common prayer attayned and gotten by the Parishioners of M. for the Minister to vse in the same parish Church IT is provided and enacted that the bookes concerning the said services shal at the costs charges of the parishioners of every parish be attayned and gotten c. And that such parishes where the saide bookes shal be attayned and gotten c. shall within three wâ—ckes after the bookes so attayned and gotten vse the said service and put the same in vre according to this act from whence it seemeth to follow the Minister not being commanded to attayne get the said booke if the parishioners have not hitherto attayned and gotten the said booke that the minister of the same parish is not bouÌ„d to vse the said service put the same in vre which is not attayned gotten for him to be vsed invred That the parishioners of the said parish church have not hitherto attay ned gotteÌ„ the said book semeth to be manifest vpoÌ„ these coÌ„siderations The Booke which the Minister of the same Church is bound to vse should differ from the booke of common prayer authorised by act of Parliament 5. and 6. Ed. 6. But in foure poyntes that is to say one of alteration or addition of certeine lessons to be vsed on every sunday in the yeare an alteration correctioÌ„ of the forme of the Letany and two sentences only added in the delivery of the Sacrament to the coÌ„municants and none other or otherwise But in the booke attayned and gotten by the said parishioners therâ— be moe alterations then are specified in the statute The forme of the Letany is not corrected and altered and moreover there is some detraction from the very matter of the booke which detraction ought not to have bene made and which is conteyned in this prayer following From the Tyrannie of the Bishop of Rome and all his detestable enormities Good Lord deliver vs. And as touching the forme of the Letanie of K. Edw. booke whereas the same by the letter of the Act seemeth by the Parliament to have ben altered corrected for the words stand thus viz. altered corrected not to be altered corrected yet now so it is that the same forme remaineth stil in the parish book vnaltered vncorrected For the whole forme order and dispositioÌ„ of prayers which is in the Letanie of the parish book is the same forme order disposition of prayers which was in the Letany of K. Ed. book Except vnhappely we shall say that the transposition and alteration of the prayer of Chrysostom by the booke of K. Edw. according to the nature of the letter of that prayer appointed to be read last of all the prayers in the Letanie is an alteration and correction of the forme of the Letanie when as notwithstanding the transposition and alteration of that prayer by the parish booke appointed not to bee read last but before sundrie other prayers is rather a playne corruption and not a correction of that parte of the forme of the Letanie For this transposition is as if an husband-man should set his cart before his horse or as an Orator should place his coÌ„clusion before his proheme Again it can not probably or reasonably be gathered that the Parliament mentioning an alteration correction made of the forme of the Letany did inteÌ„d by the words forme of the Letany altered corrected that part of the matter of the Letany was or should be altered corrected For the matter of that prayer was good and without fault needed no alteration and correction at all yea and had the ParliameÌ„t detracted or intended that that prayer should be detracted out of the Letany and that by the detraction thereof the forme of the Letanie had ben altered and corrected then would no doubt the Parliament have spoken properly and plainly in this case like as the same did in the other two cases in this or the like maner viz. one prayer against the tyrannie of the Bishop of Rome and all his detestable enormities detracted In like sorte I say as it enacted one alteration or addition of certeyne lessons to bee vsed on every sunday in the yeare and two sentences only added in the delivery of the Sacraments to the communicants wherefore the Parliament in the excellencie of their iudgement sharpnes of their wisdom by thâ—se wordes forme altered and corrected necessarily implying that the forme of the Letany of King Edwards booke was faulty and corrupt it can not by any reasonable construction bee gathered that the Parliament by forme of the Letanie did intend any part of the matter of the Letanie which was good and sincere For if we speake properly and not tropically plainly and not obscurely iudiciously and not ridiculously as all Statutes and all wise Law-makers speak or ought to speak we can not say that any parte of the matter of a thing is the forme of a thing For what a vanitie were it to call the matter of a loafe the forme of a loase The matter of an house the forme of an house or the matter of a man the forme of a man much more vainly then needs must wâ— speake if we call the matter of a mast of a ship the forme of a ship the matter of the clapper of a bell the forme of a bell or the matter of the whit of an egge the forme of an egge Wherefore it can not otherwise be intended by the Parliament but that the faulty and corrupt forme order and disposition of prayers conteyned in the Letany of King Edwards booke was or at leastwise should have bene corrected and altered into an holy sincere forme order and disposition of prayers and not to have continued still faulty and corrupted as the same was in the beginning and first originall thereof Yea and that this indeed was the true meaninge of the Parliament is more fully confirmed vnto vs out of the doctrine of one of the Homilies commaunded publikely to bee read in the churches For coÌ„mon prayer saith the Homilie is rehearsed and said by the publicke Minister in the name of the people the whole multitude present whervnto they giving their ready audience should assent and say Amen But in the Letany of the boâ—ke attayned and gotten by the Parishioners the forme of prayers is not framed after this maner For in some part of the Letany the Minister only repeateth some thing for the which the people praye and so it commeth to passe that the people only praye and not the Minister yea and so the Minister supplieth the place of the people and the people the place of the minister Agayne in some other partes of the Letany the minister prayeth for one thing and the people following pray for another By meanes whereof the faultie and corrupt forme order and disposition of prayers in the Letany disagreeable to the doctrine of the Homilie remayneth vnaltered and vncorrected contrarie to the act of
Parliament and doctrine of the church of England Concerning addition and alteration specified in the act there be divers and sundry other alterations and some additions also in the parish booke differing from the booke of King Edward in wel-nigh l. materiall poyntes And for the vse of which pointes if the Kings Iudges and Iustices should as strictly and rigorously proceed as the Bb. have done and yet doe for the not vse of the Suâ—plice Crosse they might bring all the ministers of the church within danger of sixe monethes imprisonment and of the losse of one yeares profite of all their spirituall promotions to the King For these words of the statute that all and singular ministers in any Cathedrall or Parish church c. be bound to say and vse the Mattens Evensong celebration of the Lords Supper and administration of each of the Sacramentes and all their common and open prayer in such order and forme as is mentioned in the said booke so authorized by Parliament in the fifth sixth yeeres of the Raigne of King Edward the sixth with one alteration c. and none other or otherwise These wordes I say doe as exactly and precisely bind all Ministers to vse the book of King Edw. and none other or otherwise in all poyntes excepting the excepted as they binde anie Ministers to vse the rites ceremonies mencioned in the said booke But how can any Minister vse that order of service and none other or otherwise which is appointed in the booke of fift and sixt Edw. 6. excepting the excepted when as some other order of service exceptinge the excepted is concluded within the booke provided by the Parishioners And for the vse of which booke rather then for refusall of the vsâ— of which booke a minister is punishable by the statute And to make the thing which we have in hand to be vndeniable without cavil namely that the booke provided by the Parishioners is not that booke which is authorised by act of Parliament it is to be noted besides the alterations and additions specified in the statute that there is one great and mayne alteration betweene the two bookes of sundrie chapters appointed to be read for the first lessons at Mattens Evensong vpon divers festivall dayes Which alteration also it is evident that the same was made generally and for the most part from the better to the worse namely from the canonicall scriptures to the Apocriphall writings from whole chapters to peeces of chapters and that as it seemeth not without fraud and collusioÌ„ to the Queene Realm The proofe of which alteration is apparantly scene by the severall kalenders of both bookes Vnto which kalenders for the first second lessons except the same be proper lessons at morning and evening prayer the minister is referred For in a Rubrick before Te Deum at morning prayer it is said There shal be read two lessons distinctly with a loude voyce the first of the old testament the second of the new like as they be appointed by the kalender except there be proper lessons assigned for that day And in the order for evening prayer it is thus said Then a lesson of the old Testament as is appointed likewise in the kalender except there be proper lessons appointed for that day And after Magnificat then a lesson of the new Testament Now these first and second lessons whether they be proper or not proper lessons assigned by the parish booke that many of them doe vary from thâ— first and second lessons appointed by the booke of 5. and 6. Edw. 6. is plainly to be seene not only by the kalenders of both bookes but also by the order appointed for proper lessons A paterne whereof at certeyne feast dayes followeth  Kalender of King Edwards originall printed booke Kalender of the Parishes printed booke Stevens day Morning prayer 1. lesson Esa 56 Morning prayer 1. lesson Pro. 28 Evening prayer 1 lesson Esa 57 Evening prayer 1. lesson Eccle. 4. Saint Iohn Morning prayer 1 lesson Esa 58 Morning prayer 1 lesson Eccle. 5. Evening prayer 1 lesson Esa 59 Evening prayer 1 lesson Eccle. 6. Innocents Evening prayer 1. lesson Esa 60 Evening prayer 1 lesson Wisd 1â— Vpon the circumcision day both bookes agree saving that King Edwa. readeth the whole 10. chapter of Deuter. at evening prayer and the Parish booke but part vpon the Epiphanie the chapters at morning and evening prayer for first and second lesson by both bookes are the same But the Genealogie of our Savior Christ mencioned in the third of Luke by the Kings booke is appointed to be read whereas by the Kalender and one rubricke in the parish booke the same is appointed not to be read  King Edw. Kalender The parish bookes Kalender Convers of Paule Morning prayer 1 lesson Ge. 46 Morning prayer 1 lesson Wisd 5 Evening prayer 1 lesson Gen. 47 Evening prayer 1 lesson Wisd 6 Purification of Mary Morning prayer 1 lesson Ex. 12 Morning prayer 1 lesson Wisd 9 Evening prayer 1 lesson Exo. 13 Evening prayer 1 lesson Wisd 12 Mathias Morn prayer 1 lesson Num. 33 Morning prayer 1 lesson Wis 19 Even prayer 1 lesson Num 34 Evening prayer 1 lesson Ecclus. 1 Annunciat of Mary Morning prayer 1 lesson Jos 21 Morning prayer 1 lesson Ecclus. 2 Evening prayer 1 lesson Jos 22 Evening prayer 1 lesson Ecclus. 3 Vpon Monday and Tewsday in Easter weeke vpon the ascension day and Whitsunday King Edwa. booke appointeth no proper Chapters for the first Lessons but only proper chapters for the second lessons and so referreth the Minister for the first lessons on those dayes to the chapters which by the common Kalender are appointed to bee read vpon those dayes Whereas the parish Booke appointed proper chapters aswell for the first as second lessons vpon all those dayes Vpon Monday and Tewsday in Whitsunday weeke by the K. book there be no proper chap. appointed for the first or secoÌ„d lesson at morning or evening prayer whereas the parish book appointed vpon Monday part of Gene. 11. at morning prayer for the first lesson and for the second lesson 1 Corint 12. And for the first lesson at evening prayer of the same day parte of the 11. of Numbers Vpon Tewsday in the same weeke for the 1. lesson at morning prayer part of the 19. 1. kings and for the first lesson at evening prayer Deut. 30.  King Edwa. Kalender The parish bookes Kalender Marke Morn prayer 1 lesson 2. K. 3 Morn prayer 1 lesson Ecclus. 4 Evening prayer 1 lesson 2. K. 4 Evening prayer 1 lesson Ecclus. 5 Philip and Iacob Morn prayer 1 lesson 2. K. 15 Morn prayer 1 lesson ecclus 7 Evening prayer 1 lesson 2. K. 16 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclus 9 Barnabe Morn prayer 1 lesson Hest 3 Morn prayer 1 lesson ecclus 10 Evening prayer 1 lesson Hest 4 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclus 12  King Edw. Kalender The parish bookes Kalender Peter Morn
prayer 1 lesson Iob. 31 Morning prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 15 Evening prayer 1 lesson Job 32 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 19 Iames. Morn prayer 1 lesson eccl 10 Morning prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 21 Evening prayer 1 lesson eccle 11 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 23 Bartholomew Morn prayer 1 lesson ezek 3 Morn prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 25 Evening prayer 1 lesson ezek 6 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 29 Matthew Morn prayer 1 lesson micha 7 Morning prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 35 Evening prayer 1 lesson Nahu 1 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 38 Michael Morn prayer 1 lesson Zecha 7 Morning prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 39 Evening prayer 1 lesson Zecha 8 Evening prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 44 Luke Morn prayer 1 lesson Iudu 13 Morning prayer 1 lesson ecclu. 51 Evening prayer 1 lesson Jud. 14 Evening prayer 1 lesson Iob. 1 Simon and Iude. Morn prayer 1 lesson Sapi. 17 Morn prayer 1 lesson Iob. 24. 25 Evening prayer 1 lesson Sapi. 18 Evening prayer 1 lesson Job 42 All Saints Morni prayer 1 lesson Wisd 3 Morn prayer 1 lesson part of Wis 3 Evening prayer 1 lesson Wisd 5 Even prayer 1 lesson part of Wis 5 Andrew Morni prayer 1 lesson Esai 5 Morning prayer 1 lesson Pro. 20 Evening prayer 1 lesson Esai 6 Evening prayer 1 lesson Pro. 21 Thomas Morn prayer 1 lesson Esa 48 Morning prayer 1 lesson Pro. 23 Evening prayer 1 lesson Esa 49 Evening prayer 1 lesson Pro. 24 Vnto these alterations there is one maine difference to be added and fitt in this place to be observed coÌ„cerning certaine dayes wherein proper lessons are to bee read For by the booke of King Edw. it is said proper Psalmes lessons for divers feasts and dayes but by the parish booke the title is after an other maner viz. Lessons proper for holy dayes From whence it followeth that all those dayes wherein proper lessons are to be read are by that title accompted to be holy dayes which is repugnant to a Rubricke of the same booke entituled These to bee observed for holy dayes and none other Out of which Rubrick amongst a number of holy dayes there specified six dayes be secluded from being holy dayes for the which six dayes notwithstaÌ„ding proper lessons are appointed to be read as vpon holy dayes and these six dayes be the dayes following viz. the day of the coÌ„version of Paule Barnabes day Wensday and Thursday before Easter Goodfriday and Easter even It seemeth therefore not to be so safe a matter as men are borne in hand it is for ministers absolutely to subscribe that there is nothing in the whole booke of common prayer repugnant to the holy worde of God seeing there is so grosse and palpable a repugnancie in the booke it selfe Consentiet nullâ— qui secum dissidet ipse Vnto which repugnancie also may be added an other repugnancy more absurd For besides the alterations and additions before specified and not comprised in the statute there is a Rubrick added which not only repugneth the booke of K. Edward but also crosseth the kalender aswell of the parish booke it selfe as of the booke of K. Edward By which Rubrick also there is a detraction from the booke of K. Edward worse then the former of the Letany Because this Rubrick appointeth onely part of the first chapter of Saint Matthew and part of the third chapter of Saint Luke to be read whensoever by the kalender or booke those chapters come to be read Whereas the kalender of both bookes appointeth the whole first chapter of Saint Matthew the whole third chapter of Saint Luke to be read vpon divers dayes in the yeare As for example both bookes on the first Sunday after the nativitie appoint the whole first chapter of Saint Matthew to be read for the Gospell Which whole chapter also is appointed by the kalenders of both bookes to be read for the second lesson of morning prayer on the second day of lanuary the third of May and the 31. of August The like is to be observed by the kalenders for the reading of the whole third chapter of Saint Luke for the second lesson at morning prayer vpon the 21. of February the 19. of Iune and the 17. of October But these chapters are no part of the Booke of coÌ„mon prayer and by the Preface before the second part of the Homilies a Minister may for some chapters of the old Testament read some chapters of the New as to him shall seeme to tend more to edification By your leave this your exception seemeth to be but an homelie frivoulous exception For though the chapters bee no part of the booke of common prayer yet be the chapters part of the matter of the common service of the church prescribed by the booke yea and the formall and orderly reading of such and such chapters at such such times is part also of the order and forme of saying the same service Insomuch as neither Mattens nor Evensong in matter forme can be song or said without the chapters be read And as for the preface to the Homilies that by the same the minister is at libertie to leaue some chapters of the old for some chapters of the new Testament for first or second lesson what doeth that helpe the falsification of the parish booke when the same in place of six and twentie or thereabouts of Canonical hath appointed so many of Apocriphall chapters vpon feast dayes to bee read Or how can the Preface exempt a Minister from being punishable before the Kinges Iustices if he shall follow some private preface and breake the Kings publike edict But both bookes agree in many pointes and namely that the Minister in Baptisme shall make a crosse vpon the childes forehead shall say We signe thee with the signe of the crosse c. And therefore how soever the bookes may differ in some moe pointes then are mentioned in the Statute yet cleane to disavow the book of common prayer provided by the Parishioners not to bee the booke of common prayer which the Ministers in their dayly ministâ—atioÌ„ are bound to vse is but a cavill and reproveth the whole state of Prelacie and of the Realme who have received and vsed the same booke ever since the first yeare of our late Queenes Raigne King Henrie the eight writing to the Emperour against the Pope telleth him that a free man ignorant of his freedome doth not therefore become a bondman because ignorantly he submitteth him selfe to servitude No more say we is the State of the Realme lyable to reproofe when having committed the ordering of these affayres to the fidelitie and circumspection of the Clergie it hath bene abused by the Clergie Howsoever the State then of the Realme have received and vsed the booke attayned and gotten by the Parishioners it mattereth not to the point in question For if the Clergie vnwitting to the State have caused or suffered a booke to bee printed and
had without cause devided them selves from the vnitie of the true church of Christ. Whereas in trueth the Church of Rome by hir Apostasie having cut hir selfe from the vnitie and vniversalitie of the doctrine and discipline of the true and mother church of Ierusalem is hir selfe become the most notable and prime sectarist and scismatick of all the world And of whose schismes our Diocesans so farre as they partake with hir can not be but guiltie Vnles then the Diocesans can approve them selves touching their vse of ceremonies and Diocesan governement to stand in vnitie with the true new Ierusalem in these dayes repaired departed from the old scismes and sectes of Rome we assure our selves that they shall never bee able to prove those ministers which stand not in vnitie either of iudgement or practise with them but be conscionably and so lawfully divided in these things from them for such division to be sectaries or scismatickes For it must be an vnlawful discession by inobedience from the vnitie of the first and mother church of Ierusalem and not a lawfull departure vpon conscienc efroÌ„ the vnitie of the daughterâ—church of England that maketh a sect or scisme For otherwise ought not all other Churches stande in vnitie of ceremonies and governement with the church of England or vnlawfully dividing them selves from the church of England must they not become scismatickes sectaries And how then are not almost all the christian and reformed churches in the world not onely almost but altogether scismatickes and heretickes For have they not divided them selves from all those rites ceremonies and ornaments yea from that maner of Diocesan governement which are yet reteyned in the Church of England My Lords I confesse that brevitie and perspicuitie are two commendable graces of the toung and of the penn such as in all mens speeches and writings are much to be affected But yet how long or tedious soever already I have bene I most humbly beseech your Honorable Lordshippes to licence me to passe on one steppe further especially the matter being of such importance as the same may not well bee passed over with silence It hath pleased Sir Edward Cooke Knight his Maixsesties Attornie Generall with all candor and charitie to confirme and satisfie by demoÌ„strative profes all such as were not instructed in these points following First that an ecclesiastical Iudge may punish such Parsons Vicars c. as shall deprave or not observe the booke of common prayer by admonition excommunication sequestration or deprivation other censures and processe in like forme as heretofore hath beene vsed in like cases by the Queenes Ecclesiasticall lawes though the act of primo Eliza had never insflicted any punishment for depraving or not observing the same Secondly seeing the Authoritie of an Ecclesiasticall Iudge is to proceed and to give sentence in ecclesiasticall causes according to the ecclesiasticall law that the Iudges of the common law ought to give faith credit to their sentence and to allow it to be done according to the ecclesiasticall law when the iudge ecclesiasticall hath given sentence in a case ecclesiasticall vpon his proceedings by force of that law For saith he cuilibet in sua arte perito est credendum Now then as these two pointes bee plainly taught and demonstrated vnto vs so also even by the same demonstrative reasons it is cleere that there must be first a depraving or not observing of the booke secondly that every sentence given by an Ecclesiasticall Iudge in a case of depraving or not observing of that booke must be given according to the ecclesiasticall law and vpon his proceedings by force of that lawe in like forme c. From whence it followeth that all sentences touching depravation or not observatioÌ„ of the booke be either voyd sentences by reason of nullitie or no good sentences by reason of iniquitie and iniustice if by the Iudges Ecclesiasticall vpon their proceedings the same sentences have not bene given by force and according to the same lawes in like forme as heretofore hath bene vsed in like cases by the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes or if the factes charged vpon the Ministers by the iudges ecclesiasticall by the letter intendement of the law be no depravations or not observations of the same booke And therefore to the end all questions touching these two poyntes might hereafter vtterly cease and bee quite buried your Lordshipps could not performe a more acceptable service to the King the Church and Realme then by an humble importuning his Maiestie to have it explaned by parliament both who by the letter and true meaning of the Statute bee depravers or not observers of the booke and also what lawes Ecclesiasticall may and of right ought to be called indeed and trueth the Kings Ecclesiastical Lawes For vnlesse aswell touching these pointes as touching the former pointes of Sir Edward Cooks it be throughly decided what is the binding and assured law how should the Ministers or others content and satisfie themselves with an vndoubted trueth And that this maner of controversie about the invaliditie of sentences of deprivation given by ecclesiasticall Iudges is not a controversie now first moved but that the same hath bene long since handled and discussed is a matter yet remayning I doubt not vpon publike record For whereas sentences were given in the tyme of King Edward the sixt for the depriving of Steven Gardener from the Bishoprick of Wincester Bonner from the Bishopricke of London Heath from the Bishoprick of Worcester Day from the Bishopricke of Chester Tunstall from the Bishopricke of Durham Vessay from the Bishopricke of Exeter wherein many grave and learned commissioners were imployed as the Archbishop Cranmer Ridlie Bishop of London Goodrick Bishop of Elie Sir William Peeter and Sir Thomas Smith the Kings Secretaries Sir Iames Hales one of the Iudges of the Law Maister Gosnell Maister Goodrick Maister Lisley Maister Stamford men notably learned in the common lawes of this Realme Mai. Leveson and Mai. Oliver Doctors of the Civill Law nevertheles the same sentences were in the tyme of Queene Mary revoked and disannulled without Perliament within the space as myne Authour sayth of three dayes by vertue of other Commissioners for faultes found in the processes viz. that the former Commissioners had proceeded ex officio without authoritie contrary to the Kings Ecclesiastical Law sometimes quod iuris ordo non fuerit servatus c. sometimes that the Interrogatories were ministred to divers persons without knowledge of the defendants c. sometimes that some of the witnesses were examined privately without oath sometimes that their exceptions and appellations were not admitted but their persons committed to prison pendente appellatione c. And therefore most honorable Lords it is to be considered if the like or greater and more notorious defaultes and enormities bee to bee found in any sentence of deprivation given ex officio by a Diocesan governour at this day whether the same sentence
published which hath but the shew of a booke then as it seemeth hath the Clergie no law but the shewe of a law to enforce the vse of such a booke as the State hath not authorized And therefore we may not for clearing the Clergies iust reproofe confesse an vntrueth and still conceale a kinde of iniustice vnwitting to the State executed by the Cleargie vnder a colour of Iustice as if their iniustice by colour of errour were maintainable by the State For so contrarie to all reason and good duetie which we owe to the state and to the Church we should not only interlace the innocencie of the State with the guiltines of the Cleargie but also mingle the churches industrie with the Clergies ill husbandrie It is therefore no cavill to oppose a iust and true answere to an vntrue and vnsound plea For albeit the two bookes agree in many pointes and specially in mencioning the making of a crosse c. nevertheles the parish booke can not therefore any more truely be counted that booke which is authorised by act of Parliament then can that coyne bee reckoned to be the Kings coyne which hath in it nine partes silver and the tenth part copper nether is it any more lawfull for an ordinary to presse the vse of a booke in it selfe corrupted though in many points it agree with the originall then it is sufferable for the Kings Iustices to enforce the vse of a coyne in it selfe counterfeite though in forme and charactere it be like the Kings Image and superscription Wherefore the mencion made in the parish booke of making of a crosse c. not being a matter of power sufficient to warrant the parish booke but the booke authorised by act of Parliament being a matter of power to warrant the making of a crosse c. wee may iustly avow the booke of common prayer attayned and gotten by the parishioners not to bee that booke which the Ministers in their day he ministration of divine service be bound to vse notwithstanding the making of a crosse and signing the child in the forehead with a crosse be therein mencioned If reply bee made that this plea would but litle ease or advantage the Ministers in case the right booke should be reviewed corrected and new printed we then reioyne and averre First that the day is past long since before which time this worke should have bene refined and that therefore it is now too late without a new law to reviewe and amend the same Secondly that this plea will not only but litle ease and advantage the nullities iniquities and iniustices of sentences heretofore passed by the ordinaries vnder colour of that booke but also much advantage the King and his state if his Maiestie might bee pleased to do as King Ioash king of Iudah or as K. Henry the eighth king of England did king Ioash in or about the beginning of his raigne as it seemeth having appointed the Priestes to take all the silver of dedicate thinges brought to the house of the Lord and therwith to repaire the broken places of the house wheresoever any decay was found and the Priests vntill the three and twentith yeare of his Raigne not having mended that which was decayed nor repayred the ruines of the Temple the king I say because of the Priests negligence commanded the Priests to receive no more money and tooke from them the ordering of the money and committed the same to his Secretary and to Iehoâ—ada the high Priest who gaue the money made ready into the hands of them that vndertooke the worke and that had the oversight of the house of the Lorde of whom there was no reckoning taken because they dealt faithfully If the Priestes then of our age have not only not within three and twentie but not within three and fortie yeares published that booke which is mended and corrected by the Queene her state in the first yeare of her Raigne but also for the space of eight and fortie yeares have suffered a corrupted booke to be intruded into the place of a true booke we commend it to the wisedome of our Soveraigne Lord king IAMES who is as an Angell of God to discerne betweene things that differ there being no high Priest in our dayes like faithfull as was Iehoiada the high Priest in the dayes of king Ioash whether his Maiestie might not be pleased for the redresse of this and other corruptions in the Ecclesiasticall state to appoint as king Henry the eighth did an other Cromwell to be his Maiesties Vicegerent and Vicare generall over the Clergie Vnto these differences and alterations betwene the two bookes not mencioned in the statute may be annexed both an addition of certaine new prayers and some alteration also of the forme of the old prayers to be said after the end of the Letanie By addition in the parish booke there be set three severall prayers not any one of them mencioned in the Kings booke viz. A prayer for our Bishops Curates beginning thus Almightie and everlasting God which only workest great marveilles send downe vpon our Bishops and Curats c. Secondly a prayer out of the 2. of Corint 13. 13. viz. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ c. And thirdly a prayer beginning thus O God whose nature and propertie is ever to have mercie c. And whereas by the forme of King Edwards booke the Letanie should ever end with this collect following viz. Almightie God which hast given vs grace at this time with one accord c. and so this collect should be after the prayers for rayne for faire weather in the time of dearth in the time of warre and in the time of any common plague or sicknes as the time requireth This collect I say by King Edw. booke appointed to be said after all these prayers is by the parish booke set before all these Yea and it is to be said also before the prayer beginning O God whose nature propertie is ever to have mercy By meanes wherof the very forme and order of some prayers appointed in the Kings booke and by the statute commaunded to be vsed and none other or otherwise is so transposed and inverted as that the minister observing the parish booke can not but breake the order and forme of common prayer commanded to be vsed and so can not but cast his body one whole yeares fruites of his benefice vpon the kings Iudges and Iustices mercy Moreover besides these additions and alterations in the end of the Letany of King Edw. booke there is one prayer inserted which by the parish booke is wholy left out namely O God mercifull Father which in the time of Heliseus c. Lastly at the latter end of the communion in the kings book there is one Rubrick concerning kneeling at the communion which Rubrick is not in the parish booke the same beginneth thus Although no order c. There is also one Rubrick among those Rubricks
which are in the parish booke not to be found in the Kinges booke beginning thus And in Cathedrall or Collegiat Churches c. Wherefore the parish booke in so many and materiall poyntes being thus grosly corrupted and no one true original copie provided by the parishioners for the ministers to vse it seemeth to be a very lamentable and wofull case that subscription to a feyned record should bee thus streightly vrged And that so many learned peynfull and godly Ministers for refusing to subscribe or precisely to vse an vnauthenticall scedule should be grieved and molested By what guyle or by whose cunning so foule a stratageme to the deluding of the Queene the Lords and commons in Parliament assombled was first wrought we know not Neither have we any reason to charge any of the Clergie now living with so foule and grosse an abuse Because there is not one of the Clergie to our knowledge living that in the beginning of our late Queenes raigne had ought to medle in Church-government or survey of printing bookes But this we may speake and not speake as we thinke vntruly that some one guilfull priest or other vnwitting to the Queene and State yea and it may be vnwitting to the Clergie too was suffered to shoufle and to set the cardes with the sleight of a false finger For otherwise it could not possibly have come to passe that so many chapters of the Apocryphall writings should be conveyed into the parish booke in steed of so many chapters of the true and authenticall scriptures appointed by K. Edw. booke especially the same chapters in the parish booke as it were of set purpose being ordered to be read when all the people are solemnly assembled togither vpon festivall dayes Wherefore these differences betweene these bookes being apparantlie true and the statute having decreed that the minister shal be bound to say and vse the Mattens Evensong c. in such order and forme as is mencioned in the same booke of King Edward with such alterations and additions as be mentioned in the act none other or otherwise and the parishioners not having atteyned and gotten the saide booke it is a matter that worthily and necessarily requireth the consideration and resolution of the Kings learned Iudges and Iustices Whether a Minister by the letter of the statute be bound exactly and precisely to vse a booke atteyned and gotten by the parishioners the same booke not being authorised by the letter of the statute And if not then whether the Minister by the letter of the statute bee to loose and forfeite to the King one yeares profit of all his spirituall benefices and promotions and his body to suffer imprisonment by the space of six monethes if he shall refuse to vse some part of a booke not authorised For it semeth as yet to vs absurd that a Minister should bee vrged to vse such a booke as for the vse whereof hee hath no authoritie or that he should be punished for refusing the vse of such a booke as for the vse whereof hee is by the law punishable But be it graunted that the very booke authorised and none other is atteyned and gotten by the parishioners for the Minister to vse then is it againe a matter carefully to be weighed and for the ful contentation of the mindes of all persons to be resolved by the Iudges what maner of fact is to be holden and adiudged by the Letter of the Statute to be a breach of the statute and for the which fact a Minister before the Kings Iustices is punishable in maner and forme expeessed in the Act. For the better resolution of which question it shall not be amisse to repeate in this place the first clause of the body of this Statute For in the clause of the repeale of the statute of Queene Mary and reviving the booke of king Edw. it is said that the laid booke shall stande and be in full force and effect according to the tenor and effect of this Statute the tenor and effect of this statute then is to bee noted the wordes whereof are these And further be it enacted by the Queenes Highnes with the assent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by authoritie of the same that all and singular Ministers in any Cathedrall or Parish church c. shall from and after c. be bound to say and vse the Mattens Even song Celebration of the Lords supper and administration of each of the Sacramentes and all their common and open prayer in such order and forme as is mentioned in the said booke so authorised by Parliament in the said fifth sixth yeares of the raign of King Edward the sixth with one alteration or addition of certayne lessons to be vsed on every Sunday in the yeare and the forme of the Letany altered and corrected and two sentences only added in the deliverie of the Sacrament to the communicantes and none other or otherwise Out of which clause one special poynt for the better vnderstanding of the whole tenor and effect of the statute is to be observed Namely that the Parliament hath wholy in this branch omitted and not once mencioned the vse of any rites or ceremonies in saying and vsing the Mattens Evensong celebration of the Lords Supper and administration of each of the Sacramentes So that vnlesse such rites and ceremonies as be mentioned in the book of K. Edw. the sixth be respectively part of the order forme of saying vsing Mattens Euensong celebration of the Lords Supper and administration of each of the Sacramentes c. it can not bee denied but that rites and ceremonies mencioned in that book are secluded out and not comprised within this branch and therefore not commanded by this branch to be vsed The 2. branch of the body of this statute followeth in these words And that if any maner Parson Vicare or other what soever minister that ought or should sing or say common prayer mencioned in the said booke or minister the Sacramentes c. refuse to vse the said common prayers or to minister the Sacramentes c. as hee should vse to Minister the same in such order and forme as they be mencioned and set forth in the said booke or shall wilfully standing in the same vse any other rite ceremonie order forme or maner of celebrating of the Lordes Supper openly or privily or Mattens Evensong administration of the Sacramentes or other open prayers then is mentioned and set foorth in the said booke c. or shall preach declare or speake any thing in the derogation or depraving of the said booke c. shal be therof lawfully convicted according to the lawes of this Realme c. shall loose and forfeite to the Queenes Highnes c. for his first offence the profite of all his spirituall benefices and promotions comming and arising in one whole yeare next after his conviction And also that the Parson so convicted shall for
the same offence suffer imprisonment for the space of sixe monethes without bayle or mainprise Now by the letter of this branch it can not be denied but that foure severall kindes of offences mencioned in the same by what soever minister they shal be committed are every of them punishable alike by one and the self same maner of peyne notwithstanding the offences seeme to be of divers natures One consisting in the refusall of the vse of common prayer an other in the refusall of the administration of the Sacramentes in such order and forme as they be mencioned and set foorth in the said booke A third vpon a wilfull and obstinate standing in the same in vsing some other rite or ceremonie then is mencioned and set foorth in the said booke And a fourth in speaking against or depraving the booke or any part thereof As for the which speaking against or depraving the booke the letter of the Statute seemeth to bee so playne as that no maner scruple can be moved what the minde intendement of the Parliament was about the speakers against or depravers thereof But touching the offence of a Ministers refusing to vse the said cōmon prayers and of his refusing to minister the Sacramentes in such order and forme as they be mencioned set forth in the said booke and wilfully obstinately standing in the same of his vsing any other rite or ceremonie then is mencioned c. these Queres following reallie and properly arise from the letter of the foresaide two former branches For seeing there is no mention at all made of rites and ceremonies in the former branch and seeing also there is no punishment by the second branch mencioned to be inflicted vpon a Minister for the refusall of the vse of rites and ceremonies but onely vpon a wilfull and obstinate standing in the same for the vse of other rites and ceremonies then are mentioned and set foorth in the saide booke it seemeth doubtfull and questionable First Quaere Whether a Minister conscionably refusing to vse some of the rites and ceremonies mencioned and set forth in the saide booke be punishable before the Kings Iustices in maner and forme before expressed vnles wilfully obstinately standing in the same hee shall vse any other rite or ceremonie then is mencioned c. Second Quaere If a Minister that is bound to minister the Sacrament of Batisme doe not refuse to minister the same Sacrament in such order and forme as is mencioned set forth in the said booke but shall in very deed and trueth minister the same Sacrament in such order and forme as is mencioned and set foorth in the said booke whether the same Minister bee punishable before the Kings Iustices in maner and forme before expressed for not making a crosse or not signing the childe in the forehead with a crosse after the sacrament of Baptisme is fully and perfectly ministred For so this sacrament bee ministred in such order and forme and with such rites and ceremonies preceeding baptisme as be mencioned in the said booke and none other rite or ceremony with wilful obstinacie be vsed in the ministration of Baptisme it seemeth cleere by the letter and sense of the Statute that the Minister is not punishable before the Kings Iustices by the peyne of imprisonment c. for omission of the crosse after baptisme For this fact of not crossing after baptisme not being within the letter of the Statute it is absurd to say that the same fact should be punishable by the law when as the same fact is not within but without the compasse scope and letter of the law That this omission of crossing is an omission after the ministration of Baptisme and not an omission of the order forme mencioned to bee in the ministration of Baptisme is made cleere vnto vs by the decree of all the Lordes spirituall and Clergie by the Kings confirmation vnder the great seale of England by the opinion of some great Lawyers Iudges published in open seates of Iustice For this hath ben decreed confirmed and published that the making of a crosse and signing the childe in the forehead with a crosse is no parte of the sacrament of Baptisme and that baptisme is fully and perfectlie ministred without these rites and ceremonies This case then of the omission of the crosse after baptisme being most cleere by such a cloud of witnesses that the same is not an omission of that order and forme appointed to be in the ministration of Baptisme it seemeth to be a thing most cleere that a minister by the letter of the Statute is no more punishable before the Kings Iustices for omission of the Crosse after Baptisme then is any person by the letter of the Statute of Queene Mary punishable by the Kings Iustices for maliciouslie or contemptuously molesting letting vexing or troubling or by any other vnlawful wayes or meanes disquieting or misvsing any Preacher not in but after his sermon preaching or collation Third Quaere Whether a Minister that ought or should say common prayer in any parish Church bee punishable before the Kings Iustices in maner and forme before expressed if he shall not refuse to vse all but shall vse some of the said common prayers in such order and forme as they be mencioned and set forth in the said booke For it is not said in this clause if he refuse to vse all or any of the said prayers but it is saide if the Minister that ought to singe or say common prayer mencioned in the same booke refuse to vse the said common prayers c. If then he observe the order and forme of the booke by saying some of the prayers in that order and forme as they bee mencioned in the booke though hee say not all and singuler the prayers it seemeth by the letter of the statute that he is not punishable before the Kings Iustices Indeed if the booke had appointed but two prayers onely as it hath appointed but two Sacraments only and the Minister in this case should haue refused to say one prayer and only have said the other prayer in this case it seemeth to be without all controversie that hee should have violated the law because the letter of the law sayth if he shall refuse to vse the said common prayers which word prayers being of the plurall nomber must conteyne two prayers at the least Fourth Quaere Whether a Minister that ought or should vse the rites and ceremonies mencioned in the said booke of common prayer be punishable before the Kings Iustices in maner forme before expressed if he shall not refuse to vse all but shall vse some of the said rites and ceremonies in such order forme as they be mencioned and set forth in the said booke For it is not enacted that the Minister shall vse all and every the said rites ceremonies or if he shall refuse to vse any of the saide rites and ceremonies but it is said
or shall wilfully and obstinately standing in the same vse any other rite ceremonie order forme or maner c. By which Letter of the Statute it seemeth that the Minister is none otherwise punishable before the Kings Iustices vnlesse wilfully and obstinately standing in the same hee shall vse some other rite ceremonie order forme or maner of celebrating the Lords Supper then is mencioned c. And vpon this clause as hath bene heretofore generally conceaved certaine inditements exactly framed even by some Iustices of assises sitting vpon the bench against certaine Ministers for the not observation of the booke before other of the Queenes Iustices haue ben traversed and avoyded as being in this point erroneous and not agreeable to the intendement of the statute Yea and it hath bene the opinion of some great Lawyers who have bene since Iudges that it is almost impossible to frame an indightement against a Minister for the breach of the first parte of the former clause of the statute which is not traversable and avoydable Fift Quaere If a Minister bound to say common prayer in any parish church shall not refuse to vse but indeed shall vse the said common prayers in such order and forme as they bee mencioned in the said booke whether he be punishable before the Kings Iustices in maner and forme before expressed if he refuse to say any part chapter or section of the said booke which part chapter of section conteyneth no prayer For howsoever the whole booke be authorised yet the peyne seemeth in this case to have bene inflicted only for the omission of prayer and not for the omission of every part chapter or section of the booke Besides these questions and their reasons there bee other reasons to induce vs to be of opinion that a Minister before the Kings Iustices is not punishable in maner and forme above expressed for his refusing to vse all and every prayer and prayers rite and rites ceremonie and ceremonies section and sections in such order and forme as they bee mencioned and set forth in the said booke In the preface to the booke it is confessed that nothing can almost so plainly be set forth but that doubts may arise in the vse and practising of the same and therefore for the appeasing of all such diversiâ—ie and for the resolution of all doubts concerning the maner how to vnderstand doe and execute the things conteyned in the booke it is provided that the parties that so doubt or diversly take any thing shalresort to the Bishop of the Diocesse who by his discretion shall take order for the quieting and appeasing of the same so that the same order be not contrarie to any thing contained in the said booke And in the two last clauses of the preface it is said that all Priestes and Deacons shall be bound to say daylie the morning evening prayer either privately or openly except they be lett by preaching studying of Divinitie or by some other vrgent cause And that the Curate that ministreth in any parish Church or Chappell being at home and not otherwise reasonably lett shall say the same in the parish Church or Chappell where hee ministreth From which places of the preface being part of the booke it is plainly to be gathered that the intent and meaning of the Parliament was not to have the Ministers to be punished before the Kings Iustices in maner and forme before expressed for refusing to vse all and singuler the prayers rites ceremonies and sections in such order forme as they be mencioned in the said booke if either vpon the Ministers doubts rysing in the vse and practise of these things the Bishop by his discretion did not take order for the quieting and appeasing of the same or if the Minister by preaching the word studying of Divinitie or by some other vrgent or reasonable cause were let so to doe And if no Minister in any of the cases before meÌ„cioned be punishable by the Kings Iustices in maner and forme aboue expressed then it is manifest by the provisoes following that the Archbishops and Bishops have no power and authoritie by vertue of this act to inquire and punish the default of any minister in these cases by admonition excommunication sequestration or deprivation And this not onely by the letter of the last provisoe ordeyned for corroboration of the Archbishops Bishopps and other Ordinaries power and authoritie but also by the provisoe next and immediately following that Provisoe is a matter most cleere and vndeniable Provided alwayes and be it enasted c. That all and singular Archbishops and Bishops c. shall have full power and authoritie by vertue of this Act aswell to inquire in their Visitation Synodes c. to take accusations and informations of all and every the thinges above mentioned done committed or perpetrated within the limites of their Jurisdictions c. And to punish the same by admonition excommunication sequestration or deprivation c. If then a Minister shall not doe commit or perpetrate any of the things above mencioned and so not be punishable by the Kings Iustices it followeth that the same minister is not punishable by the Ordinarie And this also by the next Provisoe is more playne by which it is enacted That What soever person offending in the premises shall for his offence first receyne punishment of the Orainarie shall not for the same offence est soones be convicted before the lustices And likewise receyving for the said first offence punishment by the Iustices he shall not for the same offence est soones receyve punishment of the Ordinarle No offence then punishable before the Iustices no offence punishable by the Ordinarie From all which premises it seemeth that the Queene the Lords and Commons never intended to impose such an exact and precise observation of the booke of common prayer vpon the Ministers as that in no place nor at any tyme they should omitt the reading saying or vsing of a chapter a prayer a section a rite or ceremonie vpon peyne of imprisonment c. before the Queenes Iustices or vppon peyne of deprivation before the ordinary And therefore the intent of the Parliament not beeing so much to binde the Minister to such an exact and precise observation as to seclude all orders and formes of prayers ministration of Sacramentes vse of rites and ceremonies not mentioned and set forth in the saide booke it seemeth very vnreasonable and much derogatorie to the authoritie of that Parliament that Archbishoppes and Bishoppes who were all secluded from that Parliament should by their extentions constructions and interpretations as it were invert the playne meaning of the Parliament and that ea qua sunt destinata in vnum sinem should by them bee converted to an other end But now if the Archbishops and Bishops at the abandoning of the Popes power out of the Realme have as we confesse they had an ordinarie iurisdiction by the statutes of the Realme reserved to their
of this act Now by what other words then by these of this provisoe could the Parliament more fully and clearly have expressed their mind that the same by the tenor and effect of this provisoe intended for ever wholy to seclude all Papall and foraine canons from being vsed and executed within this Realme For at the petition and submission of the clergie the Parliament having first enacted that neither they nor any of them from thencefoorth should presume to attempt alleadge clayme or put in vre any constitutions o◠ordinances Provincionall or Synodalles or any other Canons And againe at the petition and submission of the Clergie the same Parliament having committed to the view search examination and iudgement of the King and 32. persons such Canons constitutions and ordinances or the said Canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall and Synodall which as thertofore had bene made by the Clergie of this Realme And lastlie by this proviso the same Parliament having enacted that such Canons provinciall constitutions provinciall ordinances provinciall Synodalls Provinciall for the word Provinciall by the whole tenor and effect of this Act can not in this place but have reference to everie of these wordes shall still be vsed and executed c. till such tyme as they be viewed searched or otherwise ordered and determined by the said two thirtie persons c. Seeing these things I say be thus First submitted then afterwards committed and lastly provided and not one word sillable or lotter ayming at the continuance vse keeping or obedience of the popish canon law it can not bee averred by any vnlesse he be too too conceited opiniative that the Canon law or any part thereof made by the Pope without the Realme may lawfully at this day be attempted alleadged claymed or put in vre within the Realme by any Iudge Ecclesiasticall what soever yea and thus much also is confirmed by a statute 37. H. 8. c. 17. Howsoever therefore the Kings of England deryving their Ecclesiasticall Lawes from others being proved approved and allowed hereby and with a generall consent are rightly and aptly called the Kings Ecclesiasticall lawes of Englande in like maner as those lawes which the Normans borrowed from England were called the lawes of Normandie and as those lawes which the Romans fetching from Athens being allowed and approved by that state were called Ius ciuile Romanorum howsoever I say this be true nevertheles herevpon it will not follow that those Ecclesiasticall lawes thus borrowed and derived from others may then any more rightly and aptly be called the Kings Ecclesiasticall lawes of Englande when once by and with a generall consent in Parliament they have bene disproved and disallowed Yea and when also they have bene vtterly adnulled and commanded never to be put in execution within the Realme of England From whence it seemeth to follow that whatsoever subiect shall take vpon him full and plenarie power to deliver iustice in any cause to any the Kinges subiects or to punish any crime and offence within the Kings Dominions by vertue of those lawes once by so absolute high an authoritie disanulled that the same person denyeth the Parliament to have full power to allow and disalow lawes in all causes to all the Kinges subiects and consequently that the high Court of Parliament is not a compleat Court for the whole and intyre body of the Realme Wherefore albeit we graunt as the trueth of the Kings law is vnto the Archbishops Bishops other Ordinaries that lawfully they may proceede to inquire in their visitations and Synodes and els where to take accusations and informations of all and every thing and things above mencioned done committed and perpetrated within the limites of their iurisdictions and authoritie and to punish the same by admonition suspension sequestration or deptivation though thus much had never bene provided by the statute nevertheles we desire to be resolved whether any minister ought to bee punished by these or any other censures and processe before the ordinarie for any offence mencioned in this act if for the same offence the same Minister by vertue of this act be not punishable before the Kings Iustices And therefore for example sake put this case viz. That a Minister for the not crossing of a childe vpon the forehead after baptisme is fully administred be indighted before some of the kings Iustices and afterward vpon a traverse before some other of the kings Iustices the same Minister be found to have ministred the same sacrament of Baptisme in such order and forme as in the booke is prescribed Notwithstanding the omission of this ceremonie after baptisme and that vpon such a traverse the indightment before the said second Iustices be found to be vnsufficient in law and the Minister by the same Iustices be adiudged not to be in danger of the penaltie of imprisonment c. because his such not crossing is no offence against the law we demand we say in this case whether the same Minister by the Bishops of the Diocesse may be suspended or deprived from his ministerie or from his benefice for the same his not crossing yea or no. Considerations against the deprivation of a Minister for the not vse of a Surplice in divine service IN the whole body of the statute there is not one syllable or letter frō the which any semblance of reason can be deduced that any Minister of the church for refusing to vse or for the not vsing of any ornament appointed by the statute or by the book to bee in vse should be punished with the peyne of deprivatiō For what soever punishment a Minister for the breach of the Statute may sustayne by the kings Iustices the same is only to be imposed for such offences as are specified before the last provisoe of the statute Ornamentes therfore of the church provided to be reteyned and to be in vse being not cōteyned in those premises or things mencioned before the second provisoe concerning the Archbishops and Bishops authoritie and for refusing whereof a Minister by the premises is punishable it followeth there being no punishmēt for refusing the vse of ornaments in the last provisoe that the not vse of ornamentes is not punishable before the kings Iustices And if there be no punishment appointed to be inflicted before the kings Iustices for the refusing to vse any ornament thē much lesse is there any punishment to be inflicted for the refusall of the vse of a Surplice For the Surplice is so farre from being commanded to be worne as an ornament in every service of the church as the same is not so much as once particularly mencioned either in the parish booke or in the statute Nay by the generall wordes both of the statute and the booke the Surplice is wholy secluded from being appointed to be an ornament of it selfe in some part of the service of the Church For if with the same in some part of the service there be not a Cope
provided to bee worne the Surplice may not be worne For the better manifestation whereof it is necessary that we set downe the wordes of the Statute of the parish booke and of the booke of the second of K. Edw. the sixth vnto which booke of king Edward for the vse of ornaments the Ministers be referred both by the parish booke statute of 1. Eliza. c. 2. the wordes of which statute are these Provided alwayes and be it enacted That such ornamentes of the Church and of the Ministers shall be retayned and be in vse as was in the church of England by authoritie of Parliament in the second yeare of the raigne of King Edward the 6. vntill other order shal be therein taken by authoritie of the Queenes Matestie with the advise of her Commissioners appointed and authorised vnder the great seale of England for causes Ecclesiasticall or of the Metropolitane of this Realme Thus farre the statute the wordes of the parish booke follow It is to be noted that the Minister at the time of the Communion and other times in his ministration shall vse such ornamentes in the Church as were in vse by authoritie of Parliament in the second yeare of King Edw. the sixth according to the act of Parliament in that case enacted and provided The wordes of which booke of the second of King Edward are these Vpon the day and at the time appointed for the ministration of the holy Communion the Priest that shall execute the holy ministerie shall put vpon him the vesture appointed for that ministration that is to say A white Albe playne with a vestiment or cope Afterward it is said thus Vpon Wensdayes and Fridayes the English Letany shal be said or song c. And though there he none to communicate with the Priest yet those dayes after the Let any ended the Priest shall put vpon him a playne Albe or Surplice with a Cope and say all things at the Altar c. From all which places it is plaine First that no Minister at any time vpon Wensdayes and Fridayes after the Letany ended was bound simplie to weare a surplice at the Altare for it was in his choyse to put vpon him a playne Albe or Surplice with a Cope Secondly that no Priest vpon the day and at the time appointed for the Ministration of the holy communion might put vpon him a Surplice but only a white Albe playne with a vestiment or Cope Thirdly that no Minister vpon Wensdayes and Fridayes when hee read the Letany did weare or was bound to weare an Albe or Surplice and Cope For it had bene in vayne and a thing ridiculouse for the booke to have willed the Minister after the Letany ended to put vpon him those ornamentes if in the time of reading the Letany hee had had them vpon his backe Fourthly that no minister at or in any of the times services aforesaid is bound to put vpō him a Surplice vnlesse therewithall he weare a Cope For the vse of ornamentes ought to be according to the act of Parliament And therefore where no Cope there by the act no Surplice where no Altar to goo vnto after the Letany ended there no Surplice to be put on after the Letany where a Communion with a white Albe plaine a vestiment or Cope there a cōmunion without a Surplice There is yet one other speciall observation before touched though for an other purpose worthy to be reiterated in this place against the vse of the Surplice at the communion reading the Letany and saying prayers at the Altar And that is this Namely for that as well the Statute 1. Eliza. as the parish booke hath revived and commaunded the vse of those ornamentes according to the Act of Parliament 2. Edw. 6. which were repealed and forbidden by the booke of the 5. and 6. of King Edward the sixth It is to be noted saith the booke of 5. and 6. of King Edw. 6. That the Minister at the time of the communion and all other times in his ministration shall vse neither Albe vestiment nor Cope but being an Archbishop or Bishop he shall have and weare a Rochet and being a Priest or Deacon he shall have and weare a Surplice only And here it is to be noted sayeth the parish booke that the Minister at the time of the communion and at all other tymes in his ministration shall vse such ornamentes in the church as were in vse by Authoritie of Parliament in the 2. yeare of the reigne of King Edw. the 6. according to the Act of Parliament in that case made and provided which were as the booke of K. Edw. saith an Albe with a vestiment or Cope at the communion and an Albe or Surplice with a Cope vpon Wensdayes and Fridayes after the Letany ended But by the Provinciall constitutions ratified and confirmed by Act of Parliament the parishioners are enioyned at their costes and charges to provide a Surplice and in vayne were this charge layde vpon them if so be the Minister were not bound by the law to weare it It is true and can not be denied that all parishioners are enioyned and that every Masse-priest is bound by the Provincials the one sorte to provide the other to weare a Surplice for and at the celebration of the Masse and for and in the vse of other popish services The reason of the vse of which Surplice by the popish Glosers and Provincials is yeelded to be this That the Priest must be clothed with white to signifie his innocencie and puritie and also ob reverentiam Salvatoris nostri totius caelestis curiae quam sacramento altaris consiciendo confecto non est dubium interesse But how doeth it follow either from the provincall or reason of the provinciall that a Minister of the Gospell is bound by the provinciall to weare a Surplice at the ministration of the word and Sacraments of the Gospell when the doctrine and service of the Gospell is contrarie and repugnant to the service and doctrine of the Masse And when by the statute the Provinciall is not to be vsed and executed but as it was vsed and executed before the making of the statute which was Anno 25. of King Henry the eight at what time the service of the Masse called the Sacrament of the Altar was only in request A Minister therefore of the Gospell by the Provinciall is no more bound to weare a surplice then by the Provincials other lawes of the Realme he is bound to say a Masse For the Provinciall appointeth a surplice to bee worne at the Masse and other idolatrous services all which services and which Masse as being blasphemous to the sacrifice of our Saviour Christ once made vpon the crosse repugnant to the holy worship of God is abrogated by the lawes of the Realme Now then it were to bee wished that all states were given to vnderstand by what equitie law or good conscience
soever they should have grounds and causes so to doe Mary since when as the Discipline and governement provinciall diocesan ministred and exercised by the late Archbishop deceased and his Suffraganes was diversly handled disputed and controverted not to be agreeable but repugnant to the holy Scriptures necessarie also for the repressing of vice the increase of faith and Christian religion to be changed they herevpon iustly fearing that the most vertuous Christian Queene deceased vpon sundry cōplaints made in open Parliament against their many vniust greevances would have reformed the same their maner of governement they then presently vpon new advise and consulation taken boldly and constantly avouched the same their governement to have bene from the Apostles times and agreeable to the holy scriptures and therefore also perpetuall and still to be vsed in no case to be altered by any king or Potentate whatsoever By meanes of which this their enclyning to the popish opinion and holding their Iurisdictiō to bee de iure divino professedly mainteyning in the Homilie wherevnto also subscription is vrged that the King and all the Nobilitie ought to be subiect to excommunication there is now at length growne such a mayne position of having a perpetuall Diocesan and Provinciall governement in the church that rather then their Hierarchie should stoope they would cause the Kings Supremacie which he hath over their said Iurisdiction to fall downe to the ground In so much as by their supposition the King hath no authoritie no not by his supreame power to alter their sayd governement at all And to this end and purpose as it seemeth in their late canons have they devised and decreed this booke of ordination to be subscribed vnto Which subscription can not but quite and cleane overthrow the Kings supremacie and auncient iurisdiction in the most dangerous degree For if their Provinciall and Diocesan orders and degrees of Ministerie together with their iurisdiction be to bee vsed as established and derived vnto them by the holy scriptures how then can it be in the power and iurisdiction of the King to graunt or not to graunt the vse of Provinciall and Diocesan Bishopisme and iurisdiction Or how may the provinciall Bishops with their Diocesan Suffraganes be called the kings ecclesiasticall officers if their iurisdictions be not derived vnto them from the king For if they be called Gods Bishops or Bishops of Gods making how then may they anie more be called the kings Bishops or Bishops of the kings presenting nominating and confirming Nay besides who then can alter them who can restreyne them who can revoke or recall their power and iurisdiction who can resist them or what king of England may pluck his neck from vnder their yoke Nay how should the kings Supremacie as by the ancient Lawes of the Realme it ought remayne inviolable when his Royall person whole Nobilitie and Realme is subiect and lyable to the censure of the canon Law excommunication Which law the Provinciall and Diocesan Bishops to this day in right and by vertue of their Provinciall and Diocesan iurisdiction and none otherwise do stil vse practise and put in execution Besides if Bishops Provinciall and Diocesan as they be described in that book be commanded in the Scriptures and were in vse ever since the Apostles times then ought they to be in the Church of England though the King and his law never allowed nor approved of them But to hold this opinion as it will vphold the Popes supremacie because the generall reasons which vphold a Provinciall Bishop will vphold a Pope so will it once againe not only impeach the Kings supremacie but also be repugnant to the lawes and customes of the Realm By which supremacie lawes and customes only the provinciall diocesan Bishops have bene hitherto vpheld For seing the lawes and customes of the Realme doe make the Kings nomination presentation and confirmation the very essence and being of a Provinciall Diocesan Bishop with vs So that these offices ought to be held only from the authoritie gift and graunt of the King how ought not the kings nomination presentation authoritie and gift yea and the law it self in this case wholy cease if the order degree ministerie and iurisdiction of a provinciall and diocesan Bishop be founded in holy Scripture Vnlesse we shall affirme that that was in the Apostles times which was not or that that is to be found in holy Scripture which is not Namely that there were in the Apostles times and that there be in the holy Scriptures no Bishops but provinciall and dioceasan Bishops to bee found And that by the law of God and the Gospell every King and Potentate hath supreme power to suffer none but Provinciall Diosan Bishops to be in the Churches So that by subscription to allow that provinciall and Diocesan Bishops be Scripturely Bishops and that their iurisdiction and power is a Scripturely iurisdiction and power is to deny that their iurisdiction and power dependeth vpon the kings iurisdiction and power or that by the kings gift and authoritie they be made Bishops But how doeth subscription you will say to the booke of ordination approve the orders and degrees of provinciall diocesan Bishops to be by Divine right rather then by humane ordinance How Why thus it is evident saith the preface of that booke to all men diligently reading holy Scripture and ancient Authors that from the Apostles times there have bene these orders of Ministers in Christes Church Bishops Priests and Deacons Yea and by the whole order of prayer and of Scripture read vsed in the forme of consecrating of an Archbishop or Bishop it is apparant that the order of an Archbishop or Bishop consecrated by that booke is reputed taken to be of Divine institution And therfore seing the names of those orders of Ministers must necessarily be taken and vnderstood of such orders of Ministers as be sett forth and described in the body of that booke it must needes be intended that the Ministers by their subscription should approve the orders of Ministers mencioned in that booke to be of Divine institution and consequently that provinciall and diocesan Ministers or Bishops have not their essence and being from the nomination gift authoritie of the King Besides if we should vnderstand by the word Bishop him that hath the Ministrie of the word and Sacraments as the Pastor teacher and by the word Priest the Presbiter that is the Governing elder and by the word Deacon the provider for the poore then for the Ministers to subscribe to the booke of ordination would no way iustifie those officers or degrees of Ministers which are described in that booke but would indeed vtterly subvert and overthrow them Because the orders and degrees of a provincial diocesan Bishop of a Priest and Deacon mentioned in that booke be of a farr differing nature from those orders and degrees of Ministers which are mencioned