Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n church_n common_a england_n 3,250 5 6.3277 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A64271 Obedience and submission to the present government, demonstrated from Bishop Overall's convocation-book Taylor, Zachary, 1653-1705. 1690 (1690) Wing T597; ESTC R2448 6,580 24

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

OBEDIENCE AND SUBMISSION OF THE Present Government DEMONSTRATED FROM Bishop Overall's convocation-Convocation-Book LONDON Printed for Robert Clavel at the Sign of the Peacock in St. Pauls-Church-Yard 1690. OBEDIENCE AND SUBMISSION To The Present Government c. THAT those of the Church of England who have taken the Oaths to Their Majesties KING William and QUEEN Mary have Deserted their Principles about Allegiance and Government is the common Reflection cast upon them by some whom either Malice or Ignorance does Dispose to Reproach 'em But since Bishop Overall's convocation-Convocation-Book appeared they now Plead Reason and Authority to Justify the Scandal and pretend that they have got a whole Convocation of Unprejudic'd and Learned Men who have Unanimously Condemned the late Submission and such as being far removed from any Temptation are the fittest and most fair Judges that we can be Determined by tho' their Proceedings not having the Royal Confirmation which is absolutely necessary for Canons does as some think very much if not altogether invalidate their Authority and makes 'em as insignificant as the last Convocation we heard of I thought therefore I might do some Service to the Church and its Members if I could in some Measure Vindicate It and Them by proving that their Compliance with the present Settlement has not in the least deviated from the Doctrine of the Church of England as it was Profess'd and Taught in that Convocation I shall begin therefore with laying down the Doctrine about Government and Allegiance in Four Propositions extracted out of the convocation-Convocation-Book to which may be Reduced whatever almost can be pretended in this Controversy And they are these First That the Power of Kings was Originally Patriarchal Deriv'd from GOD and not from the People C. 2.6 13. For tho' Kings are or ought to be bound up and Limited in the Exercise of their Power by Laws C. 15. yet that proceeds from GOD and Nature who never intended Princes to be such Leviathans whose wilful Pleasure should be Laws but Parents of their Countrey Impowered from Above to Maintain the Native Liberty and Property of their Subjects as of their Children For the Conceit of Absoluteness never did or could prevail in any State but where Superstition or Ignorance blinded Mens Reasons as in Turky and most of the Eastern Empires or Parasitical Flattery and the naked Sword Maintain the Arbitrary Usurpation as it is in a Neighbouring Kingdom Second Prop. That Descent in Hereditary Kingdoms is the ordinary Way whereby a Right and Title to the Crown is Claimable I say Prov. 8.15 is the ordinary Way For since Kings Rule by GOD it is only as the Convocation-Book saith The Lord who both may and is able to overthrow Kings or Emperors notwithstanding any Claim Right Title or Interest which they can Challenge to their Countries Kingdoms or Empires pag. 53. Third Prop. That no Violence is to be used to Kings from their own Subjects for any Irregularities that they commit C. 22. For the Doctrine of Passive Obedience to a Government Established by Law whether the PRINCE be Limited and Sworn to Govern by Laws Chosen by the People and Enacted with his Consent or the PRINCE be Absolute and his will sufficiently Declared be the Law is of absolute necessity to the Support of any Government and they who deny that can never clear themselves from the Suspicion of some Designs against this Fourth Prop. That having sworn Allegiance to a Prince we cannot without the Dreadful Guilt of Perjury transfer our Allegiance whilst he continues to have an Authoritative Right and Title to the Crown C. 36. I say an Authoritative Right and Title because the Case may so happen that these being separated the Claim of Right without the Authority cannot Challenge our Allegiance as in the Case of the Kings of Israel and Judah that were led Captive by the Babylonians who they surviv'd in Babylon and some of them out of Confinement yet as it appears from Jeremy's calling for the Peoples Prayers and Obedience to the Babylonish Kings could lay no Claim to the Allegiance of their late Subjects The Reason of which is Because it is the Authority which is GOD's that Commands our Allegiance and tho' no Mortal can separate this Authority from the Person invested with it yet GOD can of which more hereafter and if he do transfer it to another wherever it is plac'd it calls for our Allegiance This is the Sum I think of what can be pretended in the present Controversie To Reply to which I will not Expatiate on what hath been abundantly offer'd by others but Confine my self as much as possible to the convocation-Convocation-Book that the Impartial Reader may judge which side the Jurors or Non-Jurors the Old Established Doctrine of the Church of England does countenance And as to the First Proposition That Government in general whether Monarchy or any other Form derives it's Authority from GOD the Author of Nature and consequently of Humane Society and not from the People tho' their Consent be ordinarily necessary to the Constitution both of the Form of Government and the Persons Governing is that which is to be the Ground-Work of the whole Discourse and therefore in the first Place to be admitted which I the more Confirm by observing from the Right Reverend the Author First That all Kingdoms are now what was more peculiarly appropriated to the Jewish Nation in their First Constitution in some sort Theocracies wherein GOD according to His own Pleasure takes away Kings and setteth up Kings For C. 35. P. 83. GOD being the Universal Lord and Ruler over all the World the whole World is His Universal Kingdom in the Government whereof He useth the Ministry of Civil Magistrates as well in other Countries as amongst His own peculiar People Israel without any Desert of theirs but as in His Heavenly Providence He thinks it most convenient p. 84. Howbeit He does not leave them at Liberty to do what they list but holds Himself the Helm of every Kingdom and useth their Services in such sort as be they Good or Bad and their Designments Holy or Wicked He ever makes them the Executioners of His own Just Judgments Will and Good Pleasure according as He is minded to Punish any Kingdom People or Countrey And this He does by reserving to His Providence the Prerogative of the Designation of the Person whom He intends for His Vice-Gerent and that even in Hereditary Kingdoms 1 Chro. 3.25 as Adoniah who was Solomon's Elder Brother and Anointed by Abiathar to succeed his Father so his great Disappointment may be an Instance Nay GOD sometimes for the only design'd Usurpation of a Prince whose Title and that in an Hereditary was altogether Indisputable does deprive him of the Government in Part or Whole and will not allow him so much as to Endeavour the re-gaining of it which was the Case of Rehoboam And how oft he has Extinguish'd the Line Royal and Advanc'd to the Crown such