Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n church_n doctrine_n rome_n 2,813 5 6.6425 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A29572 Two speeches of George, Earl of Bristol, with some observations upon them by which it may appear whether or no the said Earl and others of the same principles, deserve to be involved in the common calamity brought upon Roman Catholicks, by the folly and presumption of some few factious papists.; Speeches. Selections Bristol, George Digby, Earl of, 1612-1677. 1674 (1674) Wing B4786; ESTC R11516 12,016 34

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Two SPEECHES OF GEORGE Earl of BRISTOL With some observations upon them By which it may appear whether or no the said Earl and others of the same principles deserve to be involved in the Common Calamity brought upon Roman Catholicks by the folly and presumption of some few factious PAPISTS LONDON Printed in the year 1674 Reader BEing a Roman Catholick agreeing in principles with what George Earl of Bristol hath of late publickly declared of himself in Parliament I could hardly bear with patience the injurious censures and uncharitable constructions made of a speech of the said Honourable Persons in the House of Peers by divers of the same Communion though of a differing stamp in relation to Government They did their best to have it understood that the persecution which seem`d to threaten Catholicks had whetted that Earls wit to find out specious and plausible distinctions betwixt Catholick and Catholick whereby to exempt himself from the inconveniencies likely to fall upon the generality of that profession Distinctions which in them selves they said had no solid grounds of discrimination and that his sentiments express`d therein were adapted only to the present occasion The publishing of the said Speech in Print I thought wonld be a service to the Publick as well as a Justice to that Lord wherein his distinction of Catholicks of the Church of Rome from Catholicks of the Court of Rome will certainly appear a right and a reasonable one Concerning which if the Reader rest not satisfied but will needs descend to particular differences he is referred to a dedication of a book lately published in Print and directed to all Catholicks of His Majesties Dominions by one Peter Walsh a Franciscan Fryer wherein the chief imposals of the Court of Rome upon the more orthodox Doctrines of the Church of Rome are faithfully and learnedly exposed Now as to the second part of their detraction I thought the injuriousness of it could not better be made appear then by Printing also another Speech of the said Earls made to the House of Commons many years since wherein the self-same sentiments were eminently declared by him at a time when Roman Catholicks were as free from Alarums of any new persecution as ever they have been during any Session of Parliament A Speech of GEORGE Earl of BRISTOLS made to the house of PEERS at the First reading of the Bill against Popery upon Saturday the fifteenth of March 167 2 3 The King being then present My Lords I Am very sensible to what inconveniences a man of my perswasion exposes himself that offers to speak especially to break the Ice first to a Bill of this Nature brought up to you from the great representative of the Commons of England a Bill which those of my own profession may possibly think so severe and most Protestants so necessary If I speak for the passing of this Bill it is likely I may give scandal to the first and if I speak against the passing of it it is certain I shall give high provocation to the latter And if I speak for some parts of it and against some others I may have cause to fear that I may offend both sides the usual fate of those who affect to shew their subtilty by cutting a Feather as we say well my Lords so be it let what will befall me upon this occasion I shall still have within me a consolation above even the power of an Act of Parliament to take from me I mean the testimony of a good conscience of having discharged the duty of a Peer of this house in so eminent a conjuncture clearly and candidly according to the best of my understanding Yet still with most humble submission to the superiority of yours My Lords before I enter upon the matter give me leave to tell those Lords of my own Profession that hear me what I think their duty as well as mine if any of them shall think fit to speak in this house upon this occasion My Lords I do understand that how different so ever our sentiments are from your Lordships in point of Doctrine and questions spiritual we ought to lay the consideration of them all aside in this place and to speak in it not as Roman Catholicks but as faithful members of a Protestant Parliament And as such give a preferrence before all temporal interests of our own to the right interest of the State under whose protection we live resting confident that whatever part of our ease and conveniences in this world we shall willingly sacrifice to the Peace and security of our Countrey will one way or other be recompensed unto us by Almighty God either in this or in the other Now my Lords as to the rest of this most honourable assembly give me leave to remind you what kind of Catholick I told you the other day I am that is a Catholick of the Church of Rome not a Catholick of the Court of Rome A distinction if I am not much deceived worthy of your memory and reflection when ever any severe proceeding against those whom you call Papists shall come in question since Catholicks of the Court of Rome do only deserve that name My Lords I could easily make clear unto you the reality and the reasonableness of this distinction by instances in matter of opinion did I not think it always impertinent to trouble this house with points of controversie but I shall only take the liberty to evidence the justness of the distinction to you by a Personal instance Fra. Paulo my Lords who writ so shrewdly the History of the Counsel of Trent I am sure will never pass with any body that hath read him for a Catholick of the Court of Rome the artifices and abuses of which he hath exposed to the world in such lively colours and painted them out in Figures give me leave to say even bigger then the life and yet this Fra. Paulo my Lords dyed piously and devoutly a steady Catholick of the Church of Rome such as I trust God will give me the grace to do were I put to the bloodiest tryal such a Catholick my Lords I am and as such I make no doubt but I shall live to do Roman Catholicks more service and procure them more advantages from the comiseration of this Parliament then all the unquiet spirits or rabbi-busies of the Court of Rome And now my Lords I come to speak to the matter of this Bill which I shall do at this time generally and at large reserving my self as to perticulars till it be read by Paragraphs yet thus much I cannot forbear telling you now that there are some perticulars in this Bill as those of the Queens and Duke of Yorks domestick servants which while I have a tongue to speak and a right to use it here I shall ever oppose until I shall find my self bound up by your Lordships determination In the first place my Lords I beseech you to consider that this Bill for