of whom his Life Doctrine and Miracles his Death Buriall Resurrection and Ascension his sitting at Gods right hand and what benefit we reape by him are liuely depainted and written The Apostles Sermons were taken out of the Scriptures Act. 2. 16 25 35. and 7. 2 51. and 8. 35. and 10. 34 35 43. and 13. 16 23 27 33 36 40. by which Scriptures they confirmed what they did teach and thereby confounded the aduersaries Acts 17. 2. and 18. 28. the decrees of the Councell at Ierusalem made by the Apostles and whole Church were grounded vpon Scripture Act 15. 15 19 Saint Pauls faith and seruice to God was the written Word in the Law and in the Prophets Act. 24. 14. And those Euangelicall doctrines found in his Epistles which are so full of comfort to a true beleeuer though our aduersaries spurne at them he found written in the old Testament There could hee finde the Kingdome of Christ Act. 28 23. There hee found written that the workes of the Law before God iustifie not Rom 4. 2 6. and 3 20. That election is of meere grace without respect to will or worke of man Rom. 9 11 16. That man is blessed by imputation through faith without workes of the Law and freely iustified by grace through faith Rom. 3. 21. for all these he gathereth out of the old Testament as in the quoted places may be seene Saint Peter taught out of the Scriptures remission of sinnes through faith in Christs name Act. 10. 43. Yea the Saluation of our soules and the grace which should come by Iesus Christ 1. Pet. 1. 9. 10 11. Therefore he commendeth to the whole Church in his second Epist 2. Pet. 1. 19 20 21. the holy Scriptures to which they doe well to attend as to a candle saith he shining in a darke place This he calleth a Propheticall Word most sure Now that this might not be taken for an vnwritten Word first he telleth them in vers 20. what he meaneth hereby euen the Prophecie of Scripture a Word written and then giueth a reason why hee calleth it a most sure Word for that saith he it was not by any priuate interpretation nor brought by mans wil but it was that which holy men taught inspired with the holy Ghost Psal 20 21. All Scripture therefore being inspired of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. is this most sure Word which is to bee attended vnto And if it be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Word surer then any other then euery other word must be ruled by it No other word then can equall it for two superlatiues of the same thing there cannot bee much lesse a word to ouer-top it This is the rule then and not any traditionall word which is but a meere popish fiction and subtill deuice to deceiue by VI. Their owne Bible telleth vs by way of commendations that the Church of Berea did hold the Scriptures to be the rule to examine doctrine by Act. 17. 11. which heard the Word deliuered by preaching and receiued it but no otherwise then they found it written in the Scriptures by which they did trie it daily searching the Scriptures if those things were so Where note 1. That the Bereans held not themselues tyed to the Priests lips 2. That they heard that which was taught them with relation to the written Word 3. That they held the Scriptures to be the triall of the truth of their Teachers doctrine 4. That they hauing heard did bring that which they had heard to the touchstone of holy Writ for their greater confirmation in the truth which things are written for their praise for our instruction also in imitation For if the holy Scriptures of the old Testament were then the rule to trie the Apostles preaching is not both the Old and New the rule to try mens teaching now VII And lastly Our Aduersaries grant vs that the Word of God is that one only and infallible rule of Faith which is vndoubtable true for what can be the rule to vs of Gods seruice but Gods will And how can wee know what is his will but by his Word Therefore this Word now being no where to be found but in holy Scriptures as is proued by their own Bible they must needs yeeld that the Scriptures are then the one onely infallible rule of our faith which if they will yet obstinately deny they must deny antiquity which they so vainely boast of Contraried by Antiquity Their owne Clement telleth vs lib. 1. Recog That from the diuine Scriptures the firme and sound rule of Faith must be taken Tertul. contra Hermog calleth the Scriptures the Rule of Faith Saint Basil lib. 1. Contr. Eunom calleth the Scriptures the Canon of that which is right and the rule of Truth Saint Ierome lib. 1. cap. 1. in Mat. The holy Scriptures are the Limits of the Church out of the which we may not goe Chrysostome Hom. 3. in 2. Cor. calleth them a most exquisite Rule and an exact Square and Balance to trie all things Saint Augustine lib. de bono viduit cap. 1. The holy Scripture hath fixed the Rule of our Doctrine that wee may not presume to bee more wise then we ought Greg. Nyssen in orat de eis qui adiêrunt Hieros calleth the Scriptures a right and inflexible Rule Gregory the great Hom. 4. in Ezechiel compareth the Scriptures to a measuring Reed which meteth out both the actiue and contemplatiue life of man By which testimonies of the Fathers wee may see how they contrary our Aduersaries tenent for in plaine termes the Fathers call the Scriptures a Rule right exquisite and inflexible and the onely Rule the Limits of the Church But our new Romane Masters sticke not to slighten and vilifie the same by calling the Booke of God a piece of a rule a Lesbian crooked rule a leaden rule a nose of waxe and we must be Heretikes for not partaking in such blasphemies We may therefore conclude with the words of Isiodorus Pelusiota lib. 1. Epist 369. who saith We ought to refuse whatsoeuer is taught vnlesse it be contayned in the volume of the Bible and with that of Cyril Hier. in 4. Catech. Concerning saith he the Diuine and holy mysteries of our Faith not any the least thing must be tendered without warrant of diuine Scripture Gainesayed by their owne men Gerson de commun sub vtraque specie The Scripture is the Rule of our faith And the same man saith Li. de examin doct part 2. cons We must take heede whether the doctrine bee agreeable to holy Scripture as well in it selfe as in the manner of deliuery Petrus de Aliaco the Cardinall calleth the Scriptures the Sacred Canon Clemangis loc 3. cap. 29. affirmeth the Scripture to be the infallible Rule of Truth yea the measure and Iudge of all Truth Durand Episcopus praefat in lib. sent The holy Scripture saith he setteth out the measure of Faith wee may not write or speake any thing which may differ from
as in the place of Deuteronomie is before answered V. Proposition That the Scriptures are not to be allowed to be read of the people nor heard by them in a knowne tongue Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT teacheth that the Scriptures were written to all sorts the bookes of Moses to all Israel Deut. 31. 91 9 22 30 32. So the Prophets Psalmes and Historicall bookes and all these were commended to the Churches keeping Rom. 3. 2. Act. 7. 38. We see in the new Testament some bookes written to noble Personages Luk 1. Act 1. to Ladies 2. Ioh. ver 1. to Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1. 1. to Pastors ouer Congregations Reuel 1. 11. and 2. 3. to old men 1. Ioh. 2. 14. to yong men 1. Ioh. 2. 13 14. yea generally to all the Saints Rom 1. 7. 1. Cor. 1 2. As the generall Epistles of Iames Peter Iohn and Iude do witnesse 2. It teacheth that they were written for the benefit and guiding of all sorts for kings Deut. 17 18 19. Iosh 1. 8. for Elders and Magistrates of the people Deut. 31. 9. and for others to make vse of Pro. 1. 4. 3. It teacheth that the reading searching and attending to them was commended to all sorts without any exception Deut. 30. 10. Iosh 23. 6. Ioh. 5 39 2. Pet. 1. 19. Eph. 6. 17. Reuel 1. 3. 4. It teacheth that they were commanded to be read vnto all sorts Deut. 31. 11 12. Ier. 36. 6 10. Col. 4. 16. 1. Thess 5. 27. and so were read to them Exod. 24. 7. Iosh 6. 34 35. Neh. 8. 2 3. and 2. Chron. 34. 30. Act. 13. 15. and 15. 21. 5. It sheweth vs that they were read of all sorts and neuer reproued for any euill in them as of Iosias 2. Chron. 34. 30. of the noble Eunuch Act. 8. 32. of the noble Bereans Act. 17. 11. of godly women as Lois and Eunice trayning vp Timothy from his child-hood therein 2. Tim. 1. 5. with 3. 15. It is cleare therefore by their owne Bible that all and euery one might reade Scriptures that could and would reade them and that without hinderance The Papists are farre from Moses spirit who wished from his heart that all the Lords people could prophesie Num. 11. 29. But they that do euill hate therefore the light and will not permit people to come vnto it lest thereby their deeds be reproued Ioh. 3. 20. Contraried by Antiquitie S. Augustine l. 3. c. 1. de doct Christ A man that feareth God doth diligently enquire after his will in the Scriptures And in Serm. 55. it is not sufficient that ye heare the Diuine Scriptures in the Church but also in your houses either reade them your selues or else desire some other to reade them and giue you diligent eare thereto The Nicene Synod saith Corn. Agrippa lib. de van Scient decreed that no Christian should be without the Bible in his house Chrysost exhorteth men to get the Bible the most wholesome remedie for the soule if not all yet some part to take the holy bookes into their hands before and after meate at home and not in the Church onely Yea he telleth his hearers that to think Gods Word needlesse cōmeth of the deuill the it was as an infecting Pestilence for the people to thinke that it appertained to men of the Church to reade them and not to others whereas he telleth them that it was much more necessarie for them then for the other See for these his speeches at large Hom. 10. on Gen. 29. Hom. 1. on Ioh. Hom. 13. on Mat. Hom. 2. on 2. Thess Hom. 3. S. Ierome on Col. 3. 16. We see heare saith he that lay people should not haue onely knowledge of the Scriptures sufficiently but aboundantly that so one might be able to teach another many of his writings were written to women as to Paula Epist 8. 9. 10. 12. 14. Eustochium Saluina Demetria Furia Celantia and others commending them for their reading and studie of Scriptures Epist ad Laetam yea he instructed one Laeta how she should bring vp her daughter in holy Scriptures to learne the Psalter thē Prouerbs then Ecclesiastes then Iob and so to go to the Gospels after these the Prophets Moses and Historicall bookes He herein was then no Papist S. Basil regul contract q. 95. It is necessarie and consonant to reason that euerie man learne that which is needfull out of the Scriptures whose Nurse one Macrina taught himselfe the Scriptures from a child Bas Epist 74. Theophylact on Eph. 6. Say not saith he that it belongeth Lib. 5 de curand Graec. affect onely to Religious men to reade the Scriptures for it is the dutie of euery Christian and most of all of such as deale in worldly affaires because they being as it were shaken with a tempest haue greater need of spirituall succour And Theodoret writeth of his times that Coblers Smiths Websters and all kind of Artificers all the women not onely such as could reade but See also Euseb lib. 1 cap. 6. de demonstrat Euangel Semsters Maidseruants and waiting-women Citizens Husbandmen Ditchers Neatheards Woodsetters vnderstood the points of faith and could discourse of them What can be more cleare then this that in former ages from the beginning euery one had libertie to reade the Scriptures for their helpe Socrat. lib. 4 cap 33. were they translated into vulgar tongues into all languages For the truth of this see Aug. de doct Chri. lib. 2. cap. 5. Theodoret in his forenamed Booke Beda Hist. lib. 1. cap. 1. Chrysost Hom. 1. in Iohan. Yea do we not know how Lay men for their diuine Knowledge were chosen to be Teachers in the Church Nectarius a Iudge made Bishop of Constantinople Ambrose a deputie Bishop of Millan with other moe Gainesaid by some of themselues The Rhemists though they hold the false Tenent yet in their Preface before their translation cannot denie the Scriptures to haue bene in the vulgar Languages of diuers Nations as in the Armenian the Sclauonian Gothick Italian French English tongue yea in the Languages of almost all the principall Prouinces of the Latine Church of later times The meere Politicke caution and limitation of the Trent Conuenticle was not deuised in former ages that the Scriptures should not be read indifferently of all men but of such as haue licence Licence to reade holy Scripture was not thought of in the Primitiue Church nor many hundred yeeres after The very translation of the Scriptures aforetimes shew that the godly Translators minded to put Gods Bible into all mens hands without any Popes licence Acosta li. 2. de Chron. Reu. ca. 2. pa. 65. is enforced to confesse that our gracious God hath maruerlously prouided in holy Writ that the most rude reading in humilitie may profit thereby and in chap. 5. speaking by experience I haue seene saith he some men vtterly vnlearned and scarce knowing Latine who haue gathered out of Scripture such profound
we which beleeue in the Name of the Sonne of God haue eternall life 1. Ioh. 5. 13. that so we might reioyce and that our ioy might be full 1. Ioh. 1. 4. He wrote that we might know the things which he had seene the things that were and that which was to be done afterwards euen to the worlds end Reuel 1. 19. Now therefore seeing it is cleare as before is proued that all Scriptures are inspired of God and he the Author thereof as also that vpon what occasion soeuer or to whomsoeuer they were first written that they were not written for their sakes alone but for ours also as their owne Bible iustifieth Rom. 4. 23 24. and 15. 4. 1. Cor. 9. 10. and 10 11. Psal 101. 19. and that they were appointed for all thâ—se forenamed ends to teach the Churches to argue against errors to correct sinne and vice to instruct in vertue to keepe vs from sinne to worke faith feare hope loue patience comfort and fulnesse of ioy to know the Author of our saluation and what Iesus Christ taught and did to know the words of the Prophets and Apostles also whether we stand in the true grace of God or no how to demeane our selues in Gods Church and to be wise to saluation to beleeue in the Sonne of God and in beleeuing to haue life through his name and to know the Churches state from the beginning to the worlds end These with other before mentioned being the maine ends of holy Scripture what can be further desired to set out the perfection of it especially considering fourthly that the particulars either in expresse words or by a necessarie conclusion which are in euery book do fully shew the sufficiencie of the whole Bible according to these ends so as nothing is to be held necessarie for instruction and direction in Gods Church but is therein contained For would we know what we are to beleeue All the twelue Articles of our Christian faith are there to be found almost in so many words expresly Would we know our dutie to God and man There are the ten Commandements of God wholy set downe with the explanation thereof by exhortations dehortations and examples throughout the Bible Would we know how to pray aright There is the Lords Prayer fully set downe to teach vs to pray and holy mens prayers as a commentarie for our directioÌ„ Would we know what Sacraments Christ ordained The two Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord are plainely shewed to be instituted and commanded by Christ Matth. 28. 19. and 26. 26 27 28. Would we haue controuersies decided If men without wrangling will rest in that which is sufficient to quiet the conscience the Scriptures wil end them in any necessarie point of faith and good life I will for example instance in some betweene Papists and vs their own English Bible being iudge 1. Whether publicke seruice ought to be in an vnknowne tongue No say wee Yes say they Heare the Iudge 1. Cor. 14. 9. By a tongue vnlesse thou vtter a manifest speech how shall that bee knowne which is said for thou shalt but speake in the aire Vers 15. I will pray with vnderstanding I will sing with vnderstanding Whether any Images or likenesse of God may be made Yes say they No say we Heare the Iudge Deut. 4. 15 17. Keepe your soules carefully yee saw no similitude in that day that our Lord spake to you in Horeb from the midst of the fire lest perhaps deceiued you might make you a grauen similitude or image of male or female c. 3. Whether the Sacrament of the Lords Supper be to bee administred in one kind Yes say they No say we Heare the Iudge Mat. 26. 26. Iesus tooke bread vers 26. and tooke the Chalice saying Drinke you all of this vers 27. 1. Cor. 11. The Lord Iesus tooke bread vers 23. also the Chalice after he had supped vers 25. This was the Churches practice 1. Cor. 10. 16. 4. Whether the words This is my Body are to be taken properly or figuratiuely Figuratiuely say we No properly say they Heare now the Iudge in the like sacramentall phrase Gen. 17. 10. God speaking of Circumcision saith of it This is my Couenant Also speaking of the eating of the Lambe and manner thereof calleth it the Passeouer it is the Phase that is the passage of the Lord as their Bible hath it and as ours it is the Lords Passeouer Exod. 12 11. Saint Paul in 1. Cor. 10. 4. saith The Rocke was Christ It is vsuall to call the signe by the name of the thing signified Reuel 1. 20. The seuen Candlestickes are the seuen Churches 5. Whether a sacrifice properly so called is now to be offered for the forgiuenesse of sinnes They say yes else their Masse is mar'd but wee say no. Heare the Iudge Heb. 10. 18. Now there is no oblation for sinnes for 1. Ioh. 2. 1 2. We haue an Aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the Iust and he is the propitiation for our sinnes 6. Whether Saints bee our Mediatours to God and so there be more then one Mediatour betweene God and vs. They say yea we denie it Heare the Iudge 1. Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediatour betweene God and man which is the Man Christ Iesus 7. Whether we be iustified and saued freely through faith in Christ or by works before God We say yea by faith in Christ freely By merit of workes before God say they Heare the Iudge Rom. 3. 20. By the workes of the Law no flesh shall be iustified before him Chap. 4. 2. If Abraham was iustified by workes he hath to glorie but not with God Chap. 3. 24. For by grace you are saued through faith and not of your selues for it is the gift of God Rom. 9. 16. It is not of the willer nor of the runner but of God that sheweth mercy Rom. 11. 16. If by grace not now of workes otherwise grace now is not grace Rom. 3. 28. For we account a man to be iustified by faith without the workes of the Law Ephes 2. 9. Not of workes that no man glory The place in Iames Chap. 2. 24. is of declaring a man to be iust before men for in the Law no man is iustified with God Gal. 3. 11. because the iust liueth by Faith but such a Faith as worketh by loue and is not a fruitlesse Faith of which Iames speaketh Thus might I runne thorow all the maine controuersies betweene vs and them to shew the sufficiency of the Scriptures which they hold imperfect and insufficient Contraried by Antiquitie Ireneus lib. 2. ca. 47. We know very well that the Scriptures are perfect And li. 3. ca. 1. the foundation and pillar of Faith Iustin in Tryph. Wee must flye to the Scriptures that in all things we may be safe Tertul. contra Hermog I adore the plenitude or fulnesse of the Scriptures And against Praxeas The Scripture is sufficient of it selfe Cyprian or
a man endued with Gods Spirit and spirituall vnderstanding come to the holy Scriptures he will discerne them to be of God and of his Spirits inditing though none beare witnesse to them and tell him so much For the spirituall man iudgeth all things 1. Cor. 2. 15. and if he can iudge he also can discerne of thē Weigh also that those which bee good Bankers know money at the first sight whose image and superscription it beareth The worke of an Apelles is easily discerned from that which is an ordinarie Painters And wee know that men well read are so quick-sighted as that they can discerne learned mens writings from the counterfeites of them How much more then may the writings of God so infinitely surmounting all others in all manner of grace dexteritie and maiestie of themselues be seuered and sundred from all other writings and be knowne to be of the Lords owne inditing Lastly as in generall the Scriptures shew themselues to bee Gods Word and also more particularly that the seuerall books thereof are his Word So these very bookes which wee at this day acknowledge and haue in account for Gods Word and so beleeue them to be doe witnesse for themselues that they are indeed the very Word of God though the Church should bee silent in her dutie so to professe and teach them to be And this is cleare 1. From the Penmen who according to the wisdome giuen to them as Peter speaketh 2. Pet. 3. 15. haue written the truth of God Ioh. 19 35. and the commandements of God 1. Cor. 14. 37. Now who were the Penmen of these bookes we know 1. By the titles of them 2. By the inscriptions as that to the Rom. chap. 1. 1. to the Corinth chap. 1. 1. 2. Cor. 1. 1. to the Gal. chap. 1. 1. and so of the rest of the Epistles of Saint Paul Likewise that of Saint Iames Peter and Iude and the Reuel 1. 1 4. are knowne by their inscriptions 3. By the subscription in some as 1. Cor. chap. 16. 21. The salutation of me Paul with mine owne hand 4. By apparant testimonie within them telling vs who wrote them Iohn saith he wrote the Gospell ascribed to him Ioh. 21. 24. So Saint Paul his Epistles 2. Cor. 10. 1. 1. Corinth 15 9. 1. Tim. 1. 13. That to the Hebrewes in many places discouers it selfe to be Saint Pauls So the Gospell to be Saint Lukes and the Acts too for hee that wrote the one wrote the other also Acts 7. 7. 2. From the puritie the veritie the integritie the godly plainenesse and simplicitie and yet powerfull maiestie thereof euincing all gaine-sayers and manifesting these very bookes to be the Word of God What true and euident properties soeuer can be shewed to be the properties of Gods Word to know it by the very same these bookes challenge to themselues to approue themselues to bee Gods Word to the conscience of euery true Christian See Scotus his ten arguments 1. Sent. prol Art 1. Also Gregor de Valent. tom 3. p. 329. Let our aduersaries speake herein 3. From the witnesse of Gods Spirit making the reading studying meditation preaching and hearing of the things contained in these bookes very powerfull vpon mens consciences working conuersion to God and so perswading to beleeue them to bee of God as hereupon they doe yeeld obedience thereto feare to offend against the commandements therein beleeue with comfort the promises yea and so fully to giue themselues to the guiding thereof as they thinke in them to find eternall life and are so perswaded as that they can forsake all yea if need were also to suffer death vpon the faith of these sauing truths therein contained as holy Martyrs haue done very chearefully and constantly through the Spirits assistance bearing witnesse to them and by which they and wee know them to be the things giuen vs of God 1. Cor. 2. 12. This worketh faith and maketh vs beleeue them and therefore is called the Spirit of Faith 2. Cor. 4 13. This teacheth vs Ioh. 6. 45. and is truth 1. Ioh. 5. 6. and euer accompanieth the Word Esay 59. 21. to make it the power of God to saluation Rom. 1. and the sauour of life vnto life to them that are saued 2. Cor. 2. The Church is to testifie of them to interpret them out of themselues to keepe them and to defend them but she cannot either make them to be Gods word if they were not so already for she cannot make a word to be mans if man neuer spoke it neither can she make Gods word to be his word vnto vs vpon her owne credit if it selfe bare not witnesse of it selfe and the Spirit did not confirme the same and not worke this faith in vs. If her authoritie could worke this beliefe then were she to blame for not bringing all to the faith of them To worke diuine faith in our hearts is of God and not of men Contraried by Antiquitie Saluianus lib. 3. de prouidentia saith All that men say need reasons and witnesses but Gods Word is witnesse to it selfe for whatsoeuer the incorrupt Truth speaketh must needs be an incorrupt witnesse to it selfe Ambrose lib. 5. Epist 31. Whom may I beleeue in the things of God better then God himselfe Hilarie lib. 1. de Triniate God is a witnesse for himselfe and he is not to be knowne but by himself Now God and his Word is one and therefore saith Nilus it is all one to accuse God as Decausis dissent Eccl. pag. 2. to challenge the Scriptures Origen lib. 4. cap. 2. de Princip Whosoeuer with all diligence and reuerence as is meete shall consider the words of the Prophets it is certaine that in the reading and diligent view thereof hauing his mind and vnderstanding knocked at by a diuine inspiration he shall know that the words which he readeth were not vttered by man but are the words of God and of himselfe shall perceiue that these bookes were written not by humane Art not by the word of mortall man but by a Maiestie Diuine Gainesaid by some of their owne Gregorie de Valentia Comment in Thom. cap. 3. pag. 31. The Reuelation of the Scripture is beleeued not vpon the credit of another Reuelation but for it selfe Canisius citeth cap. de praecept Eccl. Num. 16. We beleeue adhere and giue the greatest authoritie to the Scripture for the testimonies sake of the holy Ghost speaking in them Bellarmine de Verbo Dei lib. ca. 2. Nothing is more knowne nothing more certaine then the Scripture that it were the greatest madnesse in the world not to beleeue them If he saith truth as he doth then is it madnesse not to beleeue the Scripture bearing witnesse of it selfe that it is all of it selfe inspired of God What farther Testimonie neede wee A Papist now of late in His guide of Faith saith thus We beleeue the Scriptures S. N. Guide of faith chap. 7. num 3. for the diuine Authoritie which is the
the Church at Colosse Col. 1. 4 6. for their stedfast faith loue and fruit of the Gospell and for their order which the Apostle ioyed to behold cha 2. 5. What shal I speak of the praises of the 1. Thes 1. 3 6. 2. 13 14. 3. 6. 4. 10. 2. Thes 1. 3 4. 2. 13. Thessalonians for their worke of Faith growing exceedingly their labour of loue their patience of hope their abounding in charitie being followers of the Apostles and the Churches of God in Iury receiuing the Word of God as the Word of God in much tribulation with ioy of the holy Ghost To which prayses the beleeuers at Rome did not then attaine though they had their prayses and those great too Rom. 15. 14. but not comparable with those Churches Lastly in shewing how the Apostles honoured some other Churches by their writings As Corinth by two Epistles so Ephesus by one from Saint Paul by another from Saint Iohn Reuel 2. 1. who wrote to that Church in the first place the heauenly booke of the Reuelation in like sort were two written to the Thessalonians and but one to Rome 5. It is cleare by their own Bible that Peter whō they claime falsely for their first Pope wrote two Epistles which are called Catholike but neither of them was written to Rome as the Catholike Church neither maketh he any mention of it And S. Paul writeth to the Saints at Rome as to a particular company and not as any Head-Church before and aboue other The Thessalonians are commended for being followers of the Churches of God in Iudea but not for following those at Rome to whom when Saint Paul wrote hee saith Rom. 1. 6. that they were called among others that in other Nations were called but it is not said aboue other Nations 6. Their Bible telleth vs that S. Paul wrote his Epistle to them that were in Rome called Saints and beloued of God so that they were within that City or there-about but the Catholike Church was then dispersed for the Gospell at that time had gone into all the World and was preached to euery creature vnder Heauen Col. 1. 6 23. In their Bible is mention Acts 2. made of thirtie Kingdomes and Countries ten Ilands and almost three score famous Cities out of Iury in and amongst the Gentiles where the Gospell had been preached among whom Rome was but one and had obteined at the most praises common with other Churches Their titles were Saints Rom. 1. 7. beloued of God also brethren Rom. 10. 1. and 12. 1. and 15. 14 30. Their faith the same that was among all Nations Rom. 1. 5. called the common Faith vers 12. and therefore spoken of throughout the whole World vers 8. Their obedience was published to euery place Rom. 16. 19. Not for that their Faith and obedience did surpasse others for the words are deliuered barely your faith your obedience not with prayses as the Faith and obedience of the Colossians and Thessalonians accompanied with loue and aboundant charity with patience and ioy of the holy Ghost in great afflictions and so forth but for that Rome was the sease of the Empire and the publishing of their faith and obedience might bee a meanes to draw on others which dwelt in other places Contraried by Antiquitie We may reade that the chiefe of the Church of Rome was but at first a Bishop and his Church but a Drocesan Church Then hee became an Archbishop and so his Church but a Prouinciall Church After he got to be a Patriarch and so his Church but Patriarchall as some other were then equall with him as that of Antioch Alexandria Ierusalem and Constantinople All this time he was no Vniuersall Bishop till bloody Phocas gaue him that title and so his Church not Vniuersall till she also became the great whore and so might well be common the kings of the earth committing fornication with her as was foretold Reuel 17. It is said that Athanasius as Liberius confesseth was separated Epist ad Vrsac Valent. in Baron Annal. to 3. Ann. 357. n◠44. from the communion of the Church of Rome But may we iudge so holy a man and so valiant a Champion for the truth to be therefore separated from the Catholicke Church Polycrates and the Easterne Churches did not condiscend to the Church of Rome in the keeping of Easter did they therefore dissent from the Catholicke Church who was he in those dayes that had so much as a dreame thereof S. Ierome in Catal. Fortunat. reproueth the custome of the Church of Rome and Epist ad Euagr. he preferreth the custome of the Catholicke Church he held not Rome then the Catholicke Church but distinguisheth them asunder one from another The title of Catholicke was long before it came to be added to the Church and when it was vsed many Churches were so called The Romane Church then was not the Catholicke Church Gainesayd by some of their owne Aeneas Syluius who was Pope writeth That before the Epist 30 1. Councell of Nice small respect was had to the Church of Rome Now it cannot be imagined that all the time before the learned Fathers and holy Martyrs should be said to haue had small respect to the Catholicke Church the mother of euery particular Church because they had small respect to the Church of Rome If Aeneas Syluius saith true then was not Rome held the Catholike Church of those who so smally respected her Pighius lib. 6. ca. 3. de Eccl. Hierarch saith Who did euer yet by the Church of Rome vnderstand the Vniuersall Church He then at that time had not learned this point to hold the Church of Rome for the Catholicke Church Francisc Picus Theorem 13. saith The Church of Rome is a particular Church The obiected Scriptures answered Psal 2. 8. Aske of me and I will giue thee the heathen for thine inheritance c. Luk. 1 33 He shall reigne ouer the house of Iacob for euer and of his kingdome there shall be no end Answ Who is read in Scripture but knoweth these to be spoken of Christs Kingdome and not of the Popes iurisdiction Where is here Pope or Rome expressed But the Gagger proueth hereby the Church of Christ Catholicke which we acknowledge But saith he None of these promises haue beene so much verified as they haue beene in the Church of Rome and therefore is she onely the Catholicke Church In that he saith Not so much verified as of Rome he grants it to haue beene verified of other Churches though not so much he cannot therefore from a higher degree conclude that she is onely the Church whereof the promises are made The words are spoken of Christs Kingdom in plain termes expressed And is his Kingdome now become the Romish Iurisdiction onely His Kingdome after he assumed our nature began before the Church of Rome had a being And can any thinke that Dauid in the Psalme or the Angell speaking the words
other concerning the Popes not erring and his Authority ouer Councels Not in authorizing the Latine Translation For Pope Sixtus 5. set out his Edition with his fullest power as not to bee amended yet comes Clement 8. with his corrected Edition in many hundred places afterwards Not in Decrees for Formosus his Decrees were disannulled by Stephanus and this Popes by another Not in affection as is euident by the so many and so long continued Schismes Onuphrius reckons vp aboue thirtie notorious schismes Not in life for though bad inough all of them after they became Popes especially from the time of Boniface yet some were Necromancers some Mortherers some Atheisticall contempers of the Gospell some bloudy Warriers how many of them filthy Fornicators and Adulterers it is not to be told III. Not betweene Pope and Councels for these haue deposed Popes As the Councell of Constance did Iohn the 22 that of Basil Eugenius the 4. that of Pisa Gregory 12 and Bennet the 13. IV. Not betweene Pope and his Cardinals For of them he hath put out the eyes of some and caused other to be thrattled and some of them haue opposed him in their Writings V. Not betweene the Pope and the learned in that Church such were beside many others Marsilius of Padua Dante 's Aleigerius Occham the Doctors of Paris the state and Diuines of Venice of late dayes in an opposition did not regard the Popes iudgement VI. Not betweene the parts of the Popes Lawes for the See Rainolds against Hart. pag. â— 33. Decrees and Decretals are often at odds VII Not betweene Councell and Councell for Constance and Basil were against Ferrara and Florence VIII Not betweene the Canonists and Glossaries for they iarre and are at difference one with another IX Not betweene the Schoolemen for among them are particular Sect-Masters whose Schollers are called after their names Thomists Scotists Albertists Occhamists opposing one another X. Not betweene the Friers for the Dominicans and Franciscans spent whole ages in Controuersies one holding one thing and another another opinion about the Conception of the Virgin Mary which bred other differences also XI Not betweene the Priests and the Iesuites let herein beare witnesse The Iesuits Catechisme The sparing Discourse and other bookes with all virulencie written one against another in the English tongue XII Not betweene the Learned of what sort soeuer for in their writings they crosse one another in many points of their Religion and namely in all those which maintaine the truth with vs against others of that Romish Faction as in many particulars is already before and afterwards shall be further shewed And farther for this let the Reader reade Pappus concerning the discord among Papists Doctor Hall Deane of Worcester his Booke called the Peace of Rome and Doctor White his Way pa. 154. 155. to 161. XIII Not betweene the Inquisitors for they differ in their iudgement about the purging of Bookes some allowing for orthodoxe that which other will not let passe for sound as may be seene in the Indices expurgatorij of Spaine Antwerpe and Rome varying one from another See for this Doctor Iames his Mysterie of the Indices expurgatorij pag. 15. XIV Not betweene the People for euen among them be differing opinions As Master Moulin in his Buckler of Faith sheweth from his owne experience pag. 279. and as wee may finde among Papists with vs when they are conferred withall apart one from another Gainsaid by their owne men From the Papists themselues may the discord of the Romish Church be noted from their owne Historians from such as haue written the Popes liues and from such as in their writings doe acknowledge the differences among them as Bellarmine himselfe doth confesse very many and so Nauarre For which reade Doctor Hals forenamed booke intituled The Peace of Rome in hundreds of differences Many Scriptures are alledged to proue that vnitie ought to be in the Church which we acknowledge and pray for But yet they proue not their Churches vnitie XVIII Proposition That Saint Peter was Prince of the Apostles and had a primacie of Power and Authoritie aboue all the other Apostles Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT telleth vs how Iesus Christ reproued the contention which arose about their vaine conceit of Superioritie one aboue another This hee plainely condemned and as plainely told them that there should bee no such Superioritie among them as they did dreame of and therefore hee exhorted them to humilitie yea in such a sort as that hee keepeth him downe as the inferiour Minister and Seruant of the rest that would be greatest among them Mat. 20. 24 25 26 27. Mar. 10. 42 43 44. Luke 22. 24 25 26. 2. By their Bible wee are giuen to vnderstand that all the Apostles are euery way made equall in the like chusing and manner of calling Math. 4. 18. 21. In the like Commission giuen to all at once Mat. 28. 19 20. 10. 5. Mar. 16. the like power Mat. 10. 1. the same authoritie Ioh. 20. 21 23. the same benediction Luk. 24. 50 51. In breathing on them with one and the same breath his holy Spirit Ioh. 20. 22. In making them all Apostles in office the same and in title Luk. 6. 13. For the Apostles were the chiefest of all appointed in the Church Eph. 4. 11. 1. Cor. 12. 28. All therefore being Apostles they were equall for a higher dignity amongst them there was not They were all called foundations Reuel 21. 14. They were all installed into their Apostleship by one and the same meanes Act. 2 1 2 3 4. They were all ordained to one and the same end to bee with him to goe and preach Mar. 3. 14 15. 16. 15. to be witnesses of him to the vtmost parts of the Earth Act. 1. 8. and all of them at the length to sit and iudge the twelue Tribes of Israel Mat. 19. 28. The Lord made no difference among them If any had been it may seeme to haue been in Iohn 1. For he with his brother was Christs neerest kinsman 2. He was called the Disciple whom Christ loued 3. Hee and his Brother were called Boanerges Mar. 3. 17. sonnes of thunder 4. He was euer one with Christ as in his transfiguration Math. 17. 1. and in other places Mat. 26. 37. Mar. 5. 37. 5. Hee was the onely Disciple after whom Peter made enquirie what he should doe and of whom a saying went abroad that he should not dye 6. He was the onely Disciple that went boldly in with Christ and when he was in the High Priests house hee brought in Peter 7. He was the onely Disciple that stood by Christ when he was vpon the Crosse 8. He was the onely Apostle to whom Christ committed his Mother to take care of her 9. Hee was the onely Apostle which Christ would haue to call his Mother Mother and she to hold him as her sonne 10. He with Matthew was the onely Apostle that did write a Gospell
signe being called by the thing signified as we see in other Sacraments which must teach vs to expound this as also the rest of the words this Chalice is the new Testament 1. Cor. 11. 25. this is my bloud of the New Testament Math. 26. 28. this is the Chalice the New Testament Luk. 22. 20. and Drinke the Chalice saith S. Paul which they yeeld to be figuratiuely spoken and therefore so must the other Thirdly the name of bread both before the mentioning of the words of Consecration by Saint Paul in 1. Cor. 11. 23. and after is still kept verse 26 27 28. 1. Cor. 10. 16 17. not because only shew of Bread was so to the eye but for that it remained bread indeed and is yet so to feeling and taste as well as to sight Fourthly their Bible telleth vs that heauen truely hath receiued Christ vntill the times of the restitution of all things Acts 3. 21. Till then hee commeth not bodily out of heauen except the bread be heauen it selfe into which at his Ascension he was receiued Fiftly their Bible telleth vs that when Christ commeth hee shall come from heauen visibly so come againe as the Apostles saw him goe vp Act. 1. 11. But they saw him in his body visibly ascend so shall he in body come againe and not in a conceited inuisibilitie into the Sacrament bodily Sixtly their owne Bible teacheth that a body cannot be in two places at one instant of time Mat. 28. 26. He is not here said the Angell and giueth the reason For he is risen Because hee was in another place being risen and gone out of the Sepulchre See Augustine in Ioh. tract 31. shewing that Christ is not in two places at one time the Angell plainely and truely denied him therefore to be there Now wee beleeue him to bee euer bodily in heauen Therefore by an heauenly Angels reason wee may truely say that bodily he is not here in the Sacrament no more then he was in the Sepulchre because he was risen Seuenthly their Bible teacheth that wheresoeuer Christs bodie was at any time hee was discernable by sense and therefore he willeth his Disciples to vse their sense to discerne him Luk. 24. 39. So did Thomas Ioh. 20. 28. But in the Sacrament is no sensiblenesse at all of his bodily presence Eighthly their Bible doth teach that whensoeuer God turned one substance into another or tooke one away and put another in stead thereof that the same was discernable by sense Moses Staffe was visibly a Serpent Dust in Egypt was Lice seene and felt and so the Water was Bloud sensibly and the Water good Wine in Ioh. 2. 9. 10. to the taste But in this change at the Sacrament is no such sensible perception and therefore is there no such thing for God in his miracles deludeth no mans sense Contraried by Antiquity Tertul. aduers Marcionem This is my bodie that is This is a figure of my body Ambros desacra lib. 4. saith that it is a figure of the body and bloud of Christ And speaking of the signes he saith that they remaine the same that they were August in Psal 3. saith that in this Feast the Lord commanded and deliuered the figure of his bodie and bloud to his Disciples And the same Father contra Adamantium cap. 12. saith that wheÌ„ the Lord said This is my body he gaue the signe of his body See more in his Booke de Doct. Chri. lib. 3. cap. 16. calling it a figure and contr Maximinum lib. 3. cap. 22. he calleth the things visible Signes Chrysost ad Caesarium Monachum saith that though the bread hath the name of the Lords body yet the nature of bread remaineth still Theodoret. in Dialo immuta Hee changed the names and gaue his bodie that name which belonged to the signe and to the signe that name which belonged to his body not by changing their nature but by adding grace to nature And in Dial inconfusus hee saith that the mysticall signes after consecration doe not depart from their nature but they abide still in their former substance figure and forme and may be seene and touched as before Cyril in Ios lib. 4. cap. 14. saith that Christ gaue to his faithfull Disciples pieces of bread See farther in Bishop Vsher his last Booke of the controuerse of the Reall presence citing Iustine Martyr Ireneus Tertullian Origen Cyprian Theophilus of Antioch the Author of the harmony of the Gospels Eusebius Acacius Macarius Austin Chrysostome Theodores Ephraemius the Councell of Constantinople Bishops of France in a Synode at Carisiacum Rabanus Also D. White his last Booke pag. 401. citing many and pag. 435. answering the Aduersaries places out of the Fathers Gainsaid by themselues Golasins a Pope de duabus nat Chri. saith that the nature of the Bread and Wine ceaseth not but remaine stil in the propertie of their nature and contra Eutycheten The elements are the image and similitude of the body and bloud of Christ Their Glosse de cons Dist 2. The heauenly Sacrament is called the body of Christ but vnproperly It is impossible that the bread should be the body of Christ Pet. Lombard sent 4. dist 11. si autem c. saith that some iudged and some wrote that the very substance of bread and Wine remained still and of the manner of conuersion he saith he is not able to define Petrus de Aliaco the Cardinall 4. q. 6. Art 2. saith that the opinion which holdeth the substance of bread not to remaine doth not euidently follow of the Scriptures nor in his seeming of the Churches determination Caietan 3. par q. 75. Art 1. pag. 153. saith that in the Gospel there is nothing that compelleth vs to vnderstand them properly See more in Bishop Vsher his last booke of this point Ratrannus Scotus Alfrick Abbot of Malmesbury The Scriptures obiected answered Luk. 22. 15. With desire I haue desired to eate the Passeouer with you before I suffer Answ 1. This Text is vnderstood of the Iewish Passeouer and not of the Lords Supper for the Supper was not called the Pasche or Passeouer Also the whole Text sheweth it to bee â—â— verse 7 8 11 13 15. Secondly euen in this Text is a Sacramentall phrase for here the eating of the Lambe is called the Passeouer which was an act done long before of which this Feast was onely a remembrance and not the thing it selfe Thirdly this Passeouer did Christ certainly eate of with his Disciples but the Bread Wine in the Supper which he instituted for this new sacrament of the new Testament the Apostles ate and dranke of but not a word of Christs eating thereof but onely of the other Iewish Sacrament of which in the Verses next following hee also speakes saying that he would no more drinke of the Vine verse 18. as before he said that he would not eate of the Passeouer verse 16. Ioh. 6. 51. I am the liuing Bread c. Answ This speaketh not
the Word of his Father Ioh. 8. 26. Lastly it is very euident that this Word of God hath alwaies from the very beginning of the Church been her warrant and guide in all her faith in God and seruice to God First Before the flood as appeareth first by the commendation of Abels sacrifice by faith offered Heb. 11. Now faith presupposeth a Word of God Rom. 10. 17. Secondly by Gods accepting of his sacrifice which hee so did offer as being performed according to his will Thirdly by the prayses of their obedience to be as God commanded Gen. 6. 9 22. and 7. 5. Secondly After the flood till Moses for God smelt a sweete sacrifice when Noah sacrificed Gen. 8. 21. which he would not haue done had not Noah been warranted by him so to sacrifice to him First by this Word of God was Abraham Isaac and Iacob guided as the History sheweth if we consider these places where God is said to speake vnto them giuing them precepts Gen. 12. 1. and 13. 17. and 15. 1. and 17. 9 10. and 31. 3. and 35. 1. Secondly making them promises Gen. 12 2 3 4 7. and 13. 15 16. and 15. 5 13 18. Thirdly their going to enquire of God Gen. 25. 2. Exod. 18. 15. Fourthly Gods commending their obedience in keeping his way charge commandements statutes and lawes Gen. 18. 19. and 26. 5. Thirdly When Moses was appointed by God to guide the people they were exhorted to hearken to Gods voyce and to his commandements Exod. 15. 26. they iournyed towards Canaan according to the commandement of the Lord Exod. 17. 1. And concerning Moses this is said of him that according to all the Lord commanded so did he Exod. 40. 16. He spake that which was commanded him Exod. 34. 34. Deut. 4. 5 14. and according to all that the Lord had giuen him in commandement Deut. 1. 3. and made them know the Statutes of God and his Lawes Exod. 18. 16. The Tabernacle was for the parts the matter manner and end in all and euery thing exactly done onely according to Gods Word and the patterne shewed him from God Exod. 25. 9 40. nothing left to Moses deuice Exod. 26. 30. and 27. 8. So was the Temple built afterwards by Gods commandement and direction onely 1. Chr. 28. 11 12 19. 1. King 6. 38. 2. Chron. 3. 3. The Prophets taught onely the Word of the Lord Ezech. 3. 4. for they say Thus saith the Lord Heare the Word of the Lord when they executed their Ministery and they spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost 2. Pet. 1. 20. Nehemiah 9. 30. Heb. 1. 1. Fourthly When Christ came he spake not of himselfe Ioh. 12. 49. not his owne words Ioh. 40. 10. and 17. 8. neither was his doctrine his owne Ioh. 7. 16. and 14. 24. he did nothing of himselfe Ioh. 8. 28. and 5. 19. but hee taught the words of his Father Ioh. 17. 8. his Doctrine and Word was his that sent him Ioh. 7. 16. and 14. 24. what he had heard and seene with the Father that did hee speake Ioh. 8. 26. 38. of whom hee receiued a commandement what he should say and speak Ioh. 12. 49. And before his Ascension chusing his Apostles he gaue them a commandement and charge to teach whatsoeuer he commanded them Matth. 28. 20. and gaue them the words which his Father gaue vnto him Ioh. 17. 8. Fifthly After he was ascended according as he had promised Ioh. 14. 26. hee sent downe vpon his Apostles the holy Ghost Act. 2. which Spirit of God spake not of himselfe but whatsoeuer he heard that he spake Ioh. 16. 13. By this holy Spirit the Spirit of the Father spake the Apostles Mat. 10. 20. Mark 13. 1. which guided them into all truth Ioh. 16. 13. teaching and remembring them of all things whatsoeuer Christ had said vnto them Ioh. 14. 26. So that what the holy Ghost taught them was the Word of Christ and Christs Word was the Word of the Father thus strictly was the Word of God obserued Sixthly The holy Apostles obserued this Rule in whom and by whom the holy Ghost did speake Mark 13. 11. whose direction they did follow Act. 15. 28. and gaue themselues to the Ministery of the Word Acts 6. 4. preaching the Word of the Lord Act. 8. 25. and 15. 35 36. and 16. 32. what they did teach was the Word of God Acts 18. 11. and 19. 10 20. the counsell of God Act. 20. 27. the Gospell of God Rom. 1. 1. the commandements of the Lord 1. Cor. 14. 37. deliuering what they had receiued from the Lord 1. Cor. 11. 23. and 15. 3. And lastly That which the Church and the Saints and beleeuers heard was the Word of the Lord Acts 13. 44. this they receiued as Gods Word 1. Thes 2. 13. and glorified the same Act. 13. 40. Thus was Gods Word from the beginning before the Law vnder the Law in Christs time and all the Apostles dayes the Churches instruction and direction and must be so vnto the worlds end Therefore it is the onely infallible rule of our faith by which we must euer be directed and guided III. Position This Word of God is now no where to be found but in the holy Scriptures THe truth of this will appeare if we consider how God did cause all those things which were necessary to be beleeued and practised of the Church to bee afterwards written which before had been deliuered by word of mouth 1. Before the Law till Moses the Church was guided by Gods Word vnwritten this we acknowledge and the Papists seeke to make aduantage thereof for an vnwritten Word still but their arguing hence is vaine because that all that same Word vnwritten in all necessarie points of the worship and seruice of God was afterwards written by Moses so as that vnwritten Word became to be the written Word The proofe of this is manifest For Moses first wrote the same Historically in the bookes of Genesis and Exodus vnto the giuing of the Law vpon Mount Sinai Exod. 20. which Law God himselfe wrote Exod. 31. 18. Afterwards Moses wrote the same by way of precept which other of the Prophets after him explained and enlarged as they were mooued by the holy Ghost For the better clearing of this point see the same more fully in the particulars Before the Law they were taught by the vnwritten Word To sanctifie the Sabbath day Gen. 2. 2. The very same after the giuing of the Law by the written Word So in Exod. 20. 8. and 31. 13. Leuit. 23. 32. To build an Altar to the Lord Gen. 8. 20. and 13. 18. So in Exod. 27. 1. and 20. 24. Deut. 27. 5. To offer sacrifice Gen. 4. 3 4. and 8. 20. So in Numb 28. 2 3. To make a distinction of beasts and other creatures cleane and vncleane and to offer onely of the cleane to God So in Leu. 11. 2 13 31 47. and 20. 25. and 22. 20 25. Genes 7. 8.
and 8. 20. Â To call vpon the Name of the Lord Gen 4. 26. 21. 23. So in Psal 50. 16. Ioel 1. 14. To eate no blood Genes 9. 4. So in Leuit. 17. 14. Deut. 12 16. To powre out drinke offerings and to offer burnt offerings Gen. 35. 14. and 28. 18. So in Numb 6. 15 17. and 29. 11 16 21. To haue daily burnt offerings Iob 1. 5. So in Numb 28. 3 6. To acknowledge a high Priest Gen. 14. 18. So in Leuit. 8. 6. and 21. 10. To pay tithes Gen. 28. 22. and 14. 20. So in Leuit. 27. 30. To preach and prophecie Iude vers 14. 1. Pet. 3. 19 20. 2. Pet. 2. 5. and to teach the people So in Deut. 33 10. Leuit. 10. 11. Ier. 1. 17. Ezech. 3. 4. Malach. 2. 7. To enquire of God Genes 25. 22. So in 2. King 13. 11. and 22. 13. To make vowes vnto God Genes 28. 20. So in Numb 30. 2 3. Deut 12. 25. To keepe feasts vnto God Exod. 5. 1. So in Leuit. 23. 4. To know the Couenant of God with them Genes 15. 18 17. 2. 8. 21 22 9. 11. So in Deut. 5. 2. To know the promised seed Gen. 3. 15. and 22. 18. and the Messiah Ioh. 8. 56. Gal. 3. 16. Luk. 1. 55. So in Deut. 18. 15 18. Isai 11. 1. and 6. 10. Ioh. 12. 41. To haue faith in comming to God and offering sacrifice Heb. 11. 4. So in 2. Chron. 20. 20. To be iustified and accounted righteous by faith Gen. 15. 6. Rom. 4. 3. So in Hab. 2. 4. To receiue the Sacraments as first Circumcision Gen. 17. 10. then the Passeouer Exodus 12. So afterwards in Iosh 5. 2. Deut. 16. 1. To be vpright-hearted and to walke with God Gen. 15. 22. and 6. 9. and 17. 2. to feare God and to eschew euill Iob 1. 1. So in Deut. 18. 13. Iosh 24. 14. 2. Kin. 20. 3. Eccles 12. 13. To know the commandements of God and to teach others the same Gen. 18. 19. So in Exod. 20. Deut. 5. and 4. 9. and 6. 7. and 11. 19. Lastly Abraham had a charge from God Commandements Statutes and Lawes which he kept Gen. 26. 5. So the Israelites had a charge from God Commandements Statutes and Lawes as Moses and Prophets Psalmes euery where teach Thus we see that what was first by tradition was afterward particularly written and so the vnwritten Word was the same with the written First also before the Word was written with pen and ink the whole moral law written in the hart was to be obserued as may be shewed in the books of Genesis Exod. and Iob as well as the ceremoniall Law and the Sacraments Sacrifices and other parts of Gods worship before mentioned all which afterward were written in books Therefore the traditionall Word before the Law written helps nothing for a traditional Word now seeing God would haue that same written afterwards whereby of a traditionall Word it became the written Word of God Secondly in the time of Moses God spake to him and hee to the people but it is said that Moses wrote all the words of the Lord Exod. 24. 4. Deut. 31. 9 19 24. The Prophets also spake first by word of mouth which were for the most part interpretations and more speciall applications of the Word already written by Moses which also were after written as the bookes extant doe witnesse Thirdly In the time of Christ and his Apostles they taught by word of mouth the Word of God but their Word was not then an vnwritten Word For first Christ taught out of the Scriptures of Moses of the Prophets Psalmes as his interpreting Luk. 24. of them citing them and confuting the aduersaries by them doe shew he therefore taught the written Word And what he himself either did or farther spake in all necessary things touching his life and doctrine they are now written by the Euangelists Luk. 1. 1 5. Act. 1. 1. So in like manner the Apostles before they wrote taught not an vnwritten Word but the Word and Gospell Acts 8. 25. and this same written in the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 1. 1 2. and 16. 26. Act. 26. 22. and 28. 23. According as Saint Ierome saith Whatsoeuer the Apostles preached In Mat. 13. in the Gospell they preached it by the words of the Law and the Prophets For if they had preached any thing not in the Scriptures it had been in vaine for the Bereans to haue searched the Scriptures daily to see whether those things which they had heard of them were so or no Acts 17. 11. It is cleare therefore that they taught a written Word and what they receiued from Christ and taught for the effect and vse thereof they also afterward did write as may bee gathered from these insuing places of Scripture In Rom. 15. 15. the Apostle wrote putting them in mind to wit of that which had been taught them by word of mouth In 1. Cor. 11. 23. he telleth them that he deliuered by word of mouth that which he had receiued of the Lord then hee writeth downe in the same verse and the rest following that which he had receiued In 1. Cor. 15. 1. he telleth them that now by writing he declared vnto them the Gospell which hee had preached and which they had receiued so that he wrote that which before he had taught them In 2. Cor. 1. 13. he saith that hee wrote none other things vnto them then that which they did reade or did acknowledge In Phil. 3. 1. he wrote the same things to wit which hee had preached it not being to him grieuous and to them safe In 2. Thes 2. 5. he saith Remember yee not that when I was with you I told you these things to wit which hee then in that Epistle wrote he wrote then what by mouth hee had taught And howsoeuer in the verse 15. of this Chapter he mentioneth Traditions yet those were such as were then by him written there the word traditions is equally and alike referred to word and epistle as if he had said If that I deliuered by word bee forgotten yet haue you now my Epistle to keepe them in your mind and therefore in vers 5. he saith Remember yee not hauing written downe in vers 3. and 4 what he before had told them and so in vers 6. proceeding to set downe the traditions before deliuered vnto vers 13. Then writeth hee to them to stand fast and keepe the traditions taught by word before or by his epistle now as being all one and the same deliuered now both by word and writing In 2. Thes 3. 6. he there also makes mention of tradition but what of a tradition vnwritten Yes before it was written but now Paul wrote it as you may reade in vers 10. where hee telleth vs particularly what it was In 2. Pet. 1. 12. Saint Peter endeuours to put them alwaies in remembrance that they might after his decease keepe in
knowledge that I marueiled at them but the spirituall man iudgeth all things Espencaeus in 2. Tim. 3. pa. 116. testifieth that the Iewes did vse to instruct their children from fiue yeeres old A custome continued till this day So that saith he many Christians may bee ashamed of their negligence which is not onely my complaint saith he but also of the ancient Fathers marueiling that that custome should bee iudged now dangerous and pestiferous which the Ancient so often commended for profitable and wholesome Lorinus on Acts 17. 2. speaking of the Act of the noble Bereans saith That it was no more then Christ commanded when he said Search the Scriptures that is saith he as Chrysostome and Euthymius expound it not onely to reade it but also exactly and diligently to discusse it But I neede not speake more of this for among vs we see many of them take libertie to reade not onely their owne Translations but ours too Their practice then here with vs is against their doctrine and their practice else-where for in other places their doctrine is against reading of Scriptures translated and they also doe not suffer them to be read See plentifull testimonies cited by Doct. White in his Orthodox Faith pag. 47. 48. So they disallow and allow some of one mind some of another here with vs differing from themselues in Papisticall Countries for all is as the Iuggler playes fast or loose for their grand Masters aduantage Obiected Scriptures answered Deut. 10. 5. The two Tables were written by God and put by Moses into the Arke Answ What then Therefore the Scriptures are not to bee common and freely read of all If the putting of the Tables into the Arke might force such a conclusion the Scriptures might not onely bee kept from the people but from the Clergie too for those put into the Arke were neither for Priest nor people to reade But I answere more particularly 1. That these were not all the Scriptures of God although all that God himself did immediately write with his owne finger 2. These commandements in the Tables were also written out by Moses in Exod. 20. and in Deut. 5. which Bookes after were also copied out and so were in the hands of the Priests Princes and people 3. The putting them into the Arke was not that thence man should learne not to meddle with holy Scriptures which none euer dreamed of but these Romists For God commanded to teach them to his people Deut. 6. 1. and they were to instruct their children therein Deut. 6. 7. but they were put into the Arke for other ends 1. To keepe them safe there as a testimony against Israel 2. To learne to keepe them in their heart as they were kept in the Arke 3 Because the Arke was a type of Christ in whom this Law of commandements was written and in whom the Lords people should be accounted obseruers of the same Deut. 31. 9 26. There was but one copie of the Law and it was committed to the Priests of the Leuites to keepe and was hid for a long time till it was found in Iosias dayes 2. King 22. 8. Therefore the Scriptures were not common to all Answ It s true that there was but one originall that was kept but other copies were commanded to bee written out Deut. 17. 18. and the same to be read diligently vers 19. Ioshua had a copie of it Iosh 8. 34. Esdras had so Neh. 8. 2. In Iehosaphats See the Dowaies on Neh. 8. 2. for Copies time a copie was carried vp and downe 2. Chron. 17. 9. Daniel had bookes Dan. 9. 2. Christ telleth vs in the Parable Luk. 15. 29. that they had Moses and the Prophets The Law and Prophets were read in their Synagogues from old time Act. 13. 15. and 15. 21. How also could the Bereans search the Scriptures if they had not had them Act. 17. 11. And S. Paul saith that to the Iewes were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3. 2. The booke of the Law was written to be read and heard of the people Deut. 31. 11 12. So were also the Prophets writings Ier. 36. 6 10 14 15. and free for any to reade them that could get copies of them as wee may see in the Eunuch Act. 8. 28. By all which it is cleare that the Scriptures were common for all Nehem. 8. Here they would gather that the Scriptures were read in Hebrew and yet the people vnderstood not the language so by certaine words in the Euangelists not Hebrew which were then spoken of the people as Golgotha Mat. 27. 33. Talitha cumi Mark 5. 41. Acheldama in Act. 1. 19. Answ That the Scriptures of the old Testament were in the Hebrew tongue is true but that the people vnderstood not that tongue is as false as the other true for it s said as their own Bible hath it Neh. 8. 3. that Esdras read plainely in the presence of the men and women and of those that vnderstood and the eares of all the people were attent to the Booke vers 8. and they vnderstood when it was read And though they were 70. yeeres in Captiuitie yet had they not lost the knowledge of the Hebrew tongue for many thousands and not a few of note and place which went into captiuitie liued to returne againe Esdras 2. 1 2 3 42 65. and 3. 12. And shall we thinke that these had lost their natiue tongue After their returne they had some strange words mixed with the Hebrew but yet they generally spake the Iewes language Neh. 13. 24. and the Prophets Haggai Zacharie and Malachi wrote in the Hebrew and the people hundreds of yeres after vnderstood the Hebrew tongue when it was spoken Act. 21. 40. and 22. 2. and could reade it written Ioh. 19. 20. yea it was so common that Christ spake Hebrew and in no other Language to Paul from Heauen Act. 26. 14. And as for the words of Christ on the Crosse Matth. 27. 46. which some hearing said He calleth for Eliah if they were spoken of the Iewes they did it in mockage If of the Romane souldiers they being strangers and not vnderstanding him it maketh nothing to the purpose or point in question Ioh. 7. 49. The people which knoweth not the Law are cursed Hence they would gather that the Iewes vnderstood not the Hebrew language in which the Law was written Answ 1. The Pharises arrogated knowledge to themselues and contemned the people for want of knowledge to wit of the sense and meaning of the Law but not of the letters words and language wherein it was written 2. Neither is it true that the people knew not the Law because these enemies of Christ said so no more then that they were cursed because they so said of them in hatred against them for following Christ VI. Proposition That the common libertie for all to reade the Scriptures doth breed heresies Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT teacheth that the ignorance of the Scripture
are of those things which God hath giuen vnto vs therefore by the Spirit of God can wee know them to be of God And indeed all Scripture being inspired of Gods Spirit who can better informe our knowledge of them then the blessed Inditer and Author of them 2. By the Scriptures themselues which beare witnesse of themselues that they are iustified in themselues Psal 18. 10. that Psal 19. they are all inspired of God 2. Tim. 3. 16. that they are holy Scriptures Rom. 1. 6. the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. who were guided by the holy Ghost 2. Pet. 1. 20. as also were the Apostles Mat. 10. 20. Mark 13. 11. And Paul telleth vs that he wrote the Commandements of God 1. Cor. 14. 37. III. As their Bible telleth vs that by the Spirit and by the Scriptures themselues we know the Scriptures to be of God so also the same Bible teacheth vs 1. That the testimonie of the Spirit is truth 1. Ioh. 5. 6. and is no lye 1. Ioh. 2. 27. which Spirit of Christ all the Children of God haue Gal. 4. 6. and all that are Christs else they are none of his Rom. 8. 9. 2. That the testimony of the Scriptures are of more credit then the testimony of men for the witnesse of God is greater then men 1. Ioh. 5. 9. And Christ preferred the testimony of the Scriptures before mans testimony yea though a Prophet for he saith he receiued not testimony of man speaking of Iohn Bapt. Ioh. 5. 33 34. and yet he referred himself to the testimony of the Scriptures testifying of him vers 39. Yea he saith that his owne words would not be beleeued if the Scriptures be not belieued ver 47. So that the Scriptures testimony of themselues being the Word of God so the testimony of God are sufficient witnes to take them for the Scriptures of God which whoso refuseth or questioneth the testimony of no men no not of Christ if he were here on earth would be beleeued to make vs to receiue them for Gods Word This their owne Bible doth teach vs. IV. Their Bible doth not onely shew how the Scriptures giue witnesse of themselues thus in generall termes but more particularly informeth vs that the Scriptures doe proue the particular bookes of holy Writ to bee the Word of God Moses witnesseth of his owne writings that he wrote by commandement Deut. 31. 9 19. and what he deliuered was that which was commanded him Exod. 34. 34. All the Prophets witnesse their Prophecies to be of God Esay 1 2. Ier. 1. 2. Ezech. 1. 3. Dan. 10. 1. Hos 1. 1. Ioel 1. 1. Amos 1. 3. Obadiah 1. 1. Ionah 1. 1. Mich. 1. 1. Nah. 1. 1. Hab. 1. 1. Zeph. 1. 1. Hag. 1. 1. Zach. 1. 1. Mal. 1. 1. Iesus Christ gaue approbation to the authoritie of Moses the Prophets and the Psalmes Luk. 24. 26 24. And so the Apostles Act. 26. 22. Rom. 16. 23. not onely in expounding but also by alleaging one where or other some thing out of euery booke as out of Genesis Mat. 23. 35. Act. 7. 3. and 3. 25. Ioh. 4. 5. out of Exodus Mat. 5. 38. and 22. 32. Act. 13. 17 18. Leuiticus Rom. 10. 5. Mat. 5. 38. Numbers Ioh. 3. 14. and 6. 31. Deuteronomy Mat. 4. 4 7. and 5. 31. or 7. 37. Ioshua Act. 7. Heb. 11. 31. Iam. 2. Iudges Act. 13. 20. Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Mat. 1. 2 3 12. Samuel Kings and Chronicles Mat. 1. 2 3 6 7. and 12. 3 42. and 23. 35. Luk. 4. 25 26 27. Act. 13. 21 22. Rom. 11. 3. Heb. 11. 32. Iob Iam. 5. 11. Psalmes the whole book Act. 1. 16 20. and parts thereof Mat. 13. 35. and 21. 16 42. Prouerbs Rom. 12. 26. Iam. 4. 6. Heb. 12. 6. Esay Mat. 21. 5 13. Ioh. 12. 38. Ieremy Mat. 27. 9. Ezechiel 2. Cor. 6. 18. Reuel 4. 7. and 20. 8. Daniel Mat. 24. 15. So might I goe thorow all the small Prophets but that whole booke of the Prophets is approoued Act. 7. 42. And all the Scriptures of the old Testament are called by Saint Paul the words of God Rom. 3. 2. and are confirmed in particular as the rest as Hosea Mat. 9. 13. and 12. 7. Ro. 9. 25 26. Ioel Act. 2. 16. Ionas Mat. 12. 40. Amos Act. 7. 43. Micha Mat. 2. 6. Zacharie Mat. 27. 9. Habacuk Rom. 1. 17. Gal. 3. 11. Nahum Rom. 10. 15. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Malachy Mat. 17. 11 12. Thus the old Testament beareth witnesse to it selfe and the New also to the Old so doth the Old to the New foreshewing what in the New is reuealed besides the record it beareth of it selfe For Iohn telleth vs that his writings are the truth of God Ioh. 19. 35. Reuel 1. 1. Saint Paul that his are the commandements of God 1. Cor. 14. 37. Saint Peter confirmeth the authoritie of all Pauls Epistles 2. Pet. 3. 16. And thus must we thinke of all the Apostles writings as the diuine truth of God because they were all led by the same Spirit Ioh. 15. 26. into all truth Ioh. 16. 13. which called the words of Christ to their remembrance Ioh. 14. 26. which Spirit Christ gaue them and they had receiued Ioh. 17. 8. Neither is it to be doubted but as their words in their Ministerie were the words of God Mat. 10. 20. Mark 13. 11. so were their words written of God also seeing they wrote what they taught as these places shew Luk. 1. 1 3 4. Act. 1. 1. 1. Cor. 15. 1. 2. Cor. 1. 13. Phil. 3. 1. 2. Thes 2. 5. and as before is prooued at large V. Their owne Bible telleth vs that the Word is a lampe and a light Psal 118. 105. 2. Pet. 1. 19. This is spoken of the written 〈◊〉 11 9. Word Now a lampe and a light need no man to point to them that hath eyes to see if the same be before them but they shew themselues to such clearely enough euen so doth the light of Gods Word in Scripture shew it selfe Gods workes shew themselues to be his workes out of themselues Act. 14. 16. He lest not himselfe without testimony Rom. 1. 20. Psal 18. 1. His Psal 19. workes shew him and shew themselues to be his and shall not Gods Word shew it selfe to be Gods Word Is there to a godly man a lesse print of the Deitie in his Word to discerne it then in a very naturall man to discerne his workes Moreouer shall the writings of men discouer their Authors of what profession and learning they be and shall not Gods Word be able to shew it selfe to bee of God For let one man write like an Artist another as a Philosopher the third as a Moralist the fourth as a Statist the fifth as a Diuine No man that is an Artist a Philosopher a Moralist a Statist or Diuine but hee can discerne of all these writings distinctly though hee haue not some to tell him what they bee So let
spoken is not set downe here and so proueth not the point in question 3. Of themselues there be that expound this depositum farre otherwise Caietan expounds it of the flocke committed to him So also Lyra their Glosse takes it to be his office So Hugo Cardinalis Aquinas interpreteth it of euery good thing which any man hath committed to him of God to keepe and to increase Thus they agree not among themselues if they cannot agree about the sense of the word is this then a sound proofe of so great a point as is in question Must a Rule to rule holy Scripture and the holy Church be grounded vpon such an vncertaine meaning 4. But let the Rhemists interpretation of the word goe for sound it is enough to ouerthrow their tenent for this depositum they make the whole doctrine of our Christianitie If this be the Treasure of vnwritten doctrine as Bellarmine will haue it what doth the Scripture containe Saint Paul telleth vs 1. Tim. 1. 11. that the glorious Gospell was committed to his trust as this depositum was committed to Timothy his trust if these two bee one as they are for was another thing committed to the trust of Timothy then was committed to Saint Pauls trust Then the Gospell is the whole doctrine of our Christianity except there be doctrines of Christianity which are not Gospell but the Gospell is written as before is prooued and therefore also is this a written depositum and not an vnwritten doctrine 5. This place wicked heretickes so expounded and to defend Tertul. de praescript aduersus Haeret. ca. 25. their hereticall falsities feigned such a sense of this place of certaine vnwritten traditions as the Papists doe by which they may see whence they be 2. Tim. 1. 13. Haue thou a forme of sound words which thou hast heard of me the same is mentioned Rom. 6. 17. Answ 1. This sheweth that a forme of words were deliuered by mouth but hence will it not follow that the same is not now written Saint Paul instructed by word of mouth Ergo may it be concluded that he wrote not the same How in reason will this follow And yet this is the thing to be proued or else nothing to the purpose 2. The place sheweth in what things this forme of words is to bee kept to wit in faith and in loue but the forme of the words of our beliefe is in the Scripture Ioh. 20. 31. Act. 8. 37. and also of our loue Mat. 22. 37 39. 3. If by forme of words they will vnderstand the compendium of Christianitie concerning Faith Obedience Prayer and forme of administring the holy Sacraments all these be also in the Scriptures as our Creed the ten Commandements the Lords Prayer as before is shewed For baptisme reade Mat. 28. 19. and for the Lords Supper Mat. 26. 26 27 28. 1. Cor. 11. 23 24 25. Therefore here is no forme of words left vnwritten as out of this place the Papists pretend 2. Tim. 2. 2. And the things which thou hast heard c. Answ 1. This still speakes of Pauls preaching but proueth not the same not to be written 2. It hath been before proued that Paul preached openly the Scriptures and therfore by the things heard from him must be meant those which he taught out of the Scriptures 3. It is probable that S. Paul himselfe preaching out of the Scriptures and onely according to the Scriptures also highly commending Scriptures to Timothy to be able to make perfect the man of God to euery good worke 2. Tim. 3. 16 17. that hee would haue any thing commended by Timothy to other Teachers but what was to be found in holy Scriptures This place therefore helpes not for vnwritten traditions Ioh. 20. 30. Many other signes did Iesus c. which are not written in this booke Answ 1. The Euangelist saith they were not written in this booke But what then May they not be written in other Euangelists 2. Here he speakes of signes and Acts of Christ and not of his doctrine by tradition which is the matter in question and so this text is nothing to the purpose Ioh. 21. 25. There are many other things which also Iesus did c. Answ This place also speaketh of that which Iesus did and not of that which he taught Here is not one syllable of a traditionarie word Ioh. 16 12. Many things I haue to say to you but you cannot beare them now Ans 1. This place tels vs not what Christ said but what hee concealed to wit many things which he had to speake but then spake not so as this proueth not a traditionall word nor any word at all except they will conclude that what one can say therefore he doth say it 2. If Christ had said all things to the Apostles then yet would it not follow that the same were not at all written in Scripture for Iesus Christ taught what was written in the Scriptures expounded them cited them and by them confuted the Aduersaries And Saint Luke makes a profession that his Gospell was A Treatise of all that Iesus began both to doe and speake vnto the day of his Ascension Act. 1. 1 2. 3. Can our Aduersaries tell what things Christ had to say If they can first let them shew to vs what they were secondly that they were differing from those things taught by him and written now in the new Testament thirdly that they were neuer written by the Apostles If these they cannot demonstrate to vs they gaine nothing hence for their pretended traditionary August 77. tract in Iohn word This place heretickes abused for their traditions 1. Cor. 11. 16. Wee haue no such custome nor the Church of God Answ 1. This speaketh not affirmatiuely of a custome but negatiuely of no such custome 2. Though it had spoken of a custome what is this to a traditionall word Is custome doctrine Or is it not rather applied to actions as in Gen. 31. 35. Ioh. 18. 39 3. The Scriptures allow not custome to be a Rule Leu. 18. 2. See Doway Translation Ier. 10. 2. 2 King 17. 40. 1. Cor. 11. 34. The rest will I dispose when I come Answ Here is no speech of any word of Doctrine but of order among the Corinthians Ioh. 2. 12. and Ioh. 3. 13. Hauing moe things to write vnto you I would not by paper and inke For I hope that I shall be with you and speake mouth to mouth Answ These places shew indeed that in the two short Epistles Iohn wrote not all those things which he might haue written because he would speake to them of them But can our Aduersaries proue first that Iohn euer came to vtter the things vnwritten If he did what were they If he did not then so much of their conceited traditionall word is lost Secondly that those moe things left vnwritten were either things necessarie or they were not things already written Til they can shew these things this place doth them
Augustine speakes Secondly as Lyra thinkes it is so called for that the Church doth maintaine the truth of the Gospell euen in the greatest persecutions and as other iudge for that it vpholdeth the truth that it may not fall to the ground though it be afflicted and because by words and examples it confirmes our Faith Thirdly the Apostle speakes according to the vse of pillars in old time among the Gentiles on which their Lawes written in Tables were hanged vp for people to reade yea some wrote the Lawes vpon pillars themselues So as the Church here is resembled to those pillars which hath the Bookes of holy Lawes to shew them and to vphold them and to exhibite them out vnto all to bee seene and read Secondly because Saint Peter was counted a Pillar Gal. 2 9. and yet he erred euen in not walking according to the truth of the Gospell vers 14. Thirdly because Saint Paul calleth so the Church at Ephesus then as she was and so long to be so esteemed as she should continue Thus Saint Paul to the Hebrewes telleth them that they with himselfe and others are the House of Christ if saith he we hold fast the confidence and the reioycing of the hope firme vnto the end implying that if they did not they should not be so Can any well conclude from that which one is at the present that he shall euer be the same Then had not our first Parents fallen nor Salomon been an Idolater nor the Israelites now none of Gods people nor Rome as she is spirituall Babylon Fourthly because not the name and title of the House of God it self by which name the Church is called here in 1. Tim. 3. 15. as also beleeuers are called by the name of the houshold of God Ephes 2. 19. will afford this their conclusion For the Church of Ephesus so called did erre Now may it not be inferred from hence that she is called the House and beleeuers the Houshold and may it be inferred because she is called a pillar only or stay to vphold the house Will not the whole house nor the household yeeld it And will a pillar or prop make it good Very vnlikely Fifthly it is onely vpon the praise giuen to the Church that this conclusion is made Is this then good arguing Whatsoeuer prayses the Church hath that for which or wherein shee is praysed she hath it in perfection Here she is called the pillar and ground of truth Ergo say they she cannot erre See the like reasoning She is the houshold of Faith Gal. 6. 10. Ergo she neuer hath any doubting Yet this they deny and hold here to haue no certaine assurance Lastly consider the truth of which shee is the pillar and ground * On this place Ioh. 5. 23 Oecumenius vnderstands it in opposition to the shaddowes in the Temple vnder the Law there the type here the truth there the shadow here the substance But the Temple was onely the pillar and ground that is the appointed place where the knowledge and vse of the Ceremoniall Law was had and vpheld so onely is now the Church the place where the diuine truth is to be found and is in practice and no where else Truth in Scripture is taken for the Word of God Ioh. 17. 17. and 8. 31 32. the Gospell the Word of truth Col. 1. 5. Gal. 5. 7. euen the Mystery of godlinesse as Saint Paul in this place of the 1. Tim. 3. 16. enterpreteth the Word Truth So then the Church of God is the pillar and ground or stay of Gods Word and his Gospell euen the mysterie of godlinesse This she receiueth keepeth beareth vp publisheth to the world and is the ground whereon it doth rest and no where else in the world What then Is she or it the Rule Is her authoritie aboue it or it aboue her The King committeth to some the publike Records to keepe and to publish to other Is their authoritie greater then these Are their words of force without the warrant of those Records Or is it not possible for these keepers of them to erre in their proceedings We know the contrary The Iewes had the Oracles of God committed to them Rom. 3. 2. but haue not they erred The Church of Corinth Ephesus Galatia Philippi Colosse Thessalonica Hebrewes and other Churches in the East had the new Testament committed to them yet haue they we see erred So hath the Church of Rome very shamefully as the Epistle written to them doth testifie if her now new doctrine be examined by it The Church therefore the visible mixt company of whom all our dispute is may erre XIII Proposition That the Church of Rome cannot erre Confuted by their owne Bible I. IN it we reade that shee is in particular forewarned to take heed of falling Rom. 11. 20. which admonition proueth her possibilitie of erring II. It foretelleth of her Apostasie Yea this Church which See his Maiesties broke and Bishop Downham de Antichristo Respons eius ad â—essiam de Anticâ—r they say cannot erre and whereof the Pope is Head is called the great Whore named Babylon drunken with the Saints blood sitting vpon the Beast with seuen heads hauing ten hornes expounded by their owne Bible to be Rome Reuel 17. 1. 5 6. the great Citie situate vpon seuen Hills and which in Iohns dayes reigned ouer the Kings of the earth vers 9 18. III. Their Bible telleth vs that there were begun in her vncharitable disputations about eating and not eating of some things about obseruation of dayes Rom. 14. men for these things condemning and despising one another There were such then as were authors of diuisions and scandals contrary to the doctrine which the Saints then had learned Rom. 16. 17. so that a defection was then breeding and a beginning to erre from the Apostles doctrine in his dayes IV. The Epistle of Saint Paul written vnto them sheweth that she hath erred for his and her doctrine are at odds in many things as for example in these for instance The Romish Church Saint Paul She calleth not her selfe A Church but The Church and is euer boasting of that name Hee neuer calleth them at Rome then The Church as in other Epistles he vseth to call others the Corinthians Galatians Ephesians Reuel 2. 1. c. a point for Papists to note and to obserue why this title is not giuen her She saith that God may be represented like an old man He teacheth it to be a Heathenish practice for which God plagued them Rom. 1. 23. She teacheth that all sins deserue not death but in themselues many are veniall He nameth 23. sinnes Rom. 1. 29 30 31. worthy of death not for the Act but for the consent of heart vers 32. and Rom. 6. 23. He saith that the stipend of sinne is death he excepteth none She teacheth that the Virgin Marie was without sinne He teacheth otherwise All to be vnder sinne Rom. 3. 9. All to haue
sinned ver 33. and he exempteth none of either Iewes or Greekes neither there or any where else saue Iesus Christ onely Heb. 4. 15. She teacheth that they are iust fied by workes and that before God He contrarily Rom. 3. 24. We are iustified gratis by grace for we account a man to be iustified by faith without the workes of the Law vers 28. For if Abraham were iustified by works he hath to glory but not with God Rom. 4. 2. She teacheth that concupiscence in the regenerate is not sinne He contrary calleth it sinne Rom. 7. 7. She teacheth that a man may perfectly fulfill the Law and do workes of supererogation He teacheth the contrary and that out of himself Ro. 7 15 16 18 25. agreeing with our Sauiours teaching Luk. 17. 10. She teacheth that the sufferings of the Saints here are worthy of eternall glory He teacheth that the passions of this time are not condigne of glorie to come Rom. 8. 18. 2. Cor. 4. 17. She teacheth that the Church cannot erre S. Paul sheweth the contrary in Rom. 11. 19 20 21. by example of the Israelites and doth forewarne the Romanes to take heed that God do not cast them off She teacheth that the Pope and his Clergie is not subiect to Ciuill Authoritie He teacheth the contrary not exempting any Rom. 13. 1 3 4 6. with Tit. 3. 1. She teacheth that holinesse is to be put in the obseruation of daies and difference of meates He maketh this as a thing indifferent and teacheth that none are to contend about such things and that the kingdome of God stands not herein Rom. 14. 1 2 5 17. She teacheth that it is not profitable for all to reade the Scriptures He teacheth that it was written for the vse and comfort of all Rom. 4. 23. 15. 4. She teacheth to pray to Saints Angels and to the Virgin Marie and to giue them praises for many things He teacheth to pray to God Rom. 15. 30. and so prayeth he Rom. 15. 5 13 33. and 16. 27. to none other prayeth he nor giueth prayses but to God for his mercies Thus we see them to be at odds with the Apostle by the witnesse of their owne Bible laid to their doctrines The like might be shewed out of the Epistles of Saint Peter whom the Popes claime for their Rocke and therefore their Church not onely may and doth erre And to make yet this more cleare we will view them first in their virtuall Church and then in their Church representatiue The creame or quintessence of their Church as it is reduced to an Elixir by the Refiners and Alchymists the Iesuites is squeczed into a little roome and comprized in the Pope whom they call the Virtuall Church Of his Holyhood they auouch XIV Proposition That the Bishop of Rome cannot erre Confuted by their owne Bible IT giueth vs to know that Peter whom forsooth they doe make the first Pope of Rome did erre first in mistaking Christs Kingdome as terrene and earthly Act. 1. 6. Secondly concerning the person of Eliah that he should come before the Messiah mis-vnderstanding Malachi Mat. 17. 10. Thirdly touching the resurrection of Christ Luke 18. 34. Iohn 20. 9. Fourthly in hauing conscience of the difference of meates after Christs Ascension Acts 10. 14. Fifthly in not vnderstanding his full Commission to goe to the Gentiles Act. 10. 20. Sixthly in not walking rightly to the veritie of the Gospell Gal. 2. 14. If then this first Pope as they make him did so erre then the after-Popes may except they can shew some priuiledge before him Contraried by Antiquitie For it is manifest by History that the Popes iudgement was not held to be infallible but that he might erre 1. For we may find such to haue been made Popes as may easily perswade any wise man that they might erre Some haue Alphonsus de Castro haeres li. 4. ca. 4. Platina in Iul. 1. * See Master Alex. Cooke his booke of this which no Papist hath vndertaken to answere See such Authors as haue set out the Popes liues Platina and other bin vnlettered Idiots no Grammarians that could hardly write their names in Latine some Lay-men as Constantius the second and Bennet the eighth and once a woman Pope * Ioane and very boyes for age Bennet the ninth a child of ten yeeres old Iohn the twelfth a bastard a mad Lad about eighteene yeeres old Could not these yonkerrene thinke you 2. Some haue been most abominable persons Atheists blasphemers poysoners sorcerers and such like Is it like that Gods holy Spirit would reside in such filthy monsters to keepe them forsooth from erring 3. Some of them fell fearefully Marcellinus worshipped Heathen Idols Zepherinus was a Montanist Liberius and Felix Arians Anastasius the second an Acatian Vigilius an Eutychian and Honorius a Monothelite And cannot yet Popes erre 4. Some Popes haue abrogated the Decrees one of another Benno Platina Supplementum Chronic. Gregorie the first abolished the Decrees of Pelagius so Sabinian and Innocent those of Gregorie Steuen abolished those of Formosus so Romanus those of Steuen and so forth And cannot yet Popes erre 5. Some haue decreed flat against Scripture Celestine ordained Alphons li. 1. ca. 4. de haeres Trent Conc. sect 8. can 3. sub Pio 4. Marriage to be void when either party fell into heresie Pius Quartus decreed that it should be lawfull for him to allow degrees of Marriage forbidden in Leuiticus and to forbid what God allowed And cannot Popes erre 6. Easterne Bishops and ancient Fathers haue very sharpely Euseb li. 5. c. 26. reproued the Bishop of Rome as namely Polycrates the Bishop of Ephesus and as Ireneus the Bish of Lions did Victor for his rash proceeding against the Easterne Church And yet doe not Popes erre 7. Ancient Councels haue withstood him as that of Chalcedon Acts 16. wherein were 630. Bishops withstanding Leo in the question of supremacy The sixth Councell of Carthage of 217. Can. 105. Bishops resisted three Popes one after another in that they would do contrary to the Councell of Nice These iudged that Popes might erre else would they haue yeelded to the Popes Gainesaid by Papists themselues 1. Pope Andrian the sixth de sacr confir ar 3. ad 2. pag. 55. saith It is certaine that the Pope may erre So iudged Innocentius Arbor Theosoph li. 4. ca. 32. De potestat Ecclesiae consid 10. 11. De signis Ecclesiae li. 18. ca. 6. the fourth So also haue learned men formerly held as Gerson of which opinion are the Sorbonists who hold that the Pope might erre Bosius dares to write that the Pope may be an heretike writing teaching and preaching heresies Stapleton confesseth it to be no matter of Faith but of opinion Controuers 3. qu. 4. onely because so many famous and renowned Diuines haue euer held the contrary as Gerson Almaine Occam almost all the Parisians Durandus whereto may bee added Waldensis Turrecremata
This power was not giuen alone to Peter but as Peter answered one for all so in Peter he gaue his power to all Pope Leo 1. ser 3. in Aniuers die assump suae ad pontificatum This power of the Keyes passed ouer to all the Apostles Gratian Decrees D. 21. in nouo 24. q. 2. loquitur Saint Peter receiued no more power then the rest of the Apostles Gerson de potest Ecclesiae consid 11. The Keyes were not giuen to one but to vnitie Councell of Basil The Keyes were giuen to the Church and not to Peter Hincmar Archbishop of Rhemes wrote a Booke hereof vnder Charles against another Hincmar Episcopum Laudunensem yea Canonists and those of the chiefest in cap. 1. de renunciat lib. 6. say that the power of binding and loosing in which is found all iurisdiction of the Church proceedeth immediately from Christ and not mediately from Saint Peter Touching Peters Office of feeding Cusanus Concord lib. 2. c. 13. vpon the place of Iohn 21. 15 16 17. as also of Christs charge to goe into all the world and preach saith There is found nothing said to Peter that importeth any power Marsilius Defens Pacis part 2. cap. 28. saith That Christ spake to al the Apostles in Peters person which manner of speaking Christ testifieth himselfe to haue vsed in that hee saith What I say to one I say to all Gregorie lib. 4. Epist 32. denyeth Peter to bee called vniuersall Bishop And it is well knowne how he opposed that title as very Antichristian lib. 4. Epist 34. But if hee had knowne that to Peter the whole Church had beene principally committed that hee had beene the Prince of the Apostles and Pastor of Pastors he would haue allowed of that title as iust and lawfull and not haue condemned it as Antichristian Scriptures obiected answered Mat. 16. 18. Thou art Peter and vpon this Rocke I will build my Church and the gates of Hell c. Answ Here is no expresse word of Headship neither doth this Text by consequence proue it For although Christ speakes to Peter yet he speakes not of Peters person I. The words are a promise touching the Churches safety and nothing of Peters Supremacie II. It speakes of a Rocke on which the Church is builded Now the words are a Metaphor as Bellarmine granteth But a Lib. 1. de PP Rom. cap. 11. Metaphor is to be interpreted according to the nature of the thing of which it is spoken as here of a Rocke as of a foundation which is to vphold that which is built vpon it and not to rule ouer that which is builded thereupon So that from the name of Rocke cannot be concluded Headship and Rule for it is not proper to a foundation in that respect to rule but to support and beare vp III. If Christ here either gaue or promised to giue to Peter the Headship and that before all the rest of his Disciples Why did then afterward Iames and Iohn Mar. 10. 35. and their Mother Math. 20. 2. seeke for the chiefest places aboue the rest Yea and why did the Apostles afterwards striue which of them should be the greatest Luk. 22. 24 And why had not Christ plainely decided this for Peter then and told them of this his speech and meaning in this place towards Peter If Christ had heere intended it surely there he had not forbidden Soueraignty but vpon so sit occasion offered had stablished Headship vpon Peter It is cleare therefore that Christ here meant no such thing IV. If by Rocke be concluded Headship not to vrge the Metaphor against it yet Peter is neuer the nearer his Headship for he is not the Rocke 1. The name Peter giueth it him not For first there Christ names him for more vehement affirming of that which hee The like speech Gen. 41. 44. would vtter for the Churches comfort As if he had said As verily as thou art Peter and so to be called Ioh. 1. 42. Mar. 3. 16. so certainly will I build my Church firmely vpon the Rocke which thou hast made confession of that Hell gates shall not preuaile against it So that Christ cals him not Peter because he should be the Rocke but that vpon the remembrance of his name he might thinke vpon the Churches safe stabilitie as vpon a Rocke against all the powers of darknesse 2. Petros is the interpretation of Cephas Ioh. 1. 42. and therfore he being by Christ who spake Syriak called Cephas as he is sometime so named by S. Paul 1. Cor. 1. 15. most commonly he was called Peter not alluding to Peter in this place of Matthew but for that Cephas was Syriak and Petros Greeke and so was he named Peter because of the generalitie of the Greeke tongue rather then Cephas 3. Petros signifieth in Greeke generally a stone and not a Rocke of foundation And therefore though hee be called Peter yet is he not therefore the Rocke but a Stone in the Lords building a precious stone For the twelue Apostles are twelue foundations Reu. 21. 14. and euery foundation is a precious stone verse 19. 20. And if Peter bee reckoned the first in order he is there a lasper A stone he is and so are all the other Apostles fundamentall stones and likewise are the elect stones too 1. Pet. 2. 5. though not such stones But the chiefe corner stone is Christ 1. Pet. 2. 6. and here in Mathew is hee the Rocke and not Peter Petros is a stone Now the Church is here built on a Rocke not on a stone except on the Corner-stoue and on the twelue precious Stones but not on one stone but vpon one Rocke 4. If Christ by calling him Petros had meant him to be Petra then had Petros bin an appellatiue the same with Rock and not a proper name as here it is vsed For no Demonstratiue goeth before it But if Christ had said Thou art that Petros and vpon that Rock will I build my Church and so made the word appellatiue this Text had been somewhat to the purpose but here is no such Demonstratiue Petros being a proper name 5. He cannot be the Rocke because that Christ cals him Peter for he was Peter before Mar. 3. 16. and is now Peter when Christ called him so for he saith Thou art Peter He was not now at this time the Rocke as Bellarmine doth confesse Lib. 1. cap. 10. 〈◊〉 Rom. PP Therefore it is not his name that makes him the Rocke because here hee is Peter but yet not the Rocke by Bellarmines grant II. These words vpon this Rocke will not make Peter the Rocke 1. The Scripture no where makes man the Rocke of Gods Church Dauid called God his Rocke 2. Sam. 22. 2 32. Psal 18. 2. Saint Paul saith Christ is the Rocke 1. Cor. 10. 4. 2. The word Peter and Rocke in the Originall yea and in their Translation are distinguished in gender and termination yea and in signification as before is noted and the one
Vicar of Christ they could not be Vicars too and by these mens testimonie they being Vicars he was not Christs onely Vicar Now then I conclude that if Peter was not the Prince of the Apostles nor the Head of the Church nor Christs onely generall Vicar here on earth then the Pope cannot possibly bee any of these For he claimeth all from Peter as being his onely successor Therefore Peter neuer hauing these from Christ as is fully proued the Pope cannot haue them But if it could be proued that Peter had all these which yet is most false what were that to the Pope by what right could hee claime them when al the Papists in the world are not able by vndeniable arguments to proue 1. That Peter was euer after he was Christs See my Booke The fabulous foundation of the Popedome Disciple personally at Rome 2. That albeit hee had beene at Rome therefore already being an Apostle hee was the Bishop of Rome an inferiour Dignitie 3. That whatsoeuer was giuen to Peter the same was also giuen to the Pope successiuely to the worlds end 4. That the Pope is truely Peters successor both in Doctrine and life 5. That these last Popes for many hundred yeeres are one and the same with the Bishops of Rome in the first three hundred of yeeres for Doctrine and conuersation following Peter therein Till these be proued soundly though Peter had been that which they striue to make him yet is the Pope neuer the better but a proud and an arrogant vsurper of Titles and Authoritie not due to him XXI Proposition That the Publike seruice of the Church ought not to be in a vulgar and knowne Tongue Confuted by their owne Bible 1. Cor. 14. 9. So thou also by a tongue vnlesse thou vtter a manifest Speech how shall that be knowne which is said for thou shalt but speake in the Aire This is a plaine condemning of speaking in a tongue not manifest not vnderstood of the Hearers 2. Cor. 1. 13. We write no other things to you then that you haue read and know They then knew what they read whether priuate or publike Ephes 3. 4. According as thou reading maist vnderstand Reading the Scriptures is a part of the publique Liturgie or seruice 1. Thes 5. 27. I adiure you by the Lord that this Epistle bee read to all the holy Brethren If it had beene in an vnknowne Tongue it had beene in vaine to haue beene read vnto all the brethren and it had been to no purpose thus to adiure them Act. 1. 14. All these were perseuering in one minde in Prayer and with one accord Act. 4. 24. This was Publike Prayer But if they vnderstood not what was prayed how could they bee of one minde and accord S. Paul willeth vs to pray and sing with vnderstanding 1. Cor. 14. 15. and saith plainely that if men blesse that is pray in an vnknowne tongue the vulgar cannot say Amen And hee giueth this Reason because hee knoweth not what thou sayest neither is edified verse 16 17. In their Bible mention is made First of Prayer in the Congregation Act. 12. 12. 4. 24. 13. 3. 16. 13 16. 20. 36. and 21. 5. Secondly of reading the Scriptures Coloss 4. 16. The parts of the publike Seruice of the Church in the Apostles daies 1. Thess 5. 27. Thirdly of preaching Act. 9. 20. 20. 7. Fourthly of singing Math. 26. 30. 1. Cor. 14. Fiftly of administring the holy Sacraments of Baptisme Act. 10. and of the Lords Supper 1. Cor. 10. 11. Let our Aduersaries shew if they be able that these parts of the publike seruice were done in an vnknowne tongue Contraried by Antiquitie Origen cont Cels l. 8. Let euery man make his prayer to God in his natiue Mother tongue Austin Tract in Iohan. 21. Why are these things spoken in the See more in l. 4. â— 10. de doct Christ lib. â—4 c. 16. de Trunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 18. â— 4â— Church but to be knowne Why are they pronounced but to bee heard And why are they heard but to be vnderstood And on Gen. l. 12. cap. 8. Noman saith hee is edified by hearing that which he vnderstands not Ambr. in cap. 14. 1. Epist ad Cor. If we come together saith he to edifie the Church those things ought to be spoken which the hearers vnderstand Chrysostom hom 35. in 1. Cor. Hee that speakes in an vnknowne tongue is not onely vnprofitable and a Barbarian to others but euen to himselfe if he vnderstand not In Hom. 18. on 2. Cor. Hee telleth vs that the Priests and the people say the same common prayers and all doe say one thing S. Basil Epist 63. telleth how that in his time when they met together they vsed a knowne language In the purest Churches for the space of eight hundred yeeres Diuine Seruice was neuer performed in an vnknowne tongue And if it were at any time in a tongue not the Mother tongue yet was not that tongue a strange language but such as the hearers vnderstood See for this point Master Perkins Probleme If any desire any more of this let him reade Doctor Fulk on Rhem. Testament 1. Cor. 14. Doctor White his last Book of this point pag. 369. who eiteth Origen Iustin Martyr Tertul. Clemens Alexand. Cyprian Basil Chrysostome Ambrose and Augustine with their owne words against this absurd practice of Papists See also pag. 375. in the Margin 380. Gainesaid by themselues Aeneas Syluius who after was Pope in hist Bohem. cap. 13. faith that when sute was made that the Slauonians newly conuerted to the faith might haue their Church-seruice in their Mother Tongue and there being some stay about it at Rome a voice was heard from Heauen saying That euery spirit should praise the Lord and euery tongue should confesse vnto him So the controuersie is determined by an immediate voice from heauen The Lateran Councell vnder Innocent the third chap. 9. decreed by reason of mingled Nations of diuers tongues in one Citie that meet men should bee prouided to celebrate Diuine seruice and to administer the Sacraments according to the diuersitie of their Rites and languages Lyra on 1. Cor. 14. saith that if the people vnderstood the prayers of the Priest they were better brought vnto God and so answere Amen more deuoutly And Caietan on the same saith it were better for the Churches edification that prayers should bee said in the Mother tongue Many learned Papists as Lyra Thomas Aquinas this Caietan on this 1. Cor. 14. and Erasmus in Declarat ad Cens pag. 153. confesse that in the Primitiue Church and long after the Prayers and Seruice were done in the Mother Tongue See D. Whites last booke pag. 356. mentioning Armenians Abissines Indians Russians Egyptians proued by Papists themselues And Cassander Liturg. cap. 28. sheweth that diuers Nations to this day retaine the ancient custome still Thus we see their owne Bible the ancient Fathers their owne
wood are called idols and diuels But they worship the workes of their hands made of such things and therefore worship idols and diuels Thus God condemneth Imagerie for idols and diuels And this very place may fitly be vnderstood of Papists For first these idolaters here spoken of are such as fall out to bee vnder the sixt trumpet long after the destruction of the Heathen idolaters 2. They are such as be after the Starre is fallen chap. 9. 1. and become a King of the Locusts But what Clergie man since Christ euer wore a Crowne but the Pope 3. They are such as those great Armies verse 16. were raised vp to plague for their idolatry But what can these be but Turkes the scourge of Popish idolaters idolatrous Christians 4. They are such as ouer-ranne the true Religion so as Christ sends out his Word to recouer his from vnder this idolatrie and from among them chap. 10. 11. But who haue spred their idols ouer the Church Not Iewes nor Turkes but Papists And hath not Christ sent out his Word to regaine his from among them 5. And lastly the words chap. 9. 20 21. doe set out Papists 1. They repented not of the works of their hands whē they saw the Easteme Churches ouerthrowne by the Turkes for their idolatrie after the second Nicene Councell there establishing it 2. These committed Murthers Sorceries Fornication and Thefts And doe not all know how these raigne among Papists For murders their massacres of Christians and vnheard of cruelties vpon poore Indians many millions witnesse them For Sorceries is not spirituall Babylon that is Rome full thereof chap. 18. 23 Rome now is that Whore drunke with bloud chap. 17. which deceiued the Nations by her Sorceries chap. 18. 23. For her Fornication she is called the Mother of whoredomes chap. 17. And doe not her Stewes witnesse it What shall I speake how vnder colour of vowed pouertie by Dispensations Pardons Indulgences shee robbed euery Kingdome Therefore these are Papists worshipping idols and diuels and cannot so well bee applyed to any other vnder heauen all the former circumstances seriously and throughly weighed See B. Carleton his Booke of Thanksgiuing how he presseth this text vpon Papists Contraried by Antiquitie Tertul. de idolat God hath forbidden both the making and worshipping of an Idol Now by Idol he meaneth euery forme or representation as himselfe there saith and that the consecration of Images is Idolatry Epiphanius The superstition of Images is vnfit for the Church of Christ He seeing an Image in a Church tare it in sunder hee also exhotred to bring no Images into the Churches as an horrible wickednesse yea though it were the Picture of Christ himselfe Lactantius saith Out of doubt there is no Religion where there is an Image Gregory the Bishop of Neocaesaria saith Concil Nicen. 2. Act. 6. that Heathenisme was the first deuiser and head of Images Enseb l. 7. c. 17. calleth it an heathenish custome Origen against Celsus Common sense doth will men to thinke that God is not delighted with honour of Images made by men And of his owne time hee saith thus We worship no Images In Saint Austins time it is cleere by that which hee writeth on Psal 113. that there were no Images in Churches The Councell at Eliberis or Granada in Spaine decreed that nothing which is honoured of the people should be painted in the Churches The first and sixth Constantinopolitan Councell held against Images that it was not lawfull either to haue the Images of Saints or to worship them And if any from that time durst make or adore them in the Church or at home if of the Clergie he was to be deposed if of the Laity accursed The generall Councell by the Commandement of the Apostolike See at Franckford vnder Charles the great where the Popes Legates were condemned the worship of Images Abb. Vsperg Anno 793. Rhegino Anno 794. Opus illustr Caroli Mag. contra Synod p. 486. l. 4. c. 2. See Alan Cope dial 4. cap. 18. The Ancient Christians of the Primitiue Church had none Clem. Alexand. hort ad Gent. pag. 14. Minutius Foelix Octau Atheuag Legat. Athanasius against the Gentiles saith If a liuing man cannot teach thee to know God how can a carued stocke and a stone doe it that is dead Gregory Bishop of Rome lib 7. Epist 109. commends the zeale of Serenus a Bishop in France who would haue nothing made with hands worshipped and therefore brake the Images which act though Gregorie commended not yet hee would haue him keepe the people from the worship of them The Bishop of Orleance Ionas lib. 1. de cultis Imag. professed his detestation against the worship of Images and held the doers worthy to be cursed Bishop Durandin Rational lib. 1. cap. 3. and Catharin tract de cult Imag. thinke their vse to be dangerous Gainesaid by themselues Polydor. Virgil lib. 6. cap. 13. de inuent rerum writeth that by the testimonie of Ierome it appeareth how in a manner all the ancient holy Fathers condemned the worship of Images for feare of idolatry Erasmus in Catechis saith that by the testimonie of sound and approued Stories it is cleere that till Ieromes time such as were of sound Religion would endure no image either painted or grauen to be set vp in the Churches no not the image of Christ himselfe Holcot in lib. Sap. lect 7. saith that no adoration is due to any Image and that it is not lawfull to adore any Image Agobardus B. of Lyons who liued in Anno 815. saith in Bibl. Paetrum Whosoeuer worshippeth a Picture molten or grauen Statue worships an Idol not God nor Saint nor Angel See Roger Houeden part 1. Annal. fol. 272. where he sheweth how the Church of God detested the Decree of the 2. Nicene about worship of Images Aquinas Hales Albertus Bonauenture Marsilius and nine more cited by D. White in his last Booke pag. 209. doe hold that Adoration of Images was prohibited the Iewes Then such places as bee alledged for Images in the Old Testament by our moderne Papists are but abused Bannes in Tho. 229. par 10. pag. 170. saith that the worship of the Images of Saints is neither expressely nor vnfoldedly taught in holy Scriptures All Scriptures therefore alledged are but abusiuely alledged to beguile the simple Scriptures obiected answered 1. For making Images to be worshipped Exo. 25. 18. And thou shalt make two Cherubims c. Ans This is no warrant now for vs. For we haue a perpetuall law forbidding the making of Images likenesses Exod. 20. to worship them Leu. 26. 1. This binds vs for euer But God is not bound he makes a Law for vs not to himselfe And this commandement which he gaue was extraordinarie for a time and therefore not imitable of vs no more then his command to Abraham to kill his sonne or to Israel to rob the Egyptians are to be warrants for vs to kill or rob any 2. This was not done
when hee liued on the earth Thirdly if but so what is this to proue that Saints then and so now doe know euery mans estate particularly and what passeth here vpon earth Ioh. 5. 45. There is one that accuseth you euen Moses Answ 1. By Moses is not meant his person but his writings among them as the verses 46. and 47. doe declare Secondly it is absurd to make the Saints in Heauen accusers Papists will haue them Intercessors whose propertie is not to accuse in any sort but to pray for them which pray to them Thirdly Christ saith they trust in Moses Will a Saint in heauen bee so displeased with them and so faile them that trust in him that hee will goe and accuse them vnto God Such then become miserable Patrons Doth their Legend afford any such examples Fourthly Christs saying that they trusted in Moses must not be vnderstood of his person but of his writings For the Iewes did not beleeue in man A curse as is before deliuered they knew to be pronounced against them which trusted in man Reu. 12. 10. The accuser of the brethren is cast downe which accused them before God day and night Answ In the former they make Moses an accuser of some and so in that respect a companion with the diuell heere Is not this a wise Gagger But how can they proue hence that Saints in Heauen know what is done here Because the diuell knowes what euils are here done A goodly reason But doe not wee know that the Diuell is here on earth that hee compasseth the earth to and fro Hee stirres vp Dauid to number the people hee is author of much mischiefe hee must then know many things And will it hence follow therefore that soules which remaine continually in heauen must know what is here done in earth 2. King 6. 12. Elisha telleth what words the King of Syria spake being farre from him So 2. King 5. 26. Elisha saw what passed between Naaman and Gehezi 1. Cor. 12. Saint Paul was rapt vp into the third Heauen Act. 7. Steuen in earth saw Christ in heauen Answ 1. These places tell vs that these things were so Let them bring vs Scriptures which will affirme as much of the soules in heauen heere seeing things in earth and we will beleeue But this these places proue not Secondly these were extraordinarie reuelations and giue no warrant of ordinarie knowledge In such things from extraordinarie acts to ordinarie is no sound arguing For the Prophets did not know all things Elisha knew not the cause of the Shunamites comming 2. King 4. 27. nor Samuel when he went to lesse his house whom God would chuse 1. Sam. 16. 6. Thirdly all these are instances of knowledge in men on earth of things done on earth or of things which being on earth they saw in heauen but not a word what those in heauen saw here vpon earth which is the onely point in question The Gagger quoteth moe places As Mat. 19. 28. But this is nothing to purpose And the place is meant of all appearing before Christ at the last day whom the Apostles shall then see Reu. 2. 26. 1. Here is a promise accomplished in Christ See D. White his last booke p 309. 310 311 312. in answer to this as also to Reu. 3. 12. 1. Cor. 13. 9. 5. 10. not cited by the Gagger Psal 2. in whom the Saints haue this power See Augustine Beda and many other cited by Fulke on this place for this sense Secondly this is to bee vnderstood of the Saints power ouer those out of the Church For here they are to bee ruled with a rodde of iron and to be broken in pieces But the Saints departed Papists make Protectors of others and not breakers of them to shiuers Act. 5. 3. This was an extraordinarie manifestation of Ananias his hypocrisie to Peter If they can proue that God doth reueale mens actions here to Saints in Heauen wee yeeld 1. Sam. 28. 14. Here is the Diuell appearing in Samuelt likenesse what hence this Gagger will gather for Saints knowledge in heauen I know not III. Scriptures obiected that Saints departed doe pray for vs particularly answered Reu. 5. 8. The 24. Elders fell downe before the Lambe hauing euery one of them Harps and golden Vials full of odours which are the prayers of the Saints Answ 1. This was in a vision and traunce and the words allegoricall and therefore cannot bee the ground of Doctrine of faith Secondly here is not meant the Saints departed but these foure and twenty are the type of the whole Church here on earth verse 10. Thirdly these prayers of the Saints which Saints are on earth chap. 8. 3. may be the prayers of the foure and twenty Elders themselues yet called the prayers of the Saints as if they were the prayers of others First for that these represent the whole Church verse 9. which consists of Saints Secondly because a Church or Congregation of people gathered together pray not onely for themselues but for all the Saints of God and so their hearts here being as Vials full of the grace of Prayer as it were odours are esteemed the prayers of all Saints Fourthly Tho. Aquinas Rich. de Sco. Victore Haymo Beda and other doe expound this place of the Church militant 2. Mach. 15. 14. Then Onias answered c. Where he telleth how Ieremy prayed for the people Answ 1. This is an Apocryphal Booke Secondly this speech of Onias touching Ieremies praying was but Iudas his dreame For it is said in verse 11. that he told the souldiers al this as his dreame to encourage them to fight It is weake architecture to build vpon a dreame doctrines of faith Thirdly neither did Iudas much regard the helpe of Ieremies prayer For in the same Chapter hee himselfe did pray verse 21 22 23. but intreated not Ieremy to pray for him but made his suite onely to God Ier. 15. 1. Though Moses and Samuel stood before me c. Answ 1. These words are spoken onely by way of supposition as if God had said If Moses and Samuel were now before mee as they were when they liued on earth praying for these people I should not regard them Is it good reasoning from a suppositiue speech to a reall act indeed Secondly they themselues say that all the Fathers that were before Christ were in Limbus Patrum and so could not know our affaires in particular to pray for vs. Baruch 3. 4. Heare now the prayers of the dead Israelites Answ 1. This booke is Apocryphal Secondly were not these in the place called Limbus Patrum How could they then see all things in the face of God from whose presence they were kept Thirdly heere is mention of the prayers of dead Israelites but not for whom they prayed It is not said they prayed for others on earth They might pray for themselues in Limbo Fourthly by dead Israelites are not here to bee vnderstood such as were departed
fit this Shrift is for bawdry If any desire more reade Bishop Vshers last booke wherein is cited Gratian Iohannes Semeca Michael of Bononia Iohannes de Selua Also let him look into Doctor Whites way of the true Church of the Papists differing opinions about this pag. 440. 441. in quarto digress 55. Num. 8. and D. Whites last booke p. 190 191. Ans to Fisher 192. citing Iohn Medina Gratian and Caietan Iansenius Vasques Mich. Palacius Gloss on Gratian Gerson Panormitan Maldonat and others Scriptures obiected answered Math. 18. 18. Whatsoeuer ye shall binde on earth c. Answ 1. Here is not a word of confession in this place of Scripture but rather of accusation by another For in the words foregoing the notice giuen to the Church is from the partie not offending but offended If thy brother trespasse against thee c. tell it to the Church But all Auricular confession is supposed voluntary whereby a man accuseth himselfe and in priuate not publike as here Ioh. 20. 23. Whose sinnes ye remit c. Answ 1. Here is no mention of confession of sinnes to them Secondly the authoritie giuen here to the Apostles was exercised in the publike Ministerie preaching of the Word though they heard no priuate confession as the Papists dreame of Therefore the Apostle Saint Paul calleth the preaching of the Word the ministerie of Reconciliation 2. Cor. 5. 18. Thirdly Christ saith there As my Father sent mee so I send you Now he was not sent to heare priuate confessions and thereupon to giue them absolutions but by preaching to binde vp the broken hearted to proclaime libertie to the captiues and the opening of the prison to them that are bound Esai 61. 1. Luk. 4. 18. Neither did he binde any to priuate confession nor sate to heare the same Therefore such as he sendeth are not tyed to doe otherwise neither hath heere Popish shrift any ground Fourthly Caietan on this place saith that the Sacrament of penance hath here no commandement Act. 19. 18. And many that beleeued came and confessed c. Answ Here is mention indeed of confession but this proueth not imposed priuate confession secretly in the Priests eare For first this is of a confession voluntary not enforced Secondly of many that did it but not of all Thirdly publike and not in S. Pauls eare For as they shewed their workes and brought their bookes and burnt them before all men verse 19 So was this confession open for the Text maketh no difference of these actions Fourthly Here it is said they confessed but no particular enumeration of sinnes with circumstances Fiftly Caietan a Cardinall in his Commentarie hereof holdeth that this place is not meant of Auricular confession Iam. 5. 16. Confesse your faults one to another Answ This is nothing for the Popish confession For first it is as generall as prayer one for another But Prayer is a dutie common to all Secondly he saith not the prayer of the Priest but of a righteous man And I hope that others beside Priests are righteous men Thirdly here is not a word of absolution but a promise to the prayer of faith not to the Priests words to saue the sicke and to haue his sinnes pardoned verse 15. Fourthly confession commanded heere is not confined to a Priest but may extend to any other This Saint Iames speakes to all to whom he wrote his Epistle And this place is to be vnderstood one of these three wayes First either of Priests and people and then are the Priests bound to confesse as well to the people as the people to them For it s said Confesse one to another that is mutually or reciprocally Secondly or heere is vnderstood onely of Priests among themselues and then is there nothing to the people Thirdly or onely of the people among themselues and then is this nothing to the Priest to take authoritie hence to bind the people to confesse to him Fourthly confession here is not of secret sinnes in heart against God or sinnes hidden from men but of trespasses or offences one against another as the word in the Originall sheweth and is so taken in Marke 11. 25 26. Vpon which grieuances mutuall confession or acknowledgement of wrongs is here enioyned as a fit meanes of brotherly reconciliation and preseruation of peace among themselues To which they must adde prayer one for another that their mutuall confession reciprocally for reconciliation may bee blessed vnto them Of which practice happy are they which make conscience and blessed should we be if to this euery man would submit himselfe A harder taske then to whisper his sinnes in a Priests eare secretly Lastly the Rhemists say vpon this text that it is not certaine that S. Iames speaketh here of Sacramentall confession Wherevpon others in alledging Scriptures for Auricular confession leaue out this place as not to the purpose Mat. 3. 5 6. Then went out to him Ierusalem and all Iudea and all the Region round about Iordane and were baptized in Iordane confessing their sinnes Answ This sorteth not with Popish Auricular Confession and that for these three reasons First this was publike not in a corner of the Temple or of a Synagogue but in the place where he baptized them in Iordan before all the people Secondly this was at their first conuersion receiuing Baptisme and not yeerely at set times Thirdly it s not certaine what sinnes or how many whether in generall or particular they confessed Fourthly it was impossible for Iohn to heare euery mans priuate confession with enumeration of circumstances seeing all Iudea and all the Region about Iordane and Ierusalem went out to him meaning very many and multitudes of people Leuit. 13. 2. 14. 2. The Leper shall bee brought vnto the Priest c. Answ 1. Here is no mention of confession of sinnes but of one brought to the Priest to take a view of the Plague of Leprosie vpon the body verse 9 10. All the argument therefore that can hence be drawne is onely typicall not conuicting Secondly the partie was not to come and confesse himselfe a Leper to the Priest but the Priest was to iudge him so and to pronounce him a Leper chap. 13. 3 11 44. Then should the Leper cry and confesse not to the Priest but to the people that hee was vncleane verse 45. Thirdly this iudgement of the Leprosie by a plaine Law here belonged to the Priest But where can they shew a Law onely for their Priests to heare priuate confession after their Popish manner Fourthly the Priest looking vpon the partie was not in priuate betweene them two but before other for hee was brought vnto the Priest by others to bee viewed Fiftly the Priest did not alwayes professe the partie cleane vpon shewing his malady as the Popish Priest doth euer the Confitent vpon shewing his sins by confession but the Leuiticall Priest put the partie apart from all others a time for a tryall Leuit. 13. 4 5. and after
20. Because saith hee wee are redeemed by the grace of the Creator wee haue this heauenly gift bestowed vpon vs that when we leaue our fleshly habitation incontinently we are carried to our heauenly rewards Can any thing bee spoken more cleerely against going into Purgatorie See Bishop Vsher his last Booke in the controuersie touching Purgatorie and also D. White his last booke pag. 567. citing many Papists touching the inualiditie of the Popes power ouer soules in Purgatorie Scriptures obiected answered 1. Cor. 3. 15. If any mans worke shall bee burnt hee shall suffer losse but himselfe shall be saued yet so as by fire Answ 1. Albeit the foolish Gagger doth say that this is an expresse Scripture to proue Purgatorie yet Bellarmine saith Lib. 1. de Purg. cap. 5. that this is one of the most difficult places of the whole Scripture Therefore it will not easily satisfie a doubtfull minde in this controuerted point Secondly this place is interpreted in the seuerall words very See Morneus on the Masse all their opinions cited Lib. 3. cap. 6. p. 257 261. diuersly by the Ancients and so variously as Bellarmine is forced by reason of the incongruities thereof to leaue and forsake them all and to run his owne course as wide as any of the rest and differing from his fellowes Thomas Alcuinus Hugo Cardinalis and other Thirdly Erasmus in his Commentarie saith that this place affordeth not any thing for Purgatorie or veniall sinnes This his opinion is not suffered to see light but is blotted out See Index Expurgatorius which is made the true Purgatorie for Erasmus and others that dare to doubt of the false Purgatorie Fourthly the words are all Allegoricall Now Symbolicall places proue not Articles of Faith And therein it is absurd to take any of the words properly in continued metaphors and wholly Allegoricall Fiftly this text speaketh of burning of a mans worke but not of burning a soule But in Purgatorie they say the soule is burning and not his worke workes goe not into Purgatorie but here workes both good and bad are tryed by this fire Sixtly this speaketh of the worke of Teachers building vpon the foundation either Gold Siluer or precious Stones or Wood Hay and Stubble By the former must bee vnderstood either sound Doctrine or sound-hearted Beleeuers wonne to Christ by their teaching and then by the latter must be meant errours and vnsound Doctrine or hollow-hearted Christians which in time of fierie tryall fall away Take then either way this is nothing for veniall sinnes or bringing soules to a purgation Accordingly in the thirteenth verse the fire is a reuealing and trying fire to manifest the difference of mens workes in the execution of their Ministerie What is this to the purging and tormenting fire as a satisfactorie punishment for sinne Purgatorie fire is a materiall fire say they but a materiall fire cannot try Doctrines truth from falshood sound from vnwholesome teaching Seuenthly the word fire in verse 15. cannot be taken for materiall fire or Purgatorie fire First because the continued metaphors in the whole context admits not of such a proper and literall interpretation Secondly the word of similitude is against it For it is not said by fire but as by fire so it is not meant fire properly but by some likenesse a metaphoricall fire not a materiall fire Thirdly Estius one of their owne learned men saith That the word fire three times mentioned in verse 13 and 15 is the same in euery place and calleth the interpretation absurd which puts a difference in them Which being true the former fire in verse 13. not being meant of Purgatorie by Bellarmines grant this latter cannot but absurdly be so interpreted And so in conclusion no Purgatorie fire at all This fire is spirituall such a fire as can try Doctrines and can reueale them and can saue the builder though it consume his worke which fire is Gods Word Ier. 23. 29. and 20. 9. and Gods holy Spirit Mar. 9. 49. Mat. 3. 11. This word by the operation of this Spirit vpon the conscience of an erroneous builder when by the light of truth hee seeth his worke vaine and naught worketh as fire in him to make him confesse his errour and to labour to teach the truth and thus is he saued as by fire the word being in him as fire as it was in Ieremie especially in time of trouble and day of tryall for his Doctrine Ioh. 11. 22. But I know that euen now whatsoeuer thou wilt aske of God God will giue it thee Cardinall Allen saith the Gagger hath hence learnedly concluded that Martha had beene taught and beleeued that the dead might be holpen by the pietie of the liuing Answ 1. How learnedly the Cardinal could conclude hence Purgatorie or the Gagger to helpe him I leaue to learned men to iudge and withal whether they haue not exposed themselues to folly who hence would collect such a thing Secondly touching the Iewish Church and her Doctrine how Purgatorie was vnknowne to her and the Church of Israel vnder the Law let the Reader peruse Mornay of the Masse his third booke and sixt Chapter Thirdly the speech is to Christ and of her full assurance of the efficacie of his prayer vnto God euen to raise vp Lazarus from the dead as appeareth by the scope of her speech What is this to helpe soules in Purgatorie Act. 2. 24. Whom God hath raised vp loosing the sorrowes of Hell This cleerely makes for Purgatorie saith the wise Gagger for here he and the Rhemists wil haue Christ loose others from their paines Answ 1. This speakes of Christs rising from the dead by the power of God Secondly of Gods raising him vp and loosing him from the sorrowes of Hell and not of Christs freeing others from torment Thirdly here is no mention of Purgatorie but of Hell And is Hell and Purgatorie now one place I feare mee they will finde it so that hee which goeth to Purgatorie goeth to Hell Fourthly the word Hell is here taken properly or figuratiuely If properly for hell it selfe the place of the damned then it is nothing for their Purgatorie for from hell is no redemption Luk. 16. 26. If figuratiuely then it speakes not of any reall Purgatorie place and so neither way serues their turne Fiftly if they will haue the place to bee for Purgatorie then is there no cause now to feare it for therein is now no more paines For it is not said that hee loosed the soules out of it but the sorrowes thereof and tooke them away What maketh this for Purgatorie Sixtly the word in the most current originals is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 though the old vulgar reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the first signifieth not Hell but Death so it is thus to be read loosing the sorrowes of death as we truely translate 1. Cor. 15. 29. Otherwise what shall they doe that are baptized for the dead An euident proofe saith the Gagger
called 1. Tim. 6. 20. for these be vaine and deceitfull None of these are sufficient to leade vs but we are to be ruled by the written Word The Errors of our time The Romanists maintaine these insuing Propositions I. Proposition That the holy Scriptures are not in all matters necessarie to saluation the onely rule of our faith and life Confuted by their owne English Bible THeir Bible teacheth that there is a Rule Rom. 12. 6. Gal. 6. 16. This Rule one and the same Phil. 3. 16. Now that this Rule is the holy Scriptures which is the written Word of God it is cleare by the same Bible I. It maketh the Word written to bee the rule and guide in matters of controuersie Deut 17 11. In this place the Priests and Iudges are bound to proceed according to the Law But that Law was written in a booke called The booke of the Law of the Lord which the Priests and Leuites had with them in Iehosophats dayes to teach the people 2. Chron. 17. 9. Bellarmine lib. de Verbo Dei cap 2. saith on this place Holy Moses teacheth here that controuersies arising among Gods people are to bee iudged according to the Law II. Their Bible teacheth that God vrgeth To the Law and to the testimony which is written as aforesaid and condemneth them that speake not according to this Word Esay 8. 20. III. By it we are taught that the Church is straightly charged to keepe to the written Word as in Iosh 23. 6. Onely take courage and be carefull that you keepe all things which be written in the volume of the Law of Moses and decline not from them neither to the right hand nor to the left Iosh 1 8. Let not the volume of this Law depart from thy mouth but thou shalt meditate in it dayes and nights that thou mayst keepe and doe all things that bee written in it Is not this testimony cleare What can be spoken more plainely These places vrge to keepe to the written Word and withal not to decline from it S. Paul hauing spoken against diuision schisme and syding with teachers in the Church of Corinth some of them holding of one some of another to remedy this euill he warnes them not to be puffed vp one against another aboue that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. To these places may be added Deut. 30. 10. The Lord promised great blessings vnto Israel with this annexed condition saying If thou heare the voyce of thy Lord thy God and keepe his precepts where their obedience is commanded and his voyce made the rule thereof Now lest they should doubt where to find this his voyce and these his precepts Moses addeth these words which are written in this Law which Law he wrote and commanded the same to bee read before all Israel for this end to learne to feare the Lord and to fulfill all his words in that Law Deut. 31. 9 12. yea a curse is denounced against such as keepe not to the Written Word Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 1. 10. and a plague is threatned for not obseruing the same Deut. 28. 58. Hence is it that we shall find the prayses of holy men very often in Scripture That they did according as it was written 2. Chron. 35. 12. they couenanted that they would doethe things that were written 2. Chron. 34. 31. See out of their owne Bible more for this 2. Chr. 23. 18. 1. Esdr 3. 2. 4. and 6. 18. 2. Esdr 8. 14 15. and 10. 34 36. 4 King 23. 21. 3. King 2. 3. 2. King 1. 18. And not to doe as was written was a sinne for which they were to humble themselues and beg pardon of God 2. Chron. 30. 6 18. 1. By their owne Bible we learne that Iesus Christ the chiefe Shepheard and Bishop of our soules did nothing regard traditions he neuer named them but with dislike but aduanced very highly the dignitie of the Scriptures as the only and alone rule and meanes of our instruction in all things necessary to eternall life for thus their Bible telleth vs 1. That hee tooke for the ground of his teaching Scripture Luk. 4. 17. but wee reade not any where that hee taught vpon tradition 2. That he interpreted the Scriptures and out of them taught the things concerning himselfe Luk. 24. 27. not for traditions nor any thing out of them 3. That he opened the vnderstanding of his Disciples that they might vnderstand the Scriptures Luk. 24. 25. Hee neuer did so concerning traditions 4. That he often cited the Scriptures Mark 7. 6 10. Matth. 9. 13. and 12 3. and 13. 14. and in many other places but neuer traditions 5. That he exhorteth to the searching of the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 39. but neuer to the searching of traditions 6. That hee cleared the Scriptures from abuse and corrupt expositions Mat. 5. 21 22 27 28 33. 24. 25 36 37 38 39. c. but neuer traditions 7. That he vsed the Scriptures in disputing with Satan Mat. 4. and in confuting his aduersaries Mat. 22. 31. and 19. 4. Luk. 10 26. neuer traditions 8. That he defended his owne doctrine and his manner of teaching by the Scriptures Mat. 13. 10 15. and also the act of his Disciples in plucking eares of corne Mat. 12. 3 4 5. but neuer by traditions 9. That hee tooke care alwayes in euery thing to fulfill the Scriptures Ioh. 12. 14 15 16. Mat. 4. 14. Luk. 24. 44 46. yea so farre as to suffer death to make good the truth of them Matth. 26. 54. Luk. 22. 37. but no such regard had he to traditions 10. That he did oppose Scriptures against traditions Mat. 15. 4. but neuer traditions against Scriptures or for interpretation of Scripture in matter of faith 11. That he preferred the witnesse of Scripture before the witnesse of men Ioh. 5. 34 39 41. yea the power of them for instruction before the voyce of any that should be raised from the dead Luk. 16. 27. neuer so traditions 12. That he put the triall of himselfe to Scriptures so true and sure a Iudge he tooke them to be Ioh. 5. 39. not to traditions IV. Lastly he taught how his owne words could take no place if the written Word were not regarded Ioh. 5. 47. What traditionall word is there then of any mortall man or of all the mortall men in the world which may receiue so much as equall authoritie how much lesse then supreme authoritie ouer the Scriptures V. Their owne Bible teacheth that the Apostles taught not an vnwritten but a written Word for the Gospell was that which they preached but that was written Rom. 1. 1 2. and was made manifest by the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. Our Sauiour taught his Disciples out of Moses Prophets See Treneus lib. 4. cap. 66 in fine and a little booke intituled The Messiab already come for the particulars and Psalmes Luk. 24. 27. in which bookes his Names his Natures his Offices his Birth where and when and