the examination of yong children by the Bishop in his Visitation are things simply vnlawfull without expresse or necessary warrant of Gods Word are contrary to doctrine according to the declaration and iudgement of our Church set downe in the first booke of Discipline as is aboue expressed and by Saint Paul Coloss 2. is condemned for a doctrine of will-worship in these wordes Touch not taste not handle not Vers 21. Thus the imposing either of negatiue or affirmatiue positions touching points of Religion without warrant of the Word on the conscience of men is will-worship which you doe wilfully maintayne and vrge throughout the whole Pamphlet The eleuenth Article PP The Commissioners of Presbyteries haue conuened sufficiently vnderstand that neither the Presbyteries from whom they haue their Cōmissions nor the particular Churches of this Realme either require are willing or consent to admit these nouations Confitentur Theologi nihil esse per Synodos Ecclesijs inuitis obtrudendum The Diuines confesse that nothing should bee obtruded vpon Churches against their will ANS The Commissioners of Presbyteries were not astricted to the present opinions of the Presbyteries particular Churches of the Realme but receiued a free and voluntary Commission to vote as they should bee mooued and perswaded by the motiues and reasons proponed at the Assembly otherwise they had met with preiudice And therefore what they concluded according to their Commission was not obtruded vpon the Churches against their will but according to their wills contayned in the Commission The twelfth Atticle PP The Commissioners of Presbyteries here assembled vnderstanding the alienation of them from whom they receiued commission from these Articles can by no warrant oblige their vnwilling Presbyteries and Congregations to their votes Ecclesiam dissentientem inuitam obligare quis potest Who can binde a Church dis-assenting and vnwilling ANS If the Commissioners had come to the Assembly without a free and vnbounded Commission to reason vote and conclude in their names they could not by their votes and conclusions haue bound the Churches and Presbyteries from whom they come if they had after dis-assented But the generall and vnlimited Commission giuen to the Commissioners to reason vote and conclude with this expresse clause Firme and stable holding and for to hold whatsoeuer their Coommissioners should conclude in their names obliged the Presbyteries and Congregations by whom the Commission was giuen And here I marke a contradiction betwixt this Article and that which ye affirme in discussing of the Oath pa. 30. Namely that the Oath of the Church representatiue giuen An. 1596. did oblige them all who were liuing to the maintenance of the puritie of Religion in Doctrine and Discipline Heere yee acknowledge that the Church representatiue hath power to oblige all liuing within the iurisdiction therefore yee cannot allow of this Article according to your grounds The thirteenth Article PP There stand in force diuers Acts of Parliament in fauours of our present order Iacob 6 Parl. 1 cap. 8. Iames 6. Parl. 8. cap. 68. cap. 69. Item in the first Act of Parliament Anno 1592. ANS None of the Acts of Parliament here cited is contrary to the alteration The fourteenth Article PP The Ministers of this Church by order of the same printed and inserted before the Psalme Booke at their admissions respectiue promise in the presence of God and of his Congregation assembled to abhorre and vterly refuse all Doctrine alledged necessary to saluation that is not expresly contayned in the olde and new Testament c. Item to submit themselues to all admonitions secretly or publikely giuen ANS Against this promise nothing was concluded by the Assembly at Perth but how this promise is performed by these who disobey the Ordinances thereof let them aduise with their owne conscience The fifteenth Article PP The Subscribers of the Confession of Faith by their oath therein contained promise and sweare to continue in the obedience of the doctrine discipline of this Church to defend the same according to their vocation and power all the dayes of their liues c. And to abhor and detest all contrary religions but chiefly all kind of Papistry in generall euen as they are now damned by the Church of Scotland but in special the Popes fiue bastard Sacraments whereof Confirmation is one with all Rites and Ceremonies and false doctrines added to the Sacraments without the Word of God his absolute necessity of Baptisme c. which Confession is come to the eyes of the World in print and solemnly renued in the Couenant celebrated in the generall and prouincial Assemblies Presbyteries and Church Sessions in the yeere of God 1596. and how shal any man be heard to speak against that whereunto he hath formerly sworne and subscribed For the better vnderstanding of this last Article I will set downe a short discussion of the Oath ANS There is nothing that the Subscribers of the Confession of faith did by their oath oblige themselues to obserue and defend that is contrary to any of the Articles concluded at Perth and no man should bee heard to speake contrary to that whereunto hee hath formerly sworne subscribed And therefore they who haue sworne subscribed in the 21. Article of the Confession of faith confirmed in Parliament Anno 1567. That no policie and order in Ceremonies can bee appointed for all ages times and places but that they may ought to be changed when necessity requireth should not now bee heard affirming the contrary in this Pamphlet that they may not bee changed wherein ye contradict your oath and perswade others to doe the same Of the which oath the discussion set downe by you is a glosse that destroyeth the Text as shall by Gods grace bee made manifest by the examination thereof which followeth The Examination of the Oath discussed BEfore the Penner of this Pamphlet begins to discusse the oath he sets downe the articles controuerted then fiue seuerall obligations whereby as he alledgeth our Church is obliged to exclude and abhorre the particular actes concluded at Perth Thirdly he considers the Oath which is the chiefe of the flue obligations Keeping his order wee shall seuerally examine his sayings concerning them And first touching the articles controuerted he sayes thus Pp. The Religion Doctrine and Discipline receiued beleeued and defended by the Church of Scotland namely the publike ministration of Baptisme and the Lords Supper sitting at the Table in the act of receiuing the bread and the wine of that Sacrament The obseruation of the Lords day and the examination of Children for the first time at the ninth yeare of their age for the second at the twelfth for the third at the fourteenth excluding and abhorring priuate Baptisme priuate Communion kneeling in the act of receiuing the Supper Holy dayes or Feasts of Christmas Passion Resurrection Ascension and sending downe of the Holy Ghost were brought in at the resormation of Religion and enioyed ener since in
themselues with the Lord vpon an equall Throne Therefore we exhort and desire the Sacrament of the Lords Supper may bee administred to the people standing or bowing their knees with protestation against the bread-worship maintayned by Papists Paraeus 1. Cor. 11. Controuersia 2. De fractione panis in sacra Eucharistia NEque conuellitur instantijs quas quidam alioqui eruditus Theologus obijcit quod si singula nobis imitanda essent etiam prius agnum paschalem nos edere in mensa sedere duodenos tantum communicare in domo vel palatio et nocte oporteret Hasce enim peristaseis non sacramenti proprias de quibus solis propositio haec omnis Christi actio est nostra institutio loquitur sed accidentarias fuisse iam modo ostensum est That is this proposition is not improoued by the instances which a Theologue otherwise very learned obiects saying If wee should imitate all Christs actions then it behooued vs first to eate the Paschall Lambe sit at a Table and twelue persons only communicate in a priuate house or Palace and in the night season for these circumstances are not proper to the Sacrament but accidentary onely as wee haue shewed And it is of the proper actions of the Sacrament that this proposition Euery action of Christ is our institution speakes Caluinus Instit Lib. 4. Cap. 17. Sect. 37. CHristo inquiunt hane venerationem deferimus Primùm si in coena hoc fioret dicerem adorationem eam demum esse legitimam quae non in signo residet sed ad Christum in coelo sedentem dirigitur That is Wee giue this worshippe say they to CHRIST First if this were done in the action of the Supper I would confesse the adoration to bee lawfull which resteth not in the signe but is directed to Christ sitting in heauen Beza Epist 12. pag. 100. GEniculatio denique dum symbola accipiuntur speciem quidem habet piae ac Christianae venerationis ac proinde olim potuit cum fructu vsurpari That is Kneeling at the receiuing of the Elements hath a shew and forme of holy and Christian adoration and therefore of olde might haue beene vsed profitably Petrus Martyr Class 4. locus 10. Sect. 49. 50. IN Sacramento distinguimus symbola à rebus symbolis aliquem honorem deferimus nimirum vt tractentur decenter non abijciantur sunt enim sacrae res Deo semel deputatae quo verò vel res significatas eas promptè alacriter adorandas concedimus inquit enim Augustinus hoc loco Non peccatur adorando carnem Christi sed peccatur non adorando Adoratio interna potest adhiberi sine pericul◠neque externa suâ naturâ esset mala Multi enim piè genua flectunt et adorant That is In the Sacrament we distinguish the symboles from the things signified and some honour wee yeeld to the signes namely that they bee decently handled and not cast away for they are sacred things and once dedicate to God As to the things signifyed we confesse these should bee readily and cheerefully adored for Saint Augustine in this place sayes That it is no fault to adore Christs flesh but it is a sinne not to adore it In the next Section Inward adoration may bee vsed without perill neyther is the outward euill of it selfe for many bow their knees religiously and adore Iewell in the 8. Art of Adoration BVt they will reply Saint AMBROSE sayes We adore Christs flesh in the mysteries heereof groweth their whole error for Saint AMBROSE sayth not Wee adore the mysteries or the flesh of Christ really present or materially contayned in the mysteries as is supposed by Master HARDING onely hee sayes we adore Christs flesh in the mysteries that is in the ministration of the mysteries And doubtlesse it is our duetie to adore the body of Christ in the Word of God in the Sacrament of Baptisme in the mysteries of Christs body and bloud and wheresoeuer wee see any steppe or token of it but especially in the holy mysteries for that there is liuely layd foorth before vs the whole Historie of Christs conuersation in the flesh But this adoration as it is sayd before neyther is directed to the Sacraments nor requires any corporall or reall presence So Saint HIEROME teaches vs to adore Christs body in the Sacrament of Baptisme CHRYSOSTOME in MARKE Hom. XIV An Answere to the reasons vsed by the penner of the Pamphlet against the Festiuall DAYES PP FRom the beginning of the Reformation to this present yeere of our Lord 1618. the Church of Scotland hath diuers wayes condemned the obseruation of all Holy-dayes the Lords day onely excepted In the first Chapter of the first Booke of Discipline penned Anno 1560. the obseruation of Holy-dayes to Saints the feast of Christmas Circumcision Epiphanie Purification and others fond Feasts of our Lady are ranked amongst the abominations of the Romane Religion as hauing neither commandement nor assurance in the Word It is further affirmed that the obstinate maintainers and teachers of such abomination should not escape the punishment of the Ciuill Magistrate The Booke aforesaid was subscribed by the Lords of secret Counsell ANS This Booke was neuer authorised by Act of Counsell Parliament or by any Ecclesiasticall Canon and Iohn Knox as we said before complaines of some in chiefe Authoritie that called the same Deuote imaginations yet let vs giue vnto it the Authoritie which yee require the same will not serue your purpose For in the explication of that first head which yee cite we haue these words which yee haue omitted In the Bookes of old and new Testaments We affirme that all things necessarie for instruction of the Church and to make the man of God perfect are contained and sufficiently expressed By the contrarie doctrine wee vnderstand whatsoeuer men by Lawes Councels or Constitutions haue imposed vpon the consciences of men without the expresse commandement of Gods word such as be the vowes of chastitie forswearing of Marriage and keeping of Holy-dayes of certaine Saints c. By which words it is manifest that the obseruation of dayes here cōdemned is not that which was in the Primitiue Church and now is vsed in the Refōrmed Causa ordinis politeias as our Diuines speake that is for order and Policie sake But such as are imposed vpon the consciences of men as a necessarie point of Diuine worship This obseruation vrged vpon the people of God and practised with opinion of necessitie and merit was vtterly to be abolished And to banish this opinion together with the superstitious Idolatrie and prophanenesse which was otherwise conioyned of banqueting drinking playing quarrelling and such like enormities it was thought expedient that on these dayes the people should be discharged rest from their ordinarie labours and that no Diuine seruice should be done in places where there was not a dayly Exercise of Religion as well because of the raritie of Pastors to informe people touching
A TREATISE OF THE CEREMONIES OF THE CHVRCH VVherein the points in question Concerning Baptisme kneeling at the Sacrament Confirmation Festiuities c. Are plainly handled and manifested to be lawfull as they are now vsed in the Church of ENGLAND Whereunto is added a Sermon preached by a Reuerend Bishop 1. Cor. 11.16 But if any man seeme to be contentious c. LONDON Printed for Ralphe Rounthwaite and are to be solde at his shop at the signe of the Golden Lyon in Paules Church-yard 1625. TO THE REVEREND AND GODLY BRETHREN The PASTORS and MINISTERS of the Church of SCOTLAND AS in our Church blessed be God touching the truth of Doctrine there is no controuersie so there is no doubt deare brethren but in the controuerted points of Policie wee would soone agree if wee did consider what is the power of the Church in these matters the extent of her power and the obedience that is due thereto therefore concerning these I haue thought meet to 〈◊〉 this short Preface vnto you Albeit all things necessarie to the worship of God The power of the Church and mans saluation bee eyther expressely or by necessarie consequence contayned in the written Word yet the particular circumstances of persons by whom place where time when and of the forme and order how the worship and worke of the Ministrie should be performed are neither expressely nor by necessarie consequence set downe in the Word but for determination of these some generall rules are giuen according to the which the Church hath power to define whatsoeuer is most expedient to be obserued and done for the honour of God The power of the Christian Church in electing Pastors and edification This is a prerogatiue wherein the Christian Church differs from the Iewish Synagogue as is manifest in euery one of the particulars aboue expressed First as touching the persons in the Iewish Church they who were imployed in the Ministrie were particularly designed to bee Leuies Tribe Numb cap. 3. 1. Tim. 3. In the Christians Church neither Family Nation nor People is separated for the worke of the Gospell but the qualities graces and gifts of men meete for the sacred seruice are onely set downe and it is in the power of the Church to trie the persons particularly in whom these graces and gifts are and accordingly to elect them And albeit the function wherevnto they are called be diuine yet the bounds within which and the persons towards whom the same must be exercised is limited by the Church which hath diuided national Churches in Prouinces Dioceses and Dioceses in Parishes so as both the election of Ministers and the limitation of their jurisdiction is from the power of the Church This the Apostle calls the measure of the Canon 2. Cor. 10. which God did measure out to him beyond the which he did not reach in his Apostleship and such a rule and measure should euery Pastor in the Church haue beyond the which hee ought not to passe entering vpon other mens labour As the Apostles had their measure distributed to them by God so now euerie Pastor hath his bounds designed by the Church Secondly vnder the Law Their power in consecrating places Act. 15.21 albeit the Iewish Church had libertie to build Synagogues for their ordinarie meetings on the Sabbath to prayer and reading of the Law yet the place where the chiefe and solemne worship of God was performed was first the Tabernacle and the Temple both built by Gods owne speciall direction Deut. 12.4 and hauing the principall parts of his worshippe so appropriated to them that in another place the same might not be performed But as vnder the Gospel men shall neither worship God in this mountaine saies our Sauiour nor in Ierusalem but the true worshippers shall worship him in truth and spirit the Christian Church hath power according to that Apostolicall Rule 1. Cor. 14.40 Let all things be done decently and in order to make choice of a place conuenient within the bounds of each Parish for the meeting of the faithfull to performe all the points and parts of Gods worship and this place being built and dedicated to the worship of God may not bee condemned neglected nor profaned but frequented and kept for religious vses Not that wee esteeme that there is any more holinesse in it then in another place or that Gods presence and so his worship is annexed more to that place then to another but to the end religious Seruice may be performed decently and in order this is done Thirdly The power of the Church in appointing times to Gods worship Leuit. 23. vnder the Law the chiefe parts of Gods worship were astricted to certaine set times festiuities lawfully could not be performed on other daies but vnder the Gospel omnis dies Domini est omnis hora omne teÌ„pus habile est diuinocultui as Tertul. in his book de Baptismo witnesseth and Esay prophecied in his 66.23 From one Sabbath to another and from one New-moon to another shal all flesh appeare before me saith the Lord. Thus the Apostles ceassed not to teach daily in the Temple Act. 5. Act. 19. from house to house the Doctrine of Christ S. Paul taught in the Schoole of one Tyrannus for the space of 2. yeres daily and as one of the Greeke Editions hath it from the fifth houre to the tenth On the Iewish Sabbath Act. 13.14 Epitom de â—â—â—e Catholica which is our Saturday he taught often in the Iewish Synagogues And Epiphanius records that Christians kept their conuentions on Wednesday Friday and Sonday by Apostolical tradition and example Epist ad Ianuar. 118. S. Augustine affirmes That in his time men receiued the Sacrament euerie day Our owne Church besides the Lords day hath appointed other houres and times for diuine Seruice in great Townes as houres for Morning and Euening Prayer euery day for Preaching and interpretation of Scripture such other times as they hold to bee conuenient Thus is it manifest that the Church hath power to appoint other set times besides the Lords day for his seruice as wel by the liberty which God hath giueÌ„ to his Church to come and worship before him euery day as by the practise of the Apostolicall and Primitiue Churches Yea further the Church hath power to appoint religious exercises and certaine speciall parts of diuine Seruice to be performed in the times which shee thinkes most expedient for edification So hath our Church bin accustomed to appoint particular Scriptures to be interpreted vpon the daies so called of Exercise and by the first Booke of Discipline euery Pastor is ordained to teach in his Congregation on the Sondaies at afternoones certaine heads of the Catechisme Likewise to minister the Sacrament of the Communion vpon the first Sondaies of March Iune Septemb. December It was the custom of the Church of Geneua Caluin 361. Epist in the daies of I. Caluin
for his owne soule onely but here hee suffers martyrdome for the whole Church This was the iudgement of that holy Father who esteemed it a glorious martyrdome to suffer for the vnitie of the Church Contrariwise the Donatists did glorie in this that by their sufferings they entertained Schisme and diuision confirmed the hearts of the simple and superstitious in their errours acquired to themselues the renowne of Martyrs and thereby brought vpon the Church the imputation of persecution To whom S. Augustine answers That they complained most vniustly that they were persecuted by the Church because the Church was more heauily persecuted by them and thereupon in the eleuenth Tractate vpon S. Iohn sayes Albeit Ismael was cast out of his Fathers house for Isackes sake yet the Apostle calls not Isaack but Ismael the Persecutor In his Booke intituled De Vnitate Ecclesiae against Petilian the Donatist he writeth thus Grauius persequitur filius patrem male viuendo quam pater silium castigando grauius ancilla Saram persecuta est per iniquam superbiam quà m eam Sara per debitam disciplinam grauius Dominum persequebantur propter quos dictum est Zelus domus tuae commedit me quà m ipse eos cum eorum mensas euertit eos flagello de templo expulit that is to say The sonne persecutes the father more grieuously by his wicked liuing then the father doth the sonne by inflicting due chastisement And Agar the Hand-maid did persecute Sara her mistresse more spitefully by her vndutifull pride then Sara did her by vsing due discipline And they of whom it was said The zeale of thine house hath eaten mee vp did persecute the Lord more cruelly then hee did them while as he ouerthrew their Tables and droue them out of the Temple with scourges And a little before in that same place he affirmes that they were the persecutors of themselues by the Apostles words Qui resistit potestati Dei ordinationi resistit qui autem resistunt ipsi sibi iudicium acquirunt that is He that resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and they that resist draw punishment and iudgement vpon themselues and often repeateth this sentence Non poena fed causa facit martyrem It is not the punishment but the cause that maketh martyrdome To resist a lawfull ordinance is euill to suffer contumeliously for disobedience is worse but by disobedience and contumelious suffering to confirme People in their errours and rend the bowels of the Church our cōmon Mother is worst of all These things I shall beseech you Brethren to ponder and the Lord giue vs all in meekenesse and humilitie to trie what veritie requires and holding that fast to keepe the vnitie of the Spirit in the band of peace The God of veritie and peace knit vs together in his truth by the Spirit of his Sonne Iesus Christ our Peace AMEN Dauid Brechen To the Reader THou hast here gentle and courteous Reader a true and simple narration of the proceedings of the last generall Assembly kept at Perth opposed to the false and lying Discourse made by the Libeller against the same with an answer to his Nullities the Oath and Arguments propounded against the fiue Articles there concluded These paines are chiefly taken for thy information that thou mayest know the truth and vnderstand both the matter and manner of proceeding in the said Assembly Since that time I heare they haue put the Pamphlet in Latine and set forth other Libels full of impious and reproachfull lies against the principall men of our Church These I haue not seene and if I had I would not haue deigned them any answer For when leauing the matter they fall a rayling at the persons of men that are their betters in all respects they shew the weaknesse of their cause deserue nothing of wisemen but contempt This manner of doing is better replyed with the Pillorie then otherwise Wee know the eares of many are open to admit detractions and he liues not that is not hated by some who will readily beleeue the most false things yet Wickednesse hath not so generally preuailed in the world nor are we so vnknowne in it as wee neede any of vs to feare their defamations If thou notwithstanding doest think that such Libels require an answer I aske thee How shall it be done I know no way my selfe but eyther to vse Apologies or recriminations And this last were not difficile to doe for though the Writer goeth namelesse the Faction to whose pleasure he writes is knowne and they that sport themselues with such libels sending them from hand to hand as matters of some worth Their persons we could easily pay home and repone true things vnto them in stead of forged telling them no other matters then haue beene tried confessed and publiquely acknowledged by those that are hottest in this businesse of themselues but these are the weapons of the vulgar which we disdain to vse vltio haec Christiano homini maxime indecora As for Apologies the Wise man saith That they leaue suspitions in the Readers mind plures Sermones prouocant plurium The best Apologie against calumnies is conuitiatores factis refellere Luther Caluine Beza the great lights of the reformed Church and our owne Knox had many foule aspersions cast vpon them whilest they liued yet did they not faint in their course nor do they now heare the worse for them with posteritie Fame is not at mans disposing and if any amongst men haue power of it in nostra manu est as one speakes bene vel secus audire We therefore resting in the goodnesse of our cause and conscience will keepe silence and not vnderstand such things passing little with the Apostle to be iudged of them or of the day of man He that iudges is the Lord who will lighten things that are hidden in darkenesse and make the counsells of the hearts manifest And then shall euerie man haue praise of God To his grace I commend thee for now and euer AN ANSWER TO THE PREFACE DIRECTED TO THE READER THE PAMPHLETER THE externall worship of God and the gouernment of the Church gentle and iudicious Reader are like Hippocrates twins they are sicke together in health together they liue together they die and dwine together ANSWER The externall worship of God and the gouernement of the Church are neuer matched in Scripture as one twin with another But the gouernment whereby the order decency and puritie of the worship is preserued is sometime compared to a Wall or an Hedge wherein breaches may be made either by persecution of open enemies without or by contention of seditious brethren within and thereby the beautie of the worship defaced Thus for a time they may bee sicke and dwine together but they shall neuer die till the world be done all the enemies of God shall perish but this Kingdome shall endure for euer In this they differ from Hippocrates twins and herein standeth
were present both to sanctifie themselues by prayer to cōmend the successe of the affairs vnto God his blessing The same was repeated in the second exercise made by the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes and nothing omitted on our parts that was required to bring men to a due regard thereof But the Libeller excepts against the second Sermon First that although the Text was pertinent the Preacher ranne quickly from it Next that in his Discourse of Ceremonies the fiue Articles proponed his best Arguments were testimonies cited out of Caluine Martyr and Beza all peruerted How the first can bee made good I see not seeing if the Text was pertinent as he confessed to the time and matters there to bee entreated it is as cleere that in all his Discourse hee did so strictly keep himself to the purpose as there was not so much as one digression made from it And whether hee brought no Arguments for proofe or peruerted the testimonies of these learned men Let the Reader iudge by the Sermon it selfe which wee haue made here to bee inserted word for word as the same was then deliuered The Sermon preached by the Right Reuerend Father in GOD the Archbishop of Saint ANDREWES to the generall Assembly holden at PERTH the 25. of August 1618. 1. COR. 11.16 But if any man seeme to bee contentious wee haue no such custome neither the Churches of God MY Lords and Brethren the businesse for which we meete heere is knowne to you all namely to take some resolution in these Articles which we are required to admit in our Church by that power vnto which wee bee all subiect Of the indifferency of these Articles I thinke there is little or no question amongst vs The conueniencie of them for our Church is doubted of by many but not without cause They are new and vncouth such things as we haue not beene accustomed with and nouations in a Church euen in the smallest things are dangerous Etiam quae vtilitate adiuuant nouitate perturbant Aug. Epist 118. Saint Augustine spake it long since and wee haue tryed it to bee true this yeare past I beseech God we feele no more of it hereafter Had it beene in our power to haue disswaded or declined them most certainly wee would and if any of you thinke otherwise yee are greatly mistaken but now being brought to a necessitie I am sorry to speake more sorry to thinke of the * * This was the protestation that should haue beene presented to the last Parliament meanes that wrought the same either of yeelding or disobeying him whom for my selfe I hold it Religion to offend I must tell you that the euill of nouations especially in matters of Rite Ceremonie is nothing so great as the euill of disobedience That which is new this day with a little vse will become familiar and old yee know the prouerbe A wonder lasts but nine nights in a Towne But how farre disobedience may goe what euills it may produce God knowes As the Apostle speakes here of Contention so I say of Disobedience we haue no such custome nor the Churches of God We leaue that to Papists and Anabaptists that carry no regard to authoritie Our Religion teaches vs to obey our Superiours in all things that are not contrarie to the Word of God So our Confession speakes which is printed in the beginning of your Psalme bookes Psal Booke pag. 6. So haue wee taught the people in former times and God forbid wee should now come in the contrarie Our case as I thinke at this time is not farre different from that of the Corinthians at the writing of this Epistle The question was amongst them of the behauiour of men and women in holy Assemblies What was most decent and beseeming men to be vncouered women to haue their heads couered or by the contrarie Saint Paul after that hee had shewed his owne minde in the matter and giuen some reasons for it as hee doth in the Verses preceding concludes now with this protestation If any man seeme to bee contentious wee haue no such custome neither the Churches of God As though hee would say I haue said so much as may content calme and moderate spirits as for contentious men I trouble not my selfe with them They will still be disputing and say what yee will they shall still finde a reply for they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 louers of Victorie not of Veritie men that seeketh not the Churches weale but their owne wills and make it their credit to bee alwayes stirring that is not my custome saith the Apostle he might speake it well for hee neuer cared for himselfe or how he was counted of so as he might be profitable to the Church and an instrument of sauing soules And as it is not my custome no more is it the custome of the Churches of God for they fauour not contention but follow the things which concerne peace wherewith one may edifie and make better another Some of the Interpreters refer these words to the question in hand and thinke that the Apostle is here opposing the custome of the Churches to these that contended for men couering their heads in publike meetings but the better sort take this to bee spoken against the studie of contention and thinke the Apostle his meaning here is onely to shew that it is not his fashion nor the fashion of the Churches of God to bee contentious for matters of such indifferency as those were of This is Caluines interpretation amongst others for he writing vpon this place after he had said that contention in a Church is of all euills the most pernicious addes by way of admonition these words Diligenter notemus locum istum ne abripi nos super vacuis disputationibus sinamus Let vs carefully obserue this place saith hee that wee suffer not our selues to bee carryed away with vnnecessary disputings Now these are vnnecessary disputings which are made De rebus non magnis of matters of light moment Vel de rebus non ambiguis that is of matters in themselues cleare and euident Atqui tales sunt importuni quidam disputatores qui artis esse putant omnia in dubium vocare Some there are that can finde probabilities against the clearest Truth and are still disputing about the lightest matters Such are very troublers and dangerous heads in a Church of whom wee should be wary Brethren to contend is not a fault if so it bee for a weightie matter but to bee contentious in a light businesse this is faultie and reprooued here by the Apostle Wee ought to contend alwayes for the Faith and that earnestly as Saint Iude teacheth Iude 3. not yeelding to the Aduersarie in the substance of Religion one jot There should our courage and spirituall zeale kindle it selfe but for matters of circumstance and ceremonie to make businesse and as much adoe as if some mayne point of Religion were questioned it is to iniurie the Truth
in close and secret meetings their Christnings in Riuers the ministring of the Lords Supper after meate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Church-Feasts the abhorring of leuened Bread abstayning from Bloud and that which is strangled the arbitrary maintenance of Ministers and other more particulars which to bring againe in vse were to alter and change in a sort the state of Christianitie it selfe So it being to vs vncertaine what the formes of the Apostles were in euery thing and the dissimilitude of their times and ours being so great they giue no sure direction that send vs to seeke the resolution of our differences in matters of this nature from them Reade Beza his eight Epistle written to that Reuerend Bishop Edmond Grindall then Bishop of London and you shall finde this to bee his iudgement His words are Scio duplicemesse de Ecclesiarum instauratione opinionem sunt qui Apostolicae ill◠simplicitati nihil adijciendum putant ac proinde quicquid Apostoli fecerunt faciendum quicquid autem succedens Apostolis Ecclesia ritibus primis adiecit semel abolendum existiment There are some sayes he who thinke that we should adde nothing vnto that first Apostolike simplicity but doe in euery thing according as they did And that whatsoeuer the succeeding Ages added in matters of Rites should be all abolished Because his answere and discourse is somewhat long I will remit you to the place and giue you the heads of it only first therefore he sayes that the doctrine of the Apostles is in it selfe so exact and perfect as we ought not to derogate nor adde any thing vnto it but next for the Rites and Ceremonies of the Church wee must not thinke so because the Apostles at the first could not set downe euery thing that was expedient for the Church and thereupon they proceeded by little and little and in such Rites as they instituted they had a speciall respect to the time places and persons wherof many were afterwards by the Church worthily abolished Hauing said this hee concludes Itaque quicquid ab Apostolis factitatum est quod ad ritus attinet nec statim nec sine aliqua exceptione sequendum existimo And Caluine whom I often name for the authority which he deseruedly carries with all Reformed Churches in the tenth Chapter of his fourth Booke of Institutions which place I formerly quoted hath to the same purpose these words In his quae cultum Numinis spectant solus Magister est audiendus quia autem in externa disciplina ceremonijs non voluit sigillatim praescribere quid sequi debeamus quòd istud pendêre à temporum conditione praeuideret neque iudicaret vnam omnibus saeculis formam conuenire confugere hic oportet ad generales quas dedit regulas vt ad eas exigantur quaecunque ad ordinem decorum praecipi recessitas Ecclesiae postulabit And after a few lines Prout Ecclesiae vtilitas requirit tam vsitatas mutare abrogare quà m nouas instituere ceremonias Ecclesiae licitum His iudgement is that the power of adding altering innouating and appointing Ceremonies remaynes with the Church to doe therein as shee in her wisedome shall thinke meete And certainly there is no other way to keepe away differences for matters of Rites and Ceremonies but this That euery man keepe the custome of the Church wherein he liues and obserue that which is determined by the Gouernours thereof For in things indifferent wee must alwayes esteeme that to bee best and most seemely which seemes so in the eye of publike authoritie Neither is it for priuate men to controll publike iudgement as they cannot make publike Constitutions so they may not controll nor disobey them being once made Indeed authoritie ought to looke carefully vnto this that it prescribe nothing but rightly appoint no Rites nor Orders in the Church but such as may set forward Godlinesse and Pietie yet put the case that some be otherwise established they must be obeyed by such as are members of that Church as long as they haue the force of a Constitution and are not corrected by the authoritie that made them Except this be there can bee no order and all must be filled with strife and contention But thou wilt say My conscience suffers mee not to obey for I am perswaded that such things are not right nor well appointed I answere thee in matters of this nature and qualitie the sentence of thy Superiours ought to direct thee and that is a sufficient ground to thy conscience for obeying But may not Superiours erre May not Councels decree that which is wrong This no man denyes and if they decree any thing against Scripture it is not to be obeyed for there that Sentence holds good Molius obedire Deo quam hominibus But if that which is decreed be not repugnant to the Word and that thou hast no more but thy owne collections and motions of thy conscience as thou callest it how strong soeuer thy perswasions bee it is presumption in thee to disobey the Ordinance of the Church And of this wee may bee sure whosoeuer denyes obedience to Church Ordinances in rebus medijs the same will not sticke to reiect Gods owne Word when it crosses his fancie Et videant isti sayes Caluine qui plus sapere volunt quam oportet qua ratione morositatem suam Domino approbent Nobis enim satisfacere istud Pauli debet nos contendendi morem non habere neque Ecclesias Dei With such a sentence I close all that I purposed to say of Ceremonies in generall Now hauing shewed you that Rites are necessary in a Church the qualities they should haue and obedience that must bee giuen vnto the Constitutions of the Church once being made I come to the particulars desired of vs to bee receiued these must bee seuerally considered because they are not all of the like respect some of them strike vpon the duties of our calling enioyning the practice thereof in places and at times where vsuall solemnitie cannot bee kept as to administrate Baptisme in priuate houses in the case of necessitie and the Communion to these that are sicke and in dying Others of them prescribe the obseruation of certayne things not in vse with vs as the confirming of Children and the keeping of some Festiuities throughout the yeere And there is a fift Article that requires our accustomed manner of sitting at the Communion to be changed in a more religious and reuerend gesture of kneeling ye shall not expect to heare all that may be said or is at this time expedient concerning these neither the time nor the strength of any one man I think will suffice to say all without interruption I know I speake to men of vnderstanding and my intent is to say no more of them then may serue to iustifie the aduise which I minde with Gods helpe to giue vnto you I begin with the Communion to the Sicke because this Article passed in the late Assembly
with some limitations which his Maiesty disliked The mind that is offended hardly interprets any thing well so fared it in this matter The delay of our answere to the rest of the Articles mooued his Maiestie to call our grant of this Article scornfull and ridiculous I was bold in a priuate Letter to shew there was a mistaking and iustifie that which was done neither should I speake any more of it but that it hath beene complayned that some of our Ministerie beeing earnestly entreated by certaine sicke persons for the comfort of that Sacrament since that time haue deuyed the same To iustifie therefore that which then was inacted I say shortly that by our calling wee are directly bound to minister vnto men in the last houre all the helpes and comforts wee possibly can the naturall terrours of death and fearefull doubts of conscience which at that time commonly perplexe men require this at our hands therefore Visitation of the sicke is earnestly commended to Ministers in their admission that they bee readie to attend the sicke person and as his estate craues minister comfort vnto him by preaching the promises of grace and mercie to all penitent sinners Why this Sacrament that is the seale of Gods promises and a speciall meane of binding vp our Communion with Christ should bee denyed to such as desire the same in that time there can be no reason Howbeit saluation depends not vpon the Sacrament and that they vse it superstitiously that giues it for a viaticum to the dying the end of a man cannot but be the more comfortable and his death accompanyed with the greater contentment and tranquilitie of minde when his desire is satisfied in this point For this is to bee considered that it is not to all that die nor to all that are sicke but to such onely whose recouery is desperate and vrgently desire the comfort of this Sacrament that the same is appointed to bee ministred Of which purpose Caluin deliuers his opinion in his 52. Epistle in these words De Coenae administratione conseo libenter admittendum esse hunc morem vt apud aegrotos celebretur communio quum ita res opportunitas feret Nec magnopere repugnandum esse quin maleficis detur qui plectendi sunt si quidem postulent ad receptionem satis comparatos esse appareat hac tamen lege vt sit vnà communio hoc est vt panis in coetu aliquo fidelium frangatur And in his 361. Epistle answering some one that had moued him in this matter he beginnes on this manner Cur coenam aegrotis negandam esse non arbitror multae graues causae me impellunt as you may see in the place Bucer Bullinger and Zepperus are of the same iudgement and the last of these three putting the case that none is by this sicke man disposed to communicate sayes Quod ne sic quidem priuandus est communione aegrotus You may see his reasons in the twelft Chapter of his first Booke De Politia Ecclesiastica Our owne Church hath practised the same in former times as was qualified in diuers particulars at the last Assembly So where the reformed Churches haue approued it and wee our selues by our owne practice now to stand against it when by a speciall Canon it is appointed to bee done cannot but bee thought obstinate disobedience I come to the Article of Baptisme This craues that in the case of necessitie when a child without hazard may not bee brought out of doores it bee lawfull to the Minister to baptise in a priuate house It was not long since a custome amongst vs that no Minister would baptise except vpon the ordinarie day of teaching this same being complayned of in the Assembly that was kept at Holy Rood-house in the yeare 1602. an Ordinance was made that whensoeuer a Parent should require baptisme to his child the Minister should not deny it without delaying to the ordinarie day of preaching The question was then of the Time now it is of the Place Whereabout this you all know that in the institution of Baptisme the Lord Iesus hath not tyed vs to any place but his command binds all men to bee baptized And wee that are Ministers by our calling are obliged to baptise howsoeuer wee doe not thinke Baptisme absolutely necessary vnto saluation and the child that wants it vpon a necessitie ineuitable nothing preiudiced that way yet if the occasion present there is no doubt but the Minister hath a necessitie lying vpon him to baptize although time place and other circumstances required for the due and solemne administration be not concurring But this yee will say fosters the Popish opinion of the necessitie of Baptisme Let Bucer answer it To with-hold Baptisme for want of the due solemnities sayes hee opens a doore to the Deuill to bring in the contempt of Christs Ordinance and our whole redemption by him We haue a Commandement to baptize and this to vs is a necessary duety which we may not leaue vndone As for inconueniences we must meet them as wisely as we may by doctrine and diligent catechizing but in no sort neglect the Commandement that is giuen Yee shall haue Caluin his iudgement also in this matter being asked Vbinam baptismus recte administrari possit He answers Fas non est administrare baptismum nisi in coetu fidelium non quidem vt templum requiratur sed vt vbiuis numerus aliquis fidelium conueniat qui Ecclesiae corpus efficiat Yee haue this in his 185. Epistle And thus much for Baptisme The third Article is of Confirmation to be giuen to children when they are come to the yeares of discretion and that is one of the most ancient customes of the Christian Church from the dayes of the Apostles it hath continued and with them it began Neither is there any thing more profitable for it helps children to bee seasoned with the principles of true Religion layes a good foundation for the better direction of their whole life preserues the seede of the Church sound makes children more diligent to learne and Pastors and Parents more carefull to instruct them The neglect of this dutie hath done much harme in the Church and the restitution of that good custome which Caluin in the fourth Booke of his Institutions earnestly wishes could not but bring with it an exceeding great benefit It was in substance agreed vnto in the Assembly at Abirdene but two things his Maiestie found deficient in the Act One that there was no mention of laying on of hands vpon the child confirmed Another was that the performance of it was not restricted to the Bishops care And for this last it is cleare by all Antiquitie that the power of Confirming appertayned euer to Bishops Not that Confirmation is a Sacrament of greater dignitie then Baptisme as the Papists teach these were the thoughts of ignorance but as S. Hierome speakes The Church thought fit that seeing Baptisme is giuen by
quae Dei Deo And as Constantine the Great as Eusebius hath it wrote vnto his Churchmen that troubled his peace and other weightie affaires with their contentious humours So let me intreat you in the behalfe of our CONSTANTINE Qui dum regat iubet Date illi dies tranquillos noctes curae molestiarum expertes That so he may with much ioy and contentment of heart yet once more as hee proposeth if not often visit your coasts and those places which his soule so loueth And that this poore Church and his natiue Kingdome may be made euer more and more happie by his comming and long peaceable and prosperous reigne And GOD and Men say Amen vnto it Amen Amen This Speech hee deliuered most grauely and with great affection to the contentment of all good and wise men And how falsly the Libeller charges him with bringing in the Puritane and Papist like Herode and Pilate conspiring together we leaue it to the Reader to iudge Thus ended the first Session of that Assembly The second Session of the Assembly was differred to the morrow after and the Conference warned to meet at three of the clocke in the afternoone IN the Conference after Prayer made for a blessing to that meeting his Maiesties Letter was read againe to put them in minde that were conuened of the businesse in hand at what time the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes did remember them of the proceedings that had beene kept in these matters since his Maiesties first Proposition of them at Saint-ANDREWES The promises made at that time to his Maiestie for passing the said Articles the delay made in the preceding Assembly vpon pretext of satisfying the simple and ignorant sort touching the lawfulnesse of them Hee toln them also of the offence which his Maiestie had taken at that delay the seuere rer course that was intended against the disobedient Mininisters and the mitigation which was procured by the humble intercession of himselfe and others and hereupon besought them earnestly to doe as became wisemen for howbeit as he perceiued against the aduice giuen in the particular Synods they were come thither almost all of them who were disposed to resist the conclusion intended and that they supposed to carry matters by voyces without regard what reason would craue of them they would deceiue themselues in that case and finde their numbers too weake if they did not hearken and submit themselues to reason And in the end shewing them the end of their sitting apart was to consider by what meanes matters might most easily be brought vnto a point hee said that there appeared but two wayes one whereof was by disputing the Articles which was likely to consume along time and breed irritation rather then any contentment else The other was by a calme and wise consultation to consider how the said Articles might bee receiued in all the Churches with least offence and conclude the same specially since they had promised in the last Assembly to resolue themselues and others of the equitie of the points required and which they like best he desires them to choose The greater part esteeming that such as were contrary minded would neuer receiue satisfaction vnlesse matters were first reasoned and that it should bring a sore imputation vpon the Assembly to conclude any thing which had not beene first debated by arguments vrged the disputing of the Articles which was of the rest condescended vnto Then it being proponed if they would take the said Articles in order or beginne with the most controuerted they agreed vniformely to treate of kneeling at the receiuing of the holy Sacrament in the first place hoping that satisfaction being giuen in that Article the lesse scruple should be made of the rest So according to the order two were named to dispute that Arcicle to wit Doctor Henrie Philip and Doctor William Forbes for the one side and Master William Scot and Master Iohn Carmichael for the other these two last named after a graue protestation made of their vnwillingnesse to be heard opposing to any matter for the which his Maiestie seemed so earnest excused themselues by the necessity of the Commandement and their owne resolutions which they held to bee well grounded wishing that no offence might be taken at their speeches which they should be carefull of and say nothing but with that reuerence which become them in so honourable an hearing And then adding that the contrary order had beene long time kept in this Church with great profit and the comfort of many good Christians if now any would preasse to abolish that which had beene in force and draw in things not yet receiued they should bee holden to prooue eyther that the things vrged were necessary and expedient for our Church or the order hitherto kept not meet to be retayned And for this purpose they alleadged a passage of Master Hooker in his Preface before the Bookes of Ecclesiasticall Policie wherein hee craues that such as seeke the reformation of Orders Ecclesiasticall in the Church of England should content themselues with the Opponents part and bee subiect to prooue these two things mentioned It was replyed that the difference of their case and ours was great for there a few priuate men desired the Lawes publikely established to bee inuerted and it was good reason that such should bee put to their confirmation of what they proponed but heere the Prince that by himselfe had power to reforme such things as were amisse in the outward policie required to haue the change made And therefore it concerned them to bring reasons why his Maiesties Propositions ought not to bee granted This they declined for a great while still protesting the reuerence they beare to his Maiesties commandements and without mentioning that which they would not oppose in Thesi they wished this question to be reasoned Whether kneeling or sitting at the Communion were the fitter gesture It was answered that the question could bee no otherwayes proponed then thus His Maiestie desires our gesture of sitting at the Communion to be changed into kneeling Why ought not the same to be done If it could bee shewed by the Word or by any necessary consequent deduced out of the same that his alteration craued ought not to bee granted because impious or vnlawfull that should bee enough humbly to decline the desire which wee doubted not his Maiestie would accept well and if otherwayes they could bring no argument to the contrary a necessitie lay vpon vs to obey An houre or more was spent in such speeches they declining still to giue any argument and offering themselues to answere such reasons as any man would propone for the alteration desired whereupon the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes said that if none would reason hee would put the Articles to voyces Then they proponed that reasoning should bee publike and in face of the whole Assembly it was replyed that nothing should be in conference concluded to the preiudice of the Assembly
importunately the voting of the Articles in Conference saying That hee would commit twentie preiudices to please the King whereas the truth is that after many answers made to giue them satisfaction and shew that no preiudice was either intended or done to the Assembly when as nothing could content them but still they talked of preiudice he willed them to be quiet for rather then his Maiestie should offend with the Church and these troubles come vpon it which were iustly to bee feared hee would commit twentie such preiudices as these were The rest of that after-noone was spent in talking as the Libeller sayes vpon Simony c. but in the deuising some ouerture for the restrayning of that abuse to bee proponed to the whole Assembly which the next day after was by vniuersall consent allowed As likewise the Commission for the planting of the Church of Edinburgh and the forming of the booke of Common Prayers and extracting of the Canons of the Church And thus ended this Conference Thursday the 27. of August THat day being an ordinary day of preaching a Sermon was made by the reuerend Father in God William late Bishop of Galloway against which the Libeller excepts three manner of wayes First saying that his Doctrine was farre contrary to that which he had taught before the Estates of Parliament Anno 1606. Secondly that hee set at nought the ancient order of our Church sometime highly commended by himselfe extolling the new light and thirdly that he presumed to teach them a new kind of Catechisme vnder whom he himselfe might be yet catechised To all which seeing he is now at rest this much may be truely replyed in his behalfe That howeuer his opinion in these matters of the externall gouerment were sometimes other his Doctrine was neuer contrarie to that which at any time he professed and preached but these men haue beene so accustomed in feeding the eares of people with matters belonging to order neglecting the substantiall points of Religion which are Faith and Repentance as they dreame of no other Doctrine but that and counts the alteration of iudgement in these points of outward discipline a sort of Apostasie and falling from the truth And where he is said to set at nought the ancient order of our Church it is a false and impudent lye for neither he nor any else that seeme most earnest for receiuing these Articles did euer contemne the orders and rites formerly established but while as they stood in force reuerently practised them and were obedient to the ordinances of the Church made thereabout but the circumstances of things now being changed and these times requiring other fashions and manners wee thinke without the despising of these they may be well admitted and as commendably vsed as euer the other were For the third of presuming to teach them by whom he might be catechized because this is spoken in despight I passe it with this answere That his Sermons and workes left behind him which will continue with the posteritie will witnesse against all their malice that hee was inferiour to none of the Opposites in preaching yea in many degrees superiour to them all But to returne to our purpose the Assembly being not in full number to take some conclusion in the businesse for which they were conuened after inuocation of the Name of God it was declared vnto them that by the labours of the Conference in their priuate meetings the Articles proponed by his Maiestie were brought and reduced into that forme as it rested for the Assembly to consider whether or not the same should be receiued in our Church and to moue them the rather to condescend his Maiesties resolution to haue the Articles receiued was declared and how no other answere could satisfie but granting of the said Articles They were likewise remembred of their promises made to his Maiesties selfe at Saint Andrewes and in the last generall Assembly and had the lawfulnesse and indifferencie of these matters at length of new exponed vnto them Neither was any of their common pretexts left vnanswered place being giuen to all that would reason against any one of the Articles to doe the same And while some of them insisted by long speeches to haue a continuation made of matters to another Assembly and a supplication sent to his Maiestie for some longer delay his Highnesse Commissioners hauing vrged a present answere they were desired to cease and not to trifle time with vnnecessary speeches seeing matters should receiue decision before they went forth of doores And so some few making shew to reason in the contrary were permitted to speake till they had no more to say and had their reasons answered to the full The Libeller sayes the libertie was granted to a few and that the reasons were checkt and borne downe with authoritie but how contrarie this is to the truth wee leaue it to bee answered by such as were present And now when they haue set downe in writing all that then was said or possibly they can inuent Let the Reader iudge if by the answeres giuen their obiections be not sufficiently confuted Doctor Lindsay his answere being posed on conscience to declare his iudgement touching kneeling at the Sacrament is maliciously mutilated His declaration was this as all the Assembly can testifie in whose presence it was giuen On my conscience I neither know Scripture reason nor antiquitie that enforceth kneeling sitting standing or passing as necessary but thinke them all indifferent and therefore that any of them may bee lawfully vsed when it is found expedient And considering nothing to be more expedient for the weale of our Church then to keepe peace with our gracious Soueraigne and not to contend for such matters I iudge yeelding to his Highnesse desire to bee the onely best When all the reasoning was ended his Maiesties Letter was againe read to the end the Assembly might see his earnestnesse about the same matters And because of a Pasquill cast in in the Pulpit of Edinburghe the Sunday before which was deliuered to the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes the penners whereof had warned the Ministers not to yeeld to the Articles giuing them promises of satisfaction for their stipends in case they should be taken from them and to fight in the defence of thē that cause He disswaded them to leane vnto such suggestions or be moued with them for that they would proue nought in the end as the experience of the seuenteene dayes worke might teach them And added which he is not ashamed of nor will denie That were there no other to take imployment against these Mutiners and seditious persons he could wish that he were honoured therewith These are the great blasts and terrours which the Libeller mentions otherwaies they can take exception at nothing iustly that then was vittered As matters were then proponed to be voted one of that number gaue in writing some particular reasons for disswading the grant of the said Articles which they
that Assembly at Linlythguow a man for his Wisdome Knowledge and Holinesse in greater reputation then that thy calumnies can touch him All the conclusions thereof were penned by himselfe at least by his aduice and to haue made a greater aduantage then that conclusion could bring with it would not haue altered a sillable in any Act nor forged or foysted in any clause as thou speakest The Scribe of that Assembly was Doctour Henry Philip yet Minister at Arbrothe whose truth and fidelity to speake nothing of his Learning Prudence and other gifts is as well knowne as is thy perfidle and presumptuous rebellions for which now thou liuest in Exile And if thy sayings or the speeches of the like of thee might call such mens honestie in question it should not goe well If I seeme more bitter in this Answere to the Reader then I am accustomed let him consider that he who neither spares dead nor liuing great nor small must bee answered sometimes as he deserues Now where yee say that the Bishops will not stand to that Assembly now more then the Church then did I doe not conceiue whom ye call the Church except ye thinke a handfull of mutinous persons such as your selfe to be the Church otherwise the Ministers generally in all the parts of the Countrey did consent and obey the Acts of that Assembly And what if the conclusions taken therein yet stands vnrepealed by other Assemblies that haue followed the Bishops doe all acknowledge and stand to For it is the Law of the Church that rules them in matters of outward policie and all other peaceable Ministers yee and the like of you stand to no Law but the will of your owne minds Thirdly where ye say that some Moderatours were sent Commissioners by the Presbyteries vpon an ignorant conceit that they were bound by the Act of Linlythguow so to doe ye qualifie no part of this by any particulars and if ye did it would be replyed that in euery cōuention that is permitted for exercise through the Land the fittest and choysest of a number is appointed to moderate And that whether the moderation lay vpon them or not their Brethren would haue elected them and no others to haue bin Commissioners to that Assembly Lastly where ye tell vs scoffingly that the present Moderators are of a new edition to wit the deputies of Bishops yee must know That your changeable Moderators were of that new edition yee speake of for in no age was it seene euer before this that indifferently euery man was taken in his course to rule and preside without consideration had of his gifts and qualities And these we haue now are such as the Christian Church euer had vsed to keepe order in their meetings conuentions PP The Assessours to his Maiesties Commissioners the Nobilitie Barons Bishops Burgesses and Moderators imposed vpon Presbyteries with some Ministers voting without warrant being substracted from the number of the affirmatiue voters the negatiues will not bee found inferiour in number to the affirmatiues authorised with Commission And suppose inferiour in number yet not in weight for the negatiue voters adhered to the iudgement of the Church heard no reasons for the nouelties proponed were not ouercome with perswasions or terrours as was the affirmatiues ANS It hath beene sufficiently proued that there was neyther Nobleman Baron Burgesse nor Bishop but had as good warrant to vote as any of the negatiues therefore should not be substracted from the number of the affirmatiue voters This yee perceiue and flie to another shift according to your custome Yee graunt your number were fewer for so they were by more then another halfe but their weight yee say was greater for with them as ye alledge there was three great ouer weights in the ballance First they had no feare Secondly they were not ouercome with perswasion And the third they adhered to the iudgemēt of the Church It is true indeed that neither the feare of inconueniencies and euills which might haue ensued to the great hurt of the Church and hinderance of the Gospel did moue them nor could reason whereby the change was manifestly proued both lawfull and expedient perswade them but to the iudgement of the Church as ye call it they adhered without regard of good or euill without respect to right or wrong And this is the Idoll which they still adore Now let vs consider this iudgement whereunto they adhered The iudgement of our Church touching ceremonies and circumstances to bee vsed in the worshippe of God is two-fold There is one that is particular the other is generall The particular iudgement determineth and defineth what ceremonies in particular the Reformers thought expedient to be receyued and reiected The generall declares what the Church and euery Christian should esteeme beleeue and hold touching the particular order and policie which is set downe for the vse of ceremonies and circumstances to be obserued in the worship of God The former iudgement is expressed in the first Booke of Discipline and some few Acts of the generall Assemblies cited afterward by your selfe This other we haue in the one and twentieth Article of the Confession of Faith about the end thereof and in the seuenth Chapter of the second Booke of Discipline both which are afterwards cited in the examination of your Discourse where yee professe your selfe to discusse the oath And it is that iudgement whereunto the Swearers did oblige themselues by their oath In this it is declared expresly That no order nor policie in ceremonies can be established for all times ages and places but that it is temporall and may and should be changed when necessitie require This is the generall and constant iudgement of the Church whereunto the negatiue Voters were bound by their oath to haue adhered which they did not That other whereunto they adhered as yee alledge is onely temporall and subiect to change according to the opportunities and occasions of times places and persons For if by occasion of any of these circumstances the obseruation which was profitable at one time become hurtfull at another and that which serued for reformation breedes and fosters corruptiō profanenesse or superstition it is the constant and generall iudgement of the Church that it should bee changed and altered which formerly was obserued And to apply this to the purpose in hand It is notoriously knowne That sitting at the Communion which at the reformation was iudged most conuenient to abolish the opinion of transubstantiatiō bread-worship makes the Sacrament now to be contemned and profaned by the common sort of Professours That the want of diuine exercise on the fiue holy-dayes hath almost buried in obliuion the inestimable benefits of our redemption the superstitious obseruation of these times not the lesse continuing still in our Church That the withholding of Baptisme from infants in times of necessitie and the holy Supper from others at the houre of their dying hath beene the griefe of many good
iudgement incline hee must render himselfe obedient to the Constitutions of the Church in which he liues And there is a great difference betweene decerning and discerning though eyther yee or your Printer hath mistaken it for it belongeth to the Iudge to decerne and Christians as ye say euen in their priuate callings may discerne but this their discerning will neuer free them from the subiection of Lawes imposed especially in matters of this nature for wee are now vpon order and policie onely And except ye could shew some euident place out of the Word or bring a necessarie demonstration to warrant your contrarie iudgement your disobedience will euer be faultie The authoritie of the Church must yeeld to the written Word but the iudgements of priuate men to the authoritie of the Church Otherwise we should open a doore to all confusion neyther could there be order in a Church if euery man should bee permitted to follow his owne conceit and doe as his priuie iudgment did leade him This our Church wisely foreseeing in an Assembly kept at Edinburghe anno 1583. 10. Octob. statuted and ordained That no Act concluded by a generall Assembly should bee called in question by any particular brother nay not in another generall Assembly except some iust cause might be seene for the change thereof And if it be not lawfull to call any of the constitutions of the Church in question much lesse to impugne by writ and print the same so maliciously as you haue done I omit the vnseemely match which yee make of English ceremonies and Lutheranisme with Papistrie for this is your malice against the English Church which it becomes you to reuerence and of whom if ye did loue the truth of God ye would haue spoken more honorably PP If the Parliament by acts authorize matters effected with such informalities and nullities matters of themselues so contrarious to our profession their ratification of a vicious thing cannot be a rule to a christian mans conscience But it is to be hoped that the Lord shall so dispose the hearts of Statesmen to the loue of the truth quietnesse of the Church and Country and peace of mens consciences that no vnreason able butthen shall be knit vpon the members of Christs Body by any deed of theirs vnder the name of a benefit to the Church Inuito beneficium non datur ANS Since the time that Kings and Princes became Christian it hath alwayes beene the custome that Synodicall Decrees were authorized by their Lawes not that the allowance or authoritie of Ciuill Lawes is made a rule to a Christians Conscience but that the externall man might thereby bee tyed to the obedience of these things which the Church hath found to be agreeable to the Word of God that is the only rule of conscience and it is to bee hoped that God shall so dispose the hearts of the whole Estate to the loue of his Truth and the Peace and quietnesse of his Church that refractarie and turbulent persons such as ye are shall bee restrayned of your vnbridled licentiousnesse and kept vnder the obedience of the Church and the Orders by her lawfully established which howsoeuer ye that loue to liue after your owne mindes call an vnreasonable burthen all true and peaceable Christians will esteeme a benefite to the Church and bee thankfull vnto God for the same PP Consider three things first the Nullity of this Assembly Secondly thy owne Oath and Subscription how it admits or abhorres this change suppose the Assembly had bin lawfull Thirdly if the particulars offered can be made lawfull or expedient by any Assembly whatsoeuer ANS We haue considered all these three as ye desire and finde the reasons proponed by you for the Nullitie of this Assembly to be Nullities in themselues Next that the Oath and Subscription by you mentioned admits the change concluded and does not abhorre it the same change being a part of the Oath which we all gaue as in discussing of the Oath shall be cleered Thirdly that the particulars concluded are things lawfull of their owne nature indifferent and most conuenient for this time in regard the generall Church who hath the place and power of determining the expediencie of Rites and Ceremonies hath interposed their authority to the same which in the estimation of Wisemen is sufficient to make them bee compted such An answere to the Articles presented to the Assembly AVGVST 27. and quotations added by the Pamphleter for confirmation PP FOr so much as we haue beene debarred of accesse and from hearing the proceedings of the Conference their Reasonings Consultations and Aduisements about the Articles proponed to this generall Assembly whereof all and euery one of them so nearely touches vs in our Christian resolution and offices of our Ministry in most humble manner wee present to your consideration the particulars hereafter specified in the feare of God intreating your fauourable answere to the same ANS Neither he who presented the Articles nor they who penned them can affirme truely that they were absent from the Conference and none were debarred who were desirous to be present The truth is after long and modest reasoning and graue deliberation when all had beene heard both in priuate at the Conference and in publique before the Assembly and all doubts and obiections had beene proponed answered and satisfied these or the like Articles were presented not for resolution of those by whom they were proponed who were already setled in this resolution not to be resolued but to perturbe the mindes of these who were prepared to vote and conclude and so to bring all in question againe that before had beene discussed and therefore were iustly reiected by the Moderator as malicious and crafty delatorie exceptions as shall bee manifest by the answeres following made to them not as they were presented to the Assembly but as they are proponed here with your Additions Quotations and Confirmations The first Article PP THe Articles proponed if they be concluded they doe innouate and bring vnder the slander of change the estate of this Church so aduisedly established by Ecclesiasticall Constitutions Acts of Parliament approbation of other Churches and good liking of the best reformed Christians without and within this Kingdome and so euidently blessed with happy successe and sensible experience of Gods greatest benefits by the space of fiftie eight yeares and aboue so that wee may boldly say to the praise of God That no Church hath enioyed the truth and puritie of Religion in larger libertie And vpon some such considerations it pleased his gracious Maiestie to continue the Church of England in her established estate as may bee seene in the Conference at Hampton Court and Thomas Sparke his booke written thereupon Ipsa quippe mutatio etiam quae adiuuat vtilitate nouitate perturbat quapropter quae vtilis non est perturbatione infructuosa consequenter noxia est saith Augustine Epist. 118. that is Euen a change that is helpefull for vtilitie perturbeth
loue Thirdly Giue no place to the Deuill Fourthly Let no root of bitternesse spring vp to trouble you Fiftly Fulfill my ioy that yee bee like minded hauing the same loue being of one accord and one iudgement that nothing bee done through contention or vaine glory but that in meeknesse of minde euery man esteeme other better then himselfe Sixtly Doe all things without murmuring and reasoning The eighth Article PP They bring a sensible blot either vpon the happie memory of our godly and wise Predecessors in so farre as wee depart from that reformation so wisely brought in appointed established by them or else vpon our selues by resuming againe of dangerous superfluities without reason reiected by them for weighty and necessary causes Magnum est hoc Dei munus c. Beza Epist. to Master Knox. This is a great benefite of God that yee brought into Scotland true religion and good order the bond that retayneth doctrine at one time So I beseech and obtest that yee retayne these two together so that yee remember that if the one bee left the other cannot endure long and againe he saith Quam rectè illud quod disciplinam c. How well was that done that yee conioyned doctrine and discipline together I beseech you and obtest that yee goe forward lest it happen to you which is befallen to many that could not make a progresse hauing stumbled in the very entry Yea somtime were not willing which is most lamentable ANS Distingue tempora conciliabis Scripturas What our Predecessors did being agreeable to their times was well done and is approued of vs and by their example in these alterable ceremonies and circumstances wee should likewise conforme our selues to our times by reiecting or receiuing or of new ordayning what wee find to bee meetest for edification according to the power giuen by God to the representatiue Church both to make Constitutions for the good behauiour of all her members in their vocation as also to abrogate and abolish all Statutes and Ordinances concerning Ecclesiasticall matters that agree not with the time c. as is affirmed in the Booke of the Policy of our Church cap. 7. registred amongst the Acts of the generall Assembly Anno 1581. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or good order of the Church of Scotland which Beza praiseth as the band whereby doctrine is preserued and which hee exhorteth to retayne carefully is the vse of this Ecclesiasticall power in censuring of manners called in the 74. Epist. Discipline and in the 79. Good order which being lost hee saith The doctrine cannot bee long preserued This hee proueth First by the nature of the thing it selfe Quis enim leges satis recte seruari nisi constitutis earum custodibus vindicibus posse sperarit Who can hope that Lawes can bee well enough kept except keepers and auengers of them bee appointed Here hee compareth the doctrine to the Lawes good order and discipline to the auengers and keepers of the Lawes Secondly hee proueth the same by experience Et ipsa saltem stuitorum Magistra experientia earum gentium exemplo docet quibus certum est hodie ob hoc ipsum potissimum erratum quod corrigi populi non sustinent Euangelium ad iudicium potius quam ad misericordiam promulgari that is Experience it selfe the Schoole-master of Fooles by the example of these Nations teacheth this wherein it is certayne this day that chiefly for this errour namely That the people will not suffer themselues to bee corrected that the Euangell is preached amongst them rather for iudgement then for mercy Here it is manifest that by the good order and discipline the points in controuersie belong not But yee no sooner heare good order or discipline commended but presently yee imagine that your table gesture of sitting at the Sacrament the abolition of Holy-dayes and celebration of the Sacrament in priuate places in cases of necessitie c. are meant as if without these Ceremonies and obseruations the doctrine could not bee preserued for how was it preserued in Geneua where they sit not at table but stand or passe at the receiuing of the Sacrament where the fiue Holy-dayes are not discharged but Christmasse and Pasche solemnely kept and the Sacrament ministred on them * Ep. 184. Ep. 51. Ep. 361. Ep. 363. Institut lib. 4. cap. 29. Sect. 4. 13. Caluine holdeth in cases of necessity That Baptisme may be ministred in coetu alique in some meeting without a Temple That the Communion should bee giuen to the sicke and wisheth that the examination of children with the ancient forme of blessing were restored in the reformed Churches whereby it is manifest that the discharge and abolition of these things is not in the iudgement of Caluine and Beza the band wherby doctrine is retayned but the discipline which consisteth in censuring of manners which you both here and in discussing of the Oath following take for the order and policy that consisteth in alterable Ceremonies And by the ambiguitie of the word doe purposely deceiue your Reader The ninth Article PP They set loose the filthy mindes and mouthes of fleshly liuers to triumph against the most sound Professors and to rejoyce in their rotten opinions and restored opportunities of sensuall obseruations of guising gluttony carelesse c. ANS The sacred exercises of sound doctrine appointed to be vsed on the fiue Anniuersarie dayes restoreth not but most powerfully abolisheth the opportunities of sensuall obseruations rooteth out rotten opinions and stoppeth the mouthes of fleshly Libertines not to triumph against sincere Professors The tenth Article PP They are declared by this Church to bee contrary doctrine as may bee seene in the first second and third Chapters of the first booke of Discipline in these words Wee iudge that all doctrine repugnant to the Euangell should bee vtterly suppressed as damnable to mans saluation c. By contrary doctrine wee vnderstand whatsoeuer men by Lawes Councells or Constitutions haue imposed vpon the consciences of men without the expresse Commandement of Gods Word as keeping of holy dayes commanded by men the feast of Christmasse and other feasts c. ANS The iudgement and declaration of our Church touching this point is very sound For whatsoeuer is imposed by men or by Ecclesiasticall Constitution vpon the conscience to bee obserued as parts of diuine worship that is not exprefly or by necessary consequence contayned in the Word is contrary to the wholsome Doctrine as the Papists did the obseruation of Christmasse and other festiuall dayes which the reformed Churches and the Assembly at Perth impose not on the conscience but ordaynes onely to bee kept for order and policie and therefore the imposing of sitting at the Communion to bee obserued as instituted by God and the discharging of the commemoration of Christs inestimable benefits on the fiue anniuersarie dayes the discharging of the administration of the Sacraments in priuate places in cases of extremitie and the discharging of
manner and forme as followeth Answ The Libeller hath forgotten to exclude Confirmation but since it is vnderstood wee answere to the rest First That the solemne ministration of the Sacraments appointed by the Church especially the act of the assembly holden at Edinburgh Anno 1581. which forbiddeth the ministration thereof in priuate houses excludes not the ministration thereof in priuate places when as necessitie vrges cases of necessitie being euer esteemed as excepted from all ordinarie rules of policie in which the same is not expressed Secondly The obseruation of the Lords day was so appointed as it did not exclude any of the Holy dayes now concluded to be obserued except Christmas only and this our Church excluded not simply but only so farre as it was imposed vpon the consciences of men to bee obserued as a part of diuine worship without warrant of the Word as it is expresly declared in the first booke of Discipline penned by Master Iohn Knox anno 1560. both in the explication of the first head touching doctrine and the second touching the Sacraments Thirdly Sitting at the Table in the act of receiuing the Sacrament was neuer esteemed by our Church either as a necessary point of doctrine or discipline which might not be altered but onely in the iudgement of our Reformers held to be most conuenient Neither was kneeling euer excluded except by way of consequence where sitting is ordained to bee vsed in stead thereof as it is in the first booke of Discipline But neither in that booke nor in the second which was approued by the generall Assembly holden anno 1581. nor by any Ciuill Law or Ecclesiasticall Canon was kneeling condemned or excluded as vnlawfull in the act of receiuing the holy Sacrament This shall suffice for the Articles in generall Now we come to the fiue Obligations whereby our Church as yee alledge is bound The summe of that which yee say is shortly and truely this PP The Obligatious whereby wee are bound to exclude the Conclusions of the Assembly at Perth and to obey defend and maintaine the contrary are first The vniforme iudgement of the Church condemning the one and allowing the other Secondly Ecclesiasticall Canons publike confessions and solemne protestations of lawful assemblies Thirdly actes of Parliament ratifying the Constitutions of the Cnurch Fourthly The prescription of 59. yeares and fiftly the Oath and subscriptions of the whole Estates of the Realme By all these bands the Church in generall and euery member thereof in particular are obliged to sit at the Communion and to reiect kneeling with the obseruation of the fiue Holy dayes and other things concluded in the Assembly at Perth ANS Yee are n̄ot able to produce any warrant for the vniforme iudgement of the Church nor Canon of Assembly nor act of Parliament nor confession of faith nor publike protestation which either condemnes the points concluded at Perth as vnlawfull to bee vsed in the worship of God or establisheth the contrary as things necessary that cannot be altered in no time succeeding And as for your 59. yeares practise it cannot change the uature of things indifferent and make these formes and circumstances which are of themselues alterable become necessary and vnchangeable yea by the contrary the prescription of a long time giues iust cause often of alteration because either the things practised which at the beginning were profitable become hurtfull or that which was conuenient in the time preceding becommeth inconuenient or because the same things are abused to superslition and prophanenesse or because an opinion is bred by long custome of necessitie This I make manifest by the one and twentieth article of the Coufession of our faith confirmed in the first Parliament holden by his Maiesty anno 1567. Decemb. 15. which ye affirme your selfe to haue sworne and subscribed The words of the article are these about the end thereof The other end of generall Councels was for good policie to bee constituted and obserued in the Church whereas in the house of God it becommeth all things to be done decently and in order not that wee thinke that any policie and order in ceremonies can be appointed for all ages times and places for as Ceremonies such as men haue deuised are but temporall so may and ought they to bee changed when they rather foster superstition then that they edisie the Church vsing the same Likewise in the seuenth chapter of the second booke of Discipline registred amongst the acts of the generall Assembly anno 1581. we haue two conclusions to the same purpose set downe in these words The finall end of all Assemblies is first to keepe the Religion and Doctrine in puritie without error and corruption Next to keepe comlinesse and good order in the Church For this orders cause they may make cortaine rules and constitutions pertaining to the good behaniour of all the members of the Church in their vocation Secondly they haue power also to abrogate and abolish all statutes and ordinances concerning Ecclesiasticall matters that are found noysome or vnprofitable or agree not with the time or are abused by the people Hereby it is euident that seeing the matters controuerted are but matters of circumstance forme and ceremony as afterwards shall be proued that neither the Church in generall nor any member thereof in particular did or might lawfully binde themselues by oath subseription or any other obligation not to change or alter their practise and customes touching these things for all they that subscribe the Consession of faith and the second booke of Discipline did sweare that they thought these things should and might be altered when necessitie required This answere being made to the first foure Obligations we come to the Oath about which yee spend many words and before yee begin moue the question following PP Quaritur if one or moe Preachers or Professours in the Church of Scotland standing to the Churches former iudgement and able to defend the same by good reason at least seeing no warrant in the contrary may dispense with the said Oath and follow the pluralitie of Preachers and Professors dispensing with the same in the Assembly Or what power may compell the alteration of iudgement and loose the said Oath in any case aforesaid ANS The former iudgement of our Church whereunto wee did binde our selues by our oathes was that no policie nor order in ceremonies could be appointed for all ages times and places and that the same might and ought to bee changed vpon great causes and weightie reasons as is euident by the former answere To this iudgement of the Church the Assembly at Perth adhered and according thereto altered some customes touching circumstantiall ceremonies formerly vsed in the Church vpon good and great reasons neither did that Assembly loose the said Oath or dispense with it in any sort but hath confirmed it by their owne practise Wherefore I answere That euery Preacher and Professor in our Church should stand to the former iudgement thereof whereunto
he bound himselfe by his Oath when he did sweare to the Confession of faith and that no power can compel the alteration of iudgement or loose the said Oath in any case And that he who sware That he did thinke that no policie and order in ceremonies can be appointed for all ages times and places but that the same may and ought to be changed when necessitie requires Did neuer nor could sweare without breach of this Oath that the ceremonie of sitting at the receiuing of the Sacrament esteemed by our Church at the reformation most conuenient but not necessarie could bee appointed for all ages times and places and that it might not nor ought to bee altered in any case by the contrary all who swore to the Confession of faith did sweare That the policie and order of sitting at the Sacrament was such as could not be appointed for all ages times and places and that it might and should be changed when it did not so much edifie the people in pietie as foster prophanenesse and superstition And this sitting fosters in all theso that practise it with a superstitious conceit and opinion that the same was instituted by our Sauiour as a point of diuine worship and by his exemplary practise commended to the Church for an essential or integrant part of the Sacrament which yee maintaine in this Pamphlet Now leauing this to bee considered by such as are not partially affected but loue the truth and hate contention I proceed to the Oath which yee consider first in the persons takers of the same Secondly in the matter whereto they sweare Thirdly in the forme and manner whereby they are bound And fourthly by the force and effect of that forme for making sure mens particular deeds Touching the persons yee say this PP The Persons takers of the Oath are Christians come to perfect yeares and free persons who did not only know in generall the doctrine and discipline whereto they bound themselues by their oath but in particular the points controuerted as followeth First That in the yeare of God 1581. it was concluded that the Sacraments should be solemnely ministred and not in priuate houses Secondly That in the yeare 1560 it was declared by the Church that Christ sate with his Disciples at Table when hee instituted the Supper and that sitting at Table was the most conuenient gesture to this holy action Thirdly That Confirmation was to be abhorred as one of the Popes fiue bastard Sacraments Fourthly That the keeping of Holy dayes such as the Feast of Christmas imposed vpon the consciences of men without warrant of Gods word was condemned by preaching and corrected by publique censures of the Church ANS I will not answere you as iustly I might that the first booke of Discipline whereby the most of these constitutions are warranted was neuer knowne to our common Professors nor acknowledged by our Church to haue the authoritie of Ecclesiasticall Canons but I say The Assembly at Perth hath decreed nothing to the contrary thereof For first Touching the administration of the Sacraments we fully agree to the ordinance made anno 1581 to wit That the Sacraments should bee solemnely ministred and not in priuate houses The occasion of making this ordinance was a misorder that fell out in the persons of two Ministers namely Master Alexander Mure Minister at Falkland and Master Alexander Forrester Minister at Trenent as is cleare by the narratiue of the act which is relatiue only to the celebration of Mariage and the ministration of the Sacraments extra casum necessitatis where without any vrgent necessitie order may be kept But our question is whether in extraordinary cases the Sacraments may be ministred extraordinarily in priuate houses as they were in the Primitiue Church by the Apostles and in the beginning of the reformation by the Preachers of the Gospell In these and the like cases there is no act of any Assembly that determines what should bee done Therefore put the case our Church had sworne and subscribed that ordinance yet hath shee done nothing contrary to her oath either by making or obeying the acts concluded at Perth which doe only respect the cases of necessitie So whether to sit at a Table in receiuing the Communion was most conuenient according as our Church esteemed at the time of reformation is not the question but whether to sit at a Table be necessary as instituted and left by our Sauiours example to be obserued and that without breach of the institution the same may not be altered This question was neuer defined by any Canon of our Church Therefore put the case that our Church had sworne and subscribed That to sit at the Communion was most conuenient according to the iudgement of our first Reformers yet we haue done nothing contrarie to that oath by interchanging sitting with kneeling because kneeling at this time is found to be the more conuenient gesture for that which at one time is more conuenient may bee lesse conuenient at another As to our Sauiours sitting if so be he sate nam adhuc sub iudice lis est it was not exemplary or appointed to be followed of vs as shall be afterwards proued and his practise did only declare that sitting might be lawfully vsed not that of necessitie it must be vsed and cannot bee altered when the Church findes the change expedient Thirdly whether Confirmation as it was abused in Popery for a Sacrament should be re-induced is not the question for that is condemned in the very narratiue of the act made at Perth But whether the Bishop in his Visitation ought to trie the education of yong children in the grounds of Religion as in the first booke of Discipline the Superintendent was ordained to doe whereof yee may reade in the fift head touching the office of Superintendents Therefore put the case our Church had sworne and subscribed all the heads and Constitutions of the foresaid booke yet by the act made at Perth shee hath not violated her oath by appointing Bishops in their Visitations to take this triall For they are now the Superintendents of the Church Fourthly Wee contend not whether the obseruation of Holy dayes as that of Christmas should be imposed vpon the conscience which in the explication of the first head of the foresaid booke of Discipline is condemned as also in the first words of the act made at Perth touching the fiue dayes but the question is whether the Church may appoint the commemoration of Christs inestimable benefits vpon the said dayes as all the reformed Churches doe and our Diuines hold to bee lawfull Of this our Church neuer defined any thing Therfore the making obseruing of the act touching this point is not against her former oath And to conclude The Subscribers and Swearers vnto our Doctrine and Discipline know no Canon nor constitution of the Church made in former times that is contrary to the Articles concluded at Perth Thus much touching the perfons who
did sweare The next thing yee consider is the matter whereunto they did binde themselues by their oath which yee set downe as followeth PP The matter whereunto they binde themselues by oath is the Religion Doctrine and Discipline receiued beleeued and defended by the Church of Scotland in respect of this matter the Oath is partly assertorie and partly promissorie as yee say ANS By that which alreadie hath been said it is manifest that albeit our Church had sworne to all the heads and ordinances aboue specified set downe in the bookes of Discipline yet there is nothing committed contrarie to this Oath by the actes made at Perth But now since yee are come to the matter of the Oath let vs see if the points in controuersie be any part of that matter The matter as yee affirme is the Religion Doctrine and Discipline receiued beleeued and defended by the Church of Scotland This definition or description of the matter is not so full and particular as is set downe in the Oath it selfe neither haue yee in reciting the words been so faithfull as yee are feruent for the cause yee maintaine For yee haue pretermitted diuers things belonging to the limitation of the matter by which all the particulars in question are clearely excluded The words cited by you are these We beleeue with our hearts confesse with our mouthes subscribe with our hands and constantly affirme before God and the world That the Faith and Religion receiued beleeued and defended by the Church of Scotland the Kings Maiestie and three Estates of this Realme c. is onely the true Christian Faith and Religion pleasing God and bringing saluation to man Heere yee omit many things that concerneth the limitation of the matter which at that time were knowne to such as sware the same and now must be expounded vnto the Reader that is to iudge and consider our Controuersie Therefore I shall set downe heere the words of the Oathe as it was published in print by Robert Waldgraue anno 1590. We beleeue with our hearts c. That this onely is the true Christian Faith and Religion pleasing God and bringing saluation to man which is now by the mercy of God reuealed to the world by the preaching of the blessed Euangell and receiued beleeued defended by many sundry notable Churches Realmes and chiefely by the Church of Scotland c. In these words we haue two limitations pretermitted by you The first is that the matter of the Oath is the Doctrine and Discipline reuealed to the world by the Gospell This limitation excludeth all Ecclesiasticall determinations and constitutions which are not expresly or by a necessary consequence contained in the written Word The next is That the matter of the Oath is the Doctrine and Discipline which is receiued beleeued and defended by many notable Churches and Realmes and chiefely by the Church of Scotland This limitation excludeth all these things wherein the Church of Scotland hath not the consent of many notable Churches and Realmes who with her hath receiued beleeued and defended the same By these two are all the points in controuersie excluded and cut off from being any part of the matter whereunto the Swearers by their oath did oblige themselues And vnto these two if we adde the third limitation there can remaine no more any doubt touching the matter of the Oath This is that the Doctrine and Discipline whereunto they sweare is particularly expressed in the Confession of Faith established and publikely confirmed by sundry actes of Parliament This Confession is registred in the bookes of Parliament at the yeare 1567. and is inserted amongst the Confessions of the Reformed Churches in the booke called Syntagma Confessionum But so it is that in the Confession of our Faith established by Parliament there is no mention made of the Articles controuerted neither hath many notable Churches and Realmes receiued beleeued or defended the same neither are they expresly or by necessary consequence contained in the Gospell And therefore they cannot by any point of our Religion or part of the Doctrine and Discipline whereunto the Swearers did oblige themselues by their assertory and promissory Oath By the Gospell it is not certaine That our Sauiour and the Apostles did sit at the Supper and albeit he had sitten yet sitting is no more commanded to be obserued in that sacred action then the vpper chamber where he sate or the night season when the Supper was celebrated or the sex and number of the Communicants who were twelue men and no women or the qualitie of the element which was vnleauened bread or the order finally after Supper All these howbeit they be certaine yet none of them are esteemed exemplary far lesse can sitting which is vncertaine be esteemed such And for the rest of the points Neither kneeling at the Communion nor the administration of the Sacraments in priuate houses when necessitie requires nor the commemoration of Christs inestimable benefits on certaine set times of the yeare nor the triall of yong childrens education by the Bishop at his Visitation none of these I say are either expresly or by necessary consequence forbidden in the Gospell nor are heâ—y condemned by many notable Churches and Realmes nor abiured in the Confession of our Faith confirmed by actes of Parliament and so cannot be counted the matter of this Oath But to remooue all scruple that may arise touching the matter of this Oath It is true That in the promissorie Oath the Swearers thereof binde themselues to continue in the Doctrine and Discipliue of the Church of Scotland and to defend the same according to their vocation and power all the dayes of their liues vnder the paines contained in the Law and danger both of body and soule in the day of the Lords fearefull iudgement Heere touching the Doctrine praised be God there is no controuersie amongst vs all the doubt concerneth Discipline and that is remoued also if it be taken only for that which is reuealed in the Gospell or receiued beleeued and defended by many notable Churches and Realmes or that which is set downe in the Confession of Faith as is already declared But because the Discipline of the Church may be extended beyond these limits and made to comprehend all Ecclesiasticall constitutions and determinations of generall circumstances formes and ceremonies belonging to the worship of God and the decent ordering of his house let vs consider this point more particularly If by the Discipline of the Church in the words of the Oath A consideration of the Discipline whereunto the Swearers did oblige themselues that part of Ecclesiasticall policie bee meant which concernes the censuring of manners in which sense it is taken in the order set downe before our Psalme bookes and in the seuenth head of the first booke of Discipline intituled of Ecclesiasticall Discipline and in the second booke wheresoeuer it is mentioned and by all Ecclesiasticall writers most frequently Then it is certaine
that the fiue Articles controuerted belong nothing to the Discipline wherein the Swearers binde themselues by their oath to continue to their liues end But if therby be meant the whole policie of the Church in which sense it is sometimes taken though rarely then first it containes all the precepts of policie prescribed in the Word in which precepts there is no determination concerning these articles as before we said Next it comprehendeth all the ordinances of the Church touching formes ceremonies and order to be obserued in Diuine Seruice and in the exercise of Ecclesiasticall Censures according as the circumstances of time place and persons In this part of Discipline it is true that all the controuerted points are contained But as I shewed before it is manifest by the limitations of the matter of the Oath that this part of the policie is excluded for it is neither expressely nor by necessary consequence contained in the Word uor is it receiued beleeued and desended by many notable Churches and Realmes nor is there any thing concerning it set downe in the Confession of Faith confirmed by actes of Parliament onely this generall wee haue that no constant order and policie can be set downe in ceremonies and that constitutions made by men may and ought to be altered when need requires Furthermore in the booke of Policie that was published after the Oath anno 1581 and subscribed by sundrie Ministers there is no mention made of these fiue Articles now in question In the first booke of Discipline penned anno 1560 there are some conclusions set downe touching sitting at the Sacrament the abolition of Holy dayes dedicated to Saints in Popery and the Feast of Christmas imposed vpon the consciences of men as also the administration of Baptisme vpon ordinary dayes of preaching for remouing the Papisticall opinion of absolute necessitie and if by the discipline mentioned in the Oath yee vnderstand the conclusions of Policie set downe in that booke and hold that the Swearers did by their Oath oblige themselues to obey all the conclusions thereof to their liues end then I demand what is the cause that yee and your followers do not only refuse to obey but improue and impugne the most principall point of policie set downe in that booke namely the office of Bishops whose prouision jurisdiction power and election are particularly described in the first head of that booke vnder the name of Superintendents But because the booke is rare and not at euery mans hand I will draw out of it onely some few things touching the jurisdiction and power of the Superintendents that the posterity may see what was the judgement of their Predecessors the Reformers of Religion touching the Office-bearers and gouernment of the Church And to beginne with the bounds of their jurisdiction the same is set down with this Title The names of the places of residence and seueral Diocesses of the Superintendents INprimis the Superintendent of Orknay his Diocesse shall be the Iles of Orknay Caithnes and Strathneuer his residence in the Towne of Kirkwall The Superintendent of Rosse his Diocesse shall comprehend Rosse Sutherland Murray and the North Iles called the Skie and Lewes with their adjacents his Residence the Chanonrie of Rosse The Superintendent of Argyle his Diocesse shall be Argyle Kintyre Lorne the South Iles Arrane and Boote with their adjacents and Lowhaber His Residence in Argyle The Superintendent of Abirdene his Diocesse betweene Die and Spae containing the Shirrefdomes of Abirdene and Banff His Residence in old Abirdene The Superintendent of Brechin his Diocesse the whole Shirrefdomes of Mernis and Angouse with the Brae of Marre to Die His Residence in Brechin The Superintendent of Fife his Diocesse the Shirrefdomes of Fife and Fotthringham to Striuiling and the whole Shirrefdome of Perth his Residence in Saint Andrewes The Superintendent of Edinburgh his Diocesse the Shirrefdome of Lowthian and Striuiling on the South-side of Forth wherto is added by the consent of the whole Church Merse Lawderdale and Weddale his Residence in The Superintendent of Iedburgh his Diocesse Tauiotdale Liddisdale Tueddale with the Forrest of Ettrick his Residence in The Superintendent of Glasgow his Diocesse Cliddisdale Renfrow Monteith Lennox and Cunninghame His Residence in Glasgow The Superintendent of Dumfreis his Diocesse Galloway Carrick Niddisdale Annandale with the rest of the Westdales his Residence in Dumfreis These were the bounds of their Iurisdiction their Office is described as followeth The function and power of the Superintendents THey must not be suffered to liue as idle Bishops hitherto haue done neither must they remaine where gladly they would but they must be Preachers themselues Charge and command shall be giuen them to plant and erect Churches to sett order and appoint Ministers as is prescribed in their Countries After they haue remained in their chiefe Towne three or foure monethes at the most they shall enter in Visitation in the which they shall not onely Preach but examine the life diligence and behauiour of the Ministers as also they shall trie the estate of their Churches and the manners of the People They must further consider how the poore are prouided and the youth instructed they must admonish where admonition needs and redresse such things as by good counsell they are able to appease Finally they must note such crimes as be hainous that by the censures of the Church the same may bee corrected After all this the order of election of Superintendents is set downe which we haue more largely before the booke of our Psalmes in meeter This being one of the chiefe points of policie concluded in that booke how is it that yee haue dispensed with your oath hereabout And by what power is your oath loosed concerning this head Shall men bee tyed by the Oath to the ceremonies prescribed in that booke and not to the substance of the policie to alterable circumstances and formes of actions and not to the power of gouernement whereby they should be disposed and ordered What can be answered to this by him that vrges the Oath for the controuerted points consisting in ceremonies gestures and circumstances lot the indifferent Reader iudge But because it is true that one mans fault excuses not another leauing you to your consciences we answere for our selues according to the one and twentieth article of the Confession of our Faith That we thinke no policie nor order in ceremonies can be established to endure for all ages times and places and that whatsoeuer things are appointed by men they are all temporall and may and ought to be changed when necessitie requireth Hereupon we say That no man did by the Oath oblige himselfe to obey and defend that part of Discipline which concerneth these alterable things all the dayes of his life but onely that discipline which is vnchangeable and commanded in the Word Yea we further affirme that euery man who sware to the discipline of the Church in generall by vertue of that oath
potuit cum fructu vsurpari That is to say kneeling at the Sacrament hath a shew of holy and Christian worshippe and therefore of old might haue been fruitfully vsed Whereby yee see he condemneth not simply the ceremonie but witnesseth that there was a time when the same did edifie and profite Caluine before him called it Cultum legitimum that is a Lawfull adoration being vsed in the action of the Supper and directed to Christ Petrus Martyr saith Multi piè genua flectunt adorant that is Many in receiuing the Sacrament doe bow their knees religiously and adore Christs flesh Paraeus speaking of the same gesture esteemes it an indifferent ceremonie And that which so great and learned Diuines iudged to bee lawfull what are we to condemne Next I answere That the credite of the Pastours should not be maintained with the discredit of the Prince amongst his Subiects for if they who should be patternes of reuerence and obedience to others shall in their owne persons withstand the lawfull desires godly intention of a Christian Prince the same cannot but breed disobedience and a hard conceit of the Prince amongst his people which we haue already found and perceiued As for the inconueniences feared they are friuolous and should neuer fall out if Pastors were peaceable and prudent But when they are all put together that can bee alledged if they shall bee laid in a ballance there is one commoditie which the alteration imports that shall preponder them all to wit Our vnitie and conformitie with the Primitiue Church and with the greatest number and best Reformed Churches in Europe in points of policie that most assuredly tend to farre greater deuotion piety and edification then our formes vsed in former times This being his Maiesties principall designe in vrging these Articles giueth to the world an euident testimony of his Princely zeale to procure the peace and good of the Church so farre as is possible and therefore none will charge his Maiesty with the vniust imputation of tyranny but malicious and seditious spirits whom by this pestilent Pamphlet ye trauell to perswade for feare of periury to periure themselues as is manifest in the words yee subioyne PP Our assertory Oath is already past and wee become periured if we come in the contrary This is an high degree of periury when not onely we contrauene our oath by practise but make lawes in the contrary therafter inueigh against our oath as Puritanisme If sincere and constant professors shal be still pursued for their constancie in their Profession and the conscience they make of the Oath doe we not expone the whole Nation to a wofull vengeance and perpetuall ignominy ANS Our assertory Oath touching the Articles controuerted condemneth those onely in the guilt of periury who hold that policy and order in ceremonies may not be altered when necessity requireth and being altered ought not to bee obeyed And indeede it is a profound point of infernall policy not only by an exemplary practise of disobedience against the lawes of Ecclesiasticall Discipline to contrauene the Oath in your owne Person but also vnder pretext of constancy of Profession and conscience of the Oath to perswade others for feare of periury to periure themselues Whereby yee both expose your selues to the fearefull iudgement of Gods vengeance and drawe others with you to the same perdition Your sophisticke cauillations whereby yee intend seditiously to proue the vnlawfulnesse of the Articles concluded at Perth shall now bee answered and the truth cleared to the satisfaction of all men who are not contentious An answere to the arguments brought against kneeling in the act of receiuing of the holy Communion PP IT hath been the vniforme and constant order of this Church since the Reformation that the Communicants should receiue the Sacramentall elements of Bread and Wine sitting at the Table In the second head of the first booke of Discipline are set downe these words The Table of the Lord is then rightly ministred when it approacheth most neere to Christs owne action But plaine it is that at that Supper Christ Iesus sate with his Disciples and therefore we doe iudge that sitting at that Table is most conuenient to that holy action In the generall Assembly holden in Decemb. 1562 it was ordained That one vniforme order should be obserued in the ministration of the Sacraments according to the order of Geneua And in December 1564 It was ordained That Ministers in ministration of the Sacraments shall vse the order set downe in the Psalme bookes In the Assembly holden anno 1591 It was ordained that an Article should bee formed and presented to his Maiesty and the Estates crauing order to be taken with them who giue or receiue the Sacrament after the Papisticall manner In the Kings Confession of Faith subscribed and sworne by persons of all estates are contained these words We detest all the ceremonies of the Romane Antichrist added to the ministration of the Sacraments we detest all his Rites Signes and Traditions This laudable order was altered at the pretended Assembly holden last at Perth in August anno 1618. The tenor of the Act followeth as it was formed by some of the Bishops and their Followers a The Libeller cites the Acte of Perth most corruptly which the Reader shall mend by the notes in the margine Since wee are commanded by God himselfe that when wee come to worship him we fall downe and kneele before the Lordour Maker and considering withall that there is no part of Diuine worship more heauenly and spirituall then is the holy receiuing of the blessed body and blood of our Lord and Sauiour lesus Christ like as the most humble and reuerend gesture of the body in our meditation and lifting vp of our hearts best becommeth so diuine and sacred an action Therefore notwithstanding that our Church hath vsed since thereformation of Religion to celebrate the holy Communion to the people sitting by reason of the great abuse of kneeling b The Acte saith Vsed in the Idolatrous worship at the worshipping of the Sacrament by the Papists yet now seeing all memory of by-past superstition is past c These words yee haue added of your owne head to the Acte and no perill of the same againe is feared in reuerence d These words are to be read thus In reuerence of God and in due regard of so Diuine c. of so diuine a mystery and in remembrance of so mysticall an vnion as wee are made partakers of e The words in the Acte are not such but thus it is The Assembly thinkes good that that blessed Sacrament c. thereby doe ordaine that that blessed Sacrament be celebrated hereafter weekely and reuerently vpon their knees This alteration is to vs vnlawfull for that which hath bin established by so many lawes Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall by so long custome and prescription of time confirmed by our oathes and subscriptions we may not lawfully alter But
so it is that sitting at the Table in the acte of receiuing hath bin established by Lawes Customes long prescription of time and confirmed by oathes and subscriptions as is euident by the former deduction It is notwithstanding expedient to descend further in opening vp the vnlawfulnesse of kneeling First as it is a breach of the Institution Secondly as it is a breach of the second Commandement Thirdly as it is without the example and practise of the ancient Church Fourthly as it disagrees from the practise of the Reformed Churches ANS After yee haue laid downe your grounds some for sitting and some against kneeling yee subioyne the tenor of the acte concluded at Perth but most corruptly as we haue noted in the margine and then yee forme this argument That which hath been established by so many lawes Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall by so long custome and prescription of time and confirmed by oathes and subscriptions we may not lawfully alter But so it is that sitting at Table in the acte of receiuing hath beene established by lawes customes long prescription of time and confirmed by oathes and subscriptions A man that had heard the proposition only would expect some great matter in the assumption belonging to some article of Faith or precept of obedience set downe in Gods Word and all resolues in an indifferent ceremonie of sitting at the Sacrament But yet to make simple people beleeue that it were some necessary or substantiall point of Religion that might not be altered ye make a great shew of lawes customes c which being examined shall vanish as smoake before the winde And where yee beginne with a strong alleageance that it was established with so many lawes Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall I aske you first by what Ciuill lawes Yee say so many yet in your deduction whereby you affirme the assumption to be euident yee cite not one law neither can yee albeit yee are not ashamed to say so many For your Ecclesiasticall lawes yee cite first the words set downe in the second head of the first booke of Discipline the Table of the Lord is then rightly ministred c. These words are not a law for that booke of Discipline was neuer receiued nor confirmed either by the Ciuill or Ecclesiasticall estate some of the Nobility subscribed it but others who had the chiefe authority as Master Knox complaines in his History reiected the same calling it Deuout imaginations Next yee cite the ordinance of the generall Assembly 1562 appointing the order of Geneua to be obserued this Act cannot establish your sitting for in Geneua they stand or passe as they Receiue and sit not at Table The last Acte which yee cite in anno 1564 ordaineth Ministers in the ministration of the Sacraments to vse the order set downe in the Psalme book In that Act there is no mention of sitting and by the order set downe in the Psalme bookes that may be meant which before was called the order of Geneua How soeuer it be there is no particular law for sitting no Ciuil law at all and none Ecclesiasticall but this onely one which is generall Your second probation is That sitting is established by so long a custome and prescription of time Who would not when he heares so long looke at least for a three or foure hundred yeares and all this length of time yee can alledge to is since the yeare of God 1560 not halfe an age before which time kneeling was in vse many hundred yeares on the Lords day and on other dayes in the weeke euer since the first Institution as afterwards shall be proued with better reasons then any yee can bring for the necessity of sitting This long custome and prescription for kneeling yee esteeme to be of no moment albeit it was a gesture instituted by God but for sitting a gesture instituted by man yee count eight and fifty yeares a long prescription So men esteeme their owne Dwarfes to be Giants Nostrum sic nanum Atlanta vocamus The last argument wherein yee glory most is that sitting is confirmed by oathes and subscriptions This is a childish and false alledgeance for there was neuer oath nor subscription giuen in our Church that by any consequence can import a confirmation of sitting or of any other indifferent alterable ceremonie for all times following Seeing no man is astricted longer vnto the obseruatiō of it then the Ecclesiasticall Constitution stands which being altered by the Church that made it their oath and subscription bindes them to obserue that which in stead of the former is ordained to be receiued This is manifest by the Constitutions set downe in the seuenteenth chapter of the booke of Discipline receiued and confirmed in the generall Assembly holden at Glasgow the 24. of Aprill anno 1581 the tenor whereof followes The finall end of all Assemblies is first to keepe the Religion and Doctrine in purity without errour or corruption Next to keepe comlinesse and good order in the Church for this orders cause they may make certaine rules and constitutions pertaining to the good behauiour of all the members of the Church in their owne vocation They haue power also to abrogate and abolish all statutes and ordinances concerning Ecclesiasticall matters that are found noysome and vnprofitable and agree not with the time or are abused by the people And after a few words it is subioyned That it appertaines to the Presbyteries to cause the Ordinances made by the Assemblies Prouinciall and generall to be kept and put in execution Hereby it is manifest that when the Church alters indifferent thing in policie that they who are astricted by their oathes to obey the Discipline of the Church are tyed both not to practise these things which the Church hath discharged and to obserue these things which the Church in stead thereof hath established to be done Whereupon I conclude That so many as haue sworne and subscribed after the forme contained in the Oath to continue in the obedience of the Discipline of the Church are all obliged by their subscriptions now not to sit but to kneele at the Communion because the Church hath found it meete that sitting should bee interchanged with kneeling Thus I haue answered your reasons lawes customes subscriptions and oathes which yee bring for sitting I come to consider the ordinances made as ye alledge against kneeling where first yee alledge an Act made in the Assembly 1591 that an Article should bee formed and presented vnto his Maiesty and the Estates for order to be taken with them who giue or receiue the Sacraments after the Papistical manner but by Papistical maner is meante the giuing of the Sacrament by a Masse Priest and the receiuing the same after the order of the Romane Church which may be cleared by an Act of the Assembly anno 1565. Decemb. 26. Sess 2. The tenor wherof is this Persons reuolting from the profession of the Gospell by offering their children to be baptized after the Papisticall maner
or by themselues receiuing the Sacrament of the Altar after admonition shall bee excommunicate if repentance interuene not This sheweth what is meant by giuing or receiuing the Sacrament in a Papisticall manner for it was neuer our Churches meaning to censure these that receiued the Sacraments after the manner of the Reformed Churches in France England or Germany where many of our people haue receiued the Sacrament of Christs bodie kneeling Nor did our Predecessors euer condemne their customes and esteeme sitting necessary albeit for the estate of our Church they held it in the beginning to be most conuenient Next yee say That in the Kings Confession of Faith c. are these words contained We detest the ceremonies of the Romane Antichrist added to the ministration of the Sacraments and we detest all his rites signes and traditions This argument were good if yee did proue kneeling to be a rite or ceremony added to the Sacrament by the Roman Antichrist But we know this ceremony to be diuine and not Antichristian a ceremony allowed by God to bee vsed in his worship for he hath said expresly in his Word Vnto me all knees shall how and againe In the name of Iesus euery knee shall bow Neither will yee euer be able to proue the vse of this ceremony in receiuing the Sacrament to be Antichristian or to haue been instituted by the Antichrist of Rome for albeit Honorius ordained that the people should kneele at the eleuation and circumgestation of the Hoste to those who are sicke yet he made no constitution for kneeling at the receiuing of the Sacrament and there is as great difference betweene the eleuation in the Masse and the pompous circumgestation of the Hoste and the celebration of the Sacrament as is betwixt an idolatrous and superstitious inuention of man and a lawfull act of diuine worship Therefore to conclude the answere of this Section vnto the argument propounded by you I oppone this Euery indifferent alterable ceremony the innouation and abrogation whereof is thought expedient by the Church may be lawfully altered notwithstanding of any lawes customes oathes or subscriptions formerly made for obseruation therof for a time But sitting at the Sacrament is an indifferent alterable ceremony the innouation and abrogation whereof is thought expedient by the Church Ergo Sitting at the Sacrament may be lawfully altered notwithstanding of any lawes customes oathes or subscriptions formerly made for obseruation thereof for a time The Proposition is manifest by these Constitutions which we haue cited out of the seuenteenth chapter of the booke of Discipline confirmed in the Assembly 1581 and subscribed by many of the Ministry Yea the very nature of alterable ceremonies is such that to the obseruation of them no man is longer astricted then they stand in their integritie without change but if for any corruption and abuse or for some greater or better respect they be altered by the Church the obligation for obseruing of them ceases and bindes no more As to kneeling which the Assembly hath ordained in stead of sitting as yet we haue seene nothing against it neither Law Ciuill or Ecclesiasticall nor custome c. And I hope the reasons yee bring hereafter shal be found as friuolous But keeping your order I will first consider how yee qualifie it to be a breach of the institution PP p. 35. lin 25. The first breach of the institution by kneeling is the taking away of that commendable gesture of sitting vsed by Christ and his Apostles at and after the Institution That Christ and his Apostles sate at Table yee labour to proue it by the words of the Euangelist Edentibus illis whilest they did eate Matth. 26.26 Mark 14.22 Christ tooke bread and blessed c. If whilest they did eate say yee then also whilest they did sit as these two are conioyned Mark 14.18 The phrase imports that nothing interuened betwixt the eating and the celebration of the Sacrament it was therfore ministred vnto them sitting This is your reasoning pag. 36. lin 16. seq ANS Your argument is a captione à fallacia consequentis For albeit nothing interuened betweene the eating of the Paschall Supper and the celebration of the Sacrament yet it followeth not that the Sacrament was ministred vnto them sitting For as yee say their eating of the Paschall Supper and sitting were coniunct and that eating of the Paschall Supper ceasing at the beginning of the institution of this Sacrament how will it follow that the gesture of sitting continued and was not changed For although nothing interuened betweene the Paschall Supper and the Sacrament yet the gesture might haue beene changed when the action was changed And as the one action ceased when the other began so the gesture of sitting might haue ceased with the action wherewith it was conioyned and another gesture might haue begun and been vsed in the celebration of the Sacrament Moreouer betwixt their eating of the Paschall Supper and the administration of the Sacrament to the Disciples there interuened diuers actes as first the taking of the bread secondly the thankesgiuing thirdly the breaking fourthly the precept Take yee eate yee fiftly the word whereby the element was made the Sacrament After this the Sacrament was giuenby our Sauiour and receiued by the Disciples which yee call the ministration of the Sacrament vnto them Now albeit it were true that between the time they sate eating of the Paschall Supper and the time when the Sacrament began to bee celebrated nothing had interuened yet betwixt that and the ministring of the Sacrament to the Disciples all these fiue acts interuened In which time the gesture of sitting might haue beene changed for if they changed it not at the breaking of the bred by our Sauiour which was the first act yet they might haue changed it at the thankesgiuing which was the second or at the breaking which was the third or at Christs pronouncing of the words whereby the element became a Sacrament So vpon this ground that they were sitting and eating yee cannot conclude that they receiued the Sacrament sitting seeing betwixt the time of their eating of the Paschall Supper so many acts interuened wherein the gesture of sitting might haue beene changed before they receiued the Sacrament Thus it is not certaine that they sate and receiued the Sacrament or as yee say that the Sacrament was ministred vnto them sitting If it be replied that it is not written that they rose and altered their gesture I answere à non scriptum ad non factum est non valet consequentia It is not written that they altered their gesture therefore they did not alter it it followeth not in Theologie this consequence is euer good Nothing that is not written is to bee holden and beleeued for an vndoubted truth in the worship of God But after the eating of the Paschall Supper that the Apostles sate still at Table and altered not their gesture vntill they had receiued the Sacrament is a
of his Natiuitie would be thought a great absurditie ANS If yee haue not fallen into this absurditie yee must grant that yee neuer made in your time any solemne commemoration of Christs Natiuitie And I verily beleeue that in this omission yee haue many companions by whose negligence God hath beene defrauded of the honour due to him for this benefit and the people lacked instruction in a principall Article of Faith This Article is the ground of all the rest for as Chrysostome sayes If our Sauiour had not beene borne he had neither suffered nor risen againe from the dead and thereupon he calls the day of this commemoration Metropolim omnium Festorum Euen for this it was expedient that a certayne time of the yeare should haue beene appointed for this commemoration which otherwise would haue been neglected and as yee say thought absurd But to returne to your Argument The commemoration of Christs Natiuitiy is no more astricted to the 25. of December then to any other time for although the 25. of December by ordinance of the Church bee dedicated to that religious seruice yet the seruice is not astricted to the time as the seruice of the Iewish festiuities which lawfully might not be performed on any other dayes then the festiuall The commemoration appointed by our Church to bee made on these fiue dayes may lawfully be performed at other conuenient times although on these dayes the same must not bee omitted For the seruice ar I haue said is not appointed for the Time but the Time is appointed for the worship So it is not absurd to remember Christs Natiuitie so oft as occasion is offered with all conuenient solemnitie as it may serue to his honour and the edification of the Church Thus wee haue seene that according to the Doctrine of the reformed Churches Anniuersarie dayes are and may bee obserued though not for any mysterie or holinesse that is in them more then in other dayes but for order and policy onely Against this all the Reasons which Bellarmine or yee haue brought or can inuent shall neuer preuaile more then the barking of a dogge against the Moone PP Next it may be obiected that the people of God might haue indicted dayes of fasting at their owne determination and an interdiction of all kind of worke Ans They had a generall warrant from God Ioel. 2.15 to proclayme a generall fast according to the occurrence of their calamities and other affaires of the Church The light and Law of Nature leades a man to this obseruation of an occasionall fast The like may be said by analogie of thanksgiuing that wee ought to praise God in the meane time when wee receiue the benefit But to make of the occasionall dayes of fasting or feasting anniuersarie and set festiuall and fasting dayes is without warrant It remaynes therefore that it is the Lords soueraignty to make or ordayne a thing to bee holy God first sanctifies by commandement and institution man sanctifies thereafter by obseruation applying to an holy vse the time sanctified by God ANS The conclusion agreeth not with the premisses for if it be Gods soueraigntie to make or ordayne a thing to bee holy how may the Church make a thing holy by appointing an occasionall feast or fast as yee grant shee may doe The instinct of nature and that command out of Ioel is a generall warrant onely The particular calamitie or benefit wherefore a fast or feast should be proclaymed is not expressed neither is the time particularly determined whereupon the solemne festiuitie or fast should be kept but the one is left to the estimation and the other to the determination of the Church So by that warrant libertie is giuen to the Church to consider and define the causes for the which a fast should bee proclaymed and to determine the time when the same should be obserued and to separate that time from common businesse and consecrate the same to the spirituall exercise of preaching hearing praying fasting c. as our Church hath vsed to doe very often Now if the Church hath power vpon occasionall motiues to appoint occasionall fasts or festiuities may not shee for constant and eternall blessings which doe infinitely excell all occasionall benefits appoint ordinary times of commemoration and thanksgiuing Ye say that this hath no warrant but yee speake without warrant for there is as great warrant to appoint such dayes as is for any other point of Ecclesiasticall policie touching the determination of times places formes and order to be obserued in the worship of God according to these generall grounds Let all things bee done to the glorie of God 1. Cor. 10. to edification 1. Cor. 14. with order and decencie 1. Cor. 14.16 The whole policie of our Church touching the vse of these circumstantiall things is ordered by these rules and according to these did our Church in the first booke of Discipline which yee cite often ordayne for the purpose now in hand That in euery notable Towne a day beside the Sonday should bee appointed weekely for Sermon that during the time of Sermon the day should be kept free from all exercise of labour as well by the Master as by the seruant That euery day there be either Sermon or prayers with reading of the Scriptures That Baptisme be orderly ministred either on the Sonday or after Sermon and the dayes of prayer That at foure seuerall times of the yeere the Sacrament of the Lords Supper be ministred viz. on the first Sonday of March on the first Sonday of Iune first Sonday of September and the first Sonday of December That in euery towne where Schollers are and learned men repaire a certaine day euery weeke be appointed for the exercise of Ministers in prophecie And the said booke affirmes The dedication of times and houres for such generall and particular exercises of the Word and Sacraments and Prayer to appertayne to the policie of the Church If the Church hath power after this manner to appoint times for Doctrine and diuine Seruice and Doctrine and diuine Seruice for times as the doctrine of the Catechisme on Sonday at afternoone reade the 9. Chapter of the said booke it cannot be denyed but the Church hath also power to appoint a certaine time day and houre for commemoration of Christs Natiuitie Passion c. For what more power had our Church at that time to appoint the Sacrament to be ministred the first Sondaies of March Iune c. then she hath now to appoint a Sermon to be made of Christs resurrection vpon Easter day and a Sermon of the sending downe of the holy Ghost vpon Whitsunday and does not the light of Nature teach vs that rare and great benefits should be remembred with more then ordinary thankefulnesse Hereby it is cleere that it is not the Lords soueraignty onely to make or ordayne a thing to be holy but it is a prerogatiue that God also hath giuen to the Christian Church But to the end
with imposition of hands as Caluine affirmes Instit lib. 4. sect 4. wishing that it were restored to the first integritie in the reformed Churches Yet the Pamphleter to make simple ones beleeue that euery thing concluded in that Assembly was erroneous hee giues out that the Sacrament at least the ceremonie of Confirmation was there allowed and appropriated to Bishops PP We haue abjured Episcopall gouernment and therefore we cannot lawfully admit Episcopall Confirmation giuing and not granting their office were lawfull and that they haue gotten a lawfull calling by the Church to the said office Thirdly that we were free of our oath and fourthly That Confirmation were to be allowed whether as a Ceremonie or as a Sacrament yet it is damnable presumption to appropriate vnto themselues the dutie that belongs to all Paftors ANS If by the Ceremonie or Sacrament of Confirmation yee vnderstand the miraculous imposition of hands vsed by the Apostles or yet the bastard Sacrament of Confirmation vsed in Poperie whereby Bellarmine whom yee afterwards cire sayes That the Lord would honour Episcopalem dignitatem neither of these are allowed by the Act nor appropriated to Bishops Therefore your whole dispute following being directed onely against these two points is idle superfluous But if by Confirmation ye did vnderstand according to the meaning of the Act the dutie which Bishops should performe in trying at their Visitation the diligence of Pastors in catechizing young children and in causing them bee brought before them to bee examined and blessed this part of Episcopall gouernment yee haue not abjured but haue approued by your assertorie oath and obliged your selfe to maintayne and obey by your promissorie oath if so bee yee did sweare to the Policie set downe in the first booke of Discipline Anno 1560. as yee haue often professed For the wordes in that booke touching this point of Bishops dutie are these After the Superintendents haue remayned in their chiefe Townes three or foure moneths at the most they shall be compelled vnlesse by sicknesse onely they be retayned to re-enter in their Visitation In which they shall not onely preach but also examine the life diligence and behauiour of the Ministers as also the order of their Churches and manners of their people They must further consider how the poore are prouided for and the youth instructed By these wordes it is manifest that it was not a thing common to euery Pastor to visite Churches and trie the diligence of Ministers specially concerning their instruction of the youth but that it was proper to the Superintendent Now if yee haue sworne that this is lawfull in the person of the Superintendent how can yee call it a damnable presumption in the person of a Bishop whose function and name is the same differing onely in the origination of the word the one being drawne from the Latine the other from the Greeke for a Bishop in the Greeke tongue is the same that a Superintendent is in the Latine And in visiting of Churches the triall of the education of children which now is a dutie belonging to the Bishops function is here set downe as a speciall point of the Superintendents office As to the blessing which the Bishop is appointed to giue vnto them Caluine in the place aboue cited sayes That it should bee vsed to the end that graue and sacred action may haue the greater reuerence and dignitie This examination of children in the ancient Church had ioyned with it not the blessing onely but the ceremonie also of imposition of hands and thereupon in the fourth Councell of Carthage Can. 85. It is called Examinatio impositionis manus and is appointed to be often vsed towards the Catechumenists before they were baptised But this blessing and imposition of hands vpon the Catechumenists and vpon the young children of Christians was not the principall action nor a Sacramentall rite as it was after esteemed nor giuen to Bishops for honour of their Episcopall dignitie but accessorie onely as Caluine rightly thinks vnto the examination which was the Bishops speciall dutie in his Visitation It is true the omission of the principall dutie and the vsing onely of the accessorie to wit the imposition of hands was the first corruption that crept in after that came in the crossing the annointing of the forehead and the buffet giuen to the child in stead of the blessing and so a Bastard Sacrament was instituted in the place of a most profitable point of the Episcopall function Further as it is the dutie of euery Pastor to catechize the young children in his Parish and try whether the Parents haue kept their promise made at the Baptisme of their Children in which tryall if hee shall finde the childe to haue profited well hee ought to blesse and pray for them So is it the Bishops dutie in his Visitation to try if the Pastors haue performed their parts and after examination to blesse these same children And as the examination and blessing vsed by the Pastor takes not away the power that parents haue to examine and blesse their owne children so the examination and blessing of Bishops takes not away the power that Pastors haue of triall and blessing within their owne Parish Therefore to conclude the Ordinance set downe in the Act of Perth appropriates nothing to Bishops that is common to Pastors and Parents but preserues vnto euery one the prerogatiue of his owne calling Neither is there any thing ordayned in the Act but that which Caluine wished earnestly to be restored againe in the Church In the fourth booke of his Institutions cap. 29. sect 4. 13. De Confirmatione hee writes as followes Hic mos olim fuit vt Christianorum liberi postquam adoleuerant coram Episcopo sisterentur vt officium illud implerent quod ab ijs exigebatur qui se ad Baptismum adulti offerebant hi enim inter Catechumenos sedebant donec ritè fidei mysterijs instituti poterant fidei confessionem coram Episcopo ac populo edere Qui ergo Baptismo initiati erant infantes quia fidei confessione apud Ecclesiam tunc defuncti non erant sub sinem pueritiae aut ineunte adolescentia repraesentabantur iterum à parentibus ab Episcopo examinabantur secundùm formulam Catechismi quam tunc habebant certam communem Quò autem hac actio quae alioqui grauis sanctaque meritò esse debebat plus reuerentiae haberet ac dignitatis ceremonia quoque adhibebatur manuum impositionis It a puer ille fide sua approbata cum solenni benedictione dimittebatur c. Talem ergo manuum impositionem qua simpliciter loco benedictionis fiat laudo restitutam hodie in purum vsum velim that is to say It was the custome of old that the children of Christians after they were growne vp to some perfection were brought vnto the Bishop to performe that dutie which was done by these that were of perfit yeares before they came to
Although a Temple bee not necessary at Caluine sayes in the 185. Epistle yet the Insant should be baptized in coetu aliquo Si enim infans clam baptizetur nullis adhibitis testibus illud neque respondet ordini à Dominoposito neque Apostolorum exemplo Likewise that there may bee a Communion conueniat coetus aliquis ex cognatis familiaribus vicinis saies Caluine These grounds being warranted by Scripture and by the Ancients first wee shall set downe the Acts of the Assembly which yee labour to resute next your Refutation and Answere thereto The Acts concluded at Perth touching priuate Baptisme and Communion THe Minister shall often admonish the people that they deferre not the baptizing of Infants any longer then the nexts Lords Day after the Childe bee borne vnlesse vpon a great and reasonable cause declared to the Minister and by him approued As also they shall warne them that without great cause they procure not their Children to be baptized at home in their houses but when great need shall compell them to baptise in priuate houses in which case the Minister shall not refuse to doe it vpon the knowledge of the great need and being timely required thereto then Baptisme shall be administred after the same forme as it should haue beene in the Congregation And the Minister shall the next Lords Day after any such priuate Baptisme declare in the Church that the Infant was so baptized and therefore ought to bee receiued as one of the true Flocke of Christs Fold Item If any good Christian visited with long sicknesse and knowne to the Pastor by reason of his present infirmity vnable to resort to the Church for receiuing of the holy Communion or being sick stall declare to the Pastor vpon his cōscience that he thinks his sicknes to be deadly and shall earnestly desire to receiue the same in his house The Minister shall not deny to him so great a comfort lawfull warning being giuen to him vpon the night before and that there be three or foure of good Religion and conuersation free of lawfull impediments present with the sicke person to communicate with him who must also prouide a conuenient place in his house all things necessary for the reuerend administration thereof according to the order prescribed in the Church PP In the ninth head of the first Booke of Discipline it was thought expedient that Baptisme should be ministred vpon the ordinary dayes of preaching not that it is vnlawfull to baptise whensoeuer the Word is preached but to remoue a grosse errour wherewith many are deceiued thinking that Children bee damned if they dye without Baptisme c. In the order of Baptisme set downe before the Psalmes in metre it is said that the Sacraments are not ordayned of God to bee vsed in priuate corners as Charmes or Sorceries c. And in the Assembly holden 1581. it was ordayned that the Sacraments should not bee ministred in priuate houses c. This laudable order hitherto obserued was altered c. ANS Cases of necessitie are not subiect to ordinarie rules Therfore the Acts made at Perth concerning necessary and extraordinarie cases alters not the laudable order hitherto obserued As it is an errour to esteeme Baptisme absolutely necessary that is a middest without which there is no saluation so it is as great an errour not to thinke it necessary as an ordinary meane whereby the Grace of God is communicate and without the which if it may be had and be either contemned or neglected there is no certainty that God will conferre his grace Therefore to astrict the ministration of Baptisme to a humane order touching time and place which by the Word of God may be lawfully vsed at other times and in other places is great temeritie importing to the Childe no small danger of the losse of grace and bringing vpon the Parent and Pastor the guilt of his bloud for contemning at lest neglecting the ordinary meane of saluation PP A Sacrament is a publike action to bee performed publikely by publike Ministers Neyther can any necessitie or sufficient cause be alleadged wherefore any sacred and publike action should passe in priuate because Gods Ordinance is to vs a supreme Law and necessitie which we ought to obey rather then foster popular ignorance and infirmitie These are Tilenus words ANS These words are not vttered by Tilenus against the administration of Baptisme at extraordinary times and in extraordinary places but only against the administration of Baptisme by women and priuate persons which is the second Controuersie in Baptisme which hee handles beginning at the twelfth position with these words Altera Controuersia de Ministro Baptismi and ending at the eighteenth These Where there is not so much as a syllable of the time and place when and where Baptisme may be ministred all his positions concerning only the persons by whom So in this yee are like your selfe peruerting and abusing the speeches of learned men against their owne minde And it is to bee obserued heere that yee peruersly interpret his words for where he sayes Nullaque necessitas velidonea causa afferri potest cur actio sacra publica transeat in priuatam yee to make the Reader beleeue that Tilenus speakes of a priuate place whiles he is speaking of a priuate action translate it passe in priuate as if a publike action could not be lawfully performed when it is done by a publike person and in presence of such a number as by the Ordinance of God are sufficient PP The Sacraments are testimonies of our pietie thankfulnesse profession and protestations of our faith therefore they ought to be conspicuous and publike ANS It is most expedient that they bee both conspicuous and publike but in cases of necessity it suffices that they bee publike PP We haue no externall fellowship with the whole Church militant in the publike exercise of Religion but a mediate Communion with a particular Congregation This Communion ought not to be violated ANS This Communion is not violated when in cases of necessitie men cannot resort to the Parish Church If we communicate in these exercises of Religion with two or three conuened in the Name of Christ where a greater Assembly cannot be had our Communion with the Church is not violated for they are a particular Church and a part of the vniuersall aswell as the Parishioners although they be lesse PP The Sacraments should be ministred with consent and in presence of the Church seeing they are workes of publike nature and of publike fruit belonging to all ANS Such workes of publike nature and publike fruit ought ordinarily to be ministred solemnely but in cases of necessitie it suffices that they bee lawfully ministred in caetu aliquo fidelium as Caluine speakes Epist 185. PP The Sacraments ministred in priuate houses make the Sacraments to be contemned and neglected Heretickes take occasion to corrupt the pure administration of them by these priuie practises The imperiall
whole lumpe was not formed till the Antichrist came to his full strength yet many particulars were entered before and like brookes came into the great riuer As the Antichrist was borne and did grow in yeares so did Papistrie ANS Here ye insinuate that the obseruation of the fiue Daies in the Primitiue Church was Papistrie or else this Discourse is idle But Papistrie it could not be before it was receiued and confirmed by the Pope so in these dayes it was not Papistrie formally And if it were not an errour of the Orthodoxe Church but a lawfull order as at length we haue proued it was neyther materially nor formally Papistrie The obseruation of these dayes with a superstitious and idolatrous worship is Papistrie Such was not the obseruation of the Primitiue Church and such is not the obseruation of the Reformed But as the lawfull obseruation vsed in the Primitiue Church was abolished by the introduction of a superstitious and idolatrous worship in Papistrie so is the superstitious and idolatrous obseruation in Papistrie abolished in reformed Churches by the restitution of the lawfull and religious obseruation vsed in the Primitiue Church which of all reformations is the most perfect and profitable Iehn abolished Idolatrie of the Heathen but he restored not the true worship of God therefore his reformation was imperfect But the reformation made by Ezechias and Iosias was perfect because Idolatrie was not onely abolished but the true worship of God established in place thereof This was not so sufficiently prouided for at our reformation in this poynt for the want of Pastours and is well supplied by the Act made at Perth PP As for the reformed churches except our neighbor Church they haue abandoned daies dedicated to Saints ANS Now yee come to the iudgement of the reformed Churches And here I wish the iudicious Reader to obserue whether ye bring either the iudgement of any reformed Church or of any learned Diuine that consents with you in opinion namely that the obseruation of the fiue anniuersarie dayes with the lawfull exercise of true Religion is a Iudaicall Pedagogie a rudimentarie instruction and a superstitious wil-worship And to the end all that ye say may be exposed to the view of the World I shall set all fully downe which yee bring to this purpose First where ye alledge that all the reformed Churches haue abandoned the dayes dedicated to Saints In this their practise is no way contrarie to the Act made at Perth for by it no day is ordained to be kept which is or was dedicate to any Saint except vnder the name of Saints yee reprehend him who is the most holy Next the exception ye make of our neighbour Church is calumnious and false It is a calumnie that they obserue any day dedicated to Saints All the dayes which they obserue are dedicated to the honour of God either for the inestimable benefits that by our Sauiour he hath bestowed vpon the World or in regard of the blessings that haue come to man by the Ministrie of his seruants and Saints And it is false that all the reformed Churches except they haue refused the obseruation of these dayes For Bullinger in his Commentary vpon the 14. to the Romans affirmes that the Church of Tigurie obserues the Feasts of the blessed Virgin of S. Iohn the Baptist of Magdalene of Stephen and of the Apostles PP Some admit dayes dedicated to Christ some two some fiue but not with the full consent and liking of the learned but either forced by the authoritie of the Magistrate or wilfulnesse of the people or because remaining in the middest of their enemies they are not permitted otherwise to doe ANS They in Geneua who obserue the day of Natiuitie and Easter approue the practise and order of the Church of Heluetia who obserue all the fiue and there is as great reason why on the other three dayes the Passion Ascension and sending downe of the holy Ghost should be remembred as the Natiuitie and Resurrection If by the learned ye vnderstand these whom ye doe afterwards name Farellus Viret and Caluine I am perswaded no man will thinke that either they or any other such Pastors of the Church would haue bin forced to practise that which was vnlawfull in it selfe and a superstitious will-worship either by Magistrate or People PP Farellus and Viret remooued all Holy-dayes out of the Church of Geneua as Caluine testifies The same decree which banished Farellus and Caluine out of Geneua brought in other Holy-dayes They were all againe abrogate except the Sabbath day Howsoeuer after came in the keeping of Pasche and the Natiuitie ANS The iudgement of Caluine touching the abolition of the Festiuall dayes in Geneua may be seene in his 118. Epistle where he professes that it was done se inscio ac ne optante quidem And a little after subioynes Ex quo sum reuocatus hoc temperamentum quaesiui vt Christi Natali◠celebraretur vestro more alijs autem diebus extraordinariae supplicationes tabernis mane clausis fierent à prandio ad suas operas res agendas quisque abiret And albeit in that place he confesses that the abrogation of the Festiuall dayes did not grieue him yet he protests as followes Hoc tamen testatum esse volo si mihi delata optio fuisset quod nunc constitutū est non fuisse pro sentētia dicturum If Caluine had thought as ye doe that December Christmas is a iust imitation of December Saturnall of the Ethnicke Romanes and that the obseruation of the rest of the Festiuall dayes had beene a superstitious kinde of Will-worship and a Iudaicall Pedagogie he would neuer haue consented to the keeping of the Natiuitie and would not only haue abolished the holy dayes by his suffrage if the same had beene in his option but also testified to the world his dislike of them by his Pen and writing But that all may see how different his iudgement is from yours he concludes with these words Nectamen est cur homines adeo exasperentur si libertate nostra vt Ecclesiae aedificatio postulat vtimur quemadmodum nec vicissim praeiudicio esse morem nostrum aequum est By these words it is manifest that in Caluines iudgement the obseruation and abrogation of these dayes consists in the power and libertie of the Church and that the obseruation of them in it selfe is not vnlawfull but a thing indifferent to be vsed and not vsed as the edification of the Church requires which iudgement wee imbrace and follow PP Caluine was so farre from liking of Holy dayes that hee was slandered of intention to abolish the Lords Day ANS His Doctrine shewes the last to bee a calumnie his practise and iudgement declares that hee did not mislike the obseruation of the dayes vsed in the Primitiue and other reformed Churches PP The Belgike Churches in their Synode holden at Dort Anno 1578. wished that only the Lords Day might be celebrated Luther
himselfe in his Booke De bonis Operibus set forth Anno 1520. wished that there were no Feast Dayes amongst Christians but the Lords Day And in his Booke to the Nobilitie of Germany he sayes Consultum esse vt omnia festa aboleantur solo die Dominicoretento ANS This wish Luther and the Belgike Churches conceiued out of their miscontentment at the number corruptions and superstitions of the Festiuall dayes besides the Lords Day as ye doe The late Councell holden at Dort Anno 1618. did celebrate the Feast of Christs Natiuitie most solemnely for the space of three dayes so the practise of these Churches and of Luther shewes that they agree in iudgment with vs touching the obseruation of the fiue dayes PP Howsoeuer forreine Diuines in their Epistles and Councels speake sometimes sparingly against Holy dayes when their aduice was sought of Churches newly risen out of Poperie and greatly distressed they neuer aduised a Church to resume them where they were remoued ANS If forreine Diuines had esteemed the obseruation of these fiue dayes a Iudaicall Pedagogie a rudimentary instruction a superstitious wil-worship as ye doe they had spoken no more sparingly thereof then they do of other like things in the Papisticall Church Where yee say that they neuer aduised Churches to resume them who had once remooued the same Caluine in his one and fiftieth Epistle aduises the Monbelgardens not to contend against the Prince for not resuming of all Festiuall dayes but only such as serued not to edification and were seene to be superstitious such as the Conception and Assumption of the blessed Virgin In festis non recipiendis sayes hee cuperem vos esse constantiores sic tamen vt non litigetis de quibuslibet sed de eis tantum quae nec ad aedificationem quicquam factura sunt superstitionem prima ipsa facie prae se ferunt c. And in the end of the Epistle answering one Obiection which is frequently vsed in our Church he saies Quod autem vos terret offendiculorum periculum si quam nouamagendi formam receperitis quae non sit nostris Ecclesiis vsitata id quidem meritò facitis Sed quia non eò ventum est perfectionis quin optemus adhuc progredi hic timor vos impedire non debet ab ijs ritibus admittendis quos alioqui non liceat ponitus improbare What these Ceremonies were whereof he speakes ye will find in the same Epistle to wit the administration of the Communion to the sicke and to persons who are to suffer Baptisme by Mid-wiues which simply condemnes Rites in buriall of the dead and Festiual dayes which they were vrged by the Prince to resume after they had beene remoued from amongst them But this and such other peaceable and modest aduices giuen by Caluine and other Learned Diuines yee ascribe to want of consideration PP They had not leisure to consider narrowly the corruption of euery errour that preuailed in their time the worke of reformation was so painfull to them I wish therefore that the iudicious Reader would ponder their Reasons set down in this Treatise ANS The ancient Diuines Saint Chrysostome Ambrose Ierome Augustine ye haue condemned of folly now Caluine Zanchius Chemnitius and the best Diuines of the reformed Church yee esteeme inconsiderate in this point But if the Reader shall take leisure to peruse the Learned Dispute of Chemnitius against the Councell of Trent touching this head the profound Doctrine of Zanchius vpon the fourth Command he shall find that these Diuines haue considered the Question narrowly enough Yet I must confesse that neyther they nor any other Diuines haue found out the errours set downe by you in this Pamphlet which if hee take paines to ponder as ye wish he shall find such things therein as no sound Diuine in the Christian World did euer dreame of before you PP As for our Neighbour Church standing in the middest betwixt the Romane and reformed Churches as Bucerus once said they are more liberall in their Feasts as in other Ceremonies then the other reformed Churches as Gretserus the Iesuite hath obserued Caluino-papistae Angli vt in alijs qua adritus Ceremonias pertinent longe liberaliores sunt quà m Puritans in Gallia Germania Belgia ita in Festis retinendis longe largiores ANS Hitherto ye haue neither alledged the practice of any reformed Church nor the iudgement of any learned Diuine for your opinion Now ye beginne vnchristianly to inueigh against the renowned Church of England and are not ashamed to bring the impure words of a Puritan Papist wherein as hee vtters his miscontentment on the one side so doe yee on the other both standing for extremities while as hee will haue all and ye will haue none The Church of England keeping the middle course is condemned of both for her moderation but she regardeth little to be iudged of you or of mans day What are yee that iudge another mans Seruant who stands or fals to his owne Master PP They obserue not only the fiue Holy dayes alreadie mentioned but other dayes also dedicated to Christ c. They keepe also a number of Saints dayes so that their dayes in number are more then the Iewes themselues obserued The Reasons alreadie alledged against dayes dedicated to Christ may serue also against dayes dedicated to Saints and Angels ANS If ye haue no stronger reasons to alledge against dayes dedicated to Saints and Angels then ye haue vsed against the fiue dayes dedicated to Christ the Papists who obserue these dayes will not regard your enmitie much lesse the Church of England which obserueth no dayes but such as are dedicated to the honour of God only as we said before PP We may look assuredly that the fiue dayes presently vrged will bring in all the rest to make vp our conformitie with out Neighbour Church which to vs is not lawfull They were neuer remoued from amongst them we haue abandoned and abiured them c. ANS This is an inuidous Prophesie contrarie to the experience we haue had of his Maiestie who for conformitie with our Neighbour Church hath neuer pressed vs with any thing vnprofitable for vs to receiue The obseruation of the fiue dayes restored in our Church makes vs no more conforme with the Church of England then with the greatest number of the best reformed Churches in Europe and with the Primitiue Catholike Church whilest she yet flourished in greatest puritie of Doctrine and Discipline in the dayes of Tertullian Ghrysostome Ambrose Augustine Ierome and such other notable Lights And as long as it shall please almighty God to blesse vs with the continuance of his Maiesties most happy Gouernment wee are assured to be preserued from Heresie Superstition Idolatry and such like corruptions I beseech God that our ingratitude murmuring grudging suspitions and misconstructions doe not prouoke God to stop the breath of our nostrils and remooue the Lords Annointed vnder whose shaddow wee haue enioyed peace and