in the same place are tearmed vnuisible The other place is in the Epistle to the Hebrewes the 11. chapter and 3. verse where the same thinges are called such as may bee seene Althoughe that whiche is written in the booke of wisedome the 7. chapter the 17. 18. and 19. verses and the 13 chapter and 2. verse may expound and confirme the same if it bee ioyned to the places aboue recited S. Declare these thyngs more at large M. This therefore it is whiche I saie Not euery thyng whiche subsisteth and whiche the Greekes dooe call his sumthing doeth apperteine to the handlynge of naturall Philosophie For God subsisteth who hath not onely some beeing but the same also moste true and an absolut substance and farther I would adde also if I maie bee so bolde so to speake a nature also for what shall let mee to saie with S. Peter in his 2. Epistle the 1 chapit and 4. verse The diuine nature or The nature of God the declaration and discourse cōcernyng whiche is to bee sought by an other Arte and whiche is of more price and dignitie than this is For God is the Creator and maker of thynges not a creature and made And the force and nature of creatures is onely considered of in this science and knowledge S. Yea but is the knowledge of euery creature considered of herein M. No not so For Angelles are a kinde of creatures but they belōg not vnto natural Philosophers although it bee cōmonly saied by all men that thei haue nature and this kinde of phrase also is vsually found among the Fathers to wit The nature of Angels Of which nature therfore Moses entreated not in al that whole fyrst chapter of Genesis although in the same hee haue most breifly comprehended the whole matter of Naturall Philosophie S. But in the same first chapter he hath intreated of darnesse which thinge surely can not bee seene and yet it belongeth to this science M. You iudge well for indeede it belongeth to the setting foorth of the nature of things but by accident as they call it for neither the meanes of gatheringe togither the lighte neither of other the firste thinges coulde bee plainely declared vnlesse they were sette foorth by their contraries or priuations For darkenesse as it is a meere priuation doth not properly of it selfe beelonge to this art but so farre foorth as it possesseth an vse and place in the nature of thinges and hath declared the power of GOD to bee the greater in the creation of this worlde it is very well mencioned of by Moses Of all which matter wee will speake more hereafter S. Gather therefore nowe togither such thinges as you woulde and what you haue proued M. Since then neyther God neither the Angels doe appertaine to the Naturall Philosophers and to this our present disputation it remaineth that the matter of this knowledge and science bee saide properly to be that creature which may bee seene and hath a place as S. Augustine speaketh and hath a body and is subiecte vnto our senses all or some of them S. But the Philosophers almost all of them are of another opinion For they thinke that the subiect matter of this Art is that thing which is mouable in that respecte that it is Moueable not in respecte that it is created or subiect vnto our sight M. It is true But therein they erre doubly The fyrste errour is that forasmuch as the signification of Motion is verie large accordinge to their owne opinion that it may also bee extended to the Angels since manye times also they moue from place to place at Gods commaundement and indeede are fallen from theire fyrst originall hauinge suffered no small chaunge not onely of their place but also of theyr nature surely the disputation concerninge them were a parte that proper of the science of Naturall Philosophie which notwithstandinge they doe very stoutly and that also verily in deed dency And this is theyr first erroure The second is that the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie doth not beelonge vnto the thynges which wee see if so bee any of them bee vnmouable as thinges that neither perishe nor are changed Which since it hath hapned vnto man for sinne after his creatiō perfect nature truely according to their opiniō neither should mā before hee had sinned for the most part of him haue ben a subiect of natural Philosophie neither shoulde the treatie of him haue appertayned to Naturall Philosophie Which thing howe vntrue it is it appeareth out of the sayinge of S. Paule who will haue althings that may bee seene with our eies to belong to this our knowledge to the science of Naturall Philosophie and to bee a ready and apte meane and degree to the knowledge of god It appeareth also by the same place that the nature of man while hee was pure and had not yet sinned is by Moses reckoned amonge Naturall thinges It appeareth moreouer out of sundrie Psalmes that Man and the nature of man as it was first created by God is most truely numbred among the kindes of Naturall thinges as in the 8. and 104. and 139. Psalmes the 13. 15. and 16. verses and also in the 148. Psalme To conclude they that make The mouable bodye to bee the subiect of this science what other thinge go they about but to teache that there bee two subiectes of one Art to wit the bodie and his motion when as indeede one arte ought to haue but one subiect S. Why then doe Naturall Philosophers define and determine those thinges which they call Naturall by Motion especially M. First bicause al their knowledge is gathered as they tearme it from that which is latter not from that which is fyrst For things then began to bee knowne when they were once extant and by meanes of mans transgression were made mortall that is to saie were by GOD appointed vnto miserie and destruction For when they were destitute of Gods woorde and light they perceiued not nor saw what manner ones they were first created Wherefore when they began to bee busied in these naturall things which are now corrupted they perceiued their great and perpetuall chaunges ebbinge and flowinge and inconstancie in abidinge in one estate and they iudged that Natural things should bee supposed of accordinge to that their owne condition Moreouer seeing that Motion and chaunge may most easilie and generally bee noted in all these things which wee see and which are in this worlde it was an easie matter to distinguish and determine Naturall thinges by their motion There is motion truely in all naturall thinges and also in other which are not Naturall as in Angels where by it cummeth to passe that Natural thinges cannot properly bee separated and discerned from things not Naturall by Motion S. Why do you call a thing Natural bicause of it owne nature it maye bee seene and perceiued M. Bicause forasmuch as God hath created two chiefe kindes of thinges to his owne
principles and causes of their beeyng and compoundyng And likewise that is the Generall part of naturall Philosophie which sheweth vs the generall maner and order of preseruyng and increasyng of all thynges beecause it deliuereth vnto vs all thynges in generall And these poinctes for the more part are comprehended in the first chapiter of Genesis S. Whiche is then the Particulare part M. That whiche diligently setteth doune the peculiare natures operations properties and effectes of euery kinde which are seuerally distinguished in these created and visible thynges as for example What is the Nature of a Man what of an Horse what of euery kinde of liuyng Creature with the operations also of Trees and Hearbes These thynges are partly conteined in the rules of Phisick and partly also in those treatises whiche by the Auctours thereof are intitled by the names of Histories of liuyng thynges and of Plantes and suche like certaine partes whereof and sparkes are founde shinyng heere and there dispersed in holie Scripture as it were beautifull precious stones Howbeit the whole historie general discourse of these thinges is not conteined in the Scripture since that Salomons Bookes whiche were written copiously of the Nature of all thynges are through the negligence of men perished ¶ The seconde Chapiter Whether Naturall Philosophie bee meete for a Christian S. IS there any profite in Naturall Philosophie M. Yea manifolde But that I may not run ouer them all for thei are almoste infinite I wil alledge fiue onely The first is that thereby wee knowe God not onely to bee the Creator of all thinges but also to bee euerlasting omnipotent and mercifull c. The seconde that by it wee learne the thynges that are created with their operations and natures The third for that therein wee see ourselues and perceiue what wee are of what thynges and partes wee consist and eche part of ours that is to saie what maner of thing our Soule is and what likewise is the state and condition of our bodie which all men do confesse to bee the best profitabliest moste excellēt knowledge of all other The iiii that wonderyng at in our myndes and beholdyng with our eyes these woorkes of God so greate so many so wonderfull beyng thervnto holpē by none other meanes than by this Arte wee are with greate zeale and affection stirred vp to set foorth the won̄derfull praises of God and to giue him thankes Whiche thing happened also vnto Galene yea although he were a prophane Philosopher that after hee had described the Nature of one of Gods woorkes that is to saie of Man and the partes of his bodie hee was enforced yea almoste against his will to syng an Himne to god Heerehence it commeth that suche multitude of hymnes so many Epodes and songes of praise so many Psalmes are written and celebrated The v. that wee vnderstandyng these thinges maie easily and plainly expounde and freely enter into many places of holie Scripture whiche vnto suche as bee ignorante of these matters are not onely obscure but also cannot possibly bee attained vnto or by any meanes vnderstoode Wherefore S. Augustine writeth that Naturall Philosophie is verie profitable and necessarie for a christen diuine What shall I speake of the singulare pleasure whiche this knowledge bringeth vnto the minde of the great cōmodities whiche it ministreth vnto the life of man S. How doe you prooue these thinges to bee true M. Specially out of these places of holie scripture The whole 104 Psalme The 136. and 145. Psalme 10. verse The 147. and 148. Psalmes Iob the 12. chapiter and verse 8. 9. 10. and the 36. Chapiter and 24. 25. 26. verses The 14. Chapiter of the Actes and 17. verse The first Chapiter to the Romanes and 20. verse Unto these moreouer maie bee added the 7. Chapiter of the booke of Wisedome and 9. verse with the nexte followyng and likewise the 13. Chapiter and 1. verse and the nexte followyng Likewise the holie Fathers S. Basill S. Chrisostome S. Ambrose in their Exameron or woorke of sixe daies doc teache the same thyng And moreouer the holie and absolutely learned father S. Augustine in his booke of christian doctrine and in the viii booke of Gene. vpon the letter the viii chapiter S. But there be certain obiections made declaryng that the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie is not onely vnprofitable but also vnwoorthie for a christian yea that it is hurtfull and dangerous for hym M. Yea truely And although many men haue gathered sundrie yet all of thē maie bee referred specially vnto twoo kindes of argumentes whiche are alledged againste the knowledge of these thynges whereof the firste is framed ab auctoritate from auctoritie The second a ratione turpi from reason and vnseemelinesse or from a moste hurtfull consequent S. Declare them M. First thei gather sundrie sentences partly out of the Scriptures and partly out of the Ecclesiasticall Fathers out of whiche afterwarde thei frame their reasons and make their conclusions S. Whiche bee thei M. Out of holie scripture this is specially alledged which is written in the Booke of Ecclesiastes or of the Preacher the 1. Chapiter and 15. verse in these woordes I set my harte to seeke and to finde out with wisedome whatsoeuer thyng is doone vnder heauen This euill exercise hath GOD giuen to the Sonnes of men to occupie them selues therein Unto whiche thei ioyne that saiyng of S. Paule the 1. to the Corinthians the 1. Chapiter and 20. verse God hath made foolishe the wisedome of this worlde with other suche places like vnto these whiche maie easely bee answered S. How I praie you M. Forsoothe that that in the Booke of the Preacher is not spoken absolutely but onely in comparison of the true woorshippyng of god Neither doeth Salomon cōdemne or disprooue the true knowledge of the nature of thinges whiche GOD gaue vnto hym as a greate benefite of all other moste surpassyng for then should hee haue bin of all men the moste vnthankfullest man to God and in respecte whereof hee was then greatly esteemed of by the Queene of Saba and other Princes neere vnto hym Howbeeit this knowledge of Naturall Philosophie if it bee compared with true Godlinesse if with faithe if with the true feare of GOD if with inwarde regeneration of the mynde if with the knowledge of euerlastyng life and saluation surely in comparison of these thynges it is but a light busiyng of the minde vnfruitfull rather weariyng vs then relieuyng or comfortyng our consciences For it bryngeth not the true felicitie as faithe to Godwardes doeth although a manne consume his whole life in it and as it were tyre his minde aboute it And as touchyng the place of S. Paule I see not how it oppugneth the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie seeyng S. Paule condemneth the wisedome of the worlde not the wisedome concernyng the worlde and thynges created But that is called the wisedome of the world whiche is wholy ruled by the counsell and iudgement of the
the worlde so that it is no maruaile that wee haue iudged that the true and Christian Diuinitie is partly busied also in matter of Naturall Philosophie and the settinge foorth thereof and that for that cause also the holie Scripture is in part occupied in settinge foorth of these things forasmuch as this knowledge also maketh to the aduauncement of gods glory For in these visible thinges the power wisdome and eternitie of God is to bee seene liuely S. What is the other argument of theirs that are of the contrarie opinion M. This forsooth that those thynges which Moses hath written are most plainely and simply set downe and in such kinde of stile which is fitted to our capacitie and applied to the weakenesse of mans sence and not truely and exactly expressed according to the truth of thinges and finally that Moses doeth neither throughly neither subtily search out or set downe the thinges themselues and their natures wherefore they conclude that the true distinct and perfect knowledge of the naturall part is other whence to bee drawne and learned S. What answere you vnto these thinges M. Uerily I confesse that these matters concerning Naturall Philosophie are not gloriously in a filed style set foorth by Moses although hee were the beste learned man that euer lyued but rather in a bare and simple kinde of writinge striped out of all ornament as it were out of apparrell wherby that which hee writeth may the more easily bee vnderstood But as it is to bee graunted that hee spake simply so can it not bee prooued that hee spake or wrote lyingly falsely and ignorantly of those thinges It is one thing therfore to acknowledg that Moses stile is bare simple which kinde of vtterauÌ„ce is meet for the truth and another thing to say that hee is a false man and a lyar which no man can affirme but whoso is of a corrupt conscience Wherfore simply but truely barely but rightly commonly but purely doth hee deliuer vnto vs those thinges which hee writeth concerning the worlde of the principall partes therof of the causes and effectes of thinges to bee beleeued holden and taughte among menne Uerily I confesse that Moses applyed himselfe to the capacitie of our seÌ„ses Howbeit I deney that which they affirme that therfore hee did not roue at the trueth of the matter or had not regarde vnto it for it was his purpose to set downe those things in wrâ—tinge easily barely and truely S. But some are of opinion that all those things which hee wrote in the first chapter of Genesis are to bee interpreted allegorically So neither do they think that those six dayes are the space of time neither that the woman in deede was made of Adams ribbe neither that all the residue are so to bee taken as Moses words doe pretende and sownde Which opinion if it be true what shall bee sure or certeine in all that whole chapter and such like writinges of other Prophetes as apperteining to the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie or that maye teache vs the same M. You saye well Indeede some haue benne of that opinion which notwithstanding S. Augustine confuteth in his 1. booke in the Proheme also in the 8. booke and 2. chapter de Genesiad Literam of Genesis vpon the letter S. Peter likewyse in the 3. chapter and 5. verse of hys seconde Epistle and in the epistle to the Hebrues the 11. chapter and 3. verse doth openly impungne this errour of the Allegorists affirminge that those things which Moses hath reported concerning the creation of the worlde are spoken naturally and plainly and not allegorically or figuratiuely S. And what at the length doe you conclude of all these thinges which you haue recited M. That forsooth which S. Augustine concludeth in hys 5. booke and 8. chapter of Genesis That those things which Moses wrot are true although they can be established by no other reasons For if a man will dispute to proue that these thinges are false or hee himselfe can say no certentie concerning the estate and gouerment of creatures or if hee saye not true will hee suppose these thinges to bee false in that hee himselfe vnderstandeth them not Who will beleeue that Aristotle or Plato did knowe any thinge concerninge the creation of the worlde and the causes of thinges whereof Moses was ignorant who first receiued the thinges which he wrote by most secret reuelation from god Secondly who was wel learned in all liberall artes specially in the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie and Phisick which two artes were at that tyme specially had in price amonge the Aegyptians as it appeareth in the Scripture Actes the 7. chap. and 22. verse And to conclude forasmuch as those that were the chiefest Philosophers amonge the Grecians traueyled into Aegypt to the intent to learne Naturall Philosophie as histories doe rport of Plato and Pithageras And most certeine it is as Diogenes Laertius writeth in hys first booke de vitis Philosophorum of the lyues of the Philosophers that all that parte of Philosophie whiche intreateth of the nature of thinges was deriued to the Grecians froÌ„ strange nations and from the Syrians that is to saie from the Jewes Shal we say theÌ„ against the assured faith of the scripture that any one of the cheifest Philosophers to wit Plato or Aristotle whiche were heathen men were called by GOD to counsell when hee went to framinge and creatinge of the worlde that they shoulde knowe more than Moses the seruaunt of GOD whom God himselfe taught and shewed vnto him such things as hee should commit to writinge to the behoofe of Posteritie and especially for the instruction of his moste deerely beeloued Church Surely this cannot bee thaught muchlesse spoken without notorious blasphemie against God himselfe But rather as S. Augustine teacheth in his 5. booke and third Chapter de Genesiad Literam of Genesis vpoÌ„ the letter that in that Moses speaketh so plainly hee doth it by the assured counsell and iudgemente of the holy Ghost to the intent that by the hight of the thynges hee maye terrifie the proude by the deapth hee may hold them attentiue by the trueth hee may feede the great ones and by hys affabilitie hee maye nourishe the little ones The fourth Chapter The difference beetween Christian and heathen Naturall Philosophie S. WHat differeÌ„ce therfore is ther betwen Moses Aristotle y is to say betweene ChristiaÌ„ and Heathen Natural Philosophers in thys kinde of learninge M. Uery great which notwithstanding maye bee especially perceiued in three poyntes S. Which bee they M. The firste is in the ende of this knowledge whiche thei bothe doe respecte and followe S. Declare thesame M. The Christian Naturall Philosophers whiche intreate of the thinges that are created dooe referre the summe of their disputatioÌ„ to this ende that our greate and good God who is the auctour Father and creatour of them all maie bee knowne praised and extolled and finally woorshipped the more ardently and more feared But
4. verse and wheras in an other place he calleth certain tymes seculare the 2. to Timothie the 2. Chapter and 9. verse to Titus the 1. Chapter and 2. verse vnlesse that wee confesse that all these thinges had a certeine time of beginning and beeing What are these eternall and seculare tymes what ugnifieth this woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is there not vnderstod therby a laying of the foundacions in time and doth hee not terme those times seculare whiche passed away and must bee numbred from the moment and pricke of time wherein all these thinges began to bee made In which point Sainet Augustine agréeth with vs in his booke againste the Priscillianists the 6. chapter To bee shorte howe shoulde the ages of those auncient men Adam Enoch Noah also the time of the vniuersall flood bee knowne how far distant it is since the beeginninge of the woorlde if there were no beeginning of time in which the world was made In so much as I meruaile what shoulde mooue certaine Ecclesiasticall writers to doubt thereof and specially S. Augustine a man so much exercised in the scriptures as namely in his booke of Genesis vpon the letter althoughe also afterwarde hee bee altogither variable in defending the same and manye times diuerse and dissentinge from him selfe S. But ther bee some that obiect two auctorities which are repugnaunt to your opinion whereof the first is that which is written in the 18. chapter and 5. verse of Ecclesi GOD made althing at once wherevnto I praye you to answere first M. It shall bee an easie matter so to doe For if I lyste I coulde aunswere that which as I suppose wee haue already agreed vpon that the auctoritie of this booke is farre to bee remooued and separated from the Diuine canonicall Scriptures And therefore it prooueth nothing Howbeit I had rather say that that is true which is confirmed by the woordes of the texte and that the place is corruptly translated in this maner God made all thinge at once for the meaninge of the aucthours woordes is this Hee that liueth for euer made all thinges togither hee saith altogither Wherfore wee are taught to acknowledge one onely aucthour and creatuor of all thinges as Ireneus sayth in the 4. booke and 21. chapter it is not there affirmed that all thinges that are created had there beeing beeginninge or were all made in one moment or that they were frō euerlasting or without beeginning of time This is therfore the signification of this woorde Pariter togither to wit that the power to create all thinges is giuen to one and not to many For the same booke in the 16. Chapter and 25. verse setteth downe howe that created things were disposed and made in certein order and time Howbeit I am not ignorant howe much the signification and readinge of this onely woorde Pariter togither did oftentimes trouble S. Augustine in the 5. booke and 3. Chap and also in his 6. booke and 6. Chapter of Genesis vpon the letter ▪ and also many other of the Fathers Thus haue you mine answere to your firste obiection to wyt that for at once you must vnderstande togyther Nowe tell me your other aucthoritie S. They alleage also that whiche is written in S. Iohns Gospell the 1. chapter and 1. verse In the beginnyng was the woord Now if you think that this woord beginnyng is to bee referred to time then must you most impiously affirme that the woord or the Sun of God which is signified thereby had his beeginning in some time and is not eternall M. Truely wee should bee hardly vrged by so great auctoritie of the Scripture vnlesse the matter it selfe whereof wee intreate did minister vnto vs the dissoluing and exposition of this difficultie Wee haue alreadie declared howe that the signification of this woord principium or beeginnyng is sundrie wherfore it ought too bee taken accordyng to the reason and nature of the thyng whereof wee dispute And you see how S. Iohn plainly saith that this woord or Sunne of GOD was not created in the beginning but that it was in the beeginning when God created all thinges so that S. Iohn setteth this his In the beginnyng was against the saying of Moses and creation of all things where the Scripture speaketh thus In the beginnyng God created heauen and not thus in the beginning was heauen And moreouer S. Iohn teacheth that the same woord of God is also the same god And that woord sayeth hee was god But that whiche is God can haue no beeginning of tyme Wherfore the same is most falsly expounded and vnderstoode of time and beeginnyng of existencie in Christ And therefore this woord Beeginnyng hath another signification in that place too wit that by whiche S. Iohn excludeth all beeginnyng of time to the ende that so far as our mindes are able by thinkyng too looke backe and to stretche foorthe themselues wee may not withstanding beeleue moste assuredly that beefore that woorde and Sunne of GOD had beeing and had a distinct substance from the Father By whiche meanes of speaking eternitie is accustomably signified in the Scriptures as it appeareth in the 8. of the Prouerbes And also by the selfe same testimonie of S. Iohn it is declared how that all these thinges were made and brought foorthe in the beeginning of tyme for they were not in the beeginning as was the woorde but they were made for asmuch as they were not in the beeginning The xvi Chapter That the worlde came of it selfe S. NOw since you haue prooued that the worlde had a beeginning of beeing I praye you declare whether it came of it selfe or of some other M I suppose there is no man though hee bee but slenderly learned in the Scriptures that doubteth concernyng this poinct to wit that the worlde came not of it selfe but of another to wit of god For if it came of it selfe it should also bee immortall and eternall and not made in tyme For it were then of abilitie to minister force vnto it selfe to endure perpetually and it should also haue alwayes bene And besides this it should bee a god For what soeuer is of it self and hath life substance must needs be god Forasmuch as the Creatour differeth frō the creature in that respect especially in that the Creatour is and subsisteth by his own power and vertue and the creatures onely by his power and assistance Worthily therfore S. Augustine in his Enchiridion No man saith hee can bee of hymself The omnipotencie of the Creator and the vertue of hym that is omnipotent and possesseth all thyng is the cause of euery creatures subsisting Whosoeuer therefore shall deny this to wit that this world was made by the wil and power of God but will contende that it had the force and vertue in it selfe of beeing plainly repugneth against the whole sacred Scriptures For there is no thing almost better knowne or more oftner inculcated into our eares than that God is
hearbes and flowers without seede or slippe But hee that is the true creatour hee maketh his matter and stuffe in whiche and of which hee woorketh of nothing hee hath it not alreadie prepared or ministred from some other place But to saie that the matter was coeternall with God himselfe or existing of it selfe and to deny that it was firste made and brought foorth by God out of nothing is not the part of Christians but plainly of the Hermogenian heretikes So that there is a moste large distinction beetweene creation and engendring Those thinges are created whiche are made of no substanciall or materiall beeginnyng Those are engendred or made not whiche are made out of nothing but out of a former substance and matter Wherefore neither good Angels nor bad nor diuelles bee or ought to bee called creatours mutch lesse men for it is onely proper to God to create whiche these places following doe confirme to wit S. Augustine in his 3. booke of the Trinitie the 8. chap. Isay the 45. chapt Iob the 26. chapt the 33 Psalme Actes the 17. chap. and 24. verse Yet am I not ignorant notwithstandyng what othersome doe dispute against this that the power of creating may also bee giuen vnto creatures S. But there be many thinges that doe withstand your opinion M. What bee they S. First that whiche your selfe alleaged and is a moste certeine position among the naturall Philosophers and confirmed in all mens iudgementes by continual experience Nothyng is made of nothyng How then should God haue made al these thinges if so bee that hee had no matter prepared to his hand that is to say if hee had nothing to make them of M. Truely this is an olde obiection and often repeated by Heathen men in expoundyng whereof Iustine the Martyr or whosoeuer he was else that answered the obiections of the Ethnikes hee tooke great paines therin which difficultie mee thinkes I can easilye resolue First in that the insinite incomprehensible omnipotencie of God the creatour is not only a misse but peruersly called to the lawes of nature which was made and created For what is that other than to go about to make the creature equall to the Creatour But as the Lorde witnesseth that his thoughtes doe differ farre from ours so likewise is the force power farre discrepant from ours and farre excelling the strength and vertue of this nature Iob the 10. chapter and 45. verse Now if a man woulde thus conclude At this present and since the tyme that the Lorde appointed this order that nothing shoulde bee made of nothing there is nowe nothing made without matter readye and prepared beefore Wherefore in the beeginning and before that God had ordeined these lawes it toke place then neither coulde anye thinge bee made other wise Your selfe perceiue how much they are deceiued that doe so conclude As for example if a man would thus dispute that in the beeginning the first trees at the same verie instant wherin God made them could not bring foorthe their fruites bicause y now adaies they bee not so forwarde but neede longer time to beare and ripen them if a man I say shoulde reason thus euerie body woulde laughe him to skorne and woulde perceiue that hys sayinge were falfe out of Isay the 46. chapter and â–ª 8. verse and not onely out of the first Chapter of Moyses For whoso were of that opinion were deceiued through great ignorance and confusion of diuerse tymes and conditions which amonge thinges are to bee distinguished And euen so they who as you say doe obiect against the first creation of thinges That Nothing is made of nothing bycause that nowe nothing is made of nothing hee disputeth of most different and vnlike times and conditions To wit from the nature whiche was to bee created and not yet tied by any law vnto the nature created which is now reuoked constrained by sure certein lawes Which kynde of conclusion S. Augustine also laugheth at in his booke 2. booke against Pelagia the 25. Chapter Thus haue you my answere vnto that most common and vsuall argument of the Philosophers What is the seconde argument which you say may be brought against vs S. The aucthoritie which they alleage out of the xi cha and 18. verse of the booke of VVisedome For vnto thyne almightie hande that made the worlde out of a rude and vnfourmed matter there lacked no strength to sende a multitude of beares or of fierce Lions amonge them Ergo the worlde was made of rude and vnformed matter and not of nothyng To which opinion Sainct Augustine seemeth to agree in the 3. booke the 5. and 6. Chapters of the Trinitie For hee sayth that There is a certaine common matter consisting in the causes of the worlde M. Indeede this which you doe aleage hath seemed vnto some to bee a verie forceable argument And therfore the materiar heretikes which are called also the Hermogenians doe chiefly staye themselues vppon that against whom Tertullian hath writen manye noble and learned woorkes And that I may saye nothinge of the aucthoritie of that booke lyke as I sayde beefore notwithstanding I will answere this which is most true that it is there taught and beleeued that the same rude and vnformed matter out of which it is said the worlde was made was first created by GOD of nothing not out of any other matter wrought or supplied for so shoulde wee runne foorth infinitely neithere existinge of it selfe for then shoulde it bee verye god But whosoeuer he was that wrote that booke hee wrote in such manner out of the opinion whiche was then receiued and knowne amonge the Hebrue Rabbines and was afterward alowed of and embraced of all to wit that heauen and earth which two are saide in the 1. of Genesis to haue beene created the firste daye were as it were the first matter of Gods woorkes which were created afterwarde whiche God by his mightie vertue prepared vnto him self and cast togither ministred first rudely whereby afterwarde hee might finishe and forme the residue of that so greate a woorke And as touching Sainct Augustine they that alleage him against vs do altogither wreast hys auctority For S. Augustine intreateth not there of the first matter of thys whole worlde as though hee would haue it to bee one or feigned or imagined it to bee coeternall with God but hee speaketh of the seconde matter through which as in thinges nowe alreadye created one thinge sprunge of an other by the commaundement of GOD as out of the earth trees and beastes and as at thys daye also they are made and doe proceede There was foresowne saith hee eeuen in those thinges the matter of such thinges as arose and sprung out of them the 3. booke of Genesis vppon the letter the 14. chapter and the 2. booke the 15. chapter and the 1. booke the 14. and 15. Chapter and the 5. booke the 5. chap. S. Thirdly they saye that that is not the
distributing of euery part into it owne conuenient place Othersome there bee that doe attribute more vnto god For they holde opinion that the matter was a great mole from eternitie mary but matter onely and not that althinges were encluded and comprehended within it whiche the firste sorte doe also holde but that it was rude and vnshapen Which matter for that it was great GOD taking it in hande diuided it into smale peaces and as hee is a moste wise and cunninge woorkeman facioned it into sundrye fourmes And so endued euerye parte thereof with hys owne proper fourme which wee see them nowe rertaine Euen so out of one and the selfesame barre of yron cut into sundry pieces the Smith frameth forgeth a key an hammer a sawe fetters and many other thinges seruinge to sundrie purposes whereof they tearme God Demiurgus and not the creatour or maker Howbeit the scripture attributeth all this vnto god To wyt both that they bee thinges and also haue the same force power nature and fourme which wee see to bee in them And finally in that they are situate in such place and distinguished in sutch order as wee doe beeholde that they decke foorth this mole in such cumly sorte as in hugenesse beutie we do perceiue they do and in such maner as ther is no man able sufficiently to expresse Wherefore the Scripture saith that God doeth not onely Barah that is to say create And in the Greeke tongue Kâ—â—zin or Poem but also Gascha which is to say woorke And in Greeke also to doe some woorke or Demiurgin and also Iarsar that is to say to bring things into a cumly order which in the Greeke tongue is called â—â—smiâ— and that all things which are in this world which are seene do take their beeginning from God to bee thinges at all and to bee suche maner thinges as they are wee muste so determine moste certeinely with ourselues vnderstande so and confesse the same beeing thereto constrained by the force of truth S. Haue you any proofes to confirme this your opinion by M. Yea truely that especially out of these places of holy scripture Isay the 42. chapter and 5. verse the 43. chapter the 1. and 7. verses the 45. chapter the 12. 18. verses Likewise Iob the 26. chapter and 13. verse the 25. chapter 10. verse wher the onely and felfesame God is termed by so many and diuerse names The xix Chapter Of the ende for which God created and made this worlde S. WHat cause mooued God specially to make this worlde hee himselfe lacking nothing and dwelling in that euerlastinge felicitie vnto which there can bee no encrease of felicitie immortalitie added by meanes of al this gret woorke M. Euen his mere goodnes that is to saye his moste louing good will to communicate the same his felicitie vnto certeine thinges so farre foorth as the nature of those thinges whiche hee created was able to receiue the same Wherefore hee created Angels in heauen and men vpon the earth to the intent hee might make them after a sort companions and partakers of his felicitie beeing hymself most good moste louing moste perfect and also in himselfe and through himself most perfectly and wholy blessed S. How proue you this M. Both by auctoritie and reason And auctoritie is that whiche is cheifly taken out of the Scriptures as the the 36. Psalme the 5. verse Lord thy mercy stretcheth vnto the heauens Psalme 33. the 5. verse The earth is full of the mercy of the lord Psalme 34 the 9. verse See how good the Lord is and in the 103. Psalme the 17. verse The mercie of the Lord indureth from one age vnto another And in the 111. Psalme and 4. verse But specially in the 136. Psalme throughout and in the Psalme 145. and 9. verse The Lorde is good to all and his mercies are ouer all his woorkes And next out of the Fathers For S. Augustine in his 1. booke of Genesis vpon the letter the 8. chapter and also is his Enchiridion the 9. booke sayeth plainly that the only goodnes of God was the cause wherefore God made all these things The same is likewise affirmed by Ireneus in his third boooke the 45. and 46. chapters and also by Fulgentius in his booke de fide ad Petr. the 3. chapt And if you will also commend Heathen writers in this respect you haue Plato in Timeo a most graue auctour among them who beeing led by a naturall light and the testimonie of his owne conscience wrote in this maner whiche Cicero hath expressed is his booke de vniuersitate Let vs thaÌ„ seeke out the cause which mooued hym that made these thinges to beegin a new originall and frame of thinges Hee was good And hee that is good enuieth no man. And therefore some say thus God knew and would haue his felicitie to bee communicated to others For although that the diuine goodnes is and was in God most fully and most perfectly without al these thinges as it appeareth in the 60. Psalme and is also kepte vndefiled Notwithstandyng these things which are created are manifestatiue as they speake in the scholes do declare the excellencie of Gods goodnes that is to saye they shewe that the same goodnes is altogether agreeable vnto god This muche say they S. I haue heard the auctorities declare now the reasons M. Forasmuche as there proceedeth nothyng from vs men neither from the blessed and elect Angels wherby God may be more established in respect of his eternitie or more blessed in respect of his state and condicion as it is written in the 16. Psalme and 2. verse for it is not possible that any thing should bee added vnto hym who of himself is altogether perfect truely ther was no neede that draue him to make these thinges but only this one cause to wit his owne louing good will. Wherefore like as it is writen in the 3. chapter to Titus the 4. verse that the mere goodnes of GOD was the cause of mans saluation so was it also the cause of mans creation And if it were the cause of men doubtlesse it was also the cause of the creation of all other thinges The xx Chapter This world cannot bee called the Sunne of God. S. I Do wel vnderstand so much as you haue hetherto sayd of God who is the efficient cause of thys world not as a woorkeman onely or a discriber or painter or trimmer vp but rather as a creator and a bringer foorth of it out of nothyng Tell mee now this one thing more whether in respect of these causes this world may bee called the Sunne of God M. You renue an old question which S. Augustine plainly discusseth in his Enchiridion the 38. and 39. chapters Truely if we will speake properly and to vnderstandyng this world neither can nor ought bee called the Sun of god First bicause it is not made of the substance of god For they that are properly called
concerning this matter in the 1. booke of Genesis ad literam and 9. chapter S. But these things are referred to the Sunne when it is sayd that the Lord created all thing by his woord so that Christe is ment by the woorde for by him all thinges were made Coloss the 1. chapter and 16. verse M. I will not much contende herein so that they will graunt mee that as the Sunne is called the woorde so likewise that woorde was a signe and token of his presence power and person and also of his woorking Whiche doeth likewise distinguishe the Father from the Sunne S. Why did God speake commaund them to be made M. Hee commaunded to the intent that the thinges that were afterward made might be knowne not to haue bin made by the Water or Earth out of whiche they came or the heauens or to bee short by the vertue or power of any creature ▪ but by the commaundement of the Lord onely and the power of his woord Wherfore let vs giue prayse vnto hym for all thinges that are created And he spake not that hee could not haue fourmed all thinges by the vertue and decree of his alonely will who hadde already made Heauen and Earth without speaking of any word but when as it pleased God to reueale manifest himself outwardly by his works hee vsed those meanes wherby hee willeth and commaundeth himselfe to bee most certeinly knowne to wit his woorde voice The summe and scope of this word is Christ y euerlasting Sūne of y euerlastīg father who was afterward manifested in y flesh therfore hereof they do rightly gather y Christ the Sunne of God did woorke in the creation of the world For ther is a threefold meane booke wherby God reuealeth himself vnto vs to wit the booke of creatures y boke of scripture the boke of life That which is called y booke of scripture is far more sure true and plentifull thā the other two therfore God doth especially propose and commende the same vnto vs And finally to confirme myne opinion I alledge that whiche Ireneus sayeth That God created all thyng with his word that is to saye with his voice in his seconde booke and 5. chapter and that also whiche is written by Tertullian in his 4. booke againste the Marciomtes in these woordes Is it altogether incredible how the power of the creatour should procure the remedie of one transgression with his woord who by his word hath brought foorth so great a mole of the world In whiche saiyng doubtlesse the woord is taken for the voice and in the 1. chapter and 3. verse of the Epistle too the Hebrues the Scripture vseth the woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The. xxxv Chapter Of the light which was vsed at the creation of the world S. WHat say you is secondly to be obserued and considered of in declaring the creation M. The light For God made that as a necessarie thyng for the creatyng of his other woorkes S. Whyso M. Both that by appliyng as it were a Candle or other light that confused mole might bee seen and diuided into meete partes and members and also bicause it was necessarie that some firie qualitie should bee applied vnto that moyste matter too warme it and to make it frutefull For all thinges that are in this inferiour world are engendred by a firie heate as it were by a warme and woorking father And therefore that first light was created to bee the continuall and common Nurse and moother and fountaine of the externall and accidentall liuely heate whiche God prepared as an instrument to bring foorth all other things withall Not that God was not able to see all things that were in the greate mole who at this present beholdeth the most secret thinges and obscurest darkenesse and from whom there is nothing hid not also that he needed that kind of meane who of himself is Almightie but to the intent we might vnderstand how great wisedome it was that created these visible things and what second causes of them hee appointed first which now wee doe behold to woorke in them And finally how in the making of these visible thinges hee vsed moste conueniently other thinges of the same kinde which at this day are the naturall and instrumentall and chief and principall causes of the engendryng of all thinges For there are three thinges of them too wit moist earth and that shining bright and liuely heate which is appliable and conuenient for all thinges in that all thinges haue that naturall heate in them This is therefore the second thing whiche I suppose needfull to bee considered in the meanes and maner of creating the world ¶ The. xxxvi Chapter That God made this worlde without any payne or wearisomenesse vnto him S. WHat do you thirdly consider M. This forsooth that GOD framed this so greate and huge a Mole of the worlde without anye payne or wearysomnesse at all that the Epicures neede not to feare leaste wee ascribe any greife and paine vnto God in that men are not able to finishe the least woorke that they haue to doe without some trauayle and wearinesse of bodye And therefore it plainely appeareth hereby howe greate the omnipotencie of God is aboue the strēgth of man This which I say is cōfirmed by Isay in the 40. chapt and 28. verse and likewise by S. Augustine in hys 4. booke de Genesi ad Literam and 8. chapter In somuch that it is sayde that all thinges that were created were suddeinly brought foorthe and appeared as it were in the twinckling of an eye Psalme 33. 9. chap. and Esdras the 4. booke the 6. chapter and 48. verse for nothing coulde withstande the pleasure and cōmaundement of God. The xxxvii Chapter The worlde was created by partes and not all at once S. WHat thinke you fourthly to bee obserued M. That this whole worlde was made by partes and in six dayes as Moses teacheth in the 1. chapter of Genesis as it appeareth also in the 4. booke of Esdras the 44. Chapter and the nexte folowinge and not made altogither at one instante And to the entente it may bee the better borne in memorie what was made vppon euery daye I my selfe made these verses folowing The first day made both heauen and earth pleasant glittring light The seconde streached out the space beetweene the waters quite ▪ The thirde diuided Sea from Lande and clad the earth with greene The fourth created Sunne Moone starres that bright do sheene The fifth brought foorth all feathered soules and fishes of the lake The sixt made Cattell in the fieldes then man the Lorde did make And after worke the seauenth to rest himselfe hee did betake S. But why did not god create al things togither in one day seeing hee is almightie M. Bicause hee is almightie hee needed not time for the establishing of this worlde as Sainct Ambrose saith in his 39. Epistle neither came it to passe
THE WONDERFVLL VVOORKMANSHIP OF THE WORLD wherin is conteined an excellent discourse of Christian naturall Philosophie concernyng the fourme knowledge and vse of all thinges created specially gathered out of the Fountaines of holy Scripture by Lambertus Danaeus and now Englished by T. T. ⧠Imprinted at London for Andrew Maunsell in Paules Church-yard at the signe of the Parret 1578. To the right honorable Syr Francis walsingham Knight one of the principall Secretaries to the Queenes Maiestie and of her most honourable priuie Counsell I Haue bin desirous Right honorable and that of long tyme vvith many other to vvhom your most godly disposition hath bin often reported not only to congratulate but also to honor the same vvith some poore testimonie of myne vnfeined good vvill And novv occasion sumdeale fauourably grauntyng vnto my request hope hath also pricked mee forevvarde to myne attempt that no studie or traueill vvherby the true knovvledge feare of God is to bee learned can come vnvvelcome or seeme dishonorable vnto your honour If noneother examples yet the vndoubted vvord of life vvorthily Englished and set foorth vnder your Right Honorable protection doth sufficiently prooue beesides your most feruent zeale in embracing true Religion and aduauncing the syncere vvorshipping of Almightie God by meanes vvhereof your fame is spread far among forreine nations Thus am I not discouraged but rather hartened semblably vvith duetie to offer this my simple trauell vnto your honour beeing the vvoorthy vvoorke of the learned Diuine M. Lambert Danaeus of Geneua concerning Christian Naturall Philosophie the vvonderfull vvoorkemanship of this vvorld A vvoorke doubtlesse of great auaill to the knovvledge of God in his creatures A vvorke of vvonderfull efficacie to set foorth the honour and glorie of God the Creator A vvoorke of merueilous force to stirre vp mens mindes to the contemplation of true knovvledge and learning vvhiche is gathered out of the holy Scriptures only A vvoork of rare effect to declare the prayse of God the vvoorkman and to establishe assured fayth and true religion To bee short a vvoorke so farre surpassing all other vvoorkes of like argument vvriten either by Christian or Heathen Philosophers as the proofes and auctorities vsed by them both bee differing the one beeyng founded vppon the assured ground of Gods vvoord and holy Scriptures the other established vpon the fickle foundation of mans reason iudgement This vvoorke therefore Right Honorable so profitable so pleasant so necessarie so full of varietie of Godly matter so substancially grounded by vvarrant of Scriptures so surely confirmed by auctoritie of Doctours and Fathers in most humble and duetifull maner I present vnto your honor Hoping that as in the Latine it hath bin generally liked of the learned so likevvise you vvill not mislike that it novv go abroad in the Englishe tōgue vnder the protection of your Right Honorable name by him vvho resteth your honours most hūble at cōmaundement Thomas Twyne To the right honourable the Lord Friderike of Nachod Lorde of Danouiz and of Beske c. his verie good Lorde and Patrone AVncient and noble is the question concernyng the originall of the worlde and firste beeginning of all things Right honorable Baron which hath not only long tyme and much troubled the wittes of the Philosophers but also of Christians in the end by reason of the diuerse iudgements of men hath rested so doubtfull that many graue writers coulde not tell what to determine therin For amōg the Christiās Origen in his bookes of the beginnings which bookes aboue the residue most men do iudge to bee his woorthy woork and they which after him wrote the Examera are so diuided in opinions that nothing may seeme certeinly to bee gathered out of their writinges But among the Philosophers men ignorant of God and his trueth there is farre more diuersitie of opinions so that concernyng this matter a man may better gheasse than vnderstand by their doctrine what hee hath to follow Now touchyng these Philosophers perhaps there is no such cause to wonder at their blindnes in so great a matter and that thei were so deepely drowned in darknes forasmuch as they were destitute of Gods woord that is to say the true light of knowledge But among Christians suche disoorde and disagreement cannot with like vprightnes bee excused for that there is but one way of the trueth wherof they might haue found most assured groundes in the woord of God if they had had regard therto What was thā the cause of so greate disagreement among the Christians concernyng this matter Forsooth it was the Heathen Philosophie with the preceptes wherof they were not onely then instructed and infected but many also of them beeing stuffed bee witched and deceiued therwith in respect that they ascribed mostvnto this art would graunt and admit nothyng whiche they supposed to bee repugnant to the principles thereof And this mischeif did not onely continue in the tyme of our forefathers and the firste age of the Churche whiche many hauing learned in the schooles of the Philosophers euen in their tender yeeres and afterward beeing conuerted to the faith of Christ could not easily lay doune and chaunge those opinions whiche they had receiued beefore and of long tyme most studiously embraced Yea now since the name of the Philosophers is extinguished it cannot bee plucked out of the minds of many that would bee called Christians so deepely forsooth the admiration and reuerence of this Heathen Philosophie is imprinted within the mindes of some men and of so great a force it is as the Prouerbe fayeth in tender youth and as it were with the Mothers milke to accustome a mans self vnto errour as it were vnto the preceptes of trueth And therefore I doe not doubt but that this my woorke concerning Christian Naturall Philosophie that is to say how to refourme the opiniōs of the Philosophers by the woord of God shal bee reprooued of many and therfore hath need of some noble and great personage that is welbecloued among all estastes to bee patrone vnto it by whose auctoritie beeing defended and fauour cōmended it may safely and acceptably come abroade into mens hands to bee read You only right honorable are hee vnto whose name therefore I dedicate the same how far soeuer I bee disioyned from you by distance of place And as for your honour there wanteth nothyng in you that may suffice to discomfite the force of all enemies if so bee that you can well like of this woork and doe accept it vnto your protection For if it might please you to oppose that same your moste singulare and true Christian godlines of minde against the old and stubburne crue of heathen men concerning this part of Philosophie in respect that you do syncerely and purely woorshippe God by direction of his vndoubted woord weighyng and examinyng euery thing accordyng to that as a most certeine rule there is no man that doubteth but that there is more credite to be giuen vnto your
sinfull and blinde fleshe and therevpon reposeth it self not that whiche discreetly and as farre as neede requireth discourseth of the causes of thinges S. But what alledge thei out of the writynges of the fathers to driue vs from this kinde of â—â—â—die of Naturall Philosophie M. It were an infinite thyng to goe about to report their saiynges but I will onely recite a fewe S. Rehearse them I praie you M. Lactantius in his third booke and viii chapiter writeth thus What felicitie shall I atteine vnto if I knowe where Nilus riseth or whatsoeuer the naturall Philosophers do doate concernyng heauen yea moreouer there is no certein knowledge of those thinges but onely opinion whiche also is variable accordyng to the varietie of mennes wittes S. Augustine also is coÌ„mended who in his fourth Booke de Trinitate of the Trinitie in the Preface writeth thus That minde is more to be commended which knoweth it owne infirmitie rather than that whiche not perceiuyng the same searcheth after the motions of the Planets and the walles of the worlde the foundations of the earth and the top of the heauens And that I maie not touche euery thyng in his Booke de spiritu anima of the spirite and the soule the 56. chapiter hee plainly also setteth doune the same S. Can you answere these aucthorities M. Yea. S. How I praie you M. That these thynges are also spoken by the fathers in comparisoÌ„ as it appeereth out of the same place of S. Augustine whom you erewhile coÌ„mended For the Fathers reproued the disordered studies of men whiche wee see also now a daies to reste in many and that in Christians who conteÌ„nyng the doctrine of saluation and neglecting the studie of the veritie of the Gospell whiche is set for the in a simple stile conuert themselues wholy vnto these swellyng and puffed Artes of Naturall Philosophie addietyng them selues vnto them and openly preferryng the ambicious name of a naturall Philosopher before ChristiaÌ„ godlinesse and Diuinitie Wherfore the Fathers to the intent to reuoke men from this so greate an errour haue vttered muche matter againste Naturall Philosophers and their Art and their opinions and that truely as haue S. Basill S. Chrisostome in their Exameron or woork of sixe daies Howbeeit thei doe not condemne the true knowledge of those thinges whiche certain amongst them were verie skilfull in and moste perfect S. Whiche is the other argument whiche you said was taken a consequenti of the consequente and alledged against naturall Philosophie M. That truely which S. Basile reciteth to be alledged by slouthfull and idle persones therby to colour their filthie ignorance S. What is that M. That the wounderfull miracle of the creation of the worlde is debased and made vile wherein notwithstanding the greate power maiestie and wisedome of God appeareth is laid before our eyes to bee woorshipped if wee bee able to sette it doune in any arte or Methode and if it maie bee saied that so greate a misterie maie bee comprehended For what other thyng were that saie thei than to feigne our selues not onely to bee able to comprehend the woorkes of God whiche doubtlesse are supernaturall and Diuine but also to make vs iudges as it were Censores thereof And finally to make God as it were a Grammarian subiect vnto certein lawes of Nature and Arte. S. What answere you vnto that M. Truly euen that which in the same place S. Basile the best learned amongst the Greek writers answereth S. What saieth hee M. That thereby this miracle of God which appeareth in the Creation of the worlde is more manifestly aduaunced and by vs more religiously adored by howe muche the more it is distinctly declared wherby is set forthe the greater commoditie and force thereof And to the end that you maie vnderstand this to bee true by another example Gods decree concernyng our saluation is it not commoly tearmed in the Scriptures Gods secrete and misterie And verely it is so wherein the Maiestie and Wisedome of GOD is proposed vnto vs no lesse than in the creatioÌ„ of the worlde and yet notwithstandyng Faithe or the Gospell setteth it forthe to our view so plainly so orderly and distinctly that nothyng can bee more Notwithstandyng the worshippyng of God is nothyng thereby diminished in that wee comprehende it by Art and by a Theologicall Methode but rather by so muche the more better and ardently wee praise GOD by how much the more commodiously and distinctly wee atteine to the vnderstandyng of these things And to bee short faith it self through which God will bee worshipped is not a certein ignorance or a confused imagination concernyng God but a cleare and resâ—â—â—te vnderstanding of the minde whiche directly answereth vnto suche questions as are demaunded touching God and his infinite mercie towardes mankinde Vnknowen things are vndesired as the old Prouerbe saieth Wherefore whenas the Historie of the creatioÌ„ of the worlde is set forth by art when the vertues whiche God hath giuen vnto thinges are declared Gods Miracle is not diminished but augmeÌ„ted Neither do wee set doune these things as though wee did professe that we would alledge any other causes of these naturall thynges besides the will and wisedome of GOD onely Or that through them wee can acknowledge or conteine so much in our minde as is the power of God in creating and his goodnes in preseruing them Or els as though wee went about to shewe that our great and good God the cheife gouernour of all thinges were subiect to any of our lawes or decres but onely profitably to busie our selues in setting forth of Gods woorkes so farre as wee may bee holpen by art and as it were through a glasse which looketh into thys schoole of the nature of thinges to keepe such as are lesse heedefull in the noble contemplation of them The thirde Chapter From whence the knowledge of the Generall naturall Phylosophie is to bee had most safely S. THese thinges I vnderstande proceede to the residue M. The next is that wee discusse from wheÌ„ce this knowledge is to bee drawn taken bycause in this point wee disagree from certein who suppose that it maye more safely and certeinly bee deriued out of the bookes of prophane Philosophers thaÌ„ the holy Scriptures in that they saye that it is not all set foorth in the Scripture and if haply there bee anye parte thereof conteined therein it is confusedly handled not by any art or order S. From whence then doe you iudge maye the knowledge of naturall Philosophie most conueniently bee taken M. Uerily of that part which beefore wee tearmed generall naturall Philosophie the knowledge is chiefly to bee learned out of holy Scripture And of that which wee called Particular out of the woorkes of Phisitions or of others which haue written the histories of Plantes and of lyuinge thinges S. How proue you that M. First I suppose this is agreed vpoÌ„ by all men of souÌ„d iudgement that euery workman can best and
truliest talke and dispute in his owne Art and that hee is rather to bee beleeued therin than any other But what woorkmans woorkmanship thincke you is thys worlde Is it any others than Gods onely so that wee ought to beleeue none rather than him who in hys woorde teacheth vs the maner and order of framinge his woorke that is to saye the worlde To bee shorte who knoweth seeth and vnderstandeth more truely the causes of all things their properties effectes the maner of their beeing the times when first they began then hee who is the maker of them all and the perpetuall gouernour of them all who beeing GOD and sence hee him selfe telleth these thinges what man will at anye time bee so mad but to thinke that hee is rather to bee harkened vnto in thys respect and all other writers to bee neglected Truely wee as also all other Philosophers howsoeuer surpassing in wit abounding in leasure what soeuer diligence they employed in study yet could neuer neither wee nor they attayne vnto certaine obscure slender sparkes of naturall Philosophie And whatsoeuer we define coÌ„cerning these matters without the woorde of God it is so vncerteine doubtfull variable and contrarie to it selfe and many times so contrarie to the trueth that in the ende wee are ashamed that wee either learned so or taught so which may appeare to be true if it wer but only out of Plutarchus booke De Placitis Philosophorum Of the opinions of Philosophers whereas that excellent learned man and great Philosopher sheweth that neuer two of them agreed in the knowledge of the things that are created S. Can you confirme the trueth of your opinion by the auchoritie of Gods woord to wit that this knowledge may well and safely bee learned out of the holy scriptures M. Yeas verily S. Recite them I pray you M. The first testimonie is that which is writen euidently in the epistle to the Hebrues in these woords Through Faith wee vnderstande that the worlde was made by the woorde of God. Wherefore wee vnderstande these thinges by Faith. If by Faith then by the holy scripture for ther can bee no faith without the scripture And therfore wee must certainely conclude that the true and certeine knowledge concerninge these matters is declared vnto vs by the holy scripture The seconde aucthoritie is the 1. chapter of Genesis For Moses who at the commaundement and appointment of God wrot that historie of all other most excellent and wounderfull of the beginninge of the worlde and creation of all thinges is either a vaine fellowe or a lier if the knowledge of naturall Philosophie be not conteined in the holy Scripture For what other thing doth hee in that booke than briefly howbeit truely and orderly set downe the originall of thinges and theyr vertues natures and effectes that is to say Naturall Philosophie The thyrde is a place in the Prouerbes the viii Chapiter and the 20. verse the nexte folowinge where it is saied that all thinges were created by the wysdome of God and afterwarde as they were created so are they preserued The fourth aucthoritie is alleaged out of the 42. Chapiter and 17. verse of Ecclesiast This wisdome hath God giuen to his Sainctes saith hee that they might recoumpt all his miracles and workes and search them all yea hell it selfe c. wherevnto wee may adde that which is written in the vii chapiter of the booke of VVisedom the 22. verse and the next folowing Finally let vs heare the moste holye Martyr of God and good Father Irenaeus who in his seconde booke and 2. Chapter saithe thus To whom therefore shall wee giue more credit concerning the framing of the worlde to those that wee spake of beefore so iangling in folly and inconstancie or to the Disciples of the Lorde and the seruant and Prophet of God Moses who first reuealed the creation of the worlde The selfe same thing S. Basell and S. Ambrose and S. Chrisostome in the prefaces of their Exameron or Six dayes woorke doe with one consent and plainely confirme so that whoso shall deney that the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie may not truely and commodâ—ously bee learned out of holy scripture gainsaith the sacred woorde of GOD and openly repugneth against the learned Fathers In conclusioÌ„ hearken to â—ertullian who in the 46. chapter of hys Apologet doth truely and plainly pronounce that the sacred woorde of God which is most auncient was as it were the treasurie and stoarehouse vnto all later wisdom From thence saith hee the Philosophers haue quenched the thirst of their wits But as men that were ouer riotous in the study onely of glorie and eloquence if they found any thyng in holy scripture when they had digested it according to the purpose of their curiositie they conuerted it to their owne woorkes S. Doe they that are of the contrarie opinion bring nothing against thys M. Yeas two argumentes especially S. What bee they M. This is the first That the ende of euery art ought to bee distinguished and that Naturall Philosophie is one thing and Diuinitie another whereof thys last is conteined in holie write but the other is not so S. Is that consequent and assertion true M. No verily S. Howe so M. For that although they gather that truly that artes ought to bee distinguished and that Diuinitie which conteineth the promises of euerlastinge lyfe teaching also the waye thervnto and the causes thereof ought to bee separated from Naturall Philosophie whiche entreateth of the framinge of this visible worlde and the natures of all thinges in the same yet doe they not say truely in denyinge that the order of the creation of this world the sundrie kindes of things their natures manifold sortes are taught distinguished and orderly set downe in holy Scripture All these thinges are copiously declared there which are the peculiar subiect matter of the Art of Natural Philosophie Wherefore Naturall Philosophie is comprehended in holy scripture The same also you may learne by another example are not Diuinitie and the morall parte of Philosophie both of them as they differ in kinde discerned in the holy scriptures And yet who is so rasbe and folishe that he dare deny that the Ethike or moral Philosophie yea and that most truly and generally is deliuered vnto vs in holie scripture wherefore the distinct endes of Artes and treatises are no impediment but that the Generall Naturall Philosophie and also Diuinitie are conteined in the holy Scriptures forsomuch as Natural Philosophic is as it were a parte of Diuinitie and an handmaideÌ„ vnto the same For it is a notable meane to knowe God by which thing also S Ambrose confesseth with mee What shall I saye more The Heathen Philosophers them selues when they dispute of the worlde and the creation of the partes therof and when they intreat of the nature of thinges they saye that thei play the Diuines and enter into discourse of Diuinitie as Aristotle speaketh in his booke de mundo of
glorie as S. Augustine teacheth verie often the one is visible thinges the other is inuisible which is to bee seene in the 1. chapter of Genesis Moses in his treatice of Naturall Philosophie hath cōprehended and handled but one kinde to wit of visible thinges onely and those things onely doth the Scripture acknowledge for the Natural thinges Wherefore Naturall thinges are to bee defined as wee haue saide in that they bee visible As for inuisible thinges and such as cannot bee seene whether they moue or moue not they are reuoked reduced to another kinde of Art as thinges that are not Naturall And to confirme this my sayinge I coulde alleage the aucthorities almost infinite of the auncient Fathers S. Basile S. Chrisostome S. Ambrose S. Augustine but what shoulde that neede in so euident a matter S. I vnderstande these thinges and as I perceiue this is your iudgement and opinion that all those things are properly the matter and subiect of the Art of Naturall Philosophie whiche are the creatures of GOD and subiect to our senses and maye bee beeholden or seene M. You saye true S. Nowe therefore define euerie one of these to the end that this whole disputatiō may proceed in order and methode M. I will doe so S. What is a creature M. It is euerie thinge which is neither of it selfe neither hath bene euer but was once made yea and that by god Thus doe the learned saye and that truely in my iudgement S. But S. Paule to the Romaines the 8. Chapter and 20. verse seemeth to haue taught otherwise to wite that a creature is that thinge which is subiect to vanitie corruption and seruitude by reason of sinne which deffinition also S. Hillarius followeth in his booke of the Trinitie M. You remember it well Howbeit S. Paule doeth not in that place define what a creature is generally and of it selfe but what it is now after sinne and so farre foorth as was thē necessarie for the argument which hee had in hande Wherfore hee had respect then vnto one kinde of creatures onely Neither doth Sainct Paule define a creature by it owne true nature but only by the qualitie and accident which indeede is in it and which hapned vnto things after they were created that is to say after they were once made creaturs but as hauinge nowe lost their full and perfect nature in parte by reason of mans transgression Which also may bee answered vnto him whoso shall obiect against vs the sayinge of S. Augustine in his booke against Felicianus the 7. chap. A creature is the substāce of euery corruptible thinge made by the will of God out of that which is not yet or was not sumtime so far as the nature of the thing wil permit S. You thinke then that it maye otherwise bee defined more commodiously and more truely generally what a creature is M. Yea verily For neither should the blessed Angels bee truely called creatures neither wee our selues if so bee that Adam had continued in his first state of integritie haue bene truely tearmed creatures if the latter definitions were reteined for wee shoulde haue beene incorruptible and without all vanitie Finally the fleshe of our Lorde Jesus Christe shoulde not rightly be called a creature as it is oftentimes called by S. Augustine and the trueth it selfe beareth record that it was a creature For of it owne selfe it might haue beene voide of all infirmitie bycause it was free from sinne and corruption neither was it subiecte to death for it owne sinne although notwithstandinge wee confesse that Christ died in the fleash Wherfore whosoeuer stubburnly impugneth y whiche wee say shall fall into all maner of absurdities So that thys which wee haue alreadie alleaged and which wee folowe in this place is the most true and ample definition of this woorde creature S. Nowe then by your definition is that to bee called a creature I meane the essence of the thinges themselues and also their vertues and properties togither with their accidents as for example in a man ther is a certayne essence which consisteth in the body and soule there is in him also a vertue property whereby hee reasoneth woorketh feeleth mooueth walketh There are moreouer certeine accidentes which are existinge and vnseperable partes in euery particulare man whiche doo distinguish separate the same man makinge hym to differ from other particulare persons of the same kinde whiche in the Schooles are called indiuiduall Conditions These are also necessarie and existing partes vnto the same particulare persons whereby they liue as place time coloure of the face stature of the body with other such like whiche by reasō of their essence Logicians call accidents Wherefore I demaund this question of you whether you cōprise vnder the name of a creature those three kindes of thinges to wit the essence of the thing the propertie and accident which as you see are distince one from another M. Yea truely For whatsoeuer was by GOD first ingraffed within thinges or by course of nature is ioyned vnto them or whatsoeuer was by him created in this great vniuersalitie of all thinges whether it bee a substāce or called an accident I tearme a creature Although Moses haue onely or specially handled and entreated of those kindes of thinges whiche are substances and so in deede are called which onely I confesse principally and of them selues to belong to a Naturall Philosopher And whatsoeuer hath not proceeded from him but is made by the art of man or by him wrought or by his mischeiuous or peruerse will added that I call not a creature of GOD no not a creature at all For there can bee no creature but that which is made by God who is the onely creator Wherefore the handie woorkes of men their deuises and inuentions which sometime are very excellent shall not beelong vnto this arte no not y sinne of man but by accident and in respect that by meanes thereof ther is a great alteration wrought in the fyrst pure nature of thinges which at this present appeareth in all thinges but specially in man who is the most beutifull woorke of God. S. Howe doe the Grecians tearme a creature M. They call a creature Ktisis although the woorde amonge the Grecians signifieth not onely the thinge that is created but many times also the verie woorkinge of the creator and sometimes likewise the condition of the thinge created as it nowe is and as wee see it S. These thinges I vnderstande But what meane you by this woorde visible when you saye a visible creature was the subiect of Naturall Philosophie M. Not that onely which maye bee comprehended by the sense of the eies as are substance light and coloure although this woord visible seeme properly to signifie the same but what so euer else may bee knowne and perceiued by anye other sense of the bodie as by feelinge hearinge smellinge and tastinge as smell sounde sweete or soure c. And all bodily
thinges are especially tearmed visible for that our sight is the most certaine most excellent and most noble of all the senses of our bodie and for that also the actions of euery lyuinge thinge and the argumentes whereby we perceiue them to bee aliue are chiefly gathered by the sence of seeinge as moouing and breathinge Finally that bodily thinges are more exactly discerned by the eye than by tastinge or hearinge so that to saye that a visible creature is the matter and subiect of Naturall Philosophie is as much as to meane that wee wold haue euery creature whiche is sensible of it owne nature to be the true proper obiect therof whether the same be bodies as are the substaunces of thinges or whether they bee not bodies as are the vertues properties qualities motions and actions which vnto all corporall thinges by nature and their first creation and beeginning either cleaue vnto them without or are engraffed in them within All these kindes are as I haue sayd naturall thinges and created by God. S. I UnderstaÌ„d these things But tell mee now by how many maner of meanes doeth a Christian Naturall Philosopher handle and consider of these creatures M. Onely twoo waies the first to wit as they are all generally conteined in one and all comprehended as it were within the compasse of one bodie whiche incloseth them all which is called the world Or else euerie one in his kinde which are sundrie wherein the creatures are distincted and seperated one from another Whiche the particular Historie of the creation in the six dayes setteth downe vnto vs. S. How prooue you that M. In that the Scripture many tymes reciteth vnto vs all thinges created and visible vnder the name of the world as in Isay the 38. chapter and 11. verse Iohn the 1. chapter the 9. verse and the 9. chap. the 39. verse And many tymes the Scripture reciteth them distinctly and seuerally thereby the more to set foorth the wounderfull wisedome of God as in the 104. and 147. Plalmes and 8. verse and the 149. Psalme Wherfore wee muste also entreate of them after both these manners that sutch thinges as may bee gathered learned out of these creatures apperteinyng to the knowledge of God and setting foorth of his glorie according as the Scripture teacheth may bee by vs abundantly vnderstoode so that at the length wee may beecome perfect Christian naturall Philosophers S. With whiche of these twoo Methodes must wee first beegin M. Euen with that treatice which proposeth vnto vs all thinges generally comprehended in that one bodie which is called the world S. And why with that M. Bicause that way of teaching is more generall and more easie For whole thinges are better knowne than their partes for a man shal with more ease beehold an whole house than bee able too distinguishe or comprehend in his minde euerie part thereof And moreouer that whiche shal bee saied concernyng the whole world wil open vnto vs the way and entrance too the handling of the particular kindes of thinges For it shal bee as a foundation to the residue that shall ensue The viii Chapter What the world is S. DIscourse then of the world M. I will. S. What is the world M. The signification of the worlde is diuerse and manifold as the Philosophers doe teache vs as Laertius in his 7. booke and Plutarche in his first booke of the Philosophers opinions whiche signification wee must first distinguishe least beeing deceiued by the ambiguitie of the woord either wee do mocke the reader in this whole disputation or else deceiue him S. How many significations therefore are there of this woord world M. Three speciall First the world is taken for the creatures themselues whereof this whole visible frame and woorke consisteth So is it taken in Iohn the first chapter the 10. verse so likewise in the 2. Epistle of S. Peter the 3. chap. and 6. verse And moreouer for the corrupt and miserable condition of this world which falling vnto all these thinges by meanes of mannes transgression now hangeth vppon them whereby there is a most manifest confusion and a great disorder in al thinges So sayth S. Ihon in the 2. chap. and 16. verse and likewise the 5. Chapter and 19. verse Finally it is taken for one parte of the worlde and that the most noble and excellent to wit for men only and manye times for all men as to the Romanes the 5. chapter and 12. verse Ihon the 3. chapter the 16. verse and oftentimes for the faithfull and regenerat as in the 1. Epistle of S. Ihon the 2. chapter and 2. verse and at another time also for the reprobate and vnbeleeuinge as in the 1. Epistle to the Corinthians the 1. chapter and 21. verse and S. Ihon the 14. chapter the 17. and 22. verses Otherwise also if a man would call the definition of this woorde worlde vnto certaine chapters and speciall pointes wee maye saye that vnder the name of the worlde sumtime the place it selfe sumtime the substance of the thinges sumtime the men as the principall part thereof and sumtime the corruption of the same part that is to say of men is to be vnderstoode S. But the worlde was by the Latins called Mundus for the most beutifull order of all things therein coteined like as it was also tearmed by the Grecians Kâ—smoâ— of the cumlynesse thereof which reason of the name truely is repugnant vnto that signification whereby you saye that confusion of thinges and vice is sumtime signified by the name of the worlde M. Uerily you haue alleaged a true definition of thys woorde worlde from which notwithstandinge afterwarde the vse both of the Greeke and Latine tongue hath deflected For men vnderstoode that rebellion corruption and disorder was generally in all things and partes of the worlde they called the same by the name of the worlde bicause it is inseperably distributed throughout the whole aâ—d ingraffed as it were within the marrowe of euery singulare thinge By which meanes men are many times tearmed to bee the common destinie and miserie of men The Hebrues in their tongue call the worlde Gola which woorde the Apostles doe translate Euerlastinge as to the Hebrues the 11. chapter and 3. verse the 1. chapter and 2. verse to the Ephesians the 2. chapter and 2. verse not of eternitie as if the worlde had beene alwayes and from euerlastinge but rather of the fixed and certeine order thereof which the Lorde God hath established in it after that he had created the things that are in it which wee beholde to bee in it to continue in it euen vnto this daye as are the risinge and settinge of the Sunne and the chaunge and alteration of the foure quarters of the yeare And this shall indure so longe as this state of thinges shall continue as it appeareth in the 8. chapter of Genesis the 22. verse the 9. chapter the 9. or 10. verse Iob the 26. chapter the 10. verse
proper and naturall force and signification of this woorde Create For in the 43. chap. and 13. verse of Isay the Lorde calleth himselfe the creatour of Israell which people notwithstandinge are knowne to haue beene borne of seede And againe in in the 65. Chapter and 18. verse of the same Prophet he saith Beeholde I create Hierusalem Whiche place whether it bee vnderstoode of the citizens or of the citie it selfe it is certayne that God made neyther of them without seede or matter but the men of the one and the Citie of the other For this woorde Barah is vsed in both places so that I am of opinion that wee ought not to sticke to religiously or percisely to the interpretation of one poore woorde Likewise they alleage this saying of the same Prophete Beeholde I create a newe heauen and a newe earth When as indeede the Lorde will onely renue these bodyes which nowe are heauen and earth and not make theÌ„ again of nothing M. It is writen in Isay as you say But these places doe plainly confirme mine opinion much lesse confute it For the woorde create is taken Metaphorically and wrested a litle from the proper significatioÌ„ wherby the power of God may appeare the greater more excellent in restoringe his people and holy Citie beesides al hope and other thinges beesides all ordinarie meanes For lyke as the thinges that are created are beesides the course of nature made of nothinge so likewise bycause the Lord promiseth that hee will restore and renue his people and Citie hee vseth properly the woorde of creating for that this which the Lord will woorke is as it were a new creation and a certayne wonÌ„derfull bringing foorth and generation out of nothinge Althoughe I will not deney but that the signification of this word Barah is ofteÌ„times translated and vsed more largely as when it is sayd Create a cleane hart within mee O God the 51. Psalme and 12. verse and againe The seat of the frowarde createth iniquitie Psalme 94. and 20. verse Of this sayinge and opinion of Sainct Augustine that I maye saye so much by the licence of so woorthy a man I doe not well alowe Who in his first booke against the aduersaries of the lawe and the Prophetes the 23 chap writeth thus And when there is anye difference made beetweene makinge and creatinge this maye bee the oddes beetwene those two woordes as I sayde that that is made which beefore was not at all and that created which is ordeyned of sumthinge that was beefore Hee distinguished those two woordes Make and Creat toto subtily whiche oftentimes are vsed one for an other S. How then should it bee M. Thus the Scripture plainly defineth to wit that God is the creatour of the world that is to say of all thinges that are who made framed brought foorth them all out of nothing and not out of any matter preexisting or made to his hande or whiche is coeternall with God himself or ministred vnto him by some other woorking God as the Manichees doe suppose For that opinion induceth two Goddes and in making twayne it leaueth none For either there is no God or there is but one Finally as saith S. Ambrose God should bee onely the diuiser of the figure and not the maker of Nature and hee had founde and receiued more than hee had made if there had bin any matter readie to his hande S. But there bee some that saie that this matter is signified in the scripture by this woorde Tohu where vpon afterward the Grecians and the Philosophers who receiued those thinges first of the Hebrues and of the Phenicians neere borderers to the Hebrues whiche thei haue written concernyng the beeginnyng of the worlde thei deuised this woorde Hyle by a small alteration of certein letters made according to the vse and proprietie of their tongue For this woorde Hyle saiethei signifieth among the Grecians as muche as a rude heape vnformed and as it were a certein moiste and waterishe yearth or quagmire or dregges out of whiche many thinges are engendred through the force of the heate whiche commeth vnto it From the whiche woorde Hyle is the woorde Hilys deriued which signifieth dregges and froath that is to saye a dirtie and moyst earth out of whiche many thinges doe growe in the Sea. M. I doubted not but those that goe about to defend the same errour of theirs concerning a firste matter pre-existing as though it were verie necessarie and they that haue throughly receiued the same doe deuise many suche foolishe fantasies But how small or none at all the affinity of these two woordes is Tohu and Hyle in writing of the Letters or rather how farre this is from the trueth your selfe doe see and it shall not bee needefull to seeke farther forasmuch as God is openly called the creatour of heauen and earth S. Yea God is termed Gosâ—he Ioâ—ser that is to say the maker and the fourmer as it is written in Isay the 66. chapt and 10. verse and Iob the 35. chap. and 10. verse and Isay the 54. chap. 8. verse as also in the 90. Psalme the 2. verse M. That was doone not rashly nor in vaine but to the intent to take awaye sutch errours as the spirite of God foresawe would grow afterward amongst men For there are twoo errours among men concernyng the beeginning of all thinges beesides the errour of the materiare heretikes For some thinke that first and alwaies there was existing a certein whole masse and that rude and confused whiche was the heape of all the principall partes and thinges of the worlde whiche now are existing and fourmed but then disorderly mingled togither which they call Chaos And this opinion Hesiodus folowed in his Theogonia whiche Ouid describeth in his Metamorphosis in these wordes Beefore the sea and lande were made the heauen that all doth hide In all the worlde one onely face of nature did abyde Whiche Chaos hight an huge rude heape and nothinge else but eeuen An heauie lumpe and clottred clod of feedes togither driuen Of thinges at strife amonge themselues for want of order due No sunne as yet with lightsome beames the shapelesse worlde did viewe c. This muche therefore they doe attribute vnto God that hee is the distinguisher trimmer and setter foorth of this so confused a Chaos mole and heape and not the creatour of it in time giuinge vnto it the first meanes of beeinge And therefore the Poet sayde There was as it were from euerlasting and not the same Chaos was made and created by god And for this cause they doe not call God the Creatour of the world but onely the beutifier and as Sainct Ambrose sayeth the deuiser of the shape and fourme thereof as though hee hadde giuen a certeine comlinesse and order vnto thinges that existed before and which had of themselues their owne proper strength and nature whiche hee accomplished by a certaine wise and apt distinction of them and by separating
a mans children or sunnes are beegotten of the fathers seede and substance Moreouer whatsoeuer is said to spring and come of another ought not by and by to be called the sunne of that from whiche it springeth For Lice doe breede out of a mannes fleshe yet are thei not called the sunnes of men or of their fleshe To cōclude since the comparison and respecte of GOD vnto the worlde is rather like the woorkeman to the woorke than like the Father to the Sunne truely the worlde may bee termed the woorke and perfected labour of God but by no meanes called his Sunne The. xxi Chapter What God created first to bee the matter for thinges that were created afterward S. HEtherto you haue discoursed of the efficiēt cause now saye sumwhat concernyng the materiall cause of the world M. What matter can I name vnto you since there was none at all as I haue sufficiently disputed and proued beefore as this woord Create declareth if you haue regarde to it owne proper signification Neither do I thinke it woorth the traueill to confute the opinions of the Philosopers who haue almoste euerie one of them stūbled at this block or else to conuince the heresie of the Hermogenians who reuoked that errour whiche was nowe long since extinguished in the Churche of God out of the scooles and opinions of the Stoikes and chose rather to learne how the world beegan at the handes of naturall Philosophers than of true Christians and out of Gods woord Al whose argumentes Tertullian hath confuted in a noble and profitable woorke whiche is now abroade in mens handes and is most worthie to bee read S. I doe not require after that which was not but this rather whether that among those thinges whiche God created of nothing there were any thing disposed prepared and brought foorth that afterward serued the turne and stoode in steede in the creation of other things out of which God did afterward facion and fourme al thinges else that remained to be made M. You mooue mee to enter into a difficult question which consisteth both of like number of weightie reasons and of auctorities of graue writers For among the learned auctours some thinke that Heauen and earth of whiche in the 1. chapt of Genesis and 1. verse it is writen In the beginnyng God made heauen and earth were made by God of nothyng howbeit first and before all thinges to the intent that they might be the prepared matter of all other thinges that were to be afterward created And therfore they say that God did nothyng the other daies following but onely distinguysh this matter and masse which was first confusedly brought foorth and conteined in it the seedes of all other thinges into the proper kindes and elementes and that euerie thing should be trimmed foorth in it owne kind and gouerned by it owne lawe Other dooe suppose otherwise that these thinges were only set downe in the beginning as it were in maner of a preface or supposition of some discourse that should ensue to the end that the summe of the whole matter following might be the better vnderstoode and the boundes of so great a frame as the world is bee drawne foorth In like maner cunning Carpenters when they are about to build some goodly and large house they firste drawe out a platfourme in certeine proportions and lines conteining the fourme of the whole woork that shal bee to the intent they may point out and place the other roomthes of the buildyng within that circuite so conteine themselues within those limites Thus say they heauen and earth are proposed by Moses and that in the beeginning of his Narration to the ende wee might vnderstande what limites the discription following and the whole woorke should haue Like as he also repeateth again those limites after the narration of the creation concludeth the whole woorke whiche hee set foorth after the same manner Genesis the 2. chapter and 1. verse Wherefore In the beginnyng God created heauen and earth that is to saye firste of all the summe of all Gods woorkes is layd beefore vs to bee thought on Moreouer Ireneus in his 2. booke the 10. 11. and 16. chapters sheweth that GOD is not like men as not hauing neede of any matter that hee had created or prepared before hand to finish or make his other woorkes of S. Howe then doe you thinke otherwise M. Truely the interpretation and opinion of the fyrste sorte seemeth vnto mee the more probable which hold that the heauen and earth in suche maner as thei are there spoken of were firste created by GOD of nothing howbeit as it were a rude matter of the whole woorke and bewtie that shoulde folowe out of which God by his mightie power brought foorth all the residue Although almightie God lacked no matter to create firste heauen and earth with all neither yet to bring forthe the woorkes of the other daies like as at this day also he needeth not the seede of man to bryng foorth men of if hee lust to doe otherwise notwithstanding in these questions wee must not enquire how much hee was able to doe sayeth S. Augustine in his 2. booke de Genesi but rather what the course of nature in things will suffer and what his pleasure is and what hee hath reuealed vnto vs by his woorde Neither doth this mine opinion want iust and sufficient confirmation either of the auctoritie of men or of reason And as for auctoritie there is none against mee seeing bothe Philo Iudaeus and the Rabbines commonly and the best learned of the Hebrues doe so expounde that place of Moses yea S. Augustine also oftentimes as in the 5. booke de Ge nesi ad Literam the 3. and 5. chapters and the 1. booke the 5. chapter S. Ambrose likewise in Examero and S. Chrysostome and S. Basile with others S. But can you confirme your opinion by any reason M. Yea by twaine And the first is that this exposition doth very well agree with Moses woordes and order and againe that it seemeth to be plainly confirmed by this woord Beeginning and the signification therof For a beeginning is sayd in comparison of other thinges And therefore to the intent hee might shewe how all other thinges were made afterwarde out of those twayne Moses plainly vseth this preface to wit that the same heauen and the same earth were created in the beeginning that is to saye beefore all the other woorkes that God made and also to the vse of all the other that is to saie from whence afterward the residue were taken and as it were made The very footsteppes as it were of whiche opinion howbeeit the trueth beeyng now and then manifestly intercepted do appeare to be exstant in Hesiodus in his Theogonia and Ouid also in that place of the firste booke of his Metamorphosis which is so well knowne Beefore the Sea and Earth c. This reason also may bee alleaged that the thing itself and specially
hee is not called onely the image but also the liuely brightnesse of the Fathers glorye And yet farther to the intent it may bee the better vnderstoode what and how great the difference is wee must note that the world and man are a notable but yet a shadowed representation of those things which they do teach vs cōcerning god And Christ the expresse and liuely fourme in whose inward natural and substanciall brightnesse wee may most euidently behold the infinite power of God and incomprehensible loue towardes vs men Thus therefore when wee thincke vppon God and beholde him in all other thinges suche is our vanitie that immediatly wee decay and come to naught but when wee looke vppon him in Christ wee are quieted and stayed most firmely and substantially Wherefore there ought no comparison bee made betweene these which differ in kinde and manner of representation The xxxiii Chapter Two endes of the worlde not chiefe S. BUT bee ther not also other finall causes of the worlde M. Yeas there bee two but not chiefe S. What bee they M. The first is this to wit the vse of al men For this worlde was created for mans sake and man for god The seconde is for the Church or congregation For the worlde was created to the entent it should bee an house and dwelling place prepared for the Church and congregation that should bee hereafter where in it might remaine of it owne right which congregation God woulde establishe there and afterward bring to heauen S. Howe prooue you this M. First out of the 8. Psalme And secondly by that which S. Paule writeth to the Romanes the 4. Chapter and 13. verse The xxxiiii Chapter Of the meanes and engins whereby God raysed this so great a frame of the worlde and first of the woorde of God which was the meanes whereby this worlde was created S. HEtherto you haue declared the causes of this worlde nowe shewe the meanes and instrumentes wherby it was created And when mention is made of the creation of the woorlde some do demaunde what wedges what tooles and engins were occupied to the rearinge vp of so great a mole and they thinke themselues not satisfied vnlesse aunswere bee made vnto those doubtes of their minde M. Thei that seeke to know with what instruments this worlde was created do verie foolyshly forasmuch as this woorde create doth sufficiently declare that all this whole woorke is plainly miraculous and supernaturall For God vsed no tooles nor engins as carpenters vse to doe thereby to supplie the infirmitie of their strength But all his framing and buildinge and the woorkemanship of thys worlde doeth differ farre from all our meanes and pollices S. Tell mee then what it was M. In declaringe the meanes by which this world was created ther are foure things annexed which we must not pretermit and they perteine to the settinge foorth of Gods glory and omnipotencie wherof the fyrst is this that the worlde was created at the woorde and commaundement of God. S. Howe prooue you that M. Behold a most manifest place of the Scripture in the 33. Psalme 9. verse For hee spake and it was doone hee commaunded and it stoode fast and in the 148. Psalme and 5. verse Hee commaunded and they were created Moreouer Moses in the first chapter of Genesis beefore the creation of euery thing as they were made and created orderly in euery daye so doeth hee plainely shewe that the woord and cōmaundement of God went alwayes before And the Lorde sayde let it bee made c. Yea the Stoikes haue saide that the woorde of God was the efficient cause of the whole nature of thinges as Laertius writeth in his 7. booke in the life of Zeno. S. But there bee twoo impedementes that it can not bee so M. Which bee they S. The fyrst is that which is written in the 45. Chapter and 12. verse of Isay My handes haue stretched foorth the heauens Ergo God made not these things with his woord but with his handes M. Uerily this saiyng conteineth a most manifest Metaphore when hee attributeth handes vnto God and when in respect of the weakenesse of our vnderstanding God is cōpared to an handie craftes man which woorketh with his owne hāds the like wherof there are many authorities to be foūde in y scriptures And whereas this woorde of creating is vsed in the same place it plainly calleth vs backe vnto that diuine and extraordinarie woorke of God and to thinke vppon that meane onely which Moses hath recited M. The seconde impediment is that wheras in another place in like kind of thinges and semblable argument mention is made of the woorde of God notwithstanding Gods secret will is ment thereby whiche is not expressed in any woord or commaundemēt as in the 147. Psalme 15. and 18. verses where he speaketh of Ice Hee sendeth out his woorde and melteth it M. You say well Howbeit in Genesis the verye text also Moses minde teatheth vs that wee must say and thinke otherwise where it is plainly writen that God spake and cōmaunded that to bee which was made Wherfore the only bare and secrete will of God is not there to bee vnderstood and taken but that which is reuealed by the prolation and vtteringe of some woorde of his and commaundement Which opinion of mine is confirmed by an interpretation which the Scripture it self maketh noting that this was doone by vttering of some woorde or voyce For in the 33. Psalme and 6. verse after that it is declared that these things were made by the woorde of God for true exposition sake it is added by the spirite of his mouth For a voice is made by the breathing foorth of aire which is doone by the mouth S. But by this meanes feigning that God hath a tōgue roofe of the mouth and teeth with out whiche instruments no voyce can bee vttered you seeme to reuoke againe out of Hell the abominable errour of the Antropomorphites M. God forbid that I should thinke so wickedly of the infinite and omnipotent maiestie of god But like as the Lorde spake so as he might bee heard and vnderstoode when hee gaue the law in mount Sinai which no man can deney as likewise when hee spake to Moses whē he gaue answere by Vrim Thumim y Lord spake vttered a voice in the hearing of the people yet not withstāding we must not feigne y god hath a tongue a mouth a palate of the mouth teeth So in the beginning creation of the world when it is sayd that God spake his diuine shape was not chaunged intoo an humane fourme but it came to passe by a speciall prouidence and pollicie For the Lord tooke vpon him for a tyme suche meanes as were necessarie for the bringing foorth a cleare and audible voice wherof afterward hee left the vse S Doe you thinke then that the Lord spake plainly and distinctly M. Yea verely Howbeeit I am not ignorant what S. Augustine thinketh
learne the truthe more better of the Fathers and reteined the same more freshly in memorie For that Plato in Timeo was of that opinion and all the Stoikes also their owne writynges do beare witnesse yea moreouer this hath bin agreed vpon by a generall consent of the moste auncient writers that the worlde had a beginnyng whereof Linus the eldest Poete of all who liued before Orpheus writyng of the creation of the worlde beeginneth thus A tyme there was when all thynges framed were togither once as Diogenes Laertius reporteth S. There bee twoo speciall poinctes repugnant to your opinion whereof the one is alledged by the Aristotelians and the other by the Epicurians M. What bee thei S. The first is this Seeyng the worlde is rounde and of a Sphericall fourme there can neither beginnyng nor endyng bee noted therein whereby it commeth to passe that when it mooueth it mooueth circularly or rounde whiche motion also hath neither beeginnyng nor endyng but is a continuall and perpetuall motiō and is therefore eternall Now if the worldes motiō bee eternall the worlde also must needes bee eternall Thus the Peripatetikes by the figure and motion of the world doe conclude y the world it self is also eternall M. Truely this is a verie slender argumente For firste who will graunt vnto them that all the partes of the world doe mooue by that circulare and sphericall motion seeyng that as thei them selues doe write neither the fire neither the aier neither the water neither the earth dooe mooue by this motion but by a right line and a pendent to wit the fire and aire vpwarde the water and earth dounewarde Moreouer if wee deale thus liberally with them to graunte that the worlde is of a sphericall fourme and figure who is able to prooue notwithstandyng that there can bee no beeginning of motion assigned and obscrued therein Seeyng it is not mooued of it self but by an other too wit the greate God or as thei terme it by a certeine firste intelligence or Angell And whereas it is saied of a wheele of a sphere or of a circle that the beginnyng of the motion there of cannot bee assigned in this poincte of the circumference more than in another it is true onely in respecte of the thing the figure and not if you respect the hande that turneth it or the forcyng of the cause that mooueth it in respect whereof the poinct is called the beeginnyng of moouyng in the sphere or circle where hee beginneth to mooue it first that turneth the circle sphere or wheele about Wherfore although the worlde can haue no beginnyng of moouyng neither of it self neither of it owne figure notwithstandyng it hath of God who once beegan it and turned it from a certeine poincte of the circumference and a certeine place to wit from the East continually to mooue into the Weste whether it turneth now daiely beeyng by hym mooued and not of it self And although it bee vnknowne to vs nowe whiche parte of the circumference of heauen God first moued for you see how many and diuerse thynges men dooe affirme concernyng the greate yeere of the worlde whiche is that state of the worlde wherein Heauen and all thinges returne to their place where thei wer first created yet it is certein that heauen began sometyme to mooue from some one prefixed poincte and part of the circumference S. The other repugnancie is this Thei saie it is to absurde to saie that God did not create this world from eternitie and tyme euerlastyng For after so many infinite spaces of yeres paste what should moue hym at length that hee would Create the worlde Thei demaunde therefore why GOD remained so long sluggishe and idle why hee slept so long what he did then why hee ceased from dooyng somethyng so long why hee made not this noble and goodlie woorke sooner These and suche like floutes thei cast foorthe against the maiestie of God. M. You doe alleage the argument of Velleius the Epicure vnto whiche I will answere that which as S. Augustine writeth was spoken by a certein mery old man a Christian Who beeyng likewise demaunded by suche kinde of men what God did beefore hee created the worlde answered He made Hell wherein hee might tormente perpetually suche curious fellowes as doe demaunde suche questions For what wickednesse is this to go about to enter into suche secretes what impudencie to creepe so farre what blasphemie to looke that God should rendre an accoumpt to vs of his doinges and forepassed life who must bee our iudge what needed hee too haue created these thinges sooner whiche hee neither hath neede of too his existence neither thereby to liue in greater felicitie For God hath in himself and that from all eternitie a most perfect most happie and most full state of nature whiche is vnto himselfe sufficient for all thinges and he hath neede of none other thing neither of Angell nor man Psalme 16. and 2. ver Neither was GOD then idle that the Epicures maye not mock neither did hee sleepe in slouthfulnes beefore he made this world But euen then as also now he was inwardly occupied in his woorkes that is to say hee was wonderfully delighted in the contemplation of hymself hee enioyed then himself and his perfect and vnspeakeable glorie hee was busied in the most large and incomprehensible light of his substance and essence as may easily bee vnderstoode out of the Prouerbes the 8. chapter and 30. verse and Iohn the 17. chapt and 4. verse and likewise out of Irenaeus the 4. booke and 28. chapter S. This I vnderstande declare nowe what time thys worlde was created M. Doe you demaund this either of the day or of y Moneth or of the Yeere S. Mary of euery one of them seuerally M. Concerning the day mee thinkes this much may bee sayd that the beginning and first daye of the creation of the worlde was that day which wee Christians doe nowe call Sundaye and which the Jewes called the first daye of the Sabbathes and not that which wee commonly call Munday S. Howe so M. Bicause it is euidente that the Lorde wrought sixe whole dayes togither before the Sabbath seuenth daye And amonge the Hebrues in olde time that was the Sabbath and seuenth daye which wee nowe call Satterdaye whiche is the next daye beefore Sundaye and next after Fridaye For Christians to the entente that they woulde not retaine the auncient ceremoneis of the Jewes but deuoutly to honour the resurrection of our Lorde Jesus Christ wherby ther began a new state of the Church in stead of the Sabbath they chose the next daye following to rest on as it appeareth in the 20. Chapter of the Actes the 1. to the Corinthians the 16. chapter and the first Chapter of the Reuclation and also it is extant in the Ecclesiasticall historie which day they called the Lords day or Sundaye But if you woulde number sixe dayes beefore the Sabbath daye you muste begin vpon Sundaye not
vpon Mundaye and so shall you haue sixe daies after which followeth the Sabbath which is the seauenth Thus First Sunday then Munday Tuesdaye Wedensday Thurseday Fryday after which followeth the Seauenth whiche are the Sabbath dayes So that the Lorde began his woorke of creating the worlde vpon Sunday which is confirmed to bee true by a counsell holdeÌ„ in Iudaea as Eusâ—bius writeth in the 5. booke of his historie and the 23. and 25. Chapters S. But in what Moneth seemeth it vnto you that the worlde was made M. I will vtter in this poinct that whiche seemeth vnto mee most likely and I craue pardon herein that no man thinke mee to bee curious notwithstanding I muste needes vtter my minde for that this question is demaunded by many Uerily it semeth vnto mee that the worlde was created in that moneth which is called by the Hebrues Tisri and is answereable partly vnto our moneth of August and partly to September for doubtles it began after the Autumnal or Haruast equinoctium So that I doe nothinge agree vnto those that write suppose that the world was made in the Moneth of March and in the Springe S. Can you confirme your opinion by any reason M. Yea and that by diuerse And not onely this that in the time of Autumne or Haruast the earth is most apt to receiue the seedes of good fruites as of Wheat and Barly and such like For at that time it seemeth most meete and fit to conceiue as in the Springe to bring-foorth fruite and in Summer to yelde them vp and as for winter then the earth digesteth and concocteth the seedes that are coÌ„mitted vnto hir and embracing them in the middes of hir bosome frameth nourisheth them as a mother doeth hir young whiche notwithstanding shee bringeth foorth in the spring tune when they bee sumwhat growne and in Summer is quite delâ—uered of them as beeinge then ripe and perfecte Wherefore the springe and Summer doe seeme rather to bee as it were midwiues to the earth than to minister vnto it any force or vertue to bringe foorth whiche vertue notwithstandinge Autumne yeeldeth vnto the earth as beeing yet mindefull of the first creation of all thinges and of hir owne bringinge foorth of all manner commodities reteininge vnto this present the force effect and power of the auncient commaundement which the Lorde enioyned at that time So y the Hebrues will haue it that this moneth Tisri shall not be so called of must or newe wine but of iuce wherof the earth is full at that season And these bee the two reasons of mine opinion The fyrst for that as the scripture teacheth in the 28. chapter and 9. verse and so folowinge of Leuiticus this moneth hath beene alwayes since the firste age of man as farre as euer there can bee had any remembrance the beeginninge of the yeare and first moneth And therefore in contractes and bargaines in coÌ„mon and priuate affaires and to bee briefe in supputation of the yeares and age of the worlde which was done by the yeares of Iubilee the yeare euer beegan in this moneth among the auntient Fathers in old time and among the Jewes and ended also in the same So that the yeares age of Adam and the residue of the Fathers whiche liued both beefore the floude and since are to bee reckened from this moneth The seconde reason is this For that the feast of Trumpettes which God commaunded to bee kept vpon the first daye of this moneth seemeth to haue beene specially instituted by God to the intente that the remembraunce of the first originall and creation of the worlde whiche was doone vppon that day might bee holily preserued continued in the Church Truely it was not in vaine that the Lord would haue that day kept holy so great honour reuereÌ„ce attributed vnto these trumpettes Instruments whiche wee reade at that time were so tossed blowne But by that great and pleasant sownd hee ment to admonish and put in remeÌ„braunce men the whole world also of their first natiuitie which as by the special prouision of God it fell vpon the firste daye of this moneth so was it godlily and reuerently renued and remembred in the Church that the world might not bee ignorant of it owne byrth daye Whereby also it came to passe that God coÌ„maunded many feastes and holidaies to bee kept in the seauenth moneth which moneth was called also Aetanim that is to saye the Moneth of strength or strong thinges 1. Kinges the 8. chap. and 2. verse Yea some saye also that our Sauiour Christ was borne the same moneth and not without some reason S. But it is saide in the 12. Chapter and 1. verse of Exodus that Nisan was the first moneth of the yeare answering vnto our monethes of March and April and falling in the Uernall or Springe equinoctium M. You say well But therevnto I answere two waies First that Nisan or March was not alwayes the beeginning of the yeere but at length after that the children of Israell returned out of Egyt in the remeÌ„brance of so great a benefite that is to say for the conseruation of the memorie of the newe founding restoaringe of that people Moreouer Nisan was not the beeginning of the yeere for all things that were done among the people of God but onely in respect of their holie festiuall daies and of the tabernacle For the tabernacle as it had it owne peculiare reuolution and differinge from the common so had it also a proper beginninge of the yeere not agreeing with the order of the Politike yeere to the intent that men mighte knowe that there was a difference too bee put beetweene the Politike and Ecclesiastical gouernment and that the reason of them both is diuerse and their nature separate and distinct S. How many yeeres doe you now accoumpt since the world was first made M. As some doe suppose since the tyme that the worlde was made vnto this present yeere 1578. wherin this booke was written are about 5298. yeeres S. Howe doe you beegin this number or by what meanes doe you gather it M. Euen by this short reckninge FroÌ„ the creation of the world vnto the generall diluge whiche happened in the daies of Noe are numbred in the Historie of the holy Scriptures 1656. yeeres And from the diluge vnto the promise whiche God made firste vnto Abraham and his departing vpon commaundment out of Vr a Citie of the Chaldees and Charris a citie of Mesopotamia are 427. yeeres And from that promise vnto the departure of the children of Israell out of the land of Egypt which was vnder Moses are 430. yeeres as it is written in the 12. chapter and 40. verse of Exodus And from the departure out of the land of Egypt vnto the beginning of the building of Salomons temple which was begun the fourth yeere of Salomons reigne are 480. yeeres as it appeareth the 1. Kinges and 6. chap. And from that tyme
and small were first created to the ende that the force of things might bee preserued in a certaine temperament by these contraries This is written in Ecclesiasticus the 42. chapter and 25. verse and the 33. Chapter 15. verse Whiche also S. Augustine in his 2. booke de Ciuitate Dei and 18 chapter and Irenaeus in his 2. booke and 43. chapter doe followe M. It is true whiche you say For God made not althinges at the firste of one qualitie colour and greatnes neither of one kind and nature But hee made some high some lowe some moyst some drie some warme some cold the day to bee one thing and the night another Yet God made nothing that was eeuill But why hee created them in suche varietie this is the cause both for that the power and wisedome of God is thereby more apparant and also the thinges themselues by this repugnancie of contrarie vertues and natures and mitigacion of them may bee the more easely preserued For what maner state of thinges would there haue bin if all thinges had bin hoat what numnesse if all thinges had bin cold what miserie if all wayes there had bin darknes what wearisomnesse if it had alwaies bin daye And therefore when God had created the natures of this worlde and of the thinges conteined therein hee thought it conuenient to refresh and ease them with change and course because they were bodies or apperteinyng to bodies and likewise to nourishe them with a certein mutuall knot and temperament bicause they were diuerse partes of one whole thyng hee ingraffed also contrarie qualities in them that the one should bee a let bridle and temperament to the other And to bee short to the intent there should bee chaunge and alteration in these thinges that there might bee some differēce plainly perceiued beetweene the essence of them and of the angels also of God hymself who needeth no sutch meanes for his preseruation Euen so likewise a well gouerned citie consisteth of sundry orders and of diuerse fortes of men ritche poore faire foule Subiectes Magistrates young olde Husbandmen Souldiours who are of diuerse states and vnlike callinges and many tymes also of contrarie Notwithstanding they bee necessarie for the preseruation of the mutuall safetie of the whole citie wherby it beecummeth the more beautifull the more plentifull and conuenient for the vse of this life And therfore I will confirme this opinion with the moste excellent testimonie of Tertullian who in the 45. chapter of his Apologeticum writeth thus which reason made the vniuersalitie out of diuersitie that all thinges might appeare togither from many substances into an vnitie out of voyd and sound out of liuyng and vnliuyng out of comprehensible and incomprehensible out of light and darknes and out of life and death Neither doe wee notwithstanding fauour the errour of the Manichees who hold opinion that at the beeginning there were twoo Giauntes whiche afflicted mutually one another one of the light and another of darknes There is one and the same and onely God who made all thinges and moste wisely instituted this contrarietie for the preseruation of the whole woorke S. But this varietie of things seemeth to bring in great discord when it had bin more meete that this worlde beeing as it were a certein whole thing should haue bin builded and compacted of partes freindly and louingly agreeing one with another Which thing this contrarietie among creatures doth seeme very mutch to withstande M. You gather not well For this dissimulitude amonge thinges and varietie of contrarie qualities and properties bringeth in no discorde but rather causeth great concorde and agreement Like as in mans bodie the diuersitie of the partes members and theyr force action moouinge place and office which many times are contrarie declareth that there is greate agreement amonge the members and is also necessarie for the life gouerment and defence of the whole body The like truely is to bee seene in the world for it is one bodie and conteined within one compasse And why the discorde of thinges so muth disagreeing is so friendly and agreeinge and so consenting vnto it selfe and also firme and durable the great and incomprehēsible wisedom of almighty God is the cause who hath contempered all those thinges excellently one with another as they ought to bee and hath made them of apt and conuenient weight number and measure both in respect of themselues and in comparison also of other thinges as it is written in the booke of Wisdom the 11. chapter and 21. verse ▪ and S. Augustine afterwarde also declareth the same in his 4. booke de Genesi ad Literam But what weight number and measure this is or what is the proportiō of their mingling togither by reason of whiche this world is so agreeing and meete one parte with another and of all among themselues although the Philosophers haue by disputation curiously vexed themselues herein and yet neither founde it out neither declared it God knoweth and hee himselfe onely The. xlv Chapter In what sense it is sayd that God rested after the creation of the world S. THere remaineth yet one thing whiche I would demaund M. What is that S. Whether GOD haue ceassed altogither to create any thing since the time y hee made an ende of the world seeing hee seemeth dayly to create mens soules out of nothing and hee yet woorketh still as Christe teacheth vs in the 5. chapter and 17. verse of S. Iohn M. An easie matter to aunswere For God is saide to ceasse onely in respect of this worlde and the woorke which then hee had vndertaken to doe that is to say in comparison of an other as S. Augustine answereth in his 4. booke de Genesi ad Literam And not altogether absolutely as although God neither gouerned nowe this world which he made neither were able to make any new thing more seeing there is nothyng made or doone now but by his woorking Whose most louing tender prouidence hath alwaies gouerned doeth now gouerne whatsoeuer he hath created Whose infinite power woorketh euery thing in euery thing as S. Paule writeth to the Ephesians the 1. chapter and 23. verse Finally whose strength and vertue are neither impaired by weakenes through processe of time wherby they are lesse able euery day to create many things neither are they beecome slacker or slower in woorkinge Therefore the Lorde yet euery daye createth many newe thinges to wit the soules of men Howbeeit all that his purposed woorke and the fulnesse and bewtie of this worlde hee made moste perfectly and finished most absolutely in euery poinct part in the space of those sixe dayes rested the seauenth day God sanctified sayth S. Augustine no day of hys woorke but onely the day of his rest that it might bee vnderstoode that God is more blessed than his woorkes For hee was delighted with none of his woorkes so much as with himselfe So hee sanctified the daye of his rest and