of one and the same Perswasion in Matters of Religion Thirdly Whether the Administration of Publick Astairs may not be in the Hands of Persons who are not of one and the same Perswasion in Matters of Religion nay of Men of opposite Principles without Confusion or tearing the Government in pieces between them and whether they may not notwithstanding draw together the same way for the Publick Good Fourthly Whether it is sit that the Corporation and Test Acts should be enfore'd or Repealed Fifthly Whether upon the whole Matter the Occasional Conformist may not be admitted into Publick Offices and Employments relating to the Government consistently with the Safety of the Established Government both in Church and State with the Wisdom of the English Nation and with the Practice of some wise Governments in the World And as to the first I answer that the Occasional Conformist is a sincere Member of the National Church who heartily approves of the Laws of the Land and chearfully pays Obedience to them and he and the Church-men are not of opposite Principles but of one and the same Perswasion in Matters of Religion If the Church-man whom you suppose the only Person fit for an Office be one that troubles not himself about Religion but believes as the Church believes and does as he sees others do I neither can judge of his Principles nor his Perswasion in Matters of Religion but if he have espoused the Religion of the Church of England with consideration and can give a Reason of the Faith or Hope that is in him he knows that the Religion of this National Church is all to be found in the Bible He is taught by the sixth Article of that Church that Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to Salvation so that whatsoever is not read therein nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any Man that it should be believ'd as an Article of Faith or be thought requisite or necessary to Salvation The Reason given by the 8th Article why the three Creeds ought throughly to be received and believed is for that they may be proved by most certain Warrants of Holy Scripture And as to Creeds so as to Councils we are taught by the 21st Article that things Ordained by them as necessary to Salvation have neither Strength nor Authority only as it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture Now the Occasional Conformists are herein intirely of the same mind they agree intirely in the Creeds the Lord's Prayer the Ten Commandments as contained in the Decalogue and as explained by our Saviour In the two Sacraments and every Part and Article that any Protestant can have any Colour to call a part of Christianity But I have not Inclination nor can it be expected that I should particularize every Head and Point of Religion wherein they agree but should be glad to be informed by you of any Article of Religion or Point of Doctrine wherein they differ for no Man ever called Rites and Ceremonies of humane Institution Principles or Matters of Religion I must own that they are not fully satisfied in the large Sense of that Passage in the 20th Article That the Church hath Power to decree Rites and Ceremonies nor that as the 34th Article expresses it it is sufficient as to the Ceremonies that nothing be Ordained against God's Word if the Opposition of God's Word be intended a particular express Opposition but they are of opinion that to make any Rites or Ceremonies of Humane Institution necessary to Communion especially as is aforesaid to make them Terms of Separation from the rest of the Catholick Church is against God's Word but they are extricated out of this Difficulty by the last Clause of the 34th Article it being plain by long and pungent Experience that the Ordaining of such Rites and Ceremonies is not among the Things that have been done so edifying or if this should fail yet your said Oracle is express that the 39 Articles are required from no Layman a Licence for which no Occasional Conformist will thank him The Romanists by such Ordinance have indeed edified their Babel and from things not contrary have proceeded to ordain things destructive to Christianity and so in some Measure are all such Ordinances which differ as much from Religion as Christianity does from Priestcraft But to bring this Matter a little closer I hope to make it plain that not only the Occasional Conformist but the Presbyterian and the Independent are of the same Perswasion in Matters of Religion with the Church-man and not of opposite Principles and that nothing but gross Ignorance or a wilful blind Prejudice has kept Men of either Party from being convinc'd of this Truth And to make this evident I take leave to acquaint you with plain Matter of Fact You well know that in the late times the Assembly of Divines at Westminster as also the Kirk of Scotland agreed in a Catechism called the Assemblies shorter Catechism And this Catechism was also agreed to by the Synod of the Independent Divines met at the Savoy Now after the Restauration of King Charles the 2d and particularly some time before the Popish Plot a mighty Zeal appeared against that Catechism in the Men of your Party and if I mistake not this Catechism was publickly burnt at Oxford But it happened that one Mr. Thomas Adams formerly fellow of Brazen-Nose-Colledge in Oxford being convinc'd of the Truth of what I am endeavouring to prove he in the Year 1675 wrote a Discourse Entituled The Main Principles of Christian Religion in 107 short Articles or Aphorisms generally received as being proved from Scripture now further cleared and confirmed by the Consonant Doctrine Recorded in the Articles and Homilies of the Church of England under 4 Heads Of things to be Explained 1. Believed comprehended in the Creed 2. Done in the Ten Commandments 3. Practiced in the Gospel particularly two Sacraments 4. Prayed for in the Lord's Prayer Which Discourse was Licensed Sold well and received a Second Edition in 1677 which I have but alass it was at last discovered that the 107 Articles were the Answers to the 107 Questions of the Assemblies Shorter Catechism and that hated Book was thus disper'd under the Patronage of the Articles and Homilies of the Church of England And if you will please to peruse this Book I suppose you will need no other Proof that the Occasional Conformist Presbyterian Independent and the Church-man are not of opposite Principles but of one and the same Perswasion in Matters of Religion and the Acceptation which that Discourse met with puts me in mind of a like Passage relating to the Sorbon to whom your Oracle above-mention'd desires that the Church of England may be united for when Abbas le Roy Publish'd a Discourse in France without naming the Author being a most Elegant and Pious Oration or Prayer to our Lord Jesus Christ for obtaining the Grace of a perfect Conversion the
the word Church till after the end of the Prophecy and this perhaps is also the Reason why the Reformed Christian Church of the latter Days is called the Bride the Lamb's Wife A Bride in opposition to the Whore and the Bride the Lamb's Wife in opposition to the Wife of Anthropos But this by the way only observe that Simon Magus the Father of these Aeons was if you believe Baronius fetch'd down out of the Air by St. Peter's Prayers at Rome Anno 45 about 4 Years before St. Paul wrote the Epistle to the Thessalonians And take notice also that Irenaeus in his 33 d. Chapter of his first Book observes that Ignorance and Impudence False Zeal Fury Envy and Lust were said to be born about the same time with this same blessed couple Now Sir you must excuse me if I have no kindness for any of the Off-spring of these Folk and if I find any thing put upon me as part of Revealed Religion which appears to be begot by Anthropos on Ecclesia and if you or the Men of your Party Write as many Books as would fill the Tower of Babel in behalf of such things I shall still remember such Texts as these to the Law and to the Testimony If they speak not according to this Rule 't is because there is no Light in them 8 Is 20. Thus it is written c. I must always say of the Christianity contained in the Writings of the Sacred Penman as Josephus says of the Writings of Moses Every thing that they wrote is yet extant and we must take it as they left it Joseph Page 92. without any room for Ornament or Variation And it was by this Principle which runs throughout his whole Work that Irenaeus routed all the Hereticks and all their Army of Aeons except this couple who have plagued do plague and will plague the World till the total downfal of Antichrist for as your aforesaid Oracle in his New Association Page 2. Page 17. observes when once we leave the Institutions of God there is no stop and our Imagination is our only Rule Magna est veritas prevalebi◠But 't is high time Sir to stop least after all you should think that I here condemn the Church of England as by Law Establish'd against which I don't say one word the late designed Act not being past For I do declare I take no Church to be a Whore unless she be guilty of Idolatry for that is Spiritual Adultery in Scripture Language I could wish that none but the Great Whore were concerned with Anthropos but some Churches that are not Whores are a little guilty of Jilting now and then and are too apt to Paint and to take some parts of the Attire of an Harlot tho' they are not so and therefore I wish all honest Churches would consider what it is that will be done when it shall be said that the Marriage of the Lamb is come 19 Rev. 7. and his Wife hath made her self ready The Case of the Regale makes the only considerable Matter in Controversie between the Church and Dissenters to be Episcopacy all other Matters being easily accommodated that Episcopacy was the Heir which they said come let us kill him that the Inheritance may be ours Page 248 that he takes Episcopacy to be no indifferent thing but Instituted by Christ and confirmed by the constant Practice of the Vniversal Church of Christ in all Ages Page 254. And yet in the Shape of a Wolf Page 27. He falls very fiercely upon his Brother Wolf of Rome and calls the Pope the Grand Schismatick and why e'en because Catholick Communion is broke by the Church of Rome in the Usurpation of her Bishops over all the rest of his Fellow Bishops and confining the Catholick Church to his own Communion then it seems that is Schism in the Pope which would have been Establishing Peace and Unity and Setling our Constitution upon a sure and lasting Foundation if done by the Occasional Bill Peace at Home Page 12. But if the Pope be in the wrong what is this Episcopacy that is of Divine Right And what is a Diocess and what Texts are there that prove an Equality among Bishops which do not also prove Presbyters to be Bishops St. Peter we just now read was a Fellow Presbyter and would never have Exhorted Presbyters to act the Bishop if he had known that Presbyters and Bishops differed in Order Jure Divino Nor would St. John who Wrote his Gospel about the Year 98 about 65 Years after he had received the Miraculous Gifts of the Holy Ghost and after he came out of the boyling Oil have omitted so necessary a Matter nor would he in his 2 d. and 3 d. Epistles just before his Death have misled the Church by calling himself the Presbyter which is the first word in both those Epistles especially in his Third Epistle in which he complains of Diotrephes who lov'd the Preheminence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a lover of Prelacy for not receiving him and for casting the Brethren out of the Church He would have been careful to have used the Stile of a Higher Order nay 't is plain he did not think it a Disparagement to the surviving Apostle of Jesus Christ to be styled a Presbyter but hitherto the Church of Christ remained a pure Virgin Hegesippus in Eus l. 3. c. 32. and Anthropos had not prevailed to introduce his Spouse in her stead This Parity appears from divers Places in Irenaeus in the second Century and the well known Place in St. Hierom the Confession of Binius in 1 Can. Apost is remarkable that the Names of Bishop and Presbyter were promiscuously used and not distinguish'd for above 200 Years I will add the words of the Learned Hales in his Discourse of Schism They deceive themselves and others who would perswade us that Bishops by the Institution of Christ have any Superiority above other Men except that which requires Reverence or That a Bishop is Superior by any other Law than Positivo and by the common Consent of Christians Do I then Sir Humphrey say any thing against the Constition of the Church of England not at all Jure Positivo The Priests and People are Governed by the Queen the Laws are made by Queen Lords and Commons there are as many Lord Lieutenants as Counties and Bishops as Diocesses and Archbishops as Provinces there are among the People Dukes Marquesses c. and among the Ministers Deans Arch-Deacons Prebends c. But for God's sake what Texts do you quote for the Jus Divinum either of the Monarchy limitted by our Laws and all the Subordinate Officers in the English Form of Government tho' the best in the World or for the Hierarchy of the Church of England with all its Subordinate Officers as described by Dr. Cousius in his Ecclesiae Anglicanae Politica Reprint that Book and let us have the Scriptures proving the Constitution Jure Divino in the next Edition
All the Christian Acts of Moderation in other Countries he takes to be Acts of Necessity not of Choice He seems to think that there are no Laws in England but those of Uniformity and the Corporation and Test Acts or otherwise he shamefully belies the Dissenters for no Men are more fond of the other Laws of England made for the Security of the Establisht Government 'T is a mighty Discovery that he has made that the Dissenters would Repeal those Laws Surely no Man ever doubted it so far as concerns good Protestants tho' it would be in Effect not a Repealing but rectifying those Laws He has confirmed my Observation that there is a strange Byass on a certain Party of Men towards Popish and French Presidents or surely he would not have troubled the Reader with the Presidents of Portugal Spain Italy Peace and Vnion Pag. 4. and France any more than of Muscovy Turkey Persia or China And for Holland they are a Wiser People than to Exclude those that Communicate with their National Church because they believe their Creed and Communicate also with other Protestants 'T is no wonder if Men that pretend to Infallibility and take the whole Web of Priestcraft to be as Sacred as our Saviours Seamless-Coat should Establish an Inquisition but that Men that pretend to no Infallibility but have rejected 19 Parts in 20 should be setting up an Inquisition to secure the Fag-end of Priestcraft from being torn off from Christianity this is wonderful especially when Constant Conformity Page 10. which as the Party would impose it is Schismatical Separation from the Catholick Church is put on the same Foot with the Oaths of Allegiance and Abjuration I hope that I have shewed that Author another way to Peace and Union than by Bribing Men by Offices to be Separalists there needs no going over of the Church to the Dissenters or the Dissenters to the Church but if both will go over to the Bible it would be well and Christendom in a little while would go over with them Let him take his Swing against all Parties that would undermine our Constitution but the things he and his Party are so fond of are rather our Excrements than our Constitution and if only one thing is to be done at once Page 16. let me Advise the Party to take Care of a Commandment an Article of the Creed or a Petition of the Lords Prayer and put an incapacity on those that trangress let God be first served at least before a Humane Ceremony or an Addition to our Saviours Institutions and as to his Controversy with D'foe I am not at all concerned whether your Offender or your Defender are against Occasional-Conformity upon the same or different Principles I hope the Precedent Sheets give a quite different Account of and defend that Practice from the misrepresentations of them both But least the word Excrement should offend you I think sit to acquaint you that I have it from that great Man eminent Church-man Dr. Henry Moor who among his Remains which I have seen written with his own Hand has this Passage That that which is good indeed should be generally relished by the World is as unlikely as that dead Men in their Graves should call out for Drink but when Goodness is revived in the World that which now goes for Food and Delicacy shall then be left as Dung and Excrement I hope Sir Humphry that Goodness is reviving in the World and I know that Sir Humphry Mackworth has his Heart and Hands engaged in its Resurrection and you know that there are Occasional Consormists who join intirely with you therein I was heartily sorry to find your Name to a Discourse which signifies to me that you take that for Food and Delicacy which I think deserves the other Name But there is another Passage among those Remains in these words There is a Natural kind of Religiousness which is but the Stamp or Character of this or the other Man's disposition some are given naturally to the magnificence of outward Ceremonies others do attend the inward motions of their Mind and think at ever moving of the Water a good Angel at least if not God himself is there But few Men are aware of their own natural Temper of Genius but let every one be assured that wherever Humility Upright-dealing and Charity are wanting both Ceremony and Inspiration are but a ridiculous piece of Gullery Humility assures me that the Oracles of God teach the true Terms of Christian Union to walk humbly with our God Mic. 6.8 is what the Prophet long since pronounc'd to be good and what God required Upright dealing teaches the publickly to my own Principles for which for some Years past I have been almost daily reproach'd and I thank God my Charity extends to the utmost limits of that Promise The Earth shall be full of the Knowledge of the Glory of the Lord as the Waters cover the Sea Isaiab 11.9 Oh Sir Humphrey Heb. 2.14 consider of Peace on Earth Luke 2.14 as well as at Home Not what will secure your Party but what will unite the Christian World who all agree that the Scriptures are the Word of God endeavour to render the Church of England a means of this glorious Peace and you will for ever oblige Your most c. No. 2. Woolsey's Letter IT is not concealed from your Holiness what are the various Effects of the new Invention of Printing that thereby Books and Learning are introduced and restored so that they have given rise to innumerable Sects and Schisms which daily break out in the Christian World especially in Germany where Men now begin to call into doubt the present Faith and Pleasure of the Church and to bring under Examination how far the Roman Faith at this day differs from the Primitive and Apostolical Institution From whence which is greatly to be lamented it comes to pass that Lay-men and the Dregs of the People are incited to read the Scriptures in the Vulgar Tongue Which great Mischiefs if they be tolerated not only greater will follow but it will come to pass that the Vulgar will at length be brought to believe that there is no such great need or use of the Clergy for if once there comes into the Minds of Men this Perswasion and Opinion that they can find a way for themselves to God in their own Mother Tongue which will enter Heaven as well as if it were in Latin plainly all Authority of the Mass and the whole Ecclesiastical Order will be ruin'd Pag. 73. A PLEA FOR THE Holy Sacrament being an Attempt to Rescue it from some late Prophanations in Civil Matters IN A LETTER TO A Member of Parliament By a Lay-Hand Licensed March 25 1689. James Fraser A PLEA FOR THE HOLY SACRAMENT March 20. 1688 9. SIR IT hath been one of the most successful Stratagems of the Apostate Prince of Darkness to ruin Mens Souls by those very means