Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	canonical_a	scripture_n	write_v	2,879	5	5.9738	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A76262	A Legacie left to Protestants, containing eighteen controversies, viz. 1. Of the Holy Scriptures. 2. Of Christs Catholick Church, &c. 3. Of the Bishop and Church of Rome, 4. Of traditions needfull, &c.	Bayly, Thomas, d. 1657?,; T. B.	1654 (1654)	Wing B1512; Thomason E1667_2; ESTC R208395	72,275	206

themselves in their Translations of Scripture follow sometimes the Greek sometimes the Hebrew and somtimes neither but other extravagancies yea and often our Vulgar Translation as they finde this or that or a third or fourth most convenient for them Secondly we tell them that we hold it more wholesome for us to drink the water of a pure stream then of a troubled fountain for that all learned and impartiall men know the Hebrew and Greek Originals to have been by Jewish Rabbins since St. Hierom's time and Grecian Hereticks altered and corrupted in many places whereas our Vulgar Edition is held in most parts thereof to be the same which that great Doctor at Pope Damasus intreaty corrected in the new Testament according to the Greek and translated in the Old out of the Hebrew by St. Austin in sundry places Lib. 10. de Civit. dei cap. 43. highly extolled thu● also mentioned by Doctor Whitaker against Reignalds Hierome I reverence Damasus I commend and the work I confesse to Pag. 241. in cap. 1. Luc. v. 1. be godly profitable for the Church So as Beza himself is inforced to confesse our Interpretor to have translated the holy Books with marvelous sincerity and religion And Pelicanus in his Preface on the Psalter which in our Edition is not St. Hieroms affirmeth the Interpretor thereof to have expressed the Hebrew Text with great learning and fidelity not doubting him to have been some propheticall person And many other cheif Protestants have highly commended the whole Edition generally used in the Church as Doctor Covel against M. Burges hath affirmed for 1300. past whereas Protestants with sharp and virulent censures mutually condemn each others translations Zuinglius for example and very justly condemneth Luther for having in his German Bible changed and left out not onely words but whole Sentences And Oecolampadius his Bible printed at Bazil is censured by Beza to be a sacrilegious corruption of Scripture Betw●en himself also and Castalio like censures have passed and been published of their different versions with greater bitterness then beseemed Christian Doctors Carolus Molineus condemneth Calvin and saith that in his Harmony he maketh the Text to leap up and down as he pleaseth Broughton hath noted multitudes of errours in all our English translations and King James in the conference at Hampton-Court affirmed plainly that he had never amongst them all seen a good one and judged that of Geneva to be the worst amongst them So full of incertainties are these new Doctors in the total summe as I may say of their Religion wholy depending upon the true knowledge of Scripture For that in their opinion no point or practice of Faith is to be admitted which is not expressed or gatherable by a clear and immediate consequence out of Scripture a tenent which shall be by me afterwards in every controversie disproved In the mean time to their pretence that St. Hierome denyed those very Books to be of a sacred and infallible authority which they have rejected from the Canon of Scripture I Answer first that St. Hierom as a private Doctor might easily erre in his opinion of these Books before our Churches Canon was fully declared and accepted Secondly I Answer that when Ruffinus objected this unto him In Apologia 2a contr● Russinum he called him Sycophant and said that he had onely uttered what the Jews not himself thought of those Books and professed to translate Judith because the first Nicene Councel had declared the same to be canonical albeit the Jews then denyed it to be so Neither doth it make much against the sacred authority of those Bookes that the Jews admitted them not into their Canon of Scripture because all or most part of them were written since Esdras composed their Canon and who can doubt but that Christs Church might better from them Apostles than from the Jews come to know true Scriptures And whereas some Protestant Divines pretend against those Books because they were not written in Hebrew as though no Scriptures could be written in any other tongue I can tell them here also that it hath been discovered and confessed of late even by Protestants themselves that the two Books of Machabees were first written in Hebrew and so was Ecclesiasticus which S. Hierom testifieth himself to have seen in Hebrew bound up together with the Proverbs of Solomon As for the absurdities pretended by our Adversaries to be found in those Books of Tobias Judith and Hester many of our chief Divines as Canus Bellarmine Serrarius and others have cleared them and shewed no lesse difficulties to be found in other confessed Books of Scriptures That some ancient Fathers also when many forged Scriptures were extant not distinguish'd from canonical writings doubted of or denied the authority of some Books admitted by us is an argument that proveth over much or just nothing for that we know many undoubted parts of Scripture have been questioned in a lik● manner the Churches Examen having in time discovered the verity of them And albeit no one of those Books denied by Protestants wanteth the testimonies of antient Fathers to prove the said sacred Authority yet are there two of them in former times especially so approved Sapientia and Ecclesiasti●us the first of them was written as St. Hierome witnesseth in his Preface on the Books of Salomon by Philo a Jew long before our Saviours time wherein he compiled the Sentences of Salomon not conteined in his own Books but by tradition other wise conserved this Book is cited for true Scripture by S. Hierome himself yet with this restriction Cui In c. 8 12 Zacha. iae in cap. Esaiae in 18. H●●r●●iae tamen place● librum recipere if any man will receive this book and without it in his latter Writings for then perchance he saw the Canon of Scripture more fully declared St. Ireneus Apud Eusebi um li. 5. Hist c. 8. l. 5. 6. stomatum bomil 12. in Leviti cum lib. 8. in epist. ad Romanos He●●si 63. homilia 33. 34. in Math. also long before him cited it for sacred so did St. Clement of Alexandria so did Origen so did S. Athanasius in Synopsi orat 2. contra Arianos so did S. Basil lib. 5. contra Eunomianos so did S. Gregory Nissen in testimoniis ex veteri testamento cap. de Nativitate Christi ex virgine so did S. Epiphanius S. Chrysostom S. Ciprian S. Hilary in Psal 127 S. Ambrose li. de Salomone cap. 1. S. Austin and others highly extolling the Book as Exhortatione ad martyrium teaching all sorts of vertue under the generall notions of Wisdome and Justice and conteyning in the second Chapter thereof a clear Prophesie of our Saviours Passion killed by the Jews because he made himself the Son of God c. which alone is sufficient to prove the divine authority of this Book Ecclesiasticus also was written by Jesus the Son of Sirach in

lost or spent their lives in the service of him moving us by their very sight to a like practice of Piety Fortitude and other virtues eminent in them So as in honouring their Reliques we magnifie chiefly Gods graces in them Wherefore S. Ambrose speaking of Nazarius and Celsus bodies then found out newly by him and freshly as it were bleeding in their wounds why said he should not faithfull people honour their bodies sithence Devils do feare them which once with torments they afflicted Wherefore I honour that body which honoured Christ under the sword and which shall raign in heaven with him So as it is a notorious untruth of the Centurists first and of Calvin after C●nt 2. c. 3. l. de necessitate reformandi ecclesiam them when they affirmed the custome of honouring Reliques not to have begun in the Church during the first five hundred years after Christ for that Cajus living in the age next unto Lib. 2. Historiae c. 24. the Apostles as Eusebius recounteth told Proclus his Cataphrigyan Adversary that he could shew unto him in Rome the trophies of the two Apostles Pete● and Paul honoured by Christians And the Chuch of Smyrna in their Epistle of S. Policarps Martyrdome disciple to the Apostles themselves wont for edification to be read in Christian Churches according to S. Gregory Turinensis recounteth how the Jews got his body to be burned into Ashes and thrown into a River that his Reliques might not be honoured by Christians as were in that very age the De viris illustribus in Ignatio remnants of S. Ignatius bones gathered and sent unto Antioch as S. Hierome recounteth Eusebius likewise relateth De viris illustribus in Ignatio l. 7. cap. 14. great honours done to the body of Marinus by Christians and how miraculously Apphianus his dead corps was brought out of the Sea and cast on Lib. 8. c. 14. Lib. 13. praeparat Evangelit ● cap. 7. shore to have due honours yeelded unto it as being meet saith he elswhere that Gods Friends and Champion● should have at their Tombes honours yeelded unto them Orat. in Theod●si●m O●at in Julianum Catechesi 18. Saint Basil in sundry places teacheth this honour to be due unto the Reliques of Saints and so doth his Brother S. Gregory Nissen S. Gregory Nazianzen likewise and S. Cyril of Hierusalem S. Hierome also against Vigilantius particularly mentioneth how solemnly Samuels body was brought in time of Areadius out of Jury into Thracia with a continual procession of Bishops Priests and People honouring the great Prophet in his Reliques untill they brought it to Calcedon St. Et Homiliis de S. Babild S. Ignatio Iuliano c Chrysostom in many of his Homiles ad populum Antiochenum mentioneth great honours done unto the Reliques of Saints And Saint Austine in a whole Chapter together recounteth those great miracles which he had seen done at S. Stephens Reliques all condemning by their testimonies the contrary doctrine Lib. 22. de civit c. 8. of Protestants detesting destroying and defacing in several manners Saints Reliques whereas David telleth us that God will keep all the bones of his Servant● The Nineth Controversie Of holy Images kept and honoured by us AMongst other Heresies anciently condemned in Christs Church this against the Catholick use and veneration of Images hath been by modern Hereticks pernitiously again revived and fitly served them to make us with ignorant Persons seem guilty of Idolatry by yeelding as the antient Painims did a divine honour to stocks and stones and praying unto them as if they could hear us in which imputations they do slanderously and notoriously bely us abusing many waies simple Persons hearing and believing those assertions against us First for example holy Images representing Christ or his Saints or some other Mystery of faith are falsly called Idols by them for that an Idol according to S. Paul is nothing in the world meaning according to the person or thing represented by it to wit a God or something else made onely by imagination and Fancy Whereas the incarnate Sonne of God his blessed Mother Saints now glorified in heaven are in our Images or Statues represented still or such Mysteries of faith as were in the great worke of our Redemption really performed for example a Crucifix representeth Christ as he hung upon the Crosse painfully nailed unto it and dying for us more movingly so objected to our eys than if that sacred Mysterie were by an ample discourse declared unto us In which true sence St. Gregory called Images the books of unlearned Persons for this and other mysteries of Faith represented in them And our Adversaries must be stupidly absurd if from Scriptures themselves they learne not to distinguish Images from Idols in their proper signification Christ for example is o●t aid to be the Image but not the Idol ●● the Father the m●n to be the Image not the Idol of God And there are many places wherein the word Idol in place of Image could not be but absurdly abusively used And who but can blasphemously affirm the two Statues of Cherubins in the inmost tabernacle covering with their wings the Arke and propitiatory T●ble to have been Idols And whereas our Adversaries object against us that we cut off the second Commandement and divide another into two because our Images a●●●o●bid in it they bely us because in ou● Bibles the holy T●xt is no lesse in●●r● than in theirs onely in our Cate●hi m●s and books written for the instruction of common Christians and Children amongst them we print not that which they call the second Command●ment and we affirme to be a part and e●plication of the fi●st commanding particularly the Jewes not to make the likenesse of Calves or any thing ●lse least then prone to Idol●try they should yield divine honour unto it by adoring it as God himself of which now there is no danger among Christians and so no use of that part of the first Commandement and even Calvin himself Exod. 20 in his explication thereof is inforced to grant that all sorts of Images or Statues are not forbidden by it And it is well known to all learned men that many holy Fathers have as now we do divided the Commandements the ancient Hebrew Text having no division at all in it In the meane time concerning that reverend respect which is yielded unto Images by us First it is not absolutely due or given to the materiall Images or Statues themselves but as holy Persons and mysteries are represented by them unto which our minds and intentions in beholding them ●re carri●d So that in such acts the Im●ge or Statue is respectively honoured for the person or mystery represented in it and they are likewise honoured in them In which sense S● Basil said Rex dicitur regis imago non duo Reges the image of a King is called the King nor is he and his image called two Kings nor is the honour divided