Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n canonical_a old_a testament_n 7,030 5 8.4269 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A45377 Some necessity of reformation of the publick doctrine of the Church of England. Or a modest and brief reply to Dr Pearson's modest and learned, No necessity of reformation of the publick doctrine of the Church of England. Directed to Dr Pearson himself. By William Hamilton gent. Hamilton, William, gent. 1660 (1660) Wing H489; ESTC R207963 20,948 32

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

and_o as_o contain_v the_o public_a doctrine_n or_o confession_n of_o faith_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n which_o they_o have_v prove_v firm_o as_o far_o as_o we_o have_v show_v though_o not_o so_o much_o the_o doubtfulness_n of_o the_o article_n in_o themselves_o save_v as_o to_o their_o too_o great_a generality_n and_o indefiniteness_n which_o both_o may_v be_v call_v they_o as_o in_o themselves_o and_o they_o also_o not_o so_o much_o in_o themselves_o as_o in_o reference_n to_o error_n and_o novation_n that_o by_o they_o shall_v be_v exclude_v as_o in_o reference_n to_o their_o publicness_n and_o establishment_n by_o public_a authority_n here_o then_o let_v we_o esteem_v that_o the_o minister_n by_o way_n of_o supposition_n give_v the_o article_n be_v confirm_v by_o this_o statute_n but_o grant_v not_o that_o they_o be_v and_o so_o do_v not_o contradict_v themselves_o nor_o give_v sufficient_a enough_o ground_n to_o argue_v against_o they_o ad_fw-la hominem_fw-la or_o ad_fw-la homines_fw-la though_o the_o legal_a establishment_n by_o law_n be_v prove_v and_o so_o the_o undoubtedness_n of_o the_o public_a authority_n yet_o this_o be_v nothing_o to_o take_v away_o but_o rather_o to_o make_v worse_o the_o generalness_n and_o doubtfulness_n of_o the_o aritcle_n thereby_o and_o drawableness_n of_o they_o to_o countenance_n arminianism_n and_o like_o novation_n and_o occasion_n mischief_n to_o orthodox_a minister_n if_o subscription_n be_v still_o require_v 10._o now_o though_o i_o have_v set_v down_o both_o their_o argument_n which_o you_o divide_v in_o one_o compound_a syllogism_n concerning_o both_o the_o doubtfulness_n and_o defectiveness_n of_o the_o article_n and_o that_o because_o themselves_o reduce_v their_o defectiveness_n but_o to_o a_o medium_n of_o prove_v their_o doubtfulness_n yet_o because_o you_o divide_v one_o from_o the_o other_o and_o that_o be_v not_o material_a to_o be_v stand_v upon_o i_o shall_v here_o set_v down_o their_o argument_n of_o the_o defectiveness_n of_o the_o article_n as_o i_o think_v themselves_o will_v have_v frame_v it_o have_v they_o divide_v it_o from_o the_o other_o and_o as_o they_o will_v have_v differ_v from_o you_o in_o set_v it_o down_o thus_o whatsosoever_o public_a doctrine_n common_o hold_v for_o the_o national_a confession_n of_o faith_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n want_v any_o thing_n considerable_a that_o it_o ought_v to_o have_v whether_o in_o point_n and_o head_n of_o matter_n or_o sufficient_o clear_a definite_a and_o special_a explication_n of_o they_o to_o exclude_v dangerous_a error_n and_o novation_n by_o that_o have_v be_v and_o may_v be_v still_o labour_v to_o be_v fasten_v upon_o it_o as_o its_o true_a meaning_n or_o in_o scriptural_a ground_n and_o proof_n of_o it_o ought_v to_o be_v or_o be_v in_o a_o necessity_n of_o be_v so_o far_o reform_v but_o the_o doctrine_n contain_v in_o the_o 39_o article_n be_v common_o hold_v for_o the_o public_a doctrine_n or_o national_a confession_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n and_o yet_o want_v something_o considerable_a which_o it_o ought_v to_o have_v or_o be_v defective_a in_o all_o the_o three_o foresay_a respect_n therefore_o the_o 39_o article_n or_o public_a doctrine_n contain_v in_o they_o aught_o to_o be_v or_o be_v in_o a_o necessity_n of_o be_v reform_v in_o all_o the_o foresay_a respect_n the_o major_n neither_o be_v nor_o need_v to_o be_v formal_o express_v not_o yet_o any_o thing_n to_o be_v bring_v for_o the_o proof_n of_o it_o it_o be_v so_o manifest_a in_o its_o self_n when_o thus_o propose_v the_o assumption_n be_v both_o express_v though_o not_o formal_o yet_o material_o enough_o and_o prove_v also_o as_o to_o the_o second_o part_n of_o it_o which_o only_o need_v proof_n though_o you_o lay_v all_o the_o stress_n upon_o the_o major_a because_o you_o frame_v the_o argument_n otherwise_o than_o they_o will_v have_v do_v but_o of_o this_o in_o the_o close_a 11._o their_o first_o proof_n of_o defectiveness_n i_o think_v conclude_v strong_o enough_o for_o a_o reformation_n of_o the_o article_n and_o for_o a_o enumeration_n of_o the_o canonical_a book_n of_o the_o new_a as_o well_o as_o of_o the_o old_a testament_n because_o the_o description_n by_o you_o mention_v and_o your_o reason_n for_o it_o be_v not_o sufficient_a enough_o to_o excuse_v the_o want_n of_o a_o enumeration_n because_o some_o of_o the_o reform_a church_n as_o lutheran_n namely_o have_v question_v and_o as_o i_o take_v do_v so_o still_o some_o of_o the_o epistle_n which_o other_o of_o the_o evangelick_n do_v not_o neither_o ought_v the_o council_n of_o trent_n enumerate_v the_o canonical_a book_n of_o the_o new_a testament_n make_v we_o affect_v a_o needless_a differ_n from_o they_o in_o that_o wherein_o we_o differ_v not_o indeed_o since_o it_o be_v no_o shame_n to_o imitate_v that_o which_o be_v true_o laudable_a even_o in_o our_o great_a opposite_n but_o our_o duty_n rather_o to_o praise_v it_o and_o to_o come_v up_o as_o near_o to_o they_o as_o convenient_o we_o can_v it_o be_v more_o invidious_a therefore_o than_o material_a to_o entreat_v the_o minister_n of_o sundry_a county_n that_o they_o will_v not_o prefer_v the_o council_n of_o trent_n to_o the_o article_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n where_o nothing_o material_a can_v be_v object_v to_o either_o since_o the_o defectiveness_n that_o the_o minister_n desire_v to_o be_v reform_v though_o not_o so_o material_a weighty_a and_o internal_a to_o the_o soundness_n or_o unsoundness_n of_o the_o article_n as_o you_o will_v have_v they_o only_o to_o look_v at_o yet_o both_o material_a and_o necessary_a enough_o for_o the_o clearness_n certainty_n and_o specialness_n of_o a_o national_a confession_n of_o a_o reform_a church_n when_o reform_a and_o evangelick_n differ_v from_o they_o therein_o 12._o their_o second_o proof_n conclude_v strong_o a_o necessity_n of_o reform_v the_o article_n at_o least_o so_o far_o as_o the_o assembly_n at_o westminster_n do_v and_o in_o your_o answer_n to_o this_o proof_n you_o pass_v by_o the_o main_a thing_n intend_v by_o the_o minister_n and_o insist_v on_o and_o lie_v hold_v only_o on_o a_o word_n speak_v but_o in_o the_o by_o and_o by_o way_n of_o amplification_n and_o there_o you_o dwell_v without_o answer_v a_o word_n to_o the_o drift_n of_o the_o argument_n it_o be_v certain_a arminianism_n be_v a_o novation_n and_o alteration_n of_o doctrine_n that_o be_v labour_v to_o be_v defend_v by_o and_o father_v upon_o the_o article_n homily_n etc._n etc._n though_o wrongful_o as_o appear_v by_o king_n james_n and_o the_o church_n of_o his_o time_n oppose_v to_o it_o and_o countenance_v the_o synod_n of_o dort_n and_o its_o procedure_n and_o definition_n against_o it_o it_o be_v certain_a second_o that_o consider_v what_o mischief_n this_o breed_v it_o be_v very_o necessary_a that_o the_o general_a and_o doubtful_a indefiniteness_n of_o the_o article_n as_o to_o those_o arminian_n novation_n matter_n so_o rerequire_v it_o as_o they_o do_v then_o shall_v have_v be_v help_v and_o supply_v some_o way_n as_o the_o assembly_n of_o westminster_n after_o do_v with_o their_o honour_n preserve_v from_o be_v alter_v in_fw-la corpore_fw-la or_o in_o themselves_o whence_o we_o conclude_v that_o they_o be_v in_o a_o necessity_n of_o reformation_n in_o this_o sort_n at_o least_o to_o which_o you_o answer_v nothing_o and_o we_o wonder_v thereat_o and_o hope_v it_o be_v not_o out_o of_o any_o favour_n to_o arminianism_n 13._o neither_o be_o i_o satisfy_v with_o your_o answer_n to_o the_o minister_n three_o proof_n of_o defectiveness_n because_o you_o seem_v to_o i_o to_o strain_v their_o word_n beyond_o their_o scope_n for_o their_o meaning_n to_o i_o be_v not_o that_o the_o article_n have_v nothing_o at_o all_o of_o these_o but_o not_o enough_o or_o sufficient_a of_o they_o which_o be_v a_o nothing_o comparative_o to_o what_o they_o shall_v have_v because_o indeed_o they_o want_v sundry_a head_n of_o matter_n or_o doctrine_n sufficient_o explain_v that_o they_o shall_v have_v nor_o have_v the_o article_n any_o proof_n from_o scripture_n which_o yet_o certain_o they_o shall_v have_v as_o they_o stand_v in_o the_o place_n of_o a_o confession_n of_o faith_n unless_o the_o convocation_n will_v have_v man_n to_o resolve_v their_o faith_n into_o their_o dictate_v or_o article_n nor_o in_o the_o head_n of_o matter_n which_o they_o have_v have_v they_o sufficient_a explication_n definiteness_n and_o specialty_n to_o exclude_v contrary_a pernicious_a error_n that_o pretend_v to_o imp_n themselves_o on_o their_o generality_n and_o grow_v kind_o and_o true_o out_o of_o they_o second_o when_o it_o be_v say_v all_o which_o the_o scripture_n teach_v as_o necessary_a as_o appear_v by_o comprise_v most_o of_o they_o in_o the_o apostle_n creed_n the_o meaning_n be_v not_o 1._o that_o those_o that_o be_v comprise_v in_o the_o apostle_n creed_n vulgar_o so_o