauer Iohn Iewell Iohn Mullins Iohn Parckhust Lawrence Humphry Iames Pilkington Alexander Nowell Iames Haddon Edwin Sands Edmund Grindall and others Looke the discourse of the troubles at Franckeford fol. 16. 23. 19. Which dissentions caused them to seeke the iudgements of other churches and their teachers as of Caluin Beza Bullinger fol. 25. 199. Also Robert Horne Thomas Leauer Io. Mullins Tho. Bentham W. Cole Io. Parckhust Lawrence Humphry c. were all fully determined to vse none other then the order last taken in the Church of England Discourse fol. 16. 223. The same order of seruice concerning religion which was in England last set forth by King Edward fol. 10. Also Iames Haddon Edwin Sands Edmund Grindall Christopher Goodman c. not doubting or distrusting their good conformitie and ready desires in reducing the English Church now begun there to it former perfection it had in England least by much altering the same wee should seeme to condemne the chiefe authours thereof whereas they now suffer so are they not ready to confirme that fact with the price of their bloud c. fol. 22. 23. They also at Franckford writing to them at Zurick exiled also dissenting from them about our Ceremonies Thought not that any godly men would stand to the death in defence of those Ceremonies which as the booke specified vpon iust occasions may be altered accounting it an argument that they are slenderly taught which for a Ceremony will refuse such a singular benefit
for answere I say there is agreement betweene them in the most part of those many things whereby our Ceremonies are vrged and accused to be simply euill and vnlawfull as before appeareth so that this obiection is nothing to the pointin question or to giue direct answere to this argument For my allegation of these things doeth confirme thus much Namely that it is good and necessary to practise inconuenient scandalous and hurtfull Ceremonies in a case of superior reason namely of procuring the Churches peace and libertie of the Gospel and the like which no man will deny and I seeke no more For admit these Ceremonies with vs in controuersie to be inconuenient hurtfull and scandalous more or lesse it skilleth not so long as they bee of no other nature then those Iewish Ceremonies prescribed and practised by the Apostles as hath beene prooued they are not how will it be auoyded but that in case of superior reason as of auoyding depriuation of the Ministrie they may lawfully and needfully be practised and that according to the minde of the holy Ghost and the direction of the holy Scripture Obiection But the Church of England hath not the like causes and reasons to prescribe and enioyne the present Ceremonies as the Apostles had to prescribe the Iewish Answere First this obiection is nothing to the poynt in hand For the question is heere not whether our Church doth well to prescribe these Ceremonies But whether such Ceremonies being prescribed as the Church conformed to by the Apostles decree in a case of necessitie ought not to be conformed to by our depriued Ministers in a case of like or greater necessitie Secondly But the Church of England in prescribing Preface to the book of common Prayer tit Of Ceremonies these Ceremonies professeth a respect of winning and profiting two sorts First Some thinking it a matter of great conscience to depart from a piece of the least of their Ceremonies Secondly some new fangled would innouate all things and despise the old nothing liking them but that which is new therefore they thought it expedient to take away some such as were most apt to bee abused to superstition and to retaine others and in their practise they tooke away so many ceremonies as time would serue quietly to doe it the rest were reserued to keepe order and quiet decipline in the Church Which is further noted to King Edwards answere to the Deuonshire and Cornishe rebells who being Ans to 3. Artic. Act monument Papistes would haue the Masse in Lattine To whom the King replyeth that the good things in the Masse-bookes were onely translated into English for their sakes onely the superstition taken out Obiect The Apostles Acts 16. 3. and 18. 18. and 21. 26. Did vse the Iewish ceremonies voluntarily without compulsion of any superior authority or Law to stoppe a scandal with the weake brethren of the Iewes If therefore that be pressed for the vse of our ceremonies it will proue a necessitie of vsing them out of the case of depriuation aswell as in that extremity and that a man must practise them voluntarily without any compulsion or hazard of Ministry Ans First though the cases of the Apostles practise in Act. 16. 18. 23. were voluntarily performed that is without commaund of any superior authority yet the case of practise in Acts 15. 28. 29. Was inioyned decreed and commanded Acts 16 4. and 21. 25. And that by the rule of necessitie then which there can hardly be a greater argument of compulsion Act. 15. 28. Secondly and besides the very cases alleadged were done by compulsion also of preuenting the Iewes offence yea in a case of danger also of depriuation to the Apostles if they had not conformed as appeareth by the tumult made by the Iewes Acts. 21. 27 28 29 30. Vpon a supposition of those Iewes that Paul taught non-confirmitie vnto the Iewish ceremonies Verse 21. By the which tumult they raised it came to passe that Paul was indeed depriued from any free vse of his Apostleship in Iudea til he came to Rome as appeareth in the sequell of the history And if there were no Law for depriuation of Ministers yet if the execution of their office were in hazard I doubt not but they should conforme for compulsion may aswell be vsed without Law as with Law Obiect Those ceremonies were practised but once or twice vpon extraordinary occasions But ours are vrged for a perpetuity and vpon an ordinary and standing reason and are like to continue without euer remoouing them Answ Neither doeth this obiection come neere the poynt in hand which prooueth that such ceremonies as ours are in themselues not simply euill nor of noe other nature then those ceremonies enioyned and practised by the Apostles which therefore in a case of necessity may bee practised by vs yet I answere Touching the ceremonies practised by the Apostles First it is true they were not alwayes by them practised but vpon certaine occasions Howbeit they were alwayes practised by them when they met with the same occasion of necessity and would oftner haue practised them if by the like necessity they had beene driuen to it which shewes the necessity of conforming to inconuenient ceremonies in the case of depriuation Secondly when the Apostles decreed the abstaining from blood and strangled it was inioyned without limitation of time whereupon a man might haue made this obiection vnto their decree and say They are vrged for a perpetuitie and vpon an ordinary and standing reason namely of necessity and fitnesse and are not euer like to be remooued Thirdly also some of the prescribed Iewish ceremonies endured longer in the Church then on the sudden may be imagined For it is obserued that Christians abstayned from blood and strangled till the time of Tertullian Origen Whitaker de Ro. pon cont 4. quest 7. fol. 832. 833. Syrill Eusebius Councell of Ganga yea of Augustine 400. yeeres after Christ 2 Concerning our ceremonies it is vntrue that they are vrged for a perpetuity for the preface of the common prayer booke expresly saith of the ceremonies prescribed thus they are retained for a discipline and order which vpon iust causes may be altered and changed and therefore not to be esteemed equall to Gods Law And for the continuance of practise of our ceremonies I suppose noe sound Protestant will pleade for the necessity of their practise or continuance longer then the reason of necessity doeth hold Our case is rather to be matched with the time of Pauls refusing Obiect part M Parker 2. sect 14. fol. 71 to circumcise Titus and of his reproouing Peter for his dissimulation in cōforming to the Iewes Ga. 2. 3. 11. 13. Answ This can by noe meanes hold as appeareth because Paul in a case of hazard of his Ministry disquiet of the Church and interruption of preaching the Gospell which is our case did circumcise Timothy Acts 16. 3. But did vtterly refuse as also all the
Apoâ—tles at Ierusalem to circumcise Titus * Aretius in act 16. 3. fol. 75. Gualter in act 16. hom 106. fol. 149. Beza annotat in Gal. 2. 5. Because they were vrged as necessary to saluation Acts 15. 15. Because by them false brethren laboured to bring their Christian libertie into bondage Gal. 2. 3. 4. Because by that practise in that sense he should teach iustification by workes Gal. 2. 14. 15. 16. This case sorteth therefore to the Papists who teach that God is worshipped by them That a man is iustified by practising of them That a man is bound in conscience to vse them as hee is the precepts of God al which false doctrines are in so many words disclaimed both by oath doctrine and confession of the Church in the booke of the Articles of religion as also in Artic. 11. 20. 34. the preface to the booke of common Prayer where the superstitious vse of these Ceremonies is disclaimed as also the opinion of Gods worship by them and the reasons set downe of prescribing these namely the quiet and decent order in the Church And that the conueniency or agreement of our case with the Apostles conforming not with the Apostles refusing the Iewish Ceremonies may the better appeare I haue added these paralells which I desire may be considered The Apostles and the Church of Ierusalem The Church of England To auoid offence of weak and obstinate Iewes and to winne them To auoid offence of weak and obstinate Papists and to winne them Prescribed and inioyned Ceremonies abused superstitiously Prescribe and enioyne Ceremonies abused superstitiously Holden as the worships of God and needfull to saluation Holden as the worships of God and needefull to saluation By the vnbeleeuing and weake Iewes By the superstitious Papists popishly affected But not by the Apostles nor faithfull Christian But not by any sincere Protestant teachers or people The members therefore of eyther Church may and ought equally to conforme to either Ceremonies in a case of necessitie and of superiour reason Againe The Apostles The depriued Ministers In a case of superiour reason as to further the Gospel to preuent the hindering of their preaching In a case of superior reason as to further the Gospell to preuent their depriuation and suspension Conformed to Ceremonies many wayes inconuenient abused superstitiously and holden necessary by the Iewes Ought to conforme to ceremonies though many waies inconuenient in their opinioÌ„ abused to superstitioÌ„ holden necessary by the Papists Imposed by weakenesse and violence of the Iewes Imposed and vrged as they construe it by weak Christians authority threatning depriuation Obiect Others perceiuing more force in this argument then some haue done to presse them to the practise of our Ceremonies in the case of depriuation and yet remaining peremptory in their former iudgement doe answere it another way thus Answ That Saint Paul did euill in vowing shauing himselfe contributing offering sacrifice circumcising Timothy because they were Ceremonies of practise But the Apostles constitution Acts 15. 28 was onely of Ceremonies of omission of like nature with our abstaining from flesh on fasting daies not of the Crosse or Surplesse They who thus reply haue had I confesse a light of this their answer from some * Hier. apud August Epist 19. Hierom. Ep. 89. Gualt in act 23. hoÌ„ 138. fol. 248. Bullin in act 21. M. Parker of the Crosse part 2. sect 14 fol. 70. learned men which vsually haue their differences from others according to the reasons mouing them who thus did censure Saint Paul in these actions Yet Gaulter and Bulling doe onely doubt of the place Acts 21. not of the rest but to this I say We may probably see how these repliers if they had liued in these dayes would haue behaued themselues towards the holy Apostle at least they would haue reprooued him and condemned him for committing a sinne and would by all meanes haue disliked his doings yea they would haue cast off a thousand weake beleeuing and obstinate Iewes and suffered depriuation of a thousand ministries rather then to conforme to that which the inspired Apostle Paul did submit himselfe vnto But withall we may consider whether authoritie in practise were rather to bee esteemed theirs or Saint Pauls And indeed it is a miserable shift when no better answer can be framed to accuse the inspired Apostles in their doings because their practise will not stand with the reasons which themselues haue framed or vndertaken to maintaine the suffering of depriuation for refusing to conforme A very feeble answer as I suppose which will not stand but by heauing at the pillars of the Church of Christ Though they accuse the Apostles for this conformity yet the Scriptures doe not so and it may seeme to much boldnesse to speake especially in so dangerous a case of laying sin vnto the charge of such and so great persons where the Holy Ghost is silent But this practise of S. Paul may be easily and strongly iustified 1. Because he was aduised to this practise by Saint Iames and the Church of Ierusalem Acts 21. 18 20 21 23 24. Which persons inioyning other Iewish Ceremonies in the like case were directed and inspired by the holy Ghost in so doing Acts 25. 28 29. 2. Because the Holy Ghost seemeth to iustifie the reason of Paul in circumcising Timothy not onely in not condemning him in his practises but in approuing of his reason in so doing Acts 16. 3. Paul circumcised him because of the Iewes of those quarters For saith the holy Ghost in the text they knew all that his Father was a Grecian 3. Because Paul iustifieth this practise of his in those Scriptures of his Epistles wherein vndoubtedly he did not erre as the 1. Cor. 9. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. and 10. 13. and giueth a maine reason thereof because by his practise hee would winne the more vnto the liking of the Gospel and be a meanes of their saluation 4 Because it cannot bee immagined that Paul was ignorant if it were a sinne for hee was at the Synod at Ierusalem Chap. 15. where circumcision other Ceremonies were denied in other cases and if he knew it to bee a sinne it were strange hee should so many times fall into a relapse Acts 16. 18. and 21. and obserue the Iewish Sabboth so continually Acts 17. 8. and 18. 4. and 13. 14. 44. 5 Aretius giueth another reason to iustifie this fact of Paul * Aretius in cap. act 21. fol. 95. Antiocheia ecclesia bona parte constabat ex gentibus itaque maior pars non erat offendenda in gratiam paucorum Hic vero Ierosolymis maior pars imo omnes Iudaei sunt quos Paulus debuit considerare And of his iudgement are the best interpreters namely Augustine Caluin Beza Aretius Piscator Gualter Zanchius Iunius Bucanus who with one consent doe hold these things indifferent which indifferent things should serue for the edification of the Church Touching the Apostles constituion
charitie and concord others to discipline of manners and sanctitie of life the people of God must bee instructed by the diligence of Ministers and vnderstand how they may apply themselues to euery of them with fit and competent obseruation Muscu Loc. part 2. de traditionibus § 6. fol. 31. That if any man hath so profited in Christs religion that himselfe can receaue either no profite or very small from any on tradition yet if this tradition bee so fitted as that it may serue for edification vnto the vnskilfull multitude hee ought to obserue that Ceremonie with that study of charitie whereby such as are perfect are debters to the more imperfect so farre forth that they harme them not by their example in those things wherein they are bound in the whole study of their life to profit them Musculus ibid. That when men vnder the colour of the study of perfection cannot indure any imperfection either in the body or members of the Church then are they admonished that the diuell attempteth to puffe them vp with pride and to seduce them with hypocrisie Caluin aduersus Anabaptist art That where the foundation remaines entire albeit there remaine behind some stubble error or corruption in doctrine externall policie manners or Ceremonies there we may and ought bee present at Sermons and receiue the Sacraments and exercise or hold charitie and peace with our brethren yet so as making manifest our more sound doctrine and perswasion of these corruptions and farther to signifie that for these corruptions wee will make no schisme Zanch. in Philip. 1. fol. 37. Idem confess cap. 24. § 10. fol. 207. Mornaeus de ecclesia cap. 20. fol. 32. and in respect of corruptios it were to be wished indeed that the church were pure and without spot yet if it be not we must vse patience else it is ineuitable that wee must needes make a priuate schisme which is most diligently to bee auoided of euery Christian man Wherefore those errors for which a man shall separate from the Church in which he is baptised and is conuersant must not be of any other sort but onely such as ouerthrow and violate the very substance of faith and articles of the faith either directly and clearely or in sence and consequence Danaeus Isagog part 3. cap. 13. fol. 148. Bucanus Loc. 41. qu. 22. That there are many things which are not to bee approued in the Church which are not worthy of contention Caluin Epist. 51. fol. 100. That there may and ought many things to be tollerated By tollerating them also we meane practising Beza Epist 8. which yet are not rightly commanded Beza Epist. 12. fol. 98. That many things must of vs be tollerated which is not in our power to reforme Caluin Epist 148. fol. 254. That albeit men must endeauour to purge the Church of corruptions which sprung vp out of superstition yet this exception must go along that certaine things although they bee not to bee approued yet must bee borne with all Caluin Epist 305. fol. 504. to Iohn Knox. That some rites and Ceremonies albeit not necessary are yet to bee tollerated or borne withall for concords sake Beza Epist 8. fol. 70. That as the maners of doting parents so the customs of our vnaduised country must bee endured yea the seruitude which is without impietie and that in matters of lesser nature in the Church must bee borne withall Harm confess § 11. fol. 860. Melanctho concil Thelog part 2. fol. 107. and that there is euer some kinde of seruitude of the Church more milde somewhere somewhere more hard howbeit more or lesse there is euer some Malanch ibid. fol. 92. And thus we see their iudgement and doctrine concerning Ceremonies in generall Now let vs see the generall practise of the Churches in these points Thus they speake thereof Albeit our Churches doe not equally obserue all Rites and Cerimonies with other Churches a matter which both cannot neither yet is necessary to be done that namely in all places of Christian assemblies one and the selfe same Ceremonies should bee vsed yet doe they not impugne or oppose themselues to any good and godly constitutions Neither are they so minded that they would raise vp any dissentions for the cause of Cerimonies albeit some of them might be iudged not very needfull so as they be not found opposite to God and to his worship and glory and to the true iustifying faith in Iesus Christ Harm confess § 17. fol. 214. Bohem. We the reformed Churches of these dayes hauing diuersitie of Rites in the celebration of the Lords Supper and in some other things yet in doctrine and faith we doe not dissent neither is the vnitie and societie of our Churches rent or diuided thereby But euer the Churches haue in these Rites as in things indifferent vsed liberty That which we the reformed Churches at this day do also vse ‖ Harm confess § 17. fol. 211. Heluet. Poster So much for the iudgment and practise of the Churches and of our classicall writers concerning Ceremonies in generall Now also we will consider of them in particular wherein we will giue notice of foure points First of the iudgment censure of our classicall writers touching these Ceremonies which are prescribed in our Church and the like and their aduice to others touching the practise thereof especially in a case of Depriuation Secondly the vse and practise of these ceremonies by the most excellent and worthy persons in this case Thirdly the reasons moouing them vnto this iudgement practise and aduice And lastly the obiections against these things especially in the case of Depriuation answered by them Touching their iudgement and censure of our Ceremonies I find them in a threefold difference For some of them doe approue sundry of our controuersed Ceremonies as fit and commendable Some againe do iudge of many of them as of things indifferent to bee vsed or not vsed euen as the Church shall thinke fittest for it selfe And lastly some there be who account them as things in many respects vnlawfull and inconuenient but yet in respect of greater inconueniences and namely of Depriuation doe holde them tolerable and excusable which difference if any man be desirous to make vse of he may discerne it in the reading and obseruing of them seuerally In the iudgement censure and aduice of the godly learned touching our Ceremonies we may obserue first what they thought in generall of the Common prayer Booke of our Church and of the Ceremonies therein contained Secondly what they thought concerning them in the seuerall particulars which are vsually excepted against Touching the Common prayer Booke in general BVcer In perusing the Common prayer Booke of the Church of England wherin he was set a worke by Bishop Cranmer I gaue God thanks who had giuen you to reforme these ceremonies vnto that purity I haue not found any thing in the Ceremonies of that leturgie which is not taken out of the word of God or at least is
In Ep. dedicat de Christo seruatore contra Socinum Nihil noui attuli sed antiquam receptam doctrinam quam hoc saeculo Martinus Chemnitius Iohannes Caluinus Petrus Martyr Zacharias Vrsinus multi alij Sancti Viri ex Dei verbo clarè solide docuerunt defendi tutatus sum Idem ibid. Subijcio hunc librum iudicio sanctae orthodoxae Ecclesiae quae Augustanam Helueticam Gallicam Brittanicam Belgicam confessiones sequitur Hanc enim esse veram Ecclesiam de his dogmatis quae in hoc libro tractantur rectè sentire credo cum hác me concordiam colere profiteor To these authorities there are some things excepted which heere I will setdowne And Obiect Frist that there is not that consent in these authorities no harmony nor agreement neither in iudgement nor in practise Not in iudgement for they disagree among themselues some commend the Ceremonies others discommend them esteeming them vnprofitable inexpedient hurtfull Not in practise for the first 200. yeeres their vniforme practise was answerable to the simplicity of the ordinance of Christ and his Apostles in the parts of Gods publike worships which will appeare if ye cite the vndoubted writings of the pure Fathers and not their Apocryphals or Bastard and supposed writings Answ 1 This obiection is quite besides the question and is nothing to the point in hand and therefore might haue well beene spared The question here is not whether the Churches and Writers agree or disagree in their iudgement practise of such Ceremonies as ours are but whether in a case of depriuation a man ought to conforme to Ceremonies as euill inconuenient as ours are pretended to be rather then suffer depriuation The answer by me is affirmatiue which conclusion all the forealleaged Authors as well one as other doe vniformely hold consent and agree vpon and of this there is an vndoubted harmony For their differences let them be vrged when question is concerning any point wherein they differ To giue instance hereof suppose a question betweene Timothy and Titus whether it were fit that the Apostles should visit the Church which they had by preaching conuerted to the faith and to finde out the truth heereof they will referre themselues to the iudgement of Paul and Barnabas who conuerted them vnto the truth Timothy saith that they should doe well to visit them and alleadgeth that Paul and Barnabas did consent in that iudgement and practise as appeareth Acts 15. 26. Titus denieth it and saith there was no consent nor agreement in their iudgement nor practise For Barnabas counselled to take Iohn called Marke with him but Paul thought it not meet Heere may Timothy reply that the question betweene vs is not about the taking a long of Marke wherein they disagreed but about the visiting of the Churches wherein they were both of one minde Touching their practise of 200. yeeres that it was answerable to the simplicity of the ordinance of Christ and his Apostles I grant that it was much more pure for that space then it was euer after for as the time ran on so purity vanished and superstition grew on as in a praecipitium and desperate downefall Howbeit the mystery of iniquity began to worke euen in the Apostles times The Diuell in those dayes began to sowe his tares as the watchmen began to sleepe both of false doctrine and corrupt Ceremonies the controuersie which troubled all the Christian world was within one hundred yeeres And Anacletus Euaristus Telesphorus Anicetus Victor as also Polycarp Irenaeus which note the controuersie about Easter and others were within the 200. yeeres So were the Hereticks Valentinus Montanus Chiliastae and others who brought innumerable ceremonies Clemens Alexandrinus and Tertullian within the 210. yeere did stirre in their writing Origen about the 216. yere Cyprian about the 240. yeere In whose vndoubted and not bastard writings may be seene and hath beene alleadged the diuersity and multitude of Ceremonies which were then in vse and much more might be said touching the confirmation of this point namely that such ceremonies as were then in vse as inconuenient in vse and nature as ours were practised by them and the doctrine of suffering Depriuation for refusing to conforme vnto such Ceremonies as ours was not by any of them taught but by all of them confuted partly by their doctrine and partly by their practise Obiect These Churches and writers were strangers to our cause nor so well acquainted with the state of our Church and therefore could not so well iudge of our case Answ The persons whose iudgements are alleadged were either strangers to our Church or acquainted with the state thereof The strangers thereto were the Fathers of the Primitiue Church and the Lutheran authors Both which because they were the practisers of more and worse Ceremonies then ours can bee imagined to bee it is nothing to the point whether they were ignorant of our Church or not For they that for the Churches peace did practise and perswade the practise of Ceremonies more in number and worse for quality would much more practise and perswade the lesser and the fewer in the same case as all men know For the rest which were acquainted with the state of our Church they were either forreiners or members of our Church The forreiners were some of them inform'd of our Churches estate by such as were not partiall in the relation thereof Such as Caluin who had our Leturgy translated and sent him to peruse Beza Bullinger Gualter Zanchius Vrsinus Polanus c. Others were such as dwelling in our Church were eye-witnesses themselues of the state thereof such as Bucer in Cambridge For whose censure the common praier Booke was translated into Latine P. Martyr in Oxon. The members of our Church were no lesse worthy then the Forreiners and could not be ignorant of the state of this Church such as the Martyrs Cranmer Ridley F. and Hooper who at last conformed Exiles as Foxe Iewell Nowell Parkhust Sanders Grindall Humphry c. And the latter teachers as Deering Fulke Perkins and especially Master Cartwright who with most exact diligence did sift euery thing to the vtmost of his power that might cary any shew of the warrant of an opposition Obiect These persons which had notice of our state considered not of our grounds of Scripture and of the arguments which we alleadge they professed that they saw but if they saw our reasons and so vrged as we vrge them they would doubtlesse haue bene of other iudgement Answ They considered of all the maine reasons which are now vrged as appeareth before in the Answeres of Master Bucer and P. Martyr to the seuerall obiections of B b. Hooper Besides the members of our Church were wel acquainted with the reasons vrged against them especially the later Obiect Some of the Authors which perswade to vse the Ceremonies doe giue such allegations as ouerthrow their owne grounds and thereby we are more confirmed
would euer practise or command those things after that they were growne so bad after that hee had seene iust cause to inueigh against them and condemne them in that manner To this purpose also the Apostles resolution in not suffering Titus to be circumcised when hee saw what an abuse that Ceremonie was growen vnto and how dangerous an effect was like to follow it if hee had yeelded vnto it maketh very strongly notwithstanding any thing that hee would seeme to say to the contrary in his answere to the sixt obiction as shall further appeare in the discussing of the fourth point that hath bene obserued in the confirmation of this his assumption 3. If it were granted that the Ceremonies which the Apostles vsed and appointed had bin notoriously knowen to haue beene subiect to so great abuse of some and to haue had in them so euill effects euen before or at that time and in those places also where the Apostles inioyned them yet could not this haue proued them euery way as inconuenient and euill as ours are For ours are said and sufficiently proued also as they suppose who haue suffered depriuation or suspension for this cause to bee euill not onely because they haue beene grossely abused and very euill effects haue followed the vse of them for so much may be said also of some of Gods owne ordinances but for that they neuer were good nor can euer serue to any good vse Those as they were at the first the ordinances of God so they are here said by Maister Spr. to haue beene still inioyned to certaine Churches by the Apostles which if it be so then could no abuse that obstinate Iewes or other wicked men had put them vnto make the vse of them either vnlawfull or inconuenient vnto the faithfull that by Apostolicall that is diuine authoritie were required to vse them And here fitly commeth to bee examined whether that bee true which is affirmed by him in his second reason which he brings for the proofe of this point viz. that nothing in substance is obiected against our Ceremonies which might not haue been said aswell against those which the Apostles and Churches of their times did vse In handling of this point as he hath left out much of the force and substance of euery argument which in the Abridgement the booke which himselfe quoteth are set downe against our Ceremonies so hath hee affirmed much more against them which the Apostles then vsed then he is able to iustifie and make good The trueth is that though euery one of those foure arguments doth strike to the heart the ceremonies of our Church yet is there neuer a one of them that doth giue the least touch vnto those which the Apostles and Churches then did vse For first Ours are humane inuentions notoriously knowen to haue been of olde and still to bee abused to idolatry and superstition by the Papists and yet of no necessary vse in the Church Theirs as they were at first by diuine institution so were they not at that time when they vsed them notoriously knowen to haue been abused either to idolatrie or to the confirmation of false and pernicious doctrine and were at that time of necessary vse and though they had been neuer so much abused and had beene also in any other of no necessary vse yet because they were vsed by warrant of Apostolicall and diuine authoritie this first argument toucheth them not at all hee doth indeede denie all this and quoteth Scripture to proue that they were humane inuentions of no necessary vse and abused to superstition But it hath beene already shewed that all these Scriptures are misunderstood and applied by him no more shal need to be said for the conuincing of him in this point when that himselfe cleerely and strongly contradicting himselfe hath both elsewhere in this argument and euen in this very place affirmed For were they humane inuentions which himselfe here sayth were practised and taught by direction of the holy Ghost were they of no necessary vse which he in the proofe of his first proposition of his first argument Num. 8. affirmes to haue bin commanded by the Apostles as matters good and necessary in that case and brings for proofe thereof Act. 15. 28. 2. Ours are humane Ceremonies appropriated to Gods seruice and ordained to teach spirituall duties by their mysticall signification Theirs as they were not appropriated to Gods seruice so neither were they vsed or appointed by the Apostles to bee vsed for mysticall signification or if they had yet seeing as hath before beene shewed they were not humane Ceremonies this argument doth not concerne them It is true indeed that they were in their first institution significatiue and mysticall and thus much the places quoted by him here viz. Col. 2. 16. 17 Heb. 8. 5. 9. 8 23 10. 1. do proue But that either the Apostles vsed them or ordained them that they might teach some spirituall dutie by their mysticall signification that hee hath not so much as indeauoured to proue And surely if Paul did vse circumcision as a Sacrament Acts 16. 3. then by the force of Master Spr. argument heere which maintaineth it lawfull for vs to doe now what the Apostles or Churches in their time did it may be concluded that it is lawfull for vs to vse in Gods seruice other Sacraments then those which God hath ordained 3. Ours being but humane Ceremonies are esteemed imposed and obserued as parts of Gods worship Theirs cannot be proued to be obserued by them much lesse imposed vpon them as parts of Gods worship and if they had yet because they were not humane Ceremonies this argument maketh nothing against them For what is this to the purpose that heere hee takes vpon him to prooue That the Iewes esteemed imposed and obserued them as necessarie to saluation Acts 15. 1. 5 That the zealous Iewes were violently offended with Paul for teaching that Christians ought not to circumcise their children and to liue after the legall customes Acts 21. 27 That the Apostles ordained them as good and necessary Act. 15. 28. 29 That the Apostle conformed himselfe vnto them for their sakes and in their presence that esteemed them as worships of God Acts 15. 1. 5. 16. 3. 21. 26 Seeing the question betweene vs is not heere whether the Iewes obserued and imposed Ceremonies as bad as ours but whether the Apostles or any Church by their appointment did so Did the Apostles or any of them whose conformity of Ceremonies is now in question betweene vs vse any Ceremony as imposed by those Iewes he speaketh of here And what though the Apostles called those things that by their decree was inioyned good and necessary will it follow from thence that they imposed them as parts of Gods worship or can nothing be good and necessary but that which is a part of Gods worship Though the superstitious estimation the people among whō they are vsed haue of them be
Gods of worships not accidentall And secondly that these our Ceremonies are esteemed imposed and obserued by the intention and doctrine of the Church of England for things of such nature For this I constantly auerre and resolutely holde that if they can be proued matter of this nature that they are doubtlesse to bee refused of all in a case of confession vnto the losse of Ministery and of life it selfe Howbeit of this I can by no meanes be perswaded as yet and I will giue my Brethren the reasons thereof namely because the Church of England doth not so esteeme them impose them or obserue them for parts of Gods worship But here it wil be first asked what I mean by the Church of England To which I answere that as the Church is considered two wayes first for the Congregation of the faithfull scattered here and there or for the whole societie of English men compact in one entire body visibly professing the religion of Christ distinguished from the bodies of Scotland France Germany other Countreys So by the Church of England in either acception ceremonies are not esteemed imposed or vsed as parts of Gods worships Of the Church in the former sence I know my Brethren make no question the latter I will iustifie For the doctrine and practise of the Church of England I take to be that which by coÌ„mon consent of the whole State King Nobles Bishops Iudges Commons in Parliament is taught and commanded Whatsoeuer commeth hence cometh from the compleate bodie of the Church of England and is to bee ascribed to it as to the visible Church Now the doctrine of this Church of England is included in the Bookes established by this power which are the booke of Articles and the booke of Common prayer Now for the doctrine of our Church in this point the booke of Articles expresly teacheth first that it is not lawfull for the Church to ordaine any thing that is contrary to Gods word Act. 20. Secondly that the Church ought not to enforce any thing to be beleeued besides the holy Scriptures for necessitie of saluation Act. 20. Thirdly that nothing of traditions and Ceremonies be ordained against Gods word Act. 34. Fourthly that euery particular or Nationall Church hath authoritie to ordaine change and abolish Ceremonies or Rites of the Church ordained onely by mans authoritie so that all things bee done to edifying Act. 34. So likewise the Preface of the common prayer booke tit of Ceremonies enacted by Act of Parliament that is by the authoritie of the visible Church of England this doctrine of Ceremonies is set downe We thinke it conuenient that euery country should vse such Ceremonies as they shall thinke fit to the setting forth of Gods honour and glory and to the reducing of the people to a most peafect and godly liuing without error or superstition and that they should put away other things which they perceiue to bee most abused as in mens ordinances it often chanceth diuersly in diuers countreys And thus wee see the doctrine of our Church doth not esteeme any Ceremonies as parts of Gods worships but doth disclaime it vtterly And for the application of their doctrine to our Ceremonies that wee may see what maner of Ceremonies and of what nature the Church of England doth propose to be practised and with what affection such as practise them should performe it the said Preface to the Booke of Common prayer saith of the Ceremonies prescribed in that Booke That they are retained for a discipline and order which vpon iust causes may bee altered and changed and therfore not to be esteemed equall to Gods Law Now according to this doctrine and application thereof by our Church all doctrines and practise of intention and action should bee conformed to this they should be referred If there bee any contrary direction or doctrine taught published or inioyned by any one person or many together or in diuers places it is nothing to the point For they who preach esteeme practiâ—e and impose any Ceremonies otherwise by any conceit word or acte then according to the afore mentioned direction they doe it contrary to the iudgement of the Church of England and it is to bee esteemed as the iudgement and practise of priuate persons violating the doctrine and lawes of this Church for the which they shall answere vnto God and are liable to the censure of authoritie Whatsoeuer Ceremonie therefore of our Church is either imposed or the omission censured by any persons or by any Minister practised or obserued by superstitious or ignorant people as a part of Gods worship is onely accidentall adherent and not inherent to our Church neither ought it to bee laide vnto the charge of our Church Neither doe any of the Diuines Abridg. fol. 38. 39. mentioned in the depriued Ministers reasons nor can any Diuinity iustifie or say that the questioned Ceremonies are imposed by the Church as parts of Gods worships for this cause or will perswade men to suffer themselues to be depriued for refusing to coÌ„forme vnto them For here is no such case of confession to which we are inforced seeing we may all freely and ought as in obedience to the Church confesse the doctrine thereof agreeing to Gods Word and conforme vnto the Ceremonies according to the doctrine namely as to things which are no worships of God nor needfull to saluation And as for them that hold teach or conforme vnto them as to the parts of Gods worships they are to be esteemed as malefactors condemned by the Church which can no more preiudice the doctrine of the Church then the practise of theeues rebels and murtherers can preiudice the good lawes of our Common-wealth that are made against them and it were no lesse strange to blemish our Church with the iudgement or practise of the one then to brand the Common-wealth with the practise of the other Now where my Brethren say that the Apostles neither obserued nor imposed the Ceremonies of the Iewes as parts of Gods worship I referre them to my answere in the former member touching the seruice of God and do adde that if they vsed them not as parts of Gods worship taken strictè yet they did vse them inioyne theÌ„ as parts of his worship taken latè or in a larger sence seeing God may be said to be worshipped by that he is serued and he is serued by duties done according to his will and they conformed inioyned coÌ„formity to those ceremonies that they might do duties according to his will viz. the winning of the Iewes the freedome of their teaching and the like But now whereas it is demanded further by my Brethren what it is vnto the purpose I alledge that the Iewes esteemed imposed obserued them as necessary to saluation Acts 15. 1. 5. and the rest I answere first that I might make those Ceremonies analogicall with ours that as our Ceremonies were and are holden as parts of Gods worship and needfull to