Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n canonical_a scripture_n write_v 2,879 5 5.9738 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A39279 A defence of the Thirty nine articles of the Church of England written in Latin by J. Ellis ... now done into English ; to which are added the Lambeth Articles ; together with the judgment of Bishop Andrews, Dr. Overall, and other eminent and learned men upon them.; Articulorum XXXIX Ecclesiae Anglicanae defensio. English Ellis, John, 1599?-1665.; Andrewes, Lancelot, 1555-1626.; Overall, John, 1560-1619.; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles. 1700 (1700) Wing E587; ESTC R1641 74,086 146

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Acuteness of Punishment and to the Consummation of Torments both of Body and Soul ART V. Of the Holy Ghost THE Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son is of one Substance Majesty and Glory with the Father and the Son very and eternal God Obj. 1. Altho' the Spirit of Truth be said to proceed from the Father John 15. 16. yet it does not seem to proceed from the Son because it is no where said so in Scripture Answ. Although it be not said in the very Words that the Spirit proceeds from the Son yet 't is plainly called the Spirit of the Son Gal. 4. 6. And the Spirit of Christ Rom. 8. 9. And then Christ says John 15. 26. that he would send them the Spirit from the Father In which Words he seems to mean that it would proceed from him likewise Though speaking as a Man by way of Respect he attributes it to the Father There is no need to dispute too nicely about this Matter if it be but granted that the Holy Ghost has an eternal Dependance on the Son 't is to no purpose to strive about Words and Terms Obj. 2. The Holy Ghost was not from Eternity John 7. 39. Answ. This Place does not speak concerning the Being or Person but of the Gifts and Operations of the Holy Ghost Obj 3. The Holy Ghost is not every where because he changes place The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee says the Angel to Mary Luke 1. 35. And in the same place the Virtue of the most High shall over-shadow thee therefore neither is he the most High Answ. The Words come upon thee do not signifie any change of Place but a particular Manifestation in some certain Place And then the Holy Ghost is essentially the most High tho' not personally so if by the Name of most High the Father be understood Obj. 4. The Holy Ghost does not know all things because none knows the Father but the Son Mat. 11. 27. therefore he is not God Answ. The Word none excludes only Creatures and not the Holy Ghost who perfectly knows the Father 1 Cor. 2. 10. Obj. 5. All things are made by Christ and so is the Holy Ghost Therefore he is not God Joh. 1. 3. Answ. All things are said to be made by Christ which are made but then only Creatures are made Obj. 6. He that prays to God is not God but the Hooly Ghost supplicates God for us Answ. It is not said what the Holy Ghost acts immediately and of it self but what it stirs up and effects in us Obj. 7. He that is sent is inferiour to him that sends but the Holy Ghost is sent by the Father and then he is not of the same Mijesty and Glory Answ. Mission and Obedience do not always take away an Equality of Power for an Equal may sometimes be sent by his Equal ART VI. Of the Sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for Salvation HOly Scripture contains all things necessary to Salvation so that whatsoever is not read therein nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any Man that it should be believed as an Article of the Faith or be thought requisite or necessary to Salvation In the name of the Holy Scripture we do understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority was never any doubt in the Church Of the Names and Number of the Canonical Books Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomium Jeshua Judges Ruth the First Book of Samuel the Second Book of Samuel the First Book of Kings the Second Book of Kings the First Book of Chronicles the Second Book of Chronicles the First Book of Esdras the Second Book of Esdras the Book of Hester the Book of Job the Psalms the Proverbs Ecclesiastes or Preacher Cantica or Songs of Solomon Four Prophets the greater Twelve Prophets the Less And the other Books as Hierom saith the Church doth read for Example of Life and Instruction of Manners But yet does it not apply them to establish any Doctrine such are these following The third Book of Esdras The fourth Book of Esdras The Book of Tobias The Book of Judith The rest of the Book of Hester The Book of Wisdom Jesus the Son of Sirach Baruch the Prophet The Song of the Three Children The Story of Susanna Of Bell and the Dragon The Prayer of Manasses The first Book of Maccabees The second Book of Maccabees All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received we do receive and account them Canonical It may be thought that the Scriptures do not contain all things necessary to Salvation for Obj. 1. It is necessary to Salvation that we should know what and how many Books are Canonical Answ. This is not so absolutely necessary for we only enforce it that the Faithful may be Baptized may Believe and Live well Obj. 2. It is likewise necessary to know that these Books came to us uncorrupted Answ. The Goodness of God is such that he would not suffer those Books to be corrupted which contain the business of Salvation There was a Promise made to Esay that his Prophetical Writings should remain for ever Esay 30. 8. and Christ has promised Mat. 5. 18. That not one● Iota or Tittle should pass from the Law Obj. 3. We ought to know how many Articles of Faith are to be believed by every one under the hazard of forfeiting his Salvation but neither ●is revealed in the Sacred Writings Answ. We have a Creed that is collected from the Scriptures but yet it is not necessary to Salvation to have a distinct knowledge of the number of our Mysteries One thing is needful as Christ answered Martha Luke 10. 42. One thing is absolutely necessary namely that in comparison of Christ we should look upon all things as Loss I determined not to know any thing among you save Jesus Christ and him Crucified says St. Paul 1 Cor. 2. 2. Obj. 4. We no where meet with the Means that God made use of to purifie Females from Original Sin or Males that died before the Eighth day or indeed concerning the Gentiles how they were to be saved under the Old Testament Ans. By the circumcision of the Men the Females were consecrated the Married Women belong'd to their Husbands the Unmarried to their Parents The purging of Females from Sin was done chiefly by Faith they and the Children of Jews that died before the Eighth Day were saved by vertue of the Promise made to Abram I will be thy God and the God of thy Seed God was not bound to any external Sacrament even without that he could conferr his Grace So also the Gentiles were justified by Faith Gen. 12. 3. All the Families of the Earth shall be blessed in Abram Obj. 5. If the Scripture be perfect either the single Books of the Canon are perfect or the whole Canon It is granted that the single Books of it are not so And then the whole Canon is
not because many Books are lost as the Writings of Nathan and Gad with others 1 Chron. 29. 29. as also the Epistle of St. Paul to the Laodiceans Col. 4. 16. Answ. The single Books have an essential Perfection because they have the Matter and Form of the Word of God the whole Canon has a proportionate one The one has the perfection of the part the other of the whole But we have all the Books that are Canonical those Books that are lost were Historical Narrations and some others too that were not Canonical Obj. 6. All that Christ said and did are not comprehended in the Scriptures Answ. All that Christ did and said necessary for our Salvation are in the Scriptures Obj. 7. St. Paul bids us 2 Thess. 2 15. to hold or keep the Traditions Answ. Either the Apostle there speaks of those free and indifferent Constitutions that concern the Government of the Church or concerning the Doctrine which he himself in Person had preached to them and then even that was contained in his Writings and other Canonical Books for Tradition is wont to be taken in that Sense Now he had delivered nothing contrary to the Scriptures as some others had done Obj. 8. But besides Those Books which we call Apocrypha should seem to be truly Canonical because not only many Councils but many Fathers have called and accounted them Canonical Answ. We are to give credit to Councils as far as they follow the guidance of Scripture and no further and if at any time General Councils call these Books Canonical this is only in a comprehensive Sense and has no other meaning but that they were wont to be read in the Church for the ed●fication of the People not that they had the same assurance of them as of those that are truly Canonical because these were never received into the Hebrew Canon and from hence they were called Deutero-Canonici or Canonical in a second Form And then as to some of the Fathers that they called them Canonical that will not prove them such Neither is it very likely that the more Ingenuous of them would call them so unless in the foregoing Sense Obj. 9. The Church is wont to cite many things from thence Answ. The Apostles cited some things from the Writings of the Heathens but we must not gather from thence that their Writings are Canonical Obj. 10. There are many things in the Books of the Apocrypha which mig●ly encourage Faith and Piety There you have ●ittle Morals Oec●mics and P●liticks in short a Compendium of Scripture Answ. All the Books that contain good Precepts are not Canonical ART VII Of the Old Testament THE Old Testament is not contrary to the New for both in the Old and New Testament everlasting Life is offered to Mankind by Christ who is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man Wherefore they are not to be heard which feign that the Old Fathers did look only for transitory Promises Altho' the Law given from God by Moses as touching Ceremonies and Rites do not bind Christian Men nor the Civil Precepts thereof ought of necessity to be received in any Commonwealth yet notwithstanding no Christian Man whatsoever is free from the Obedience of the Commandments which are called Moral Against the aforesaid Article it is Objected Obj. 1. That in the Old Testament things were obscure but in the New they are clear In the Old Christ was shadowed out under Ceremonies in the New himself is present from whence may be inferred an Opposition between the Two Testaments Answ. There may be inferred some difference between the Old and the New Testament in respect to the manner of Administration to the clearness and circumstances of Things but no contrariety in respect to the Substance Obj. 2. Christ as a Man had not yet suffered and for that reason Grace thro' him was not yet offered Answ. Grace was effectually offered thro' Christ that was to come Obj 3. The Mystery of the Incarnation was unknown to the Sons of Men Eph. 3. 5. Answ. It was unknown to the Gentiles before their Conversion Or This Mystery was unknown to the Fathers i. e. It was not so plainly and distinctly known as now it is as you have it in that Text. Obj. 4. The ancient Church was in its Infancy and its Knowledge was accordingly Gal. 4. 3 So in bodily things it could not discern Spiritual ones Answ. The ancient Church is called childish not because it knew nothing of Christ but because its Knowledge was very weak in respect of the Church of the New Testament which saw those things brought to pass which were before prophesied of Obj. 5. Christ was the Mediator of a better Covenant because it was established by better Promises Heb. 8. 6. Answ. Christ is the Mediator of a better Covenant than that of Moses for that promised only Blessing upon condition they kept the Law But the ancient Covenant that was freely made with the Patriarchs has the same Promises with the New Testament in which Life is promised by Faith Obj. 6. Circumcision is called an everlasting Covenant Gen. 17. 13. The Passover is called an everlasting Worship and the whole Levitical Service is called an eternal Precept a perpetual Ordinance and therefore it does bind all Christians Exod. 12. 14. Answ. The Levitical Ordinances are called everlasting i. e. so long as the Old Law should last so that such a duration is spoken of as the nature of the thing will bear And the Word Olam in the Original signifies an Age or long time but does not always denote an absolute Eternity Obj. 7. The Law of not cating Blood does bind Christians Acts 15. 29. Answ. The eating of Blood was forbidden to the Gentiles not for ever but for a time to avoid giving Offence to the weak Jews who were not yet fully confirmed in the Faith of Christ and did still believe that this Ordinance was not quite abolished But then you 'll say that abstaining from Blood and Fornication are both joyned together in the Apostle's Edict Acts 15. 29. therefore by the same necessity that Christians are obliged to abstain from Fornication by the same likewise are they bound as to the eating of Blood I answer that the eating of Blood and Fornication were joyned together by the Apostles not that they really were but only were accounted equal For by most Heathens Fornication was accounted no Sin and Christians began to be wondred at by the Gentiles that they were so much in love with Chastity Neither is it any new thing in the Law of Moses to have moral judicial and ceremonial Precepts mix'd together Obj. 8. None can make wiser Laws than God Now the civil Precepts of the Law Of not defrauding the Hirelings of care for the Poor and several others do highly oblige every Christian. Answ. 'T is true no body makes Laws wiser than God but among the Laws which He has made some are only proper for the
Vertue nor the Common-wealth The thing at last ended thus That the Archbishop should beg Pardon for what had been done so unadvisedly and ●ould promise to write to Cambridge to hinder these 〈◊〉 Ar● fro● being any further published or sprea●●road which also he did But a long while after as it seems there was a Copy found a●ongst W●itaker's Papers whereby at length this Work was made publick against the consent of the Authors After these Articles were made Baron continued both in his Professorship and in his Opinion but Whitaker died a few days after the Assembly at Lambeth At length Baron his Three Years being out for by the way according to the ancient Insti●ution the Professors were to continue in that Lecture but Three Years quitted his Office and retired to his private Studies After these two between whom the Contention arose Dr. Jo● Ove● a most I earned Man was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He sollow●d that way of ●aking which determ●nes That sufficient Grac● is offered to every Man and that Christ died 〈◊〉 All. In every good th●g Grace does opera●e first and then in the next ●lace Free-Will informed and a●tuated by Grace Grace that Grace does operate in an 〈◊〉 manner and that not by binding up Men after a natural way to particular Actions 〈◊〉 Tha● justisying Grace is not consistent with deadly Sins before actual Repent● As to that ob●ure Controversie about Predestination he behaved himself so as to condemn neither the former nor the latter Opinion of St. Austin as thinking there was no great matter of difference between them especially since St. Austin himself has said after the Dispute arose betwixt him and Pel●ins that he had the same Thoughts then as he formerly had when he opposed the Manici●s and that now he had not so much changed his O●ion as his way of Speaking What happen'd afterwards under the Reign of King J●mes the First First 〈◊〉 1603. may be seen in Dr. 〈◊〉 Book 〈◊〉 about that Matter For there Dr. Reynolds with the rest that opposed the Bishops amongst other things which they thought did mightily tend to the puri●y of the Church of England they requested this also that the Lambeth Articles might be put into the Confession But King James would not grant their Request thinking that such sort of Desinitions did not tend to the Peace of the Church The Articles of Predestination and the Heads adjoyning proposed at Lambeth by Dr. Whitaker I. GOD has from all Eternity predestinated s●e to Life and reprobated some to De●h II. The effi●ient Cause of Predestination is not a Fore●ght of Faith or Perseverance or good Works or of an other thing that is in ●he Person predestinated but it is the sole absolute and simple Will of God III. Of those that are Predestinated there is a determinate and certain Number which can neither be increased nor 〈◊〉 IV. Those who are not predestinated to Salvation shall of necessity be condemned for their Sins V. A true lively and justifying Faith and the sanctifying Spirit of God is neither extinguished nor lost nor does it depart from those that have been once partakers of it either totally or finally VI. A truly faithful Man that is one that is indued with justifying Faith is certain with a certainty of Faith of the forgiveness of his Sins and of his eternal Salvation by Christ. VII Grace sufficient to Salvation is not afforded communicated or granted to ail Men whereby they may be saved if they will VIII No Man can come to Christ unless it be given him and unless the Father draw him and all Men are not so drawn by the Father that they may come to the Son IX It is not put in the Will or Power of every Man to be saved All these Propositions are either plainly inserted in the Book of Articles and were always approved of in our Church or else they may by a necessary Consequence be drawn and collected from the Articles The Articles proposed at Lambeth as they were drawn up by the Reverend Dr. Whitaker in his own Hand writing and presented to the Bishops and other Divines at Lambeth The Articles proposed at Lambeth as they were drawn up by the Bishops and other Divines and of the sense wherein they were admitted and approved of I. GOD has from all Eternity predestinated some to Life and reprobated some to Death I. THis Article was admitted in the same words for if by the first some be meant Believers and by the second some Unbelievers Here is no occasion of Contention but it is a very true Article II. The efficient Cause of Predestination is not a foresight of 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 or good Works or of any other thing that is in the Persons predestinated But it is the sole absolute and simple Will of God II. The moving or ef● Cause of Pred●tion to Life is not a foresight of F●h or 〈◊〉 or Good Works or of any other thing that is in the Persons Predestinated but it is the sole Will of God that is well pleased In this second Article there was added by the Lambeth Divines 1. moving 2. to Life 3. The sole absolute and simple Will of God is changed into The sole Will of God that is well-pleased and that not without good reason For the moving Cause of Predestination to Life is not Faith but the Merit of Christ since God designed Salvation for those that are to be saved not for their Faith but for the sake of Christ. The word moving agrees properly to Merit and Merit is in the Obedience of Christ and not in our Faith These words to Life are added because altho a foresight of Infidelity and Impenitency be the Cause of Predestination to Death and so likewise of any thing else which is in the Persons predestinated to Death yet there is no Cause of Predestination to Life but the sole Good-Will and Pleasure of God according to that of St. Austin The Cause of Predestination is sought for and not found but the Cause of Reprobation is sought for and sound too The absolute and simple Will of God signifies something more than the sole Will of God that is well-pleased For the Will of God well-pleased is Conditional God would have us to do well if we would not be wanting to his Grace and it has pleased God to sa● all Men if they would believe III. Of those that are Predestinated there is a determinate and certain number which can neither be increased nor 〈◊〉 III. In this Article there is nothing changed for it is most 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be understood 〈◊〉 Fore-knowledge 〈◊〉 which is never 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for neither 〈◊〉 nor sewer can be sav● than those whom G● did foreknow IV. Those who are not predestinated to Salvation shall of necessity be condemned for their Sins In this Article there is nothing changed for it is most true God having determined not to forgive Sins but to such as believe But if you would so interpret this and the former Article