of all Offences committed in the County of Middlesex in consideration of our Duty and in obedience to the Directions given us by Mr. Justice Rookeby in his Charge do humbly present that We find by daily experience that several great and fundamental Articles of the Christian Religion as they are professed by the Church of England and contained in the 39 Articles and established as the Avowed Doctrine of the Church of England by several Acts of Parliament are not only disputed and questioned but absolutely denyed and particularly the Doctrine of the Trinity of the Divinity of Christ and of the Divinity of the Holy Ghost and Books are daily writ printed and published either directly contrary to the said Doctrine or by consequence in opposition to them denying all the Mysteries of the Christian Religion and resolving all into such Notions as are to be made good by Humane Reason and thereby making void the whole revealed Religion and destroying the Necessity of Faith in order to Eternal Salvation by means whereof Arianism Socinianism Atheism and Deism do greatly abound and there are Proselytes to the same daily made to the great Scandal of the Church of England and the Orthodox Members thereof For preventing of which for the future We do present that all care possible ought to be taken for the speedy discovering of all such Books as are so writ printed or published contrary to the known Doctrine of the Church of England and the Authors Printers and Publishers of the same and for punishing the Authors Printers and Publishers thereof according to the utmost severity of the Laws and for the suppressing all such Books of that kind as are already printed and for preventing the printing any more for the time to come And we do farther present that a Book Entitled Christianity not Mysterious or a Treatise shewing That there is nothing in the Gospel contrary to Reason or above it and that no Christian Doctrine can be properly called a Mystery supposed to be written by one Mr. Toland And also another Book Entitled The Reasonableness of Christianity as delivered in the Scriptures And also one other Book Entitled The Lady's Religion in a Letter the Honourable the Lady Howard are Books fit to be suppressed and the Authors Printers and Publishers of the same ought to have such Punishment inflicted on them as by the Laws of the Land they may Item We present a Pamphlet lately published Entitled A Letter to a Convocation-Man concerning the Rights Powers and Privileges of that Body to be Scandalous and against the Constitution of the Government and ought to be suppressed and the Author punished Now ye may see by the Agreement of this Presentment with the things contained in my Epistle and Preface to which 't is posteriour how in what I said or did I was not in the wrong nor out of the way I faithfully give it as it is without changing Words or altering the Sense as some of you have done of some of your Citations out of my Papers ye are always sure to give the worst Construction of Words and Things like Spiders ye turn all things into Poison about which besides what I already observed I shall on the way take notice of one thing more when I say no Soldier in an Enemy's Country ought to struggle out of the way c. for he that doth so ventures to be knocked on the head you put in ought instead of ventures is this fairly done Certainly 't is a great difference between saying a Man runs the hazard of being knocked and he ought to be knocked on the head so if I should but write or speak Reason you with adding one Letter would soon make it Treason and if you write or speak Treason with taking off one Letter you can soon make it Reason this is said to shew your Partiality As to what follows in the same Page and the next after about Dr. Sh against his Antagonist as against me I shall not trouble my head about it only God forgive and give you Grace to mend I see all that have any thing to do with this Man or lye in his way and are not of his mind must prepare for the like usage but I say I do not concern my self about Persons so much as about the Cause and therefore whosover would in the Godhead set up three Spirits and Substances is in my opinion fallen into a fundamental Heresie and whosoever is against such in that same thing I join with because I always love to be for the Truth In what follows I desire the Reader to take notice of the Man's want of Sincerity As well as I he knows we are not and cannot be agreed upon the very Terms he sets down for they contain the quintessence of their Error about the Holy Trinity for Sirs ye would have Jesus Christ to be not a Person but only an Attribute as the Wisdom of God so the Holy Ghost to be only the Vertue and Power of God and not an Hypostasis a Person of the Godhead for tho' one of you saith that for Peace-sake ye submit to the Phrase of the Church that is to the name Person yet ye interpret it not as the Church doth Therefore tho' you say the Vnitarians the Catholick Church the Translator and I are at perfect Agreement and tho' we agree in the Oneness of the Godhead or of one Divine Nature and to make use of your words that there is One Infinite Spiritual Substance yet we are far from agreeing with you in what follows with three Properties unbegotten begotten and proceeding c. except ye explain your meaning otherwise than ye use to do Arius under a word which if well taken might be harmless enough sheltered his Error so 't is usual with you ye are meerly for Words but we do besides Words look for Things and would have such Words as are proper as much as may be to signifie the Things Now your threefold distinction of Original Mind reflex Wisdom and Divine Love may be sufficient to represent what you mean thereby but not what we believe We make a distinction between the Property and the Person of the Godhead but you do confound them and would have it to be but one and the same Now if with us you will say that in one and most simple Nature of God are three distinct Persons to whom the infinite and singular Nature of one only God is common and that these three distinct Persons the Attributes of that one God do belong to then you say something to the purpose or else like the Gibeonites you come in to us only to deceive us We assert three Persons and not barely three Properties in the Godhead we say the Father is a Person the Son a Person and the Holy Ghost a Person and so three Persons but we don't say the Father is an Attribute the Son an Attribute and the Holy Ghost an Attribute thereby of three Persons to make
THE Epistle and Preface To the BOOK against the Blasphemous Socinian Heresie VINDICATED And the CHARGE therein against Socinianism made Good In ANSWER to TWO LETTERS By J. GAILHARD Gent. Hinc Drances Thersites inde If any teach otherwise and consent not to wholsom words even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the Doctrine which is according to Godliness He is proud knowing nothing but doting about questions and strifes of words whereof cometh envy strife railings evil surmisings Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth supposing that gain is godliness From such withdraw thy self 1 Tim. vi 3 4 5. LONDON Printed for J. Hartley over-against Grays-Inn-Gate in Holborn 1698. AN ANSWER TO Two Letters HAving lately publish'd a Book against the present great grievance of the Nation in Matters of Religion Socinianism I mean and knowing how the Pen-men of that Party are now fallen in a course of writing from time to time against what comes out in Opposition to them I indeed looked for an Answer but thought they would have gone about to refute my Arguments as 't is the usual way of those who follow the School Rules but I therein find my self disappointed and am apt to believe that these Men do so far depend upon what their great Masters have done as to think they now may sit still under the shadow of their Works for It is plain say they that the most polite and rational Modern Sermons and other Moral Discourses are extreamly beholden to Socinus his Works Yet instead of what I expected out comes from behind the Curtain and in disguise one of those Fancies which our Ideists are so fond of under the name of An Apology for the Parliament c. and this in Two Letters by different Hands I must need fear what will become of me But Sirs it is not in you the part of generous Enemies tho' to support a weak Cause to come Two against One yet for what they have done 't is no matter for Truth and I against any two or twenty such Hands And the Truth now in question tho' they would have driven it into Corners hath gotten the upper-hand and is so strongly settled that it hath disheartened its Adversaries from making any attempt upon it and they have chosen to meddle with other things and leave that untouched This Answer no Answer this Apology or Two Letters having been sent me down into the Country I fell on perusing of them to see what they contained as to Matters in question and the Cause in hand but 't was not to be found and so I concluded it to be lost among them hardly any Steps thereof being left only instead of it I lighted upon Reflections and Invectives which that sort of Men are full of and very free to bestow against the Author of the Book they fly off from the Point and avoid coming to discuss it What Notion of theirs can this way of deciding Controversies be grounded upon No Answer in the least to any of my Arguments tho' I had given them a large Field They being a People not usually Mute may not I reasonably infer that seeing upon things in question they say nothing then they have nothing to say and so yield the Cause if not positively yet by a good Consequence thus they save me the trouble to refute any thing or to add to what I said upon the Matter tho' about it I have many more things to say The Author of the First Letter gives a convincing and short Reason why he Answers none of my Arguments I thought you an unfit Writer on behalf of the Trinity and therefore did not so much as read over your Book tho' in another place he saith I have dipp'd into it here and there and have staged it over This is magisterially enough decided but there is in such Decisions more Mercury than Salt You say I am an unfit writer upon those Matters and yet you did not so much as read over my Book this is wisely and learnedly spoken 't is an unanswerable Argument but if you had given any for me to answer I might well have desired the Reader by this Paw of yours to have judged of the Lion how great a Logician you are to draw Conclusions out of Premises But what would ye have done if there had been no Epistle nor Preface to carp at Then 't is likely you would have taken no notice of my Book or else why do ye leave the Principal for the Accessary Such a Carriage gives me cause to suspect that seeing you take no notice of it you look upon 't as a Morsel of too hard a digestion for your Stomach therefore you meddle not with it ye Answer it not but Invectives against the Author must do the work for indeed whilst in these Letters I was seeking for what I could not find I found what I was not looking for soft Words and hard Arguments from Men who would seem to have engross'd all Reason unto themselves I sought for but found very soft Arguments if any at all yet hard Words Truly Sirs to Answer in your own way I could almost say I have happen'd to tread upon a Nest of Wasps so had cause to expect some of them would come out Buzzing about my Ears that 's all the harm they can do me if they intend any thing more then I hope they lost their Point and missed their Aim I think that what I said to prove my Assertions might in some degree have been taken notice of but seeing they have no mind to meddle with nor remove the Weight there let it ly for me yet tho' as to the Matter they offer'd nothing to Answer rather than to be altogether silent we must turn to what they otherwise have started up tho' not belonging to the Subject of my Book They act like those who shot at a Man from behind a Hedge and so think they may with safety to themselves wound their Enemy who cannot well close up with them for they with being nameless and in their holes have taken sufficient care to provide against it and none can swear against them Ye are the Men However because such Men would call one dumb who should say nothing to their Imputations and Misconstructions tho' never so groundless I shall by the grace of God take notice of most things in the Letters and therein hope to clear my self of their Aspersions also to demonstrate how they are guilty of some things which they would charge me with or of the same nature and I shall examine what here and there they say about Matters in question Sometimes I shall Answer both Letters together in those things which tend to the same purpose and at other times asunder and as I shall see cause however I shall not do 't in order but here and there according as I light upon the things in the Letters which I intend to examine one after another
I said the Enemy and Plague of Socinianism was gotten into the Bowels of the Church the more the Pity and therefore seeing they will not hide themselves for shame here I do humbly desire the Heads and Governours of it to take notice of Socinians boasting to be Members of the Church and care to weed them out Good Lord Men who overthrow the first Article of our Religion of one God in three Persons and the second of two Natures in one Person besides others the Athanasian Creed the the first part of the Litany with several others of the Service Book yet they have the face to call themselves Members of the Church However 't is worth the inquiring into what they ground upon their calling themselves Members of the Church we already have taken notice of one place wherein speaking of themselves in the third Person they say For Peace sake they submit to the Phrase of the Church and own three Persons so they seem not to be much concerned for the Truth to know whether what they or we say be true but they take care of their Safety being as they pretend alarm'd with fear of Fire and Faggot and to save their Bacon therefore I am apt to believe that what they say in relation to this is more out of fear of Punishment than of love for Truth however for Peace sake they are Members of the Church but to dive into the bottom of this Title of theirs of being Members of the Church two Places I am to look into the first is this As for those late English Writers sometimes called Unitarians and very injuriosly termed Socinians they seem desirous to wash their hand of it and their disputing some of the Articles of our Church hath proceeded chiefly from their Apprehension that it would be Idolatry to admit them Thus still under disguise and of a third Person they are those late English Writers who call themselves Vnitarians who seem desirous to wash their hand of Socinianism so 't is only seemingly and in appearance for else what could make them tooth and nail concern themselves so much for Socinians let it be taken notice of how these pretended Members of the Church confess that they disputed some of the Articles of it and these are none of the less fundamental which they suspected as leading into Idolatry and therefore they would not admit them See what Members of the Church these are who publickly and in Print own that some of the Articles of the Church do tend to Idolatry doth not this very thing deserve Punishment according to Law and to justifie their disputing of some of the Articles they would infinuate as if the Church or some part of it had owned they were in the right Therefore upon the prudent Explication which hath been given he doth not name by whom of some obnoxious Terms they wave the Dispute and come in as Brethren This is as good as to say that in our Articles those that are the most Fundamental are in terms justly obnoxious that is to their Cavils And to shew they had cause to take Exceptions an Interpretation hath according to their Sense been given those Articles and so upon their own Terms they are come in as Brethren if they are come in then they were out before and so no Members Thus it seems they had Correspondency in the Church with some who as they term it prudently made way for them to come in Now doth not this Confession justifie what in my Epistle I said Socinianism is gotten into the Church and consequently shew a necessity to turn it out Thus having as he thinks twisted Socinians with the Church he most judiciously draws this Inference and Ironically bids me defiance I hope Mr. Gailhard will not in anger against them impute Idolatry to our Church as by Law established Can any thing in relation to the Church be spoken more insolently in the face of the whole Nation A strange thing indeed tho' nothing may seem strange from Men whose Principles allow them to say and make themselves any thing Like the grievous Wolves which in Sheeps Clothing enter in among the Flock not to feed but to tare it to deceive the blind they come in with Esau's Hands but the Voice is Jacob's yet being known should bring a Curse upon themselves But 't will be strange indeed if such ones be once found out having under the cloak of taking Care of Souls Poisoned them be not cast out by Suspension or Deprivation according to the severity of the Penal or at least of the Ecclesiastical Laws Upon this occasion the Eyes of the whole Nation are fixed upon my Lords the Bishops The other Place which I must take into consideration is this He tells us speaking of me that to deny the Trinity and our Saviours Divinity is as much as in a Man lieth to pull our Religion up by the very roots and quite to overthrow it which saith he that the Socinians do he takes it for granted That they deny the Trinity and Christ's Deity 't is done in the face of the Sun and that these Points are the Foundation of Christian Religion no true Christian will deny and my Inference is good that pulling down the Foundation the Building doth necessarily fall Yet according to the usual way he would mince the matter thus Yet those who are injuriously called Socinians declare that they only dispute some unscriptural Terms with us but are well satisfied with the Sense put upon those Terms and Explications which a considerable majority seem to be agreed in They cannot leave off the ridiculous juggling in their change of Persons for they are those called Socinians who dispute with us that is with themselves so they act both parts put the Question and answer it be the Socinian and Church-men too but the worst is they want Sincerity that whilst they indeed are the Socinian yet would pass for the Church-men Besides they would have the Dispute to be only about Words and so of no Importance thus whether there be Three Persons in the most adorable Trinity and whether the Lord Jesus and the Holy Ghost be truly God they make it to be a Dispute only about a Word and a Trifle What a Confidence is it for such Men so publickly to vent their Impieties Thereupon they declare to be satisfied upon this ground that a considerable Majority of the Church seem to be agreed with them in their Sense so according to this a considerable Majority of the Church is become Socinian Let him that can believe this for my own part I am not so Credulous however I humbly desire of the Church especially of that lesser part which this Man owneth not to be Socinian to mind what he saith so openly and to take it into their serious Consideration I bring it to their Door and there leave it They are highly concerned to take in hand their own Cause as 't is now become I have done
Rhetorick sallying into sundry Metaphors as he speaks of and he adds One or two now and then with wondrous Confidence and manly Resolution would bolt out upon the open Plains of Natural Reason but they were quickly forced to shelter not being able to bear the brightness and warmth of the Meridian Sun which illuminates and gives light to those Plains these are high Fancies and true Bombast if any thing be so surely the Man hath read Don Quixot This People who condemn in others something of Metaphors allow it to the full themselves as being privileged Persons who may say and do what they please and all is well But alas all these opposers of Socinianism were but Fools for their pains especially those who would talk of Reason with them who are the great Masters of it and could not stand before them but-were sent to School with a Rod upon their Back and all this depth of Learning height of Fancy closeness of Reasoning brightness of Eloquence and clearness of Stile are set in form of a Triumphal Cant yet for all this for greater security he still runs under the shelter for after he hath talk'd of some of our old School Terms of which we had no great opinion our selves whether we will or not this Man is always among us and kept them only because we could get no better but then the wisest of our Doctors explained them to a very honest Sense Speak said one formerly that I may know thee so this People are known by their talk but still I say our Man runs to the shelter when he saith Oxthodox with us who are the majority of the Church which if it was true as 't is not would be but to follow the Multitude to believe and do Evil. Something he would be picking out against my Citation out of the Book of The Reformation of Ecclesiastical Laws wherein without passing Sentence as he pretends I do I humbly offer a Precedent of what was formerly done in like cases And suppose the Book had been written before Socinus was born yet it may reach him and his Opinions as for instance when a Law is enacted it doth reach those who break it tho' born never so long after and we know a Law can be broken in several ways nay sometimes Laws are made not only to restrain present Crimes but also to prevent others to come for 't is the prudence of the Law-giver not only to punish Evils in being but also to prepare a remedy against those which may happen therefore if Socinians in the Land do any thing forbidden by some Law tho' never so old if unrepealed they are liable to the Penalty of it The Law doth more directly regard Things than Persons When the Law makes a thing to be Treason which was not so before yet whosoever hereafter tho' unborn when the Law was enacted commits it is no doubt by that Law guilty of Treason this truth one may know without Prophetick Inspiration As to what I add out of King Edward's Letter to Archbishop Cranmer c. how according to the Power Form and Effect of a certain Act of Parliament in the Third Year of his Reign he had appointed them to compile his Ecclesiastical Laws his wresting and unfaithfully representing the thing is clear and palpable for he would make my Observation thereupon how in those Laws there is something of a Parliamentary Authority because he saith he hath chosen them by virtue of an Act of Parliament in the Third Year of his Reign to be gainsaid by my next words by him misquoted thus That something wants a Parliamentary Stamp when they are thus and if there be any thing wanting it lieth in your power to set a Parliamentary Stamp upon 't he relates them Absolutely and I Conditionally with an if I take it to be good Sense to say There is already something of a Parliaments Authority and in case there be any thing wanting this present Parliament may supply it if they please It is great pity that this spoils his Witty Jest in that place of a Something that 's just as good as Nothing I shall have a farther tryal of their misrepresenting things I find they are not so much concerned as to what the Gospel saith about Matters in dispute as they are about what the Law saith when it reaches their Persons threaten them with a Parliament and they are more concern'd than if you would set the whole Bible in order against them Therefore they are nettled with the Fourth Canon directly pointed at them by name of the Ecclesiastical Constitutions by both Convocations in 1640 and by King Charles the First straightly enjoyned and commanded to be diligently observed and executed The King is Supreme Head of the Church within his Dominions by virtue of that Supremacy King Charles of his own voluntary Act and without any violence or compulsion set upon them his Royal Authority and his Memory is not become so odious and contemptible and in that particular so slighted that no regard at all should be had for it and tho' Socinians despise the Authority of those who went before I dare say in the Nation there be some who are not of their mind and as we know the Legislative Power to be lodged in Kings Lords and Commons so we hope they will agree in things which tend to the Glory of God the good of the Nation and that upon occasion none of the three through God's influence will as I said before give the Convocation any Repulse about things within their Sphere when represented in Parliament But I find you are as Angry Hot and Fiery I make use of your own words against Convocations as against Calvinism for you speak of the Ceremonial or Sanguinary Rules and Orders Canons and Constitutions of the Convocational Clergy and let me say how in the same Page you give the Clergy some other Lashes which is not Brotherly done but I hope you will give me leave to think if not to say that you or your Partner may be of the Tribe if so then in Moses's Words let me tell you Ye take too much upon you ye Sons of Levi. The Man seeing he is unable to defend his own Cause would be suing for help in order to 't he maliciously and fasly would suggest that I have slurred the Honour of my Lords the Bishops when I no where have named or so much as pointed at them only in a place of my Epistle where it was unavoidable 't is upon the occasion of a Quotation out a Book call'd The Reformation of the Ecclesiastical Laws my words are these According to this Bishops are to take cognizance inquire into and declare whether or not the Person or Persons be guilty of Blasphemy which being clear he or they according to that Law are to be delivered into the Civil Magistrate's hand but if through neglect or otherwise any of the Bishops happen not to act their