Religion but his discipline The reason why Calvin rejected all ceremonies in his Church was Luthers ill successe in admitting and framing some This mad fellow tooke upon himselfe the authority which he denyed to the Catholick Church composing a Masse and ceremonies of his owne but soone repented his folly when he perused Iodocus Clictoveus his booke confuting his fond presumption to which Luther could never answer This made Calvin so great an enemy of Ecclesiasticall ceremonies 7 Though he hated ceremonies he coveted miracles because they are necessary to make a new sense of Scripture and a new private spirit prudently credible his bare word was not a sufficient testimony of the truth without some supernaturall and visible signe to confirme it Calvin therefore persuaded one Brullen a Frenchman of his owne Sect in Geneva to feigne himselfe dead and when he would bid him rise in confirmation of his Religion spirit and discipline to obey and tell the spectators newes of the other world The agreement was made Brullen was to have so much money his wife gave her consent because she was poore and they communicated the matter to her it being impossible to conceale it from her knowledge To be briefe the supposed death of Brullen was published Bolsee c. 11. Lang c. 13. and none lamented it more then Calvin considering the distresse of his wife and family Out of meere compassion he repaires to the house declaring the affliction of his spirit to all who met him but withall giving them hopes of a miracle whereby the sanctity of his owne life doctrine and discipline might be made evident As soone as he fixed his eyes upon the supposed dead Corps he lifted them up to the Lord and desired his faithfull brethren to joyne with him in prayer that God might command Brullen his soule returne to his body and Calvin naming him bid him rise and declare to all present Gods sense of his doctrine and discipline The wife seeing her husband did not rise and that really he had signes of death in his face drew nearer and by experience found that Brullen was dead indeed Whereupon she cryed aloud and declared to all the people the story accusing Calvin of being not onely an Impostor but a murtherer both he and his friends sneakt away and never afterwards attempted to worke miracles which now he hated as much as ceremonies Such another miracle doe we read of Cyrola the Arrian Greg. Tur. 2. hist 3. who by touching the eyes of one who feigned himselfe blinde was realy made blinde by that hereticall hand but Eugenius the Catholick Bishop of Carthage restored him his sight againe by making the signe of the crosse upon his eyes These Hereticks were rather Cheates then Politicians weake policy doth betray it selfe at length and when it is applyed to the discredit of the true Religion and establishment of heresie God is so much concerned in the discovery of these petty plots and tricks that its impossible they should have any effect The Lutherans did so laugh at Calvin for this successe that neither himselfe nor his Disciples could abide to heare the word miracle pronounced 8 The Calvinists had no other way to stop their adversaries mouthes but by casting in their teeth the onely miracle which Luther attempted to worke A poore woman was brought to Wirtemberg to be dispossessed by him Staphylus in prodro apol 2. Genebr Chronol lib. 4. in Paul Sur. in Comment Martin refused to intermedle in the matter being fearfull of the successe But perceiving that his backwardnesse made others for ward in censuring and contemning both in his person and doctrine he resolved to venter and try what his exorcismes lately composed by himselfe would be able to doe The man was led to the Vestiary of the Parish Church thither repaired Luther accompanied with his disciple Staphylus who writ this story and begunne in a grave and severe tone to command and threaten the Devill who laught at Martins folly and impudence seeming to say How now friend Are we not better acquainted then so Doest thou imagine to conquer me with the armes I put into thy hands The Devill might lay claime to Luthers exorcismes Luther de Missa angulari Sacerdotum consecrat as well as to his doctrine in other points which himselfe acknowledgeth to have learnt of the Devill and to have eaten a bushell of salt in his company We may judge what a ridiculous object it is to see a Pâ—otestant Minister exorcise or pretend to performe any Ecclesiasticall function or ceremony when Martin Luther the Apostle of Protestancy looked so absurdly and despicably in the Devills eyes that instead of being exorcised he did exorcise Martin and did so fright him that he attempted to leape out at the window the doore being made fast by the Devills art untill at length Staphilus who had more courage broke open the dore with a hatchet but was almost stifled fot his paines with a most abominable sent occasioned by Luthers feare Hereticks may counterfeit miracles but never worke any in confirmation of that doctrine wherein they differ from the Roman Catholick Church in confirmation of our Tenets against Hereticks we have continuall miracles and we read of Jewes that escaped dangers and Devills by making the signe of the Crosse and though Protestants should doe the same in confirmation of the Trinity or any other Tenet of Catholicks that would favour Protestancy no more then Iudaisme As for the Kings of Englands gift in curing the Kings evill if any such thing there be every seventh sonne hath the same as many say or other as extraordinary privileges and if it be a supernaturall miracle they owe that grace to Saint Edward the Confessor a knowne Roman Catholick to whom and not to their owne merits or Protestant Religion they must attribute all their cures Calvin dyed in the yeare 1564. the 27. of May in Geneva invoking the Devill Laing Franc. Balduinus Claudius Sancterius Guiliel Lindanus Hosius Florim Prateol Rescius alij de morte Calvini blaspheming God cursing himselfe his studies writings doctrine and discipline as Hierom Bolsee his owne Scholler and many more his domesticks and friends testify though Beza who never told truth affirmes that he delivered his soule in peace I am sure his Sect which is more violent then politick hath occasioned so many warres and rebellions that Calvinist Princes doe not desire to make their Subjects of their owne Religion SECT V. Of the Reformation in Holland and the other united Provinces 1 IN the yeare 1565. the Hereticks of France sollicited their brethren in the Low Countries to a rebellion and Reformation for these two sisters goe alwayes together The Prince of Orange tooke this opportunity and advised the malcontents to send Agents to King Philip the II. humbly desiring his Majesty would be pleased to recall his Fathers severe Lawes against novelties in Religion and that Cardinal Granvile and the Spanish garrisons might be removed
Pius V. his profession of Faith Declarations against new heresies are no new Creeds they are but explanations of the old not new articles of Faith One article of Faith may be divided into many branches how many doth Saint Athanasius set downe in his Symbol of the Trinity and Incarnation The Catholick Church did alwayes practise this way when it was necessary to confute heresies If it was lawfull for the Church of the fourth age to command all Christians to professe and believe the Symbol of Saint Athanasius which was but an explanation of particulars contained in the mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation why cannot the Church now explaine more particularly the Apostles Creed and any part of Scripture impugned by Hereticks and command all Christians to believe the same All the pretended new articles are contained in the Apostles Creed implicitely as in that of the Communion of Saints Remission of sinnes Catholick Church c. or at least in some text of Scripture as Transubstantiation in Christs words This is my Body The petty Ministers of the English Nags-head Church presume to make a new Creed of 39. articles protesting against the ancient Faith of Christendome and they admire that the Vicar of Christ and a generall Councell should warne all Catholicks to beware of their heresies and to that end declare in a Symbol of Faith more particularly the received Doctrine of the Church of God Away with these shamefull shifts of Hereticks whose last excuse for their Schisme is that they who begunne it were Roman Catholicks So were Rebells once loyall Subjects and yet that doth not excuse themselves or their adherents from the guilt of rebellion With these hereticall devises are many poore idiots misled by ungodly and wicked Preachers who gaine their living and credit by the damnation of soules that Christ our Saviour purchased at so deare a rate 6 The last thing I proposed in the title of this Chapter was that its a greater foppery in Protestants then in Catholicks to deny the Popes infallibily in deciding controversies of Christian Religion That it is a foppery in both must be evident to all persons that will reflect upon the nature of Christian Faith and the Bookes of holy Scripture When men believe as Christians they must exclude all manner of doubts and feares of being mistaken from the act wherewith they believe they cannot defend themselves from a new heresy by onely protesting against it by word of mouth they must detest it with their heart and understanding and believe the quite contrary truth There was never Heretick so simple as to broach an errour upon his owne score he alwayes pretends Gods Word for its fundation and backs it with as many texts of Scripture as Catholicks oppose against his heresy This was the practise of Arrians Nestorians and all other ancient Hereticks which Protestants doe now adayes imitate If the true meaning of Scripture were as visible to us as it is infallible in it selfe no Heretick would make use of the words of holy Writ because his fancy or interpretation would be easily discerned from the sense which God intended at least by combining and comparing one text with another but experience demonstrates that notwithstanding all combinations of one place of Scripture with another the controversy remaines and cannot be decided by Scripture alone To imagine that all which cannot be decided by Scripture alone is superfluous and the beliefe thereof not necessary for salvation is to dispense with the mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation seeing the Councell of Nice Soz. lib. 1. c. 16. Athan Apol. 2. and Saint Athanasius that great Champion of the Catholick Church confuted and condemned the Arrians not by Scripture alone but by tradition and adhearing not onely to the words but also to that sense of Scripture which that present Church had received from the former 7 Seeing therefore that controversies of Christian Religion must be decided by the sense as well as by the words of Scripture and that the said sense is more clearly delivered to us by tradition and the testimony of the Church then by the words themselves in controverted texts and that Hereticks may endeavour to confound their owne tradition with that of the true Catholick Church as the Quartadecimans did in the celebrating Easter and that they may invent new heresies never thought of in former ages supposing I say that all this is possible the remedy of these evills in the Church cannot be impossible and truly the remedy is impossible at least at all times to wit when generall Councells are not assembled if the Pope be not infallible in declaring what is heresy divine Faith and Catholick tradition Such few Catholicks as called in question the Popes infallibity excused their errour not onely with the infallibility but also with the morall possibility of a generall Councell whensoever a new heresy would be invented but they were grossely mistaken as experience doth demonstrate and a perpetuall generall Councell was never intended by God who commandeth the Bishops and Prelates to have a care of the particular Churches which he committed to their charge a thing not compatible with their continuall assistance in Constantinople Trent or any other one City where the Councell is assembled But Protestants hitherto have denyed even the English Church in the 21. of their 39. articles that generall Councells arc infallible and consequently must say that God commanded an impossibility bidding us beware of new heresies Act. 20. and not believe false Prophets when he left us no infallible Judge or Pastour to declare unto us what doctrine is heresy and who are the false Prophets No Catholick was ever so unreasonable as to defend such a foppery 8 And though of late some of our Nags-head Doctours contrary to the 21. article of their Creed and English Church acknowledge that generall Councells are infallible in deciding controversies of Faith and to their eternall shame and the infamy of their venerable Mother the Protestant Church of England are now forced to call the 39. Articles of their Religion by the name of onely probable opinions yet such a definition or description they give in their printed bookes of a generall Councell with so many odde conditions and so insuperable difficulties that onely mad men may hope to see such a Christian Assembly meete and much lesse agree in condemning any heresy or declaring what is Catholick Doctrine This new definition of a generall Councell is but a meere put of to gaine time that Nags-head errours may last as long as their Ministers but they are evidently convinced and condemned by the absurdity of their poore shift it s a greater foppery to admit of infallibility in an impossible Councell then to admit of a possible Councell without infallibility The first is an absolute Chimaera contrary to the evident light of naturall reason the second seemeth onely impossible to Christians that grant there is a Church of God upon earth and that be hath
so rare a peece as the great machine of this world 6 Seeing therefore that something there is which seemes by these effects to be most powerfull most wise and most perfect we ought so to judge and believe and give it due honour and respect The right to such duties acquired by outward appearance and signes doth extend it selfe even to our inward and most secret thoughts which is the onely reason why a rash judgement is a sinne and why men may be as injurious in thinking ill of others as in backbiting If we must not judge otherwise of men then they seeme to be much lesse of God We must not be Christians in our words and Atheists in our thoughts Therefore the obligation of believing honouring and loving God is evident though the Deity it selfe were not as evident as it is even to the most vulgar understandings that are not stupified by vice and besotted with sensuall pleasures Now supposing it s demonstrated that there is a God or at least that we are convinced of our obligation to believe there is one we may proceed to inquire CHAP. III. Whether God ought to be served his owne way and in what manner 1 THere is not an absolute Prince that doth not pretend as his birthright or prerogative to be served his owe way that is as himselfe thinks fit and not according to his Subjects discretion If this be granted to Princes our fellow Creatures how can it be denyed to the Creator Princes may erre in the conduct of affaires God is infallible Princes may employ unfit instruments men not valued or hated by their people God by employing men doth enable them and supply their defects Princes may looke more upon their owne interest then upon the common good in their projects and designes God can have no designe upon his Creatures but their owne good his interest is their happinesse To be briefe Princes are men and though no Subjects yet subject to all humane frailties but God is as free from any frailty as from subjection Therefore if according the maxime of Politicians Princes must be served their owne way God must not be deprived of the like prerogative 2 Whether Princes ought to be served their owne Way is not for my present purpose to examine yet I must presume to tell them that it s no part of their prerogative to define or declare what way God hath appointed for his owne service the politick ends are not alwayes agreable or compatible with Gods ordinations and in such case we must serve Princes in Gods way not in their owne no humane Lawes or Kings pleasure ought to be preferred before Gods commandments It s as evident that God may choose his owne way of being worshipped as it is manifest that worship is due to so great a Majesty Some Rites and ceremonies of divine Worship may be left to mens choice and discretion but before they undertake it they must shew their commission for so great a power and eminent a charge Every one must not presume to be Master of ceremonies in Gods Church and Court If there were not a way setled for the worship of God before we came into the world perhaps every man might choose his owne but to intrude new Rites and Lawes into a Commonwealth contrary to the government long established hath beene alwayes judged in the State dangerous and in the Church damnable Master Hooker in his bookes of Ecclesiasticall Policy is much admired and cryed up by some Protestants because he proves by Catholick arguments that the Church of God may command the practise of Rites and ceremonies but he is farre from proving that the new fangled English Protestant Church is the Church of God and therefore could never conclude that Puritans or any others ought to sute themselves in the new fashion of the Church of Englands formalities because they must shew their authority before they intrude their formalities and take away realities 3 It s as unwarrantable to reject ancient Rites and ceremonies as to impose new ones without authentike testimonies and signes of divine authority If the Church that went before us and upon whose relation we must depend for the knowledge of times past doth testify that such ceremonies as seeme now to fooles ridiculous and to the ignorant superfluous were invented by God or by men to whom he committed the care of our instruction we must practise them persuade our selves that it is not in the power of any Nags-head Convocation The English Protestant Ministery descends from a few consecrated at the Nags-head in Cheapside invalidly for many reasons deduced in a late Booke of the Nature of Catholick Faith and Heresy to frame a new Religion or 39. Articles reject old ceremonies pare and shave of the matter and forme of Sacraments and degrade the Order of Priesthood of all Ecclesiasticall ornaments the cap surplise and black scarfe excepted Puritans proceed more consequently they retaine no Popish dregs nor rags of Rome as they call them and firmely believe that God cannot be served in spirit if the Minister of his Word appeareth not before him in cuerpo rid of all Aaronicall ornaments But with their good leave to serve and worship God in spirit is not to reject or reforme ancient Rites and ceremonies but rather by performing them the spirit is raised to God with reflexion upon the mysteries in them contained The ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Catholick Church S. Ambr. lib. 1. de Sacerd. c. 1. de iis quae initiantur mysteriis c. 1. practised even that which of all is most excepted against in the administration of Baptisme and is lesse undecent then the making a plaster of spitle and dust S. Greg. in Sacram. Tertull. lib. ad Scapulam S. Aug. tract 44. in Ioan. Euangel Alcum. lib. deliv Offic. de Sabbatho S. Paschae Beda in 0.7 Marc. Homil. 19. a signe that our Saviour would not Have us so nice and squeamish as Protestants are I am sure if we reflect upon the Israelits we shall finde the chiefe worship they gave unto God in their sacrifices accompanied with so noysome circumstances in their fleaing pulling out the bowels and frying the fat of beasts that they would make a nice Proteshint stomach rise although it be able to digest a dish of as course stuffe for a Fridays breakfast As for the dresse wherein our * S. Anacletus qui vixit temporibus Domitiani Ep. 1. de oppr Episc Steph. Papa Martyr vixit an 250 Ep. 1. ad Hilar Origen hom 11. c. 20. Levi. S. Hieron lib. 13. Comment in cap. 44 Ezech. Bishops and Priests celebrate their functions antiquity called it sacred though Novelists terme it profane or superfluous There is not one ceremony practised in the Roman Catholick Church which deriveth not its beginning from God or by his authority from primitive times all relate to divine Mysteries as you may read in Durantius De ritibus Ecclesiae Catholicae and
in that excellent Booke The Protestants Apology for the Church of Rome 4 Whereas ceremonies be the object of phantasy and ours are so decent that no phantasy can except more against them then against those of the Law of Moyses instituted by God himselfe and approved by Protestants the aversion which they manifest against our Ceremonies cannot proceed so much from their fancy as from their understanding dissenting from that Doctrine to which the Ceremonies relate To kneele is not an object ridiculous or offensive to the fancy the most precise practise it out of Churches and at Court and yet all Protestants cry abomination against kneeling to our Lord Iesus Christ in the Sacrament or worshiping himselfe or his Saints in Images these ceremonies agree well enough with their fancy but their understanding cannot brooke them A weake understanding may occasion as great errours as a strong fancy 5 Some fantasticall and fanaticall fellowes call the Roman Catholick Religion an Apith Keligion because forsooth it hath so many odde ceremonies But the fault is not in the Roman Religion or ceremonies they have Apish understandings they looke as Apes upon our ceremonies without considering the mysteries All the ceremonies of the Masse relate to Christs Passion others to the mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation If it was lawful and laudable in the old Law to practise ceremonies representing things that were to come why should we Catholicks be censured for ceremonies that put us in minde of past mysteries and mercies We ought not to be unmindfull or ungratefull and there is not a more efficacious way to preserve a gratefull memory of past benefits then by representing them in ceremonies to the light 6 I must confesse that all Sectaries have as great cause to cry downe ceremonies as we Catholicks have to uphold them Because the strongest pillar of the true Church is a continuall tradition of Catholick Doctrine from the primitive times to this present and this pillar of Tradition is much strengthened by the practise of ceremonies relating to that Doctrine delivered from hand to hand which we now maintaine as Catholick against Heresy or pretended Reformation To adore the blessed Sacrament both in Church and Processions is a strong argument of Christs reall presence not onely in the act or use of Communion but also before and after What mervaile therefore that they who deny Christs reall presence or grant it onely in the actuall use of Communion should oppose the adoration whereby their false Doctrine is so clearly condemned by the practise of the faith full these and other Catholick ceremonies are not odious to Protestants because they are ceremonies but because they put them in minde of the ancient Faith and Doctrine of Christs Church To reject some of the ancient ceremonies and retaine others as the Nags-head Congregation doth is to furnish their adversaries Catholicks and Puritans with unanswerable arguments their choice of ceremonies doth prove their choice of Doctrine and their choice of Doctrine demonstrates them Hereticks an Heretick being he who chooseth out of the Doctrine delivered by the Church what he fancies rejecting what he thinkes not fit for his purpose Our Prelaticall Protestants must with the rest cast away their Bishops bonnet lawne sleeves he white surplise and black scarfe if not they may cast their cap and despaire of answering to Catholick or Puritan objections they must keepe all or nothing unlesse they can produce better evidence for their pretended Reformation then the fancy of 7. or 12. men in King Edward the Sixth his time confirmed by the authority of a yong head of the Church and a Parliament called by the Protector Seamour to establish in England Zwinglian fopperies and reject the Christian Doctrine and discipline of our Catholick Ancestors they must not rely upon Queen Elizabeths she supremacy or their Nags-head Ordination and Synod with their London Assemblies and Hampton-Court Conferences of lay Ministers God must be served his owne way and not by framing Religions â—o the humor of people or interests of Kings Queenes Parliaments and Protectors But before we goe further in censuring these Protestant wayes let us prove CHAP. IV. That to believe God and consequently to serve him his owne way its necessary to repaire to an infallible Guide which is no other but the Roman Catholick Church 1 THe first step in the way of Gods service is to believe God a step of no lesse difficulty then necessity Suppose there were a man dropt downe from the heavens graced with this singular privilege that the sound of his words could no sooner be at our eares then the evidence of their truth before our eyes whatsoever he said in the same instant we did see confirmed by the reall appearance of the objects and our own experience This singular privilege would deprive him of another common to all men of worth and integrity it would make him uncapable or being believed all who heare him would assent to what he said but for their owne evidence not for his veracity When any thing is evident to our understanding or to our eyes we believe our selves and not others though they should tell us the same we doe experience If God were pleased to manifest himself to men in such a manner that they had evidence it is he who speaketh to them he had deprived us of the merit of Faith and himselfe of that duty which we are obliged to give every honest man for though Divine Faith doth exclude all doubts and feares of falshood yet it supposeth in the subject a possibility of doubting if men will be obstinate and imprudent but there is none so obstinate and imprudent that can doubt of the truth of Gods words if it be evident to him that God spoke them Though we heare men speak we doe them a courtesie in believing them because they are fallible and we doe not read the truth in their words though we believe them but if we had evidence that God uttered any words the truth of them must be as cleare as it is that he can neither lye nor be mistaken and if the truth be cleare and evident to our understandings we believe our selves and not God though he should speake it To believe is to trust and he that hath evidence of any truth doth as little trust the speaker as we rely upon anothers credit for the money we have in our own coffers 2 Seeing therefore that either God must not be believed by men or that he must disguise himselfe and speake to them by others who can be so impudent as to deny that we deserve damnation if we doe not believe and obey God in that Church which he hath beene pleased to institute as his owne Interpreter Quod autem rogant unde persuadebimur à Deo fluxisse Scripturam nisi ad Eccleisae decretum confugiamus perinde est ac si quu roget unde discemus lucem discernere à tenebris album nigro c. lib. 1. Inst