our dayes whose sayeng maketh much for traditioÌ„s for thynges vsed in the church of christ without manifeste scripture for them Nowe where some lerned meÌ„ haue supposed As Iohan ceciê° BuÌ„de riê° and other certen and set also forth in theyr bokes that the goinge downe of our sauiours blessed soule with his godhead in to the place where the olde fathers soules remayned before christes death called libê° patruÌ„ to coÌ„fort theÌ„ to shewe the he was come in to the world by his birth had dyed for theÌ„ to deliuer theym thense is not expressed in the scripture I thynke that therein they were greatly deceyued as no man is cleare from all erroure especiallye they that write vpon goddes holy worde which onely is without al lyes and errours as the wryters of August ad hieroni it onelye were in that theyr dede not deceyued in any one poynte I say the they whyche affyrmed that descensus Christi ad inferna the descendynge downe of christ to hell is a truth not wrytten in the scrypture were playnlye deceyued therein because manye textes of the scrypture do proue that thing euydently of the whiche these are the chyefe Dauyd sayeth in the parson of our sauyour Psal 19. chryste Non derelinques animam meam in inferno O father thou wylt not leaue my soule in hell Howe could this haue bene truely sayed of chryst to god his father excepte his soule coupled with his godhead had desceÌ„ded in to hell or the place where the fathers were before chrystes coÌ„mynge and death Also we rede these wordes in the sawtre Abstraxisti Psal 29. de inferno animam meaÌ„ Thou hast O father taken my soule oute of hell I let passe other Act. 2. Ephe. 4. auctorites puing the same because these two are sufficyent for to proue this purpose which is that the scrypture maketh meÌ„ tion that christ defeeÌ„ded or went downe in to the place where the fathers soules remayned abidyng and lokyng for his comyng thither to them after his death wheÌ„ his body laye in the sepulchre Nowe to make ones an ende of this treatyse I wyll breyfely declare that the certayne knowledge of the holy scrypture coÌ„meth by tradicyon without any other auctorytye then of the catholyke churches the fathers of christê relygyon that lerned of the apostles which were the very trewe scryptures wrytten by the inspiracion and styrynge of the holy goost which were not though they were putforth in the euangelystes or apostê names Saynt Austen in dyuers places of his The euangels and other the holy scripturs are not assuredly knowen to be gods worde but by the churche of chryst bearynge wytnesse there vnto workes and namely iÌ„ these that nowe do here folowe affyrmeth the the auctoryte of the holye scryptures dependeth and hangeth vpon the iudgement of the vniuersal or catholike church Fyrst this hath he lib .vii. coÌ„fess Scripturas saÌ„ctas ecclesiae catholicae coÌ„mendat autoritas That is to saye The auctoryte of the catholyke churche setteth forth the To. 6. epist coÌ„tra fuÌ„da Mani holy scryptures Agayne more playnly this he wryteth Quid faceres dicenti non credo euangelio Ego vero non credereÌ„ euangelio ni Hiero contra vigilantium Quid necesse est in manus sumere ê™ ecclesia non recipit si me catholicae ecclesiae authoritas coÌ„moueret That is to say What woldest thou do to hym that saith I beleue not the gospel I trewly wold not beleue the gospel except the auctorytie of the catholyke churche shulde moue me It folowethe anone there I muste neades beleue the boke of the apostles actes yf I do beleue the gospell because the catholyke churches autorytie coÌ„mendethe to me of like sort both those scriptures TertuliaÌ„ also affyrmeth Tertilianê° prescript the same thus wrytynge Quid apostoli predicauerint id est quid illis christus reuelauit et hiÌ„c praescribam non aliter probari debere quaÌ„ per easdeÌ„ ecclesias quas ipsi apostoli condiderunt eis predicaÌ„do tam viua quod aiunt voce quam per epistolas postea That is What the apostles haue preched that is what chryste hath reueiled or opened to theÌ„ I wyl note or determyne also hence or therof that it ought not otherwise to be proued then by the same churches or sayth full companyes whiche the apostles them selues buylded preachinge to them as well with a lyuely voyce as they say coÌ„menly as afterwarde by epystles Besyde this in another boke he wryteth after this maner Tertilianê° lib 4. aduer sus martia nem Habemus et Iohannis aluÌ„nas ecclesias NaÌ„ et si apocalipsin Marcion respuit or do tamen episcoporum ad origineÌ„ recensitus in Iohan nem stabit autoreÌ„ Sic et caeterarum generositas recognoscitur Dico apud illas nec solas a postolicas sed apud vniuersas quae illis sacrameÌ„ti societate confaederantur id euaÌ„gelium lucae ab initio aeditionis stare quod cum maxime tuemur Eadem autoritas apostolicaruÌ„ ecclesiarum caeteris quoque patrocinatur euangeliis quae proinde per illas et secunduÌ„ illas habemê° IohaÌ„nis dico Mathaei et Marci Thus may be the englyshe of these wordes We haue also churches of s IohaÌ„s scholynge or bryngynge vp in learnynge of the gospell For though marcion doth refuse the reuelation or apocalipse yet the ordre of bysshoppes nombred or rekenyd to the begynnynge shal hold with Iohan that he is the autour or maker of it So also the nobilite or strength of the other scryptures is knowen perfectly I say yâ— that gospell hath stande for Lukes from the makynge or puttynge forth of it at these churches nother onelye with them that were the apostles but at or with all them holly which are confedered or ioyned to theÌ„ with feloshyppe of a sacrament othe or sygne of a holye thynge the whiche thinge we do chyefly defende The same autorytie of the apostles churches defendeth also the other gospels froÌ„ iniurye the whiche therfore and after or by them we haue I say Iohas Mathewes and Markes Hitherte the auncyent wryter Tertulian whose wordes declare yâ— the apostles tradicyon teacheth vs / whiche are the gospelles of chryste and the trew scryptures where there is no scryptures to proue them by and therfore he that wyll beleue nothynge withoute scrypture let hym tel me why he Mark this reader beleueth any one boke of yâ— scripture to be true scrypture syth no texte of the scrypture can testifye that it is scrypture in dede Wrote not I praye the reader Bartylmewe a gospell and Nychodemê° another as storyes do tell whiche are not receyued for anye parte of the scrypture By what auctorytye is this done wherfore doest thou rather giue credence vnto Lukes gospell whiche neuer sawe chryste then to saynte Bartylmewes whiche was one of the twelfe apostles Eusebiê° testifyeth that an euaÌ„gel Lib. 3. ca. 3. or gospel was iuged to haue bene
that zachary whom chryst sayed that Mat. 23. the iewes murdered betwene the temple and the aultare was S. Iohan baptistes father prouiÌ„g by certen bokes dreames which were apocriphi because theyr makers were hyd and not knowen that he was therfore sleane because he publy sshed our sauyours coÌ„mynge Hoc quia de scripturis inquit hieronimus non habet autoritateÌ„ eadem facilitate coÌ„temnitur qua probatur That for as moche as it hath not auctoritie of the scryptures is with the same easynes despysed by which it is praysed or aproued Loo we se that the holy father saynt hiecome mente of that one thynge which was proued onely by bokes of none auctorytie what is this agaynste the apostles tradicions or to proue that we are bouÌ„d to beleue and kepe nothyng but onely that whiche is expresselye written in the scrypture Do the churches traditions hange and depende of bookes the autours wherof be vnknowen Haue not I declared that scrypture approueth the apostles vnwrytten traditions and that they taught or ordeyned diuers thinges by the motion and inspiratioÌ„ of the holy goost which they lefte to the churche vnwrytten and so they remayne hytherto and shal styll whyles the world dureth Now to make an ende of this boke I exhorte euery man and woman to be ware of erroneê° doctours and yll bookes which do teache and auauÌ„ce any learnynge contrary to the fayth of the churche of chryste / that is yâ— deare spouse of our sauyour bought with the shedynge of his moost precious bloude and therfore hath euer bene so tenderly beloued of hym that he hath not suffred hyr wholly to erre in any weightye point of our religion nor hereafter wyll permit to erre accordyng to his ê“mes sayeng hel gates yâ— is syn and heresye shal not preuayle agaynste hyr Who that leaneth to this sure pyller the church shall be euer in the ryght waye ouercome all heresye to the great coÌ„forte of his soule / at the length throughe the helpe of god lyuiÌ„g deuoutly he shal come to endles Ioyes of heauen which our saniour Iesu Chryste purchased for all his seruauntes to whom with the father the holy goost be honoure glorye for euer AmeÌ„ ☞ Another tradition of the apostles ⧠The catholyke and vniuersall churche of chryste our sauyoure hathe beleued almoste this xv huÌ„dred yeres euen sence our ladyes deceace that her body is in heauen and yet there is no scrypture to proue that poynte wherupoÌ„ it must neades folowe that this beleefe came vp fryste by the holye apostles tradition especially sence no man can tell whaÌ„ by whoÌ„ it was fryste of al begone brought iÌ„ to the church ¶ Saynt Hierome sayeth vnto Theophilus Scito nobis nihil esse antiquiê° quaÌ„ nec christi iura nec patrum transire terminos That is in englyssh Knowe thou that we do set by nothynge more then nother to passe ouer Chrystes lawes nor the fathers lymytes or determinations †Hieronimê° vigilaÌ„tio OiÌ„a coÌ„tra ecclesiaÌ„ dogmata reprehendo et publica voce damno I do reproue al doctrine that is agaynste the churche and condempne it with an open voyce Theophilê° hieronimo Optamus sifieri potest in diebus nostris catholicam fideÌ„ et ecclesiae regulas cum subiect is nobis populis custodire et omnes nouas sopire doctrinas We wysshe or desyre yf it maye be to kepe with the people vnder vs the catholyke fayth and the churches rules and to brige a sleape al newe doctrine ☞ Imprinted at LoÌ„don in paules churche yearde at the sygne of the maydeÌ„s hed by Thomas petit M. D. XL vii
veritatem Euenit it aque neque scripturis neque traditioni consentire eos But whan we do stere or exhort them / which are agaynst the truth agayne to that tradition which is of the apostles and is kept in the churches by successyon of the preestes they wyll say that they beynge wyser not onely then the preestes but also theÌ„ the apostles yâ— haue fouÌ„de out the pure truth It hath therfore happended that they do consente neyther to the scryptures nor the tradityons Seest yâ— not reader here a playn difference betwene tradicions yâ— scryptures he coÌ„cludeth thus Traditionem itaque apostoloruÌ„ per totum mundum manifestataÌ„ in ecclesia adest oiÌ„bus perspicere qui vera audire velint That is to saye Wherfore all men whiche wyll see the truth maye perceyue the apostles tradicion declared in the churche throughe all the whole world But of saint Ireneê° this may be sufficieÌ„t for my purpose Nowe let vs see what saynt Clement Paules coÌ„panion in preachynge the gospell hath wrytteÌ„ in this poynt which is nowe intrauerse and questyon betwene me and the lutherans Eusebyê° the olde wryter of the churches Lib. 5. â—â— 6 storye thus wytnesseth of hym Clemens scripsit epistolam ad corithios exprimeÌ„s in ea apostolorum traditionem quam nuper ab eis ipse susceperat Clement wrote sayeth he to the corinthians an epystle expressyng in it the apostles tradicion whiche he of late had receyued of them Also another clemens bysshppe alerandrya which was as he sayth him selfe Eusebtê° wytnessynge shortlye after the apostles thus wrote of the apostles In libello quem scripsit Eusebiê° lib. 6. ca. 11. de pascha inquit eusebiê° confitetur extorqueri sibi a frarribê° vt ea quae a presbyteris et successoribus a postolorum voce sibi sola traditasunt describeret in libris et posteris traderet In his boke sayeth Eusebiê° of eastur clement coÌ„fesseth that his brethren gat of hym by force or with greate difficultie that he wolde wryte in bokes and de lyuer to his successours or them that shuld come after hym those thynges whiche were taught hi by voyce onely of the preestes successours of the apostles Loo this bysshop beynge very nygh to the apostles tyme coÌ„fesseth that he learned by voyce onely certeÌ„thynges of the preestes and successours of yâ— apostles and lefte them written to them that shuld come after hym and luther bullynger with a greate rablement of an yll heare Do saye the contrary whether wylt thou beleue Epistalâ— Ignatiê° also saynte Iohan the euagelystes discyple holdeth with me in this matter saynge Stude â—e coÌ„firmari in dogmatibus domini et apostoloruÌ„ That is Applye your myndes to be coÌ„fyrmed in the ordynaunces of our lorde the apostles That he ment here ordyuannces of the apostles vn wrytteÌ„ it appeareth fyrst by that that saynte Basyll sayeth dogmata silentur decrees or ordynaces called in greake dogmata aâ— not spoken of in wrytynge Secondly B asniê° de spuÌ„ Cancto cap. 27. it appeareth that ignatiê° saynte Iohan euangelystes scholer wolde men to endeuour them selues to obserue the apostles tradityons vnwrytten by that that he wrote hym selfe a boke of the apostles tradicions as eusebiê° witnesseth sayenge Ignatiê° â—â— 3. â—â— 36 edocebat populos vt diligentius ettenacius apostolorum traditionibê° inherereÌ„t quas traditiones cautelae gratia et nequid apud posteros remaneret incerti etiam scriptas a se asserit reliquisse Thus moch it is turned into englyshe Ignatius Mark this well reader saynte Iohans disciple taughte the people that they wolde more dilygently and fastlyc cleaue to the apostles tradityons the whiche traditions he affyrmeth that he lefte yea wrytten to make meÌ„ ware and leste any vncerteyntie shulde remayne to them that shuld come after Here we se that thys holye Martyr exhorted men to sticke vnto the apostles tradytions very dilygeÌ„tly and fastely / whych he left behynde him written that they whiche shulde succede or come after him shulde be cyrcumspecte leste they were deceiued of heretikes which might teache some thynge contrarye to the verities vnwrytten that chryste taught his apostles and they other wythout wrytynge Therefore is it not many fest by thys wytnesse that Luther and Bulliger do erre whyche not so ernestly as vnlearnedly vngodlye defende that the apostles wryte all thynges necessarye that they hadde preached to the people Saynte Ignatius saynte Iohans scholer whyche was muche conuersaunte wyth the apostles and was made bysshoppe of Antiochia nexte after saynt Peter wytnesseth that the apostles lefte sundrye thynges not wrytten necessary to be knowen and beleued and Bullynger sayth the contrary whether of them two is more worthye to be receyued and belyued Now shall saynt Deonise the apostle Paules disciple make an ende of thys chaptre whiche as he was taughte of Paule Hierotheus learned manye thynges of the other apostles whych thynge he him selfe affyrmeth in dyuers places of hys booke De ecclesiae hierarchia eueÌ„ so he wrote playnlye of the apostles traditions lefte by them to the churche wtout writing For thus hehath Substantia accrdotii nostri sacra scriptura est diuinitê° nobis tradita Diouâ—â— dâ— eccle hieraâ— cap. 1. Porro huiusmodi plena venerationis eloquia dicimus quae a beatissimis nostris patribus a quibê° sacris mysteriis iÌ„buti sumê° in sanctis ac theologicis coÌ„meÌ„data sunt libris Ac pretaerea quaeque ab iisdeÌ„ sanctissi mis viris sacratiore purgatiore et ê“piÌ„qua quodaÌ„ modo caelesti hierar chiae doctrina sancti duces ac praeceptores nostri didiceruÌ„t et ex animo in animuÌ„ medio intercurrente verbo corporali quideÌ„ sed quod car nis excedat seÌ„suÌ„ sine literis transsu sa sunt That is to say The holy scrypture gyueÌ„ or taught vs of God is the substaunce of oure preesthode Moreouer we call suche sayenges full of worshyp honour or reuerence which are wrytten in the holye and diuine bokes of oure mooste blessed fathers of whom we were instructed or taughte the holy secretes or pryuities And furthermore al those thynges which our holy leaders the apostles and oure maisters haue learned of the same moost holye men by doctryne or teachynge more holy more purged and nigh after a certen maner to the heauenly holy gouernaunce or principalitie which are powred froÌ„ minde to minde or harte to hart the worde runnynge a meane betwene sothlye corporall but such as exceadeth the flesshes perceyuynge or fealyng Saynt Dionyse here putteth manifeste difference betwne the holy scrypture other thynges conteyned in bokes of dyuynytie set forth by holy men affyrmeth that manye thynges came by harte from one to another wythout wrytynge whyche are worthy to be had in honoure and reuerence thoughe the Lutherans despise al such thynges both to theyr owne coÌ„fusion and other mennes also oure lorde amende thys in tyme. But euery good chrysten man wyll beleue thys saynte Paules scholer rather
et instigaÌ„te spiritu saÌ„cto instituta nec dissimulatio negligentiae nec aliqua praesuÌ„ptio valeat perturbare Sed sicut hoc ê™ exigebat rationis vtilitas oportuit definire ita quod definitum est noÌ„ debet violari That is to saye The dilygence or studye of your care must be put to or you must be diligent and careful that dyssymulation of neglygence may not moche trouble nor any arrogance those thynges which are ordeyned of the apostles their successours and instructed by the holy goost styrrynge or prickynge forward Also he spake of the iewes ceremonies which theÌ„ it was vnleful for yâ— GalathiaÌ„s to obserue kepe therfore the obseruing of theÌ„ was mans tradition That thys is the true / righte meaninge of the apostles wordes it apeareth both by that that anone afterwarde wheÌ„ he had spokeÌ„ of yâ— iewes choyse of meatê their feastes he calleth theÌ„ elemeÌ„ta muÌ„di elemeÌ„tes of yâ— worlde sayenge If ye be dead with christe froÌ„ the elemeÌ„tes of thys worlde why do ye yet put difference betwene meat and meat daye and day etc Also the iiii chapter of his epistle to the Galathians paule calleth the olde lawes ceremonies egena elemeÌ„ta elemeÌ„tes lackyng somewhat Therfore this pauls letter staÌ„deth nothynge agaynst the traditioÌ„s of the apostles their successours / lefte in the churche froÌ„ one to another But let thys Pet manê° tradua be sayed for the repeallynge of that argumeÌ„t They dispute yet further The .v. argument of this sort against traditions Paule sayeth .ii. To .iii. Al scripture geuen by the inspiratioÌ„ of god is profitable to teach improue informe to instructe in righteousnes that the maÌ„ of god may be perfect prepared vnto all good workes Then why do we thruste sayeth Vrbanus regius wisely in the churches haÌ„des the lawes of men as necessary to christes religion Thys argumeÌ„t is sone answeared vnto For what argumeÌ„t I besech the good christeÌ„ reader is this al scripture inspired by the holy goost is profitable to teach man yâ— he maye be perfect made ready to al good workes ergo the scripture coÌ„teyneth in it expressely al truth and euery thing necessary to be beleued of vs kept May not euery part boke of the scripture be as in dede it is profitable to instructe maÌ„ yâ— thereby he maye be perfecte prepared to all good workê yet not coÌ„teyne al truth the hole yâ— is necessary for our saluatioÌ„ The .v. bokes of Moses coÌ„teine a doctrine profitable to yâ— purpose so of the rest seuerally yet that notwtstandyng there are sundrye thynges both true necessary not conteyned therin Yea but perchauÌ„ce some maÌ„ wyl say to me The gospel is perfecte sufficient for to procure oure saluation for Chryste gaue vnto hys churche not botched clowted nor vnperfect lernyng seing there nedeth no addition to be made vnto the whiche is perfecte wherfore shulde men beleue the the scripture coÌ„teyneth not in it all truth thynges necessarye for our saluation but the diuers thynges come by tradition whiche are both necessary to be beleued of vs also kepte It is very true that the scripture the gospel is perfecte not that it conteineth in it expresselye all truth necessarye to be knowen obserued as I haue proued before in thys my boke but the it is perfecte touchynge the thynges coÌ„prised thereiÌ„ coÌ„teyneth general rules pÌ„ceptê out of the which al thynges necessary for a chrysten mannes religion saluation may be collected gathered thoughe they be not particularly expressely publyshed sette forth therin As for an example The scripture byddeth vs honoure god but vpon what daye Exo. 20. Deute 6. Math. 4. we shulde do it chiefly scripture plainly telleth not leauing that to be taughte the apostles of the holy goost whiche dyd institute the sonday styred of that spirite of al truth as I haue shewed before Also the scripture sayeth the wythout baptyme none caÌ„ entre in to the kyngdome of heueÌ„ IohaÌ„ iii. the holy apostles inspired with the holy goost of that and other sayenges touchyng the necessitye of baptysme ordeyned and taughte wythout wrytynge that chyldren ought to be chrystened may be saued therby Finallye the scrypture coÌ„mauÌ„deth euerye maÌ„ to take vp beare his crosse mortify the sensualities affections of the fleshe the apostles taught bow that shulde be done by fastynge the lente wensdaye fryday such other This we se therfore that wyth the perfectenes of the scripture agreeth standeth right wel that it coÌ„teyneth not expressely all truth but that dyuers truthes were opened to the holy apostles by the holy goost / which they lefte vnto the The .vi. argument churche vnwrytten Hytherto of thys Another reason maketh Vrbanê° regiê° vpoÌ„ Pauls wordes â— Cor. 3. sayenge All thynges be yours / whether it be Paule / eyther Apollo / eyther Cephas Wherby sayeth he we do vnderstande the neyther Paule / nor Cephas or Peter hath auctoritie to bynde mens coÌ„science / where god byndeth not / therefore we are not bouÌ„d to beleue or kepe of necessitie any traditioÌ„ of paul / peter or any other whiche God byndeth not vs to beleue / obserue by his holy word Did euer any maÌ„ The aunsweare reade / or heare so fonde folysh a reason as this is who wyl not bewayle lameÌ„t this great bliÌ„d nes of the lutherans which do reason so vnlernedlye to defende an heresy It is trew the peter paul were the corinthiaÌ„s for asmuch as they were ministers sent of God for theyr saluation What thaÌ„ coulde not they yet teache many thinges by mouth onely leaue theÌ„ weout writing vnto the church the it shulde beleue theÌ„ to be trew kepe theÌ„ also But thou sayest that they could not bynde mens coÌ„scieÌ„ce where god biÌ„deth not I graunt the / but of the must it nedes folow that they left nothyng vn writteÌ„ byndynge mens coÌ„science to beleue and obserue it Doth god bynde vs to nothynge vnwrytten in the holy scrypture Haue not I proued the coÌ„trarye in this boke Byndeth not theÌ„ there god mans coÌ„science / when where the holy gooste styrreth the apostles to institue ordeyn any thing not coÌ„preheÌ„ded in the scripture leaue it to yâ— churche vnwrytteÌ„ Therfore this slender argumeÌ„t is cleane wypte away as this other shal be grounded lyke wyse vpon the wronge vnderstandyng of these S. Pauls Colo. 2. The. 7. argument wordes to the Collossians Ye beyng dead wyth christ why are ye holden styll with decrees What is this yf it be not plaine wrestynge of scrypture from his true sense Saint Hierom sayed wel that heresye standeth in the Ca. 1. ad Gala. wronge takyng of the scrypture doth 〈…〉 Dyd not saint Paule in that seconde chaptre to the Colossians playnly speke of yâ— olde lawes decres or ordinaÌ„ces which dyd coÌ„syste in
choyse of meates suche other ceremonies / that were theÌ„ anulled made voyd by chryst For he thus hath If ye be dead with chryste from the elementes of this worlde why do ye yet decree or teach or els as the greke nowe hath Dodmatizesthe are ye taught suche decrees and ceremonyes as yet lyuynge in the world Touche not nother taste nor handle Who seeth not that these wordes do playnlye show that saynte Paule mente of the iewes decrees and ordinaunces perteynynge to theyr olde ceremonies theÌ„ abrogate cleane by chryst and nothyng of the churches decrees or the apostles tradicions It is therfore a greate blyndnes to applye suche textes agaynste the traditions of the churche and they do verye lytle regard theyr soules health that do folowe suche teachers which do so manifestly abuse and mistake the scrypture to kyll theyr owne soules and other mennes by an heresye Some man perchaunce wyll say to me chrysten people are indued with libertye Vrbanns regiê° of conscyence .ii. Cor .iii. whiche nother ought nor can be bound to the obseruynge of any tradicion set vp by man whiche scrypture speaketh not of for theÌ„ we shulde be the seruauntes of meÌ„ agaynst saynte Paules coÌ„mauÌ„demente To that I saye that chrysten men are free and idued 1. Cor. 7. with a certayne libertie froÌ„ the yocke of the olde lawe / and the bondage of synne in which two standeth the lybertye of chrystes gospell not in the lybertie froÌ„ the obseruynge of good and hol some tradytions institute set forth by the holy apostles without wrytynge by mouth onely The obedience due vnto the hyer powers and to the kepyng of theyr lawes standeth not onelye with the libertie of the gospel but yâ— gospeÌ„ll doth also coÌ„mauÌ„d that to be done of vs. They that suppose them selues free frome obseruynge of the apostles traditions by reason of the lyberte of the gospell do agaynst pauls coÌ„maundement vse theyr lybertie to satisfye the flesshes lustes and haue as saynt Peter sayth Gala. 5. 1. Pâ— 2. it as a cloke or a couer of theyr malyce Chrysten people shuld not be the seruauntes of men it is true but what thaÌ„ Wylt not thou therfore be bounde in conscyence to obedientlye kepe thy prynce and kynges ordynauÌ„ces and lawes when Paule biddeth vs to be obediente vnto his coÌ„mauÌ„demeÌ„tes for coÌ„scyence sake It is not therfore holly vnleful Ro. 13. nor forbydden of saynte Paule to be mennes seruauntes but to obey them and to serue them coÌ„mauÌ„dyng any thiÌ„g ageÌ„st the lybertye of chrystes gospell or els any vnlefull thinge the kepyng of the which shulde cause theÌ„ to fall from the benifite of christes deathe and therfore he dyd put them in remembrauÌ„ce that they were bought with a great pryce Thus saynt Chrysostome doth vnderstande this paules texte byddynge that we shulde not be mens seruauntes Saynt paule also he ment that the corynthyaÌ„s shulde not be meÌ„s seruauntes to reyse schismes or diuisioÌ„s so yâ— one of theÌ„ shulde be counted cephas scholer because he was christened and instructed by hym another Apollos Take nowe this text whether way thou wylt it maketh nothyng at al against the traditions of the holye apostles and the church Moreouer wheÌ„ we do beleue certen truthes and obserue theym also whiche the apostles lefte vnwryten by the inspiratioÌ„ of the holy goost / as they dyd manye thynges whiche are aboue rehearsed in this boke what madde manne wyl saye yâ— therby we be mennes seruauntes / and not rather the holy goostê the autour of those tradicyons Some men do suppose that these god the fathers wordes IpsuÌ„ audite heare hym do bynde vs onelye to learne of Mat. 17. drâ—auê° â—eâ—â—ê° chryste the doctoure and teacher of the church and to beleue and obserue nothynge but his doctrine therfore we oughte not nor can be bounde to any thyng not wrytten in the scrypture as though we are not bounde to be leue the apostles teachiÌ„ge in thiÌ„ges not taught afore by chryste or yâ— we ought not to beleue as I haue touched before that chyldren ought to be chrystened albeit we fynde not in yâ— scrypture that euer christ taught that doctrine or els hys apostles but it cometh onely without wytnesse of the scrypture by theyr tradition If thou yet wylt reasoÌ„ further and saye that Chryste sendynge his apostles to preach abrode yâ— gospel in the hole world commaunded them to teache the people what soeuer he had commaunded and therfore men are not bounde vnto any thyng not commaunded of Chryste of the whiche it muste neades folowe that there are no traditions vnwrytten necessarye for vs eyther to beleue or to fulfyll This reason of one vrbanê° regiê° a lutherans makynge declareth the autours ignoraunce or blinde malyce conceyued agaynste yâ— churche of chryst For chryst byddiÌ„ge the apostles teach the people all that he had coÌ„maunded theym dyd not bydde theÌ„ teach nothing more then he coÌ„maunded them For who doubteth but the apostles taught afterwarde manye thynges by inspiratioÌ„ of the holy goost which chryst neuer coÌ„maunded as that the gentyles shulde abstayne from bloudde and meates suffocate or strangled with manye other thynges as it appeareth in theyr epystles and the actes wrytten by Luke the euangelyste But se what kynde of argumeÌ„t is this of regiê° Chryste commauÌ„ded his apostles to preach al what soeuer he had dyd theÌ„ do ergo the apostles lefte nothynge vnwrytten to the church yâ— ought to be beleued or obserued or men are not buunde to kepe the churches traditions This is a wonderfull blyndnes What madnes were it to beleue suche teachers Maye it not be sayde truely of them yâ— blynde leaders they that are Mat. 15. ledde by theim do fall bothe togyther into the den as our sauy our chryste sayed There are other obiectyoÌ„s as fonde and folyshe as these be which because they are made agaynste mannes lawes and constitutions not agaynste the apostles and hole churches traditioÌ„s vnwrytteÌ„ in the holy scrypture I wyll recyte them very compendiouslye as coÌ„pendiouslye confute the same Thys is one of them Paule sayeth Si spiritu ducimini noÌ„ estis sub lege It ye be ledde wyth the The. 8. argument spirite ye are not vnder the law These wordes do proue sayeth the lutherans that no mannes traditions can bynde vs to the obseruinge of theÌ„ yf we do leade our lyues after ryghte reasons and the holy goostes guydynge and styrrynge for els we shulde be vnder the lawe whyche saynt The answere Paule denyeth here Thys auctorytie of saynte Paule proueth nothing more agaynst the churches constitutions ordinaunces and traditions of the apostles that they oughte not to bynde mennes consciences then it doth agaynste the law of god that iuste and good men ledde by reason and the holye gooste shulde not be bounde to kepe it because yâ— paule vnderstode not here the law of man but the law of god whiche rested in ceremonyes was
wrytteÌ„ by saynt Peter and a boke of actes with a reuelatioÌ„ which are not alowed to be scripture Enoch wrote a boke of the which Iudas iÌ„ his epystle spake and also Tertulian Manye dyuers De habitu muliâ—bri other bokes were ascrybed vnto the apostles and euangelystes beynge put forth in theyr names and bearynge theyr tytles whiche in dede eyther they neuer wrote or els the holy gooste moued not them to make them or thought it not good nor necessary to haue them receyued and vsed amonge chrysten people which thing he opened taught the holy apostles and other the beleuynge people of and frome whom the certeyne knowledge whych is the holy scripture and whych is not doth come as S. Cypryan sayeth thus wrytyng In enarrâ— symbo apâ— Quae sunt noui ac veteris instrumeÌ„ti volumina quae secundum maiorum traditionem per ipsum spirituÌ„ sanctum inspirata creduntur etecclesiis tradita competens videtur in hoc loco euidenti numero sicut expatrum monumentis accepimê° designare That is to wyt Whiche are the bookes of the newe and olde testament that accordynge to the elders tradition are beleued to be inspired by the holye gooste and delyuered vnto the churches it semeth mete to assigne or note in thys place by an euidente noÌ„bre lyke as we haue learned of the fathers recordes or bookes Then streyght he recyteth the numbre of the bokes whyche are reckened to be holy scrypture Wherby it appeareth yet ones agayne that we knowe not what bookes be to be iudged estemed gods worde but by tradition of the apostles and oure auncetours or elders whom the holye gooste sayeth saint Cyprian that blessed martyr taught that thinge by inspiratioÌ„ It foloweth therfore that yf thou wylte beleue nothynge wythout wytnesse of the scrypture that thou causte beleue nothynge of the gospell to be scripture nor no other parte called scrypture and so all the fayth wholly muste neades at ones by that one deuellish opinioÌ„ cleane peryshe Wherfore cease asking where it is wrytten in the scrypture in thinges at the lest receyued generally of Christen nations and gyue credence vnto the catholyque churche whose authoritie as it is moost certeyne and sure so it is verye longe and greate as this chaptre shall proue to the by goddes grace sufficientlye ¶ The auctoritie of christes catholike churcch of and vpon the Apostles traditions and veryties not written in the scripture AS touching the authorite of christes catholyke or vniuersal church I entende at thys tyme to be very briefe and shorte The olde and auncyent wryter saynt Ireneus Iâ—eneus lib. 5. cap. 4 whyche was scholer to one Polycarpe saynt Iohan the euangelystes disciple thus wryteth of the churches auctoritye We ought not to seke yet the truth at other the which it is easy to take of the churche seyng that the apostles haue brought al thinges beloÌ„gyng to the truth in it most pleÌ„teously as it were into a rich treasure house or store house so that euery man that wyll maye receyue of it water of lyfe Here thys holye martyr sendeth vs to the catholyke churche to learne the truthe sayeth we maye not seake it but there onelye Thys churche neyther doth approue any thynge agaynste the fayth good lyuynge nor suffereth any thing agayust eyther of theÌ„ to be Tomo â— Epist 119. kept as s Austen testifyeth If thys churche through the whole worlde do teache anye thynge Epist 118. quiÌ„ ita facieÌ„duÌ„ sit disputare inquit August insoleÌ„tissime iÌ„saniae est yâ— is but that it must so be done to reasoÌ„ or dispute it is most proud Tâ—en was Luther madde as many other are that folowe him nowe madnes Thys sayeng of saynte Austen declareth many meÌ„ both to be proud and very madde also whyche do reason stubbornely and spytefullye agaynste dyuers thynges obserued kepte through the whole church these many hundred yeres Oure Lorde make theym meke humble and wyse that they maye acknowledge the hygh and certeyne authoritye of Chrystes catholyke churche agaynst the whyche no Aug. de trinita lib. 4. cap. 6. quiete man hath or wyl as S. Austeyne testifyeth iudge saint Austen intreating of the christenyng agayne of them that were baptysed or christened of an heretyke thus wryteth Thoughe there were no exaÌ„ple of this matter taken out of the holye scrypture yet the veritie of the same â—ib 1 cap. 33. contra â—resconium graÌ„maticuÌ„ scriptures is holdeÌ„ of vs in this thynge when we do that whyche hath pleased the whole churche wheÌ„ the same scriptures authoritie commeÌ„deth setteth forth so that foras much as the holy scripture can not deceyue vs who so euer feareth to be deceyued by the darkenes of thys questyon whether one baptysed of an heretyke shâ—â—lâ—e be chrystened agayne or not let hym aske councel of the same catholike church whom wythout al doubt the holy scrypture coÌ„mendeth Hytherto this great clerke saynt AusteÌ„ whyche wylleth vs to aske couÌ„saile of christes catholike church in thys doubtefull question of baptyme of the which the scripture speaketh not and therfore al thynges can not be proued by the scrypture whyche we muste both beleue / do also thoughe many men vngodly / and falsely saye they may The same AusteÌ„ / which sayed he wolde not beleue the gospel / except the authoritie of the catholyke churche shulde moue hym / in another place defineth / declareth / what is the catholike churche sayeng I beleue Tomo 10. sermoneÌ„ de teÌ„pore 131. the holy churche catholike that is to saye whyche is spred and dyspersed throughe all the worlde because the churches of dyuers heresyes for that cause are not called catholyke that they what churche is called the catholike church are conteyned in theyr places and countreyes Hec vero a solis ortu usque ad occasum usque vnius fidei spleÌ„dore diffunditur That is Thys the catholyke churche is scattered abrode wyth the shynynge of our faythe from the sunnes rysyng vntyll the goyng done The donatystes whyche were a certeÌ„ kynde of heretykes in Numidia aboute the yere of oure Lorde thre hundred fyftye thre affyrmed that the church or congregation of christen people was no where but with them as Luther and hys scholers are not asshamed to booste of theyr flockes which is agaynst the nature and name of the catholyke churche of the whiche VinceÌ„tiê° lirynensis which was aboue aleuen hundred yeres before this VinceÌ„tius lirinensis gallus tyme wryteth after this sorte I haue often with great studye asked of very many men both wel learned and godly also by what rule or sygne I myght discerne the truth of the catholyke fayth from the falsite And I had almoste euer this aunsweare that whether I or els anye other wolde espye out the gyles or deceytes of heretykes and auoyde theyr snares and abyde sownde and hole in a sownde faythe he oughte two wayes by goddes