Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	church_n	scripture_n	word_n	7,766	5	4.4516	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15431	Tetrastylon papisticum, that is, The foure principal pillers of papistrie the first conteyning their raylings, slanders, forgeries, vntruthes: the second their blasphemies, flat contradictions to scripture, heresies, absurdities: the third their loose arguments, weake solutions, subtill distinctions: the fourth and last the repugnant opinions of new papistes with the old; of the new one with an other; of the same writers with themselues: yea of popish religion with and in it selfe. Compiled as a necessarie supplement or fit appertinance to the authors former worke, intituled Synopsis papismi: to the glorie of God for the dissuading of light-minded men from trusting to the sandie foundation of poperie, and to exhort good Christians stedfastlie to hold the rockie foundation of faith in the Gospell.	Willet, Andrew, 1562-1621.	1593 (1593)	STC 25701; ESTC S119967	179,229	213

Mariage is honourable amongst all men Heb. 13. The Rhemistes also are not a whit ashamed to say that the mariage of Priestes is the woorst sort of incontinencie Annot. 1. Cor. 7. Sect. 8. Pope Siricius epist. ad Himerium Taraconens applyeth that saying in the Scripture against marriage Qui in carne sunt Deo placere non possunt They that are in the flesh cannot please God Now as their doctrine is so is their practise whereby they do not onely make fornication equall to mariage but euen preferre it It was one of the greeuances of the Germanes exhibited to Cardinall Campeius that the Bishops and their Officials did not onely suffer Priestes for their money to haue Concubines but compelled continent and chaste Priestes to pay their tribute to the Bishop and so it might be lawfull for them to liue chaste or keepe Concubines Fox pag. 862. But honest mariage in Ministers they punished with death as anno 1525. Petr. Sponglerus was condemned to die for no other cause but that hee had married a wife ex Oecolampad Thus it is manifest both by the doctrine and practise of the Church of Rome that they do not only with these heretikes match fornication and honest mariage together but giue it the preferment before mariage 5 The Cataphriges did make or mingle their Eucharist with the bloud of children haeres 26. The Papistes much like vnto them haue shewed the people in the sacrament the bloud of Duckes and Pigeons making the people beleeue that it was the bloud of Christ as here in Englande the bloud of Hales which men from all partes of the lande came in pilgrimage vnto many yeares taking it to bee the bloud of Christ was in the ende found to be but the bloud of a Drake and openly shewed at Paules crosse by the Bishop of Rochester the King himselfe being present Fox 1188. 6 The Pepuzians allow women to be priestes haeres 27. So the Papistes suffer women to execute the priestes office in baptizing of children vide suprà haeres obiect 4. 7 The Catharistes did so name them selues as being pure and cleane haeres 38. Such are the Papistes which affirme that some are so iust in this life that they neede no repentance Rhemist annot Luk. 15. 1. That iust men in this life may keepe the lawe of God and by their iustice be free frō the curse therof Galat. 3. Sect. 4. That habitual concupiscence without consent of will is not properly forbidden in the law neither doth make vs guiltie before God Rom. 7. Sect. 5. 10. Do not these men nowe in effect say that they are pure and cleane in this life 8 The heretikes Angelici were so called because they worshipped the Angels haeres 39. which sect Epiphanius saith Augustine thought to be worne out and extinguished But if Epiphanius were now aliue hee should see this heresie reuiued by the Papistes for they doe maintaine the worship and adoration of Angels Rhemist Apocal. 3. Sect. 6. Annot. in cap. 19. 22. 9 The heretikes called Apostolici did not receiue into their communion those that had wiues or proper possessions haeres 46. 10 The Hierachites did receiue onely Monkes and Nunnes to their societie haeres 47. Papistrie sauoureth strongly of these heresies for professed Monkes are with them the deuoutest men how impure soeuer their life be in so much that the profession of Monkerie hath obtained amongst them the name of religion the rest that liue in the world they call seculares mundanos secular men and of the world The Rhemistes affirme that Monkes come neerest to the imitation of Christ 1. Thessal cap. 1. v. 6. That maried priestes cannot conueniently be occupied about prayer or the Sacraments but ought to abstaine from all matrimoniall actes 1. Corinth 7. v. 5. 1. Timoth. 5. v. 5. contrarie to the Councell of Gangra cap. 4. where it was decreed that if any man make difference of a married priest by occasion thereof refraine from his oblation should be accursed Lastly the Apostolici would in no wise suffer those which had vowed single life afterward to marrie though they found themselues vnable to keepe their vow Epiphan haeres 61. So the Rhemistes allow virgins after their vow vpon no occasion to marrie Annot. 1. Corinth 7. v. 28. 11 The Euchites did nothing els but pray helde that it was not lawful for Monks to labour with their handes for the sustenance of their life haeres 57. The Papists encline to both those heresies for first what els do their Monks Nunnes but mumble vpon their beads a certaine stint of praiers in the Latine tongue which most of them vnderstand not at all times houres almost both of day night as they haue their Nocturns Primes their morning euening midnight seruice their third sixt and ninth houres Rhemist annot act 10. sect 6. Secondly we see that most of the Cell-birds both cockes hennes Monkes Nunnes I would say do liue idlie and they beare them out in it for religious men say our Rhemistes such as they count their Masse-munging Monkes to be are not bound to worke annot 2. Thess. 3. Sect. 2. 12 There is another heresie saith Augustine or sect that walketh with bare feete because God said to Moses put off thy shooes haeres 68. So among the Papistes there are sectes of sryers that go barefoote as their friers Flagellantes Franciscans 13 The Priscillianistes did make the Apocrypha that is bookes not canonical of equal authoritie with scripture Haeres 70. So do the papists the bookes of Tobie Iudith the Machabees others which are not found in the Canon of the Hebrue they make them bookes of Canonicall scripture and part of the word of God yea their blind and vncertayne traditions they are not ashamed to call the worde of God vnwritten And yet further whatsoeuer say they the Pastors of the Church doe teach beside scripture in the vnitie of the Church is to bee taken for the word of God Rhemist annot 1. Thess. 2 sect 2. 14 There were certaine heretikes that helde that by Christes descending into hell the incredulous and vnbeleeuers beleeued and that all were deliuered thence at his comming Haeres 79. This heresie I see not howe the papistes can shift off from them selues who doe all generally vnderstand that place of Saint Peter 1. Epistle 3. verse 19. of Christes descending into hell Where the Apostle speaketh of the incredulous and disobedient persons of the olde worlde who perished in the waters and afterwarde remayned in prison onely eight persons beeing saued in the arke If Christ then should deliuer all these incredulous persons how can they auoyde this heresie that Hell was in a manner emptied by the descension of Christ 15 The Coluthians affirmed Deū non facere mala that no euil was wrought by God contrary to that saying of the scripture Ego Deus creans mala I am the God that createth euil Shall there be euill in

epistle to the Ephesians word for word And how is it like that Marcellinus which died in the 20. yeare of Dioclesian could write of consubstantialitie of the diuine persons when that controuersie and terme of consubstantialitie was not heard of in the Church before the Nicene Councell which was 23. yeares after him Fox ibid. Eusebius in his decretall epistle writeth thus In sede apostolica extra maculam semper catholica seruata est religio That is in the Apostolike Sea alwayes the catholike religion hath beene preserued without any spotte or blemish And yet his late predecessor Marcellinus within his time and remembrance did fall grieuously in sacrificing to Idols though afterward hee repented thereof and was condemned for the same and expulsed the citie by the Councell of 300. Bishops How then could Eusebius this fault and error of his predecessor beeing so fresh in memorie so report of the Apostolike Sea that it was neuer stayned with any blemish in the faith therefore it is apparant that it was none of his doing The decretall epistle also of Milciades bewrayeth it selfe to be counterfeite wherein the forged author sheweth how much more worthie the popish sacrament of confirmation is then baptisme Thus I hope it is a cleare case to anie man that is not wilfully blinde that those decretall epistles are but forged and bastard writings those holy Bishops and Martyrs to be falsely reputed the authors thereof considering that the matter therein conteyned neyther seemeth to be agreeable to those times nor yet besitting the grauitie of their person Beside these counterfeite decretals of the Bishops of Rome they haue also many other of the like inuention In the decrees of Gratian Distinction 10. Quoniam Is set foorth vnder Ciprians name Ciprianus Iuliano imperatori Ciprian to Iulian the Emperor wherein it is affirmed that the imperiall dignitie is subiect to the papall dignitie as the inferior to the superior But Ciprian lyued not in lulian the Apostata his time not by 200. yeares wherefore this is a lying glosse Siluesters constitution whome I should before haue recyted amongst the number of the Bishops of Rome That the Corporal whereupon our Lords bodie lyeth vpon the altar must bee pure and plaine linnen seemeth also to come out of the same forge for the papistes practise is contrarie they lay it vpon a guilt patten and they haue a certayne poke for reseruation lyned indeed with linnen but the out-side is silke gold siluer and pearles Dionisius booke de Eccles. Hierarchia which commonly is thrust vpon Dionisius Areopagita who was conuerted by S. Paul is worthily suspected not to bee of that authors doing for his writings coulde not haue beene vnknowen to Eusebius Hierome Gennadius who continued the catalogue of the principall writers of the Church for 500. yeares after Christ. And Dionisius Bishop of Corinth who lyued in the raigne of Commodus about ann 185. writing of Dionisius Areopagita declareth how hee was first conuerted to the faith by S. Paul as it is in the Actes of the Apostles and afterward was made Bishop of Athens But of his booke de Hierarch he hath not one word Euseb. li. 4. ca. 23. Gulielmus Gracinus did read in his open lecture in the Church of S. Pauls this book de eccl Hierarch who at the first entrance vehemently inueighed against those that held opinion that Dionisius Areopag was not author of that booke but after a fewe weekes being better aduised hee altered his minde and protested openly that in his iudgement Dionisius Areopag mentioned in the Actes was not author of that booke Ex Erasm. ad Parisiens Historia passionis of S. Andrew S. Martialis epist. ad Burdegalens are but counterfeite fables Fulk Hebr. 10. sect 9. No better is that pamphlet which goeth vnder Linus name intituled De Petripassione Which if it were true that is there reported Peter was most iustly condemned for entysing and leading away women from their husbands Beza annot Iohn 21. v. 19. against the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles The Liturgie of S. Iames is but a late deuised toye for Balsamon patriarke of Antioch sayth that the Liturgie of S. Iames was not extant in his time but vtterly worne away Fulke annot 1. Corinth 11. sect 10. No maruell then if these good fellowes make it not dayntie to belie the auncient Bishops and Martyrs with phantasticall and forged pamphlets seeing that they presume without blushing to vtter their forgeries both of the Apostles themselues and vnder their names not much vnlike to the olde heretikes the Manichees and others that scattered abroade hereticall deuises vnder the Apostles names as the Apocalypse of S. Paul whereof S. Augustine maketh mention Tract in Iohann 98. Another booke of S. Thomas the Apostle Augustine epist. 38. Certayne Epistles fathered vpon the Apostles August in Psalm 47. Yea they conteyned not them selues here but in their foolish conceyte deuised fables more auncient then the floode as the booke of Henoch whereof Augustine speaketh de ciuitat Dei lib. 18. cap. 38. And yet were more impudent for they alleadged an Epistle which they say was of Christes owne writing August cont Faust. lib. 28. cap. 4. I would now our aduersaries did not giue vs occasion by these imaginarie and decoytfull writings of theirs which they would notwithstanding to bee reputed as sound and substantiall to compare them in this respect to those heretikes of elder time Let vs now see what other phantasies they haue which doe maske vnder the name of later writers In the Liturgie that beareth the name of Chrysostome which the papistes call Chrysostomes Masse as it is set foorth by Cla●dius du Sanctis there is a prayer for Pope Nicholas and the Emperour Alexius whereof the one was neare 500. yeares the other 700 yeares after Chrysostome Iudge therefore Christian reader whether it bee likely to bee Chrysostomes The Liturgie bearing the name of Basill sheweth it selfe to bee none of his because it obserueth not that forme of doxologie that is prayse to the holy Ghost with the prepositiō 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Basil doth so earnestly maintayne to be deriued from the Apostles tradition de Spirit sanct cap. 27. 28. There are 4. bookes interserted among Cirils commentaries vppon Iohn which were composed by Iodocus Clictouaeus to supplie so many bookes of Cirils wanting yet are they commonly alleadged by our aduersaries in Cirils name Paulinus Bishop of Nola his epistles forged For epistle 1● hee writeth thus of the wood of the crosse That it hath such an incorruptible vertue that it susteyneth no diminishing but continueth as though it had neuer beene touched men daily taking part of it Which is so grosse a fable that the Censors appointed according to the Councell of Trent in their Ind. expurgat commanded it to be put out How many bookes are foysted into Augustines workes it were to long to rehearse for as he in number of his workes exceeded any one of the auncient doctors of the

Church beside which are reckoned to 232 bookes beside his homilies and epistles which were more then as many againe So foolish men haue presumed to be most bold with his writings defiling his learned workes with ridiculous additions of their owne All I cannot neither is it needful in this place to recite onely for some trial of the matter I will set downe these fewe The questions Veteris noui testamenti are none of Augustines for quest 21. it is affirmed that Melchisedech was the holy ghost which opinion is heresie with Augustine and in his booke de haeresib he numbreth the Melchisedechians amongest other heretikes Therefore Augustine is not the author and this Bellarm. confesseth De sacrament lib. 2. cap. 10. yet is the authoritie of this booke vrged by our Rhemistes as sound Annot. 1. Corinth sec. 5. Saint Augustine not the author of the serm de sanctis for the author of these homilies alleadgeth the testimonie of Isidorus who liued about 200 yeares after Augustine August ser. 91. and 251. none of Augustines the author saith that the mightie men when they come to Church compell the priest to make short his masse this manner agreed not with Augustines age The booke de visitatione infirmorum none of his Erasmus saieth it is the speech of a brabler neither learned nor eloquent and most impudently entituled to S. Augustine The 215. serm de tempore the treatise de rectitud Cathol conuersat none of Augustines Fulk annot Galath 4. sect 2. The booke de dogmatib ecclesiastic none of Augustines for the author of that booke excludeth those from orders that had eyther more wiues then one or one concubine By this rule Augustine could neuer haue beene a Bishop for he had two cōcubines And many other beside these are found to be counterfeit bookes as he that wil take the paines to peruse Erasmus censures vpon Augustines workes shall easily finde The last forgery which I will charge our aduersaries withall in this place shalbe concerning the donation of Constantine vpon the which the Bishop of Rome doth ground his supreame dominion and right ouer al the political gouernmēt of the west partes The which said donation is but a forged and deuised deede or instrument of their owne For the donation saith that Constantine was baptised at Rome of Siluester and the 4. day after his baptisme this patrimonie was giuen before his battaile against Maximinus and Li●inius Here are manie vntrueths couched together 1. Because the trueth of the storie of Constantines baptisme is otherwise reported by Eusebius Hierom Ruffin Socrates Theodoret Sozomen that Constantine was baptized at Nicomedia not at Rome and by Eusebius Bishop of Nicomedia not by Siluester and not before that battaile but in the xxxi yeare of his raigne a little before his death 2. whereas the saide donation giueth iurisdiction to the Bishop of Rome ouer the 4. patriarchall seas of Antioch Alexandria Constantinople Hierusalem how could this be done before his battell with Maximinus when as the citie of Constantinople was not yet begunne So this forged donation neither agreeth with itselfe nor with others Plura apud Fox pag. 105. All this notwithstanding which we haue not barely and nakedlie affirmed but I trust sufficientlie prooued and to the indifferent Reader by more then probable argumentes demonstrated that our aduersaries haue vsed much deceit in conueying false and forged writinges vnder auncient authors names yet they will needes beare the worlde in hand that there is no such matter but that they are those authors proper and peculiar workes Whereupon they are boulde in euerie controuersie as they haue occasion to presse vs with their light and vaine authorities As the constitut of Clemens alleadged by the Rhom annot Luk. 4. sec. 1. Ignatius Math. 4. sec. 2. 1. Peter 2. sect 6. Hippolytus Math. 24. sec. 5. Policarpus Act. 6. sec. 1. Decret Alexandri 1. Timoth. 4. sec. 13. Milc●adi Fabian Act. 8. sect 6. Dionisi Areop ibid. S. Andrew S. Martial Hebr. 10. sect 11. Leiturg Iacob Basil. Chrysost. 1. Corinth 11. sect 10. Iodoc. Clicton for Cirill Iohn 11. sect 1. Paulinus Iohn 19. sect 2. August serm de sanct Act. 1. sect 7. de rectit●d cathol conuers de visitation infirmor serm de tempor Galath 4. sect 2. de ecclesiastic dogmatib 1. Corinth 11. sect 7. Thus we see both the great boldnes of our aduersaries in vrging such authorities which they knowe to be counterfeit as also the apparant weakenesse of their cause that are constrained to vse such beggerlie shiftes But let them vse and vrge these stragling runnagate and fatherlesse bookes neuer so much wee will still holde vs to this point wherein they shall neuer be able to disproue vs that they do deceiue them selues and abuse the world in making men to beleeue that they are the fathers owne writinges Wee say therefore of these and of all such other bookes as Augustine did of that which went in Henoehs name Libriisti ob nimiam antiquitatem reijciuntur These bookes are too old to be true De ciuitat dei lib. 18. cap. 38. And concerning some of them as those which are fathered vpon the Apostles and them that followed in the next age as Augustine saith of the epistle which the Manichees ascribed to Christ Si aliqua huiusmodi epistola fuit ab eis proferri potuit qui illi adhaerebant So if they wrote any such bookes it is like they would haue brought them to light that were the Apostles schollers cont Faust. lib. 22. cap. 79. And of them all and the rest of that sort wee pronounce this sentence with the same father Quae proferuntur ab errantibus sub nomine ipsorum quia non sunt ipsorum improbantur nec acceptantur ab ecclesia Those bookes which are brought forth vnder the name of the Apostles and other auncient writers because they are not theirs are reiected and not receiued or acknowledged of the Churche in Psal. 130. Thus hauing in part declared so much as I thought necessary for the matter in hand how deceitfully our aduersaries haue dealt with the worlde giuing them Quid pro quo as wee say one thing for an other in falsely entituling their friuolous pamphletes with graue and good authors names I will spende a little time before I leaue this place to shewe how they haue not onely thrust vppon those auncient doctors and fathers false writinges but haue also falsified their good woorkes by putting in and putting out by clipping chaunging and altering lines wordes sentences And no maruaile then if by such cunning rather cousoning sleightes they make those good authors to speake what they list them selues Ann. 420. There was a councell held in Africa by 217. Bishoppes called the 6. councell of Carthage whereat Augustine was present vnto this councell sent Zosimus then Bishop of Rome certaime messengers with fower requestes or demaundes whereof this was one that it might be lawfull for Bishops or Priestes to appeale from the sentence

may iustly say with Augustine Ipsam religionem oneribus premunt vt tolerabilior sit conditio Iudaeorum qui legalib sarcinis non humanis praesumptionibus subijciuntur They cumber religion with their burdensome inuentions so that the Iewes case was more tollerable than theirs that liue vnder Poperie who were subiect onely to legall ceremonies not to the inuentions of men And thus wee see the weakenes of Popish religion and feeblenesse of their cause who through verie beggerie are constrained to patch vp their tattered garments with Iewes ragges Thus much for the first part Now to the next The second part of this Piller conteining the insufficient answers and solutions of our aduersaries AS most of the arguments which our aduersaries vse against the common cause of the Gospell and the truth do verie feebly and weakely conclude any thing against vs so their aunswers likewise which they shape vnto such arguments as they are pressed withall are verie simple and do bewraie the weaknesse of their cause Some particulars for examples fake wee will see Beeing vrged concerning prayers in an vnknowen tongue with that place of S. Paul If I pray in a strange tongue my spirite prayeth but mine vnderstanding is without fruite 1. Corinth 14. 14. That is such prayers are vnprofitable to the Church which it vnderstandeth not They answer that publike prayer is made vnto God not to the people and it is inough if God vnderstand though the people vnderstand not Bellarmine de verbo Dei lib. 2. cap. 16. obiect 2. A verie absurd aunswer for if it were sufficient that God vnderstandeth publique praiers they need not be vttered with the voice but conceiued onely in the heart the thoughts whereof are as well vnderstoode of God as the wordes of the mouth And the Apostle reasoneth cleane contrarie shewing that the vnlearned cannot say Amen to prayer not vnderstood v. 16. Ergo the vnderstanding also of the people is necessarie Whereas we alledge that place Apocal. 22. 18. If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall adde c. To proue the Scriptures to be sufficient and to conteine all necessarie matter to saluation and that nothing ought to be added to them to supply their wants Their answere is that Iohn doth onely forbid any addition to be made to that booke Bellarmine de verb. Dei lib. 4. cap. 10. resp ad secund obiect whereas notwithstanding the same sentence is pronounced els where generally of the whole word of God that nothing must bee added to it Deuteronom 4. 2. 12. 32. Prouerb 30. 6. We againe reason thus The whole Scripture is profitable to teach to improue c. as S. Paul saith 2. Timoth. 3. 16. therfore the Scriptures conteine all things necessarie to saluation we neede no other helpes Their aunswere is that S. Paul saith not the Scriptures onely are sufficient to these purposes but that they do ad haec omnia prodesse iuuare they do profite and help towards these purposes Bellarmine ibid. As though it followeth not in the same place that the man of God may be absolute being made perfect to all good workes v. 17. If the Scriptures then work an absolute perfection in men touching the former duties then are they not onely profitable but sufficient To proue that although Christ in the verie first moment of his conception was perfect God perfect man yet as man receiued not at once the fulnes of wisedome but grew vp encreased therein daily we vrge that place in Luke And Iesus increased in wisedome and stature cap. 2. 52. They aunswere he did encrease opinione hominum onely in the opinion of men whereas it followeth in plaine and direct wordes in the text He encreased in the forenamed graces both with God men Bellarm. de Christi anima lib. 4. cap. 5. resp ad 3. loc To that place Mark 13. 32. of that day and houre knoweth no man no not the Angels which are in heauen neither the sonne him-selfe saue the father which words plainly shewe that Christ as man onely knoweth not the time of his comming to iudgement They frame this aunswere Non scit addicendum alijs The sonne of man is said not to knowe it that is to declare it to others but to keepe it secrete to himself Bellarm. ibid. This answere is verie insufficient for as the sonne knoweth it not so neither doe the Angels if the sonne be said not to know it to tel others yet knoweth it in himselfe so likewise the Angels should know it to themselues though not for others but I thinke they will not saye that the houre of Christs comming is reuealed to the Angels Againe as the sonne is said not to know it so the Father is said to know it if the Sonne onely know it not to reueale it to others then the Father knoweth it to the intent he should declare it to others but neuer yet was it declared to any creature nor euer shall till Christ suddenly appeare in the cloudes Wheras S. Peter saith whom God raised vp loosing the sorrows of hell as the Rhemists translate Christ they say loosed other men frō those dolours of hell Rhemist in eum locum Bellarm. de Christ. lib. 4. cap. 8. yet it followeth because it was impossible for him to be holden of it these sorrowes therefore were loosed which Christ was in for awhile but could not be long kept there namely the sorrowes of death as wee doe read agreeable to the Greeke text not the sorrowes of hell It is therefore but a childish shift which they vse contrarie to the sence words of the text Being vrged with that scape that Peter made Galath 2. for the which he was reproued of Paul they shoote out these words Sine dubiopeccatum illud aut veniale ac leuissimum fuit Either it was a veniall and most light offence or he offended onely materially that is erratum quoddam fuit sed absque Petri culpa an error was committed but without any fault at all of Peters Bellarm de Pontif. lib. 1. 28. A most grosse and absurd aunswere First Saint Paul saith he withstoode Peter to the face that is openly and plainly rebuked him and not without iust cause for hee was to bee blamed Galath 2. 11. Secondly Peters fault was that he constrained the Gentiles to doc like the Iewes v. 14. And by his example he caused the Iewes and Barnabas to dissemble Is dissimulation then so small an offence or was it so light a fault to constraine the Gentiles Iudaizare to play the Iewes or was Paul so vndiscreete so sharply to reproue so worthie an Apostle for so small a fault Thirdly And what doctrine is this that a man may sinne and not be guiltie of sinne may do a fault and not be faultie as though sinnes committed ignorantly and vn wittingly doe not bring a guilt with them albeit not so great and heynous as sinnes willingly done For to what end els were

namely Christ and yet againe that they were yet Bellarmine affirmeth both the first lib. 2 de Sacram. cap. 17. resp ad argument 3. The latter lib. 1. de Miss ca. 20. 19 To say that faith goeth before repentance or as they terme it Penance and that repentance goeth before iustification is all one to say that repentance goeth before iustification and that iustification likewise goeth before repentance for by faith are wee iustified Ro● 5. 1. As soone as faith commeth iustification doth accompanie it If faith go before so doth iustification and if iustification follow repentance so doth faith yet are they both affirmed by Bellarmine de Poenitent lib. 1. cap. 19. 20 Manie such contradictorie and repugnant sayings are easily to be found in Bellarmines volumes in the writings of other papistes so that they neither agree with others nor with themselues as the Rhemists sometime say that the meritorious workes of the Saints the verie ground of popish indulgences are to be disposed by the Pastors of the Church 2. Corinth 2. Sect. 5. Sometime that they are applicable by the sufferers intention Annot. 1. Coloss. 1. Sect. 4. Harding Sometime calleth their Legend storie an old moth-●aten booke and confesseth that among many true stories it may haue some fables Defens Apolog pag. 166. And yet forgetting himselfe hee stoutly affirmeth that there are no fables nor lies in that booke pag. 750. Thus much of the personall contradictions among the papistes both olde and newe Nowe wee will set downe for a taste and tryall the repugnances and contrarieties which their religion hath within it selfe Popish Religion contrary within it selfe Part. 4. 1 IT is generally taught and beleeued in the popish Church that Baptisme is necessary to saluatiō which errour they would ground vpon those wordes Iohn 3. 5. That vnles a man be borne of water and the spirite he cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen yet they themselues also affirme that baptisme was not necessarie before the passion of Christ but beganne in the day of Pentecost after to bee necessarie Bellarm. lib. 1. de baptis cap. 5. Yea and nowe also they make two exceptions of Martyrs and penitent persons who without baptisme may bee saued Bellarm. cap. 6. The Rhemistes adde vnto these a third exempt case of those that depart this life with vowe and desire of the sacrament of baptisme Annot. Iohn 3. sect 2. But if they ground the necessitie of baptisme vpon those words of our Sauiour it beganne to bee necessarie when those words were vttered and therefore was necessary before the passion of Christ. Secondly the wordes are general in so much that there is no priuiledge graunted to Martyrs or penitent persons if they stande strictlie vpon that place In this poynt therefore papistrie is not at vnitie in it selfe 2 Bellarmine with the rest do affirme that Christ gaue the cup onelie to his Apostles whom at that instant they say he made priestes and therefore priestes onelie not lay-men are bound by the word of God to receiue in both kindes Yet the practise of their Church is contrary For neither doe priestes if they communicate onely and minister not the sacrament receiue in both kindes according to the decree of the Tridentine chapter Bellarm. de sacram Eucharist lib. 4. cap. 25. 3 Againe in their priuate masses the priest saith Quotquot ex hac altaris participatione sumpserimus As many of vs as haue beene partakers of this altar When as there be no communicantes beside the priest himselfe how can this hang together ex canon missae 4 The priest also being at masse saith commaund these to be caried by the handes of thine Angels vnto the highest altar in heauen and anone he swalloweth downe the host into his belly that he would haue conueyed into heauen how can these thinges agree 5 The papistes generally make but seauen degrees of ecclesiastical orders as priestes deacons subdeacons Acolythistes or Attenders Readers Exorcistes doore-kepers Bellarm. de Cleric cap. 11. And yet Bellarmine the mouth of the rest affirmeth that Ordinatio episcopalis the ordaining of Bishops is a sacrament as the other ministerial orders be Ergo it is also a distinct degree from the rest and so there are eight in al Bellarm. de sacram Ordinis cap. 5. Further if there be eight distinct Orders euery one by it selfe is a sacrament as Bellarmine teacheth then haue we eight sacraments of Order beside the other six for al these seuerall orders cannot make one sacrament seeing they differ one from another both in forme of wordes in the externall signes or ceremonies that are vsed Consul Bellarm. lib. de Ordin cap. 5. 6. 7. 8. 6 In wordes and outward profession they affirme that matrimonie is a sacrament And yet some of them call it a pollution or prophanation of orders Gregor Martin And that the mariage of ministers is the worst sort of incontinencie fornication Rhemist 1. Cor. 7. sect 8. Haue not these men now a very reuerent opinion of their sacramentes 7 Againe they preferre continencie before matrimonie as a state far more excellent and meritorious before God Yet they hold matrimonie to be a sacrament and to conferre grace of iustification how then is it not more excellent then single life which is no sacrament neither a conferrer of grace 8 Bellarmine saith Bonum est a Deo petere tum vt sanctos pro nobis orare faciat tum vt illos pro nobis orantes exaudiat It is good for vs to craue of God that he would cause the Saintes to pray for vs and that then he would heare them entreating for vs De Miss lib. 2. cap. 8. Thus they make God a mediator between the Saintes and vs. And what an absurde thing is this to pray to God that the Saints may pray for vs whereas in thus saying they confesse that we haue accesse vnto God our selues without their mediation 9 It is the opinion of the schoolemen approued by Bellarmine that the fathers of the lawe were iustified by the merite of Christes passion as we are but herein to stand the difference that the merite of Christs Death is applied vnto vs by the sacramentes Hebr●is autem per solam fidem But vnto the Hebrues by onely faith Bellarm. de sacram lib. 2. cap. 13. I pray you now if they were iustified by faith onely who liued vnder the law which is contrary to faith The law is not of faith saith the Apostle Galath 3. 12. shal not we much more vnder the Gospel which is by S. Paule called the word of faith Rom. 10. 8. Who seeth not nowe the packing and iugling of papistes 10 Now cōcerning the pope they euery where beare vs in hand that he is heade of the Catholike vniuersall Church And yet in the end being vrged they confesse that he is Christes vicar but in the regiment of that part which is on the earth Rhemist Annot. Ephes. ● sect 6. He is not then